TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ShitlordAndProud Archive

View 8 posts and 598 comments by ShitlordAndProud on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

it's still a fine idea to pursue dating and relationships and even sex once a mutual trust is established. At 15? Someone might observe that the age of cconsent is 16. I find all this perplexing.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 12:03 PM
8

Doesn't it strike anybody else how reminiscent these psychological effects are of the claimed effects of rape?
/r/MensRights30/11/14 12:02 PM
2

Surely, if the girl was only 13, he did commit rape, statutory rape. Also, since he was only 15, so did she. Can anyone explain to me the apparent contradiction in law, that no one under 16 can consent to sex, but that boys under 16 can commit rape? Also of note, he would have been just fine if he'd only been falsely accused of murder. I can't resist the conclusion that all this reveals that something is really out of kilter in our societal attitudes on this subject. But I guess that just makes …
/r/MensRights30/11/14 11:56 AM
1

A better history would leave the reader to judge the merits of the various positions and ideas proposed, and would restrict itself to laying out the field, perhaps with some contextual reference to contemporary events, attitudes and beliefs.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 04:44 PM
4

Traditional wives?
/r/MensRights28/11/14 10:02 AM
10

We believe in equality.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 12:00 AM
5

Idgaf? I don't go after females?
/r/MensRights27/11/14 11:57 PM
2

Yes?
/r/MensRights27/11/14 11:56 PM
2

Then that's an issue for men's rights, but we should be clear, what is relevant is men being brutalised because they are men, not because they are black. The furor, justified or not, over the brown shooting is perceived as an outrage by the public at large as an issue of race. To the extent that you see it this way, it is a race issue not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 06:25 PM
1

Men being killed for being men is a men's rights issues, but Black men being killed because they are black is not a men's rights issue any more than Palestinian men being killed by the Israeli state, or discrimination against left-handed men.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 12:54 PM
5

The name must be publicised so that other victims will be encouraged to "come forward". The police will assure the public that all allegations will be taken seriously. No? /s
/r/MensRights26/11/14 06:48 PM
1

User has karma -12 and has posted the exact text twice in other threads on this sub, as well as a comment about feminist fatpobia in gaming using the term "thinsos". Only a cynic would doubt his sincerity.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 02:29 PM
4

I feel invalidated by that.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 01:01 PM
1

That's what's properly called begging the question.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 03:14 PM
-1

Funny.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 12:25 PM
1

Whether it should be subject to legislation or not, I think it's clear from this it could be caused by either men or women: http://www.wikihow.com/Deal-with-Emotional-Abuse
/r/MensRights23/11/14 11:33 PM
3

On the one hand, it's hard not to think that judging emotional abuse has to be very subjective. On the other hand, I find it hard to read any part of the following definition and not think of my previous employer: What is Emotional Abuse? Abuse is any behavior that is designed to control and subjugate another human being through the use of fear, humiliation, and verbal or physical assaults. Emotional abuse is any kind of abuse that is emotional rather than physical in nature. It can include anyt…
/r/MensRights23/11/14 10:54 PM
3

Looks like she's arguing that the right is no longer uniformly traditionalist, on a cursory glance.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 03:17 PM
1

Well, let's take them one at a time. "A 15 year old cannot consent to sex." What does that depend on? Notice I said "cannot", not "does not". Under what circumstances can a 15 year old legally consent to sex, in a jurisdiction where the age of majority is 16?
/r/MensRights23/11/14 09:32 AM
5

Just to be clear on the law as it now appears to stand, unless I'm mistaken. A 15 year old male can commit rape, but cannot consent to sex. Is that correct?
/r/MensRights22/11/14 09:26 PM
1

What is something about the male perspective on dating that your female friends don't understand? A man can both see you as a sexual being and as a person. If a guy propositions you for sex, it's not a sign of disrespect. It means he's attracted to you. How contradictory the whole "Don't be my friend to get in my pants. Let me know straight up that you want to date me." and "I don't date strangers. I wouldn't date someone just because they found me attractive" is. These are relevant to Men's Rig…
/r/MensRights22/11/14 04:07 PM
1

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/06/13/fathers-rights-and-womens-equality/the-fathers-rights-movement-undermines-victims-of-domestic-violence
/r/MensRights22/11/14 02:21 AM
1

Great way to change the subject.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 05:09 PM
1

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Libertarian%20Socialism
/r/MensRights21/11/14 12:56 AM
1

So Chomsky is like Hitler? Does your mother know you're out?
/r/MensRights21/11/14 12:01 AM
3

But why isn't affirmative consent sex-positive? Doesn't it mean loads of women running around enthusiastically demanding sex? (Slightly tongue in cheek)
/r/MensRights20/11/14 06:13 PM
1

Why doesn't framing fall under false accusation? Surely it is? I think the burden of proof should be just as high in rape cases, then false accusations wouldn't make much sense there either. That would solve the problem better than prosecuting false rape accusations, no?
/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:13 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:09 PM
1

I was hoping to stimulate thought without spelling it out.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:09 PM
1

Yes it does depend. That's just fascist/corporate/communist propaganda.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:06 PM
2

How so? Did you even get my point? Murder convictions need evidence, so false allegations won't get you far. Rape convictions don't so much, so false allegations do get you far. Woudn't it be better that rape convictions did require as muc evidence as murder ones? Then not so much problem with false allegations. That's my point.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:45 AM
0

Exactly. Am I supposed to be disagreeing? Of course, it all depends what type of socialism you're talking about: authoritarian (Stalinism) or Libertarian (Anarchism) or all points in between. "Socialism" is every man's broad term. That's why I said, "nothing wrong with that in itself".
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:42 AM
1

Thanks. That explains it.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:12 PM
1

I take it you're a proud socialist? Nothing wrong with that in itself. It's the authoritarians that bug me. (Sigh)
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:11 PM
2

Well, that's a different point. I'll grant you that. You've got a bee in your bonnet about something.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:09 PM
6

No. I'm not talking about Hitler. Are you're being sarcastic? Would you like a serious discussion about this? If not, that's fine. I'm just not sure. If to would, let me know in a polite way please. I need to know you're genuine. EDIT: According to the standard text, the Bolsheviks could have prevailed without the largely theatrical storming off the palace. You may disagree. I'm happy to be corrected. EDIT2: Of course, if you're a Marxist, you'll tell me the standard text is justthe ideology of …
/r/MensRights19/11/14 08:58 PM
-4

It's funny how no one is ever sentenced for false murder allegations.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 05:39 PM
0

It's not 4am. It's 12:30pm.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 05:37 PM
-2

Men talk plenty when they need to. There's a crisis alright, but not the one this article suggests.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 05:23 PM
5

It seems to me society fucks men over two times. First it fucks us over, then it blames us for not taking about it before killing ourselves.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 05:21 PM
18

Bolsheviks don't convince. They storm winter palaces, even when they can convince general assemblies, just to demonstrate how they intend to rule: by force.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 04:57 PM
5

OMG. That's so familiar i can't bear to read it. I don't know whether to laugh or cry. Bolsheviks on the loose in Christ Church. Christ!
/r/MensRights19/11/14 04:54 PM
1

Wobegon. Lol. Very good. Whatever happened to old garrison kieler?
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:21 AM
1

She said it's because of public opinion. The sheriff is a publicly elected official so he cares GREATLY about popular opinion and wants his officers to respond in ways that would please the public at large. That's correct, except it's not public opinion, but elite opinion, including the conventional wisdom of the feminist establishment, that they respond to primarily. The police generally don't like it when you tell them their job is to supply the law impartially, unless it happens to suit them.…
/r/MensRights16/11/14 03:42 PM
1

Great point.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 11:20 AM
3

Correct. It caused no actual harm, unless you call humiliation actual harm. But think of all the ways men can be humiliated and no law prevents it. It's fucking shocking this guy went to jail.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 06:16 AM
1

Evidently. Take a look at this one: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2m64jf/woman_attacks_man_with_pepper_spray_in_hollywood/cm3p49p
/r/MensRights16/11/14 05:57 AM
1

Anybody who wants to be a teacher now is mad.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 05:53 AM
3

We need to crack down on this loophole in child protection regulation. Do i need '/s' here?
/r/MensRights15/11/14 05:52 PM
1

Feminists in my country act like a group of sheep. All these woman in rage about Julien Blanc don't get how he is using them for publicity. Banning him from countries will only give him more attention and a martyr status. It's all hysterical moralising feminists trying to deny the darker part of themselves and projecting their denial unto the men who are simply giving women what they want.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 05:24 PM
7

Fine. On your logic no one can be presumed innocent. But that includes you. And unlike the headteacher, you haven't yet been investigated. He has, and nothing has been found capable of proving his guilt. You, we're not so sure.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 12:37 PM
2

In a related matter, a 95-year-old former head teacher with Parkinson's disease (hence the furrowed brow) is being hauled over the coals in court over alleged offences dating back as far as 1954, sixty years ago. Society is much safer now, no doubt. http://www.shropshirestar.com/news/2014/11/07/man-95-in-court-over-historical-child-sex-abuse-in-shropshire/
/r/MensRights15/11/14 11:03 AM
1

I'll kill you.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 06:40 PM
9

I don't know. I'll ask around.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 11:32 AM
3

That's a decisive own goal for our friends in gynville. Oh dear.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 11:31 AM
1

I never understand this urge to retaliate if the legal system will take care of it for you with all the ineluctable power of the state.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 10:48 AM
1

No. My jab matches his. I wasn't trying to look smarter with Latin for cripes sake. And he's embarrassed for me. What am aloof, supercilious fucker. As for taking lesson, there is none to take. You can look at it purely as an insult. That's true. But you can also look at it as a contracted ad hominem. In speech we often abbreviate like that. So you can view it as either, and there is no contradiction.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 10:43 AM
-1

Yes. You could look at it like that. It hasn't yet been formulated into an argument. I accept that. It must be awful for you being embarrassed like that.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 08:14 PM
8

I know. At first I thought he was just speech-raping her. But then he tapped her on the shoulder. Imagine! At that point, something has to be done, don't you think?
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:05 PM
1

I would disagree with you, but I'm too scared. /s
/r/MensRights13/11/14 12:39 PM
24

What do you expect? She was being shoulder-tap-raped.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 10:36 AM
1

Yeah, but she would do that anyway, most likely. It's complete venom.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:57 AM
-1

Ad hom.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:55 AM
-1

I think her basic analogy is sound. Leaving aside questions of fairness, whatever that may be, the social relationship between men and women has been like that between a master and a slave, if you go back far enough. Of course, the man may have looked after her, and had extra responsibilities for that reason, but still the woman was subordinate in the sense of being economically dependent on, and, in some times and places, the property of the man. So where do you go from there? Well, I would sta…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:53 AM
1

Now you tell me. Pfuh!
/r/MensRights12/11/14 02:01 PM
1

Ha! You got me. I am a big fat idiot.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 01:53 PM
1

So can a taxi company hire white drivers only because customers don't like African-Americans, for example? Wouldn't that be unlawful discrimination? Why is this not the same?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 10:59 AM
1

Punctuation?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 10:56 AM
5

Dude, you're title is completely misleading. Why don't you edit it, or delete and repost. Stop click-wasting.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 10:49 AM
1

You only weaken your case when you exaggerate. From the article: Pathologist Steven Gould told the inquest that the most likely source of the deadly infection was boils found on his upper thigh. The inquest was also told that there was no evidence of Stanley being attacked, with police investigating the matter after suggestions he was hit with a hockey stick prior to his death. Delivering a narrative verdict, Bedford said that despite Stanley being seen by various healthcare professionals, they …
/r/MensRights11/11/14 10:17 AM
1

I'll throw my 2 cents in. Your saying why should you do fuck all to please women? Right.. No. You can please women all you want as far as I'm concerned. I'm not saying you sholdn't. Maybe you should. Maybe it's a good idea. I wasn't saying you should or you shouldn't. In fact, I wasn't making a "should" kind of statement at all.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 08:02 AM
0

Why do you say that?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:56 AM
1

This is actually quite a deep and penetrating observation. Much can be explained hereby, methinks.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:55 AM
1

Obviously that don't want to be associated with your blog because they think it would be bad for their brand. My guess is it's because the MRM is too marginal for them, as yet. Try another charity.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 09:15 PM
1

Are you trying to blame and shame me by insinuating that I am to blame for my position? EDIT: That would be male domineering Master Suppression Technique number 5.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 09:10 PM
2

Fine. It's a lousy script heavy commercial website. I'm with you there. But, just out of interest, or plain fairness, if OP thinks this material is worthy of our attention, as I do, how would you prefer him to present it to us?
/r/MensRights10/11/14 09:01 PM
1

You're bACK! With threats of violence?
/r/MensRights10/11/14 05:01 PM
1

privaledge What the fuck new way of spelling "privilege" is that? EDIT: Ah! You got it right the second time. All is forgiven.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 04:58 PM
2

I'm thinking of creating an account called "MST" or something, and using these techniques here in MensRights in faux attack on our views, just to give people practice in dealing with them, and to parody feminist rebuttals. What do you think?
/r/MensRights10/11/14 04:58 PM
2

What they do is move the locus of blame from male desire to women's bodies.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 01:53 PM
3

I think that will be better for all of us.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 09:42 AM
1

Now that I look at it again, your comment isn't so bad. Sorry. I just reacted to the use if the pejorative "creep" to describe a man who looks at women, deliberately or otherwise. I agree, however, that there are subtleties and it can be ride to stare, of course. One subtlety you overlooked is what happens if the woman cannot and does not know he is looking? There's surely no discourtesy there, though his immortal soul may not go to heaven, if that's your beef.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 09:36 AM
1

That's because single men dominate all these establishments to the exclusion of women. /Poe
/r/MensRights10/11/14 01:44 AM
1

All of which is consistent with you bending over backwards to please them, in order to be the top dog. No?
/r/MensRights10/11/14 01:15 AM
6

For what it's worth, my guess is that the MRM is now where feminism was in the 1970s: marginalised, ridiculed, mocked, outré, dangerous, dissident and radical. The journey from there to mainstream acceptance can be surprisingly short. I also have the impression that feminism is in decline, but it's hard to tell, because it's hard to be objective, and a guess isn't really worth much.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 01:03 AM
1

I don't know. What would they like? I feel your questions are good ones, and you're on the cusp of making a really valid point, but you haven't quite made it yet.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 12:57 AM
2

Isn't that a bit like saying, "bend over backwards to please women in every way you can"? Isn't it? I know you didn't mean it like that, but isn't that what it amounts to? At least, would it not be completely accurate to describe it that way?
/r/MensRights10/11/14 12:53 AM
1

This is true but misses the point. Yes, he could act as you say, but the point is it ought to be within his gift to choose, in the same way it's within a woman's gift to choose whether to dress provocatively.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 09:53 PM
2

Fuck off.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 09:11 PM
7

"Inappropriate" = bad or wrong, for an age that won't acknowledge moral categories.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 09:10 PM
19

If that's the case it's visual harassment for the woman to put her butt in your visual field. This whole thing is fucked up man-shaming and I'm sick of it. What gives the game away is that every single moment of a woman's life, including sleeping ones, is spent trying to figure out how to make men go more crazy for her butt. The whole thing is a world-historical con of mammoth proportions and men have to wake up to this, rather than internalise the misandry. If we're going to shame men for desir…
/r/MensRights09/11/14 09:07 PM
-1

Thanks for educating me.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 11:20 AM
0

What's a "topical issue"?
/r/MensRights09/11/14 11:05 AM
1

I haven't watched the video, but if brains were male or female, then people would be wanting brain changes.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 11:03 AM
-2

Would you expect to see a woman wanting to become a man because misandry is mixed up? Leave him or her be, of course. Nobody is advocating interfering with them. But you're missing the point. The point is to draw attention the internalised misandry, which is the only motive offered for the talk of sex change.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 10:49 AM
1

Internalised misandry, don't you think? What does our society do to men that they wind up feeling like this about themselves? Also, notice how the term "educate" is used to mean "impose my dogma upon". Is this indicative of what is happening to education in the liberal arts more generally?
/r/MensRights09/11/14 10:46 AM
2

I wouldn't know. I'm scared to look in case someone calls me a perv.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:55 AM
-9

Get that fucking pro-war propaganda the fuck out of my face. If you want men dead and buried in France, don't worry, there's already an entire generation of Europeans down there waiting for you, because of the vile madness and stupidity of a war about nothing more than supposedly turning boys into men: dead ones. EDIT: Oopsie. I missed the white feather in the background. Very good. Captures the madness just perfectly now.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:42 AM
1

The edge?
/r/MensRights09/11/14 01:12 AM
37

All adults over the age of 18 must be accompanied by a child at all times. Time was that would have been a joke. We are sorry but we are unable to let single MEN OR WOMEN without children into the park. If you are here to meet someone let one of our reception staff know and they will happily do a tannoy announcement asking them to come and meet you. Now it's actually happened. Wait long enough, and just about everything that can happen, will happen.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 01:06 AM
4

"Cis" = non-trans Most people are non-trans.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 10:51 PM
1

I'm not sure. Under what UK law? Genuinely curious.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 10:41 PM
2

Not that much, surely. Those are top notch academic publishing prices. I'd give him a round 15 cents.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:19 PM
13

Jesus fucking Christ, Mary, Joseph and the Holy Spirit! That was more than 2 cents.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:07 AM
2

"Acrimony" is good.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:05 AM
2

What has happened to modern university education?
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:01 AM
10

No mention of the confidence interval. Too complicated for the daily news. I'd like more details on this improbable result for the quiet and pleasant little coastal city. What is going on that 1 in 20 boys are selling sex?
/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:38 AM
4

My first thought is. "My goodness; it's reached the Daily Mail. A US site in the MRM hits British gutter press".
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:52 PM
2

I agree with this and have been saying it for some time, as have others, though I don't think modern feminism is about equality of outcome, I think it's about empowerment for women without regard to equality.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 11:29 AM
1

Hear, hear!
/r/MensRights03/11/14 06:54 PM
2

Does your mother know about this?
/r/MensRights02/11/14 09:30 PM
1

Of course. It's my privilege, dear.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 09:28 PM
2

I know damn well I'm a person. I'm pretty sure about you as well.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 05:29 PM
1

Yeah. But what's her answer?
/r/MensRights02/11/14 03:52 PM
1

I'm a person. Aren't you?
/r/MensRights02/11/14 03:47 PM
3

This is interesting because it implies the belief that your body is an object inside which a 'real' person is living - the two are separate, like a driver in a car. The body is not the person or part of them, it's just a container for the person. This is called "Cartesian Dualism", and is rejected by most if not all modern philosophers of mind.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 08:26 AM
2

As sharp fall in demand, all else being equal, will produce a correlate fall in price.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 01:25 AM
2

Don't worry. You just post them. We'll read them for you.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 01:23 AM
1

Pissed off? No. Just get it in writing. Signed and dated.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 01:18 AM
26

TIL: Physically, a man’s defining characteristics speak to the one, single job he was modified by nature to do. That’s his responsibility; that is the only right he needs to worry about. And that right…that job and that PRIVILEGE is To protect and provide for women and children…or die trying. Why did no one explain this to me when I was young? Who would have thought it? I am a drone whose sole purpose is to defend the queen of the hive. Well, pardon me for fucking living, and, umm, deviating. Yo…
/r/MensRights02/11/14 12:16 AM
7

Well I'm against women being seen as unable to be rapists or pedophiles or any other such issue, against the draft being male only, against women being seen as the only "nurturing type" and therefor should get default custody to name some things Said a feminist on here recently. Claimed to have never seen anything to the contrary in feminism. But as this post makes clear, feminism can be female-supremacism.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 12:06 AM
1

No shit.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:25 PM
1

Umm...this is the conclusion of the article: Meanwhile, many in the men's movement, including major outlets like www.avoiceformen.com, are taking a wholly wrong turn by joining the Feminists in clamoring for 'equality', pointing at egregious inequality before the law, for instance in family courts, or punishment for men and women for the same offenses. But there is no equality. Men are more spiritual, more rational, have a bigger brain and are simply much more powerful than women. Women are more…
/r/MensRights01/11/14 08:02 PM
1

What do you mean? What addiction?
/r/MensRights01/11/14 04:37 PM
7

Observe: even if true, this would be an ad hominem. Just because I've been rejected does not mean what I say about men's rights is false. Further comment would be superfluous.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 04:33 PM
1

Is that true if Finland? Say more.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 01:54 PM
2

I understand that. But women can comment approvingly on mine and that's fine. What explains this commonplace truth?
/r/MensRights01/11/14 01:52 PM
0

I agree with you about discreet looking. That's what I do, I think. My wife doesn't think so, but no matter. But it's worth remembering catcalling in itself causes no actual harm. Except to special snowflakes, of course.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 01:50 PM
1

Maybe because you're jealous. You feel you own her. And your property is being threatened. Sounds like it bothers you more than her. Oh well. That was karma suicide.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 01:47 PM
2

That!
/r/MensRights01/11/14 01:43 PM
1

Have you ever been pleased to be catcalled? Have you ever been pleased to be flirted by a stranger on the street?
/r/MensRights01/11/14 11:18 AM
1

Just read No sex in the city, your first link. Great read. Where do you get these from? Do you keep a list?
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:30 AM
0

Sorry. I still can't here you over hear.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:04 AM
1

No you are not.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 06:35 AM
4

Can you speak up a bit. I can't here you.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:25 PM
1

I notice you're being very negative about "negativity".
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:44 PM
1

I've looked at it again, and I don't think it was much of anything, just meant to funny, without offending anybody, including feminists. I hadn't been able to read the text earlier. Sorry.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 08:30 PM
3

As always, the voiceless poor are stamped on when the going gets tough. Fucking disgusting and despicable. And all ennobled by some hypocritical idea of social justice.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 04:03 PM
1

Uh..yes. In a nutshell. Unless, of course, they're attractive.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 04:00 PM
1

OK. So it's not just me then. This seems to be a real Poe's Law moment.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:22 PM
0

As already posted. EDIT: in this thread.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:12 PM
1

Umm...seems a bit, I don't know...reductionist; simplistic; loveless?
/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:09 PM
2

Fine. But it still tells you something about their hive mind that they operate like this, no?
/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:06 PM
2

Right you are.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:04 PM
1

Of course. You've committed reason-rape. This will never go down well with the general secretary or the central committee. Shame on you! /s
/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:02 PM
-1

Best not to watch; it might be watch-rape.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:58 PM
4

9:30am.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:57 PM
1

She must be living on baked beans and sausage.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:56 PM
-1

OK. Let's have a party.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:53 PM
-1

Could be. Mine was a very fleeting judgement, on a tiny phone with poor sound. I hadn't expected all this.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:10 PM
3

I thought so, yes. Furthermore, I thought the point was that the attention women are getting, which can be construed as harassment, can also be construed as privilege, looked at in another way, but as I said, I would need to look at it again.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:04 PM
1

Seems like I'd better get down to work.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:51 AM
1

OK. Skip to the text slide at the end. I'm reluctant to give my take on it until others give theirs. And so far I've only watched it on as tiny, tiny smartphone, so maybe I missed something. Sorry.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:03 AM
0

Oh go on. Watch it.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 08:01 AM
0

Very good. That was actually quite subtle. You don't get the real message till the very end.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 07:51 AM
0

There's fertile ground for disagreeing with feminism in all that.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:46 PM
0

Wut?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:11 PM
0

Well I'm highly against men being seen as "weak" or "inferior" for showing traditionally feminine qualities or ideas of men needing to be the "protector" for women, men being seen as idiots or being obsessed with sex with lack of impulse control, and against the idea that men cannot be raped or that there are no men that face domestic abuse Look more closely.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:47 PM
1

I didn't mean it as a correction, though I now notice you misspelt. I just thought it was a great point and it made me laugh. That's all.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:40 PM
0

So where are the links?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:37 PM
3

That does appear to be the case, captain.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:28 PM
2

Now, now. No need to be patronising. Wait. Is there a link here with patriarchy? I'm lost.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:26 PM
2

Warren Farrell is a feminist, self-described. The truth is feminism has such a wide variety of proponents and positions it is way too internally contradictory to be a meaningful label on any particular theory. Feminism in practice, however, can be assessed by what it stands for in particular cases.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:24 PM
1

Fair point. I think he's wrong about that. There's no logical necessity to his claim. It depends for its success as an argument on the facts.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:21 PM
4

Me too. I hate those fucking Nazis. Join me and we can get rid of them, along with all inferior races.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:19 PM
2

Oh fuck. Not another NAFALT.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:17 PM
-4

Your problem is your head is so far up your ass you don't know who you are. You believe your own conceits. Judge no one by what they say of themselves. Look behind the mask. Link me your comments taking issue with feminists for being Stalinist, misandrist and female supremacist and I'll believe you're none of those and welcome you here, no matter what you call yourself. Until then I'll suspend judgement, if you don't mind, you little wutmonger.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:15 PM
-5

Stop violating our safe space and making us feel uncomfortable™, you aerating whine-monster with a victim complex. As a real feminist (sex egalitarian) who doesn't need to go stalking others who are just minding their own business in their own space, what the fuck are you doing here if all you've got to say is "wut"? Fuck off back to Wutville already.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:09 PM
1

I'm lost. Sorry. I shouldn't have started this.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:04 PM
2

You don't understand. The privilege, as you call it, to go homeless, is just the flip side of patriarchy. It's because patriarchy leaves women essentially homeless from the outset that the state is called on to step in to help them in their hour of need. And how does patriarchy leave them homeless? By forcing them to depend on a male breadwinner and to dutifully serve as domestic goddess and child rearer in the home, a home that belongs to him. Women are forced into these roles by patriarchy. If…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:01 PM
2

Stay calm and carry on.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 11:28 AM
4

You can sure point out the weirdos one by one, and even one, heavily upvoted, should cast a pall of suspicion over the entire company.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 10:06 AM
4

I do.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 10:03 AM
1

Time for a big blog post. Come on. You went to a prestigious school. You know how to write. The case is open and closed. Shoot.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 10:03 AM
6

Men have to be stopped wearing hoodies and even looking at women, so that women can put their bodies on full display without feeling they're drawing attention to themselves.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 09:59 AM
3

Gender studies: a pseudo-academic practice in some modern I universities, consisting in a bunch of women sitting around complaining about men and getting credit.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 09:56 AM
2

Bang on. Jehovah's witnesses. Lol
/r/MensRights29/10/14 09:52 AM
1

Hook, line and sinker, to the bottom of the deep blue sea. You got them. Archived!
/r/MensRights29/10/14 09:48 AM
4

Nice post. Good bless you. Have a good evening.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 09:36 AM
19

Because feminism is a Stalinist, female-supremacist, misandrist hate movement.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 09:33 AM
1

Correct. No slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 09:28 AM
1

Childbirth?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 08:18 AM
27

Rape is rape, even when it's accidental. Oh fuck. Getting born a boy will be womb rape pretty soon.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 06:08 PM
3

Dirtbag racists all the way back to the deep south lynchings and horrible phobias projecting rape hysteria unto an entire population designated by skin color. Nothing changes.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:57 PM
2

It's total fucking bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:43 PM
1

It would help me if you put some context around this.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:42 PM
-6

Really? Juries have been part of legal justice since about the thirteenth century. I'll have to check my trial history. Are you sure you're not smoking something?
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:39 PM
-4

No I didn't read the article. The jury is part of the court. What is your problem? Is your head too far up your ass?
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:31 PM
0

Haha. Yeah. Got to keep those hoods in the hood. Noting like a good euphemism.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:29 PM
5

Yes. I appreciate it. Much had been achieved, but more work needs to be done.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:27 PM
-9

Androphobia is intrinsic to the princess complex. EDIT: Just curious. Why the downvotes?
/r/MensRights28/10/14 04:51 PM
0

Yes. Some people are crazy.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 04:09 PM
-4

Well, if she's been acquitted then she's been thoroughly investigated and no evidence has been found capable of convincing a court, so we can be sure of her innocence, unlike yours. You haven't even been investigated.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 04:07 PM
2

Accept it, then invite them to join the MRM to fight misogyny. There's really no problem here.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 04:03 PM
1

Thedre ids, odf courdse, ndo "d" idn privilege.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 02:25 PM
2

Well, that's not quite the same thing as alleging false equivalence. Not so relevant, perhaps, but not false.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 02:22 PM
1

And images of a muscular male torso appearing on the covers of romance novels for women are just a male power fantasy: is that it? It's possible for there to be an equivalence without there being symmetry. I argue only for a vestige of male visual desire in women (there surely must be some, the same way men have nipples).
/r/MensRights28/10/14 10:28 AM
1

OK. I'll make it easy for you. Here's one: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2k6l3u/z/clin48w
/r/MensRights28/10/14 10:20 AM
3

That is really tragic. Death can come at any moment. Makes me think of MacBeth, "life....struts and frets his hour upon the stage, and then is heard no more", if that's not too trite. For what it's worth, I'm sorry this happened to you and your cousin. Hope you can come to terms with it.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 10:13 AM
0

Actually, it's reddit, I don't get paid, and that was just one too many "please help me with my homework" posts. Fuck off already.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 10:04 AM
1

Yes I do. Look man, it's your essay. Give me a topic that interests you. Also, there's a sidebar. Failing that, check my profile history.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 10:00 AM
1

Your conditional is false. Not sure where you're getting it from.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:58 AM
1

It is rather chilling, isn't it, that police have the power to trawl through your computer and phone for evidence of crime, under an ever-broadening definition of "crime". But I'm sure police won't abuse that power. Only a cynic would think so.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:52 AM
-2

Oh go on. Humour me.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 11:09 PM
-5

Penis size.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 10:42 PM
1

Truth is stranger than fiction.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 07:43 PM
2

Well, yes. I women stop depending on men, but I don't think men always run away. Many times women do.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 06:18 PM
1

"Ooh, I like you, but you are awful ".
/r/MensRights27/10/14 04:59 PM
2

Well, maybe the cops shot him, and he killed himself at the same time. Maybe.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 04:57 PM
1

COBOL. One small step for a man. One giant leap for men's rights.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 02:32 PM
1

Thanks. So JCL?
/r/MensRights27/10/14 11:18 AM
1

What a lovely man. Just do exactly what he says, dear.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 11:17 AM
1

Data! That was it. I collapse in ecstasy.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 10:50 AM
1

What file system and OS are you using? Vsam, dl/1, DB2, DOS?
/r/MensRights27/10/14 10:48 AM
2

The procedure division and the working-storage section, in the environment division. Then three's the identification division and one other I forget. I'll start tomorrow at nine.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 10:46 AM
1

Can you PM me the name and number of your department head. I'm coming out of the retirement i never got a chance to get into. Remind me again, what are the sections in a Cobol program? Your father and I miss you terribly, dear.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 10:41 AM
13

Let's not say, "the. SWAT team shot and killed him". It's so much less... I don't know...official.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 10:19 AM
10

Two delightful examples of a convenient use of the passive voice.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 10:17 AM
1

Conjecture is idle. The facts are lacking.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 10:16 AM
8

How about, "It's sexist to believe sexism can only be directed against women."
/r/MensRights27/10/14 10:09 AM
2

COBOL? What is that? Commercial or business oriented language? Surely not. A project, of an academic variety, in COBOL, in 2014? I am your mother. Call home at once.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 10:06 AM
1

It took me a second. I'm getting old. I think your point is, another example of an ad hominem fallacy is: he is a puppy kicker, therefore he is wrong to say water is H2O? You're right. It is.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 09:50 AM
0

I accept this, but having ties is a very tenuous association. Consider: all US tax payers have ties with the CIA. They pay for them.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 09:46 AM
1

What's your point?
/r/MensRights27/10/14 09:44 AM
1

If you say so.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 09:43 AM
1

What's in a name?
/r/MensRights26/10/14 08:06 PM
2

I really think that's a bit tenuous, because in the cold war the CIA had its money in everything, including radical art like Jackson Pollack. The idea behind this was to sway the intelligentsia with a favourable display of artistic freedom in comparison with the suffocating constraints of soviet social realism. Just because she was working for organisations in part funded indirectly by the CIA doesn't mean she was working for the CIA or consciously trying to advance their agenda.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 07:56 PM
15

This fallacy has a Latin name: ad hominem
/r/MensRights26/10/14 06:19 PM
1

OK. I get it. Sorry.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 05:37 PM
1

Just more gutter press drivel.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 05:26 PM
1

They have to sell papers somehow. This isn't worth worrying about.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 05:26 PM
9

Fucking outrageous. Your post was deleted "because it is wrong", evidently.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 05:24 PM
1

If we were raised in a society where women could be topless just as much as men it would be fine and we wouldn't have such sexual arousal at mere nudity. I'm not sure. Maybe, if women had that much freedom, the correlate constraint on men would be even stronger. Maybe just glancing would be vilified. On this view, which I'm unsure of, the increasing restraint on expressions of male sexual attention go hand in hand with the increasing freedom for women to put themselves on display, given an under…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 05:21 PM
1

Oh. I see. What did you do then: transcribe the video?
/r/MensRights26/10/14 05:15 PM
0

Marry rich and piss someone else's money away. /i
/r/MensRights26/10/14 05:13 PM
3

Fuck "do it yourself". Get someone else to do it for you. It's been working for women long enough.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 03:18 PM
2

I like your attitude. Paragraphing and structure may be worth looking at.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 02:40 PM
1

Just seems like a lot of women talking about bras and breast size and then you butt in and they all shut up. Besides, what is this stupid attitude about hating women?
/r/MensRights26/10/14 12:16 PM
5

What you fail to understand is that since men dominate women by force, for a man to do this is an instance of domination by force, and is therefore oppressive. Since women do not dominate men, for them to do this is not an instance of domination and is not oppressive. /s /Poe's law As an exercise, of what common logical fallacy is this an example? (No prizes)
/r/MensRights26/10/14 12:08 AM
1

Pervert!
/r/MensRights25/10/14 11:40 PM
1

Everybody must be normal. There must be no negative vibes. [I slam my first on the table and demand your full attention, while glaring at you intensely] /i
/r/MensRights25/10/14 11:38 PM
3

Steady now...
/r/MensRights25/10/14 11:26 PM
11

Q. What sort of institution even considers firing you for "negative vibes"? A. A petty tyranny. The whole thing is giving me negative vibes. How do people put up with this shit?
/r/MensRights25/10/14 11:26 PM
1

And the relevance status of the equivalence does depend on the extent of demand. Correct. I didn't say it did not.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 07:20 PM
1

The truth-status of the equivalence does not depend on the extent of demand.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 05:20 PM
1

What. You mean I don't have to care about any of them?
/r/MensRights24/10/14 06:31 PM
1

I am the shitlord and i endorse this message.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:39 PM
1

How does anybody ever learn your language? /tongue in cheek
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:32 PM
2

Ah, the biological / physiological angle. Good. I'd forgotten about that. But wouldn't women also stand to benefit from being desired? Their sexual value increases and their range of mating options increases, enabling them to up-move on the gene scale, or something. Go easy. I'm new at this.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:17 PM
1

These rules for definite and indefinite articles are just too confusing. What means "chivalry is a shit"?
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:12 PM
4

For a second I thought you were borat. I'm sorry you've had to endure all this oppressive objectification under the matriarchy. We must burn our codpieces now and demand to be treated as human beings, not just human doings. /i
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:06 PM
1

All good points. I remember the shorts article. A rich seam of gender inconsistency lies here below. Goose and gander at not permitted the same sauce, evidently.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:01 PM
2

That guy in your picture won't be hiding anything. He may need a lawyer. Now, what is he: an oppressor or a sex object? And why can't we be consistent in the application of that judgement , whichever one we choose, to men and women when women are putting their sexuality on display? After all, an aggressively sexualized presentation by a woman could be said to dominate the male visual field and to manipulate and exploit his contingent desire. Just saying.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:54 PM
4

The commodity fetishism of men as success objects.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:28 PM
2

Yes. Men can be physically objectified too. But some will say you enjoy being ogled. I don't know what I'm really trying to say here.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:25 PM
5

Yes. Men as success objects.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:23 PM
2

Maybe. But wasn't the original question about objectification? I'm not sure men can be objectified in the same way as women, that is, physically. Isn't there something about men as success objects? Where does that fit in here? Perhaps ostentatious displays of material success are the correlate? At the same time, I think women do retain at least a vestige of male visual motivation. There are such things as male strippers for women, evidently. And some women would doubtless giggle and enjoy a bold…
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:21 PM
1

Chivalry is the shit? I don't think so.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 01:32 PM
2

We all deserve to be treated with a reasonable amount of dignity and to be treated fairly and equitably. Get thee behind me Satan. What new heresy is this? /s
/r/MensRights24/10/14 01:11 PM
2

Oh yes I have, you hyperbolic, gynocentric pissant.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 01:05 PM
6

Thanks. A very good application of the terms. Really puts the matter clearly. This is indeed the problem. The only weakness in the symmetry of the analogy is that men's arousal is visible to all, but that is an inherent weakness of the male condition, if you will, like child-bearing for women, or an oppressive display of phallic dominance, depending on how you look at it. Take your pick.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 12:06 PM
5

Oh it's banned already. You would need to be very careful going about like that guy in the picture without a very good excuse. Just try it. We'll still be here when you get out.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 12:02 PM
12

Yes. It's interesting that when women do it men are banned from looking. When men do it they are banned from putting it on display.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 10:32 AM
1

They can remain a shrill minority. "Minority"? Aren't we supposed to care about minorities?
/r/MensRights24/10/14 09:43 AM
1

'xactly.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 11:53 PM
2

It could. It could be many things we weren't told. What's your point?
/r/MensRights23/10/14 07:01 PM
0

You are a feminazi. Go stand in the corner. May your progeny wither in ignominy. We know who you are. /s
/r/MensRights23/10/14 07:00 PM
6

No. It's not fair. The real dad is the real dad, and will always remain so, but he blew it from the outset. The best he can do now is ask nicely. If he did, I would be glad for the child that he can still stay connected with his real dad, but custody? It's too late for that in my view. Edit: Google typos fixed.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 06:45 PM
3

No.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 04:33 PM
2

Already linked.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 03:48 PM
32

The victim is a she.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 02:44 PM
1

I didn't say you were a troll.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 12:23 PM
1

You're a redditor with 13 days as /u/TheWaterFallStation at -89 comment karma.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 11:00 AM
7

One of the unintended consequences of belittling men is that we women end up with the sort of men we really don’t like, if truth be told. For, when we are not lampooning men for being idiots, we seem to be attacking them for not being manly enough. Oopsie. The dreaded unintended consequences. Notice the gynocentrism in this article. Men have yet to acquire the status of fully self-actualusing human beings for the author. But she's trying.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 09:21 AM
2

Is it all harmless fun? I don’t think so. In Spreading Misandry: The Teaching Of Contempt For Men In Popular Culture, Katherine Young and co-author Paul Nathanson warn that this patronising of men is now so pervasive in movies, TV, comic strips and even greetings cards, that it could have ‘disastrous consequences’ for society, and eventually provoke a serious backlash against women. Hilarious.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 09:04 AM
1

Reacting against progress to restore tradition. Same thing, more or less, disregarding the overtones and connotations.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 08:51 AM
2

This is exactly correct. You get to choose, just like women after their revolution. This is our revolutionary moment. When all the hypergamy has been widowed, women will have to face equal responsibilities go with equal rights. Earn your own money, if you want it, or at least have some respect for the role and place of those who bust their guts giving their lives to earning it for you. You get to choose, if you're lucky. But you can't have it both ways.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 08:49 AM
7

I hadn't thought of that. But in Japan the grass eating men are sitting out too. Whereabouts did you have in mind? "East" is a bit vague.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 09:10 AM
9

No they are not irrational. Women don't love them any more. The only reason they wanted lots of money in the first place was so that women would love them. Come to think of it, who wants to be loved for their money anyway?
/r/MensRights22/10/14 09:04 AM
2

What if you're lady is the same height you are?
/r/MensRights22/10/14 08:44 AM
3

I always think of bitterness as repressed anger. Maybe the answer is to do something about what you're angry about. I'm thinking advocating for political change.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 07:47 PM
1

Anyone calls you a creep, they're a creeping totalitarian.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 07:38 PM
2

Yes. Coming here makes me bitter as fuck too. I think I'll fuck off. /s
/r/MensRights21/10/14 07:06 PM
1

I'm not giving fuck all legitimacy. I'm just sick of rights without responsibilities. That's illegitimate.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 09:54 PM
0

Are you a screw loose? Of course the British public v could have believed he was guilty. Look what happened. Everyone is now convinced. Look at cliff Richard. What about DLT? And as for pecuniary motive being absent when he's still alive, of course it isn't. Accusers stand to make money either way. What impaired state does our collective mind need to be in to fail to see how that diminishes the reliability of the accusers, as it would in any other case. There's madness in all this.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 08:38 PM
1

Yes. And the constitution places political power in the hands of the civilian government, and ultimate sovereign power in the people. Don't forget that. The people will decide whether it wants to draft women, not the military. You are free to voice your opinion as a member of the public, and your private opinion as an expert, but the people are endowed with the power to decide this question not the military. That's the constitution.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 08:18 PM
2

That's fine. What do you think about the one being investigated, though? What about the problems with dates concerning the Duncroft home for girls? What about the police losing the diaries? What about complainants appearing after the compensation payments are mentioned? What about those who went to the media first and the police second? What about evidence of collusion online amongst the duncroft girls when though they claim to be independent? What about the lack of scrutiny of the claims for co…
/r/MensRights19/10/14 08:08 PM
1

I've no idea whether he was guilty or innocent. I don't think we'll ever know without a trial. Have you read the article?
/r/MensRights19/10/14 07:16 PM
2

I'm glad you spotted that. Actually. It's not the only thing. But it's a doozey.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 07:08 PM
3

Always look on the bright side.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 05:12 PM
6

Yes. But it's not a capitalist society. The army is public sector, not private. Defence has been socialised.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 05:08 PM
1

Our liberty is no joke. Remember the oath of allegiance.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 05:06 PM
3

I'm going to get a lot of shit for this, but actually, he's never been arrested, let alone charged or prosecuted. He's dead.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 04:21 PM
1

Uh oh. Somebody's not paying attention. The commander in chief of the US military is...wait for it...a civilian. Alternatives are available under what are called military dictatorships. If it's a dictatorship you're looking for, I'm available. Just sit down, shut up, and do what I say. And I say we're having a liberal democratic republic.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 04:15 PM
2

The task is still harder because the police, who seized Savile’s diaries that recorded his movements for more than 20 years, say they have ‘lost’ them. ש¢¥√π•©™[[!!!!!!!!! Surely you're joking, Mr Feinman.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 10:21 AM
1

This is it. The worm turns.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 09:24 AM
0

The big argument in favor of allowing women on the front lines is that they're already there. Not a good argument. One might say, for example, though they are already there they shouldn't be. Just because something is, doesn't mean it ought to be. The argument is an example of the naturalistic fallacy. In any case, I'm not saying they shouldn't be allowed there. All I'm saying is equal rights bring equal responsibilities. If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 08:03 AM
1

There's a good point. I hasn't thought of that.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 05:24 AM
34

Agreed, but a better reason for supporting it is "equal rights mean equal responsibility".
/r/MensRights19/10/14 05:22 AM
3

So your point is, I think, uniformly draft men and women, but deploy women differently? I have no bone with that for now. How they are deployed is a separate question, no? I take my questions one at a time. I'm just unsophisticated like that.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 05:20 AM
1

That's what I figured. Never mind.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 05:16 AM
2

This is a good argument against another proposal: that women should be permitted to serve on the front line. This is not the proposal under discussion: no equal entitlement to fight without equal responsibility to sign up. You might say pressing this second proposal will have undesirable consequences, but in fact it won't for a very simple reason: the draft has not been used since Vietnam during which time it proved a disaster and lead to mass war resistance because suddenly everyone was exposed…
/r/MensRights19/10/14 05:16 AM
248

This is what we need. And before anybody says it, I'm not in favor of the draft either, but as long as we have it, it should be applied equitably, especially if, as we're told, women can fight alongside men on the front line. Anyone who opposes this now is just utterly shameless.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 08:20 PM
5

That seems to beg the question. If you remove moral obligation, then what would we prefer? I'd prefer to live in an alpine hut, regularly supplied the groceries and a broadband connection. I can dream. EDIT: Hey, that's given me ideas. How much would that cost?
/r/MensRights18/10/14 07:27 PM
3

a man is defined by his job in this society. Pretty much the first thing people ask is what you do. Indeed. And this is a big problem.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 07:24 PM
1

Seems reasonable.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 01:20 PM
1

Grabbing a hold is now considered criminal sexual assault. What do you make of that?
/r/MensRights18/10/14 01:18 PM
-2

What are you on about?
/r/MensRights18/10/14 12:27 PM
0

Agreed.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:44 AM
1

So did you yourself want sex with him, or did you see it as a favour you owed him in exchange, if he wanted it? As for whether it was assault, I'm heartened that, unlike some feminists, you have some appreciation that these things are a matter of degree. It sounds like he felt the need to be the initiator and you feel though forceful, was wasn't intent on being forceful beyond what you really wanted. Is that it?
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:39 AM
2

Not good at picking up on signals sounds about right. He attempted forcible sex, no? You don't think he's a potential rapist. OK. But then what is rape? Is it not rape if you like him? I can't quite believe that's what you think. I'm puzzled.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:29 AM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:18 AM
1

Also. Be aware sometimes people post things like this so they can illicit a response that enables them to say, "See, MRAs don't think this is rape". We are at the white-hot epicentre of targeted man-hate. People here will be very defensive. That's why you'd be better taking it to /r/theredpill or something similar, I think, though I don't know much about TRP.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:16 AM
1

OK. Cool your jets. I didn't say it was rape either. What do you make of the rest of what I said?
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:07 AM
2

Try /r/theredpill. They'll give you a different take on it. Contrary to stereotype, we don't really believe in jumping on women, forcing them to the floor and trying to tear off their clothes. How rude! It would be interesting, however, to speculate on what was going on in his mind. And then there's the the question of why you gave up the goods so willingly to your attempted rapist. Makes me think I should have tried a little attempted rape myself. Nobody tells me anything. /s There arises in my…
/r/MensRights18/10/14 10:41 AM
2

I've thought about this some more and I'm not persuaded. Sorry. Here's why. Paedohysteria is nothing to do with preventing actual harm to children and everything to do with regulating male pleasure. Here is proof, if ever it were needed: http://www.torontosun.com/2014/09/09/60-days-in-jail-for-watching-animated-child-porn
/r/MensRights16/10/14 09:31 PM
3

Oh go on. Humor us.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 09:18 PM
1

if men stopped doing society would fall apart. Yes. I was thinking of that. Maybe it's time for a man-strike. Make the ladies wake up and smell the roses. I'm sure you wouldn't aprove.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 09:18 PM
2

eventually, men will get stick of the double standards and stop doing. They will refuse to live up to a standard when women live without them. "Eventually"? How about thirty years ago already?
/r/MensRights16/10/14 09:16 PM
3

a man wants to just enjoy life and maybe work a simple job, is a man-child. I think that's it.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 09:14 PM
2

But its so hard to even take a stance against this without immediately seeming suspect and being decried as a pedophile apologist. Correct. This is a sure sign of mass hysteria.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 12:35 PM
1

Interesting point. Thanks.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 12:33 PM
2

Nice lady. Good to know some people are just as sweet as can be and always have the best interests of others at heart. /s
/r/MensRights15/10/14 10:32 AM
1

This line of thinking has a long pedigree, going all the way back to Aristotle, who thought women were less rational than men, and who heavily influenced later Christian theologians who projected their notion of sin onto the female body, which sullied the otherwise pure male mind. Along with this sat a broader social structure characterised by the superordinate authority of bishops in the spiritual domain, and kings in the temporal. All this began to change in 18th century France with the emerge…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 10:06 AM
1

Actually, I don't see why he shouldn't go there. He just wants to test his doubts about ideas against their source. The problem is, they don't want to talk to him which seems to leave their ideas bankrupt and he wants to tell the world. Most of the stalwarts here have all been through this and have seen this so many times it is no longer interesting.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 09:00 AM
1

You can have all of that as far as I'm concerned.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:49 AM
2

Why not make one for us?
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:02 AM
2

If you are a modernist, you must surely have noticed the traditionalism in some feminism.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:00 AM
3

Equality is a modernist concept.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 11:59 PM
2

Good question. I say modernism.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:49 PM
1

I could say much, but let's stick to one thing. The 'is', not the 'ought' of the matter is that most of us just do look for a single pair-bonding, though we may not find it. No?
/r/MensRights14/10/14 12:39 PM
1

Sperm is cheap, eggs aren't. As a man you don't hold the valuable resource and are forced to compete as a seller in a buyer's market. I've never quite understood this resort to the physiology of reproduction as a determinant of higher level behaviour. Here is why. You say men must play the numbers game because sperm are cheap. But down come from one set of reproductive organs belonging to one organism and that organism is not cheap. You might say that in some primordial past reproduction was car…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 11:59 AM
1

Surely the solution to this lies with women's responses. They can respond by not going on a date, all 500 women. Or they can start a actively pursuing men they would like to meet by going up to the ones they genuinely like, in just the way you suggest for men. I wouldn't find that in the least irritating. I could respond however i please. If women did this in aggregate, our PUA here would get nowhere creating his manipulative illusions because he would simply be rejected, while the genuine desir…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 11:44 AM
1

The author of the report calls him creepy. 500 women agreed to go on a date with him. I struggle to imagine how they could have found him creepy at that time, unless creepy is attractive to them. I can't bring myself to think he forced them to go on a date with him. Perhaps he whispered sweet nothings in their ear that fulfilled their fantasies without satisfying the requirements of genuine love, but that makes the women culpable for pursuing their fantasies as much as he is for satisfying them.…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 11:28 AM
1

All correct. I wonder, though, about rape-murder. People feel irrationally scared, ie more than they should be, of terrible adverse outcomes they can't control, eg more scared of plane crashes than car accidents, though latter far more likely, but drivers have some control.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 09:31 PM
1

Personally i don't see it as reactionary. You can if you want. What forum are you from?
/r/MensRights13/10/14 09:22 AM
1

Ah yes. The history of sexuality. I started that once, but didn't get far. Had better luck with Discipline and Punish. Do you think Foucault really answers my question though?
/r/MensRights13/10/14 05:33 AM
1

If it was a privately owned shopping mall, that's it. Those tyrants can basically evict anybody they want without any reason.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 10:27 PM
2

Can you give some examples of it being splattered all over the place? I'm not disagreeing. I'm interested.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:00 PM
8

getting laid (with a consenting adult, obviously) without facing social stigma has now become harder for your typical young man Yes. That's true. Interesting that. But something else has become harder too: the intimate long-term sexual-romantic bond and partnership that used to pass under the now passé names of "love" and "marriage". I may be wrong, but it seems to me that these too have been affected by the sexual revolution because now, unlike before, they must begin with the "getting laid" th…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 01:59 PM
26

Has sex become our new religion? Women are the mediators of its redemptive power, and men must worship at the altar of women, under increasingly strict rules. Is that it? Look everywhere at how our society has become obsessed with sex, yet at the same time binds it up in punitive regulations. What explains this?
/r/MensRights12/10/14 11:26 AM
8

Is it just me, or does anyone else have the sense that in parrallel with this new sexual puritanism, sex is being promoted in other ways. There is a kind of twin effect of sexual freedom and sex as something basic and necessary, and at the same, sex as something sinful and shameful and terrifying and electrifyingly terrible. I don't quite know how to put in into words.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 11:18 AM
2

Good point.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 09:50 AM
2

What a bunch of craven fascist crap.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 09:48 AM
2

You ask the cop under what law you are required to leave. If none, then tell him the public office he holds requires him to protect your liberty to stay there. Then come back the next day with about 180 man bros and their sons and stage a man and boy sit-in. This sort of thing requires activism. Get the issue out there. Go to the media. Then let them tell us we don't do anything and we are not real activists.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 09:47 AM
10

Yes. Body parts scare me.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 08:41 AM
3

She is going back to work and finishing school once our kids start school. So you're getting divorced then?
/r/MensRights11/10/14 08:11 AM
1

I love rape. Here I am comment-raping this thread, and later I'll thought-rape someone, and here I am joke-raping the topic. But oh no, whatever you do, don't ever, ever devalue-rape the term "rape". RAPE-IS-RAPE™
/r/MensRights10/10/14 08:49 PM
1

Much lol. Haha. I like you. Stick around. Just don't feed the ducks.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 08:37 PM
1

I'm getting riled up. Stay calm and accept it.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 08:35 PM
2

In three years you've had 105 comment karma. You've been busy!
/r/MensRights10/10/14 08:29 PM
1

I only submit to the IRS.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 08:27 PM
1

Lol
/r/MensRights10/10/14 08:27 PM
2

This is hilarious. Does your mother know you're on the computer? lol
/r/MensRights10/10/14 08:18 PM
1

This is akin to the question of whether African-Americans can be racist. For a time academics, I them Jewish, argued they couldn't. Then along came Louis Farakan and the fiery antisemitic rhetoric of black nationalism. They changed their minds quickly.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 09:18 AM
1

Google Armin meiwes
/r/MensRights09/10/14 01:21 PM
1

Just as well you didn't, because then you would have question-raped me. I concede it's not the most traumatic experience, but still...rape is rape.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 09:47 AM
2

Fuck off. I didn't want that posted. You just comment raped this thread, man. /i
/r/MensRights07/10/14 07:37 PM
0

There was an element of irony in my comment. I will edit it to that effect. Sorry for any confusion.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 07:11 PM
19

Yes. More rapist parts for men. Demand your rights. EDIT: /i
/r/MensRights06/10/14 05:04 PM
1

Let me just clear up one thing. I know ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about this case other than what is written in the article. Nothing. That's it. Speculation is fine, but I know nothing more.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 10:57 AM
1

It might be like one of those cases in Germany where the victim is willing and actually gets a kick out of it as well. Some sort of underground bizarre cannibalism fetish thing. Just saying. There are such cases. I've no idea about this one, of course.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 09:25 AM
0

Oh dear. Do you have some pig problems?
/r/MensRights06/10/14 06:27 AM
2

Actually, that's rather a good point. I hadn't thought of that. In fact, when she says "no", denying him sex is rape. Umm.... [sticks thumb in mouth]. When can we go to the zoo mommy?
/r/MensRights05/10/14 09:27 AM
9

You tawkin' to me? Irony over-ruled.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 08:14 AM
0

Sorry. I think people who disagree with me are stupid, crazy, wasting my time, or trolls.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 07:52 AM
0

Sorry. I think people who disagree with me are stupid, crazy and wasting my time.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 04:04 AM
0

What are you suggesting: pig bias?
/r/MensRights04/10/14 07:27 PM
-1

I was being sarcastic, hence the "/s".
/r/MensRights04/10/14 12:33 PM
4

Who gives a fuck?
/r/MensRights04/10/14 10:45 AM
9

Male sexuality is dirty. It is bad, sinful and even evil, but since we eschew these categories in these democratic times, we call it inherently violent and emotionally, psychologically and even physically damaging to women and children instead. That gets the same results. Notice, it used to be female sexuality that was the site of evil for most of western history. That has been flipped. But the two ways of seeing unite in the assumption that sex is vile, sinful, evil, immoral and shameful, no ma…
/r/MensRights04/10/14 10:35 AM
7

Yes. I think people who disagree with me are stupid and crazy too.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 10:28 AM
-1

Sorry. The correct word is "girl". /s
/r/MensRights04/10/14 10:25 AM
-2

I've just figured it out. A victim is what we used to call a good-time girl.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 07:45 AM
1

Perhaps the boys weren't actually harmed? Everyone seems to know for sure. Sorry.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 05:10 PM
3

Relax, unless it was white.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 04:55 PM
1

fire her, sure. ban her from teaching forever, sure. jail time does not need to factor into it. A very measured judgement, really.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 04:52 PM
6

Downvote fodder. Devils advocate here. I haven't read all the comments, nor the article, but it seems to me there are two ways we could go here, and I like the other one: so-called victims, male or female, are sometimes complicit in their so-called victimisation, and the age of majority is a very arbitrary and blunt basis upon which to make a judgement of moral substance concerning what is often a very subtle matter. No doubt, whatever way we go should be consistent across the board. Also, lest …
/r/MensRights02/10/14 09:24 AM
1

Umm.. This is the metro. Gutter press drivel for bored commuters.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 09:13 PM
6

We have a vibrant support network for the six footer community. It's just quietly battling on without much general acknowledgement. /s
/r/MensRights29/09/14 08:36 PM
2

No. Batshit insane persons are a background constant. The issue is how the system deals with their false allegations. That we can do something about. Innocent until proven guilty might be worth a try.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:12 AM
7

Exactly. Nothing quite like being able to use your skills directly, instead of working your butt off to get stupid children to develope them, all the time wondering which vile pervert thinks you want to fuck them.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 08:41 AM
16

Fuck off. If people come here and see language policing they might think worse off us.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 08:39 AM
1

Good point. How many male graduates are languishing unemployed or in low income insecurity because of quite justified fear of false allegation and its consequences in the teaching profession. If you close enough options down for men, you end up with nothing left.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 08:37 AM
1

Withholding sex is sexual violence? I'm a victim. /s
/r/MensRights26/09/14 09:05 PM
1

Plainly? Or just mainly?
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:56 PM
1

Dog bites man.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:54 PM
10

Authors don't write titles. Sub-editors do.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 03:31 PM
47

We are all subject to the matriarchy.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 03:30 PM
16

"While the sober brothers lock themselves in their room and study". That was pretty funny though.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 03:29 PM
5

The usual bullshit. Men must learn not to rape. I've never raped anyone. Do i need to learn not to rape? I don't think so. But the reasoning goes, men rape therefore all men must learn not to. Some men do rape. Does it follow all men must learn not to? If so, consider this. Some women rape: statutory rape, lesbian rape, rape of men even. Does it follow that all women must learn not to rape? I don't think so, but according to the argument of the author of this piece it does.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 09:35 AM
2

Firstly, it's a false analogy. Secondly, everyone does say men shouldn't rape.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 02:16 AM
4

Here he is. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmav517MQJc Forced to prostitute himself to women just to find shelter. An oppressed man in a matriarchal society. /I EDIT: i for irony
/r/MensRights21/09/14 12:02 PM
1

Do you feel more threatened in the street as a man or a woman?
/r/MensRights21/09/14 11:26 AM
1

He's basically a male prostitute. Nothing wrong work that, but that's what he is. Exploited, perhaps, if we switch genders, but a male prostitute who knows how to please women and feed their fantasies.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 07:40 AM
4

What do you mean you don't know any more?
/r/MensRights20/09/14 11:13 PM
9

Which sex is freer to express its sexuality?
/r/MensRights20/09/14 04:59 PM
8

Which sex is freer to express its sexuality?
/r/MensRights20/09/14 04:58 PM
5

Do you find men are able to impose their desires on women? As a female were you subject to the imposition of male desires?
/r/MensRights20/09/14 03:59 PM
3

Well, this is revealing. Only women have threatened you, and violence by proxy to boot. To redress the balance, I'm thinking of threatening you myself just to help out the feminists. This must be terribly embarrassing for them. Would you care to step outside? [rolls up sleeves]. /s
/r/MensRights20/09/14 02:31 PM
3

Any difference in the way store security treats you? Are they more or less suspicious, or just the same.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 01:46 PM
1

Have you thought of telling women they have it easier and if so what reaction do you get? I have known women who would go into meltdown and call in the boys to take care of you if you suggest women may have it easier. If women have it easier, what does that leave you thinking about women's rights as a movement and so on.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 01:42 PM
3

This is just more evidence of "culture" appending culture.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 10:20 AM
1

Explain that like I'm five.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 10:16 AM
1

How about we call them wictims? Cam you think of any other portmanteau? Victmen, perhaps...
/r/MensRights20/09/14 10:09 AM
9

So the man is supposed to be more selfish out of a motive of selfless concern for his wife. Why aren't women supposed to be more honest about what she wants? They must be like little children who can't possibly be expected to act like responsible adults. How patriarchal!
/r/MensRights20/09/14 08:14 AM
1

That's replacing "victim" with "woman". I meant the other way round. The Royal and Ancient Golf Club of St Andrews has agreed to admit victims to its membership.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 07:58 AM
13

It's not just the first date, it's the five Ds. Dating, dinner, driving, drinks and the diamond.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 03:42 PM
2

Yes. The double bind. Either you initiate and get accused of harassment, creepiness or rape, or you don't initiate and get called a "nice guy™" and live life alone. We all know the double bind. Does that mean we're oppressed?
/r/MensRights19/09/14 02:43 PM
1

Boys are taught they must initiate but also that what they want is dirty, harmful and damaging. Boys: with one head wake up and roar. Tell them to fuck off. The lousy, cretinous pieces of shit. Relationship advice: be attractive. Don't be unattractive.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 02:31 PM
2

Now relationship lessons to explain how boys can behave with girls without risking accusations of creep or harassment, I wouldn't mind. But this...
/r/MensRights19/09/14 02:28 PM
1

I'm thinking of replacing "woman" with "victim" from now on just to see how it reads. Join me. Together we can start a trend.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 02:17 PM
2

"Vapid" ?
/r/MensRights19/09/14 02:10 PM
1

I specialise in this stuff.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 01:52 PM
3

All women must always be believed because all women are victims. If you think women should be subjected to the same standards as men you are a misogynist because women are special and must be protected like children, even from themselves. Big men protect little women. If you won't protect them too, they'll beat you up and everybody will laugh because you are just a man. Don't then protest you are a victim because "victim" doesn't mean you. It only means women. Victim: noun, a woman.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 11:54 AM
2

Sicko!
/r/MensRights19/09/14 09:25 AM
1

Well, there ya go.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 09:25 AM
3

The problem is not that false accusations are rare. It's that rape is happening everywhere and going unreported because people don't even know they've been raped. Rape has to be stopped. Report every case you know of. How many times did your friend give continuous verbal affirmative consent while fucking his wife? Was he repeatedly chanting the "yes" mantra during the act? No? He is a victim of rape and needs to be saved. Report this to the police, err, sorry, the university administration (for …
/r/MensRights19/09/14 09:12 AM
3

The problem is not that false accusations are rare. It's that rape is happening everywhere and going unreported because people don't even know they've been raped. Rape has to be stopped. Report every case you know of. How many times did your friend give continuous verbal affirmative consent while fucking his wife? Was he repeatedly chanting the "yes" mantra during the act? No? He is a victim of rape and needs to be saved. Report this to the police, err, sorry, the university administration (for …
/r/MensRights19/09/14 09:10 AM
2

Yes, I love framing people for murder. My place? Coffee? What is this and where does it come from?
/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:55 AM
6

As opposed to implied. He wanted it. He participated. He changed his story later to suit a jealous partner. Allegedly. BUT WOMEN WOULD NEVER DO THAT. FUCK! What happened to, "The victim must be believed"?
/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:53 AM
23

Victim blaming.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 07:03 AM
1

I fail to see how this is funny. You are a sordid rapist and a vile sex attacker. /s
/r/MensRights18/09/14 06:58 PM
1

Phenomenon.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 05:39 PM
-1

Vile pervert rapes school child in abuse horror.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 04:37 AM
3

There's no doubt in my mind this was rape because he was not continuously chanting 'yes'. Why didn't you intervene to help him you sick fuck? /s
/r/MensRights18/09/14 04:30 AM
1

I've been drinking. I think you just logic raped me. /s
/r/MensRights18/09/14 03:35 AM
4

Breath rape.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 03:11 AM
2

Vile pervert abuses vulnerable hospital patient in rape horror.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 07:20 PM
1

It's fucking awful, man. I know how you feel.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 09:10 AM
1

Suicidal.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 03:27 AM
2

Well spotted.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 05:29 PM
2

The answer to your question is yes and no: yes if you are attractive, no if you are unattractive.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 05:24 PM
2

Have you registered yet as a sex offender? /s
/r/MensRights15/09/14 05:22 PM
0

Or reclaim it for the true proponents of liberty (for we + men).
/r/MensRights15/09/14 04:22 PM
0

"Admit" ? I claim.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 04:20 PM
1

So you get rejected and you feel like killing someone?
/r/MensRights15/09/14 02:13 PM
1

The main point should be physiological, initially at least. Women can only bear one child per nine months. Men can produce about one or two a day if they get busy. To a population, then men are less crucial for reproduction according as there are twelve hour periods in a nine-month: 30 x 9 x 2 = 540. One man, a good stud of a man, will keep 540 women in reproductive business and the remaining 539 can be disposed. Since the dawn of time, men have been physiological redundant to the physiology of …
/r/MensRights15/09/14 01:42 PM
3

Or just, that man expressed interest in me for the first time and I really wasn't interested in him.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 01:34 PM
1

The national union of students, bastion of the advancement and preservation of student rights and freedoms, complains that the university allows students to behave as they please and enjoy sex. Three quarters of all sexual advances are exactly what girls want. Two thirds of all students have overheard someone making a joke about this new sexual puritanism. University authorities praise the national union of students for at last getting with the program and cracking down on all this fun. Delighte…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 01:31 PM
1

Interesting theory. Do you have any evidence or do you just happen to think it?
/r/MensRights15/09/14 12:52 PM
1

You're no allowed to answer at the top level if you aren't a feminist in at least one of those subs.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 08:50 AM
2

So, judging by the title alone, I ask precipitously, does this mean boys and men must be included in the sense of "We women must tell them what to do and implore them to do it," or does it mean "We must stop telling them what to do and ask them what they think is for the best in terms of equality so that we can all engage in an open, free and rational discussion towards that end as equals"? What a radical idea that second option seems.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:08 PM
1

Interesting. So it has something to do with not saying anything.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:47 AM
0

"Homicidal"? Don't you mean "suicidal"?
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:40 AM
4

Well, a tree just gets blown about by the wind. It has no agency. The wind has agency. It is an agent of movement in the tree. So having agency is having the power to affect change. Sexual agency is just the power to affect outcomes in matters sexual.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:19 AM
3

I can't believe you victimised this woman-child like this. First you manifested as an attractive man then you metamorphosed into an unattractive one. Don't do that. Be attractive. This has nothing to do with her changing her mind. She lacks agency completely. It's all your fault, you sex monster. /s
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:11 AM
1

At last. A correct answer.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:03 AM
1

Feminism has reversed a long tradition in our culture going all the way back to Aristotle, by successfully moving the locus of shame from the female body to the male mind.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 09:57 AM
1

Following a recent salutary misunderstanding, for which I take full responsibility, I make a point of always appending '/s' to avoid confusion.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 07:45 PM
1

You mean it's been that way for the past twenty-five years already?
/r/MensRights13/09/14 07:06 PM
-4

"Sir" ? Are you in the army? Is he your commanding officer?
/r/MensRights13/09/14 02:46 PM
1

Yes. Bullies and little Hitler authoritarians and assorted white knight cunts do. But mostly, regular guys don't. Mostly it's women who treat men as disposable in proportion as each sees herself as a princess who is entitled to the 5 D's just because she exists: drinks, dates, driving, dinner, and a diamond.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 02:39 PM
1

...and if she's so afraid, why is she half naked, making out with the guy in his fucking bed? please. She's just a wee, timorous, beastie and a woman-child.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 02:33 PM
1

On the other hand, if we let them have it their way, and refuse sexual overtures because the requisite enthusiasm quotient is not yet met, we could finally end up in the world of our dreams where women go around enthusiastically demanding sex from us out of sheer desperation. I'm sorry dear, could you be just a little more enthusiastic? Have the feminists really thought this through. /i
/r/MensRights13/09/14 02:31 PM
1

Its your right, and everybodys right to have sex only when you truly want it. Put on your big girl pants and own your shit. THAT is empowering, not having to depend on a guy asking you.The guy doesnt matter, you do. Sounds like rape apology to me. I'll book you in for a correctional visit from your district sisterhood coordinator. Is Wednesday afternoon OK? /s
/r/MensRights13/09/14 02:25 PM
1

It wasn't rape. It was a rapish situation. Evidently.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 04:34 AM
1

We don’t feel entirely violated. It doesn’t affect us forever. We just feel like we got the short end of the stick, and that sometimes, we have to do something we don’t want to do, out of politeness or social obligation Maybe this feeling is correct.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 04:27 AM
7

This was exciting. Reminds me of Warren Farrell: If a man ignoring a woman’s verbal ‘no’ is committing date rape, then a woman who says `no’ with her verbal language but ‘yes’ with her body language is committing date fraud. And a woman who continues to be sexual even after she says ‘no’ is committing date lying. Do women still do this? Two feminists found the answer is yes. Nearly 40 percent of college women acknowledged they had said “no” to sex even “when they meant yes.” In my own work with …
/r/MensRights13/09/14 04:06 AM
4

some serious bad boy in him that made him seriously hot in a not-hot way. So let's get this straight: bad boys are hot? What does that say to good boys? Be bad? Notice that being good and respecting women go together, and feminists want men to respect women, but women find men who don't respect them "hot". Isn't it about time feminists acknowledged the part of women in all this?
/r/MensRights13/09/14 03:36 AM
-14

OK, this is where I put up a big flag saying downvote me now. I think it's a bit rude to keep refusing sex with your spouse. If having sex when you don't want it is rape, then I'd say rape isn't necessarily so bad. OK. Do your worst.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 11:39 PM
1

Point out that calling something a hate group constitutes hatred for that group.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:04 AM
2

Do you think this is because the household is the domain of the woman, though the wider society and workplace remain the preserve of men? Am I even slightly right? I know that some women may work, but my hunch is that in more traditional societies domestic duties are thought of as women's work, and therefore the domestic sphere is the preserve of women, hence hen pecked men.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 06:59 PM
1

The simplest thing would be to outlaw sex altogether. Within a few generations there would be no more ephebophilia. /s EDIT: '/s'
/r/MensRights08/09/14 02:35 PM
11

Yes, and since feminism is now the dominant view I think we should all just go with the flow there as well. Who would want to challenge the accuracy of conventional opinion? /s
/r/MensRights06/09/14 04:56 PM
5

Feminism has made men fearful to be men. It denies them the ability to fulfill their biological programming as protectors and providers, because to do so is “sexist.” Umm...not quite.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 10:20 AM
0

Because not all false allegations are willfully false, perhaps.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 10:03 AM
3

Surely you mean "other", rather than real.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 08:13 PM
1

Yes, if the broad thrust of the article was sound, it was a little frayed at the edges.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 07:58 PM
1

A tad apocalyptic, but an interesting and thought-provoking read.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 07:57 PM
1

It doesn't hope to achieve anything. People hope to achieve things. Movements just move. Some members of the movement, however, may want to achieve Men's Rights. What do you hope to achieve?
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:28 PM
1

This culture has a mental problem. Women just have a will to power.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:07 PM
3

This is a reddit first for me. Thanks! How I have longed to hear those words! /s
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:04 PM
2

Enough with that high handed tone, you lousy piece of shit. /s
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:45 PM
1

Please see my edited post for the reference. I hope Dr. Diamond is not giving Anthropology a bad name.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 03:06 PM
15

Be circumspect with this gutter press drivel, if you can even stomach reading it at all. Yes. Things could be as the headline implies. Alternatively, she could have just said "we can't apply the defibrillator yet because the chest is too hairy", meaning, we need to shave him first. There's just no way of knowing from the article.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 02:08 PM
1

Nope. I don't think so. I think you missed that I got it.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:42 PM
-2

Who the fuck are you? Twat.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:41 PM
0

Sure, I'll get you the link when I get to my computer PC. Don't get too high and mighty with me though, I'm no anthropologist and don't have anything as grand as a position. I was reading an article by someone with, I think, a PhD in anthropology and it looked pretty academic to my untrained eye. You can keep me appraised of its place, if any, within academic controversy. On a final note, regarding giving men's rights a bad name, I'm only interested in telling the truth as I see it. I'm happy to…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:35 PM
0

No seriously. I'm not drunk. I've just been reading about the sexual culture and mores of some pacific islands, like Hawaii and Polynesia before the Europeans arrived. That's what it was like. Expressions of sexual interest were considered uniformly flattering. Peri-pubescent non-adults were taught by adults to enjoy sex. In general, it was considered bad manners to refuse sex, best as I can tell. They seemed to manage perfectly well. I wonder what the suicide rate was? Perhaps zero. Still, ther…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 12:19 PM
7

Wouldn't the simplest thing be for women to just enjoy being looked at by men because it's flattering and sex is nice and fun and good and not inherently bad for your health, and looking is harmless.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:10 AM
3

"Women are the victims, men are the privileged." Because "men and only men must perform this shit work of initiating relationships" and are therefore construed as the eternal aggressors.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 08:55 AM
1

Yes. Some people really struggle with analogies.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 08:35 PM
1

No, the interesting question is why feminists came up with the whole "Nice Guy" attack to begin with. What's your answer?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 08:33 PM
2

http://www.kalliope.org/da/digt.pl?longdid=lawrence2001061760 "Good husbands make unhappy wives" D H Lawrence
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:15 PM
5

OK. This is good. I make a comment here as much to place a marker for my own future reference, with the imperative to read this to the end in detail and take notes, as anything else. I'm only part-way through but already I know this humdinger takes the debate to the next level. The ball is now firmly in the opposing court. Many thanks for posting. What's interesting is that the nice guy problem is so threatening to feminism that they felt the need to stretch logic to the extent of folly this pie…
/r/MensRights01/09/14 03:25 PM
1

The "traditional male breadwinner, stay-at-home wife" is younger than 100 years, so not the natural norm. And only worked for the upper middle class and richer. Can you say more about this please. I hadn't thought much about this before.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 03:35 PM
1

I completely agree with that.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 01:25 AM
0

Me again. I've been thinking. In reply, likewise, being the victim of non-consensual sex is not necessarily worse than a major operation. I could be just trying to stop my wife from nagging. It's all degrees either way.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 12:24 PM
1

You mean a loser™? [Looking for link] http://www.youtube.com/attribution_link?a=WxJcnUDhpJs&u=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DpCD9hp998JE%26feature%3Dshare
/r/MensRights30/08/14 10:15 AM
2

There's really a world of interest in this video. It merits careful attention and it's heartening. Shield Wife may be getting better. It's deceptive. What she says appears simple and her presentation is flat and monotone, but when you think about what she says it's actual quite deep thought crystallised in very simple and ordinary words. She deserves more attention, a bit like "losers" perhaps. This video makes me proud to be a loser™.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 10:00 AM
1

Lol
/r/MensRights30/08/14 09:48 AM
1

This is interesting, but I'll have to park it up for now. Real life beckons and this humdinger could be a blog post in its own right, never mind a reddit comment. Maybe I'll get back to it later. I'd still like to get you links to the honey badger stuff. Thanks.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 09:47 AM
1

:-)
/r/MensRights30/08/14 02:17 AM
1

What about having to undergo major surgery? Would that not be pretty bad? Myself, I'm thinking a medium grade anal rape might not be so bad. I mean, the woman might be quite gentle and use lube. The medical operation might leave me permanently disabled or of diminished mental capacity. I can see circumstances where I would take my chances with a little rape, though the fear of it is not something that occurs to me at all. Living in a rural Christian conservative backwater whose population unacco…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 02:15 AM
1

Thanks. Glad to keep you entertained.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 01:50 AM
2

Yes. You've got to show those twelve year olds who is boss.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 01:46 AM
1

I could have sworn Pierce's resume make it clear that consent could be nonverbal. I haven't read the bill.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 12:42 AM
1

In other news, people like to fuck but sometimes deny it. Dave Singer has the details...
/r/MensRights29/08/14 11:38 PM
1

Fuck off you arrogant blowhard.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 11:34 PM
1

"heading"?
/r/MensRights29/08/14 11:22 PM
1

An erection is not a yes Consent can be nonverbal, for example moving towards the other person. Erections could be construed as a yes. It's not clear. I take your general point though about female on male rape. I think they've taken it so far they're in danger of being hoist on their own petard.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 11:20 PM
1

Actually, I think it says consent can be "nonverbal".
/r/MensRights29/08/14 11:15 PM
2

But with this new law human = rapist. They just don't know it yet.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 11:14 PM
2

"Most guys are pretty nice and easy to talk to". Shocking! /s
/r/MensRights29/08/14 11:07 PM
1

The upshot of this whole feminist initiative is to reduce/eliminate and/or criminalize the entire male population on campus... FTFY
/r/MensRights29/08/14 11:03 PM
1

They would infiltrate the male-only bastions of chauvinist power.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 10:59 PM
1

The law doesn't say you have to say "yes", just that you have to give consent, whatever that is.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 10:58 PM
1

But as long as she's happy you'll be fine. Be attractive, don't be unattractive. /s
/r/MensRights29/08/14 10:57 PM
1

He's suggesting legally contracting in or out of an elemental biological act is the height of madness.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 10:56 PM
1

Pah! Marriage is an instrument of the dark forces of patriarchy. /s
/r/MensRights29/08/14 10:55 PM
1

We need a multi-part form to cover the many levels of sexual activity. "Your honor, in part 3C, the characteristic signature is missing and replaced by an illegible scrawl".
/r/MensRights29/08/14 10:54 PM
2

If enough women are brought up on stupid-ass sexual assault charges? If I recall, the last time we played them at their own game they called it abuse of procedure.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 10:04 PM
2

Pretty soon everybody will be raping everybody else but nobody will know about it.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 10:03 PM
2

Really? It's hard to remember this little detail, dispatched so happily down the memory hole at the ministry of truth.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:55 PM
1

Don't worry, I apply the scumbag label quite liberally. Perhaps your remark was meant to be k helpful, but you did call him "ignorant", which I thought was unkind.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 08:59 AM
1

It's true; you did introduce the qualification "forcible", but nomenimion's original comment did not, and i intended my remark more generally. In any case, i think the analogy remains valid, even with forcible rape, because throwing someone in jail is forcible, as are the other physical constraints entailed by false allegation, such as having to hide away at home, being arrested, increased risk of being assaulted, sometimes seriously, or even killed, in the street, or even being raped in prison …
/r/MensRights29/08/14 08:53 AM
1

Now it's clear I should have done. I tended to resist adding /s, because IRL if you have to, you've misjudged the remark. For the same reason I resist doing so online. It seems to make it less funny. I was hoping it would be obvious, though i was resigned some wouldn't get it. What I hadn't considered was that if I omit /s it may not be obvious to me that my respondent gets the sarcasm, and hence i may not get his. Oh what a tangled web... From now on I will add /s every time. Viewed from a suit…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 08:35 AM
1

Wow! That is delightful and most unexpected. Thank you very much indeed. This is a first for me. What a nice thing. 'preciate it.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:54 AM
1

Or someone who has reached the age of majority having consensual and satisfying sex with someone who still has a day to go. Sorry if that's not graphic enough for you.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:58 PM
2

I hate downvote whiner whiners.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:16 PM
1

Ah...
/r/MensRights28/08/14 05:48 PM
-7

It was a joke, you fucktard.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 02:40 PM
-8

You are a misogynist loser with commitment problems.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 12:12 PM
-1

I'd say it's pretty similar.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 11:15 AM
0

You shouldn't dismiss that. It's an important point.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 11:14 AM
1

Ignore the scumbag.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 11:08 AM
1

True. You didn't actually say women get raped more, but come on, you asked for evidence of the reverse and then refused to accept it. You haven't really explained what your real issue is here.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 11:01 AM
1

Good answer.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 10:55 AM
1

There's plenty to disagree with there. Firstly, possessive "its" takes no apostrophe. Call me a grammar Nazi. I don't care. Secondly, you haven't really categorically distinguished prison from non-prison rape. You have merely restated you belief in the distinction. Some prison rape is inter sex. Thirdly, the view that all rape is equally bad is implausible and at odds with the common sense judgement you have shown at the outset. Do you really believe that?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 10:53 AM
2

Wtf is this being downvoted for? I admire you for playing devils advocate. This is to be encouraged. We are all playing devil's advocate to the dominant feminist paradigm. That's how we ended up here. If we can't deal with devil's advocates here, how are we to deal with feminists out there. I get tired of this shit. It's easily the worst thing about this sub. Just because a post doesn't tell you what you want to hear doesn't mean it is not a useful contribution to the debate. What a bunch of dev…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 10:41 AM
3

This is a thoughtful and subtle post. The issues it raises are important and should be addressed head on. Even if the poster is trolling the questions remain to be answered. There's no use calling troll every time someone asks challenging questions.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 10:31 AM
1

He's not comparing you to a Nazi. I'm with you on everything else.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 10:26 AM
1

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_care_sex_abuse_hysteria
/r/MensRights27/08/14 10:15 AM
1

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2000/nov/26/socialcare.childrensservices
/r/MensRights27/08/14 09:57 AM
1

http://www.theweek.co.uk/uk-news/55810/bristol-man-falsely-accused-paedophilia-killed-and-burned
/r/MensRights27/08/14 09:49 AM
4

As long as a woman's status depends disproportionately on her sexual attractiveness, and a man's disproportionately on his earning power, then the sexualization of women will have a different meaning to the sexualization of men. This is I think something like what your opponent was trying but failing to articulate. However, what is missing from this analysis, is any understanding of the power this entails in women's sexuality. Thus, Camille Paglia writes: Feminists, coveting social power, are bl…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 09:10 AM
2

I'm wondering if this is trickling down from Heidegger. Anyone know? https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Heidegger+on+things&oq=Heidegger+on+things
/r/MensRights27/08/14 08:50 AM
5

Your sister is a piece of shit. Throw that frying pan.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 08:46 AM
0

My experience of working with children is that it's extremely dangerous. I would rather die than have anything more to do with them. Normally I'm motivated to challenge norms and stand up for my rights, but this is just too scary. Your mileage may vary, especially if you are prepared to make a big show off how stylish and fashionable you are in all other respects. But who wants a career that precludes just being yourself, and which could land you in jail for doing your job, or even beaten up in …
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:46 AM
5

No. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:35 AM
1

Yes. That was a bit retro.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 07:21 PM
2

Fuck off.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 07:17 PM
3

Disturbing new trend. Hard to label. Hard to prove. They did a good job of making this appear not totally ridiculous. Do they all have to have fake red hair?
/r/MensRights26/08/14 10:46 AM
1

Thanks. That's worth keeping.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 07:08 PM
2

I didn't know that. Have you got any more on that story?
/r/MensRights24/08/14 12:32 PM
0

OK. You win.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 05:27 PM
1

Exactly. Why arrest a 14 year old boy for rape?
/r/MensRights23/08/14 03:32 PM
0

You're from Texas.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 03:30 PM
1

Yes. Switch the genders and then see what happens. When it's a girl, the very idea that she may have encouraged it is considered victim blaming.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 02:27 PM
1

There has been a bit of a delay, yes.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 01:37 AM
11

Yes. I can't work it out either. On Pluto, where I'm from, only men are violent and controlling.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:59 AM
1

Thanks. That was funny.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:55 AM
5

Good one.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:52 AM
3

Fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 06:44 PM
1

What a bunch of prevents they are. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 06:43 PM
1

But...?
/r/MensRights15/08/14 06:35 PM
1

Fuck off.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 06:34 PM
1

"Your cause"? Have you considered fucking off and getting one of your own?
/r/MensRights14/08/14 06:13 PM
9

Empowerment is whoring for a good price.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 09:31 AM
1

Can we stop with the 'Can we stop with the "Can we stop" posts' posts, it's super annoying and arrogant.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 09:16 AM
0

"antimra"? So you downvote what you disagree with? That doesn't escape the headline problem. Deterring unwelcome opinion just is the problem.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 09:12 AM
-1

"You guys"? Fuck off.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:29 AM
1

What kind of dumb fucking question is this?
/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:27 AM
12

Have you considered speaking?
/r/MensRights13/08/14 10:18 PM
1

We're not white men who send the police to kill black men. We're against men being killed by the police. For specifically white men being killed by police, that's another sub-reddit. Same for black men.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 09:05 PM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights11/08/14 05:44 PM
1

Oh, I see. That was meant to be an insult.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 09:26 AM
1

Was Stalin a transgender?
/r/MensRights11/08/14 09:24 AM
0

Perhaps this is a little uncharitable. Have you considered fucking off forever? Just a thought.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 07:15 PM
1

Do I sense some cross-Atlantic tension?
/r/MensRights10/08/14 07:11 PM
5

I've seen threads where the author of the comment piece himself had his comments removed. I think it was Glenn Greenwald. This is the guy they paid to write the piece having his comments removed. It made me laugh, but it was no mistake. This is what they do. Community standards? More like a disjoint multitude subdued by a brawling despot.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 07:08 PM
7

Yes. And they've said so themselves, explaining that if they leave responses to deleted posts the thread won't make sense. Facts are sacred. Comment is free. Sometimes. What a bunch of crap.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 06:38 PM
5

Yes. Just like Americans. But you are right. Less freedom of speech privilege.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 05:35 PM
8

It's worse than that. Sometimes they remove comments without leaving any marker. The comment simply vanishes. It is impossible to know what proportion this happens to. Comment is not free, sadly.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 05:32 PM
3

You must be South Asian, I presume.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 11:34 PM
8

So every rape conviction of a man disproves rape culture. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 11:49 AM
1

I be da victim.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:41 PM
19

What a bunch of creepy prevents those girls are.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 09:00 AM
1

Strong stuff from Steve Moxon.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 07:29 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 08:54 PM
1

Oh, you're a feminst, SweetieKat? I'd no idea. I'm sorry. I hope you don't think I'm going to rape you. Sorry about my rant. Despite being a man I'm definitely not going to rape you. Please be assured. You'll be fine. I hope you're convinced? Naturally, being a man, it's not that I want to fuck your sweet, hot ass, or anything, for sexual pleasure. No, no. It's just that, you know, I'm hard-wired for power. Sorry about that. Can't help it. I'm real nice though, and very restrained. I haven't rap…
/r/MensRights08/12/13 12:49 AM
1

Well, yes. I was also thinking how little things have changed, but one thing that has changed I think is that women would not now be so uniformly behind the feminist label. I think feminism was close to its peak in 1992, and is now on the wane. But in other respects, yes, it's surprising how little has changed.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 10:29 PM
1

This is brilliant. Thanks so much for posting. The feminist guy is just hilarious. The rapturous applause is just delightful. It's striking how dated this already seems. Shows that feminism's hay day is already past. The show is a really nice showcase of the different positions. "We feel harassed every minute of every day of our lives", says the MRA. That's it. That's the answer to the harassment beef. We are harassed in our way too.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 04:27 PM
0

You seem to be as much of a shape shifter as your namesake of Norse Mythology. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loki
/r/MensRights07/12/13 04:17 PM
4

If he had been accused of murder do you think anybody would have done this? Of course not. Grave heads would shake and sharp breaths draw, but the gaping public would have awaited the spectacle of a trial. A trial, however, is considered an insufficient and overly technical procedure when it comes to the dreaded Our-Ay-Pee-Eee. But never ask, "Is rape as bad as murder?". That's not allowed, even on this sub.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 03:51 AM
82

"Tom became a recluse in his own house. It was horrific. He was screaming and crying asking why were they doing it. I tried to explain that it was because they couldn't get to him so this was the easiest way for them to start rumours. "The rumour went through the whole school and from that moment he was never safe. "School was only a 10 minute walk away but I had to drop him off in the morning and every evening. He had to finish earlier. We would have gangs of 30 coming to my door shouting abuse…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 01:13 AM
2

I have three points. PurplePaintBalls has, at time of writing, made a total of 1 post and 3 comments on reddit, all of them in this thread. It has been a redditor for 25 days. Warren Farrell has a PhD from NYU. The phrase "emotional intelligence" is a carefully crafted propaganda term designed by feminist psychobabblers for the special purpose of making us believe waltzing around impulsively doing what the heck you feel like and getting all pally wally with your little friends and bullying the o…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 12:22 AM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights06/12/13 05:15 AM
2

Yeah. I was mostly talking about one unwanted proposition. After that it's a different ball game.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 02:48 AM
0

I'm puzzled. When I ask you whether non-violent date rape is not as bad as any other kind of rape you reply, "at the very least there is added pain involved in violent rape" and add that objectively non-violent date rape is not as bad. You claim to believe "not all rape is created equal" and to disagree with the mantra "rape is rape". Yet in /r/TheBluePill did you not just recently write?: It reminds me of the way people dismiss non-violent date rape as "not as bad" because the victim didn't get…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 02:33 AM
4

What kind of crap is this? Is this what passes for sympathizing with us and being fair? I call bullshit. Look at this line: I believe that sexual harassment happens, because I’ve experienced it, though not in my years as a journalist. I certainly believe that many female journalists have been made uncomfortable by bosses and coworkers, subjected to unwanted propositions and so forth. "Subjected to unwanted propositions". In the words of big red "cry me a river". What the fuck are these dim fucks…
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:46 PM
1

At the very least there is added pain involved in violent rape, obviously. So you would agree that non-violent date rape as "not as bad" because the victim didn't get beaten? And you would disagree with those who say "rape is rape"?
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:14 PM
-1

Do you agree with feminists about rape? Do you think the primary motive is humiliation rather than sex? Do you believe non-violent date rape is just as bad as any other kind of rape? Do you believe "rape is rape", in other words, that all rape is equally bad?
/r/MensRights05/12/13 02:45 AM
-6

Feminists are obsessed with rape. They say nothing can be worse. They say rape is rape, by which they mean all rape is equally bad. What is so terrible about countering this with the question, "On a scale of 1 to 10 just how traumatic do you think rape is?" Why should it be taboo to ask this question?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 08:08 PM
2

Here's another video of women defiantly baring their breasts but able to deal with the fact some men may be looking. [NSFW]
/r/MensRights04/12/13 06:33 PM
0

What these women have done is downright evil. I'm not sure it is.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:01 AM
1

Can't we be a little more bitchy please, TheStinkingMachine?
/r/MensRights29/10/13 02:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter