TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Shitpostbotmk2 Archive

View 0 posts and 10 comments by Shitpostbotmk2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Sure, there's definitely more than one way to be a loser. Being a purposeless coward is one, and being unable to form healthy sexual relationships, built on mutual trust and understanding, is another, unrelated, path to loserdom. Certainly anyone who was actually focused on building up their own life, and wasnt a coward, would be more than capable of acknowledging and addressing a fairly massive deficiency like that. They wouldn't need to pretend there wasnt something deeply wrong with their own…
/r/MensRights20/07/20 11:18 PM
0

That's nice sweety
/r/MensRights20/07/20 03:51 AM
0

Courts really want both parents to be in the child's life. If you aren't able to see your kid either they're violating the custody agreement and you take them to court, or you explicitly wanted no custody and were granted it, or you were such a massive pile of shit the idea of you in the child's life terrified the court and they granted full custody even though you were contesting for it.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 02:53 AM
0

You dont have to do anything to be a man. You do have to be capable of forming meaningful, and in this case sexual, relationships with other people to not be a complete loser though.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 02:48 AM
-5

Damn, how did ya'll losers get something far enough up /r/all for me to see it. 0.) Both can choose whether to use protection, have a vasectomy/get their tubes-tied, or not to sleep with people. Not being given this choice is felony. 1/2.) Same thing twice. While pregnant she can choose what to do with her body. Maybe the dude should have kept it in his pants, or does that offend you? 3.) No she cannot. Neither parent is allowed to give away the child if the other wishes to maintain custody. 4.)…
/r/MensRights19/07/20 08:08 PM
7

http://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/about/programs/health/ourwatchrespectfulrelationships.pdf#page=104 Yeah, the definitions are the smoking gun here that they've drunk the kool-aid. Even if you accept the argument that since it happens more often to women that's where the effort should be directed, you still wouldn't specifically exclude violence against men in your definition of "Gender-based violence", you would simply target your program for violence against women.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 08:45 PM
15

Also this We call it family violence. We call it domestic violence. We call it all these things – it’s a euphemism actually. It’s male violence. Yet it doesn’t get labelled that. Focus group session, Principal. everything taken from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/about/programs/health/ourwatchrespectfulrelationships.pdf
/r/MensRights16/10/16 08:33 PM
10

I was gonna come in here and say something about the article never actually saying anything about male privilige and this was stupid, but I wanted to make sure and started digging through the actual document. Buried way down in the middle... The absence of professional learning poses potential risks Where teachers did not undertake the professional learning there were negative impacts for some classes. Focus groups revealed examples of untrained teachers who presented to students information whi…
/r/MensRights16/10/16 08:23 PM
2

nice dude
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/15 02:08 AM
5

And people like you are why others want guns banned, because you're clearly entertaining masterbatory righteous killing fantasies which point to an inherent mental imbalance and sadism
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/15 01:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter