TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Shlapper Archive

View 0 posts and 98 comments by Shlapper on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Don't interact with the feminist society at all. Focus only on men's issues.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:25 PM
4

The last interaction between the two men was so painfully melodramatic that I found myself wondering whether I was watching a poorly scripted soap opera or the actual social experiment it was claimed to be. The director is Stephen Zhang, a social media and online marketing expert, and I suggest that he's attempted to ride on the fame of the recent 10 Hours in NYC video which has tens of millions of hits. I am very sceptical of the legitimacy of this video at all.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 12:50 PM
3

She was sober, you were beyond intoxicated. She could consent, you could not. I won't tell you whether this was or was not rape, but with the definition in mind (and this will depend on where you live) and what I've told you (which is just what you already know), have a think about it. Are you feeling alright? Did you talk with Ella or any of her friends?
/r/MensRights09/10/14 11:58 AM
2

After watching the first four minutes, I can say that I tend to agree with what I think she might be saying, even if she might not agree with my interpretation. There are many feminists who believe that the world will be a better place if more women were in power. Fewer wars, fewer social problems, less inequality and so on. This assumes that women are inherently good and men are not. It assumes that women are unchanged, unspoilt and uncorrupted by wealth and power. It also assumes that women wh…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 02:27 AM
2

It's understood that our primate ancestors wore no clothes, though we were still not sure if they walked on two legs or all fours. Recent evidence indicates that they did indeed wear clothes and spent most of their time sat behind a pseudo-news desk.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 06:00 AM
7

They "stray close to the line". I don't fucking think so. They're interpreting rape and spousal abuse as an incompatibility between two people in a relationship simply because the one suffering was a man.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 02:37 PM
-1

I simply can't listen to this guy for more than a minute without wanting to end my life. He might be raising some good points (as I said, I can't watch for more than a minute), but I can't take him seriously at all. He is so fucking annoying.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 06:39 AM
1

MRA has few friends in the media. It doesn't matter whether you lean right or left, the news sources that typically pander to your political demographic are going to have some pretty fucked up ideas about men and their rights. It's not worth paying attention to male victims as according to the left, they're in the minority, have privilege and are unimportant in relation to female victims, and according to the right, are pussies for suffering abuse and not conforming to their traditional gender r…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:10 PM
17

If there's no such thing as equality, than anything feminists work towards is a system of female supremacy and anything we work towards is a system of male supremacy. Biological differences between sexes don't mean that we can't work towards a just system in which all people are treated fairly, regardless of their birth circumstances... even if the notion of total equality is idealistic and unlikely. Science will probably never find all the answers to the universe, but that shouldn't mean we sto…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:05 PM
7

Even though women experience less violence than men, they are seen by men and women as the group that should be protected from physical violence. Just remember, men: beg your attacker to beat you within an inch of your life or even kill you if you want any sort of help or sympathy. Few are interested otherwise.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:15 AM
6

It took me a couple of seconds of the narrator talking to realise that this wasn't in English. At first it sounded like a weird British accent from a rural village.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 05:04 PM
1

There was a thread a while ago that tried to make a big deal of the fact that many petition sites have a "women's rights" category and no "men's rights" category. I was downvoted for saying that I didn't particularly care. I feel ashamed that legitimate issues of men's rights are more important to me than some category on a mostly meaningless petition website.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 01:09 AM
1

I'm sort of wondering how a discussion about shaving chests turns to an anti-MRA circlequeef.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 06:27 AM
1

I'm self-diagnosed as having autophobia and your use of the i-word triggers me. I'm offended.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:27 AM
4

Except the difference is that their lives aren't affected negatively. They're offered regular work writing for one or several online blogs and "news" sources because they happen to view reality as one in which men are evil, no questions asked.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:21 AM
-4

I'm totally fine with not having a Men's Rights category on change.org.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:04 AM
3

Why the fuck doesn't anyone call the police?
/r/MensRights29/06/14 06:42 AM
4

This story reeks of bullshit. The biggest giveaway is that it was written by Anonymous and on a website that is openly bigoted.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 07:36 AM
–

There's no fucking way I'm watching a half hour rage video about a shitty article from some SJW garbage website. MRAs are already aware of why the article is fucked, the people who need convincing are especially not going to be bothered sitting through a long video.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:41 AM
4

Sorry, no. I understand you're trying to do something positive, and that's good. However, petitions have already been cheapened by the overzealous social justice crowd. They mean next to nothing, especially from groups such as ours, which would be considered fringe by some. Petitions only hold weight when a group that already holds weight uses them.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 05:43 AM
9

I think he was referring to the article using rapist as a word synonymous with a man who rapes a woman. The article doesn't list the traditional male attacker, female victim paradigm as a myth... they fully employ it.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 06:02 PM
4

They'll only care about men's issues when they don't get what they want, and they're almost sure to get what they want every time. If only they would do this more often. Offer services and help to men whenever we do something they don't like.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:15 PM
6

Holy shit. It appears the job title of those who draw these comic strips is now sans humour and illustration ability.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 10:30 AM
5

This is what we need to avoid. Labelling strength and willpower as masculine virtues and vulnerability and sensitivity as female ones only further serves to define them arbitrarily and nothing more. The MRM already encourages men to seek help for issues of mental health or being a victim of violence. That "femininity" is already there, just as feminists have begged men to do: open up to their "feminine side". And yet when we hold lectures, talks, and conferences related to male suicide, mental h…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 12:47 PM
1

These young men say that they'd be so lucky to be involved with a teacher, but what they don't realise is that sitting at a computer and imagining it (a fantasy) and actually being in front of a person decades older than you who is trying to have sex with you (an actual rape) will yield different emotions and responses. It isn't a give-and-take situation where the teacher and student are star-crossed lovers. More likely is that the teacher is abusing the student for sexual pleasure without much …
/r/MensRights07/06/14 12:38 PM
5

Until they start focusing on the actual issue of rape in society rather than one class of victims, this initiative gets no praise from me. They could also stop implicitly and/or explicitly stating that an obligation to solving this problem and protecting women falls solely into the hands of men. It doesn't.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 12:32 PM
2

There are feminists who would discount some or most of what you said. You claim through your explanation that the patriarchy isn't run by (rich, white) men, but there are very many feminists who would say completely the opposite. Patriarchy isn't a set-in-stone concept. It's largely used to scapegoat men for all societal problems and is passed off as a legitimate concept in the realm of academia. Trying to find a definite definition is near impossible.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 02:25 AM
19

Call her and ask her what the deal is. If she gives you a shitty reason, end that relationship and don't look back. If she gives you a semi-valid reason, explain how what she did was really fucked up and then either continue friendship or not. It may be a misunderstanding, especially if you were both drunk. Bottom line, call her. Or don't and just move on.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 01:34 PM
5

Luckily, both my feminist and feminist~ish female and male friends didn't care. My girl friends usually argue with me to whatever degree of passion and then we move on and forget about it, and some even laugh along when we argue because we make a joke out of it all. My guy friends are similar, except they don't get mad with me at all, and they often consider my point of view as interesting or insightful. I guess I got lucky in that respect.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:38 AM
13

"I'm about to generalise something I know nothing about!" by some awkward and quirky "comedienne" writer who a handful of people know about. Nothing to see here folks, move on.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:30 AM
5

It's laughable that people are suggesting that he would not have killed if only society had taught him how to properly treat women. Rather than institute a public health service that includes high quality mental health services for both men and women, as well as having more strict control over the types of people who can and can't own a gun, society should just teach men how to treat women better.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:00 PM
1

Thank you for the contribution! Your points are also very relevant. I think that after seeing so many people make these mistakes and then post the arguments here, I just wanted to let people know there was a better way. It seems like it's not so popular though.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 01:26 AM
11

You had any to begin with? That website has been uploading trash for years to anyone who is willing to swallow it. The problem with articles like this, and this and others have been around for years now, is that they're all based on (usually David Wong's) conjecture about how the world works.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 01:40 AM
3

This is an extremely hard lesson learnt. A child or the prospect of one shouldn't be the punishment, but it looks as though it might be. Your only options are to stay and care for and raise and love the child as best you can; allow the mother full custody and probably be stuck paying for the child for the next 18 years (I wouldn't choose this); leave for another country out of reach of your own. There's no easy option unfortunately.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 01:33 AM
18

He was clearly disturbed. The few people that are seriously tying this event to men's rights are doing so for clicks on their articles from armchair tumblr-tier feminists. They won't be convincing anyone with half a brain.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:21 AM
3

I notice that, especially recently, a lot of men and women are rejecting this control feminism appears to have over the discourse on gender issues. I never used to notice it, but now it seems that a lot of people are making themselves heard.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 09:07 AM
2

These people would still be facing prejudice, sexism, discrimination as a result of their sex. This comes under the range of men's rights. That they happen to also be trans, black, gay or otherwise is not a problem of ours. It is neither a woman's issue nor a men's issue. It is one of their own faulty community. They are free and encouraged to start their own new communities if they feel so unsafe in communities where they believed they should feel safe. And the fact that they don't feel safe, i…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:22 AM
4

Yes. "A real woman has curves. A real man likes curvy women." It's misleading people into thinking that they should be a certain way to fulfil the requirements of being a human. On a related topic, I'm also tired of society trying to distance "real" from "evil". A man or woman who tortures, kills, rapes, hurts others is no less real than the next person who wouldn't dream of hurting fly. These people who do horrible things are real men and women. We can't just pretend that these people are fake …
/r/MensRights12/05/14 01:49 AM
4

I don't understand a need for an intersectional community based around the men's rights movement. Gender and sexual minorities already have their own movements and communities, both much stronger than our own currently, and many feminists have already appropriated and abused these causes to make their own look more varied and popular. This was obviously a good move on their part, but a moral transgression I won't willingly replicate with our movement. If an individual identifies as a men's right…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 01:43 AM
2

Notice how those women who either denounce or don't identify with feminism are often those who have made their own success in life.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:29 AM
27

I find it hilarious that an indigenous male, a gay male, a male with a disability or a non-white male would still have to pay 30 cents more than a heterosexual woman. There is no way that women are less advantaged than any of those classes of people, unless this was an error on their part and they forgot to mention that gay people, indigenous people and people with disabilities aren't really men? I'm not quite sure. Also, Australians who are of an Asian ethnicity are not at all lacking in privil…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:53 AM
1

I would challenge the decision of DHS, perhaps contact a lawyer or find a way to gain some sort of legitimate legal advice. The most important thing is that you aren't deemed an unfit parent for this reason. I assume your wife would be able to support you in this instance, as any partner should. I'm slightly sceptical of this story, but I'm sure weirder things have happened still. You need to control for the fact that something is happening that is allowing your son to leave the house and make i…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 12:36 PM
24

Don't drink so much alcohol that you become unaware of your surroundings and unable to protect yourself. This isn't with regards to the unwanted advances that you received from this girl, it's just a general piece of advice and common sense. Onto your issue, unfortunately not much can be done about a lack of seriousness from your friends. This is how society has raised them. You can convince them otherwise, but they cannot be forced to change their preconceived notions so simply. As for school, …
/r/MensRights05/05/14 01:09 AM
2

Making a tough decision such as that with the potential to tear a family in half can be really difficult, knowing that the people you grew up with are probably going to hate your guts. And your ability to do that is a testament to how brave you are.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 12:30 AM
20

If I could give you some advice, don't tell him on Facebook. Make sure you call him and ask to meet him in person. Ask him out for a coffee (call him), preferably on a day you know he has free time to meet you, and then you need to meet him on the same day. You want to reduce the risk of him getting anxious and asking your cousin "Hey, anon called me and asked me to get a coffee sometime, what's up with that?" Ask him about his trip first, ease into it and then let him know. You can always ask h…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 04:58 PM
5

As someone who is instinctively wary of what this woman has to say, I'm impressed that she was able to at least get the information out there unlike many feminists who claim that men are either not raped or not raped frequently enough to warrant discourse. I'll give an ounce of credit where credit is due, though I hope in future articles she will have the integrity to criticise the fact that the feminists who claim to liberate men as well as women largely ignore the non-gendered nature of sexual…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:27 AM
1

Those female gamers who claim to mute their microphones and shy away from any communication that might hint as to their sex/gender due to the vitriolic harassment that will apparently inevitably follow, are stuck in a self-fulfilling prophecy of forcing themselves out of the gaming community because they're being forced out of the gaming community by sexist male gamers. It's absolute nonsense. Female players are reasonably common in any sort of game that requires communication anyway, and in man…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 08:21 PM
3

Having seen other excerpts of Wendy Williams' shows, I'm not at all surprised that she would take this stance. If it's good for the woman, that's all that concerns her... especially if that woman is black.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 10:24 AM
3

The show isn't claiming that women can't survive; it's asking whether men can.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 10:12 AM
2

This shouldn't be a surprise. Feminists aren't interested in being inclusive unless it serves their purposes. They'll happily feign interest in the rights of gay people as central to their movement if it means gaining more supporters. The same is true for the rights of men. If the inclusivity is born out of manipulation though, is it truly inclusive? The answer is that it's not (if any doubt remained). Just as others have said, if the workplace policy is to be professional about the discussion b…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 05:18 PM
2

People, even feminists, are already aware of how unjust the child custody and child support system is and how it favours women over men. They've listen, they're aware, they just don't care. Suicide might force action, but at such a high cost, does the end really justify the means?
/r/MensRights21/04/14 05:05 PM
2

There's something to be said for multi-tasking (protip: not only women can do it).
/r/MensRights20/04/14 03:58 PM
2

I never claimed it was either sexism or a denial of equal opportunities.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 05:32 AM
3

Why is that? I tend to believe that career paths typically gone down by women are romanticised and tend to be made appealing in media portrayals (movies, TV shows, etc.), and so people perpetuate this view that there is something entertaining and fulfilling about being a psychologist or a social worker because you're always meeting new people, doing new things, the job isn't particularly boring. That's probably true. STEM fields don't have the same sort of romantic portrayal. Many people just th…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 03:10 AM
6

Not to be overly pedantic here, but I'd rather not link someone to an infographic that lists its sources as several newspaper articles. Even though it may be legitimate, I'd rather just link directly to the actual study... or even statistics from the relevant government bureau.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:38 PM
5

I hope you'll feel welcome here to discuss men's issues again in the future. Of course, you're free to talk about patriarchy, rape culture and reduce privilege down to simplistic thinking if you truly believe in the weight of those things, but I can't say that people won't disagree with you vehemently on those particular topics. Anyway, I hope you do contribute in future.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 03:23 AM
19

The whole issue of the school claiming that the yoga pants were distracting to boys wasn't verbatim from either school administration or school policy. It was a single quote from one 13-year-old girl, who (surprise, surprise) just happened to have a mother who was very familiar with and supportive of feminist theory, including rape culture, which she accused the school of supporting. This whole thing was blown out of proportion by a group of whinging teenage girls and their parents who used sens…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 07:51 AM
3

I don't understand the logic behind this Purely Pink event. They're encouraging the gender stereotypes that they so often complain about. I'm interested to know if these events are actually successful or whether they're merely filled with feminist types (considering the goal should be to appeal to all women, not just a subset of women).
/r/MensRights02/04/14 11:35 PM
1

Perhaps too pedantic and for little reason. I'm not writing a thesis here. What followed was not an emotional plea. Again, I could understand your comment if it was, but it wasn't, nor was it implied, nor were emotions mentioned at all.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 04:24 AM
1

I think you've interpreted my saying "I feel..." as meaning that I have a deep emotional feeling about this rather than as a way of saying that this is the conclusion I've come to through logic and reasoning and I may be wrong. I could understand if I then followed with "sad", "upset" or "angry" and implied that moral outrage was justified, but I didn't. Sexual education and providing condoms, which are far more effective than circumcisions at protecting against STIs, would benefit the culture i…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 12:09 AM
3

Tony Abbott is legitimately a terribly confused and wicked person. The reason emotions fly high when he is mentioned is because he manages to upset people by saying things that are undeniably sexist, homophobic, elitist, racist and so on. The reason for a lot of the hate he receives is primarily due to the things he has done and said and the groups he has marginalised or is planning to fuck over. People didn't suddenly decide to throw names and insults at him because of his political policies, i…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:54 PM
3

I feel it would just be cheaper to spend the fifty million on condoms or sex education programs. Instead, we get this pity-the-black-people sentiment and offer a largely useless and harmful procedure to a largely uninformed culture. While we're at it, why not donate millions to help these African countries import some narcotics for the people there to voluntarily consume. Never mind that they're unaware of the risks associated, they're doing it voluntarily.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:20 PM
4

So you picked half a sentence out of a paragraph of text and very reductively interpreted it so you could offer a snappy comeback. I don't really got it.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 08:06 AM
4

It's much like the rest of Fox News. She sits at a desk and nonsensically and condescendingly yells at Obama about every little thing she can find. I can respect her views on domestic abuse, but her obnoxious method of yelling at Obama for the sake of having something to criticise is not really far from what social justice warriors do. Two sides of the same coin. Is that how the saying goes? And before anyone decides to call it, I'm not part of Obama's little fan club.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 07:47 AM
-1

I'd probably have a lot more respect for her if she didn't host a section on Fox News. But definitely bonus points for her for going against the norm of siding with a woman just because she's a woman.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 03:21 AM
5

There are many people who have built their lives around perpetual victimhood, and they become supremely unhappy when legitimate issues are raised that either surpass their own troubles in gravity or don't directly affect them. It's the reason so many people use privilege as a means of silencing opposition.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 12:38 PM
12

I don't experience life as a girl or a woman, and so I can't understand how pervasive this "bossy" issue is. Having said that, trying to police the word just further entrenches the view that women require the help of society at every turn rather than to be taught by their parents to be strong and independent individuals who should be able to overcome adversity to succeed (like we teach boys).
/r/MensRights12/03/14 08:04 AM
5

SNL isn't exactly a shining beacon of feminist theory, and through its portrayals of women, I can see that many feminists would take issue with it. The skit actually sounds as though it's intentionally exaggerated to the point of sarcasm, but who really knows? I'm not worried about it. The show so rarely invites funny and talented people on it (the only funny hosts are former cast members like Tina Fey and Kristen Wiig), and it relies on weak punch lines and bad jokes about sex because stupid pe…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 08:14 AM
8

It would be a waste of time. David Wong and his writers and editors have realised a potential and have built the website around an audience of tumblr-tier social justice warriors who love click-bait. It brings in the traffic, and it brings in the revenue. They would write about anything, whether or not they disagree is irrelevant, and I'm sure that they're aware their tower of cards will tumble the second they dissent against their target audience, probably to the point where they actually belie…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 03:41 AM
0

There's a good chance that your rapist wasn't a rapist before he raped you. This is the reason I included: "(whether intentionally foregoing the consent of the victim or doing so because they don't understand how to respect consent)".
/r/MensRights06/03/14 04:18 AM
10

I dislike the last phrase, mostly due to its excessive use for no apparent reason. Of course, the meaning is reasonable. Ultimately, at a basic level, rape happens because a rapist rapes (whether intentionally foregoing the consent of the victim or doing so because they don't understand how to respect consent). Alcohol comes into the picture because it inhibits people from making choices as responsibly as they would while sober. It doesn't cause rape, but it definitely does rid people of a safeg…
/r/MensRights05/03/14 04:18 PM
1

It helps to cause HIV? Are you sure that's what you're wanting to say? That it helps to cause HIV?
/r/MensRights04/03/14 05:16 AM
2

I would just lay it all out on the table to her. Explain it sincerely and firmly and try to open her eyes. If that doesn't do it, I'm afraid that any effort to change her is beyond your control. All you can do is try to rebuild your life either on your own or with someone else. Best of luck.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 03:56 PM
1

I don't understand why people are upset. Obviously any story without evidence is going to be taken with a grain of salt, and the anonymity and atmosphere of 4chan convinces some that stories such as this one should be trusted even less. It's one thread, one story, one scenario. It doesn't make a point about what the MRM/world/feminism/women/men is, are or should be. It's just harmless fun.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 07:43 AM
16

I feel like the first half of your comment is pure gold for quote miners.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 04:27 AM
2

I find it really creepy, but if the three of them genuinely wanted to participate, then who am I to strike that down? The double standard is very typical though, women have no agency and are eternally victimised, as perpetuated by not only feminists but society as a whole. But this is still creepy as fuck.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 04:22 AM
13

If you open your feminist dictionary to the T section, you'll find "trolling" is defined is offerring dissent. Check your vocabulary.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 11:28 AM
7

The MensRights movement is working in parallel to feminism, not against them. Many feminists would disagree with you. Controlling the discourse is easier by claiming to represent both sexes behind a single ideology that is titled as representing only one "oppressed" sex, because the issue is then convincing men that feminism can fix men's issues through smashing the patriarchy, but when men's rights advocates try to fix men's issues, it's helping to reconstruct patriarchy, period. As a result, I…
/r/MensRights10/02/14 11:26 AM
0

I find it interesting that while she has had roughly two decades to initiate a trial-by-media that she chose to do so when it would be most damaging to his reputation.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 05:59 PM
5

In the interests of accuracy, no one is ever proved to be innocent, only "not guilty" of the crime they're accused of.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 05:37 PM
2

When she appeared on screen, I could've screamed at how excited I was. This woman is a legend.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 02:09 AM
–

She claimed that she thought it was a rock at first, but I'm highly doubtful of her honesty in that claim. With no difficult admission, her driving over the two kids was an accident, but she is guilty of shirking her obligations (regardless of whether she was convinced by a boyfriend) and should spend time in jail. She is an adult, after all, and should be treated as such. I don't think she is a bad person though.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:20 AM
2

This. Anecdotes are useful as an example of a solid statistic, but they cannot be used to substantiate a statistic. If we did this, we would be no better than the feminists who cite stories upon stories of discrimination against women and then claim that it's representative of patriarchal oppression.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 05:41 AM
16

I remember when I was 12, my school decided that students were not allowed to tackle each other during rugby... rugby, a contact sport. Instead, to get the ball off another player, you had to tap them on the shoulder and they then had to give it to you. I don't really like sport even at the best of times, but if you don't want to be injured, don't play a contact sport... or just realise that pain is a part of life and stop trying to bubble wrap children until they suffocate.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 03:23 PM
6

Implying the whole friend-zone-nice-guy phenomenon is even slightly directed at women in general. It's about women who complain about a lack of suitable "nice" partners and then proceed to go from one asshole guy to the next while rejecting their male friends who conform to their definition of a suitable "nice" partner. See, if they were just honest and said that they wanted to date an asshole, there wouldn't be an issue.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:07 AM
0

Implying patriarchy is a legitimately real thing.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 05:58 AM
7

I can't fathom why feminists haven't labeled this male privilege yet. Being moved away from a potentially annoying kid on an aeroplane? I'd be fine with this if the excuse for doing so weren't so sexist.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:52 AM
4

This video has been linked too many times within the past few weeks. The original by Alison Tieman (typhonblue) has over 50,000 views. When something is distributed by AvFM or uploaded by a popular figure in the MR community, it's almost guaranteed that this subreddit will have had a link on the very day the video was uploaded. I know people mean well, but we need to stop fucking spamming links to videos, regardless of how good they are.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 11:15 AM
2

It's been explored vastly already, and this is the reason you perhaps don't see as many deep explanations as you would like. Basically, the reason infant/minor circumcision still exists is due to religious "requirements" or aesthetics, and very rarely for those who medically require it. I oppose the religious requirements as it is physically forcing religious beliefs onto a child. I oppose the aesthetic requirements as they're the product of a society that encouraged circumcision to dull male se…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 01:16 PM
28

We have name-brand clothing, name-brand make up, gourmet coffee, delicious breakfasts and lunches daily, we get to watch brand new movies. It's unbelievably cruel that these services are provided for homeless women and almost nothing is provided for homeless men. Priorities take precedence over luxuries, as the respective words imply. Especially so when you have a certain group of people left out of these luxuries and priorities while the other group enjoys both. Homeless people need beds, cloth…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 07:38 AM
1

Interesting analysis, and I agree with much of it. The argument that the lyrics are sexist or misogynistic is ridiculous. You could argue that the fact the women are barely dressed at all while the men are suited up is somehow sexual objectification, and I would tend to agree, but feminists can't legitimately pretend that the same does not happen to men. When women are objectified, it's sexist. When men are objectified, it's making up for the fact that women are objectified, or SHUT UP HIS ABS A…
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:35 PM
8

You could discuss the Selective Service System in America that requires adult males (and not females) to register or face penalties. You could also raise the notion of the "disposable male" and perhaps draw from Karen Straughan (GirlWritesWhat). You can talk about legislation (VAWA) and campaigns that shift focus to women as primary victims with regards to non-gendered issues (violence in general). You can talk about male genital mutilation and female genital mutilation (one is allowed, one is n…
/r/MensRights27/12/13 04:04 PM
23

Women check men out just as much as men do to women. There's nothing wrong with it if done subtly and without being invasive or rude, and if you both happen to be checking each other out, that's always a good start.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 10:12 AM
2

We still have a rocky friendship but would love for remain friends. We both have no problem stripping our lives of each other though. Which is it? If I understand you correctly, maintaining a friendship and cutting one another out of your lives are mutually exclusive. Considering the intensity of your past relationship and your unconcerned approach to either maintaining a friendship or cutting all ties, I'd just walk away while it's still simple. You might be frustrated or anxious at first, but …
/r/MensRights24/12/13 05:29 PM
4

This article must be fake. Women would never falsely accuse someone of rape. There's simply no reason to do so, and the social stigma that is forced upon women who are victims of rape by the patriarchy is too great for any woman to consider lying ever.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 05:09 PM
1

Yes, I could have replaced the "you" with "one", but I'm not prepared to hit that level of pretentiousness. I'm generally talking about feminists who claim to be totally concerned with gender issues on both sides of the fence and yet regard themselves as feminists because apparently a feminine ideology is suitable for solving the issues of both sexes.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 05:01 PM
5

I would think we either need two separately and equally recognised gender rights movements without constant hostility between the two, or a single gender rights movement that is grounded in solving issues without gender bias goggles that dictate how societal problems will be solved. It seems that those who recognise a need to empower women without depolarising men also recognise a need to empower men without depolarising women, and so why would you continue under such a one-sided gender ideology…
/r/MensRights24/12/13 08:09 AM
2

That depends what you consider feminism and radical feminism to be, and even then I still don't agree with the term and what it implies, as well as what the ideology is so often based on, i.e., that women are completely disadvantaged relative to men and that issues should be examined through gender goggles tilted towards portraying women as the only important victims. I'm sure most feminists do believe in equality, but so so few believe in the relevancy of men's rights in that equation of equali…
/r/MensRights24/12/13 07:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter