~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Here's a nice convenient picture for the next time some vegan is trying to tell you that meat is unhealthy for youAs a nutrition major, you probably know enough to feel sure of your own views about nutrition. But not being a scientist, you seem to not yet grasp the fact that human health and nutrition is far too complex to be summed up by two figures from what appear to be a single paper. You can also find papers directly refuting the figures you shared. I'm not trying to say that meat is poison, but there is no evidence that men nor women nor anyone requires meat if they're getting varied nutrients from ot… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/15 09:48 PM |
| -3 | CDC: Male circumcision benefits outweigh risks.No, because it's entirely within reason that those countries may have other factors that outweigh the changes in risk associated with the circumcision factor. I'm not taking a stance on this one way or another--maybe you're used to fighting with people about this topic, but I'm arguing from a scientific method standpoint, not arguing what should be done. My point is that, in this instance, cultures that don't circumcise also have dietary/lifestyle/genetic factors that may decrease STI/cancer rat… | /r/MensRights | 02/12/14 07:59 PM |
| 1 | CDC: Male circumcision benefits outweigh risks.The UK and every other European country who do not routinely circumcise babies DO NOT have higher rates of STDs, penile cancer etc That might be because STDs and penile cancer are more complex than "how much foreskin do they have?" You can't simply point to penis protocol as a reason for differences in disease rates. That aside, this would be the funniest conspiracy in human history. | /r/MensRights | 02/12/14 06:22 PM |
| 2 | I'm trying to construct a clear and direct argument to be used for more uninformed people as to argue that feminism (as a movement) is not necessarily needed. Would appreciate some thoughts.I'm sort of drunk, so I'm not going to respond quite yet. If I remember to get around to it tomorrow, I'll reply. You make some interesting points, and I have both slight refutations and some earnest questions for you. Regardless, I admire that you're passionate about anything at all, when so often apathy seems viewed as "cool." | /r/MensRights | 26/04/14 05:19 AM |
| 1 | I'm trying to construct a clear and direct argument to be used for more uninformed people as to argue that feminism (as a movement) is not necessarily needed. Would appreciate some thoughts.Look, feminism, at its core, is just about equal consideration of individuals regardless of gender. If you agree with that sentiment, but hate the radicals, then congrats: you're the same as every rational member of any forward-thinking group. So to be honest, saying that feminism as a philosophy has not accomplished anything is silly. Yes, there are some radicals out there. But you're seriously a victim of confirmation bias if you think most feminists are radical assholes. You know a ton of pas… | /r/MensRights | 25/04/14 03:28 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter