TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ShutupPussy Archive

View 14 posts and 780 comments by ShutupPussy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
80

Social IssuesShutupPussy/r/MensRights26/01/16 07:28 PM
35

SatireShutupPussy/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:46 PM
32

ShutupPussy/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:26 PM
28

Fathers/CustodyShutupPussy/r/MensRights09/07/15 04:52 PM
26

Edu./Occu.ShutupPussy/r/MensRights17/06/15 04:09 AM
23

Social IssuesShutupPussy/r/MensRights08/10/15 01:00 AM
21

Raising AwarenessShutupPussy/r/MensRights14/07/14 10:29 PM
6

ShutupPussy/r/MensRights31/12/14 04:28 AM
6

False AccusationShutupPussy/r/MensRights10/07/18 01:33 AM
5

NewsShutupPussy/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:48 AM
4

GeneralShutupPussy/r/MensRights24/07/15 09:56 PM
3

Social IssuesShutupPussy/r/MensRights06/06/16 07:10 PM
1

False AccusationShutupPussy/r/MensRights01/05/15 05:54 PM
0

QuestionShutupPussy/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:10 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-18

I wonder how many people read the article
/r/MensRights25/07/26 04:55 PM
5

Yes, insulting someone as a response to something you don't agree with is not good.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 08:14 PM
3

Yeah. I responded because out of all the examples you could have chosen, picking overused claims of antisemitism at a time of real, exploding rates of antisemitism was a problematic and eye raising choice.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 07:02 PM
-2

Sure, if they targeted actual journalists and hid their bodies, that would be valid criticism. If that happened.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 06:38 PM
-10

If you're trying to say calling out anti-semitism is actually hate speech because you don't think certain criticisms are antisemitic, you're just rationalizing antisemitism. The comparison is a bad one overall.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 06:22 PM
20

The ages were far apart, but she was 16 at the time and aside from telling it flippantly, I think the grimaces are appropriate.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 07:55 PM
-4

Who has called them misogynyists?
/r/MensRights15/03/26 09:25 PM
-17

The point of it is to ad-hominem Renee Good and deflect from her murder.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 04:44 AM
4

He's right most women aren't like that. This is too much time on the internet warping your view of people in real life.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 06:50 AM
2

What do you want from an "organization for men"? Specifically, what do you want to see that's not culture war rhetoric?
/r/MensRights23/12/25 04:15 AM
1

Get off social media and get help. I'm not even kidding. Misogynists don't live happy lives. Don't be one.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 03:36 AM
4

You should listen to what he says because it's nothing like caricature
/r/MensRights15/11/25 02:56 PM
0

100% agree. Many comments on this subreddit are just as toxic as the ones we rail against. Also far too many "look at what random ignorant person said" type grievance posts.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 08:50 PM
1

I don't like the gaslighting conflation of serious issues with mock-worthy outrage, but that was very well written and made me laugh several times.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 09:21 PM
9

Thanks for the archive link so I can read it. I wish it was posted as an opinion piece and not a wellness article.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 03:28 AM
-17

You should know you are going to get very biased answers asking on this subreddit. And your population issues aren't being of feminism. Work culture, family culture, and costs are the bigger factors. Even affording a home large enough to have a family is very expensive.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 06:48 AM
21

The influencers they profile are little more than grifters who talk in toxic tones because it's more attention grabbing and emotionally charged. There are legitimate concerns are the dating market, cultural expectations and double standards and all that. You can talk about them in a reasonable way and you can also talk about them in a toxic way. These "alpha ballers" are toxic and getting rich off negatively influencing young kids.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 06:55 PM
6

Read the article you lazy bums. On Tuesday, after her X account had been deactivated, Hill resumed posting there and acknowledged she had “refused to participate in this suit in any way shape or form.” She nonetheless said she would appeal and “further delay any shot he ever had at getting his career back.” Wrote Hill: “He will never see a cent from me.”
/r/MensRights05/06/25 04:29 AM
0

The comments how stuck in your mind partisan people here are. Damned if you do and damned if you don't.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 12:09 AM
5

Yeah. It does speak for itself and it's good awareness to raise. It really is getting crazy
/r/MensRights20/05/25 06:21 PM
10

Great video
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:40 PM
-9

What does the UK have to do with this?
/r/MensRights15/04/25 09:02 PM
45

stop giving these people attention.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 05:15 AM
8

Thank you for sharing.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 09:17 PM
-5

I don't worry about it at all. I know it's a possibility and don't do anything overly compromising but scary stories on the internet are not reality. It's a very small % who would falsely accuse, as it is a small % who commit SA
/r/MensRights21/03/25 07:16 PM
4

Your response make you sound like an unhinged incel
/r/MensRights17/03/25 08:18 PM
5

Amazing how you can call something you know so little about a baseless myth
/r/MensRights13/03/25 09:01 PM
7

He's a long time right wing influencer/grifter who once had some decent opinions but also has a lot of regressive ideas as well. He's pretty traditionalist too
/r/MensRights04/03/25 08:43 PM
5

Worth the read but she went to infiltrate some conservative and libertarian conferences and realized they were monsters
/r/MensRights04/03/25 04:56 AM
2

What's the point of commentating on a headline without knowing the context? That's circlejerking a misperception
/r/MensRights22/02/25 11:39 PM
1

It sounds like nobody read the article. The title is response to a 2010 Atlantic piece and this author largely argues against the claims made. Congratulations on taking the bait.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 09:24 PM
21

They're a tabloid rag. They do they have good articles sometimes, but their bread and butter is tabloid ragebait
/r/MensRights20/02/25 04:46 AM
39

What cognitive dissonance? 95% of respondents say NTA and agree with his take. Interesting AITA tho
/r/MensRights19/01/25 08:49 AM
-22

Don't be so sensitive I was asking because nobody was giving an answer. And the state isn't going to do that. Not because if feminism but because it would cost them. Of course the mother should be in prison.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 04:25 AM
-22

Who?
/r/MensRights17/01/25 03:45 AM
-30

Who should get custody?
/r/MensRights16/01/25 10:28 PM
7

No but in America there are huge cultural hangups on the word cunt . It also felt misogynistic in nature which adds an extra dimension. If it was a guy I'd argue he should get the same punishment but it wouldn't be news
/r/MensRights16/01/25 08:19 PM
45

Apparently it's a third party supplement unaffiliated with Hasbro or has the D&D brand
/r/MensRights09/01/25 07:23 PM
62

Ridiculous. Do they allow the male variant, Gary Stu?
/r/MensRights20/12/24 02:25 AM
-10

Her campaign criticized men and offered a negative view of masculinity >were being told by leading Democratic politicians that they were lousy if they didn’t vote for Harris. I agree the democrats do a good job of making men feel excluded and mostly mention them as a nuisance, but are there actual examples of the above coming from the Harris campaign?
/r/MensRights05/12/24 07:37 PM
20

He's apparently a mutual friend. And if anything, he's the one doing the public displays at her on social media. This post is pretty gross attempting to portray a grieving girlfriend as some trollop
/r/MensRights20/11/24 06:18 PM
4

I hear what you're saying. What do you mean by "There is something wrong with the system" though? Are you essentially saying you liked how things were but think we need less DEI/quotas?
/r/MensRights20/11/24 05:38 AM
-14

My bad, sorry for being rash. I missed that you were talking about labeled sections. I thought you were decrying the lack of groups themselves. Valid complaint about categories of interest. Maybe there simply aren't enough groups to warrant a section. Guys don't usual seek out gendered social groups.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 06:40 PM
-24

Meet Up groups are self created. Who is leaving you out, the mom's who create a group for themselves? "Deliberately left out". Sounds like complete entitled whining. Meet Up is a platform, not an organizer.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:50 PM
125

Not "I didn't mean that" but "I don't want that on the record"
/r/MensRights09/10/24 06:06 PM
-30

Why would you want to compare yourself to them?
/r/MensRights06/10/24 03:40 AM
-32

Because I could dig up some story of women behaving badly from 1996 but what would be the point in posting it? It's not relevent to men's rights or is it current.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 01:41 AM
-41

This story is 10 years old why are you posting it as if it's recent news?
/r/MensRights06/10/24 12:28 AM
8

So that's why she flipped parties
/r/MensRights09/09/24 04:44 PM
6

He didn't specify he any kind of safety related reasons for a dress code. He could work in an office.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 12:44 AM
18

But do you have a cohesive argument against it? He prefers to wear a hat for his self presentation. Women wear makeup for their self presentation. What's the difference?
/r/MensRights06/09/24 10:28 PM
1

Get this projecting propaganda nonsense out of here. Many settlers are assholes but they're not raping kids. Unlike all the evidence we have of hamas raping and sodomizing innocent civilians and prisoners.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 08:04 PM
-18

This article is 8 years old. Why post it now?
/r/MensRights03/09/24 06:35 PM
0

Dregs of Israel
/r/MensRights28/08/24 05:57 PM
8

There is definitely discourse. Non-x discourse https://www.reddit.com/r/illinois/comments/1eysvdu/chicagos_morning_answer_mocks_tim_walzs/
/r/MensRights23/08/24 08:52 PM
99

It would be a no go for me. I'd be very clear and sober about why I wouldn't feel comfortable with that. It's literally inviting problems and if it's for a laugh, go to a comedy show instead. Your girlfriend has no idea how fucked up this can be for guys and the entire reality of those groups is horrible.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 02:11 AM
1

Depends on the human
/r/MensRights02/07/24 06:54 PM
1

That's sex. Animals don't have gender.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 09:15 PM
1

Gender is not biology. Biology is sex.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 08:18 PM
1

What's your answer?
/r/MensRights01/07/24 07:37 PM
3

How is this a men's rights issue? It gives the exact same answer if you ask about a girl
/r/MensRights01/07/24 02:49 PM
51

You sound like a kind kid. I'm sorry that happened and nobody stuck by you. Good thing is high school will end and once it does, nobody cares about it anymore. You will hopefully be able to go somewhere with a fresh start and be able to be yourself and make friends.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 05:52 AM
3

Theyre both forms of escapism
/r/MensRights25/06/24 06:07 PM
-14

In your sentence you're using male as an adjective/descriptor. The noun is friend. I'm guessing when you used female, you used it as a noun Nobody would have an issue with "my female friend". Yoy couldn't replace it with woman anyway since that word can't be used as an adjective.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 07:00 PM
11

The point is you live alone. Nobody complains about load when it's just themselves to take care of.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 11:31 PM
-9

Nobody cares about people's personal metadrama internet arguments. They don't need to be shared.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 06:09 PM
1

There's no men's division, it's women's and open. The women's division was created to help grow the game for women as there were more top male players than women, which can be discouraging. Men in general are more represented at the tail extremes than women.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 11:30 PM
44

"that's why you're single"
/r/MensRights16/04/24 05:10 PM
37

Another great piece
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:01 PM
5

Agree. I am adding additional context to the title.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 12:34 AM
4

For completeness, he was also arrested and charged, not simply accused.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 10:37 PM
2

Very good resource. Thanks
/r/MensRights16/02/24 05:53 AM
-3

I wouldn't go that far but it's a bad look. How much can you have in common with someone who was in high school a year ago?
/r/MensRights09/02/24 07:40 PM
-6

Because an adult teenager is barely an adult and an easy target for exploitation. They're not dating them for the intellectual jousting.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 07:04 PM
2

Can anyone share the author of the Atlantic piece so I don't have to give it a click?
/r/MensRights09/02/24 06:33 PM
313

No it's not illegal and you didn't do anything wrong at all.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 05:06 AM
-8

It's pretty twisted to make someone's gender dysphoria about you
/r/MensRights19/01/24 03:22 PM
0

Must have. I couldn't find them
/r/MensRights19/01/24 06:09 AM
9

Gillette commercials shamed men. Harry's featured a trans influencer. That's not the same at all.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 05:17 AM
5

Don't fall for this guy's ad hominem propaganda. In this very video Bari makes clear her long commitment to free speech and explains why the congressional hearing fallout is different. She's a wonderful, transparent, and fair journalist/commentator. This guy has some kind of weird grudge
/r/MensRights18/12/23 09:13 PM
1

What meaning will you have in your post retirement life?
/r/MensRights11/12/23 04:17 AM
-4

That's the case for the vast majority of cancers, not only prostate. It's one of the reasons why push so hard for breast cancer awareness, because there's something you can do to catch it early.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 04:19 PM
2

Because the screening for breast cancer is relatively easy, is not invasive, and breast cancers form earlier than prostate cancers. Prostate cancers on the other hand, like most cancers don't have great screening available. There are risks you need to weight against the benefits, unlike breast cancer which has very little risk when it comes to mammogram and physical exams. Here is one list. Missing from this list is the risk of false positives which could leave to unnecessary biopsy. https://www…
/r/MensRights18/10/23 02:56 PM
5

I can and I can read the post as well. Thanks for sharing. The other commentor quoted a portion of the blogpost.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 03:05 PM
1

Any source for the allegation or public record of the disbarment?
/r/MensRights30/05/23 03:01 AM
26

There's still a Chicago group with 25K members
/r/MensRights30/05/23 02:29 AM
6

Appreciate all the citation.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 06:04 AM
20

These are the high quality posts we need more of on this sub.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 08:20 PM
1

I think parenthood is better as an opt-in than a default in.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 12:44 AM
3

Unfortunately not for Canada but I found this link I found interesting https://www.dadsdivorcelaw.com/blog/fathers-and-mothers-child-custody-myths#:~:text=Myth%3A%20Fathers%20Almost%20Never%20Get%20Custody&text=A%20Massachusetts%20study%20examined%202%2C100,7%20percent%20of%20the%20time
/r/MensRights14/03/23 06:00 PM
1

The email was nonsense but it's inappropriate for a psychologist to be referred to as a doctor in a hospital context. He's not a medical doctor nor a psychiatrist and seeing that him referred to as Dr. _____ is misleading to patients. Same as if a DNP went around calling themselves a doctor.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 02:03 PM
22

Archive articles like this.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 03:34 AM
1

https://apnews.com/article/brittney-griner-michigan-united-states-government-russia-bbf0c7e3029fea40d604b11fd271533f
/r/MensRights08/12/22 10:06 PM
20

Very surprised this came from Hanna Roisin considering the books she's written.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 06:15 AM
29

Tell administration you don't feel safe and request a change.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 02:40 PM
1

They do it so people like you click and share their article.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 03:52 PM
18

🇹🇷?
/r/MensRights02/08/22 09:24 PM
2

Twitter OPs link doesn't work. Does anyone have a source for the claim?
/r/MensRights18/07/22 11:06 PM
1

https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolab/articles/facebooks-supreme-court
/r/MensRights30/03/22 04:41 PM
1

Which peers are upset?
/r/MensRights08/01/22 03:42 AM
3

It's no assumption https://www.artofmanliness.com/people/relationships/male-loneliness/
/r/MensRights08/12/21 06:14 AM
3

https://mobile.twitter.com/womenreadwomen/status/1243093968616710146?lang=en
/r/MensRights16/08/21 04:54 AM
0

Source?
/r/MensRights02/07/21 04:41 PM
3

Thank you again
/r/MensRights15/03/21 02:34 AM
2

Thank you
/r/MensRights14/03/21 01:45 AM
3

do you have sources for the 'same degree' and 'always consensual' comments?
/r/MensRights13/03/21 04:41 PM
3

The other three related to the small business thing 🙄
/r/MensRights22/02/21 05:54 AM
3

I searched and saw 15 mentions for "women", is that what you're referring to? 12 of those related to pregnancy and postpartum women. The other mentions were for small business which I don't agree with but that was the only one.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 01:20 AM
19

Thanks for these
/r/MensRights22/12/20 08:37 AM
2

90% of these replies show people don't know how to counter these claims.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 03:24 PM
-3

You're going to be biased answers here. Try r/askmen or something
/r/MensRights27/10/20 04:39 AM
1

If he has the sources there and took the time to write up this post, it would make more sense to link them so not everyone who's interested in sources has to search for them.
/r/MensRights12/10/20 02:27 PM
-5

Just curious, is there a reason you didn't link the sources?
/r/MensRights12/10/20 01:07 AM
1

I can't access the researchgate study, but do you have any sections that tie trauma to false testimony as a exculpatory evidence?
/r/MensRights10/10/20 02:34 PM
1

Is there a non reddit link just for this slideshow?
/r/MensRights26/09/20 10:12 PM
8

Pictures are moot without sources.
/r/MensRights08/09/20 11:40 PM
1

You're extrapolating a good and simple message to some massive social issue.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 11:48 PM
0

All "it's ok to cry" means is men shouldn't be confined to rigid gender rules about what emotions are and aren't ok to show.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 08:49 PM
1

Posts like these have a high credibility bar to meet so thanks for editing to clarify. I know Philip's reputation here but when I did my own research, aside from her chortle at male DV I didn't find as much as I'd expect. I'll check out the Intl men's day thing though. Cheers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/20 05:57 PM
3

Sarah champion hasn't been the domestic violence minister for nearly 3 years. It's Jess Philips.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/20 02:47 PM
1

That's not what privilege means.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 05:28 AM
21

got a source?
/r/MensRights27/06/20 04:35 PM
1

Your first link appears to be gone.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 10:41 PM
1

I don't think that's the same at all. I think most men definitely prefer pissing in a urinal than going in a stall.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 04:31 AM
1

That's because women can't piss in a urinal.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 08:48 PM
6

This is from a 2 minute scan on the MR homepage. It's all cherrypicked posts of women being ignorant. We know there are ignorant women out there as well as men. Many of these are just images without any added value. There is a plethora is these circle jerk posts. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g0n4rw/well_if_this_woman_know_most_slut_shaming_and/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g0j23w/found_this_rare_gem_on_runpopularopinion_but_of/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/…
/r/MensRights14/04/20 12:37 AM
7

I was going to make a similar post. There's been a flood of rage bait posts. It almost feels like some Russian troll operation to rile up culture war tensions even more.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 11:02 PM
0

I skimmed the Dropbox pdf and didn't read anything that raised alarm bells. Maybe using search on Dropbox web didn't scan fully.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 07:17 AM
-4

"privilege" and "woke", "implicit bias don't appear anywhere in the pdf. Two of the speakers talk about implicit bias but implicit bias is a real thing. Going "full sjw" sounds like hyperbole.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 05:11 AM
0

You're arguing with an idiot. Stop.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 06:46 AM
11

Does anyone know of projects Depp was dropped from?
/r/MensRights02/02/20 02:15 PM
2

I don't doubt it, but it's a limited vibe. I think the aim is to expand the vibe to be more accessible to other personality types
/r/MensRights25/01/20 04:33 AM
2

I think that's the point. Trying to change the insular IT to make it more approachable/conducive to different types of people.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 08:50 PM
7

Did you get any examples of unfriendliness?
/r/MensRights24/01/20 06:25 AM
3

You gotta be kidding me. One month apart? What site is this and are these articles still up?
/r/MensRights16/01/20 08:29 PM
-10

Why can't it be both?
/r/MensRights10/01/20 04:16 PM
-6

I don't think it's welcoming to men but I don't like to think of us as easily triggered and over sensitive. There's no discrimination, just a real lack of courtesy.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 05:36 AM
-22

I agree it's not welcoming to welcome everyone except straight men, but they weren't barred. All others were explicitly welcomed, but no one was explicitly unwelcomed or discouraged.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:17 AM
5

So you think this was clear minded malicious intent and not a psychological ailment?
/r/MensRights27/12/19 05:50 AM
1

Why add them? one is a subset of the other.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 10:54 PM
4

Does that homeless stat seem low to anyone? I thought it should be twice as high.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 10:35 PM
-1

neither is your made up opinion.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 10:58 PM
0

And your opinion is? Urban dictionary is as reliable as you're gonna get. It's a consensus source, 7K upvotes.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 08:37 PM
-1

Did you read? they're mocking feminists. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=meninist
/r/MensRights24/12/19 08:21 PM
-2

He's wrong https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=meninist&amp=true&defid=8093373
/r/MensRights24/12/19 07:00 PM
2

I thought it was a word made up by MRA to mock feminists. High schoolers would wear meninists shirts and feminists would freak out.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 06:57 PM
1

I already said I looked it up and couldn't find anything. Sounds like you can find the evidence real quick?
/r/MensRights19/12/19 06:29 PM
3

Girls scouts were strongly against this change in policy. Do you have any evidence they were pressured internally/externally?
/r/MensRights19/12/19 04:58 AM
4

I looked it up and can't find anything that says they were forced to. Couldn't even find that they were pressured to allow girls. Do you have a source?
/r/MensRights19/12/19 04:46 AM
3

Did they? I haven't read anything about that. I know numbers haven't been great and I understood it to be a decision taken by the organization.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 03:28 AM
1

Did they? I haven't read anything about that. I know numbers haven't been great and I understood it to be a decision taken by the organization.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 02:49 AM
1

How did they destroy the boy scouts?
/r/MensRights19/12/19 02:32 AM
2

How did feminists invade the boy scouts?
/r/MensRights19/12/19 02:31 AM
3

Who took away the boy scouts?
/r/MensRights19/12/19 02:23 AM
1

Yeah, if a guy is determined to sleep with you, you're not the fight type, and you're afraid of making things more aggressive and scary, that's a pretty helpless feeling. Also way to disregard the rest of my response and latch in to the one piece that irritates you.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 08:33 AM
2

How lucky for you. Anyway there are several other reasons for not saying no, such as fear of violence or feeling helpless and not wanting to make it more traumatic. Not saying no doesn't dismiss rape just like not hearing a no shouldn't allow a retroactive rape cause.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 07:41 AM
1

I don't know if you have a sister, but I bet you wouldn't be saying that if she had a "giant wimp" personality. If hypothetically she were to be raped, it wouldn't be so because she was a wimp? Only those who feel able to resist can qualify as victims, whereas if you happen to be weak and feeble, too bad so sad?
/r/MensRights17/12/19 06:41 AM
1

What if you're afraid to say no to someone who is aggressive or intimidating? Is it not rape if the victim is meek or easily scared? If it their fault if their panic response is to freeze instead of fight or flee?
/r/MensRights17/12/19 05:02 AM
2

Not where I work. Women devs fix bugs, everyone asks for help when they need it on a difficult feature. Women not more than men.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 04:12 PM
2

You're not a loser. That's an easy label to give yourself.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 06:41 PM
1

There is no equivalence here between trump and Hilary. Trump has literally spilled the beans on our intelligence capabilities and secrets that have resulted in material changes on the ground. If Hilary is a criminal for her emails, then Trump has committed treason on account of his incompetence.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 04:50 PM
23

You shouldn't be worrying about other people. You can't control them anyway.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 04:32 AM
5

You've got to be kidding me. Trump's kids were caught using private email in like the first year. You care about national security? Trump literally outed an agent we had in Russian who had to be extracted because of his incompetence.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 02:17 PM
4

Super edgy, bro https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Catholic_philosophers_and_theologians
/r/MensRights25/10/19 03:57 PM
2

Where did you watch it?
/r/MensRights25/10/19 06:51 AM
11

Protip: link the original thread in your post next time.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 06:55 PM
2

I thought women aren't jailed anymore for nonviolent offenses?
/r/MensRights20/10/19 11:16 PM
3

No its not. It's specifically for Jews.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 03:28 PM
8

This sub feels the way to best the female victim complex is to have one of their own.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 11:58 PM
1

Where did you find that 49.7% Stat? I couldn't find it in https://domesticviolenceresearch.org
/r/MensRights08/10/19 02:35 PM
1

Thank you. Wish they included tables for Master's and Doctorate but this is great.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 01:30 AM
2

You got an actual link?
/r/MensRights02/10/19 03:23 PM
3

Most of these comments are negative. This outrage over shitty people on the internet is the other side of the feminist outrage horseshoe.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 07:14 PM
3

Accounting is majority women already, what are they talking about??
/r/MensRights28/09/19 11:13 PM
2

Good post, thank you.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 07:59 PM
12

What do you mean it was a hoax? The whole preferential reviews thing never happened and was made up?
/r/MensRights12/09/19 05:19 AM
10

Contraceptives fail too.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 12:01 AM
4

I think you're reaching here. I'm sure there are tons of professions like that, would you say all those types of 9-5 service jobs discriminate against men because women may work less hours?
/r/MensRights27/08/19 06:14 AM
-5

What do you mean by easier access to healthcare?
/r/MensRights27/08/19 12:59 AM
-5

I can only think of two possibilities: Either women are incompetent and can't manage to figure out how to kill themselves, or most female suicide attempts are really just attempts to get attention. It's not really that hard to kill yourself, so I think the answer is that women just see fake suicide attempts as a way to get attention. This is the kind of shit that makes men's rights look terrible and misogynistic.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 08:48 PM
12

How did his hairline suddenly improve?
/r/MensRights21/08/19 03:49 PM
3

She'd also sometimes bring along a transsexual friend to have a threesome and trick the drugged out guy into having sex with a transsexual. Presumably in a sadistic effort to humiliate him. So not only robbery but also rape.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 12:25 AM
5

Thank you for taking the time with this post.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 09:09 PM
3

Did you ask, why?
/r/MensRights24/06/19 09:07 PM
1

Sorry to hear that.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 03:33 PM
5

Sorry to hear that, man. Don't mean to dig up, but can you explain how she "made" it so you couldn't see your daughter?
/r/MensRights09/06/19 05:25 AM
1

☹️ Sorry. The responses were calling the author sexist.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 02:38 PM
2

Sorry to bust the circle jerk but take a look at the thread and responses: https://www.np.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/bxjczn/why_im_no_longer_reading_books_by_white_men/
/r/MensRights07/06/19 04:02 AM
1

she was arrested and charged with attempted second-degree murder, illegal discharge of a firearm, theft of a firearm, resisting an officer and obstruction or tampering with evidence. what does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights01/06/19 04:28 PM
1

This story have nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 03:05 AM
1

Shut up, pussy.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 03:43 AM
-19

It has nothing to do with men's right. They just don't like you questioning a circle jerk.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 03:57 AM
0

Yeah. You still sound petty.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 03:11 AM
0

This title makes you sound extremely petty.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 02:04 PM
5

You've got it backwards, equity is easily measurable.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 06:02 AM
0

You're complaining about a tabloid. This is what people point to when they accuse MRM to be a bunch of whiny babies who aren't serious.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 11:58 PM
8

Why?
/r/MensRights26/04/19 11:50 PM
4

This is the fifth post about this Cafe in 2 days, have people not seen any of the other multiple threads??
/r/MensRights24/04/19 09:09 PM
3

You're a dev, find another job. When she asks why, you can tell her.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 03:29 PM
8

It is satire. There was a whole thread on it a couple weeks ago. It uses red pill language or something and was determined to be written by a someone on that side of the debate, not some man hating feminist.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 05:36 PM
3

This looks to be the daily mail? This is tabloid trash.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 03:29 AM
-3

the entire point of trolltx are shitposts like these. it's literally a troll subreddit..smh
/r/MensRights24/02/19 04:13 PM
1

What? What if the child doesn't go to university?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 08:31 PM
1

This is one of the most editorialized titles I've seen. Did you read the article or are you committed to pushing a narrative?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 03:48 PM
1

24?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 07:14 AM
3

Actual reason it was removed: https://snew.notabug.io/r/legaladvice/comments/aozucm/caught_gf_stealing_my_sperm_from_condom/eg5arjg/
/r/MensRights11/02/19 04:33 PM
0

Pointing out institutional gender bias in the justice system is good. Posting some cherry picked comments from a YouTube or Facebook post. Even ones with a lot of likes is scraping the bottom of the barrel. Posts like "look at what VagPuff96 said about ___ men's issue!" is this subreddits equivalent of a shitty tabloid post. It makes us look petty and does nothing but give us an excuse to bitch and feel victimized because some twat has very backwards/sexist views.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 02:24 PM
1

This sub can be incredibly petty and whiny. Still 10x better than vice though.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 11:00 AM
1

True.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 02:36 AM
17

"Stop associating us with red pillers!" posts from RedPillPhilosphy
/r/MensRights06/01/19 07:26 AM
1

I'd love to see that list.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 01:32 AM
4

MensRights now includes memeing people we don't like?
/r/MensRights20/11/18 01:31 AM
2

No one needs to constantly fear being attacked. It's hysteria.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 06:51 PM
1

If men need to constantly fear attack then women do too. This is poor logic.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 03:21 AM
0

Posts about ridiculous article. Links actual article giving it more views.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 05:43 PM
6

Interesting. Is there a non tabloid article?
/r/MensRights24/10/18 06:02 PM
5

Archiv links like these instead please.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 12:09 PM
2

Do removed threads show up on r/undelete or something?
/r/MensRights17/10/18 02:13 PM
1

https://quillette.com/2018/08/15/why-its-not-ok-to-hate-men/
/r/MensRights10/10/18 05:45 PM
5

Stay off this subreddit probably. The middle school story is really horrible, but thankfully rare (aka rare enough for you to not need to worry about it). Kavanaugh is a high profile figure so he's being targeted. I dont think you should let things like this scare the hell out of you. Just be wary and keep and eye out for crazy women.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 12:33 AM
10

Is this the same story I remember hearing about before where a bunch of middle school girls had text a group text about how they were all going to accuse this one kid, or is this a different case?
/r/MensRights07/10/18 03:08 PM
3

Is there another source?
/r/MensRights05/10/18 01:14 PM
2

Thanks for archiving all the posts you archive.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 02:04 PM
1

Are you an actual user?
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:34 AM
-9

When's the last time you or some guy know has been harassed in a store? I'm curious.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 08:03 PM
18

Thanks for archiving
/r/MensRights19/09/18 12:53 AM
-3

Agreed. This sub has merged alt right.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 03:19 AM
3

Is this saying female on male domestic violence is greater than male on female?
/r/MensRights03/09/18 09:05 PM
1

They've been given the substantial preference of a vagina?
/r/MensRights29/08/18 04:36 AM
1

What kind of substantial preference explains the additional 50% enrollment?
/r/MensRights28/08/18 12:39 AM
2

Maybe she's just a bitch and this has nothing to do with gynocentric behaviors. You heard multiple other women telling her to get her ass up.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 12:08 AM
16

Agreed. I don't know what the bus driver tried to do, but I think there's a protocol for dealing with uncooperative passengers.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 12:06 AM
3

Bari Weiss is hardly a feminist. She's more MRA than anything.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:10 AM
7

Archiv crap sources like this.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 01:31 PM
2

No, but that's not what I'm talking about.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 05:15 AM
2

Yes, it's either poor reading comprehension or intention misconstruing.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 05:14 AM
8

What? Those were examples of the types of tweets she was responding to. That's why she wrote, "along this vein". They never said this is what she was responding to.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 11:45 PM
7

What a rag of an article. I agree with a lot of it, but this is more fit for a Facebook rant than a published op ed.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 05:30 AM
1

thanks
/r/MensRights10/07/18 03:15 AM
1

thank you
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:01 AM
3

Is there a non breitbart article?
/r/MensRights16/06/18 10:59 PM
2

Can we make a wiki out of something like this and add approves references when they come up?
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:55 AM
37

How do you custom sort? And what do you custom sort by?
/r/MensRights23/02/18 02:31 PM
24

What kind of challenges were there in opening up a men's shelter? I remember it being more than simply raising $50,000.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 09:54 PM
1

thanks for the thorough response. I'm apparently not great at parsing through research data. Does anyone see where it states the 40% of physical violence claim (I assume they mean 40% of all physical violence). I found the claim for more often the victims of psych aggression (48.8% vs 48.4%). This is only in relation to an intimate partner, right?
/r/MensRights21/10/17 04:39 PM
5

Source for the 40%?
/r/MensRights16/10/17 08:12 PM
1

This is a red herring. She's not talking about the bravery of men, she's talking about their propensity for mass violence like this.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 02:14 PM
0

Maybe now they can fire Matt Taibbi
/r/MensRights18/09/17 07:24 PM
-4

They didn't call it a romp the source isn't a tabloid.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 01:03 AM
3

yes that is good, but this is like manufactured outrage by proxy since tabloids like DM and the Sun are purposefuly playing the rise you got out of the article.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 03:09 PM
7

you are getting mad at a tabloid column. It's like posting condemnable youtube comments and getting mad at them. The entire point of tabloids is to post controversial pieces so people react, click, and share.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 03:04 PM
-1

They're talking about stuff like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hc45-ptHMxo
/r/MensRights03/06/17 06:26 PM
5

Why do you guys insist on getting worked up over random nobodies on social media who likely have their own issues? Their opinions are not indicative of anything other than her own personal issues and she is not speaking for women at large. Posting cherry picked examples of bigoted women does absolutely nothing for men's rights other than give users here a subject for naval-gazing.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 07:27 PM
1

Vehicular homicide is sentenced like this though. It is known to be MUCH more lenient, across the board. Freakanomics had a episode on it.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 03:52 AM
1

This is more political than MR. Better for politics or some sjw board.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 03:18 AM
0

Are you asking me how I can evaluate how important something is to me?
/r/MensRights02/10/16 01:40 AM
1

Oh ok. Archive removes pay walls?
/r/MensRights01/10/16 07:13 PM
1

Why would you want to archiv a positive story?
/r/MensRights01/10/16 05:39 PM
3

I never get why people archive positive articles to deny views but other times post direct links to garbage.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 04:32 PM
0

It's a birthright that's not very important to me. Ill give you everything else you wrote.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 04:26 PM
-2

Lol I'm in denial because I don't see myself as a victim. Two sides of the same coin, some of the people here.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 06:45 AM
-2

That's perfectly fine. It's not an easy rationalization. I don't care much most of the time either, it's only when people start labeling me mutilated and such is when I have a problem.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 08:53 PM
0

What exactly is the sexual grievance industry?
/r/MensRights30/09/16 08:05 PM
-6

While you're entitled to you own opinion, I would remind you and others not to project your personal (and inexperienced) views onto me (or other men). I've never felt oppressed by this and never felt that my body was not my own. I don't think I need a survey to claim most circumcised men feel this way. I keep reading threads and comments on here (not this post so much, but other posts) telling guys they're mutilated, deprived of sexual pleasure, and overall victimized. It seems to be a dogmatic …
/r/MensRights30/09/16 07:37 PM
1

You didn't link to her talking about the wage gap.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 03:12 PM
2

I'm sure Femen were mad they couldn't get more publicity from a caution.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 10:07 PM
1

Did Femen have protests in england?
/r/MensRights15/09/16 04:46 PM
2

Why do these always get cut off before the reply?
/r/MensRights24/08/16 02:24 PM
5

you're right, justice was not served. There is a point to be made about prisoner decency and cruel and unusual existence as an excuse to letting criminals off the hook.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 04:24 PM
2

It's rational, it's just shitty. But if they aren't going to allocate more money to properly fund women's prisons then this is a political problem, not a judge problem. The state has certain responsibilities and they must be able to adhere to them, otherwise they would be violating whatever rights they have agreed to. this maxim should be applied to both men's and women's prisons but if there is fault, it is on parliament/CPS (or whoever runs the prisons) and not the judge.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 03:43 PM
-6

I agree but you're wasting your time trying to be rational in here.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:51 PM
-2

No, it just buys into the feminist narrative that mra's are simply feminist haters who spend more time complaining about feminism than focusing on men's rights.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 04:43 PM
-4

Your opinions are your own, but that doesn't change the fact that this article has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:31 PM
-4

I was being rhetorical. This post has nothing to do with men's rights, it's only bashing on feminists.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:30 PM
-8

I really think we need to change the name of this subreddit from men's rights. Or have half the readers join r/antifeminists.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:10 PM
3

This is on the pay gap level of statistics.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 11:16 PM
8

Archvis Buzzfeed. wth are you doing?
/r/MensRights13/08/16 12:15 AM
2

The ones who damn men if they do and damn them if they don't are the same sjw's I don't read. It doesn't surprise me if they are critical from both sides. But they have featured Cathy Young and other people talking about issues from our side. If you don't think there are enough articles, well then become a journalist and start writing.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 12:52 AM
4

Yeah it's called trying to give a voice to each side. I used to think The Atlantic was another crap publication like Vox or something but then I read a lot of centrist and conservative columns that I found sound and cohesive. I may not agree with Ta-Nehisi Coates but I appreciate them giving him just as much a voice as they do David Frum.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 07:37 PM
1

First they cry that they don't need to conform to our standards of what it means to be successful and then they cry when Roberts reiterates this, noting how conventional measures of success is probably not appropriate for everyone and therefore he doesn't see the lack of women in leadership as a problem.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 10:40 PM
1

that's a great example, really. Never mind we're talking about individual acts of violence and not policies of war or the fact that naming a female warhawk literally proves nothing. If you want to share the blame of those soldier and civilian deaths on Hillary then you also have to share it with the countless men who voted for the iraq war and thus only reinforcing the author's point. There are legitimate arguments such as the lack of support or other options for disenfranchised men as compared …
/r/MensRights28/07/16 10:46 PM
-2

You're talking to cyncial mgtows, it's pointless.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 06:42 PM
1

Yeah but she could also say if it weren't for these violent men in the first place we wouldnt need shielding or hiding.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 05:04 PM
5

Sounds ridiculous. How can it be in the public interest to accuse a man of being a rapist who was never convicted of such a thing? I really hope he gets his appeal. I can definitely sympathize with the father though.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 01:55 AM
95

That's why we shouldn't be seeing his face without his express approval.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 06:49 PM
9

You're right and this post is gawker-level, just from TRP side. but it reinforces outrages so you (and me) will continue to get downvoted. This is celebrity gossip and has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 10:09 PM
1

Are these judges rubberstamping the same ones using their own rubberstamped TRO as evidence against the accused?
/r/MensRights01/07/16 03:14 AM
1

Who are the major culpable figures here? The judge? Is there anyone else rubberstamping these TROs?
/r/MensRights30/06/16 05:24 PM
2

This video is retarded. His father is a man and no one told him how to not abuse so how can he even hope to teach his kid?
/r/MensRights30/06/16 12:19 AM
0

online polls and petitions have zero scientific rigor and merit to them. When researchers poll people for matters on society, they take cross sections of the population, account for variety, bias, and all other factors that would make the data useful.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 09:06 PM
-2

They're as indicative as gossip polls or comment sections. There's a reason why online petitions aren't used in any sociological studies or research.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 08:41 PM
-3

an online petition is as indicative of society as any online poll (i.e. they're both useless in saying anything meaningful about society), they're not representative.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 07:50 PM
-9

A petition to make Zayn Malik an honorary member of parliament would get more signatures than either of these. This doesn't prove anything about society. Stop being an overdramatic baby.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 06:55 PM
1

Keep a level head and stray from knee jerk and reaction. Lean towards moderation and call out extremists or zealots.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 03:37 AM
1

That's good example, but I think there is a big distinction between making a knowing joke between jest and circle jerking, which echo chambers like this and sjw subreddits have. The reason I call it out is because I think it does the opposite of honing our ideas. All it really does is move people to extreme views over moderate ones. I forgot what this is called but it's like a ramped up group think that only begets itself more and more zealously.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 11:02 PM
3

We're all sick of double standard bullshit, but arguing it like you're trying to convince someone is really just circle jerking about it.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 02:21 AM
2

The jest was lost on me (it's text, plus i've seen people legitimately repurpose sjw arguments on here before.). I never understand why people make points against SJWs as if they were in a debate with them here. You're not showing them anything because this is a MR subreddit, not a SJW or neutral subreddit.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 11:01 PM
-1

You can't decry SJWs and then use their slogans when they suit you.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 10:35 PM
2

Well you and the people who jumped to downvote should work on reading comprehension instead of assuming what my points are. my comment was on the fact that just because something is legal doesn't mean it's ok like the person i was replying to was implying.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 10:52 PM
1

thats great but why are you arguing that with me?
/r/MensRights17/06/16 10:45 PM
2

My whole point was just because something is legal that doesn't make it ok. that's it.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 10:36 PM
2

What ever happened to common sense.? If you want to argue for the sake of arguing that's fine, but if you dont think cheating is bad the law doesn't forbid it then that's all I need to know.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 10:29 PM
-8

They are assholes if they're harassing people. Social convention exists because there is general society consensus about certain behavior. Just because someone may not agree with it doesn't mean it's all relative. The whole point was the legality of a thing doesn't automatically make it ok. Cheating on your spouse is legal, that doesn't make it ok.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:48 PM
-19

If you don't know what jackass behavior is then you might as well be a sociopath, or asshole yourself. It doesn't require an intellectual debate to determine if someone is being a douche or not.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 07:34 PM
-24

It's legal to be a total jackass, that doesn't make it ok.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 07:21 PM
7

They should be outraged at both
/r/MensRights15/06/16 06:54 PM
5

The whole article I was waiting to hear what turned her around and made to see how ridiculous all her indoctrination was. We know how ridiculous SJWs are, what we don't know is how to get them to see it.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 03:12 PM
1

its a delicious delicacy. Expensive things don't always have to be painstakingly crafted, but it's not easy to harvest and it tastes really good. I dont know why you find it ridiculous, other than it's uncommon in the western world. Also not all caviar is expensive. Most people dont even eat that beluga black caviar.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 08:14 PM
1

How the hell is caviar retarded?
/r/MensRights02/06/16 07:57 PM
-3

Because a lot of people here are pussies who take offense to moderate stances.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 07:55 PM
-15

it's not exclusive, it's just a focused society to address the specific issues of that group, similar to the National Association of Black Accountants. By 'isnt' exclusive', I mean membership is open to anyone. You're right, women arent minorities. Maybe in terms of the engineering field they are, but for everyone one of those there's a field where men are a minority too.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 05:53 PM
-15

Can you give me some specifics if you have them? I dont think there's wrong with a minority group having a society for themselves (so long as it isnt exclusive). There are other good clubs to join. The other stuff is pretty discriminatory but just wondering if you had any specifics off the top of your head. Edit: Yes they aren't an actual minority. I was talking about within the engineering department. And yes I acknowledge that there are tons of other majors where men are the minority and get n…
/r/MensRights02/06/16 04:10 PM
1

No one here thinks anything should be done based on feminist claims.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 04:05 PM
5

Weren't women still less happy than men, even with all the advantages they get?
/r/MensRights25/05/16 03:07 AM
19

This gave me a good laugh, but this has nothing to do with men's rights and just reinforces the anti-feminist hater angle people try to paint us with.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 06:43 PM
4

This looks like a shitty mock up made by some overactive anti-feminist/clinton person. Any source that this came from her campaign?
/r/MensRights12/05/16 01:41 AM
13

Excellent article. thanks for posting.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 12:06 AM
12

Meanwhile.... Police Arrest High School Student Who Exposed Himself in Yearbook Photo, Officials Say http://www.fox2detroit.com/news/136138406-story
/r/MensRights03/05/16 05:40 PM
4

Archiv when posting stuff like this...
/r/MensRights01/05/16 05:10 PM
32

a while ago a women penned an article about how office air conditioning is sexist. He's saying she looks similar to that author.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 07:09 PM
0

What a crazy and unsympathetic view. Each case should be judged as innocent until proven guilty, but sexual assault victim's claims should be viewed with suspicion is one of the worst things you can do. During a divorce assume it's false? How about you don't make any assumptions, listen, and look for evidence.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 11:57 PM
4

That's because of male power fantasy bro
/r/MensRights20/04/16 07:28 PM
-5

Source on the stats?
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:09 AM
2

and why is that?
/r/MensRights19/04/16 05:30 PM
1

yes, dont disagree with that.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 09:17 PM
0

Well then she seemed really restrained for a nutcase
/r/MensRights17/04/16 03:40 PM
0

Firstly if I had a one hour debate with an idiot, that would make two of us. Secondly, if he wanted to just see if this person was a feminist, it wouldn't take an hour to find that out. It sounds like he was looking for a debate and when she was giving him one and answering truthfully, he decided to get aggro, screenshot the conversation to post on here to circlejerk how ridiculous her views are. That doesn't sound too mature to me. It sounds like he got what he was after.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 08:57 PM
-11

Well don't you sound mature. Question and discuss? Nahh, just call her thoughts retarded and fuck outta there.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 03:09 PM
-1

Well then that ho needs to respect her client and call her by her intended gender.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 06:37 PM
4

Most of these comments are arguing hypocrisy but they haven't even read the article. This men's only shop denied service to a transgender man. This isn't a woman issue. If the it were a transgender woman would they have allowed service, since she is biologically male? I doubt it. But either way it doesn't matter because trans people deserve the same rights as anyone else.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 06:08 PM
1

You're arguing with semanticists who either dont want to acknowledge your point or shoehorn their own
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:39 PM
2

Don't bother. I was just making a point against claims like op.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 03:03 PM
9

I'd like to see some numbers of the gender disparity between rapists and serial killers. My understanding is that they are not equal.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 03:09 AM
1

More for trp than here
/r/MensRights12/04/16 11:56 PM
6

You're doing the right thing. Don't listen to be bitter person.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 07:38 PM
2

They had a week where they talked about men's and boy's issues. Not all of it was crap.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 11:49 PM
2

He was making a joke. Comedians don't believe everything they say for a laugh.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 11:48 PM
2

Do you have a source for their lobbying against?
/r/MensRights06/04/16 04:58 PM
2

Thanks for the numbers. Gives the right context.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 11:52 PM
-9

Yeah, but over that 1 period of time.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 08:59 PM
-9

I've read that the USWNT brought in more money than the men's NT, but were still paid much less than Men
/r/MensRights01/04/16 06:58 PM
1

I wish more explanation videos were like this. Her presentation is clear and fantastic.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 01:14 AM
2

Thanks, that was the clearest explanation i've heard (even if it is still a bit fuzzy). And im glad that other guy did most of the talking because Molyneux is quite annoying.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 05:14 PM
1

I agree. I do think there are some parallels between the take from the haves (guys) and give to the have nots (women), but debating socialism vs capitalism doesn't do anything to progress men's rights.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 03:55 PM
1

Ok thank you.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 05:18 PM
1

I heard the judges decision was based off of their poor testimony. As in, their post rape action wasn't necessary consider for the judge to find Jian not guilty.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 04:00 PM
2

Vice also had an outrage article. I heard his acquittal was more to due with witnesses mixing up their testimonies (lying) than it was with their behavior post alleged rape. Is this right?
/r/MensRights25/03/16 04:58 AM
7

I don't know how this isn't SOP. How do some people stay anonymous while others are named? What's the distinction?
/r/MensRights25/03/16 04:54 AM
1

I agree with your feelings, I'm just not sure it was discussion worthy. But you did use archive so it was responsibly posted. And I'm just sharing my opinion on this thread; it's your prerogative to post if you like.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 04:24 PM
2

So why is this being here? And it wouldn't be the sentiment at my dinner table.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:56 PM
16

I don't get the point of checking the bottom barrel and posting about how bottom barrel it is. Jezebel already attracts some of the most sexist readers and the comments section is only going to be the worst of the group.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:21 PM
2

Don't try to reason when someone is in mob mode.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 05:39 PM
7

No. Can you remind me
/r/MensRights18/03/16 04:34 PM
0

How would you guys respond to "obviously this girl felt scared and that's all that really mattered." we know it's not a valid justification, but how would you articulate that?
/r/MensRights13/03/16 05:30 PM
5

Just relax. You're jumping to worst case scenario when despite howthis sub makes it look, drunk hook ups happen all the time without issue.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 05:23 PM
1

completely unable to control yourself. Haha
/r/MensRights12/03/16 03:20 PM
-2

"people like you" are the reason why people don't respect MRAs and why people may be supportive but avoid the title. Your reaction is that of an angry feminist, but from the other side.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 03:40 AM
-1

My whole point is they fucked up but if I saw a 12 year in a porno I'd be quick to action. Not a lot of girls like lupe out there, even the young looking ones.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 08:00 PM
-8

16 or 17? Walk around a mall and see how many 12 year olds there are that look like her.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 07:51 PM
-15

If you saw an 11 year old doing a nude photo shoot and fucking a guy, would you say "now now, let's not jump to conclusions". No, you'd react like a normal human and be like wtf we have to put a stop to this. The fault lies with the justice system. Not with the guy and not with Lupe. They fucked up and should have investigated and verified she's of age. I'm just saying it's super easy to believe it's underaged porn and be moved to take swift action.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 07:39 PM
-10

This is certainly shitty and they should have done basic research to see she's legal, but a 19 yo Lupe does look like a preteen.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 06:45 PM
2

The worst thing about their transition is it's going to take getting used to calling them the Wachowski Sisters. Aside from that, more Cloud Atlas, less Jupiter Ascending.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 06:44 PM
2

That's a different issue than universal basic income.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 04:42 AM
2

My view is that it's not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 03:59 AM
8

This isn't sexism, it's just slightly degrading ra-ra girl power.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 06:33 PM
-11

What the hell are you talking about? Your analogies are as misguided as your foreign prejudices.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 07:29 PM
1

True, it is about how even false rape confessions can be false.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 09:42 PM
1

Because political correctness is skewed against real thinking. And also in the past people did question victims over things like their dress and used that to place fault on them. But i dont like how many on here engage in equal and opposite thinking, such as labeling a call to act, blaming bystanders.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 09:32 PM
-1

And that's what he's trying to change. He thinks if more people took some action, even just verbal action it could be effective in helping victims. If you disagree that's fine, but that's his message. Not putting any blame on bystanders.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 08:28 PM
0

no one is blaming bystanders. He is just saying, if we all spoke out or took some action if we see a sexual assault, it would help victims. Same thing if we see someone stealing or vandalizing or etc...
/r/MensRights29/02/16 08:19 PM
0

i guess CAPS AND EXCLAMATION is how you GROW UP!
/r/MensRights29/02/16 08:15 PM
-1

you ask the members of this board if they should intervene in a rape and the majority of responses will tell you not to get involved. And he didn't single out the inaction of men in particular.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 08:14 PM
0

Is that really what you got out of it? That he's blaming rape on bystanders? And people in here wonder why MRA's don't get taken seriously.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 04:36 PM
-2

Sorry, but if you were unable to film yourself being raped or have witnesses present, you don't get any support That seems pretty cruel. Sounds like he doesn't get how a rape works.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 05:25 PM
4

How is Kanye manufactured? No one could make him.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:49 PM
3

The one who's one if the biggest pop stars on the planet
/r/MensRights12/02/16 05:57 PM
7

Lawsuits like these arent cheap. I wonder who's affording them because these college students don't have those funds. Have they just convinced their parents to take up such a case because I dont see how they can afford such ludicrous legal action.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 11:21 PM
4

Why don't you have a beer and sit down for a minute.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 08:14 PM
4

He complaining about how private sector doctors are profiting off of a procedure they get paid to do..
/r/MensRights03/02/16 06:29 PM
7

maybe this should get an archiv.is to not give clicks to lunacy.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 05:41 PM
1

I think we have a lot of cause for outrage, but too many times it just feels like a circle jerk echo chamber with varying levels of sarcasm. A lot comments and some posts are just self serving.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 04:11 PM
3

They're all just sjw
/r/MensRights26/01/16 04:07 PM
1

it wasn't a feminist event.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 07:03 AM
1

Yeah feminists are smug because they assert themselves to a moral and social highground above men so no doubt they're gonna talk down to anything who doesnt understand the "obvious facts" that they do. I think having a video where they just pause on smug faces and echo chamber off each other about how contemptuous feminists look is just petty and pointless. The smug ass faces are the result of their smug ass self adulation, do they really need to analyze that?
/r/MensRights26/01/16 06:16 AM
0

I think a lot of people here are hyperbolic or just go into diatribes about everything they think us unfair and it circle jerks over everything else. But I expect to see a lot of negative comments to that thread and to this post which only confirms what they're saying. We mock them about feels over reals but then attack anything that isn't in line or tone with prevailing indignation. And I can already guess at least several of you want to reply with "shut up, pussy."
/r/MensRights26/01/16 01:09 AM
2

Thank you. Now i'll sit here patiently hoping someone has put this data in an easy to read/share graph image.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 09:36 PM
4

Is there an easy access source index for the Title information?
/r/MensRights25/01/16 07:41 PM
1

my thoughts exactly.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 09:58 PM
1

I think basic rights for women should be a priority.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 09:42 PM
1

This is a great post.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 07:59 AM
-2

That's unfortunate because that's the kind of ad hominen sensitivity I'd expect from feminists.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 03:01 PM
0

Why am I an ass, you seem to agree with me. And it would be morally wrong, not to mention a burden on am already congested justice system if a cleared rapist (who committed a rape) was able to counter sue an actual victim just because on this case justice wasn't served.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 05:42 AM
-5

I look at each case on it's own merit. And just because you file any case doesn't mean youre going to win.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 01:40 AM
-4

This is ludicrous. Rape isn't the easiest thing to prove, especially if you don't report it right after. And if you are of the mind, if you dont immediately report it then that's your own stupid fault, then I think you don't have any idea what your talking about. Just because you report a real rape doesn't mean you're going to get a conviction.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 01:31 AM
3

Every twox thread about someone complaining wage gap gets downvoted and all the comments are about how there is no wage gap.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 07:59 PM
3

I mean you kind of sound like them from the other side of the horseshoe, but yeah.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 10:20 PM
8

It's only disturbing and ridiculousg when you grossly mischaracterize conservatives.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 05:27 PM
-4

im not familiar with her case. The only thing im saying is that it was a patronizing and douchey thing to say.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 04:03 AM
-11

Because we're not hysterical little babies. But those instances dont dissuade from this guy being a bit of a douche when he called her baby. Plus we know most of the time there is no outrage, and news people just like to stir up controversy.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 01:15 AM
-1

agreed.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 10:12 PM
-11

Calling a reporter baby whens he's trying to interview him as part of her job you think is misreading the situation? The number of words have no bearing and i never called it an assault. Maybe you need to stop making assumptions. You dont know how old or experienced I am and you shouldnt suggest I see patronizing acts everywhere. I just stated my opinion and you're trying to debate me on fact.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 09:30 PM
-19

The don't blush baby comment was pretty scummy and patronizing.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 09:04 PM
4

r/mensrights is about discussing men's rights issues and men's rights activism, not taking easy shots at feminists. There are many other subreddits for that kind of circlejerking.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 06:14 PM
10

This image doesn't have anything to do with feminism or fat positive feminism. And secondly I'd like to remind people this isn't an anti-femenist subreddit, it's a men's rights subreddit. Feminism hurts men's rights but random posts mocking feminism are not helpful.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 04:22 PM
15

Why is this here? Are we just slapping "feminist" in front of stuff we don't like to post here? This isn't a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 03:55 PM
8

when the favoritism is out of a group of two, the non favored is by definition discriminated.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 08:53 PM
-3

I don't know how often you visit the sub, but at least 80% of the sub is reasonable.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 04:29 PM
2

The dailymail is tabloid trash. Just like the Mirror and Sun, it is an attention grabbing shit rag and not a legitimate news agency. This is what they do.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 06:18 AM
1

In the comments section? I doubt they check that. You can still send a letter to the editor without giving the page views. And page views ($) > a bunch of men who SJWs care about anyway complaining about a piece.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 08:14 PM
4

Then why are you not using archive.is?
/r/MensRights22/12/15 06:43 PM
-12

why are you trying to gain feminists' respect? What im saying is there's no reason to pointlessly circlejerk but based on your exuberant response it appears ive struck a nerve.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 08:16 AM
1

Another thank you to Rick Snyder!
/r/MensRights21/12/15 07:58 AM
-20

It's just circle jerking. And whether people lie about MRAs or not shouldn't inform our behavior.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 07:37 AM
-21

This is the top post and this is why people continue to have such negative views of MRAs.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 07:18 AM
1

Actually I asked you first
/r/MensRights21/12/15 12:44 AM
0

Are you asking because you dont see a difference?
/r/MensRights21/12/15 12:20 AM
2

A child knows it's wrong to steal. Do you mean to say a child stealing is the same as an adult stealing since they both have an understanding that it is wrong?
/r/MensRights20/12/15 11:19 PM
5

Because he's a teacher. A professional with a code of conduct and he has a certain level of authority over her. That in addition to the fact that she could be 15/16 and not as mature and level headed as an adult professional. it's not equal parts.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 10:38 PM
4

No its the comments section. The comments section...
/r/MensRights20/12/15 05:46 PM
2

i was being rhetorical towards op, not you. sorry it wasnt clear
/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:32 PM
13

How hard is this to get? We need a flash note before every link post.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:23 PM
12

good video, shit title
/r/MensRights16/12/15 12:32 AM
2

Why do we feel the need of post ridiculous comments people make. Comment sections are bottom barrel and don't add anything to this forum other than letting us circle jerk.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 08:20 PM
16

lol of course it's swedish
/r/MensRights11/12/15 10:51 PM
2

ok, didnt know.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:52 PM
5

Why would you archive a positive article? we would want publishers to see articles like this get hits
/r/MensRights11/12/15 07:32 PM
3

it's not even that much when you factor in all differences
/r/MensRights11/12/15 05:32 AM
1

What a shit post, you don't even include links. The who seems to be in a rabid fit is you. The majority of people on twox are very reasonable, more so than people on this sub I would say.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 04:24 PM
0

so what? it's not like they've printed more since the other 4 stories have been posted.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 10:31 PM
0

How many posts are we going to get on this one story?
/r/MensRights04/12/15 06:13 PM
20

She doesn't even consider herself a feminist, bro
/r/MensRights02/12/15 05:44 PM
1

I took it as "people here" on this subreddit, not in this thread.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 03:32 PM
1

You make a valid point. But I dont think he's generalizing men because of a couple comments in here. I've seen a lot of the most upvoted comments being overly cynical and extreme characterizations of women and I not only think it's unhelp, but also creates a sort of extreme-view echo chamber that I think is harmful. If you want proof, i'm not going to compile a statistical analysis of the top comments and how extreme they are, but this is something i've seen myself. Like you said, this thread is…
/r/MensRights28/11/15 04:03 AM
1

This sub is has a lot of members who have much more extreme views than "regular" people who care about men's issues. I've expressed similar questions when I read ridiculous top voted comments and calls for reason aren't too popular.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 02:19 AM
1

excellent interview. Thanks for posting
/r/MensRights20/11/15 10:13 PM
28

It's stories like these that hit a nerve unlike most others for me. If I were a parent I'd raise hell like no other over the personal discrimination and emotional/social harm she's doing to these boys.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:29 PM
1

There are tiny minorities in every field and industry that have the power to fuck you over. Isolating yourself from them because of this blown up fear is an overblown reaction. You might as well avoid driving because there is a minority of reckless drivers who could kill you on the road or a minority of officers who can unlawfully stop and charge you. I'm all for calling out administrators over ridiculous charges like this but hyperbolic responses such as isolating yourself from half the populat…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 09:56 PM
1

Telling your son to ignore and avoid half the population because there are moronic school administrators out there (who are a tiny minority whether you believe it or not) is a hyperbolic reaction. And will probably mess them up more than the chance they'll experience the kind of administrative bullshit you posted.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 04:57 PM
-6

Do y'all just love hyperbolic comments or do you guys actually believe this stuff?
/r/MensRights13/11/15 04:16 AM
3

I wonder how much of it is violence by women is ok vs men aren't allowed to defend themselves. I assume most people dont take it seriously because they assume a man can easily fight off a woman. This is usually true enough, except that men are not allowed to retaliate. Not even in self defense.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:20 PM
-4

He is being extreme using this one case as a case for why you NEVER marry someone who wants to stay at home. She seems selfish and shitty. I wouldn't extrapolate that to all women.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 11:13 PM
1

Yeah his wife sounds pretty shitty. Im sure there are breadwinner women with deadbeat husbands in the similar situations. Likewise, there are tons of examples of one income households with a stay at home parent that work out great. Stop being so extreme.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:28 PM
10

Will you stop linking articles that give page views to these shitty outlets? We all already know how shitty these articles are. Either copy the text or make it an archiv link.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 07:56 PM
1

This is my bad experience. HR will NEVER help nor protect you.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:35 PM
2

I knew it was Kate Brooks before I even clicked. They really needed a couch for her to faint on.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 03:14 AM
2

Well I had it on in the background as I was mindlessly browsing something else (it's over 10 minutes give me a break). Maybe something like a tl:dr wrap up line after you make a point (or even before) so I can absorb it without worrying about drifting in and out.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 08:41 PM
2

Good video. Easy to listen to and follow. Tbh im not sure how much of your good points stuck with me 5 minutes after the video, but I enjoyed it while I listened.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 08:23 PM
5

I think you're asking a biased group here, buddy.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 02:10 AM
3

i know him from his stand up career. I havent watched TDS in years because of Stewart skewing way left. But with Noah in charge (thank you Jessica W for turning down the job), i think i'll watch again
/r/MensRights15/10/15 01:27 AM
-2

you're talking to MR zealots
/r/MensRights14/10/15 04:44 PM
6

That is probably true, but just speaking from my personal experience, that subreddit dominates my notion of the red pill movement (or whatever it is). When I google the red pill and men, the top two hits are r/theredpill and another site who's focus is in large part anti-women.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 02:21 AM
4

It's like we're getting pre-emptively maligned. Anyone searching the red pill out of curiosity or interest is probably going to be instantly turned off.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 12:07 AM
-4

ok but i still think it's best not to assume.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 10:41 PM
13

Anyone else have a problem with the title? I'm not a red piller and don't want the MRM conflated with the red pill movement, which I think is less focused on men's rights and issues and more extreme in ideology.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 09:40 PM
-5

you're assuming nuances arent being given due consideration. Unless you've read whatever bill is in question, you can't say that. It could be a decent law. It could be a crappy law. Using emotion to rouse public attention to a matter that has otherwise been ignored is not automatically a bad idea.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 09:32 PM
3

They use it to gain attention. Many necessary changes to the law don't get noticed because of general public apathy. Just because they're trying to give the proposition more attention doesn't discredit the law change itself.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 09:17 PM
-1

I dont know how they veer off into social work but yes I do think they need to keep to their duties. If they want those expanded, they don't get to choose who it gets expanded to. And no problem, thank you. Happy to discourse with someone who doesn't just get emotional and downvote (too many of those experiences here).
/r/MensRights08/10/15 11:06 PM
-2

I don't think the police have an obligation to worry and check on the mental health of those they investigate. It is outside of their primary responsibilities and would be a wasteful use of police resources. That said, I dont know when they dropped the investigation, when they informed the accuser, and when the suicide took place. Should both the accuser and accused be informed? of course. But I dont know the details of the case to say whether this it was bureaucratic delay or willful apathy.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 10:35 PM
-3

You're right but you're not going to get anywhere on here with your fact of the matter talk. It really does feel like you can to follow language convention or else you get downvoted on this sub.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 08:54 PM
3

His being there would violate their safe space policy I think.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:52 AM
8

But radical homophobes are tolerated. You know, so long as they're leftist accepted religions. http://mancunion.com/2013/02/18/homosexuals-would-be-killed-in-ideal-world-says-speaker-at-society-event/
/r/MensRights08/10/15 01:36 AM
1

and it was for 'manspreading'?
/r/MensRights06/10/15 12:31 AM
10

The entitlement is through the roof.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 06:52 PM
1

it's common.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 06:52 PM
2

Aren't they not allowed because of titles IX provisions?
/r/MensRights05/10/15 03:37 PM
2

I like helping people out and would happily assist a colleague, but I would not act on it out of fear of exposing myself to accusations.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 11:34 PM
0

I think she got bamboozled. Growing up in Europe and being in a very left wing environment (she even went to Brown) I just think she was ignorant of any of the criticisms of feminism and these movements. This backlash was just a matter of time.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 02:09 AM
-1

attitudes like these disappoint me. We hate radical feminists but then we disparage the ones who want genuinely equal rights as evil manipulators.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 02:01 AM
2

“The more I’ve spoken about feminism, the more I have realised that fighting for women’s rights has too often become synonymous with man-hating. If there is one thing I know for certain, it is that this has to stop,” she said in the speech. If there has to be a global feminism ambassador, im glad it's her over the countless other true misandrists.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 05:59 PM
1

That rabbit hole doesn't look like it leads to a happy existence. And as much as I like the Matrix references, this isn't the matrix. Women are wonderful. Men are wonderful. Women and men can also be assholes. But that's not a reason for me to swear off them for self preservation. that's not how I want to live my life.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 11:38 PM
1

Well yeah, many many women are great.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 10:23 PM
5

It's like that kid who was being charged as an adult for having juvenile nudes (of himself) on his phone.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 05:44 PM
1

Lol can't tell if you're trolling me
/r/MensRights25/09/15 03:56 PM
-5

Please. The the majority of this group is rarely receptive to counter moderating voices while the brash aggressive outbursts get more than enough impulse love. There's nothing derisory about making my opinion known that this subred loves to echo our own group think. I don't think it's helpful and it's certainly not going to win us any common support.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 10:24 PM
1

Children are raped and women are property who can't even get basic access to things like education/etc... I guess if your rights are taken away, you are able to do less so you have less responsibilities. But if you want to make that a negating argument, especially when they're not the ones advocating for less responsibility then be my guest.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:27 PM
1

Great job and leading me in conclusions I haven't made. "Afghanistan is committed to [the] protection and safeguarding of the rights of all its citizens, especially children and women" All im saying is women and children suffer more, so while the state is for safeguarding all of it's citizens, considering women and children have less rights and suffer more, they especially want to protect them. Doesn't seem like an issue to me, unless we want to turn into hyper sensitive whiners a la the feminis…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 07:56 PM
-9

I think we're all aware here. This is kind of echo chamber stuff for us to beat off to.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 07:06 PM
1

Who's responsible for that? It's not the women in Afghanistan
/r/MensRights24/09/15 06:17 PM
0

And why is that.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:43 PM
0

Women and children have much fewer rights than men in Afghanistan.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 03:49 PM
0

Yep
/r/MensRights24/09/15 03:07 PM
-1

To be fair, the lives of children and women are in a worse state than men's in Afghanistan
/r/MensRights24/09/15 02:58 PM
1

i like how you still get downvoted for this clear point.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:54 AM
13

If its propaganda can we get an archive link?
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:50 AM
1

chutzpah?
/r/MensRights13/09/15 05:24 PM
5

He's very anti porn
/r/MensRights13/09/15 03:27 AM
5

Tell that to terry crewes
/r/MensRights13/09/15 01:38 AM
1

In the later years Stewart was the same, he just had more art to not be as heavy handed as Wilmore
/r/MensRights10/09/15 08:15 PM
1

I think TRP are kind of the conspiracy asshole side of the MR spectrum, if you will. They seem to stick to their little bubble so closely that any any other opinions are seen as "blind" or "sheeped" or w/e. I don't see MGTOW as douchy as TRP, but they seem very jaded and have kind of taken a black and white view of dating and marriage and all that. like they're limiting themselves because it's safer and I think that's sad.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 07:39 PM
0

How the fuck is this the top post. Do you guys stop to listen to what you're saying. Posts like these make us sound like paranoid wackjobs. Regarding OP, women arent a monolith under feminism, despite the selection bias of this sub. Even if they still associate feminism with the good kind from back in the day, they aren't the ones trying to hegemonize the country. Even r/twox consistently shuts down typical feminists myths that get posted.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 07:37 PM
20

Who the hell agrees with these loony ideas? Brash posts like this only serve to make us seem out of touch and give us a bad name.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 10:39 PM
5

yeah, their libel and extremism is tolerated.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 07:32 PM
6

Sounds like it's tolerated just fine, at least until they interrupted the BLM route.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:50 PM
2

This doesn't show anything.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 02:37 PM
-11

really? men winning the murder stat is "recking"?
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:24 AM
4

It's a race to the bottom in terms of oversensitivity and vulernability. Resiliency has turned from a mark of strong character to something to be shunned and is victimizing.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 05:34 PM
1

The Guardian isn't a tabloid though. It's shit, but not a shitrag like dailymail or mirror or any of those. But it's probably worse because it's not like those.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:24 PM
4

"Destruction" is always buz-- newsworthy.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 04:59 PM
1

If you think you need the UN to help you, I've got some bad news
/r/MensRights15/08/15 03:27 PM
7

That was the most matter of fact story I've heard about a death because of willful ignorance, or maybe criminal incompetence. I'm surprised I didn't hear outrage from the wife. Absolutely sad and infuriating story.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 06:21 AM
0

But is she watching you or is she getting something out of the closet and leaving? She probably hears you peeing, but I don't get the humiliation part. I'm not doubting it, I'm just trying to understand where it is from.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 11:20 PM
-3

I'm curious, why would you find it humiliating? Especially if they are just there to get something out of the closet?
/r/MensRights11/08/15 07:24 PM
4

I had the same initial reaction, but I think this sub has made me super sensitive. I know before I would've taken the approach of, if he didn't want an altercation, he shouldn't have physically accosted someone. She had has to right to defend herself against such subjection.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 07:22 PM
1

Agreed. Feminism is a nasty outlet of progressivism but it's still part of a larger movement and ideology.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 12:57 AM
1

Good point, I stand corrected.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 03:59 PM
0

I don't know how bottom barrel the site posting this is, but any public image site posting similar of T swift would get the wrath of the lefty mob.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 03:30 PM
2

It wasn't published by online by gossip columns. It was shunned to user generated content sites.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 03:12 PM
1

You have all the evidence supporting your claim from world records to...everything else. If she doesn't think men are athletically superior, put it on her to show how that's not true. The ONLY athletic endeavor i've heard where women can match or beat men is in ultra distance marathon running, and even then I heard that might not be the case.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 01:20 AM
2

Thank you but you didn't say anything to apologize over.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 05:02 PM
4

:\ that's my take on iainmf's take
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:50 PM
14

We can do it! You do it for us!
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:37 PM
2

Well you're in the minority.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 03:05 PM
0

I dont understand what you're saying with Benghazi? That it's a nonissue we should stop looking into because it's already old? The death of US diplomats should just be moved on from?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 03:26 AM
0

Guys prefer modest girls over a girl who's gotten around when it comes to serious relationships. The value is in herself, not her status. Girls dont really get turned off by guys who get around a lot since many are about getting the most alpha status guy they can.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 03:19 AM
7

I cant tell if youre joking or not
/r/MensRights26/07/15 06:35 PM
1

I was mainly referring to the treatment of women as the number one human rights abuse because "men don't give a damn".
/r/MensRights24/07/15 10:22 PM
1

eww. and i like funny old brawds
/r/MensRights23/07/15 05:34 AM
5

I see the picture, but it cant be because they suck at parking..
/r/MensRights14/07/15 07:48 PM
0

She's a great speaker.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:43 AM
3

thanks!
/r/MensRights13/07/15 09:18 PM
3

can I get an archiving instructional?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:49 PM
3

Ah ha, but I was making a lack of agency joke
/r/MensRights11/07/15 04:51 PM
3

But how..... How were you able to say no and reject someone's advances???
/r/MensRights11/07/15 02:29 PM
1

Well I agree that both parties should have rights if both have responsibilities. But I also agree that you should look out for yourself, man or woman. The rights come into play in the event of mishaps (broken condom, bad pill, etc)
/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:24 PM
2

Aside from the fact that protection doesn't have much to do with reproductive rights, she does have a point. The party that doesn't want to have the kid should ensure they take measures.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:15 PM
2

yeah i think you are right. sounds like she got riled up pretty good.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 10:47 PM
1

The article is unfortunately light on detail, but it was surprising to see a Judge stand so strongly with a father's rights against what is allegedly a manipulating mother against the father. And just to clarify, they're going to Juvenile Detention, not Juventus.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 04:54 PM
-6

How popular is this guy because his act and delivery is horrible. Good to hear people talking about the seldom discussed issues
/r/MensRights27/06/15 04:25 AM
2

They're literally giving any self appointed liberal "thinker" a platform for their flapping gums.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 02:32 AM
13

CNN is just as shitty, but people on the left don't see that because it is in line with their views. Plus liberal kids (and kids at heart) hating on Fox news has become a meme. 95% of the Fox they see is on a dailyshow bit clip. Watch O'Reilly or the kelly factor and see how much you actually disagree with.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 04:28 PM
15

This kind of hyperbolized 'ideology before content' is just as bad a people judging MRAs because they're read a few red pill articles.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 02:46 PM
1

? Do you associate national news on CNN with political ideology? She was reporting a story. It wasn't an ideological opinion piece.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 03:37 AM
8

She was talking about the Amherst John Doe student who was unjustly expelled. Just before this clip she read out a series of text messages from the accuser which all but proves that not only was there no misconduct by John Doe, the accuser basically incriminates herself by admitted that John was throw up drunk when she slept with him.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 04:10 AM
-1

Can anyone articulate without jumping to conclusions why this rubs us the wrong way
/r/MensRights16/06/15 04:25 PM
5

How is this the top comment?
/r/MensRights14/06/15 10:11 PM
1

im just going based on what I read. And nothing I read made me think, "oh crap, these right wing feminists are even worse!" If anything, conservative social politics is much more about personal responsibility and being proactive, not blaming another party like many on the left (especially liberal feminists) like to do.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:57 PM
0

I didn't read anything I really disagreed with. Or thought was harmful. It seemed to me like you're a liberal (probably fairly left) who has a big problem with right wing politics and republicans. Therefore by merit of her affiliation, you used your (potential) bias to exacerbate both affiliations.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:43 PM
0

Sounds like youre just combining two charged labels you dont like to exacerbate one another.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:26 PM
0

Question, what do you think MR would be more in favor of on the scale. Men getting acknowledged for who they are like women do or women having to do things in order to earn their acknowledgement? One of the reasons that I really like being a guy is that we have the expectation to do things. Like we are the "accomplishers" of the world as self-gratifying as that may sound. Plus i'll be honest, i've never really felt neglected as a person. I just figured that i'm just another person like any other…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 06:40 PM
1

Ignore em. fuck em. just like I know feminists who are more egalitarian than the usual bunch, there are MRAs who are more militant than the usual bunch. you'll find people willing to engage.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:12 PM
2

your intention isnt that important. people will take it as they will. Like i said, i think too many people on here are naturally inclined to be defensive when a woman posts something like this.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:04 PM
3

I think you're talking about MGTOWs or Red Pill guys. I dont like the red pillers and I dont agree with the mgtow's so you're probably seeing the most hostile side of the MRA group. I think a lot of people here need to chill the fuck out and stop being so confrontational with their strict Us vs Them mindset.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:54 PM
1

Consent education is important, I just dont want it being taught by feminists or according to feminist ideology. The public perception thing is often anecdotal and hard to judge. Anecdotally speaking, I dont know anyone who excuses guys having sex with a passed out girl. Our stance comes more from the perspective of personal responsibility and not being labeled as a victim blaming misogymist for pointing out that while women dont get a responsibility not to be raped, they should have some respon…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:17 PM
5

kerb???? Well she certainly is correct that if she isn't wearing a new dress, new shoes, has a fresh mani/pedi, waxed, or paid for a blow-dry(??), then she might as well not even bother!
/r/MensRights13/04/15 05:11 AM
4

Thought you guy's might find this funny. There's another one too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eirBtt7wIDU
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:47 PM
2

Not too that relevant for me since my candidates tend to be the least anti-male (least feminist) out of the party leaders, but I do consider it.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 01:35 PM
2

Thanks. Clean and concise.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 04:46 PM
3

it's not news, its the dailymail, mate.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 06:05 PM
-29

You can't compare internet rhetoric to an actual monster like Hitler. I know this is tagged as satire but this isn't satire. Godwin's law strikes again.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 05:23 AM
2

Come with pragmatism, get dusted by the comments. That said I didnt like your negative portrayal of republicans. If anyone were to care about injustice against a non protected class, it's a staunch principled republican.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 07:26 PM
4

I dont think he's being Chivalrous. I think his main reason for not pressing charges is because it doesn't help him. Punishing her won't help his situation and he'll have to go through the added rigor of attending court. So the only reason to do it is to punish her or for some sense of justice. I dont think there is a justice equivalent that he could get. Sending her to prison or whatever wont make him feel better since it won't improve his situation. So I think he sees it as, considering he has…
/r/MensRights21/03/15 10:40 PM
0

I think i'll listen to family friends who also got out right before the fall. Life under communism was bad and they're very happy they got out.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 10:43 PM
0

Dude, you are like one of the angriest people I know. Ask any russian who was able to leave russia was like was like under communism; it was awful. And I didn't read your article but if a lot of russians miss the USSR, it's because they miss being a superpower, not life under communism, which is basically life under a totalitarian state (not super unlike Putin's russia). Russians by nature are pride and nationalistic. To a fault I would say. So yes, I do know what it was like living under commun…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 09:39 PM
0

You just forgot the /s, right?
/r/MensRights18/03/15 08:34 PM
1

Should that include making ear piercing illegal for children?
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:19 PM
2

Best response on the topic i've heard. thanks.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:33 AM
-4

I guess I am taking this to a side discussion, but what im getting at is asking if its appropriate? Mutilation is a pretty horrendous term with hugely negative connotations. I understand many MRAs feel very strongly about circumcision but I question whether their decries of mutilation is appropriate, since the description is against the act and not the lack of consent. I get the issue for MRAs is the lack of consent and not so much the act itself but the characterization of it comes off as inten…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:24 AM
4

but do you think it's appropriate to still call it mutilation? Does consent change the description?
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:15 AM
4

Don't you guys consider the act of circumcision mutilation? So even if a person consents to circumcision he is still mutilated?
/r/MensRights18/03/15 01:13 AM
3

Wow what a piece of shit ad. Not only are men are the only sexual assault perpetrators, but apparently it's up to us to forgo out complicity and put a stop to it.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 11:10 PM
1

Why are you arguing against already downvoted comments?
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:42 AM
4

They're working on it!
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:02 AM
18

more people should know about cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 08:17 PM
1

Does she say this stuff in tweets? I never catch inflammatory remarks like these that I know some nutso feminists make.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 11:57 PM
2

Meryl is the truth but yeah it's so cringe worthy. It looked like a '08 Obama rally at the University of Michigan.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 04:15 AM
-7

Do you see any conservative feminists? This all lines up with liberal ideology.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 03:17 AM
18

I just caught the tale end so I didn't hear the meat of her speech but it sounded like some grade A liberal bullshit and judging by the uproarious applause (lol @ ethan hawke) I was wondering what she said. Thanks for the fill in.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 03:09 AM
-1

One could argue anything. The title called them feminists and was likely why this was posted. I dont think this is a men's rights issue. It's a legal rights / freedom of the press issue.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 03:33 PM
0

This is terrible but what makes them feminists?
/r/MensRights13/02/15 05:49 AM
3

I agree. Thats why i dont think it's a big deal. I think most objectification is natural and generally harmless. but who am I to downplay the epidemic of eye rape.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 08:49 PM
4

I think it's a problem. Maybe not a problem, but it's basically objectification. Now, I dont actually think objectification is that big of an issue depending on what it is, but the double standard is moronic.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 06:11 PM
1

Yeah i gotchu. I'd just rather focus on the standard being wussy and placative than hypocritical.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 08:54 PM
113

You are supposed to take it because your personal feelings shouldnt give rise to policy that infringes on others. I dont want to see men getting the pussy power women get. I don't want to see any pussy powers at all.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:43 AM
1

I don't know about Taylor Swift...And for Carrie to not consider herself a feminist and write the song, Before He Cheats??
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:13 PM
0

There's no evidence the gun was fake either. If you want to believe this cop rolled up and just shot, then you can. Almost every single police scenario like this the cops that i have seen, the cops are screaming at you to put your hands up or get on the ground or something. I don't believe cops want to shoot people. If you do, I definitely don't believe cops want to shoot kids. The kid still went for his shirt, where his gun allegedly was. If you wanted the cop to wait until the kid grabbed the …
/r/MensRights04/02/15 12:44 AM
0

Ok. That was damn quick. But I could also see what looked like Tamir lifting up his shirt, implying he was going for his fake gun, instead of complying with the officer. The shots came after he disobeyed the order and instead went for the toy weapon or was in the process if going for it.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 12:05 AM
0

Did you see the gun. It looks real. probably fake isn't good enough when it comes to lethal weapons. I bet the kid didnt understand the gravity of the situation. He did not comply with the officer's request, and allegedly reached for the gun. You don't disobey a direct order and then reach for a weapon. The implication in that is real active danger and the officer couldn't and shouldn't put his own life at risk because of chance the gun might be fake. This isn't an officer showing up and shootin…
/r/MensRights03/02/15 09:16 PM
0

nah dog. He spray painted an airsoft gun and that is no joke. That is a potential life and death situation. It's horribly tragic but this isn't about men's rights.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 09:04 PM
5

Dove also had a good commerical for men too. I mean this superbowl had at least 3 pro male/dad messages I can think of.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:38 PM
1

to be fair, this is the mirror. they can't not write pure shit.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 03:49 PM
2

I don't believe in trying to encourage a certain group of people into a certain profession. I do think it's important to remove barriers to allow people to pursue whatever it is they wish. the unsafe male thing is a big issue but thats largely a cultural thing that needs to shift. I'd like to see some policy changes to protect men to these unjust perceptions; starting with actual due process and a real innocent until proven guilty model. This includes keeping names private.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 06:01 PM
9

Good on him.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 06:31 PM
2

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11266430/Nurse-faked-having-baby-by-borrowing-friends-child.html better article (obviously)
/r/MensRights02/12/14 01:43 AM
1

I got your point. The article is about her commentary. You're comment switched the subject from her comments to her irrelevancy. How relevant she is or isn't has no bearing on the content of her message.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:49 AM
-2

but thats not what this post is about.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 01:34 AM
-1

Are you criticizing her relevancy with a totally irrelevant question?
/r/MensRights20/11/14 12:41 AM
1

It just would make it a fairytale ending lol. You can pick him up and carrying him into bed. I agree with you about the libertarian stuff. I can appreciate their principles but they are a bit too ideological for my taste. And I never said anything about dating.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 11:14 PM
1

You're standing up for injustice, especially when the ramifications for Mike to retaliate are so high is really commendable. I hope you two hooked up after.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 07:10 PM
-17

I dont think a good morning or w/e is harassment. But more aggressive comments or trying to get her to stop so you can try and land her might be easy to brush to every now and then, but if it happens all the time i can empathize with how annoying and bothersome it can be. I think it also depends on the person, and if I were a girl most of those guys would make me feel comfortable. They're not the kind of guys I would associate as being innocently interested and harmless. Just because it's not ho…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 03:38 AM
-19

If you think the decision to engage her was not sexually motivated, thats fine. But I think when they see her strut by, get some bugs bunny eyes and say Good Morning or Hello Beautiful, then yeah it's sexually motivated. Acknowledging this doesn't put you on the side of the outraged feminists.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 03:28 AM
-24

They're not saying good morning to be friendly. Those weren't midwestern "good morning's". Do you think those men we're just saying good morning just to be polite? because i'm pretty sure if she wasn't thick in tight clothes they wouldn't have bothered. Hearing good morning because people you look isn't such a terrible thing, but when it's coupled around a bunch of "damn babys" and the like, they don't stay cute.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 03:18 AM
-30

They're trying to draw attention to the issue and bring about as a discussion in an effort show that this type of behavior is unacceptable in their eyes and how hard it is for women.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 02:57 AM
1

The NYC girl was curvaceous, "thick". Her tight jeans and shirt fitted to accentuate those features. the Aussie girl was cute, but just looked like another skinny girl with a pretty face. That's how I saw her at least. Some guys like more body on a girl than others; so long as it's proportioned and in the right places.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:23 PM
2

These girls are totally different though. Shoshana is a curvy girl wearing tight jeans and a crew neck T. This model is a skinny girl dressed very averagely, albeit in short shorts. If AUS wants to replicate the experiment, they should get a "badder bitch".
/r/MensRights05/11/14 12:49 AM
3

That first paragraph alone was beautiful.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 04:43 AM
3

Don't listen to all these table top footsoldiers. You just came to share, not for political strategy.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 10:14 PM
1

Jeez what is that?
/r/MensRights10/10/14 03:13 AM
2

when my hair gets super long, I tie it back and keep it neat. no problem for me.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 04:26 AM
3

Dude, it's a guy. Hilarious if not, but it's a guy.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 04:14 PM
1

you're phrasing makes sense. Too many people on here are just overly cynical paranoids.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:27 PM
1

amazing youre getting downvoted.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 05:55 AM
-6

This is some of the most paranoid cynical advice i've heard. Just watch out for crazy bitches.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 11:44 PM
2

MRAs are to feminists what Jews are to anti-semites.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 11:06 PM
2

Can she be charged with something?
/r/MensRights17/08/14 05:19 PM
2

they've been talking about men and a lot of the things they go through. Issues and topics as taken from the male perspective and their take on it. one of the segments I remember was about "what it takes to be a man". They had a former NFL lineman talk about growing up and how he was treated and the expections of him from people, from his coaches, etc... stuff like that.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 11:25 PM
3

They've been doing a whole summer exploring exploring men.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 02:51 PM
1

if it's not haughty i appreciate the correction :)
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:05 PM
1

Man i feel like i an idiot. I knew something felt off about that. At least I didnt go all the way with it and write Queue. Thanks.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 03:09 AM
1

i'm sorry to that you had to go through this bad experience. I'm not that up on the laws so i was wondering, how did they keep you in jail for two nights? And then how did you get out? bail?
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:55 AM
-5

90% of deaths are hamas fighters. See, i can do that too.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:20 AM
1

It's largely because women usually arent hamas fighters. Easy to rule them out vs some middle aged guy.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 11:35 AM
4

Yeah they're actually bringing a lot of our concerns to the forefront and giving them time.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 12:44 AM
2

I mean a crying woman is sad no doubt but as long as you're willing to help both people then to each their own.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 03:04 AM
1

sorry, then it can be addressed. and i dont think theres a book on what young teen boys are thinking about. But we already know the answer: Boobs.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:58 AM
-1

then it can be dealt with but its not going to do him any good worrying about something that isn't very likely to happen. Contrary to whats portrayed in this sub, the vast majority of circumcised men have no problem with it. and that isn't an argument for or against.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 11:54 PM
-3

If it makes you feel better, I doubt your son will have any problem with it. Most of my friends (including myself) are circumcised and I dont know anyone who has a problem with it. You're son will be just fine and grow up enjoying sex as much as anyone.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:35 AM
6

Just keep in mind that this is a bit on a late night show and is meant to be funny.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:11 AM
-33

You want people to crowdfund civil suits? We're not a lynch mob..
/r/MensRights11/06/14 11:53 PM
6

Yahoo answers? Jesus, guys. Come on.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:41 AM
2

Damn, that's some good wisdom, WP. I've realized for a while now just how amazing of a job my parents have done and it kind of scares me as I have a lot of adversities i have not overcome to be able to provide that level of father figure that my dad was to me. Now i know i dont need to become my dad or compare myself to him, but i'd like to give my son/daughter the same quality that my parents have given me. Sometimes tricky finding that balance between wanting to be for them the figure they des…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:12 PM
1

I also think kids are wise beyond recognition in their intuition in regard to others. Thats some really good advice. I'm pretty good with younger kids because its easy to be silly and joyous and free with them but with older kids there does seem to be a level of maturity and mentorship they need and that sometimes causes you to take a real look at yourself. How great it's going to be for your kids when you become a dad :)
/r/MensRights01/06/14 07:07 PM
1

Congrats man! What do you think you do that really sets you apart and lets you connect with the kids so well?
/r/MensRights01/06/14 05:05 PM
2

I think people should be able to advocate on behalf of their group. I think the main thing is to change their paradigm so they dont always look at things from the perspective of victimization.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 04:37 AM
2

It must be pretty shitty wanting to be part of a movement to advocate on behalf of your gender but instead get lumped in with people promulgating hypocracy, double standards, and overall injustice. Almost seems like its too far gone to take back. Maybe start your own tea party split off.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 11:12 PM
3

most young american women are white though.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:24 PM
1

that's pretty long. i'd move away if she didnt leave and then i'd tell her to fuck off if need be. But you seem like a nice chap.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 01:15 AM
2

How long was she going at you? I'd feel the need to tell her to fuck off after you've explained, which you had no reason to in the first place.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 11:31 PM
1

Alien! You're an Alien!! Cmon kids lets get away from this Alien! No difference. You don't have to let someone like this have so much power over how you feel. Good job on doing your job.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 11:08 PM
1

wut?
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:10 PM
7

We really have to spot posting links complaining about comments. Internet comments are the bottom rung of society. We dont need to point out how shit they are.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 03:58 AM
1

Sorry man but the Dailymail is shit and no self respecting Brit trusts it.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 03:47 AM
10

Ha! they cant suspect all of us!
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:16 AM
2

in france its not about who the father is, its about the family. Whether you want to be in that family or not.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 11:26 PM
3

Never been raped? So Privileged!
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:25 PM
-1

he wasnt doing that.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 08:06 PM
10

I havent seen the subred full of that word. but we're also not calling women cunts because they're women. We usually use that kind of language to describe a woman to hires a hitman to kill her husband and then lies about abused to get out of it (true case). Women like her are categorically cunts.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 03:24 PM
1

why the hell are you people downvoting him for coming with real questions?
/r/MensRights08/04/14 03:13 PM
6

Do we need posts bout dumb online comments?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 09:23 PM
2

Video please...for..evidence.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 03:40 AM
6

and risk assault and attempted rape? And good lord English girls look so bad when they're trying to be attractive in a "cool american" type of way.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 03:27 AM
9

His response was in poor judgment at best, but if his tone was belittling/demeaning as well, then i'm glad you made your opinion known.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 07:07 PM
1

But it's not. and thats a big problem. Not to mention the age of the girls and the trauma of the experience. Plus all procedures have risk of complications. The risks associated with circumcision when done by a professional is very low.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 05:32 PM
6

Murder turns to manslaughter awfully easily here.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:27 PM
-1

Because despite the demonization you'll hear on this subred, circumcision is not a brutal and dangerous procedure like FGM is.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:50 AM
1

You gotta be fucking kidding me. Im guessing this isn't a typical corporate office?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 11:50 PM
6

Family court system+enforcement, false accusations and prudence to protect the legally innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 01:22 AM
100

"genuine remorse." I forgot what a great legal defense this is.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 04:48 AM
0

These people arent looking for discussion. They're made up their minds. There is no "debate" on the issue for most members here.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 01:07 AM
-2

you're wasting your time in this sub
/r/MensRights07/01/14 01:04 AM
-1

I dont know how old your son is but has he indicated any ill feelings about being circumcised?
/r/MensRights06/01/14 01:45 PM
1

I'm just curious where you live? I peruse this sub but I've never, not even once encountered these types of people in my life.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 11:47 PM
1

Well ive never been married or in a serious relationship so I dont know how much use I would be but the other relationship advice subreddit someone suggested might be better. What I am pretty sure of is working on controlling your anger is only going to benefit you. When she is hurtful towards you, I imagine its very painful to hear, but getting angry isn't going to convince her to change. It likely reinforces her actions in some weird way. Maybe she sees it as her being able to control your fee…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 01:16 AM
1

Yeah this might not be the best place for advice on reconciling the relationship as many members do not believe in marriage and think its a scam. I find this view very empty and pessimistic, personally.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 01:04 AM
2

Im sorry to hear that. I can only generalize as I dont have all the details but how do you think she feels about you. Do you think she still loves you or cares if she were to split? I mean, when she's going off on you, how do you respond? How does she respond to your response telling her how you feel? Also, how old is she if you dont mind me asking?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:54 AM
3

I would seek counselling. She's obviously getting some need met and is taking it out on you in a horrible way. It's just making the both of you miserable. If she won't listen to how her shaming is making you feel, maybe a change of setting like a counselor's office could help. Are you guys religious? How is the communication between you two?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:32 AM
-7

well you can fuck right off.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 01:44 AM
3

The majority believe it is exceedingly rare and not an issue. And they defend false accusers unequivocally and pass the blame.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 12:48 AM
2

stop changing the subject to a matter of semantics. The point is feminists dont give a shit about false rape accusers and defend them as victims at every chance. read idiomatically, "the large majority of the time".
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:46 PM
11

Why are people using google searches as any sort of real metric criteria? But at least the UN is staying consistent in their worthlessness and that it isn't limited to international relations.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 05:22 PM
1

Im just saying its a crappy title. I'm avoiding the topic as much as he's trying to make a false argument against the quote.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 02:27 AM
0

These aren't women. These are bratty insecure teenagers.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 12:25 AM
3

Interesting analogy lol. Both have their megaphone cries.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 02:29 AM
1

Anyone can be sued for anything. But no you cant sue for shitty journalism, unless there is clear intent to harm to defame, i'm guessing.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 11:07 PM
53

This reporting makes me sick. Absolutely repressive slander.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 06:13 PM
0

The dude is a bitch. The headline is pure shit.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 02:23 AM
1

No that's what you logic obsessed atheists dont understand (im going to assume you're an atheist. You can't quantify everything and just it from an entirely logical approach, you're not a robot. Consider deciding whether to buy a dog or not. The cons overwhelmingly outweight the pros. but the fact is the joy a dog brings is better than that 20 item list of cons.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 02:00 AM
1

I never called you bitter and jaded. but the guy who i replied to is exactly that. You can feel it in his post.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 01:46 AM
0

i'm not trying to shame him. I just think he's sounding extremely bitter and jaded.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 12:34 PM
-10

No it's not.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 03:17 AM
-5

You're not smarter if you don't want to get married, you're just bitter and jaded. It's not something you make a pro/cons table for a rationalize.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 11:41 PM
-10

Rape is usually more traumatic than a beating. Would you rather get a beating or get raped? The answer is unanimous.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 11:30 PM
2

a broken arm often heals a lot quicker and a hell of a lot easier than the trauma of rape
/r/MensRights20/09/13 12:44 PM
3

At least the comments are promising. It's all too clear that women do have a privilege (or curse) of not needing to think their actions through, especially in the case of physicality. There are other ways she could have helped than putting herself in danger and then expecting to be bailed out by her boyfriend. It's a really shitty situation but if you are so compelled to act as to not worry about your own safety, you need to be ready to deal with the consequences.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 12:22 AM
18

How is this policy even getting support from the "regular people"? Also, whats the biggest hurdle you're facing when it comes to slapping down something so inherently alienating and restrictive?
/r/MensRights14/09/13 03:30 AM
6

I'm shocked I didn't think MSNBC could be this bad. I applaud Christina's courage to go into that shithole.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 12:29 AM
-22

you're wasting your time. you are correct, but once the people in this subred hear something they dont like, thought goes out the windows except for a few.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 11:26 PM
1

im saying you cant equate the procedure when it's done in very early years compared to when it's done on an adult. And to be fair, most of the horror is irrationally disproportionate. The procedure is safe and not that invasive. so there really isn't much objective rationale for the horror we think about getting happening near our dicks. Fact of the matter is, all I can do is look back and be happy that my parents made this decision for me which I likely would not have been able to make for myse…
/r/MensRights07/08/13 12:25 AM
1

I guess the reason why I am so against all of this anti-circumcision fervor on this subreddit is the predication that it is some kind of wanton abuse of child and mutilation and that these children are helpless victims who have suffered a horrendous injustice and thats just not the reality. One of the commenters above tried to force this opinion on me as if my disagreeance towards how I and a lot of other people felt is wrong and that I was indeed abused and mutilated. Surely you can see how fuc…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 10:31 PM
0

you think that stuff matters in places where reddit where agreeable opinion is king? This subreddit isn't much better than the other in terms of it's contributors
/r/MensRights06/08/13 10:20 PM
-6

you really think im the one who needs to relax, especially relative to jesus marley? I'd love to post in this subred more because I think it's great, but I cant because my open opinions have me downvoted so much that im time locked.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 01:15 AM
-1

lol on the first reply, you're talking out of your ass. and don't speak for me or all those who share my view. you just invented a bullshit reason to suit your stance and you've convinced yourself of it. And it's not the same FGM is a lot more severe. you might as well equivocate getting a girl's ears pierced to real abuses if that is your reasoning. anyway, I know you're not circumcised and you have no clue what you're talking about, just a bunch of made up ideas about what circumcision really …
/r/MensRights06/08/13 12:09 AM
1

She is very good. this subred is such a great resource to discover such great thinkers and speakers as Janice.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 11:49 PM
-3

hey, his username is aethistdynasty. no one's going to get through to him. It's honestly not worth your effort. most of the people who consider circumcision "mutilation" aren't circumcised and are seeing it through the most horrific lens which suits their purpose. Strange how the VAST majority of circumcised men have no problem with it. and trying to equivocate it to FGM is just a joke.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 11:37 PM
2

Quick question. Are you circumcised? im going to guess no, but i'll wait for an answer.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 11:20 PM
-4

yes, go through all that trouble and risk your job!
/r/MensRights01/08/13 11:50 AM
1

well if you ever meet trey you can ask him. He's talked in a few different videos ive listened to about how much he doesn't like and is creeped out by redheads.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 04:11 AM
1

this isnt the more extreme one, but heres the one i referenced https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOJ-Hfyswos
/r/MensRights01/08/13 12:05 AM
1

I cant find the really fucked up one. It was on one random commentary mini i think where he just kind of let loose. Again, he doesn't want to just "get rid of all gingers", but if he But it could be that no one in the world was ginger, he'd do it in a heartbeat. he's told anecdotes where he dated this girl and everything was going great, then he met her mom and she was a ginger and he knew it was the beginning of the end, because he couldn't ever have a chance of having a ginger child. In the Gi…
/r/MensRights31/07/13 11:35 PM
-18

yeah but to be fair, Trey really really hates people with Red head. Ive seen a few interviews where he's talking about them and I keep waiting to hear the ending sarcasm and it doesn't come. Now I dont think he wants to genocide them, but he definitely would prefer the world redheads. I think his stance on red heads is the most fucked up thing about him.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 12:09 PM
4

This is a pretty amazing compilation. I honestly think that Feminists are the angriest group of people I have ever seen.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 04:15 PM
9

good lord this interview is on two completely different intellectual planes. It sounds like the interview was looking for little sound bites and gww is trying to discuss the crux of the matter
/r/MensRights16/07/13 02:07 AM
-1

lol well that's because of all the pussies on reddit ;). To give you some useless yet maybe comforting anecdotal evidence, I am circumcised, most of my friends are circumcised. I don't know anyone who has EVER had a problem with it except for one post I found on the internet. The procedure is common and about as safe as a surgery can get. Just talk it over with your husband, see how both of you feel about it. Personally, i'm glad I had it done. If I didn't get it done, I can only imagine I'd be …
/r/MensRights03/07/13 11:44 AM
-9

Im glad you are open minded, but I hope you know coming here asking this question be like going to the vatican and asking if you should believe in Christ. Just dont get fall for the whole emotional mutilation appeal.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 12:08 AM
12

What about the research that says couples who co-habitate before marriage are more likely to break up. When two people get married then move in together, everything is new for both of them. So when they have problems, they tend to work it out more often. When couples live together before they get married, marriage isn't that new for them so when things eventually get rocky, a lot of the time they don't have this shared new struggle and feel that they should pull through together.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 04:58 PM
6

Hi, thanks for doing this AMA. Is there any advice that you have for men who think their wives might be fancying a divorce to do to protect themselves from any possible unjust treatment (of the law)? Also, is there anything you recommend men know or do in particular aside from a standard prenup (if they so choose) when they are about (or thinking) or getting married? Sorry for the crappy open ended question.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 04:36 PM
1

Isn't there also a guy's LuLu?
/r/MensRights21/06/13 11:00 PM
3

Can someone give some examples?
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:17 PM
1

good job, OP.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 10:43 PM
1

I think you hit the jackpot
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:39 AM
1

This post hits home on most major points and does it in such a succinct and effective way. Great post!
/r/MensRights22/05/13 12:01 AM
1

A huge pile of Bullshit. What class uses this book?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 10:24 PM
1

Yeah, I see and agree to that too, but just think of how it sounds to the fiancée. it's a tough spot to be in. I hope he can reconcile things and keep himself safe.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 04:19 AM
1

I mean, it does kind of sound like you'd value the child you conceive more than your "adopted" child. Imagine how that would sound to her, it would sound pretty terrible. Then again, if things don't work out, you dont and shouldn't have an obligation to the other child.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 03:21 AM
1

Aren't just about all workplace deaths preventable? They couldn't really have a position where death is a real possibility.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 11:45 AM
0

When have I ever called someone here a pussy or a wimp? you're putting words in my mouth that I never said in order to demonize me. Sound like a familiar tactic?
/r/MensRights06/05/13 02:01 AM
-1

you're sounding a lot like a feminist.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 01:41 AM
-7

But listen to all the circumcised men who are complaining about the atrocities done to them.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 05:43 PM
-5

Do you think he feels discriminated against because most men take more dangerous jobs or they die earlier? that doesn't feel like discrimination to me.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 05:32 PM
1

you're making a whole lot of assumptions and getting angry over them. I doubt she'll walk anywhere free.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 09:35 PM
1

It's not a men's rights issue because a bunch of crazy women are loud and crazy.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 03:01 AM
1

Why is this a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 11:46 PM
7

and?
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:28 AM
4

I'm surprised these deplorable feminists dont apply the creep label more often. Its not seen as that damage in the public eye yet the stigma is being labeled a creep is pretty damn big. anyway, its just too bad that she's allowed to write this attack on a such a publicated site :(
/r/MensRights30/03/13 11:46 PM
2

So dumbfounding a normal person would believe it to be satire.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 09:37 PM
11

I read those 4chan male privileged greentext stories and laugh but listening to crazy bitches like this almost makes them seem realistic.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 11:45 PM
2

Does anyone know the justification that any judge uses to allow this heinous behavior? It surely cant be "thats what the fucked up law says". I've heard so many examples of judges using their open discretion when dealing with civil matters like these (is this considered a civil matter?). Its just so unreal that the fact that its actually real is pushing the limits of my comprehension.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 11:35 PM
2

you all know no one is going to have the procedure done when they're 16 or 18 or whatever. its totally impractical. It is a safe procedure that is best performed when the patient is a baby/child and there is nothing wrong with it. Newsflash, parents do have that right over their children. Just like they can choose to pierce their ears and whatnot. Again, why dont you ask circumcised men if they regret the decision or if it is a bane on to them. and not just the few on this subred who are against…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 11:22 PM
-3

come on circumcision is normal in most cultures. even in the cultures where its not widely practiced its not seen as something horrendous like its seen on his subred. If people argue that boys are too stupid to clean their own penises, then they can go be ignorant on their own. your conclusion is fine for you. I think its a perfectly fine and relatively safe practice. What bugs me is that I get the feeling that most people against it arent men who are circumcised. but instead its people who cant…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 11:01 PM
-1

its an advantage. some advantages are necessary, some are just bonuses. there is nothing about circumcision that says uncircumcised men can't stay clean. you are making that wide assumption and applying it to circumcision unfairly, because it suits your viewpoint.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 10:50 PM
2

again you're not getting it. to make something easier does not imply an inability of an individual. it just makes it easier. easier, in this case is better. can uncircumcised men stay just as clean, of course. But this isn't misandry in the faintest. the intensity of your detestation of circumcision i assume comes because you view it as a cruel and barbaric practice where the penis of a young innocent baby is mutilated. That seems to be the core which is another debate that doesn't seem to get t…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 10:39 PM
-1

it is ridiculous to make the association that a want to improve cleanliness or just to make it easier, that that means that men are incapable of washing themselves. The creator of this image is just a jackass who really hates circumcision and is trying to associate it with some invented misandry.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 10:27 PM
-6

wow this is dumb. The only one saying "what we're really saying..." is image creator. This is one stretch that is too far, even for anti-circumcision advocates.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 10:02 PM
0

Yeah, a lot of women are trying to prove something. a lot feel the need to compensate. And again, i said they're not going to catch MY eye with that attitude. OP wanted to know what other people thought. Permission or them caring has nothing to do with what I said. you're filling in blanks that arent there.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 09:45 PM
-1

hey, you're pretty great at making assumptions and labeling people. when did i say people work to prove or to try and be attractive to me?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:16 AM
-2

theres a reason why traditional values and roles are so successful and emulated. I honestly just find those women much more attractive too. I really respect the work they do and to all the 'modern women' who want to prove their worth by measuring up to a man or whatever they think they're proving, by all means you can go ahead but you're not going to catch my eye.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:30 AM
1

I like traditional gender roles, but a woman can do whatever she wants. I do respect women who choose to homemake and who don't mind making their men sandwiches/etc. a lot.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:38 PM
-1

You aren't obligated to do anything. When you choose "not to rail" on someone, you do so BECAUSE you dont want to offend them, which you do because you are presumably a considerate person. If you think announcing that you are offended is akin to not being able to control your emotions so you want other people to, then that is some cynical shit. Decent people try to be aware of whether they are offending someone and they try to be considerate. Otherwise you're that jackass who runs his mouth rega…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 12:45 AM
2

This is on all day in our breakroom and i just thought she shot him too. I cant wait for this dumb ass trial to end so we can switch of headline news.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 12:20 AM
5

Quotes like this and the lines by stephen fry and louis ck miss the point entirely. There is a level of good social etiquette that comes from the notion of not wanting to offend people. If you say something that offends a friend of yours and they tell you, i would hope you would think about that rather than blowing it off as them "not being able to control their emotions".
/r/MensRights06/03/13 11:48 PM
-1

where do you guys go or who do you talk to have people say these kinds of things to you?
/r/MensRights02/03/13 06:44 PM
0

If you want to get to know her a little more: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNINB0tyGI0 quite unpleasant, imo
/r/MensRights29/01/13 03:47 AM
-4

Brilliant indeed. Straightforward, blunt, effective. thanks for the share
/r/MensRights22/01/13 06:25 PM
4

wow, a load of shit that im sure strong independent women will eat up. i can already hear the nauseating applause coming from the audience.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:11 PM
-3

lol isn't it always easier to justify the stance on your side. surely this is hypocritical. but if you dont think so, thats fine. no need for reply. not looking to debate on this one.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 03:46 PM
-19

right im sorry, all married women just want to divorce you to steal half your things and take your children. just like every man is a rapist.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:57 AM
-28

these guys seem like a bunch of pussy-whipped bitches. I think MR should be as much about informing men they dont have to succumb to this anti-guy storyline we have here and show them that they can get married and still have hobbies, drink, gamble, and dont have to accept abuse and whatnot.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:23 AM
1

This poster is kind of dumb because the entire time i was reading this, i kept thinking, "this cant be right. im pretty sure it's the other way around." I think most people aside from feminists would think this
/r/MensRights18/01/13 01:00 AM
-1

Firstly, this group has a lot of little bitches in it. There are also a lot of good posters but a lot of guys here just cant wait to try foul for every little thing and try to make it a men's rights issue. Do I think social shaming is bad, of course. I dont want anyone to feel insecure because society tells me one look is right and another is wrong. But you need men's rights because your mother wants you to circumcise your son? So fucking what. My mom wants me to start going to the gym so i get …
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:39 AM
-7

Why are you pussies (mods) removing my comments? im not here to troll.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:02 AM
-18

You dont need men's rights because some women think foreskins are gross
/r/MensRights14/01/13 10:46 PM
8

its usually girls who seek female only tenants
/r/MensRights14/01/13 09:27 PM
10

I dont know if simply copying the stupid fad of poster picturing is the best thing to do. Also, some of these are just retarded: what? you need men's rights because your mom wants you to circumcise your son? if you dont want to then dont, wtf is wrong with some of these pussies.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 08:48 PM
-1

I'm going to stop here. Feel free to think you've won over another brainwashed nut, but you are a classic example of why atheists dont get taken seriously. When you talk to people, it is all self-superior hyperbole and condescending retorts. Youre as idealogical as any ultra conservative, but its ok because you're being "rational and logical". Continue to use all the antagonizing words you can to describe something that really is not a big deal. Honestly, is it any wonder that the majority of op…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 11:29 PM
0

you're being hyperbolic. I'm not a hypocrite for being a supporter of circumcision and not for lopping off a breast. you people have little to no respect for culture and religion when it goes against your version of what is appropriate. Again, Circumcision is a non-issue in most of the world and you guys are demonizing this normal and safe practice. I Really wonder how many of you are circumcised and really hate/regret it. My guess is, not many. If you dont want to do it to your kids, thats you'…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 10:09 PM
0

you guys are using a broad definition of mutilation in order to demonize this common and safe practice that is by all accounts a non-issue that you guys are blowing up.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 07:45 PM
-1

again, i can say the same to you. I think you all are morons too (not all). whats youre point other than you're right, im wrong.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 06:58 PM
-10

and I can say the same to you guys.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:41 AM
-9

What's your point. It's all "mutilation" to you anyway, whether it's done safely or not.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:28 AM
-6

wow, great characterization. Theres a difference between taking a sterile blade to carefully perform a procedure and using a razorblades/broken glass/etc... and simply carving away.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:11 AM
-18

Educate yourself. If you think FGM and circumcision are two sides of the same coin, you are sorely mistaken.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 08:21 PM
1

good presentation, thanks.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 01:07 AM
1

genius answer...
/r/MensRights26/12/12 05:22 PM
1

no im still looking for a wife.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 12:28 AM
0

thanks for the info. i just cant imagine the picture is as bleak as painted.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 10:41 PM
0

oh, what is the default option? and can it possibly be worse than FOC?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:19 AM
4

i gotta say, men's rights makes me not want to get married.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 11:49 PM
1

Jeez this sounds so fucked up. Is there any alternative to FOC or anything auxiliary that can be done to keep her for accountable or just stop her violating your agreements?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:41 PM
-3

Yet another BS title to suite your position. stay classy!
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:07 PM
-2

now you're splitting hairs. if you are arguing on principle, it should all be considered mutilation. (which it is not)
/r/MensRights27/11/12 06:01 AM
-10

They are not equal. You cannot compare FGM in africa with male circumcision. Its not even close. Circumcision when dont appropriately (as done in 99% of cases) isn't even mutilation. And if you consider it to be, then any piercing or plastic surgery is mutilation too.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:19 AM
-8

seriously, what the hell do any of you know about this medical procedure? oh, you've watched a video and read a few things? How very qualifying.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 02:42 AM
-1

yes. you were being hyperbolic
/r/MensRights10/10/12 10:15 PM
-4

Americans stupid. Uganda has much bigger issues than circumcision.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:42 PM
-3

ok so clinton believes it. We get taught in schools/etc that contraceptives/abstinence is the best way to not get HIV. And not sharing needles.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:03 PM
-10

no one has ever thought that. Stop using hyperbole.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:31 AM
1

Are you usually this fat?
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:33 PM
0

now youre getting it!
/r/MensRights09/10/12 01:48 AM
1

Thanks and I too wish you wel- Fuck you. to be honest, i think I just get bored debating with people like you, liberal or conservative. boring debaters, no flair or flavor, no fun. On the whole youre a dumb liberal who can't underatand anything thing, look up jonathan Haidt. you'll love him, hes a liberal like you. but he studies these things and in one of his videos, i think one on TED, he touches upon how liberals cant seem to comprehend how conservatives think the way they do, that some of th…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 01:07 AM
-1

youre a typical dumb liberal idiot who cant understand my side and you think this sentence is only a validation of that. its pointless so im going to stop. And you're not teaching me annnnything about debate. so get off your high horse this is where people like you get your horrible prejudice in the way. You seriously considered the fact that I called him an ugly atheist as an argument. That was just an observation i decided to write. it wasnt an argument. liberals always make such assumptions a…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 11:44 PM
-2

vaginoplasty lololol. we would not see doctors around the world opposing the practice? I'm willing to bet like 1/3 of those doctors are circumcised themselves! (whats your point? my point is I dont know where you got this idea from. probably from your one sided field of view). doctors all over the world opposite it? well there are doctors all over the world who find it safe and appropriate. appropriate letting the parents decide, and appropriate performing the procedure on infants/children.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 11:13 PM
0

Are you seriously saying that by posting a piece of anecdotal documentation in video form, the only equal and appropriate response is another piece of opposing anecdotal video? and im not dismissing your video with ad hominem, though he is an ugly atheist. I dont value it much as it is only isolated piece of anecdotal evidence.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 10:44 PM
-1

its a medical procedure, which is safe with widespread use and minimal complication, asshat. this isnt like genital mutilation in africa.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 10:34 PM
0

I havent even mentioned God. one reason why atheists are so against it is because of the religious association
/r/MensRights08/10/12 10:21 PM
-2

stop bastardizing the practice as something cruel and barbaric, which it isnt.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 06:05 PM
-6

Yes, lets use one video from atheists who openly oppose the practice as evidence but its barbarity. I don't know what you say, but the practice is not gruesome. I personally had mine done in a hospital, but a traditional bris is well practiced and relatively safe (just like all procedures are "relatively" safe)
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:57 PM
-48

I hope you said fun writing all that because im not going to read it. And I dont care what a bunch of organizations from liberal cultures like Scandinavia and such think about it. The debate is blown way out of proportion. Characterizing the procedure is unsafe is disingenuous. its just not that big of a deal at all. And the argument that you should let the children decide when they grow up is stupid. Its up there with people who think its not right for parents to piece their daughter's ears wit…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 09:37 PM
-28

fine. you prefer plastic surgery? at least this has health benefits. but the main point is, its not the big deal you firebrands make it out to be. you are viewing it through such a horrific lense for some reason
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:37 PM
-40

ignorance.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:15 PM
-4

agreed.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 07:58 PM
-53

no it is not. It is no more violent than a tumor removal. It is not mutilation. It is a practice accepted and even recommended by the AAP. Stop viewing it through this lense of religious disfigurement.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 07:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter