TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sicilian_Drag0n Archive

View 0 posts and 188 comments by Sicilian_Drag0n on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, it isn't. If you surveyed thousands of men and asked them "In your experience, is alcohol a net bad in your life? Does it have bad effects overall?" and they almost universally concurred, then you could assume with great certainty that alcohol is a net bad overall for men. In a similar way, if men unanimously agree that opening up has been bad for their romantic relationships, the inference is clear. The AA meeting analogy fails because it isn't just damaged men answering these questions, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/22 08:59 PM
3

I'm so sorry, love. That is awful.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 04:28 AM
7

Nearly everyone here is an autistic misanthrope, so it is
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 10:27 PM
5

The only good comment on the thread, so it stands to reason that no-one replied to it
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/21 09:54 PM
1

Autism
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 07:21 PM
1

In all likelihood there is a very good reason for the deep dislike, but since it isn't available to immediate a priori reasoning it's dismissed as irrational or bigoted or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 03:44 AM
1

Good sex outweighs good sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 10:43 PM
5

Went from boy crazy to absolute flatline and I thought I was broken. But I wasn't. Can you talk a little more about this and how you got out of it? Experiencing something slightly similar, but from the other side (male, into women).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/21 10:58 PM
1

how can you not see this is not the same type of generalisation? me saying "i personally don't generally like X" is not the same type of generalisation other people often make here. The point is more broad than the example given: this hand-waving of "there are no groups, only individuals" is pure solipsism. Even in this post you cannot be consistent with it; you have been forced to generalise over and over. There is a reason that no academic, in sociology or otherwise, actually attempts to stake…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/21 02:50 PM
1

I read it, it was pure windowlickery. Everyone is an individual, so you can't make any generalisations about men - but you certainly can turn around and promptly make generalisations about straight men, who you find it uniquely hard to get along with. The whole thing was just pure sophism, but it was a very feminine train of thought in its own way, which fits the bill.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/21 05:08 AM
2

A stunningly useless contribution
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/21 01:02 AM
6

most of my friends are either women or gay men. i can't get a long with typical straight men atleast on the level that i could be close friends with them. Has it ever occurred to you that you are not at all representative of most men, then?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 07:56 PM
6

You picked a professional rugby player, a man whose life is dedicated to his sport, which happens to be the most muscle-focused sports in existence, and who is in all likelihood on large quantities of designer PEDs (not steroids). Do you honestly think that this guy is going out to the movies with you and buying popcorn and nachos for a snack?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 10:13 PM
3

Your belief system is literally the belief system of an urban middle class western Redditor
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/21 07:05 PM
1

Yes. This idea that the Taliban stroll around casually raping women on a day-to-day basis is a delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/21 02:59 PM
1

Just because you dislike the Taliban does not mean they are indiscriminate rapists
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/21 01:13 PM
69

The drop in testosterone is not sexually selected for, it is environmental (overwhelming presence of plastics, etc). This entire question is a non-starter.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/21 03:52 PM
1

With respect, a 20% chance of paying alimony for the rest of your life might be better than 50%, but it is still fucking terrible. Especially if there is an income gradient between you and your wife, which is more likely if you're college educated, you are dancing on the edge.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/21 05:43 PM
0

That's just the PPD experience, don't take it personally
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 11:32 PM
1

you would just need to concede that you are icky Doesn't this imply that you need to make a concession about yourself, whereas I'm disagreeing?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 11:23 PM
3

This isn't true, you don't have to yourself possess traits in order to find their absence repellent in others. Women, very typically, dislike narrow shoulders in men. It is obviously not the case that women must be broad shouldered themselves to hold this preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 10:47 PM
4

I'm more than happy to argue the former. There have never been more adversarial male-female relationships in the history of our species than in the modern West, and it's getting worse, not better.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 03:05 PM
0

With respect, OP, a lot of these things are strawman arguments. For example: Patriarchal societies weren't just respected, middle-class patriarchs, happy, subservient wives and clean obedient kids. There was still a lot of suffering in these societies, a lot of exclusion, poverty, homophobia, tyranny, social shaming of anyone who didn't fit in. There is suffering under that agreement, just as there is plenty of suffering under our current agreement, and there would be suffering if men and women …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 01:40 PM
7

You've happily implied that you're willing to fuck numerous people in between dates and feel absolutely no compulsion to do otherwise. I don’t want a guy I don’t like committing to me or demanding commitment. It sounds like you don't want any form of commitment at all, which begs the question as to why you are going on dates and leading others on.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 07:34 PM
20

No, it's just typical American selfishness. How is it such a colossal imposition to you not to fuck someone for a week or two? And why do you describe it as him owning your free time, like you are a dog he holds by the collar, when he is extending the same obligation to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 07:19 PM
18

No, both of you are obligated not to go on a date and/or fuck someone else for a few days until you further figure out what's going on. The fact that you consider this "forced", "immoral", and an imposition is just hard to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 07:10 PM
7

You cannot fix broken American dating culture. It is such an abyss that the people ensconced in it cannot even fathom what a healthier culture looks like, one that treats people you could potentially marry with a modicum of respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 07:08 PM
8

I'm simply remarking that given the relative arbitrariness, those boundaries are going to get initially violated fairly often by men who lack the capacity to magically calibrate their approach to every women's different standards and requirements. I'm not suggesting that you should casually continue to violate their boundaries by following, harassing, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 03:39 AM
7

And if you listen, you will find that virtually any initiation, no matter how innocuous, can potentially cross women's boundaries. For plenty of women, a particularly unattractive man asking them out is a violation of boundaries regardless of how he does it. And acting like a craven isn't a solution, because most women find the profound lack of confidence deeply unattractive. You have the privilege of not understanding this because you don't approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 02:12 AM
–

Have you ever made a post where women were culpable whatsoever? It's society's fault, men are too fragile... do you completely lack agency?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 03:10 PM
2

Yeah it's way out of line, 2/3/4 is a much better call. You don't have to hit a 5 plate squat before you cruise.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 05:25 PM
6

You dont really go up to another man and call him a whore for not liking eachother. You also dont go up to another man and be angry at him for him not providing something for you. Men do not do this en masse, and when some of them do it's not because they disrespect women, it's because their ego has been wounded and they do it as a defense mechanism. The analog to how men treat women who reject them would not be how men treat other men, it would be how men treat an interviewer who has just rejec…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 11:59 AM
1

Sure, but didn't you say other studies showed a lower preferred height? Thus 25cm is an upper bound on that preference, not what it actually is likely to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 08:11 PM
2

Sounds plausible, source?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 01:43 PM
8

The anti-Lilith. Not redpilled, but she consistently posts new and interesting takes. Well played, Grid.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 02:23 AM
–

Why do people reply to threads she makes? It's the same shit over and over.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 08:53 PM
2

No, based is internet slang for good. I absolutely agree with you. It's cuckery through and through.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/21 03:23 PM
2

Watching other men fuck women you’d like to fuck in ways no real woman will ever let you is cuckery. No other word for it. Extremely based take.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/21 12:12 PM
5

Jesus Christ man this is the lowest IQ take I have ever seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 12:42 PM
2

This subreddit is borderline pointless because any scientific study linked is just dismissed by the sex that it disparages as "NOT RELEVANT BECAUSE CORRELATION DOESN'T EQUAL CAUSATION" and any philosophical view gets dismissed as non-empirical.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 04:39 PM
0

Are you high? Do you honestly think a secretary works as hard as a high-profile lawyer? Do you really think the remuneration difference is some arbitrary mistake?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/21 11:51 PM
0

"They work the same hours, therefore neither is working harder than the other". Have you thought about this statement for very long?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/21 10:17 PM
1

Very based take, really the only good one in the thread
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 05:06 PM
2

Maybe. Alternatively, maybe you're delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/21 09:46 PM
1

Your wife just hasn't realized that you want to have sex with her, even though you keep feeling her up in explicit fashion. Once you verbally mention it, though, her latent nymphomaniac will spontaneously emerge. Who knew women were so simple?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 01:23 AM
1

What exactly is the loving ultimatum? Haven't heard of it before.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 03:35 PM
1

The fuck cares about what people believed 2000+ years ago? Didn't read past this. Your ignorance is so profound that you think it's a virtue. You have no idea what a man is, and you will never be one.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 07:08 PM
1

Try reading Cicero, or Tacitus, or Thucydides, or a Periclean speech, or literally any kind of history, and see if their version of a man includes obesity or eunochdom. The problem here is that you have some weird definition that's not a part of any medical definition of male. The problem here is that you're completely unfamiliar with history, literature, and the arts and so a normative ideal of what a man should be is completely baffling to you. Your only resource is a neurotic reliance on medi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 06:18 PM
1

An obese person We're talking about men. According to you, low libido shouldn't make anyone less of a man. But even if obesity is unhealthy, according to you that shouldn't make him less of a man either, albeit an unhealthy one. A man is a man, obese or not, castrati or not. Nice and tautological. Isn't that how you see it? There isn't any point in me engaging with you because you don't even have a normative concept of what a man is to engage with. I'll reiterate my view; an obese man is less of…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 12:46 PM
1

So your argument is “this thing has been for a happening for a long time so it must be right”. Yeah, that sounds right. Tradition is much smarter than, say, some random woman on the Internet desperately trying to pretend that androgyny is the default state of affairs between men and women. I'm sure your stance has nothing to do with your personal incapacity for femininity or anything like that. The history of our species (about 200-400 thousand years) is FAR longer then 2000, which is nothing bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 12:27 PM
1

No, my view of what a man is has held throughout two thousand years of civilization. Your freakish desire for androgyny is a passing fad that will be gone in a few decades. History is on my side.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 03:03 AM
3

Nothing says maturity like making unprompted threads on PPD boasting about having no sex drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 01:52 AM
7

Sure, obese male still has cock and balls too. Doesn't mean they should boast about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 01:51 AM
2

You seem so angry that I have a firm opinion on what a man is. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 01:50 AM
2

low testosterone is strongly linked with low libido, even if low libido doesn't preclude normal-to-high testosterone levels. Read this again, then read it again.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 09:32 PM
5

You are fucking boasting about being a castrati and moaning in the comments when anyone disagrees with you. There is no projection. Testosterone levels have almost nothing to do with libido. I don't have low testosterone. Can you even keep track of your own bullshit? I don't give a fuck if you've deluded yourself into endorsing eunochdom ("this is self-love!"), I'm not gonna pretend your vices are somehow virtues. Go post this on MensLib or something, not here.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 08:05 PM
-1

Testosterone levels have almost nothing to do with libido. This is a flat-out lie, low testosterone is strongly linked with low libido, even if low libido doesn't preclude normal-to-high testosterone levels. And even if they were, isn't it better to be proud of myself? It would be better if you investigated it and fixed it, thus acquiring a normal male libido. Beyond that, you can do what you want, but you're certainly not entitled to have me agree with you about it. This whole self-acceptance t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 07:58 PM
1

Accept what, you boasting about the fact your testosterone levels are in the grave?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 07:48 PM
6

One of the worst threads ever made on the sub. Seeing castratis boast about their castration wasn't what I signed up for.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 07:44 PM
1

No, that's not even mainline Alekhine. 1. e4 Nf5 2. e5 Nd5 3. c4 Nb6 4. d4 d6 5. exd6 and White has a comfortable position with central control while Black's knight is misplaced. Black has an advantage after g6, Bg7, 0-0. If you try playing 4.. g6 then 5. c4 Nd5 6. Bc4 e6 7. Bxd5 exd5 and you've ruined your pawn structure and bishop. Which you would know if you had played any competent White players, but you haven't. The fact you're playing this Nf3 shit instead of taking the centre tells me tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 01:45 PM
1

You can just play e5 w/ c4 and push the knight around, there's no dynamism compared to the Dragon
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 01:42 AM
10

Really good reply, not sure why it didn't receive more commentary
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 09:49 PM
10

As are 80% of the women who post on this subreddit. It's a fucking madhouse here, the patients are running the asylum.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 02:20 AM
12

Any man fucking a woman must marry her and must provide financially and emotionally for her and her children, forevermore. I was wondering how long it would take the sexual revolution to loop back around to... orthodox Christianity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/21 12:32 AM
1

Just gonna throw it out there that everyone can do it all on their own. what the actual fuck are you talking about? do you think that men can just look in the mirror and jerk off to the view of jerking off?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 06:55 PM
1

This was posted as an attempted own, but ...yeah, sounds good to me
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 04:29 PM
1

This is genuinely one of the strangest stories I've ever seen on the sub. It's definitely a kink, but I don't understand the nuances of it at all. Was there a particular emphasis on them being his mother's clothes? Very Freudian. In the moment I didn't want to seem kink shamey (about the womens clothes), but was quietly horrified. [...] I would say that I didn't care if he wants to wear womens clothes, I'm cool with that. I've got no issue with it, he doesn't need to lie Lmao you probably were h…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 11:49 PM
1

So, only the most desperate of guys, and some of them were WEIRD. Like dress up in their mothers clothes and want me to dominate them and call them a bad bad girl, weird Lmao, can you elaborate on this kind of shit? That's fucking hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 10:14 PM
2

No, he gave you an example of the main figure of the movement doing it. De Beauvoir is in fact that influential. She is also, as it happens, the only French feminist intellectual to go on record about the age of consent. Wittig, Cixous, Irigaray, Kristeva, etc. never do it. So the only representative we have from the entire French feminist tradition - which, along with the Anglo feminist tradition, is the most influential branch there is - is for lowering it. This is not trivial, even if you wan…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/21 04:06 PM
3

As well as most of the great philosophy of the 17th and 18th century, various art movements, and the first great democratic revolution on the continent. How culturally ignorant can you be?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/21 03:55 PM
2

No, he's not. You said that age of consent has always been an issue for feminists, and they have never sought to lower it. He gave you the best possible counter-example in de Beauvoir, the feminist par excellence, advocating for lowering it. You dismissed her because she's French. This is just dishonest, and no-one buys your "it was a fRenCh lEgAl tHiNg" dismissal. I don't care if your merry band of hand-picked feminists haven't advocated for it or not, there are plenty feminists who have, de Be…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/21 03:53 PM
4

I fucking hate this illiterate subreddit
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/21 03:51 PM
4

Age of consent has always been a feminist cause. Women did not care to lower the age of consent, ever - it was never addressed by Second or Third Wave Feminism (or the bizarre Fourth Wave we’re in now) This statement is only defensible if you specifically limit second-wave feminism to American second-wave feminism, which you didn't do (for good reason, because your claims about feminism are universal claims, and limiting them with that qualifier would destroy your argument). You can't pick and c…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/21 03:44 PM
1

:(
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/21 03:16 PM
2

what's up with the alt
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/21 03:01 PM
4

This ends the discussion. Simone de Beauvoir is the primary figure of second-wave feminism, and she directly lobbied for a lowering of the age of consent in France. That letter, by the way, was signed by all sorts of pro-feminism French intellectuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/21 03:00 PM
2

Sure, ban those as well. I just want LoB limited to a certain number of weekly posts so that their quality might marginally increase/her opportunities for pretending to engage in discussion decrease.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 04:14 AM
5

Here is the triweekly anti-men thread from the same poster, making the same point, just phrasing it slightly differently. Why does this get through the filter?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 12:39 AM
1

You would actually have to read Jung and decide for yourself, rather than expect me to pull some standard of truth out of the air that isn't subject to Munchausen trilemma-style skepticism. One notices, of course, that no belief of yours could withstand this tier of scrutiny, not simply the ones you're commenting on here. But of course, in some very limited sense you have a point: there isn't going to be hard evidence in an empirical sense for, say, Jungian hypotheses. That's less a flaw of them…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/21 09:59 PM
0

I'm not sure what you want me to say further. This is standard Paglian art history - the feminine is pagan, it's Dionysian, it's chthonic, while the masculine is monotheism, it's Apollonian, it's transcending. These are two opposite essences. Jung is of course right that to some extent, as you see in the yinyang symbol, we embody both. We all have anima and animus within us. But in the male and in the female, one or the other predominates. So it is that women are simply more sexually fluid; in v…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/21 08:40 PM
3

Female sexuality is more fluid than male sexuality. It doesn't have anything to do with societal stigma, or whatever garbage this sub uses as a catch-all. In the same way, femininity is more malleable than masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/21 07:57 PM
32

Sure, but the rampant male self-characterization on this subreddit as a) always aspiring to be Chad, b) never desiring to commit, and c) only committing because they can't be Chad, is just absurd and a larp.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 03:30 AM
108

Men who dislike women and only want to sleep with them and never want to meet a long-term partner are a minority that are over-represented on this sub. Don't take what the men here say as a reflection of how the majority of men feel about women. This cannot be stressed enough. The men on this sub are a fucking grotesque caricature of real-life men (as also are the women, though typically not quite to the same extreme). Do not let this sub blackpill you on gender relations, they're not nearly as …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 02:15 AM
9

Her replies in the comments are always somewhat related to the point made in the comments, but are in fact just a dogmatic restatement of her original position. Also, all the threads are the fucking same, it's just her Chad-doesn't-really-exist line getting strung out over and over. When the point is rammed home by some comment that Chad is not a myth, she tacitly admits Chad does exist, but then implies being Chad is actually a bad thing, and women who want Chad are just stupid. There's plenty …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/21 04:02 AM
15

The women on this subreddit do that religiously. Because there is no way to prove causation in these studies, they trot out the correlation-doesn't-equal-causation line while fucking drooling over themselves, then give the same shitty advice that the entire manosphere began by disproving (just be yourself, women love nice guys, she'll love you when she's more mature!). You cannot reason with these people, they have a biological imperative to disagree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/21 03:58 AM
4

She criticized me in her reply for apparently claiming that those were mutually exclusive beliefs... which they are. I didn't respond further.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/21 08:52 PM
2

If you would like it if your boyfriend looked like Jason Momoa, then how would nothing change if he did?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/21 06:57 PM
8

Would I like it if my boyfriend looked like Jason Momoa? Yeah. Would it change anything if he looked like Jason Momoa? Nah. How exactly do you hold both of these beliefs at the same time?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/21 06:53 PM
2

Skinny is better than fat, but muscular is way better than skinny. Do not let this sub tell you otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/21 06:45 PM
1

long neck Don't you mean thick? You can make your neck thicker, but you can't make it longer. Though you might be referring to big traps, which is kinda the same, but kinda different.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 05:59 PM
5

A girl with a massive, bulging cock at least 2" bigger than his
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 01:38 PM
–

This is fascinating stuff. I genuinely wish there was a subreddit, a la TRP, where you and other women discussed this at length.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/21 03:24 PM
3

This guy has told me in a different thread that he was 5'11 230lbs 6% body fat, which would make him a world class bodybuilder. So yes, it's unfortunately fan fiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/21 04:19 PM
3

Anyway, (thank you if you're still reading this far,) I had a literal "Come to Jesus" moment, where because of religious convictions, I chose to give up my old ways, delete all my old accounts, and swear off of porn. I was then baptized with my husband, and I've been supporting him in his health journey for over a year. He has lost 30+ lbs (199 to 168lbs) and is in the process of getting ripped. This is extremely wholesome - really hope it works out for you and your husband. Genuinely appreciate…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/21 01:30 AM
2

Can you give a rough idea of what it was? It's a personal question, so it's cool if you don't feel comfortable sharing, but I am curious since I've heard of the post-fap shame phenomenon from many men, but never any women. You can DM if you want to keep it off the sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/21 09:11 PM
2

Can you give a rough idea of what it was? It's a personal question, so it's cool if you don't feel comfortable sharing, but I am curious since I've heard of the post-fap shame phenomenon from many men, but never any women. You can DM if you want to keep it off the sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/21 09:11 PM
3

This is only hot if he's a serial killer, otherwise it's just loser shit
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 01:45 PM
7

He adamantly defended it below and further claims that he did it without steroids. I hate this subreddit so much
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/21 01:13 AM
8

Instead of addressing the obvious lie (your BF% and LBM are comparable to world-class bodybuilders on a cocktail of steroids, though you don't even take steroids, making you genetically far more gifted than them) you deflect by writing some nonsense about different tests to try to pass off your blatant lie, as if any test would make a difference. One comparison: at "5'11 and 230ish pounds with 6% BF", which you claimed to be above, you would have been the same height, slightly higher BF% and sli…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/21 10:48 PM
5

He just did
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/21 10:27 PM
7

No, I was no where near his size, those are his stats after dropping 50lbs and on competition day, not off-season weight No, you said you were 230+ at 6%. None of these guys walk around at 6%, they hit it and slightly below (4-5%) for competition. Their body fat at peak competition is only slightly lower than yours. In other words, you're claiming you were slightly smaller than the best bodybuilding pros in the world who abuse the fuck out of steroids, all while neither competing nor taking ster…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/21 10:26 PM
11

I was 5'11 and 230ish pounds with 6% BF This would make you a world-class IFBB pro on a fuckton of steroids, significantly bigger than Flex Wheeler. Please, enough with the larping, you're not even doing it well.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/21 08:10 PM
2

If you're working full time you have every right to complain, I'm specifically referring to SAHMs
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 06:55 PM
1

Because they married when they were very, very young, not in their thirties. Further, one should not neglect the ability of culture to curtail certain desires, like men's incessant need for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 06:04 PM
1

Dragon much more alpha than grandmaster
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 03:45 AM
4

I don’t see how you can expect someone to do all of one job and half of another job while you do half of the other job and nothing else. Half the subreddit tries to argue this shit all the time by hand-waving about how much time kids take up
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 02:23 AM
2

There are eucivic alphas, but they are few and far between when compared to dyscivic alphas, and we can't hide from that fact
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/21 03:19 PM
2

Cheers for the reply
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 08:17 PM
1

Do you think that if you could split your mindset between outside and inside the bedroom (outside the bedroom you don't give a fuck about her pleasure, inside you do) you'd be even more successful? In other words, is your apathy about her pleasure a more successful sexual strategy for you for its own sake (i.e. you find that women somehow find your apathy more alluring/masculine than a man who cares a lot about her pleasure) than caring about her pleasure inside the bedroom? This seems counter-i…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 07:24 PM
1

HOM?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 07:07 PM
9

You can read these Cracked articles and console yourself that alphas don't exist if you want. When you meet them in real life, you know, they know, and women know.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 02:21 PM
8

The word attractive is quite ambiguous here - one needs to differentiate between sexual and non-sexual attraction. The claim being made is that their tastes change precisely because the men they find most sexually attractive won't marry them, since they are either playing the field or have better options. Thus women's tastes don't shift for no reason; they pragmatically move towards more stable options who will provide for them and their kids. But although you prefer his non-sexual attributes mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 08:58 PM
8

It is settling if you find your husband markedly less sexual attractive than previous lovers. And if you don't think your husband would consider it to be settling, and insulting to him as a man, tell him the unvarnished truth that you married him for his non-sexual attributes. Unless he is a castrati, it will go over very, very poorly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 06:22 PM
9

This subreddit has nothing to do with Africans, it concerns the West. Hence why we don't discuss Islam here. And in the West, women marry men richer than them. You're too obsessed with the potentiality of losing sex, sex isn't even the main purpose of marriage. I do like the tacit admission that the bedroom does in fact dry up with these kind of arrangements. At any rate, sex is not just an act. Beyond the physical sensation, it represents her desire for you, how she sees you as a man, and many …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 06:20 PM
1

But don't you feel that sometimes sex with one person will leave a permanent imprint on you? Like a guys does a Vogue model, or a woman does a 6'2 hung football player, isn't is a tough standard for the future partners to live up to. Even if they give their 100% 50% of the sub portray the fiction that this is somehow not the case, just smile, nod, and pretend you agree with them
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 04:13 PM
23

It's a nice story. The women on the subreddit are going to buy it, the men are not. I am sure you believe it yourself. For many of women, it takes a long time to realize that it is definitely not the way to happiness. That's where your "beta bucks" comes in. It's not "settling." It's growing as a person. We become interested in a different kind of man, and it isn't for $$ reasons. Though, of course, money becomes a much larger issue to women once they reach 30 or so and want to start a family. J…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 04:02 PM
0

Lol yeah, the suggestion that doing this for half a year straight would have you "well on your way to even" was just too much for me to pass over
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 06:41 PM
0

Yeah I'd say eating pussy for half a year while not receiving an inch of reciprocation is pretty snivelling
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 06:22 PM
1

Where do you find these women
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 01:20 AM
1

Absurd caricature of fathers, portrays desirable male behaviour as acting like a snivelling wimp while his wife does literally nothing, posts on FDS. Sounds about right.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 01:15 AM
2

Yes, he makes it and you spend it, or he spends it on you, if you want to hamster it that way
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 01:09 AM
5

If you're really concerned about this go live in Miami or LA. I can assure you that women there are, by and large, in unbelievable shape. The corollary is that so are the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/21 04:48 PM
11

When your GF is banging you she's at least aware of you making minimum wage at Walmart, though
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 04:23 PM
4

I'm not attacking you at all, I'm just giving my opinion. I don't mean any of this personally. In your life, given your experiences I am sure it makes sense to require consent for everything sexual. In other people's lives, this will not be required (because they are, frankly, healthier relationships). The dysfunctional relationships we see growing up are either mirrored in our own or fled to an extreme; as such, I would imagine that the man you're getting married to is not aggressive to an extr…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 10:52 PM
3

Look, I am sympathetic to the claim that people on this forum should explicitly ask for consent. They are social imbeciles (specifically the men) and will invariably fuck it up if they try to do otherwise. My specific point is that well-socialized men and women do not need to do this because they are able to read each other well enough (see: the billions of loving and healthy male-female relationships over centuries that did not begin with explicit requests of consent from both parties). It is e…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 09:49 PM
4

Yeah, I'd call it overprotective to ask for consent for every single thing you do in bed because you are incapable of reading body language. The only reason you could think otherwise is if you're so absorbed in your online bubble that you don't interact with normal people (which, given your stance on this, is in all likelihood true), or if you have a poor relationship with your father, which leads to increasingly neurotic views of men like the ones you demonstrate here. You pathologize men becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 09:38 PM
7

You're deeply attached to treating sex like a legal contract because you're so neurotic that it couldn't work any other way for you. You perceive people as incapable of saying no, or wielding any sort of agency, so you infantilize them and call it virtue.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 09:32 PM
8

What a surprise that you have a) absurd, freakishly overprotective views on sex and b) you post on polyamory subreddits. These things always, always go together.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 07:28 PM
10

/thread
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 07:25 PM
4

Do not think you can argue with people here they are severely socially crippled, they have never had an organic social interaction in their lives
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 07:25 PM
4

No, that ratio is just you/people like you on this subreddit
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 07:23 PM
6

No. Interactions with PPD individuals are not representative of anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 12:15 AM
3

Muscular legs. I don't know why but they do it so fucking much for me. Would much prefer her on the thicker side as well - not fat, but I don't really want/need to see her abs.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 05:29 PM
2

People on this subreddit in particular have many gripes about the other sex that stem directly from their almost supernatural levels of social incompetence (particularly the men). The idea of a dynamic between man and woman where there is a slow escalation of indirect tells, a forward and a back to it which both enjoy - which culminates in the man kissing her because he can read her well enough to know that she wants it - is absolutely impossible for them to comprehend. The chase, the uncertaint…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 04:20 PM
4

If I had a son you would be the last person on Earth I would tell him to seek advice from
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 03:58 PM
2

Completely false dichotomy, but you wouldn't get that if you've only ever interacted w/ autistic men
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 01:49 AM
1

The little brusque remarks mask your ignorance very poorly
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 03:01 PM
5

This comment is absurdly wrong, but it's absurdly wrong in a way that highlights the deficiencies of a mindset too drugged on liberalism to understand geopolitics (and a mind that has virtually no exposure to history before the twentieth century to boot). In its own way, it would be an interesting historical document for future societies to study as a marker of the delusion of the true believer - as the empire she believes will last forever is crumbling around her, she nonetheless puts forth the…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 04:31 AM
1

Well, if Big Science is saying it, far be it from me to deny it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 08:08 PM
1

Assuming with no prior context that any reported n-count is ~8x lower than its actual number seems a touch hostile, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 07:39 PM
2

The subreddit can be, ah, hostile to women sometimes
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 03:00 PM
3

A lot of this subreddit's advice is projection. "I do not do well with women" --> "I would do better with women if they approached me" --> "I would like women to approach me" --> "HVM like HVW to approach them". It happens the other way too, but this is one of the more dubious male varieties.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 12:20 AM
6

O, reason not the need! Our basest beggars are in the poorest things superfluous. Allow not nature more than nature needs, man's life is cheap as beast's.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/21 11:32 PM
1

Remove the abusiveness and you can switch the genders and have the quote be about feminism, and work just as well as it does now. There is nothing profound about it, it is a poorly dressed up version of "dae think men bad women good?" Which isn't to say that men don't post the reverse of that all the time on this subreddit, just that it's banal and vapid either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/21 10:26 PM
10

His mother spoke to him. Disgusting behavior from her.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 09:43 PM
2

Nah, being short isn't not being tall, it's just not being 5'9+
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 05:16 PM
0

Too bad it doesn’t make sense; human beings can’t be compared to vehicles. Absolute nonsense no matter which sex you are. Humans have varying physical features, experiences, and personality traits which make them more or less valuable as a partner in an analogous way to car parts; these little "quirks" that we have don't make us nebulous, idiosyncratic blobs incomparable to anyone else. The fact that height as a physical trait in a man cannot be quantified in an exact sense does not mean that we…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 05:19 PM
4

Be a man Make all the money, but do at bare minimum 50% of the housework. Sounds like a great deal to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 04:49 PM
3

Just keep projecting, there's a good lad
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/20 04:14 PM
2

Oh, not the capacity for changing eye color or whatever, the part where blue eyes are considered generally attractive (as above, say, brown eyes). Cheers.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/20 11:48 PM
1

Source on the blue eyes bit?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/20 11:40 PM
2

Winry x van Hohenheim
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/20 01:39 PM
2

Wasn't quite aware, actually
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/20 02:34 AM
2

I don't know why your comment got such a shitty response, you justified everything you said. This subreddit is so bad sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 02:25 AM
1

Being bulked up is a choice. Depending on genetics, it can be easier or harder to bulk up on muscle, but you don't get muscles without working on them. An aggressively stupid take.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 01:49 PM
3

There are perfectly reasonable arguments for the lack of congruence; men are more deviant in virtually every facet of life, from intelligence to autism to height. The theory itself is congruent enough to stay; dismissing it requires much harder evidence than what you're provided (a one-sided disagreement which can reasonably explained away by different factors). The significant majority of men, and overwhelming majority of women, adhere to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 04:43 PM
2

Even if you want to run this argument, you can only run it from one side, because women are not at all deviating, whereas men are. So the correct synthesis is probably agreeing with OP's point, but admitting your point that men are more prone to deviance from it than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 04:17 PM
0

The OP is a drooling imbecile
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 05:38 PM
1

Maybe
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 10:57 PM
1

Despite the rabid libfem pushback you're doing God's work here
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/20 02:26 AM
1

This has nothing to do with whether or not you c h o o s e your actions. If anything, yet again, it just shows that everything in your head is the result of priors. In order to get the thought, you need a prior. In order for there to be a prior, there has to be a prior to that prior. To think that suddenly "You", or your internal "I" and sense of self somehow push forward thoughts into the universe without priors is nonsense, it is literal anti-scientific gobbledygook Taking this kind of Spinozi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/20 02:15 AM
2

I think that seems right - the most fluctuation is in the middle. If you are a 5, there is someone out there who thinks you're an 8 and someone who thinks you're a 2, and a lot more people who think you're a 6, 7, or 4. The scale's utility mainly derives from it being able to place extremely ugly or attractive people at the bottom and top (MR is always 8+, LD is always 3-) in a pleasingly objective way; it breaks down quite a lot for people in the middle, like you say. Having said that - you are…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 12:09 PM
3

the healthiest option for both of them if they want a happy relationship would be to communicate with their bf/husband on what satisfies them in bed. This is a strangely naive view of sexuality; certain partners have physical and mental attributes that others permanently lack. A muscularity, a curviness, a control, a tenderness; these are almost always unsolveable via "communication". When you have had many partners, there were many bests. There is no guarantee that the person you end up with is…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 12:48 AM
2

Sure, that makes sense. My 10, which is quite niche among women, is another person's 6, and my scale isn't always as well-pegged as it should be. But a woman who is stereotypically attractive can peg herself pretty accurately (i.e. her self-assessment is generally correct) on an average man's scale (she'll be high, 7+) while a woman who's stereotypically unattractive (overweight, ugly, or extremely niche like ultra-goth) can do the same (low, perhaps 4). My scale varies according to my personal …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 03:28 PM
3

rating yourself isn’t an accurate number either? Like if I think I’m a 7 but you think I’m a 5 but Brad thinks I’m a 9, who’s right? There’s no accurate rating system here it’s all very subjective Well over 99% of men think Margot Robbie is a 9 or 10 and Lena Dunham is a 2. There's plenty of subjectivity, but also a lot of objectivity.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 01:48 PM
1

Very impressive, you look like you're right on the natty threshold or roiding given the delts (no judgment here). What weight are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 01:49 AM
2

I completely get that you're attracted to fitness/buffness and find it entirely reasonable, but I'm saying that I genuinely don't understand what it actually means for a man to be "watched by fit buff men" (I don't see how this is even possible, in a very literal sense of possible). Do you mean that being watched by fit buff men turns you on, or are you saying that watching a man get watched by other fit men makes you attracted to him? It might help if you rephrased it, since it could just be a …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 09:55 PM
3

the process goes something like this : visual cues attract me > man with said visual cues does something that turn me > +++ attraction > man with said visual cues does something to me that turns me on > very high attraction You are black box'ing the actual question, though; OP is asking about what "something" that turns you on actually is. Not all men with appropriate visual cues turn you on, so there must be a distinction between their behaviors that distinguishes the one you're attracted to fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 08:31 PM
3

They're not rules, just heuristics. They work much better than a guess, but they're frequently wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/20 05:35 PM
1

Stereotypes don't have to be 100% accurate to work, and literally no-one who adheres to them thinks they do either
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/20 05:32 PM
4

Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 01:59 PM
4

That guy unironically posts impotent anti-Trump shit on /r/politics: he can barely dress himself, let alone judge Peterson (or anyone else)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/20 09:13 PM
1

hit me w/ the pm too
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 10:27 PM
1

See, I think that to some extent attractiveness is social not biological. This is absolutely true; the burning issue is to what extent attractiveness is governed by one rather than the other. There's many different cultures around the world that have very different views on what makes a man or woman hot. That's true, but those cultures tend to be quite racially/ethnically homogenous, and have simply selected for that over a very long period of time (i.e. the Indian male conception of beauty maps…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 11:40 AM
3

we could ameliorate the constant comparisons both men and women are forced to make This would seem to involve wholesale limitation of Internet access for women, and porn access for men, as well as making it a prerequisite for both not to live in large cities like LA/Miami, where large quantities of extraordinarily attractive people are found. So I don't see how you could ever hope to stem the tide here; Pandora's box has been firmly opened in this regard, and all the horrors except hope have bee…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 11:29 AM
1

I think it's more likely to work than your previous suggestion - we've all had that experience where we look at someone we've known for a while and it suddenly clicks that they are really attractive, though we hadn't noticed it before. For this one, I think it really depends on your priors coming into it. If you think that we can consciously alter our attraction by making an effort to find them attractive, whether through consciously affirming that they are attractive or making an effort to noti…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 11:26 AM
5

I definitely think the status halo works, but that doesn't translate to the general population. In other words, Adam Driver might be seen as attractive, even with a dadbod, due to status, but the 30-year-old with a dadbod who works in the office remains as unattractive as ever. Status can make individuals much more attractive, but it won't somehow transmute attractiveness to the members of the general population with similar facial and bodily attributes to the individual with status; they remain…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 11:14 AM
11

This gets the causality wrong, I think - women don't find those men attractive because they are set up to be so in movies, they're set up that way because women already find them attractive to begin with. You can argue that it's a chicken-egg problem, that women find them attractive because they've already been bombarded with movies that signal that man to be attractive, but I don't think this is actually the truth. There is virtually nothing about the dadbod that is attractive in comparison to …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 11:00 AM
3

You're like the worst Stoic of all time. "Why do you care what anyone thinks of you?" Because, whether you like it or not, what people think of you matters to your happiness and your material prospects, and any adult will tell you that. The way you've gone about trying to argue that it doesn't makes you look like a 17 year old girl who read the first chapter of Meditations. Why are you arguing with this person at all? Why do you care what they think of your opinion? Why bother having friends or …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 10:54 AM
5

Say you meet a woman you’re interested in and she agrees to go out with you. You’ve been interested in her for awhile, and you’re hoping this date will lead to whatever it is you’re looking for. Do you genuinely believe it’s going to be a good idea to ask her to pay half of the bill on the first date? No. She’s going to think you’re a fucking loser. Rightfully so, men who do this really are fucking losers
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 11:51 AM
1

Winner's mindset
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 03:59 PM
12

Yeah the most alpha thing you can do is dress as a woman and get fucked in the ass, you've cracked it
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 05:04 PM
8

Unbelievably stupid take
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 10:55 AM
1

All g bro
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 01:01 AM
4

It's fucking spelt casual, alphadawg
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/20 10:20 PM
3

This guy you are talking to is an absolute imbecile lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 09:51 AM
8

Chad strikes again with a tactical performance of sheer brilliancy
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/20 06:47 PM
5

This is borderline sidebar material. OP should screenshot this and read it over and over again.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/20 08:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter