TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sierrashoot Archive

View 0 posts and 109 comments by Sierrashoot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Hot take (in this sub): 10 is an acceptable number of sexual partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 04:28 PM
–

Sex related infections were common, lethal and unavoidable, wtf are you even talking about. And I didn’t want to turn this into an academic discussion because it’s obvious that you don’t know shit about this matter and your points are completely biased, but anthropologists and evolutionary psychologists have been talking about this for decades. David Buss, Hill & Hurtado or Anderson are some examples. You can agree with them or not but you need to understand how counter arguing works and stop us…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 03:34 PM
–

First of all, I specified that it COULD be one of the possibilities of how it could be instinctive for biological reasons, learn to understand what you read, please. Second: I didn’t say STI anywhere, having sex without proper hygiene is HIGHLY risky not only because the possibility of a contagious of a STI. Some of those infections could be fatal or leave severe sequels without optimal medical attention. Third: you’re straight out wrong about STI not existing in prehistoric ages, treponema pall…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 03:08 PM
0

How COULD it be biological? I can explain you one of the hypotheses that are considered: Exposal to diseases. Suffice to say that back then didn’t have many ways to prevent and cure many contagious diseases. Men who instinctively picked women less prone to have multiple partners were less likely to die or watch their entire family die and leave the gene pool. Apply that natural selection for hundreds of generations.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 09:38 AM
5

Women don’t age out of the dating scene (as much as RP community tend to say), they probably gave up, but they can find a man if they want. Tinder offers relationships too, do you really think that from all those infinite matches they will get no man will be ready to start a relationship with them? Tons of them would. And I said Tinder, but they don’t even need an app, an ex coworker in her 50s that went to a matrimonial agency to find a partner and told us she rejected dozens of men until he fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 09:47 AM
5

Sorry, but that is simply not true. Tell those women right now to take some photos (don’t even have to be good ones) and make a profile on Tinder. Then swipe right on the first 100 profiles that show up. No matter how ugly they are, I’m sure they will end up with more than 50 matches. Even an above average man who does this will end up with less than 10. You say they don’t get “attention” because you compare them against women more attractive. But that’s not being ignores by men, that’s simply n…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 08:37 AM
2

It’s pretty much dead but still has its followers apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 12:48 PM
4

Nah, it’s just a FDS nut girl trying to take advantage of hyper fixation of most pills communities on cuckolding to make them dislike porn. Since I see several comments of these FDS cray crays I bet they elaborated together this childish strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 11:31 AM
25

Don’t overthink OP’s post, I’ll tell you her logic: -She doesn’t like men watching porn. -She knows “cuck” is a buzzword men feel strongly against. -She poorly try to link one word with the another even though it makes no sense in order to stigmatize porn the same way cuckolding is stigmatized among men. She tried, she failed. The point makes no sense, cuckolding requires the existence of a relationship. Not even watching cuck porn could be considered being cucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 11:24 AM
2

Well, you’re right, I should have expressed myself better, is not “relationships” what give men status, is the appearance of receiving female attention or having sex. A man who is unable to have sex is often seen as a loser, no matter how successful he is in another areas. But yeah, most of the times that I see a man getting married I think that his life is going to be miserable sooner or later, but I’m a lawyer, I’m biased.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 05:47 PM
6

I know a surprisingly high amount of men in sexless relationships. It’s not very difficult to understand why they this situation. Even if they’re not married many times when the dead bedroom occurs they already share friends, family ties, home, even bank accounts so they just don’t want to face the consequences of a break up. Also, this kind of relationships are very draining to men’s self esteem so they end up thinking they’re not going to find someone who finds them attractive anyway. You cann…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 03:23 PM
6

I don’t think that’s true. Most women are not stupid, they know when someone is not stable. Most bad guys are not manipulative geniuses, they are just more exciting and interesting and women tend to forgive or ignore their red flags. And it’s not that they feel “unsafe” with them, quite the opposite, men that live constant dangerous or stressful situations are often seen as someone strong enough to protect you if you see yourself in an scenario like that (wether if they are the ones putting you …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 05:22 PM
21

You’re right, but let’s pretend it’s real. If those women are gorgeous it’s because they are escorts hired for those ugly men just to be able to attend those “no single men allowed” sex parties.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 06:34 PM
3

Change “they think that’s what they deserve” for “think that’s what they want”and I agree with you. I don’t think they choose to date that kind of people (I know lesbians who date highly toxic women too) because they’re convinced they cannot get someone better like “deserve” implies, I think they crave that kind of interaction and search people with those toxic traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 07:40 AM
7

Why do they deserve better? I mean, they chose those men, they literally deserve them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 07:26 AM
3

OLD didn’t break anything, is a consequence of the current status quo. Women don’t receive social pressure to get serious relationships anymore, they don’t get pressure about getting laid either. Men still do, men who don’t have sex or a gf are often seen as losers or something worse. Now we have fewer and fewer single available women ready to settle for anything less than the best and you have a majority of men ready to do anything in order to get female attention. Supply and demand.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 06:39 PM
–

I’m pretty sure you’re wrong, women are as violent and intrusive as men if not more (they just are not as “effective” in physical violence due to biological differences), as I said that behavior is less punished and minimized by society, that’s why you don’t give it enough credit. So let me ask you a question with a real example: a friend of mine has a partner, that partner doesn’t let him/her go out with friends without him/her in the equation (but s/he can do it),s/he doesn’t even let him/her …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 01:14 PM
–

So the same behavior is more harmful when men are the ones doing it than women. Great logic there, buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 12:33 PM
0

Most people have toxic traits but no, I disagree, not only because my personal experience but because toxicity in women is somehow accepted and tolerated while toxicity in men is punished and rejected.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 08:10 AM
3

Don’t blame the player, blame the game. Average guys don’t have many options to begin with so they instinctively took and hold what they got. They are easy prey for this kind of women. Many people think the problem behind the dating market is about men having very high libido. It’s not (just) that, it’s about the enormous social pressure men receive to get laid. A man who can get no woman is a loser, no matter how successful in other areas he is, he’s a failure to the eyes of most men and women.…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 10:44 PM
4

This is what I’m experiencing too. Average looking men with gfs and wives all the time…however those men didn’t pick them they just took what they could, the first woman ready to settle down with them is the one “they love”. And God, it’s hard to watch, a high percentage of those women are very toxic individuals who make them suffer every moment of their lifes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 08:39 PM
4

Your OP says it doesn’t happen. His post proves with stats it does happen. Then those stats contradict your OP. It’s not that hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 05:41 PM
1

Nor have the ugly girl. Of course it’s more than likely that a beautiful girl is gonna reject an ugly guy but so is the ugly girl who can score average/above average guys on a daily basis. At least the one with higher self esteem probably won’t find his advances as an insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 09:55 PM
-1

Not really. Those men would fuck almost any woman (ugly or not) if given the chance this is just a dating strategy to avoid painful rejection. Women won’t fuck anything below a certain attractiveness threshold. I think it’s true that the chances to score a beautiful girl and to score an average/ below average woman are pretty damn the same. At least in my experience. Basically because there are more chances that they don’t have a heavy amount of physical insecurities and won’t take your advances…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 01:06 PM
1

You missed the part when I said “normalize prostitution to OF levels”. That’s the most important piece of the solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 01:58 AM
5

Nah, it’s because they’re unpartnered by choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 01:54 AM
1

I already answer it in another comment: Basically, I think market tends to regulate itself. If the demand is high enough then the market will find the solution. In this case, by increasing the supply (or the appearance that the supply has increased). Soon the society will make a shift turn into either a very conservative society or the whole opposite. I know it’s not politically correct but I do think it could be as easy as legalize and normalize (to OF levels at least) prostitution. Without sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 01:43 PM
2

Yes bro, that’s exactly what you’re trying to convince us the whole thread, that we should socially engineer men into thinking they should accept their lonely fate just by not stigmatizing them (which is ridiculous: “I know you’re envy of all of those happy couples but hey, I accept you as an undateable man, bro. You’re feeling better now, right”). Your take is laughable and I fail to see how unempathic or depressed you must be to think this is a logical solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 07:35 AM
1

It’s imposible to rectify why? Because you say so? To me it’s more difficult to normalize “inceldom” than changing an anomaly in the market. Basically because if the demand is high enough then the market will find the solution. In this case, by increasing the supply (or the appearance that the supply has increased). Soon the society will make a shift turn into either a very conservative society or the whole opposite. I know it’s not politically correct but I do think it’s as easy a legalize and …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 07:27 AM
11

So according to you OP they should, what? Accept their fate? Live a sad lonely life without doing anything about it? Kill themselves? You may not see what is wrong with this situation but I assure you those guys do. And most of them will do something about it. Ignoring society’s problems won’t solve them, if more and more men are becoming unhappy about their loneliness the problems linked to frustrated unhappy people will also go on the rise.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 07:37 PM
–

Look, your tweet is about “quiet nerds”, I know for a fact that quiet nerds can be and often are very good partners. Can Chads be good partners? Of course, some of my friends are, but let’s face it, when everyone treats you like a God just for the way you look despite your personality or how you treat people, being an asshole it’s a more common trait in this people. Basically because they face less consequences for that behavior than average/ugly people.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 04:09 PM
3

Nah, that’s false. There are plenty of men desperate enough to give them all the attention and respect she didn’t earn they just don’t want them/are afraid to being rejected by them/think if they’re patient enough they can get a hotter man. That’s why the RP statement that “men have the keys of relationships” is bullshit too. Women can have as many relationships as they want but just not with the same kind of guys they want to have sex with.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 12:32 PM
2

Nah, you coping girl, I’m not gonna lie, I’ve met some “nice guys” who are utterly trash but most average/below average are amazing and dedicated guys and surprisingly good partners (sometimes despite their gfs). And no, it’s not proving your point, if you don’t want to be cheated statistically speaking is less likely if you pick a below average partner, that’s facts. Do you want ripped guys with chiseled chin? That’s ok but please don’t lie to yourself and take accountability of your choices. Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 12:22 PM
1

Why is it the better option? I mean, if both are assholes but you value loyalty and stability over looks then the most reasonable option should be the ugly one, right? I mean, this whole discussion is about ugly guys not being able to get laid even if they want. It is “better” because you want the trophy not the guy. Stop coping sis, you say ugly ones are as bad as jocks to justify your poor choice capability. It is ok if you want to date the hottest guys but don’t act surprised when you discove…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 11:58 AM
0

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 07:12 AM
48

She was fishing for compliments I guess, because that pussy looks pretty damn good to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 07:47 AM
–

Oh show me any of those statistics please. And paste the definition of average while you’re at it too. And any proof of your “science” too. An average man can score women outside of OLD, of course, inside? Maybe at the beginning, depending oh the area you’re at and using a good amount of tips. That shit is too unbalanced, the average man becomes invisible when you’re competing with zillions of highly above average men for a few dozens of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/23 08:36 PM
–

Bro bro bro, chill, I understand, probably you searched the definition and realized you were wrong, right? My poor boy… don’t worry you can’t be right always 👐🏻 accept the defeat and go on with your life
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/23 07:23 PM
–

Bro, can you search the definition of average an paste it to me? Please, do us that favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/23 06:53 PM
–

On OLD apps? I guess it depends from app to app and location to location but bro, you’re delusional. Just basic market economics tells you everything you need to know about how fucked the average man is in an app with a major ratio w/m disproportion.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/23 06:34 PM
–

I don’t think you know what average means, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/23 06:20 PM
29

Exactly. Had happened to me a few times that fairly attractive women were clearly into me and their friends were actively boycotting any advance of each part basically because they thought I wasn’t hot enough for her (one of those times their friends directly told me that was the reason). Sometimes it’s not jealousy, it’s they feel insecure and if one of their hotter friends “lower” their standards (on the looks department basically) they’ll have to do the same. So they’re not saving her friend,…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/23 08:50 AM
2

Well, that’s the problem OP is stating, if you can’t attract any kind of women then you’re in no league so you have no option to play. It is not “your league” if you don’t have “league” at all. For them this statement is basically saying they should give up.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 06:28 PM
2

There’s a problem, when something becomes “mainstream” or vaguely socially accepted, people who are not that mentally bad or would take another way to deal with their problems could instead take this route. Idk if more and more men stop putting effort into improving their social skills (or the way they should interact with real women when you’re interested in them) then it could become a real social problem. But probably I’m overthinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 07:26 PM
1

Bro, you just proved my point. Men just get frustrated about what is considered an 8 for a woman in comparison on what an 8 is for a man (at least on OLD). Maybe he’s a 6 to you, idk, but he’s the stereotypically handsome guy (tall, dark, good facial structure, fit, good career), every girl I know agrees that he’s hot. Tinder is just flooded with men, a 7-8 competes against a hoard of 9s. Can he get matches? Ofc, but not as many and of the same quality as he should if the proportion were 50/50. …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 05:58 PM
1

Well, more and more men are becoming deeply broken and mentally unwell so I think OP is right about AI gfs being a huge financial success. Just look at Onlyfans, a sane person would spend thousands of dollars just to get some online intimacy with some random girl who only wants your money? Maybe not but here we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 04:30 PM
1

Exactly. The problem is the double standards and the hypocrisy. Basically no man gets flustered at a gorgeous fit woman demanding a handsome tall toned guy, it’s when the disparity shows up when guys start complaining. But OP is tripping if he thinks anyone (or almost anyone) with just some exercising, grooming and decent clothing can hit 100 matches on Tinder. That’s just false (or he pays for the Premium and lives in a very populated area), I know handsome guys with pretty decent profiles who …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 04:01 PM
–

I understand where the entitlement comes from but if you want a highly demanded man you should ask yourself why he should pick you over the rest of the competition. For their own mental well-being actually, I’ve met plenty of frustrated and resented women just because they don’t understand the enormous gap between the female attention a regular man receives and the one received by the top percentile.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 09:55 AM
–

I agree that’s a very confrontative question which most often has harmful intentions and shouldn’t generally be asked but I do think that some women (basically the extremely picky ones) should ask themselves this question for everyone’s wellbeing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 08:44 AM
2

In the A scenario you leave the zone so you end up in no zone. In the B scenario you keep being her “friend” so you still are in the friend zone.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/23 09:35 PM
1

Exactly. This question is absurd if someone forced me to pick “gun to the head” between a 10/10 man (both pshyical and mentally) and a 1/10 physically woman who is mentally deranged, bad hygiene, has sued all of her exes, is much older than my preferred age range and has had over a 1.000 sexual partners then be fucking sure that I’m going to take that guy’s cock i my ass if necessary just to avoid the another one and I’m pretty sure I’m 100% straight.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 07:04 AM
3

Yeah, this is a prime example that sometimes the conclusion is right but the reasoning that lead to that conclusion is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 06:06 PM
6

Maybe but probably not in the way you're thinking. Lack of affection, intimacy, loneliness for very extended periods of time are really hard to endure and very damaging to someone's psychological wellbeing. An increasing amount of men spend huge amounts of time without any physical interaction and the frustration and desperation of not knowing how much longer it will take for the next "dose" can literally make you kill yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 10:55 AM
9

Sorry but that’s not true. Maybe they’re plenty of them if you compare their standards to yours, but women with low standards ready to have sex to any guy? Sorry but no, if that was the case then purple pill debate wouldn’t exist. 99% of women, no matter how ugly they are, can make a Tinder account and get a ridiculously high amount of matches and transform them into casual sex. Try it yourself if you don’t believe me, pick any random picture of anything and set up your gender to female. That’s …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 07:23 AM
13

I’m so tired of this “It’s just a numbers game!” argument. No, that’s not how it works. If you use Tinder you can be rejected A LOT and still don’t have regular sex (specially if you’re somewhat ugly). If you go to pubs to get laid you can’t go asking out every woman in there and expecting to have success because there is 99% chance that after the first rejection women who have seen you being rejected will do the same. Cold approaching? Nice way to get you in trouble. Hobbies? Even if you choose…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 06:59 AM
0

Again. Not everybody lives in the same country with the same laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 07:47 PM
0

Nowadays and because women are not full time housewives anymore (and it depends on which country you live in). Alimony was literally created to prevent this kind of situations, that’s my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 07:42 PM
-2

Alimony was created for this. In fact the men are the ones who should be terrified of her leaving them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 06:43 PM
11

Men get played as well and they don't have a way to tell either. At a certain point in their lives, certain types of men (not overly attractive but loyal and financially/emotionally stable) start to cath the attention of women who until then had not noticed them (basically, their priorities change and for different reasons like social pressure or age they start wanting to create a family or financial/emotional stability). That is, they do not start dating those guys because they are attracted to…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 10:33 AM
4

Bro, if you gonna troll at least don’t make it so evident. It was a good bait, shame you ruined it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 02:41 AM
2

Listening? To everyone. Following? To no one. Just don’t be a sheep. Those self-named “man leaders” of course have some valid points, (if they didn’t no one would follow their content) but they say blatantly stupid things too. Don’t believe everything they tell you. Always be critical and try to find which of their points are valid and which are not. And for the love of God, don’t kid yourself, some people choose the easy effortless path, don’t be that kind of guy. Forge your own opinion and try…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 03:39 PM
9

The problem is how you’re expressing your preference. “Virginity” in women have certain connotations, one of them being very young and grown up men who like very young women are seen as creeps, yes. You want to express your preference? Use better wording. I’d use: “very conservative”. Trust me, it works, after that you can answer every question without being seen as a creep or a misogynist.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 07:22 PM
0

Empathy is a skill, very often women have it more developed than men but that doesn’t mean they’re more empathetic, they just are better at showing it. The same way an introvert can be very good at socializing but doesn’t mean he is very sociable.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 06:02 PM
1

You need tons of money to live like that. You only male good money by having a good job. Most of the times you only get access to good jobs through experience in your work field. Experience you gain in your 20s. So no, it doesn’t make sense, at least not for the 99% of the population. If you’re a trust fund kid then maybe this can apply.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 10:32 AM
1

Probably but it wouldn’t be so viral, part of the success of the “movement” is precisely how they are introducing those names in our vocabulary.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 09:13 AM
3

I’m happy for you but you’re the exception not the rule. People don’t tend to solve their psychologycal trauma through sex nor on their own (often don’t even do it through therapy). Women (or people in general) with that kind of baggage usually return to their past behavioral patterns, it’s like someone with an addiction, you can be “out of it” for a long time but if something triggers your “wrong side”, then you’re back at what you were. So, honestly, I understand how many men don’t want to eng…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/23 09:21 AM
0

Not saying some men don’t present those features but honestly, until your last paragraph I thought you were supporting OP’s view. I know many, many women showing those attributes on a daily basis without remorse or self-awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 06:14 PM
4

What kind of incentive is to be the cuck of the town? Relationships or fullfilling “social obligations” should give you status not taking it away from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 07:47 PM
1

If they’re open to date men with children then maybe, if not they’re with you for the money.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 06:58 PM
2

This is wrong. Men break their rules for women they like ALL THE TIME and they don’t really put rules often other than the most basic stuff like cheating (and sometimes not even that). That’s why the dating situation for men is so extreme (or it’s a consequence, difficult to know). The point of your first post still stands but there’s not a valid equivalence for men, pretending that women can’t find a suitable partner because men have some kind of leverage to the access of relationships is delus…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 06:47 PM
19

“What are you talking about? the bar for men is too low, we don’t really care about looks, in fact my ex-bf was short and kind of ugly” Proceeds to swipe left to 200 men in a row in less than 5 minutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 03:16 PM
2

Men care about status, that’s all. Honest, caring people tend to surround themselves with a circle of honest caring people, this kind of people usually value different things rather than just physical appearance, that is to mean, strippers won’t necessarily give them status in their social circle. In other circles (often rich ones), however, appearance is one of the most valuable things so dating an insanely beautiful woman gives you status. The second group it’s not very usual so that’s why peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/23 09:48 PM
1

Let's pretend I buy your "videogames/music/tv/movies make people violent" take (even considering it doesn't exist any evidence of it). Ok, what's the alternative? You said it, the guys who would buy those dolls/robots are undesirable losers whose lack of presence wouldn't be noticed, what should they do to replace their lack of physical interaction? hookers? I bet you are against that too. Porn? By your comment I understand you're not in favor of that alternative either (and doesn't really solve…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 11:14 AM
2

Then why do they care so much? In my country feminists are actually trying to get sexual robots banned
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 09:14 AM
1

Easy. They are protecting their market value. If many people demand your “product” you can have high prices if not, then you will eventually have to lower them (or at least you won’t have the same negotiation leverage). They don’t want your attention but they need it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 10:27 PM
2

Did I say it’s because of women? Please answer me, do you really think the men who listen to Tate do it for no reason at all? People don’t follow that kind of person because it’s fun, they do it because those person provide answers to their struggles. Men listening to those gurus, black pillers, Mgtow… all of that is not the problem, is a consequence of the real problem. You cannot seriously expect desperate people to stop doing something they believe it will improve their lives just because. Ok…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:44 PM
1

“And then, for no reason at all, people started following [some horrible person].” Can you please take a moment and think why do men follow that asshole? Why do people consume that much pornography? Why do people in here are seriously debating how sex dolls are viable option for men? You can’t honestly believe there’s not a bit of truth underneath of what those “masculinity gurus” say, they’re feeding on a huge social problem that feminism and states are refusing to acknowledge. Keep ignoring th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 10:49 AM
3

Indeed all men who are horrible don’t look crazy but all men that look crazy are horrible. If you’re picking a man who looks like a prick, well, at least don’t act surprised whe he starts acting like a prick.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:41 PM
1

Great, another echo chamber full of hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 08:39 PM
4

The most logical conclussion is to find women who would have always picked the “good husband type” instead of the hot one but, for different reasons, couldn’t do it (I’ve met some and the pattern is clear: introverted highly educated foreigners from a culturally conservative/ religious country) Not many of these women around tho. And the ones who exist are not very easy to spot or flirt with, it’s not like they do Tinder or go to comic cons.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 05:49 PM
19

I might be wrong but if I remember correctly he killed himself.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/07/22 02:42 PM
9

Alpha Fucks/ Beta bucks doesn’t happen Not redpiller here but you’re wrong. I know I can’t extrapolate my own experience to the rest of the world but…anyway, as a not a very physically attractive guy I’ve never had received this amount of attention from women in my life than now in my 30s. And trust me I don’t look better. And no, I’m not more confident now nor my social skills have developed that much (never were bad actually), it’s just my qualities didn’t make up for my looks and now women ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:58 PM
2

Bold assumption to think all women in there are realistic about their physical expectations or even thinking people know what their looksmatch is. Especially when one of the most recurrent topics in there is that you should aim higher due to the higher demand of women. Moreover, how do they even know in what league they’re in when they get an excessive amount of sexual attention from men when sex has no value for those men? Yes, you can have sex with a 9/10 but that doesn’t mean he is in your le…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 05:08 PM
3

I wish you were right about what a HVM means to FDS members but you’re not. Please, don’t make me do it but I can list you dozens of posts and comments (by the moderators themselves) calling women to vet basing in physical attributes. Hell, they even have a podcast episode about how women should ridiculice men for the size of their penis. Honestly you cannot expect people to believe that the only requisite women in there have for men is “treating their partner with respect”, because as you say, …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 06:40 PM
3

I think your analogy is flawed from the start. You're assuming all of FDS members (or at least a truly relevant portion of them) are the equivalent of a highly qualified proffesional of a very demanded field. Sorry to break this up to you but not every FDS member (or every woman in general) is a "pharmacist with experience", by stadistics alone some of them have to be the equivalent of an uneducated person. Pretty sure in your life you've met women who're not HV too, they can receive attention f…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 11:43 PM
–

Dating market and job market are very similar in some aspects, would you only teach people how to vet bad jobs? Probably not, if you want to help someone to find the job of their dreams you would give them tips on how to find and being a good candidate to that perfect job. Women do have plenty of options, yes. They are undoubtedly in high demand but, when your requisites are too high and you vet way too much then you're aiming for, let's be generous, the 3% of male population. And that 3% is in …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 11:30 AM
9

I don't do any of these things on OLD and still get treated like a ghost or piece of shit by women 90% of the time Most of men don't even have the chance to show that behavior because they don't have matches to begin with. Either way, men can't fix something that's rigged from the start, their market model is based on making people desperate enough to spend hours using their app and, hopefully, pay for bonus services.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 11:09 PM
–

I don't know, you might be right, but some friends (three that I remember now) have married women from way more conservative countries (two asian and one born-and-raised latin american) than mine (Spain) and they look pretty damn happy right now. I can't predict the future though but, so far, their dinamics seem healthy. And sorry but my opinion seem way more elaborated and logical than "I just know how they are". Well, you don't explain how they're and why it's bad for us but even if you're rig…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 09:39 PM
–

Interesting how convinced a lot of the posters (mostly women?) on here seem to be that these type of men would still be miserable failures abroad for not meeting the Western idea of being competitive in the dating market In my opinion it's an instinctive response. Protectionism. Like a local commerce facing the effects of product importation from asian countries. They instinctively fear their market value would plummet if this tendency becomes more usual. Lot of women don't even understand that …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 12:26 PM
5

You know that men having unrealistic standards don’t mean women don’t have even more unrealistic standards too, right? One doesn’t invalidate the other. Both can be true (it is not, though). Sexual attention and romantic attention are not the same. “Not as desirable men” can’t lower what it doesn’t exist anymore, they usually just get what they can. Hot men doesn’t have to lower anything because they get what they want. Women, generally speaking, wouldn’t call ‘success’ to having sex with a hott…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 06:04 PM
11

Well, women are not getting what they want either. That’s why femcels and FDS exist to begin with. When people say they’re unrealistic they usually exclusively mean about expecting a LTR with a man who met those high standards, everyone knows ONS from a man has no value, even if he’s hot as fuck. That 10/10 settling down on the other hand… it’s unrealistic because it’s statistically speaking barely impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:21 PM
12

Every now and then the same question is asked. I don’t know what’s so hard to understand it’s unrealistic to get commitment from someone highly demanded if you have little to nothing to offer. COMMITMENT. An ugly woman can be pumped and dumped by 9-10/10 on a daily basis if she wants but it’s not realistic to expect him to settle. A single 6,2’, muscular, handsome, wealthy, ambitious, charismatic, caring man it’s very very unusual, a woman will always have to face an absurd amount of competition…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:07 PM
2

Because women know that male sexlessness is only beginning to rise. Women are finally being sexually freed, and that means being free to do what nature intended women to do: filter out the bad DNA of the human race. Kind of agree with this but disagree with the "they must be made an example" part. I think it's more simple, if you succesfully construct the narrative that sexually undesirable men are dangerous for vulnerable people then them being ostraziced is a 'good thing'. They are inherently …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:58 PM
1

First of all, the act of refusing to have sex with your partner is not bad itself what people criticize are the reasons and goals behind that denial. I think you give “average” a wrong meaning. If you have to get it right 7/10 answers of a test and most of the students get 5/10 that doesn’t mean those students are “below average”, that means the bar is too high. And we, as a society, should analize why women’s standards are higher now than ever and try to find a solution before it’s too late.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/21 07:44 PM
3

99% of men know that. Guys around here just hate the blatant hipocrisy of some women (FDS types basically) that actively defend being shallow with men but get enraged when men do the same (especially with the body changes caused by age). It doesn’t help that mainstream media pushes body positivity only for women, tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 08:37 AM
6

It’s the premise of the post, one girl is loyal and committed but not very attractive and the other one is not loyal nor committed but very attractive. Just admit you read the post wrong, it’s not that bad. And I don’t know mate the “huge” part is pretty relevant. Not the same being told by your doctor that you have a “huge” probability of survival than just “a probability”.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 05:04 PM
5

Literally in the title, it’s the premise: “huge cheating risk”.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 04:50 PM
20

First of all you’re assuming I don’t find left physically attractive enough to enjoy sex with her which is wrong. But in any case any man who can’t appreciate the INMENSE value of a loyal emotionally stable woman who deeply loves you in today’s society and picks the cheating thot just because you can brag in front of your friends then that guy deserves his fate. I couldn’t care less if a woman cooks or cleans for me, I can do that by myself, but the loyalty and the love thing…man, you can’t hire…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 04:27 PM
1

I have so many questions for you: Is he a HVM? and if he is, will he settle for you? Do you see yourselves getting married in the future? Do you see him as the last man you're going to have sex with? Can I screencap your answers and send you a DM in three years asking these very same questions? Please and thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 11:43 AM
59

This is an absurd question. It doesn’t matter what men answer because you already decided that if anyone chooses left he is lying. Btw, left anyday, I’m not a moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 11:37 AM
2

I don't know man, she's a top 60% female (at the very best) aiming for the top 0,00005% male population. It's not only the 6' feet thing, she wants a single Australian/Irish descent, raised as a Roman Catholic, around her age with the same economical and academic status (she's a doctor) who WANTS TO DATE HER. 5000$ seems even a reasonable fee for such a feat. She probably realized that the odds weren't in her favour and understood how little time she has left.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/21 11:08 AM
14

”I’m very honest” Proceeds to use every filter available to deceive you Ok.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/08/21 09:58 PM
4

I think this attitude is less prevalent on men since we’re so used to ‘sexual competition’ we tend to know our real market value. Not only me, most of my friends has had partners or sexual encounters with women more physically attractive than them and didn’t have a problem dating/marrying far less beutiful women afterwards. Or maybe we just tend to be more pragmatic and accept what are the things that actually make us happy.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/08/21 05:28 PM
1

I can’t wait to see people defending that not being raised by single mothers is a priviledge and the state should do something to solve that disadvantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 05:45 PM
1

I bet her definition of a "nerd" is a Brad Pitt lookalike who happens to wear glasses 99% of the cases you'd be right but the "male's rights activist" part makes me think she's truly looking for an ugly rich nerd. Would she cheat on him at the first chance and take half of his belongins? Most likely. Obviously I'm not saying she's even remotely passable but, man, have you seen the other women in that compilation, in comparison she looks almost reasonable.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/07/21 11:07 AM
1

Unpopular opinion here: the nerd chaser is not THAT bad. I mean, at least she's not completely delusional, she's realized that she can't get a 6,6,6 man and only goes for the most important 6.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/07/21 11:39 PM
2

I don’t see it as having some leverage or admitting being low value, I think it’s about the insecurity feeling linked to being in a relationship with someone who can (and has proved) date a huge range of people. If the “n count” it’s high enough then it’s inevitable that some of them were better than you in aspects that your partner might value and might miss in the long term (which might also lead to them breaking up with you/ cheat on you in order to seek those traits again in the vast dating …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 09:52 AM
2

Spanish guy here. Yes, you understood it correctly. She’s implying she still wants a 6’ guy.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/06/21 04:51 PM
60

You're absolutely correct, however most people could never follow your advice. In order to actually be hard-to-get those women should have real goals, interesting time consuming hobbies, important obligations...and the vast majority of people can't say they have without lying. And, as you said, if they lie, high value men will see through their bullshit. In conclussion, if you want high value men you have to be a high value woman yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 02:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter