TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SightBlinder3 Archive

View 1 posts and 112 comments by SightBlinder3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
124

SightBlinder3/r/MGTOW23/11/18 05:45 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

When asked what they look for in a man, many women will tell you what they want to find attractive, not what they do find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 03:17 AM
7

I'd add 4. Handwriting. It falls into 1, but it's a specific factor that male students don't seem to think matters at all. I've helped grade high school papers and holy shit some of these dudes must hold their pens in their fist like a chisel. The worst ones were so bad that I'd be so irritated from deciphering the handwriting that by the time I got to free response questions my desire to throw partial credit points their way was 0. It was always a male student. Female students value the appeara…
/r/BlackPillScience24/10/22 03:08 PM
4

FTFY People will whine/boast about their "high standards" online, then date someone who isn't half of those things when there's more money and/or less time. There's a clear and observable inverse relationship between both age/standards and money/standards. Age or money go up, standards go down.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 01:29 AM
1

Nvm, I believe you truly didn't understand now. My apologies.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 05:41 AM
6

I don't agree with him either, but you'd have to be incredibly dense to not understand what his point is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 05:10 AM
4

I agree with you on 1, but 2-4 are basically just feminist talking points meant to romanticise the importance of motherhood. 2) Mother's are more likely that fathers to non-physcially abuse their children. When women had the role of caregiver in the home, they obviously did more of the nurturing since that was their contribution to the family. That does not make them the only capable gender to take on that role. 3) Men are just as capable as women to control their emotions and teach a child to d…
/r/MensRights18/06/22 06:42 PM
6

"13000 single women and 4000 single men." I'd be interested if this ratio matched the ratio of who tried to adopt a kid. Could be that women are just way more likely to try, but I wouldn't be surprised if men are denied more often either. Edit: the source the article links to says 15k women and 2k men, which is even worse"
/r/MensRights18/06/22 06:25 PM
3

Why would you ask a random stranger that question? What if he had been? You've just implied to a rape victim that they are either not a man because they were raped or that their rape wasn't real because they aren't a woman. You're seriously fucked in the head.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 07:57 PM
5

I don't have the power to decide someone else's feelings. I'm just recognizing inconsistencies so Im not operating on incorrect information. That isn't a bad thing, in fact it can save you a lot of hardship. If someone tells me a show airs at 9, but I know it's at 8, it isn't rude for me to turn my TV on at 8 and watch my show. If the inconsistencies prove temporary I can adjust my opinion, but I'm not going to ignore trends because they point to something I wish weren't true or because it leads…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 02:20 PM
9

Well, idk what to tell you. Your feelings of discomfort don't make something false. Lots of objectively true things make me uncomfortable too. I don't gain comfort from pretending I don't see what's going on around me though. I also did not claim they were all lying, I gave unaware as a possible option as well. Men describe hair color like 80% (percentage obviously pulled out of my ass, but it's a lot) of the time. I agree its weird and not something women usually include, but it's definitely a …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 02:04 PM
13

I'm bi, but end up in that role with a lot of women since I'm male and can talk about men with them. It's not a matter of can't. It's the 100% rate of the thing they supposedly don't care about and a 0% rate of the thing they say is all that matters. That would lead anyone who isn't willfully ignoring the obvious to the conclusion that the person is either unaware or doesn't think it's socially acceptable to voice their true desires. And yes to most (not all) women and men meet the examples,not …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 01:35 PM
15

Most women just wanna date a nice guy who they find attractive Most women say they just wanna date a nice guy who they find attractive. One thing I've learned as "the gay best friend" is that women's voiced desires literally never match their dating history. Women will be like "I just want someone who is cute and funny, height doesnt matter" then have 6 busted exes that barely speak yet all just happen to be 6'3" Men will be like "I prefer blonde tomboys" then have 6 exes, 4 of which are blonde …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 01:10 PM
1

People with no self control have to remove temptation since they are incapable of resisting it. Super common mindset, but a major red flag because that mindset applies to all aspects of their lives and once you are together it will be your options they are limiting because they can't control themselves. Common example: People forcing partners to diet with them because the only way they can stop eating unhealthy food is to literally not own any.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:44 PM
6

Okay, take the quotes away and pretend that person said those words to you. The quote clearly illustrates how men take being called husband material and it coming from a published woman negates the inevitable gaslighting of "women don't actually think like that" responses. You're coming off as being dense on purpose.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 10:39 PM
6

That wasn't an answer I liked. FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 10:04 PM
1

We all know there are more women in college than men. It’s only a matter of time before women out earn men across the board tbh Completely agree, makes you wonder why they're considered marginalized and in need of special assistance.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 03:55 AM
2

Are you saying women aren't capable of meeting the standards of having an education and a job? That's an interesting hot take.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/21 08:30 PM
7

Except they do. Literally happened in a high school this week. New security guard got hired who was tall and muscular. All the women teachers and staff were running around like chickens with their heads cut off telling everyone who would listen to go look at the new security guard because he's so hot. I'm bi and he wasn't even that hot! Literally just tall and not ugly and they all lost their minds and wouldn't stop talking about how hot he was. Can't wait to jokingly reminisce about it in front…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 09:31 PM
13

Grouping with the adult psycho Karen's was the best strategy for non STEM classes. They are the perfect combination of masters of subjective facts and unbridled control issues. They'll do all the work, you'll get an A, and they'll be happy about it.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 03:16 PM
11

Ngl the recording was super creepy, but the "He said I wouldn't do it again, so I did it twice more" gave me a chuckle.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/21 06:50 AM
2

It literally does though. Like if it was "I don't like bi men." I wouldn't care. Instead it's "I don't like bi men because they all have AIDS" If you can't see the difference in that and "having a preference" then it's not my responsibility to re-teach you literacy. If you're purposefully pretending not to understand then it's not my responsibility to engage with someone arguing in bad faith. Either way: I'm out ✌
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/21 02:58 PM
2

When their reasons are based on false information and when their reasons don't change when that information is proven false to them and when the argument eventually devolves into a rant about men "dry humping everything" it means they're lying and spreading misinformation. Since you're responding to every singe post I made on this thread, I assume you've already seen this exact scenario played out. When I have an interaction with a woman about this that doesn't end that way I'll consider changin…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/21 02:43 PM
2

Completely agree if they'd stop lying to themselves and others while spreading bigoted misinformation in the process.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/21 02:25 PM
2

HIV is one STD, you're cherry picking data that fits your agenda. If you checked out the source I provided you will notice the most common gender to have STDs when looking at multiple diseases are women and the most common ethnicity is black. So by your logic you think people should refuse to date women and blacks, I was just asking if that's was your stance because if its not then you aren't actually trying to avoid STDs but avoid your fear of men cheating on you. Thus my original point: women …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 06:54 PM
2

Being concerned that you're that you're with a person who will dryhump anything that moves isn't insecure. Once again, I agree with that statement, but it's not what I said. you are either barely literate or biligerently pretending you don't understand the difference between that and: Assuming every bi male will dryhump anything that moves just because he is bi, is insecure. Which is it? Are you unable to process how those are different or just unable to produce a relevant retort?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 05:57 PM
2

100% agree, I just think they shouldn't maliciously lie to themselves and others about why they have those preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 05:02 PM
1

Strange ... maybe that's why bi men end up with men since data shows far more women have stds. Do you also refuse to date black people? Or do you just believe stereotypes when they validate your fears? https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D128;jsessionid=EDABB3643596ABD8A061DCE13B9B
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 04:59 PM
1

It's insecure to not want a man you fear will cheat on you? Really? It is insecure to think a man will automatically cheat on you just because he has more options, yes. You twisting it into a 100% chance to occur when it isn't is what tells me you are insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 04:53 PM
6

That's just not a true statement. Yes, it is definitely more likely for bi men to end up with men, but to say all do is disingenuous. You're also ignoring the why. Most bi men I've talked to listed one of two reasons they ended up with a man. 1) women weren't interested in them once they learned of their past with other men. 2) men are more likely to expect to take less and provide more in a relationship than women. This makes male suitors a more appealing long term choice. Both of those things …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 06:35 AM
35

Bisexual/homosexual men can act on their desires much easier than a straight man (usually). Theres a fear him going out and cheating and it being easy bc hes looking for guys. In my experience most women will say number 1 and 2, but it almost always boils down to 3. Women who refuse to date bi guys is always a red flag for possessiveness and insecurity.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/21 09:52 PM
1

Lack of awareness? it's true. Most guys are shit in bed. Most young men learn the shit they do in bed from porn movies. That may be your experience, but not relevant to the lack of awareness. Screeching about men not being confident in the same breath as insulting all men is what I was referring too. This sub isn't therapy? Tell that to all of the red pillers and black pillers and mgtow who use PPD as a way to vent their frustrations and mental problems I will also gladly call out any single red…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 12:24 PM
20

are fuck boys because those are the only cunts confident enough to fucking speak to us and get naked infront of us, did I say shit in fucking bed????? The lack of self awareness in this sentence alone is absolutely bonkers, not to mention the 50 other comments you've left in this thread. This sub is not therapy, go get a licensed professional you clearly got some shit to work through.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 04:18 AM
30

Now, we're still together and things are better because I am making great money again ... but during that time she was emotionally abusive Read this sentence outloud to yourself and pretend it's someone else saying it. Internalize whatever you're reaction is and consider whatever advice you would give.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 02:59 PM
2

Women are literally telling you what they want in bed Women are literally telling men what they want to want in bed. Not quite the same thing in most cases unfortunately for everyone involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 01:34 AM
5

So you're saying Chinese women are gold diggers and others races arent? You're just moving one uncomfortable conclusion to another uncomfortable conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 01:26 AM
6

You're more worried about whether some random internet stranger has masturbated without porn before than responding to their attempt to acknowledge middle ground with you. I don't think you're here for a discussion but for an outlet of your unprocessed insecurity related to men who you couldn't get off. Just like with any activity that releases dopamine, people can become harmfully addicted. Doesn't mean everyone has to stop doing it. Otherwise you need to stop shopping, eating, drinking alcohol…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 04:44 AM
5

I haven't spent much time in the sub, but the fact that anyone with a single dissenting opinion on a topic is perma banned from the whole sub is certainly a warning sign.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 04:34 AM
1

Great, now even if I do manage to climb the ladder I'll just be the token bisexual regardless of how I get there.
/r/MGTOW24/02/21 02:56 AM
8

Oh, my bad, I misinterpreted. Normally when one tries to point out an anecdote doesn't provide the full picture they point out something that doesn't work within the anecdote not something that does.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 01:48 AM
11

Okay? That doesn't refute anything i said
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 01:29 AM
19

In my experienceas a bi man this is a fallacy. HVM and HVW are both picky and since most women can fuck HVM they pursue them to date and think all men are picky. The disconnect, imo, is women who are less desired remain picky while men are more aware of their status because they don't get the constant attention and validation from the opposite sex and their friends like women do. There are lots of gay men out there are willing to date pretty much anything that shows them attention, I've yet to c…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 01:06 AM
2

This is either top tier irony or bottom tier trolling. Either way I'm amused so at least you accomplished that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 11:36 PM
2

Men here are congradulating each other for having "realistic standards" but if they do realistically approach women, then it doesn't mean shit. I'm assuming you meant to say don't, other wise that sentence goes against your point so my reply is going to be based on that assumption. That statement might have been able to hold water except the entire second half of the comment you replied to that you are so willfully pretending you didn't read completely derails your entire reasoning for thinking …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 11:00 PM
9

You didn't prove anything though. All you did was scream something into the ether and pat yourself on the back while trying to mock anyone who disagrees with you. You're also blatantly ignoring how the first graph affects the second. How could women also mostly message 7s when they barely ever give anyone a 7+ rating? Like there are soooo many holes in that study for you to poke at and you've chosen one that only takes 3sec of thought to dismiss and seem confused why nobody is convinced.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 04:40 PM
3

Yet you didn't state what country you were talking about in your question. Its clear you're just using this excuse up and down this thread to not acknowledge anything that goes against the narrative you're not even remotely subtle in pushing with this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/20 12:59 AM
1

except the ugly nerdy girl is never actually ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 08:28 PM
3

A 2 year degree you can get from a community college. It's kinda like trade school but for things that aren't trades. An associates degree will also get you some credits towards a bachelor's at most colleges so they are often used to make a 4 year degree cheaper to get.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 10:29 PM
1

Lady it's been a day, are you planning on charging rent for all the space I'm taking up in your head?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 08:28 PM
1

Are you even literate? I do not care who you bang, I just called out that the thought process of why is shallow and bigoted. Why is that differentiation so incredibly hard for you to understand? Is it belligerence or actual incapabablilty? I'm convinced its belligerence at this point, I refuse to believe anyone is that dense so imma gonna stop being toyed with and piece out. Enjoy your life, try to open your mind more even if it's hard and scary!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 04:35 AM
2

For someone who doesn't care about my opinion you've spent a lot of time trying to change it! Like I said Idc who you bang, but itd be nice if more of the general population had more critical thinking skills than you've displayed so I try to encourage it, but obviously it's your right to keep being a bigot! Have a nice day :)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 11:14 PM
2

You're clearly bringing personal baggage into this. I've been cheated on by every woman I've date and none of the men. Everyone's experiences differ. All of that is irrelevant tho because you are still just skipping over what I said. Like I've never interacted with someone so dense. This is how the convo has gone: "Treating someone like a stereotype is narrow minded" "But here are all the sterotypes" "I understand that, but its narrow minded to assume everyone in a category is automatically like…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 10:52 PM
2

I never asked a question (that wasn't hypothetical to prove a point). I stated you were narrow minded. Throwing STI stats at me just enforces that claim tbh. "People who only half share your sexuality are more likely to have stds so I'm going to treat you like you have one regardless of whether you have an std or even exhibit the behaviors that lead to that stat." How is that not narrow minded? Your mind cannot seem to comprehend that people exist outside of a stereotype or a statistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 10:27 PM
2

Coulda lead with "I dont care" instead of pretending to care on a debate sub lol. Have a nice day!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 10:12 PM
1

You love starting to argue a different point to distract from a point you cant counter. I'm not denying any of that post. A refresh for you, the topic you're replying about is: Declaring that all bi men should be avoided because you've observed gay men act a certain way is narrow minded.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 09:28 PM
1

I can see you used your extrapolation skills to get "gay men are actually nuns" from what I said. Let's try rephrasing the situation in a different way for you. Do you think men should avoid dating all women because I can name 50+ women who have used a man for his money? Should I extrapolate that all women are just after men's money and only date men? When you switch the subject around it really starts to look exactly like incel logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 08:04 PM
1

To assume you know the lives of every gay man at your "massive" university is arrogant enough, and then you add a further generalization by saying that defines other gay men. I'm not arguing whether ITS FINE or not so I'm not sure why you brought that up. I'm saying you're allowing your narrow experience to define an entire population, which I do believe qualifies you as narrow minded by definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 07:51 PM
1

Your view of gay men is incredibly narrow minded. Maybe only gay men that are clearly starved for literally any attention are the only ones willing to be around you?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 05:14 AM
2

I was being asinine based on the comment above you: "-High Sex Drive -No history of casual sex -Good looking Pick 2."
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/19 06:21 PM
13

Guess you've picked your two
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/19 04:54 PM
16

This 100%. Ive picked up both Women and Men on Tinder and my god it is certainly easy to slip into this mindset if that's your sole interaction with women. They (generally speaking not all of them) put zero effort into a conversation because they are the gatekeepers in the arena and dont have to. Men will try to be clever and will flirt, Women just give one word responses while they bide their time seeing the whose the hottest guy they can get that night.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/19 03:32 PM
4

Off topic but I asked a friend of a friend the "What do you do" question to try to bring them into a group conversation wed been having about our careers. she replied "I work at 7-Eleven" and just looked mortified. I felt so bad, I'll never ask that as small talk again.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/19 11:23 PM
3

Anyone who uses "Shame." as a stand alone sentence instantly loses all credibility. That and random all caps is a constant in every brand of psycho mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/19 03:17 AM
10

You're either so socially inept that you cant tell the difference between mocking sarcasm from a challenge to a duel or you're just pretending to be incredibly dense for a thinly veiled need to gain personal validation from how manly your husband is. Which is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 01:42 PM
16

"Lets put you and my wife in a room and see who's more feminine" See how childish and petty that sounds? That's what you sound like.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 12:48 PM
11

To be fair women constantly lie to their male friends (and im pretty sure themselves) about what they are attracted to (usually heavily up playing personality and shared interests and down playing physical appearance and job status) then act confused when men think women are attracted to things they aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/19 06:18 PM
1

It's not crazy, and there are many that do. But if we stop looking at ourselves long enough to zoom out, it is still vastly frowned upon for a man to be unemployed while women who want to be taken care of aren't viewed with that same criticism. I've dated both men and women. When I say I have a girlfriend everyone wants to see pictures. When I say I have a boyfriend everyone wants to know his job.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/19 02:10 PM
0

Lol let's not pretend they weren't just taking a general statement as an opportunity to pat themselves on the back state that they specifically didn't fit the general mold I was referring to. I'm sorry a period where a comma should be makes a sentence so incredibly unreadable to you that it becomes useless, but that seems like more of a personal problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 09:49 PM
1

You realize I said they couldn't be inclusive too right? Like this is satirical at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 09:45 PM
0

I know reading is hard but I've found breaking things down into patterns helps those who struggle. So when someone says unless x, y. The y cant be inclusive (that means all of a group, such as everyone)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 09:14 PM
2

Okay? Wasn't talking about you specifically...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 08:46 PM
3

I would assume career track. For example I have a BS and my partner has a Masters, but I would probably be considered more promising because my career track leads to jobs making 250k+ (Little do they know I'll never take on that level of effort or responsibility lol) while his realistically maxes at like 80k (with a few exceptions). Many high education career tracks even when maxed don't make upper class level income so I would expect that's more relevant than level of education.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 08:45 PM
8

Let's be real, unless you have serious masculinity issues or are super ambitious, everyone wants to be a stay at home parent. It's undeniably easier than any job that can support an entire family. But I'd be willing to bet anything that it is significantly more common for women to plan for that as a realistic future.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 08:39 PM
4

Masters degrees are such a waste of time, money, and energy. Any pay increase you get is not worth the cost of the degree plus the lost year's of experience. Get a PHD if your field requires upper ed, otherwise take the BS and get experience. (Education is the exception to this as getting a master is like one extra class compared to getting your teaching license)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 08:34 PM
13

Could you imagine if men dated with this mindset? So many women I know are sitting in dead end 30k max office jobs just waiting to pop out a baby and quit forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 08:28 PM
1

Honestly I'm not against this one.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/19 01:04 AM
1

See theres a crucial difference tho. Men lie and say you look better without make up because we want you to stop wearing makeup. Women lie about how important looks are because they want to appear less shallow. Yes both are lying, but one lie encourages behavior the person lying wants while the other encourages behavior the person lying doesn't want.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/19 05:12 AM
22

Same reason the "body acceptance" movement preaches that fat women deserve fit men instead of pursuing other "beautiful" bodied men. People want what they can't have and it's easier to blame society than accept and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 03:39 PM
5

Keep in mind it's only over a 10 year period. That's pretty small in terms of judging marriage success
/r/MGTOW27/05/19 07:25 PM
1

That's great and I'm not trying to say that she is it isn't like that, but you might want to double check what the word All means.
/r/MGTOW11/05/19 01:12 PM
1

You cant have your cake and eat it too. Either your mom isnt like that and thus NAWALT. Or AWALT and thus so is your mom. It's just what the words mean.
/r/MGTOW11/05/19 04:07 AM
4

So you're saying NAWALT?
/r/MGTOW10/05/19 09:36 PM
9

To be fair, that's what shes getting paid to do.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 05:14 AM
1

I don't think I've ever read anything with such a lack of self awareness before. You do realize you just kept a conversation going with the sole purpose of telling the other person it was bad to keep that conversation going, right?
/r/MensRights10/04/19 11:21 PM
1

Your choice of what to respond to and what to ignore is very telling. You clearly get something out of being riled up so to each their own I guess.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 06:52 PM
1

First off, They didn't mass manipulate anything. They just said what the masses already thought in order to gain their approval for their brand, which is not a manipulation. I think you might be mixing up the cause and effect relationship here. Secondly, I'm not falling victim to anything. I'm having this discussion on the clock and watching the money roll in too! Thirdly, Not everything has to be so dire. There will always be crooks and their will always be fools. The only thing we can do is ma…
/r/MensRights10/04/19 03:36 PM
1

I mean I agree, but honestly had the same opinion about that. It was a stupid ad that should've been ineffective, but I can't really blame the company because it ended up being effective and that is their job. I can't blame them for being good at knowing what the moronic masses want to hear.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 01:56 PM
1

I was not, idk why you brought that up?
/r/MensRights09/04/19 06:03 PM
22

I'm sorry but I can't be mad at the companies when the scam is so obvious. At some point the person falling for it needs to take responsibility.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 02:36 PM
7

Why are the options once a month or not at all? Like can't a guy have sex every couple months?
/r/BlackPillScience30/03/19 09:23 PM
2

That article is about making profits smaller...
/r/MGTOW12/03/19 03:27 AM
3

It ranked 7th out of the 21 marvel movies for opening weekend profits so the empty theater part must not have been as bad as that video made it seem. Edit: newer articles are saying it finished 6th of any movie ever.
/r/MGTOW11/03/19 09:58 PM
1

Sort of. Men can 'get' a yeast infection but show no symptoms other than giving it to other women. Had a roommate in college whose gyno told her she kept getting yeast infections because she was raw dogging her bf, using w.e meds to get rid of the infection, and then raw dogging her bf again before his went away. This knowledge didn't stop her from continuing this cycle btw.
/r/MGTOW02/02/19 07:21 AM
2

Both graphs x-axis show percent of men in the work place. So men have higher divorce rates towards 0 (aka more women) and women have higher divorce rates towards 1 (more men).
/r/BlackPillScience28/01/19 01:17 PM
11

To be fair, the male graph shows the same is true for men
/r/BlackPillScience28/01/19 12:56 PM
16

Why are so many men trying to hook up with a Bagel?
/r/MGTOW01/12/18 04:27 AM
-1

You sound like a joy to be around.
/r/MGTOW24/11/18 04:18 PM
3

Pretty sure she sees me as her child not her potential lover 😂
/r/MGTOW23/11/18 06:45 PM
18

The fact that she thinks a savings account is the best option shows she cant understand that question
/r/MGTOW23/11/18 06:00 PM
21

I said thanks for the free advice, I don't think she caught the /s
/r/MGTOW23/11/18 05:50 PM
21

She didn't exactly look stellar in the before either.
/r/MGTOW22/11/18 05:30 AM
1

Also not a true statement. She and her husband worked closely together and it is true that her first Nobel Prize was given to both of them for research they both did. However She continued making discoveries and winning awards after her Husband's death. Again, the more you deny facts because they don't fit your desired narrative, the more evidence you give everyone who claims MGTOW is just a bunch of bitter rejected men.
/r/MGTOW08/11/18 01:39 PM
3

That is just not true. Just off the top of my head Marie Curie literally discovered and named radioactivity. Yes men have discovered way more than women, but to say women have never discovered or invented anything just makes you seem like you're arguments are based on what you want to be true instead of what is actually true.
/r/MGTOW08/11/18 05:02 AM
2

They get better pay and housing if they are married
/r/MGTOW25/10/18 11:32 PM
15

Just off the top of my head: Degree from an all women's college with that in the name Leadership position as part of a club or sorority with women in the name Awards or other achievements with woman in the name. While you may disagree with those things, they do not inherently make someone unqualified just because they received them.
/r/MGTOW22/10/18 06:17 PM
26

If you had read the article and not just the headline youd know that's not what happened. It was literally throwing away resumes because they had the words 'woman' or 'women' in it because most of the resumes it was using to learn we're from men. I'm just as much against diversity quotas as the next guy, but taking something out of context and trying to make it fit your narrative just makes it seem like your narrative doesn't have anything real to support it.
/r/MGTOW22/10/18 02:14 PM
19

Why though? I've never understood the appeal. Maybe it's because I like short girls.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/10/18 05:47 AM
2

I feel like someone in a position that can tell a candidate to go home on the spot would know the difference between was and were.
/r/MGTOW13/10/18 04:11 AM
1

Its pretty normal where I'm from to use they as a gender neutral he/she.
/r/MGTOW12/10/18 12:40 PM
8

I'm confused why they included the car accident.
/r/MGTOW12/10/18 03:33 AM
6

They do realize what the word radical means right?
/r/MGTOW25/09/18 05:30 AM
8

Brandon Sanderson. He finished Robert Jordan's series, but did not take his name 😋
/r/MGTOW17/09/18 07:40 PM
21

The fact that nobody's body looks like that. When shopping, it generally helps to get proportions within the realm of what can naturally occur.
/r/MGTOW17/09/18 11:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter