TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SigmundFloyd76 Archive

View 0 posts and 1,456 comments by SigmundFloyd76 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,456 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
33

That famous bridge in Austin that was promoted as "100%designed by womanz" and it fucking collapsed the day it opened because it was the worst designed bridge in history. Apparently, lots of people had an inclination about what was coming, but weren't allowed to "mansplain" about shear-strength and redundancy.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 10:08 AM
4

Quick, ramp up the opium wars such that the idle men with a proclivity toward improving their situation can remain a wealth-generating burden on the rest of society through the addiction industrial complex/crime-control industry/pharma. Oops, too late.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 10:05 AM
59

I do believe the federal sentencing guidelines are always in months.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/26 03:18 PM
32

Hear, hear. I spent half of my one day off fixing our washer. Because I can. I saved us $800, which is about what I make in 2 days. Then I put my partners winter tires on her car. I saved her $100. We split the finances. So where's my $150?
/r/MensRights04/12/25 09:29 PM
13

Zelensky the professional actor that was in the Pandora papers?
/r/MensRights30/06/25 04:42 PM
71

So afaik, and I was into this for a while, any country or municipality that ever instituted mandatory paternity testing quickly discovered that the numbers are off the charts. Like 5-6%, some places were close to 15%. Imagine, the implication that when I sat in my grade 6 class with 30 other kids, probably 2 of us at least are being lied to about who our father is. It's all erased under the "for the good of the children" pretense. Like "the truth would do more harm" (We pretend it doesn't happen…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 05:58 PM
2

Now you know how we felt when you spelled it "spelt".
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/22 05:15 PM
4

You're right. Good example.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 07:47 PM
16

Like when Jian Gomeshi "kept" all those exculpatory emails (gmail, like I've never deleted one in my life) and the CBC portrayed it as if it was proof of his guilt. Which was one of the most ironic things i've ever seen. The content of the emails proved his innocence, but the fact that they existed at all meant he's guilty. This was also about the time that it went from: "just because she lied doesn't mean the crime didn't take place" And into: "the fact that she lied about every other aspect of…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 04:35 PM
6

Dude. Wow.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 04:01 PM
1

The infamous Koss study.
/r/MensRights26/05/21 04:20 PM
13

...well it's kind of a "actions damaging to the mainstream ideological narrative" pass.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 04:15 PM
6

Well said. But dude, my ex merely IMPLIED that I MIGHT hit her and it was enough to have the full weight of the state bare down on me and remove me from my house and children. And destroy my reputation. And she was the violent one, not me. Even in spite of copious exculpatory evidence, the entire system just chugged along as if I was an abuser. (Eventually won custody of my children back and moved on, i'm good now) Humans have an evolutionary drive to protect woman. So much so that even innocenc…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/11/20 04:45 PM
12

Right. Good point.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 02:34 PM
216

...and concocted a false story with two of her orbiters to add some weight to her own narcissistic victim narrative... ...and lets not forget the "ouch! Ow Johnny! Stop hurting me Johnny" cries that were heard by the two security guards. What did they find when they ran to assist? They found Amber alone and smacking herself in the face.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 01:38 PM
3

This here. Clearly.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 11:52 PM
5

Victim of spurious accusations of DV as a divorce tactic here... Beg, borrow and steal. OP MUST have a lawyer.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 10:41 AM
1

Exactly. Meanwhile, in spite of drastically increasing the number of doctors and expanding the med school, we still have a major shortage of doctors in Newfoundland. Why? Because a large percentage of the new docs only work part time. By choice.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 02:46 PM
2

like saying there shouldn’t be any women doctors! In my small Canadian city, the med school is 65% woman.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 10:25 AM
3

Reminds me of the stories of the Hitler Youth informing on their own parents. I used to wonder how could a society get to that point (where kids rat on their own parents), but I haven't wondered that for many many years now. It's ideological possession mixed in with some righteous victim complex.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 08:10 PM
2

I think we're basically saying the same thing. "..proven they can learn..." and "proven they are obedient and sufficiently indoctrinated" are the same thing. I'm just breaking down what "learned" means as it would pertain to the interests of an employer. Being sufficiently indoctrinated would imply some degree of "learning", would it not? Cheers, btw.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 06:46 PM
10

It's not a conspiracy, it's just how it is. Inherent in my assertion is that education provides a measure to prove a person's ability to learn. To preform the required complicated task, etc. It's a given. The official pretext. It's in the "obedience" part. We outsourced the majority of our unskilled labor jobs ...and SKILLED labor jobs. Case in point that we're "sufficiently indoctrinated to serve the needs of the ruling classes"
/r/MensRights15/12/18 06:30 PM
30

It's to show employers that you're capable of learning obedient and sufficiently indoctrinated to serve the needs of the ruling classes... ~Noam
/r/MensRights15/12/18 06:01 PM
4

Great comment! Eloquent. Ka-Boom!
/r/MensRights17/07/18 06:11 PM
3

.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 11:11 AM
2

Take the high road. If you try to make her sound crazy to the judge, YOU are the one who will come across as crazy. Seriously. Rooting for you. You got this.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 07:27 PM
5

Dude I never worry about being accused by my neice, nor my own kids accusing my siblings. We have a tight, beautiful relationships based on admiration and family bond. It's a beautiful thing. You'd be an awesome uncle dude.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 01:46 AM
1

.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 10:58 AM
0

This guy cucks.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 05:42 AM
2

Hugs brother.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 10:55 AM
3

Good post.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 01:12 PM
2

.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/17 01:31 AM
8

Third.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:29 PM
2

Exactly. Logically absurd. Welcome to the patriarchy. Seriously though, all the best.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 03:14 PM
17

Hugs bro.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:46 PM
2

Beyond absurd. I hear you. In my case my ex wasn't cooperating at all. I had to get notarized statements from "prominent members of my community" asserting that I, in fact, had my kids 60% of the time. It was no small feat to get these letters, then CRA "lost" them and I had to do it all over again (5 letters from doc, laywer..etc etc). In one letter, my lawyer used the phrase "to the best of my knowledge...", which CRA took exception to. They said the best of her knowledge wasn't good enough! H…
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:43 PM
3

I went through this. It took 14 months for Canada to recognize that I had 50% custody of my kids. God speed to you sir.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 04:10 AM
1

Hugs brother.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 10:13 AM
1

It was called the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995. Biden himself draws parallels between his 1995 bill and its 2001 cousin. “I drafted a terrorism bill after the Oklahoma City bombing. And the bill John Ashcroft sent up was my bill,” he said when the Patriot Act was being debated, according to the New Republic, which described him as “the Democratic Party’s de facto spokesman on the war against terrorism.” It's not exactly a secret or anything, but you'd have to dig deeper than wikipedia. I…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 08:33 AM
1

Joe Biden: Wrote the Patriot Act in 1995.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 12:33 AM
8

Hugs for you, man. I was falsely accused of violence as a tactic in a divorce settlement. And I too have climbed some fucking hills, let me tell you. But tonight I fell asleep on the couch in a "dad sandwich" between my two kids. Tomorrow I'll make them breakfast, Wednesday I'll take them to school. Of course you have hope. Seriously, best of luck. Hugs and beers and all that.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 06:50 AM
75

Indeed. Friendly invite for all to /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 11:05 PM
13

Ouch. Edit: The best advice always hurts.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 11:54 PM
5

My disdain has to do with the presuppositions that justify the spending.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 09:18 AM
6

"...Your Honor, in light of the recent comments, /r/MensRights wishes to inform the court that we have no further questions regarding the matter of High Road vs. Low Road and furthermore, we rest our case..."
/r/MensRights27/06/17 11:24 AM
–

Gretzky!
/r/MensRights25/06/17 10:55 PM
18

Funny that. Assuming that all men are misogynists, is, in and of itself, misandry. So your sister is the sexist. See how this works? It's the grand irony of feminism. My mother the other day: "those two men are disparaging woman!" Me: "What? Oh no! What are they saying?" Mom: "Oh I can't understand them, they're speaking Arabic, but I can just tell" Me: "You can just tell? gtfo here. You can't understand their language, but you can tell they're misogynists? YOU are the sexist here, how can you n…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 10:50 PM
4

"to protect and serve.... ...the interests of the STATE.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 03:09 PM
5

Pretty sure it takes a lot of masculinity to be a drug dealer entrepreneur in a highly competitive, dynamic, high-risk industry.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 05:30 PM
9

This. Can't stress it enough. The cop who served me with my own spurious Emergency Protection Order gave this advice: "...sell your car, sell your toys, cash in your favors: beg, borrow and steal, buddy...if you want to see your kids again....this is it!"
/r/MensRights10/06/17 03:57 PM
2

given the source Indeed. Given that the findings are utterly contrary to the official Gov't of Canada narrative on the matter, I find it particularly interesting. Cheers!
/r/MensRights08/06/17 02:49 PM
1

In heterosexual couples, women commit more DV? Do you have a citation for that? I quoted the crucial line as a tl;dr from the Stats Can study.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 01:58 PM
3

In 2014, equal proportions of men and women reported being victims of spousal violence during the preceding 5 years (4%, respectively). This translated into about 342,000 women and 418,000 men across the provinces. Similar declines in spousal violence were recorded for both sexes since 2004. Source: Statistics Canada. Spousal violence in Canada "Equal proportions"? Looks like 20% more male victims to me.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 10:38 AM
–

Yes. I told our Counselor (during our first visit) that I believe my wife was suffering from some sort of mental illness/personality disorder and that her refusal to entertain the notion was the main problem in the relationship (I'd been with her for about 16 years at this point). I truly believed, as I do now, that she has a personality disorder or is mildly sociopathic. The counselor looked at me, with contempt, and said: "um....you're saying you think she's crazy?..." Then she looks my wife i…
/r/MensRights06/06/17 10:16 PM
8

Fair point. But we all know it's her ass.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 06:24 PM
14

Hugs brother. My chest physically ached when I read your comment. I have some experience with the weaponized "family" courts. Seriously, sincerely, warm thoughts and hugs for you.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 06:18 PM
9

Yeah, what ever happened to darkie?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/17 06:00 PM
1

Dude. Story time.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:22 PM
2

Do tell.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 12:09 AM
1

Gloria Steinem, CIA agent and tool of the social engineers.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 05:12 PM
–

I can't comment on pzg8, but I will say that Stephen Colbert is a mockingbird. He is a mouthpiece for a propaganda wing of Wall st, essentially.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 11:49 AM
4

Dyncorp is basically the operations wing of the CIA. They are massive. From training armys to police forces to vaccine testing (3rd world) and intelligence, counter intelligence, cyber warfare, kidnapping, framing, assassinations, arming rebels, human trafficking, prostitution, paramilitary, organ trafficking and biggest of all is the drug and weapon trading and subsequent money laundering. I've been researching Dyncorp and it's sister corps for years. They are everything that is bad about the C…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 10:57 AM
1

to teach things that are more relevant to women Like not throwing babies in dumpsters, for example.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 10:29 PM
1

myth that we get the right person and justice actually works Exactly. Bang on.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 01:18 PM
5

Fun fact: The FBI admitted recently that their entire branch of "hair analysis" forensic science was/is complete nonsense. Scores of (mostly men) people have been falsely convicted over the decades as supposed "expert witnesses" would testify to the identity of the accused. Here's the WAPO whitewash.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 01:00 PM
3

Great post.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 01:35 PM
3

Got you. I'm Canadian. Good post.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 09:10 PM
1

What part of the world are you in? Just curious.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 09:00 PM
2

We love you Karen. I'll subscribe to your Patreon account this evening.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 11:33 AM
14

What on earth is going on in our schools? It's Humans. 250 000 years of evolution through sexual selection mixed with the social and monetary incentivizing of victim-hood. What could go wrong?
/r/MensRights25/03/17 03:44 PM
4

I'm an equal opportunity hater.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 07:33 PM
27

"Why is there no female Mozart? For the same reason that there is no female Jack the Ripper..." -Camille Paglia
/r/MensRights24/03/17 10:25 AM
3

All hail Diana Davison!
/r/MensRights23/03/17 11:14 AM
–

I hear you brother. I'm back working at my shop again now, directly next door to the house I once owned where my ex and her new provider currently reside. You can imagine. I can feel the bitterness festering into mental illness with every breath. Let's hear it for male privilege!
/r/MensRights17/03/17 11:06 PM
67

It's true. I had to get one of the FAMILY icons hole-punched on my male-privilege card, but sure as shit, there was a beautiful and fertile woman sitting on my front step the next morning. And I figured it was about time I started my new CEO gig too, so I called the Dept of Male Privilege and I start Monday. Sweet!
/r/MensRights17/03/17 06:32 PM
1

Ah yes, the famous "...close....but no cigar..." quote.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/17 01:20 PM
18

Woah, woah. HRC is smart AND funny.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/17 09:53 AM
35

Mods: Can we sticky this post? Seems important.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 12:16 PM
4

Thanks, done.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 12:15 PM
35

i would kill for your 4 inches That's not what she said.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/17 02:07 PM
12

Ah. A shake down.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 02:22 PM
3

Likelihood of a fuck up combined with magnitude of impact Well said. Let's test it: "It's better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all" -Hmm, alright, sounds reasonable, I'll give it a try. "It's better to have loved and lost your house and children and spirit and income under threat of prison than to have never loved at all.." -Woah woah, what was that middle part again? I'm out. See, I had the "likelihood of fuckup" part down, it was the "magnitude of impact" aspect that sneak…
/r/MensRights27/02/17 12:33 PM
7

I got you. Allow me: tldr: She has troubles of the mental variety. Woof!
/r/MensRights25/02/17 12:28 AM
6

The majority of DV is reciprocal (can I say vast majority?). This is what we're seeing. A codependent, abusive relationship. This wasn't the first time she hit him, not the first time he hit back.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 12:19 PM
1

Hola doesn't work for Netflix anymore.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 09:13 PM
60

Indeed. She came to Newfoundland a few years ago to "educate" the fisherman so they could "save the baby seals from being clubbed". She showed up on her private jet with her bling and her tits and her entourage. She was laughed out of town. PETA forgot to mention to her that nobody has killed a baby seal here in over 30 years. She simultaneously alienated the people of Newfoundland AND hurt her cause globally. I'm happy somebody is bringing attention to false accusations, but too bad it's Pam An…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 07:35 PM
1

'normal' people who don't want to fuck their mothers Pffft!
/r/MensRights16/02/17 09:31 AM
6

Actually, Trump said "YOU could grab em' by the pussy". He never said he ever did, never said he would, merely that ONE could. The point was to highlight what a stud he was. Consider: "dude, my car is so awesome, you could go 200km/h to the grocery store" Can I actually drive 200km/h to the groc store? Probably not. Have I ever drove 200km/h to the grocery store? Nope. Am I exaggerating to get a point across? Yes. What's the point? That I am awesome because my car is so fine.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 09:19 AM
2

Cheers.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 01:32 PM
2

You're doing good work. We tend to frequent the same subs, you and I. I've been observing your carefully measured approach in posting about pzg8 on this sub and I commend you. The balance between posting the facts and risking looking "crazy" is difficult. I see that. I'm with you.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 12:44 PM
3

Or the gay Jew Brit is a nazi.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:46 PM
2

Hey I just finished reading Propaganda by Edward Bernays ("the grandfather of PR"). He was the guy.... His major coup, the one that really propelled him into fame in the late 1920s, was getting women to smoke. Women didn't smoke in those days and he ran huge campaigns for Chesterfield. You know all the techniques—models and movie stars with cigarettes coming out of their mouths and that kind of thing. He got enormous praise for that. So he became a leading figure of the industry, and his book wa…
/r/MensRights06/02/17 05:37 PM
4

mentally ill homeless felon sleeping behind the dumpster ....who is probably a vet...
/r/MensRights06/02/17 05:26 PM
1

turn 360 degrees and walk away
/r/MensRights31/01/17 12:51 AM
10

Speaking of "being fleeced", check out the story of how Edward Bernays (the grandfather of PR, and nephew of Sigmund Freud) was able to socially engineer woman into smoking back in the 20's. It was taboo for woman to smoke in those days. Within 5 days of running his print ads, spontaneous groups of woman sprung up protesting all across the country in support. They thought it was about empowerment and feminism, but it was actually about suckering them into trading their money for cancer. Fascinat…
/r/MensRights24/01/17 10:00 PM
1

His penmenship is fabulous!
/r/MensRights24/01/17 09:37 PM
3

True. I have a pretty good idea how it ends, but there's a massive winter storm about to render me housebound for the next 24-36 hours. Plus dragging it out will increase my smug sense of self-satisfaction. We'll see where it leads... Thanks for the link!
/r/MensRights20/01/17 08:39 PM
3

Ah! Well I now know where at least 280 minutes of my evening are going.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 07:20 PM
2

I tend to agree. Even if a "..let me suck those juicy cocks.." tape emerged, there'd likely be some rape-shield law that would prevent disclosure. Fucked up.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 02:52 PM
48

There was a case like this recently where the two guys were exonerated because they had recorded the entire event. It's pretty hard to claim "didn't consent" when you're screaming "fuck me in the ass, harder, yeah let me suck that juicy cock..." Always Be reCording.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 10:42 PM
25

women are so completely innocent in childbirth that they often don't even have a clue who the father is They know. Denial is a hellava drug.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 09:54 PM
1

But it feels so good to imagine saying it.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 12:55 PM
3

Camille Paglia on Lena DumbHam It's almost as if she took the thoughts right from my own head, except she's more articulate. And faster. Enjoy.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 12:18 PM
–

2+2=5. As you know, it really is that simple.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 11:24 PM
–

Ah yes, the ol' double-ended dildo paradox.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 03:54 PM
12

I have to wonder why she never uses best evidence and only regurgitates bad flawed and discredited evidence? Because she's a Barrister...
/r/MensRights04/01/17 06:32 PM
1

Hmm, I wonder what evolutionary psychologists would say about this....oh, right.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 03:05 PM
2

Sweet! Shit I hope Netflix picks it up.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 09:58 PM
2

When "The Red Pill" movie starts streaming on Netflix this Spring, then the game is on. Wishful thinking? Or is that for real? I hadn't heard that yet.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 05:52 PM
2

No, actually I'm well aware of the value of some basic human empathy. I feel it, therefore I should express it. I've had my own divorce from hell. My kids were used as weapons of leverage against me in the settlement. False accusations were made and my spirit was broken. I did eventually "win" 50% custody, but there was a period of absolute uncertainty there that was hell. If my ex had been able to fuck off to another country, I have no doubt they's be there now. Everything I thought was real ab…
/r/MensRights31/12/16 04:55 PM
2

I'm with you .It causes me ache and nausea at the thought. Know that some random dude on the internet feels a tiny little bit of your pain. Good luck, love and hugs.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 04:34 PM
3

I'm Canadian. I have an acquaintance married a German girl in Canada. They had two kids. She wanted the kids "to meet her family in Germany". You know the rest. Hugs for you brother. And more hugs again.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 01:29 PM
1

something something Duluth Model, and something something Implicit Bias.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 02:30 PM
2

Oh no you di'int!
/r/MensRights20/12/16 11:08 PM
12

Yeah, I didn't go see Ghostbuster's either....
/r/MensRights20/12/16 11:03 PM
3

Hmm, indeed. Very cunning.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:38 PM
3

Me too, similar story. Got divorced raped, false accusations of DV. I thought "what a giant mistake they've made, but I'm innocent, so it'll all work out..." It didn't work out. Nobody actually gave a fuck if I was innocent or not. My guilt was assumed. So I must be the exception, right? Well that's where my head was. How unlucky that I happened to pick a cunt for a wife, I would think. But the cracks were appearing. Around this time I wondered to myself "where are all the battered woman?, they'…
/r/MensRights09/12/16 08:10 PM
1

RELEASE THE TAPE! I can only assume that she's an insatiable whore who loved every minute getting DP'd. Please God it gets leaked.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 08:20 PM
11

Yep. Almost exactly. Only it was ALL my assets and half my kids. But potato potato, right? When I consider the "wasted her youth" aspect, I get this weird, almost bitter tasting ringing in my ears. That's right, I can taste bitterness from sounds now. Oh Jeezus.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 11:47 PM
9

Always Be reCording. ABC rule.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 01:35 PM
3

It would be quite comical to see how the On Duty Mr Bitter could deconstruct Miss Entitled. Lol. Sounds like a good movie. Starring Johnny Depp, narration by Jian Ghomeshi and soundtrack by Paul McCartney. The Bitterness Squad.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 12:50 AM
10

I'm quite bitter about the whole thing Brother. Be kind to yourself. I went through something similar (predatory divorce of the false accusation variety from an abusive cunt) and I know something about bitterness. I'll handle the bitterness tonight, you take the night off.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 10:15 PM
1

Not my post, I merely linked it. Sorry.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:15 PM
1

Pizzagate for skeptics. I'm a skeptic, but there's something there. And now the Brietbart tweets from 4 years ago have been revealed.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 09:30 AM
65

As a Canadian, I foresee a Streisand Effect happening as a result. In this case, "no such thing as bad publicity", stands. Especially if CBC is covering it. Many people are going to want to see what all the fuss is about.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 05:54 PM
53

Obligatory: ...equal proportions....342,000 women and 418,000 men Equal? That's a 20% greater number of male victims.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 05:48 PM
3

I'm sporting a full, unkempt beard in support of men's month.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 05:27 PM
3

This is the "doubling down" routine that almost ALL false accusers follow. You'd have to maintain the "narrative", after all.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 12:38 PM
5

I have two kids. I went through a predatory divorce of the false accusation variety, lost my house, my dignity and went through a period of bitterness bordering on mental illness. Yada yada family court...won shared 50% custody. I will say, without question, having/raising my kids was/is the best, most fun thing I've ever done/am doing. I wouldn't trade it for the world. Cheers to the joys of fatherhood.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 01:09 PM
2

Hugs brother. Two months to go, hang in there...
/r/MensRights26/11/16 12:56 PM
2

Hmm, let's see....Womanz? check. Petz? check. Menz? Shit, better mention the menz I guess. Good post. I lived in Alberta in the early 00's. I worked in a shop with 500-1000 guys (depending on the season). I was witness to many a guy with a clawed-up face or in the middle of a predatory divorce (well paid guys usually away from home a lot). Fort MacMurray was know as Fort Divorce in my day. I have often thought of Alberta as the men's rights epicenter of Canada (in that they NEED the MRM most of …
/r/MensRights20/11/16 03:00 PM
1

If you want a good laugh, check out the video of Miley Cyrus bawling her eyes out. Good times, good times... I do want a good laugh. Especially after watching the videos of her dad bawling his eyes out as his spirit breaks incrementally with every on-stage simulated sex-act involving a gay black dancer and a strap-on.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 01:13 AM
1

Exactly. And when he released his statement on facebook, just prior to the media/criminal onslaught, they said "see, he was trying to get ahead of it" !! Seems obvious to me that, had anybody listened, Jian was the only one telling the truth.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 06:16 PM
20

Ah yes, the Ghomeshi Principal. I find it particularly interesting how the #believewoman people used Jian's record keeping as further proof of his deviance. It literally exonerated of all him of all accusations, yet "if he didn't have something to hide, he wouldn't have had to keep them". Fucked up.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 04:43 PM
16

That's what the glue's for.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:43 AM
9

It was purported to be about his physical attendance at the event, not so much his physical appearance. However, they decided it better if it didn't come from the DNC, so they got Perez Hilton to tweet it. This came out in the Wikileaks.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 08:44 PM
2

"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others"
/r/MensRights27/10/16 04:56 PM
3

Good question.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 04:34 PM
27

"not enough evidence either way" -The Police. The woman are on tape. #believewoman indeed.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 02:25 PM
1

What, was it prom night already?
/r/MensRights24/10/16 05:44 PM
1

It was used as "evidence" in her ex parte application for a TRO, or an Emergency Protection Order as it's known here. It literally said "..he told me I was delusional..." on the application (which I obtained eventually). Never mind whether or not she IS delusional. That, and one other spurious accusation made up the "evidence", which is just two paragraphs scribbled on the back of official application. Nobody asks the respondent, nobody makes any attempt to verify the claim, and I have had no pa…
/r/MensRights22/10/16 09:11 AM
6

Canadian here. Keeping it in the colonies I see: Physical: hitting, kicking, pushing, etc. Sexual: unwanted sexual activity including touching, fondling and intercourse Emotional or Psychological: use of isolation, threats, coercion and name-calling Also I'd like to highlight "name calling". My ex claimed that another man was communicating with her telepathically. For real. I described this as "delusional". Telling my ex that she was delusional was considered "name calling", therefore domestic v…
/r/MensRights21/10/16 06:29 PM
5

That was my impression at the time. Just one of the many "fucking overs" I got during that period. A close acquaintance of mine actually worked at a CRA call center when this was all going on. He said "lost it" means "didn't want to deal with it" and it got losted.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 01:10 AM
5

Maybe. I know of a few people who have gone through hell in a similar fashion. My case was complicated somewhat by my ex making occasional assertions that I didn't actually have custody. Had she simply signed the papers acknowledging the facts, it would have been pretty quick. But my case is rare because woman never lie, especially when money is involved.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 11:17 PM
3

"All triplets on campus will be forced to wear large, novelty pirate hats so that they can be identified at all times and from a distance."
/r/MensRights20/10/16 09:44 PM
21

When I got divorced, the CCTB was already in my ex's name. On separation, CRA assumes the mother will retain custody. Because my ex was vindictive and uncooperative, it took me over a year to "prove" to CRA that I did, in fact, have shared, 50%, physical custody of my kids. I had to write a letter explaining the situation, as well as provide sworn affidavits from "prominent members of the community" that attest to the facts at hand. I managed to get 3 different notarized letters from various doc…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 06:59 PM
22

"well, if she didn't want to get hit, she shouldn't have started throwing punches.....and profanity, and causing a scene, and slapping me, and spitting in my face, and insulting me, and punching me AGAIN..." -Ray Rice
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:23 AM
2

I would hazard a guess that you've not yet heard the argument. Prof. Janice Fiamengo gives one of the most concise presentations on the issue that I've heard.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 07:35 PM
3

but there was at least 1 guy saying things that were really extreme and not OK Ah, the Agent Provocateur.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 07:43 PM
3

Here's Stats Canada on the matter. In 2014, equal proportions of men and women reported being victims of spousal violence during the preceding 5 years (4%, respectively). This translated into about 342,000 women and 418,000 men across the provinces. Similar declines in spousal violence were recorded for both sexes since 2004. And "equal"??, looks like 20% more male victims to me.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 03:33 PM
2

I'm with you, science is science. My point is that, at the same time, "science" is science, too. When a claim of "science" is made, or that something is "scientific", basically it's meaningless. Words don't mean what words mean. Take "democracy" for example. We all were taught the meaning through school. When the Americans claim to be spreading "democracy", but are in fact doing everything to prevent democracy, well the meaning doesn't really hold much weight anymore, does it. It becomes "double…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 03:06 PM
2

"Anti-intellectual". Hmm. Sounds like a weaponized term like "deadbeat dad", Rape apologist", "Holocaust denier", "conspiracy theorist", "anti Vaxxer", "trump supporter", "anti-American" etc etc. How does one know if a narrative is being carefully controlled? The use of weaponized terms are a good clue.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 01:19 PM
3

"science", you say? The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. Universities are in a perpetual struggle for money and talent, endpoints that foster reductive metrics, such as h…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 01:14 PM
2

Ooooh...The Germans are mad at me! Sorry bro, this came to mind and It had to be posted. I wanted the clip where the German engineer says "..forgive me...my english is ....inelegant..." (his english is better that Homer!)
/r/MensRights15/10/16 01:10 PM
1

I had a Tim's today myself. It's hard to boycott when there's no real competition (where I live). Google: On August 26, 2014, Burger King agreed to purchase Tim Hortons for US$11.4 billion; the chain became a subsidiary of the Oakville-based holding company Restaurant Brands International on December 15, 2014, which is majority-owned by Brazilian investment firm 3G Capital. I guess my complaints against Tim's are more of a general commentary on the state of things overall. Obligatory: "Get off m…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 09:24 PM
6

Seriously? That's fucking it. Tim's is shit now anyway. I feel guilty everytime I go there ever since I learned they were owned by BK. Who owns BK? Well a Brazilian mega-corp. They peddle Canadian culture all the while the profits leave our country. They provide McJobs, but worse than that, they employ huge numbers of temporary foreign workers under the pretext that "they can't find workers". T I thought if you can't find workers, you are supposed to increase your wages? Free market and all that…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 11:09 PM
4

Ok, ok. Going to have to chime in here. Basically I disagree with you. I've been reading your comments and it put me on the fence. You seem like a good person, I thought "I don't think I agree, but good for this guy for standing up". The term "toxic masculinity" is a propaganda phrase. It is designed to propagate an ideology. It's extremely "Joseph Goebbels-ish" (hitlers propaganda minister, the pioneer of the use of weasle phrases). "Toxic Masculinity" is not actually a real thing. Or, if it is…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 12:10 PM
1

Wearing dude's t-shirt. Let's see if we can crack the metaphor. Cat=pussy, dead=dead, T-shirt=OP.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 11:44 AM
2

Shit post. Counterproductive shit post at that.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 11:14 AM
1

Good one. lol. I gotta say, we disagree, but still I find myself liking you. Good luck.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 03:56 PM
2

Great post, as usual. I'm Canadian. I think you are too, but I'm not sure. Just a comment, In my experience, the Clinical Psychologists are far less indoctrinated than the Social psychologists in terms of feminist ideology. Which would stand to reason. You are probably familiar with the Reproducibilty Project , but in case you're not, there it is. Thanks for all the time you put in here.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 03:54 PM
2

Oh yeah, I love cupcakes. Thanks. I'll get you a batch of WhiteKnight cupcakes to reciprocate. Good luck dude. We'll welcome you with open arms when you eventually become disillusioned from the sheer contrast between your experiences/observations and the "narrative". Source: I used to be a White Knight just like you. Let us know when you find that unicorn.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 02:34 PM
7

Wow. Seriously? Are you capable of forming your own thoughts? You're virtue signalling here, but disguising it as sarcasm. Wage gap. What do you believe is a better measure of a human beings success- Total money earned, or the ratio between that amount and the TIME/RISK spent to earn said amount? The Leisure time gap. Hard to get woman ahead? In what world do you live? Look around you, what do you actually observe woth your own eyes? Not the feminist propaganda, but real world observations. Want…
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:49 PM
5

Dude. Nice blog.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:26 PM
8

Male privilege indeed.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:24 PM
3

Well TIL. That's great! Black-and-white Astro Boy fights blacks AND the KKK. That made my night. Lol.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 02:23 AM
1

Good point. I was thinking from the angle that hand drawn implied a higher labor intensity than current computer animation, which implies a greater relative expense, which implies lower production standards. Was trying to rationalize why it seemed crappier than I remembered/today's standards. Shit, if my grand kids ever say "Yeah I think that Zeppelin Album was hand played, that's why it seems shitty" I'd have to cane them. Allow me to retract my earlier statement.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:47 AM
2

because they were all adapted for the English-speaking market from completely unrelated anime series Ah-ha. So that's why the series abruptly changed one day out of the blue. It was supposed to be the descendants of the original characters or something? It's vauge to me now, but I remember, even as a kid, going "WTF is going on here?" I had to search for the Barbra Papa's recently to prove to a friend that I wasn't making it up. "Get off my lawn" I guess. Cool man, i'll check out the links. Than…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 11:55 PM
1

Ok you win this round. I actually don't know the difference between the different Robotech series'. The one where they live on a re-purposed aircraft carrier in space was the one I wanted. But thanks for the links. Time to socially re-engineer my 6 year old. All he wants to watch is youtube videos of dudes playing video games.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 10:48 PM
2

Hmm, very crafty. Yes. Almost had me. Well I'll call that bluff on your StarVengers, and i'm all in with Robotech. Read 'em and weep.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 10:28 PM
4

Yeah, me too. I guess they were actually hand drawn? I tried to get my 6 year old to watch it. "This sucks, dad". There's a remake, but I heard it was shit, so I've avoided it so as to not sully my image of Astro Boy.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 07:33 PM
7

Dude. Two words: Astro Boy.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 05:42 PM
3

Hear, hear.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:34 PM
22

Funny, too, that the transgender boy, the 6 year old transgender boy who "knew" at such an early age that he was actually a girl just happened to be born to a feminist who openly subscribes to this ideology. What are the odds? So I guess in her mind this kid must be the luckiest kid on earth to have such a "progressive" and "open minded" mother. And when she was pregnant, was she hoping against hope that she'd get a little trans-baby to wear as a badge of honor? Like really. My dad says "to a ha…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:26 PM
18

Sad it is. Rage inducing. I could rant, but it'll only make us feel worse. I have a six year old with a penis too. He's a boy. How did I know he is a boy? Well he was born with a penis. So I'm going to go with that for now.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 01:57 PM
3

No, you didn't need a "/s". Having to explain to a person that you are, in fact, being sarcastic, defeats the purpose of being sarcastic. As you know. Subtle sarcasm is the most effective. IMHO. Great comments. As usual.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 01:46 PM
24

These kids eventually kill themselves.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 01:31 PM
24

Sadly, there's many a white knight who wears a black robe.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 08:20 PM
7

You know you want to see CatFight Club. "The first rule of CatFight Club is that you don't talk about CatFight Club....the second rule of CatFight Club is that you post it all on facebook..." -Tyra Durden
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:44 PM
5

...or parental alienation as the "pauli exclusion principal"...that two feminists with the same spin can't occupy the same place at once, therefore dad has to pay child support. Makes total sense to me. This is why men invented the "two-slit experiments". Something had to give.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 02:56 PM
2

Do you have a link to the post about the Canadian guy? Just curious which of the many recent cases you are talking about.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 11:15 AM
7

When will you people learn Oh, here we go.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 02:54 PM
20

"Dad, can you buy me that new Ghostbusters lego set?" "Nope." -conversation in my home.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 08:30 PM
4

Well, for example, I can lay x number of pieces of hardwood floor, paint X sq ft of wall, run X linear ft of conduit etc etc, in a given amount of time. At the end of the day, either the job is done or it isn't. So it my world, the answer is "YES".
/r/MensRights29/09/16 10:54 AM
2

Stats Canada Intimate Partner Violence survey In 2014, equal proportions of men and women reported being victims of spousal violence during the preceding 5 years (4%, respectively). This translated into about 342,000 women and 418,000 men across the provinces. Equal? Looks like 20% more male victims to me. The CDC has similar data if you care to dig. How many men's shelters in Canada? How many "Violence Against Men Protection acts" have been passed? Reality doesn't match the narrative.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 02:09 AM
3

PC culture ruined it? I seem to remember a slew of sex abuse scandals. Yep: Scouts Canada sex abuse 2012. Scouts Canada apologizes to sex abuse victims 2011. Scouts failed to stop predator Scouts covered up sexual abuse for years...
/r/MensRights25/09/16 11:06 AM
1

As a lawyer, I am very concerned with the shifting definition of consent. Are you familiar with The Fiamengo File? This particular episode might be of interest to you.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 12:24 AM
23

just another brick in that wall "...Hey teacher.....leave those kids alone..."
/r/MensRights23/09/16 10:05 AM
15

Canadian here. Dude, I throw up a little in my mouth everytime I hear about this. Up until about a couple months ago, it's all we heard about in the MSM. "Murdered and Missing Wonamz!, we MUST do something to figure out what to do about the MAM womanZ". Yada yada and all the Orwellian terms to go with it. But lately? Barely a peep. It was all we heard about, and then in one day it basically vanished from the media. What happened? I'll tell you what happened, Prime Minister "it's 2015" Trudeau th…
/r/MensRights21/09/16 06:21 PM
3

Dude you're going to want to post the actual Stats Can or CDC stats on family violence. Here's Stats Can In 2014, equal proportions of men and women reported being victims of spousal violence during the preceding 5 years (4%, respectively). This translated into about 342,000 women and 418,000 men across the provinces. Similar declines in spousal violence were recorded for both sexes since 2004. Equal? Looks like men are victims 20% more often to me, but I digress.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 10:34 AM
3

This here.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 10:29 AM
3

Ah there she is with her Blue lense Parkinson's glasses after her brain freeze at the 9/11 memorial. "Non-contagious pneumonia" implies Aspiration pneumonia. It's what eventually kills most Parkinson's patients. The lady doth protest too much...me thinks... Didn't some "news agency" report the Russians have poisoned her? How is the wifi in your Part of the twilight zone? Mines not too bad.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 06:54 AM
2

sell our home, move to the country/seaside, raise our kids, and allow them to see and experience life outside the 'big smoke' Very nice. I have much admiration for this.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 06:25 AM
0

But look at the discussion he generated.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 09:10 AM
1

Nice.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 07:26 AM
1

Holocaust deniers See, I got really suspicious when I looked closely at the phrase "holocaust denier". It's one of those PR terms that absolutely shuts down any conversation. Like "deadbeat dad" and "abuser". Is there a patriarchy? Do men really oppress woman? Why can't I ask about the holocaust without being labelled and immediately vilified? I found this really interesting. There was a guy on r/history yesterday who was banned for a "soft holocaust denial". He pointed out that the official dea…
/r/MensRights15/09/16 07:22 AM
6

You shut your whore mouth!
/r/MensRights13/09/16 12:56 AM
1

Hear, hear.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 01:43 PM
2

Nice. Maya Angelou next. You should do a series of these.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 08:32 PM
8

I thought we were doing the reverse gender test. Had the genders been reversed, the drunken passed out PIV is worse than the drunken passed out finger, wouldn't you agree? And while we're at it, there are people who argue that Brock was, in fact, the victim. Compelling argument, too. I passed out once getting a blow job.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 07:54 AM
5

Actually, that's worse than what happened to Brock.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 07:26 AM
24

"You puttin' your hands on her?.....you fuckin' touch her?..." #Believe"Survivors" indeed. See how effective? Always Be reCording.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 12:53 PM
2

Great post. Thanks for doing this.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 12:49 PM
1

"If you can't handle me at my worst, then you don't deserve me at my best..." Her worst: "..Who the fuck is Susan?...I'm going to burn your car motherfucker..." Her best: "...I made chicken nuggets for you but I burnt them, so now you get to take me out to dinner..."
/r/MensRights04/09/16 02:16 PM
3

Shit post.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 01:49 PM
1

The point of the poster is to propagate ideology while masquerading as a "public service". The message we're supposed to leave with is "Men inherently oppress womanz". That it's in our nature to disrespect woman and we must be educated. I find it offensive. Good post.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 09:26 PM
1

Good post.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 12:26 PM
2

Well, the kind that gets $300 000 per year spousal allowance after a 2 year marriage. Idiot indeed. Mind blowing.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 11:50 PM
4

We're with you, OP. My only critique would be that left out the word "forced". When you drop a truth-bomb, there's always a mess to deal with.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 12:53 PM
2

Except it won't happen. Perhaps the government will actually run the formerly private prisons, but the majority of prison services will still be private contract. Like food, medical, guards etc etc. It's still a "for profit" operation. It's PR. We used to call it propaganda, but now we pretend it's "news".
/r/MensRights19/08/16 07:41 PM
3

I'm with you. OP has at least noticed that the data is bad, he just hasn't asked why yet. He's at a stage of his disillusionment where it all just seems like a big misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:57 PM
2

If you lose your job, you lose your woman..
/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:44 PM
2

I subscribe to /r/Shoplifting. I don't shoplift. It's fascinating to just observe other humans sometimes. We can dig it.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:23 PM
2

Nice. I've always said "Logic and accountability", but I'll bow to Jack on this one. What movie is this?
/r/MensRights18/08/16 12:54 PM
1

"...medal hopes dashed as camel-toe strikes diving board.."
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:46 AM
2

Oh, but it is. Woman's studies/feminist studies isn't scholarship, it's advocacy. Advocacy that operates under assumptions. See here.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 01:27 AM
1

Oh, but it is. Woman's studies/feminist studies isn't scholarship, it's advocacy. Advocacy that operates under assumptions. See here.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 01:27 AM
2

None of the Canadian provinces do that, Dude. Yes. They all do that. Source: Canadian single dad with 50/50 shared legal custody and an ex who is legally obligated to pay CS. It was simply as a consequence of the disparity in our income. They calculate both our CS rates as if the other had full custody, then they split the difference. The rationalization has to do with preventing disparity and alienation between the two households and therefore giving one parent an "advantage". I'm sure it was d…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 01:23 PM
2

A rather obvious conclusion to draw from that is that there is something in Nash’s character that draws her to aggressive and physically violent men. This right here. The elephant in the room. I know a woman who has been the "victim" of THREE abusive relationships. Three. Feminist (mainstream) logic (from my own mom as an explanation) says that "she seeks out men who will dominate her because her self esteem is so low because menz". The reality (after getting the real story from my dad): "She's …
/r/MensRights08/08/16 12:47 PM
8

In the 70's, HRC co-wrote a paper titled~ For the Good of The Children. It was a junk science paper used by feminists to support the idea that woman are the real care-givers and that men are obsolete in child-raising; redundant, essentially. I can find NO trace of the paper other than a Warren Farrell video where he references it. If anybody has further information, I'd really be grateful.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 12:36 PM
1

And make no mistake, she WILL win. This has been ordained for 8 years now. TPTB have decreed it, therefore it shall be so. "...if you're going to let the people choose for themselves, well you're going to want to make sure you control the choices and the outcome...." -Noam Chomsky on how elections actually work. Just ask Al Gore.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 10:48 AM
3

Hear, hear.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 07:44 PM
1

Hmm, I forgot about that one. Ok, dry paper bag, then.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 01:55 PM
3

I'd like to see her act her way out of a wet paper bag first.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 01:45 PM
12

I nominate Haven Monahan for Rapist of the year.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 04:04 AM
2

That's not how humans work.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 04:43 PM
3

the judge thinking the exact same way Not only that, but he has an "activist background". He co-wrote two books — the last one, in 1976, was called The Law is Not for Women — with the late activist June Callwood. Is it just me, or do "activist" and "impartial Judge" seem to contradict one another? Terrifying.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 02:35 PM
4

A "Heroine of the cause", if you will. Hmm, where have I heard that phrase lately in a Canadian courtroom?
/r/MensRights28/07/16 02:16 PM
1

Hugs, brother.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 11:23 PM
5

Single dad with a vindictive ex here. You nailed it. The empathy gap is real and the vilification is deeply systemic.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 12:29 PM
1

Or "don't get me started", which really means "I'm ranting now, too bad". Or "I could go on and on", which usually means they've run out of examples/info. Or "I admit there's a conflict of interest", and then does nothing about it.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 12:27 PM
5

In a word: Yes. I think they bio-engineered him in the woman's studies lab at Ecole PolyTechnique ~35 years ago so that he would one day rise up to be the king of the white-knights. Ironic that his own mother was busy doing blow and getting DP'd by the Rolling Stones while he was raised by nannys. I digress.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 04:58 PM
9

Canadian here. I used to think Australia was worse than Canada, but I see now that you guys are still in the indoctrination/propaganda phase. I read a post yesterday about a Judge quoting a feminist writer as he imposed a guilty verdict in a contentious rape trial (Canada). Judges are quoting blatant misandrist, sexist, junk science here now for crimes against feelings. My condolences. Big Sister will be watching.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 01:23 PM
1

There has only been one wave of feminism with two rival factions and the wrong feminists won Huh. Very interesting. I find it confusing to keep track of all the "waves" and how they overlap and relate to each other. Your interpretation is attractive, care to expand on it?
/r/MensRights15/07/16 02:08 PM
9

From one divorced custodial parent with a crazy vindictive ex to another: Hugs brother. We have to always take the high-road for the sake of our kids and I know it isn't easy. Yes, you did the right thing. No, it's not fair. But your kids need at least ONE sane parent, and you are it. Forge ahead.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 01:51 AM
2

We're with you brother. We know the utter dedication and devotion you have for your kids. You couldn't "give up" even if your life depended on it. And I bet your kids are fantastic little human beings for it. Keep going, man. Hugs.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 10:17 AM
1

The contrast between your cool-headed actions and her little tantrum will send an excellent message to the people who matter in all this. Very good advice.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 10:03 AM
2

"Shot oneself in the foot" actually isn't supposed to mean "do something stupid". It comes from trench warfare. It's when a person inflicts injury upon themselves as a means of avoiding further, more serious injury. You shoot yourself in the foot to avoid being shot in the head. Now it just seems to mean "be a dumbass/fool"
/r/MensRights20/06/16 08:40 PM
1

"#BelieveSurvivors" -Haven Monahan "...because it's 2015.....and Mick Jagger and that old drummer guy DP'd my mom and cummed in her face....." -Justin Trudeau "Why buy a mattress anywhere else?" -Mattress Girl (assistant manager at Sleep Country Canada)
/r/MensRights17/06/16 11:33 PM
6

This here. You wouldn't know this level of detail unless you'd been through it. Hugs bro, I've been to spurious-tactical-TRO town myself. It's a horrible place. Hope you didn't stay too long.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 01:25 AM
1

Wow. Nice compendium of info you've put together there. Thanks for that.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 10:57 AM
1

Hear, hear.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 05:53 PM
12

And a similar disposition.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 05:11 PM
19

Because he loved someone and tried to help her And she sold him out for some of that sweet sweet victim cred. Been there. I don't know who this guy is, but the letter from his mom hit hard.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 01:25 PM
4

This. It's a private entity in which companies purchase a membership.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 01:08 AM
17

Worthy of a post, in and of itself. Very nice. I'm not a betting man anymore, but I'd stake my soul on Amber being an abusive person prone to violent outbursts who never had her "accountability circuits" properly wired. She reminds me of someone.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 07:03 PM
1

Temporary Restraining Order. They are so often used by divorcing woman as a highly effective tactic in the settlement. No evidence is required and there is often no reasonable recourse for the respondent. Ask Johnny Depp. Or me, for that matter. Op's situation warrants a TRO.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 06:51 PM
3

This here. Or she's on the BPD spectrum. It's TRO time.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:51 PM
3

What?!!? Lol. Surprise surprise. Are we allowed to acknowledge the pattern here?
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:48 PM
2

She needs a more refined sugardaddy, you might say.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 03:35 AM
4

"There's an epidemic of gold-diggin' whores in this country..." -Bill Burr
/r/MensRights04/06/16 04:19 PM
2

The gold-digging whore doth protest too much....me thinks.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 01:23 AM
2

What's the deadline for submissions? I have a story. Probably she'll get many similar tales; divorce rape through use of ex parte court action, but still i'm interested.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 11:16 PM
2

In 2014, equal proportions of men and women reported being victims of spousal violence during the preceding 5 years (4%, respectively). This translated into about 342,000 women and 418,000 men across the provinces. Similar declines in spousal violence were recorded for both sexes since 2004. Stats Canada "Equal"??...looks like 20% more male victims to me...
/r/MensRights03/06/16 11:13 PM
1

"Post-feminism". Now there's a term.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 11:10 PM
7

The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule. -H. L. Mencken
/r/MensRights03/06/16 12:40 AM
4

Hey brother, I can give you some advice. I am in a remarkably similar situation to yours; shared custody with a vindictive human who has already ruined me with false accusations of DV in the divorce settlement..yada yada..long story. But sounds like you can dig it. I live in fear of what she might do. Everytime I pull around the corner, I expect a police car in my driveway. Still, after almost 5 years. My ex seems to have a borderline personality disorder flavor. Anyway, my advice pertains to yo…
/r/MensRights02/06/16 11:48 PM
16

You know, Jackie has actually done the MRM a service. She highlighted the mass hysteria aspect of "rape culture", and she did it without even taking a real, non-imaginary man down. Imagine if she had named some actual guy in her peer group. He'd probably be in prison right now getting raped and all we could do would be to speculate. I really want to get a #believeJackie t-shirt all of a sudden.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 02:08 AM
2

Yes, invading 7 sovereign nations in the last 15 years alone.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 12:41 PM
2

I'd buy one.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 12:23 PM
9

Are there any fucking ribbons for guys falsely accused of rape and domestic violence? Yes. I just designed them in my head. They're green, made of recycled mattress material and they say "support Haven Monahan". Green because it symbolizes some of the various motivating factors: Money, greed, envy and jealousy. Recycled mattress material to symbolize the sheer absurdity of many false claims. And Haven Monahan because.....well because he doesn't exist. Thinking about T-shirts, too.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 12:03 PM
0

Hey, you must consider that the majority of DV is reciprocal. Also, the term Violence Prone Woman comes to mind. Coined by Erin Pizzey, the woman who opened the first woman's shelter. It describes a woman who is a victim of not somebody elses violence, but a victim of her own violence. Erin found that, out of her first 100 "clients", 62 were Violence Prone Woman. I'm sorry, but the meme about the frustrated husband who relentlessly beats his wife for burning the toast is extraordinarily rare.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 02:48 AM
2

Because "slut shaming" is a woman thing.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 12:42 PM
2

Does Janice Fiamengo have a Reddit account? I realize we can comment on You Tube and she replies, but /r/MensRights seems a more appropriate venue. Message to JF: Janice, we love you. Please register an account so we can tell you how smart and awesome you are. -/r/MensRights (that's right, I'm speaking for everyone, tell me I'm wrong)
/r/MensRights27/05/16 10:05 AM
5

stay in your lane I like this guy.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 09:50 AM
1

Wasn't Justin Trudeau's mother busy doing drugs and fucking the Rolling Stones while he was home being raised by a nanny? Yep, woman and girls first.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 02:08 PM
5

Yes. It was an Australian study. They took 100 people who had presented claiming they had been drugged and did blood and hair follicle lab tests. Guess how many were found to have actually been "roofied"? 0! The ol' goose egg. Of course, a 115lb person consuming 9 shots of Sambuca on an empty stomach in one hour wouldn't explain it. IMO, being "roofied" is as common as albino alligators living in sewers.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 11:29 AM
3

Me too, man. Ex Opiate addict. Clean for 7 years because my daughter is 7 years old. It's that simple.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 11:12 AM
233

Yes. "Listen and believe" the womanz. Menz are liars, you see.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 02:30 PM
3

I agree with you. True "journalism" seems to be a thing of the past. There was a time when a journalists had real power and credibility. Those days are gone, for the most part. Just as an example, This doc on the Iran Contra scandal highlights my point. I watched it the other week and was stunned at what they uncovered. This wouldn't doesn't happen today.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 12:51 PM
3

Ok, dibs on The Cult. I've already got some ideas.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 11:29 AM
15

Follow the money. This woman is selling/sold out her daughter for $575 a month and a favorable divorce settlement. Ache.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 06:48 AM
3

I feel bad for Haven Monahan. Poor guy doesn't even exist and I feel like taking him out for a beer.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 06:38 AM
5

And then the one where Marge decides she wants a divorce, makes false accusations of abuse to have Homer wiped off the planet. She gets the house, the car and the kids. Homer is saddled with absurd child support and alimony payments and eventually just kills himself when he finds out that Bart was actually Lenny's son.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 06:24 AM
3

Not 2015 anymore, I guess, eh Justin? I think Jian might have some advice for him.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 02:31 PM
11

There you go. Nice. I've been accused of being a cynical arsehole of late. Maybe it's true. But i'm calling shenanigans. This is the modern incarnation of Public Relations. It promotes the show to particular demographic, it promotes Netflix as being "progressive", it promotes Penn herself, and most of all it serves to propagate an ideology (this is where i'm an arsehole, apparently). If Penn left the show, it would go on. If Spacey left the show, it's over.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 01:58 PM
29

Just an aside, but the original definition of "mansplaining" was actually more rigid than what the feminists use today. It was supposed to describe when menz explain something to a woman in a condescending manner but the woman already knows more about the topic. It was supposed to highlight menz assumption that woman know nothing. It's morphed into any explanation from any man now. It's a conversation stopper. Like deadbeat dad, rape apologist, wife beater, etc etc. It's a common PR tactic. Good…
/r/MensRights18/05/16 05:54 PM
1

"Kids, drugs are bad!...One night I did the marijuana. We stayed up late eatin' cookies and candy, watchin' movies and playin' video games laughin'. It was AWFUL!" -Tyrone Biggins
/r/MensRights18/05/16 08:48 AM
1

The feminist version of "street cred".
/r/MensRights18/05/16 08:41 AM
2

"Hey rabbit......does shit stick to your fur?" -Bear in the woods
/r/MensRights18/05/16 08:22 AM
1

Good luck, brother.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 11:15 PM
2

This here. Nobody gives a fuck about "Genocide" unless it enables large sums of money to move or justifies power. We haven't had an "honest" war yet.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 04:26 AM
6

Just wanted to say how glad I am to read the update. As a single dad, and a man with intimate knowledge of the magnitude of false accusations, good job sir. I'd been wondering about how it was going. I could hug you guys.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 02:06 PM
2

Stats Canada Report In 2014, equal proportions of men and women reported being victims of spousal violence during the preceding 5 years (4%, respectively). This translated into about 342,000 women and 418,000 men across the provinces. Similar declines in spousal violence were recorded for both sexes since 2004 Also, /r/MRRef has lot's of good sources. And check the sideboard. Good luck.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:06 PM
13

When I was spuriously accused of DV by my ex as a tactic in the divorce settlement, I received similar advice. I spoke to an off-duty cop who had experience in this world. His advice: "Sell your car, sell your toys, sell your soul....beg, borrow and steal. As a laymen who believes in Justice (he did air quotes), you can't possibly understand how fucked you are if you don't hire a real lawyer..." Obviously just a slice from a much larger tale, but it became the most important advice I've ever rec…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:58 AM
1

Me neither. But I'm hugging the shit out of my kids as much as possible. Your post hits me. My cousin killed himself 2 years ago at the age of 18. And I'm no stranger to addiction. My deepest sympathy for your loss. Be kind to yourself.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:57 PM
1

Indeed indeed. Plus, what exactly are we talking about when we say "rape"? Are we talking about a violent assault by a trusted person? Or are we simply saying two people were drunk and regretful?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:48 AM
3

Hugs for you and your family.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:42 AM
3

And "because I instigated the violence/am a victim of my own violent behavior" doesn't seem to be one of the options. One would think that since it's well established that the majority of DV is reciprocal, maybe it's time to consider "I asked for it" as a possible legitimate cause. Just sayin'.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 08:41 PM
3

I second this. My ex used spurious Peace Bond applications and TRO's as a tactic in our divorce settlement. It was about gaining advantage and destroying my ability to defend myself by wiping me off the planet. It was pretty effective. It enables the use of children as weapons in divorces. And no matter what the outcome, people will forever think "well he must have done something, the cops were involved...". Etc. I wonder if part of the Ghomeshi "deal" is that the accuser is also bound by some r…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 12:36 PM
10

~800 "murdered and missing woman" in Canada= $60000000 from the federal gov't to status of woman council. ~4000 "murdered and missing" MEN in Canada=.....you guessed it $0.00 from the federal gov't. There's your answer. It's about self preservation and the transfer of wealth.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 10:24 AM
1

Canadian here. Yep, you said it. It's political propaganda. We might as well have Lady GaGa for Prime Minister. At least she could play a song every now and then so as to serve some purpose. Fuck Trudeau.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 01:07 PM
1

Thanks for that. Intensely interesting.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 12:22 PM
1

One of the most concise descriptions of my ex wife I've heard yet. Sadly, he was describing the traits of a Sociopath. But bang on. Not the first time this has come up. 70% of Sociopaths grow up without a father I'd like to see more on this. I'd imagine that it isn't something our feminist university's are digging into. Good post.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 11:09 AM
1

You need to contact the school council.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 10:24 AM
5

This is exactly why I'm not on facebook.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 10:11 AM
1

They're still married today.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 10:05 AM
7

The ABC rule applies here. Always Be reCording.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 04:17 PM
2

You're right. I was paraphrasing from some essay I read recently. But you make a good point. I've observed it myself. I can always tell when a DV/SA "victim" or such has recently read the official pamphlet. They use the catch-phrases, they subscribe to feminist ideology and it's the defining point in their life all of a sudden. Look at the Ghomeshi case, as a near perfect example. It's horrifying. Fascinating too. Cheers.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 04:18 PM
5

Two of the most common features in false accusations are: The accuser has no idea what they are getting themselves into. They almost NEVER admit it's a false claim. Even in the face of undeniable exculpatory evidence.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 03:19 PM
3

I should point out, also, that my ex is a woman of exceptional good looks (was, anyway). We weren't equal in that department. I'm not bad looking, per se, but "exceptional" I was not. I was the "decent guy". She came from a poor family, I was middle class. And when we first got together, I had high social status because I played in a hot band. So that equalized the relationship for a while. The relationship was fucked anyway, but the "stay at home dad" period did it in. And you've guessed by now…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:55 PM
9

Ex house husband here: Brother. You said it. I lost my job (of 10+ years) right about the same time that my wife was about to return to work from maternity leave. Our son was 1, our daughter was 3. So, being "progressive", we rationalized that it was for the best that I simply stay home with the kids and we'd save significant $ on daycare and the kids could spend their time wit their dad. Sounds good, right? Let me say first that this was, for a brief period, the happiest time in my life. I was …
/r/MensRights28/04/16 11:33 AM
4

Poe's law.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 11:12 AM
2

Horseshoe theory Nice. I forgot about that.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 11:11 AM
42

Hear, hear, brother. I was in a similar situation. I wasn't the violent one. It all ended when she made false accusations of domestic violence as a tactic in the divorce settlement. I'll spare you the implications, suffice to say that it's the worst thing I have had to endure. Don't be me. Hugs for you.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 11:13 AM
-2

This guy gets it.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 10:35 AM
4

I'm with you. But I have little doubt about who will "win". Clinton was ordained 8 years ago. It's a plutocracy, after all.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 10:33 AM
2

Hear, hear.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 07:47 PM
15

I can't speak directly to the inherent anti-male bias on the BBC, but I can tell you that I now hardly even listen to CBC radio in Canada. And I was a person who used to have it on in my kitchen 24 hours a day. Last week alone on the Current, there was a daily dose of feminist propaganda. There was a story about how woman who had miscarriages should automatically be granted Permanent Disability Status (read: woman are oppressed), another about woman "coerced" into aborting female fetus' by their…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 11:49 AM
2

Good post, OP. We need to keep the Ghomeshi fire burning.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 11:24 AM
43

This here. And I don't think she's sorry about her behavior; she's sorry she got caught! Chaulk this one up to the ABC rule: Always Be reCording!
/r/MensRights23/04/16 08:49 PM
27

Canadian here. Anybody wondering why we haven't heard about the "Murdered and Missing" woman epidemic lately? Yes the one where there's ~800+ missing woman and ~4000 missing men. Well it's simple. Our "feminist" Prime Minister allocated $60 000 000 to various "status of woman councils" to "solve" the problem. They got their money, and the steady propaganda has ceased. It was all we heard about there last year. Just sayin'
/r/MensRights23/04/16 02:44 PM
26

His life is ruined. He'll never feel comfortable around kids again. There'll always be some level of suspicion. Be it real or imagined, it's all the same to him. He probably doesn't even realize the magnitude of it yet. These things fester into mental illness. Source: Was falsely accused of domestic violence as a tactic in a divorce settlement. I can't imagine if those accusations were of a sexual nature. My deepest sympathy to the music teacher and his family.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 02:33 PM
0

gnaw at him
/r/MensRights22/04/16 02:44 PM
3

Canadian consumer of Canadian "news" here. I would not have seen this if not for the post on /r/MensRights. I live in another part of the country, but these stories are usually on the national news.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 01:28 PM
5

Allow me: Menz constructed the alphabet ("alpha", see?) as a tool of oppression against womenz. It was first used only for words like "bitch" and "cunt". Then we added possessives so it could be "my bitch". Basically, since the alphabet is a "social construct" and a "tool of oppression", any use of any of it's characters to describe anything woman is...well misogyny. Pffft, you and your well reasoned, evidence-based, logic. Hopefully you'll know better next time than to bring "reals" to a "feels…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 10:37 AM
1

Seriously, it improved my day for having read that. Cheers. Spread the word.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 02:30 PM
2

Dude, wow. This should be a post in and of itself. Personally, and I assume it common among MRA's, I find this fascinating. The whole "mob mentality", "confirmation bias" phenomena. We are all prone to it, but only some of us even know it exists. Great comment. I'd love to see more similarly themed posts.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 11:05 AM
15

I thought the general consensus among MRA's is that the "gender is a social construct" hypotheses is an absurd, antiquated idea the fails to take into account obvious hormonal and physiological differences between men and woman. That there can be no "nurture" outside the context of nature. Just sayin'.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 11:36 AM
2

In 2014, equal proportions of men and women reported being victims of spousal violence during the preceding 5 years (4%, respectively). This translated into about 342,000 women and 418,000 men across the provinces. Similar declines in spousal violence were recorded for both sexes since 2004. Stats Canada Trends in self reported domestic violence
/r/MensRights14/04/16 08:10 AM
5

It's true. There's a slew of refugees at my kids school now. I've met many of them through my participation on the school council. All of the refugee dads I've met are proficient in English and highly educated. We're only accepting the cream of the crop as far as men go. The Canadian refugee program is more about demographic engineering then it is anything about "human compassion". Call me cynical.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 09:32 AM
0

So being a male feminist DOES get you laid, go figure. KA-BOOM! Sorry guys, couldn't resist.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 09:05 PM
2

Good post. I think the Janice Fiamengo series should be required course material for every human. This one on the empathy gap is particularly good. My mom fancies herself a "feminist". She's a "believe the survivors/because it's 2015" person. It hurts me deeply. I've been wanting to enlighten her and thought I'd start with this. How does one convince a fish that they are, in fact, in water? Well you start with a TFF video, I guess.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:17 PM
2

Forget the mug and the pen, your CEO job awaits. Welcome. Your disillusionment is complete, now you're off to stage 2: enlightenment. Hugs for you.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:08 PM
1

Because they "hate your freedom", right? So do you think propaganda is a one way street? That it's something only the "bad guys" do? The US has invaded 4 sovereign nations in the last 15 years and the 5th one soon. What do you think the implications are? When one country wants to expand their empire, do you think they're open about it? Do they acknowledge that it's about money, resources, borders and self interest? Do you remember what the official reason Hitler invaded Poland? How did Vietnam s…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 08:26 AM
1

Is that true? Or do you think maybe that people are killing each other for political reasons and religion is merely a pretext and a justification after the fact? Beware of the boogey-man. If the MRM has taught us anything, it's that much of the information we absorb is agenda driven. This is no different. Just sayin'.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 01:08 PM
3

we're hearing about how it's a violation of human rights. I'm with you, but they said violation of Charter Rights, specifically. "The Charter" is like the Canadian version of the American constitution. The judge is right. It is a violation of our Canadian Charter rights to have mandatory minimum sentences imposed on anybody. However, WTF? It's only a Charter Violation when it's a woman? Does this judge think this only applies to men? Nobody gave a fuck when my Charter rights were trounced. My vi…
/r/MensRights07/04/16 10:57 AM
3

Well, to be fair, I can only imagine how traumatizing it is to be called out as a liar in court. Maybe she should have a Zopiclone shake like LUCY did before her big day.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 12:21 AM
3

Exactly. Yes, not to minimize it. Real human men, fathers, sons, brothers, husbands and uncles paid with their lives. And continue to do so.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 02:40 PM
14

Ah, yes, selective service. Wow, yes, that certainly adds another layer of absurdity into debate. That's right, you have to offer yourself up to the state or else they will reject your rights. So not only did she NOT fight for her right, you actually might have to fight in order to keep yours. Am I grasping the concept sufficiently?
/r/MensRights05/04/16 09:05 AM
8

Not to mention that, at the point when "they won the right", I would have been of the majority of men who do not own property, and therefore not able to vote myself. When woman "won", most men still couldn't vote.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 08:16 AM
14

No, she's half right. I, a 39 year old man in our modern "enlightened" society have never actually had to fight for my right to vote. I did exactly as she did. It becomes inherent to my citizenship. On my 18th birthday I woke up, and BOOM, I could vote. But I'd love to hear the detailed account of how she had to fight for her own. That had to be, like, a bunch of work! Cheers.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 07:53 AM
4

you can't have equality for a thing, you can only have equality between two things. Very nice.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 12:49 PM
4

broke up with a girl about 5 months ago over some shitty IKEA furniture *broke some IKEA furniture over some shitty girl, about 5 months ago... See how bad that could have turned out? You got off easy! :)
/r/MensRights02/04/16 11:59 AM
3

Hey, thanks. Yeah it's a nasty, evil substance. I was prescribed it as a result of a bad car crash in 2003. Everything was fine until doctor asshole was implicated in a "sex for drugs" scandal locally. The fallout led to about 1000 people being abruptly cut off from their prescription, thus creating the opiate epidemic in Newfoundland. Lucky for me (or not), this was about the same time that an insurance company dumped $140 000 in my lap (from the accident). Oxy 80's were $20 at that point. They…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:57 PM
8

Canadian ex prescription opiate addict here. Clean 7 years. There is a direct relationship between this issue (our general lack of empathy for men suffering addiction) and the disproportionate suicide rate. I would have certainly killed myself in 2008 except my daughter was born and I had no choice anymore. The key to understanding the opiate epidemic is two fold: 1) Opiates, especially short acting opiates (oxy contin, Fentanyl, etc) are the MOST EFFECTIVE anti-depressants known to man. Period.…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 01:16 PM
9

Holy shit. Jian Ghomeshi anybody? The mainstream media had him all but convicted in the court of public opinion. "The evidence is clear" they said. "multiple victims" they said. Anybody know how that one turned out?
/r/MensRights31/03/16 01:03 AM
8

Think the lawyers should've gone with the "received death threats" and have her manufacture some Good one. Not to mention the ol' "it'll cause victims to not come forward". Of course we all know the real victim here.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 12:33 AM
1

I know, right? The implications are mind blowing. And all under the "best interests of the child" doctrine. It's mental gymnastics. How is it in the "interests of the child" to have his family torn apart 7 years later, or to grow in up a house full of resentment. It's a serious MRM issue. We've done the math, folks, we're getting fucked here. Again. Mandatory paternity testing would take a bite out of this. Even if for no other reason than the collective dignity of society. Cheers.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 05:42 PM
17

Canadian here. All I have to say is "believe the survivors!". Barf.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 02:48 PM
2

Great post, OP. So glad you're feeling good again. Not making a comment about your wife at all, but it is not unreasonable to have concerns. It's now widely accepted among those who work in genetics that roughly 10 per cent of us are not fathered by the man we believe to be dad. Source.Mommy's little secret
/r/MensRights30/03/16 12:10 PM
3

Good comment. Yes! It's propaganda. It's purpose is not to give a platform for humans to "vent", it's merely a tool for the propagation of an ideology. Like those purple "respect woman" magnetic ribbons on everybody's car here in Newfoundland. The message isn't that we need to respect woman, that's absurd. Of course we respect woman, we respect all humans, don't we? The purpose of the ribbons is simple. It promotes the idea that men oppress woman and are disrespectful as a default. I mention thi…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 10:57 AM
3

Shit, there you are again with the voice of reason. We're just "taking the bait" here every time we ignore the bigger picture. What part of the world are you in? Just curious. I'm Canadian.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 10:51 AM
6

Hey, thanks for posting this. /u/TR6Cool is the unofficial UK bureau chief for /r/MensRights. Many of us would never hear these stories if not for the posts here. Cheers.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 10:43 AM
2

Nothing happens without a reason. Trivial, perhaps. Absurd even. But reason nonetheless.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 01:42 AM
3

No, BPD is a personality disorder in and of itself. The "borderline" seems to be a misnomer. It's not like a person with BPD "almost" has a PD; they most definitely do. They are usually sick puppies. I heard a doctor once say about BPD: "..I can always tell when it's BPD because it'll be the person who reaches deep within my soul to insult me. They'll have the ability to find my one vulnerability and exploit it..."
/r/MensRights29/03/16 09:33 PM
7

Ah. Finally we have the soundtrack from the Ray Rice video. I imagine it sounds pretty similar. Except more spitting in faces.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 01:43 PM
1

Christie Blatchford She was there.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 11:51 PM
1

Wow. It's scary that you are going into law. Did we read the same thing? Because this goes well beyond "fuzzy memory". You left out the part about the collusion. The "maiden of the cause", the 19 interviews, "playing chicken with the justice system", etc etc. Even if they had been completely truthful, it's still unlikely he'd have been convicted. Funny thing about bias. Nobody has one as long as the people around them share it. You're operating under many assumptions here. It sounds like you hav…
/r/MensRights28/03/16 11:48 PM
1

Have you read the judgement? Because it seems from your comment that you have not. It's ~25 pages. 20 minute read, but don't skim it.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 11:11 PM
1

Have you read the judgement? It's clear. And the onus isn't on anybody to prove his innocence, that we assume. For example, he was portrayed in the media as if he randomly "attacked" the complainants. Out of the blue because that's what gets him off. It came out in court that the incidents were all during make out sessions. That the "throwing to the floor" was, in fact, "pulling me down to kiss him", etc etc. He's certainly a douche bag. But once you go out with him again, and again, and stalk h…
/r/MensRights28/03/16 10:29 PM
1

Just so we're all clear here: The Difference Between Feminism and Egalitarianism -Paula Wright.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 01:36 PM
2

This guy really gets it. It delights me to read such enlightened comment. Nice.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 10:35 PM
1

But, remember, this wasn't a "he said/she said" because he didn't testify. It was a "she said". Even if the accusers had been completely honest, the two that didn't admit to an outright lie, that is: S.D. acknowledged that her earlier comments were a deliberate lie and an intentional misrepresentation of her brief relationship with Mr. Ghomeshi Both the remaining accusers pursued him romantically and sexually after the fact. And to a substantial degree. The implication here is that they were per…
/r/MensRights27/03/16 10:19 PM
1

Yes absolutely. That's a given. It goes without saying. Jian Ghomeshi was not accused of raping anybody. Noteworthy, too, that the accusers pursued him sexually and romantically after the fact. To a substantial degree. The implication being they were each ok with the BDSM as long as it resulted in a romantic relationship.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 06:54 PM
1

Very important point here. Seriously, how many copies of 50 Shades were sold? And to whom? Not men, that's for sure. Isn't it bizarre how society seems to deny the fact that woman enjoy sex too? Especially the sexual/domestic violence grievance industry.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 02:26 PM
2

Exactly. They were all ok with it as long as it resulted in being his girlfriend. They all pursued him romantically after the fact. They only thing they have in common (other than being liars) is that they were all rejected by Jian. I promise you, if he'd married any one of them, brought them to red-carpet events on his arm, furnished their own careers, provided a life of luxury and financial extravagance; they'd be saying "My husband is innocent, those girls are liars"- just like Clinton did.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 02:21 PM
3

This guy understands. "Conform to the Charter" my ass. My own experience with a false accusation of DV during a divorce settlement as a tactic was that my "Charter Rights" are a myth. With NOT ONE shred of evidence (actually the evidence was exculpatory), and purely on the basis of the word of one vindictive female who "implied" violence, I was considered Guilty until proven innocent. I was removed from my own home under threat of prison, I was separated from my children and my spirit was foreve…
/r/MensRights26/03/16 12:44 PM
2

Oh no, it's civil suit time. The judge put a few things into his decision to assist. It isn't the judges place to determine the motives of the witnesses, so his language is somewhat restrained. But "serious difficulties with the witness's credibility" is judge speak for "You goddamned dirty liar"/ And "S.D. acknowledged that her earlier comments were a deliberate lie and an intentional misrepresentation of her brief relationship with Mr. Ghomeshi" is Judgespeak for "perjury" and "bring on the ci…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 10:13 PM
3

This guy gets it.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 03:30 PM
2

S.D. is one of three accusers, but not the primary. The Main accuser is Lucy Decoutere. All you have to do to see her is turn on Canadian news. She's all over it. She revoked her right to have her name withheld. She's saying things like: "..I feel like the judge doesn't really 'get it'..", "I feel..", "Um, but it feels like..." It's a huge case for mensrights. I actually know the identity of S.D. I would like to release it. But I don't want to end up in jail, either. Which is certainly a possibi…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 11:57 AM
11

It's ~25 pages; a 15 minute read. Every man in Canada needs to read it. Read it and then watch video from the demonstrations after the verdict. S.D. acknowledged that her earlier comments were a deliberate lie and an intentional misrepresentation of her brief relationship with Mr. Ghomeshi I'll translate: Perjury. Civil suits. I didn't realize I had so much invested in the case till "we" got the acquittal. Cheers Canada!
/r/MensRights25/03/16 04:35 AM
3

Wow! Are we talking about the same trial here? It pains me to read that.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 12:50 AM
5

Talking to Jian will be intensive, perhaps three days of intensive questioning — 50 hours. Add in legal research, preparing for evidentiary issues, and other trial preparation and the bill could climb as high as $500,000 to $800,000. Source Thanks for the mention.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 09:56 PM
13

Not to mention Jian is probably going to want the $500G-$800G's back for his defense. Civil suit time. Gentlemen.....start your lawyers. edit: Source of $ figure above
/r/MensRights24/03/16 07:16 PM
16

That label comes after a court case, not before Fair enough. Case closed. The judge even used the word "deceitful", in reference to the witnesses. So...? Edit: Update. I've read the entire judgement. S.D. acknowledged that her earlier comments were a deliberate lie and an intentional misrepresentation of her brief relationship with Mr. Ghomeshi. Just sayin'
/r/MensRights24/03/16 07:14 PM
1

Great post. It's been pretty obvious for years that the calculated amount is artificially high.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 01:33 PM
2

Huh. You're right. The animation shows the woman "sinking" into a literal and metaphorical pit of debt. I didn't notice the first time. I guess the producer saw the flaw, but he couldn't afford to re-do the spot because his child support payments are artificially high. I'll let it slide.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 10:08 PM
2

Ask for one example of a woman being paid less for equal work. Just one example. I haven't seen it yet. Seriously, some people actually believe (and it's no accident) that a man gets paid $20 per hour while the equally qualified woman gets $15 per hour by the same employer. This is absurd and deliberately misleading. The real earnings gap only appears when you ignore the hours worked. Also, the more progressive a country, the higher the earnings gap. How could this be? Look into it. It's telling…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 07:21 PM
20

You're right. But there's a bigger message here. The implication is the real message. The message is that men don't respect woman as a default. The point is not to promote the "teaching of respect"; it's to intimate, to ingrain the "Oppression" narrative. Feminism can only exist in an imaginary land where men oppress woman out of hatred. Intentionally and inherently. This is the problem. we're all here debating if we need to teach respect or not, meanwhile, we're only furthering the agenda by en…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 05:37 PM
1

Hey thanks! That's the one.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:12 PM
3

Check out /r/MRRef, also the links in the sidebar might be helpful. Cite from the two most recent CDC IPV studies that demonstrate that domestic violence is 50/50, show how the laws (TRO's, ex parte action) are blatantly biased toward woman. Also, the CDC doesn't consider "forced to penetrate" as a form of rape. If it did, it'd be 50/50 again. That, in and of itself, is a massive issue. You can find both studies at /r/MRRef. Good luck! Be sure to let us know how it goes.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 03:36 AM
1

Great answer.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:38 AM
0

This guy gets it.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 01:08 PM
1

Very nice. Do rebuttal next.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 01:03 PM
5

Oh yeah, Lots of drugs.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 12:03 PM
20

The College was founded in 2002 by a group of pediatricians including Joseph Zanga, a past president of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), as a protest against the AAP's support for adoption by gay couples --Evidence that they're anti-gay.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:38 AM
4

Yes I guess my advice was less than specific to your situation. I don't mean to criticize and certainly you're not ignorant of the implications in either direction. I have much experience with a violent ex, though. She was the violent one, not me. However, in the end it was me who the police took away. SO on one note, maybe I should have just beat the shit out of her because that's basically what everybody thinks anyway and my resisting any urge to retaliate never kept me out of trouble anyway. …
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:30 AM
13

My dad is great. Another gem from my youth: Dad: "Ok, so most of the bullshit you've been taught in school and on TV psa's about drugs is complete bullshit." "So here it is: You can smoke pot when you're 16-18, but not all the time. Recreationally. "I don't mind the odd beer from about 17. If you're drinking a few beers you have to have a plan or tell me. You or your friends CAN'T drive; i'll pick you anytime no questions asked. Just don't do it." "Cocaine when you're in you early 20's, but it s…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:15 AM
5

But not your girlfriend. You can take your chances with the cops and the judge, but you will lose. You can lose everything right there, even if she's the aggressor. She will get support and Victim cred, you will become a social pariah. But who knows? Maybe the girlfriend who pulled the knife is a reasonable person who accepts accountability for her actions? Walk away, and keep on walking.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 06:38 AM
27

My dad: "You can't hit a girl, ever" Me: "I know that, dad. Girls are weak" Dad: "sort of, but that's not it." Me: "Because they don't deserve it?" Dad: "No, they probably deserve it, but that's not it" Me: "what is it then, I know we aren't to hit anybody?" Dad: "Because hitting a woman can literally ruin your life, reputation, and your finances and freedom. You lose, she wins. Even if she hit you first. It's just how it works in this world.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 06:29 AM
22

The two common themes in cases of false accusations are: The accuser usually has no idea what they are getting themselves into. And they NEVER ADMIT IT. Even in the face of undeniable exculpatory evidence, once they commit to the narrative, they tend not to budge.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/16 06:56 PM
5

No, it's only the Assault Stilettos we need to ban.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 04:57 PM
9

Well said. Just wanted to add that 90% of throat cancer is also the result of HPV. Little known fact. If you know a guy with throat cancer, it is highly probable it is the direct result of HPV transmitted through oral sex. I was shocked to learn this last year. I'm Canadian. My daughter gets the vaccine for free, yet my son does not. wtf?
/r/MensRights20/03/16 11:35 AM
1

whether a particular incident should be classified in the "rape category" or the "false accusation" category There's a third category: the "perceived rape where there was none" category. The whole Regret=Rape concept. It gets complicated. You know, that whole lived experience thing.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 12:48 AM
3

The classic "double down". This is exactly what Lucy DeCoutere did. One classic theme of false accusers is that they often don't realize what they are getting themselves into. In the face of examination, they continually have to push it further by adding details or "resource building". And the other classic theme of false accusers is that they WILL NOT ADMIT IT. Even in the face of undeniable exculpatory evidence. They hold on to the story for dear life. Their entire identity now depends on it, …
/r/MensRights20/03/16 12:28 AM
2

Ok, well I have kids and I'm going with you. Excellent attitude. The ol' "don't fufill your own bad prophecy" idea. I can dig it. Welcome brother.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:37 AM
7

You're new here, right? Don't get me wrong, I'm with you. But you realize that this is an industry, right? You can "get out", but money will move. Wealth will be redistributed. Pressure will mount. Animosity will build. Lives hang in the balance. But I'm still with you.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:15 AM
5

You're right. But she could have a TRO within hours if she wanted. Especially with her parents involved. TRO's shoot first and ask questions later. Usually by the time the questions are asked, the balance of power has already shifted immensely toward the applicant. I feel for OP.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:56 PM
1

True that. Yeah, good point about primates. I was picturing elephants who morn their young, but certainly I don't think the rat eating it's own young has the same sense of loss. lol. We're definitely primates. We still hurl shit, it's just more metaphorical in nature. Mostly. Cheers to you. I like seeing your comments around /r/MensRights, you are a voice of sanity and reason.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 12:46 PM
5

Good answer! You've met George Carlin, right?
/r/MensRights17/03/16 10:19 AM
1

Hear, hear. It all comes down to money. Men are deprived of their children because it means money will move. I came really close to being turned into a walking ATM myself.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 03:38 PM
24

Hugs, brother. We're mammals. We're not supposed to be separated from our children. It fucking hurts. Keep it together. easier said than done, but do it you must. 2 small pieces of advice. Hard earned advice, I offer to you for free. 1) The Jones Paradox: When and if you attempt to convince a third party (a judge) that another human is "crazy", it is YOU who will appear crazy. It's just a freak of human nature. Especially when talking about a citizen who is, in and of herself, a protected class …
/r/MensRights13/03/16 02:17 PM
1

mistakenly tying morality in with gender instead of humanity Well said.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 04:57 AM
4

The Just-World fallacy.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 12:16 PM
10

Most of us got that, btw. We're with you.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:07 AM
16

Good point. I recently had a meeting with my kids school guidance counselor on "bullying" in my capacity as a volunteer council member. He was very enlightened. His point was that, we as a society, seem to be perceiving "bullying" where it does not exist. Any minor interaction resulting in any feelings now immediately gets labeled. He said that true repetitive bullying is nowhere near as common as people think. He added also that just because someone is a jerk, a bully that does not make. I was …
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:03 AM
3

Hmm. Don't want that. I guess that old Canadian folk saying is true: "if she has a bloody beaver, in the woods you must leave her". Wouldn't want to get ambushed.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 01:42 AM
28

My mouth is moving, but nothing is coming out. Talk about a giant leap backwards. The Orwellian nature of this is stunning. Didn't we used to banish woman who were on their period to the menstruation hut? So what's the message here? That woman are fragile creatures who require special treatment, or women's superiority is such that we are obligated to filter out any possible discomfort? Hmmm, so it stands to reason that woman are not operating at 100% for about 23% of the time. Hmmm, so we get ab…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 05:58 PM
64

False accusations of domestic violence as a tactic in the property settlement guy here. I knew where I was sticking it, I just didn't fully understand the true implications of "crazy". I tried to reason with "crazy", you see. I grossly underestimated the human capacity for betrayal.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 12:57 AM
15

So yes, we should teach men not to rape (I don't know anyone who teaches anyone to go out and fuckin rape people anyway, this is one of the silliest things I've ever heard) See, "teaching men not to rape" has absolutely nothing to do with preventing rape or helping anybody. It's all about ideology. It promotes the idea that "men are born rapists". We have this "Teach him to respect woman" public awareness campaign where I live. Respect woman? Of course we respect woman. I have a mother, a daught…
/r/MensRights04/03/16 03:38 PM
2

Dude, this happened to my brother almost 8 years ago. Two facts: We're Canadian, and the woman is a reasonable human being (as is my brother). Not sure what your situation is. So he was finished his undergrad and was living temporarily in France teaching ESL (to improve his french). He came back to Canada for Xmas and hooked up with this woman he had a bit of a history with. 5 months go by and all of a sudden he gets word. Mommy "didn't think she could get pregnant" because reasons and went all …
/r/MensRights04/03/16 02:52 PM
1

Great post.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 02:29 PM
1

You guys see that "Denny's" video yet? I'm anticipating a reaction.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 11:04 AM
9

I got banned from /r/MorbidReality on a post about Paul Bernado. On Bernado: Plot twist: He never actually murdered anybody. It was his evil wife, the same one who offered and murdered her own sister. It was the plea deal of the century. The prosecution bought into their own bullshit and offered her a deal on the premise that she was a "victim". She testified against him and is right now a free woman with children. To be clear, he is a rapist and a piece of human shit, no doubt, but Karla was ex…
/r/MensRights03/03/16 04:13 AM
1

He's wealthy, he's a man, he has LOTS to lose, he has children, and he's going through a divorce/custody battle. Whenever I hear this in the context of ANY accusation; domestic violence or sexual, I automatically assume it is spurious and merely a tactic in the divorce settlement. Gee, we're divorcing anyway, we can't seem to come to any agreement on a settlement, BOOM; all of a sudden with the utterance of a few words, she gets an overwhelming strategic advantage that most men never recover fro…
/r/MensRights01/03/16 10:13 PM
8

Lol. Seriously though. Say what you will about the evil menz marketing pink razors, but I bet they at least function.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 10:00 PM
43

Hear, hear. Scary is the word. "...had a great time tonight...can't wait to fuck your brains out tomorrow..." -Primary accuser in Jian Gomeshi case. She was caught lying, colluding, cherry picking and showing a general contempt of the seriousness of the situation and the Canadian legal system. Yet now they're using this case as justification to lobby for a separate legal system for "crimes against woman" based on a lower threshold of probability. Talk about scary. The poetic justice in the Jian …
/r/MensRights01/03/16 01:38 PM
1

I rest my case.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 08:15 AM
7

Throwing babies from incubators. Dude who cut his own mother's head off. Entire male population massacred in one village. That was fun, let's play "spot the blatant propaganda" some more. And from the Times of Israel no less.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 01:42 PM
2

Dude, talk about assaulting dignity. Hugs brother. Take some comfort that at least you have a sense of how fucked up that is. Have you any indication that other men share your feelings?
/r/MensRights29/02/16 01:35 PM
2

Shambala meditation is basically all the good of the Buddhist practice, but without all of the religious ideology. It's a very pure and basic form of meditation. It enabled me to discover TRP 20 years ago before there was TRP. We called it "enlightenment" back then lol. But seriously, it forces you into reality. The more you practice sitting, you more you realize how much bullshit in your mind is running the show. Cheers.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/16 05:11 PM
7

I was a stay-at-home-dad for about a year after my second son was born. It was, without question, the happiest, most fulfilling time in my life. No shit. I felt like I was the luckiest man in the world. Everyday we'd walk down to the beach, i'd work on a few projects when I had a chance and I felt like I had figured out the secret to life. It wasn't "easy" per se, but my overwhelming drive to care for and love my kids made it very fulfilling. I guess if you resented the kids it would be harder, …
/r/MensRights28/02/16 01:54 PM
2

This is at the top of the /r/conspiracy page. Not sure if that's good or bad. Good that people are seeing it and obviously agreeing with it. Bad that it't being relegated to "tinfoil hat" territory.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 01:39 PM
1

Consider that 90%-95% of modern espionage is public perception. The vast resources of the CIA aren't in foreign countries using a wrist watch laser to cut the cage, they're on a computer somewhere engineering and maintaining social perception. Note, this isn't a crazy conspiracy theory, it's well known within certain circles.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:24 PM
1

It's fake. Don't take the bait.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:18 PM
3

Me too. However I've had a number of weird "door opening" experiences of late. I held the door for a woman last week. One of those cases where they are close enough behind you to warrant holding the door, but they're still far enough behind that I ended up standing there for a slightly extended period holding the door. I generally will err on the side of not letting a door close in a persons face. So the person in question turns out to be an attractive skinny 20-something. She refused to allow m…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:06 PM
-1

I agree. It seems obtuse to claim that "rape" could count as a "sexual advance" in this context. Absurd even. Telling a judge that you've never applied for a car loan isn't proof you didn't steal a car. They both involve a car, but one doesn't discount the other. Just sayin'.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 04:14 PM
1

And ask Ray Rice what he thinks of "severe injury". On paper he's the abuser, in reality we all saw the video.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 02:08 PM
1

I saw that too, but when you look at the actual numbers it's telling. 2.5/10 male victims vs. 4/10 female victims. And, just to bring it home, where would Ray Rice's wife fit into this? She punched him, slapped him, berated and humiliated him, spit in his face, yet surely on paper it would count as "female victim severely injured", right? Being injured doesn't equate victim-hood. Although, there is still a large section of the population who view the Rice video and still only see a female victim…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 02:06 PM
4

Don't you think that they mean "sexual advance" in a non-rapey way? Like did he hit on her in a manner that she perceived was sexual in nature? Or proposition her? Also, wouldn't you think that the team of high priced lawyers would already have considered this to the nth degree? You and I, sitting home on our laptops, aren't privy to the inner workings of the case or the larger strategy. I'm not saying you're wrong necessarily, I tend to think it's all a ploy for publicity and contractual consid…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 12:22 AM
1

Great post. It's only a matter of time until Janice starts getting millions of views. I think #25 is out now too. Request: A Fiamengo File on the Jian Gomeshi trial.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:05 PM
8

As the head appears to have an issue with you - it sounds to be honest that the reason she’s like she is with you is that as a man, she may believe you to be trying to throw your weight around and undermine her authority so she’s behaving in such hostile civility because she has presumed that you have presumed that as a ‘little lady’ she’s going to be lacking in competence. It’s likely untrue, but if she believes it she will behave to you as if it’s true - making it true (if that makes sense). D…
/r/MensRights20/02/16 03:58 PM
21

Similar to the Jian Gomeshi trial in that they seem to be able to change the meaning of words at their whim. So the complainants ALL lied. Like on the stand, they made a mockery of the Canadian court system, they cherry-picked the bits and pieces that served their agenda. But we're still supposed to convict him because they "weren't lying about the important parts". Reality is fluid, apparently. So only some of the words are important; ignore the ones that don't fit the narrative. Scary as hell,…
/r/MensRights20/02/16 03:16 PM
3

Jian Gomeshi's "abuse survivors"? Lol "I had a great time tonight....I can't wait to fuck your brains out tomorrow" -Email to Jian a few hours after the "abuse".
/r/MensRights20/02/16 12:59 PM
3

Ouch. Hugs for your bud. Shocking that such an obviously dedicated father and great human being would be refused shared custody. I'll bet he has to make support payments, right? See, part of the problem here is that full custody=$, humans can't be trusted when it comes to money matters, and putting the "best interests of the child" against a persons financial security is flawed beyond reason. Seriously, hugs for your friend. Is there some specific way I can support his cause or sign a petition o…
/r/MensRights19/02/16 11:03 PM
3

The best interests of the child require that they have contact with both parents. However, if the custodial parent is determined to deny access to the other parent, then the best interests of the child require that the child have contact with only one parent. The elephant in the room here is this: custody=$. When mother's financial security is tied to the amount of time the father spends with the kids; jeez, I wonder how often dad gets time. There is a real financial incentive for mothers to den…
/r/MensRights19/02/16 11:19 AM
2

She's great. I was hoping to see a video re the Jian Gomeshi trial. Perhaps she's waiting for the verdict.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 02:15 AM
3

This here. I mean, seriously. 18 years not a peep, but when there was a prospect of reduced comfort it's false accusations of DV as a tactic in the divorce settlement. Never mind the absurdity of the claim, the lack of evidence, the evidence that exculpated, never mind the fact that we're now divorcing, or that one simple paragraph gave her complete control of the house, assets and the kids (=$) which is a major advantage. Divorcing? Yeah, well we don't believe you.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 11:37 AM
2

The difference between feminism and Egalitarianism. -Paula Wright. Darwinian Gender Studies.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 06:26 PM
9

You left out victims of false accusations of violence. It's becoming a standard procedure for many a divorcing woman to claim "DV" as a means of acquiring a TRO so as to take complete control of the house, assets and the children (=$). If you don't already know someone to whom this has happened, you will soon enough.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 05:54 PM
4

Is there a way I can read the essay without having malware installed? I'm hesitant to turn off Adblocker.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 05:51 PM
1

TRO's are ex parte. Meaning the applicant most often never meets a judge, nor does the respondent. She fills out an application through the local police and then they bring it to a judge. Sometimes at 2 am. No evidence, no past history and no notice for the respondent is required. All the judge ever sees is a paragraph. It's "guilty till innocent". And the avenue for appeal is absurd. Here's an essay. The obviousness doesn't seem to matter. That they tend to get ordered during divorce's and that…
/r/MensRights16/02/16 12:23 PM
3

What percentage or TRO's are spurious? My lawyer says at least 50%. I've also seen lawyers claim it's 90%!
/r/MensRights16/02/16 11:32 AM
5

Good answer. Another question that i'd like answered has to do with the spurious use of Temporary Restraining Orders. So my ex was the violent and unstable one, not me. However, as a tactic in our divorce settlement, my ex made false accusations of domestic violence as a means to take complete control of the house, assets and the kids. So "on paper", the stats on DV would portray my situation as "male on female", but the stark reality is that they have it 180o wrong; it wasn't me. In fact my ex …
/r/MensRights16/02/16 11:23 AM
3

Canadian here. Greetings my colonial brother. What you described is very similar to the current Canadian situation. I'm a single dad, student and I'm basically poor. The difference between how my single mother student friends are treated compared to me is stunning. I apply for assistance with daycare costs as is my right as a student; I get 25% subsidy and EVERY WOMAN I know gets 100% coverage (and I have 2 kids, they often have only 1). There are "student work" programs where you volunteer hour…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 12:50 PM
1

Not that i'm supposed to mention it here, but seriously, check out /r/TheRedPill, it's all there. Learn about woman's co-pair mating strategy and understand what actually drives us humans. Hint: The concept of "love" you've been fed your entire life is seriously flawed. There is no "love", only an evolutionary drive to mate and stay with your partner long enough to sire a few pups. Understanding this is key.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 12:24 PM
2

Dude, me too. I was avoiding it because I can't stomach the "narrative", but it's actually having a pro-mrm effect. Check out Christe Blatchford's video blogs. Christe says: "Never in all my years covering trials have I ever seen the witnesses ......destroyed on the stand..." (paraphrasing).
/r/MensRights13/02/16 03:58 PM
4

I agree completely. The ongoing Canadian trial of Jian Gomeshi seems to further enforce the concept. In particular, Lucy DeCoutere, who claimed publicly she wants to be "the poster girl for violence against woman" but was caught lying, cheerypicking and colluding on the stand.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 01:13 PM
3

Great post. I've been following Christie Blatchford's video blogs on the Ghomeshi trial, she's really good. This trial is going to have major implications in the MRM. It's fascinating.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 11:01 PM
3

The title was missing a few words. Allow me: ...purposes of fraudulently securing legal aid and/or to ensure complete control of the house, assets and children through the TRO avenue. Ok. i'll leave now.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 03:03 AM
13

Victim of false accusations as a tactic in a divorce settlement here. The injustice is of such magnitude that I absolutely seriously considered suicide as a means of ending the suffering. My reputation was dead, my social life was dead, my spirit was broken and the burden imposed on my family was such that death was actually the most attractive option. What's worse? Having no father at all or a father who is broken? Well I decided a broken father who loves my children unconditionally is better. …
/r/MensRights07/02/16 04:53 PM
0

It is insane. It's inherently contradictory. How can one claim that half the species is "flawed" (you got me) because of "reasons" (again), and not be open to the concept that they, themselves, are prone to the very same "flaws" as well? ..yada, yada, glass houses, something, something...
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:00 PM
1

We already know the answer. Yes, but we still want to hear somebody say it.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 02:53 PM
12

Well it was my own fault, really. She opened with "deadbeat dads are responsible for child hunger" (paraphrasing). What did I expect? She was mixing up her SJW causes. Sometimes I can't tell if it's a troll or an actual debate in good faith. I'm getting better, though.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:37 AM
2

We already aren't making enough children to sustain society for more than a few generations. Says who, exactly? Is it because of our fractional reserve banking system that requires constant exponential "growth"; ie more and more people to constantly borrow more and more? Because I'm in the camp that thinks we're about full here now.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:01 AM
23

...and therein lies the problem...
/r/MensRights06/02/16 02:57 AM
19

Hey. I quoted this to a feminist earlier as part of a larger debate on "deadbeat dads": It's now widely accepted among those who work in genetics that roughly 10 per cent of us are not fathered by the man we believe to be dad. -Globe and mail. With the source. And this was her response: You should understand that the field of genetic research is in its infancy and we don't know far more than we know Mental gymnastics. S'fun!
/r/MensRights06/02/16 02:52 AM
1

Are you purposely obtuse? Disdain for Woman? Tracing Jesus' ancestry? I said no such thing. Read my comment again, I guess. And your disdain for men doesn't count? And, while were at it, nobody ever has been born of a virgin mother. I think I see the problem here. The TIME of Jesus. Not Jesus. The era in which we've been told he lived. I see now I'm being trolled.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 07:25 PM
1

Who said I wasn't empathetic toward woman? My ex, who is legally obligated to pay me support payments for raising her children, would probably tell you that I've been extremely empathetic by not having her drivers license revoked or her wage garnished. In spite of the fact that I'm a full time student and she is gainfully employed. You should understand that the field of genetic research is in its infancy and we don't know far more than we know That's absurd. So you're saying that it isn't 10%?W…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 06:01 PM
1

Mommy's little secret. It's now widely accepted among those who work in genetics that roughly 10 per cent of us are not fathered by the man we believe to be dad. -Globe and mail. And 10% is thought to be low by some reputable sources. Yes, how dare I claim any victim status from Womanz. Many many men are delinquent. For a variety of reasons. If you care to actually look into it, you'll find that it's far far more complicated than you seem open to. Sounds like you have been pretty heavily indoctr…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 04:59 PM
3

She is freaking awesome.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 01:24 PM
1

Greater society. The fact that men have almost zero reproductive rights, that 10%+ of babies are born into paternity fraud and the rampant use of spurious accusations as a tactic in divorce settlements; a tactic that ensures the woman's complete control of the children and the asserts leading to regular payments, that fact that debtors prison exists for men. I assure you, as with anything we humans do, we are unfairly labeling many people. They happen to be men, this time. Guess how long it's be…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 11:20 AM
1

Exactly. I'm 40, divorced. My ex is a textbook example of the woman in the study; torn between needing comfort and security (me) and her biological drive to fuck the most attractive guy she could bag. Cheers.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 01:19 AM
2

Well said.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 12:07 AM
1

That's right. I've heard about this. Of the fathers who seek out a paternity test, 30%-40% were proven to be unrelated to their kid. I couldn't imagine. Thank goodness that both my kids are little clones of myself because I have no doubt that my cheating ex was more than capable of keeping that secret from me. Also it's interesting that our expectations of searching out our human genetic history and our past descendants had to be dramatically reduced when it became clear that there was so much c…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 11:09 PM
4

Ah yes, inequality in the name of equality.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 03:11 PM
4

Dude, this goes on all the time. Being compelled into "sexual harassment sensitivity" training in the morning, and for lunch we ate a birthday cake made to look like a naked "hunk" complete with detailed muscles and an erect penis with a dribble of white icing down the side that was brought in by one of the girls. This happened. I made a mistake, though. I pointed out the inherent hypocrisy. I said: "Um....sorry, but I can't help but feel, especially in light of the recent Sexual Harassment sens…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 12:43 PM
3

"False accusations are the rule, not the norm" Dr. Christina Hoff Sommers. Similar to This. Mommy's little Secret: It's now widely accepted among those who work in genetics that roughly 10 per cent of us are not fathered by the man we believe to be dad. -Globe and Mail The last thing the establishment wants is for the general public to understand reality; it doesn't fit the current social narrative. Personally, the hypocrisy makes my blood boil.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 12:24 PM
2

Consider, too, that the label "deadbeat dad" gets leveled against any father who misses payments; justified or not. The Deadbeat Dad label is essentially society revoking the guys "real man" status. There are massive social implications here that seldom get mentioned in greater society.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 10:35 PM
19

Ah! I have an answer to this: Paula Wright Paula is an independent researcher in evidence-based sex and gender studies grounded in evolutionary biology, psychology, anthropology, ecology. For brevity's sake, she refers to this is Darwinian Gender studies. (my emphasis) Darwinian Gender Studies. Based on evidence, not feelings. What a concept! The (A) problem with "gender studies" it that it operates under the assumption of Patriarchy Theory (among other assumptions). It is built upon a foundatio…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 10:24 PM
7

It takes the strongest of men down. My condolences. Hugs for you and his. You're a loyal friend for posting this.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 10:02 PM
1

Hey thanks.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 05:11 PM
1

Oh yeah. This was over 4 years ago. I bet you can't tell I'm bitter at all. In my case, since they had zero evidence and I had no past history, all they had was a woman showing up making claims. So they put a short expiry on it (21 days), leveled maximum conditions against me (just in case) and told me I had 10 days to apply to vary. Before I even had a chance (actually THREE different lawyers all advised me to just wait out the 21 days because lying woman isn't worth the risk. Imagine!) to cons…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 04:41 PM
5

in a case that triggered a furore in Germany.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:30 PM
3

This here. This is what it's all about. She doesn't even need to "believe" it, she just needs others to believe it. And they will, unconditionally. And in our society, she'll be rewarded for claiming it; true or not. The collective confirmation bias kicks in; this must be that guy we keep hearing about. The misogynist. Mob mentality kicks among woman and the men are quick to differentiate themselves from the "misogynist" and declare themselves as "other". It's this giant echo-chamber-circle-jerk…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 07:28 AM
1

young boys growing up in this generation are FUCKED, the generation before them (millenials/genx) are selling them out for pussy points they'll never get There's an interesting summation. A little crude, but eloquent still. Very nice. I'm pretty sure I agree with you. But the genX-Mil people have no idea that they're selling out their own children, right? They (we) are just behaving as they've been programmed; trying to please, buying into 'true love', and "treat woman right" and such. This fasc…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 07:12 AM
3

Yes, the "double down". It's pretty common. Did Bill ever actually admit Monica sucked his dick? Did Nixon admit he was a crook? Did Bush admit there wasn't any WMD? Fake it till you make it. Did you see that Reddit post yesterday about the guy who caught his wife spitting in his water? Same thing, in spite of him just absolutely insisting that he SAW her and that he wished to operate within the realm of reality; she dug her heals in, made it about him owing her an apology and denied, denied, de…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 06:50 AM
1

No, I didn't mean that I didn't have a right to my earnings. I wasn't able to make any changes to our financial situation that would effect her or the house that the kids lived in without clearing it with the judge through application of a variance. My lawyer was pretty certain that cutting her off completely would count. Basically when the EPO is issued, it's a long list of conditions; boxes on a page that get ticked. As a default they generally tick almost every box and it is assumed you'll be…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 04:05 AM
5

Not sure how it works in PA, but during the hell that was the spurious TRO leveled against me as a tactic in the divorce settlement in my life; during the TRO I was legally prohibited from making any changes to our joint finances or bills under threat of imprisonment. Seriously, I would have been arrested and criminally charged if I stopped my paycheck from being deposited into our joint account while the TRO was in effect without the permission of a judge. My lawyer warned me: "Don't touch that…
/r/MensRights30/01/16 02:59 PM
2

Anybody have any good sources on how many of the approximately 10 000 black men lynched and hanged from Popular trees were actually guilty of rape? I've run across it before; it's staggering how few actually did anything more than TALK to a white woman, but I it'd be a good thread to open up the discussion.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 02:42 PM
5

Hmm. I'm paraphrasing something I heard Karen Straughan say. I guess I'd better nail that one down so as not to sound like an ass. Thanks.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 08:55 PM
1

Great post!
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:04 PM
2

And more than a few mens involved in the Gay's rights movement...
/r/MensRights27/01/16 04:08 PM
1

I misunderstood. Ah. My bad. I was obtuse. Good question. Yes of course.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 04:08 AM
1

Poe's law.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 03:50 PM
2

Is identity politics twisting our collective reality when it comes to perceptions on what is gender equality and what is gender reality? Yes.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 11:47 PM
2

Good point. My friend sells cars for a living. He says "You wouldn't believe how many people end up buying the car because they simply don't want to disappoint me".
/r/TheRedPill22/01/16 02:18 AM
13

Proof? All you had to do was ask. Across all cultures, women deploy a dualistic sexual strategy: Coupling and Dual Mating. Coupling, meaning the formation of a long-term 'monogamous' relationship with a provider, is necessitated by human infants requiring long years of high resource expenditure before they are independent. Evidence indicates that for the purpose of Coupling, women seek out men that display characteristics like ability to provide, kindness and reliability. When selection is const…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 11:25 AM
1

You realize that there are humans, just like us, who are being bombed as we speak so that you and I can Have this discussion, right? Our monetary market economy, the one that ensures that we have many types of toilet paper to choose from, can only exist because there are a vast number of humans who are oppressed. Like, really oppressed, not just bitching about men who can't cross their legs on the bus, but hungry, war torn, and suffering. My point was to highlight the inherent hypocrisy in femin…
/r/MensRights19/01/16 09:10 PM
1

Based on our current idea of Female Sexual Strategy; Mary was a lying cheater. Remember Mommy's Little secret; sounds like ol' Joe was cuckolded. Just sayin' Also, Joseph was short, dark skinned and had tight curly hair that water would bead off. I'll bet he knew deep inside that the Eric Clapton looking baby wasn't his. Poor fucker.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 07:47 PM
1

Brought to you by the Koss-one-in-five technique for statistical analysis; make the data fit the idea.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 07:41 PM
2

There's an even bigger misunderstanding at play here, too. Global economics. To have the privilege to complain that the pink, fuzzy, triple-ply toilet paper costs too much means that there is, has to be, other people elsewhere on earth that have NO CHOICE at all. In fact, I do believe that the majority of the humans on earth are still shitting in a hole in the ground (if lucky) and wiping their ass with the hand they don't eat with. "Oppression" is relative, really.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 07:20 PM
1

Well said. So, basically it's because of freedom that this exists. I remember the tales from soviet Russia from when I was a kid; everybody having to line up for hours to get their toilet paper ration. Everybody gets the same type, the same number of rolls. Probably single ply and rough, too.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 07:13 PM
2

The difference between Feminism and Egalitarianism. One assumes a neutral position, the other assumes systematic oppression and disadvantage. They're not the same.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 11:23 AM
4

Dude who was the victim of a woman who "used the system" against me as a tactic in a divorce settlement here. RUN. My ex had a violent outburst toward me at her place of employment in front of many witnesses. She begged me not to go to the police of complain to her employer. I didn't. One week later KNOCK KNOCK. It was the police there to serve me with an Emergency Protection Order. Your GF is suffering from troubles of the mental variety as well as threatening you with one of the worst forms of…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:53 PM
2

Dude. Good answer. Good point. I regret the smug tone of my comment very much all of a sudden. Brother. Allow me to retract my comment and replace it with: Huh. Very interesting. As a person who doesn't live in a land where everybody has a gun, perhaps I am not an authority on the relationship between local crime rates and the prevalence of firearms. I was trying to be mindful of not making crude generalizations. I guess one slipped by. My bad. Cheers.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 10:47 PM
5

Lol. If crime is so low, why then do you have 7 times the prison rate as Canada? Are Canadians 7 times less likely to be criminals? Or perhaps we have a different attitude about what exactly "crime" is. Funny, THIS book, written in '94, did an amazing job of predicting the massive increase in the American prison rate. Allow me to simplify it: In Canada, crime control isn't as important an industry as it is in America. You guys feed your families by putting other Americans in Jail. What was I rea…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 10:18 PM
1

Hey I had a look at your comment history. A Newfoundlander antifeminist socialist with Aspergers. We might be friends. THIS is for you. It's about the difference between Feminism and Egalitarianism, very interesting read, but it's written by a woman on the spectrum who studies what she calls Darwinian Gender studies. She calls herself an "evidence based" researcher. I like her. I like her logical approach. Thought you'd be interested. See what you think.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:02 PM
3

Dude ruined by spurious EPO as a tactic in a divorce settlement here. Can confirm everything.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 12:21 AM
7

Elephant in the room. Imagine if between 5% and 8% of all sexually mature men suffered from delusion, dysphoria and mood swings for 5 days out of every month. My abusive ex wife was prone to PMDD. I have no doubt that it plays a larger role in our world than it's being given credit. Good call, bro. Although I'm probably on a list now for mentioning it.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 02:53 AM
4

No, brother, I did not get my house back. That was the whole idea, it was all about the house. I got "nuked". Funny, too, because we had already agreed on a settlement; house was mine. She moved out. I let her back in for one week because of reasons, and it was during this period that she availed of the EPO. There was no emergency. Nobody needed protection except me, and it was always about the house and taking custody of the kids so I'd have to pay support (cause the house cost money, who knew?…
/r/MensRights14/01/16 12:33 PM
1

Yes, sorry, EPO is an Emergency Protection Order. They hand them out like candy with, wait for it......ZERO evidence having ever been presented, no notice to me, no reasonable avenue of recourse, no past history whatsoever and nobody to regulate and investigate false claims. Also, in some parts of Canada this isn't outlandish at all.. Oh yeah, MY part of Canada for one!
/r/MensRights14/01/16 12:27 PM
33

Second, file for a protective order. Do not tell your spouse/partner about it, or she could file before you, and courtroom bias would work against you. Do not threaten to do so "next time you hit me." THIS! My ex was the violent and unstable one, not me. There was a particularly dramatic and violent outburst by my wife at her place of employment that was witnessed by many people. It finally gave me the power to make a formal complaint with actual undeniable substance. She begged me not to go to …
/r/MensRights13/01/16 06:44 PM
4

Dude with relevant experience here. My ex begged me not to go to the police; not to get an EPO. A few days later: KNOCK KNOCK. It was the police. She had applied for an EPO and removed me from my house. She was the violent and unstable one, not me. she gets the last laugh :( The bad relationship was one thing. The abuse and the getting cheated on and lied to was emotionally draining and soul destroying, but the bitterness and the implications from being falsely accused of DV as a tactic in a div…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 10:08 AM
12

Simpson's paradox, or the Yule–Simpson effect, is a paradox in probability and statistics, in which a trend appears in different groups of data but disappears or reverses when these groups are combined. It is sometimes given the impersonal title reversal paradox or amalgamation paradox.[1] This result is often encountered in social-science and medical-science statistics,[2] and is particularly confounding when frequency data is unduly given causal interpretations.[3] The paradoxical elements dis…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 12:49 PM
-1

Ok, what assumptions would one have to make for Whistle-blower protection to be considered an Oxymoron? Now make those assumptions and you'll understand where I am going. Lol. I made it up, therefore it is. I can say to my friends "I coined an oxymoron today". Goodnight.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:34 AM
0

It isn't really something that can be argued. I was making a point. You can argue whether or not whistle-blowers are "protected" or not, but you can't whether it's an Oxymoron or not. It was because I said it was, that was the point. Do you see? There exists a contradiction between those two terms. This is the crux of my commentary. Oxymorons are famous for the exact thing you and I are doing. People not getting it. People not making the leap to see under what context makes it work. lol. I still…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:55 AM
-1

lol. Dude, it isn't math.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:28 AM
0

lol, I'm getting trolled, aren't I.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 11:48 PM
0

Dude, that's the whole point of an Oxymoron. Oxymorons as paradoxes[edit] Writers often use an oxymoron to call attention to an apparent contradiction. For example, Wilfred Owen's poem "The Send-off" refers to soldiers leaving for the front line, who "lined the train with faces grimly gay." The oxymoron "grimly gay" highlights the contradiction between how the soldiers feel and how they act: though they put on a brave face and act cheerfully, they feel grim. Similarly, in Henry James' novella Th…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 11:13 PM
0

Whistle-blowing implies a betrayal of the establishment, does it not? It wouldn't be whistle-blowing otherwise, it'd just be saying things. My point is that the establishment seems conveniently selective over what it deems "whistle-blowing", therefore the idea that one would be "protected" is contradictory, is it not? One man's whistle-blower is another man's traitor.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 09:52 PM
-1

Oxymoron. One man's whistle blower is another man's traitor. Edward Snowden comes to mind, among others.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 09:36 PM
2

My mom raised an MRA too. How? By being an ignorant feminist man hater who blamed all her troubles on my dad. She would actively prevent me from spending time with my dad allthewhile criticizing him for not spending time with his son. I observed this from a young age. I was a true believer. So not only am I an MRA, but i'm a disillusioned feminist MRA.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 08:05 PM
-4

whistleblowing protection Ah, a new oxymoron. Nice one!
/r/MensRights08/01/16 07:57 PM
1

Hear, hear. 100 000 years of evolution through sexual selection can't be wrong.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 01:27 PM
3

You mean there isn't really any "terrorist" threat to justify bombing hundreds of millions of humans who happen to control the most valuable natural resources in the world? Who'd have thunk it?
/r/MensRights06/01/16 11:36 AM
2

But once you become enlightened to the concept, it just becomes more and more obvious how prone we are to manipulation and bias. So all of a sudden it's becoming clear to you that FeminismTM is actually a huge complicated hungry industry. It lobbies for policy change, it constantly has to assert it's relevance and the actual effect on society is becoming clear to you, right? It's so massive that you need to see many many trees before the forest becomes clear. The Crime Control Industry, the Mili…
/r/MensRights02/01/16 04:10 PM
3

Look deeper. Look wider. You've uncovered the most basic motivation for everything humans do. For example, do you really think that the systematic invasion of the middle east has anything to do with fighting terrorism? Or have we been engineering this outcome for the last 2+ decades? Humans only act when there's incentive.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 03:31 PM
2

So the false report is a misdemeanor, but I'm willing to bet 30 years in jail that the "sexual assault" was a criminal offence.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 03:23 PM
33

A satirical commentary on SJW bully culture, I suspect.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 04:50 PM
2

Where can I collect my victim points? It's actually the same building where we get our Male Privilege cards stamped when we want to get away with rape or get a CEO job or a 30% raise over the nearest woman. So the Victim Points office is on the other side of the same building. The points are retroactive so I imagine you'll have enough for a smug sense of self satisfaction and entitlement with an overall reduction in personal accountability. Good score, dude!
/r/MensRights01/01/16 12:57 AM
19

This. My ex made spurious accusations of DV as a tactic, a highly effective tactic, in our divorce settlement. Legitimate cases? What legitimate case get's tainted in a system where the man is automatically assumed guilty? And my ex was the violent and unstable one, not me. The sad reality is that the father of my children was ruined (me); financially, socially and emotionally. My children deserve their dad to be at his best; not some shell of a human. This is the sad part.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 11:24 AM
30

We had a "teach him respect" campaign here in Newfoundland a few years ago and there are still purple ribbons on a lot of cars, some government, that say "Teach him Respect". I physically remove them from any car any chance I get and I rip them into shreds and dispose of them. I do this for my children. The whole point of the campaign isn't to inform us that we need to teach our sons to respect woman; it's to promote the agenda that men dominate woman as a rule and that we are inherently violent…
/r/MensRights30/12/15 06:54 PM
3

I'm just the messenger, and I didn't purport it was true, just that OP ought to be informed and do his own due diligence. But I can google it for you, see what comes up... One Two Three Four And five. I didn't vet the links; they are actually just a few of the top search results. But it does stand to reason that changing a persons personality artificially during the period when their neurons are forming seems risky to me. I can attest to the dramatic effect ot powerful SSRi's. I am not surprised…
/r/MensRights30/12/15 03:23 PM
3

Exactly. The definition of "rape" has changed somewhat. Also, what constitutes an "accusation" would be highly variable too I would imagine. How many people have been socially accused of being a "rapist" but never faced formal charges? Do those guys count, for example? Also, the threshold for accusation is low; two people drunk sex counts as rape for some, yet when a man is socially accused it is assumed that the threshold is high; that he is violent. So my point, for the sake of clarity, is tha…
/r/MensRights30/12/15 02:56 PM
2

OP you need to google the effect of SSRI's on small children ASAP. There is a thing called Post SSRI Sexual Dysfunction and a lot of credable information demonstrating that SSRI's during pregnancy and early childhood has a dramatic effect on the sexual development of a child. There are a lot of people claiming that it causes asexuality. These kids grow up with no sex drive; gay or straight. Don't want to alarm you, but you're going to want to do your own research. Consider that SSRI's were one o…
/r/MensRights30/12/15 12:07 PM
3

Actually there is a huge movement building that says that SSRI's during pregnancy and early childhood is contributing to asexuality. The idea is that you ought not to mess with serotonin while pregnant or during sexual development of a child. There is a thing called Post SSRI Sexual Dysfunction. It's real. SSRI's have dramatic effect on adults sexual function and sex drive and people are now demonstrating that for some it's permanent. I know this because I have been on SSRI's in my past and have…
/r/MensRights30/12/15 11:58 AM
25

The difference between egalitarianism and feminism. Fantastic essay by one of my new fav's. She calls it "Darwinian gender studies" and qualifies it as "evidence based". Enjoy. Share it with your cousin.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 11:05 PM
3

Hear, hear.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:18 PM
13

From one of my new fav writers: Paula Wright. She's an "evidence based" researcher in "Darwinian Gender studies". "..Patriarchy is an elegant and pragmatic solution for a species who have uniquely helpless infants with unprecedentedly long childhoods..." This dynamic between the sexes, of team work and strong pair bonds, is one of the foundations of our success as a species. The feminist concept of patriarchy is embellished from the anthropological observation that in many cultures men appear to…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 02:33 PM
3

I agree with you. Once you've been indoctrinated with the idea that the root of "patriarchy" is hatred for woman, that men have the advantage and are working to keep it and are are predisposed to naturally dominating woman because "menz"; well this shit doesn't seem so unreasonable anymore. I promise people are reading it and accepting it at face value.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:16 PM
8

Divorced dude here. Not in my home did my ex do more housework. I was still expected to do my "half" on top of the lawn and any "man" jobs. Not to mention I built a massive deck, a wood fired hot-water radiation furnace (= free heat) and put down new HW floors before I got divorce raped out of my own home. Conversation in my old house: "Well sweety, the laundry needs to be done and the heat coil needs to be pressure tested and welded. Hmm, ok i'll do the laundr...WAIT a minute, which one of us w…
/r/MensRights27/12/15 12:21 AM
1

They just want to put bodies in cells. That's what they get paid for Crime Control as Industry, written in '94 by a Norwegian penal expert, it made stunningly accurate predictions about the current state of crime control in the US. It made the point that since all the manufacturing jobs were shipped overseas (freedom, btw), that the Crime Control industry is taking it's place. Americans feed their families by putting other Americans (men, usually poor) in prison. The US has 7 times the prison ra…
/r/MensRights24/12/15 11:54 AM
2

Poe's law.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 03:52 PM
1

Wait, so i'm automatically banned from other subs because I post on /r/mensrights? I had no idea.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 03:37 PM
1

Not at all. It a right of passage on the way to the MRM to get banned from /r/Feminism. Silly you, thinking reason and logic had anything to do with it. I accidentally pointed out that "the rule of thumb" was a myth one time and got the same treatment. I sincerely thought they wanted to operate within the realm of reality. My bad, i guess. You're one of us now, pull up a chair brother /u/sevensix67
/r/MensRights21/12/15 03:33 PM
1

as you can only become a true feminist when you have recieved this holy sacrament No, no. You only need your "victim card". Easy peasy. Simply regret a sexual encounter and declare it as "rape", or fail to see your own violence as "abuse" and accuse your ex of DV. You can even start to refer to yourself as a "survivor". Now, however, you should know that if you had a regretful sexual experience with a person who you later declared a "rapist" and whom "deserved" abuse and then got yourself pregna…
/r/MensRights21/12/15 03:24 PM
3

A big part of this has to do with the false impression that only a small fraction turn out to be false. Cristina Hoff Sommers says; "False accusations aren't the exception; they're the rule." How many of the people on this thread who were falsely accused would even make the stat, I wonder? Dropped charges don't count, you see.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 11:02 AM
4

Dude. While I was never formally arrested (Canada), I was falsely accused of DV as a tactic in a divorce settlement. It was implied that I was a danger to my own children (I was primary parent), although never directly accused. Ruined. Forced to leave my own home and children under threat of arrest and never provided with a reasonable avenue to defend myself. My ex was the violent and unstable one, not me. I can relate to your bitterness. It's actually the bitterness that is the worst part. It w…
/r/MensRights21/12/15 10:33 AM
1

Paula is an independent researcher in evidence-based sex and gender studies grounded in evolutionary biology, psychology, anthropology, ecology. For brevity's sake, she refers to this is Darwinian Gender studies What a great phrase. Who's going to argue with Darwin? Ahem, that was rhetorical. Great essay.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 02:28 AM
7

You said it. That's what it's all about; divide and conquer, divide and conquer: racism, gender, sexual preference, religion, guns, abortion, crime...etc etc. When will they let us just get on with the equality thing...
/r/MensRights19/12/15 09:07 PM
3

Great comment. Very true. What's that song?...."I'm half the man I used to be..."
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:30 PM
9

Fighting who, exactly? The Americans? These people are victims of circumstance and somebody else policies that have nothing to do with "good or evil". This isn't like WWII where the Nazi's have to be stopped at all costs. Remember, it was the absurd pretext to an illegal war 15 years ago that got us here. It didn't make much press in the US at the time, but The rest of the world was screaming about the implications. And guess what, we were right. We invaded them, remember.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 04:53 PM
1

I agree completely. Yes, it isn't only the "feminist agenda" propaganda that I'm tuned into; I realize we are being fed a number of "wars". From videos of "isis" cutting off heads to propaganda supporting the Crime Control Industry: We're being led down the garden path as far as "free will" as a society is concerned. It's a "Forest for the trees" type situation. I've seen enough trees now that i recognize a forest when I see one. Cheers.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 02:57 PM
3

Good point. Really good point. Hmm. No kidding, the new corporate agenda of "equality" in light of the "culture of misogyny" in the workplace. Yeah Shad sucks. Bill Burr was on the other day and he was saying some great stuff. Shad wasn't even listening, he was just waiting to ask the next question on the list. Burr says "Oh....I thought we were actually going to have a conversation..."
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:43 AM
3

Me too. I grew up in a house where CBC radio was on in the kitchen constantly. My mom grew up in a house where CBC radio was on constantly. It used to be on much of the time in my own home, too. I can't listen to the Current anymore. It's about a 50% chance it'll cause me actual stress. And even if it isn't a feminist topic, it'll be from from the feminist perspective. There's still some good stuff; Ideas is usually really good, for example. But I'm with you. I don't know if it's more prevalent …
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:26 AM
12

Dude. Oh yes. And, not to sound paranoid myself, but really that's the point, isn't it? Feminism is built on a foundation of patriarchy theory; that woman are oppressed, that men have the advantage and are working to maintain it, be it deliberate or as a result of deeply ingrained social norms. It's getting more difficult to make a case of "disadvantage" these days; what with the "pay gap" being better understood and the obvious legal and societal privilege enjoyed by woman observed by all. So t…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:20 AM
3

The asshole doth protest too much, me thinks...
/r/MensRights17/12/15 10:14 PM
46

Everyday, on the CBC, there is a story about rape/domestic violence. Today was about woman in Syria being raped. It's part of the daily propaganda agenda. CBC is run with an overt feminist agenda. Years ago, my uncle would complain of this. I never understood what he was talking about. I do now.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 07:59 PM
2

Atheism is the answer. If I said the dragon who lives behind my house told me not to pick my nose or else he'll burn me to death, people would say I'm crazy. Make believe has no place in modern society.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 02:06 PM
2

Is "Carbon Fibre" the name of a men's support group or something?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:58 PM
2

Humans. We're so easily manipulated. The secret is to be aware of how easily we are misled, how simple conditioning through emotional stimuli can have a dramatic effect. Great post.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:29 PM
8

I agree with you. if it were women committing suicide, they would be no question that men would need to do something about it A concrete example of this is the "missing and murdered" women issue raging in Canada right now. We're being fed a steady diet of shame for not "doing something" about the ~800 MM woman. To the point where our new "because it's 2015" Prime Minister just announced a spending allocation of $40 million on an inquiry into the issue. There are over 4000 murdered and missing me…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:15 PM
1

Two words: Ex Parte.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:15 AM
2

Jeez, maybe we should get them their own buses or something. Wait a minute,...
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:09 AM
6

Single dad here, one son, one daughter. I could hug you. Well said. Beautiful. You are so going to enjoy being a great dad. I subscribe to the same parenting philosophy as you described. It works. Congratulations.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 07:57 PM
4

Hear, hear.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 07:24 PM
12

"Give me control of your wallet, work your fingers to the bone so that I can live in comfort in a nice house, Rescue me from a life of poverty and social stigma, raise my kids to be intelligent and reasonable humans. In return you get to do your own laundry, still do half the housework even though you work 50 hours a week, all the home maintenance including building your own wood-fired hot water radiation furnace so that we can heat said home for free and hang out in the hot-tub you built down n…
/r/MensRights13/12/15 01:48 PM
1

Who would "keep" that rancid, pig-faced turd of a woman? I don't know /u/ThePigmanAgain, if only we could find the answer...
/r/MensRights12/12/15 10:48 PM
2

Does the Pope shit in the woods? Of course he does.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 10:40 PM
3

Dude that's brilliant! it actually serves to get the point across. I envision a larger one, all shiny and designed by a graphic artist. A proper pyramid made of bricks; but each brick has a "problem" written on it. It would really get the point across that the issues at the top of the pyramid are real, but not faced by modern western woman. But the issues toward the bottom are absurd. Very interesting concept. We could print them off and post them at university disguised as real feminist propaga…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 10:28 PM
19

I was really hoping he'd win his lawsuit; but it sounds like nobody "wins" in that they always settle out before it goes to trial. Same as the vast vast majority of malpractice suits.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 02:31 AM
1

thats the spirit
/r/MensRights11/12/15 02:22 AM
1

I apologize for taking out my annoyance on you. I do feel bad. I think I was addressing the entire world's bad grammar, only I directed it at you. I "snapped". I finally said something; to you, and I felt better for a moment. But I just kinda feel bad now. Partially too, I wanted to know what you were talking about. Anyway, thanks for the reply, but please know I had been storing it up for a while and it wasn't personal.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 02:00 AM
4

Single dad with much experience with the CCTB here: So after my ex made false accusations of DV as a tactic in a divorce settlement and i eventually "won" my own children back, I had a HELL of a time getting the CCTB in my name. They required that I present them with 3 (!) sworn letters from "prominent professionals" from the community stating that my assertions of parenthood and active custody are true. Which I did, which they "lost". So I got my lawyer, my doctor and a teacher friend of mine t…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 11:55 PM
0

Is it really that much trouble to capitalize and re-read your sentences to make sure they are clear? Because your first sentence actually causes me annoyance. WTF is it saying? I really don't think i'm being unreasonable. Mind, sometimes I drink beer and reddit. I wake up the next day and my grammar is all bad and my thoughts don't really add up to anything. Perhaps you are just in a perpetual state of inebriation?
/r/MensRights10/12/15 11:35 PM
2

"...Men's ambition sacrificed on the alter of woman's progress..." Fiamengo is one enlightened human. She doesn't mind "debating" radicalized feminists either; which, as we know is no small feat. Great post. Fiamengo is like Karen Straughan, except slightly less charismatic and seems slightly more intellectual and educated. Although, I haven't ever actually seen either's CV.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 09:54 PM
1

Done. I'd sign it all day long if I could.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 12:25 PM
1

You mean speak up about how nobody is listening? It's complicated.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 08:16 PM
13

Great post! So that's a really great way to understand the real position and motives of feminism. I went through a period there where I needed to go deeper and understand "WHY". Not the "what" was happening, but the underlining pressures and agenda. For instance: "Why was I treated as guilty before innocent when my ex made those absurd and spurious accusations of DV as a tactic in a divorce settlement?" Why? Why was her word; the word of an unstable and recently violent and blatantly non-credibl…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:23 AM
1

Ouch brother. Hugs for you. Ache. Yes I've tasted that particular brand of suffering under the family court system in Canada. This was 4 years ago. Only in the last 6 months has the bitterness subsided to below clinical levels. Hugs and love to you.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 02:27 AM
1

Victim of false accusations of DV as a tactic in a divorce settlement through ex parte action here. Great post. To be honest I don't think I can watch it; I get too emotional and angry and disheartened. However, that it exists and that it is posted here and available to the world is comforting. I'll do my part and promote it within my circles. Can we lobby Netflix to pick it up or something?
/r/MensRights08/12/15 12:35 AM
1

That can't be true; it's only one paragraph.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 12:19 AM
3

Let me guess. Circular saw, disposable diapers, dish washer and plastic bags. AmIright?
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:58 PM
2

Dirty secret of the world that we aren't allowed to mention: PMDDThe fact that up to 8% of woman are clinically mentally ill and prone to delusion for 5 days every month. Seriously, my ex suffered from this; well we all suffered, but she had it. She was abusive and unstable, every month like clockwork. 8% of woman is a LOT of woman. Just sayin'
/r/MensRights07/12/15 11:59 AM
21

Me too. That's cause we're privileged, see. And most of those aren't very well paid; some very low pay actually.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 09:31 PM
42

The 10 Deadliest Jobs: Deaths per 100,000 Logging workers: 128.8 Fishers and related fishing workers: 117 Aircraft pilot and flight engineers: 53.4 Roofers: 40.5 Structural iron and steel workers: 37 Refuse and recyclable material collectors: 27.1 Electrical power-line installers and repairers: 23 Drivers/sales workers and truck drivers: 22.1 Farmers, ranchers, and other agricultural managers: 21.3 Construction laborers: 17.4
/r/MensRights06/12/15 06:27 PM
1

I'm joking. But I actually just watched some old Nirvana videos last night and that song was fresh in my mind.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 01:30 PM
1

Maybe he had some 'splanin' to do after he released his hit song. Hmm, what was it called again?....um Oh yeah! It was called Rape Me.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 01:08 PM
3

Can you expand on that a little? So if he said "let the guy go", she'd assume he was guilty? But instead he said "Off with a warning" and this means he's innocent? Or is it about reffering to himself in the first person; "let the guy go" vs. "let ME go"? Seriously. Help me out.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 10:34 PM
5

Ah-Ha. You've found the loop-hole. Here's how it works: When any woman self-identifies as a "strong woman", you can interchange it with "fucking entitled bitch" or "fucking unaccountable bitch". Also, maybe it's just me, but it seems like the people who really are "strong", don't go around telling everyone how "strong" they are, they're too busy getting shit done.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 04:32 PM
17

Nah, ISIS will know in advance and just use blanks when shooting at US woman in combat. Like that Die Hard movie at the airport.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 04:24 PM
3

So I'm reading between the lines and it's pretty clear that "Stoya" is fucking batshit insane, has zero ability to empathize with others, is irrationally jealous and inherently insecure. She sounds exactly like my ex wife who made false accusations of domestic violence as a tactic in a divorce and ruined me. If ever there was a profile of a woman prone to false reporting of violence or sexual assault; this is it.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 12:39 PM
1

Is that you. Warren?
/r/MensRights05/12/15 12:26 PM
1

Very good point. Yes, of course. That's a big one. Good catch.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 12:31 AM
2

No, I would think adultery is generally accepted as a human issue by most Mra's (can't speak for everyone). It's the whole "legal contract" part of it that we're focused on. Marriage is a sham.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 08:52 PM
7

$720 000 a year! I have no more words. Rest in peace sir.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:06 PM
58

That's the crux of the problem. Similar to harassment laws, I assume it transitions into a criminal offence whenever the woman says so. Scary.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:56 PM
1

"I put up with it for years and thought it was normal until a couple of pieces I wrote got attention from the MRA — the Men's Rights Association — in the US. I see now, so they think we're like the NRA.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:47 PM
2

Can confirm. Source: Am victim of spurious claim of domestic violence as a tactic in a divorce settlement. It seemed to me to be so utterly absurd, especially the convenient timing, that I figured it was only a matter of time before I was vindicated. I'd love to see that article, OP. Here's one from a couple years ago. It nails the issue. Noteworty too that divorce lawyers are advising clients to avail of this method because it gives them instant control of the assets, the house and the kids. An…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 10:31 PM
31

So my ex made false and spurious accusations of domestic violence as a tactic in a divorce settlement. Basically I was branded a "wife beater". 18 years we were together and in spite of her aggression and instability; I never ever hit her. Seriously. So I had a long enjoyable daydream recently where I actually got to fucking smack her a few times. Everybody thinks I did it anyway, although never convicted; still I was treated as guilty until innocent without ever being offered an avenue to defen…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 10:13 PM
2

You can postpone it on the grounds that you have no lawyer. You can also get "sick" until you figure it out. I've been to a few settlement meetings in my time, you're going to want a lawyer.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 02:09 AM
8

As far as I know, In Canada anyway, the kid has no say till their 12. We stopped subjecting kids to his years ago. But when you're 12 year old says "i wanna live with dad", it carries some weight.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 12:40 AM
3

Goodness, we know that. Seriously, great post. Well written and articulate.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 04:05 PM
2

I know. I couldn't resist. Yours was a great post. And I'll second that: Nobody gives a fuck about men.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 03:53 PM
-1

Argh, I looked and looked. On the google "search results" page I see it again and again, but when I click the link or article, I can't find the origin. I was quoting from a /r/MensRights post I saw about a month ago where they excerpted a few paragraphs of hers and It was there. I'm thinking it comes from her book Who Stole Feminism. I did see that she uses the phrase "xxxx isn't the exception, it's the norm" often under different contexts. I'll find it.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 03:34 PM
8

we live in a world where sexism towards men has become normalized and no one cares to fix it. Dude! We're standing right here.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 02:26 PM
-10

"False accusations aren't the exception, they're the rule" -Dr. Christina Hoff Sommers.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 02:20 PM
3

That poor bastard. He's just aching to be near his own flesh and blood. He loves her unconditionally, he wants to provide for and hold her. It goes beyond "want", he is biologically compelled. Is there a petition we can sign? I realize that this guy represents a mere "drop in the bucket" in this regard; still the publicity highlights the work of the MRM. Great post.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 02:18 PM
2

/r/MRRef
/r/MensRights29/11/15 12:35 AM
1

Well, to be fair, there does seem to be a few different definitions of rape these days. They've successfully moved the goal posts. What you and I consider rape; forced penetration, is at an all time low. The ol' "wake up feeling like a dirty whore cause you are" definition of rape seems to have infiltrated those minds. So my problem, when presented with an opportunity to debate the prevalence of rape, is that it keeps coming back to the fucking definition. When I say "no,no...rape is down", and …
/r/MensRights28/11/15 06:19 PM
2

Well we're supposed to be. Because in this case I predict a Charter challenge if he gets convicted. And then I predict a win. The Charter is the Charter; it's the final say. It may take you 10 years, but we've got an almost unblemished record of vindication at the Charter level. Source: I am at this very moment preparing for my own Charter Challenge relating to the false accusation of DV as a tactic in a divorce settlement. I was ruined on every level. It turns out that, under the Charter, I am …
/r/MensRights28/11/15 02:48 PM
4

...and they charge you with criminal harassment if you disagree and call them out on facts.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 02:11 PM
1

No, no. This is big business. There are thousands of Canadian woman; middle aged wealthy Canadian woman who travel back and forth to Cuba just to get laid. It's an industry in and of itself. My friend used to do it a couple times a year. She'd have a "boyfriend" in Cuba; some strapping dude who's "job" is to be this woman's fuck buddy. For her it's the romance and the pounding she's looking for by some bronzed muscled man; for him it's how he feeds his family. Just a $100 tip to this guy is like…
/r/MensRights28/11/15 12:22 PM
2

I'm not sure "charges" can be laid, but I'd think this might qualify as a Charter violation; we are guaranteed free speech under the charter in Canada. Sometimes cases take years and decades even to reach the Supreme court in a Charter violation.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 12:14 PM
3

Yep, that he was. Too bad his boss was such a douche bag.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:22 PM
2

Great point. Well articulated, too. All those young feminist women who've been getting communications and marketing degrees for 30 years? This is what they are doing now. It also helps that they have some really low-level psychological biases to exploit. This here can not be understated. I was accused of "conspiracy theory" recently for mentioning it. I swear I don't wear a tinfoil hat. I've heard Dr. Christina Hoff Sommers, Erin Pizzey and Karen Straughan ALL mention this in one form or another…
/r/MensRights27/11/15 04:55 PM
1

Great comment. Just wondering: the more I see, the more I look, and the more I look the more I see Does this overlap into other aspects of the mainstream media for you? Like do you see the blatant US propaganda for what it is? I ask because my own enlightenment began when I started to pay attention to the Newfoundland seal hunt; specifically the deliberate misinformation being generated by groups that had a financial interest. It shocked me to observe with my own eyes that a baby white-coat seal…
/r/MensRights27/11/15 01:53 PM
2

Absolutely true. And the man who said it certainly had the authority to make such a statement. You realize who said this, right?
/r/MensRights27/11/15 01:46 PM
2

Great post. I assume that goes on here, I've seen it a few times where the comment is so ignorant and reactionary that it's absurd. Usually they get downvoted.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 11:13 AM
3

He will likely not change his mind when presented with evidence. His mind is built on a foundation of misinformation. Simply poking at one corner will not bring the structure down. So with that in mind, perhaps you could present your counter sources in such a way as to not become adversarial with him about it. I would point out the CDC study that demonstrates that "forced penetration" and "forced to penetrate" are basically equal. Then I would see if you can get him to rationalize this. It requi…
/r/MensRights27/11/15 03:37 AM
1

And this is how the monster feeds itself.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 12:45 AM
5

So I was just drinking my morning coffee and the daily Canadian CBC "domestic violence grievance industry propaganda session" came on. I have had enough of the lop-sided reporting so I copypastad your comment, with the link, and emailed it the "contact us" address with my own comment. Cheers brother.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 12:31 PM
3

“A number of studies found that female perpetrators of violence, including sexual and physical forms of violence, as well as female-perpetrated homicide of a male partner, accounted for a high proportion of the total volume of media reports on violence, despite the rarity of these events.” WTF? For the second time today I need to acknowledge George Orwell and his foresight.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 12:14 PM
2

You're right. In a weird Orwellian style, "Equality" actually means "inequality". You know, I read 1984 as a young teenager on the advice of my dad. I never really "got it" till I was falsely accused of DV as a tactic in a divorce. Now I see it everywhere; "Homeland Security" is actually making it less secure by scaring the bejesus out of everyone, department of defence is actually all about offense, The dept of "advanced education and training" (Canada) is where you get your WELFARE cheque from…
/r/MensRights26/11/15 11:13 AM
3

But it gave me a justice boner. How can that bad?
/r/MensRights25/11/15 10:28 PM
2

Love you guys. Love you too, brother. Great job on the presentation. You give us hope.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 09:23 PM
1

Mobile now, but yeah, i was wondering about it, so i googled. There's about 800 m+m woman and there's about 4000 m+m men. I just googled "how many missing and murdered men in Canada" and there's all sort of official government info. Yep.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 06:04 PM
2

From the front page of /r/MensRights The byline: Report from Our Watch says stories about ‘salacious aspects of violence against women’ give the public a provocative but not representative perspective This was what I was trying to say. As I assume you knew. Anyway.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 12:26 PM
4

In other words, anti-feminists two decades ago would have been called feminists. Very interesting. Good post.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 12:18 PM
10

This here. Whiteknightosis is real. It can be treated with information and empathy; but the afflicted must be open to enlightenment.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 12:14 PM
1

Violence is not a gender issue. This means that it isn't simply about one gender abusing the other. I'm saying "violence against woman" is a misnomer It implies violence is gendered. It's a human issue. So we need to debate what "gender issue" means? I'm saying the story of the woman beaten for burning the toast is very rare compared to public perception.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 12:11 PM
1

I disagree. We're fed a story that just isn't true. Absolutely my observations matter. All of our observations matter. Policy is written by humans. Does it matter if those humans have a flawed concept of reality? Does it matter that men are always treated as guilty when we know that at least half of the time they're statistically innocent? You're playing some mental gymnastics when you say "just because we can't see doesn't mean it doesn't exist". Violence is NOT a gender issue and it's being po…
/r/MensRights25/11/15 11:22 AM
6

Nope. I'm saying our perception of the prevalence of the rate at which woman are "battered" is seriously flawed. My ex was abusive. She made a false accusation of DV as a tactic in a divorce settlement. As far as the "stats" are concerned; I am the abuser. The reality is that SHE was the violent one, not me. So in my case they got the stats 180o wrong; they mixed up the victim and the perp. Erin Pizzey found that 62 of her first 100 clients at the first ever woman's shelter were "violence prone …
/r/MensRights25/11/15 11:05 AM
2

Besides, it's unarguable that some blokes batter their women. Where exactly are these "battered" woman? Serious question. Where, in this day and age, is there a "bloke" who isn't acutely aware of the consequences of even raising his voice to a woman? I haven't met him. I have witnessed a few actual incedents of domestic violence in my life and it was always woman attacking men who were too scared to even defend themselves. In fact, they all seemed more concerned with not being perceived as the a…
/r/MensRights25/11/15 10:31 AM
6

despite her continued claim that the baby was a way for her ex to commit fraud against her. Beer just came out of my nose.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 02:08 AM
3

Well I grew up in a house where CBC blared all day long. I tend to do it myself, even. I also recall, years ago, hearing someone claim CBC has a "feminist agenda". I thought "what the hell are they talking about, an agenda for equality? Big deal..." So here I am now. Single dad, two kids. I can not expose my kids to daily propaganda sessions about how victimized and oppressed woman are and how evil and abusive men are. Anyway, yesterday's story about the gang rape in India was the last straw for…
/r/MensRights25/11/15 02:01 AM
17

I've noticed that on CBC radio 2 in Canada there is at least one prominent story everyday about "violence against woman" or rape. Yesterday was a story about a woman raped in India. India; a third world country with over a billion people and for some reason Canadians needed to feel the anger about it. I'm all for public broadcaster's, but having a daily propaganda session promoting the idea that these issues are far far more prevalent than they actually are isn't doing my children any favors. It…
/r/MensRights24/11/15 09:22 PM
6

The Primeknight.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 12:23 PM
14

Trudeau is the highest ranking WhiteKnight in Canada.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:53 AM
10

Yes, I subscribe to the "what would my mom do?" technique. Then I do the opposite. Imagine, who knew that simply speaking to children in the first person using a respectful tone of voice would yield such reasonable little humans?
/r/MensRights23/11/15 07:30 PM
1

Dude! Well said.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 01:57 AM
2

Allow me, as I've actually had the pleasure of having this very debate. It goes like this: "The very nature of patriarchy is that you don't notice it. It just seems natural. And that's the problem..." My mouth was moving I think, but there was nothing coming out.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 01:49 AM
18

My point was that woman have always had the real power; despite what's been drilled into our heads. But I imagine it's much different these days. When I was 15 there was this 17 year old girl at a party who was letting all the boys feel her boobs. They were the first boobs my hands ever touched. She's a lawyer now and a perfectly reasonable person. It was "normal" human behavior. She knew what she was doing and she liked it. I imagine these days that the police would be knocking on some doors if…
/r/MensRights22/11/15 08:06 PM
19

So it's exactly like when I was 19 in 1995?
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:52 PM
28

it is about "ejecting silly preconceptions and cultural definitions of what a 'man' is". It's about "looking to no-one else for social cues. Refusing to bow, serve and kneel for the opportunity to be treated like a disposable utility." And, it's about "living according to his own best interests in a world which would rather he didn’t". Well said.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:50 PM
11

Don't talk to the police. They are not there to sort out the truth, they are there to see if they can charge anyone: YOU. Talking to them only gives them what they need to charge you, they don't give a shit either way. If you had one penny for every innocent guy who got charged because of what he said to the police in an attempt to "make things clear"; you'd be fucking rich. Make your dad watch that video too. It seems really counter-intuitive to avoid the police when you are innocent, but it's …
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:46 PM
2

Yes, exactly. When my ex claimed "farther's aren't even necessary", it was conveniently timed to coincide with her spurious claims of violence as her "A-bomb" tactic in the divorce settlement. The beautiful irony, unfortunately, was lost on her; that a psychopath cunt who is so willing to destroy her partner and cause undue stress to her own children in a greedy bid to ensure financial security under the pretense of "...Pfft....Father's aren't even necessary.": Of course you know the punchline: …
/r/MensRights22/11/15 06:26 PM
3

Do you have a: "You were the violent one, you were unstable, you're a fucking psychopath cunt who sold out her own children and ruined the one human on earth who actually gave a shit all for greed and malice and to 'win'. Too bad you're too fucking stupid to see that when it hurts the kids that NOBODY WINS. Fuck yourself you sick evil hypocrite." - in a medium long sleeve? Cause I'll take 2.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 08:58 PM
1

Yes that's exactly what happened with Jesse. They hadn't seen him so positive and even almost happy in years. And it was exactly as you say; he was able to stop talking about it because he had his mind made up and it freed him. The solution was clear to him.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 01:46 PM
1

No kidding. Yeah hindsight is 20/20 isn't it. They had a lifetime of "alarm bells". They're having a rough time now actually. They divorced and are both drinking heavily. They feel very guilty that they missed it. I can't imagine the guilt one would feel as a parent. It destroyed his dad. I hope your family is alright. So you have a relative who is having troubles and is openly suicidal? That is really hard, I can relate. My cousin killed himself 2 years ago and it's been really hard on our fami…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 01:31 PM
3

The problem is a court system that automatically assumes the mother gets custody of the children regardless of the children's best interests. This here. So let's put it all together and see what we're left with: We have "no fault" divorce. We have a system that assumes the woman gets custody. Custody=money. Where does this leave us? Well 75% of divorces are initiated by woman and the number 1 stated reason is "boredom" (used to be infidelity). It reminds me of when elected or appointed officials…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 01:05 PM
3

No, they were desperate to help. He'd had serious illness his whole life, had a few involuntarily hospitalizations, one time was found wondering across the US border with no clothing and wouldn't tell the border patrol his name. That took a few months to sort out. They thought that they could finally relax a little about the suicide idealization because it wasn't his focus anymore. For the first time in years he showed signs of improvement and his parents were really happy that he didn't seem to…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 11:30 AM
6

Exactly. I was thinking about it since. It's like what Yoda says: "Do or do not, there is no try". Can't believe I just quoted fucking Star Wars, but it's a good line. So very few actually "attempt" suicide. There are those guys who manage to only blow their jaw off and survive and others who end up paralyzed thinking they'd die from a particular height; those are "attempts", people who really tried and failed for one reason or another. The girl who cut her wrist and made a big fuss about doing …
/r/MensRights15/11/15 11:40 PM
19

Great comment. Just wanted to add another aspect: That a large percentage of suicide "attempts" are actually not intended to succeed; the ol' "cry for help" if you will. I have no stats to offer, but over the years I have known a few people who have committed suicide; most recently my cousin, RIP Louis. and I have known a few people who "attempted". Actually I only know of men who successfully killed themselves and all of the attempts are woman. None of the "attempts" seemed like there was any r…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 09:15 PM
2

lol. Yep. Too bad our society affords her the privilege of being able to make baseless and absurd claims in a spurious accusation of DV as a tactic in a divorce settlement. I ran, I wasn't looking back. She took all of her stuff, moved out and we agreed on a settlement. 2 weeks later she decides that she actually does want the house (that I built with my two hands), the police show up with a court order and BOOM, she has instant control of the kids and the house and the assets. No proof, no inve…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 05:41 PM
2

No prob.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 02:09 PM
5

Isn't that what /r/MRRef is supposed to be all about? I've had to avail a few times myself. It's exactly what OP is talking about. I think.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 01:57 PM
2

Hey I got a mensrights boner now and nowhere to stick it. Where is this circle of which you speak?
/r/MensRights15/11/15 01:55 PM
2

Great post!
/r/MensRights15/11/15 12:48 PM
6

This is very similar to what happened to me. Except it wasn't a Music star; it was a guy she hadn't seen in 10 years who she thought was her "soulmate"all of a sudden. She was delusional. She claimed he was sending her telepathic messages. Yada yada, decided we needed to separate (18 years together, just had a baby and bought our first house). Eventually she became very abusive and accused my assertion that she was "maybe having some troubles" as abusive. And in the Canadian Family violence prev…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 10:11 AM
13

So in her mind, you're a pedophile, violent oppressor who rapes his wife and starts wars and is the cause of all that is wrong with the world. The scary part isn't bumping into them in the mall, it's when your court assigned social worker or your judge or the HR person or the manager at your kids daycare or your math prof or your sons teacher or your wife's new friend..etc etc. It's stunning.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 12:35 AM
1

Yes, it was in reference to this comment: is the 70's when the catholic church was founded? I don't actually know when the catholic church was founded, but it gets the point across. Humor, you see.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:40 PM
2

I wondered that. Pretty hard to miss on /r/MensRights these last few days. Cheers.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 02:54 PM
2

Here you go. It's in the top 3 at /r/MensRights, btw. Your outrage is shared. TBH, I can't even listen/watch the CBC "debate" because I get too emotional.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 02:27 PM
6

the 70's when the catholic church was founded? No, I meant the 1470's I guess. Good point. I meant in the context of having the feminist agenda programmed into our kids, as you know. But it sure is effective, isn't it? Get 'em young and you've got an ally for life.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:59 PM
2

You've read Karen Straughan's letter to the CBC re the "men issues" panel?
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:49 PM
21

deliberately abusing her position as a teacher to spread her crap to children Yep, this has been going on since the 70's. It's a big part of the reason why things are as they are now.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:05 PM
22

Nice! I came here to post the Lessing quote on the "rubbishing of men" too. Enlightened woman, that Doris Lessing.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:02 PM
6

Dude you're triggering me and it isn't cool. I was, as a child, once raped by a goldfish. It was very traumatic. I took it in the bath with me and it had a seizure and started to violently slap against my buttocks and genital area. I thought I liked it, I did nothing to stop it, but I felt so dirty the next day that it was definitely rape. I tried to have the Goldfish arrested, but he died before the police showed up.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 02:40 PM
17

but if gender roles were swapped, it would have been a huge story about how the fighter should be banned, jailed, but if gender roles were swapped, it would have been a huge story about how Ray Rice should be banned, jailed, Yes, that rodeo has already been to town...
/r/MensRights13/11/15 01:26 AM
1

Imagine what MEN would be like if we were above even criticism and all accountability like women are in the U.S. We would be HORRIFIC. Just like women are today. Nice! dude this could be a post in and of itself. One man's observations sort of deal. Cheers.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:54 PM
1

Dude that is fascinating! To be honest, I actually don't believe that 10% of humans are shit, I believe it's skewed in favor of woman being emotional terrorists. The problem I have is that I can't be sure that my experience and observations represent an accurate sample of society. I have a strange hope that we're "equal", but my honest observations have been like yours. I truly believe we are fundamentally wired differently. It's nature, for whatever evolutionary reason; woman who were able to t…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 10:18 PM
2

Hear, hear!
/r/MensRights11/11/15 09:54 PM
3

Do you have to be married for a set amount of time before perpetual alimony kicks in? If you're only married for 4 years, doesn't it seem reasonable to limit the alimony to maybe 4 years? Or some percentage. Half even?
/r/MensRights11/11/15 07:21 PM
6

Amen brother. And we're not talking about your average 130lb yoga warrior flailing at you, we're talking about a trained and accomplished ass kicking machine. I remember hearing, as a kid, that Mike Tyson would be charged with "attempted murder" if ever he punched a person because his fists are "weapons". Does nobody want to mention this aspect? She's a fucking trained fighter. Jesus, think of the Ray Rice video (which I watched again recently). She punches him, is screaming the most horrendous …
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:47 PM
4

"What I am absolutely not willing to say is she's committed domestic violence without speaking with him and learning more about that relationship." WTF? So It's like claiming an accident on your insurance. The first beating is free. You can beat your partner to a pulp and it unless it's a "pattern", it's not DV? WTF? My ex made false accusations of DV as a tactic in a divorce settlement. She "implied" I was violent, having no actual incidence (in 18 years btw) from which to use as an example. I …
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:41 PM
1

No I wasn't saying to distrust all woman, my point was that, in spite of this massive sample of woman with a temporary clinical condition, we are never allowed to even mention it. It simply isn't acknowledged by society. My bigger point is that we're all human, we're all inherently flawed. Men are shit on all the time. We hear bullshit stats about toxic masculinity and "the poisoned m&M", yet here we have a tangible, observable and repeatable FACT about a clinical condition that effects woman; m…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 01:16 PM
3

Dude this sub is full of guys who were accused of domestic violence. My ex made false accusations of DV as a tactic in a divorce settlement. She was the violent one, not me, but here I am. It destroyed me. No proof, no past history, no possible chance of a conviction if it had been criminal; yet they came and removed me from my own house and children and socially i've been labeled as a "wife beater". In my opinion, there is no purer form of domestic violence than being falsely accused and having…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:54 AM
9

Even if she isn't State Hospital crazy, at LEAST one day or week a month she is. Only problem is you don't know if it's that time of the month. This. This is the dirty secret of the world. My ex suffered from PMDD. My ex who eventually falsely accused me of domestic violence as a tactic in a divorce settlement, would occasionally be mildly delusional during her period. Like bat-shit insane and beyond reason. It turns out that 5%-8% of the general population suffers it too. 8% is a LOT of woman. …
/r/MensRights10/11/15 09:30 PM
39

For the record, I was once banned here for "inciting violence". I was being satirical. They unbanned me pretty quick once I explained, but i was impressed with the speed and low threshold of the initial ban. Great comment.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:43 PM
11

They seem to be ignoring that pesky "hours worked" aspect. Yes, it's true: A man and a woman with the exact same qualifications and experience can "earn" different amounts. Why? Because the man will work more hours, be more available for after hours work and overtime. They have the same wage per hour, but work different hours. Using the term "wage gap" is highly misleading. Wage implies a "rate"; dollars per hour. If one segment of society tends to work more hours, it reasonable to assume they'd…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 02:38 PM
2

Simpson's Paradox So if we remove the top 0.1% of men, the earnings gap vanishes. If we remove "mothers", the earnings gap vanishes. If we correct for hours worked, it vanishes. Also a good time to point out that when considering single adults with no children between the ages of 20-30: Well the earnings gap reverses and it's WOMAN who earn more. Sure there's an earnings gap. But there's an Accountability gap, a responsibility gap, a "home with the kids" gap, leisure time gap, stress gap etc etc…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:43 PM
1

Yeah I can't even see his comments because I have him blocked. lol. He's seriously lacking in common sense and real world experience and honestly I'm surprised he's no banned. He hates woman, but he really doesn't know why.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:31 PM
8

When I was a teen ager I guy I knew was falsely accused and CONVICTED of killing his own mother. Not only that, it was publicly implied that it was sexual. Against his mother. So we turned on him. Everybody turned on him. years later, turned out that he didn't do it. Which was what he was saying the whole time. Somebody else confessed and it was proven that the guy we knew was innocent (for killing his own mother, remember) So they were playing a "song" on the radio that dude wrote with his frie…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 12:36 PM
1

*earnings gap.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:04 PM
4

I was taking exception to the idea that only woman are capable of caring for a child in the early years because they are more "nurturing". I agree completely that fathers are vital in the healthy development of a child. My ex wife claims that fathers aren't even required in the raising of children (she never met her own dad). Of course, there could be no better endorsement of the importance of fathers than an emotionally fucked-up human completely lacking in basic human empathy who destroyed her…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 02:40 PM
10

Hear, hear.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 01:53 PM
2

Hmm. Maybe i misinterpreted your point. You were trying to say how important dads are in the long run. I can't disagree there.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 01:15 PM
19

The research is in. Ironically, children do need mothers most in the first few years of life, but after that fathers are much more important. Women need to be held responsible for their actions. Sorry, but what research exactly are you quoting? Because anything that says how important mothers are during the first years opposed to dads is absurd. There was a study (posted here) a few months ago from a prominent university where they found that it matters not; mom or dad, when a parent spends time…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 12:57 PM
2

I am a man, who cries, who loves, who cares, who values other people in all their diversity and who believes passionately that we can each fulfil our potential when we believe in ourselves, rather than upon the opinions of others. Hear, hear.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 02:37 AM
6

Right on. Yeah I was raised by an illogical feminist who blamed everything on others (men). My dad joined the Christian Brothers when he was 14, heavily indoctrinated, and eventually became disillusioned. He left at 25(?) right in the middle of the 60's having never even jerked off. Seriously, no exaggeration. He was groomed from the beginning by his parents and his catholic teachers; he had no chance. So he's spent his life deprogramming himself, and by some extension me too. Cheers.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 12:45 AM
11

That's right. They are mixing up two definitions of the word "rape". Dude is talking about the older version of the word; actual forced penetration. And the definition he's arguing against has a far lower threshold; regret even, as you say. While it gives me a mensrights boner, it's a flawed argument. There's one of those logical fallacy memes that describes it too, I just am too lazy to figure it which one. If only it were this simple! They've moved the goal posts however and "rape" isn't "rape…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 07:13 PM
2

Let me guess, she was initiating divorce proceedings anyway and she decided a drastic imbalance of power was warranted so as to leverage her a tidy settlement. Source: Been there, done that. I no longer take any claim of domestic violence at face value, I automatically assume it's a tactic in a larger agenda. It's becoming epidemic. But not for long.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 03:15 PM
46

I thought people who are active in promoting equal rights were more concerned with giving rights to people being treated unfairly. Not taking rights away from those perceived as already having them. Shocking, really. The blind, blissful ignorance must give her a real sense of her own importance. To be completely honest, part of my MRAness has to do with the pure fascination I have for people deeply indoctrinated. I'm sure I'm not alone.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 02:44 PM
5

Exactly. She's probably already pregnant. That'll cost him.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 02:47 AM
8

Hey I get justice boners like everyone else, but help me understand how this is a men's rights issue? You met an asshole. He hit on your gf in front of you. I'm sure that the redpill dudes even have terminology for it. Enlighten me.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 02:32 AM
1

"Help us reach our goal of $14.58 so that we help pay the parking costs for one man with prostate cancer."
/r/MensRights08/11/15 02:27 AM
2

You got me.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 02:24 AM
8

Dude! Thank you so much. I am about to put my "A" in MRA by attempting to sue my provincial government under a Charter claim for the spurious accusations of violence that ruined me. I'm building up materials. My case is based on the premise that my charter rights as a Canadian were violated when I was treated as "Guilty until innocent" through a series of fraudulent TRO's that were merely a tactic in a divorce settlement. I can attest to the high rate of PTSD for those of us who have had to navi…
/r/MensRights07/11/15 07:58 PM
7

Dude I have some experience getting railroaded under false accusations. First, although you say "the truth is on my side", you must understand that the truth has nothing to do with this. Not one person in that meeting, except you, gives a shit for the truth. They are there for one purpose and getting to the bottom of the truth is not one of them (contrary to how we think it works). Now, that said, having the truth on your side is almost enough. If you can prove that it is within the balance of p…
/r/MensRights07/11/15 07:10 PM
17

Martin Fiebert, a psychology professor at California State University, Long Beach, says this in his summary of his research: "This bibliography examines 286 scholarly investigations: 221 empirical studies and 65 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 371,600." Holy sweet fuck! The two most recent CDC family…
/r/MensRights07/11/15 06:51 PM
17

Actually, if the recent Canadian election is anything to go by, woman made up more than 60% of the voters here. So to correct your thought, I say: Half of all registered voters are woman, 60+% of all voters are woman. Just to strengthen your point a little...
/r/MensRights07/11/15 06:47 PM
23

And on top of that, we're all thinking that if it was anybody but a good looking young woman; someone would be in jail.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 05:24 PM
10

Well, a difference is that 'Merica has to maintain this illusion of "freedom"; China doesn't bother with that shit.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/15 12:20 PM
5

Consider that in accusations of domestic violence and sexual assault it's often the case that you actually never do get the chance to face your accuser. It's all part of the stopping the "oppression", you see. First we believe anything the woman says, second we then treat men as guilty until innocent, and then since we can't subject the "victim" to the trauma of actually facing the evil menz, that right gets trounced too. From Ex Parte court action, mandatory Family violence prevention classes a…
/r/MensRights06/11/15 07:27 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 02:55 PM
1

Interesting. Scary. Although I realize now that I know nothing of the post/comment history of the banned user. Also, is it safe to assume that your "you have been shadowbanned" message is always in reply to the offending comment, or is that not always the case? Thanks for the reply, btw.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 01:41 PM
1

I'll second the tag; Why /u/EvilPundit ? Help us understand. Btw, in my experience, /u/EvilPundit is a reasonable person. He'll sort it out. There is a misunderstanding here.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 12:57 PM
4

Dude, the entire raison d'etre of all waves of Feminism past and present has pretty much been to shame others into interceding on their behalf. Feminism – of whatever wave, shape or form – is ultimately a movement defined by a set of demands for social change. Its purpose must therefore be to continually portray the need for these changes as a dire need, as urgent, as critical. The emphasis on fear, on victimhood, on oppression and exploitation is a necessary and fundamental part of a movement o…
/r/MensRights06/11/15 12:28 PM
1

Wtf was that? Dude was making a point. Somebody said "well when a woman does it, it's a laughing matter", so the next takes it one step further, suggesting we consider the outcome if dude was trans, and he gets banned? Was that satire that wooshed over my head?
/r/MensRights06/11/15 11:08 AM
3

over a 14-month span, the women’s accusations, in total, amount to three kisses and six touches, plus a series of reported inappropriate comments of a sexual nature. =130 years in prison?
/r/MensRights06/11/15 11:05 AM
2

I'm hoping at least CunnyRegret will be further studied. There's something to that.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 04:35 PM
1

It's real. Consider the Oxford study from '14; 1 in 5 feminists scored 7.8 or higher on the Simulphallus strap-on test. Noteworthy too, that the woman who reported the greatest satisfaction from wearing the fake penis also showed significant hatred for men. Although known colloquially as "pole envy", the actual medical term for what these woman suffer is: CunnyRegret.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 01:49 AM
1

Good point. Might as well opt for the happy ending too I s'pose.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 10:48 PM
2

She's brilliant in that she see's the future and she decided she want's to be a part of it. It's obvious that the MRM will eventually become mainstream; she'll go down in the books as a "pioneer" of the mrm and such. Now, that said, she better deliver. I'm scared that she was merely pandering to the mrm for funding and the message in her film will be a sort of back-handed compliment; "don't fault the mrm for being misguided" or some such idea. Time will tell. In the meantime, i'll keep some of m…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 07:24 PM
3

This right here. I read recently that people never change their mind; not quickly, anyway. How progress happens is that the older generations die off and the younger crowed take over. And I can say that I have observed as much in my 40 years; Gay marriage, marijuana laws etc etc. I have two young children. It isn't that the world will be different for them, but they will certainly be different for the world. And your kids. And all of the children of all of the mra's will grow up and live what we…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 06:48 PM
1

So did she actually get charged with anything? I'm thinking she'll plead "Hot sexy woman" and will be let off.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 06:41 PM
6

Look up the "deluth model" on Erin Pizzey's White Ribbon site. It's pretty clear. If you can stomach it. I can't.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 06:41 PM
2

Fantastic! What better way to channel your experience and suffering than to work to actually do something about it. Don't feel that you must downplay your own experience and suffering on account of mine though. Something really gets broken inside of us when we are separated from our children. It's like when elephants morn the death of their relatives; mammals aren't supposed to be separated from our kids. Great to talk with you. Good luck! You actually have the power to make the world a better p…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 02:42 PM
3

My pleasure. Feel free to ask anything. The use of TRO's in divorce settlements has become epidemic and it I keep running into claims that divorce lawyers are actually suggesting the tactic as a quick and easy means to gain control of the assets and the children (=money remember). Not only that, but I had to keep paying her bills all through the ordeal or face prison! But the worst part is the bitterness. Man I was bitter to the point of mental illness there for a couple of years. It had a tangi…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 02:04 PM
2

I agree completely. When we hear about actual violent rape survivors talking about how their life is forever ruined, how their sense of self, their dignity, their self esteem was robbed from them, I can relate. And It not like some stranger did this; it was the person who I dedicated my life to. I would die to protect our children if required! I worked my fingers to the bone to provide comfort and I did it willingly and with pride. I just listened to that Erin Pizzey interview that was posted ye…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 01:27 PM
1

I'm guess he broke the cardinal rule to hitting on woman: Always be attractive. So he rubbed the back of a woman's neck before as she was getting out of the car? She was reciprocating his attention (famous scientist, remember), probably he thought he had a chance. He was mistaken. Where's the crime?
/r/MensRights03/11/15 12:59 PM
6

This here. Call it an "income gap", fine, that describes it. But calling it a "wage gap" in spurious, IMO. Wage implies "rate of pay", like an hourly rate. Men and woman get the same hourly rate for the same job all things being equal, but chances are the man will earn a higher income because he'll work longer hours. "wage gap" is a weasel term.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 12:47 PM
6

This here. This man undoubtedly has PTSD. A human being can not endure that level of injustice, betrayal and suffering without significant emotional costs. Period. I was so relieved just to be able to see my kids again and so worn down by the false accusations of domestic violence as a tactic in the divorce that I couldn't, as bad as I wanted to, press the issue. I use the analogy of the suicide bomber; how do you fight against someone who isn't scared of death? In my case, how could i fight aga…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 12:13 PM
2

Amplifying the echo chamber.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 11:38 AM
1

Well it's easy to spot the liars, there the one's always accusing everyone of lying. I'm sure you have better things to do than to take a fake fucking picture and post it here. On behalf of most of /r/mensrights, I apologize for the false accusations.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:02 AM
1

I got you. The modern definition of the word. With a political connotation. But I mean the literal meaning from the word "progress"; enacting new ideas, the opposite of reactionary. Universities are supposed to be places of new ideas for the betterment of us all.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 05:15 PM
9

Fantastic! At the 53 minute mark she describes exactly what happened to me. Stunning. Great post. The general public need to hear this interview. I seriously this one interview has the power to enlighten.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 03:18 PM
0

This is actually a pretty good answer. There is an evolution that social movements go through on their way from the fringes into legitimacy and into their final form; politics and industry. My only complaint is the reference to another comparison as "idiotic"; no need to insult.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 12:23 PM
1

The 'End Violence Against Women' argument is so intrinsically bigoted. If you believe gender doesn't determine the value of a human life, then you would be trying to stop all forms of violence. To only focus on the minority of victims is to say their lives are intrinsically worth more by virtue only of gender, therefore bigotry. Well put. You nailed it. There is no such thing as "violence against woman"; it's just violence. We all suffer it.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 07:42 AM
6

Isn't a university; a Canadian University no less, supposed to be a mecca of progressive thought? Shocking. Ignorance.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 06:57 AM
5

There are more people who agree with you then you think. Caution is really important here. Maybe it's my age or maybe i'm cynical, but the first sign of trouble is when everybody jumps on an idea claiming it's a solution. The movie has not yet been made. Period. She already had the name all wrong; few seem to mind. And I can't help feel she is pandering to the MRM for funding. I fear the overall message will be something of a backhanded compliment; the people who make up the MRM are basically hu…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 05:57 AM
2

I'm with you, OP. Although I have nothing against TRP, I feel that use of the term in the title of a movie about the MRM is a bad idea. It'll cause more confusion and misinterpretation than it'll solve. The Red Pill no longer simply refers to "what's real", it now and will forever be associated with PUA and the subculture that it implies; not the MRM. Change the name, for Gods sake. Does anyone really think people over the age of 45 will understand there is no connection between the MRM and TRP?…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 05:44 AM
3

Thanks. Truly I'm an equal opportunity asshole. Seriously though, I'm a single dad with a son and a daughter. I really believe we're all equal, but different. Cheers.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 04:13 PM
4

Well. Call me a misogynist I guess.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 03:53 PM
4

See, this is sort of what I was looking to hear. It aligns with what I have observed through life. Now I just got a reply from a guy who works at family court. He said that men and woman are equally dishonest in these situations. Which could very well be true. the ability to justify anything to themselves being one of the main methods This in particular seems to ring true.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 02:14 PM
3

/u/DougDante for President/Prime minister.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 12:59 PM
6

It's the whole regret=rape debate. That powerful sense of regret; this can't be right, sex is supposed to be fun. Something must be wrong. Along comes the "you were raped" suggestion and BOOM we have a problem. Rape test: Do you think you were raped? No? Well you weren't. Do you have a powerful sense of regret because you got drunk and had some dude fuck you in the ass while your boyfriend was at work? Ah-ha, a tricky one. Although you feel profound feelings of regret and shame, it is because yo…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 11:22 AM
34

Is it just me, or do woman seem far more capable of this level of dishonesty then men? I say this because of my own experience being absolutely astounded at my ex wife's ability to lie without any trace of empathy. She had an objective; ruin me, destroy me, get the house and the kids so she could command support payments (to pay for the house) and don't compromise until that end had been reached. So is it just my own ignorance? Is any human capable of this when when the conditions are right? Is …
/r/MensRights01/11/15 10:55 AM
2

I agree completely. There is a massive overlap. I mean we're talking about "reality" here; what is actually going on here. Personally I believe we're heading toward some form of higher enlightenment; Things are most definitely NOT as we've been led to believe and we're starting to catch on. Domestic violence, how we treat addiction, feminism, capitalism, terrorism, religion etc etc. Evolutionary psychology will play a larger role in figuring out why human's behave as we do. Cheers.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 01:59 PM
1

I didn't know that. Well that makes it far far less scary. Thanks for the clarification.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 01:14 PM
2

Thanks. I've lurked TRP but I generally don't spend much time there. Although I'm certain my own "marriage" and subsequent divorce from an extraordinarily good looking woman who constantly cheated on me would fit well into TRP theory; I've kept mostly on the MRA/father's rights side. But I find it very interesting. It's been quite an enlightenment.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 12:13 PM
3

Canadian here. Even more disturbing is that you guys "elect" judges; opening up the entire process to the usual political shenanigans and posturing. Not that there aren't shenanigans and posturing involved with any other system, but the fact that American Judges have to pander to the whims of the ignorant general public I find scary. Among other aspects. Great post, btw.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 11:27 AM
1

And what was OP supposed to do? Ignore them? Laugh?
/r/MensRights30/10/15 11:37 PM
1

Enlighten us. What's a "shit test"? Serious question.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 10:16 PM
3

Well said. Great comment.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 12:17 PM
3

...let me count the ways...
/r/MensRights27/10/15 02:00 PM
2

Specifically they tend to not be reproduced when someone else tries the same study No small detail. This is what separates "science" from opinion. I mean, we're doomed right from the start; "social sciences". It's a misnomer. Science has so little to do with it.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 12:38 AM
3

The one reason why the divorce is your fault: You got married when you knew better.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 12:33 AM
5

Oh yeah. I should have clarified that maybe. My bud drinks my last beer "you cunt!". We're still friends. My wife cheats on me: "you fucking cunt". We're not friends anymore. It's very versatile. Context is everything.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 11:54 AM
7

But when you call someone a "cunt", it isn't "you are merely a body part for the sexual gratification of men". It means: "you're the lowest form of human, probably unreasonably hurtful". If I was going to degrade a woman on the basis of her being useless except for providing sex for men, i'd call her a "Whore". But yeah, I agree with you; "cunt" is reserved for those special occasions where you mean business and you are intentionally crossing the line. There is no higher insult to direct at a wo…
/r/MensRights26/10/15 11:35 AM
12

I agree with you. They aren't "evil". These are humans just like you and me. And I've actually been through this. Luckily for me, the social worker assigned to me was some 20 year old dude fresh out of university. And I'm in Canada. But theses people are victims of ideology and programming. They probably majored in Woman's studies before going into Social work. They've been programmed for years. There was a case in my area recently that made the news when a single dad had his kids removed from h…
/r/MensRights25/10/15 04:02 PM
24

“We have to be allowed to talk about that this is a gendered issue and acknowledge that men may be victims but not lose [sight of the fact] that the overwhelming issue is the attitude men have to women as their possessions, as something they can control and punish. It is about their attitude.” What men, especially in this day and age, thinks of woman as a "possession" who we can control and punish? It's a classic logical fallacy. Also it is so completely contrary to what's been drilled into our …
/r/MensRights24/10/15 02:46 PM
2

I couldn't have said it better: Follow the money. Ask "who benefits?" Custody= financial security.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 02:16 PM
2

Cheers, brother. Yeah, it's been just over 4 years since I went through it. It has fundamentally changed the essence of the man I once was; positive, optimistic even in the face of difficulty, and I had faith in humanity. To be betrayed by the person you love most, to have them use your own children as pawns in some game that really only turned out to be about who "gets the house", only to have my Charter rights as a Canadian completely disregarded as I was sacrificed on the alter of "equality" …
/r/MensRights24/10/15 01:47 PM
1

The ability of one parent to withhold contact on baseless false allegations is out of control. There are lengthy delays in getting family reports to try and get to the bottom of parental disputes and the wait times and process times in the FRC’s (Family Relationship Centres) are simply untenable. Even when you do get to the FRC the other party delays or the mediation is suspended for months and months while minor obscure details are worked out. Parents allege they cannot talk to each other and t…
/r/MensRights24/10/15 12:23 PM
2

Good post. I've always felt that the penalty for a false accusation should equal the maximum penalty faced by the wrongly accused. Of course we're talking about malicious accusations or spurious accusations (like as a tactic in a divorce settlement).
/r/MensRights24/10/15 12:17 PM
6

This right here. It was said best in the movie Liar Liar; the kid asks "Is it true that looks don't matter, what's inside that counts?" "No, that's just what we tell ugly people." Can't believe I just quoted Jim Carrey, but my point is that, despite what we hear, sexual attractiveness is a major advantage to humans. And directly following that is that being unattractive is a disadvantage. I especially find it interesting when people who have probably zero experience in the realities of sexual re…
/r/MensRights24/10/15 12:03 PM
1

When she found out I was vegan How do you know if someone is vegan? They'll tell you.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 11:21 AM
5

"Shhh. Reality's here." "Shit who let him in here."
/r/MensRights22/10/15 07:40 PM
3

What's that? A woman was sexually assaulted at 1:30pm while walking through her university campus and listening to music? Well, she shouldn't have been wearing headphones." "Hey, nice head phones! Are they those new AT's I saw advertised?...wait...why are you running away...don't....i wasn't....I just wanted to know where you bought......nevermind."
/r/MensRights21/10/15 09:13 AM
3

It was posted on 2X yesterday. The comments from "academic feminists" (self identifying) were almost too painful for me to bare.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 09:06 AM
3

Or she attacked him and he blocked it. I actually witnessed a woman motion to hit a man, he blocked it making contact with her wrist, at which point she fell to the ground screaming "You hurt my arm, you hurt my arm". Recap: She hit him, he prevented the strike from hitting his face by taking it to his forearm, she claims he hurt her. Yep.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 12:48 PM
11

Well, hate to be so cynical, but anytime i hear a story like this one I immediately assume it's merely a tactic in a divorce settlement. It happened to me. It is happening to so many men now that it will become a major part of attracting MRM awareness. See, all they have to do is recall one time that he raised his voice, imply they are "scared for their saftey" (with not one shred of evidence, btw) and KABOOM, in one instant they have control of all of the assets and the children. Remember Erin …
/r/MensRights20/10/15 12:43 PM
1

Hey thanks. Yeah they've been allowing almost anybody who wants to speak. The last meeting (hundreds of people) we heard about how 50% of girls 7-14 would be sexually assaulted and all about the "murdered and missing" woman. I just don't think scaring us with bullshit stats is serving the greater goal of mental illness awareness. Also i'm all for getting to the bottom of the "murdered and missing" woman problem; but at last search there were about 800 of them. But why doesn't anybody bother to m…
/r/MensRights19/10/15 02:28 PM
3

Holy shit, you're right! I got mine at a used book store for $1 or something.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 07:04 PM
8

boys engage in the vast majority of child labor, yet this does not count as a "gender imbalance" according to the UN. Similarly, the fact that men are more likely to die from cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, respiratory disease, HIV, tuberculosis, malnutrition and MURDER is also not taken into account. Only areas in which females are disadvantaged count as "gaps." Men and boys are effectively ignored. My emphasis. He's saying that there's a gap gap. He's right, too.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 06:23 PM
2

Just curious. Not sure if anyone here could answer the question; but what does it take to get Karen Straughan to come to your town to speak? I'm a member of a community mental health coalition. We have regular meetings. Recently there has been a strong feminist presence and some speakers have begun to attempt to make mental health a gendered issue. Considering that 90% of suicides are men and it's barely peeped about, I'm feeling strongly that the issue needs to remain non-gendered at best. Just…
/r/MensRights18/10/15 04:48 PM
11

Dude, I have a book for you. Crime Control as Industry. First published in '94 by this Norwegian penal expert (penal expert! awesome). I read it in '99. He basically predicts a 9/11, not specifically, but he says something similar was imminent in the next few years. He want on to predict essentially exactly the state of things right now. Written in 1994! Basically the larger point was that crime control, in and of itself, was going to turn into this massive industry to make up for the vanishing …
/r/MensRights18/10/15 04:39 PM
2

Shit. Am I too late to be a misogynist pig? I held the door open for a human yesterday; turned out to be a female human who was "capable of opening her own door". How do I get my misogynist permit? I've got a few "Oinks" to express!
/r/MensRights18/10/15 11:44 AM
5

Yeah, my ex got all mine in the divorce. Turns out it's important.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 03:53 PM
0

His balls are on the inside I guess...
/r/MensRights17/10/15 02:12 PM
1

Have you seen the episode I referred to? It was well controlled and those guys aren't idiots. They follow scientific method. But I realize it's a TV show and it's primary goal is entertainment. That said, the source you provided seems to be the methodology that they followed. The only difference was that in the MythBusters study, there was no incentive offered for enduring more pain. They stopped at 3 mins no matter what the result and it was only to see how long one could stand it. The woman di…
/r/MensRights17/10/15 12:55 PM
43

Right? No kidding. The feeling of regret that comes with "bad sex" (yes men have that too) is an emotion in and of itself. That weird feeling of awkwardness, guilt, shame etc. Apparently, there is a thing called "regret asymmetry", and the idea is that woman have this powerful sense of regret too, but more so. I can only imagine having that particular emotion coupled with "he raped you" drumbeat from every source is what makes all these girls claim they were raped. They no longer have any accoun…
/r/MensRights17/10/15 12:35 PM
-1

I meant unwarranted in the context of my own imaginary life.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 03:18 PM
1

And they also seem to have a lower pain tolerance. Have you seen the myth busters where they test this? They conclusively found that woman had a higher pain tolerance than men. They also found that swearing helps. I realize it's myth busters. I realize the sample size wasn't massive, but of all of the episodes I've watched; this one was one of the more convincing. Woman were significantly more tolerant to the induced pain. And I've always "heard" that woman had a much higher pain tolerance than …
/r/MensRights16/10/15 03:17 PM
-4

Well i'll say it again. I'm a non-violent person. However, if that ever happened to me or to someone that belongs to me; unwarranted police brutality, I would wait an extended period and we's be paying mr tough guy cop a visit and introducing him to Mr. Pipetm . We have a citizen police force. That means that we ourselves are the police; not the military. We police ourselves. Ok I'm ready for some opinions now.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 11:33 AM
3

Wtf? Doctors don't take woman's pain seriously? Argh is right.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 10:04 AM
1

I'm interested in this topic. I generally go with at least 40%-50% based on everything I've read and my own life observations. First, I've witnessed actual domestic violence on 3 occasions in my 40 years; all three were woman abusing men. I know only one female "victim" of DV, but it turned out that THREE of her last long term relationships were abusive. It's obvious who the primary aggressor is in her life: her. I was falsely accused of violence as a tactic in a divorce settlement. The classic …
/r/MensRights15/10/15 11:38 AM
2

Rape test. Step one: Do you feel raped?
/r/MensRights14/10/15 09:29 AM
0

Good point. I agree there are legimate alimony cases.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 10:25 PM
1

Mobile now, but I've run into those numbers a few times. I'll dig when i get a chance.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 10:21 PM
9

No, I think his point has to do with "no fault divorce". It's one thing to suffer through a divorce, but entirely another when you know your wife deliberately treated you like shit because she knew full well that she could divorce on a whim and there'd be no financial blowback. Your points are valid and well written. But the fact that the #1 stated reason for divorce is "boredom" and the 80% of divorces are initiated by woman is directly related and proportional to the alimony/ child support saf…
/r/MensRights13/10/15 09:22 PM
2

Well, consider that Erin Pizzey found 62 of her first 100 clients would be considered "violence prone woman". 62%.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 02:39 PM
24

I recently watched the Ray Rice video again. She was screaming at him (in public no less), insulting him, actually strikes him in the face, continues to berate him and then tries again to strike him, misses and decides to instead spit in his face. A moment of silence for all of the male victims of domestic violence who had insult added to their injury by being portrayed as the primary aggressor.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 11:42 AM
4

This guy gets it.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 11:38 AM
1

My logic?
/r/MensRights12/10/15 08:29 PM
12

"I was in a class of nine- and 10-year-olds, girls and boys, and this young woman was telling these kids that the reason for wars was the innately violent nature of men. "You could see the little girls, fat with complacency and conceit while the little boys sat there crumpled, apologising for their existence, thinking this was going to be the pattern of their lives." Lessing said the teacher tried to "catch my eye, thinking I would approve of this rubbish". She added: "This kind of thing is happ…
/r/MensRights12/10/15 07:03 PM
6

Aka: the Enough rope to hang thyself concept.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 06:55 PM
5

This guy gets it. Our mods will separate the wheat from the chaff and the quality of the majority of the posts here can stand on their own merit.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 01:09 PM
1

I know, right. It angers me daily when I see them. They're left over from a "public service" campaign from a couple years ago. There were posters, radio spots and worst of all were the TV commercials. Complete with dark lighting, dramatic music and accusatory narration, they had the stereotypical images of the unreasonably angry dad coming home from work and abusing his poor innocent flower of a wife while the child cowers in fear. Burning the toast, I guess? "Teach him to respect woman" was the…
/r/MensRights11/10/15 02:14 PM
4

Those videos are made by "status of woman" councils. Those councils generally aren't staffed by progressive and forward thinking people. I feel your outrage.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 11:30 AM
5

Dude my government (Newfoundland) has those magnetic purple ribbons that say "teach him respect" on many government, police and municipal cars. I wanted to make matching one's, but instead write "Teach her accountability" and start swapping them out.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 11:28 AM
2

Have you been acquainted with Erin Pizzey yet? She started the first shelter and she's known for coining the phrase Violence Prone Woman. She's an enlightened and forward thinking human.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 11:23 AM
14

Karen Straughan for President.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 11:17 AM
2

Paternity leave that everyone is talking about isn't just time off; it's time off with pay. In Canada we get a year that can be split between both parents and the Government pays you 55% of your salary up to a max. If you work while you are collecting those benefits, they will claw back the money, dollar for dollar, until it evens out. If you have time off with no pay, then obviously you can do as you please.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 09:18 AM
5

I assumed the lack of a wiki is due to her open anti-feminism stance. I don't really understand how it works and I'm merely theorizing, but wiki doesn't seem open to every concept tha goes against the grain. I think she'll become more and more prominate as more disillusioned humans hear her eloquent message. This is the thin edge of the wedge. It's coming.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 12:31 PM
8

No kidding. In 20 years the MRM will be mainstream and Karen will receive the Order of Canada. We'll look back and she'll be the Rosa Parks for mra's.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 11:20 AM
16

Canadian MRA here. What can I say? The feminist ideology has permeated deep into the zeitgeist here. I can't speak for anyone else, but my disillusionment with feminism was sudden and abrupt. I was falsely accused of violence by my ex as a tactic in a divorce settlement. It was so absolutely absurd, yet carried so much weight that It was a shock to my system. It was shortly after this that I wondered to myself where are all of the woman who are paid $15 per hour compared to my $20 for the same w…
/r/MensRights08/10/15 10:24 AM
2

My view is that if that's what "sexism" means, then "sexism" is not ipso facto bigotry; in fact it can often be a perfectly justified, rational behavior. And I think there's a fundamental philosophical divide here amongst those who reject feminism's hypocritical application of that point, so I hope to persuade people, if possible, to my side. What annoys me about "pink tax" proponents is that they apply this premise at all, not that they apply it to women and not to men. Both are coherent ways t…
/r/MensRights07/10/15 10:24 PM
3

I don't think your assumptions are unreasonable. I can certainly see how they'd be offensive to people, tho'. The sad fact here is that, in reality, your take on it is far more likely to be true than most people understand. Regret asymmetry is real. Girls are being brought up to believe regret=rape. I don't think you were suggesting that she is lying; if it's true at all she probably actually believes she was raped. And there is where the cracks emerge. My take on it? The lady doth protest too m…
/r/MensRights07/10/15 08:13 PM
1

Well if what you're truly looking for is a place where the vast majority of people completely agree with that particular concept; you've come to the right place. You can try /r/feminism. You'll likely not get any respectful debate, but you'll reach that all important milestone: getting banned from /r/feminism for sincerely wanting to discuss an important issue. There are many regulars on this sub who know a whole lot about your topic, though.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 07:54 PM
4

Feminists are not going to turn traitor to an ideology which has not only nurtured their careers but determined crucial, life changing, and possibly life destroying, decisions in their private lives. The courage required to recognize their error would not be outweighed by the gain.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 07:45 PM
9

Hey, to be fair, nobody seems to listen to the live men either. Got divorce raped by means of spurious accusations. Despite the absurdity of the claims, the fact that SHE was the documented unstable person, the fact that she obviously had everything to gain; nobody gave a flying fuck if there was/is any validity to it. I screamed from the rooftops, but nobody listens. Actually they ignore. Male privilege indeed.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 02:48 PM
2

Stalin just threw himself in the gulag and threw away the key...
/r/MensRights07/10/15 01:49 PM
11

38 year old University student here with a graying beard. Should I wait for the summons or should I go straight to jail to save some trouble?
/r/MensRights07/10/15 01:42 PM
2

Hey I'm more of an /r/MensRights person, but I do frequent TRP often when I need to reaffirm what I've been observing my entire life. Triggerpocolypse is a fucking awesome idea.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 01:16 PM
15

It's definitely a criminal offense here in Canada. I have no doubt if I were to pull an alarm at my university I'd be criminally charged. They'd likely have video of me doing it and some fire pull stations even spray yellow dye on the hand of the person pulling it just to ensure justice. But I guess If I was a righteous feminist fighting the evil shitlord man as a patriarchy membership meeting was happening I could rest easy in the knowledge that I wouldn't be arrested. Male privilege indeed.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 11:37 AM
1

Actually dude, I can think of a couple of single moms I know who would undoubtedly implode if they had a chunk of money drop on them. I guess there's probably a statistic somewhere that would demonstrate that the woman who use spurious court action as a tactic in a divorce tend to be the same woman who would have poor impulse control. Interesting concept. I like your style; build 'em up a little before you crush them.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:55 PM
3

I have an easier method. I just ask "ever hear of the rule of thumb"? Three possible answers: 1) Never heard of it: Good sign, but no guarantee you're out of the woods. 2) Heard of it and is outraged: Run. 3) Heard of it and recognizes that's it's a falsehood feminist myth imposed on us by a prominent feminist writer: Good sign. That they are open to the possibility of "common knowledge" being absolute bullshit, agenda-driven propaganda for the purpose of subtle indoctrination is a highly positi…
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:44 PM
4

While women can speak freely in our designated, secondary space, we remain relatively silenced in mainstream media. I was going to write something really succinct and captivating in debate but my brain just crashed with that last line. Beep...blurp...fzzzz...
/r/MensRights04/10/15 12:40 PM
1

Hear! Hear!
/r/MensRights03/10/15 11:40 PM
3

I detected sarcasm in the title. I was wrong. Well like dad says; if you're a hammer you'll only see nails.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 11:29 PM
3

I agree. Dad says that what he was being told wasn't matching what he was observing; cracks appeared.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 11:28 AM
22

Awesome! My dad laments the lack of religion in schools these days. Because he's religious? Fuck no. But he was so deeply indoctrinated with catholic nonsense as a kid that when he was 14 he left home to join the Christian brothers. He said he did it because he was so scared of hell he though it was the only sane choice. Eventually he left the brothers, finally jerked off for the first time at 26. Discovered girls. Discovered girls discovering him. Met mom. yada yada fucked everything that moved…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 10:42 PM
1

Do what you have to do. Definitely follow your lawyers advice, You got this. This is just a blip in your long happy life. Deep breaths, stay in the moment and show them that you're a reasonable person. Good luck.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 11:36 AM
1

Exactly. Not always easy to do, but reacting to it actually gives it some validity. We all knew Richard Nixon was actually a "crook" because he kept saying he wasn't. "..the lady doth protest too much, me thinks..."
/r/MensRights28/09/15 11:13 AM
2

Dude my deepest sympathy. Sounds similar to my situation in that I was blatantly innocent. Never any dealings with the police. And she was the unstable one, not me. Thankfully it was pretty obvious once she opened her mouth, but she still inflicted immeasurable damage. Just tell it like it is: You are his dad, you are dedicated, you will provide and your love is absolutely crucial to the development of a healthy little human being. Look him right in the eye (the judge), tell it like it is. There…
/r/MensRights27/09/15 07:29 PM
2

Too true, sadly.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 02:55 PM
22

Dude I've been right there where you are. My advice is to refrain from saying shitty things about her too much, let her destroy her own case. Jones Paradox: When you try to convince a 3rd party (the judge) that someone else is crazy (your ex), YOU are the one who inevitably comes across as "crazy". I don't know the details, but you must understand that nobody involved gives a flying fuck about you. They probably don't care about your ex either, but this isn't about what's right or wrong, it's a …
/r/MensRights27/09/15 01:11 AM
2

Actually a lap band would probably worsen her shitty attitude. As for dude, well for him I prescribe a lap dance.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 12:46 AM
2

Thanks. Just curious. Makes sense, I was in grade 12 in '94 and recall distinctly that sexual harassment awareness was really being pushed on us; posters in school, special assembly's, videos, guest lecturers. And with all of that comes a hypersensitivity to the issue; hence grade 5 boys charged with sexual harassment. Grade 5 boys! Shocking, really.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 08:00 PM
1

So when were you in 5th grade, OP? What year was it?
/r/MensRights26/09/15 07:43 PM
1

Poe's Law.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 07:38 PM
2

Op, are you aware that 95% of throat cancer in men is associated with HPV and oral sex? If you've ever known a man who had throat cancer, it's most likely from going down on a woman who carried HPV. I get the 95% stat from a guy on CBC radio a couple days ago who was trying to raise awareness of this. He was a survivor, a CBC reporter and he actually wrote a book on the topic.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 11:58 PM
6

Wow. If we did the gender reversal on this essay, it'd be considered hate speech. I'm an MRA. This actually hurt my feelings. Absurd. So they're just making shit up off the top of their heads now?
/r/MensRights25/09/15 11:47 PM
1

"Yes your honor, my client would like to invoke the Wealthy Defendant clause and therefore actually get justice."
/r/MensRights25/09/15 11:40 PM
3

No they don't. These are the people who don't show up to vote. The lower your socioeconomic status, the less likely you are to vote.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 11:36 PM
4

*toe the line. I'll be leaving now.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 05:08 AM
5

Exactly this. That's the real story here.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 04:45 AM
5

Crime Control as Industry. Written in '94, a stunning prediction into the current situation in the US. He predicted it would take the place of the vanished manufacturing industry. He also predicted a 9/11 type of event that would be used as pretense. Americans provide food for their families by putting other Americans in Jail.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 05:18 AM
2

Also "Woke him for sex" might be the same as a female teacher "providing sex" to a 13 year old boy. The bias runs deep. Consider the gender reversed headline: Man sexually assaults sleeping woman; she courageously fights off his attack.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 05:13 AM
-9

Or talking to an American about invading sovereign nations under the absurd pretense of "saving them", or to "root out evil" etc etc.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 05:06 AM
7

Dude! Awesome comment. A topic of great interest to me; a guy ruined by a false accusation of DV as a tactic in a divorce settlement. As you say, the accusation, in and of itself, IS domestic violence in the purest form.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 12:25 AM
17

Guy ruined by false accusation of domestic violence as a tactic in a divorce settlement here. Dude, I am that anecdote. My ex applied for and was granted an Emergency Protection Order as a means to take complete control of the house I built and full custody of our two children. She was the violent and unstable one, I was doing my best to keep life together and surviving the mood-tornado that was my SO. That was 4 years ago now. I won shared custody of my children back by asserting my parental ri…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 12:20 AM
2

All of this has more than convinced me I made the right choice. Funny how that works.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 12:23 PM
5

No, what is prevalent on this sub is that simply being drunk doesn't equal rape/sexual assault. There is a difference between "drunk" and "incapacitated". The idea that simply being under the influence of alcohol implies an inability to consent is absolute nonsense. We tend to agree that a person in a comatose state no longer has the lucidity to consent. But we take exception to the idea alcohol automatically implies assault.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 11:23 AM
1

there are about 300 actual MHRAs in the world Translation: If you're a real MRA, you'll send us money.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 10:25 PM
3

First of all, of the 6 pharmacist's who work at the pharmacy that I frequent; 5 are woman. The owner is a woman. Pharmacy tech's? All woman. I'm willing to bet that in any given pharmacy in Canada; the majority of new hires are woman. I say this because it is what I have observed.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 01:12 PM
22

You make a good point there. "Pedophilia" refers to prepubescence. A fully developed 16 year old girl who went through puberty 7 years prior is certainly not "prepubescent". That said, I don't think it's ok for an older guy to get involved, but it has nothing to do with pedophilia. And here's the reality for 99% of men: I was at my niece's birthday party yesterday. It was a "cheer leading" themed event because the mom is a cheer-leading coach. She hired a half dozen of her high-school cheerleade…
/r/MensRights20/09/15 12:25 PM
3

Yes. It's ridiculous. It's great.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 11:34 PM
8

Yeah I can't make sense out of it at all. Patriarchy theory is so utterly contrary to what I have always observed in life.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 10:13 PM
4

Feminists argue that we live in a patriarchal society, and therefore men have male privilege, which is invisible to them. As a result, any issues men have are insignificant and are only a result of the massive privileges men have.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 09:59 PM
23

Here's what the Canadian Children's Rights Council has to say about it: The Canadian Children's Rights Council advocates for mandatory government paid paternity testing as early as technologically practical which compliments the current mandatory genetic disease testing of newborn babies. A very progressive document. It goes on to build a very convincing case for it. Hopefully the rest of the site is as enlightened.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 08:52 PM
2

Well said. Jeez, I thought Noam must be getting senile or something.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 03:19 AM
11

she says she was unhappy in the relationship but was still trying to get pregnant with a third child. Little also admitted she lied to Hampton about being on birth control when she became pregnant with their second child. No, she's not a liar and a manipulator.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 10:07 AM
1

I think it's called the "Human Fund". Although I'm pretty sure it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 11:40 PM
1

I'm only guessing as to why they'd have to lift them. Perhaps it gets further and further away as the job moves alone, also pouring the bags into the mixer might be constant, non stop. Perhaps they have multiple mixers? I know the site is constantly changing and moving as they pour concrete on the slip constantly; like for 7 months straight without end or something. This is the work site. I'm unsure if it was this particular rig tho'.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:23 PM
1

At some point, after all the tower cranes, mobile scissor lift's, forkllifts, etc have moved the material onto the actual work site; somebody physically has to move it. We're talking 60lbs here. Well within what a human can do. Also this is a concrete, gravity based off-shore oil platform. There is immense planning and engineering. and they are constantly learning from themselves. Somebody physically has to empty the bag into the mixer because the crane can no longer access the area; I'm guessin…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:33 PM
3

There we go. "Spicy taco bandit slips into the bush"
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:06 PM
1

I'm certain there's lot's of that happening. All it takes is one sideways glance, the odd groan within ear shot.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 12:36 PM
3

I'm sure it's no fun to be the person on the job who is the shits. I've been that person before; it's no fun. See the pay is insane. The oil platform is so valuable that the company was offering quadruple time as incentive to complete it early and the hourly wages are shockingly high anyway; nobody wants to rock the boat. My uncle made my annual salary in about a month.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 12:19 PM
12

Newfoundlander here. My uncle was working at Bull Arm until recently. He's a stone mason. So he had some unbelievable tales of absurdly unqualified woman working on his crew. He says that a major component of his job was carrying these heavy bags of cement; 60 lbs or something. He said that it was the grueling part of the job. So a few of the woman on the crew physically couldn't lift these bags, and there was a steady supply of them. Everybody pitched in, everybody took their turn except these …
/r/MensRights16/09/15 12:03 PM
6

So all I can say is thank fuck my brothers kid looks like him, because I had my doubts and would probably have gotten my arse kicked if I'd suggested he get a paternity test again. I got you. Funnily enough, my brother actually did get a paternity test. He came home for Xmas and had a fling with a woman. She didn't know she was pregnant for 5 months and then could no longer nail down exactly which of the gaggle of men it could be. She narrowed it down to 3. So the kid is born, looks kinda like h…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 10:52 PM
7

There'd be a pink SUV outside your house with a pre-beaten, pre-raped woman who already has your sperm cloned and inside of her ready to engineer some proof in 5 minutes. They're idling as we speak waiting for dispatch to activate. Do it, see what happens...
/r/MensRights15/09/15 10:17 PM
17

I’m not sure that many people are much happier for it. Um, what about the 49% of the population who are men? I get it, men aren't considered people when parental rights are concerned. All I can say is thank fuck both my children look exactly like me because I have no doubt my ex was cheating at any given moment and was completely capable of cuckolding me.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 07:16 PM
5

That, my friend is true power.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 07:09 PM
15

I second this. You always know it's a top notch post when it's from the COTWA. I read everything he posts, he is actually getting the word out and making this a better place for my children. No small deal.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 04:47 PM
1

Yeah I think her neutrality is the real gem in these photos. This says more about woman's false interpretations and their indifference to the real issues than it does about evil menz. But her indifference is most interesting.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 10:19 AM
3

This. I came to say the same thing; some poor dude wearing an ATM costume with a judge tying one hand, a police officer tying the other all the while the woman with her hand in his pocket has her mouth on another guys cock and is shielding the kids from their dad's loving embrace. I actually just made myself well up picturing the dad reaching out for his kids. Been there. Done that.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 10:16 AM
1

supplier induced demand Yes I was thinking after about it; I do it. It's my say how complicated I want to get on a job. I'm just as human as the doctors I referenced. Well I don't cut into other human beings or do I get to bill $20 000 for a days work, but I absolutely alter the amount of hours on a job to suit a variety of factors; mostly a clients budget in relation to their expectations and the time allotted. Wow. I feel giddy and my brain hurts all at the same time.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:48 AM
3

Interesting. Yeah I got one comment that implied I was wearing a tin foil hat. I'm just the messenger. Also I recall from the Freakonomics study that it wasn't just about different areas with different rates, it was about how individual doctors rates of C-sections per 100 births would increase during slow months and decrease again during "normal" times. Really the story here is the bigger implications in health care and human nature. Fascinating to no end.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 12:23 AM
8

No it's one of the study's done by the Freakonomics guy. The numbers don't lie. There was a substantial sample and numerous controls. Simply labeling something as a conspiracy theory doesn't make it false. And nobody has suggested outright conspiracy. Read it. It's really interesting.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 09:48 PM
11

So you were circumcised without consent on the premise that "it's cleaner", yet you still experience a burning sensation? Sorry brother, couldn't resist.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 05:15 PM
29

Well said. As far as I'm concerned much of it has to do with drumming up business. Remember Freakonomics: Areas with low birth rates always have the highest number of C-sections. If business is slow; infrequent births, then OBGYN's need to make the most of each "gig" and extract maximum financial benefit. It seems like they handled this recent change of position like lawyers; that is they started with a theory and worked backwards searching for supporting information. Call me a cynic, but simply…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 05:09 PM
2

Many people, myself included, don't discover that their depression is of the Bi-polar flavor until they are prescribed SSRI antidepressants. I was down. Was prescribed Paxil and within 2 weeks was text-book hypo-manic. I stopped sleeping, I spent all the money, i cheated on my SO, told my boss to fuck off. In the DSM, you only need one incident of SSRI induced mania with some normal depression symptoms to get a Bi-polar II diagnosis. This was really common in the late 90's. Oh, and if your physi…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 12:20 PM
85

Can confirm. Source: Single dad. I still like being picked up.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 06:07 PM
2

And I believe she has 3 kids now. And a husband. Surely she can't hide tho'. Her name changes seem to always get publicized and her infamy mated with the interweb is a powerful force. Not that anybody could actually hurt her feelings anyway tho'....
/r/MensRights12/09/15 05:57 PM
4

And the disillusionment begins.... Welcome brother. My dad often laments the lack of religion in Canadian schools these days. Because he is religious? No, he's an atheist. He says it's an important human right of passage to be taught one thing, discover it's just somebody else agenda and become disillusioned. It's enlightening. So first lesson here is that there is no such thing as "violence against woman".....it's just regular violence that we all have to deal with.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 12:45 PM
11

You're right, I was getting carried away: Known incidents are: May 4, 1987, rape, 21-year-old woman, Scarborough, in front of her parents' house, after following her home. The attack lasted more than half an hour. May 14, 1987, rape, 19-year-old woman in the backyard of her parents' house. The assault lasted over an hour. July 17, 1987, attempted rape. Although he beat the young woman, he abandoned the attack after she fought back. September 29, 1987, attempted rape, 15-year-old girl. Bernardo b…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 11:54 AM
0

I missed the twitter girl saying something about a dead cop.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 11:48 AM
-1

I never said he was a serial rapist. I was making light of something. But you're right; He has Karla Homolka eyes, not the other way around.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 11:47 AM
5

Like clockwork. Good comment! I knew it was only a matter of time before we found video of her drowning kittens or something. “eroticisation of women’s physical appearance is a way of exercising power over women”. Come again? Who has the power there?
/r/MensRights12/09/15 02:17 AM
77

No, the stupidest one ever was when we offered Karla Homolka a sweet plea deal and blamed everything on the man all because she claimed "he abused me, he forced me". It's been revealed over the years that she was in fact the mastermind, manipulator and murderer of those poor girls including HER OWN SISTER. I'm not saying Bernado is an angel, but notice how Karla Homolka has Stephen Harper eyes and it tells you all you need.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 02:14 AM
1

What does this mean?
/r/MensRights12/09/15 12:19 AM
2

Well said.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 12:05 AM
4

As I ponder microaggressions as “a form of social control in which the aggrieved collect and publicize accounts of intercollective offenses, making the case that relatively minor slights are part of a larger pattern of injustice and that those who suffer them are socially marginalized and deserving of sympathy,” I certainly see their emergence on college campuses, but I wonder about other possible iterations. Great essay. Good post.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 09:36 PM
1

But I could be wrong and you could be right. No, you're right.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 09:25 PM
14

Was he hitting on her really? Perhaps he felt safe in the knowledge that the difference in age would imply his intentions were strictly innocent? Complimenting someone doesn't equal "hitting on them". How would it have been different if they were of a similar vintage? Or if he happened to be a more attractive and desirable mate in the eyes of the "victim" I wonder.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 10:47 PM
10

Yeah. Hopefully something to say went like this: "Sorry that crazy feminist bitch with an agenda publicly shamed you for being a warm-hearted and conscientious gentleman......when you're finished the pizza you can lay your beer on my head while I suck your stunning cock..."
/r/MensRights10/09/15 10:26 PM
2

Atlantic Canadian here. Good post, OP. Please keep us up to date.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 10:08 PM
12

So he was complimenting her in the most respectful way he could; a stunning picture. He didn't say "you look beautiful", or even specifically mention her; he said the picture was stunning. Please God she never gets offered a Judgeship. I assume she doesn't think reverse sexism is a thing, buys completely into the Duluth model and thinks she gets paid $77 dollars per hour while her male collages are paid $100. Why is it when an SJW or a feminist calls "oppression", however unreasonable, nobody ev…
/r/MensRights10/09/15 10:02 PM
1

No you aren't asking too much to want to have reasonable access to your children. I've been in a very similar situation, I feel your pain. I doubt you'd get anywhere with it legally, however it's a good idea to document everything. Technically it is a form of parental alienation. Her contempt for you is getting in the way of what's truly best for the kids. Just because she doesn't call them while they are at your house doesn't mean she has any say as to when they talk to you (assuming she doesn'…
/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:18 PM
5

Wow, just switch the genders and see what happens: Evil Manz Rapes Helpless Disabled Woman. Open and shut. Don't drop the soap.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:00 PM
8

Jeez, I was thinking it would turn out that the daughter gets a cushy affirmative-action sweet job while the son has to work his body to death in the trades making half what his sister makes.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 07:39 PM
2

Poe's law.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 07:35 PM
7

I've read all the comments so far and nobody yet has bothered to say thank fuck he had that recording. Imagine how screwed he'd have been.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 12:03 AM
2

Dude! Thank you.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 09:11 PM
8

Awesome. I noticed that the digits on my Social Insurance number contain the "license to rape" code (80085), does it have to be someone I already know? Or do I have to apply for a Stranger rape endorsement? I've successfully completed my Roofie Certification at Boy Scouts when I was a kid. But I never finished the Violence as a Tool course. I guess I'd better sign up for that again to be sure.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 01:32 PM
2

Headline: Evil Manz tricks kids into using pepper spray on innocent mother. Charges pending.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 12:33 PM
158

Are all actors objectified? Or can we never truly objectify men in a patriarchy? Average dude here: Will someone please tell me where I'm supposed to sign up for this "patriarchy" thing? I'm ready to try being a CEO now...
/r/MensRights07/09/15 12:13 PM
2

You would be amazed at some of the things 'modernized' out of the historical knowledge base at that time. Yes please, amaze me. Fascinating topic. History is a very fluid and dynamic concept, it turns out. And don't forget what Churchill didn't say; "History is written by victors"
/r/MensRights06/09/15 11:53 PM
5

I disagree. That was not the spirit in which the law was written. Welcome to the American Crime Control industry: Where you're going to jail because our jobs depend on it. Why you guys aren't marching in the streets yet I do not know.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 11:28 PM
4

Its Generation Jerk we are seeing and I want to vote them all off the island. You win /r/MensRights for the day.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 10:55 PM
2

Exactly. Op, where are you, if I may ask?
/r/MensRights04/09/15 05:59 PM
1

Dude! Jesus. Aside from the obvious; lawyer lawyer lawyer, I'm not sure I have much to offer. I assume you're in the US? The only thing that comes to my mind is that the use of "date rape" drugs, (assuming that's the implication here) is way way overestimated and often attributed when there is little chance of legitimacy. There was report came out of Australia where, out of every single reported incident of alleged "date rape"; over 100 I believe, guess how many of the 'victims' were found to ha…
/r/MensRights04/09/15 04:24 PM
2

I do have some advice, actually. This lesson came at a high cost and I offer it to you for free. I call it the Jones Paradox: It goes like this: When you are trying to convince a third party that someone is "crazy/ill/lying for gain" etc etc, the result will be that YOU are the one who will appear 'crazy/ill/lying'. Basically, the more you try to convince a court that she's "crazy", they will invariably come to the conclusion that it is, in fact, you who is "crazy". I can't stress this. I have h…
/r/MensRights04/09/15 02:41 PM
2

You are dealing with a spurious accusation or an actual wrongful conviction? I know something about being falsely accused of domestic violence as a tactic in a divorce settlement. My lawyer says what happened to me is akin to a wrongful conviction, but since it was all ex parte, there exsists no avenue to have my name cleared, compensation or to have any sort of investigation. It's a fucked up world we live in when one person can accuse another or something absurd and unfounded, without recourse…
/r/MensRights04/09/15 02:32 PM
12

The American university’s plunge into triviality may have become irreversible. To the narcissism of identity politics and victimology can now be added the quackery of “healing circles” and “mind/body work.” Columbia proudly claims that it has developed one of the first university-wide programs on sexual respect in the nation. Expect desperate one-upmanship to follow as our national descent into a new academic Dark Age accelerates.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 02:02 PM
3

Well said. I think it's more to do with knowingly defrauding a man by forcing him to be responsible for a child that is not his. Everybody cheats; it's what humans do. It's why we've been so successful a species. It's the lying and the fraud that warrants criminal treatment.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 12:00 PM
1

Just World Fallacy. For example, after my car accident and subsequent Compression fracture diagnosis, I was prescribed Oxy Contin. It's good for "sprains and strains" they said. Of course, people suffering depression and Oxy Contin are a bad combo because, not only is it good for treating pain, it's the best mood stabilizer ever invented. Yada yada, years of struggling with addiction, completely MY fault and surely I deserved whatever suffering I brought into my life. Never mind the class action…
/r/MensRights04/09/15 11:53 AM
1

I remember feeling bad for Kermit and not liking her. Also I have this instinctive dislike of blonde, chubby pug-nosed woman ever since. And an affinity for frogs. Go figure.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 08:20 PM
6

Fantastic! I was thinking about it later. Ms. Piggy was jealous, possessive, narcissistic, violent and generally selfish and unreasonable. Always playing the victim. Check this out, pulled from her wiki page: Miss Piggy began as a minor character on The Muppet Show TV series, but gradually developed into one of the central characters of the show. She is a pig, specifically, a mangalitsa[citation needed] who is convinced she is destined for stardom, and nothing will stand in her way. She has a ca…
/r/MensRights03/09/15 02:59 PM
-1

Hey, you know what they say about German engineering: 6 million can't be wrong!
/r/MensRights03/09/15 11:17 AM
23

I recall Mrs. Piggy as an abusive, controlling, emotional time-bomb. She'd openly punch Kermit in the face and it was "funny". I'm sure a clever writer with a more progressive view of DV could re-write this article from a much different perspective.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 11:04 AM
2

Darn right. You don't want to waste your time with that crap.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 04:28 PM
4

"Slapped me twice while we were quietly watching TV" -is what it could say on the Emergency Protection Order that she could be granted without you ever knowing. The police would show up, tell you they have a court order, from a judge, that clearly states that you, sir, have 30 mins to gather your "belongings" and leave the house. You can not contact, directly or indirectly, your (ex) partner, or your children under threat of certain imprisonment and criminal charges. You have the right to apply …
/r/MensRights02/09/15 04:17 PM
6

I'll bet many of us here have "ex friends" similar you you. I had a really close friend do the same thing to me once. It all started with "Have you ever heard of the Rule of Thumb?" I listened as she explained how it was a law that prevented men from beating their wives with any stick 'thicker than their thumb'. "Ah, well, if ever I heard a propagandist myth, that is one right there, with all due respect; That can't possibly be true" I replied eventually. So we googled it. Guess what? Not only i…
/r/MensRights02/09/15 11:11 AM
2

Being banned is now just a right of passage into MRAdom.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 11:04 AM
1

Male privilege right here.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 11:01 AM
7

Yes, it's metric, no? Like a centibutthertz is one hundredth of a Butthertz. Kilobutthertz is 1000 butthertz, etc etc
/r/MensRights31/08/15 10:16 PM
8

You're right. It's not HER fault she was raped, ultimately. But good of her to acknowledge the obvious. I wouldn't walk through downtown Toronto at 2 am, obviously drunk and holding a fist-full of $100 bills and not take some responsibility if I was robbed.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 06:35 PM
6

If they are allowed to keep speaking on this eventually it will start to affect society as a hole Well said. Society is certainly becoming a hole.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 06:27 PM
8

She (Dr. Christina Hoff Sommers) sees young women in prestigious universities who are “chronically in a state of panic”. They are the daughters of helicopter parents, the products of entitlement and self-absorption and dishonest gender propaganda. Where once young women would come to her lectures to “spar and debate ... Now they say I give them post traumatic stress disorder and they create safe rooms on their campuses … It’s a hypersensitivity bordering on madness. Hear! hear!
/r/MensRights30/08/15 06:26 PM
2

Well said. It's a statement thinly veiled as a question. Exactly why I consider myself, not an atheist, not an agnostic, but a Non-theist. It's not that I want to deny the existence of God, I'm denying there's even a debate. There is no debate. Debating it, in and of itself, makes it true on some level.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 02:43 PM
0

Well said. Good point. I tend to agree completely. My point, however, is that to a feminist, it's a straw man. See, now were debating what is is lol. One man's satire is another (wo)man's straw man. It goes both ways too. I've seen what I'd consider a straw-man attack from feminists, only to be told (by feminists) that, no, it's not a straw man, it's reality. See how it works? If I was a feminist, I'd argue that "no, this is not what we're arguing, it doesn't take in to consideration gender norm…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 02:35 PM
8

So the comic took someone else's argument;That woman deserve equal pay, and presented a weak version of it (from the feminist POV). I assure you, they have a much better argument than is presented here. This is, by your own definition, a straw-man attack. Not saying I disagree with the overall message, and not saying if it's funny or not. Just making a point.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:25 PM
1

You've said it best. as feminism evolved into the matriachy. Your bit on "all rights and no responsibility" is particularly succinct. Well said.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:15 PM
1

No, it's not "as equivalent to legally married". It's like an "in-between" area where some rule apply and some don't. I was common law with my SO. She divorce raped me. She was mentally ill (textbook) and very unstable. Had we actually been married, i'd have been able to have her put in hospital, but because we were only common law I did not have that right. Also, I had to fight tooth and nail just to get some recognition that I had claim to the house I BUILT WITH MY TWO HANDS. I had to prove to…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:05 PM
7

Help me out here, Cis-men can be gay, right? So only woman and trans....ah..men, or is it trans woman are invited. So gay men not invited? They've been throwing gay men under many buses for a while now.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 12:50 PM
1

Good point! Karen Straughan: gateway drug to the MRM.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:19 AM
2

Maybe he first needs to be on the losing end of a divorce or custody battle to get that through his fucking head. Sadly, this is exactly spot on. I can't think of one MRA I know personally who wasn't first a victim of the system. I'm sure they're out there, but I don't know any. Be it a false accusation, divorce rape or just some dude who really wants to see his kid; one way to learn about the issues affecting men is to be a man with issues and receive zero support and to told to man-up.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:15 AM
3

Want to know how the DEA was able to charge Marc Emery? They bought seeds from him in Canada (legally), then they took the seeds back to the US, planted them, germinated them, vegged, flowered, harvested, cured, and manicured the bud...then they charged him with Marijuana production and extradited him to the US. Yes, it's true, American crime control is an industry that feeds on humans.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 11:39 AM
0

Akbar: "...well I was going to strap some explosives to my body and wander into the Mosque and murder a few dozen infidels, but on the way I got a $20 hummer from Jazzmin and I think i'll just go shoot some pool now with my bro's..."
/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:23 AM
2

Could you maybe quote some of the myths being peddled, OP?
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:19 PM
59

40+ years of indoctrination right there. How would you explain to a fish that it's in water? My mom is similar. My man-shame runs very deep, only in the last few years have I even really begun to understand how deeply feminist ideology is ingrained. I was raised by a person who hates men. I am a man. Now I have my own children.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:09 PM
1

I've actually done this. Successfully too. With no court order in place, you have every right to assume custody of your children. In my case I notified the local police, RCMP, Provincial court, family court, CYFS and Family Justice services of what I intended to do. The police do not respond to cases of custody, CYFS does. My ex had every right to apply for an emergency hearing, which she'd have been granted within 30 days. The police knocked on my door and asked that I return the children, but …
/r/MensRights23/08/15 09:54 PM
1

Well it isn't as if any of the men in jail are suffering any sort of mental illness, addiction or emotional instability. Certainly none of them were raised by abusive, blame-men-for-all-wrong; woman lacking in basic human empathy.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 09:38 PM
30

Oh oh can I play? She'd call it Sexual Gratification Asymmetry, or Know-when-you're-lucky-osis, perhaps Unintended Orgasm. The ideology runs deep in these folks. I no longer wonder how human-kind was able to exterminate the Jews in WWII.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 05:11 PM
3

Mostly I think he's just trying to point out the the inherent inequality. See, there are many people, and much empirical data to suggest that woman are not, in fact, disadvantaged or oppressed in our modern society. To the contrary, actually, to many, myself included, it certainly seems that being female is a major advantage. So when the rights of men are trounced on the basis of "equality", it actually pushes some of us to act. To inform. To cry out. As an average dude, I have absolutely no adv…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 03:16 PM
1

The authors supposed that the positive general evaluation of women might derive from the association between women and nurturing characteristics. Supposed?
/r/MensRights23/08/15 01:49 PM
5

It doesn't even make sense. Don't worry, OP, it's all starting to fall apart. In Australia, 63% of University grads were woman, yet the "Earnings Gap" widens (i can no longer use the word "wage", because it implies a "rate" of pay). Accomplished scientist has to cry and apologize for wearing an "offensive" shirt, yet on the EXACT same day, Kim Kardashian appears naked on a magazine cover and it's empowering to woman! Logic has nothing to do with this, feminism isn't a social movement any longer;…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 01:46 PM
1

I don't disagree. But the actuality of it is that it's dynamic and complicated. There were many variables; the biggest being the systemic bias against men in family court. She was the violent one, yet on paper it says I was abusive. She was the unstable one, yet on paper it says I was an addict. It was a stunning exercise in futility.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 01:32 PM
3

Wow that's one enlightened human. My feelings about Naked and Afraid are the same. It acts like a microcosm into gender relations. Another similar example was an episode of Survivor where they separated the men and the woman. I never actually saw it, but there was an awesome post about it here a few month ago.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 01:21 PM
3

Dude who got divorce raped here: My ex was obviously suffering troubles of the mental variety. I truly believed I had something to offer her. Red flags are hard to see when life gets in the way. And nobody expects to be betrayed. The lesson? Humans are capable of almost anything if the incentive is great enough. Play the victim to get a house and financial security for life? Where do I sign??
/r/MensRights23/08/15 01:06 PM
7

The Just World Fallacy..
/r/MensRights23/08/15 12:49 PM
1

Nice. Yes it has the "off the cuff" feel to it. I dig.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 04:42 PM
1

Brother! I predict much discussion and enlightening discourse if your comment was it's own post. Surely this wasn't just off the top of your head? You've been crafting this for a while, give it the platform it deserves.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 11:17 AM
5

Dude! Well said. I think i'll print that and carry it around with me.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 08:16 PM
2

This has been hard. Just wanted to offer my best wishes and moral support. Trust me, there are many people on this sub who actually understand some of what you are suffering. It is hard. For many of us, it's the hardest thing we'll ever have to go through. We're mammals. We're not supposed to be separated from our offspring, something gets broken inside of us. Forge ahead brother.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 08:01 PM
3

Hugs for you brother.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 04:30 AM
1

I'm with you. A-Huit.....argh...ah-whoit...ah BARFFFFFFFaaaah god....
/r/MensRights20/08/15 03:05 PM
1

A father in my town recently had his children removed for calling a Depression Help Line. The woman heard kids in the background and took it upon herself to call CYFS and the police. Fucking nightmare for dude. The Social workers were eventually called out on their absurd reasoning. He wasn't suicidal, he threatened nobody, just a struggling dad who actually took a step to help himself. Welcome to Feminism 2.0
/r/MensRights20/08/15 02:38 PM
1

If i'm not mistaken, I remember reading an article about Maxim to the effect that more woman buy it than men and that it's actually a woman's magazine veiled as men's. Which didn't surprise me at all considering it was my GF who bought me a subscription and would actually read it.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 02:32 PM
2

Silver for you for putting me on to Briffault's law.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 12:02 PM
-1

...something something 95% of suicides are men....
/r/MensRights11/08/15 09:34 AM
4

Well his love betrayed him, his country completely threw him under the bus, you people celebrate this. "Might as well" is how you worded it, he said "I'd consider". It's a completely natural human reaction to have feelings. How would you feel?
/r/MensRights11/08/15 09:33 AM
-1

...and we'll lick stinky places, too...
/r/MensRights06/08/15 05:37 PM
4

Yeah my mom would only rent to woman in our basement apartment growing up. Tenant after tenant (always female remember) caused trouble. Often it was boyfriends showing up at all hours also much screaming and yelling. Drama. The woman would always destroy the property, too and always have a conflict about the damage deposit. Finally she relented and rented to guys. What do you know? Well there was almost no trouble at all renting to men. Every second Friday night they's have friends over, but res…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 05:35 PM
1

Great post, OP. It generated an enlightening discussion, too.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 08:28 PM
1

Dude, you said it. My ex was perfectly willing to sell out our children to get what she wanted. Every time I had to be the one to choose to NOT cut the children in half. She would win every time because I'd always make the sacrifice to spare the kids the hell. It is this one quality in vindictive woman that always surprises me the most. "For the good of the children??, um, have any of you Judges, lawyers, social workers or police not noticed that she's the one putting the kids through hell to ge…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 09:35 AM
3

But I thought that we've already had 215 so far this year or something? I guess it depends on the definition of mass shooting. Like the dude the other week at the movie theater who shot two woman; does he count?
/r/MensRights02/08/15 11:21 PM
1

I'm not discounting Elam by any stretch.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 04:38 AM
1

I've witnessed a few incidents of domestic abuse (bad area) and every time it's a woman being abusive to men. Mostly extreme verbal abuse and once violence where dude very deliberately DIDN'T fight back (as is the case in most modern DV). The last time I saw it, the woman was saying the worst, most hurtful, personal shit to the guy; "I'm going to suck Billy's dick, see how you like that you fucking ugly loser.." etc. He was just pleading with her and begging her to quiet down and stop being so h…
/r/MensRights02/08/15 04:20 AM
5

Warren Farrel is a lot more influential for me. I'd hardly call that pearl-clutching. Farrel's work has become more effective as time has passed; now that the times are catching up.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 04:08 AM
2

Well said. Me too brother. I actually lose sleep sometimes just from coming to this sub.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 05:24 PM
1

And when do you get to define Poe's Law for the teacher and hint that your piece is actually a piece of satire? Soon as your sister gets her diploma I guess?
/r/MensRights31/07/15 04:34 PM
1

Great link!
/r/MensRights31/07/15 04:33 PM
2

Hugs for you too brother.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 04:26 PM
1

Oh brother. As a shared custody dad with an uncanny similarity to the father you just described; 50/50 yet I have the kids at lt least 60+% of the time, and as a man WELL acquainted with the systemic injustice that is Family Court: I want to say that, to me, your story represents the essence of what the MRM is all about. My ex made false accusations of violence as a tactic to gain control of my house and our children. I know that it was only because of my poverty that she finally gave up on full…
/r/MensRights31/07/15 04:24 PM
2

Hear, hear.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:46 PM
2

Sigmund Freud and Winston Churchill are examples of men who were not afraid to change the world.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:37 PM
8

Fantastic post. Especially pertaining to the recent trend of "A warning for all men" style that i've been noticing on /r/MensRights of late. The more money a man makes, the more likely a "motivated" woman will press for a restraining order as a tactic to gain control of the kid; therefore $ and the less likely dad gets even partial custody, let alone access. You have a better probable outcome from NOT showing up to your hearing (In that particular jurisdiction) and the more your net worth, the w…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:22 PM
3

Dad here. Don't worry, op. You'll have your daughter well enlightened by that time. Source: My kids (girl, boy) are being raised in 2015; that is to say it's my son who is inherently disadvantaged because of his gender, contrary to what we're being told.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:06 PM
5

I hope so. I'm usually very non-violent, however I also feel that justice comes in many forms. Mostly people need to learn to mind their own business.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 05:04 PM
25

All I know is, man or woman, if you assault me, humiliate me and physically injure me with backward justification (like police brutality or white knights), you might be introduced to "Mrs Pipe" (I'm an equal opportunity weapon guy) when you least expect it. Just sayin'
/r/MensRights29/07/15 01:22 PM
9

Pink-knighting?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 01:18 PM
3

I agree. However I kinda feel that the vast majority of guys in this day and age would recognize that he was risking police intervention and give up long before it got to that point. Threatening a guy with "Calling the police" is a real threat. Imagine the outcome had she decided to say "he hit me" or "he tried to rape me" as soon as they had shown up. We all know that being the person to make the original complaint to the police doesn't mean you aren't getting arrested. Op is lucky.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 11:39 AM
3

I'm not sure I could back it up, but I do tend to feel that I agree with you. I have another aspect that is, in my opinion, the elephant in any room with false accusations: PMDD. My ex, the one who leveled false accusations of violence against me as a tactic in a divorce settlement, had very Bi-polar tendencies and traits as well as would suffer INTENSE PMS, sometimes she'd even arrive at delusion and mild psychosis . Mood swings, she'd get abusive, manic, I remember one time she was walking aro…
/r/MensRights25/07/15 05:47 PM
3

Good point. Or haw many are simply due the the intense sense of regret that often accompany's casual sex? GWW has a video where she explains the evolutionary psychology behind that intense sense of regret. Our cave-person brains are still hard wired to avoid sex with a partner who won't stick around to take care of the eventual offspring. In early days, it was extremely risky for a woman to have sex with a man who wasn't "all in", her life was actually at risk if she became pregnant without supp…
/r/MensRights25/07/15 04:58 PM
2

Didn't the chief of police in NY or LA get in trouble for asserting 50%+ of all rape claims are false?
/r/MensRights25/07/15 04:52 PM
10

True. Or the real cost of the social implications when your reputation as a "wife abuser" or "rapist" spreads as fast as a click.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:17 PM
23

Actually, all the girl has to do is imply she is afraid. This is one area of the law where you can get arrested or have an ex parte order leveled against you because she claims she "feels" you might hurt her. I assure you, one never never need lay a hand on anyone to be ruined.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 12:20 PM
14

Not to mention how many "Ex Parte" court orders get leveled against innocent men. Source: Am victim of spurious accusation of violence as a tactic in a divorce settlement. I wasn't the violent one, I wasn't the unstable one.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 12:17 PM
31

“Sometimes, and often in these cases, it’s one person’s word against another so the decision of how to prosecute and whether to prosecute isn’t an easy one. I believed her in this case and that’s why I went forward with it. I felt she was telling the truth and I felt it was a community safety issue.” I thought we were finally enlightened enough to know that in just such cases: one word against another; we humans are too imperfect to possibly be a reasonable judge. There HAS to be a higher thresh…
/r/MensRights23/07/15 12:04 AM
2

I'm betting the red pill folk have a few things to say to this guy. Poor bastard.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 09:42 PM
1

So here we have what seems to be another case of Totalitarian Feminist Maenads becoming outraged over suggestions they are emotional and illogical and pointlessly vindictive, once again demonstrating themselves to utterly emotional and illogical and pointlessly vindictive. Lol. I actually laughed out loud here by myself when I read that paragraph. Awesome.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 09:33 PM
8

What you witnessed is the true face of domestic violence. There is almost nobody being beaten for burning the toast. Imagine that one time dude has had enough and decides to use minimal force to stop the assault; guess who the cops will arrest? And then guess who gets support and treated like a victim and encouraged to lay an Ex parte order against dude to remove him from his house? Some system we have.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 08:59 PM
10

Never mind that she is, as a matter of fact, a fucking psycho bitch. Why on earth would any reasonable human think this is a crime. Could he not call her a psycho bitch in a crowded bar? Would that be a crime too? This has as much to do with the Crime-control industrial complex as it does with Feminism.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 12:17 AM
7

Me too brother. I too, as a man, have the instinctive drive to protect woman, but since my own experience being "white-knighted" when my drunk GF became abusive one late night. I've sworn to myself that i'd intervene if ever I was witness to a similar situation. All I was doing was trying to calm her down, these assholes approach and are all "treat her like a lady, man". And roughed me up. Little did they know I had a knife concealed in my hand.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 12:55 PM
2

Yeah I meant the metaphorical "burn it down", but my outrage is visceral. I just really hope the judge has the good sense to see it for what it is. The problem is that judges are feminists too. Ideology can easily get in the way of reason. Source: I'm no stranger to family court, false accusations as a tactic in a larger agenda and feminist bias as a system. Cheers brother.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 01:03 PM
1

No Way! This will not happen. This case will be thrown out, I have no doubt. On top of that, the judge will scold the two applicants and there will be consequences for frivolous prosecution. If he gets convicted, we have to take to the streets and burn the country down.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 12:33 PM
2

I agree. See, here's another take on it from a man's perspective; I'm a 140lb guy who has worked with my hands my whole life. I've been on those jobs where you have to lift 200 sheets of 100lb MDF and if I didn't perform at least as well (or better really, having to prove myself constantly) as the next guy, i'd lose the respect of my peers and have to find another job. As a "small man", I've had to work extremely hard to keep up. I do it, I'm really strong "for my size" now because of it, but i'…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:53 PM
1

Of course not. No. I'm saying it implies a rate. Be it per hour, per week, month, or even a given salary to "do your job" however long you spend; like a teacher. I agree with your original comment, just adding something to it.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:48 PM
5

But then opens another important discussion: equal work. My uncle is a stone mason on a large gravity based oil platform construction site. The pay is insane; quadruple time 15 hour days because they are in a mad panic to complete the project on time. He has about 0ne third of his crew that are woman. The main part of the job is lugging these 80lb bags of cement. All day long, 15 hours a day they are lugging these super heavy bags. All but one woman on the crew can actually perform the work. The…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 12:16 PM
3

But doesn't "wage" imply the rate at which one is paid. Like a per hour amount or weekly salary? I like "Earnings Gap". I cut the discussion down to one word; earnings. It's an earnings gap, men earn more than woman earn, on average. Because they work more or they work risky jobs. Source: I work 50 hours a week these days. I earn more than a woman who works 35 hours. I'd much much rather work 35 hours, btw. Male privilege indeed.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 12:05 PM
9

Wikipedia is clearly run by Feminists. FTFY.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 12:37 AM
2

I generally avoid the use of gender-specific weasel-terms, but I gotta say I like Mancriminate.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 12:12 PM
2

why would you want a gun to your head in the hands of someone who gets a payday for pulling the trigger? This right here. Well Put. As the victim of a spurious accusation of violence as a tactic in a divorce settlement, I dig your words.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 12:08 PM
1

Oh yeah! I couldn't agree more. I find this topic endlessly interesting. I watched as big pharma successfully changed the definition of depression; there used to be two main types. Clinical depression (the real one) and acute depression (when becky-bigtits rejects you). They successfully morphed these into ONE. So all of a sudden anyone who had fucked up their life and was suffering the obvious emotional response was declared as "mentally ill" and put on powerful meds. SSRI's were in the top 3 m…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 06:54 PM
4

Never underestimate the drug companies either. If you think about it, it really is to their benefit that we are all "crazy", that we're addicted to various substances, that we all smoke; as long as we're "sick" one way or another, and it is absolutely undeniably highly beneficial for them. Your point is valid certainly. Consider that the higher the ratio of police officers, the higher the crime rate; every time.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 11:53 PM
0

Canadian here. America, I love you, I get the manifest destiny thing, the american dream etc etc, but sweet Jesus, you're Crime control industry is fucking out of control.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 11:31 AM
3

That's beautiful man. I'm not in the Army and I still got royally fucked by my ex. If that was the suffering you had to endure to get to where you are now, at least you've tasted "bottom" so you have a good idea what "up" really means. One day, I'm going to say exactly the same thing.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 11:13 AM
12

Hey thanks! Yes it was done through spurious use of an Ex Parte "emergency" court order. I won my kids back, but the damage is done and I no longer live in the house I built with my two hands. Cheers. I'm telling anyone who'll give me the 2 minutes.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 06:34 PM
48

Another great post by /u/DougDante. I found /r/MensRights after I was falsely accused of domestic violence by my ex as a tactic to gain control of my house and our children. It turns out I wasn't alone; in fact I am a member of a group that is growing exponentially. OP, just curious, but I wonder what led to your enlightenment regarding the MRA and more specifically IPV? I imagine your observations weren't consistent with the current 'school of thought' on DV, but I also wonder if you too were i…
/r/MensRights04/07/15 04:24 PM
6

It's the ABC's; Always Be reCording!
/r/MensRights02/07/15 07:16 PM
3

If you pass GO, do not collect $200.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 10:06 PM
-8

/r/MensRights
/r/MensRights01/07/15 12:11 PM
-5

/r/MensRights
/r/MensRights01/07/15 12:10 PM
11

This right here. I live in the city where this happened. If she had been a man, they would never had let her out into daylight.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 12:08 PM
13

Hey that happened where I live. I remember it clearly. Mostly I remember that everybody knew what was coming, nobody was really surprised when Shirley Turner and the toddler were found dead. The boys paternal grandfather had gone public and had done a good job in demonstrating the woman was a murderer. Ironically, it was surely the pressure created by the media attention that forced her into that last desperate act. It became adversarial between Turner and the grandparents and I guess she decide…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 12:06 PM
1

It's "archaic" because it was derived from another time from when the class system played a larger role. It's designed to prevent people of less means from taking civil action against the wealthy. The problem with it is that often legitimate and warranted legal action is stifled because if you lose, you aren't only risking the loss, but then you also risk complete ruin. You may have a valid legal concern, as I did, but are forced to accept less than you might be entitled to because the outcome o…
/r/MensRights29/06/15 03:05 PM
1

Basically if there is a right to settle clause and she pushed for a trial, she gets personally hit with the difference between the proposed settlement and the verdict. I'm In Canada, so I'm not sure how it works in other places, but this is standard in civil suits of all types. If you're suing over a car crash and they make you an offer, if the trial yields a LOWER number, than you have to pay ALL of the court costs of BOTH parties. My lawyer says it an archaic law left over from the olden days …
/r/MensRights29/06/15 10:11 AM
3

Exactly exactly. It's actually the opposite of scientific method. It's what lawyers do; start with a conclusion and re-write the story so it'll seem conceivable. What really happened doesn't seem to matter.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 12:35 PM
7

Because a victim complex is the anchor of the feminist movement. Feminism is no longer a social movement, it's a political movement now in disguise.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 12:52 PM
7

Wow! Similar with my mom. She was a teacher, has her masters and is "intelligent" generally, but there is no hope in ever changing her mind. Every now and then she'll mutter something; "...and I can't fathom why all those girls are being paid $0.75 on the dollar, it shouldn't stand" My mom has become a facebook feminist. She sucks up the headlines and doesn't give it a second thought. "Somebody has to do something about all those girls being raped" etc.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 11:08 AM
84

But of course, rape is all about power, you see. Source: My mom. She is in her 70's. She was verbally expressing her fear of being raped while out walking (In a small Canadian city with low crime and super friendly white-knights all around). I asked her; "Ahem, sorry, but I'm just wondering which rapist exactly is interested in raping the 73 year old with the limp and the bad varicose veins?" "Rape is about power, it has little to do with sex..." Yep.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:01 PM
7

I'd report it. never know what crazy shit might happen down the road and from her side of the story, you look suspicious. "Well there was that weird guy stalking the place last week. He kept looking in the windows and licking his lips. I got a weird vibe right away so I managed to outsmart him and get his name and number before he realized I was on to him. He was carrying a teddy bear, I really thought it was trouble, I'm just glad I got his information and we can catch this child abusor immedia…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 05:57 PM
6

Single dad Canadian here. I live in fear that my ex would try to change my children's names. They have my surname now, but I know if given half a chance my ex would change it. Male privilege indeed. Great post, OP. I can give you a first hand account of the Emergency Protection Order situation in Canada too if you'd like. Ex Parte court orders forcing men from their homes on the whim a vindictive ex or as a tactical divorce consideration. Canada is the land of the spurious ex parte.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 11:29 AM
3

I couldn't agree more. You should make this a post in and of itself. So much of this is the result of political posturing and clever marketing. "No fault" divorce on top of a system the equates financial security (aka MONEY) with custody leads to world of kids estranged from their dads. Even as a single parent I agree with you. I never signed up to do this alone, however too many do just that.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 11:22 AM
2

Wow. You're the first person to make that suggestion; to show her kindness. It would probably blow her mind, actually. People are kind to me often. I'm very fortunate to be related to awesome human beings. Holy shit. I did feel pretty bad about her up until she had my property vandalized. I'd have to come up with the perfect gift. Good answer!
/r/MensRights24/06/15 02:44 PM
1

The Circle. Didn't say I was close to MUN, just that I'm on the board at Student Parents at Mun. Yep I tend to agree. I've been losing sleep over what to do, but basically there is nothing I can do that won't result in more attention from crazy lady. You said it; time to move!
/r/MensRights24/06/15 10:04 AM
2

Time for you to get off the computer I think. Go outside. Get some fresh air. Talk to other humans.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 09:44 AM
3

Newfoundland. Right country, wrong coast is all...
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:19 AM
2

Well see it's not an impossible strategy. She lives across the street in government social housing. They passed a new law a few years ago the strictly forbids any criminal activity; If you're convicted of a crime while you live in NLHousing, you're evicted no questions asked. When they passed the law apparently they went through the 'hood and evicted a slew of people. If I thought I had a reasonable chance of a conviction I'd call the cops ASAP and then pass it on to housing. She risks being thr…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 10:23 PM
6

Exactly! It was a really good lesson for my kids to see exactly why the kids are assholes; They have a mom who thinks it's ok to threaten and then destroy the property of a neighbor. I keep saying if i could have my time back i'd have just hugged the kid and told him something positive. Probably doesn't get enough hugs, let alone the way he's treated. You're right. Communication would be near impossible. it's like we're from different planets. Cheers. I appreciate the comment.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 10:15 PM
4

Hey thanks. I really appreciate that. It sucks, but we'll be alright. Really the solution is obvious: Time to move! It's a shitty part of town. It wasn't too bad when the kids were really small because we didn't have to interact with anyone. Not any more. Cheers.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 09:41 PM
1

Yeah. I was thinking about cutting off it's head and having the crazy woman wake up to find it in bed with her, but I'm not the be-heading type.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 03:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter