TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Siliceously_Sintery Archive

View 0 posts and 59 comments by Siliceously_Sintery on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If you think a random ass compilation on YouTube is objective evidence you may be the retard. Go watch “how reality shows take everything out of context through video editing” and then also the dictionary definition of objective.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/20 04:08 AM
3

Why would she do that? She’s not a fucking malevolent idiot. Outrage culture doesn’t solve shit, look at trump. You want her to do the same thing knowing the results are entirely nothing? Ok. Nice virtue signalling retard.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/20 08:13 PM
1

Cough misogyny subreddit cough
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/20 12:48 AM
2

Dude I’m a math teacher and high school girl just kept saying “I’ll do ANYTHING to pass this class. ANYTHING.” “Ok, do some good math on the final.”
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/20 01:07 AM
1

Ok surely the ticket sales are vastly dwarfed by advertising revenue.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/19 11:33 PM
1

10 year old data, maybe things have changed.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/19 10:21 PM
1

They’re asking for money proportional to their viewership AKA revenue, yes? Guy above you has a point. 130 million to 750 million is a much bigger ratio gap than the 3.4 to 4.4 billion
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/19 10:19 PM
1

I beat my kid once, maybe what, 5 years? I repeatedly assault them and damage their internal organs? Multiple counts. If I do it 20 times, how many years do I owe?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/03/19 06:02 PM
-4

You’re in /r/pussypassdenied man, this sub has a big old cross-population with shut like TD, cringe anarchy, TIA, etc. You’re going to have people who are very comfortable with their racial stereotypes.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/19 12:49 AM
18

I mean this comment screams salty right here. Just because a woman fucks/exhibits herself for cash doesn’t mean she’s not a good person. Did some stripper reject you or something?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/17 02:43 AM
-21

Still nope.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/17 04:04 AM
-29

Oh, if you didn't actually understand I meant that it was ridiculous to say the users of this sub would be mainly egalitarian. No problem with an equality believer. TwoXChromosomes usually just posts terrible shit being done to women, and usually a lot of women. This sub complains about isolated incidents and circle jerks.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/17 02:35 AM
-11

Haha he's also a jerk off instructions and pain porn mod. These guys just can't get real women.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/17 12:14 AM
-51

"Egalitarian" Lol yeah I'd call him crazy for that too.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/17 12:11 AM
6

/r/incels is leaking a lot these days, and the alt-right fuckwits eat it up. Fuck women, amirite?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/17 12:45 AM
28

It's how I saw it, where does it say "income"?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/17 08:45 PM
2

Awww she's fully retarded folks!
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 12:46 AM
0

Oh my god Pannra, it's you! I didn't think the white whale of a trump supporter would surface!
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 12:41 AM
2

How much can I cut off then? Just a little bit and it's ok? You're definitely cutting off sensitive tissue, I fail to see the difference.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 04:05 AM
2

Brainiac you didn't answer, can I trim off a bit of the clitoral hood? How much can I trim off before you get upset about it?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 10:15 PM
9

You mean pleasurable tissue, a flap of skin? What if I only trim off a bit of the hood, is that ok?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 09:14 AM
1

Thank god for you
/r/MensRights12/03/17 05:30 AM
1

Not all American boys man, just remember half their country doesn't even believe in climate change. You think those guys know about genital mutilation or care? That's so weird to hear, it's not even thought of here. My buddy said he might, cause he is, so I just showed him that video about how useless it is. Nobody wants their baby to get hurt.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 05:05 AM
3

He's 100% joking.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 05:02 AM
5

Welcome to the united states, the only country on the planet not to ratify the Convention on the Right rights of Children from the UN.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 05:02 AM
3

We don't prosecute but it's entirely less prevalent, etc. Source: Canada, and I'm uncut, and so are most of my friends. Some are cut, but they have no idea why they were cut, none were religious. We think it's just America leaking into Canada.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 05:01 AM
2

Not the greatest by any metric these days except for non-ppp related GDP and military.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:59 AM
19

Only reason you think it's less crazy is because you're in a society that does it. Plenty of places in Africa do FGM and don't mind it there either.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:58 AM
1

I 100% don't put it on the women, I put it on the men. It's so weird, in Canada we don't hear any of these arguments at all. Most of my friends are uncircumcised. Why would someone get made fun of for it??
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:57 AM
0

...enough people in a culture agreeing can lead to shit like genocide dude, this is why we have objective science. I mean it's not even hard, would you want someone cutting a piece of you off without your permission? Go ahead, give me permission, I promise I'll make sure it isn't "necessary". Are you circumcised? I'm beginning to think this is a desperate cut guy trying to rationalize.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:25 AM
1

If you change your concept of an accepted definition for something, that's on you.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:52 AM
1

What do you think about a parent saying "cut off his earlobes, we like how it looks"? Also not essential, and maybe they think it's an improvement.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:49 AM
1

It is technically mutilation, those body modifications. Mutilation only has a negative connotation because we as a society don't like the idea of disfiguring ourselves. Pierced ears, sure, tattoos, etc. Great. Power to them. Even circumcision, I don't mind if you do it yourself, self-mutilate to your hearts content. I mind when someone chooses to do it for you. You are definitely damaging skin dude. I don't know how we're still debating this. Look, if I cut the earlobes off an infant, I'm mutila…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:02 AM
3

Just sucks because kids don't deserve to have elective, painful surgery without consent. Just because their dad feels it looks better? Come on. We don't just let parents chop off earlobes at birth if they think it'll look better, the only reason we've let this persist is the weird mentality the US has with old-school Christianity and Puritanism.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:42 AM
1

As you did as well. I'm pretty sure you just never responded when I posted how I refuted your points. But hey, that's not getting pissy, right? Or moving on? lol. Because it sounds like you keep moving the goalposts through shitty strawmen arguments.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:31 AM
2

Sure, and it's still the job of the world to say "Hey I'm sorry but your parents were wrong." I can agree that someone shouldn't be so abrasive when doing it, absolutely.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:17 AM
1

lol Strawman is the act of reducing arguments so that they're easier to argue against. Every single time you go "WELL I BET YOU THINK THAT ABOUT THIS EXTREME SITUATION" You're using a strawman argument. You're fighting a statement that buddy never put forward, and I didn't either. Ad Hominem doesn't apply here because I'm attacking your arguing style, not your person. Your arguments are fallacious and immature, it's not ad hominem to point that out and warn people about you.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:16 AM
1

I'm so glad that you're not just acting like a twat with your strawman arguments against me, good luck /u/-redditardation-, the kid kept trying to reduce circumcision down to strawman arguments against me and I eventually told him to go fuck himself. Have fun.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:08 AM
2

Injure? Many would argue its not an injury. This is where you lose me and I think you're grasping at straws trying to avoid the Mutilation definition. It is absolutely an injury, you are cutting off skin. You are absolutely disfiguring a piece of body permanently. It may make it look more appealing to some, but it's still disfiguring the same as piercing your ear is. The big difference there is that an ear can heal over the piercing, so it's not quite as invasive, though I still don't agree with…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:56 AM
1

We're not trying to say it's not normal, we're trying to point out that it's worth thinking outside of that box because there are both botched circumcisions and it causes extreme pain to the child for no reason. It sucks that he was raised thinking he's perfect, but somebody he'll have to believe otherwise. We're all ok, but there's nothing 'perfect' about it. It's like parents who are climate deniers telling their kids "no it's ok that you don't believe in science sweetie, you've got the right …
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:53 AM
5

I'm sorry, as opposed to loudly being sarcastic and making strawman arguments like you? Again, you can go and sit on a sharp stick, and rotate. I notice you had no slam-dunk shit reply so you resorted to Ad Hominem now instead, as if my message lacks merit. Here are the refutations since you need a catch-up there little buddy: 1) I pointed out your studies about cervical cancer are selective and only based around heavily promiscuous/at-risk people, it doesn't make a significant difference in nor…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:46 AM
5

I'm sorry, are you deflecting and ignoring the fact that I just refuted your point? You can go fuck yourself. Young men shouldn't have to suffer mutilation because some guy had a penchant for trying to cut down on masturbation. It causes outright pain and disfigures a person for life, no recourse. I'm sorry, and did you just say 'could not harm their future or life'? Here, click this: https://www.google.ca/search?q=circumcision+complications&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjugcDA58_SAhXBKGM…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:25 AM
4

lol you're referring to ONE study in Uganda. I already said they say it's an objective benefit in countries where HIV/AIDS runs rampant, because it reduces the amount of skin available for infection. Here's some studies for you since you're being so aggressive and dense all at once: A 2002 paper in the New England Journal of Medicine studied men in Europe, Asia, and Latin America, and found that circumcision was correlated with a decreased risk of penile HPV infection (this correlation is corrob…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:14 AM
5

It is mutilation, despite his condescension. We could be cutting off earlobes, instead, and people would be up in arms. They aren't over this because of history and tradition and religion. The US is a weird place.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:06 AM
3

It's cool that it worked out that way for you, it certainly doesn't for everyone. It definitely is mutilating a baby, by definition, without their say, for no objective benefits. I'm a big spokesman for choice, my mother had me in 1990 and said even then that she did a lot of research into it before deciding to not make that choice for me. Her logic was "I didn't want to cut off sensitive tissue for no reason."
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:05 AM
5

There's objective, scientific benefits to shots. What part of 'optional mutilation' don't you get?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:03 AM
2

Dude, it IS mutilation. Here's the definition: Mutilate: to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:04 AM
8

It also explicitly causes pain. You are cutting off skin that is meant to be there. WebMD is a dumb source to just say "well WebMD says it, that's a consensus!" From Wikipedia: The positions of the world's major medical organizations range from considering elective circumcision of babies and children as having no benefit and significant risks to having a modest health benefit that outweighs small risks. No major medical organization recommends either universal circumcision of all males or bannin…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 11:21 PM
3

Would you modify a baby's body without their permission? Maybe put plugs in their ears? Edit: Oh I can see you agreed already, ok. "Sure, I don't think it should be done without consent." And I mean, we shouldn't say "well I don't consider it hardcore mutilation so therefore I will ignore it." That's not nice. Edit 2: As you keep arguing it, I'll just leave the definition here. Mutilate: to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts. Sounds like cutting off a …
/r/MensRights11/03/17 11:17 PM
2

Why is it so important to you that other dicks look worse than yours? It kind of sounds like you're insecure about your dick and want to put down others to make yourself feel better. I'm uncircumsized and so are most of my friends, but it doesn't really matter. Women love my penis, my girlfriend loves my penis. It 100% hurts your child, massive amounts of pain. You're cutting off skin that is meant to be there. If you want to hurt/scar your child just so they can be a little lazier when washing,…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 11:11 PM
0

That's really weird, it isn't in Canada.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 09:03 PM
58

What? It isn't recommended to circumcise at all, it's a choice. Jesus people who have 0 information about birth and youth should not make comments about this. Edit: Anyone reading this, the US also currently has another huge shame on it about children, it is the only country able to sign that has still not ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child, a human rights document that guarantees rights for children. THIS is what you should be fighting for, it's unbelievable that your country ha…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:08 PM
1

Lol abortion is under massive attack, if you haven't been watching the news.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 04:40 AM
2

Really? You can't shout this and then not provide abortions. 10 bucks says the_donald supporters are upvoting this; There's some fucking irony there.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 04:37 AM
1

Had to change usernames eh? Wonder why.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 02:47 AM
1

Bill Clinton had three, and the women testified under oath that they did everything consensually. Bill Cosby never had an official charge against him either you know. We accept it because with that much evidence, and witnesses, it's obvious. With trump, it's obvious. He bragged about it on video, his tactics. And he's right, women have kept silent because they've been intimidated and thought nobody would believe them. Study after study shows that that happens. I'm a MRA too man. I hate the idea …
/r/MensRights25/01/17 07:47 PM
1

You're joking right? Why don't you read and let me know what you find. Dozens of women linking him with specific times and places that he was, with witnesses. Even multiple suits filed, he settled out of court (guilty). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations Is this how people support him? They just go "well I'll believe a lie."
/r/MensRights25/01/17 05:39 PM
4

He's had dozens of women come forward giving correlating accounts of fucked up, rapist behaviour. Cosby had the same thing. Trump is a rapist/violator.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 05:29 PM
7

Eh, he's still resorting to ad hominem rather than defend his shitty comment. His comment WAS shitty.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/17 02:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter