TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SiliconRain Archive

View 0 posts and 28 comments by SiliconRain on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
23

I'm kinda surprised that 'car guys' are an identifiable demographic for these women. Do they just mean men that like cars as a hobby? Men who have (nice?) cars? I've seen everything from roided-up gym rats to skinny nerdy dudes to middle aged hairy guys all into cars. It's a broad church. I'm struggling to think what she's got in her mind when she says 'car guys'.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/02/21 06:17 AM
8

Is that overall or is that the ratio for the dating-age demographic?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/10/20 09:54 AM
7

SB?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/03/20 06:39 PM
15

"Practicing self-love" has become a euphemism for indulgence, narcissism and justifying lack of self-control.
/r/MGTOW19/02/20 09:46 AM
7

Holy shit how do I un-read that?
/r/MGTOW30/01/20 04:47 PM
25

AWALT All Women Are Like That
/r/MGTOW20/12/19 04:35 PM
2

The car and the beard are both beautiful. I bet the house and the investments are too. Good on you, my man. Enjoy your new life!
/r/MGTOW15/12/19 12:37 AM
2

Nice one, living with your parents is a great way to reduce your outgoings and it sounds like you're in a strong position. I'm not here to give you financial advice and I appreciate you didn't ask for it, but it's worth thinking carefully about buying new cars at all in the future. The received wisdom is that they're always poor financial decisions, but I appreciate the die is already cast on that decision for you! You'll find the balance of lifestyle and saving that works for you, but it sounds…
/r/MGTOW12/09/19 06:28 PM
5

You'll find the right job when you graduate if you have persistence, patience and resilience. A lot of people I know just ended up slipping back into low-skilled jobs after graduating because a grad role didn't fall in their lap. Start looking as soon as you hit your final year of college. Have a linkedin profile and put in some effort to make it as complete and professional as possible. Get the feelers out for internships at good companies etc. If you're willing to put in the effort, you'll get…
/r/MGTOW12/09/19 08:39 AM
16

Reminds me of the white guy vs black guy vs pretty girl bike theft experiment. Spoiler: people challenge the white guy, physically stop the black guy and actually help the pretty girl to steal the bike.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 11:26 AM
1

Really? What was hard to read about it?
/r/MensRights27/08/14 09:31 PM
-5

The OP is essentially saying that the feminist argument is "Women get no attention or representation anywhere and women's issues are never highlighted", which he has torn down by showing a high-profile instance of a women's issue being highlighted. But that's not exactly a feminist argument; it's similar to what a feminist might say, but it's not actually a position that a feminist would realistically defend, hence it is a straw man.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 11:35 AM
7

I absolutely agree with a lot of what you say about equality of opportunity and proportional demographic representation. My argument is that enforcing quotas is not equality of opportunity. You can't force women to go into politics or business and so you'd just be penalising otherwise talented men who do want to be company directors but wouldn't be able to because the places that they would occupy must be reserved for women, even if the female candidate who would occupy that position is less exp…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 06:34 PM
20

Not necessarily, but there are fewer women with business, accounting and STEMS degrees. Having to draw disproportionately from a small pool because of regulation means that you're going to have to promote people who otherwise would not be seen as meriting a promotion. There aren't fewer women on boards because of institutional sexism; there are fewer women on boards because fewer women choose to study subjects that would qualify them for such positions. There are also fewer female refuse workers…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 03:06 PM
14

Furthermore, since when is being sexually attractive not a female power fantasy? How many times have you seen men buy expensive things, give up their time, going to the ends of the earth and much more for a beautiful woman? On the few occasions I've been in a strip club, I couldn't help but look around and see men handing cold hard cash from their pockets into the hands of women who give them basically nothing in return. Tell me, who has the power in that relationship? Call it dumb, call it clev…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 06:17 PM
2

A girlfriend once admitted to me that the reason a lot of women freak out when the toilet seat is left up is because they will often go to sit down without looking and actually fall into the toilet. They're too embarrassed to admit that they fell into the toilet but they still get really pissed off and throw a fit, but just claim it's about principle or whatever to save from having to admit that they just got their butt wet. I don't know how true or universal that is, but I found it pretty amusi…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:13 PM
19

I totally agree. I just meant to illustrate the gender-reversed equivalent unfair generalisation of the one represented in the comic.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 08:35 PM
43

A casually teased man at work laughs it off as a joke (as it is); a casually teased woman at work takes it personally, cries about it and files a formal complaint against her coworker.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 05:50 PM
16

It did come out that way, but that was just an accident. I can assure you, I'm being sincere.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 10:58 PM
43

Wow, man you have quite a way with words. I hope you don't mind that I'm going to steal that so I can look as eloquent and erudite next time I get into a men's rights argument.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:23 PM
13

Yes. That shit. That made my freakin blood boil. How dare she be so gleeful in her pseudo-feminist hypocrisy?
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:20 PM
11

That's the tragic thing man: we're here to discuss and support each other with regards to men's rights issues. We don't even campaign or fight, we just come for mutual reassurance that we are not alone in facing discrimination as men and try to give constructive advice to those that need it. Exactly like the male equivalent of a female-oriented forum. But it's only us that have to deal with numerous groups being created both inside Reddit and elsewhere with the explicit intention of harassing, c…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 11:50 AM
4

Jesus, the gender discrimination in the justice system is just appalling. No man could ever have this kind of control over a woman, no matter what evils she had committed. (Nor should he, for that matter) That a woman can withdraw a man's freedom at the snap of her fingers if he can't make enough money makes me tremble with indignation. If anyone ever asks me what I'm talking about when I say "female privilege", I will point to this example. It's disgusting, degrading and heart-breaking.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 03:37 PM
1

How do you know?
/r/MensRights20/12/11 10:49 PM
-1

Yes, I understand how peer review works. I've been published several times and I know how much scrutiny your methodology is put under before publication. And I'm not in medicine, which has a reputation for being the most difficult field to be published in. If your study has methodological flaws (in the eyes of experts on the subject) you will not be published, especially not in The Lancet. I understand the methodological criticisms you guys are talking about and accept them as legitimate. But I'…
/r/MensRights20/12/11 08:25 AM
0

Yeh, sorry. That paper is published; it was edited into officeroffkilter's comment after I replied to it. I was referring to the first paper he linked.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 08:15 AM
-3

As much as methodological scrutiny is important, the papers I cited have been peer reviewed and published in some of the most prestigious (and hence rigorous) medical journals. The study you cite has not been peer reviewed nor published. I don't have time to go through it in detail, but figure 1, for example, takes it's data not from a recognised, peer-reviewed source but from an advocacy website, which has a clear and explicit axe to grind. I don't want to lecture anyone about confirmation bias…
/r/MensRights19/12/11 08:45 PM
-7

Actually, circumcision significantly reduces rates of HIV infection on the part of the man (not sure about the effect on the woman, probably no difference but IDK). This study shows a 40% risk reduction. This study, published in The Lancet, shows a 53% reduction. This 15-study meta-analysis shows a 42% reduced risk among circumcised men. This paper, published in the BMJ, emphasises the large risk reduction to circumcised men and explains that the modus operandi of this risk reduction is that the…
/r/MensRights19/12/11 08:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter