TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Silvangelz Archive

View 0 posts and 51 comments by Silvangelz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

None of that makes sense. If sex is such an important part of the relationship then why wouldn't you want to marry someone who you know likes to have sex instead of someone who is more reserved about it? That just seems like setting yourself up for a dead bedroom situation. In addition you're shaming a woman for doing the exact same thing you want to do. So again - no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/23 09:34 PM
1

But the person I was replying back to said that the second woman is just as bad as the first because the second woman wants a relationship, not just casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/23 08:44 PM
4

But you just said that men don't want to have sex with women who have lots of sex. So which one is it? I mean really all you're doing here is making men look like hypocrites - they want to have sex with women who like to have sex, but they'll look down on that women because she likes to have sex; they want to have sex with women who don't have sex as often as the first woman (because she's somehow worth more by not having sex as much), but then you'll look down on this woman who doesn't have sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/23 04:26 PM
10

Your question pretty much illustrated the illogical nature of it. Why wouldn't men - who only value women for sex - want to have sex with a woman who wants sex? It really doesn't make sense to shame a woman for doing the exact thing that men also want to do. Or to call her dirty or lesser for doing the exact thing that men want to do. Unless it's more that men only want to have sex with women who make sex a challenge....and if that's the line of thinking then it's not even about the sex. It's ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/23 01:46 PM
4

Maybe, maybe not. But saying it like this puts the onus of maintaining/fixing society on women because that's basically what your comment boils down to - that women are responsible for saving society from single men by being available (intimately) for men. That womens' standards need to be on average low enough so that a majority of men can get a relationship (so that these men don't fuck over society). There needs to be something done to help these men outside of the focus on women. Just as wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 06:55 PM
1

You’re calling men whores. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 03:35 PM
10

Using this logic shouldnt the woman also be out fucking other men? You know since it's helping these other men 'practice their skill' and be attractive to their partners as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 03:20 PM

Yes and no. Honestly giving money like this for all babies will result in some people being incentivized to rape regardless. Most rapes aren't done with the intention of impregnation though. It's power and control over someone else. Most rapists will be happy with just the rape - they won't care if there's a child or money for that child after.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/23 05:14 PM

....but now you're punishing the child for it's mothers' decision to rape the dad. Also abortion vending machines? That's not how abortion works. It's healthcare - you need to have a doctor to perform whichever procedure is needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/23 05:00 PM
6

It really amazes me how many men in this sub seem to personally know every single woman in the world well enough to say what shes like/what kind of partner or life she wants. Just astounding. How do you do it? Oh that's right - you make generalizing statements about women being a monolith in some kind of way to pass off as facts when it's only really your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/23 12:12 PM

I said penetration only was off the table - all other sex acts are still on. Oral, hands, toys - they're all still on the table. She's not denying sex - just changing what it encompasses. She just wants to eliminate the possibility of getting pregnant again and penetration is the main one that has that risk. I can see that you don't see the irony in saying you won't go under a scalpel to significantly reduce the possibility of pregnancy but she should absolutely risk getting pregnant again and a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 08:56 PM

......you do realize marriage doesn't mean you own someone right? You're talking like you just automatically get to have access to someone else's body and can do what you want because you entered into a union with them. That's a pretty crazy way to view marriage. There's an expectation of sex in a relationship - but it's not an obligation. You are never obligated to let someone else use your body without your consent no matter how close you are to that person.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 07:54 PM

And you're putting all the blame on the woman because she didn't want to have sex with him. Why didn't she want to have sex with him? (And don't say she was complacent because you don't actually know that for a fact. You're making an assumption to suit your narrative)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 07:49 PM

How is that weaponizing sex when it's being suggested because it's in the benefit of both parties - no more pregnancies or pregnancy scares? There are other sex acts besides penetration that can be done to satisfy the need for sexual intimacy. Condoms and birth control are not 100% effective - there's a risk each time. We're talking about a woman and her partner that don't want to have anymore kids. So basically when you're saying 'oh we'll just use condoms or birth control then or I'll leave' (…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 05:03 PM
1

The most extreme example said by a small percentage of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 06:06 PM
3

Hypothetical question - she asks and you say no. She accepts that but then says that penetrative sex is off the table. Would you accept that and stay together?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 01:20 PM
1

I think on average most women already understand that (some) men are jealous and bitter about women getting sex more easily - it's practically a continuous topic anymore. I find it a bit silly though considering that the fact it's so easy for women IS because of men. Perhaps men should work on dealing with these feelings in a constructive manner. Its normal to feel jealousy and bitterness when you can't have something you want (that you see other people having) but it's very self-defeating to ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:02 PM
1

Oh boy. This is just insane. Planet wide vandalism because a woman 200 years ago asked for equal opportunity education for women....the horror! Planet wide vandalism because girls and boys were being educated together.....and these girls started living their own lives instead of immediately loving the first man to show interest in them as per the woman's 'promise'. Double horror! My dude - you can't call this a source for the state of education between men and women. You can't call it a source f…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 07:38 PM
1

This started with a quote you provided from a woman apparently making a promise to all men that women will love men more freely and be more nurturing and caring if men would just unshackle women. Though this was in regards to providing the same education to girls that boys get the use of the word unshackle is important here because it means that women were held back. At the time of this quote men had all the power; women had no power to really affect anything. How are women supposed to be able t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 06:11 PM
1

So your source for co-education being bad and specifically women educators being bad for men is that in the past men decided who got education. And men were also so magnanimous to be willing to provide some educational opportunities for women as well - but separated and different education of course. Wouldn't want women learning how to contribute to society and making something of themselves outside a man - no they learned how to contribute to a man while men learned how to contribute to society…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 05:44 PM
1

Right. And men denying women the opportunity of the same education that men got is not holding women down? It's not subjugating women by providing them with less opportunities than men get? That's what you're saying - is that we should go back to where men received all the opportunities in life. While women were forced into one narrow 'opportunity' where the main beneficial party was men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 05:03 PM
2

You're literally blaming women for things men make the conscious decision to do that women had no part in. The fix to this is not women just freely offering themselves to men to prevent this - the fix is men working on themselves so they don't fly into a rage and do horrific shit just because they don't have access to someone else's body. Do you seriously not see how infantile it is to say it's women's fault they were raped or killed or their family dies in a war because they didn't have sex wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 04:42 PM
1

Be more specific and actually provide sources. Otherwise what you are saying is just YOUR OPINION - not a fact as you're trying to imply.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 04:09 PM
1

So if I'm understanding you correctly what you're saying is men should go back to subjugating women because women aren't freely loving any man that shows them attention. Do you hear how you sound? And how would that not be punishing women? When that is literally what we were fighting to get out of. That's like saying 'hey that slave didn't thank me for freeing him from slavery! I'm going to re-en-slave him.'
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 04:08 PM
3

First of all it was the Chinese government that created that gender imbalance. It wasn't women with some malicious plot to abort their female fetuses just so they can take advantage of men later. And considering why female fetuses were aborted more than males - why shouldn't women take advantage of this imbalance in a society that historically valued and treated them as less because they're women? Men would do the exact same thing if the roles were reversed. That's just human nature. You also ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 04:02 PM
1

So men are complaining because some women are reducing the size of dating pools for themselves by having 'unrealistic standards' for their romantic partner? So basically men are complaining because some women are removing themselves from their (the men's) dating pools.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 01:56 PM
1

What is it that makes women not good teachers for boys?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 01:34 PM
2

You do realize that one singular woman does not have the ability to 'make a promise' on behalf of all women, for all time, right? Also bringing up the point that men built everything is not the gotcha you think it is. Men built everything because they forced themselves to be the only ones building everything by not allowing women to participate in the workforce. It's hypocritical to try and use this as some kind of fault of women when men prevented women from helping.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 01:31 PM
1

Please provide a source that supports your last point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 01:10 PM
3

Women's standards are not a problem. People are allowed to have whatever standards they want for a romantic partner. If it limits their pool of potential partners then that's on them - but it's not a malicious act being perpetrated against men. Saying that women are to blame (because of their high standards) for men's inability to get a relationship is essentially saying that women should have less of a choice in who their partner is while men get more of a choice. It's saying that because a man…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 04:20 PM
2

The 'less baggage' defense for age gap relationships always cracks me up because it begs the question - where did this baggage come from that older women have that makes them so undesirable to men in their own age group?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 10:26 PM
5

In an above comment you said you're 19 - you've barely just begun your adult life. The 10 women you've slept with ( who I'm assuming are around your age yes? So young just like you with the same maturity antics as you) does not give you the experience or wisdom to be able to claim that ALL women are greedy hypergamous bitches/sluts. There's millions of women on this planet and your sample size of 10 is not enough to claim your assumption as fact. Maybe you should be focusing on what you want YOU…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 02:31 PM
1

I read a comment a while ago that really resonated with me on the divide between men and women and how it's partially due to upbringing. Basically it was that 100 years ago boys were raised to go to school, get a job, then get married and have kids. Provide for the family. Girls were raised to find a man, get married and have kids. Support the husband and family. Then about 50ish years ago as women were finally given the same rights that men already enjoyed (having their own bank account and mon…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 05:33 PM

So you took something ONE woman said and are now generalizing it to all women? That's like saying one time I heard a man say that he likes anime - therefore all men like anime. You can't hold a single statement by one individual as a monolith for millions of other people. Just doesn't work that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 12:29 PM
2

I keep seeing posts like this insinuating a large percentage of women showing outrage over the passport bros movement and I'd love to see examples of this. Where is this coming from? Maybe I'm just not seeing it but the most response I've seen from women on this is that they're fine with it, just worried about the treatment of the foreign women when she comes to the country. There's no outrage expressed toward the men (maybe disgust), just concern for the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 07:13 PM
1

If you’re having trouble getting into a relationship your post is the reason why. You view women as two dimensional beings who are either sluts/whores or prudes. Their only value is in how they can please you sexually. I assume you then treat women the way you perceive them through these two lenses. You will not advance very far in life with such limited thinking. You’ll probably remain pretty stationary in life until you realize that women are complex individuals - just like men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 06:41 PM
1

And again I’ll say - a better family dynamic does not happen when you unduly burden one half of the partnership with all the chores and work of running a household (in addition to working outside the home) just because of their gender while the other half gets to sit on the couch after their work day is done with no additional worries. That’s not a healthy or functioning dynamic. These static roles (roles assigned by a society predominantly run by men) you’re talking about that were done in the …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/23 07:37 PM
1

Just because something was done a certain way in the past doesn't mean it's automatically right. Betterment of the family happens when everyone contributes to the family - not one person doing 90% of the work while the other just contributes via finances and then checks out when at home.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/23 06:21 PM
1

The pill for men wasn't approved because the men who tested it didn't like the side effects - the same side effects in womens' contraception.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 03:23 PM
7

Everyone can have their preferences - I’m not disputing that. But there is absolutely a hypocritical nature with a preference for virginity in commitment when that person has not saved their own virginity for said commitment. It is hypocritical to shame someone or deem them not worthy because they participated in the very same activity that the shamer enjoyed participating in.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 06:05 PM
10

A shorter person wanting to date a taller person is not a hypocritical preference - that is just a preference based on physical traits. The only way that would be hypocritical is if the shorter person had a choice in their own height and chose to be short, then went around saying how great it is to be short and how many short people they've been with but that they could never commit lifelong to a short person because tall people are better. That's hypocrisy. To reword this back to the post it wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 05:49 PM
5

It doesn't make mathematical sense and it is hypocritical. Who are men supposed to have sex with if women shouldn't be having sex? I've seen many comments by men about it being right and acceptable for men to want and have sex...but then turn around to say that women's value is in their virginity. It's a hypocritical double standard - that's all it is. And for anyone saying that preferring a virgin wife is ok because it's a preference - you're only partially right. It is a preference and to each…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 05:01 PM
1

Ask yourself this - do men do stuff only with the intention of getting women’s attention? Or do they do it because they like it and want to for themselves? Now apply that to women. Yes there are some women who actively do stuff just to get men’s attention - but you can’t apply that to ALL women. If a majority of women are saying that they wear makeup or get cosmetic surgery for themselves because they like how it looks then they’re not doing it for someone else. They’re doing it for themselves. …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 11:59 PM
23

Not emotional detachment - that will just cause more issues down the line if they're constantly stuffing down their emotions. Emotional control/regulation is what is needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/23 02:22 PM

She never said hers is high now - you inferred that from what she said. For all you know it could only be 5 now. And it doesn’t prove any point - everyone starts at zero. When someone gets in a relationship and has sex then the number of partners they’ve had sex with increases. Which is obvious - of course that happens. That’s how it works. You have yet to prove your point that lower body counts have a direct correlation to long term commitment and marriage longevity. She has provided evidence t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 05:58 PM

What stats? If you make a claim like that you should back it up with evidence. Otherwise you’re just stating an opinion as fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 05:32 PM

Actually they proved that your point is not true - there’s no added benefit to choosing woman A because woman A can still leave the relationship. Choosing the woman with the low body count does not automatically guarantee a long lasting relationship or that that relationship will be better than one with woman B.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 05:30 PM

You didn’t answer my first question. Why would having experience prevent or negate the ability of long term commitment and marriage longevity? That doesn’t make any sense. That’s like saying the less experience you have at something the better you’ll do….which is just simply not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 05:09 PM

You never explained why there would be no benefit to choosing the promiscuous woman. As this is just an opinion of yours can you explain why you think there’s no benefit? Also I’m curious if this situation was flipped - do you think women should only go for men that have a small body count like woman A?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 04:53 PM
2

Where are you getting this idea that women find the idea of men being easier upsetting and creepy? Because I’ve never seen that said. What I have seen said is that women are upset and creeped out when sex is the primary focus of men instead of getting to know the woman. Especially when it’s in the first interactions and a man is already asking what’s your favorite sex position, do you like using toys, or can you send some nudes. Or they just straight up send dick pics. When sex is the primary fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 07:25 PM
14

This kind of logic is flawed because essentially you’re saying that nobody can do anything. Because it might create envy or jealousy from another person. That just simply won’t work. You have to learn to control your own emotional responses and not put them on someone else as their responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 12:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter