TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SimCity8000 Archive

View 0 posts and 232 comments by SimCity8000 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

lol you are making a collage of my comments and replying to a three-month-old comment. happy new year?
/r/MensRights04/01/17 03:48 PM
-2

some stereotypes are harmless but some are racist. southerners are good at barbecues? not harmful. arabs/muslims are violent terrorists? that's a racist stereotype. another example: there are people who inhabit men's rights who are concerned about harmful stereotypes against men, and will claim they are sexist.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 06:37 PM
-1

OK but are the people in this thread literal children
/r/MensRights19/09/16 02:39 PM
0

what's going on here, did two 7-year olds finally get Facebook and are already fighting about gender stereotypes?
/r/MensRights19/09/16 01:56 PM
1

You should easily win fun at the person, if they no longer feel they have to go back behind the boys. Yes ... yes! It's all so clear now.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 05:50 PM
1

if you're going to try to turn this discussion into how well i remember the 90's, I'm out. Not productive, and silly. And condescending. Bye.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 02:04 PM
1

All I can say is that you are probably going to end-up very disappointed in a few years. Yeah. She'll be the executive office in a government structure set up to limit what she can do, in a political environment where the other party will shut down government just to be petulant. Coming out the other side of the Obama administration, no fucking doubt I'm going to be disappointed but it won't necessarily be Clinton's fault. You don't need to paraphrase her bio at the State Dept. web site. I alrea…
/r/MensRights12/09/16 01:48 PM
1

i don't see any feminist outrage. am i missing something?
/r/MensRights11/09/16 04:21 PM
8

Threatening suicide is used as a form of emotional manipulation in relationships, and this guy is in court right now under charges of harassment. He breached his restraining order. There are places to get help, but the woman he's charged with harassing is not one of those places.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 04:11 PM
1

I'm old enough not to respond to your age baiting. I do think it's pretty funny you think Clinton's foreign policy towards Russia is worrying, specifically considering Trump's relationship with Russia looking more mob-style financial debt. Clinton took the reins of the State Department after Bush's foreign policy deeply damaged America's reputation. She played a role in getting the world's biggest superpowers on board with Iran sanctions, so they wouldn't be able to develop nuclear weapons, she …
/r/MensRights11/09/16 03:32 PM
1

TIL men don't like to be told this.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 06:57 PM
1

Oh interesting Kenny did apologize for Bay of Pigs and made improvements in his foreign policy. I do think it's interesting that this is something you afford Kennedy but won't extend to Clinton, whose service as Secretary of State wasn't a disaster, despite what the right wants Americans to believe.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 02:46 PM
1

You're getting all that from a bullet point list that looks like it was drafted in 2004 by a 15-year-old for a high school health project?
/r/MensRights10/09/16 02:21 PM
1

I didn't say she was a saint, and incidentally she happens to be a politician who admits mistakes. What other leader are you aware of who admits their mistakes and learns from them? For me, that instils confidence that she is using her experience wisely. I don't care who up vote by the way, lol. This is Reddit, not the general election.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 02:09 PM
-4

I'm familiar w the Fbi papers and how they were much ado about nothing. Politifact is a non-partisan fact checker so there is no reason for them to be charitable or uncharitable. They simply check facts against political statements and reporting.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 08:51 PM
1

The majority of Americans have never been made up of white males though...
/r/MensRights09/09/16 08:38 PM
1

It's little more complicated than that. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/19/politifact-sheet-hillary-clintons-email-controvers/
/r/MensRights09/09/16 06:43 PM
1

Isn't there a leaked email from Colin Powell out there to Clinton where he tells her he kept private servers too? You are basically toeing the anti-Clinton line, which has no regard to reality if this is how you see her.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:42 PM
2

Uh, no. First of all, that bullet point makes no sense. Further, if we take this list as gospel to what makes a relationship abusive, literally every relationship is abusive. May he or she who never rolled their eyes at their mom as a teen cast the first stone.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 02:47 PM
12

This is one of the bullet points: Present a wonderful face to the world and is well liked by outsiders Uhhh
/r/MensRights09/09/16 02:32 PM
0

look at the context. i'm not talking about the general American population, i'm talking about candidates for president, which is what this entire post and discussion is about.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 02:22 PM
-2

What other explanation do you have for it? That white men are actually the superior race and gender?
/r/MensRights09/09/16 02:12 PM
5

Exactly. I don't know what is so controversial about voting for the most qualified candidate and a person who has dedicated their career to helping people.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 02:02 PM
-7

exactly. the white male demographic has been the de facto candidate in America for the entire history of America only because the majority of Americans believe that a leader needs to be a white male.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 01:51 PM
7

There are a couple problems. First it paints a false equivalence between what drives these crimes: What drives women to throw their babies in a dumpster? In a vast majority of cases, it's poverty, which for many women includes a lack of access to family planning options such as birth control or abortion. These women are driven by self preservation and desperation and while the act is heinous, our society has responded by creating safe havens for women to deposit their babies if they can't take c…
/r/MensRights08/09/16 07:40 PM
22

The only thing i'm offended by here is the bad logic.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 04:06 PM
1

Oh! Ok. Thanks. But doesn't that happen after conviction? I admit I'm a little suspicious of the veracity of OP's story...
/r/MensRights06/09/16 07:10 PM
1

what is an RSO?
/r/MensRights06/09/16 03:24 PM
1

Like I said ... my point flew over your head. Not too much I can do about that. Cheers!
/r/MensRights05/09/16 11:59 PM
1

Spending God knows how much time reading my Twitter activity is weird and indicative of social problems. (Sorry!) Taking the time to respond to a reply to a message is not. If you don't see how the term bitching and moaning is regularly used to discredit women, you blind, son. Misogyny is as misogyny does and you are pretty clearly doing it. Again, sorry to state facts. And because you demonstrate the critical thinking skills it takes to comprehend how the MRA tendency to pounce on unpopular opi…
/r/MensRights05/09/16 08:59 PM
1

Hey if I'm gonna get bombarded w people responding to me comments, it's much more convenient to be able to reply w/o the wait. I'm not bitching and moaning, I'm stating a fact. By the way, i love it so much when people like you use gendered words in your attempts to refute my claims that /r/men's rights is a misogynist space. Words such as "bitching" and "moaning", for example. It is just so amusing to watch you guys double down on your misogyny while claiming you're not. Thanks for that.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 02:43 PM
1

uh huh. uh huh, uh huh, uh huh. sure. have fun in my posting history. i'll be over here kinda hoping you get a life.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 12:13 AM
1

I do. And I have achieved it here. Not with you, obviously. But it has happened.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 03:14 AM
1

Why are you even engaging me if not to have a civil discussion? What's the point?
/r/MensRights03/09/16 01:31 AM
1

you're not an MRA. you just come here to defend them. gotcha. you've never come to me with an intelligent comment that's made me think, so why would i ever care what you thought of me?
/r/MensRights02/09/16 07:06 PM
1

i've run across you back when i was using a different username probably over a year ago. you've always been one of the more immature MRAs who tend to resort to namecalling rather than civil discussion. there are like a handful of you who are really embarrassing to the rest of the movement.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 02:07 PM
1

If an opponent of an ideology is changing the definition of said ideology in order to justify their opposition of it, what exactly are they opposing? The ideology, or their conception of it? If they oppose their own conception of the ideology rather than its actual manifestation, this is what is extremely unhelpful to discussion. I do know the dictionary definition gets posted here often, and I've seen a variety of counter-arguments to it, which usually end up being a person trying to hold me ac…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 11:49 PM
1

There is a comment in my history from about week back that simply shares the dictionary definition of feminism to a person here. That comment was down voted 47 times. Now obviously I don't think there is collusion, I don't think people are out to get me and my intention is not to play the victim card (thanks for that, btw). But to get down voted by 47 people for literally sharing the dictionary definition of a term is outside the bounds of Reddit's etiquette. I do believe the ideal is to not dow…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 10:46 PM
0

this top comment is from a two-year-old reddit post about what brigading means: It's when a group of people get together to down vote the same thing, be it a single person, or a group of people representing a dissenting ideology. How is what is happening to me not brigading?
/r/MensRights31/08/16 07:11 PM
1

my sub? that's not my sub. i am not a mod there. i am a user. i have no idea what the moderation policies are over there.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 07:01 PM
0

Cool. My karma was higher until I came to this subreddit, btw. The brigading of unpopular opinions on /r/mensrights is a pretty immature tendency. it takes advantage of reddit's attempt to weed out bots by instead muting the ability of people with differing opinions to engage in discussions here, but I'm sure you are aware of this problem.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:52 PM
0

hey /u/sillymod i would participate in the discussion but /r/mensrights is limiting my comments to once every 10 minutes, making participation mighty cumbersome. (for the record i haven't reported this thread. but i'm not even going to try to engage in debate here if i can't reply to people.)
/r/MensRights31/08/16 01:59 PM
2

i love how this straight-up fact is getting downvoted.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 02:56 PM
1

The person you use in your example is a member of your own family, who is presumably was not disseminating sexist over the internet for dozens (hundreds? i don't know the reach that post got) to debate. if the guy who created this meme was simply sharing his own experiences without attacking another gender - which he needlessly and viciously did - it wouldn't be a problem. am i laughing at him, btw? i don't think so. there was nothing mocking about my post, actually. it was a serious comment abo…
/r/MensRights29/08/16 06:53 PM
0

I think your words veil something terrible. Firstly, you claim that women are incapable of the same previsions as men. Of course you think my words veil something terrible - you are literally putting them in my mouth. Women are not perpetuating violent, predatory behaviours at the same frequency and with the same severity as men. That's different than saying women are women are incapable of the same behaviours as men, full stop. There is nuance there. I have faith you are capable of understandin…
/r/MensRights29/08/16 02:18 PM
1

In AMR you were claiming women aren't capable of assaulting men and that helping male victims is misogyny. Sorry I'm not going to read past this sentence because it's so ludicrous. I don't believe that women aren't capable of assaulting men and I've never used that argument. IN FACT I've talked at length to people in this subreddit about how in my career I have seen men affected by DV and sex assault and I feel there should be more supports for them. So if you are going to intentionally misinter…
/r/MensRights29/08/16 02:08 PM
1

i read your article, i shared my thoughts on it in a respectful manner and this is your response - sarcastic, defensive, and weirdly fixated on what happens in female spaces on reddit. in other words: your response basically just proves my point. cheers. have a nice day.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 03:47 PM
1

while i wasn't familiar with decrow specifically, i am familiar with the issues she championed. and i do agree with her on a lot of points regarding fair custody laws and the fact men need to be protected and given supports the way our society has decided women need to be protected and given supports. but i don't agree with her stance on sexual violence, at least the way the author of the atlantic article interprets it. but that's fine - i think critical discourse and the ability to disagree pla…
/r/MensRights28/08/16 12:30 AM
1

If I were in a situation where it was appropriate to be in a support group situation with male DV victims, and one of those victims was complaining about female DV victims and generally saying misogynist things about women, I would ask that man to find a more constructive way to deal with his trauma. Hopefully moderators of support groups do that when the conversation derails from positive support for male DV victims to harping on women. But Reddit is not a support group, so i'm not sure that's …
/r/MensRights27/08/16 06:07 PM
-4

yep
/r/MensRights27/08/16 05:45 PM
1

classic.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 05:24 PM
-1

Dude if you're talking about that awful meme that derails female victims and perpetuates harmful and untrue stereotypes about women, perhaps you should think more carefully about what you are saying. I feel for men who are victims of sex assault. I live in an area of North America that was hard hit by Catholic priest abuse. I think there should be more supports specifically for men, and a shift in our culture (both men and women have a responsibility for this) that doesn't ridicule men for the f…
/r/MensRights27/08/16 05:14 PM
0

i don't seek out sex assault victims to troll and i think it's really fucked up you think that.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 05:04 PM
0

classic MRA stereotype of women: we are dishonest. it's so predictable it's boring. i do love that you are taking the time to downvote my replies to you as if that proves anything, other than how much of a wiener you are.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 04:52 PM
0

dude, you're a random guy on reddit. you're never going to force me to do anything. and i'm not being dishonest. the amount of time it takes to blithely respond to people's messages versus the amount of time it would take to go into individual statistics and discredit them individually on their own merit is absolutely phenomenal. so i'm choosing the blithe path because i'm not going to waste my time and quite frankly i don't think MRAs are worth it anyway if they are going to remain disingenuous…
/r/MensRights27/08/16 04:42 PM
-1

why did you comment twice to say the same thing? get a life, and please make it one that isn't following me around reddit. thx.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 04:24 PM
-1

for you, probably. but that ain't none of my shit so whatevs. peace!
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:40 PM
-1

i'm not retarded and i'm well aware of my sense of humour and brilliance. thank you :)
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:06 PM
-2

oh man, we've reached the point when the messages from MRAs devolve into petty insults. not sure what you're trying to accomplish by calling me retarded. you do know calling me retarded isn't actually going to make me retarded, right?
/r/MensRights27/08/16 02:46 PM
0

no, it's more that i have a career, and friends, and family, and a life, and responsibilities. i don't really have the time to devote myself to waiting 10 minutes (i have to wait 10 minutes between every comment on /r/mensrights now) so i can dissect another random internet person's misleading statistics and explain to them how they don't accurately reflect the point they're trying to make. and really ... to what end? it's not going to stop /r/mensrights users from circlejerking around these mis…
/r/MensRights27/08/16 02:34 PM
-1

You'll have nobody to share the laughter with besides yourself, laughing alone, as you hide behind the internet. I love how a person with the username WithdrawnInBasket is trying to paint a person on the Internet as a loner. I suppose you'd see people on the internet the way you see yourself. That's not very funny though, it's kinda making me sad.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 02:22 PM
-2

a hate crime is when somebody perpetuates an act against another person because of the colour of skin, religion, or yes, their gender. but obviously that doesn't mean every violent act against a woman happened because the perpetrator hates women. it would qualify, for example, if a person targeted female professionals because that person didn't believe females should have careers. but violence against women isn't necessarily driven by hate in that sense. violence against women is driven by eithe…
/r/MensRights26/08/16 07:02 PM
0

i don't really have time to wait eight minutes to reply to individual comments. also, i'm not going to reply to a wall of text. i just don't have time and i've been through this before - the wall of text filled with misleading statistics and the distortion of numbers, none of that is going to make you correct, i'm really sorry to break it to you.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 06:52 PM
-5

misogyny in /r/mensrights? well, I never!
/r/MensRights26/08/16 06:42 PM
-1

I don't downplay sexual violence against men. But I do argue against derailing violence against women as a way to address violence against men. You do realize I can make perfectly reasoned arguments in this subreddit but because my opinion is unpopular I'm getting downvoted. Which ends up being just another form of censorship when the brigading starts. The irony is worth a laugh. If you deny this is true, that's fine, i'll just have more to laugh at!
/r/MensRights26/08/16 06:31 PM
-2

hate crime? violence against women does not fall within the realm of hate crimes.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 06:21 PM
0

I do not understand the point you are trying to make? I have worked in a criminal law office so i've seen domestic files. most of it is minor, whatever gender is doing the violence. But this is really quizzing: "Yet when a man does it it becomes domestic violence and violence against women" It reads as though you are suggesting female on male violence be classified as violence against women.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:53 PM
0

i'm not angry and hateful towards men. i'm angry and hateful towards misogynists. i had to wait eight minutes before replying to you because this sub's mods are making it difficult to reply to these messages (that are filled with bad arguments anyway, so who cares, really.) BUT it's interesting, because the right-hand side of the /r/mensrights page states, "/r/mensrights strongly supports principles of free speech." amazing!
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:04 PM
-1

get back to work.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 01:54 PM
1

Time Magazine's synopsis is a lil' different than the study itself: Key Findings Sexual Violence by an Intimate Partner • Nearly 1 in 10 women in the United States (9.4%) has been raped by an intimate partner in her lifetime, including completed forced penetration, attempted forced penetration, or alcohol/drug facilitated completed penetration. • Approximately 1 in 45 men (2.2%) has been made to penetrate an intimate partner during his lifetime. An estimated 16.9% of women and 8.0% of men have e…
/r/MensRights25/08/16 02:25 PM
0

the unfortunate part about starting debates in /r/mensrights is when the argument from the mister starts totally unravelling into nonsense, like it has here.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 02:14 PM
0

is feminist a gender seriously though, who is staring at shirtless men? and if there are women out there who do that, it's not going to be perceived as a threat the same way staring at a woman might be. it's unthinkable that the gawking woman would or could ever sexually attack that man, while men do this to women in this world on a daily basis. this is the world we live in. this is the context. trying to extricate yourself from that to make a point makes the point disingenuous.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 06:28 PM
-1

of course you're questioning my claim. that's what the men here do ;) saying, "hi" isn't always just saying, "hi" by the way. some men use it as a tactic to try to force women to pay attention to them. i've been sworn at, shouted at, called a bitch and a cunt for choosing not to say, "hi" back to guys who are clearly trying to use the greeting to engage me in ways i don't have time for and obviously no interest in. and this isn't a thing that's happened to me once. it's common. it happens all th…
/r/MensRights24/08/16 02:31 PM
1

love how you blame feminists for a subset of assholes
/r/MensRights24/08/16 01:47 PM
-2

the only reason i come to this godforesaken subreddit is because the people here talk shit about women and i am a woman. and i feel as though i need to defend myself and women against the nasty shit here. that's pretty hard to do when i find myself with 15 new messages in my inbox and the inability to respond to them all because the mods have limited how much i can post. but whatevs, MRAs complain about censorship and then turn around and do it themselves. c'est la vie, eh? the fact i can't resp…
/r/MensRights23/08/16 03:58 PM
-2

i spent more time than i care to admit the other day trying to convince a subset of y'all that it's not cool to make fun of a woman to ask not to be catcalled when she's working out outside. according to the MRAs in that thread, she's "asking for it" because her clothes are "inviting attention." and she's "crazy" for asking to be left alone. she's also a "bitch," naturally. because how dare she. this has nothing to do with custody rights or male DV. it's just plain ugly ass woman hating. and thi…
/r/MensRights23/08/16 03:35 PM
-9

omg i love the fact you're probably sitting in the middle of buttfuck, iowa claiming feminists in baltimore aren't doing anything about this hahahaha. classic. do a google search. you'll find out that's not the case.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:08 AM
1

nope not gonna happen. what a silly way to retort.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:03 AM
0

sorry man i have a life and don't have time to read this tome. who do you think you are, tolstoy? but i do enjoy the fact you told me to calm down, as if you perceived me as shrill. of course you would, haha.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:03 AM
-3

no
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:02 AM
1

oh really? check this out: http://everydayfeminism.com/2013/08/bias-against-fathers/
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:02 AM
0

the problem in this subreddit is the fact every person here who declares themselves to be anti-feminist does so under the guise that a person calling themselves feminist today must be second or third wave, when that's not the case.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:00 AM
1

random
/r/MensRights23/08/16 01:59 AM
-6

custody rights and support for male DV victims is not an anti-feminist viewpoint - it's actually a feminist viewpoint, due to the fact feminists want equality of the sexes, and there obviously are concerns regarding custody and DV. but this subreddit chooses to ignore all of that for some reason.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 01:59 AM
-1

oh, i understand. i've spent a long team reading this ridiculous subreddit. y'all say some hateful shit about women.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 01:58 AM
-3

hating women is hilarrrrrrrious, inn'it
/r/MensRights23/08/16 01:57 AM
1

it's an ideology that falls along a spectrum just like men's rights ¯_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights23/08/16 01:57 AM
1

oh, i don't care, don't worry.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:32 PM
1

All I'm saying is if you see an attractive stranger, maybe start with eye contact and see if she returns it, rather than barging in on her workout to tell her that her revealing outfit pleases you.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:30 PM
-23

oh man. your comment is really really hate-filled but you do ask about an argument that any feminist has leveled that didn't try to blame men for their problems so I will share this recent story: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/12/us/baltimore-police-sexual-assault-gender-bias.html?_r=0 The story I linked to is one major reason we need feminism. Thank you and good night.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:23 PM
1

i honestly have no idea what point you're trying to make by showing me that picture.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:20 PM
1

If you're asking why men don't wear the same clothes you can ask why everybody doesn't wear the same outfits this woman does. Why don't they? Because everybody is an individual and makes decisions that make themselves comfortable. There are of course men who run shirtless, go to the beach in speedos, and wear other forms of revealing clothing because that's what they are comfortable in. So no, i'm not going to speak for this woman and questioning her judgement because "men don't dress that way" …
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:18 PM
-15

Feminism is the belief that women should be socially and economically equal. Saying you are anti-feminist is saying either you don't believe women should be equal or denying there is a problem when there objectively is. Either is anti-woman, insulting, sexist and degrading.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:15 PM
1

The shirt that scientist wore has nothing to do with catcalling. And he wasn't catcalled while wearing it, soooooo what's your point?
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:13 PM
0

Yes well those women will probably couple their attention-getting outfits with eye contact and an inviting smile if they want to talk to you. That's how you tell the difference!
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:11 PM
-47

anti feminism is anti woman and there are plenty of posts here that demonstrate that.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:44 PM
0

i can't speak for this woman. i can only trust that she's being honest about stating she works out in the clothes that are comfortable to her. and no, you don't get to speak for her by saying she was "inviting" attention by wearing what she was wearing. she explicitly says she doesn't want the attention, so what's wrong with just accepting and respecting that? i'm not even going to comment on your theories on dating because they are really kind of fucked up and show you don't respect women or un…
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:34 PM
0

there is a difference between inviting attention and inciting attention. nobody invites attention by wearing something, unless it's literally a shirt that says, "pay attention to me!" it's simple human decency and respect to not walk up to strangers and bore them with what you think about how they look. but unfortunately there are a lot of people out there who are incited by body piercings, tattoos, midriff-baring blouses, etc., that they feel the need to say something despite the fact the perso…
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:27 PM
0

i think you've missed my point.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:22 PM
1

answer to your first question: i am in a long-term relationship and will probably grow old with my partner. it's wonderful to have that human connection. i won't miss the catcalling. reply to second statement: if she says she was dressed for her own comfort, she was dressed for her own comfort.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:21 PM
-1

i am a completely normal looking woman who does not go outside in tight gym clothes yet i am catcalled all the fucking time. that's because every woman is. it's not crazy to ask men not to do that. it's also not crazy to dress for your own comfort if you're outside working out. how many men go jogging shirtless and get left alone?
/r/MensRights22/08/16 01:42 AM
-1

On the other hand, it is completely naive to think that dress doesn't invite attention. If you don't want people to comment on your looks, why wear makeup? Why expose your stomach? Nothing invites attention except eye contact and positive body language. There are so many people - men and women - who dress flamboyantly, tattoo themselves and get piercings. we don't see these people as "inviting attention." why is it that the only thing that "invites attention" is a woman who is attractive? the wo…
/r/MensRights22/08/16 01:38 AM
-4

she's not bragging. she's asking men not to do these things to her anymore. it's really simple.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 01:29 AM
6

... I don't think you understand what a victim impact statement is.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 03:15 PM
16

From the victim's impact statement: "When the policeman arrived and interviewed the evil Swede who tackled you, he was crying so hard he couldn’t speak because of what he’d seen." Yes, it's an oath-on-oath-on-witnesses-so-upset-by-what-they-caught-him-doing-that-they-were-crying type of case.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 09:26 PM
2

To revisit your original question, I think we have established it's hard to apply "real justice" to sexual assault. Knowing the justice system presumes innocence beyond a shadow of a doubt, we as a society can't expect victims of sexual assault to willingly succumb themselves to a lose-lose situation. Women, just like anybody, are going to go down the path of least resistance. For most, that means saying nothing and suppressing a bad experience. Today, when a couple dozen women (in the case of J…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 10:50 PM
1

What about sexual assault such as unwanted touching or fondling? What if the dude inserts his penis inside a woman and doesn't ejaculate? What if that rape kit sits, untested, in a police station? Or in Ghomeshi's case - what if he's kissing you and all of a sudden chokes or punches you or pulls your hair? Hard enough to be assault but not hard enough to leave a mark? There's no rape kit for that. Even if she reports right away, what evidence can police collect?
/r/MensRights07/02/16 08:23 PM
1

this works only for crimes that leave evidence. what about the ones that don't? ghomeshi, the subject of the article above, is a perfect example of that.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 06:36 PM
1

what is real justice?
/r/MensRights31/01/16 11:10 PM
2

the mod there bans everybody. don't take it personally.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 04:25 PM
2

Haha slow your roll, she wasn't convicted - she has been charged.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 07:02 PM
8

/r/askreddit?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 02:31 PM
3

Yes I've heard of 'em. They're not getting ignored.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 11:34 PM
0

Here's a guy in Toronto who is being charged with eight counts of sex assault on boys and men spanning the ages of 11 and 30 years old over a period of 30 years - from the mid 60's to the mid 90's. Are you saying the boys aged 11 to 17 should be able to come forward free from the bindings of statute of limitations but the victims over 18 shouldn't? Why?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 12:57 AM

There is no statute of limitations for sex crimes in Canada and guess what? That benefits men, too. Monsters like this guy: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/another-inuvik-man-accuses-david-button-of-abuse-1.2995426 and this guy: http://www.cbc.ca/m/news/canada/topstories/paul-leroux-to-serve-more-time-for-residential-school-sex-abuse-1.3062374 are serving time for molesting boys in the '70s. This isn't a feminist victory, it's a victory for survivors of childhood abuse.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 06:41 PM
3

local paper wouldn't touch it. especially if he were to go in guns blazin' against the mother of his child. reporters don't wade into family issues of private citizens.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 12:40 AM
2

the mod of /r/feminism and /r/askfeminists has a reputation for banning people and not giving a reason for it. he's a dude and i have no idea if he even identifies as a feminist. it's just his subreddit. lots of legit feminists have gotten also banned and don't know why and other feminist subreddits have popped up because of it. he's certainly not indicative of the larger movement.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 07:34 PM
1

I'm very confused as to where you're seeing a double standard? To keep the Harry Potter comparison going, Emma Watson - a feminist! - started showing up half-naked on magazine covers as soon as she became of age. Maybe even before, I don't know. Don't really follow her career that closely. I remember she used to be a Reddit favourite, not sure if she's still popular on this site. Point is, nobody cares if she chooses to be photographed clothed or half-naked.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 12:19 AM
5

Well, due process is public and people charged with crimes are publicly named. This keeps the court system open and transparent. Which is something we want. I don't know about you, but I'm not comfortable with the idea of sex assault trials happening in the shadows without any public oversight. Alleged victims' names are protected because there is a stigma around sexual assault thus a belief that people won't come forward to allege it if allegations would mean they would have to come forward pub…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:31 PM
1

wut.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:32 AM
-2

Are women walking up to men doing live television stand ups and shouting castration jokes? No? Okay.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:12 PM
1

lots of people discuss their shits. there are entire instagram accounts and websites devoted to comparing shits. my boyfriend texts pics of his shits to his friends.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 07:04 PM
1

The words 'sexual assault' is in the story because that's what she was charged with.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 06:19 PM
1

Personally I would never, ever, ever take a phone out of another person's hands. Especially if I just met them and they are a guest in my house. If this person was at my house for something as awkward and touch-and-go as an online one night stand encounter and she took out her phone instead of engaging with me, I'd take the hint. She's not into me. Abort.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 12:10 AM
13

don't think that was /u/purpleviolettron's point.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 11:29 PM
4

Allowed? By whom? I can think of a few female gruesome death scenes going back pretty far. There are a number of examples on this site: http://www.horror-movies.ca/10-horror-movie-death-scenes/
/r/MensRights04/05/15 11:28 PM
1

Why doesn't Samantha Brick cite any sources in telling this story? It could totally be made up.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 07:36 PM
1

who's quantifying the data to support your opinion on this?
/r/MensRights03/05/15 12:16 AM
1

ah yes, that ol' zinger. you got me good, you did!
/r/MensRights02/05/15 12:16 AM
-5

hahaha this is great. i thought it was feminists who couldn't take a joke, but i guess it goes both ways.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:34 PM
-8

It's calculated by taking CEO salaries plus stock options. Maybe companies with female CEO's just make more money ;)
/r/MensRights30/04/15 02:25 PM
12

The damage is done a lot of the time before a woman knows she's pregnant, and many pregnancies are unintentional. To compound things, sadly, many people (men and women) don't understand it. You'd be surprised by how many people don't know what it is and don't understand how it's spread. FASD is a very, very sad issue spread by ignorance and lack of education.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 02:27 PM
-5

it's not your baby?
/r/MensRights23/04/15 05:08 PM
4

you mean "staring provocatively to the point where the person feels uncomfortable"?
/r/MensRights20/04/15 05:08 PM
6

that particular subreddit has a moderator so invested in banning people that i wouldn't be surprised if i get banned for saying this to you, here. i've spent time trying to figure it out, but i haven't been able to discern his (the r feminism moderator is a dude) modus operandi.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 05:10 PM
27

People get banned from that subreddit all the time for no reason, which is why no good discussion happens there.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 02:49 AM
-5

Forget rape culture. The much more powerful force at work here is ego.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 02:26 PM
2

Leaving the frat out of the apology may have been a logistical move, considering the frat is pursuing a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 06:29 PM
3

If Rolling Stone practiced due diligence, nobody would be lamenting anything because nobody would know who Jackie is. Because the story would have been shelved.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 03:43 PM
1

I was just replying to this phrase: ...hmm never heard of her. Why? Because she's a nobody and a nothing.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 06:35 PM
1

She was a psychotherapist for 30 years before she married Cleese.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 04:02 PM
5

I'm confused. You say it's your fault, but you also say she lied. Which is it?
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:34 PM
1

If that's true, what follows is whatever men do, they do it with less regard for safety than women.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 02:29 PM
1

What is a man's job?
/r/MensRights02/04/15 02:46 AM
2

I totally agree with you.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 02:59 AM
-4

I came here because I was curious about what the men's rights movement was about and basically found a donut of misogyny sprinkled with a few legitimate rights issues. For example, I'd love it if there were more links to studies that find evidence of anti-male discrimination in family court than links that seek to debunk the gender pay gap.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 03:29 PM
3

he had an extra charge - burglary there's a possibility there were priors on his criminal record
/r/MensRights26/03/15 02:33 PM
-1

Ya ya ya let's keep getting mad at this
/r/MensRights26/03/15 04:50 AM
6

it's an MRA issue because if any men had decided to attend this feminist-oriented conference, they would have been asked not the bang their fists together like they are entitled to, as men.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 04:17 AM
0

How can I be jumping to conclusions when I gave three options to choose from? Also, random internet person, thank you for sharing your preferences with me as to where I should and should not post. I will take that into consideration.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 02:06 AM
0

wut.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 12:09 AM
0

how do you know this about each individual conference attendee?
/r/MensRights25/03/15 06:33 PM
-1

I don't want to defend the jazz hands because I also think it's pretty stupid, but PTSD can come from a lot of different life traumas so I feel shitty judging what a group of people have decided the rules of engagement are for a conference on their own time and dime, y'know? Sorry to re-use this old nugget, but how does this have anything to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights25/03/15 02:34 PM
-5

good one
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:39 AM
-1

I'm not here to argue women have the physical capacity to lift a human body the same way men do. But what he said is indicative of how he feels about women, for sure. Which leads me to question - is this guy a.) legitimately interesting in furthering mens rights b.) a dude who comes here just to hate on women or c.) a troll trying to make you guys look bad.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:30 AM
-5

Society at large? Sure. But not at an event catered to people who have needs similar to his.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:24 AM
-1

It's satire, guys.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:22 AM

hahaha! Know who else gets triggered? people like my boyfriend, who suffers PTSD from his Afghanistan tour. If he were at a convention full of people like himself, where there were set rules to respect the fact he and other PTSD afflicted folk are on edge from sudden noises, I definitely wouldn't make fun of him. But you know, carry on.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 12:17 AM
1

What a hateful comment towards women. Probably wouldn't do much the MRM image.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 11:44 PM
1

'magine. but it still got 55 upvotes.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 11:30 PM
-1

yeah it's a great article if all you're looking for is for your biases to be re-affirmed.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 06:31 PM
-1

When compiling this list I saw many posts about women that would have worked well, but I skipped over them. I avoided it because many of the users here use the caveat that they are complaining about feminists - not women. I also avoided it because there are users here who identify as women.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 02:29 PM
-3

This is a lazy comparison because the term Jew is inflammatory and you could replace basically any noun in an opinion piece with "Jew" and it's going to sound awful. Examples from this subreddit: 20 /r/mensrights post that would count as hate speech if they were written about Jews: Jew strategy: Containing the non-Jew break-out Ridiculous Jew talks nonsense. No means no, Jews To /r/Jews: Here's what's wrong with Reddit. This sub spends too much time complaining about Jews and not enough time pus…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 01:13 AM
-5

yes but who are you talking about? I'm curious, because many members of this subreddit love to point out how there are female MRAs here.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 06:27 PM
2

This woman is not advocating for women-only bike lanes and if she is successful in her lobbying, everybody would benefit from the improved infrastructure.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 06:24 PM
-8

are you talking about all women or just feminists as you make this sweeping generalization of women as fearful and demanding, because you're basically giving a loaded gun to the people criticize the MRM as misogynist with that comment.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 06:21 PM
-1

it's hard to fathom how hard some people make simple communication seem.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 04:36 PM
0

I'm talking about all women. so either you're implying only feminists joined the workforce during WWI or that only feminists are in the workforce today.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 04:31 PM
1

that's how women find themselves in scary situations.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 06:39 AM
1

i'm not sure what you're trying to imply.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 06:36 AM

i'm a woman
/r/MensRights20/03/15 03:12 AM
1

uh. that's exactly how women entered the workforce. women have female factory workers of yore to thank today's liberties. being born and raised in a small town i know many women who work in factories and the ones who don't work in restaurants or retail. also unglamorous with no benefits.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 03:11 AM
-2

I've read the piece and can't find any reference to this woman suggesting men be banned from anywhere. Could you please reference this?
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:44 PM
-11

what a strange pissing contest you're trying to start here.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:32 PM
-3

Huh?
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:05 PM
-4

"until she was sentenced did she suffer at all?" No? No what? I was not expressing an opinion in response to your comment, just offering an example legal precedent that addresses that exact question. (Canadian law.)
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:02 AM
0

isn't it the very people in this subreddit who complain about how men's lives are ruined in cases of false rape accusations? but as a more practical response to your concern, legally the time a convicted person spends in remand while waiting for sentencing is given back to them as "time served." so the courts themselves acknowledge some degree of suffering just by having to go through the justice system. of course if you are remanded and found innocent, there's no way to get that time back.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:27 AM
1

here's an example, with lots of specific examples within, of oppressed people managing to become violent. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_rebellion
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:16 AM
10

Hello. Devil's Advocate here. In Ontario at least, there are a number of legal precedents for acknowledging a decision a person makes while drunk might not be a legitimate decision. An officiant can't legally marry you if he or she knows you've had even one drink. Tattoo artists are not allowed to tattoo you if you seem intoxicated. The most obvious one, bartenders are legally responsible for your safety if they are serving you.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:07 AM
1

and vice versa
/r/MensRights18/03/15 11:54 PM
-2

therefore .... ?
/r/MensRights18/03/15 07:14 PM
0

i understand there is a social stigma around porn ... but I definitely don't think this is any sort of human rights issue.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 06:32 PM
-1

you have the right to view porn! nobody disputes that!
/r/MensRights17/03/15 06:30 PM
-4

hahaha ok cool, but how is this an MRM issue?
/r/MensRights17/03/15 12:43 AM
-3

meal ticket, eh?
/r/MensRights16/03/15 11:38 PM
0

Every time a woman sees you on the streets she will hold up a can of mace and threaten you to back us just because you are male. News to me.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 11:34 PM
2

because they're not. there's tons - tons, tons tons, written about WWI and and the different injustices suffered by veterans of that war. In fact, one of the greatest war movies of all time - Stanley Kubrick's Paths of Glory - is a satire about the inhumane way a company was treated after losing an impossible battle.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 07:10 PM
-1

People. Victimhood is not a contest. This goes for both genders.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 02:10 AM
1

So emma watson was rebuffed for wanting to pay for dinner during a date, eh.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 05:06 PM
0

why are people here even identifying this person as a feminist? she doesn't identify herself that way. She's clearly not bright and doesn't have a great logical skillset but to call her a feminist because she's espousing an idiotic double standard that is not even well articulated is also pretty dense.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 04:55 PM
1

I don't see anything in this story that indicates the reporter was trying to hide the fact the perpetrators were teen girls. In fact, any producer/online editor worth his or her snuff would have wanted to see more focus on gender because it is against stereotype and would generate more web traffic.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 04:51 PM
0

really? you know this? not that it really matters, but there's not enough information in that photo to come to such a conclusion. and even if it was originally a placard from a rally, it is now a photo getting shared on social media. that makes it a meme, baby.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 12:06 AM
0

OP has provided zero evidence of his assertions.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:44 PM
1

what meme isn't condescending and oversimplified?
/r/MensRights09/03/15 03:45 PM
4

neat.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 03:43 PM
-7

at 30k subscribers out of 174 million weekly unique hits to reddit you're defs mainstream, congrats bro.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 03:37 PM
-2

real man does equal good man. they're the same thing. obviously any person with testicles and a penis is a real man who exists and is also male. .. but is he a real man? (as in a good man?).
/r/MensRights09/03/15 03:34 PM
-3

"have we ever asked what is womanhood?" yes. every day. http://thoughtcatalog.com/lydiana-inari/2014/05/the-10-qualities-of-a-good-woman/ http://ca.askmen.com/money/mafioso_100/140_mafia.html http://jamesmsama.com/2014/05/05/10-ways-to-know-youre-dating-a-good-woman/ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-logan-levkoff/womanhood_b_1135555.html http://magazine.foxnews.com/love/top-10-qualities-men-are-secretly-looking-women http://www.torontosnumber1datedoctor.com/NEWSLETTER%20ARTICLES/women2date1.htm …
/r/MensRights09/03/15 03:15 AM
-7

censorship? silly. gamergaters can't claim they're succeeding on the basis of censorship when those who criticize gaming don't call for censorship in the first place. have fun trying to find an iota of positive gamergate coverage outside the funhouse mirrors world of gamergate and gamergate media itself.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 03:11 AM
2

Men were discriminated against because Ruby Tuesday wants women in front line service positions. Why would they want women in those positions? Well... This is definitely a men's and women's rights issue.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 02:14 AM
5

GamerGate is doing well? From what standpoint?
/r/MensRights09/03/15 02:10 AM
0

lollll
/r/MensRights08/03/15 10:26 PM
3

at least the dude got a coffee and a scone out of it! and she was completely honest about what she was looking for. you don't want to offer what this girl is asking for, don't answer her call. ps. there's no law against using an app for what other things than its expressly intended purpose. ** edit: I fixed a typo in the last sentence
/r/MensRights08/03/15 08:24 PM
1

what part of 'no strings attached' do you have a problem with?
/r/MensRights08/03/15 08:18 PM
1

show some self-respect and go dutch then?
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:07 PM
1

seriously though. if i were spending a few days in a city i didn't know, tinder seems like it'd be a great place to find someone to grab a couple drinks with, no strings attached. why should the local responding to the tinder date feel used? it's a casual app for meeting people in circumstances just like this.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:03 PM
-1

sorry how do you feel duped? because you didn't get pussy out of the interaction? lol.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:31 PM
6

whatever this lady is awful. this isn't a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 05:14 AM
2

it's totally within the rights of the man and woman in this hypothetical situation to figure out an agreement like this without court intervention.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 03:55 AM
-4

Who even looks at an ad campaign focused on advancing a specific cause and says it's a bad campaign because it makes their demographic look bad? Selfish. It'd be like me, as a white person, looking at an anti-racism ad and complaining that it makes all white people look like racists. Whoever designed this campaign chose to advocate against male abuse against women. There is no implication that men are the only abusers or that they are never victims. Maybe men do need advocacy campaigns to teach …
/r/MensRights07/03/15 11:40 PM
2

If you're looking for even a modicum of justice in an Indian context, male or female, have fun with that. It's a brutal place for pretty much everyone.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 11:30 PM
1

thanks!
/r/MensRights07/03/15 06:03 AM
2

curious for any context for this quote. when did she say/write it? where?
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:30 AM
-1

This irony here is that "blind adherence to dogma, identity politicking, immunity to reason, bigotry, etc" is exactly how many people who hang out in this sub act.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 03:27 PM
1

if you take any sentence and replace the nouns with niggers it's going to sound bad. let me find a random opinion piece from a newspaper to demonstrate. This Andrew Coyne piece, for today's national post: "They problem with So-cons (social conservatives): Why can't they be more like pundits?" http://news.nationalpost.com/2015/02/27/let-the-so-cons-sing-out-a-joyful-chant-were-here-were-square-get-used-to-it/ We'll take social conservative out and replace the word with Nigger. "The problem with n…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 03:23 PM
-6

lol at your comparison of amanda marcott to the granddragon of the KKK because you think she's ... stubborn?
/r/MensRights02/03/15 09:22 PM
1

Looking at which specific departments see the higher disproportion of male or female representation in management is telling. It doesn't surprise me that the GNWT department of public works would see a management team that is only 9 per cent female while the department of human relations would be disproportionately higher than any other department at, if memory serves me, 80 per cent.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 04:32 PM
1

While your observation seems like it would be convincing, I don't think you would be able to deduce family planning as a barrier to success in the GNWT context. If you were to point out an employer that bends over backwards to accommodate work/life balance and family planning, it'd be the Government of the Northwest Territories. I don't have access to statistics about women who have chosen to become stay-at-home mothers, but the cost-of-living is extremely high in the NWT and I suspect it wouldn…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 04:29 PM

i was just looking at some Northwest Territories stats today, incidentally. in the NWT, women make up 65 per cent of gov employees, yet they make up anywhere from 9 to 20 per cent of the top managerial positions of specific departments and agencies. caveat: there a couple departments, such as HR (80 per cent) and Justice (50 per cent), where women make up a larger proportion of managerial positions.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 02:17 AM
6

lots of people, men and women, gravitate towards less useful degrees. ever been to a first year poli sci course?
/r/MensRights26/02/15 02:14 AM
2

for what it's worth, the mod for that subreddit has a reputation for arbitrarily banning users w/o explanation.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 09:45 PM
3

OK well that just makes the comparison OP is trying to make even more weird.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 12:42 AM
3

Canadian here. It's a crime here. http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Canadian_Criminal_Law/Offences/Public_Mischief
/r/MensRights03/02/15 08:13 PM
-5

not my point. my point was this ad was meant to sell maxi pads to women; to tell them what they want to hear so the next time they are strolling down the aisles of CVS they think, "you know, this time I will buy Always." ads are notorious playing to stereotypes in order to push product and there is an abundance of ads that play sympathetic to male-centric tropes so i honestly don't get why there's a need to ring the alarm over this.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 09:34 PM
-5

How is this an MRM issue? I was an advertisement, not a doctoral thesis.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 06:18 PM
1

I'm seriously not wasting any of my time with you since you're either a troll, have an IQ under room temperature, or suffer from misandry this is the line that exposes you for what you are.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 06:44 AM
1

Wow, this is one of the most asinine arguments you've used yet in this entire thread. It's equivalent to saying rape hurts men just as much as women since father's and brother's have to deal with the aftermath and emotional issues of their sisters and daughters being raped. You're really good at making terrible analogies. Death is worlds away from rape. And if you want to live your life believing your family would not be affected by your wayyyy hypothetical death in war, so be it, but you must b…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 12:53 AM
1

If, worse case scenario, a war so consuming broke out that the government would be forced to enter into conscription again, everybody - not just men - would be negatively affected. First and foremost, there's nothing saying women wouldn't have to sign up in this totally hypothetical war. Women were almost conscripted into WWII. Second, wives, mothers, sisters, daughters would also possibly lose their husbands, sons, brothers, fathers to war. For some people, losing a person as dear to them as a …
/r/MensRights30/01/15 03:33 PM
1

I could also make a list of ways that black people have "privilege" and it'd be hard to recite the list with a straight face. For example, if you are a black person and anything on this list pertains to you, congratulations! You have privilege. Let's see... If, by law, your resume will be considered above any caucasian person's resume because of affirmative action. If you can rap along with hip hop songs and say the 'n' word without people shaming you. If you can get a cheaper apartment in the g…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 03:21 PM
1

why did your friends abandon you? that's the shitty part, i think. It's not like it's a huge, ridiculous deal... buy denying it exists just makes you look like an intellectually dishonest liar. like i said, i've never benefitted from this. i don't know what else to say. and it's also an intellectually dishonest complaint considering bouncers don't just let in any women, they only let young, attractive, scantily-clad women go past them, which arguably could be a unequal preference given to older …
/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:58 PM
1

There are a lot of factors those statistics don't take into consideration. When a judge decides on a sentence, he or she will consider the offender's criminal history, aggravating factors, historical factors, mental health history, age, obviously the seriousness of the charge itself... Naked numbers like the ones you provided honestly tell me nothing.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:33 AM

Woman here. If you're able to interact with young children without people assuming your a sexual predator. As a female reporter, I can tell you parents are weirded out when you talk to their children w/o letting them know your intentions first. And miraculously, the male reporters I work with are able to go on the same assignments I do, which include a lot of the time photographing small children. If you have the option of choosing to work full time at your career or staying home full time with …
/r/MensRights29/01/15 01:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter