TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SinglehoodVeteran Archive

View 0 posts and 105 comments by SinglehoodVeteran on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Hey, that's my experience too. I'm 33 now and would be classified as an older millennial, and I was a virgin until 23 and that was with my long-term FWB. My friends are guys but they're all 10-15 years older (my FWB is 48 and is the oldest of the entire group). I don't know all of their numbers, but of the ones who have shared that info it's in the 4-12 range... probably because A. There wasn't this rampant SJW stuff going on back then and B. Despite the fact that we're all nerds some of them ar…
/r/BlackPillScience15/12/18 02:24 PM
1

True, it's one of the ways the math works out. Like how I've only been with one guy so far, but my 4 female coworkers have said they've been with 5-8 guys and we're all in our 30s. I don't know if any of those guys were ONS, but it would make our combined average (1+5+5+6+8)/5 = 5, and our median would also be 5. So because of my low number, the reported values of the two highest women get somewhat "cancelled out" which is likely what is happening in a lot of these reports.
/r/BlackPillScience15/12/18 01:57 PM
8

Damn, that's a lot of guys...
/r/BlackPillScience13/12/18 09:02 AM
2

Yeah, she apparently tried to argue that it wasn't meant to be sexualized or a case of using a child in a sexual context, but come on. There's no way a sane man or woman could view something like that as anything else.
/r/PussyPass08/12/18 12:51 PM
1

"Prosecutors say the videos show Felten dancing around in lingerie, breastfeeding the baby and exposing herself to the camera all while making sexually suggestive gestures and comments."
/r/PussyPass08/12/18 11:35 AM
3

And opinions like that are why I think people like you shouldn't be allowed to vote. Look at that, something in common.
/r/BlackPillScience07/12/18 02:14 AM
1

Eh, 7" would hurt me, but it's fine if you personally prefer a partner of that size.
/r/BlackPillScience27/11/18 03:12 AM
1

Interesting choice. Is this something you usually listen to?
/r/BlackPillScience25/11/18 07:45 PM
1

No problem! Hope I helped clarify some things for you.
/r/BlackPillScience25/11/18 07:30 PM
1

Don't worry, that's not an insulting question. Neither my father or stepfather were fat, or any of my uncles for that matter. They were all average-skinny build men. I haven't spoken to my father or stepfather for many years, but I still visit my uncles once a year during the holidays (they live across the country). Perhaps part of why I find dadbod/overweight males attractive is because I was bullied horribly by the jocks in middle and high school, so I came to associate their fit physiques wit…
/r/BlackPillScience25/11/18 07:12 PM
1

I don't find Brad Pitt physically attractive, and don't know anything about him so he's not emotionally/personally attractive either. I've found some incels who've posted their pics physically attractive, some I've found physically unattractive, some I'm neutral towards. Obviously I have no ability to know if I'd find their personalities attractive since I don't know then IRL. My FWB looks very similar to this stock photo gentleman and I find him physically attractive. However, he's also my clos…
/r/BlackPillScience25/11/18 06:43 PM
1

Eh, some people are into extreme pet role-playing. What's the point of kinkshaming a man or woman for something they enjoy doing with their partner that isn't hurting anyone? Just because you don't find it sexy doesn't mean other people don't.
/r/BlackPillScience22/11/18 10:24 AM
1

By "genetically closer" you're only referring to skin color and minor facial features. Humans are humans, no matter what we look like.
/r/BlackPillScience21/11/18 07:54 PM
10

Uh, racism is bad. Judging people based solely on uncontrollable biological factors like skin color, ethnicity, sex, gender, hair color, height, etc is not moral. Also, not every woman gives a shit about having a mate with "the best seed". Some of us don't want any seed (lesbians), and people like me don't want working seed (childfree). That's not even delving into your assertion that black people somehow aren't as genetically viable, which is ridiculous.
/r/BlackPillScience21/11/18 01:59 PM
3

Wait...do those women actively exclude black men as potential dates (as in actually being racists) or do they just not usually date black men? I'd describe my body type as average (5'8" 140 lbs) and wouldn't mind dating a black dude but every one who has ever asked me out has been either obese or way too tall. But yeah, if you go around saying you'd never date anyone who is of a specific ethnicity, that's pretty damn racist.
/r/BlackPillScience21/11/18 10:09 AM
1

It holds true for men? Are you saying that men prefer women who show benevolent sexism towards them?
/r/BlackPillScience16/11/18 10:58 AM
1

Listen, I'm only repeating what I've been told. I'm not a gay man. I have no experience with it.
/r/BlackPillScience14/11/18 01:16 PM
1

Gay men are more promiscuous, but as I understand it from talking to gay friends and co-workers, it can also be much more difficult to find partners due to the hated homosexual men face that homosexual women largely don't. At least not to the same extent.
/r/BlackPillScience14/11/18 01:09 PM
0

I agree that Feminism has gotten out of control, but as an egalitarian I cannot say that removing women's rights would be any more righteous or justifiable than removing men's rights. Instead, I'd advocate for working towards a more truly equal meritocracy, devoid of things like affirmative action or pussy passes.
/r/BlackPillScience14/11/18 01:06 PM
0

Do you believe that was ever truly the case, at least in the modern age? Patriarchy of the type you're referring to sounds like it was only truly prevalent in the very distant past, thousands of years ago.
/r/BlackPillScience14/11/18 12:52 PM
1

So it could explain part of the numbers, but not most.
/r/BlackPillScience14/11/18 12:50 PM
2

I was wondering whether women wanting a man to "protect them" is maybe just a half-truth and they really just want someone to sacrifice himself for her. Some women definitely have this mentality. Obviously they are not worth being friends with or in relationships with. Anyone who would sacrifice you to protect themselves is a horrible person.
/r/BlackPillScience14/11/18 10:36 AM
1

Did this study only interview heterosexual men and women? Or could the social acceptance of lesbian relationships/flings over that of gay ones explain why only women had more partners?
/r/BlackPillScience14/11/18 10:32 AM
2

What is the answer?
/r/BlackPillScience14/11/18 10:28 AM
2

Also true. To be fair, nonverbal signals aren't taught to us or to men, and some interactions can be extremely confusing if you don't know them. Or you get accused of flirting by random dudes when you're literally just being kind. So much miscommunication, when actual words work far better.
/r/BlackPillScience12/11/18 01:49 AM
2

You've seen women who stare at stereotypically attractive men with the negative indicators mentioned in my first paragraph? In that case, perhaps they know the guy personally and don't like him, or maybe he's unattractive to them. Not all of us are attracted to the same type...in fact, 6' with a buff body and strong jaw is rather the opposite of what I find sexy. The other possibility is they're a misandric Feminist or lesbian, and just are disgusted by men in general. Unfortunately there are qu…
/r/BlackPillScience11/11/18 10:46 AM
1

Or if you have a dadbod, try to get a date with the 2% of women who prefer that body type...
/r/BlackPillScience08/11/18 11:19 AM
0

How is it virtue signalling to have a different opinion than the norm on what one finds sexually attractive?
/r/BlackPillScience08/11/18 11:18 AM
1

Women's body type preferences vary all over the place. We're individuals, just like men we have different tastes in men.
/r/BlackPillScience08/11/18 11:17 AM
1

Depends on how you define Chad. If it's a man who's attractive to that woman specifically, then yes... for men and women alike it's obviously easier to get aroused when you're sexually attracted to your partner. After all, an obese 2/10 woman won't be making your penis rise very easily if at all, will she?
/r/BlackPillScience08/11/18 11:13 AM
1

Masturbation is not only about touching your genitals, but also about mental stimulation. Mostly true. Masturbating typically involves mental fantasy, but it's not a necessity. Rubbing one's clit or penis, regardless of whether you're watching porn or fantasizing, will still feel good and lead to arousal. When heterosexual women masturbate, they're thinking on attractive men. If they don't stimulate themselves mentally, they don't get aroused. If they don't get aroused, they don't reach orgasm. …
/r/BlackPillScience08/11/18 11:08 AM
1

Of course penis size matters. A micropenis of under 2" erect won't be able to hit the g-spot, much less stimulate the rest of the vagina. A penis of 7" or larger is too big, especially if you have a tilted uterus since it will hit the cervix during sex (incredibly painful). Best size is 5"-just under 6".
/r/BlackPillScience08/11/18 10:58 AM
1

Yup, just as men are far more willing to date a 9/10 manipulative bitch than a 6/10 one.
/r/BlackPillScience08/11/18 10:52 AM
2

Looking at the rest of the face can help a bit. If the person has a slight scowl, furrowed brown, downturned lips, narrowed eyes, or one side of lop pulled up as if in displeasure/disgust, that's obviously a bad stare. The person doesn't look away as often either. A good stare will have wider eyes, bigger pupils, a slight smile or upward quirk to the lips, smooth brow, slightly raised eyebrows, and will be willing to make intermittent eye contact, but not constant. Remember, for both sexes prolo…
/r/BlackPillScience08/11/18 10:44 AM
2

He definitely looks better in the after picture. No contest, his jaw looks very weird in the original.
/r/BlackPillScience08/11/18 10:22 AM
3

Yes, personality is 50%. Looks is the other half. Both are necessary for a successful relationship. Of course, either of these are very subjective. There's no guarantee that what one woman finds attractive won't be a turn off for another. For example, my sisters are 5'4 and 5'3" have a minimum height requirement of 5'10 for men they date, as well as greatly preferring semi-muscular/fit ones who hold traditional gender roles (planning the dates, buying them gifts, opening doors, paying for all or…
/r/BlackPillScience08/11/18 10:18 AM
-1

Possibly. I honestly don't know enough about how a significant amount of women act in their relationships. All my friends are men and I'm a tomboy/masculine gendered. I know that I'm not, I know my mom and sisters are, I know that most of the women I've worked with have been to different degrees but not all. Usually I go with EWALT.
/r/BlackPillScience06/11/18 06:27 PM
-1

Because those terms have different meanings. When Feminists say "All men are potential rapists" you don't see that as horribly misandric and inaccurate? When Red Pill guys say "All women are hypergamous" you don't think that's really quite misogynistic and incorrect? Sorry, but I'm an egalitarian...I don't approve of sexism against either men or women.
/r/BlackPillScience06/11/18 04:37 PM
1

I'm not being a bitch or a faggot, dude. You're the one resorting to name calling and putting words in my mouth.
/r/BlackPillScience05/11/18 03:08 PM
3

Nope. Just pointing out that it's retarded to make fun of either men or women for knowing they are individuals.
/r/BlackPillScience05/11/18 02:42 PM
2

Cool, thanks for the info. I'll read the full study later today. I guess that's why I don't have any in-group biases, since I have gender dysphoria and have always considered myself to be male minded. How much of this is taught behavior I wonder? Given how gynocentric most of Western culture is, it'd seem like it's nurture based.
/r/BlackPillScience05/11/18 02:40 PM
2

"I'm not the same as those other guys, I'd treat a woman right, why does she only go out with men who aren't me..." Do you now understand how stupid it is to say things like that, or like what you wrote? Seriously dude, think before you type. There's literally no need to be so asinine or patronizing.
/r/BlackPillScience05/11/18 10:40 AM
1

Yeah, I do. Go ahead and look through my comment history. Just last week I was arguing that affirmative action for women is unnecessary specialized treatment that I don't approve of and find to be sexist against men. I just don't do it very often because it's like banging ones head against a wall sometimes... similar to speaking with diehard RP dudes. Feminists and tradcon women making over-generalizations about "all" males is just as potentially incorrect as when men do it to us. Is there a dec…
/r/BlackPillScience05/11/18 02:42 AM
2

It's not really a mistake, simply an over-generalization. You do make a good point that it appears to be mostly Feminist-aligned women who were selected for study here, whereas the results may indeed have been quite different if they'd included actual egalitarians. We tend to be a somewhat different breed than those women who confuse superiority and preferential treatment for "equality". Also, are you just as amused as I am, that they are literally "BS traits"? Lol. It's too perfect.
/r/BlackPillScience04/11/18 09:58 PM
2

I haven't heard of that. Do you have a source? But regardless, that's still making an assumption that all women cannot be unbiased as well as assuming that no man can be biased. People are individuals. Yes, it's okay to acknowledge that the majority of a group might be X, but not at the expense of denying the existence of members who are Y. Being a male doesn't 100% guarantee any personality traits any more or less than being a woman does. Anyone who believes that is a modern day Feminist.
/r/BlackPillScience04/11/18 04:30 PM
2

Why are you giving your opinion on what you find annoying in men? Because the OP specifically stated that "ALL" women find benevolent sexism attractive, which is not even fully supported by the study. It would be more accurate to say that a large amount of women, or heck, maybe even most women find those actions attractive. I'd agree with that, because it's clearly visible in most male-female interactions and it drives me nuts. How can someone say they are pro-equality when they prefer being ped…
/r/BlackPillScience04/11/18 03:09 PM
0

Uh, I'm only one person, lol. I'm not a "women". That's plural.
/r/BlackPillScience04/11/18 02:28 PM
0

But the study shows that there are still standard deviations for women who found the traits attractive. If it really was "all" women (which would still only truly be indicative of the thought processes of the ones in this study) who found benevolent sexism attractive, then there should be no deviations in their responses. Honestly, men who exhibit benevolent sexist traits aren't more attractive, they're simply very annoying and blatantly pandering as opposed to men who are maliciously sexist, wh…
/r/BlackPillScience04/11/18 12:23 AM
5

Really? I haven't seen that in most studies. It usually appears to be the opposite, even in OP's own post. Honestly, I can't see having the burden either. It may not even be a gendered thing, but a millennial thing.
/r/BlackPillScience02/11/18 07:21 PM
3

Weird, some of those are just reiterating the same exact thing... like being horny and being aroused, or wanting to show affection and wanting to express love. That list could probably be cut down to 80 reasons, honestly. My point is that a lot of people here talk about how if you're not +8/10 attractive (or even just not conventionally attractive) that it's almost impossible to have sex. But men like Ron Jeremy and Harvey Weinstein...who essentially look like trolls from a child's fairytale boo…
/r/BlackPillScience28/10/18 07:37 PM
2

No, but he was able to do that because of misused power and status. Most of those women weren't attracted to him whatsoever, he just made sure they knew they'd be passed over for acting opportunities and career advancements if they didn't stroke his dick and ego.
/r/BlackPillScience28/10/18 07:17 PM
2

Wait a minute. I thought looks are everything in the majority opinion here?
/r/BlackPillScience28/10/18 07:10 PM
-3

Blue pilled garbage. Purple pill, actually. Every single one of those things, except religious beliefs, is affected by the halo effect. How...? If you're a staunch Southern Baptist conservative with Republican values and only likes vanilla missionary sex, no amount of halo effect will make a relationship with a woman who's an atheist and political anarchist who's into pegging men. It just won't work. Your likes, dislikes, and relationship needs are simply too different. Hot guys are perceived as…
/r/BlackPillScience26/10/18 11:59 PM
2

I can understand how this would be true for rating initial physical attraction. However, there's no way whatsoever anyone...man or woman... can make a determination about things like core personality, annoying habits, sense of humor, political standing, religious beliefs/lack thereof, level of intelligence, how one treats their perceived "inferiors", their love language, sexual abilities, and all the other minutiae of being someone's partner in just a few minutes. Hell, my best friend and I are …
/r/BlackPillScience26/10/18 09:42 PM
1

It’s not at all surprising to me that you’re “normal”. When I was writing my response I was thinking that if you’re woman you’re very well put together and emotionally stable. Glad to see my instincts haven’t dulled lmaooo. Lol, nope. You appear to be right on the money. I feel like a lot of blackpillers are in denial. I’m sure you’ve seen how many comments with guys going ”lOoKs aRe EvRyThiNg!!¡!”. Indeed. It's worth noting they aren't entirely in the wrong, though. Looks are important since mo…
/r/BlackPillScience24/10/18 10:15 AM
1

I am working late tonight and do not have time to craft a full response worthy of this conversation, but wanted to take a moment to "tip my hat" to your kindness and reasoning. It is amazingly refreshing, finding someone online who engages in not only civil but also intellectual discourse! I hope to speak more with you later. In the meantime, please endeavor to have a relaxing evening.
/r/BlackPillScience23/10/18 11:28 PM
6

The problem here is that you’re looking at the situation logically like a man. Thank you for the compliment. I do have a more masculine brain than most women. That's autism for you. Here’s a revaluation that will completely change your understanding of the wonderful female creature Most women are not wonderful, just as most men are not wonderful. Frankly, the majority of the population seems neither good nor evil, simply apathetic and uncaring towards anyone not within their immediate social cir…
/r/BlackPillScience23/10/18 11:26 AM
2

Some girls love having an asshole boyfriend because they’re addicted to emotions he makes them feel. On the most primal level: Asshole = Doesn’t give a fuck = Alpha Male = Good genetics = I wanna have his babies. Totally agree with you that there's a lot of women who are addicted to the behaviors of Alphas and/or "bad boys". Sorry, rereading my comment, it does sound like I'm actively denying this, whereas I meant it more as a "shaking my head in disbelief at some women's choices". Classic “nice…
/r/BlackPillScience23/10/18 10:31 AM
1

How?
/r/BlackPillScience23/10/18 01:45 AM
1

Huh. Never thought of it that way. So does that mean you personally consciously intimidated by men who have larger jaws than you? Edit to add: Men with a "no fucks given" attitude aren't indicative of being good mates. The exact opposite in fact...if he gives no fucks, he's probably a poor choice since he won't care about you. A man who treats you like an equal is so far above one who acts as though you mean nothing to him.
/r/BlackPillScience22/10/18 10:38 PM
3

How is that "scary" though? I thought you were going to say something like "resting bitch/asshole face" or "narrowed, mean eyes".
/r/BlackPillScience22/10/18 05:04 PM
12

Yeah, the tables have really turned on that topic. More and more males are starting to want families/children than their female peers at certain ages (20s especially). However, it's easy to see why there's such a gap when you realize the man probably assumes he'll still be able to keep his career and assumes his wife will spend less time at hers to raise the children/take maternity leave to care for them while young. Many women don't want to do that.
/r/BlackPillScience21/10/18 10:39 AM
1

I'm not disputing the results of the study. I simply remarked that it is extremely strange that a skinny male body type was shown to be considered "creepy" by the participants instead of a more threatening muscular body type. When a man or woman experiences a creepy sensation, it is typically in regards to a person, object, or situation that is off-putting or disturbing. Namely, something the more primitive portion of our brains perceive as a potential danger. It is odd that a muscular build was…
/r/BlackPillScience21/10/18 03:17 AM
2

Ah, I thought you might be incel since most here are. My apologies. Why do you hate women? Guessing you mean as a generalized group, not individuals.
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/18 06:21 PM
0

Some do care very deeply, some don't give a shit. It's up to the individual person, same as for men. Some men would completely avoid dating a woman who's an asshole towards others, some men wouldn't care how much of a bitch she is so long as she's on his dick.
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/18 11:25 AM
2

But is that not the argument incels frequently have?
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/18 11:23 AM
2

What would be a scary feature?
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/18 10:42 AM
1

Will his gf start to feel less attracted to Chad due to his weakness (inability to protect the progeny), and start to feel attraction for the stronger more physically dominant male? If her Chad bf is a total asshole, she might because she knows he had it coming by being a bully and she'd gain respect for the normie standing up to him (though why she'd be with an immoral dude to begin with is beyond me). But if her Chad bf is a good, kind, loving person then she'd feel protective/empathetic towar…
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/18 10:41 AM
3

You didn't find any women who shared the same interests as you?
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/18 10:35 AM
4

Even when you go to imgur directly, the pictures are shit. Can't read anything at all. Do you know what dating site this data comes from? I can do some searching for the original article/graphs and post the links here if I know where to start.
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/18 10:33 AM
2

Would it though? I'm in favor of legalization of prostitution, but isn't one of the things incels and blackpillers constantly correct people on is that they don't just want sex? Legalizing prostitution would help to make sex more available, but it wouldn't give incels the emotional connection they say they're really looking for.
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/18 10:26 AM
0

But then that's not a woman you'd want to be with anyway. Assuming you mean the "better" trait is something like money, looks, material possessions. If Guy B is more moral than Guy A, then you can't blame a woman for leaving the immoral guy for the better, moral guy. That just makes sense.
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/18 10:19 AM
1

I didn't know if you really wanted to talk, so I PM'd you.
/r/BlackPillScience18/10/18 11:31 AM
1

Lol. Well, I've never been married or had a boyfriend, but I have been FWB with a very nice guy for the last 10 years. Idk if you count that as being single or not? If you're serious about continuing our conversation via pm, I'm cool with that. Unless you're being sarcastic? I can't usually tell.
/r/BlackPillScience15/10/18 09:17 PM
1

The fact that you had add the word "Homebound" into your recount of what i said, when i clearly didn't say it goes to show how pathetically weak your mind must be. You were the one who said that women only began voluntarily working in the last 60 years. Homebound just means someone who is unable or unwilling to leave their house. Why are you so triggered by a single word that you immediately resort to insults? No wonder you place the weight of all of your arguments on the anecdotal one in a hist…
/r/BlackPillScience14/10/18 02:34 PM
2

Who on earth lied to you and said women were exclusively homebound wives and mothers until the 1950s? Whoever they were, they're an absolute moron without any knowledge of history or anthropology.
/r/BlackPillScience13/10/18 10:37 PM
2

Ah, I can understand that. I'm an introvert, but was also mocked and degraded by most of the boys and girls in school. They used to call me "transvestite" and "fakeboy", amongst other stupid names, just because I prefer wearing male clothes. Some people just suck. Sorry you had to put up with that shit.
/r/BlackPillScience04/10/18 10:13 PM
1

How do you know they hated you if you didn't have any conversations? Honest question.
/r/BlackPillScience04/10/18 09:01 PM
2

That's an interesting hypothesis, but how would it hold up to the fact that the overwhelming majority of social interactions being women and men don't involve sexuality or intimacy to any relevant degree? A female cashier at CVS isn't thinking of having sex with her male customers or worrying about getting pregnant by them... she's being polite as a customer service rep and scanning out their purchases, but is thinking about what she's having for dinner after her shift and wondering if her frien…
/r/BlackPillScience29/09/18 04:44 PM
1

You do have a very relevant point regarding pregnancy, but perhaps less of one regarding an individual man or woman's danger in being overpowered. In a face-to-face, punching out sort of fight? Yes, the majority of men will win over the majority of women. But there are moves a woman can use to overpower a man who is attacking her. I've had to use them on two different occasions in my life so far, and while I did get bruised and was definitely frightened, the males attempting to hurt me ended up …
/r/BlackPillScience29/09/18 04:37 PM
0

Okay, so your answer to the question would be no, you personally wouldn't find it creepy if an ugly woman approached you. Same here, it's not creepy when ugly men or women approach me, it's a neutral interaction, like being approached by religious people or door-to-door salespeople. You simply listen to what they have to say, thank them for letting you know about the opportunity to date them/join a church/buy a product, and politely decline said offer. It wouldn't be creepy unless they did somet…
/r/BlackPillScience28/09/18 09:45 AM
0

Showing interest while not attractive is creepy But why? If a really ugly woman hits on you, you'd consider that creepy? You wouldn't just feel neutral about the interaction, or maybe a little happy they took the time to tell you so, and then you tell them something nice back so their feelings aren't as hurt? hence why oldschool pua promotes indirect approach exclusively and used dhvs for improve your chances while looking for iois. I've researched PUA techniques hoping they could lend some insi…
/r/BlackPillScience28/09/18 08:51 AM
7

It's a very common misconception that autistic people as a whole don't have empathy. For some of us it's a problem, but many of us have normal or even excessive levels of empathy for other people and animals. It's just that we don't always have typical responses (body language, facial expressions) towards people we know are in distress so we usually suck at comforting others even though we are feeling their pain. For example, a lot of us... myself included... have minor haphephobia, a dislike or…
/r/BlackPillScience28/09/18 08:32 AM
1

It's generalizations vs anecdotes, dude. That's all I meant. I have a minor in both biology and philosophy, and my main degree is in business management. I understand the scientific method, types of research, laws vs theories vs hypotheses, statistics, etc. But instead of actually contributing to the conversation, even to just inform me of how I'm "wrong" by speaking simplistically, you just throw insults. Why? What is there to gain by acting out like that?
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/18 10:10 PM
5

It's nothing worth "congratulating", and it's not only me. There are other people, of both sexes, who empathize with your issues and don't want to see the media running around calling all incels mass murderers or entitled, misogynistic assholes. Likewise, there are men and women who are getting pissed off about all this weird sjw shit that's trying to essentially legalize misandry. Why can't we work together to support one another and become a louder voice than the tradcons, Feminists, and socia…
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/18 07:12 PM
2

Scientific evidence is, by necessity, generalizations. So yeah, I disagree with saying all men are X or all women are Y because you can't put all people into neat little boxes. Individuals exist, not robots all programmed a certain way. But some people lack understanding of this so of course I was expecting downvotes.
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/18 06:55 PM
6

It will give that man or woman a favorable impression of you, certainly, but then you still need to be attractive to them to be considered a potential romantic interest. Both are important aspects of finding and keeping a mate.
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/18 03:39 PM
3

tee hee its the other girls im not like that at all Please refrain from using quotations when that's not what I said. I greatly dislike it when people put words in my mouth. what are the chances you just lack self awareness when you do the exact same as the other women? Not very good. I'm incredibly self-aware, and highly empathetic in addition to being autistic/PPD. That already means my brain doesn't work the same as normal females. I am also employed at two jobs (edit to add: I work at a sex …
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/18 12:44 PM
1

Same for women wanting a career, money, power and not understanding that men don’t care about that in their partners, only women do. Having money and/or a career is necessary for basic survival and gaining a comfortable life as a single person. Doesn't have anything to do with what a potential mate, either male or female, cares about. Maybe the same for being nice for men, as men want nice smiling girls (not bitches), but women don’t want nice meek guys (but prefer ‘don’t give a fuck’ dominating…
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/18 11:25 AM
0

It's just a different way to make your partner orgasm, which you should want to do anyway. Same with men giving their female partners oral.
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/18 11:17 AM
5

Honest question: Why did you pedestalize us as a whole in the first place? Yeah, I realize this comment is going to get downvoted into Oblivion just for asking this, but it's something I've always wondered. Did your parents teach you to do this? Your school/teachers? Peers? Church? Media? I grew up in a very Catholic tradcon household and was taught to pedestalize males, which I thankfully grew out of when I became an atheist, so was curious about your own personal journey. It's better to see me…
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/18 11:11 AM
5

You wouldn't, unless they strike up a conversation first. See my comment here. Basically, looks get you in the door (initial interest like what OP is talking about) but personality dictates whether you get to stay or you get kicked out (secondary interest, which is what actually leads to a LTR).
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/18 10:56 AM
11

Physical Attractiveness is the Strongest Predictor of Initial Romantic Interest in Both Sexes Are there actually people who disagree with this assertion? It's basic fact. Initial romantic interest almost always has to depend on looks, because that's what you first know about a person. It's the first thing you see, the first judgement you can possibly make in most cases. You see the lightning (looks) before you hear the thunder (personality). A man or woman making the determination if a person is…
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/18 10:50 AM
2

That is certainly a real possibility for some of the reasoning behind this type of reaction. There definitely are a bunch of women who get butthurt or annoyed by men they deem unattractive approaching them. Those kind of women most likely would say that is a "creepy" thing, even though it's not. But imo creepiness isn't about sexual attraction at all, it's about red flags that go up regarding your personal safety. For example, if I'm being obviously followed by someone while in a grocery store, …
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/18 10:22 AM
21

Weird how "creepiness" was associated with an ectomorph/skinny body type. I'd have figured that a mesomorph/muscular type would have set off more "creepy" vibes since a stronger looking male poses more of a potential physical threat than a skinny guy or a chubby guy.
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/18 09:32 AM
8

If a woman says you need to give up a hobby you love in order to be with her, she's obviously not worth keeping around.
/r/MGTOW24/09/18 10:13 AM
0

Definitely. Good for you too, less women trying to befriend you.
/r/MGTOW24/09/18 01:41 AM
0

Lol. Same for you. Guess that's what happens when we're each half of the population. Of course, I'm a tomboy and all my friends are dudes so I wouldn't try to get away from males in general... just ones who irrationally dislike me.
/r/MGTOW23/09/18 11:47 PM
0

Well, yeah. In your case, or guys like you who don't like women simply for being women, it's really best for both parties that you stay away from us. Similarly, Feminists should stay away from men. Nobody ever wants to be around misandrists or misogynists, after all.
/r/MGTOW23/09/18 05:35 PM
0

Your just wasting your time. How exactly is reading and gaining knowledge of new perspectives a "waste of time"? It's actually the opposite. It is time well spent, to understand people who have different life experiences than yourself. Do you think it's a waste of time to read books or watch documentaries too? Me and most guys here will never get with a woman because you all are succubi demons and use unfair rules to your advantage. I was unaware there were any rules to relationships? It's kinda…
/r/MGTOW23/09/18 04:55 PM
0

I read a bunch of different subs. It's good to hear from many different viewpoints, even ones that fly in the face of what you know to be true. Keeps you from becoming stagnant in your beliefs. For example, I sometimes read the red pill women sub even though I'm egalitarian, happily single, and childfree because it's interesting to see what married tradcon women believe. Once in a while I'll read subs dedicated to discussing conservative or liberal stuff, even though I'm a Libertarian. Or I read…
/r/MGTOW23/09/18 03:07 PM
2

Obviously that's what some here believe, and everyone is entitled to their own opinions based on their personal experiences. But saying "all people of X group are like this" simply isn't statistically true. It's like when Feminists claim that 100% of men are potential rapists... obviously false. Same as when some manospherians try to say that 100% of women are disloyal or sluts. That also isn't true.
/r/MGTOW23/09/18 02:35 PM
0

Many women aren't loyal, but that's not true for 100%. Just like for men. There's millions of cheaters out there but that doesn't mean 100% of males are like that.
/r/MGTOW23/09/18 11:10 AM
1

Neither is naturally stronger, they're both around the same in that respect. It's just that in the past male hypergamy was allowed for thousands of years, but due to cultural shifts female hypergamy is now allowed.
/r/MGTOW23/09/18 11:08 AM
1

I wonder, is it possible for a forensic expert to state if it's indeed rape or not? Like, there must be signs of forced entry, but if the bitch wanted to get fucked then that wouldn't exist on her body, right? Not every woman's body is capable of having rough/hard sex since some of us have difficulty with regular penetrative sex. Someone like myself could very much want sex but if my partner or I go to fast/penetrate too quickly without giving my muscles time to relax, it can lead to vaginal str…
/r/MGTOW23/09/18 11:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter