TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sintar07 Archive

View 2 posts and 648 comments by Sintar07 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Sintar07/r/askTRP24/03/18 07:53 AM
0

Sintar07/r/askTRP29/10/19 07:03 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

Well, he kind of encouraged that behavior in his fans.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 08:18 PM
8

This. He supported this happening to other men 100%. Hopefully he's learned something from this.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 08:14 PM
3

I think he is. It's very on theme with the rest of his stuff. Pretty sure this is the same dude who was doing "establish a council of official male culture" a few weeks back, and I think I also regularly see him comment about how 'traditionalists are the real feminists because gender expectations' or something. I'm guessing he's one of these 'fabulous' sorts from a relatively traditional family that thinks it's weird, has some deep seated stuff with them, but hung out with progressives long enou…
/r/MensRights14/04/25 05:23 PM
5

It would be pretty funny if every man woke up tomorrow and announced they were a woman now. Wouldn't even have to actually change anything. Probably cause a progressive crisis of some kind.
/r/MensRights05/04/25 05:14 PM
3

IMO, that's a semantics game. There's plenty of natural and evolved behaviors we reject. The question isn't whether it's new or evolutionary and if it can be named a feature or not, it's whether it's a good behavior or a bad one.
/r/MensRights05/04/25 04:22 PM
0

No they don't. But I suppose I can't expect any more than completely incorrect takes from a crowd that whole heartedly believes everybody was an idiot for thousands and thousand of years, but they're the first people who have ever actually thought about anything 🙄
/r/MensRights05/04/25 03:01 PM
2

Conscription, and really, war in general, is a series of catch-22s that basically piss all over modern ideals and put their weaknesses on full display, because in direct combat, it either works or it doesn't, and there's not much point pretending that what doesn't work does.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 04:29 PM
-1

tradcons can't be correct. Sounds like some very questionable personal dogma. People are fast to call out "if it's traditional, it's automatically good" as poor thinking, but this "if it's traditional, it's automatically bad" is even dumber and runs dead into Chesterton's Fence. People don't make something work from antiquity by accident, and we keep finding out there were actual reasons in real time. There may be better ways, we may have moved beyond some reasons, but blindly spitting at anythi…
/r/MensRights04/04/25 03:33 PM
3

IMO, it would not work. I do believe it could go as far as officially abolishing "the draft" and "the selective service" -in particular. But the moment a draft is needed again, it will return under some other language: "defensive manpower measure" or "military maintenance protocol" or any officious sounding yet inoffensive term you like. We'll be told it's completely different (if we ask), and there may even be very subtle differences from prior drafts that will be greatly inflated to the genera…
/r/MensRights01/04/25 08:26 PM
3

Let's be fair: some do. The increasingly popular feminist pejorative, "pick-me," was basically created to try and forcibly reign those women in by public shaming, and it's growing in popularity because, at least atm, it isn't working and they're in the "maybe it will work if we ramp it up" stage.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 01:20 PM
3

A bot is "people I don't like." There might potentially be some legitimacy to the accusation if an awful lot of the same sort of people showed up at the same time, but it's often just a way to discredit what you don't like. And the way it's used, I don't even think the layman uses "bot" to imply bot; most of the time they seem to be trying to imply more that somebody is speaking disingenously on behalf of some agenda because they're being paid to do so and/or have an ulterior motive. Like "Russi…
/r/MensRights01/04/25 12:43 PM
2

Conservatives do have expectations of men, it's true. Conservatives also believe in men receiving compensation and respect for meeting those expectations, and in something far closer to equality under law. Progressives just flat out hate men and expect them to be responsible for everything, always take the fall, and get nothing, to facilitate women being responsible for nothing and getting everything. This fantasy world of the future they like to dangle sometimes, where men team up with feminist…
/r/MensRights31/03/25 05:12 PM
201

Right after insisting it wasn't to step around the (true) allegations of changing the details of the story that inspired it.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 04:51 PM
2

The idea you can just repaint something and declare "it's different now" is so very left wing. Reminiscent of feminists declaring that, though they had just finished "liberating the female body" or whatever, now they were worried about the "male gaze," so covering women in media back up is now feminist, and exposing them was actually "the patriarchy's" idea. We're all well aware that the left's interest in this is propping up illegal immigration, and has nothing to do with "men" or "mens rights.…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 02:51 PM
2

I don't know why your original post was deleted, but I would question the claim it was getting positive feedback. Last I saw last night, most comments were "no, it's silly and how would that even work?"
/r/MensRights27/03/25 02:32 PM
1

Well that's exactly the point, isn't it? Put a little roadblock up here, a little roadblock up there, multiply it by hundreds, thousands, millions, and it jams up the system and makes it expensive and ineffective, at which point the narrative can be turned in the direction of how expensive and slow it is: "is it even worth it?"
/r/MensRights27/03/25 02:23 PM
84

Feminists, in particular, have a terror of men's spaces because men might be making some kind of connections in private that advantage them without women, or having male thoughts, conversations, development, or bonding without feminine oversight, and a feminist might never know of the feminist unapproved direction of any of those. But it's really just feminists who, for some reason, are permitted to speak on behalf of "women." More normal women don't care (though, in fairness, he very nature of …
/r/MensRights26/03/25 11:33 PM
275

My favorite was when the feminists freaked out about 'men not supporting women' or sonething when the second Captain Marvel underperformed, but it turned out more men went to see it than women. Classic identity politics moment.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 09:58 PM
4

Note, too, the attempts to characterize standard law enforcement, a key aspect of any normal and functioning society, as something unusual and scary. Never forget, we saw how these people handle law enforcement, directly back in the 2020 riots, in "CHAZ." And also indirectly, by controlling and punishing the men who's job it is for doing that job, in major cities around the country. Unsurprisingly, they did a poor job.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 09:39 PM
13

Nice try, but I'm not voting for the party of feminism and active discrimination against men because of your speculative fearmongering on long overdue enforcement of our laws.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 09:05 PM
14

Not to mention that, as always, it has only become a problem because they feel like it's effecting them and ruining their grand ideas about society. It's never, never, never, "men are hurting and we should do something about that." It's always instead, "men ruined our globalist plans and sometimes hurt people we care more about; we will begrudgingly investigate why that's happening so we can try to stop them." And then they get it wrong anyway.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 02:27 PM
11

To answer the question of the post: yes. And the article posted kind of demonstrates it by couching every single concern about men in greater concern for women and reassurances that 'they know women have it bad,' and how very self aware the author is, etc.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 05:55 PM
2

Interesting. Level 7 does seem like the real jump, and I know a lot of people can't make it. I meet them constantly online; incapable (likely willfully at times, to be fair) of remembering who they were and what they thought before... I think my go to example would be what people think they thought about the movie Starship Troopers in the past. I know for a fact that most people at the time of release did not know it was "satire" (quotes because it isn't very good through that lens), and did not…
/r/MensRights21/03/25 07:39 PM
11

Feminists invented the term "emotional labor" because they weren't even doing enough to impress themselves.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 03:35 PM
13

I almost snorted my drink out my nose when it got to the line "24/7 baby machine," as if vast swathes of feminists don't proudly murder their own children for mere convenience and name them the enemy for threatening a lifestyle change.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 03:20 PM
32

We have been told for a long time that "one of the good ones..." is not an acceptable view to take of any member of a broader population. Either it is or it isn't. Can't be double standards for just one group.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 08:00 PM
21

They probably mean when men notice that, despite women getting everything, feminists continue to both pretend women get nothing and demonize men in pursuit of yet more.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 03:57 PM
7

I don't think it's just the estrogen. I think it's also projection. Women know very well how they would treat men if women were bigger and stronger, in no small part because due to earlier onset puberty, many of them are for a few years and lord it over the boys around them. After all, society still treats them with the privileged consideration of tradition, but refuses to demand the demure behavior of tradition that consideration was intended to go with.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 02:45 PM
13

I have definitely gotten the impression there's a lot of lonely women who just refuse to say so or characterize it as something else. Like every time you see the "five cats and a bottle of wine" sorts, there's obviously something missing, but they're going to insist their lives are perfect, because otherwise they become the meme.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 05:19 PM
18

You've never seen the stuff presenting the murder of a child as a grand tragedy for the woman because "postpartum depression" or 'being desperate and afraid' or something? But fair enough, I'll see if I can find you one in a bit.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 08:03 PM
10

For sure, but it used to be more equitable; a responsibility coming in part with a higher position, and in part out of respect for women's own risks in bringing new life to the world. It hits differently in a time when women have demanded mens' "privilege" and roundly rejected their own responsibilities as some manner of oppression.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 07:53 PM
33

Well, there's the (sort of) pragmatic reason and the real reason. The pragmatic reason is, having told women they should prioritize career above all to get more workers and given them absolute authority to kill their own kids, including an awful lot of handwaving even after birth when it's not technically legal anymore, because those kids could "ruin" their lives by interfering with that all important career... The system still needs people. And the women, empowered with absolute authority over …
/r/MensRights31/01/25 07:13 PM
20

I am personally of the opinion that baseline human behavior has that aspect... however, men (presumably because we are leaned on and can do more damage) are firmly expected to control ourselves -and always have been. Women are not. In the past, that meant men set themselves in charge and (mostly) let women do their thing from a place of relative harmlessness. The theoretical aim of feminism should have been to transition women from that place to a place of adult freedoms and expectations, and to…
/r/MensRights23/01/25 07:42 PM
144

Well, just straight-up lying is certainly one way to pad your politically important stats.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 07:28 PM
6

There is NO world in which men would get away with killing babies because they were sad; this is as it should be. But a female privilege to kill is certainly a men's rights issue. Some of these babies killed will be male babies, probably the majority where it's feminist mothers. Males being killed, especially by feminists, is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 02:01 PM
102

"Postpartum."
/r/MensRights21/01/25 11:21 PM
26

Well that would look much, much worse, and this already looks bad. Don't know how Finlands numbers are, since they're quite a bit smaller, but here in America we've averaged a million a year for the past 6 decades and hit numbers that put most genocides to shame. Some fall under medical necessity and the very grey area of rape, of course, but the overwhelming majority (like 95%) are for financial concerns or because they don't feel like a kid.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 10:56 PM
16

That principle rarely extends beyond a pet issue or two, and never into territory where it might disadvantage them. They will insist they believe it whole heartedly, of course, but there's always a reason it's different when it's time to make someone else do things.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 10:58 PM
30

Because at broad identitarian levels it's almost basic game theory. You have two groups, men and women, and both can broadly behave responsibly or do whatever they want. Society used to broadly hold everyone accountable and expect them to behave, albeit in different ways. Feminists want (and have often gotten) society to push men to behave and be responsible but allow women to do whatever they want because (morality aside) "You hold up your end while I do what's best for me" is the winning squar…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 10:51 PM
8

I'd guess "greedy" more, because honestly, it sounds like she could quit now.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 08:00 PM
25

Ugh, women's "pockets" thing is so dumb. Just constant whining: "why can't we have pockets?!?" and then absolute refusing to buy stuff with pockets. Why? Because they want pockets, but they also want the sculpted look of their designer jeans or a clean, straight hang of the skirt, and the pockets interfere with that, and women consistently choose looks over pockets. Guys choose comfort and function, so we're sold comfort and function. And frankly, nobody is stopping women from buying guy jeans a…
/r/MensRights25/12/24 06:47 PM
2

But that's exactly the truth that the "both sides" people are talking around. It is true that both sides expect men to foot the bill, but traditionalists follow that up with respect, and societal and even some legal privileges, in recognition of the work men do, and have (lesser, admittedly) expectations and duties for women too. By contrast, progressives expect men foot the bill but follow it up with making men eat dirt, giving every right and privilege to women, and reassuring them they owe no…
/r/MensRights23/12/24 06:01 PM
15

Exactly what you think: nothing.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 03:16 PM
2

I'd fight for my wife and literal sisters because they don't suck and I owe them some loyalty. The rest? If they haven't chased their own brothers off, their brothers can fight for them; otherwise, I guess they can enjoy their time with the enemy, whoever that may be.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 02:47 PM
4

Oh, it's not just "now." The wide spread extra hatred for specific babies is relatively recent, but they've hated babies in general the whole time.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 08:42 PM
7

I firmly believe one of the reasons many of these movements are so dead set against opposition spaces and try to get them all labeled "hate speech" and banned is because they are well aware from their own spaces how effective it is to have a space that reframes things to fit the narrative and keep the participants on board. Consider, if this woman didn't have that space to flee to and be validated, she would currently be having an adult discussion about the issues with her husband and probably c…
/r/MensRights20/12/24 02:12 PM
8

Yeah, that's always fun. They seem more and more to just believe flatly false things, and if you point out it isn't true, they get angry and try to silence you. Offensive facts remain facts and often win out in the end by virtue of existing, but there's a prevalent belief among some of these people that facts are just a social construct too, and whoever wins gets to decide what they are, because if enough people act like it's true then it almost is. Basically, if you call a tail a leg, a dog sti…
/r/MensRights20/12/24 02:04 PM
35

That's more or less it. My own mother, though she would never admit it, was part of a divorce chain. If you've never had the displeasure to witness one, it's basically all the women in a social circle getting a divorce, one at a time like dominos, as the other women in the circle get one and start talking up the "empowerment" and "freedom," finding fault with their friend's husbands, and pushing then to get divorced too. The purpose seems to be validation, i.e. if they're all divorced, then none…
/r/MensRights20/12/24 01:58 PM
10

Fan magazine in the 60s or 70s, I think. Pre-internet it was the big way fans circulated fan fiction. One of the editors created Ensign Mary-Sue as a parody of a class of very common submissions to the magazine that did not have a name yet.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 06:29 AM
56

Or "It's like he thought he could buy me." Or "He didn't respect my agency to pay for myself." Really sounds like he was just fucked as soon as being poor came up.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 03:30 PM
10

Christianity fully acknowledges the world sucks by the free will of its inhabitants, but without that, we would be little more than biological automatons. It is permitted to facilitate our sentience and allow us to learn from both triumph and tragedy. This isn't the endgame.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 09:22 PM
9

Sure, it does not inherently mean that, and yet, they weren't. Men consistently received the short end of the stick on everything but power, and that power was provided with the clear expectation they would be responsible for and protect women and children.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 05:47 PM
1

It's basically social pressure, legal action, and, as you say, waiting for them to notice on their own it makes them less competitive. We've already seen when social pressure rises against affirmative action, they just rename it and keep trucking. We've already seen the courts will tell them to stop, but not penalize them, and they nod dutifully, rename it, and keep trucking. So now we're on "DEI initiatives," which are even worse than before, and their seeming current play against the social is…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 02:10 PM
4

The expression means that if you have a cake and eat it, you no longer have a cake. Though I also have a critique; if you have a cake and never eat it, it gets moldy and you still don't have a cake.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 09:22 PM
37

In theory, I support anything that tilts towards cultural traditionalism because women need to collectively either step up to responsibility or step down from privilege, and I don't believe they'll do the former, but... I admit, there's facets of that in the current trend. With any luck, it will be dismissed as unreasonable expectations in time.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 02:19 PM
8

Some people on this sub, honestly too many people, think that men will only be free when we can completely eschew our responsibilities without consequence like (some) women, seemingly not understanding that this will simply be the end of any civilization and then it's the law of the jungle and nobody will enjoy any benefits or protections. They see humanity as half free and want everybody to enjoy that level of irresponsibility. Suggestions that women step up to adult responsibilities instead of…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 09:58 PM
4

The suggestion that the only options in regards to children are doing nothing but childbearing ever or never doing it at all is a weird and glaringly false dichotomy.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 09:07 PM
11

I'm genuinely glad others have the patience to read the study and find exactly how it's biased and obviously incorrect, but I knew it from the headline alone. I swear the fake science is starting to have almost an aura of unreality about it that one can just sense.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 06:11 PM
-13

I am legit incredibly jealous of women's ability to bear children and, in equal and directly related measure, disgusted with those women who spurn their greatest gift and power out of selfishness or misplaced pride.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 05:58 PM
14

I actually ran across a post the other day in, I want to say, womeninthenews. Haven't joined it or asked it to appear; reddit just pushes prog stuff at me. Anyway, it was some malarkey about "women losing the tight to vote" that basically said "some dudes online said this when they were angry; that means it must be Trumps secret agenda!" Women down in the comments are like "if this happens we need to go on strike, no more traditional tasks like cleaning or helping w/the kids at all, no sex, also…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 01:35 PM
11

I don't really think he will, but I've been crossing my fingers Trump will randomly identify as a woman for a day and declare himself the first woman president.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 10:38 PM
18

No, not at all. If anything, this is a perfect example of how ridiculously society ends up having to bend over for bad behavior when they just allow it.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 02:09 PM
7

It's an issue with their entire political block at this point. "Words are violence," but actual violence is "peaceful protest" or "freedom of expression" -if the right person did it. But feminists actually got it in law with men. Male freedom of speech hangs on by the barest threads in America with the government, and is harshly extra-legally punished, and in Europe it's legally punished. Women, meanwhile, are permitted to openly assault men, largely without repurcussion, in any of these places.…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 07:33 PM
2

They're barely against abortion right now, more's the pity.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 08:00 PM
11

Yes, and we've all put together the pattern that feminists collectively think every man is misogynist, every action "proves" it, and even actions directly to the contrary are some kind of manipulation and, therefore, even more sinister.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 07:56 PM
16

Actually, I think it's more that he doesn't kowtow to their feelings in his speeches. It's all of it, but this is probably the biggest and first thing that set them off to start negatively spinning the rest. Like keystone moment, probably, was the "grab 'em by the pussy" bit, which they always misleadingly cite without the rest of the sentence to imply he was encouraging assault or something... Because what he was actually saying was much worse and more embaressing (for them): that a certain cla…
/r/MensRights22/11/24 07:51 PM
44

Right? I mean, it's weird, because while I kind of enjoy them taking it as a personal middle finger from "men," I seem to remember exit poll stats indicating about 54% of male voters voted Trump while about 54% of female voters voted Harris... so it isn't exactly.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 12:55 PM
8

It's one of those things that's annoying, but objectively minor, and not really worth more time than noting for the record. It's kind of like charging someone with murder, arson, and jaywalking, you know?
/r/MensRights20/11/24 06:30 PM
4

I assume it was a case of 'did it in a blind rage to "win" by any means, thought about it after the fact.' But I never did ask. I have a whole clan of a family that's very close, so it could be that she realized I was unlikely to just vanish from her life with the cops, or that the family told her off.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 07:24 PM
14

Asked a girl to a dance in high school. She said she was busy that day. Went anyway and saw her there; I assume she hadn't expected me to go and was embarrassed, because next thing she's telling everybody I'm "a stalker" and ruining my reputation. Asked a girl out in college like, "I really like you, could we get coffee sometime?" She said no, I was disappointed but thought that would be the end of it. Turns out she was 17, there on advanced placement, and telling anyone who would listen I was "…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 06:59 PM
2

The surveys that provide that 1 in 4 stat are insane. They're purely self report, but throw out all non-respondents, creating not only an initial bias towards people who want to tell you about something, but a self reinforcing bias with the reputation of the surveys. Further, the questions they ask largely describe situations that aren't necessarily rape, or even just aren't period. For example, "have you ever had sex after drinking?" (many couples will plan to share drinks and have sex on a rom…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 05:00 PM
2

Geeze, that's disturbing. Makes me think of spiders getting their babies and then eating their mates. Glad you got out.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 04:29 PM
1

I'm sorry, her grandmother killed her own son?
/r/MensRights14/11/24 04:21 PM
9

But they bulk at any responsibility. Srry, I know this is an autocorrect issue and you meant "balk," but I totally got a mental image of she-hulk freaking and transforming because dishes.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 04:12 PM
25

While obviously designed to take a swipe at pro-aborts' favorite slogan and make them angry, "your body, my choice" is already the attitude of women, and society broadly, towards men. And double standards like these are untenable.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 04:09 PM
52

Always bears noting that at the same time women were upset they didn't just receive the right to vote, men were marching into the meat grinder that was WWI for theirs. At the same time women complain they were "forced" to do difficult housework, men were spending their days in pre-OSHA mines, factories, and chemical plants. Women were very proud of stepping up to do some factory work of their own... when we were in a state of total war and something like 20% of men were going toe to toe with Naz…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 04:03 PM
1

So the theory behind it is that what is desirable is "financial independence," i.e. the ability to support yourself without help from another person. In the case of feminism, it was pursued because slews of men were ALLEGEDLY abusing women and using their lack of ability to support themselves as a leash. I will stress again, allegedly, as over time we have discovered that feminists regularly exaggerate and lie; it's almost certain that this happened occasionally, but probably not remotely at the…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 03:41 PM
-2

On the contrary, it's absurd not to. Here's the truth: you can't get rid of the draft. You think you can, but you can't. It hasn't happened recently because it hasn't been needed, but they won't hesitate to use one (and use the appropriate propaganda to get enough people on board with it) if necessary. They might call it something else, but it will be a draft. In this case, the path to equality is acknowledging that women (who you can count on not being included in the draft) have their own soci…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 03:15 PM
1

She already can, so she should be willing to "risk" a bit of discomfort to not kill his child.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 02:37 PM
11

Basically, they're discovering there were reasons for everything that upset them and they wanted torn down, but they can't just say "you were right" after all the shit they put society through. Especially since that would lose them their power, which they still want. So their plan is rephrase it, angrily and in their own language, and pretend it was their idea. A good metaphor here would be a woman demanding her husband take down a wall for keeping wild animals out because it's restricting her, …
/r/MensRights14/11/24 02:25 PM
6

That's the happiest ending to someone in the government stalking you that I've ever heard 😅 But congratulations, man.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 01:47 PM
2

I'm almost jealous, sounds like you were sitting pretty through election season, silver lining either way. Can't complain too much myself, but it's always tense.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 07:24 PM
2

Though, while certainly not "billions," we once again left a bunch of our local allies behind. I swear, one of these wars the locals are going to stop helping Americans on the basis we stir everything up and leave them behind, and I'll find it very hard to blame them.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:16 AM
-3

Tell me how having a foreskin prevents discriminatory HR action. Go.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 07:36 PM
2

For sure. Can't even discuss it in a "What is the practical purpose of this rule" sort of way some days; all has to be 'arbitrary and dumb because some old dudes wanted to control everyone' and must be resisted on principle, nevermind if every society had the rule independently and a bunch of seculars have logicked their way back around to it too. But what are you gonna do? 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights07/11/24 07:17 PM
2

This actually seems like a smart, reasonable, even elegant solution. It's not like insurance wants to pay for stuff, so it could be an easy sell compared to other ideas. It's not like people want to pay for stuff either, so some of them won't, and those kids will have even less incentive to later on. Would build social momentum completely passively, and not step on the pertinent religion's toes either.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:33 PM
6

Because they KNOW how viciously toxic and shitty they are when they talk behind other peoples' backs Men used to know too. Malicious gossip used to be a punishable offense, and we ostensibly grandfathered that into more secular legal systems with laws against slander, but good luck getting any judge to enforce that today. What's really wild is women will actually boast about how they used to cause such problems that the village elders would literally gag them and hold onto the key. I learned abo…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 03:39 PM
1

I think you're reading too much into it. The director was just mad the "wrong people" liked his film for the "wrong reasons" and wasted everyone's time and money to character assassinate his own unexpected and unwanted hero.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 03:01 PM
61

And frankly? It just doesn't matter. First and foremost, who are they actually punishing? The promiscuously sexual women were doing it for themselves and their own satisfaction in the first place, not for men's benefit, so they're really only punishing themselves and anyone they're currently sleeping with (i.e. men who are probably already on their side). Hilariously, the only way they could punish the men they hate is if they were already receptive to the men they hate. At best for them, this w…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:57 PM
-15

I think this is objectively one of the smallest issues faced by men, and one of the hardest to fight, being culturally and in some places religiously ingrained in society. I think spending time and effort fighting enemies on it is pointless and fighting potential friends on it is a trap. Speaking as a circumcised man, it simply hasn't effected my life. I've never felt "something is missing" or "violated" or any of the other stuff. It just is and always has been. I'd have been helped far more in …
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:37 PM
5

In the west too, occasionally, though it's very frowned on. Many will still be beaten though, even if not so extremely as to die. In fairness, it's often because they try to fight police, and idk what we're supposed to do about that. It'd be nice if the cops were amazing at de-escelation, but I also hardly expect them to just stand there and take it.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 06:55 PM
14

I'm genuinely curious what he's going to do with situations like Israel and Ukraine. Call him a showboating narcissist if you like, but the man loved to go to hostile places, shake hands, and try to build rapport, even if he had to strong arm a bit to get in. He loved being seen to tackle these problem places from a place of strength. Wasn't afraid to flex, but he also didn't get baited into war. Like the time he ordered the assassination of that Iranian general who was managing a bunch of the t…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 06:30 PM
2

Oh, many thoughts. In order: 1, Killing babies for petty reasons (or no reasons) is wrong regardless of legality. Nevertheless, I would like our laws to reflect that. 2, It's a "right" nobody should have, but even if it wasn't wrong, it was established on the shakiest of rulings (since overturned, of course) against the express will of the overwhelming majority of states at the time. It is not the formative, foundational right they portray it as. 3, An awful lot of women don't believe in this "r…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 06:07 PM
1

IF you're right, we'll all be in that boat together and men in a better position to bail it out, instead of being under the heels of women.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 03:01 PM
1

I encourage you not to mistake people's primary concern being the cost of gas and food for people having no other concerns; while their PR machine is incredible and has successfully talked down more incidents than I would have believed possible, the left has definitely taken lumps for some of their rather extreme progressive social views. You guys have a tendency to write off embarrassing and awkward moments as 'not representative of whatever movement' and forget them quickly; others... don't al…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 03:00 PM
5

They didn't need to be proven right; they considered us guilty without trial. And a Harris election was never going to exonerate us, but would rather be taken as a mandate to proceed with our just punishment.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 02:15 PM
5

for every woman that dies because of *activist doctors performatively pretending not to understand laws that allow lifesaving care, which incidentally weren't going to change under Harris anyway because they're local to hard red states and without a national constitutional ammendment, weren't going anywhere. FTFY.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 02:13 PM
34

You know what the problem with these potential "sex strikes" is? If it's only those women who voted Harris, because far more women voted Trump than they thought would, then they're only punishing the men that already support them. And moreover, I don't think any men on the fence or in cross-political relationships are going to be convinced to vote blue in the future by witnessing their partner cynically wield their very intimacy as a weapon; in fact quite the contrary.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:01 AM
38

Of course not, because their alleged oppression is the basis of their power. They aren't physically strong and they aren't risk takers. Their only real power comes from getting men to do what they want by appealing to mens' moral sensibilities.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 08:56 AM
4

and both of them apply the same standards to the men around them. i thought they just assume men were sexual predators. A minor clarification, "both of them" in this sentence meant both groups of theoretical men under discussion, and the fact that men who want women to sleep around are not expecting men to abstain, and men who want women to remain pure expect men to do so for their future wife as well.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 06:03 PM
3

and i fucking hate that, like if the women want to be a slave and is living the time of her life as it why do other women get to tell if she is unhappy or not? There's a few, not necessarily mutually exclusive, answers to this. Some feminists are going to claim that it's self evidently slavery because "unpaid labor" or something -setting aside the obvious issues with this, of course, like the strangeness of expecting to be paid for caring for your own children and house, or the fact the women in…
/r/MensRights27/10/24 06:01 PM
7

they use conservative household data to proof that women are forced to become stay at home parents in liberal households AND claim oppression based on that... And the opposite: using liberal opinions on children and housework to prove that conservative women (who want that) are miserable. It's very like the feminists who go online and say "why do men call women who sleep around "slts" and women who don't sleep around "prudes?" They just hate women..." completely neglecting to recognize that it i…
/r/MensRights27/10/24 03:57 PM
37

There was a when home chores meant washing and starching shirts by hand, dragging area rugs outside and beating the dust out of them. Product advances have changed all that. Though it bears noting that at that time, men were spending their days in pre-regulation mines, chemical plants, factories, etc. -or on the frontlines of major wars. There's a reason we're taught about first wave feminism, early unions, and WWI as separate phenomena, even though they happened at the same time. And that's wha…
/r/MensRights27/10/24 03:49 PM
32

if 20% of crimes are against women and girls, does that make 80% of crime against men and boys? If that is the case which one is a 'national emergency'? Because feminists are for women's advancement, not equality, and despite hating traditionalism and attacking it at every opportunity for having expectations of women, feminists expect all the traditional comforts and protections thereof and consider them their due as women. Therefore, men are expected to restrict any violent actions to other men…
/r/MensRights25/10/24 05:02 PM
2

Dude, even if the good ones actually want to help, even if the best ones do, I see only sinister things in the push to get everyone on therapy. At best a means of getting people dependent on another system to advance medications and drugs. Very likely an avenue for the government to ultimately regulate so they get a say in the advice passed down to the masses and the drugs administered to them. At worst, these people will report to the government and be spies into our personal lives.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 01:17 PM
3

I suppose I should be pleased this one is just a straightforward and honest political appeal instead of the normal post trying to attach feminism to traditionalism, but progressives are still not for men, and in fact, often expressly anti-man.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 08:11 PM
35

And moreover, if she's just drugging and robbing these men, she's not even so little as a "sex worker," she's just a thief.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 07:12 PM
12

IMO, that's backwards; feminism is just the advancement of women, period, and all the alleged ideals are just justification after the fact. At some point recently, I realized that first wave in the late 1910's was literally happening at the same time as WWI, and though both are taught and mentioned often, you never hear them mentioned together as contemporary things, because it throws into a harsh light how petty, easy, and openly seeking power first wave's "fight" really was. It wasn't about eq…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 06:03 PM
5

I think he, and many who will read this, are just a bit suspicious of the claim you have seen large amounts of male genitalia in Hollywood films. Like there are NC-17s, sure, but those rarely even show in theatres and you kind of have to look for them. The rest of Hollywood is still waffling on breasts and the occasional full front on a woman. And if you're just talking about Watchmen, Dr. Manhattan has total control over his matter and is as hung as he wants to be.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 06:03 PM
0

That doesn't sound a thing like what I said. Are you comparing adult responsibilities to slavery and nuclear holocaust or the concept of citizenship?
/r/MensRights18/10/24 01:13 PM
3

her... she... There's your issue ;) But joking aside, you should understand that, barring a few genuine saints who are already doing what they can and want to do more, socialists don't really care about you. They broadly fall into three categories in my experience, and the best, the middle class to wealthy who believe in the system, are still low key using it as an excuse not to care about the people around them (who they could already be helping), like "I'm a more advanced human because I care …
/r/MensRights18/10/24 01:01 PM
4

Yep, that's certainly one way to balance the equation, and is, in fact, how civilization balanced the equation for the last several thousand years. Used to wonder why.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 05:10 PM
5

In an ideal world. In the real world, there's stuff that needs to be done and someone needs to do it. We use various means to incentivize people to it, and when those fail (or become too expensive) we use force. We always have. And we always will. I don't believe for a moment that getting rid of drafts will accomplish anything; the government in dire need will simply create an identical system with a different name and portray it as a great progressive step in civic responsibility. So the only r…
/r/MensRights17/10/24 03:09 PM
7

I think you meant 'perchild with a uterus.' The suffix "son" assumes masculinity and is, therefore, sexist and erasing of feminine perchilds with uteri.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 11:51 AM
6

A pitch for black men that was really a pitch for black women. Sounds like any leftist attempt to court men, honestly. I remember a feminist dude angrily telling me there were totally male spaces under feminism (after I said something to the contrary) and linking me like three male feminist organizations, which predictably all described themselves as shit like "places for men to organize and deploy themselves for women."
/r/MensRights16/10/24 05:10 PM
21

This is the answer, and I would add, further, that women are far more communal, more vulnerable to shaming (this is why they try to elevate words to the level of actual assault), and have terrible in group bias compared to men (remember, women getting the right to vote by ammendment required an overwhelming majority of male support, since they were the only ones voting on it). Additionally, men are often loyal to one thing: their families and personal responsibilities, and women are often willin…
/r/MensRights16/10/24 02:48 PM
15

Probably the same way it's to blame for queens being more violent than kings: the evil violent structure of the patriarchy forced them to.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 12:20 AM
8

It's a little irrational. While one must acknowledge any of those are possibilities, we should try to stay realistically aware of the long odds against most of it. And unfortunately, as you say, we cannot read minds, and the only way to get things like companionship is to go try. But pay attention to what women say. If they're openly anti-man on their profiles or on the first date, the odds of any of these are going to go up.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 05:52 PM
2

Yep. The slippery slope "fallacy" is intended to point out the problem of simply pointing to anything, extending it to it's illogical extreme, and declaring it must inevitably lead there. But it is now inappropriately applied to things where you can detail a clear path from one point to the next supported by past events. It's even sometimes inexplicably applied to things that already happened.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 08:21 AM
14

You raise a fair point, and yet even when it is brought up, we're also treated to denial, justification, "children need their mothers," friendly judges, and just generally the "women are wonderful" effect to keep punishments light to nonexistent. If a law isn't enforced, is the activity actually illegal?
/r/MensRights02/10/24 07:30 PM
2

More to the point, whether it's true or not, approaching people as individuals is still the best way to handle problem people without sweeping aside the innocent with the guilty.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 07:27 PM
24

Yes. But if they were allowed to run away, they might. The west is sending a message they don't just expect Ukrainian men to stay and defend their country no matter how hard it shits on them, they also expect Russian men to stay and invade Ukraine even though we ostensibly hate that.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 07:19 PM
4

Might as well come in for the easy post-work years and milk it for all it's worth. What does the UK military even do anymore? I mean, I know they get into random stuff, but it seems like they just act as a special unit of the US. They gave up their empire entirely and backed out of all management of former territories. I don't think they're involved in any of the instability in Africa anymore, because of prior scandals with UN peacekeeping and fear of looking imperialist. And for all Europe want…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 03:17 PM
53

When men are ahead, men are privileged because we're ahead. When women are ahead, men are privileged because women want a man who's ahead, but we're just taking it easy instead of getting ahead for them to have.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 12:54 AM
1

Yeah, no, that's more or less correct. Eugenics was huge world wide before WWII and died (relatively) quickly after because Germany turned it up to 11 and scared everyone. In a very dark way, the Nazis did us a great service; without them, we all might have marched to the same place as them together, just a bit more slowly.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 11:02 PM
1

The plan was for them to die off on their own. America's eugenicists never went as hardcore or as impatient as Germany's, but they got big on the idea of soft pressure to get "undesirables" to just wither out. Planned Parenthood was going to be a big part of that, which is why I find it concerning when people accept the same propaganda once directed at black mothers (babies will ruin your life, the way to build wealth is not to have children, etc.) at face value when more broadly directed.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 10:31 PM
5

The good news is it definitely will. Unsustainable things always collapse sooner or later. The bad news is it might take a bit; you can force it for some time on belief and eagerness alone. And the other bad news is when it does collapse, the harder they pushed it and the more of society they invested in it, the nastier the fall is. When it finally comes, people like you and I (if we are alive), though we may revel in the justice of it, it may not be particularly enjoyable either. But... in hist…
/r/MensRights14/09/24 03:41 PM
1

18 is "pretty young," because that's where we've moved the Overton window on the issue. Perception of age and adulthood has been highly malleable throughout history, and for much of it, 18 would be considered a fully mature and experienced human. It was not very long ago, in the grand scheme of things, that the civilized center of the world recruited children down to 12 to serve on ships and the frontlines, and not just orphans or something, but 3rd sons of the nobility. And those kids rose to t…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 06:17 PM
2

That is a terrible idea that would not have the intended effects and would definitely make the population crisis much, much worse.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 02:32 PM
3

Idk what to tell you, man. If two people go to the court and tell two different stories, and things supporting the details of one are found, that's considered evidence. It means at least part of that story is true and the whole thing is more likely to be true. It's bad enough already we so often treat the accused as guilty until proven innocent in these cases, but you seem to additionally want to declare potential evidence as "offensive" and bar it.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 02:20 PM
5

But it would be considered a piece of evidence in favor of a dude who said "this guy said he was going to come over to play with a buttplug."
/r/MensRights13/09/24 01:31 PM
14

Closer to "ideal beauty standards" in places nobody who they aren't undressing for will ever see.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 12:08 PM
32

Girls: "My space sucks, let me in yours!" Boys: "Why not improve your space or make a new one?" Girls: "Just let me in, sexist!" Girls: *makes the boys space suck too
/r/MensRights12/09/24 07:04 PM
4

Seems very on brand this political season.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 02:45 AM
1

I was ready for that. I'm shocked to see it didn't happen. Maybe because the moderator removed the post.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 11:04 PM
22

Didn't say I did ;) Just that people expect you to. And unfortunately, "who's the real sexist" is one of those games where perception can matter more than fact, and complicated heavily by the existence of more traditional women who embrace their traditional roles, reject feminist idpol, and therefore reasonably expect their traditional accommodation.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 04:53 PM
6

Ok. Bluntly, how can we know this is real? Like, it's well within the realm of possibilities, sure, but honestly, I've kind of resigned myself to not really knowing what's going on in this war until it's been over for a couple decades or so. Too much propaganda. I mean, y'all remember the Ghost of Kyiv? CNN literally ran video game footage and claimed it was a heroic Ukrainian pilot. Russia's been 'on the back foot, totally going to collapse any day now' for years. This is the problem with propa…
/r/MensRights06/09/24 04:42 PM
101

Yeah, but only if they ask. If they don't ask and you offer, you're sexist. If they do ask and you say no, you're also sexist. Also, you may be sexist just for existing.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 04:26 PM
1

Child Sexual Assault.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 07:53 PM
28

They want our votes for now, but hope either way for them to become unnecessary; women make a slim majority at present and are more easily swayed by their rhetoric than men when removed from social support structures like family and religion. Their work for some time now has been tearing down every conceivable social support and replacing it with their politics.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 03:22 PM
51

As with everything, they decide if they're a hivemind or not as is most convenient in the moment. If they feel judged by their proximity to another woman, "we aren't a hivemind." If they need the backing of "the sisterhood" to win an argument, then they speak for all women.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 01:18 PM
13

Ah, the endless effort to convince men that those who openly embrace feminism and despise us are actually our friends because "everything bad is right wing."
/r/MensRights04/09/24 01:14 PM
41

It is really wild how often women just leave for several months, years, or quit entirely, but they expect these schools and industries to be catered around and for them.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 01:13 PM
2

In fact, you're even more correct than you thought; all kinds of men did not get the right to vote 200 years before women. Land owning men got the right to vote 200 years before women, and at least one place allowed land owning women to vote too. By 100 years before women were given the right to vote, most men still couldn't vote most places. In fact, by the time of the 19th Ammendment, which casually granted women the right men across the West had just been drafted to a brutal war for, a variet…
/r/MensRights03/09/24 01:17 PM
5

So there's admins and mods, and there's no such thing as a sub admin. Admins are paid positions under the company with special powers granted on the overarching site and no official sub affilloations. Mods are volunteer positions that have special powers inside their own subs and nowhere else. You may have confused admins with "powermods," an unofficial designation denoting a user who's been made a mod in a vast amount of subs and is usually affiliated with admins (they spread via admins finding…
/r/MensRights29/08/24 01:22 PM
10

To my understanding of history, exactly that instability is believed to be one of the big reasons harems were left behind in the first place. People with no investment in society and no societal investment in them will gleefully tear it down, even those unwilling to go that far will sort of check out (we are absolutely seeing the latter with men right now), and the end result is civilizations filled with strife.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 05:14 PM
3

Sometimes they even redefine them as good because it helped a woman, nevermind who it hurt, and openly celebrate and campaign for more.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 06:36 PM
6

Oh. This post... again. "Yeah, guys, feminists might dump on you day and night for existing, invent new rights you must lose yours for, and mobilize the state itself to hunt you on their behalf (looking at you, UK)... but what about those tradcons, huh? What about the tradcons having horrible ideas like your rights coming with responsibility? Or stepping up to work for or defend society when crisis strikes in exchange for honor and opportunity (of course, feminists want the same thing, but will …
/r/MensRights20/08/24 06:34 PM
4

Yeah, it's pretty ridiculous, and someone or other makes sure to post it regularly. I don't think the point is to make any sense or be at all reasonable, it's to try and catch emotionally waffling men who are slowly opening their eyes but still struggling to leave behind the rhetoric they've heard all their life that "the right is pure evil." Maybe give them an out for their difficulties in the form of a nice safe space like menslib that's just controlled opposition, pinky promising men they'll …
/r/MensRights20/08/24 06:21 PM
1

A civil war between men and women? That sounds like it would be over quickly.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 06:33 AM
2

I find it telling that when men were in charge of women, women were asked to work as little as possible, allowed to give over their time to social pursuits and hobbies, and generally honored and respected for their essential role as mothers. But when women are in charge of men... this! All of this!
/r/MensRights20/08/24 06:28 AM
3

Except even worse, because the pigs pretended they supported the whole farm, and the animals were in it together. Feminist pigs pretend to support half the farm and actively oppress the other half to prove it. The less they actually do for the one half, the more they have to do against the other to make up for it, and they do so very little for that first half.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 06:25 AM
1

Hardly surprising. Feminism, like stalinism, is a braincells of the left and just one of many avenues to power for them, and they take whatever pans out.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 06:10 AM
1

If they treat their men like this, absolutely. No man should ever die for women like this. Ever! Can you even imagine having your entire leg torn off of your body, maimed for life, only to get "I mean, you're brave and stuff, but that leg gives me the ick," from the women at home? That is insane, the ultimate in male disposability! If they can't find enough respect to treat the men who stand between them and the wolves right, those men should stand aside and move on.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 05:48 PM
4

I liked the "women need romantic relationships to cope..." bit. Like "why can't the men simultaneously prosecute a war against a superior opponent and make time for my needs? 😢"
/r/MensRights05/08/24 05:41 PM
19

The part after it is worse. Not sure how I got in since I don't subscribe; maybe they do a "few free articles a month to get you interested thing." On the dating app Bumble, Ms. Bairachna liked the looks of a hipster. But when she scrolled through his photographs, she noticed his amputated leg. “I looked at his profile for 15 minutes and felt so sorry for him,” Ms. Bairachna, 35, a marketing director for a clothing brand in Kyiv, said in an interview. She wondered if she could handle a relations…
/r/MensRights05/08/24 05:29 PM
8

Shoe is pretty great, though sadly will probably be making far less content in the future. She announced in her last video that she's had a baby, is spending most of her time on baby, and isn't planning to change that (and good for her).
/r/MensRights05/08/24 03:01 PM
3

Right. The current state of "anti-racism" is literally racism, and anyone against it "far right," for one example.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 02:57 PM
8

That escalated quickly.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 11:49 PM
1

Because they have influence and their opinions carry weight whether they're foolish feelings based opinions or not.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 01:37 PM
14

Yes, yes, yes except I didn't wait, no, yes but not quickly because that would broadcast my concerns and draw attention, I avoid talking to small children in public because people accuse men of being pedos for interacting with children, yes, yes, no, sort of, yes. We all have problems. Some of us are taught we can't use those as an excuse to abuse the people around us... and a lot of women are taught they can 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights31/07/24 03:28 AM
3

I've noticed some women swinging back towards traditionalism are actually taking proactive steps like cutting feminist friends out if they won't stop negging, so that's promising.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 01:32 PM
6

Heh, reminds me of a Moroccan woman I dated briefly. I was mystified when she described herself as liberal but listened almost exclusively to right wing talk radio, until I realized she was a recent immigrant and very progressive for small town Morocco, which of course made her an "alt right nazi" here.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 01:29 PM
2

I couldn't tell you. I am very fortunate in that most women in my family loathe feminists.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 10:30 PM
5

🤔✋️ Monk mode 😏👉 Return to monke
/r/MensRights16/07/24 05:17 AM
7

Le sigh Feminism is not "a socially conservative movement," it is a women's supremacy movement that always seeks what is best for women, an ideal that has nothing to do with conservatism or the right wing, that always demands what it considers best for women (it isn't always actually best for women) and only for women. It is most often progressive because it is most often asking for a relaxation of responsibilities and expectations placed on them or new privilege, and both are opposed by conserv…
/r/MensRights08/07/24 08:42 PM
4

No -but neither is anything else on the left.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 08:07 PM
3

Cannot agree with the wording that feminism is trying to preserve gender roles because it is unnecessarily confusing. I suspect OP is on the left and trying to resolve his personal politics with the realities of feminism and it's close relationship with the left by coming up with some mental gymnastics to categorize them with the "badguys" instead. It's confusing because it's basically false.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 08:06 PM
4

Also, on a more basic level, the concept of "hate crime" makes a bit of a statement that other crimes are lesser, and victims of violence, harassment, whatever for non "hate" reasons are lesser victims. Some are going so far as being sympathetic to non "hate" crimes because "they were desperate," or "driven to it," or "historically have been oppressed" or something; to them "hate" is the only true crime. As if my car being stolen was any less stressful, made me any less unable to get to work, or…
/r/MensRights08/07/24 07:50 PM
14

No, not even a little, and in fact, if you add race to the equation they are immediately capable of seeing the obvious bigotry. They will, of course, blame it on you for "bringing race into it," but they are nigh universally unable to repeat any of their misandric statements about black men specifically. The danger in such a statement is clear to them. Some will even go so far as to say they would feel far safer with a black man. Of course, if indeed there is nothing wrong with what they said ab…
/r/MensRights08/07/24 07:21 PM
3

Marxists.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 02:34 PM
3

Nah, I see "left men parties" say they're pushing something for us, but you take a look at what they're pushing and it's just feminism. Conservatives have a cohesive vision of how men should benefit for the expectations society places on them. The left just pinky promises we'll totally get to men's rights -just as soon as we solve everyone else's- and then dumps on men again. Frankly, I'm not even clear what vision of the future the rare left man who's actually for men is advocating. I get the i…
/r/MensRights03/07/24 05:10 PM
51

An ex told me she'd been "raped" by the guy before me. I was horrified, because I knew him and he seemed like such a nice guy. Details were forthcoming months later when she decided I was safe to talk to... Turned out he'd just come home one day and they had sex like normal, but she secretly didn't want to because of an argument with her mom (about premarital sex). But she didn't say anything to him about it because she was afraid of it being awkward enough that she'd have to leave, and if she h…
/r/MensRights27/06/24 04:37 AM
5

Name three and explain what "without rulers". Yeah, I get it, and 'real communism has never been tried' either, but maybe there is a problem with both ideas if they stall out in the middle and detour to strong man dictatorships. Aye. Given that so few people value actual freedom, it's inevitable. Anarchism is an ideal but is likely unachievable with the animals we are. I may be missing a nuance in your argument, but I believe this is essentially what I am arguing. I have the natural right to def…
/r/MensRights20/06/24 05:41 PM
15

Anarchist states are historically terrible and inevitably become a more ordered state, under warlords if nothing else. I'm unclear how you believe "rights" work.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 04:44 PM
22

Would you consider it a victory for men's rights if the military, while drafting, assigns more men to the front lines because women can replace them in the cushier support jobs?
/r/MensRights20/06/24 04:41 PM
14

Anarchy doesn't work.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 04:39 PM
15

Yep. Conservatives speaking of "our daughters" are literally speaking about their daughters, not in the "sisterhood of every woman" sense when feminists do, and their daughters are likely not feminists, considering women complimentary equals rather than literal.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 04:28 PM
47

Yep. This is how it would go down. Despite their anger for the right wing, the left wing is bluntly gynocentric and will absolutely push no actual drafting of women if feminists don't want to. Feminists will not, because they change their stripes whenever it's convenient. Insofar as feminists have pushed for combat roles for women, it has been in context of seeking glory in, atm, a solely volunteer army fighting, atm, no wars, and recently, one sided wars. Women remain an extreme minority in com…
/r/MensRights20/06/24 04:24 PM
16

In fact, greater expectations and duties are exactly why men held greater privelege in the past. This is essentially the traditionalist viewpoint. We can't make women do stuff they don't want to. We can try to make them want to, but at the end of the day, all the cajoling, affirmative action, special scholarships, casting women in the roles in media, and of course, shitting on men, has failed to get women into STEM en masse, for example. Because they don't want to.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 03:36 PM
-11

Conservatives are working for men, just not in the way you would like.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 03:12 PM
11

If a man doesn't have a sex drive or isn't pursuing sex before marriage for religious reasons, then he's a loser creep that just wants to get his dick wet and lying about it, which makes him sinister too.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 01:23 PM
16

Yes. The Red Pill acknowledges some uncomfortable truths that feminists don't like, but ultimately takes a weirdly "feminism, but with a hostile attitude" approach towards those truths, essentially saying "just give women what they want and be who they want; as long as you planned to cater to her, it's your plan on your terms so you're the real winner."
/r/MensRights10/06/24 08:41 PM
68

Feminists just have to continually make up new stuff to be offended by so they can always be victims, because they reached a point where they so obviously aren't that women are abandoning the title, and some of them the thinking too.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 12:01 AM
10

And the solution is what, to extend men endless leave to do nothing as well? Somebody has to do something, especially when you're responsible for children. The equality to be sought here is not to infantilize men as well to 'stick it to the trads' or whatever that last bit was about, it's to expect women to be adults too.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 02:53 PM
20

No, but neither will a female soulmate fulfill the need for male companionship. They're two discrete needs. Denying yourself one because you can't get the other is a downward spiral.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 04:21 PM
15

"At least the gas would kill me quickly, a man would... [detailed fantasy she's clearly spent too much time thinking about here]!"
/r/MensRights22/05/24 03:39 PM
10

Well, many women, especially feminists, are indeed very "me, me, me." At a certain point, do you want to endlessly demand they change completely overnight and vote for your concerns on principle alone, or do you want to actually make some progress? Man hating obviously hurts men more, but pointing out how it hurts women is not surrendering.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 03:22 PM
1

I would guess they're still at the sarcastic critique stage over there. If I remember correctly, that's how it started on the English speaking web, with guys rolling their eyes at some especially cringe feminist consent videos, especially of the "continuing and enthusiastic" variety ("you literally want me to check in with you every couple seconds; would it be easier if I signed a form?"). A few feminists picked up the jibe for serious, initially positive as a "gotcha," discussion before fully c…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 02:43 PM
1

Reminds me of that quote to the effect of "If you aren't actually capable of violence, you aren't "peaceful.""
/r/MensRights13/05/24 08:12 PM
2

Or 'suffering postpartum depression.'
/r/MensRights13/05/24 08:11 PM
8

I think what really grinds my gears is how utterly they miss, even with saturation fire like this. That minority of men doing bad things? They don't care. So good men aren't even being screamed at as some sacrifice to get at the bad men, it's literally just society at large screaming only at good men.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 05:24 PM
1

I do think fewer women love men than men love women today, largely because of feminism pushing the socially acceptable hatred of men, but the idea that " no women love men would certainly be one of those intrusive thoughts from dark places.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 04:39 PM
68

I'm in favor of actual child support. You should take care of a child you create. I'm not in favor of the weird system we have now where there's no way to guarantee it goes to the child (and it usually doesn't), women have no similar accountability to and for their children, and for men it doesn't even have to be your child some places.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 04:14 PM
58

Same way they get the ludicrous numbers for women supposedly experiencing sexual assault (1 in 5, 1 in 4, etc) you'll see feminists post: -They ask questions in a self response survey the researchers think describe sexual assault, for example, "have you ever had sex after having one or more drinks," that can aboslutely describe consensual activities. -They include scenarios that are edge cases stretching the definition, like drunk kissing, and still possibly consensual. -They sometimes include c…
/r/MensRights13/05/24 03:20 PM
7

The original questionnaire, off of which all others are based (which included questions like "have you ever had a drunk kiss?" held up alongside far more serious things under a blanket term), included a final question directly asking if the woman had been raped. Half of the respondants who had answered "yes" to any of the survey's above questions answered "no" to the final one. The researchers reported this number as "women who don't even know they've been raped." This means that women having co…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:37 PM
242

That's how a lot of their arguments work today. Feminists literally believe disagreement marks a man as party to their (purported) oppression, retroactively justifying anything they might do or say to that man.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:57 PM
1

Sure, and that's good to hear. It means if he pursued legal action there'd be a chance the coworkers, or at least some would back him up. It's just that despite everyone having laws and policies against retaliation, there's just no world in which it's going to be nice to work under a hostile management, and management would certainly be hostile after legal action. Idk, this is one of those things where on a principled level, you want to see people held accountable and changes to happen, and if n…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 01:34 PM
32

Well, we have feminism :p
/r/MensRights02/05/24 11:43 AM
2

In my personal opinion, his best move is simply to leave. Unfortunately, I don't see any attempts to better his situation going anywhere under the management and HR you describe, and while he could potentially have some kind of legal case, it would probably take ages to resolve and regularly come down to his word against everyone else's. Not to mention, win or lose, he's the badguy where he works and probably needs to leave anyway. It would be fastest to get a better job using this one as experi…
/r/MensRights01/05/24 04:07 PM
1

Listen, kid, I'm not going to do the "you have to break up with your girlfriend immediately" but, but I think you need to have a serious conversation with her about what it is she actually thinks of you and why you need to abase yourself to her on behalf of "men" because of a feminist meme. Is your relationship always going to be subject to influence by angry radfem strangers on the internet? If she says yes, is that something you can live with? Presumably, you love and trust her and she loves a…
/r/MensRights01/05/24 02:40 PM
4

I would strongly encourage you to take a step back and think carefully about "inappropriate comments," how broad it is and what all it can mean, exactly what it means to you, to your girlfriend, and to feminists, which definitions are being falsely conflated to make a problem seem worse, and most importantly, why you are holding it in ANY capacity similar to being eaten alive by a bear.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 02:17 PM
4

I would point out, the kid is 17 and struggling with what sounds like his first overt misandry, with his girlfriend essentially demanding he denounce his gender against all reason and personal integrity, to demonstrate he's "one of the good ones" according to a meme she saw. That's incredibly shitty, as is the feminism that pushes it, but we could stand to tell him so gently.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 02:10 PM
3

Oh, I've always known. For all my mother taught me a rosy and inaccurate image of women, broadly, she at least always taught me that feminists were trouble for men and women, but especially men, and I wasn't to trust them when they spoke of equality.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 08:36 AM
29

Most bears don't eat people because bears and people don't live in close proximity, not because bears are not man eaters. You, and most women, live in close proximity to millions of men and encounter thousands, maybe tens of thousands, in the course of your lives. And the vast majority women go through life unmolested by men. That would be shocking if men were as dangerous and unhinged as you suggest. I do not believe any amount of women would make it through a week, let alone their lives, witho…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 06:45 PM
6

I sometimes wish I'd been raised to care more about money. I was raised to believe in family and love almost exclusively, and told money sorted itself out if you weren't just spending willy nilly. Was told women also cared first and formost about love and family and my first move should be to find love and start a family, then work hard to support them. It turned out that wasn't how it works at all, especially in a blue area.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 06:34 PM
1

I will clarify, when I say more was asked of men, but more given, I mean in relation to women of the time (and contrasted against men and women of today), not in relation to men of this time.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 06:27 PM
2

Yep. Red Pill is actually a fascinating example of horseshoe theory, IMO. Radfems would suggest that women can do whatever they feel like with no regard to men because women are better, and men should bow to their whims because men are subhuman. Red Pill would suggest that women will do whatever they feel like with no regard to men because women are emotion bound subhumans, and men should simply accept their whims and work within that framework because men are more intelligent people. In a truly…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 06:23 PM
3

It's a callous attitude, yes, but it's born of the callous secular attitude towards men.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 06:10 PM
5

It was a different time. More was asked of men, but more given. I'd be fine with that. My issue is the modern day where it seems even more is asked of men, but all benefits we might get in return are "sexist" and must go to women. This isn't fair or sustainable. Men cannot hold up their traditional duties without their traditional benefits. We have to commit to the ideals of actual equality or go back.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 06:07 PM
3

Red Pill sees some difficult truths about the world for what they are and is willing to say them. It's also willing to directly state dating and love are major problems for men, which I appreciate. MRA lets us vent, but seems reticent to directly say that for fear of mockery, and of course MensLib is just dressed up feminism. Buuuuut, it approaches them in a kind of cynical, "realpolitik" sort of way. Red Pill basically acknowledges bad behavior in relationships and dating by women, but preaches…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 03:25 PM
98

Geeze, I just searched out of curiosity and there is a r husband, but despite it's description, it's almost entirely women angrily complaining about their husband's, broken by a single post where a husband asks how he can show his wife more love... which really seems emblematic of the absolute state of Reddit.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 06:14 AM
2

Dead on. I have zero sympathy for women who were "exploited" by willingly sleeping with a man in exchange for a career of wealth, fame, and influence. Especially since we all know there were likely more talented women who said "no" and were denied in turn. Those women are the real victims of all of this, but they're not famous so no one cares, and the ones who got everything dare to claim that mantle.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 03:56 PM
17

This is unlikely to end until men are doing the same thing and women want it to stop.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 02:45 PM
13

I just don't understand why Taylor Swift is suddenly a thing again. Or I guess has been the whole time? I mean, her songs are fine, I guess. I remember one from a long time ago I liked, one that really disturbed me, one I incorrectly thought was hers that I liked, and an awful lot of really mid stuff. Ok, she wasn't for me. So I stopped listening to or thinking about her except for that one song that occasionally cropped up on my play list. And suddenly like a decade later, I'm randomly being in…
/r/MensRights21/04/24 08:17 AM
28

It always astounds me that other people had whole wars fought for the right to vote and women were just like "can we too?" And society was almost instantly like "sure" and didn't even ask them to give anything back. But feminists will be like "police force fed a dozen suffragettes in prison..." in these hushed and reverent tones as if it's in any way, shape, or form equal to, say, hundreds of thousands dying to end slavery.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 04:30 PM
13

What would they say? "Equality." They will always say "equality," point the finger at some social standard somewhere they don't like, and use it as an excuse to pass a battery of unrelated anti-man laws. It's up to us to keep highlighting how their actions give lie to their words.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 03:31 PM
10

If I remember correctly, the actual explanation we were offered at the time was that men could be secretly business networking without women in any space that didn't allow women? But overall it was just a general and kind of vague sentiment that any time men didn't want women there, it must be something really amazing men were gatekeeping women from, or keeping for themselves, or something like that. Like "if it's worth guarding, we want it."
/r/MensRights17/04/24 01:32 PM
1

Or feminists for that matter. Because the neutral are always watching in the wings, and a particularly bad/crazy take from the feminist could be the factor that tips someone our way.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 01:25 PM
25

So you are now required to be feminist and required to be happy about it? I don't even understand what's going on over there sometimes. Isn't this the same country that's just recently started taking false accusations more seriously and warned one of those women's "ruin my ex" sites to knock it off?
/r/MensRights17/04/24 01:15 PM
16

Was just having this argument with a feminist man earlier. He kept insisting feminism, on the issue of the draft, was about equality by being opposed to any draft. I pointed out they don't actually do anything about that, and he started saying it wasn't important anyway, because who gets drafted today (nevermind all of Ukraine, I guess), and feminism focuses on real men's problems like (sigh) being sexist and opposing feminism 🤦‍♂️
/r/MensRights17/04/24 05:17 AM
5

Abolition of conscription, however, is not realistic. Even if we did away with it, the first time the government felt they needed it, they would bring it back as some kind of emergency power. So the only real question is "when men are inevitably drafted again someday, will women shoulder the responsibility with us?" And the answer is "Almost certainly not." Women won't want to, and large portions of men won't want women to, or at least not those women close to them.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 05:11 AM
2

You aren't wrong, however, the actual point is the reactions to him compared to the reactions to the first woman.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 04:28 PM
8

Heh, beat me to it.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 04:25 PM
56

Seems like a natural extension of "revenge porn" laws, which, while basically ethical, are clearly designed to protect women's social reputation at all costs. Notice few to no similar protections are made against the social weapons women use against men.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 04:12 PM
8

Maybe they'll mandate AIs having to report all prompts.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 04:09 PM
3

Idk, just weird shit, I guess. Or feminism. I don't really trust psychology as a discipline. It's a very soft science. And therapists often seem very opinionated and I wonder how their opinions impact how they practice and interpret their stuff, since it isn't like chemistry, say, where there's a hard answer and the wrong ones show wrong very clearly.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 12:16 AM
3

Are psychologists even safe?
/r/MensRights15/04/24 10:00 PM
9

More to the point, if it did exist? Nothing they're doing to "fight the patriarchy" helps men anyway, despite their insistence (for decades) it totally will any day now. They rarely fight anyone in power at all. They woo people in power, then they use the power to fight the men on the ground that they're ostensibly helping too.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:56 PM
2

That's my immediate thought with half of this. Just go to a different parish. These experiences all sound alien to me from my nice, conservative parish... but I'm aware of a couple parishes around the city that are really progressive. I go occasionally if I miss my early mass. They'll never expressly preach something against the Church, but they'll also pointedly avoid preaching anything the Church says that disagrees with them and talk almost exclusively about the poor and immigration. I could …
/r/MensRights13/04/24 11:48 AM
7

Will they? Or will they just loudly demand all the men move away from them for their entire lives.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 12:14 PM
5

I suppose, with the notable exception that it doesn't end the child's life. But I don't really support those either. The correct parity of so called "reproductive rights" starts at both parents being responsible for the child they made and scales back with reasonable exceptions from there, abortion exceptions for medical necessity, for example, or "paper abortions" if the resources don't exist (can't squeeze blood from a stone).
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:30 AM
-7

I really hate how you anti choice people keep feeling the need to co-op the men's rights movement with this rhetoric. So sorry, I'll make sure to consult you personally next time about what I am and am not allowed to speak of on a public forum under a post literally about this issue 🙄 The massive overreach of women's "rights" is well within the regular scope of this subreddit. You speak of protecting the "innocent and defenseless" and yet I'd bet my savings you don't give a damn about those in t…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:17 AM
2

Yeah, you tell me the baby's already dead? Ok. The baby's going to kill you? Ok. The baby is from rape? I don't like it, but I see where you're coming from. You just don't feel ready for a baby? ...wtf. And then you find out that statistically, that last category is like 19 out of 20 abortions.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 12:21 AM
13

Also featuring in this gem: https://youtu.be/8Gv0H-vPoDc?si=SkSO1hf9-5Meddja
/r/MensRights10/04/24 12:04 AM
-2

Abortion is a "right" nobody should have and I applaud Arizona for protecting the innocent and defenseless among them. This is the correct direction for a parity of reproductive rights between men and women: both parents being responsible for the child they have created, not just the man.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 11:21 PM
1

Long video, but the beginning was good. Will probably listen to the rest tomorrow.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 11:04 PM
57

Remember, the one thing men stumbled across that could really damage a woman's reputation or social status, racy pictures the woman gave them of her own free will, was immediately outlawed as "revenge porn." And though I agree that such a thing is basically unethical, so is this, and women have been at it far longer and more effectively, and not only are they freely permitted or even encouraged to engage in this social abuse, they're handed newer and better tools to do it. It's very telling.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 08:54 PM
18

Age 15, asked a girl to a dance for the first time in my life. She said no; had a family thing. Ok. Went to the dance alone because there was no one else I wanted to go with, but I was trying to overcome my social reticence. Girl showed up with another guy. I don't know why she didn't just tell me. She clearly didn't expect to see me there either and was upset about it, I assume because it made it uncomfortably obvious she'd lied to me. So she told all her friends I was "stalking" her and the gi…
/r/MensRights09/04/24 08:06 PM
6

That's the real rub. If they've been a traditional woman all along, they're entitled to claim the traditional benefits as well, but if they're one of these "down with the patriarchy" girl boss feminists, how dare they claim the benefits of traditionalism when it suits them? Like I know it isn't the most important thing going on in Ukraine by a longshot, but I felt almost physically ill reading about their new women's only carriages several months back. Here are your men, being fed slowly through…
/r/MensRights08/04/24 06:21 PM
1

Not to a person, to a woman. Sexual violence against men is laughed off as not a big deal. And against a woman it doesn't even have to be violence. Touching, talking, looking, her thinking you are looking, are all potentially sexual crimes against a woman. Our culture holds women only as sacred and involiable.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 06:12 PM
12

It's almost like there were reasons for most of our jettisoned traditions.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 05:26 PM
2

Fucking White Feather Brigade all over again.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 03:54 PM
3

Ah, the classic "traditionalism is EEEEVIL! (so support the people who hate men)" post. Just realized I haven't seen one in a bit.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 03:29 PM
5

Even intelligent people are susceptible to propaganda, and in this case I was never entirely convinced she actually believed it as opposed to it being a cynical social thing. I always found it odd she didn't seem particularly bothered by it or concerned about seeking justice or whatever, if she actually believed it. Instead she seemed perfectly happy to just tell people she got "raped" and revel in the support and sympathy. She was really proud of her status as a "survivor." But this sort of thi…
/r/MensRights08/04/24 03:04 PM
5

Judges and courts are no help in the court of public opinion. You can be wholly exonerated of wrongdoing in the legal system and still have tour life ended in the real world.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 12:44 PM
18

It seems like it's almost designed to create victims via self-fulfilling prophecy. Tell women over and over again they can't say no or else men will do horrible things to them -> women say yes to things they don't want to because you told them to -> now you have an army of "oppressed" women who all feel they were forced to do things by men they never actually told "no." And feeds back into the insane "sometimes yes means no" subsect of feminism that seems to think any good man will be a mind rea…
/r/MensRights08/04/24 12:42 PM
2

I admit, though I try to keep it to feminists, in my time I have sometimes fallen into bitterness at women in general. I try not to. But there was a lengthy period of my life where nearly every interaction was negative -and I took the "if you meet assholes all day you're the asshole" thing to heart and tried to be better and it only seemed to make it worse. It can be disheartening. But I feel like I see more good women and less radfems every day. What I think I came to realize, after a time, is …
/r/MensRights08/04/24 03:04 AM
2

Thanks. I know you're not the only one; my sisters and my wife also see men's problems. But it is nice to hear from people outside the circle.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:26 PM
27

Yeah, I was never a feminist, thank goodness, but I certainly came out the gate being told lies by both society and the mother who mostly raised me (dad wasn't absent, just working hard). Women were these kind, empathetic beings who only wanted to love, be loved, and have a family. If I wanted to be a good man, I would empty myself of the lust, greed, and competitiveness that bad men make the world a worse place with, and learn to be what these innocent beings of love needed. I would never be co…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 03:41 PM
2

Because traditionalism gives back to men in exchange for the greater expectations, as opposed to the equality we theoretically seek in the modern day (but are unlikely to achieve) that has become, in practical terms, "men continue to meet higher expectations, but women receive all benefits."
/r/MensRights04/04/24 03:58 AM
4

Yes, that's true, and that's exactly why the old social orders existed. Men protected women from these things and took on hardships from them. Women were happy to benefit from this and respected men in return. Men got something from women and society for their trouble. But since feminism, yes even first wave, women have demanded the rewards, but ducked back under the shield of traditionalism anytime they might have to help foot the bill.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 06:46 PM
16

Do you remember the days when women weren't allowed to fight... but they still champed at the bit to get to the backlines as nurses or into the factories to make sure their men had ammunition and came home? Feminism has done something very ugly to women over the last several decades.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 04:38 PM
21

Or they'll just continue doing the exact same thing and call it something else. That's also popular.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 04:06 AM
3

Yes.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 08:19 PM
2

What's finally convinced me they're evil and not really coming from a confused place of concern is my state legalizing third trimester abortions on the basis that "it's so obviously evil that nobody could ever want to do it unless they had a really good reason, therefore we need to pre-approve it in case of that really good reason, whatever it might be." Like, I'm sorry, WHAT?!? That could justify literally anything.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:02 PM
2

Lol, same.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 03:59 PM
15

Always more rights, never more responsibilities, never any more of the burdens of society, never any acknowledgement of what they were and are sheltered from, nor of the men who do those things for them.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 12:57 PM
6

I don't think you understand the right wing. If we were as pro corpo as you think, we wouldn't be in pissing matches with so many of them over culture stuff right now. Seems clear culture issues matter more. In any case, feminism absolutely does not fall under our banner. It's expressly anti-tradition, anti-marriage, anti-family, anti-children, and anti-men. Often anti-religion too.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:30 AM
4

Critical theory and it's subsidiaries have been a scourge on western civilization. You just pick your favorite, view everything through that lens no matter how ridiculous, and characterize all disagreement as a conspiracy against you and, therefore, further proof.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 05:40 PM
12

I'm legit happy you added that, because people online seem so fucked in the head these days I wasn't sure how you actually meant that.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 11:06 AM
2

Ooook? So can we get our male only gyms now? No, still exclusionary and sexist? Ok.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/24 12:07 AM
5

Data supports this. Almost 56 per cent of women have faced harassment during their workouts, a survey from Run Repeat found in 2022. Does anyone actually believe this?
/r/MensRights21/01/24 01:46 AM
3

The GOP will nominate who's voted for in their primaries. That's how we got an outsider like Trump in the first place. Remember that thing when everyone was crazy about Bernie but the party was like "no?" Not a thing with the Republicans. She'll be voted for, or not (probably not) based on her appeal to the voters and nominated or not accordingly.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 01:04 PM
1

No, I don't think SpaceX is bad. I think they're great. I just understand why some people falsely imagine them to be bad, while I'm unclear what complaint could be leveled against Tesla.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 01:22 AM
1

It would be right more than twice a day then.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 11:40 PM
1

I'm surprised you picked Tesla of all things as a bad point. I disagree, but can see the argument on SpaceX. I don't think he's doing a bad job, but do think he wildly overpaid on Twitter ("X"), and I'm not sure whether that's doing well or not, since people are paying him for it and traffic is up, but also advertisers and some corpos are pulling out. Tesla just seems like an unqualified success from any side of the aisle. He made electric cars cool, which is an achievement in and of itself.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 11:23 PM
3

Ever notice how the time when one worker could support a family was also the time one breadwinner was the norm? Now the economy has slowly adjusted to a two income household that forces even couples who want to pursue traditional parenting to make incredible sacrifices or just figure out a way to take two jobs. Weird how women's empowerment means women being forced into the workforce to produce (and sometimes fuck their boss), but having children and a loving husband is slavery.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 08:30 PM
1

AC settings make me so mad. They could just wear an actual shirt and be warmer, but no, they're far too invested in light and sparse clothing to make men look (but only the men they want to look; everyone else had better keep it to themselves or it's harassment).
/r/MensRights18/12/23 08:21 PM
1

Indeed. And because they are inherently dangerous despite our efforts, people are compensated higher for choosing to do them. And because they value safety higher and have a multitude of fallback options, women choose not to do them. And because "equality," feminists attack men for earning more at their more dangerous jobs despite making up the vast and overwhelming majority of workplace deaths.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 08:19 PM
1

Equity is straight up Harrison Bergeron.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 08:14 PM
3

Right, that directly conflicts with the idea of an "equal draft." Make no exceptions, send women home who can't hack it, there will inherently be less women drafted, because women do not physically measure up to men. Equality is already a myth. Equity is a much worse myth.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 08:14 PM
5

For me, it's far less the specific instances and more just the constant cultural assault. "Toxic masculinity," "nice guys," "mansplaining," the broad insinuations (or direct accusations) we're all sexual predators, the verbal and emotional abuse, the social demonization, even just fucking sitting down somewhere can get you "manspreading." They treat us like subhumans. Until women collectively get that attitude under control and feminism and its talking points are received the same way as any oth…
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:27 AM
1

I thought the smile was doing good work as a not totally obvious /jk, but downvotes would suggest otherwise.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:43 PM
10

Yeah, they lie about this stuff, but at least as much (probably more) for themselves and their own self image than the broader "sisterhood."
/r/MensRights27/11/23 07:42 PM
5

It's projection. I spent a lot of time actually talking with some of these women in the simp days and they just couldn't stop talking about sex. Everything is seen through the lens of sex or sexual metaphor, especially power dynamics. You see it all over the things they like to watch and read. Even places it seems wholly inappropriate. A Handmaid's Tale is the dystopian piece by feminists for feminists. But where men write "imagine if the government was all powerful: it might embrace secret poli…
/r/MensRights24/11/23 10:42 PM
33

I once worked outside at a department store and I noticed when you put the reflective vest on, people, and especially women, started looking through you like you weren't there.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 02:43 PM
17

Yeah, no, that's what has always made me truly furious about the conversation: I lived through the mockery and bullying of being a nerd and liking things like video games, science fiction, and D&D. There's this narrative like everything got better and the normies embraced us, but they fucking didn't; they just stole our stuff, dubbed themselves "nerds," started calling us different names and kicked us out of our own damn spaces! They go "why aren't there more women in video gaming" and it's like…
/r/MensRights15/11/23 03:56 PM
1

Ugh, what did Stephen King say now?
/r/MensRights15/11/23 02:59 PM
3

I went into the article wondering if they were going to present some really small evidence they found as absolutely conclusive and destroying wverything that came before or if they were going to claim that all the evidence showed it all along and people just didn't notice this whole time for reasons. Instead they straight up said "well you can't prove women didn't hunt sometimes." 😑
/r/AntiFeminists28/10/23 03:59 PM
1

Yeah, it's really the hysteria that turns me off of the whole thing. I get tired of people claiming I'm "mutilated" and "half a man," as if it doesn't work perfectly well, as if maturbation was the primary purpose of my life anyway.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:25 PM
6

100%. They act as thought they were "forced," but it was always a transaction for their own benefit, to get themselves considered higher than they otherwise would have.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 06:50 PM
1

But that doesn't really have anything to do with conservatism. That attitude doesn't proceed from any belief in or commitment to either traditionalism or true equality before the law, which are two different flavors of conservatism allied, atm, against progressive idpol ideologies. It proceeds from those idpol ideologies, which say whatever they need to say in any moment, regardless of consistency, to achieve supremacy for their designated "oppressed" classes. Women stand near the top of their b…
/r/MensRights25/09/23 10:33 PM
1

They called themselves "The National Socialist Party." "Nazi" is a shortening of the German words.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 09:50 PM
6

You might find this interesting: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html
/r/MensRights18/09/23 12:35 PM
114

Boys: *receive any positive attention whatsoever Feminists: "...and I took that personally."
/r/MensRights17/09/23 03:54 PM
2

Which is basically the reason behind a multitude of these "monsters" in the first place. Imagine shitting on someone day and night from practically the moment of their birth on the basis they're "an oppressor class," then being surprised they didn't turn out well adjusted after two or three decades of it.
/r/AntiFeminists13/09/23 06:46 PM
1

Yeah, dude, "Western Propaganda." Like the Ghost of Kiev? Snake Island? Purported footage from a drone firing on hapless, disorganized Russians that turns out to be a video game? Just a few examples of big stories that turned out to be fake. And then there's all the stuff that nobody has admitted is fake yet but seems crazy sus, like "oh yeah, a farmer totally snuck up on a tank in his tractor, hooked it up to tow and stole the tank!" Not to mention the general positive portrayals of a crazy cor…
/r/AntiFeminists13/09/23 06:21 PM
4

Unfortunately they can't just flee with the women. The Ukrainian government cleverly foresaw that they're shit and too few actually like them or would voluntarily fight a superior power on their behalf, so they just closed the borders to men.
/r/AntiFeminists13/09/23 04:58 PM
2

Yes, but the solution is to wrest it back, not jettison the entire institution and/or refuse to reproduce the human race.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 03:11 PM
5

Assuming you mean the US, still officially like $7.25 most places, but the soft minimum wage is more like $15, $16. Don't know which one she means, but if it's the hard one, $36.25 is quite respectable, but still just middle/upper middle class.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 01:25 PM
40

It sounds ridiculous, but I think this sudden explosion in men's awareness really is from the Barbie movie. Like honestly, after running across about a bazillion reviews from every angle that can't seem to make up their collective minds about it (Rian Johnson must be seething with jealousy), I am not really sure what, if anything, he movie was trying to say (ironically or otherwise) anymore. But I know a lot of dudes saw it for one reason or another and did not recognize the "real world patriarc…
/r/MensRights15/08/23 01:10 PM
52

I find it most interesting/disturbing how advanced education seems to attack basic morality. See how the percentages fall dramatically at each level.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 05:05 PM
2

I mean, I agree, I would consider her a villain, you would consider her a villain, but the film seems to frame her as maybe an antagonist at worst.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 06:30 PM
4

You're absolutely correct, in context of the movie. In pop culture, people embraced that "no rules, do what you want" song in a vacuum to the extent the film was actually altered to change Elsa from a tragic and sympathetic villain to not a villain.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 12:37 PM
3

Right now women hold all the rights and get preferential admittance to colleges and basically any position they want. If the field is still male dominated it almost always means women don't really want to be there.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 05:34 PM
0

Don't do nude pictures and it won't be a problem. I don't. And I can't say that I have a lot of sympathy for women who send nudes that get posted online. Not when I've seen how viciously women will use their social sway to fuck over exes with unsubstantiated gossip and rumors. It's such a typically feminist attitude to say "I can hurt you by making up things about you, but don't you dare show anyone anything true that would hurt me."
/r/MensRights22/07/23 05:30 PM
5

The same caricatures they disavowed decades back are now symbols of empowerment. Idk how old you are, maybe you haven't experienced it before, but feminism has, for some time, waffled on culture war topics to create cyclical arguments where they demand solutions to a problem that they created by creating the next problem to be solved. For example: more clothes/less clothes. Feminists intermittently switch sides between demanding women (culturally and in mass media) wear more and be more covered …
/r/MensRights22/07/23 05:23 PM
23

Honestly? It was always like this. You read the actual history of feminism and you realize more and more that they were only ever for more rights and priveleges for women. They never stood for picking up their share of the responsibilities along with their share of the rights, and pointedly refused to see that they go hand in hand.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 03:26 PM
23

People tell you early in life that Santa Claus isn't real and start making fun of you if you still believe. People never stop telling you that unconditional forever love between humans is real and often attack you for poking holes in that one.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 03:20 PM
10

Say instead that modern women's state of mind and attitudes have influenced the economy in ways that make this difficult for even a more traditionally minded couple. Your wife doesn't have to be a feminist directly in a career at the expense of men to be affected by feminism benefitting women at the expense of men in the workforce, or the two income economy created by women broadly entering the workforce. Right now, if you are not at least middle management, you basically require a second income…
/r/MensRights22/07/23 03:14 PM
13

When I was 18, I briefly attended community college, and there was this girl I thought was cute and smart and she was into video games and stuff, so I asked her out. Turns out she was 17 and there in some sort of advanced placement program. But did she tell me that? Nooooo. She politely turned me down in person, then told everybody else she was 17, acted like I should have just known that somehow, and labeled me a "creep." Basically killed any opportunity to date there. I think that was the firs…
/r/MensRights21/07/23 09:15 PM
5

Not that we needed a study for that. I think every man knows this is true and has experienced it. But it certainly helps to have hard numbers along.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 06:06 PM
0

No, this is an "I'm not obligated to carry you on my back when you have perfectly good legs" argument. Nothing in student loan "forgiveness" will remove the hill of your metaphor. Nothing about it will "help future generations." It will slightly alleviate some people's problems right now and only right now at the cost of other people who are not responsible for their problems. I didn't set the price so high, academia did. I didn't encourage them to pay anyway, their counselors did. I didn't offe…
/r/MensRights12/07/23 05:24 PM
4

Excuse you, we don't need your permission or to meet your requirements to be against the blatant wealth transfer that is student loan "forgiveness." Some of us paid our college loans, some of us joined the work force immediately; none of us should be on the hook for debt other people took on. Especially that second category, as the graduates demanding free cash are projected to make more than them. Additionally, student loan "forgiveness" solves zero of the root causes of the problem and will ju…
/r/MensRights12/07/23 01:04 PM
12

Well, I don't think you can have a sub that isn't heavily censored and also has no "TEMRAS" or negativity about women, because that's how a large amount of men, possibly the majority of men, feel right now.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 02:57 AM
9

Holy fuck a duck, that article rambles. But for the brief moments of introspection in the first half, and the talking in the back half of 'appropriate masculinity,' she really seems incapable of finding any progressive vision of men that isn't about how they interact with women to women's benefit. She even admits at one point how how recently -and virulously, she and her's were anti-man, then tries to brush it off as if the late 2010s were AGES ago.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 03:49 PM
11

Women think they're being honest about what they want because they are also being lied to.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 01:25 PM
21

I know it's just a step in a larger journey, but that article is beyond cringe. Keeps talking about the symptoms and pointedly avoiding the "why." Why do men have no sense of belonging? Why are men unhappy? Why don't men listen to women? Why don't men trust therapists? The article just sort of offers these up like "this is just happening for no fucking reason, idk, but anyway the result is bad men!"
/r/MensRights11/07/23 01:10 PM
12

Fun fact: did you know one of the primary benefits monogamy is theorized to have brought to society was sharply reducing the numbers of disaffected young men and getting them invested, via children and wife, in society?
/r/MensRights11/07/23 01:04 PM
1

It's more like schrodingers all men. They speak to "men" but it becomes "all men" or "just those men and you obviously should have known that" as necessary. Like when 'men need to stop raping' is convenient to bash men as a class, but anyone pointing out that extremely few men do so and other men already severely punish them for it will be soundly thrashed in the comments: "obviously we weren't referring to you if this isn't you, but if you object, perhaps it's because you feel attacked because …
/r/MensRights02/07/23 03:21 PM
9

It's really as simple as considering the phrase with another group and imagining how it would go over. Is "the future is male" sexist? Is "the future is white" racist? Obviously, yes, and so "the future is female" is clearly offensive too. It's insane how much privilege women now hold that they can not only openly wear hate speech, but demand acclimation for it.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 04:21 AM
3

I agree completely. It's one thing if you just demonstrate a lack of evidence or that the alleged criminal didn't do it, but if you can demonstrate that the accuser knew they didn't do it, that should be an instant and HARSH penalty. We punish harshly for harming innocents with your own private resources, so why do we tolerate the far worse crime of misappropriating public resources to harm them?
/r/MensRights26/06/23 05:11 PM
2

The whole point of a legal and justice system is to instill confidence in it and it arises out of a recognition that people cannot and should not be their own judges. Sure, but we have a bit of a problem here now, at least in the US, where vast swathes of people have no confidence in the legal system. It's out to get you because of your skin color, or your gender, or it won't protect you from criminals based on their protected status, or it will protect the wealthy and punish the downtrodden, or…
/r/MensRights26/06/23 05:00 PM
14

I think more to the point, if women were truly fearful of men doing all these things to them they would embrace remote work as much as these men apparently have. The fact they want to make men go back to work with them demonstrates that they know accusations are broadly overblown and falsified just as well as the men do.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 09:09 PM
14

Glad you got out. I've known so many guys who got into it for one reason or another, raised to it by mom, thought it would make then more attractive to girls, or most disturbing, a horribly misplaced but genuine sense of injustice, and most seem to get stuck there.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 06:41 PM
2

I've been using the same electric razor for like four or five years now. If it works it works.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 07:06 PM
46

I think it's a joke in poor taste that doesn't think through it's own implications, yes, but we should probably avoid that feminist rabbit hole of going too hard at jokes. I see where you're coming from, I'm just saying that child support being $20 is clearly an absurdity from whichever angle you approach it and obviously meant to be funny, and this isn't really in a class with, say, that "women, punch your boyfriends in the dick, isn't it funny?!?" thing from a couple years back.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 08:08 PM
4

I like how the one goes "what's stopping you [from doing what you want] as a woman?" and another is all "so you're just going to ignore my disability?" What do disabilities have to do with feminism?
/r/MensRights30/05/23 05:24 PM
22

Stands for "Pick-Up Artist." Barney Stinson from How I Met Your Mother is the big mainstream example (albeit a satirically extreme one) I can think of offhand.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 04:56 PM
5

I've met them, but they're always college guys stuck on a feminist woman trying to impress her. Interestingly, feminist women are rarely impressed by men who are feminist.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 06:56 PM
17

At this point, were I a Ukrainian man, I would no longer support the nation. It is insane that they continue to push misandric feminist agendas even as they demand men step up and die for them.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 05:06 PM
6

We as a society don't just teach boys not to rape, we screech it incessantly into their ears, day in and day out, and treat them as criminals even if they've done nothing. We promote women's words to hard evidence to the extent that Johnny Depp is still being extra legally punished for "abuse" despite producing actual evidence it was exactly the other way around. Feminists will not be happy until they hold absolute supremacy and may destroy any man at a word unquestioned.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 03:39 PM
2

Yes, the whole thing is of questionable ethicalness already and I believe at least the Abrahamic religions are already pre-emptively against it. Not that I expect that to necessarily do anything; religion has been against lots of stuff over the millenia that people were like "stay in your own lane, religion!" and then when it turned out to be a bad thing later they're like "how could religion have let this happen?" as if they hadn't been told off and flipped the bird in return. But I digress. I'…
/r/MensRights26/05/23 12:19 PM
3

Yet once, men broadly found that acceptable because in return they were honored for their willingness to put others first and given benefits of their own. Today, any manner of benefit for men including those that are simply equal, like men's spaces to balance women's, are seen as wildly sexist, and men are expected to uphold the ideals of "women and children first" while being demonized for "infantilizing women" for such ideals.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 12:53 PM
7

Because a large amount of judges and juries no longer see the court as a place to determine individual responsibility for crime, but rather an arena to redress societal wrongs (real or imagined). Justice becomes a lot simpler when you don't care about who did it, only who belongs to which category and, therefore, is "complicit in the system," a.k.a. the one who really did it just by existing. It ends up as a class based system where any member of the "bad" class is guilty, because even if they c…
/r/MensRights19/05/23 12:46 PM
12

People don't understand how literally they mean it.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 02:11 PM
3

You stupid man, don't you know you can't just be ok with your body?!? You need to believe you're mutilated! You need to feel in your heart you're maimed for life! You must rend your clothes, gnash your teeth, and deny your mother and father! You must dwell endlessly on all the things you'll miss out on or be denied in life for having a slightly smaller foreskin, like... well... I'm sure you can think of something! /s I swear this sub gets downright feminist whenever this topic comes up.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 10:10 PM
-12

Stubbing my toe has literally had more effect on my life than being circumcised. There is no "mutilation." You are hysterical and lack perspective. The fact you can't let a reply agreeing it's unnecessary go because I didn't agree with you hard enough demonstrates it. No amount of angry downvotes will make it otherwise. There are a wide variety of problems men face in this world, and a sliver of skin that none would think to be angry about without an external apparatus dedicated to making them a…
/r/MensRights16/05/23 09:41 PM
6

This, but unironically.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 04:41 PM
3

It's a feature, not a bug.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 04:32 PM
-28

The advantages to being circumcised are negligible. The drawbacks to being circumcised are also negligible. Basically, circumcised your already easy to clean dick becomes extremely easy to clean and the already low chances of certain infections drop to roughly nil. Uncircumcised, you theoretically feel more sexual pleasure or something, but offhand I'm unaware of anybody who's tried one way, then gotten circumcised and tried the other to actually tell us for sure. There's a lot of annoying hyste…
/r/MensRights16/05/23 04:07 PM
3

And in some places already, more soon I'm sure, you are legally barred from specifically looking into it, for "preserving the peace of families," because women apparently get around so much in France that the government can already guess as well as you or her if you're really the father.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 06:37 PM
13

Also funny how "child is considered the patient" and "their rights trump the parents" when we're talking about a man being enslaved for literal decades vs a child growing up with less household income, but that attitude vanishes in a heartbeat in favor of the mothers "rights" when we're talking a woman being inconvenienced for a few months vs the child literally being killed.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 05:38 PM
5

Outliers don't negate a clear pattern. With every possible advantage and a massive social movement encouraging them and discouraging men, women remain just not very interested in STEM.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 04:55 PM
12

What they want is to place you, and all men, in a no win scenario, where anything you do at any time could potentially be grounds for charges against you. They want your only option to be groveling at their feet, doing all they say without thought, question, or objection, because they hold absolute power over you. They want to be able to do whatever they want, they want you to do whatever they want to, and they want you to be held responsible for anything that goes wrong like a sacrificial pawn.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 05:44 PM
16

They will demand laws that we have to pay more taxes for government programs benefitting them.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 06:30 PM
15

In speech and attitude, yes. In action, most still seem to want a guy to take care of them. They'll just also shit on him for it.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 06:27 PM
5

Everything happens for a reason. Sometimes that reason is you were stupid and made bad decisions.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/23 05:06 PM
1

False rape complaints can ruin lives. Even suspects who are quickly exonerated can face public scrutiny and lose their jobs and reputations. But such cases are rare: A 2012 Ministry of Justice study estimated that only 3% of rape reports were “perceived to be malicious”. In contrast, most victims don’t report a rape to the police and when they do, a successful prosecution is unlikely. Only one reported rape in 14 results in a conviction. So... one in 14 accusations results in a conviction, but t…
/r/MensRights08/11/22 01:22 AM
2

I honestly think half of them are getting off to it. Just look at the success of Handmaid's Tale. Their insistence they only watch the graphic show about powerful men lording it over women and forcing them to have sex to 'be warned of the dangers of patriarchy' or whatever rings as false as my insistence as a child that I only watched Yu-Gi-Oh to make fun of it. I liked Yu-Gi-Oh, I was embarrassed because I knew it was bad, I made an excuse for people who called me on it. They like domination fa…
/r/MensRights24/10/22 04:44 PM
14

There are indeed some key differences. The largest one, probably by far, is that im the past, male citizens received many exclusive social and political benefits in exchange for their duties and responsibilities, where today, society offers all benefits possible to women and takes them from men even as it actively seeks to increase men's responsibilities and refuses to do away with the worst of them.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 05:42 PM
10

And their leaders would lose their income and their power.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 04:26 PM
0

Nah, dress codes are cool. Make women's dress codes as strict as ours again.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 07:35 PM
2

Well, yes, but also no. There are a very limited number of those guys, but many women date them, sometimes more than one at once. Knew a guy once who was sleeping with two women at the same time, with the full knowledge of both. Both were ostensibly traditional women who should have objected to such treatment, but he was a personable man with family money and they both wanted to lock him down, badly, so they just each tried to out-fuck the other. I think they only stopped when he suggested somet…
/r/MensRights17/10/22 04:38 PM
-1

Less than 40% support abortion bans under certain phrasings of the question that imply total or near total abortion bans, which few are actually talking about. Many would compromise to abortions for edge cases (rape, incest, etc.) only, and even the Catholic Church doesn't oppose abortions of medical necessity.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 05:44 AM
2

It's depressing, but unsurprising. People have a tendency to be very understanding of their own actions ("it's not acceptable to just hit people, of course, but this is different because he was being really rude to me") or think the negative interpretations don't apply to them (how many confused male feminists get in trouble for sexual harassment they thought would be seen as just flirtatious fun because they're allies?). I'd guess most of the women in this video didn't even think about what the…
/r/MensRights12/10/22 04:43 PM
3

Good bot, but also bad bot.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 04:31 PM
8

That's why the post was deleted. Boys and men were agreeing in an open forum on something very against the narrative. A lot of sociopolitical power has been found in feminism, and those who have power fear to lose it. But more than the general principle, they especially fear a similar opposition movement of men. While many women now occupy desk jobs, men still occupy the vast majority of jobs that must be done regardless of difficulty and discomfort to turn the wheels of society, and men are cre…
/r/MensRights12/10/22 03:07 PM
4

Those men should look to the west, see what our feminism became, and just stay home next time.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 04:13 PM
5

Lol@the "ex-MRAs" who "came to feminism because MRA doesn't actually present any solutions for their problems." So a man had a problem with men being oppressed by society, didn't find solutions in MRA, therefore quit and joined a women's supremacist movement that is the primary offender? Very realistic, very believable.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 06:18 AM
5

It means that in the past, the well off made no secret they were well off, but in the present it's am embarrassment and greatly frowned upon to be better off, so those who are use their power and influence to declare themselves victimized and lower than you, so not only do we get to be shit on by them, we also get to be gaslight about how we're actually in power and stuff.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 10:56 PM
6

Not all, but a lot of women just don't get it. Any of it. Love, life, happiness, family, the world. Most of them are insulated from harsh realities. All of them are force fed anti-reality ideals and propaganda from society in general and feminists in particular. It's inevitable many come to believe.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 03:22 PM
7

Incidentally, if you were curious, apparently only about 10% of the US military has ever been in combat.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:14 PM
28

Meanwhile, when any woman accuses a man of rape: "Evidence is so hard to collect the standards need to be lowered! Her testimony is all the evidence you need! Why would a woman ever lie? Believe all women!"
/r/MensRights28/08/22 06:21 AM
14

I'll give that a solid "maybe." I've had simpy male coworkers before who didn't like something I did or said and passed on an embellished version (or even made something up) to a female coworker to try and prompt an HR incident.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 11:15 PM
6

This seems pretty cringe and mostly pointing fingers at men.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 05:01 PM
2

I believe that is the case in California, where the vast majority of our media comes from, and is likely where you got the impression. Check on your state laws either way; there are still 12 that consider it illegal to varying degrees to record a conversation without everybody involved knowing.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 06:17 AM
3

You might be interested to know that single party consent to recording (i.e. just one person who is involved in the conversation agreeing that it can be recorded) is federally legal and legal on the state level in 38 states. It is illegal to record people without their consent 'in places where there is an expectation of privacy,' to whit, bathrooms and bedrooms, but there is a high probability you are free to record any interactions in your main rooms, like the initial consent/invitation and you…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 06:05 AM
15

I think what's really getting me on a deeper dive into them is how loads of comments include some variation on both "This is weird and pointless anyway because it doesn't protect him since you can withdraw consent at any moment," and "he will rape you and use this to protect himself." Those are pretty clearly mutually exclusive talking points, but they happily pound away at both to essentially imply that it will somehow only protect him if he actually does something.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 05:44 AM
3

Same. You hang around women long enough, they get to feeling like they can confide in you, and wow, some of the stories. One I dated for a year slowly revealed that every ex had purportedly raped her, but then revealed even more slowly that actually she just had completely consensual sex with them, neither stating nor indicating she didn't really want to. She "felt trapped" by living with one, for example, or was "afraid he'd tell her parents they'd been sleeping together" with another. She'd wo…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 12:30 AM
59

Worse and more entrenched evils than feminism have fallen throughout recorded history. I can't promise you it will fall tomorrow, or even in our lifetime, but I promise it will fall. And we may yet live to see it's end; movements so inherently opposed to reality as feminism has become don't do well in reality, and the cracks are already growing. Have faith, if not in a deity, then in the patterns of history and the march of time. And in the meantime, keep fighting. Feminism may be teetering, but…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 10:47 PM
32

Yes, that is a thing. Or more specifically, it is a thing that women regret sex afterwards for one reason or another and convince themselves hours, even days after the fact, that they actually didn't want it at the time either.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 09:59 PM
66

Consent is only sexy when it's enabling them to control you in bed. When it limits their ability to court rape you later, it's not sexy.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:48 PM
365

That comment section is five kinds of fucked up. Some of them are actually accusing the kid of being a rapist for asking for provable consent and insisting that provable consent is "dangerous to women." Might as well come out and say you want to retain the option to falsely accuse later.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 04:59 PM
1

Just means more men care more about family and companionship than they do about money, something we learned as a civilization long ago when we left polygamy behind to invest more men in society and the outcome thereof.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 04:49 PM
1

Yeah, gotta say, ever since this scene started going around the net, I've been discovering an awful lot of women are apparently borderline psychotics, constantly seething with a murderous rage over very small things, restrained only by an equally psychotic fear that all men are just waiting for an excuse to kill them (because that's how they feel about men after all, so that must be how men feel about them), and their impotence only enrages them to new heights of fury. And apparently, even thoug…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 04:45 PM
1

Even better, every public space is also a safe space for women to shit on men; you can get banned from half of Reddit just for disagreeing with one of their rants.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 07:35 PM
7

It's a traditional privelege of women. There's nothing unfair about it -IF men also receive their traditional priveleges. Men currently don't, so attempts to use this and other traditional priveleges of women are exploitation.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 03:13 AM
0

Murder isn't a right.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:08 AM
5

The odd individual notwithstanding, Women as a group, even the "empowered" women who pursued careers and earn high, cannot seem to let go of the expectation that any man worthy of then must be able to take care of them -to their accustomed tier of living of course- and therefore refuse to consider men below their economic or education level. Many eve refuse to consider men at their level, preferring to marry up. Of course, the more men are crowded out of high positions to make room for more wome…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 08:51 PM
6

Where on earth did the author get the idea that American anti feminists are calling for the rich to have harems? That's what feminists want, though they couch it in different terms. Anti feminists are just tired of the constant double standard, double speak, and "women get the best of both worlds" attitudes and want to see either real equality or their traditional privileges for their harder lot in life reinstated.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 08:44 PM
5

So with the women's soccer team the issue wasn't that they lacked viewership, the issue was that they'd previously negotiated a lower but more secure payscale than the men's team. To whit, the men's team got paid a lot but only if they won, the women's team was paid whether they won or lost but was paid less than the men's would get for winning. The year the women's team did very well, they became incensed that the men's team was earning more than them and wanted to retroactively change their pa…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 01:06 AM
16

May well have been in sports circles. Maybe it even was widely known and I somehow missed it until now. I personally started seeing it repeated everywhere, mostly via a meme of a quote from some dude over his picture, just a week or so ago.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:38 PM
130

Didn't it just come to light the WNBA has been losing ten million dollars a year this entire time and is propped up by the NBA? And they want more by several orders of magnitude? At what point is it not really a job anymore and just handouts?
/r/MensRights05/08/22 07:43 AM
10

And then they blame their shaming of each other on "the patriarchy" and shame men for women's internal issues too.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 10:10 PM
1

Many reasons. It gives us a moral high point on freedom of speech against our opposition. It helps shield us from devolving to the 'kill all men' levels of echo chamber induced extremism found on opposition subs. It keeps us up to date on opposition viewpoints and in practice confronting them. It demonstrates we are not afraid of disagreement. It exposes any who come to argue to our views. This can potentially help us, as ours are more reasonable and a few may be swayed when they compare what we…
/r/MensRights28/07/22 04:08 PM
1

Unfortunately, from my experience, your reasonable attitude is going to get you screwed over sooner or later.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 11:27 PM
1

The biggest pitfall is, unfortunately, human beings. Bad people, men and women, though mostly women atm since they are the vast majority receiving child support, will continue to look on it as "their" money and seek ways to take advantage of it: things for themselves, clothing, things they would like to eat, etc. passed off as "for the kid," or in the worst case scenario, use it to buy high value child items (like baby formula) to resell. Only way to potentially address this would be to have a n…
/r/MensRights25/07/22 05:28 PM
1

Human waste, everything our bodies neither need nor want with a healthy helping of bacterial diseases it caught early enough to flush with that waste, mixed with rotting grease, oil, milk, and bits of animal and plant that are washed down the drains of a hundred thousand homes after three meals a day, with a concoction of dangerous chemicals, cleaners, weedkillers, pesticides, and anything else people have washed off their hands for fear of it getting it elsewhere on themselves to boot, all conc…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 07:37 PM
1

The bit about them convincing you your father was evil was rough to read. Brings me back to high school and watching the first girl I ever actually loved be slowly twisted around and consumed by feminism until seeing her was like seeing some thing in her skin. When I first met her she was a happy member of a happy family, she was so kind and considerate of others, and she loved gaming and science fiction and would sit with her brother and me for hours chatting about it. Then a few years down the…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 07:24 PM
2

The issue is feminism. Either because of their own feminist values or their fear of feminist reprisal, directors seem afraid to allow heroines to ever fail, even struggle, on screen. Any failure would be a 'sexist portrayal' or be 'telling women they aren't capable.' Consider Rey Skywalker Palpatine, probably the premier example of our time, who can't seem to fail if she tries. She is a master pilot with no prior experience, threading needles at high speed in a freighter and nailing three enemy …
/r/MensRights19/07/22 05:26 PM
1

I'm sorry you're experiencing this. I remember experiencing something like it, though my saving grace was that I got more angry than sad; still not a great place to live, but a little better. But I have some understanding. My personal advice to you would be that it might be time to try to take a break, to step back and maybe inwards, from all this stuff. Focus on any positive relationships in your life and let less positive ones slide a little. Focus on hobbies in your downtime. Do you game? Bui…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 12:40 PM
15

Hey, congratulations on having intellectually honest management that listens to feedback, though. That sounds nice.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:44 PM
5

Well that's very interesting; I, and many people including vast amounts of women, am opposed to anyone, regardless of gender, murdering babies.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 09:38 PM
6

The court that overturned it had women in it. Only one of the women voted in favor of the repeal, and she is a religious nutjob who wants the laws of her religion forced on other people. So you're not in favor of women having a voice, you're in favor of women having a voice if they say what you want.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 09:07 PM
3

First, they did not, they returned the issue to the states, which is not the same thing (mores the pity). Second, men do not have that right and never have.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 08:47 PM
3

I thought the funniest thing was that by withdrawing sex from their husbands, pro abort women are primarily punishing men who agree with them, but I might reconsider; yours is pretty funny.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 09:41 PM
2

I suspect it's like it is in most of the west: your "reasonable activists" are slowly becoming defacto outlawed. People are permitted to agitate for approved agendas because it gives those approving them the opportunity to sieze more power in the name of "justice," and literally anybody else is characterized as fascist brownshirts and excuses sought to arrest them and destroy their lives. Just look at the truckers in Canada, how fast the normal platitudes like "protests are supposed to inconveni…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 06:02 PM
11

Recent years have taugh me why some 1700s societies had such a zero tolerance policy for women using their words malevolently.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 04:33 PM
2

Pretty sure more men were burned at the stake than women. I assume their citation of that was the continuing myth that witches were only women.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 02:31 PM
1

You know, even setting aside the total lack of feasibility of the idea, I love how in their completely imaginary utopian city, when they're invited to describe the perfect place for a woman, their first thought is "it needs to have problems created by men for us to complain about."
/r/MensRights01/07/22 09:12 PM
5

So even when they are capable, "helpful" men and other women come swooping in to make sure they don't have to.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 05:05 PM
3

We don't even do that. We're starting to hear more and more of women who blatantly kill or try to kill a man and get off with some nothing slap on the wrist while society goes "oh, the poor dear, what did he do to drive her to it?" I'm hoping this thing with Amber Heard was a turning point in this, but I suspect it will continue towards absolute non accountability for women in some countries cough CANADA! cough
/r/MensRights01/07/22 05:00 PM
184

Pretty sure this is historically inaccurate. Woman rulers were traditionally more likely to start wars. Feminists, of course, downplay this fact with an argument to the effect of "they didn't want to, they only felt they had to so the patriarchy would take them seriously!" i.e. still men's fault somehow.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:40 PM
0

Imagine comparing human reproduction to Alien and thinking you have a point.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:00 PM
2

Not to feminists anyway.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 03:23 PM
1

I feel like if you were to reverse it, I don't really think it's a valid platform for feminists to say "I'm upset that men will only date hot skinny girls with big boobs, they are terrible people and should be made date fat ugly girls so they don't commit suicide". But you understand they do say that, like constantly, right? And there's a bit of a contrast there in that not being morbidly obese is attainable by the vast majority, whereas being rich is attainable by a small minority and becoming …
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:52 PM
2

Your "more nuanced poll" seems designed to get people to say "pro choice." I am pro life. I also believe lifesaving medical abortions, which are an extreme minority of them, are fine, because having to choose whether one or the other (or neither) lives is not the same as treating it as birth control. It is a huge difference from your provided option labeling it "pro choice" because it starts from the basic position that it is not ok to kill babies and proceeds to exceptions of highly unusual cir…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:50 PM
3

While I agree, the shared quote seemed fairly neutral to me.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:18 PM
6

I almost snorted hot tea out my nose.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:08 PM
6

I, and, I don't doubt, many, support an equal responsibility towards children, not an equal right to pass the buck. This is a step, albeit a small one as it since returns the matter to the states, towards that. Murder is not the answer. For myself, I have supported the so called "financial abortions" or "paper abortions" as a rhetorical, and if necessary actual legal tool to push people who dislike it to see the parallels with actual abortion. It seems we may not need it. Either way, this has br…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:22 PM
0

Hate crimes in general are stupid, either "Oh, this already illegal and harmful thing we have already weighted a punishment to becomes more illegal and more punished if we conclude it's motivated by (intentionally vague) "hate,"" with this patronizing attitude like any of the rest of us should obviously be comfortable being robbed, assaulted, or killed for some average reason, or "this thing that isn't and shouldn't be illegal because it's nothing has become illegal because of politics." That be…
/r/MensRights21/06/22 04:38 PM
24

I'd say I'd like to know what, in their world, looks like an appropriate attempt to be friendly with, or seek a potential relationship with, a potentially interesting prospective partner. The secret ingredient is being hot or obviously wealthy. Any way they say they want men to behave towards them will still be considered creepy if the average man does it. Any of that stuff they say is creepy behavior will become exciting when a man they like the look of does it. There was a guy on YouTube a whi…
/r/MensRights20/06/22 07:04 PM
20

Most things people predicted would happen from progressive policies have. Slippery slope was never a fallacy, they knew where it was going and wanted that outcome but couldn't say so until they had more power, so they pretended it was all bunk and could never happen.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 06:53 PM
6

They want you to be dominant, but in exactly the way they want. They all want to top from the bottom.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 07:06 PM
9

Doesn't sound at all like a tradcon.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 05:46 AM
17

I was raised to believe that women were basically better than men. That's not how my mom ever specifically stated it, and it's kind of ironic since she'd be the first to furiously denounce feminists and the ills they brought on society, but that's how it was nonetheless. I was taught that women were basically just full of love and care where men were violent brutes and if I just showed kindness and the willingness to work for a family to a woman and allowed her to be kind and such in return inst…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 08:53 PM
3

Headline is slightly misleading, as the quotes clearly indicate they are fighting against their party.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:12 PM
1

I favor the rights interest in traditionalism, where I get some benefits and freedoms for my responsibilities, over the left's blatant gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 01:16 PM
7

LGBT community is by people who's sexuality is their personality for people who's sexuality is their personality.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 02:11 AM
56

She can just go begging to some feminists. I'm sure they'll top her right off as their new celebrity victim.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 02:32 AM
3

I have come to firmly believe they are just making this shit up.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 07:24 PM
3

A pretty important question, since according to feminists, women expressly going along with something, sometimes expressly saying "yes," but still meaning "no" is super duper common because women are just so terrified of men they can mentally freeze like deer in headlights when a man makes an advance, meaning he still raped her (a.k.a. she changed her mind in the morning).
/r/MensRights13/06/22 05:11 PM
5

Yep, all the rights, none of the responsibilities.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:08 PM
3

It means 'glancing at a feminist,' especially if you're not attractive. People naturally glance around unless they're expressly reading or something. Feminists have sex and gender issues on their minds 24/7. Random man glances at a feminist, they interpret it as sexual.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:05 PM
1

I don't know what you mean by that statement. Feminists change up the words, but they've said "man behaviors are bad and oppress women" in one way or another as long as I've been alive.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:04 PM
7

Yes, feminists are dirty liars who don't actually believe in equality or pulling their weight. They are 100% opposed to traditionalism because traditionalism demands they pull their weight in other ways.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:00 PM
1

How old are you? Feminists have been at this a while.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 12:57 PM
28

Sure, as long as women are maintaining their traditional responsibilities too. But they decided all their responsibilities were below them as human beings and they just deserved the benefits of civilization for free.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 12:45 PM
25

But will a feminist do any of that? Probably not.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/22 04:54 PM
4

"But you don't understand, that was just because they had to prove they could be as tough as men, if it wasn't for toxic masculinity and the patriarchy they totally would have ruled peacefully, so you only proved that men cause wars!" -feminist revisionist historians.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 08:58 PM
15

They want specific men to approach them, but not others. That's their real problem. They don't want to take the responsibilities and risks of approaching men, and initiating yourself is the only real way to get the attention of a specific person for sure, but they also want the attention of specific men.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 06:04 PM
1

While your point is technically true, it should be noted that America is somewhere between 80-90% Christian; if anything relied on just non-theist support it would be over in a week.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:48 PM
3

Yes, but they can also make bad decisions and they can also recognize bad decisions or just change their mind based on new information if it comes up again later, which is what is happening here. The US constitution has nothing whatsoever to say about abortion, the original decision found it as an implied right of an implied right, which is ridiculous. There are processes to alter the constitution, and they are intentionally difficult because the founding fathers always intended for the states t…
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:46 PM
1

Just existing is enough to trigger these people; in this case he has not yet, but is potentially overturning Roe vs Wade.
/r/AntiFeminists09/05/22 06:08 PM
-1

This is building ourselves up. Evil doesn't happen in a vacuum.Taking major steps to end the mass murder of babies enriches everybody.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 06:44 PM
6

An awful lot of the Boomers were hippies, weren't they? So they basically invented half the new agey parenting crap.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:39 AM
3

You got banned from an unpopular ideas post for having an unpopular idea; kind of amusing in a way, but very typical of this site. Most "unpopular opinion" places are just for people to circle jerk about how "unique" and "quirky" they are; most truly unpopular things will be downvoted, rules or no, and later removed.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 05:48 AM
7

Exactly. I like traditionalism, where we have more responsibilities but coinciding rights and respect, but I could deal with equality where we all have the same rights and responsibility, as long as we pick a consistent set of rules! It's the 'picking whichever is most convenient at any given time' that really gets to me and makes me angry. If there's a war on, it's a man's job to step up. If there's a high paying job up for grabs, it's expected the woman will be preferred in the name of equalit…
/r/MensRights24/04/22 10:18 PM
96

Not only do they expect you to pay them not to work, they expect you to pay them more not to work to help make up for the "pay gap" that largely exists because they don't want to work as much in the first place.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 03:54 AM
6

Neither way is clearly better, which clearly means the best way is whichever way you feel like.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 05:49 PM
16

Why would men seek mental health care? It's an industry for women, and these days mostly by women. They literally don't understand man's problems and feel confused and threatened by male patients.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 04:00 PM
4

What? There's consequences to attacking men and tearing down their institutions and driving then away from everything until many are defacto exiled from society? No way! And his advice is seriously "just deal with it?" What a fucking clown. We move mountains to cater to groups so small and weird they've basically self exiled, but when we get to the 49% of the population that is men, then it's too much effort, every one of our expectations is portrayed as unreasonable and crazy, and society just …
/r/MensRights21/04/22 03:11 PM
8

It ends well before that. When was the last time modern "equality" really benefited any man? It's only ever sapped our rights without giving us any of theirs or alleviating any of our responsibilities.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 11:22 PM
5

Bluntly, psychologists are largely women and psychology is largely aimed to women's benefit right now. All that stuff you've ever heard about 'horrible sexist psychologists' from the past who thought crazy things about women is true today in reverse. Individual exceptions notwithstanding, women on the whole do not understand men, not only because their brains are literally different, but because society places very different expectations on men than women. Moreover most of them don't want to und…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 03:59 PM
1

Yes, but also no. This is where we run headlong into the problems with the equality mindset and why I lean more traditionalist myself (or more specifically, I think traditionalist makes the most sense, but if we're doing equality we need to actually do it, not this stitched together Frankenstein conglomeration of both where it's always "whichever one benefits women more at any given moment"). But, despite the clear issues with it, if we are serious about equality, we need to do so.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 05:16 AM
1

You'd see plenty of women helping out. History demonstrates this. But none of them would be the self absorbed feminists.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 07:40 PM
7

Point of order, Wikipedia is expressly about "verrifiability not truth" and extends that concept to opinions as well to avoid 'having to show both sides of the argument with Nazis for example,' which effectively means their opinions are decided by the MSM, since those are considered the sufficiently official sources for opinions and they all say the same thing. I tried multiple times once to edit an entry I knew to be factually incorrect and had it counter edited to it's original version by some…
/r/MensRights20/02/22 09:32 PM
3

Yeesh, if it made it to the front page, that's the "progressives" being racist like that too.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 06:34 AM
16

I recently read this with some of my friends in a reading group and not only really enjoyed it, but it made me rethink a number of concepts (primarily feminist ones) that I had earlier written off, as well as introduced me entirely new ones. I had tried to read this five or six years ago but stopped since the language was too complicated for me. Reading it again now (with a few more years of academic-type reading under my belt and with friends) it was a little easier. First review literally admi…
/r/MensRights12/02/22 07:48 PM
10

We have one: feminist.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 06:58 AM
2

Oh wow, a law making dowries illegal is passed and women immediately start dropping false dowry accusations; color me shocked.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 12:34 AM
2

I don't WANT a male version of feminism, but how do you fight people like this without a similar front?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 03:32 AM
2

Did you know Norway only had five capital ships? Other than those frigates, they have a handful of submarines and patrol boats. This "one accident" Literally cost them 20% of their largest class of ship, and the thing was almost brand new too. Don't try to downplay this.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 04:13 AM
1

The KMN Helge Ingstad is one of the five Nansen-class frigates billed as “unsinkable” due to its construction with water-tight zones designed to keep the warship “intact and operable”. I know it's completely beside the point, but when are people going to learn to stop dubbing their ships "unsinkable?"
/r/MensRights21/01/22 04:08 AM
25

I like to see them as more "self care" movements. Girls are really into self care these days, yeah? So why is it bad when men do it?
/r/MensRights21/01/22 03:43 AM
28

Not to mention the number of women who'll take up a second seat with their purse, because it can't go in their laps or on the ground for some reason.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 04:37 AM
7

I strongly ascribe to this theory. Just look how quickly society is spinning apart since the sexual revolution.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 06:40 PM
2

Is this how Australians who gave up their guns cope?
/r/MensRights31/12/21 08:47 PM
73

Incredible how they proudly announce that as if it isn't just proof of an isolated circle jerk of an "education." "Gender studies" is nothing but a bunch of angry women writing emotional rage rants about men for more angry women to "cite" to pretend their hatred is intellectual and write more. There is literally no market for anything that gender studies produces outside of gender studies. It is probably the most worthless degree in history, leading at best to a self referential, pyramid scheme …
/r/MensRights26/12/21 03:55 PM
5

In fairness, few leftist movements have anything to do with the wellbeing of their supposed beneficiaries. It's just alot easier to hide the long term negatives of free money and government enforced power in relationships they offer women, for example, than the fairly obvious downsides of taking all your legal rights one by one that they offer to men.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 06:01 PM
1

Idk, Russia seems pretty cool right now.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 06:14 PM
2

Feminism is never conservative. Feminism just occasionally overlaps with traditionalism when they think it benefits them.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 05:13 PM
2

Yep. I saw that back in the day too. I was mystified and decided it must be related to politics (I was a conservative in a left leaning high school). Didn't realize what a broad and deep seated cultural issue it was until college, when one year I'd finally had enough of people in general and women in particular. Stopped being so polite to everybody, started speaking my mind and sometimes being outright rude, and I found to my shock that women, plural, were suddenly interested. This quickly impro…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/12/21 06:15 PM
0

"Traditionalists in one wing messed up this one time by keeping a status quo you don't like, therefore you should all instead support those who openly hate you, take more of your rights on a regular basis, and want to make you slaves to women." -people in this thread that I suspect of not caring much for men's rights.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 10:23 AM
10

Because they're not single issue voters and even if they were, the alternative is voting for people who openly allign themselves with feminism.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 10:15 AM
1

It's pretty wild how "the patriarchy" decided to give women the right to vote and stuff.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 07:59 PM
9

Oof, I feel a little bad for this one because she seems to know it's basically dumb and wrong, but can't shake the feeling anyway. Probably because women are very social creatures and her friends are bad women who try to make her feel bad about having a good man so they can feel good about engaging in hookup culture. And odds are everybody will give her TERRIBLE advice. What she REALLY needs to do is distance herself from the low value women she surrounds herself with, find some new friends, pre…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/11/21 01:54 PM
2

There's really only two ways about this. Either transwomen are women, in which case they and their rights don't concern me or most on this sub, or they're men, in which case the "TERFs" are basically correct so what else is there to say?
/r/MensRights07/11/21 04:46 PM
1

I get where you're coming from, but I no longer agree. The big idea was that if we don't censor then we won't be censored, and vice versa, but it turns out we just get censored anyway.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 01:12 AM
5

Did I say something about "women?" I thought we were talking about feminists.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 10:21 PM
7

They most certainly are not. The ven diagram of feminists and misandrists is almost a circle. It's how they justify remaining feminist in a world where they're already legally superior.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 07:27 PM
32

This. So much this. Women who aren't willing to offer you the good years of their life don't deserve your resources later.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 04:21 PM
9

Thinking these dreamboat men who make six figures are all over the place is probably also why women are all so damn convinced that they're oppressed by a wage gap.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 04:19 PM
8

That also means in six years an average of about six men a year from Tinder alone; as others have noted, there are likely quite a few more if we factor in all the bar pickups, cute guys from college, etc.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/21 02:31 PM
3

It's why every conversation with them gets so circular and kafka trap-y.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 10:26 PM
5

Looks like somebody threatened them. That's a pretty radical revision of policy and sounds like basically what big tech demanded of Parler before shutting them down.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 06:10 PM
5

Of course as far as those go, you also have the issue of big tech actively trying to kill spaces that let people get away from them. Look what happened to Parler.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 04:53 PM
15

In all seriousness, maybe. I'm starting to seriously believe that about so called "anti-racism" stuff. It seems like lately every single thing they do, while ostensibly in support of minorities, only breeds more resentment and isolation thereof and increases their dependency. Meanwhile, the "fuck white people" bit seems like it will inevitably cause a backlash. And while they claim to have changed, in my country at least they are literally the same political entity that perpetuated and fought fo…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 02:58 AM
3

Well, one can only hope that the moderates on MGTOW2 learned a valuable lesson about compromising themselves for their enemies in the vain hope that they will show mercy; they won't. Beyond that, I'd echo the others who say "be proactive and backup your communities off site," because the problem wasn't ever that they broke this or that specific rule, the problem was that they offended leftist and feminist sensibilities, and as leftists and feminists get more extreme, more moderates will seem ext…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/08/21 04:08 AM
6

"Never be afraid of being alone because the right man will come along eventually..." O.o from the single old lady who talks to a tree?!? O.o How self unaware can one person be? Or at least one hopes she's not self aware, because the alternative, that she knows exactly what she is and just chose to drag younger women down, would be so much worse. Thank God you see through her. It's tragic to think about how many other young women she might have access to who will probably listen to her.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre03/08/21 04:54 PM
3

Darmok and Jalad.
/r/MGTOW17/07/21 06:02 AM
2

Honestly, if I saw this I would be horribly tempted to pretend to date her for half a year, just to sap more of that time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/07/21 04:32 PM
1

I basically agree with this, but I've gotten a bit disillusioned lately; at least SOME of them have to be doing it out of cowardice or malice. Idk where you are, but whether you live in America or not, you've likely heard about our recent shit show; our conservatives ran every branch of our government for years, did jack all with the power, meekly handed it over despite all manner of issues and incongruities with the election results, and even played along with the "coup" narrative, bowing, scra…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre25/06/21 04:44 PM
8

If there was just one single piece of wisdom I could get across to younger men, it would be "you can walk away if you're not getting what you expect." I wish I could have learned it much earlier myself. It's very sad sometimes to think about how much time I spent on obviously lost romantic causes because I was sure if I persevered in showing love and kindness, she would see her issues more clearly by contrast, she would feel more secure, she would be able to overcome them more easily. It was a b…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre25/06/21 01:05 PM
3

O.o that's an average of over two dates per week.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/05/21 08:00 PM
16

"Self reliance" is toxic? Really? I mean, REALLY?!?
/r/MGTOW221/05/21 07:52 PM
1

Or they're trying to make it the norm so they can justify their own choices by popular opinion because they can't justify them otherwise.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/21 01:37 PM
3

Huh. I skipped this film when it came out because as a religious person, the attitude that life was all about sex annoyed me. It sounds like it was even worse than I already assumed it was.
/r/MGTOW08/05/21 03:24 PM
2

Just play on easy. Just do it. I did it for years. When it got too easy I played on normal and when that got too easy I played on hard. I rarely tell anybody what setting I'm playing on unless it's friends playing the same games comparing notes. Flexing on my friends for being better at games is lame, and they feel the same. And does anybody say "git gud" unironically? Shit.
/r/MGTOW08/04/21 04:46 PM
2

So she utterly destroys his life and sues the school district and now it's come out she lied and the school district sues her and the guy... What happened to the guy. I'm a bit more concerned about his justice than some school district's.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 11:53 AM
2

How would it return 100 fold for generations when she'll barely have sex with you and doesn't want your kid? Does she mean she hopes for returns of 100 fold for her child with another man?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/04/21 09:42 PM
8

Yep. Even if society doesn't collapse, none of them can actually do much except rage against the machine, so as soon as the totalitarians they're putting in power need to run things instead of subvert them, those people will be useless or even liabilities. Of course some will get to be part of the new ruling class because of their great "virtue" of being the right skin color or having the right genitals. Most will probably be relabeled bad somehow, pushed down into our new lower classes, and bea…
/r/MGTOW05/04/21 08:13 PM
1

Lolwut? Wtf even is that sub? Paraphrased: Somebody I know IRL found out about my sex work and asked me about it and I was like "what were you doing on an escort site?!?" You make your living selling men porn and sit in judgement of men consuming porn? A guy from my gym recognized me and asked if I was me and showed me a picture of me from the website and I rudely told him it was somebody else and how dare he ask me such a thing and stormed off! Are you a "sex worker" or aren't you? You're mad a…
/r/MGTOW05/04/21 04:50 PM
9

But only nice work positions. Notice there's no women lining up to help with equality for garbage disposal, or sewage work, or oil rigs. Which is probably contributing to the pay gap; those jobs are all higher paying than the skill level would suggest because over half the work force doesn't want to do them. Free market in action.
/r/MGTOW04/04/21 12:32 PM
6

Lol@"hey maybe women in rural Africa don't have the same rights as women in the UK." As if they're ever concerned about women in rural Africa or use their resources for those women's benefit instead of trying to further enslave men in the West.
/r/MGTOW04/04/21 12:10 PM
16

It's the "born again virgin" bullshit. They think they can just start fresh and call themself a virgin again. I sort of get it, even slightly applaud it on some levels, as everybody makes mistakes and you don't lose pair bonding entirely if you just did one or two people, and there's something to be said for trying to stick to religious principles, BUT... If you're going to pull that with such clear evidence of prior sex, be prepared for a LOT of rejection. If your principles are actually import…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/04/21 05:30 PM
3

I agree in theory, but the problem is the bleeding hearts (or those with an agenda) are always swooping in to make sure the consequences of degeneracy don't come to pass. I'd be much more in favor of legalized drugs, for example, if we stopped paying for infinite hospital visits for habitual ODs. People would do it less, and those who repeatedly couldn't handle it would simply remove themselves from the equation. Instead we spend vast amounts of cash and resources on bringing back people literal…
/r/MGTOW03/04/21 05:19 PM
7

Aren't they always the first to say that they "didn't do it for you" if you have the nerve to look at them or comment on it?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/04/21 05:54 PM
4

It has additional connotations in the anime community, typically that an anime girl is printed life sized on the pillowcase in various states of dress or undress. The stereotype is "sad pathetic incel weeboos buy the pillow to cuddle and fuck because they can't get a real woman." I don't know to what extent that stereotype is or isn't true. The controversy is multi faceted, but mainly the 'male sexuality is icky and uncomfortable' thing, though there's also a hefty dose of feminists raging about…
/r/MGTOW02/04/21 04:49 PM
5

Not just atheists sadly. A LOT of people are convinced that we're brilliant because we have flat screen TVs and the internet and everybody who lived before 1960 was a moron. It's amazing to read about some of the feats of our ancestors and really think about them. Like navigating across the ocean, the freaking OCEAN, on fifty foot, unpowered wooden ships, propelled by wind alone, that don't even work unless dozens of men know it inside and out and can function harmoniously to make it go. And it'…
/r/MGTOW02/04/21 06:18 AM
3

Eh, I like my family. Anyway, idk wtf "fuck Easter" has to do with mgtow.
/r/MGTOW02/04/21 05:59 AM
3

I also love how she expressly says she's trying to move to other men in higher circles, but expects these ones she's using to tide herself over in the meantime to take her to expensive dates and shit when she's not even thinking of committing in return.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/04/21 01:18 PM
4

Hey, thanks, but also don't beat yourself up for things other women do. Though I admit, I'm as guilty as the next guy of conflating them sometimes, especially in anger, our problems are with feminists, not women. If you indeed were a feminist in the past... Well, it looks like you woke up, and it sounds like you've already done some time trying to reason with their online hate mobs. I feel like I'm saying contradictory things; I both appreciate the sentiment, the thought and understanding, and t…
/r/MensRights24/03/21 06:23 PM
3

After years of beating my head against the wall with fantasy romance love and kindness, only to be ground in the dirt by woman after woman, I became angrier and angrier and found, to my surprise, that as I began doing my own things and treating women with a dismissiveness born of that anger, women mysteriously became interested, wanted to know more about me, made a point of hanging out with me sometimes. This made me feel much better and I immediately thought I'd simply chosen poorly before, and…
/r/askTRP23/03/21 10:17 PM
2

"People" are not that evil. Feminists and progressives are. The fascists of the future did indeed call themselves anti-fascist -as predicted.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 09:18 PM
34

Yep. Life in America is priced to like 1.5 normal salaries, or two or three minimum wages, and all the fucking progressives pull out their hair like "how could teh evul coporashins do this to us?!?" and I'm sitting here like "this is clearly because feminism made it the norm for a two income household while simultaneously doubling the workforce overnight," but none of them want to hear that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/03/21 05:17 PM
10

So she wants a highly successful white business owner who's also really into ghetto culture? That's already basically impossible without tacking on some of the others.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/03/21 06:23 PM
14

Starship Troopers, by Robert A. Heinlein. If you've seen the movie, read the book anyway; the movie hits only some of the very broad strokes and satirizes much of it. The book is a good story, but also an incredible philosophical treatise on the purpose, use, and justification of military force, and the concept of earned rather than inherent citizenship. I'd also recommend The Forever War, a much more cynical take on the subject(s) by Joe Haldeman, as a followup. Though often considered a "rebut…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/03/21 08:11 PM
27

"Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Breeds that forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and their freedoms."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/03/21 04:14 PM
15

Lolwut? Why does she think old timey men would just take a woman beating on them? They might not be physically hurt by it, but they were not big on tolerating disrespect. That would've been a backhand followed by sharp words and a banishing to the fainting couch to cry it out alone.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 12:15 PM
1

He can't be that cucked if he persisted in those pursuits despite her harsh attacks on them and him. It is indeed disappointing he seeks "forgiveness" for his success, but he didn't let her dissuade him in the first place.
/r/MGTOW17/03/21 04:50 PM
2

Lawsuit time.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 01:38 AM
-7

As I understood it was discriminating against women... Because they told it to. Either by oversight because they just assumed it would not consider the information or by wanting to prove a point about men and women being equal, they gave it access to the full data after training and let it take sex into account, so it did. Idk why the fuck you'd think it was a good idea to instruct an AI to consider sex and then be upset it did, but that's progressives for ya.
/r/MGTOW10/03/21 05:24 PM
3

For what it's worth, there seems to be a slowly expanding awareness of the real state of things beyond the hardcore SJW circle. I recently said on a neutral fan page where the subject came up in relation to one of the characters, paraphrased, "It's not toxic masculinity to hide emotions; it's security. There's a lot of shitty people around willing to take advantage of any chink in the armor for their own gain and a not insignificant subset of women who react to it with disgust at your "weakness.…
/r/MensRights10/03/21 03:03 PM
12

We don't even have to imagine. For the first time ever, right wingers did break a couple windows in anger the other month and we've been hearing nonstop how they're domestic terrorists and need to be rooted out of society ever since, even as significantly more violent antifa protests are ongoing in Oregon!
/r/MGTOW09/03/21 01:27 PM
6

Even the dominant class needed to have a solid head on their shoulders for most of history. They were expected to manage their husbands household, and to an extent his affairs if he was away. Even if only from self interest, I doubt any noble woman wanted to be on the receiving end of a husband returning from the Crusades to discover she'd sold the county for a pair of shoes.
/r/MGTOW03/03/21 01:34 PM
8

You ever feel like you grew up being taught that harems were this wicked exploitation of women by powerful and wealthy men in the ancient days, but it turns out that an awful lot of women want to be in one? Because if every woman wants the like <5% that make that kind of money, they're going to have to share.
/r/MGTOW27/02/21 11:56 PM
3

Is India lying about their stats or something? I feel like I hear a horror story out of India from some men's sub or another every day or so.
/r/MGTOW27/02/21 11:17 PM
1

Yep. I never liked that show, even when I was young. There was nothing funny about it. Every damn episode is just his wife finding something new to shit on him about.
/r/MGTOW27/02/21 08:18 PM
4

Because we've spent the last five decades telling them that honor is out of date and women are equal. We're supposed to be horrified by their behavior, but it's only the natural consequences of the modern agenda.
/r/MGTOW25/02/21 10:26 PM
7

What I think made Tywin compelling is he initially seems defined by his cruelty, but you come to realize that he's not "cruel" so much as "coldly pragmatic." Cruelty is just a tool in his toolbox, and if he uses it more than others, it's because he genuinely believes more situations call for it, not out of some ghastly pleasure or revelry in it like Ramsay, for a contrast. Cersei thought she was following in her father's footsteps, but never really got him or grasped what he was actually doing i…
/r/MGTOW25/02/21 06:45 PM
30

Honestly, I don't mind it in a historical context because for most of history men were given respect and authority in exchange for all the responsibilities taken on. It's only today that society expects you to be a provider while giving job preference to the other sex, or expects you to be a defender whil arresting you for defending yourself or others, or lowkey expects you to handle anything dangerous, dirty, physically intensive, etc, while systematically shitting on you for being capable of d…
/r/MensRights19/02/21 06:03 AM
2

Well, she's not wrong. Unfortunately she probably means just women. Or maybe even just her. Idk. I don't follow celebrities and idk how down to Earth Halle Berry is, but most women who start talking about this really just mean they think women shouldn't pay.
/r/MGTOW211/02/21 03:53 AM
2

Where the hell are they getting those statistics they imply but don't quote when they say "statistically..."?
/r/MGTOW209/02/21 01:16 AM
2

Time. That's all. Helps if you find something to occupy yourself, but if you really loved them it can, and well might, take years to move on.
/r/MGTOW201/02/21 08:36 AM
2

Isn't she? He literally has recordings of her admitting to her crimes and mocking him that nobody will ever believe him and saying she will lie to the courts, and somehow he's still the one who got screwed.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 04:00 PM
0

Obviously the US college system is a scam, but the solution is for people to stop feeding it, not to enable it with government money and fuck everybody who bothered to actually pay their bills.
/r/MGTOW214/01/21 04:51 PM
1

What really gets me about this isn't even that the mom slept around; it's that she kept the secret for fifteen years and then tells her daughter on her freaking death bed, putting her on the hook for it! Like honestly, that's so fucked. What possible reason could there be to share this piece of information when you've hidden it for fifteen years and are on your way out anyway? In what way shape or form could this have helped the daughter or contributed to her quality of life? Did she expect the …
/r/MGTOW13/01/21 08:19 PM
3

It's probably not really her mom.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/01/21 02:23 AM
2

Girls can see the difference between ballet slipper pink and bubble bath pink, but can girls see why kids love the taste of Cinnamon Toast Crunch?
/r/MGTOW10/01/21 10:25 AM
3

Bluntly, I don't believe the Republicans fell for a trap; I believe they were in on it, looking for a way to switch sides. Did you see how hard and fast they folded? On EVERYTHING? They couldn't bow and scrape low enough. Kind of weird after a solid summer of their colleagues excusing Antifas terrorism.
/r/MGTOW09/01/21 09:12 AM
1

But it's not from both sides. I readily admit, I'd LIKE the left to shut their loud mouths and I think the press SHOULD have been held accountable for lying under slander/libel laws this whole time, but notice how the right held total power for years and none of that happened at all, much less anything unreasonable? The left hasn't even held power for two days; hell, they don't even officially hold it yet, and they've already engaged in mass censorship like we've never seen outside of communist …
/r/MGTOW09/01/21 09:09 AM
4

Right wing and authoritarian. Not ideal by any stretch, but they're nowhere close to the totalitarian extremes of that and unlikely to go left anytime soon.
/r/MGTOW09/01/21 08:45 AM
3

Seriously, they folded so hard and fast yesterday that I almost think it was planned. I don't know if they were blackmailed, threatened, promised stuff from the new regime, but it was obvious they were just waiting for an excuse to have a dramatic "seeing the light" moment and stab him in the back.
/r/MGTOW08/01/21 10:10 PM
2

There's a scene in 1984 where a guy giving a speech against Neighbor-A is informed in the middle by his party that they now hate Neighbor-B and are friends with Neighbor-A. He changes his speech almost mid sentence and all the people who brought anti-A signs get really embarrassed that 'somehow, inexplicably, they accidentally put the wrong name on their signs,' destroy the signs, and move right on to chanting against B. That's all I can think of as I see this total, absolute 180s from the left …
/r/MGTOW08/01/21 10:00 PM
6

This is painful to see every time. More so knowing she then convinced him to come out and condemn the people on his side, publicly reaffirm their "friendship," and defend her reputation.
/r/MGTOW06/01/21 12:10 AM
5

Cool to know, I suppose, but nothing's going to happen.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 01:25 PM
65

If you go by the rule that it's always three times more than she says... 😳
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/01/21 05:08 PM
42

I think that feminists couldn't possibly have gotten where they are without hordes of thirsty men supporting them the whole way. It doesn't necessarily matter that they be true believers.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 09:40 PM
2

"It's totally the government and not us." But... acknowledging the vast legal inequalities is a really good start. Incredibly better than most manage. Anyway, it's not JUST the government, but in fairness without the vast force of the government you aren't so utterly outmatched in case of a serious argument.
/r/MGTOW231/12/20 12:16 AM
2

I can't even wrap my head around how you can believe that relationships are so tilted in mens' favor and solely to the benefit of men while you're having to literally force them to date women!
/r/MGTOW20/12/20 08:32 PM
1

Do people who aren't feminists obsess over the gender of those professions? Has anybody here ever said the words "female engineer" outside of the context of specifically talking about feminist talking points/statistics on a purported lack of "female engineers?" It would be so typical of feminists to declare their own terminology "sexist" and try to blame men for it.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 09:44 PM
3

They also define the Sad Puppies movement at the Hugos as an "alt-right anti-diversity movement," which is almost the exact opposite of what it was. I'm sure I could find a dozen more examples if I looked up anything controversial or political; Wikipedia is not a useful resource anymore.
/r/MGTOW223/11/20 06:24 PM
3

You have to remember, few villains think they're the villain. In her mind, the narrative is that she's a wonderful, brilliant, rising star, a success story of feminism, rising to great power amidst the oppression of her people and wielding that power justly yet sternly from on high. Almost certainly in her mind, everybody she bullies deserves it. It's probably not even bullying to her. It's "discipline," "direction," "constructive criticism," or just "asserting herself." She probably tells herse…
/r/MGTOW220/11/20 05:20 PM
494

The one that got me was "well yes, men are imprisoned at a higher rate, but that's because studies have shown incarceration is hard on women." O.o wtf?!? Yeah, it's incarceration. For doing crimes. It isn't supposed to be nice! How entitled do you have to be ti drop a line like that?
/r/MensRights20/11/20 12:38 PM
25

Literally came to the comments just to point that out. And nobody seemed to notice at all. Seriously fucked up.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 12:35 PM
2

I usually think that, but I would point out, Trump just recently said "let's install a judge in SCOTUS in like two weeks" and they actually did. In the old days I'd have expected like half of them to do like the one chick from Maine did and vote against their own interests in some pathetic attempt to appear more principled for the media or "reach across the aisle," as if either of those EVER earned them any friends or respect on the other aide. Still, I'm concerned how they'll be when Trump leav…
/r/MGTOW03/11/20 11:34 AM
2

Anger towards men, anger towards the world, towards humanity in general, and loss of trust in those same people and institutions is totally valid. Feel fucking angry, dude. Go scream in the motherfucking woods. And yeah, you’ve had 25 years to gather empirical data about men, and you’ve concluded that men are garbage. That’s valid, too! Most men are garbage! So why do you want a “man”? A man is nothing but an idea (and yes, you can have sexual preferences for ideas). Wtf did I just read?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/11/20 07:20 PM
10

Really does seem like societal problems get bigger and bigger the more women have power. We've made so many decisions for stupid emo reasons or "compassion."
/r/MGTOW02/11/20 04:43 PM
15

It always struck me that a perfect gentleman who had nothing but reasonable expectations was portrayed as the villain and then out of nowhere steals somebody's kid to survive at the end. I find myself wondering if test audiences were too empathetic towards him and they needed to throw in something just horrible to make Jack look better in comparison.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/10/20 11:45 PM
1

Mostly they won't, though. It's more important that they be right than that other women be happy. In fairness to them, the feeling seems mutual; I've watched the few old feminists who try be ripped apart as "weak" by the young and angry feminists who still believe their self righteous fury and a couple cats will see them through life.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/10/20 07:53 PM
2

I love the "MUST NOT OWN CROCS" line; God himself apparently intervened to find somebody who met all her other insane expectations and was willing to give it a go with her ancient ass and THAT was a deal breaker? Some people really choose to be alone.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/10/20 07:20 PM
11

"The four men face life sentences if convicted, while Dunaeva could receive up to 20 years in prison." And that's not 20 years, that's "up to" 20 years. Pussy pass putting in some work.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 03:55 PM
12

Hey, good for you! Sounds like you got through a little bit.
/r/MGTOW24/09/20 03:46 AM
2

No, the first one never, ever goes away no matter what you do. I firmly believe we are wired for "pair bonding," as some like to call it, and long term emotion and physical attractions are strongest with the first few they're established with, especially the first. Pretty sure this phenomenon is exactly why traditional morality held that you get emotionally involved only with your parents backing and physically only after marriage. But I digress. The first one won't go away. Decades down the roa…
/r/askTRP21/09/20 05:29 PM
2

I'm hoping the inherent grim darkness of the world keeps them from injecting their particular brand of (perceived) progress and happiness.
/r/MGTOW15/09/20 06:49 PM
2

XD this conversation always has me flashing back to Fat Larry from Vampire the Masquerade: Bloodlines. He drops the line "You can call me Fat Larry!.That's 'Fat' with an 'F,' because I know I got a weight problem, I just don't give a shit!"
/r/MGTOW15/09/20 03:15 PM
17

I gotta be honest, I feel like this didn't happen... But it could have, and that is a pretty sad state of the world.
/r/MGTOW15/09/20 02:10 AM
1

I think she's being legit; she clearly chose four men in a row who were intelligent enough to leave ;)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/08/20 06:29 PM
2

Sure. I don't think that idea reflects reality though. It's just a thing feminists say because they don't like mgtow (among others), and they're not going to stop saying it just because it's false.
/r/MGTOW210/08/20 04:32 PM
1

Well, as somebody you would most likely consider "homophobic," I don't see much here about the topic at all, much less agreeing with me. If I had to guess I'd say you're seeing a negative association as a representative of a special interest group both reminiscent of and ostensibly allied with feminism. But I've never seen anybody here specifically talk about it. Personally I've reached a point in my life where I truly don't care what happens in the privacy of your bedroom, but I expect you to k…
/r/MGTOW208/08/20 05:02 PM
15

Fast-forward a couple of years, and he is at least 125 pounds lighter, is on his way to finishing law school, and has really invested in his appearance. I’m talking stylists and manicures and $700 suits. I’ve been treading water financially (working my way through dental-assistant school) and mired in a relationship with NO FUTURE (guy has no ambition, no drive and is a jerk), and he has become the talk of our social circle. Oof. She just comes right out and SAYS "I said no before because he was…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/08/20 03:41 PM
1

Dude, "a break" only ever means the one suggesting it wants to try to get somebody else but keep you on the back burner in case it doesn't work out. She hasn't been distant because of stress, she's been distant because she's seeing somebody on the side and has him on her mind.
/r/askTRP02/08/20 04:59 AM
6

I'm starting to think of our world as 'post-information.' Who can tell for sure what's real or not? Our "legitimate" news sources are caught lying constantly and other ones are reporting truth -sometimes- but also mistakes, spins, and lies themselves. Even scientists/scientific authorities seem to be regularly caught lying. Everybody has a clear agenda, one way or the other. There is an overabundance of information and only one version can be true. Occasionally they're ALL false. How does one pa…
/r/MGTOW31/07/20 12:49 PM
14

I doubt anybody could tell for sure, but probably most of them are satire and maybe one is for real and just doesn't see a problem with saying it. Many women believe this, but most who do will never plainly state it, because it looks BAD when you write it down. You'll typically get the long winded justification that steps around quite saying it, or straight denial. It's the 'on-the-nose-ness' of the statements that has me thinking satire.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 12:20 PM
2

I can't tell which of them are being for real and which are being satirical and are actually against it. I wonder if any of them can tell.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 12:14 PM
1

Would you believe there's a Star Wars book where Mace Windu is taking a shower and some dudes try to mug him, so Mace just beats the shit out of them buck naked? Well there is, and I hadn't thought of that scene in years. Thanks 😂
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/20 09:15 PM
8

You'd think, but a lot of companies are doing it lately.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/20 07:33 PM
1

Trump supporter There are feminist Trump supporters?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/07/20 08:37 PM
1

Ah, must be from the newly woke Urban Dictionary. It's truly incredible how willing they are to piss away all accumulated credibility and good will to try and push an agenda.
/r/MGTOW20/07/20 07:00 PM
1

Attempting to manipulate you by breaking up is a HUGE red flag. I'd have been unlikely to take her back the first time and would have dumped her myself the second. She's lucky you put up with her this long. She's lucky you took her on this vacation and not somebody better. It sounds like she takes and takes and takes and gives almost nothing back at all.
/r/askTRP20/07/20 02:33 PM
1

I see why you would think that, but I would say a lot of different factors kept a certain amount of bad behavior in check: a clear division of responsibilities, harder divorces that would not necessarily favor the woman, a broad understanding that people including women are prone to lie to advance or gain, a socially enforced caste-lite system that made it improbable and risky to pursue men well above them... There are certainly more, but I'm just listing off the top of my head atm.
/r/MGTOW19/07/20 01:08 PM
25

And wow! O.o when he gets to the bottom and asks her why there's more women graduating college she goes full female supremacist, like 'well, women are just smarter; that's biology.'
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/20 03:56 AM
17

They had just broken up. "They'd been dating for over two years and he said he 'just wasn't ready to settle down.'" This got Birger, a former economics writer for Fortune and Money, thinking: How could a man of that age be so cavalier about casting aside such an amazing woman? Ha! 😂😂😂
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/20 03:47 AM
2

No.
/r/askTRP12/07/20 09:09 PM
2

Mist right wing subs are also free of them, but if you're a centrist or more reasonable leftist your options are highly limited.
/r/MGTOW212/07/20 02:47 PM
12

It's actually not even that many people saying so. Almost everybody seems to be saying NTA, this is clearly crazy, but for some reason it's flared as "Everybody Here Sucks." But yeah, pretty objectively insane. I mean, can you even imagine the rage if a guy demanded sexual favors based on something an ex of hers claimed happened several years ago?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/07/20 01:27 AM
1

And the comments on that... "This is the audacity of most men." 'Oh, how dare a man even look at women who are better than him.' Why don't they just admit they want a caste system for men.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 06:43 PM
3

Feminazis be like: "Men must be removed from positions of power and wealth to make way for women." "Why are there no wealthy and powerful men for me to date?"
/r/MensRights11/07/20 06:42 PM
5

It is basically turning into an evil megacorp :/
/r/MensRights10/07/20 12:49 PM
2

I only hate the fans that act like Disney is paying them to cover for the movies and spend their time shitting on the EU.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 12:48 PM
8

Don't forget "no woman will ever want to be with you."
/r/MGTOW210/07/20 12:36 PM
2

Lol@"no trumpsters." Sounds like a low risk preemptive rejection to buff her own image by imagining that hordes of men want her but are scared off by her powerful morality, when in reality none of those people were interested in her in the first place.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/07/20 12:30 PM
2

I would say the root problem is actually secular conditioning telling her it's ok to cheat. Whether you believe it was divinely inspired or entirely man made, morality and tradition weren't just random things people did for no reason. It is possible they can become outdated: for example, the exhaustive and seemingly arbitrary list of mostly dietary restrictions in the Old Testament has come to be understood as an effective health code barring problem foods and unhealthy behaviors, but can be str…
/r/askTRP10/07/20 12:25 PM
4

Might be our two party system. Your extreme left is separate from your left and your center and probably does not enjoy a majority or near majority support. They have to play nice to get along with other parties. Our extreme left is not seperated from our left and many of our centrists choose one side or the other. While they have traditionally tut tutted at their extremists when directly confronted about them, the left has never actually stepped in and reigned them in because they're all friend…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/07/20 06:32 AM
1

Wow, what a toxic looking sub. Went briefly to see if I could find the actual post. Couldn't. But their stickied post pretty loudly declared that you despite it being a sub to get weird or hard stuff off your chest, you need to have correct opinions to participate.
/r/MGTOW02/07/20 12:04 PM
5

Because it's one of the places they can mob up and pretend they're strong. Strong people are capable of defending themselves but normally peaceful, like the main guy from this post. Weak men are incapable of fighting and bitter about it, so whenever they can get in a big group they lash out violently while insisting they're "peaceful." Of course, they aren't peaceful at all; they're just typically incapable of the violence they desire.
/r/askTRP01/07/20 03:02 PM
9

We are on Reddit; this kind of person is probably overrepresented here.
/r/askTRP01/07/20 06:24 AM
1

Well... At least they're pretending to be slightly consistent, I guess.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 05:57 AM
10

Well maybe China will save you :p But in all seriousness, it's disturbing me that various "evil" authoritarian countries are starting to look slightly better than most of the west. We say we're all about freedom, but reality is that rights are just for some people and the rest of our's are eroded daily. They tell us it's justice because we all owe everybody else for things a fraction of people did hundreds of years ago. Honestly, Russia may be authoritarian, but their authoritarians just demand …
/r/MGTOW201/07/20 05:48 AM
26

Honestly, never did laugh. Most of the jokes seemed to be "he said something nerdy and indecipherable, look at the normal women react, hahaha!" As somebody who understood most of what they were saying, it didn't amuse me. Didn't come down on people for watching it because I'm not a fucking SJW, but never watched it myself beyond the brief initial look.
/r/MGTOW01/07/20 05:35 AM
15

Apparently Reddit has altered their definition of hate speech so it's not hate if you are attacking the majority. Aren't women the majority atm?
/r/MGTOW29/06/20 09:14 PM
4

I heard the Democrats were refusing debates or something.
/r/MGTOW29/06/20 01:50 AM
5

It's disturbing the amount of bowing and scraping he has to do to their movement and even the perpetrator in a post about his own innocence filled with proof thereof. But even with that it's still half luck people accepted it.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 04:36 PM
7

"orr sugar daddies." Just going to come right out and say it, huh?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/06/20 04:33 PM
6

He's completely fucked. In lefty land you aren't allowed to have guns, you aren't allowed to defend your property, you ABSOLUTELY are not allowed to defend your claim to your wife, who is 100% free to fuck anybody she wants. There is nothing morally wrong with what your friend did. But it's all 100% illegal.
/r/MGTOW222/06/20 04:31 AM
30

My mom and dad were in a rough patch. Nothing special, they'd had them before and they had nine kids together and had made it through them for the kids before. But two of my mom's friends had recently gotten a divorce and started telling her about how "great and liberating" it was, pushing her to 'show him he wouldn't stand for it,' etc. She got a divorce. She subsequently "inspired" multiple friends to leave their own husbands, none of whom had done anything wrong. The two families I knew, of t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/06/20 05:26 PM
1

No (but kind of) because it expects similar commitments from the woman. The issue, of course, is that the laity is influenced by secular culture despite the Church's best efforts, and it ultimately has little to no power to enforce it's strictures, so we get in an incredibly annoying place where the faithful women will quote the religion at you to try and force you to do x, y, and z for them but then get super secular when you expect them to hold up their end and yammer about "outdated attitudes…
/r/MGTOW219/06/20 09:21 PM
25

Oof, been there :( long time ago a girl acted interested in me but said she "needed one relationship in her life that wasn't about sex." Good, caring man that I was at the time I bought that line. Took me far too long to have the epiphany that if every other relationship was just about sex then I was being actively snubbed for doing my absolute best for her in every way while other guys had just shown up and gotten what they wanted for no work whatsoever. Tried to talk to her about it a few time…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/06/20 06:29 AM
3

Getting there myself. I get real sick of people demanding that I have empathy for everybody else when the same types of people, sometimes literally the same people, have been telling me my problems don't matter and they don't care for my entire life.
/r/MGTOW13/06/20 03:24 PM
6

"Fucking Pick-Me!" incoming.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 08:33 PM
1

So if you HAD to choose one, lawyer or cop? 😬
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/05/20 06:52 PM
3

Seriously, wtf is with women and height requirements? Could you even imagine the rage you'd get if you ended a profile in "8s and up only; don't waste my time if you're a 7-."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/05/20 06:48 PM
4

"The constant sex is sole crushing" Trying to figure out which position crushes soles like O.o
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/05/20 04:05 PM
1

Three months, huh? >.<
/r/MGTOW03/05/20 10:37 PM
56

I got pulled over for speeding once with my girlfriend, who was recovering from surgery, in the passenger seat. The cop just assumed I had beaten her into this state and had me out of the car, "hands on the trunk, stay there!" and took her aside to press her about the "abuse." He didn't even believe her the first time she told him it was surgical cuts (should have been obvious the whole damn time) and only relented when she got visibly angry, still gave me the stink eye while he was letting me g…
/r/PussyPass22/04/20 06:29 PM
9

Holy fuck, I almost thought for a moment that this was an example of people actually giving a shit about men for the hostile response to the initial poster, but then I got to the bottom of the article and found just more women trying to make it about them, talking about "toxic masculinity" and downvoting anybody who said it wasn't about that.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 03:15 PM
1

Honestly, just stop doing pot and don't worry about them. If your friends are so hard into it that you have nothing to do with them other than smoke pot, they're addicts and will only drag you back eventually, and if they'll dump you for not smoking it, they're shit people. There's lots of cool stuff to do in the world and cool people to do it with.
/r/askTRP16/04/20 10:19 PM
2

Some, sure. There will always be some. It just seems to me that if I can keep my nature under control because society expects it, they could broadly as well. It's in my nature to have a quick temper and desire swift and harsh retribution, but I'm expected to keep it in check and threatened with consequences if I don't. Harsh consequences keep a lot of people in check. Never all, we do still have murderers, but many. Most even.
/r/MGTOW12/04/20 10:11 PM
3

Sorry, I see I used 'them' to mean multiple things in the post. To clarify, we as a society should have expectations of women, I hate feminists for opposing societal expectations of women.
/r/MGTOW12/04/20 09:55 PM
4

I get you're saying it's in their nature, but true or not that doesn't mean we can't have higher expectations of them. We can, and we did for thousands of years, and it's largely due to feminists that we don't anymore. They're the cause of exactly this kind of bullshit and it's just one more reason to hate them.
/r/MGTOW12/04/20 09:39 PM
20

Shit, I never even thought about that with the ending before. That's so fucked up.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/04/20 08:31 PM
4

"You've run out of dick." 😂😂😂
/r/MGTOW12/04/20 08:05 PM
1

I mean, is it? While there have always been cheaters, we considered ourselves monogamous for thousands of years and pushed that ideal. It's only since the sexual revolution that some very biased and agenda driven movements have pushed the idea that we should all sleep around.
/r/MGTOW12/04/20 07:44 PM
15

What REALLY disgusted me, though, were the feminazi replies under the original post (if you follow it all back to the 4y old r/relationships post) telling him he 'was "entitled" to expect anything from her' and 'it's her body; she can do what she wants.' How fanatical, how fucked in the head do you have to be to come to a kid who's just been stabbed in the back by his literally lifelong love and say that shit? Feminists are pure evil.
/r/MGTOW12/04/20 07:40 PM
4

The story and the followups indeed made me almost nauseous. Especially because I know what she'll turn into. Met her type all day long on a Catholic Singles page I was a member of: "used to fuck all the time and it was such a mistake, but now I returned to God and I expect the highest quality men here to forgive me and take me for who I am; I have been forgiven and should be free of my past. Also my standards are impossibly high. Also I'm a bitter feminist and clearly hate men." What really piss…
/r/MGTOW12/04/20 07:35 PM
6

While I expect it would have been briefly satisfying, he wouldn't have had the community on his side anymore. While I can relate to his story all too easily, I can not even imagine the triumph I'd have felt had my cheaters own mother briefly turned on her. Later down the road of course, but still.
/r/MGTOW12/04/20 07:24 PM
2

To my mind, the most important aspect of MGTOW and TRP is just that they exist, prove you aren't crazy when you do finally see it, and prove the women who say you are are gaslighting you.
/r/MGTOW12/04/20 05:03 PM
6

I believe so too. I've moved on as much as one can, but I speak from personal experience. I never even got it off the ground with the first girl I actually loved, but I've never forgotten her or a myriad of little details about her and still vaguely miss her from time to time. I haven't seen or even spoken to her in over a decade.
/r/MGTOW12/04/20 03:22 PM
10

And not just a piece, she gave them the best pieces. Those kinds of women will only ever give you the dregs of her love and sex drive and expect everything in return. It's because at a certain point they have no good pieces left. Pair bonding is real. You never have a love like your first love and never forget your first time because both were the best and truest, and the further you get from either of them, the less likely successive tries are to be good.
/r/MGTOW12/04/20 03:13 PM
2

We just wanted all your money, special rights, and power? We didn't mean give up any of our own!
/r/MensRights09/04/20 08:56 PM
2

Damn, he's actually winning, and winning hard.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 12:47 AM
2

A thing that really gets under my skin with the left is how everybody in it approaches you on any issue like their stance has always been the norm, they've always held it, and you're a radical trying to turn back the clock to the stone age. They'll have changed their minds about something two minutes ago after reading a tumblr post and come at you like they've been fighting for it their entire lives. Most of those fuckheads 2 decades ago were what they'd angrily label a "Nazi" today.
/r/MGTOW08/04/20 06:19 AM
6

I don't consider it "we suffered, now it's your turn" unless we're actively pushing for it or it's becoming a norm. What I consider this is a wakeup call to feminists to take a critical look at a practice they've promoted now that it's actually effected one of their own gender. This isn't where men should push for more of this, because then it's just trading blows. This is where men need to say "it sucks, huh? Let's end it period."
/r/MensRights07/04/20 04:38 PM
18

Ah, I see this one justifies the ludicrous numbers by expanding the definition of "sexual violence" to include "unwanted comments?"
/r/MensRights05/04/20 04:40 AM
1

Good!
/r/MGTOW04/04/20 08:52 PM
2

What in the ever loving fuck?!? Is this guy supposed to be a Doctor? Is he actually threatening to withhold expertise over social justice issues while supposedly we're all going to die? Must not be as serious as they're pretending.
/r/MGTOW04/04/20 06:28 AM
13

Men can also be pressured into sex. We just don't get stuck on it. I would argue that's because we don't have a massive socio-political apparatus telling us to be stuck on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 03:34 AM
10

Holy shit, I'd heard they were bad, but I never bothered to go look before. Just clicked on your link on a whim and WOOOW! It's insane. There's not a bit of real politics in there. Just an endless string of thousands of upvotes propaganda with nothing in the comments but competitions for who can say "I hate Trump/any non minority" the most frothingly.
/r/MGTOW04/04/20 01:26 AM
15

And it's incredible how entitled they act if you lay it out for them too. I would commit my life to somebody who committed their's to me, but I'm not going to be an emotional provider for some aging mid 30s bitch who wouldn't give me the time of day when she was 20. If you won't spend your best years with me, I'm sure as hell not going to agree to be with you just for your worst. Said something like that a little more diplomatically, in broad terms, and minus the b word of course (since it alway…
/r/MGTOW02/04/20 06:55 PM
1

I love Bojack, although the random feminist/SJW focus episodes are cringey. The one where they dropped the line about 'men hating women more than they love guns' was especially insane since I know for a fact that 'guns as a great equalizer' is one of the NRAs major points. It's honestly kind of incredible and telling of how people eat up propaganda that a bunch of otherwise clever writers can be so uninformed.
/r/MGTOW02/04/20 09:29 AM
1

Oh look, no comments section im the article. What a surprise /s
/r/MGTOW02/04/20 09:18 AM
4

When aren't most women harboring resentment and hostility towards men. Feminists have told them that no matter what reality looks like they are always victimized and enslaved and men are the enemy and overseers. Most listen, and if they're not saying it to your face it's because they fear looking foolish in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, but they still believe it deep down in spite of that evidence and justify to themselves how any situation, even being served hand and foot, …
/r/MGTOW201/04/20 07:27 PM
1

I'm not sure how she was proved indispensable. Because her food is better? Sure, better food is better, but not indispensable. Simple fact of the matter is, most of us are fine with hot dogs, ramen, hamburger helper, canned corn, what have you. Unless our food is so utterly lacking in nutrition as to kill us, she's not necessary because her food is fancier or even more nutritious.
/r/MGTOW201/04/20 07:20 PM
4

That's not even hyperbole. You will literally develop deeper and more fulfilling relationships with most men from a good fight and a drink after than you ever will talking to most women.
/r/MGTOW31/03/20 05:18 PM
4

Seriously, on day one they were trying to claim equal rights without equal responsibility, and since then they've only gotten worse. I don't hate Susan B; she at least kept things grounded in traditional roles and common sense despite asking for things she hadn't earned, but she still set the stage for the subsequent movements of insanity.
/r/MGTOW31/03/20 05:03 PM
4

Feminists have never wanted equality.
/r/MGTOW31/03/20 04:59 PM
1

No "friend" drops that kind of money and effort for a day out.
/r/MGTOW31/03/20 04:38 PM
1

Somebody posted an article above, and apparently not. He still was defending her and apparently even giving her big bucks for college months later.
/r/MGTOW31/03/20 04:36 PM
2

I have been in a space like this with a woman before (doing stuff for someone who didn't want me I wouldn't do for others) and even with self awareness it was hard to break out of. In fact in truth I didn't strictly. I just got more direct with her about what I wanted and less accepting of emotional manipulation until she went too far, we had a fight because I wouldn't roll over and play her stupid game or validate her acting insane, and she ended things. Bit of a wake up call. Sadly I doubt thi…
/r/MGTOW31/03/20 04:35 PM
1

Here's the real cringe, she's already with guys who treat her badly (according to her, so grain of salt); her attempted justification for so extravagant a "friend date" was that her "good friend" was 'just showing her what she should expect from a real boyfriend because of all the bad people she dated.' Of course that makes it even worse, since she's admitting she bangs the bad dudes while hanging guys who treat her well out to dry, but we already knew from the initial post that this particular …
/r/MGTOW31/03/20 04:23 PM
11

She probably justified it to herself as "creeper won't take a hint" when she did it. Women are amazing at self justification to prop up their image. And I guarantee she was expecting to be either the set upon woman for "putting up" with his friend date or the cool/badass one for "having standards;" she was never expecting a backlash, which is why the defensive article posted above exists.
/r/MGTOW31/03/20 04:18 PM
7

Reading that actually made me slightly ill. Like my stomach is actually unsettled by the cringe of it all. Like first off, who an earth do either of them think they're fooling? What sane person would ever, EVER, dish out that kind of time, effort, and money on a "friend date," and what sane person would drop such a post in response if they weren't trying to broadcast a shutdown? And off course an official publication getting involved just to try and salvage some woman's image, because of course …
/r/MGTOW31/03/20 04:11 PM
2

I feel like some people here have to be being ironic or trolling, but I can't really tell.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/20 12:39 AM
14

I had a gf once around high school who was into 'being a strong woman' or something. Went to some junior police thing with plans to someday join the force. She'd get really annoyed when she wanted to demonstrate holds and moves she'd learned there and I just removed myself easily. Insisted she couldn't actually try with them or she'd hurt me. Very in denial of reality. Some of them need that vision of themselves I guess.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/20 03:17 PM
1

To most if them it's just a cool new insult that hasn't been around long enough to be cliche yet, so people drop it constantly. Kind of like when the left discovered the word "incel."
/r/askTRP12/03/20 07:57 AM
10

Unfortunately, women have adapted to defend against the potent weapon of shame by just not having any. Social shaming can still be effective but is currently difficult to pull off, as society broadly backs them up on anything they do and their friend groups, while unstable and back-stabby, tend to circle wagons against any external force.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/20 07:45 PM
5

Mostly here to see what others have to say, but it really is alarming what lies people are willing to swallow. I took a special interest in facts after an incident in which I told a lie so much that I actually fabricated a memory of it and it scared me straight how easily even I, the person who knew what happened and knew it was a lie, could convince myself something else happened... Well by far the most abject lies I've seen that every body believes through repetition are about the nature of wo…
/r/askTRP30/01/20 02:25 PM
1

Yep. Girl at work is mad at me right now for not approaching because we were into each other briefly a while ago, but she left for several months without a word and then came back, but I got involved with somebody else while she was gone.
/r/askTRP19/01/20 09:19 PM
3

The problem with religious women, speaking as a religious man, is they talk a big game about being different from the secular chicks and seem to actually believe it themselves. Of course they're not that different. They just expect even more and usually come with a bigger laundry list of random things that set them off. Literally was on a Catholic Singles page at one point and it was just FULL of posts from women to the effect of "here are all the reasons you should dump a guy instantly" and the…
/r/askTRP22/12/19 12:20 AM
3

I 100% get this. I do this too. I don't know why after the fourth or fifth time I got burned, but I do. For what it's worth, given I can't follow the advice myself, everybody else is right; 99% of them won't give a shit about you or hurting you if things aren't going well.
/r/askTRP08/11/19 03:03 PM
4

I expect because people with aspegers or autism have high representation in the set 'men who have trouble with women' because they're socially awkward by default.
/r/askTRP19/10/19 11:48 PM
1

In all honesty, it's going to be around for a long time. Maybe forever. I haven't seen the very first woman I ever really loved for over a decade and I still have the occasional day when she comes into my mind and won't leave. They're a bit further apart every time, but I don't know of any way to stomp it out completely. I tried going over all the reasons it could never work out and all the ways they were basically bad people for the second and third ones, and I think of them less, but still som…
/r/askTRP11/10/19 10:38 PM
1

I'm not sure I follow. I don't disagree with much of what you said, but it doesn't seem to address what I said. Do you deny that there are powerful special interest movements that encourage women to do as they like and characterize any attempt to reign it in as "sexist?" Do you deny that they encourage women to view men as subhuman and use men with no thought to their wellbeing or interests and characterize it as "empowerment?"
/r/askTRP01/10/19 05:28 PM
2

Probably comes from being treated as subhuman by women. What goes around comes around, you know? Doesn't help when they act subhuman themselves. I fully believe women are capable of being rational, wise, honorable human beings, but right now society and special interest groups tell them, demand of them even, that they give into their most base urges and blame men for any negative consequences. Most listen. Do you expect men not to notice the pattern?
/r/askTRP01/10/19 04:08 AM
13

I just lurk a lot, but I had to jump in for this. A highly similar thing happened to me, ex I had been talking marriage with before the breakup wanted to reconnect and it was a similar setup, guy she left me for was abusive, had nowhere to go, needed emotional support and help. I jumped at the chance to 'prove I cared' thinking it was some fated second chance and she'd learn that I was the dependable man she never should have left. I sunk countless hours and a couple hundred dollars into comfort…
/r/askTRP28/09/19 02:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter