TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SiotRucks Archive

View 0 posts and 369 comments by SiotRucks on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Because the birth rates in liberal western countries are so high.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 11:30 AM
–

supposed privileges This great irony of leftists crying out loud about men not acknowledging their privileges when most women are unable to even acknowledge the most obvious privilege in centuries.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:47 PM
–

Oh just stop this ridiculous facade. It's embarrassing. Acting like you have to deal with possible death or rape behind every corner. Laughable. "OH THE EFFORT!"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:44 PM
–

Oh noooo, they CHOSE celibacy. How horrible!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:42 PM
–

When a guy loads a gun, aims at someone and pulls the trigger you can safely assume he intends to kill. If a women pushes a hanger up her vagina while being pregnant you can assume her intention as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 06:23 PM
–

Ever heard of child support? Also, the hypocrisy of some men you described isn't an argument. These examples would count if there was a proven and easy way to improve them which hasn't been taken. And side effects aren't equal to side effects. I already can't take you seriously after you thought imagining a fictitious scenario would be an argument but this is just ignorant. How about NOT having sex if that burdens you so much? Equality of opportunity... for sex? Women have the same opportunities…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 04:55 PM
–

We already talked about rape. Bringing it up again won't change anything. How hard is this to understand: If a doctor judges the women's life to be in danger it's legal. If the women says a rape has taken place its legal and if the trial concludes otherwise the doctor shouldn't be held accountable. You can keep your constant irrelevant accusations to yourself. I already proposed ways the law could work. You just continue to claim stuff and find possible problems that can be solved if you just wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 04:41 PM
1

Shit happens. If you can't handle the consequences, don't do it. Again, exceptions would be made. Let’s also not forget that if the genders were reversed, and it was men who got pregnant, abortions would be available at every gas station and vending machine. Let's quit those ridiculous fictitious imaginations. "Let's not forget" followed by some fake shit.... don't make me laugh. Women aren't forced into giving birth unless they are forced to have sex. Are they?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 03:10 PM
0

How does that relate? How about aborting when necessary and letting the law prove it was just in the following trial? Again, exceptions dont disqualify the principle. Then make it safer. People being wrongfully convicted of murder doesn't make you question murder-convictions in general, does it?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 03:03 PM
-1

You don't need birth control when you don't have sex. Pregnancies caused by rape should be an exception. Miscarriages should also be an exception. The justice system is already heavily biased in favor of women so don't give me that shit about how one law not affecting men. Problems solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 07:37 AM
1

I would make an exception
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 07:24 AM
1

Yes I know. He has a million followers. And yet he cannot pay his own rent. I don't know what's going on but it sure looks like he is broke.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 04:09 PM
-4

they cannot ever 100% control I have bad news for you... they can. They just don't want to. anti-abortion laws result in some women being thrown in prison for miscarriages that are incorrectly assumed to be intentional abortions. Systems shouldn't be abolished solely based on their imperfection. Innocent people are imprisoned regularly. Doesn't mean we should abolish the justice system.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 03:44 PM
1

How is he rich when she was literally paying for him in part with destiny's money?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 03:39 PM
-2

give the woman the power to NOT put her body through a pregnancy Women already have this power. To my knowledge there is only one case of a virgin birth in history. But jokes aside, women don't "HAVE to get pregnant".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 03:37 PM
1

Complete disagree. Not a fan of TRP but what you are describing is literally a guy with so much "game" he can get a girl way hotter than him. Also he's tiktok famous. And destiny was twitch famous.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 10:02 AM
1

near impossible Not sure if I would say that but anyone who denies that being a 30+ single mom reduces your chances is delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 10:00 AM
1

Didn't have that much respect for him in the first place but seeing mister super-debator make such stupid mistakes completely invalidates his opinions on everything for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 09:56 AM
2

Guess I'm not gonna get a real answer because you just believe things you believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 09:45 AM
-1

If you start confusing some online spaces for real life I have some bad news about the "nature of women".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 08:15 AM
3

"Ripped apart" For real: What kind of porn are you talking about? Because if you are just talking about getting fucked by a large dick then gay porn falls under that definition too. Something thats notoriously consumed by women. Do they not respect men then? Moreover, "ripped apart" is such a ridiculous overstatement. At what point is the penis small enough that you can consider it "respectful porn". This is such a funny concept to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 08:12 AM
2

Trans women have a penis... are they respected. Jk
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 08:07 AM
5

recent overturning of Roe, that women are still not legally as free as men Men can't abort. How is that even comparable? Women are only as free as men if they can choose to get an abortion? Something men can't chose?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 08:04 AM
2

they become invisible, no one is even noticing that they exist Literally most men's experience. You are wailing about fundamental principles of life. Hot people get more attention. And aside from stating that "we" as men wouldn't respect women how would you know. Anecdotes or your subjective worldview? There are men out there thinking they are oppressed. They have lots of personal experience....
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 08:00 AM
4

It definitely shouldn't be told in the presence of female colleagues, and I can't imagine why anyone would. I agree. But her point was men are disrespectful because they tell rape jokes in presence of female rape victims and then double down. Which is obviously some fake imagined scenario I have never witnessed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 07:53 AM
3

conversation that is already not working A working conversation must be one where I agree with all your shitty points. And I "admitted" that people tell rape jokes earlier. You just shifted the goalpost twice and then try to pull out.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 07:51 AM
4

So now it's about just making rape jokes? Because at first you imagined a scene where such a joke would be told in presence of a rape victim which after stating her discomfort with the joke would get attacked by other guys at the scene. "People don't respect women because men keep telling rape jokes." Is that it?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 08:16 PM
2

What you are describing doesn't really fit the comment you agreed to. She was describing a lack of "genuine" respect. Whatever that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 07:14 PM
4

wait until someone tells a rape joke and a woman who has been traumatized by rape gets upset about it. how many men pop out of the woodwork to tell her that actually its just a joke so she's a cunt for not laughing Never happened in my over two decades of being alive. In general I dont hear people tell rape jokes outside of the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 07:08 PM
3

but i think that every guy has a certain type of women (Fat, trans, OF, take your pick) That's appicable to the way they see some men, too. Not sure if acting that way towards some type of people is indicative of a general lack of respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 07:06 PM
3

Report to HQ for your award
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 07:02 PM
1

Seems like 4 and 6 are quite popular with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 09:24 PM
2

What would option 6 fix about dating? Wouldn't it make men even more desperate?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 09:23 PM
2

How would 6 fix anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 09:21 PM
1

Wouldn't it be more fun if there was more sex? As an alternative we could all become asexual machines but that doesn't sound fun does it?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 09:20 PM
2

The man pays because she puts in more effort to get ready so he should put in more effort as well, which means paying. How the fuck would you know? Or she? How is that quantifiable? Such a bs excuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 08:30 AM
–

That's not natural selection. And if it were it wouldn't have started just now. You're not crazy, just unable to understand the point or respond to it. Time wasted anyway...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 07:22 AM
1

I have read it and it has nothing to do with my point. It actually confirms my definition. Have you even read my previous comment? Either you start explaining what you mean briefly in your own words or im gonna have to accept I wasted my time arguing with a crazy person.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 09:19 PM
-1

Keep your fun facts about Darwin to yourself when you don't even understand high-school biology: natural selection is about the survival(reproduction) of the fittest: which means the ones best adapted to the environment. Believe it or not, human society is not nature. So either you count adapting to our civilization as "natural selection" or you don't. You can't make an arbitrary cut in history and just declare it starts there.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 09:00 PM
1

If you think that is natural selection and before it wasn't there you don't understand Darwin...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 08:48 PM
12

I have NEVER seen a man 'marrying' a woman, who is physically less attractive than him. That's probably because you think women are more attractive than men in general. Or you have never went outside. Could be both.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 05:53 AM
0

I dont see women in AI relationships though... mostly it's men. Wierd
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 05:50 AM
10

And they say women are the empathic ones...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 05:49 AM
4

It's a pretty good take.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 05:28 PM
–

When i see who this post is from... regularly the biggest garbage takes you can imagine
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 12:31 PM
2

Yes it's the same thing. The "behind your back"-part is the main bad thing about cheating. If the women would just fuck another guy in front if his back he would be fine. Good argument. Cheating is equally as bad as suspecting someone to have cheated. Peak wahmen logic. Sounds like someone doesn't want to be held accountable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/23 05:13 AM
2

Not ugly per se, just uglier than the average women. I'm starting to think you are incapable of understanding basic logic. If you have 5 individuals in both groups. In group A there are 2 attractive individuals and in Group b there is 1. What group is more attractive on average? Unless you are willing to tell me that group A also has 2 ugly individuals and group b only 1. Aside from that: so ur telling us that most women you see in your life and in media and entertainment are hotter than the men…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 09:43 PM
4

"i said there are a larger amount of attractive women then there are attractive men" Let's do a little thought experiment: If one group of people has a larger amount of wealthy individuals than the other group which one is wealthier on average?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 09:33 PM
4

He directly quoted you. That's exactly what you said. You don't even understand your own point let alone his. Even in your "rebuttal" you prove his assessment. LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 09:26 PM
4

"Testosterone's a social construct. The only thing keeping women's libido down is society, bro. If patriarchy stopped they would suddenly fuck everyone."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 09:05 AM
4

What are you doing? No dating apps?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 08:54 AM
12

It's literally a generational problem and this guy is like "uhhh, just be happy without women and they will come". Hmm guess all those millions of men, the 30-50% are all just idiots. Reminds me of the dated, ridiculous advice from my boomer parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 06:13 AM
7

Yeah I just laugh whenever women bring up the famous "personality detector" that only works on unattractive guys for some reason. "Ypu can't get girls because you are sexist." Yeah, sure. Works well for Andrew Tate. Guy had literally multiple girls kissing his ass while he was a sexist POS.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 04:58 AM
5

Sorry I really don't want to hear your input because as a girl you literally have no fucking idea. Im so tired of hearing the same old shit out of girls mouths all day: get well dressed, shower, be nice, make a better profile; then there is the famous "personality detector" that women have which for some reason only works on unattractive guys... Guess what: at the end of the day it's still 9 men to 1 women on dating apps, even if you get your profile from a 5 to a 7; congratulations! Now your ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 04:51 AM
15

When my female friends complain how terribly lonely they are because their boyfriend is visiting his parents for 3 days...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 05:19 PM
1

Sure the reason might be the relationship, but if you are going to get financially boned by your wife you will think twice about divorce. As long as the wife gets out better than the husband, which I think is the case, it still makes sense. And the reason women have more childcare responsibilities than before is because most of the time they get custody - another way the justice system is rigged against men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/23 06:13 AM
1

Yeah but the arguments you used for why women don't need men are just bad. That was what i responded to. I know you didn't mean divorce when you said projection. You simply ignored that point because it explained why women initiate divorce more often way better than them not needing men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 05:49 PM
3

Arguing like a 6th grader... you know what I mean. Just too immature to not be dishonest... And you don't need to answer the question. By not answering you already admitted defeat. Rape>death
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 04:47 PM
1

Never said that. I even doubt it. In my opinion these statements are useless and needlessly inflammatory. You could also never even try to prove that shit. Same goes for "men don't need women". And the divorce thing is a fact. No projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 04:35 PM
3

I was talking about the winning side of course.... if you don't want to think don't respond Would you rather die or get raped?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 04:27 PM
1

That last part is just copium of the highest order. Even if those kind of robots were available there would still be millions of incels simping for twitch thot's and such.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 04:20 PM
9

Because they are single by choice and can get casual sex whenever they want to so the sexual component gets satisfied with or without a relationship. And they initiate divorce more often because the law and justice system favors them heavily. They have so much more to gain from divorce than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 04:15 PM
5

I always hear that bullshit argument "but what if we get raped during the war?" I don't know, mostly because I'm probably already dead then. And the winning sides women won't get raped at all or far less most likely. What hardship did women endure during any of the USA's wars?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 04:11 PM
1

No. Maybe disgusting. Not dangerous, at least mot nearly as dangerous as the jobs men do. Look at workplace fatalities statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 04:07 PM
2

The funny thing is they say things like that but most of them would never wanna be in the other position if given the choice. Being a man has it's perks, dating isn't one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 10:35 PM
4

She is trying to say that being able to have casual sex and not being able to have casual sex is the same thing because some women don't like casual sex. Like saying a rich person choosing to not spend money and a poor person not being able to spend money is the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 08:15 PM
3

Always with the victim complex. Nobody is using you. Basically a spoiled child "but I don't like the candy, mom"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 08:12 PM
3

Oh man I'm so sorry for you. You can have sex everytime you want but not with everyone that you want to. Horrible
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 09:12 AM
0

I mean, if you don't want to understand that fine with me too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 10:48 PM
1

Yeah, putting on makeup is work sure. Just not as much as actually getting fit and losing weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 10:43 PM
0

I really feel like you misunderstand the chain of causation here. The point isn't that an individual fat girl dating a guy that is more attractive than her is a problem. That happening is just the result of the dating market being so unfair. Which is what actually makes things harder for you. Also, a few of your misconceptions: 1)Things don't have to affect you personally to be bad. You can understand that, right? I mean, I personally don't feel any negative consequences of children starving in …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 09:18 PM
1

Leaving the field of dating aside, if I have a very good education and spent years studying and gaining qualifications and then earn the same or less money than someone who didn't do all that I would be mad too. Don't think this is a wierd way to feel. I would even call that measurement of success pretty valuable, because if you have the same success as people who put in much much less effort your level of succes does change. That's just business.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 08:50 PM
3

And that's a crazy thing to be upset about?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 08:48 PM
3

This is anecdotal of course, but I see fat men ONLY with fat women while for fat women it's seems to be more diverse throughout school and university I saw plenty of couples where she is obese and he was average weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 08:46 PM
2

Why be salty when you work 60 hours a week to earn the same money as someone that works 10 just because of reasons that were determined before your birth? I know right? SMH.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 08:43 PM
1

Isn't it more questionable that compared to women men are so much more deprived of that stuff? Either men need more attention (not sex) by nature or they just get massively blindsided by society. My money is on the second one.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 08:41 PM
5

And then women will go online and act like online dating is equally bad for men and women. Even this morbidly obese girl can just go online and get intimacy. Yes, she can't get a relationship, but WHO CARES? Still better than getting nothing. They would literally never change places.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 08:34 PM
2

No way you dont know these definitons. Not on my watch. I will force you to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 06:59 PM
1

I know. A blessing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 06:57 PM
1

This is an open discussion thread. And it wasn't a conversation. He didn't even answer you. Also since you don't wanna use Google and he didn't answer I basically did you a favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 06:55 PM
1

Yes, I am a gentleman. How observant of you to notice.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 06:53 PM
1

Well I didn't write stupid shit
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 06:52 PM
1

Yeah how nice of me
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 06:50 PM
1

Well I didn't make you type these follow up comments. Instead of trying to justify a stupid question you could have used Google for 30 seconds. And I'm just human, we all judge groups of people based on interactions with members of the group. Although I said "women on this sub". I know some pretty smart ones irl.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 06:49 PM
1

Guess that is a connection. Still not the same thing. Not even close. At best promiscuity is a side effect of hypergamy. But the different partners all had to be of higher social standing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 06:42 PM
1

Alright: hypergamy = dating and/or marrying people of higher social standing than oneself Promiscuity = having lots of sex with different people ...Not even remotely connected This is btw what the guy you asked meant. Men would (if they had the opportunities) fuck around alot but they wouldn't really care about social standing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 06:37 PM
1

Yes and I gotta say you are single-handedly lowering my expectations of women on this sub. That were some low IQ comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 06:33 PM
1

The weirdest thing also is that if that was the case and you wondered what his definitions were you must have had different ones to begin with. And looking at your comment that must mean you thought they were the same. Which is just wrong and easily corrected by using Google for 30 seconds. There are no definitions for hypergamy around that would make it the same thing as promiscuity. So either you didn't know or thought they were the same which both is... wierd.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 04:48 PM
1

These are not complicated terms with multiple definitions like when you ask someone what they think feminism is to them. If the guy has a different definition his comment doesn't even make sense. It's like you asking him if he has a different definitin for "grape".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 04:43 PM
1

Oh didn't know that questions can only be answered by the people getting asked. Like that makes your question better. LMAO Btw do you now know what the difference is or are you just too lazy?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 04:32 PM
-1

Im not having this discussion again.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 02:02 PM
–

Finally something that truly fits the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 02:01 PM
1

Google, im honestly wondering what you are even doing here when you dont know basic terms
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 01:59 PM
1

That's doesn't make any sense. The guys that do have the options (and I'm assuming you mean rich people) don't marry up, they trade money and social standing for someone better looking. You would be right if there were very attractive men that marry rich and hot women or smth. But that literally almost never happens. How many rich women with boytoys do you see vs how many men with trophywifes?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 01:59 PM
-2

Lol, still here spewing the same garbage. That's why I don't debate in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 01:52 PM
-1

She reminds of me the old "long, tan, handsome" joke from SpongeBob. https://youtu.be/UG6ER_ER8Gw
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 12:50 PM
7

Yes, I too am a member of the beautiful women's club. We love going on purple pill debate because it helps us identify men in real life that we don't want to date. This is a real story.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 12:46 PM
1

Very funny. Keep living in your delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 07:47 AM
5

Living in a fantasy where 80% of men drink mountain dew and eat cheetos to maintain your delusion be like... if adhering to your "advice" would be so powerful then why aren't women just doing those things instead of putting on tons of makeup "Brush your teeth occasionally " what a lazy joke you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 07:46 PM
5

Then you are literally deaf. "Women just take better care of themselves" is a phrase I have probably heard a bazillion times. And that phrase is just code.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 07:41 PM
3

And it still misses the subject lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 07:51 PM
3

U are implying there aren't any female gender roles today other than those of past centuries?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 07:45 PM
4

You can read about things expected of men and women today on Wikipedia. I have no intention of writing a paragraph of that in a reddit comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 07:44 PM
4

That's not change? So when I remove half of a rooms furniture, that room hasn't changed? And they added things too. And that still doesn't make your comment miss the subject any less. It's TODAY'S gender roles. And it's ease of fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 07:29 PM
3

They fought to be emancipated from past gender roles. They basically just changed them. So comparing women's gender roles from the 1910s to today's roles isn't fair. Also the question was about ease not restrictiveness or quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 06:57 PM
7

Are you intentionally misunderstanding? Of course people aren't fighting like baboons. They talk, and they judge silently. It's called reading between the lines. Everybody knows what's going on without needing to talk about it. Why do you think there is so much advice on how to stop comparing urself to others? Most people do it by default. That's literally what alot of social media is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 06:51 PM
5

It isn't. It's the default position. Just like "winning break-ups" or "winning school-reunion". Fighting that instinct is a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 06:40 PM
2

I literally explained the contradiction. Sex is no longer sacred Wtf has that to do with anything? Are relationships sacred? No they aren't. I think you don't know how a counterargument works. A counterargument would be: "this isn't a contradiction because either men aren't proposing sex more often than women or the analogy doesn't work because some reason." Both are wrong btw. Either you restate your opinion like a bot or you talk some gibberish that has nothing to do with the discussion. All I…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 05:05 PM
2

You are literally contradicting yourself now. I'm starting to think you are unable to grasp this. So the point is men have more power over marriage because they propose, but have less power over sex despite proposing (most of the time). Solid logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 04:27 PM
2

Don't know what backwater country you live in but here where I live it's fine. Let me guess, ur afraid of being branded "easy to get" after asking a man out. By some random people in a bar? What a horrible fate. Ever heard of tinder? How about men's imaginary power there? Have you ever thought about a man's decision to NOT ask someone out already being a no to the relationship in question? Do you think that if women could magically ask men out all the men previously not asking you out would sudd…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 04:13 PM
3

Yes and why might that be? Because women are physically incapable of proposing? Or maybe because women generally want marriage more than the guys who are happy already with the "light"-version of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 03:56 PM
2

Your argument was that because both parties have to say yes they both have equal power. That's just not true. "OBviouSLy". When one party wants something more than the other one it becomes unequal. You need to stop living in fairytail-land. Oh and btw, how about this simple lifehack that destroys your whole idea to begin with: the woman asks the man out.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 03:51 PM
0

The guy doesn't understand that just because it takes two people for a voluntary agreement to take place it doesn't mean both parties have equal power. Whenever I want something more than the other person the power balance is unequal.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 03:45 PM
4

Yeah and I have the power over money because I INITIATE the "asking the bank for credit"-process. Pure idiocy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 03:40 PM
1

I have no sympathy for men who knowingly stay in a AFBB situation. But that isn't my point. My point is that the woman's behaviour is condemnable. Which is something you agree on, given by your response. Your initial claim was that the woman's behaviour is acceptable because the man puts up with it. Which is something I disagree on.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 01:21 PM
1

I'm sorry, I really am, but this still isn't an answer to my question. I asked whether or not that makes the cheating part okay. The best I can interpret from your response regarding my question would be that you think the act of cheating is ok because the person that got cheated on chose to stay in the relationship which is a position I'm pretty sure you don't hold.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 01:18 PM
1

Just to make it extra easy we can modify the question even more: person a has a history of cheating in every past relationship, yet person b still starts a relationship with person a. Person a cheats (duh). Do you think person a's behaviour is condemnable or not? Just answer this question please.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 12:47 PM
1

I think it's great that you find cheating a better choice but you still haven't answered the actual question. Do you think the cheater shouldn't be held accountable for his actions IF he told his gf UPFRONT that he was going to do it? This has nothing to do with your personal history. It's a moral question.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 12:44 PM
1

Not really sure if redpillers do want that. But if they did, your argument would work. What I can say for certain is that I don't want to be valued for JUST money or status. It's that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 12:33 PM
1

But in my example she would indirectly chose rape. Not sure if you don't get or if you intentionally dodge the question. We can just swap rape out for any other condemnable behavior really. If that is more comfortable for you to answer. When people chose their life partners they don't automatically consent to everything they could do or everything they will do. Do you not understand that?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 12:30 PM
1

No the rape argument you would make would go like this: "you are well aware that this specific area is very dangerous with alot of rapists lurking there. So you walking through there kinda makes the rape your fault and also absolves the rapist of his guilt." Men who fall for betabux don't have a talk with the women before where she literally explains her intentions and then they do it anyways. If that was the case then yes, it's the man's fault, but even in that case the woman would still be a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 12:21 PM
1

Oh now you're going the misogyny route. Are you going to ask me whether I hate women like you did the other guy? Man what a debating BEAST you are. It's clear you don't even know what beta bux is. It means the women BY DEFINITION doesn't love the man and has no desire for him, just for the money and status. What do you think it is: women fuck around in their twenties and then marry a wealthy man they love when they get to their thirties? That's what you think people get upset about?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 12:10 PM
1

Honeslt not rly sure about what u mean. Can't really say anything that I haven't already said in the previous comment. No, it's not what defines a man. I said these women don't love the man they only want the money and status, and I found that to be bad. What do you want to prove? That If men are only defined by money and status the women actually loves the man by only wanting that?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 12:06 PM
1

I already commented this on another one of your posts, but basically all you do is trying to shift blame. That's your whole shtick. Somehow trying to make behaviour like that the man's fault. Nobody said the man chooses to use his money to attract the woman. That's in your head. I get the feeling you are intentionally trying to misunderstand the situation to keep making up ur own.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 11:05 AM
1

Did you.... report me for that? Man I sure am afraid I'm gonna lose my free reddit account.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 11:00 AM
1

I think you are confusing me with these redpill guys. If you are talking in terms of absolute value, no. If you are talking in terms of value on the sexual market, then yes, money and status are PART of a man's value. And love has nothing to do with value anyways so idk how your comment relates. What you meant to comment was probably "but doesn't money and status define a man".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 10:57 AM
1

So your analogy comparing women to objects is more realistic than mine comparing them to... humans? What you want to do is to remove blame from these women by acting like "it's in their nature, they can't do anything about that" when that's not true at all. They're not animals, with your logic you can basically excuse every behaviour like rape or murder by shifting the blame on the person "letting it happen to them".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 10:52 AM
1

Did I say that? Does beta bux say that? Ur finished dude, stop pulling straw from ur ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 10:48 AM
2

Do you need yo get scammed to feel angry at the scammer?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:52 PM
2

Dude, the point of beta but isn't that she loves him it's that she loves his money, and status etc
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:51 PM
3

But there is no choosing involved, hello? She either couldn't secure the guy even though she wanted or she just changed her priorities to money.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:50 PM
2

So you have to win the genetic lottery to deserve being desired? Or do women only desire men who win the genetic lottery by default? Is that what you are saying? And how does that relate to this whole post anyways? One guy says "being beta bux isnt that bad" the other one says "it is" and then you jump from your bush "is it the womens fault you didn't win genetic lottery" like what. If anything they would be angry that the woman only uses him for his money while not being in love.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:40 PM
5

How is this so hard to understand. Being actually in love and being attracted by money isn't the same fucking thing. You can't exchange looks for money (or sexual attraction for money).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:25 PM
1

ThE dOWnfaLL of SocIEty, or smth
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 11:11 AM
2

You have a problem. Your comments all point to this circlejerk you would like that have. I don't know what in that head of yours wants to make you believe this black and white garbage but I hope doing so feels comforting to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:45 AM
2

Damn you must be busy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:43 AM
2

Funny how you said in another comment that you dont feel bad about manipulating people like that because they know what they are in for and then you write this. I guess the people lying to us the most are we ourselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:40 AM
2

It's like being hungry with a snack bar always in your pocket more like. Thats pretty funny and I kind of see it the same way. It does seem logical. I guess masturbation and sex are very different. Like a band aid vs morphium. I mean that has to be the reason because otherwise society wouldn't look like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:27 AM
3

I believe this is about 99% the answer to op's question. Some men here try to elevate their horniness in some philosophical sense but I think it's just coping.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:21 AM
3

Based. Queue that famous Oscar wilde quote.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:18 AM
2

True, and after monkey brain made the decision the rational brain comes and rationalizes it until we think it was a rational decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:13 AM
2

Very true, I always wonder what they want to accomplish with these posts. Endless debating, they may even get a yes and then what?? That's why it doesn't matter in the end. Harder or not harder, if you really want to achieve you have to try no matter what.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 06:27 PM
9

Convincing
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 11:09 AM
34

You mean she is sexually pure but only since last summer ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 11:08 AM
0

Why should men cold approach and hit on women when they will probably just use us for money? If I went around hitting on women, they would probably "go along with it" hoping for easy money, but wouldn't have been interested otherwise. See, you can easily change that so it fits for men. Your excuses are just bad. You think approaching women is great? How narrow-minded you are. Stop kidding yourself , it's all because men have to and women don't. It's that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 05:55 AM
2

I guess I see this post more as a theoretical idea than a direct appeal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 04:06 PM
1

Despite whatever stuff anyone here says about a progressive society, women still almost always take a passive demeanor with guys. That is exactly my experience as well. Progressivism sounds great in theory then you go into the real world and suddenly you see all those damn "stereotypes" being verified left and right. I think it's sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 03:58 PM
3

The point of this isn't to assign blame in his story. His point was just that women don't need to keep a backburner because they have some many options whether they realize it or not. Something the other guy already told you tons of times...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 03:51 PM
5

THAT is gour takeaway? Man some people don't want to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 03:37 PM
0

Maybe they thought they were pretty clear with their intentions too? Also these things can change over time.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 03:17 PM
3

You are right about the power imbalance. The problem is that you can't really implement idealistic ideas like that into society. In most relationships there is a major or minor power imbalance. Also imagine being a pretty guy or girl: you literally can't be friends with most people of the opposite gender just because most of them want a relationship with you. That's why in my opinion it depends on your intentions. If you treat them like every other friend and don't exploit them its OK for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 03:11 PM
-1

Has it occurred to you that they, just like you, misinterpreted the relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 03:06 PM
1

Because instead of contributing something useful this person instead tried to sidetrack this into a worthless superficial outrage debate. I know a person in my social circle that always does this to avoid questions. It annoys me.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 03:04 PM
13

And now that your outrage about this expression has calmed down, could you just answer the question?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:01 AM
44

Usually I'm not the one jumping up to defend these people but you have to consider that situations like these can easily be forced upon you. There is a person you like on a character level but you don't want a relationship. At the same time you know they want that with you. Now do you ruin your friendship by unpromtedly telling them "ay, it's not gonna happen" or do you not do anything and just treat them like a friend? In my opinion you shouldn't be expected to do the first one but instead the …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:59 AM
2

He never said that was the only reason and I think it is understandable to be frustrated about these questions that have so many obvious answers. His is just one of them and not even thinking about that just shows a lack of interest in op.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:22 PM
3

He probably doesn't think it's the only reason, but it's surely one of the biggest. And for some reason you seem to take offense at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:14 PM
6

You mean "human science" as opposed to "non human science"???? Whatever that is. Also you need to look up what a scientific theory is. It is basically fact. Scientific theories are real things all the time. And what is your problem with supply and demand? How does it not explain your question?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:03 PM
1

Dude.... astrology isnt vaguely based on science unless you consider medieval medicine vaguely based on science. Wtf is even a "true" astrology believer "? Either you think the star constellation at the day of your birth magically influences your life or you don't. There is no in between. On the other hand half of redpillers say they only like the redpill for the self help stuff and another faction bases their entire worldview around redpill ideology. Both can call themselves redpillers. So what…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 01:15 PM
1

Wierd, because here in reality people proclaim they are redpilled all the time. And you know what, astrology isnt a real thing too. Astrology also doesn't have a body of knowledge with a strict research process and all that. Yet still there are tons of people claiming to believe in astrology. Do you even realize how ridiculously lazy your thought process and attitude is? You invented your own personal get out of jail free card. Reality works this way: when someone calls himself Christian or Musl…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 06:38 AM
1

How does that relate in any way to what I said? Are you dumb?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 04:55 AM
5

That's exactly the point. How many bs Hollywood romcoms have an ugly guy get a model by just being nice while the women always need makeovers to get their crush. It's socially propaganda that says: women have to be good-looking, guys have to be nice and try very hard. That propaganda is false.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 05:28 PM
1

Yeah you're delusional. Here in reality men say they go for the looks all the time. It's literally socially engraved while women always get described as innocent and deep.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 05:25 PM
4

Thats a great basis for pulling the "No true scotsman"-shit on everyone. Religious people use the same strategy. "I saw a Muslim lady steal smth once" " well then she wasn't a REAL muslim".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 05:17 PM
-1

I would be very curious to know how you can get raped 3 times by 3 different men without it at some point partially being your fault. If my home gets broken into 3 times I either live in an incredibly bad neighborhood or I just haven't learned anything from the times it happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 04:29 PM
1

Dude, women are with men they don't really find attractive ALL.THE.TIME. My sister literally describes her boyfriend like that. Its because alot of women would rather be with someone like that (if he otherwise has a great personality) than to be alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 06:06 PM
18

Same argument I have heard a thousand times already, it doesn't get better. It goes something like this: " You know how you have no food and are hungry? I don't like the food I have so I choose to be hungry. So we are both the same (until I choose otherwise)!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 12:52 PM
0

Great apologetics. Same points people make about women getting raped. Noice.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 12:47 PM
1

What you say is true (that alot of movies have this dynamic) but you picked the worst possible movies. Have you even watched them? Neo doesn't even really care that much for trinity in the first half of thr movie and she is super into him. What were you smoking? You need to pick Romcoms or smth because those movies are actually guilty. Also, no woman in an old school James bond movie is ever 'meh' towards him, you know, that's kind of the point. Haven't watched the newest one though.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/22 06:26 AM
1

Most of them don't have to worry about that. It happens, just mostly to really really rich people. Funnily enough, when I was little, my mom told me about that as a warning. Turns out, alot of what she told me about women isn't really true. Especially not for women under 30. She still says things like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 08:18 AM
1

Pretty sure the reason football players don't have 100 children is them putting on a condom and being careful because everyone knows that is what some women do. I think I even heard tiger woods talk about that in an interview.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 08:04 AM
3

80 percent of divorces are initiated by women, so yes
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 07:59 AM
1

I'm not sure if I should be thankful for your politeness or disgusted by this passive aggressive backhand of a comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 08:27 PM
1

Calling men who are ambiguous about their intentions to not have to settle down "emotionally abusive" is beyond ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 03:52 PM
3

You act like you try desperately to deflect every criticism with accusations of sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 03:45 PM
1

Ah, the good ol' 'there are bad things on both sides so they are equally bad'.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 09:45 AM
2

Wow you are a special kind of idiot. Luckily, I know what to do when someone tries to argue in bad faith on the internet. Although "argue" is probably the wrong word since you made none.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 07:05 PM
2

Yes, life experience in the real world. Do you have to BE a hipster to know how they look? what an idiotic hill to die on... And what do you want to accomplish with this? Insult me? Shame me? That wouldnt even make a difference concerning my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 06:48 PM
1

Unless they are hot or have money. Which is the same for men. You know, these red pill guys that try to insert their idiotic ideology into everything even if it doesn't have anything to do with it are so annoying.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 05:43 PM
2

I dont get why you even would write that comment? It contributes nothing even if it was true. Do you want to imply im 45 yo, fat and bald or that im a prostitute? And no you don't need experience to know what a big portion of "customers" look like.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 05:42 PM
1

At first I was going to argue here. But then I realized what you just said is so utterly stupid if you even think one second about it that arguing with you is basically useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 05:39 PM
1

She never said it's always LVM behavior. She said it's socially frowned upon UNLESS you are rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 08:34 AM
2

I dont get how these guys are under the impression they can see through women like glass. Women have manipulated men for thousands of years and they think they can predict the amount of men a women has slept with before by ,idk, reading rheir hand or something. Btw this doesn't go in just one way. Women fall for men too all the time. It's simply that it's very hard to read people especially when you have thick pink glasses on.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 08:30 AM
1

Well, again, they aren't getting shamed for taking care of their needs. They are getting shamed for not being able to do it without paying someone. It's that simple: if people get the impression you can't get women any other way than paying its shameful, if people ,for whatever reason (rich, attractive), think you don't need to pay prostitutes but di it anyway, it's not. Even then some people think it's gross or smth but they won't think the guy's pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 08:26 AM
4

Only prostitutes get fucked by 45 yo bald fatties and other women can choose.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 08:15 AM
4

Please look up the naturalistic fallacy so you can spare some people in the future ur trash takes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/21 08:47 AM
3

Everyone wants the hottest possible partner. Not getting that is not suppressing your sexuality. If she is having sex with you and you both are having fun everything is fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/21 08:49 PM
2

I dont talk to all of my high school friends whom I liked alot. I never did something awful to them. It just was a slow falling out.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/21 07:39 PM
2

Yep, that's good.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/21 07:37 PM
1

If you view sex as degrading then how about not having it. There is probably smth wrong with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/21 07:36 PM
1

That is literally one of the major plot points in how I met your mother that always leads to trouble there. Of course that's just a sitcom but don't ask how someone could view it as a red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/21 07:33 PM
1

Yes. If that is what you meant then you did word your first comment very poorly.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/21 07:31 PM
1

Comparing this quiz to one from buzzfeed would demean buzzfeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/21 05:51 PM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 12:02 PM
3

Oh yes they are. Studies have shown that you are slightly happier when you have a loving partner which basically makes it the same thing as having something to eat everyday. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 11:25 AM
2

Exactly. Such vague claims don't prove shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 11:20 AM
3

Op's desperate attempts to make people who struggle to get by on a day to day basis and people who don't have sex look equal are just pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 11:19 AM
1

What an idiotic worldview. Just because mother mature isn't fair doesn't mean we shouldn't implement changes that reduce unfairness. Total fairness being unobtainable isn't a reason to not try and unfairness being the default isn't either. Many of the great things we have today were implemented by people "complaining" about unfairness.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 11:15 AM
1

You should look up what "jumping through hoops" means. It's a rethorical device and he is talking about doing stupid unnecessary extra stuff. If op actually means that he wants women to just fuck him on the spot then of course it's stupid. Pretty obvious though that he doesn't. Just a bad strawman you interpreted into his post for your personal reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/21 12:44 AM
–

No perspective as per usual, nobody talked about fucking a random stranger. Op is talking about making the man do alot of extra stuff WHILE DATING just so he can have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:11 PM
1

That is?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 07:42 AM
1

First of all: the pictures aren't all that different in attractiveness. And second you prob swiped on all the fat ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 07:33 AM
3

Does that incredible revelation change anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 07:30 AM
2

"Problems dont exist when I ignore them." /s
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 07:30 AM
1

I dont know in what fantasy world women live in but if a guy with a knife comes at you it doesn't matter how much you can lift especially if he is prepared for violence and you are caught by surprised. Just because I can open a Marmelade glass and you don't doesn't mean I am not scared walking around a sketch neighbourhood at night.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 07:25 AM
7

Just because everything has downsides doesn't mean there isn't a clear better or worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 07:03 AM
1

Comparing the foodless to the one who don't like their food. It's the womens argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 07:03 AM
1

There will always be fat people or people that don't workout for good or bad reasons. People have know how to look better for hundred of years yet still most people aren't interested in putting in the work or don't deem it important enough. If you think that in a few years magically most young men will be jacked ur wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/21 06:55 AM
1

First. That won't happen. There will always be fair people. Second. Red pill doesn't work. Regardless of the norm. Besides the obvious eat, Workout and be healthy the advice is bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/21 04:29 AM
1

I was talking to him. Him just denying people wouldn't exhibit the behavior you described in the post because it would be "emotionally immature" isn't helping.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 08:40 PM
2

You calling it a fact doesn't make it one. You are making a vast, unprovable generalization. You know that people don't behave a certain way just because it "would be the emotionally mature thing to do". If you can't see that there is no point in talking to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 08:37 PM
16

Denying reality and instisting on idealistic principles isnt helping anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 06:15 AM
-1

Wow I didn't want to drag this on forever but you actually make the worst points. You can't see your liver in a mirror as well. Wanna remove that too? Seeming able to do manual labor doesn't matter shit in most jobs. "being able to move a couch is a factor in getting an office job". AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. You want women to be men in order to not get oppressed? Wanna have black people put on white makeup too? Your logic: In order to stop discrimination, just make discriminated groups stop existing. Gre…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 06:54 PM
5

You don't know the context. Men are also more aggressive and belligerent.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 06:41 PM
0

To be thinking that this shit improves your life you must be living in some sort of fantasy dimension. Aside from the whole questionable "don't look like a women because you don't want to be discriminated against" thing the only good tip is the fourth one. Your whole comment reeks of a strange mindset that you are unable to be yourself because you can't possibly improve society.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 06:38 PM
3

I said I don't need it. Most of the time I am at home. And I can get physically assaulted as well. Man aren't "safe". They are just safer than women. Can you really not believe that there are some male advantages that are just as obsolete to us as your privilege in the dating game? And I very much don't think you want to be treated as a male in the dating game as well. Doesn't mean those things equal out. I just don't like the "I don't need it therefore it's not a privilege " argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 06:33 PM
7

True that. But compared to women we are still alot safer. Not safe. But safer.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 06:27 PM
6

Bullshit. Quit acting like only low paying jobs can be fulfilling. Or that there aren't any people interested in high paying jobs for other reasons than money. And men don't only have an advantage in "grindy corporate jobs". They have an advantage in most jobs. Also being able to make you own ends meet is an entire fulfilling and desirable thing by itself. Don't exclude women just because you want to "protect" them from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 06:26 PM
4

Yeah.. because slaves and slave owners are "in it together". And men and women are in the same boat even if the women can't have a bank account or the right to vote. Biggest bs I have read in this entire thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 06:21 PM
2

While I don't agree with most of the people using this argument you are still misinterpreting it. Women's sexual power doesn't come from being able to fake an orgasm. It's that the whole dating game is in their favor. By the point you get the women in bed most people that complain about this sort of stuff are already done with all the problems they talk about.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 06:19 PM
6

You may not believe it, but some very few mystical people actually like their jobs and for them a career isn't just a way to eat fresh bread in the morning or buy the newest car. They also seem to like not being dependent on finding a rich man to leech off.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 06:09 PM
5

Tell me dude. After you teasered it so much I wanna now.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 06:05 PM
13

That's a nice fresh perspective on the whole "being invisible/irrelevant" thing. Most people think it's a downside, justifiably in my opinion, but as you highlighted it has some great perks.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 06:04 PM
12

Just because women don't want it doesn't mean it's not a privilege. I don't want or need to walk around safely in a park when it's dark but it's still something women don't have and want.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 06:01 PM
1

Only this isn't science. It's overarching themes mixes with alot of subjective taste. You can't scientifically measure a SMV. There are indicators, sure, but you can't put an objective number on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 11:23 PM
1

So you think it's a mix between genetics and socialization? Then we are basically on the same page and the only thing we disagree on is how/ or whether to change the nurture aspect. My statement that society defines masculinity doesn't lend your idea of an attack credibility it merely suggests that it would be possible. I do think that societies idea of masculinity is changing only it's not an attack but rather a questioning of traditional ideas about what it means to be a man. The question isn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 11:19 PM
1

Of course it doesn't have to be that. But it's still an unnecessary ugly way to frame things that invites a particularly inhuman interpretation.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:39 PM
1

Again, just because you personally think that a man hitting a woman isn't masculine doesn't mean that that specific behavior can't be attributed in part to societal definition of manhood. Societies understanding of masculinity influences people which manifests in their behavior and thoughts. Why do you think men are on average so much more violent than women? It's either genetic or circumstantial. And trust me, you don't want it to be genetics because then you can join the radical feminists on t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:35 PM
1

Oh and thanks for the example
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:20 PM
1

So you are talking deterrence which to be fair is a nonviolent way to use physical strength. The reason of course why it would work is the threat of losing a violent encounter. It's a good point. I'm just wondering about the reasonableness of physical strength to be in your value system if you only ever want to use it that way. Also, it doesn't help you win arguments in any way. In today's society that tools use in fighting for your values is miniscule. But, that's your business.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:19 PM
1

Okay let's leave all the other stuff aside. I just want to know how you imagine using physical strength in the fight for your values. Please that's all I wanna know. Because I'm sure you know that you meant violence or intimidation with that. Its like saying I want to have guns on me in the fight for my ideals and when someone asks what for I tell them it's there to make me more confident.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:05 PM
1

I'm sorry but at this point I am questioning your sanity. You are telling me that by "fighting for your values with physical strength " you mean working out so you seem more confident in arguing for your values? Then you pivot from fighting for your values to protecting shit? Also stop using strength and physical strength like its interchangeable. You clearly said physical strength in order to fight for your values. And now you declare I have proven your point? Dude what even is this? I never de…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 08:53 PM
2

Your analogy is bs. And I know TRP. I watched alot of redpill YouTube back in the day and I also read alot of their blogs. Don't bs me. I know exactly what TRP is. Not even sure what your analogy is supposed to mean. Because every bicycle has to get one at the store. But ignoring that you are telling me that TRP isn't the coaches the forums or the blogs. It's something different. That's delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 08:34 PM
1

You are "like" the behavior that racists express in that particular situation which has nothing to do with their belief but with their thoguth process. That's not being a racist. I think you don't want to understand so you can continue acting outraged.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 06:11 PM
1

I dont know how to quote specific parts, im on mobile... But here I come: People misusing the term toxic masculinity doesn't invalidate the idea (which is what I just told you). About the value thing: look up integrity. It's literally what you mean. And also you literally specified PHYSICAL strength. What else are you supposed to do with it other than violence or intimidation.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 06:10 PM
18

There is a difference in calling a behavior or a characteristic low value and calling a human being low value. I hope you understand that. Also one mans 4 might be another man's 6 or 7. Categorizing entire people is way too limiting in my opinion. Also there is a difference in terminology: value implies other things than attractiveness. Someone calling you worthless is way different than someone calling you unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 05:58 PM
0

Thanks for making me feel better about myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 05:55 PM
1

You do understand the differen e between "you are like" and "you are". Yikes man. You really are stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 05:51 PM
1

Okay since we decided to be civil again I'm restating my point: if you have your own definition of masculinity that's fine. I have mine as well. That doesn't mean everyone has the same definition. And it doesn't mean that there isn't some overarching societal definition on what it means to be a man: competition, drive, bravery, dominance, stoicism... and some of these qualities can be expressed in a very toxic way. Doesn't mean men are inherently toxic. Only hard-core radical feminists believe t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 05:49 PM
1

This gets funnier by the minute. And be careful, your misogyny is showing: im not a ma'am nor a girl. I'm a dude. Also I explained very well what I don't like: you not being specific in your own definition. What is spiritually strong supposed to mean even? Wait. Don't answer. I'm sure there won't be anything smart coming from ur direction anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 05:34 PM
0

It's funny actually. You still don't get the point. You are like one of the people looking at race iq charts, concluding racism and then saying: it's not racist because the numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 05:31 PM
1

Pivoting to insults just makes me more confident in how my position is correct. Maybe next time you learn.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 05:26 PM
1

It's common sense that when you see all your coaches and prophets to be huge hypocrite losers that you stop for a moment and examine your beliefs. Of course even if every person in the world thinks 1+1=3 doesn't make it true but we are talking lifecoaching here. It ain't science. But I really don't wanna argue with you. From reading your comments I know it's a waste of time. People like you can't be convinced because they demand impossible things to be convinced.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 05:25 PM
1

You gave a definition in the same way Star wars explained how the hyperdrive works. You don't even know what a definition is ffs. "Spiritually strong" don't make me laugh. Tell that to 3 different people and they all think of something else. If you want definitions just look them up im not ur nanny.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 05:20 PM
0

You don't get the point. Taking the bible for life advice is like using a cookbook to learn spelling. You don't need TRP for answers especially when half of it is misogynistic pseudoscientific bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 01:51 PM
1

Just because you yourself have some weird different definition of masculinity doesn't negate the overlying social definition of what society mostly thinks it means to be a man. Toxic masculinity exists if you like it or not. And people in magazines writing about some bs incident doesn't count as an attack on masculinity. And your paragraph about parenting is idiotic. Wtf does that shit even mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:42 AM
1

Happens to alot of guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:33 AM
1

They don't. They have an internally contradictions worldview and don't even see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:32 AM
1

AGAIN, the fat advice is good because it's PROVEN. You already know it to be good in the first place that's why your analogy doesn't work. TRP is a bunch of pseudoscience.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:31 AM
1

You see, some people just want to believe trash. People like you. It's irrelevant to them what you tell them. If something doesn't work they make up excuses why and leave out common sense in the process.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:28 AM
3

Reading these comments I'm absolutely shocked how some people just want to believe their shit no matter what. It doesn't count to them that their prophets are greedy hypocrites that don't follow their own advice. It doesn't matter how their ideology doesn't work and their coaches acknowledge that by telling them they just have to try it a hundred times until it works. Some people you just can't convince I guess. No amount of evidence or indicators is enough. And because it's all a bunch of fairy…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:23 AM
1

"And stopped giving a fuck when he got married" exactly the thing he tells others not to do. And then he wants money for that advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:18 AM
1

Aside from all the other people that succeeded in debunking ur trashy analogy I might add that there is solid decades of scientific evidence for one of those things and people that sell the other shit tell you it won't work the first 99 times...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:16 AM
3

The lengths people go to defend their shit. Yikes. The megachurches are Christianity. Not all of it of course. And trying to make money from desperate young men ist part of TRP. I would actually say it's all of it. A bullshit philosophy with some crumbs of truth sprinkled in there designed to make money.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:14 AM
2

You are like on of these "I only take the good bits of the bible"-people.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:11 AM
1

Only porn works.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:10 AM
1

You have to be very immature to think of men as " arghh GROSS".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 04:59 PM
19

At this point im not sure if this is parody or serious and I'm too afrqid to ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 04:57 PM
22

Im not sure whether to like this comment or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 09:30 AM
3

I feel the same way dude. It's very hard to resist. But arguing with an arrogant retard that refuses to recognize rules of basic human interaction is even worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 08:01 AM
2

Dude why are you still arguing with that retard? Hes the type of person that just wants to be right. You have given your explanation if he still thinks he is right just let him be. No point in arguing with idiots.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/21 11:45 PM
–

Even then you don't know if it's even true and not some ex partner out for petty revenge.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 09:35 PM
–

What an idiotic idea, trying to punish cheaters like that. How do you actually know someone's a cheater and it's not just someone else lying about them for whatever reason? Also what constitutes cheating is very different for alot of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 05:45 PM
2

Literally all of your opinions are just common redpill dogma. Very controversial... especially because at least half of this sub are redpillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 11:02 AM
4

Couldn't agree more, but I just had to point out "game box". Ahahahahah
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/21 09:54 AM
2

Someone read the story of yahwee and Ijob too much it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/21 09:11 AM
14

In your first comment you claimed that all women are gold diggers. Which means that in your opinion all women only care about money or try to only care about money whatever that means. Apart from the ridiculousness and inherent sexism of your opinion it's basically impossible to prove. What you are doing now is trying to prove that women generally favour richer partners or partners of higher social standing. No shit Sherlock. It's just not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 09:39 AM
10

You do know that there is a difference between wanting your partner to be as rich as possible and being a gold digger? It's perfectly normal to want the best possible partner in all regards. Gold digger means that someone only cares about money and nothing else. That's not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 09:35 AM
19

"Evolutionary psychology ". Or, for everyone living in reality, it has been that women were kept financially dependent on men for centuries. Culture and social narratives don't change that fast. If you disagree, list a source or some sort of proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 09:18 AM
-1

Sometimes you need a little distance to see things more clearly. This guy doesnt have any.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/21 10:27 PM
1

Yeah.. the problem with coach red pill clearly is that he uses "feminine fonts". He's fucking 50 and not even a good looking 50 yo. Even if he ever was average looking it's long gone by now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/21 01:10 PM
1

Alcohol always damages your brain. That's because it's poison. And there is literally no difference between drinking at 20 or 21. The age is just a random political coincidence. They had to put a number on the restriction somehow.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 10:22 PM
1

You can drink alcohol before 21 and it won't make you a retard. Just because the usa has it that way doesn't mean it's right. Never said she is fully developed at 16 mentally. Also I don't know your definition of grown but you can easily be physically grown with 18, not to mention being sexually mature in a way that you can procreate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 01:58 PM
1

Definitions aren't belief. If you are attracted to sexual characteristics of grown people ur not a pedophile. But even if you have a 15 year old looking like a model, her brain isn't fully developed yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 11:23 PM
1

Yeah sure. Doesnt change the definition of pedophilia. And of course we should punish that behavior, pedophilia or not, it's predatory.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 11:19 PM
0

I wouldnt be able to handle it
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 12:47 PM
1

Yeah.. the red pill is all that.... plus all the misogynistic crap about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 11:23 AM
1

The "trick" is to tell your ignorant audience that they can do everything and get everyone if they just practice their "game" enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 09:38 AM
3

I hate to say it but he is right. It's definitely very weird but not pedophilia if the woman has developed sexual characteristics. Pedophiles enjoy literal children.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 09:36 AM
2

Yes, that's a huge problem but not only with dating buy alot of other teaching things as well. I see it everything: after all the good informative content is out click bait is starting and the informational value of most vids is decreasing immensely.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 09:34 AM
1

Not only dating but alot of these people give life advice and shit. By the answers here I can only conclude that some people are willingly oblivious.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 09:31 AM
9

If you seriously think that coach red pill is able to pick up hot 20 yo women on the street just with his "game" then you are on some next level reality denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 09:29 AM
3

This is a great question for once. Asking for opinions, which is all this sub is capable of, on an interesting topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 09:26 AM
1

Okay so I answered all your other comments but now I will stop because I honestly think you have some mental impairment of some sort. You said: "bsdm feelings hurt" to which I responded that I don't even do bdsm. Now you tell me your delusional definition of bdsm that I already know about from your first comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 03:12 PM
1

Do you even know the definition of science. Show me a scientific study that proves that "male domination " (that's not a vague word at all) is needed for hot sex because of female biology on the genetic level. You can't. Because all you are doing is assuming things from some anecdotes and things you like to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 03:10 PM
1

The whole bit about male dominance being required to do hot sex. But that isn't even the point. You can't respond to the actual point and that's why you didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 11:49 AM
1

Classy argument. But I don't do bdsm nor do I like it. I actually have no idea about it. But you seem do not have one either.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 11:48 AM
1

That is a good fucking question. Even IF all the shit said here about women was true it only is true about a small fraction of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 08:16 AM
1

Ahahahahah great fucking answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 08:15 AM
5

I love the double standard again. When women get dominated it's "an extension of their natural sexuality". When men do it it's "an unnatural kink".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 08:14 AM
1

Love it when people discredit themselves immediately by using unproven redpill pseudoscience. If your gender has been held financially weak for centuries and you got socially conditioned your whole life of course you tend to place a higher importance on money than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 08:13 AM
1

Confirmation bias at work here
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 08:11 AM
1

If you view every woman who doesn't want to live life as a housewive as feminist then manufacturing feminist hypocrisy is pretty easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 08:10 AM
1

Also, I might add, if your pseudoscientific bs is correct there would be a desire to do bdsm in almost every women, which obviously isn't correct. You can of course argue that there actually is and they are just too scared to admit it but at that point we might as well argue the matrix or that ur a hamster in a robot.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 08:06 AM
1

I think in your crooked world you mistake "real male dominance" with someone making someone else do shit under threat of violence of some sort. You probably think if someone is dominating another person that person for some reason has no choice other to do everything the dominating person says.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 08:02 AM
1

I dont get the whole "they are open about their sexual fantasies so they couldn't get subconsciously shaped by society before they even hit the age of puberty" argument ur making. Doesn't make sense to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 07:39 AM
7

I cringe whenever I see someone use all the incel Redpill Words: "betabux" "shittest" .. This is either some mislead women that is hard-core into redpill or (infinitely more likely) a sad pathetic guy
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 08:20 AM
10

This is the most obvious fake post I have ever seen ... kinda pathetic if you ask me. "most if us women" yeah sure buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 08:10 AM
1

So I have read this thing twice (what am I doing with my life) and I still dont know what the fuxk you are even talking about most of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 11:33 AM
1

Love this reply. Other than some interesting chit chat this sub is a worthless pile of anecdotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 01:57 PM
1

Nice burn.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 01:20 PM
1

The last sentence.... so damn right. I totally agree. Online dating is fucked for men and its their own fault. Women just try to make the best out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 01:15 PM
0

I know that it was just an anecdote. But did you tell the anecdote? Because you want to make the argument that men an women have it equally as bad because while men have few to no options, lots of the options that women have turn out to be bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 07:43 AM
1

Again. How is it equally as hard for women? And please gimme the study you base ur second claim on.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 07:10 AM
1

So again: NO WOMAN EVER IS FORCED TO DATE JUST BECAUSE SHE CAN. Being used is only one outcome from dating. Or just paraphrased: "It is better to have little food because your stomach starts to hurt when you eat lots of it"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 07:09 AM
1

Lol ur mad. "Rant"... 2 sentences. Lmao. "Manipulative".... what !?!?! Honestly I think ur just bitter.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 07:06 AM
1

Ever considered of saying no? You play it like there are two options: not dating and getting lied to. Wtf is wrong with you. She chose to date, made bad decisions and could have pulled the plug anytime. I dont get how you can even hold such a position.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 07:05 AM
1

I dont see you cant compare them. Also for the rest... yikes. I dont wanna argue your pseudoscientific mishmash of redpill ideology and strawmen of me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 07:01 AM
1

Dont know what study you pulled out of ur ass but ypu can link it if its real. Also did you ever hear about the concept of choice. You can always choose to not date. So if you dont like your selection of potential partners just say no. A person without that doesnt have that luxury. Couldn't believe how hard it is for women to acknowledge that specific privilege until I read this comment section. So many excuses. I bet if you tried having no options at all you would beg to go back.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 06:53 AM
0

Lol u are so delusional. Do you think all women are perfect. If you wanna find a girlfriend you will have do dig through all the same trash. Only you have much less selection. Would you tell a poor person that having alot of food is actually worse than having none at all? Because you dont like most of it? And creepy messages have nothing to do with the matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 06:50 AM
3

In what way is that equal or worse to being alone? Jusg wondering because ur rant seems so self-centered.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:23 PM
4

"Who meet the criteria".... yikes. Wants an 8 while being a 5 and then complaining how hard it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:21 PM
2

Its not two different things. You have one person that wants a but cannot get it. Then you have another person that could get a easily but wants a plus b. The mental gymnstics people are pulling here are ridiculousl. Its like comparing 3rd world people to first world ones and saying everyone has problems so everyone has it equally bad....
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:19 PM
2

If you define female needs as "everything men want but more" then ur correct. But thats just stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:15 PM
17

Do you honestly think having to weed through an abundance of possible dating partners is equal to having no or very few partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:12 PM
1

Don't want to explain alot here. If ur interested just read a little on it. What it comes down to is that wanting to be taller or wanting a longer dick isn't a mental health issue just like being sad isn't equal to depression.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 10:09 AM
1

comparing gender dysphoria to wanting to be taller. yikes dude. ty for proving my point about the empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 03:45 PM
1

Remember, women are biological computers that you can hack into regardless of your looks if u just max out ur confidence stat.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 08:49 PM
4

So let me get this straight: You give ur personal experience, some random stranger mistakes that for arguments, feels attacked in his worldview, tries to start a debate, gets denied, then says he won't debate or help the person he tried to debate, because there were no arguments. AHAHAHAHAHA. Redpillers are so insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 08:46 PM
3

He has no obligations whatsoever to tell you anything or persuade you. He gave his position and if you can't believe it just move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 08:43 PM
5

Holy shit can you guys even listen to yourself? So if he uses the Redpill and it works its because of the Redpill and if he doesn't and it works then he still does, just unintentionally. And if someone manages to get a girl by intentionally not using a single redpill technique at all its just "an outlier". Talk about indoctrination... Guess you believe what you want to believe. Meanwhile the red pill "coaches " make huge amounts of money off desperate and inexperienced virgins that they conned i…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 08:38 PM
0

Easy to say when u don't have this problem. Just shows a lack of empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 08:32 PM
2

Some biological women have surgical created vaginas too btw. Some people have wierd birthdefects that force doctors to make some last minute adjustments.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 08:26 PM
1

That really depends. I am turned on by female secondary sexual features. So if she looks like a woman and I can't see a difference then yes on the hookup part. But too be honest this doesn't really matter because most transwomen I have seen dont look attractive at all. Its probably really hard to change your body against us biology and still look good. I also feel bad for people with body dysphoria but it also not my fault I dont feel attracted to them. And who would want a relationship with a p…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 08:24 PM
1

That is never going to happen. But if for some miracle it does, then we had a much more hateful society. Humanity wouldnt die out.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/20 06:07 AM
0

Funny how all the red pill guys can't stand you. You got to close to reality. They don't like that. You should've talked more about the wall and how today's women are so whore-like.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 03:27 AM
3

Yikes, someone really had some bad experiences... Honestly in all your comments you just sound bitter and femcel-like with your AMALT-shit. You said she should first look of the man wants to commit. Why would someone commit to a person expecting everything from them first. Men also check if they want to commit... Do yourself a favour and look on the other sides pov every now and then. And newsflash: everybody puts people in boxes. Not just men. And most people are trying to hide that fact. Not j…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/20 09:22 AM
3

"Its an observation of their nature, their instinct" The only thing I observe here is a huge pile of pseudoscience being practiced by an unqualified guy who thinks he cracked the code.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 04:10 PM
4

Flipping what people say is just showing how interchangeable their argument is. I just made clear how worthless and stupid your comment is because you wrote a bunch on unproofed biased nonsense. You complain about that not meaning anything when you wrote horoscope shit like: "it's real." Or "that's how we feel about each other". Also nice job responding to half my comment. And you didn't even get the meaning of that half. It was stating how you literally did what op complained about without inte…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 04:07 PM
5

This guy is literally what you were complaining about. And instead of bringing arguments he went the "I feel like"-route. He is cancer. His comment is toxic. His glorification of hatred is disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 03:55 PM
7

What the actual fuck is wrong with you? Ironically I can turn your argument easily around (which is btw the thing op complained about): "This mealy mouthed anti-egalitarian bs is far more offensive than egalitarianism. I personally find mutual love and partnership between the sexes refreshing. It's real. Its how we feel about each other. And you should believe me. Why? Because I'm a bitter redditor who has no education or proof on the topic whatsoever. I just claim shit because I like believing …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 03:54 PM
-1

First thats an assumption; second, your sexuality being fluid doesn't mean it depends mainly on personality. Also, honestly, if some dudes online typing shit about women make you dislike men in general and lose your sexuality that's on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 11:10 PM
-1

Honestly, if you aren't attracted to men after you read this you weren't attracted to them to begin with. Finding someone attractive isn't something you can decide on. If I knew Margot Robbie was basically Hitler I would still find her attractive. Physically. It's not something you can switch off.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 11:01 PM
4

You're being delirious. Men don't just walk into a date in a garbage bag. Believe it or not things cost money for men too. Also, the danger part: How does giving someone money have anything to do with that. Danger is already over by the point of paying the bill. So fucking stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 07:31 AM
4

Well, someone certainly is overcompensating...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 07:12 AM
3

It's not high effort when there is a 2 to 1 gender ratio on every dating app lol
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 07:09 AM
2

This red pill revolution talk isn't an argument. Because you have none. I said if no-one is gonna take the first step there won't be a relationship. Your answer: yes but there will be one if the women does it...... If I wanted to hear red pill stuff I would just go to one of the Blogs or yt channels and then prob blow.my brains out.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 02:21 PM
3

You do realize my point? If no-one ever is going to make the first step there won't be a long term or a short term. I with say you have to buy a ring instantly just someone has to do something.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 01:25 PM
9

Never invest in a woman before she invests in you. Well... with that attitude noones ever gonna be happy. Being safe all the time is boring.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 01:00 PM
2

What do you mean in detail? The sunk cost fallacy? Or the "it's costs a lot so it must be good" logic?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 12:56 PM
8

That's what I kept wondering about. Why would he stop seeing you as a cumdump if you made him invest money. He is just gonna use you more to get his money's value and then leave. I know it sounds idealistic but viewing relationships as a business deal is horrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 12:54 PM
2

This is neither r/pussypassdenied nor is it a good post. Seems like this subs votes for anything that's bad for women. Next post: "woman slips on street - 4 broken bones" 11k upvotes.....
/r/PussyPassDenied04/02/20 04:40 PM
1

It saddens me having to agree. This is just a generic divorce Story. Where is the denied pussypass?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/20 12:31 PM
-3

Not r/pussypassdenied
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/20 12:21 PM
3

Literally everything she listed is less bad than what the joker had to endure in his movie.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/20 11:16 AM
3

The more I read the comments the more I realise this sub is the incarnation of dunning Kruger. Everybody talks about them being in a bubble while being in a huge bubble themselves. Can you even list a few counterargument these people present to your theories? You don't have to agree with them just list them.
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/19 11:51 AM
1

You guys are like the creationist that try to convert atheists by appealing to the bible. Or god. Have you ever tried to even understand argument they put forth? Believe it or don't things go a little deeper than laws and shit. And still you are sitting here like in a time machine bringing all the old arguments that have been countered a thousand times already what you would know if you actually were interested in a discussion. Because to get that you don't have to run at them repeating stupid d…
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/19 11:41 AM
2

If you find that scary you aren't easy for the real world. Every movement has crazy people. politicians wanting something and getting it is a big difference.
/r/AntiFeminists07/12/19 10:45 PM
4

Thats what I mean. He's crazy and abusive and shit and he says all sorts of stupid bs that's why you can't tak3 him seriously
/r/AntiFeminists07/12/19 09:30 PM
-1

I wonder, in this subs description it says point out problems with feminism but everything that ever gets posted is basically just stupid people saying stupid shit so everyone here can get outraged. This guy onision is a fucking joke you can't take him seriously whatsoever and he has nothing to do with feminism. He doesnt even have an argument. He just states some bullshit. Why don't you guys take real argument (you know those with an explanation or reason for claims they make) and debunk them.
/r/AntiFeminists07/12/19 10:57 AM
8

That what i mean. He doesn't really believes this shit anyways and he has different reason for saying that too. His head is fucked up. You can't take this guy seriously whatsoever. Sadly most people here do that.
/r/AntiFeminists07/12/19 10:45 AM
1

You shouldn't. That's the only one we have. Also don't believe in this "everything is going to shit"-propaganda. Even if it were true -its not- you can't change anything about that and you will only become unhappy. Btw have you even read my comment? That post is very surely sarcasm.
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/19 09:08 PM
1

Im pretty sure that's sarcasm. They just want to make of people who use this talking point the other way around. Because I usually only here it used that way. Come on guys... this is so obvious.
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/19 09:23 AM
1

first of all: nice job posting it twice. unfortunately for you that doesnt make it right. I am very sure you never have even read the quran (i think you meant that book when you said: "in islam it doesnt say"). Your whole comment shouts uninformed. There are literally websites that do nothing but show violent quotes from islam: https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/violence.aspx i got this from a simple google search of 15 seconds. This just shows your utter lack of interest in this dis…
/r/AntiFeminists28/10/19 09:58 PM
3

What is that logic? A lot of religious and non religious people are uneducated. One thing doesn't exclude the other. And wanna know how they are associated? They shout it out in the world just before they kill innocent people.
/r/AntiFeminists28/10/19 07:48 AM
3

That's true. And where is your point?
/r/AntiFeminists27/10/19 10:27 AM
6

I guess this person also believes that isis has nothing to do with islam
/r/AntiFeminists26/10/19 06:49 PM
2

Dunno about the hate thing. Immature? Sure. What are you doing here anyway?
/r/AntiFeminists17/09/19 07:19 AM
1

I do like jokes. But this is high school niveau. It's childish. And the title of the subreddit doesn't suggest this is a joke forum. But by now I'm starting to believe this thing is a joke. Didn't think I would ever say that but the feminist sub has more niveau than this. At least there they talk and discuss politics. Look at this subreddits post history. It's sad. And the immaturity of the main audience of this becomes very clear when they need to downvote everybody that doesn't like this subs …
/r/AntiFeminists13/09/19 07:33 AM
2

Holy shit. That is American Pie level cringe. This post getting so many upvotes suggests very unfortunate things about the most people on this sub. I thought this was a serious argumentative sub. Not r/im14andthisisdeep. One more post like that and I'm gone.
/r/AntiFeminists13/09/19 07:19 AM
-34

Very childish. 8th grade niveau. I hoped for arguments and discussion here...
/r/AntiFeminists07/09/19 06:36 AM
5

You forgot " fragile masculinity" and "you hate strong women" in the normal girls talk bubbles.
/r/AntiFeminists21/08/19 10:30 PM
1

Who the fuck are you talking to? He made a nice point in a respectful manner. He didn't even talk about the things you are adressing. You're arguing against a straw.man in your head.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy02/08/19 06:43 PM
1

Funny thing there was a French guy during French revolution who stated the law that the more freedom the people get the more likely they are to go even further. Don't remember his name tho.
/r/AntiFeminists23/07/19 07:58 AM
1

Everybody has to be the same and if they don't want to they will be made. Can't imagine my ancestors putting up with criticism on the way they sit...
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/19 08:44 AM
2

"For her man crushing efforts".... holy shit. Gender mainstreaming under the cloak of equality...
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/19 09:11 PM
3

Im sure it was real during segregation era
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/19 06:46 AM
1

What chair. Can you link it?
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/19 06:45 AM
2

What are you doing man. These women don't want to discuss or talk. These are basically the rules of this sub and subs like r/pinkpill And r/femcels. Just like with incels whatever brought them to this place isn't logic or rational thinking. The only way to persuade them is to find out what makes them so vulnerable to these toxic beliefs. Btw.: half the people here on this subs are just lurking here to have a few laughs.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy17/07/19 02:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter