TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SirCallipygianDuck Archive

View 0 posts and 60 comments by SirCallipygianDuck on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-14

Maybe my problem is with your choice in diction. Let's leave natural out. It is normal to die at war because it's war. It's normal to die during birth because it's childbirth. They're incomparable other than two dangerous situations with likely mortality.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 12:38 PM
4

Why do you want to compare the two? What does that achieve?
/r/MensRights17/02/24 11:34 AM
-1

Looking at your history you clearly have a bit of an unfounded agenda. My bad, go off.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 04:45 PM
-4

How is the system more geared towards men in general if the people who are the most disproportionately disadvantaged in terms of education And yet men overwhelmingly represented in top managerial positions and many industries. Most leaders are men. Most of the wealthiest people are men. And no it's not just because women are just too 'agreeable' but because the system since it's conception was made for men and left women to just be child bearers who did chores and sold clothes. We're talking tho…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 12:45 PM
-4

Precisely. Quite worried about the subs overall trajectory. I used to defend the sub and it's importance but increasingly I find it more and more difficult. There aren't bad women or bad men more than just bad people who happen to have a penis or vagina. But as you say, I do understand where it's coming from- a place of personal hurt or outrage which is fair.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 11:39 AM
10

I think this space is very important but in all honesty there is a shift into blaming and hating women. I would be very interested in a poll in our attitudes towards women because I'm quite sure majority would be negative.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 08:27 AM
-9

because the richest people in the world come from families which include women You can't be that stupid mate. The whole idea of the patriarchy is that most wealth and power is held by who, men and the system is geared more towards men. Saying these men have women in their families is not a debunk more than illogical rambling. Denying the patraichy is like denying that racism isn't Institutionalized.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 08:23 AM
3

So I've read the links and I think it's very important to stress that correlation is not causation. In fact, this study set out to find a correlation but not to find any causes. Even your study (1st) acknowledges that other factors were at play more than just being depressed with increasing body count. The questionare they used didn't try link body count to depression more than it just asked general questions and looked at what the data was. What this does is it just ties together hypersexual vi…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 08:17 AM
6

I signals an interest in her Both paying shows both are interested, by your logic, which would be a good thing no?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 07:39 PM
11

Do you want to be right or do you want someone in your life? Lmao, you make it sound like someone would be a prize when the write you off just at the idea of paying their fair share.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 07:37 PM
4

Shoot your shot and if she doesn't reciprocate then move on. But that's OP's point. How do you keep shooting your shot freely when you keep getting rejected? Naturally the pressure will build with each rejection and desperation will become more and more apparent and thus more rejection so how can that be avoidable.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 10:34 PM
4

Ok. Do you possibly have any links or proof of preach confirming it?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 08:17 PM
8

You literally did though mate. They said that fat comedian was a longtime friend of preachs and not his wife
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 08:08 PM
10

u/dishonouronmycow You don't know how Preach's wife looks like. Neither does F&F or A&B fans because he keeps her private. You are saying she's fat because of a mix up that they literally addressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 07:58 PM
17

Lol, this person just proved one your points as false but sure, you're just stating 'facts'.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 07:52 PM
0

Once again, we - at least I'm not - saying abortion should be removed. That's not even the topic or the argument. Just that it the ability to remove responsibility should also be extended to both parties because both parties knew what could happen but only one gets a way out.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 02:55 PM
1

I think you miss the point. I'm not arguing that abortions should be illegal. I'm arguing the belief that somehow bodily autonomy wasn't exercised when you had consentual sex knowing the risks. Going back to the example, you knew the risk so you couldn't go sue the skiing company or whatever because you knew and accepted those risks when you decided to ski. So you can't argue bodily autonomy is the core foundation and that's why men can't have their own version. To your example, you have a right…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 02:51 PM
3

The justification behind pro-choice arguments when it comes to abortion is fundamentally bodily autonomy Not necessarily because it could be effectively argued that bodily autonomy was exercised when you chose to have sex since everyone knows what can happen when you have sex. For example skiing down a dangerous slope. You wanted to have fun but you ended up breaking all you bones. That's was the risk you accepted when you went down the slope and you exercise your rights to make that choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 01:40 PM
-1

It's a very well documented medically complex issue and if you want to undergo then that was your choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 01:32 PM
1

Are you intentionally being obtuse? Yes, two people made the baby so both should be able to absolve responsibility. What aren't you understanding?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 01:30 PM
1

That is your kid whether you like it or not. Biologically, sure. That doesn't mean much in reality though. You’re not a sperm donor. You weren’t paid to drop your sperm off for pay So sperm donors who aren't paid should be liable to pay child support? You willingly laid down with a woman and had unprotected sex Funny, you're previous comment spoke about how unexpected pregnancies can come from failed birth control and not just unprotected sex and that's why a women might seek an abortion. But no…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 01:28 PM
1

First off no one said anything about unprotected sex. I'm talking about sex. Protected or unprotected. Babies don't come from a stork. Pregnancy is a very obvious consequence of sex. Second, the overwhelming majority of abortions are elective and not due to medical intervention. Rape pregnancies are also only a fraction of total rape pregnancies. But that's not even the point and you know that. Throwing in rape and medically necessary abortions into the conversation is just a disingenuous attemp…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 01:22 PM
0

I'm not sure I understand your point
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 01:12 PM
2

It's always equal and they equally have a right to opt out. Equally. You're right. It is very simple
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 08:17 AM
1

Last I checked abortion wasn't murder so there's no child after he put his semen into her. But there is one after she doesn't abort. Just like its not cake just because you mixed the batter but it is once you put AND keep it in the oven.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 08:16 AM
1

And none of that would happen if the women just closed her legs. Which is exactly why they should be offered the same options to opt out because they both equally contributed and you can't force a woman to go through or abort a pregnancy since she's the physical carrier. But there is a role to be taken over, left by the vacuum of his absence. No there's doesn't have to be. Going back to the sperm donor example. It should be the women's responsibility alone. The problem isn't with a guy who came …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 08:14 AM
1

The man doesn't bring a child into the world. The women does remember? Has something to do with 9 months, incubation and some hours of labour. Also has something to do with termination or continuing being her sole decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 08:05 AM
2

You simply can expect the woman- the person who continued with the pregnancy regardless of the reluctance or complete withdrawal of the father- to provide for her child. And you should. It's not stepping in. It's taking responsibility for your choice to bring a child to this world. There's a reason sperm donors don't have to pay child support. Because the person who wants the sperm sourced is knowingly choosing to take on the full responsibility of the child. And that's what you're choosing when…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 08:04 AM
1

Nope. If she can remove her financial obligations so should he. It's that simple. When she continues with the pregnancy knowing the father isn't interested in being involved then she takes on that full obligation. It's called decisions. A drain on society is someone who knowingly brings a child into the world that they can't provide for and already missing a parental figure from the jump just because they can't be selfless and either have an abortion or be responsible.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 07:59 AM
1

So basically you believe the double standard is ok? Should've just said that. You can't debate with someone who doesn't care about preserving fairness.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 07:27 AM
5

men should start treating their emissions like a serious part of the equation Women should start realising that they hold the equal sign of the equation. Especially since they're the ones who would carry the child so more responsibility should fall on them outright. And that it can and will incur consequences. You're right. That's the risk of sex. The risk both parties a very much aware of. There's no naive victim. An abortion is a traumatic experience just like any pregnancy and not to be taken…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 07:25 AM
5

Don’t have sex with people who don’t agree with your views on abortions Doesn't work like that. You can't say a women can abort responsibility but a man can't and the man should just choose their partner better when your literal argument is don't have sex if you aren't willing to be supportive. It either applies to both or to none. Abortions aren’t even actually accessible everywhere anymore so that argument doesn’t work for you. Abortions aren't accessible anywhere? That's simply not true and y…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 07:10 AM
3

Well it does matter because if you believe it fine to have an abortion but isn't fine to not be financially support then your argument is has a double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 07:06 AM
3

Just to clarify, you're against abortions then?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 06:58 AM
5

Equal fault. If she can abort the pregnancy to remove the her 50% of the financial responsibility then he should also be able to remove his financial responsibility. That's if we're striving for fairness.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 06:57 AM
10

Don't have sex at all unless you're 100% willing to have a child. Women included.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 06:55 AM
13

You know that argument is used for anti abortion as well? Don't have sex if you're not ready to carry a kid to term. See how your logic backfires? Sex isn't only for reproduction. Consent to sex isn't consent to pregnancy
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 06:53 AM
0

I don't understand your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 09:40 AM
1

The legal age of consent varies around the world. Those "basic principles" are no where near universal nor consistent. Not drastically. The majority legal age of an adult is 18. There's also a distinction to be made between age of consent and the legal age of an adult- the latter being what we've been talking about. Several people say every day that as long as they're a "consenting adult" that it's okay Yes. As long as they an adult and capable of consent, it is fine. That isn't arbitrary.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 07:50 AM
3

You know pointing out outliers doesn't discredit anything I've said right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 07:45 AM
3

Laws are fundamentally built on basic principles so dismissing it as if it was something created on a whim without any moral dialogue is just disingenuous if not just wrong. You could get input by any reputable psychologist or any student of the human brain and most if not all will agree that 18 year olds are not mentally incapable of consent. They are capable of giving consent. They are capable of making decisions. They are also capable of making mistakes and that's fine. That's what they mean …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 06:47 AM
2

Yes, a literal child and an adult are akin to one another. Right...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 05:53 AM
0

I don't think anyone said it was a foolproof guarantee. Even with that statistic, there are higher odds of woman over 25 having kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 05:50 AM
1

You are talking about things that are so irrelevant. It doesn't matter whether it can be fixed or worked on. The point is, the statistics RIGHT NOW say they are more of a threat to rob you. That why people are scared. If the statistics changed and improved so will people's perceptions and fears around them. But right now was they are, they are more a threat. Simple. Why you're going on about fixing shit and estrogen is beyond me. That's neither here there nor anywhere. Fucking Dora couldn't find…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 12:08 PM
1

Mate, how does that affect anything? That's the reason why they are more likely. But people aren't scared of the reason why they're more likely, they scared that they are more likely. Wtf? Why are you complicating this? Do I need to bring out the crayons? This is so simple. Black people are the predominant perpetrator of robberies. Men are the predominant perpetrators of violent crimes. People who are wary of either do so because of these statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 11:42 AM
1

Mate, is the general black person obama or wearing and immaculate three piece suit? That's literally like pointing out that they are 4ft 2 twig like gents to disprove that men are less likely attack them. We're working on statistics mate. Your comment has as much sense as a triangular parking space.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 11:26 AM
2

No. You're conflate the reason and the cause of the reason. They're scared of black people because black people are more likely to be thieves. Their likelihood to be thieves is because of their socioeconomic status. They aren't scared of people with lower socioeconomic status. For example, you're actually more scared of men because of their likelihood to attack them. Their liklihood to attack is because of their biological ability to overpower you. There are many women out there who are stronger…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 10:50 AM
-1

You absolutely can't be that obtuse. The request wasn't to prove that men are more violent than women. They are. That's why they're the main perpetrators. I wanted you to prove that the reason men are more attacked, killed or robbed is because of gang violence or drunken brawls. Those were your claims. Back them up or drop them. Is the literacy problem that bad or are you purposefully being disingenuous here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 10:40 AM
2

Black people have no significant differences to other people Socio economic situation. The leading cause of theft is poverty. That is why black people are more predominant in roberries. Statistically speaking, the mistrust is not completely unfounded. It's just prejudiced. Just like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 10:36 AM
1

Actually no, I recalled incorrectly. Gangs are not a large chunk. I think the largest is just drunken brawls but not sure I'd still appreciate a source for that mate. Either way, men are more violent and less risk-averse in general, therefore suffer the consequences. Please, you absolutely do not want to go down the road of risk-aversion in this discussion. Your second paragraph is useless. The point is that women still have to fear stranger rape because it is likely to happen Have you forgotten…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 10:24 AM
-1

Well mate any accusations against any person should be questioned especially if it's of a serious nature such as rape. Women are more believed than not believed when talking of public opinion. That's just facts. The court systems don't operate on belief but if you came out with your me too story online the gross majority would rally behind you. "false accusations" as if that wasn't far, far less common than, ya know, actual rape This is what I do have a slight problem with. How did you get to th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 10:14 AM
1

I literally gave you a whole scenario directly responding to your comment to prove how ridiculous that comparison is. Which you haven't given an answer to but don't worry, I've noted that silence as it's own answer. If you think women are treated as guilty false accusers for not proving rape Who said women are treated as guilty false accusers for not proving rape? Do quote me if you can.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 10:01 AM
0

Or sexual crimes against aquintances are not reported in fear of the communal backlash. Worse if its family resulting in fear to report as well as insufficient evidence in that regard as its was usually at a younger age. Or they don't know how they'd prove that the rape their bf committed wasn't just consensual sex. Do you see how many "what if"s we could conjure that will take us right back where we started?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 09:57 AM
1

Gang activity accounts for a large portion of male homicide so yes I am blaming them for joining gangs. Do you have a statistic for that perhaps? Also your statistic about rape is a relative assessment between stranger and acquaintance rape Well first it's an assement of all rape reportings which was then categorised by perpetrator and that's how they go the percentage. Second, what's your point? Do you disagree? Would you like to prove something to the contrary?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 09:53 AM
2

Yet plenty of men will assume guilt if she doesn’t bear the burden of proof for SA 1) incorrect. They're assume innocence of the man because that's how the legal system works and that's how we consider anyone who's been accused of a crime without proof. As the accuser, you literally have the burden to prove that your accusations are real. There's no better system to have. Because no one cares about women falsely accused of slander Riddle me this. There's a lad who's been accused of stabbing and …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 09:47 AM
3

What exactly is your point here? Are you trying to suggest that these are random so it's not comparable to rape cases? Because most rape reportings are made against acquaintances which then rises the question why you're scared of random bloke in the street when statistics are that he's less likely to assault you than someone you already know and hang out with. Or are you blaming men getting assaulted, killed and robbed primarily on gang activity?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 09:36 AM
2

Account where? There hasn't even been many serious or credible studies and research in the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 09:30 AM
3

You sound envious of men and their supposedly superior ability to defend themselves. Yet, men are much more likely to be victims of physical assault than women. Mate, write this shit in Proverbs. Exactly. Men are the greater victims of every violent crime except those of a sexual nature and usually by a great margin. If the ability to defend yourself was even remotely a deterant or something greatly helped then what's going on with the stats?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 09:13 AM
2

It also doesn't account for the incredibly massive lack of underreporting Well it also doesn't account for any false reporting or even attempts to validates these claims. Were you aware the method of reaching that specific estimate was via random phone calls. You, random person, just answer the random person on the phone without having to provide anything for your credibility or validity. Now I'm certain most rape reporting aren't false but you can't call out potential under reporting and ignore…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 08:52 AM
22

And yet you're still not answering how any of it is different. I'm not bashing anyone for being scared of anything but they must accept that it's fucked up and heavily prejudiced. That's it. All I ask for is self awareness. Black people are responsible for most roberries in the us. You'd probably call someone racist for clutching their purse or locking their car if one walked by. Them being black doesn't make them thieves just like men being men don't make them rapists but you'll still be prejud…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 08:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter