TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SirIsaacGnuton Archive

View 0 posts and 104 comments by SirIsaacGnuton on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

No. You didn't address any of my central claim so I feel no need to respond to any of your diversions especially the ridiculous black/white analogy. If you don't know why it's ridiculous then you should examine it closely.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 12:01 PM
1

But does your distaste for the way the message is delivered mean you are going to reject the meaning behind it? The statistics are the statistics no matter how the message is delivered.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 11:24 AM
0

I didn't say anything about anyone's speech. My first sentence said the man/bear question is a proxy for the STATISTICS. You can react emotionally to the way a woman talks about it and call it hate speech, and it probably is in many cases, but that doesn't change the underlying statistics and that doesn't invalidate the claim which is, as I said, statistics. For any of the examples you give it's the same situation. You can have an emotional and defensive reaction to them or see them as a symptom…
/r/MensRights24/05/24 11:12 AM
2

Belief has nothing to do with it. According to the CDC intimate partner physical violence is equal between men and women. That includes hitting. If it's sexual violence men commit it at a rate of 2-3x higher. Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey
/r/MensRights24/05/24 10:57 AM
-4

Obfuscation instead of discussion. Par for the course.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 10:37 AM
-18

The man/bear question is a proxy for sexual assault statistics. You are taking it too literally. That's why this thing has gotten so much traction. It's the defensiveness that's telling women that men don't get it. When it comes to sexual harassment and assault statistics women are predominantly the victims and men are predominantly the perpetrators. Those are US Dept of Justice numbers.There should be little debate about them. That doesn't imply that men aren't sexually assaulted by women. The …
/r/MensRights23/05/24 11:10 PM
-2

Lying about what? An opinion I hold? I think you need to adjust your definition of what an opinion is. And who said anything about being nice or earning respect? Instead of trying to own the libs with insults try to make some coherent arguments. People in an echo chamber never think they're in one. And when you throw out that mainstream label it's off base. Views are on a spectrum.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 10:58 PM
-5

Their rhetoric is equally divisive so I ignore it. The OP's question is why does THIS sub have a bad reputation and you haven't responded to my observations, just changed the subject. What good does that do? As I foreshadowed in my prior post, I'm being downvoted for asking legitimate, non-inflammatory questions. None (one?) of those downvoters bothered to respond.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 07:01 PM
-16

Okay. At a very basic level many of the conversations here devolve into women-hating and anyone who attempts to call that out is downvoted and called a brainwashed simp or some variation of that. It's an attitude that completely destroys honest communication. Secondly, any movement that relies on scapegoating another group is usually bullshit. The world is far more complex than scapegoaters want you to believe. But they do it because it provides instant gratification and the feeling of 100% blam…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 05:48 PM
-15

If you want the echo chamber answer why ask the question?
/r/MensRights07/05/24 05:06 PM
1

All you need to care about is that she picked you. That's real, not hypothetical. At the heart of the man-bear question is fear. Women fear being sexually assaulted a lot. It's an everyday concern for them. Every day. That's why the question resonates for them.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 01:56 PM
1

If you're mathing it consider the other dimension of the question. Out of 100 random men left alone with a woman how many would commit sexual violence? The answer is likely to be non-zero based on the statistic that 50% of women have been the victim of sexual violence. That or there are some very prolific sexually deviant guys out there. Out of 100 random bears left alone with a woman how many would commit sexual violence? Zero. Definitely zero. Sexual violence can't be equated with other forms …
/r/MensRights03/05/24 06:55 PM
4

Love to see that post.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 04:03 PM
2

It's an overly reductive buzzword that I don't use. Toxic femininity is the same. And woke is probably the worst of them all for taking something positive and turning it into an insult.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 12:52 PM
-1

Bullshit. Typical red state conservative propaganda. Illegals committing crimes that provide no benefit to them and literally make them visible to police. I suppose you "learned" this on a Facebook group? Or just made it up?
/r/MensRights27/03/24 06:06 PM
2

Fashion and style are subjective. You can't win an argument about them.
/r/MensRights11/03/24 09:01 PM
-6

Don't get caught up in the trap of hating the concept because you hate some people associated with it.
/r/MensRights01/03/24 03:24 PM
1

You said that biological distractions make women too emotional to be rational. Why are college completion rates higher for females? College is an inherently rational challenge.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 10:07 PM
1

Fewer problems? So a woman with no children and no period is equivalent to a man in terms of decision making?
/r/MensRights12/02/24 06:39 PM
2

Women have no monopoly on irrational decisions. And you fail to recognize that men have the same emotions as women, just expressed differently. So your premise is biologically and psychologically wrong.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 06:17 PM
1

Women are just as emotional now as they were before the suffrage movement so you're saying there's a good reason for them not to vote even now?
/r/MensRights12/02/24 06:02 PM
2

Back it up here. What is your definition of modern day ideologies? What's your definition of a good degree? There are men running for elected office in the US right NOW who want to roll back the laws to the time when women and blacks couldn't vote. Most conservatives don't criticize them at all. The 1960s was when women and minorities started accumulating power and conservatives to this day point to the 1950s as the last time the US was great. I wonder how today's MRAs look at it. Was feminism b…
/r/MensRights12/02/24 05:43 PM
-5

I'm going to need a citation to an actual study. Until then you're just fear-mongering in the manner of religious zealots everywhere. It's the playbook of the right. Build a straw man to rail against and hope that the uneducated believe it.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 09:28 PM
-5

Science is objective and it already has a mechanism to deal with bad science. Republicans aren't comfortable with science infringing on their territory and conflicting with their religion so they claim that the ENTIRE world of science is compromised. That's the only way they can make their argument and it's sad and pathetic. If there are test results that are contradictory NO ONE suppresses them. Scientists are eager to replicate results. That's what anti-science conservatives hate. It's useful …
/r/MensRights10/02/24 09:08 PM
2

Left/Right is misleading. In the 1970s Republicans were more in favor of abortion than Democrats. Now Republicans are all against it. Democrats didn't move. Same deal with science and education. Both were supportive (after all, the US won the space race on the basis of science and education) Republicans are far more likely to want to hamstring science teaching. Who moved?
/r/MensRights10/02/24 07:38 PM
0

I read carefully.You said you oppose Trump's NOMINATION, which is what people say when they're going to vote for him over Biden in the general electionn. You're in that group of people who pretend they're being forced to vote for that orange skinned piece of crap - because Biden is worse somehow. The dumb are voting for Trump.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 10:54 AM
0

Criminal case? The statute of limitations on sexual assault in New York was 3 years at the time. It's 20 years now. And the fact is that Trump made dummies FEEL good while putting more long term debt on top of the middle class than any president before him. He figured out that formula - say the right thing so they're too distracted to pay attention to the theft going on under their noses. His deal with SA to flood the world with cheap oil gave us low prices for two years AND put US refineries an…
/r/MensRights28/01/24 10:49 PM
2

I guess the judge and jury were trolling too. Let's see if the appeals court agrees. You guys have a weak grasp of reality if you think Trump made his case and the prosecution didn't. But I shouldn't be surprised because when it comes to the orange pussy grabbing rapist you guys believe you're protecting the Messiah.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 09:36 AM
0

You mean infamous by his pervert behavior? The guy doesn't stand out physically from any of the other thousand rich assholes who frequent Bergdorf. He didn't travel with a posse to announce his presence.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 02:38 AM
0

Bullshit. One of a hundred annoying rich assholes to walk through Bergdorf Goodman on a given day. And as a point of pure logic, you can't prove he wasn't there unless you have video of the entire time they were open.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 02:34 AM
1

Basically, they said that unenumerated rights at the time of the 14th amendment aren't protected. So there goes contraception, gay marriage, and mixed marriages on the same basis. It was an incredibly stupid ruling.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 02:31 AM
-1

Maybe after he was the President. But before that in 1996 he was just another annoying rich prick in an expensive suit in a store that sells $10,000 Prada dresses and $40,000 Hermes bags. Manhattan Bergdorf Goodman is filled with those assholes. And they wouldn't take notice of E. Jean Carroll either. These people aren't remarkable for that store.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 02:18 AM
-5

Does the staff check everyone at the door? No. Your statement proves nothing.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 08:51 PM
0

The fact that they ignored precedent says otherwise.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 08:49 PM
-1

If the fetus has primacy over the mother what do you call it? Let's not obfuscate. That's the bottom line.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 08:39 PM
-6

NBC insiders party. Not a meet and greet. Trump doesn't like the public and avoids meet and greets because of his germaphobia. Plus, he proved himself a liar with that picture. He said Carroll wasn't his type and then identified her as Marla Maples who was the woman he cheated on his first wife with. Obviously she was very much his type. If you lie enough people doubt everything you say.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 08:36 PM
-13

The staff doesn't follow the customer into the dressing room. Even the orange rapist isn't stupid enough to do it in front of a witness. The jury believed her. Trump can appeal all the way to the SC if he wants. That's a majority conservative court, three of whom owe their positions to Trump and a majority of whom are skeptical that women have rights to their own bodies.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 08:14 PM
2

It wasn't he said she said. She told multiple people at the time it happened. They testified. He was allowed to prevent evidence but it was rebutted. Such as he said he never met her but she had pictures of them socializing together.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 07:33 PM
-3

Carroll told multiple people about the assault at the time it occurred in 1995. They testified to this fact. Trump said he never met her but there are pictures of the two of them socializing together. Then he defamed her, saying she was crazy, and tried to get the government to defend him as if this had occurred as one of his official duties. The stupid motherfucker could have said nothing and there would have been no lawsuit. Then after losing the civil suit he immediately defamed her again. WT…
/r/MensRights27/01/24 07:30 PM
1

Because the mainstream recognizes it as stupid people saying stupid things. Isn't that half the point of social media? Men, why do you take the bait? I think women do this for attention, to create drama and as a form of camaraderie. They know that only 10% of men are over 6' tall. So if half of them feel that way then there's a lot of competition and the odds are against them. That's a problem they create for themselves. The other aspect is that when you don't need a particular thing it makes se…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 05:27 PM
3

This is a question in search of a problem. Anyone can want whatever they want. Don't marry a person who wants different things than you. Divorce a person who doesn't share your goals or misrepresented themselves. You make it sound like a woman should just start churning out babies if the husband wants them, as if that's her main purpose in life. There could be 1000 good reasons why she wouldn't want to. If you think her main value is as breeding stock, that's effed up.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 12:40 PM
2

Icks are subconscious reactions to superficial qualities like a guy with a man bun or wearing a fedora. It's not really an outgrowth of some philosophy. I've gleaned this from listening to women talking in podcasts. And there are always exceptions to the rule. A funny one I heard was a guy who put his shirt on in first after a shower instead of pants, aka Porky Pigging it. Another one I heard was falling down while walking. Then the exception to that was it's okay if they're drunk. The additiona…
/r/MensRights02/01/24 02:02 PM
-1

The answers here explain why. They're mostly focused on feminism. How can you build a case for change if you can't describe the change you need in constructive terms? Men's rights should be described in terms that can be translated into goals. Like positive education for little boys, remove stigma around seeking mental health and medical care, reexamine divorce laws, etc. I think "men's rights" at this point has no clearly defined objective. It makes no sense to say that men's rights means rolli…
/r/MensRights06/12/23 09:53 PM
2

Damn right it is. I try to avoid toxic situations but it can be tough to do that sometimes. I worked at a place that started out fine but then a new manager came in, hired his friends, and the environment changed over night to one of the worst places I've ever worked. I started looking for a new job immediately.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 11:16 AM
0

If you were king what would your solution be? Women communicate differently than men. That's a fact. Some of them enjoy drama too much. That doesn't mean your rights have been infringed. I guess I'm lucky that I work in an IT organization where that doesn't happen. Everyone is pretty professional.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 08:59 PM
-8

How does this relate to men's rights?
/r/MensRights30/11/23 07:19 PM
8

Looking at the ultimate aim of the New Republican party which is to institute a theocracy, I can't see myself ever voting Republican again.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 05:40 PM
3

I agree that more male teachers is a more realistic approach than single sex schools. Role models are incredibly important. The other issue is that a single sex school, if it intends to have male teachers, is going to have a vanishingly small pool of teachers to draw from.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 04:40 PM
9

More male teachers would be great but how are you going to do that when the pay sucks and parents treat them like crap? Would you rather have boys performance rise in a shitty educational system or everyones performance rise in a better educational system? A whole segment of the population no longer trusts experts in any white collar profession and you'll never get them to give two shits about education.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 12:36 PM
1

The first two articles you cite actually make the business case for "equal pay" fairly well. You want to ignore that and insist that every team be paid according to head to head competition. This is why the utterly stupid U15 boys comparison keeps rearing its ugly head. So the direct questions to you are: Are all women's sports stupid because any 15 year old boys team can beat a women's team in head to head competition? Should women receive no pay at all because U15 boys aren't paid? I certainly…
/r/MensRights12/11/23 04:32 PM
1

Perceived slight meaning everything in life that doesn't go your way. Not just football. To my knowledge no women are demanding equal pay from club teams. If there are I'd like to see the reference. The national team has a different argument. The men and women are employees of the same organization, US Soccer, performing the same tasks. All leave their clubs and families to travel to camps and competitions. All train the same. The women achieve more in their respective area. Here's an analogy fr…
/r/MensRights12/11/23 02:10 PM
1

No women are claiming that they should be paid as much by their club teams as the men are by their club teams. The women's argument applies to the USWNT only. The womens WC final had 82 million viewers according to FIFA which is almost Superbowl numbers. It's 5% of the mens final but still big bucks. You haven't applied any "feminist logic" to the U15 argument. The fact that men's and women's sports are separate for reasons of size, speed, and power is a GIVEN and has been for a century. Winning…
/r/MensRights11/11/23 01:23 PM
1

How much revenue and merch sales would the 15 yr old boys team generate? That's why it's a stupid comparison. It's apples and oranges. It's not a gotcha or a revelation at all. People want to see the best in class competing against each other. That's what's compelling. Is it really a surprise to some people that women love to compete and people like to see that? Men's and women's sports have always been separate for obvious reasons. That doesn't make their competitions any less intense or dramat…
/r/MensRights11/11/23 12:38 PM
-7

I'm not sure why you're celebrating this? The best U-15 boys team in the country beat them. Not just any U-15 boys. They were already bigger, stronger, and faster than the USWNT. Many of them would be competing for spots on the men's youth national U-18 team in a couple of years. So what's your conclusion? It's not misogynist to say that boys of that age are already bigger, stronger, and faster than adult women. What other conclusions do you want to state?
/r/MensRights10/11/23 07:08 PM
-1

Not going to help you, but there's a new drug being tested that prevents swimmers from swimming. In other words, your sperm can't make the trip to fertilize the egg. It's in mice studies right now. It'll be a while before it gets to human studies. That will turn the tables.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 12:55 PM
-1

No man can take out a squad of elite soldiers either. The hand to hand combat scene is a Hollywood device that is completely unrealistic no matter who the hero is.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 05:40 PM
1

I responded with salient facts about this guy and what he did. You, on the other hand are off in la-la land citing irrelevant details. Stick to the facts as reported. 1. He kissed her on the lips. They BOTH said he kissed her on the lips. 2. It wasn't consensual. 3. He lied about her giving consent. The fact that you interpret a video to be proof that there was no kiss is comical. The point has been decided by the participants already.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 04:56 PM
1

The video I saw shows a kiss on the lips. I watched the feed on Telemundo when it happened. Afterwards both participants described a kiss on the lips. Why do you think the scumbag said it was consensual? Does it make sense to ask for consent to NOT kiss her? Did you watch an edited FOX news video? Also, we're talking about this event. What someone else did has no bearing on this. Stay focused. Just because someone else does something wrong doesn't give permission for Rubiales to do something wro…
/r/MensRights30/08/23 04:49 PM
1

Both Rubiales and Jenni Hermoso (the one he kissed) said it was on the lips. What are you talking about? These are professional athletes. He's the President of their football association. He's supposed to have a PROFESSIONAL relationship with them. He's supposed to RESPECT them. Look at all of the other officials, men and women, up on the podium who are also congratulating the players. Any of them grabbing the players and lifting them off their feet and planting kisses? Nope. Also when the final…
/r/MensRights29/08/23 09:24 PM
1

Both Rubiales and Jenni Hermoso (the one he kissed) said it was on the lips. What are you talking about? These are professional athletes. He's the President of their football association. He's supposed to have a PROFESSIONAL relationship with them. He's supposed to RESPECT them. Look at all of the other officials, men and women, up on the podium who are also congratulating the players. Any of them grabbing the players and lifting them off their feet and planting kisses? Nope. Also when the final…
/r/MensRights29/08/23 09:23 PM
1

I agree. It's a universal feature of groups that coalesce around an idea. They band together to increase their voice, gain power, and apply that power. It applies to unions, corporations, the religious right, etc. In all cases there are members who are over the top. There's no single infallible personification of a group. Individuals have their own priorities within the group. It doesn't make sense to focus on the craziest member unless that member wields enormous influence. I don't see that hap…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 02:55 PM
1

If you spend enough time on the interwebs you'll see everything and you'll also see people agreeing with the dumbest things. Don't be distracted by the sideshow. Andrew Tate has lots of idiots hanging on his every word even though he spews the stupidest crap. Do rational adults bother with him? Nope. Should you give any energy to a claim that most men are rapists? Nope.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 11:51 PM
1

Yes, the rippling abs of Seth Rogan. Hollywood has long filled its pictures with unrealistic physical specimens of both sexes, but the women's roles are more often there as eye candy so it's harder to find an average looking woman than it is to find an average looking man. Let's face it, Hollywood loves the superhero genre with it's bad acting, lack of character development, and over reliance on action and CGI. If that's what you like then you're going to get rippling abs and fashion models. The…
/r/MensRights09/07/23 10:06 PM
-13

Any successful movement attracts fringe adherents who want to push the envelope and they are the ones who get most of the attention. For instance, BLM had roughly 23 million march participants in 2020 with 10,000 arrests for mostly low level incidents like failure to disburse. Only 5% of protests had any arrests. Only 3.7% of arrests had property damage. Yet some people believe that BLM burned down entire cities and that it's purpose is to assault white people and eliminate the police. I don't t…
/r/MensRights19/06/23 06:34 PM
1

I believe that marketing to women is based on the idea that appearing beautiful and youthful are the goal. It's a source of anxiety for them in a way that it isn't for men and manufacturers know that. With men, marketing focuses on functionality. Women get caught up in the pursuit of the latest and best beauty products which of course come at a premium. It's a youth obsessed culture that puts more pressure on women to appear youthful. I don't know if the simple blue three blade razor marketed to…
/r/MensRights07/06/23 09:08 PM
2

To be fair, are feminists any less versed in the "labor theory of value" than anyone else? It's a discredited 100 year old theory. You are implying that feminists are incapable of understanding it?
/r/MensRights07/06/23 08:38 PM
1

When someone claims that all feminists are radical feminists that's a counterproductive statement that should be opposed. My daughter is in a male dominated field. She faces discrimination based on her gender not her ability. Is it radical to believe that she should be treated equally?
/r/MensRights04/06/23 12:31 PM
1

Is heavy physical labor still necessary? Yes. Has most physical labor been eliminated by heavy machinery? Also yes. The fact that men provided the labor before machines became ubiquitous is beside the point. Women can use a joystick in heavy equipment. Women do physics. Women do engineering. Women can redesign the machines that require a man's strength to operate. They're only machines built to a specification. I've never read any Germaine Greer and I suspect the stuff about eliminating men is j…
/r/MensRights02/06/23 06:46 PM
0

Egalitarian? That's a dodge. Rights are denied to them because they're women. You want to say poor people and rich people have the same rights, that's egalitarian. But your dodge makes it easier to label all feminism as bad. How about female genital mutilation? Is opposing it egalitarian? Men don't have their penises amputated to prevent them from having sex for pleasure. It's a purely female issue.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 03:55 PM
0

Mainstream feminism is for equal treatment. Like any political movement the groups at the extreme are the ones that get more attention and move the needle more with respect to changing laws. Loud angry people get support even when they're unreasonable. It's why the Tea Party came to power even though they were batshit crazy in general. You're going to have to stick to the United States if you want to have a reasonable discussion. Feminism is different everywhere. In Pakistan it's just girls want…
/r/MensRights16/05/23 02:55 PM
0

Tell us how they differ.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 10:26 AM
-4

I'm not quoting anyone. Didn't Alek Minassian begin his "incel rebellion" and directly reference Supreme Gentleman Elliot Rodger before he killed 10 people? Didn't Facebook and YouTube have their hands full taking down Elliot Rodger tributes? These are my memories.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 04:44 PM
-7

And how many MRAs were sympathetic to Eliot Roger and fantasized about doing the same thing? I saw a fair amount of that online and I bet you did too. My point about that research article was that the poster listed a series of 6 or 7 bullet pointed "conclusions" that were purported to be from it and none of them were. It was 100% bullshit made up by someone who hates feminism. It was clumsily done and easy to refute but several people were gullible enough to buy it. If you're going to quote some…
/r/MensRights14/05/23 03:53 PM
-2

Not saying your comments are unreasonable. But you asked why the hate towards this sub? I think it's because MRAs have jumped on the anti-feminist anti-woman bandwagon that conservatives and evangelicals got rolling. Not all MRAs but some who regularly spew their venom here. It's unfair, but you get judged by the company you keep.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 03:32 PM
-12

Saying feminism is bad is a losing argument. It reminds me of MAGA morons longing for the pre-Civil Rights era. It was great for some and horrible for others. All of the changes in society have to be put in their historical perspective. Don't equate feminism with the worst thing you've heard a woman say or do. There are shitty people in every demographic group. Remember that people could equate MRAs with the worst thing one of them said or did. Would that be reasonable? The disinformation. There…
/r/MensRights14/05/23 02:07 PM
-1

I'd be interested in seeing the actual article by Osterloh and Rost that reaches those conclusions. Your provided links are just tabloid opinions based on who knows what? I found several papers written by the authors in researchgate.net. One that they collaborated on in 2020 might be the paper the tabloid is referencing. That paper contains none of the bulleted conclusions you list and I'll note that it's highly unlikely that an academic paper would be so broad and unfocused in its study. The bu…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 10:28 PM
4

In a population of 100 million one percent is a million. If you're searching for examples that's a decent population to pull from. Also, lower limb strength is where males and females are more equal. What is the same statistic for upper body strength where it's generally acknowledged that men are vastly superior? I think it's ironic that MRAs talk about how superior men are to women in traditionally male fields that require physical labor like construction. The women who break in to those physic…
/r/MensRights03/05/23 06:53 PM
5

Thank you for bringing the statistical evidence. People use anecdotal evidence to support a preconceived position and I wish people would see that for what it is.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 05:52 PM
1

It's something of a circular argument though. A role that anyone can perform is neither masculine nor feminine. And who says men don't take on "feminine roles"? Any competent adult should be able to cook or clean. We're not stupid. The fact that a guy may think he's "too alpha" to cook or clean just means he's incompetent.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 11:43 PM
14

Men circumcised as adults. Is that a population electing the procedure for religious reasons or AIDS prevention reasons? Religion could be a pretty strong motivator to minimize differences.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 05:48 PM
11

I use the term MGM advisedly because MRAs have chosen it and there is an argument for it. The practice of removing a functional body part which enhances the senses for no reason could be called mutilation. Yes, the penis still functions, but the sensitivity and therefore the pleasure is reduced. The foreskin is analogous to the clitoral hood and we know that the hood has a great bearing on the sensations felt in the clitoris. I agree with your conclusions about the studies. The WHO only recommen…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 05:26 PM
-7

There are some African cultures where the purpose of FGM is to make sex unpleasant. Not less pleasant. Unpleasant. The idea is that women who enjoy sex will have sexual relationships with many men and be harder to control and not make a subservient wife. The FGM in that case could be amputation of the clitoris or sewing the labia shut. MGM was supposedly a health issue. That has been debunked now.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 04:26 PM
-4

Jews don't think male circumcision at birth is cosmetic. It's part of their religion. That's going to be an interesting fight.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 04:17 PM
-4

The view that feminism wrecked society is problematic. Any movement taken to extremes causes problems. The basic goal of feminism is equality and it benefits everyone. Pre-feminist America was unfair to women the way pre-civil rights america was unfair to minorities (still is but that's another story). Balance is what's needed.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 03:17 PM
4

Technology means any labor replaced by a machine or a product. So washing machines, sewing machines, vacuum cleaners, refrigerators, central heating, prepackaged food, medicine, etc. Any product you can buy that replaces your manual labor in the home. The article points out how it used to require the labor of two adults to run a household. Now technology allows one adult to run a household and still have free time.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 11:53 AM
1

Did you read the article? It blames technology for reducing the hours of labor required to run a household which in turn allowed people to work outside the home. The labor supply has always been the same. The allocation of hours has gradually shifted from in the home to outside the home. I think it will continue to shift because technology is still automating household labor.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 11:48 AM
2

That article was pretty math heavy. I should have expected it from an economics researcher. The point of the article is that technology, not women's liberation is the driver behind the creation of single person households. Basically, it used to require work of two people to run a household because it required so much labor. Then technology (washing machines, ovens, micro waves, vacuum cleaners, preservatives, central heating, etc.) reduced the labor required which allowed people to work in the l…
/r/MensRights13/04/23 11:38 AM
-2

What do you think are the consequences of rejecting feminism in all forms and rejecting the "woke agenda"? ( By the way, woke is an African American term for awareness of biased policing that Rush Limbaugh, may he rot in hell, co-opted and used as a catch-all phrase for anything progressive so that people with barely functional gray matter could easily understand what they should be against. Talk about sheep). Anyway, I see MRAs becoming anti-liberal (correct me if I'm wrong) which in our two-pa…
/r/MensRights10/04/23 12:53 PM
0

Yeah, I saw them and rejected them for their stupidity. What a bunch of snowflakes. You're selling a product no one wants (the basis of capitalism - the free market) and you intend to rectify the situation by stupidest way possible - take away choice from women (the Republican way) until you don't seem that bad after all. Bottom line is that your feelings have been hurt. Nothing has been taken away from you except your sense of entitlement..
/r/MensRights10/04/23 11:46 AM
2

I read your complaint. It's an everything but the kitchen sink, the world is against us complaint. You are not every man. How have you personally been shamed?
/r/MensRights09/04/23 11:13 PM
-28

Maybe it's the online world and how everyone feels the need to share everything publicly, but if you aren't putting your preferences about superficial characteristics out there for all to read then there wouldn't be any shaming. Too many people think that their right to free speech means that they can shit on people without getting blowback. So just be tactful and avoid cruelty. My pet peeve is someone who's blunt and cruel and justified it by saying they believe in absolute honesty. Bullshit. A…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 10:52 PM
-32

Women are shamed all the time for unreasonable preferences. I don't know where you're looking but maybe if you're always hunting for shaming of men that's all you see . Neither preference is wrong. The big difference is the weight thing because you can start out 150 pounds and end up at 300 for a variety of reasons, some of which are beyond your control, so that puts the partner in a tough situation. The people who get shamed are the ones who have no compassion for their partner's situation. Pre…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 10:41 PM
-6

Just the fact that you use "woke" as a pejorative shows that you don't think for yourself.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 10:15 PM
-5

What your SPECIFIC complaint? Not the "woke communist liberal" rallying cry. Because a lot of people have general complaints that sound like they heard them at a rally or on a Christian radio station.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 10:14 PM
-26

Society is changing. All kinds of people who historically had the short end of the stick are speaking up. Just because they are making their feelings known doesn't mean men are losing out or being treated unfairly. I have three kids as well, two boys and a girl, all out of college now. They understand history and culture and why our society is where it is.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 09:57 PM
-60

I see shaming as a push back against unreasonable demands. That's the key isn't it? Demands. When you aren't owed anything but you demand it you just come across as a tool. That's where the shaming comes in. What you want isn't the same as what you are owed. I see today's GOP trying to push society back to the days of female subservience pre-WWII and it's not going to work. Either you pay attention to what the shaming really means or you live in a troglodyte fantasy bubble for the rest of your l…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 09:46 PM
-28

Sounds like you're really in your head on this. You obviously haven't been shamed for all those reasons so you're projecting. All of those preferences are fine to have but it's up to you to find a person who is that way instead of finding someone and then trying to turn them into that. But here's the thing. Anyone worth having is going to have their preferences as well. It's a two way street. If you both have some pretty specific preferences the odds are not with you that you find someone like t…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 09:14 PM
1

Some hires are based on the manager knowing someone already or some other factor not relevant to the job. So anything that removes the opportunity for partiality could be good. You may have been the best but they almost hired somebody's drinking buddy or brother in law who wasn't as good. You'll never know. I worked for an IT manager who changed companies every five years. He always hired his cronies from the last place he was at. Not because they were good, because he got them raises and they d…
/r/MensRights27/03/23 03:23 PM
0

Do you ever know if you're the best candidate? Job requirements are listed which include must haves and nice to haves and then you bring experience, enthusiasm, communication skills, and other intangibles into the mix. Assuming ALL candidates possess the NECESSARY COMPETENCY who's the best for the job? I've worked with plenty of "smartest guy in the room" types and they suck unless they also have the right personality to work in a team.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 02:51 PM
-1

She's not so bright. The biggest source of oppression is the plutocracy. This is still the richest country in the world and plutocrats are increasing their shares and making 99% of the population fight each other for scraps. Getting liberals to fight conservatives over wedge issues is how they maintain control. However, ALL THINGS BEING EQUAL, some groups are more oppressed. It's a statistical fact and anecdotal rebuttals make no sense. The data is there in traffic stops, arrests, incarcerations…
/r/MensRights19/03/23 07:09 PM
-10

As a man I'm sympathetic to your post but I do have to point out one thing that I think indicates that your perspective is a little off, at least from my vantage point. You say "women being universally oppressed by men from the drawn of time until feminism." That fails to recognize that a SYSTEM that bestows advantages on one group over another can reasonably be viewed as oppression. It doesn't require that men hate women or that its stated purpose is to favor men over women, only that they are …
/r/MensRights15/03/23 04:05 PM
0

Is he listed on her tax documents as a possession? Can she sell him to someone else? Can she kill him without repercussions? Enough with this slave shit! He is a party in a terrible business arrangement but he's not a slave.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 02:34 PM
11

There are a surprising number of women who think that they alone make the baby, as if the man's only contribution is "hitting the start button". It's based on a complete ignorance of genetics. That baby is half its father's genes even if it gets all of its support and food from the mother. I think this also explains how some women are surprised when the baby bears no resemblance to the husband but a strong resemblance to someone else. If the mom thinks this way then of course she's going to thin…
/r/MensRights07/12/22 03:31 PM
1

Keep in mind that she did her "pass as a man" experiment in 2006. Some headlines make it seem like it was last year. And she seemed to study mental illness rather closely, possibly because she suffered from clinical depression which is itself a risk factor for suicide.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 06:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter