TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SirNickClegg Archive

View 4 posts and 187 comments by SirNickClegg on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

https://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com/shaming-tactics/ And Karen Straughan did a great video on them. https://youtu.be/ymkwdf7XPKc So I’ll say it again. Sure thing buddy.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 08:09 AM
0

Sure thing buddy.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 07:20 AM
1

I don’t even fuckin know at this point. Must be past his damn bedtime.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 07:19 AM
0

Sure thing buddy. It’s everyone else who’s wrong, not you.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 07:14 AM
0

Every one of your replies only serves to prove my point further, and prove yourself unhinged and cranky. Oh and you shouldn’t be obsessed enough with internet points to think I’m cheating just because my comments are being upvoted and yours aren’t.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 07:09 AM
0

There you go again. Your entire sense of being stems from ad hominems, you have no actual beliefs or arguments. You live a sad life. But you bring it on yourself.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 06:59 AM
1

I’m very sorry your internet points are suffering. I god forbid did something feminists do Let’s not forget your first reply to me included an accusation of being just like the feminists. Shaming tactic: Charge of Irascibility (Code Red) Discussion: The target is accused of having anger management issues. Whatever negative emotions he has are assumed to be unjustifiable. Examples: “You’re bitter!” “You need to get over your anger at women.” “You are so negative!” Where you used it: Now calm down…
/r/MensRights21/12/18 06:21 AM
1

The other commenter is right, you seem to stick pretty close to that shaming tactic. One can disagree with whatever Your Manliness spews onto his keyboard and still be well within the “definition” of a man.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 05:51 AM
1

Anecdotes don’t even come close to the empirical evidence that men are treated orders of magnitude harsher than women in the justice system. Some countries even give women their own sentencing system. It’s not about the outliers, it’s about the standards. You can understand that empirical evidence trumps anecdotes, right? To me, not understanding that basic fact makes you more similar to feminists than anyone else here. No offense.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 05:25 AM
1

rioting against women It has absolutely fucking nothing to do with “women” and everything to do with the double standards in the legal system. You think a judge gives a flying fuck if a 14 year old girl consented? Because the perp is female and the victim is male, people say he “wanted it” and demand nuance about the age of consent. Flip the genders and people want the man hanged.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 05:03 AM
7

Because men are supposed to work themselves to death or kill themselves purposefully to please women. If men aren’t dying at work or killing themselves, that’s evidence men are living well happily, and men are only truly happy when women are oppressed. ...or some feminist bullshit like that.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 06:57 AM
21

Biblical circumcision didn’t remove enough skin for it to possibly be considered more hygienic. It was only about a centimeter of skin removed. It never had anything to do with hygiene. Cutting baby penises was first a blood sacrifice in the place of sacrificing an entire life, then was about preventing masturbation (which it clearly does not) and now is just about making doctors money and the removed foreskins are used in some women’s facial products. Talk about objectification. TL;DR circumcis…
/r/MGTOW18/12/18 10:40 PM
14

All three of you are fucking retarded. Guarantee none of you would be looking to fight anyone from outside the safety of your keyboards.
/r/MGTOW18/12/18 04:17 PM
8

/r/IAmVeryBadAss
/r/MGTOW18/12/18 03:42 PM
13

She’ll just say “you must be a virgin” and everyone will flock to her side and she’ll think she was right.
/r/MGTOW15/12/18 03:01 PM
2

Leftism was about workers as a class uniting despite any biological or social differences. Now they would like nothing more than to divide us by sex, race, sexual orientation, religion and more.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 03:35 PM
1

210 pounds, Jesus!
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 04:05 AM
2

As someone who’s still in education, all methodology is becoming less and less important. I’ve had multiple professors completely baffled as to why I would question results when questions were phrased dubiously, or ask to review the methodology before drawing conclusions.
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 04:03 AM
3

Years? Try hours.
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 03:58 AM
2

We must rise up against kids with leukemia
/r/MensRights10/12/18 03:42 PM
1

Grade four is a little too young for reddit.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 06:44 PM
1

Buddy, what grade are you in?
/r/MensRights08/12/18 06:24 PM
1

It has nothing to do with trolling you. My comment was clear in the first place, you just didn’t bother trying to understand it. So when you told me how you’d like it clarified, I did exactly what you asked me to do. It’s not my fault you can’t follow the conversation, and I would suggest you try reading it again to see if that helps. Have a nice day!
/r/MensRights08/12/18 06:09 PM
7

It’s really not my fault that you can’t tell which of your points I’m responding to. It’s self-explanatory not only in the first sentence but the first couple words.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 05:55 PM
6

Sure. I disagree with this point because when suits became popular for work, they were popular for every occasion because they were status symbols in a status-obsessed world. Not wearing one would not have been seen as informal, it would have been seen as crass and silly. Fast forward to today, suits are just seen as more formal regular clothes and not wearing one is no big deal. But there is no reason why women’s dress codes allow for markedly less formal, more comfortable clothes meanwhile soc…
/r/MensRights08/12/18 05:20 PM
1

Number 3 ain’t bad tho 👀 At least wearing whatever that compression short type thing is
/r/MensRights08/12/18 03:46 PM
22

When suits became popular for work, they were popular for every occasion because they were status symbols in a status-obsessed world. Not wearing one would not have been seen as informal, it would have been seen as crass and silly. Fast forward to today, suits are just seen as more formal regular clothes and not wearing one is no big deal. But there is no reason why women’s dress codes allow for markedly less formal, more comfortable clothes meanwhile society takes seriously the complaints that …
/r/MensRights08/12/18 03:42 PM
11

He’s just a friend!
/r/MGTOW06/12/18 06:15 PM
6

Well I make $0000000000000000001 per year so I should be all set income-wise
/r/MGTOW06/12/18 03:50 PM
7

I’ve found just using “n” in place of “and” is a red flag in women
/r/MGTOW06/12/18 03:47 PM
7

To be fair most of the countries with female leaders aren’t doing so great. It’s almost like electing genitals instead of policies isn’t a great idea.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 05:01 PM
8

She really doesn’t have any redeeming qualities. She’s even rude to her fans but they just take it because she has already claimed some kind of divine royalty status.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 04:32 AM
72

The celebrity worship of Beyoncé is beyond retarded. She can do no wrong in the eyes of many, many women.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 10:34 PM
7

Remember, using a female-gendered word to describe something good (feminism = equality) is good. Using a male-gendered word to describe something good (fireman = brave, strong etc) is bad. Using male-gendered words to describe something bad (patriarchy = backwards, anti-equality, sexism) is good.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 06:49 PM
5

Every gym or rec center I’ve been to with three lockers, in practice the men’s was family, and the family and women’s were women’s.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:56 PM
5

Husband, boyfriend, orbiter, financial submissive, and sugar daddy*
/r/MensRights26/11/18 09:06 AM
4

I like the equal treatment stemming from it but honestly each person evading taxes is just another step in the right direction. Want real change from the government? Stop giving them your money.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 09:04 AM
3

Taxes pay for hospitals Not in the US, where most reddit users are located. And one can be opposed to taxes while viewing them as a necessary evil that should be kept minimized, pretty much to what you mentioned: roads, cops, fire, schools and some would include a defense force.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 09:03 AM
13

It’s not our fault that third world countries don’t have toilets to be discriminatory with
/r/MensRights25/11/18 04:04 AM
2

But it really is women we shouldn’t trust with kids... you may disagree with the tone but it’s 100% verifiable fact that women hit and kill children more.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 04:01 AM
7

If women are so good at multitasking why do they think being a stay at home mom is the world’s hardest job? They can’t even do one thing at once without feeling overwhelmed lmao
/r/MensRights22/11/18 08:00 PM
6

They understand the concept of supply and demand. They supply pussy. They get money, favors and nice stuff in return. Men supply, women demand. FTFY
/r/MGTOW22/11/18 03:49 AM
8

I used to work for a Verizon retailer and I would have this interaction almost daily with dumb broads: Me: Hey these phones these days are all glass so you should definitely put a case on it. Even if you don’t get it here it will save it, I guarantee it. Her: No, cases are rip offs. Me: Well the phones are slippery without one. Are you sure you don’t want a case? Her: Yes I’m not going to be ripped off by a [some variation of dumb retail worker]. Me: Okay, duly noted. leaves a comment in her acc…
/r/MGTOW22/11/18 03:46 AM
2

It’s a loading screen tip. “Not all women are bad... Eating food can replenish your health...” and so on
/r/MGTOW21/11/18 06:02 PM
7

Oh, you’re talking about Android. Incidentally, that’s something else you shouldn’t use if you’re trying to avoid Google.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 10:36 PM
55

It’s projection. They always assume men are fucking everything in sight, because they’re fucking everything in sight.
/r/MGTOW19/11/18 10:26 PM
4

Don’t celebrate too soon folks. A bunch of the tweets in there are denigrating men, one goes so far as to even talk about the problems “women face because of men.” One asks about “unlocking men’s ability to care,” as if men don’t already care. And of course, many, many mentions of “toxic masculinity” as if it’s a. Real b. All men that suffer it.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 09:57 PM
8

Er... you probably shouldn’t use chrome if you’re trying to avoid google.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 08:40 PM
1

You have a childish and idyllic view of how things work. Not everything you heard last year in your second grade history class is true. The constitution has been shit on for more than a century and a half.
/r/MGTOW19/11/18 04:21 PM
3

Venmo is fine to pay people back when you borrowed money, not great for paying for actual products or services.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/18 01:20 AM
15

The right to vote gives 51% of the population to send men with guns to strongarm 49% of the population to follow the majority—ever so slight—in whatever they want.
/r/MGTOW18/11/18 07:30 PM
3

It’s fine man, you’re allowed to have your own views. The words you used are indicative of those views. Just don’t pretend you meant to say something that was the exact opposite of what you said. I mean you literally claimed you were trying to acknowledge the reality of the trenches when you said NOTHING about the men actually at war. Just give it a rest.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 03:54 PM
6

Let me show you what you wrote because clearly you don’t remember what you said. “This image could also speak to the heartache faced by millions of women who had to send their sons, husbands, and brothers to war. That required putting the national interest above the personal, despite not knowing how you'll survive. Yes, yes, male disposability etc, but this image can be heartbreaking regardless of gender or even how society can treat men during a time of war.” Only the bolded phrase can even be …
/r/MensRights15/11/18 03:38 PM
23

“What about the wahmen” is so ingrained in our social fabric that even some here fall into that trap. Flippantly saying “yes, yes, male disposability” as if it (and the actual destruction of men) should be an afterthought to women’s feelings being hurt by men dying. Like, how about we prioritize the death and then loop back to the feelings part.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 06:33 AM
7

Horse in Suit becomes 2020 front-runner instantly
/r/MensRights13/11/18 10:12 PM
14

women have had it for 1000s surely you can put up with it Something tells me her attitude would be very different if the conversation was about ending the draft for men but creating a new one for women. Come on honey, men have been sent to die for thousands of years, surely you’ll be fine with it!
/r/MensRights12/11/18 05:24 AM
17

51% male = sexist 100% female = diverse Same shit, different asshole.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 04:41 AM
4

And charged with perjury
/r/MensRights04/11/18 03:23 AM
13

Social media just exposes it and gives them avenues to act it out
/r/MGTOW01/11/18 06:43 AM
5

Dumb meme. Women were always the way they are
/r/MGTOW01/11/18 06:17 AM
7

Don’t think most women really understand penises. A six inch dick is bigger than 68% of guys. 7 inches jumps to bigger than 96% of guys. 8 inches is 99th percentile or higher. A lie or two from guys and gossip among girls has them convinced average is 10 inches
/r/MGTOW01/11/18 06:07 AM
12

They are sooooo afraid of not being able to provide or withhold anything, and it is fucking delicious. They like their whole “men are obsolete” thing but it’s more accurate to say women are quickly becoming obsolete.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 01:59 AM
2

Sorry your mangina makes you nag other men about their weight
/r/MGTOW28/10/18 10:36 AM
5

You’re not as fat as they’re making you out to be anyway. MGTOW is about not being nagged, not about being nagged by men online.
/r/MGTOW28/10/18 10:35 AM
29

It’s also an example of most people forgetting that fathers are even parents
/r/MensRights28/10/18 07:34 AM
1

It’s not so much due to the fact that there are women only grants, it’s due to the fact that discrimination against men doesn’t hold any legal weight, and discrimination against women does. And if you say “we are discriminating against women and here’s why,” you’re admitting to it before a suit is even brought.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 01:00 PM
29

Ariana Grande is a piece of shit, a diva, and an air head.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 05:12 AM
1

That would almost certainly accelerate any lawsuits, and it would likely transform from negligence to intentional discrimination.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 12:50 PM
10

I don’t know about that. I think it’s more that they know they can’t replace the mother if he lives with the mother.
/r/MGTOW22/10/18 12:34 PM
13

Definitely adoption. Kids with single moms are so disadvantaged. I can only imagine how shit their life would be with two single moms.
/r/MGTOW22/10/18 07:17 AM
18

pasty ass senile old guys Seems like someone is racist, sexist, and ageist! Nice!
/r/MensRights29/09/18 07:52 PM
10

Only if it’s for actual nefarious reasons. You never see a stripper get arrested for dressing like a cop.
/r/MGTOW23/09/18 03:33 PM
3

Regardless of roid rage I think men just have the capability of getting their tempers back under control quicker.
/r/MGTOW12/09/18 03:09 PM
2

Even in a case like Tom Brady, who knows it would take some serious shit for him to get ejected, knows when to stop screaming at a ref. And trust me I get it, all referees are assholes. All athletes will know that. But you gotta quit while you’re ahead. She flipped her shit, screamed at the ref for a good 30 seconds, then came back for more. Not to mention she ruined the trophy ceremony for the other woman. It’s a total lack of class.
/r/MGTOW12/09/18 02:52 PM
1

I went to Cornell. Ever heard of it?
/r/MensRights01/09/18 02:46 PM
7

A program is 51% male: "institutional sexism!" A program is 100% female: "it's diversity! lulz male tears much?"
/r/MensRights01/09/18 02:45 PM
9

Its counter trolling
/r/MensRights07/08/18 11:18 PM
14

You’re looking at the workspace thing wrong. The military and some police departments require shaving. That’s government mandated shaving, only for men, so it’s a tax only men have to pay.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:20 PM
1

Lil Peep was poisoned as others said. A supposed “friend” of his sold him laced Xanax.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 10:25 PM
34

Now watch this drive.
/r/MGTOW20/07/18 02:07 PM
8

Ironic. He could save others from grammatical errors, but not himself.
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 02:28 AM
3

Britain, aka Cuck Kingdom
/r/MGTOW04/07/18 06:28 PM
14

If you really want to make something happen, complain to HR that men are being excluded from free food. It’s illegal to compensate workers differently based on sex or gender, and food is definitely compensation.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 05:13 AM
24

Frankly it’s one less thing for the state to steal your money over. I wish I could get rid of my car and use public transportation or ride a bike, but it’s just not feasible for my situation.
/r/MGTOW20/06/18 06:21 PM
2

Only incels say “cope” over and over. Don’t even bother with it
/r/MGTOW14/06/18 04:53 PM
0

I want to be the breadwinner No. It’s fine if you want to work and to make money. But NEVER, never call yourself the “breadwinner” to your husband.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 02:58 AM
0

Uh... your meltdown aside, it’s pretty obvious he meant he got someone to post it from their own account.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 02:52 AM
8

What?
/r/MensRights03/06/18 12:52 AM
4

You are such a fucking simple child. Every time the media clearly ignores actual bad shit happening to men and their children or has a clear double standard in reporting it, some little twerp like you comes along with their fingers in their ears yelling that it doesn’t prove anything. It’s almost as if you blatantly ignore evidence that proves your feminist worldview wrong for no reason other than you fear being wrong.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 01:52 PM
6

You people are honestly extremely retarded sometimes. You come on a men’s rights subreddit and get upset that we give a shit about fathers who are, as usual, forgotten by the mainstream media. He made a conscious choice to say “mothers” instead of “parents.”
/r/MensRights29/05/18 12:08 PM
14

That’s my point, retard. He specified mothers when it happens to fathers who are foreign and natural born citizens every fucking day and no one bats an eye. Fuck off with your dumbass virtue signaling.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 09:05 PM
22

No, he’s ridiculing the hypocritical little cunt who only cares when it happens to “the WAHMEN” despite it being the norm when it happens to men.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 08:59 PM
51

Holding women accountable for their actions is sexist
/r/MensRights25/05/18 03:16 PM
2

A growing population and a sustainable population are two very, very different things. Just because they spend all their time fucking and popping babies out doesn’t mean all, or even most, will survive. Edit: A couple dumb little cunts in here seem to think Africa is thriving because they have a high birth rate. Wrong. Africa has a high birth rate precisely because of their low development and poor education. Africa is a fucking shithole. Stop trying to delude yourselves into thinking Africa is …
/r/MGTOW19/05/18 04:21 AM
3

There is definitely a real subset of women who are big and attractive. However, every fatass woman thinks she’s one of them
/r/MGTOW18/05/18 02:35 PM
3

Even as someone who’s vehemently against retaliatory violence (except to end a direct threat to someone’s safety) can’t you see that “violent people need to be killed” is not the same thing as “angry people should be allowed to attack others if they’re justifiably angry?”
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:51 PM
4

That way he can get expelled for sexual assault for walking into the women’s rest room
/r/MensRights14/05/18 10:01 PM
12

More like she demands he stopped eating the Cheetos and is then upset he’s not the man she married so she cheats
/r/MensRights13/05/18 09:11 PM
23

A guy doesn’t even have to react to his cheating wife to be blamed for her cheating and called an asshole
/r/MensRights13/05/18 08:56 PM
17

That’s my favorite part though, they deserve to showboat on these cheating whores
/r/MGTOW13/05/18 08:40 PM
12

-people who get offended when a guy’s only requirement is less than 300 pounds
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:38 PM
2

I like when retards get into this back and forth on reddit. “You can’t read.” “No, YOU can’t read! You don’t even understand what you wrote!” “No, you read it again.”
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:37 PM
5

Don’t know why you’re being downvoted. You’re totally right. Every wave of feminism has fought for these things.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:25 PM
6

I initially read it as 'child molesters' and was...skeptical Well, I mean, yeah. When women take advantage of children the media calls it a sex romp, accuses the child of seducing the woman, tells the child they're lucky, or gives them a "comedy" show.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 09:25 PM
1

Most people aren't moderates, it's just that "extremes" are presented as negatively as possible, i.e., far-right = Nazi & far-left = Stalinist.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:43 PM
1

Nice middle ground fallacy, bruv.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:05 PM
10

The Army is just the Boy Scouts with more cleaning and less shooting
/r/MensRights02/05/18 06:57 PM
8

I disagree. If you concede the idea that real feminists are all about equality, you lost the argument around the fact that the feminists who get results are the most radical misandrists. By the end of any prolonged debate with a feminist the goal should be to get them to question feminism itself, or to even shed the label entirely.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 12:21 AM
20

Seems like you're the snowflake, having a meltdown just because someone posted something you disagree with.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:34 PM
1

Yeah, no. It never should be used. Unless we're gonna start saying women who think they shouldn't have to do things because they're women are cuntfused or call bad driving womandriving, mansplaining has no use.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 06:25 PM
1

TURN YOUR DAMN HEARING AIDS ON GRANDPA
/r/MensRights24/04/18 06:33 AM
1

No matter how much you try you'll never be as edgy as you think you are. I'm an atheist but redditors think being anti-Christian is the true marker of intelligence. You're a midwit at best
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 04:53 AM
1

Not being a Christian is the least brave thing you can do. The entire religion is based around loving your enemies and turning the other cheek. You're not edgy
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 04:42 AM
2

VERY CAREFULLY
/r/MensRights24/04/18 02:51 AM
18

Someone who lost their penis and wants to feel whole again, according to the soldier who received the transplant.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 02:46 AM
2

Very carefully.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 02:45 AM
2

Hygiene for them is different. They spend a ton of time grooming and use a million different products. In reality though one bar of soap OR one body wash AND shampoo is enough for a guy. Conditioning our hair isn't important because it's not long (for the most part. Guys with long hair typically condition). That's it though. On her previous videos and Twitter she's outright said that the reason men don't use a ton of different products is because we are just too stupid too.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 02:52 PM
25

Could do without the whole "men are too stupidly utilitarian to wash themselves properly" trope from her though. Men pay less for hygiene products because we haven't fallen for the lie that you need a separate soap for each skin cell, not because we don't shower.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:37 AM
3

I don't mean to discourage you but this is New York we're talking about. Unless your state Senator is a Republican, your letter probably will just be passed around the office by staffers and laughed at. And even if the Senator is Republican I don't like your chances for getting a supportive response. But purely based on the wording of the rule, you do have a case.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:35 PM
21

Exactly. The only difference between yesterday and today is that men and masculinity used to be celebrated. Now it is shamed, but if men do not provide for women they are also shamed.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 07:46 PM
2

Because they don't just want different treatment, or equal treatment. If it's anything less than leagues-better treatment, they're up in arms. Same with feminists.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 10:44 PM
6

United Kaliphate.
/r/MGTOW11/04/18 03:01 PM
28

One word: tingles. If it gives them tingles it must be good. Hence their love for 50 Shades, the story of which is incredibly rapey if the main character isn't hot.
/r/MGTOW11/04/18 02:56 PM
4

To be fair he doesn't go back to his "job" because his wife was killed, he goes back because his dog is killed and his car is stolen. At least he's got his priorities right
/r/MGTOW11/04/18 04:15 AM
2

Nobody is naturally fat. And skinny fat is a term made up by feminist fat activists to downplay their fatness.
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 03:44 AM
3

Everything positive associated with men needs to be made gender neutral, everything negative that's gender neutral needs to be associated with men, and only good things can be associated with women
/r/MensRights02/04/18 01:02 AM
-1

Wrong. You need the mother's permission. Circumventing this in any way is illegal.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 12:44 AM
1

The sad thing is she still only gets partway there. "When men make these points they're called sexist and when women make them they say we're suffering internalized misogyny," she says. Well yeah, but it's feminists who say those things. Feminists shame women for choosing a family. Yet she still identifies as one. Edit: And she also pushes for more subsidies for women's health, despite the fact that men are still dying younger than women.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 10:36 PM
1

I did, only showed German.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 10:27 PM
1

I don't see any English subtitles on that video, is there another source?
/r/MensRights29/03/18 06:35 PM
47

Because they're boys. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 02:07 AM
1

You've never heard of someone saying something they don't truly believe? Well, okay then... But no, they say, essentially, that they don't find men attractive but women are all perfect beautiful angels which is proven incorrect by the fact that they date men. Which seems to point to them just saying those things to body shame men. As my post said.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 08:28 PM
8

Well that's a pretty backwards way of looking at things. Women enjoy sex just as much as men and men are just as capable of genuine love as women. This trash doesn't have a spot on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:42 AM
6

Well that's good to read! This post was prompted by a few girls in a group I was out with saying the type of thing I laid out in my post. I'd definitely be glad to learn my anecdote is not reflected by the empirical.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 09:44 PM
4

Glad I'm not the only one with this experience. Went to a doctor with abdominal pain. She said I likely pulled a muscle at football practice and that I just have to grin and bear it. Football season ended two weeks prior. Turns out, I had internal bleeding. I almost died. Ninja edit: I mean, I'm not glad other people had this experience, I'm glad I'm not crazy and complaining about things that don't happen.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 04:54 PM
11

Except the first feminists got the right to vote and actively campaigned to keep the draft but exempt women from it, and the second feminists fought for the Duluth model, plus an alimony model that says the wife's property is hers but the husband's property is joint, put women in the workforce but designed default mother custody, and fought for longer male sentencing for crime.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 03:08 PM
7

not all of us study sociology so you may need a moment to understand what I meant /r/iamverysmart
/r/MensRights23/03/18 02:58 PM
24

STOP BLAMING MEN FOR MALE SUFFERING. I have never had another man mock my depression. Other guys are always there for me. I had female friends literally end their friendship with me over it.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 02:57 PM
1

Ah well, I totally missed that.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 07:16 PM
3

I think women making 2¢ less isn't because they don't ask for raises, it's because they low-ball when they're first hired. For example in one of my recent jobs I was talking with my girlfriend, and said that the hourly wage was negotiable. I looked up what someone in my job in a salaried role makes, figured out the hours I would work in a year, and it came out to about $21 an hour. My girlfriend said I would be asking for too much if I said that as my starting point, and that I should shoot more…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 04:20 PM
0

No, they'd just want all women forever and always to be celebrated for the one female war, while men are still overlooked for their sacrifices in literally every other war.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 02:54 PM
2

Prenups don't just not count for the Royals. Prenups are not legally enforced in the UK, period. It is unwise for him to get her to sign one, and serves no purpose other than putting him on the receiving end of purposeless controversy driven by feminists.
/r/MGTOW20/03/18 05:18 AM
6

I've said to my feminist friend before - I'm sure you can imagine it went over extremely well and changed her mind thoroughly - that if you want to know how life is for men in general, imagine life for a black man, and make it 10-20% better.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 02:28 AM
7

And die years earlier and have that whole issue be ignored by everyone in medicine! Yay!
/r/MensRights18/03/18 06:13 PM
17

100% of babies are mutilated in all circumcisions.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 04:54 PM
10

Still though, I just don't understand someone finding it more difficult to drive an automatic over a manual. It's like saying "I don't know how to light a fire with matches, I need two stones!"
/r/MGTOW16/03/18 06:21 PM
10

Not all cars have that but regardless it's easier to drive automatic even if you learned in a manual. That is the point of an automatic, the ease of use.
/r/MGTOW16/03/18 03:37 PM
9

Almost all infants murdered (I cannot stress this enough: INFANTS, not unborn children) are killed by mothers as well. I'm just wondering how long it will be until feminists push for the right to murder their already born children too, because abortion just isn't enough.
/r/MGTOW06/03/18 07:53 PM
3

I wish you wouldn't look at it as if I'm "shitting on" OP. I'm really not. I do think it's quite unfortunate that men face such vitriol that "hey, let's tone down the vitriol a little because it harms our message" is adequate support on men's issues for OP. It's not good enough for me. Emma Watson saying "men are dumb because they think feminism is bad, and good men are feminists" is NOT good enough. Some blogger saying women hurt their own image when they tear into men is NOT good enough. A dif…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 07:19 PM
6

Honestly you're not going to find a whole lot of women who defend men. A lot of articles in your post are saying that feminists shouldn't shame men because it harms the feminist image, when the reality is feminists shouldn't shame men because men are people.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 06:19 PM
10

That Emma Watson video isn't even about feminists shaming men. It's literally shaming men for pointing out that feminists shame men. Honestly most of your post is kind of trash but that one takes the cake.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:22 PM
7

I'm super cereal
/r/MGTOW02/03/18 08:04 PM
3

Seriously.
/r/MGTOW02/03/18 07:12 PM
28

Don't forget, Twitter feminists said the bird was sexist because he kept pursuing "someone" who wasn't into the advance. I wish I was making that up.
/r/MGTOW02/03/18 03:26 PM
5

Hold the parents and the doctor accountable. If they get the procedure, it should be a criminal penalty, if it's a botched procedure the penalty should be more severe. Maybe we need to start putting parents, who ask for the procedure outside of absolute necessity, on the sex offender registry or their country's equivalent.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 04:35 PM
17

Legally, I don't believe grants from Twitch count as employment, so the company has found a grey area to "pay women more" or only hire women while, on a technicality, be perfectly within the law.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:59 PM
1

Think about the common trope that you even see on Reddit. "I didn't care when the fleshed out, attractive, intelligent, useful, funny, heroic man died in the movie, but I cried when the dog died."
/r/MensRights18/02/18 01:44 AM
1

You posted a tweet that says the literal words "boys are broken" and said you agreed with it. Is that still your view?
/r/MensRights16/02/18 12:43 AM
6

Nah, this shit always suggests that men want to be a certain way and society reinforces it. In reality, men want to be nice people but society causes an incredibly small minority of men to lash out (the rest just becoming depressed and unhealthy).
/r/MensRights16/02/18 12:33 AM
23

No no no. No, no. This is all wrong. MEN are not the problem. BOYS are not the problem. The problem is that this country only has three settings when discussing mental health in general: disdain, punchline, or glamorization (in the media). This is further restricted to only disdain and making a punchline out of men's mental health. Society does nothing but tell men they're inherently violent, they're predators in waiting, most men never hear a single word of encouragement (and when they do succe…
/r/MensRights15/02/18 09:27 PM
1

You don't have milk in your heart?
/r/MensRights13/02/18 02:53 AM
7

You're worse than ISIS Whoa whoa whoa! You're suggesting ISIS is bad, when they're actually a progressive feminist organization (according to intersectional feminism).
/r/MensRights11/02/18 04:30 PM
42

Honestly sometimes the pets piss me off more than the kids in breakups (not that I've gone through any breakups involving kids or pets for that matter). But shit, you grow attached to these animals and they grow attached to you, and you might literally never see them again. And there's no point where a pet comes of age and you can see them and explain what happened, why "you left." With kids at least you can talk to them and maybe they'll understand and you can have a relationship with your kids…
/r/MGTOW10/02/18 05:27 PM
8

Well men certainly aren't people, for goodness sake. They are machines with two settings, "oppress" or "serve."
/r/MensRights10/02/18 06:22 AM
16

Those things may all be true, but have you ever ridden a bus and seen a man spread his legs to make room for his oppression rod and privilege jewels? It is truly a grotesque act which permisses, nay, DEMANDS men be faced with the societal repurcussions you detailed.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 06:09 AM
20

Well it's worse you see because uh, well it's worse because you're a bigoted male and women deserve agency
/r/MensRights09/02/18 09:36 PM
5

What the fuck, really? That's awful.
/r/MGTOW09/02/18 07:28 PM
1

The media reflects the culture, not the other way around.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 04:01 AM
5

Anal sex and blowjobs were around before porn, it's just a shame the knowledge was lost between the Greeks and when you were conceived, maybe then the world would have one less moron. Anal sex and BDSM predate porn. Erotic literature with anal sex and BDSM predate porn. It's not that it is widespread or ever was. You're trying to act like porn literally invented anal sex and BDSM which is absolutely demonstrably false. I'm not mad at you, I'm just disappointed.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 12:06 AM
1

again Implying women have a first time
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 08:59 PM
1

Man, a dude doesn't even have to earn less or get fat or be worse in bed for women to justify not being attracted to him anymore. He doesn't have to change at all and women would say, well if she's not attracted to you that's tough shit. The world is extremely gynocentric.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 08:54 PM
5

Yeah because your teacher didn't say, in a classroom setting, girls suck dick and take it up the ass – that means it didn't happen. Moron.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 08:34 PM
12

BDSM has been around before porn. The Greeks had anal sex before the fucking Bible was written. Fuck off with your bullshit.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 08:32 PM
3

The feminists that come in this sub like you are always pants on head retarded. Relationships are supposed to be sexually fulfilling for both partners. A healthy sex life is so extremely important to a relationship that some psychologists argue it's more important than the romantic/emotional side of relationships. If a man or a woman feel they are not fulfilled in their relationship FOR ANY REASON and decide that reason is enough to break off the relationship, that is their choice to make. They …
/r/MensRights08/02/18 08:30 PM
10

They're better than men at everything except for the fact that they're worse at everything. Save manipulation perhaps.
/r/MGTOW06/02/18 07:55 AM
6

Depends on where you live. In some countries and states, no. In others, definitely no.
/r/MGTOW06/02/18 07:38 AM
23

She's probably fucking the "ex best friend" or even his brother. No woman could get my relationship with my brother to falter on words alone.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 10:14 PM
8

Except conspiracy theorists are the ones who'd say "I don't need to address the arguments of round earthers when I already know the Earth is flat," because they, like you, don't have facts on their side.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:29 PM
6

None of what I said is a conspiracy theory, just readily available fact.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:23 PM
5

You're still not responding to my points.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:19 PM
4

Except you addressed my conclusion, not my premises, which, again, shows you don't have an argument. Feminists were responsible for fighting for the right to vote without the responsibility of draft registration. Some intellectually honest feminists were for women's suffrage and for ending the draft outright. However, a majority of feminists were for the draft for men, and even went on public shaming campaigns designed to get non-draftees to enlist. For example, UK feminists pinned white flowers…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:12 PM
7

You didn't address a single thing I said which shows you don't actually have an argument.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:40 PM
2

Because some people in this sub are feminist apologists even though feminism has always been harmful to men, from demanding the vote without being required to register for the draft to demanding unequal custody to demanding our current domestic violence model to demanding oppressive alimony and child support laws to demanding campuses teach toxic masculinity as a real thing... The list goes on and on but some people in this sub just are very blind to it.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:17 PM
44

Women are statistically more vulnerable to battery What? Men are the majority of victims of all violent crimes that aren't rape.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 08:28 PM
15

Can't insult something that doesn't exist. /u/kittypadding explicitly mentioned not only first world but the exact country they're talking about when they mentioned the USA.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 05:47 AM
3

Was thinking the same thing. To a judge that's basically the same as chaining her outside naked during a blizzard
/r/MGTOW15/01/18 06:54 AM
20

You're fucking stupid. Men HAVE to register for the draft for all of the following: Driving, student aid, any form of state issued I.D., voting
/r/MGTOW14/01/18 10:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter