| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Feminism is CANCERIf we aren't all enlightened like you, perhaps what there is to learn is exactly what those falsehoods are. Then they can be defeated. | /r/TheRedPill | 24/04/18 07:36 PM |
| 2 | Awareness: The Solution to Every Problem That You HaveA thought comes. Observe it, acknowledge it. Then let it pass by without judgement and refocus on your breath. At first it's a flurry of thoughts, but over time they will come less often. Eventually you'll know your quiet awareness. | /r/TheRedPill | 14/12/17 11:02 PM |
| 1 | A rejection of spirituality. The nihilist's take.Always glad to reach another person. Curiosity means you see the edge of a void and you wonder what might be inside. I honestly do not believe in a higher consciousness. I merely used the example of why nature might be seen as such to highlight how others think who do believe that way of thinking. I believe in the existence of a thing called Dao that gives rise to the order to the world and is the "agent" deciding the consensus of reality. Sadly, due to the nature of such a thing, it is impossib… | /r/TheRedPill | 22/01/16 02:28 AM |
| 1 | A rejection of spirituality. The nihilist's take.Regarding your definition of "spirituality" is the main reason I commented, and I decided to comment to try and show you another facet of spirituality that doesn't have to be in conflict with logic, that can be well aligned with RP ideals. I am a long-practicing Daoist, working in mindfulness practice. From my perspective, the spirit is that in things which "does" and the body is that in things which "are". Anything you think, observe, remember, or direct would be the body. The thing that does a… | /r/TheRedPill | 22/01/16 01:57 AM |
| 1 | A rejection of spirituality. The nihilist's take.I don't fully understand, but I'd like to. I agree with a lot of what you're saying. I think life has no meaning other than the meanings humans decide to derive, and even that meaning is tenuous and unreliable. Here's where I have a gap in trying to use logic as a basis for substantiating beliefs: We use words to convey meaning, but for the meaning to be delivered it needs a messenger. The understanding the recipient of words has of those words defines the meaning they glean from you. It's not a… | /r/TheRedPill | 22/01/16 12:34 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter