TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SirSourPuss Archive

View 1 post and 91 comments by SirSourPuss on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

SirSourPuss/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/20 08:06 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Identity politics. People who are more interested in choosing one aspect of their lives and building a tribal identity around it than improving their lives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 09:59 PM
2

Why is ct in the thumbnail? Because dudes rock?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 07:47 PM
0

It's idpol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 07:44 PM
5

That's because his hand is forced. His advice is on point, genuine and more beneficial to men than anything else online at this level of accessibility. If the fact that he occasionally has to virtue signal or make an acknowledgement makes you believe he's any less valuable to men (or that this is even worth pointing out in this thread) then you need to start treating your idpol brainrot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 07:43 PM
5

On the flipside, a man needs a woman like a fish needs an aquarium.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/25 12:04 PM
2

Ideological cross-dressing party
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/23 05:16 AM
1

You can disagree with the argument that was presented. Some I agree with, some I disagree with, and most of it is focusing more on being sound debate-tier arguments rather than arguments produced with scientific rigour (which is what it ought to be in order to be an application of Marxist theory). I don't disagree with this sub but I really don't like it and don't believe in its potential, which is why I haven't participated in years, but I felt compelled to reply because I am slowly working on …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 10:33 PM
3

I don't think OP is trying to avoid it on purpose, simply because it's not a true counterargument to the claim that "women have a fundamental reproductive advantage, and a real power over men in that particular domain, being the sexual marketplace". Society is complex. OP has argued one mechanism by which women are advantaged and has concluded that their overall class positioning is privileged. Marx's theory is a fairly comprehensive economic theory at long timescales; it defines a set of concep…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 10:04 PM
-1

I skimmed the rest of it and did not find what I said is missing. OP's post starts with fundamental arguments (class positioning of women) which he then builds on, so it's enough for me to take apart the fundaments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 09:48 PM
1

Women can be thought of as extracting surplus value from men in much the same way that capitalists extract surplus value from workers. That depends entirely on what is a fair or desirable exchange rate between the fruits of productive labour and the fruits of reproductive labour, since this exchange is what you claim to be exploitative. I think that this is too big of a question to tackle on Reddit and that your statement is unsubstantiated. I mean how do you convert between the value of passing…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 09:44 PM
5

Yes it does. Reproduction is giving birth to a new generation of a given species. Bringing up children is not part of reproduction, it's another step entirely. Education, whatever you want to call it. Read up on R-selected and K-selected species, and what defines us as mammals. In our case successful reproduction involves much more than just birth; in the case of animals such as fish birth is enough. it's hard to deny the asymmetry of power on the sexual market Sure, but ending the analysis ther…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 09:29 PM
-3

Those points are all fair and can stand on their own, but that's got nothing to do with correctly applying Marxism to the reproductive realm.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 09:07 PM
2

Re*arded. A moderator on a sub related to the one I moderate got banned for using the word, so I don't use it on my main account.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 09:05 PM
-9

I got through about 40% of this and it's pretty r-slurred and rambly, so I won't bother with the rest. Though I appreciate some of the sources, they'll be helpful when I get to writing about this. To quickly take this apart at the foundations: The means of reproduction do not end with the female reproductive organs, or any reproductive organs since reproduction does not end at birth but continues on into adolescence and arguably beyond. Women and men have both traditionally experienced numerous …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 08:14 PM
2

"Logically presenting things" doesn't accomplish anything during conflicts in relationships if you're not both exceptionally mature and emotionally developed individuals (neither of you are: you wouldn't be asking this question, she wouldn't behave like she does). She needs to learn to see the girl as a separate individual from her, instead of weirdly identifying with her via her womanhood. She is upset because she feels as though those things you said to the girl were directed at her, so a chea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/22 04:16 PM
11

We are fine and she was never mad as far as I can tell. My SO is still mad , she tells me it’s not about me and I think everything is about me but after my comment her attitude has been rather negative to me I asked her to explain it to me then and she just says not everything is about you Sounds like she's making everything about herself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/22 02:07 PM
70

How are you doing fellow men's advocates?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/21 07:24 PM
-1

Liberals are right wing, ergo menslib is right wing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/21 12:09 AM
30

systemic inequalities that women often face in accessing the health services they need I really want to hear more about those.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/21 03:24 PM
7

Post-feminism. It's both fair, accurate, and bound to trigger the worst feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/20 11:46 PM
5

Does this really need elaborating? Well, I hope this post isn't going to fuel the whole women-blaming narrative present within circles like this one; many people of both genders would do the same if similarly incentivized. Also, the same dynamic is still playing out today albeit in different contexts. Marriage is certainly one, where women who don't want to get married have more positive narratives associated with their choice than men who don't want to get married do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/20 08:09 PM
1

Make the admin account communist. Ask the owner to change the password and just give it to you, then restart the sub. Also, what made the admin give up? I believe I had a few chats with them in the past (unless that was another mod).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 07:45 PM
1

legitimate descendance Think about what you're saying. It's not a game and you're sick for thinking it is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/20 12:15 AM
3

Thanks. And yeah, it's hard to find a good online space for discussing gendered politics. I think it's because these spaces attract people who are too desperate about being heard and having their suffering acknowledged to think calmly about these issues. The response to being hurt is 'fight or flight', hence many of the ideas and narratives these hurt people come up with serve either to hurt others in return (toxic MRA segments denying oppression of women, incels) or to enable an escape from the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/20 11:34 PM
4

surveys have routinely shown that men and women alike find the latter more appealing Domestic labour has changed over time. In fact women have immensely reaped the benefits of having their (domestic) labour automated by gaining more free time, whereas men haven't gained as much from automation. Also, in a sense society has become a sicker place and having to participate in it has become something more and more people choose to avoid. So yeah, different times. I don’t understand why you think bei…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/20 11:01 PM
0

That's true, but it was better to be forced to work than to be forced to stay home. Claiming the opposite is just slave morality, and claiming that neither was better is just senseless nihilism. This is not to diminish the tweet entirely. The point that 'men had it rough too' is valid. But far too often when men's activists push back against feminist narratives their arguments are perverted in interpretation. Men had it rough too, but it is both incorrect and undesirable to say that men had it a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/20 10:15 PM
5

better work-life balance Women dominate the part-time job sector too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/20 06:31 PM
3

I don't care about studies about self-reported happiness. With this one you don't know which one of the following explains the results: Women who tend to be innately happier are less likely to get married Marriage makes women unhappy Single childless women are more likely to lie about their happiness The implications on health I think should be taken more seriously. But happiness is a worthless construct for science.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/20 04:37 PM
2

There are documented statistical differences behind some of those. Keeping them at the forefront of your mind when interacting with men/women is dismissive of their individuality and reduces them to mere representatives of their sex - this is the 'sexist garbage'. Unless you're designing policy, education programmes or in some other way trying to organise and accommodate large numbers of people you shouldn't give much thought to these differences.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/20 12:23 AM
6

Archive link. For future reference change the 'r' in 'reddit' to 'c' so it's 'ceddit' and you'll see an archive copy of most removed content. u/guitarguy109
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/20 04:07 PM
6

I can't answer these questions as I never did any research into them. I reviewed the paper in my above comment not because I am an expert on the subject matter (I am not), but because the paper is really simple and anyone scientifically literate could see the flaws in it, no matter their discipline (I am doing a PhD in AI). Oh, and I have academic access to it, which I assumed most of the people here don't so I felt a bit obliged.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/20 04:09 PM
4

Also, you're free to repost this comment in full or in part wherever you want. I understand that few people discussing these topics online are scientifically literate, but don't worry the authors of this new paper aren't decent scientists at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/20 03:54 PM
20

The paper hurts to read. They open with a vague criticism of the formula used to come up with these numbers ( a/(a+b) ) but then don't follow up with a concrete point regarding what's wrong about it. Just a bunch of hand-waving, unfounded statements and intentional obfuscation of the original's study design choices. The paper is seriously dishonest and so badly written that IMO it was only published for ideological reasons. In the second section, they criticize the measure that the original pape…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/20 03:52 PM
7

capitalism creating and propagandising social divisions to distract us from their exploitation and violence feminism in 2020 I don't see a difference.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/20 02:29 PM
1

I'm probably in the minority here, but I'm with Jonathan Haidt where he says that a healthy society needs both progressives and conservatives, as there always simultaneously parts of culture they need to be preserved, and those that need to be changed. Nobody in here is trying to erase or dismiss the right AFAIK.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/20 06:06 PM
8

If they managed to re-define "left-wing" then I don't see why shouldn't we be able to do the same.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/20 05:30 PM
9

"Economical leftism" is not enough to address all of men's issues. Many, maybe most of the biggest ones, but far from all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/20 05:29 PM
7

I really like your point about universalism, but I don't think you realize the conclusion it leads to. You are essentially saying that the only way to get society to properly address men's issues is via an embrace of universalism and a rejection of systemic "competitions for victim status". This is correct, but at the same time this means that a men's advocacy movement is only supposed to be a stepping stone to a universalist advocacy movement, an impulse leading to a broad re-formulation of the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/20 05:25 PM
2

I’m certainly not advocating for outright abolishing feminism, and plenty of others here aren’t either. Plenty is the keyword here. There should be clear lines drawn as to what are acceptable in-group opinions here on these issues. The issue is that banning people for unacceptable opinions doesn't work in community-building; the community should self-moderate by confrontations and down/upvoting. And it clearly doesn't. One can post the dumbest neoliberal point about 'lifting people from poverty'…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:56 AM
2

What would you like to see us do? Discuss what the systemic root causes of men's issues are that predate feminism. Discuss how does capitalism affect men's issues. This is a left wing sub ffs. Discuss the liberation of masculinity from the constraints of both traditional and contemporary norms and how would it look like. What kind of a man would it be best to teach one's child to be in order to both succeed in today's world AND make it a better place? Discuss how much power do other men vs women…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:49 AM
1

They weren't granted the legal rights to be violent brutes. Hmm... Prove it. Because I'm going to enjoy watching this claim blow up in your face.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:38 AM
2

It's a small sub. And make that two, because instead of confronting his BS you're trolling, which is exactly my issue with how feminism is discussed in here. Nobody will ever confront anyone here on feminism, no matter how idiotic of an opinion one gives as long as it's against feminism. Why? Because you've all accepted that feminism is the root of all men's issues and don't have a better, left-wing narrative to guide you. Lost.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:34 AM
1

link Doesn't work for me, says 'corrupt pdf'. It's not a matter of "competition" it's a matter of wanting equality. I'm not sure how can this sub talk about equality when half of the members want to do with feminism **completely** and **nobody** here is giving an alternative vision of feminism, everyone is only hurling criticisms and complaints.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:30 AM
3

I know about that. Feminism has hurt that woman and destroyed her work, stopping any progress on *resolving* the issue of perceptions of DV. *But that act did not cause the issue of anti-male perceptions*.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:26 AM
1

"In the early 1800s most legal systems implicitly accepted wife-beating as a husband's right, part of his entitlement to control over the resources and services of his wife. " link Men had de-juro privileges to "use violence within relationships to exercise power and control". Whether individually they did so or not does not matter as this was something that was in a sense expected of them otherwise this wouldn't have been an implicit assumption of most legal systems. Tell me this - if people di…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:24 AM
3

You even took the time to bash capitalism (an economic ideology that has done more to raise people out of poverty than feminism has). This sub is lost.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:14 AM
1

Now you're just talking past me and ignoring my points.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:08 AM
0

It is estimated that 20–25% of homeless people, compared with 6% of the non-homeless, have severe mental illness. Others estimate that up to one-third of the homeless suffer from mental illness Correlation. "We are the best movement to combat homelessness, Any others are bigots." Politicians compete to govern countries. Charities compete for donations. If my competition was calling me a bigot I'd take care to not look like one by unreasonably hating my competition.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:07 AM
4

This is straight up propaganda. This is also what people believed prior to the invention of the Duluth model. That model is why men can't avoid being charged with false misconduct allegations unless they have direct video evidence proving otherwise. That model is just a formalisation of sexism against men that existed for centuries. Just because feminists put it on paper doesn't mean they were the ones who invented and popularised these attitudes and prejudices. Wake tha fuck up and stop trying …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:01 AM
3

we can safely attribute feminism as a men's issue Is it the only one? Is it the most important one? Is it the first one we have to address? Is it the easiest to address? No, no, no and no. So why the constant bickering? Does the excess focus on it hurt the cause? Yes. Am I saying to completely stop talking about it and act as if it's not an issue at all? NO. But this excess stinks of a complete lack of collective self-awareness. This space seeks to distinguish itself from other men's issues spac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 11:59 PM
-4

In certain cases, such as the Duluth model, feminism has directly and negatively impacted men. It didn't. The Duluth model is a feminist construct that only confirmed the pre-existing biases against men. Creating a realistic and truthful model of domestic violence was an opportunity for improving the lives of many men that was wasted by feminism - yes, but it caused no harm. It simply legally entrenched what harm was being done beforehand. Things weren't any better before that model was introduc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 11:51 PM
1

Well, considering the fact the feminism is opposed to addressing men's issues, actually yes we can. If feminism didnt oppose male progress, I would agree with you. The amount of attention given to feminism on this sub is disproportionate to this motive. If it was only about feminists opposing men's issues then we'd see much less such discussion. The problem I'm getting at is that there are *lots* of people who blame the majority of men's issues on feminism. These morons act as if men had it all …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 11:48 PM
2

There are plenty of other problems causing homelessness. Mental health issues are not 100%, not even >50% responsible for it. And even when they co-occur, there are deeper underlying causes that are being obfuscated by hyper-focusing on mental health.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 11:44 PM
-3

The liberation of women, via feminism or otherwise, is not a men's issue. Men's liberation is not women's subjugation. Anarchism, (et. an-archos - without-rulers) is literally defined as the opposition to rulers. If you believe that all of men's issues are due to feminism then sure, go ahead, but don't expect anyone to join you in that fantasy land and prepare some Aloe Vera because you're bound to get butt hurt over people rejecting your axioms as harmful to the cause of men's issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 11:41 PM
-12

You guys have an unhealthy obsession over feminism. You cannot build a case for men's issues while constantly talking about feminism. Stop it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 11:32 PM
2

Check out Richard Grannon for a start.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/19 12:24 PM
1

Ahh, you misunderstood. There is such a thing as positive masculinity, so you're wrong there, but it's fallacious to build up a gender like that with simplistic character traits, which is where you're correct. You are right in saying that gender is not only traits but also the way these traits are used - but then why deny tying the consequences of enacting one's gender with it? I think what you are really trying to say in the OP is that there is no such thing as positive masculine traits, that i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/19 05:53 PM
1

How you use your masculinity/feminity is a part of your masculinity/femininity. How you enact your agency as a gendered individual can have positive and negative outcomes for both yourself and your environment, and it also constitutes your gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/19 05:04 PM
1

It's a kind of "death tax" vs "inheritance tax" ordeal. The language used to describe the issue decides how people think about it and the outcome of the study. If the study asked whether being rude should be outlawed then the result would be completely different in spite of how both "hate speech" and "being rude" are very similar, arbitrary and fuzzy categories. Death tax vs estate tax - I couldn't find the original article I've read which talked about manipulating public opinion more broadly, b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/19 12:15 PM
1

Right, so how are social democracy and democratic forms of socialism a bad deal for men? What about social liberalism, ie enabling more and more people to live life however they wish to? And the welfare state - do men benefit from an ill society full of people who go broke trying to pay for their bills? If you want to be taken seriously you need to flesh out and justify your standpoint, not just come waltzing in here with no introduction or argument whatsoever.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/19 01:29 PM
6

You need to read up on what really constitutes leftism, because you clearly have no idea. And no, rabid hyperpartisan right-wing accounts of leftism don't count.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/19 11:45 AM
3

The idea that men were all these abusive parties in marriages is ridiculous and speaks to your internalized misandry. You automaticity view men who actually worked like crazy so that their wives could relax and live of their labour as abusive??? No. Your perception of the material and cultural realities of the era distorts your views. People didn't get married for love. Men needed women to perform domestic labour because they disn't have the time (or skills) to do it themselves, so they married …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 05:33 PM
4

There were some odd cases, but the average husband isn't an abuser. I could just as well say "there were some odd cases, but the average industrial era employer was not an abuser". It's naive to think that. Divorce was much less acceptable, many reforms were still not introduced at the time and the person instigating the divorce had to prove the other party's fault. The 50% of the husband's earning is, AFAIK, a much more recent invention.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 04:40 PM
2

Working a true job was privilege relative to the female domestic labour in the 50s. Your presupposition is wrong in this question because your perspective is ignorant of how society has changed over the years. Female domestic labour was never regulated, yet marriage was a much more pragmatic, material and contractual ordeal than it is today. People got married primarily to have a future, not to fulfil their romantic ambitions. In such an arrangement women got the short end of the stick: they wer…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 12:32 PM
2

Seconding this. The DV conversation really took off in the anglosphere with Pizzey's work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/19 10:03 PM
3

"Given the choice, I'd like my corporate overlords to have manners" is what you're saying. "Given the choice, I don't give a fuck if they drowned a bag of kittens as long as they break the status quo or at least don't start yet another war" is what everyone who isn't a neoliberal tool is saying.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/19 08:53 PM
3

One candidate is a polished, professional politician Darth Vader was a polished, professional emperor. Polish and professionalism are irrelevant. Neoliberal detected.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/19 08:13 PM
1

I was talking about their degree of support towards Clinton in the GE.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/19 07:47 PM
2

The latter at the least. They were heartbroken (live) when Trump won, even though that GE was a lose-lose already and one could only make a highly hypothetical and flimsy case as to which one of the candidates was 'the greater evil'. Being so emotional about Trump's victory is by itself already a sign of neoliberalism, whether indoctrinated or consciously adopted (literally from my notifications right now). Also, since you're addressing my comments in a highly selective manner, I'm out. I've mad…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/19 06:54 PM
5

considering how hard they go after the establishment neoliberal left in ways that count, that's a pretty good fucking disguise! Do tell me, how hard do they go after the neoliberals? Because from what I recall they were all over Clinton even though she had the primary rigged against Sanders. For anyone even remotely left that election ended with the primary. They are all over RussiaGate, the US neoliberals' favourite spin on their failures during the 2016 election. And they are all over smearing…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/19 06:28 PM
14

I like a lot of things about The Young Turks and I think they're a vital part of the current American left. Why? They are a hub for the regressive hyperpartisan narcissism and idpol that undermines the left. They are little more than a bundle of red flags, from Kasparian being better than you to the very name they use. They are the establishment, neoliberal left in disguise. Their job is to spread the brand of cultural neoliberalism that is responsible for the widespread neglect of male issues, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/19 12:29 PM
2

This. People will be asking this question quite a lot so I think it'd be good to have a sticky answering it one way or another.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/19 06:15 PM
2

The mods should sticky the last thread asking this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/19 05:11 PM
3

Evolution has equipped men and women for different tasks, both physiologically and psychologically. Men, being the stronger sex, were most often given the role/opportunity of perpetrating physical violence. And there were evolutionary benefits to being violent, Vikings being a good example. This promoted psychological traits that make men "better at violence" (very broadly speaking). Women, on the other hand, evolved traits that help them stay away from physical violence, being the physically we…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/19 06:14 PM
20

One is full of self-hating, narcissistic and passive-aggressive men, one is uncomfortably close to using men's issues as a pawn to advance right-wing agendas and one is this sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/19 12:09 AM
4

Occupy Wallstreet was a reminder to the establishment elites of how they're losing their grip on narrative control and how activism is a growing threat to their rule in the Internet age. They responded by infiltrating activist environments with spies (this bit is documented AFAIK, just not with regard to idpol activism) and promoting a revolutionarily impotent culture that is both easy for capital to game and that effectively undermines any real change from the left. This culture is intersection…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/19 11:47 PM
2

what would you like to see from this sub Solid QA (quality assurance). Discussions of male advocacy, misandry, feminism and politics can very easily turn into shitstorms. I didn't join to witness a shitstorm, I can always sign up for Twitter if I want feces-level content. If the admins of the sub aren't already a tight-knit group who churn out good content on the topic then the sub cannot rely on merely hoping that the post standard will naturally go up. Proactive, frequent and highly arbitrary …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/19 10:57 PM
1

there's now been a second spike aside from that Sweden has broadened their legal definition of rape multiple times. Once in 2018 and once in 2005.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/19 06:35 PM
1

But AFAIK you'd have to browse restricted records to find out whether a case of rape is rape-as-understood-in-the-west or rape-because-broader-definition. Show me your sources.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/19 06:25 PM
2

what i have said is that there is a disturbing correlation between immigration in sweden and a spike in rape (separate from the spike caused by their changing the definition) How can you demonstrate such a correlation when the Swedish government severely restricts the publicly available statistics from their own studies?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/19 11:33 AM
0

You sound like a right wing loser when you talk about professional victims. In other words REEEE anyone who doesn't agree with me is a right winger!!11one Get out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/19 12:36 AM
1

the Pro Male page this all comes from Link?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 05:57 PM
1

I was late to the party so nobody read it, but this was my take on how should this community operate. Making a public post calling out a member for being 'abusive' instead of privately DM-ing the moderator is the sort of histrionic behaviour that characterizes professional victims. So it's pretty ironic that you're getting upset about someone claiming MRAs are just as bad as feminists, seeing as most MRAs might not be but you certainly give that comparison undue validity. /u/serpentineeyelash a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 11:31 AM
2

Give up on trying to directly convince the left to embrace male advocacy. Instead, convince male advocates to go left. The left will transform as a result. Don't let your loudest advocates be histrionic victims or id-pol players. Any member who makes a huge deal out of being incel or mgtow or exhibits the toxic behaviours commonly (correctly or not) associated with those positions should be shunned for acting like this. Male advocacy should be just that, and not a means for victims to vent their…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 12:24 AM
4

/u/userleansbot
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 12:01 AM
1

It's your choice to be charitable and feign agnosticism regarding what he means by this or that. If he's espousing misandric opinions then he is a misandrist. I don't see a point in a further discussion on what he said if that's your approach, however: All we can be sure of is that he feels men have some level of responsibility to prevent the awfulness of others, with physicality a last resort option. That should not be particularly novel as an idea. Misandry is not novel; as I said it often goe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/19 11:59 PM
2

Justifying his position on gun ownership with "oh but think about the poor women who have to protect themselves from men" as well as believing that men deserve to be physically punished to be disciplined ('not be evil jerks'). At this point in our culture it is not appropriate to single out any subgroup of people as in need of a violently taught lesson; not even 'teaching' animals through violence is completely acceptable today. If someone said the converse, that they believe bad women should be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/19 06:15 PM
2

Traditionalist and misandric often go hand in hand, just like traditionalist and misogynic. This is one of such cases.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/19 04:08 PM
1

BPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 05:10 PM
1

What's true of your woman is not necessarily true of every other one. Try not going for the basic thots for once.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 11:11 PM
1

Finding out what you really want, as in the more abstract and long-term effects of an intimate relationship, is a large part of the relationship itself. Sure - if you understand relationships in the more traditional and *contractual* way then you can treat them as a job, but most people strive for more liberal relationships. Having to stick to some pre-defined goals is constraining, whether these are our own or our partner's. None of my relationships turned out what I wanted them to be at the st…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 04:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter