TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SirTrumpalot Archive

View 4 posts and 48 comments by SirTrumpalot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
78

Biologically ready or not, you can't claim that it's okay for adults to be essentially co-ercing children into sex. At that age, children can still be massively influenced by those people in a position of power who have sworn to protect them. You're essentially arguing that it's just as okay for a 24 year old to sleep with a 13 year old as it is for two 13 year olds to sleep with each other because in both cases they were "willing"
/r/MensRights04/06/16 11:54 AM
486

But why male models?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 05:11 PM
2

I imagine it is slightly more than gender equalitn as well. Actual sexual stimulation is important in this case. Dildos for women can be used as an aid or another "source" of stimulation even during physical sex whereas with a fleshlight, you're pretty much stuck to committing to it with no other real outlet. Emotion and "mood" play a big role in sex for women whereas men tend to stay aroused more from the physical side. With a fleshlight I could see men almost "settling" on one as i hear they a…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 02:36 PM
1

Sorry do you mind explaining what you mean by right and left wing feminists? Not really understanding here.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 02:22 PM
11

I didn't realise your income was a factor on if you should be having sex or not.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 02:13 PM
3

Sounds fantastic. Where does the money that they make from this go towards, does anyone know?
/r/MensRights21/05/12 12:47 PM
17

I don't get this? Theres a day to celebrate mothers, and there is a day to celebrate fathers. It's like celebrating all the birthdays in your family on one day so no one feels left out?
/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:57 PM
2

Evidence please then.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 06:50 PM
2

So a group which made up of nationalist, fascist, racist, xenophobic, homophobic and anti-Semitic views is comparable to feminism? How on earth can you make such a conclusion?
/r/MensRights28/04/12 06:05 PM
0

You're comparing feminists to neo-nazis? seriously?
/r/MensRights28/04/12 04:42 PM
-2

The systemic changes that have come from the recent feminist movements in regards to men are what's wrong, but labelling an entire group of people as hateful is stupid.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 08:48 AM
1

I am sure in the Jewish communities, they will get Mohels to perform the circumcision and they are not required to have any formal medical training to perform the operation. With the money, I meant more in terms of why you actually pay $400. It seems like an extraordinary price for what it is.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 02:01 PM
1

Circumcisions – which cost about $200 to $400 each Whatthefuck. So you are gonna pay someone (may or not be a doctor) $400 to perform this? I wonder where that $400 goes?
/r/MensRights25/04/12 01:12 PM
133

It's a horrible piece of journalism. Anyone writing should know better than to generalise a group of people by viewing the actions of a select few. Articles like that never succeed and all they do is create stereotypes. I could write an article about Myra Hindley, Beverly Allitt, Belle Guinness and Katherine Knight, thus proving that women are crazy killers. /s
/r/MensRights23/04/12 01:06 PM
4

Woah there, you shouldn't really go around throwing the word pedophile so lightly. Makes it lose all of its meaning when used so loosely; like rape and misogyny.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 07:48 PM
3

This sub is NOT a hate site. You can tell your professor to contact DoJ Civil Rights Division for an official statement or the FBI Cyber Crime Division. If it were me in your shoes I would definately fight it, but I understand that you might not be in a position to.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 02:29 PM
1

It's pretty muchthe same issue in sports. If you look at any of the current segregated high fitness sports (football, rugby, tennis) and just compare the top ranks of women and men then you can tell the noticeable difference. Men are just biologically capable to be "bigger and stronger" than women. Although in certain sports I think there is a case for it, particularly in the leas fitness demanding ones such as golf, formula one.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 12:23 PM
5

Then either explain the situation otherwise don't expect us to be able to read your mind. The only questionable thing here is that she labels him as less of a man for his actions.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 06:39 PM
1

Because it's totally the case that all clubs are majorly filled with underage kids and none of them frequent the pub ever.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:49 PM
4

They will simply turn you down if you meant it that way. Problem is the significant majority of young people prefer a club over to the pub. Just look at attendances in the establishments.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:40 PM
2

No that's simply not true. You will get turned down regardless of gender as the bouncers have to follow the club's policy. You might often get a nice bouncer but they are still breaking the rules that thy are meant to be enforcing
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:37 PM
2

And yet you will get into barely any clubs as a woman by wearing "comfortable" clothes
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:31 PM
4

Tell that to pretty much every club. They simply don't let people in if they're not wearing the "right" clothing no matter how unfunctional that may be.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:29 PM
3

Right okay. What if they were told "you're not allowed to dress warmly because you're a certain gender. You have to wear silly clothing otherwise you're not goin out"
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:23 PM
2

So if you saw your friend there freezing their ass off, while you could probably stay a little warm without a coat, you wouldn't offer?
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:17 PM
7

Only reason she is wearing heels is because she has been pressured into it by society. Women are expected to wear them and a majority of clubs or bars (in London anyway) do not actually let women in if they're not wearing heels. It's just a polite thing to do rather than the "wrong behaviour". If you had been wearing painful shoes the whole night, you yourself would appreciate being given a pair of comfortable shoes. Have you never given a coat to anyone because they're obviously freezing, regar…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 10:53 PM
1

Reading it over again I think I misunderstood it a bit. I do believe however that you can't oversimplify sexual relations to males only wanting to have as many babies as possible and women only want to raise a child with that father. I guess it boils down to the same principles of the beneficial reasons behind polygamy.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:13 PM
3

Oh right. I just read a few of the surface comments and assumed people were getting bitchy about MRAs "stealing" the thread. My bad.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 10:56 PM
3

I understand the points the author makes, but it just doesn't seem correct considering that men and women only exist in these limited definitions.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 10:50 PM
2

Just ignore them. Downvote. Don't feed them through comments. Simples.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 10:26 PM
2

Im assuming this is the commonly quoted "how much do women earn for every dollar men make"? If it is, this is an absolutely crappy source as it has fuck all for refernces nor any explanation at all. For all we know somebody could have asked a child to write some numbers down on some states. Even if taken accurately, the largest flaw that these studies have is that they take total median salaries of men and women in a year rather than being more rigorous and taking things like the amount of varyi…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:54 PM
11

Again, I don't get that. Why would you have sex with someone that means nothing to you? Seems a bit shallow
/r/MensRights15/04/12 07:38 PM
2

Can you explain those terms please? I'm not familiar
/r/MensRights15/04/12 07:28 PM
19

Not everyone wants just sex. Personally I prefer the more romantic aspect of a "hook-up" much more which makes getting with people I already know the more appealing as I actually know the person. I don't understand how people can act so emotionless in a situation like sex.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 07:26 PM
-2

I doubt if there are any because it would cause an uproar. For example, look at how badly all the White power groups are treated around the world (granted a lot of them are hideously racist) but they essentially exist for the same reason black rights, etc. It's the whole freedom of speech thing gone wrong and that's why people don't like the MRM because for a long time through history men have been "superior". You're better off as a White male lookin around for companies that give scholarships b…
/r/MensRights15/04/12 02:40 PM
22

This is why MRAs have a bad image because some people find it perfectly acceptable to insult women and then blame feminism. I need feminism to abuse my child by purposely making him homosexual. Comeon that's one of the most horrible statements I've ever seen. Completely unfounded, ridiculous and just plain chauvinistic.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 02:31 PM
3

SRS are feminists, but feminists aren't SRS
/r/MensRights12/04/12 06:44 PM
-39

As horrible as it is, I don't believe posts like these belong here. They offer no sort of discussion value, nor do they actually add anything and this is the direction that this sub should avoid going in.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 06:42 PM
-3

You gotta be careful with the wording you use and thats where people often slip up. I'd argue that leading feminists don't think like this, it is just the thought of the female bandwagon that don't actually know much about the subject and decide because it's been a prevalent issue for the past 100 years that they know everything about it.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 02:12 PM
7

Just another example of how the justice system is fucked in every way possible.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 02:08 PM
3

Missing the point here. Gender is irrelevant to the OP.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:40 PM
12

She pleaded guilty on the basis that she perceived she needed to defend herself Right. Sure. Why not ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:34 PM
4

She fucked up by only using one location for all "evidence" in the referencing. No matter what source it is, if you are attempting to make an intelligent and constructive essay you would use more than source of factoids.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 07:51 PM
5

This isn't really an issue to do with a man's rights though is it? The video is of a clearly mentally ill person rather than anything else
/r/MensRights21/03/12 12:08 PM
12

Police dispute his account, saying it wasn’t snowing and the girls were “dressed properly” and wearing coats. Doesn't seem AS innocent as it had portrayed to be even though it still is complete bullshit.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 09:12 AM
1

Personal attacks aren't cool, no matter who they are.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 09:26 PM
-2

Ugh. This is why people dislike this subreddit because people like you just go ahead and label all feminists into one big man-hating group.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 09:13 PM
2

Downvoted because this is exactly what we don't need. It's that dangerous line where you turn into one of those "radicals" that everyone here abhores
/r/MensRights17/03/12 10:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter