TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sir_Derpsworth Archive

View 0 posts and 75 comments by Sir_Derpsworth on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
32

Most people here are cool. But when dealing with people on the internet in any capacity (and especially reddit) you're going to run into a lot of people who are just looking to get a rise, or to find little things to poke and pick at to draw misleading conclusions from. So some people come out as aggressive from the gate because it's not uncommon to run into people who are just looking to harass people on /MR. Continue on though, you seem to be pretty open about other opinions and at least accep…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:06 AM
1

That's kind of a weak argument though. I know (from statistics) that black people are more likely to rob me than a white guy because of where I live. The majority of the population is black, and even though I'm not, the likelihood of it happening is much higher than normal. By your logic, just because a black guy robs someone or breaks into a car, I should fear all black men for they might do the same to me as well. If that sounds ridiculous and/or racist, why should doing and thinking that abou…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:27 PM
1

Either way, should probably just watch Little Witches Academia Wow, this is legitimately one of the best shows I've seen in a long time. I would have thrown in money if I had known about this a year ago. Edit: AND they made Kill la Kill?? I'm not even going to lie, this studio sounds badass!
/r/MensRights24/05/14 03:15 AM
35

So you agree that he is right... but he can't say that because he has a penis instead of a vagina? ...right, great logic there.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 07:15 PM
25

I think this kind of boils down to, "Don't be a nickel if you're trying to catch a dime" or basically, don't expect to find someone that will be perfect if you aren't/wont work on it yourself.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 05:42 PM
3

Eh, it's still cheaper than a kid and safer than nothing if a condom breaks or something else goes wrong.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:39 AM
4

Dude, I agree with you. But condoms are so damned cheap and especially compared to 18+ years of raising a kid, I'd rather just buy them whether they're subsidized or not. Not even considering the health benefits of no STDs on my willy.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:28 AM
1

I have a copy of the full journal article if you can give me a decent website to upload it to.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 03:54 AM
8

That's exactly the thing. Most young men are just "dropping out" of society's dating system much like people did in the 70s with drugs and society. We've become so disillusioned that it's hard to even care about anything other than doing our own thing and living life how we want to without worries. We see so many books about how men are rejecting family and relationships in the last 15 or so years and it really makes me wonder how noone has figured it out yet. Men are being harassed into roles w…
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:49 PM
14

Honestly I think whoever wrote it probably didn't see any problem with the wording. If you follow the link at the bottom, you see that the whole Jackson Katz website implies men are the only ones who rape and can prevent rape. I'm not 100% positive how this got through the universities checks, but I am writing an email to hopefully get at least some answers.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 01:43 AM
3

I wrote this up as an email to send to the manager of the Department of Resident Life. What do you guys think? Anything I should add or change? Dear Quan Vu, Recently I was helping a fellow terp move into their new room in Oakland hall on Friday August 30th, 2013. I walked into the main lobby in front of the service desk, and a certain poster hung on one of the pillars caught my eye. As I walked over to inspect it I was very offended by some of the language used in the poster because of its very…
/r/MensRights04/09/13 01:34 AM
1

It's not a parody. I also go to UMD and saw these in a few of the dorms as I was going around. Normally we're (Maryland) slightly more moderate, but apparently whoever let this through didn't think things out too well.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 12:53 AM
2

They don't.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 12:52 AM
5

No, there should be counter posters put up with opposite gendered language to make the point.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 12:50 AM
2

I saw those while doing arrival survival in oakland. We were sitting right near one handing out carts and it took all I had not to rip them down or take a sharpie to them. Nice to know im not the only one who reads this sub at UMD though. Its annoying seeing shit like this around campus and hearing the feminist malarkey with no outlet.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 11:21 PM
1

Just out of curiosity, is this in response to the askreddit post a couple nights ago?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 08:56 PM
2

Pretty much, yeah. In some states and other jurisdictions, acting as a father even if you are not later named it can get you saddled with CS payments. Especially if they can't find who the actual father is.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:26 AM
16

No, it's part of the patriarchy. When women slut shame one another it's because men have imposed a virginity ideal and having sex destroys that. Fucking male scum. /s
/r/MensRights23/08/13 02:35 AM
1

Of course! But society sells that as something good, and sometimes it's not good for everyone. When would it ever good to force someone to have children 'for the good of everyone'? Who says your moral judgements on what is good for society are right? I can not remember a single time in history when having too few children was a bad thing unless we've previously over populated and things were already out of balance either socially or in terms of hard numbers. Having more children to support the p…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 02:42 AM
7

However, liberal bullshit tells us it's better to be single, be alone and "free", and reject family. Or it's people making personal life decisions for themselves. Just because you don't want to have kids or get married does not mean you reject or hate the idea of families. I've been in multiple relationships, I just don't see the need to get married or reproduce adding to overpopulation. The result? Despression. Mental illness. Feminism. The first 2 are completely unrelated. Both happen to be ge…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:16 AM
2

they just changed VAWA to be gender neutral. Do you have a source for this? (EDIT: I did a little research, it was written to be trans inclusive, not gender neutral) And did they redo the research they collected, because a LOT of it was faulty or written in such a way to still push an agenda with men as primary aggressors. If not, them changing it to be 'gender neutral' wording doesn't change much for what their end results show.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 07:33 AM
1

It's called VAWA and that isn't going to help him much unless he has a vagina.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 08:15 PM
3

Not even going to lie, but there is a couple huge leaps and swathing judgements you're making here man. Care to explain your points in some more detail?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 07:14 AM
1

Well I don't blame them completely. What human would willing give up a privilege when they don't see a harm to it. Most MEN don't even see a harm to it, and that's fine. If your choice as a person of either sex is to pay for someone's meals, take them out occasionally, etc etc and you feel your are getting equal treatment however you define it. That's fine. But for ANY person to expect to have things paid for, and to assume it should be that way is the problem I have. You should not expect free …
/r/MensRights01/08/13 06:01 AM
1

It's sad how many self-proclaimed Feminists will still say these things, and still think there's nothing sexist about putting the entire burden on the man. It's not even feminists, it's women I've talked to in general.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 04:17 AM
4

Now, women ask out men just as much. Most women expect to split 50/50, or to take turns. I dont know where you are getting your information, but it is still largely a social norm for men to ask women out. Ive gotten varying reasons from its a "man's job" to "it shows he's interested" but there is almost always an excuse to why women dont ask men out. On top of that, while I will say its more common now for women to want to pay some or all of the bill, its still by and far not the norm.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 05:40 PM
2

You're right. It works both ways just fine. My real problem with it was why should she get to define these aspects. Why should I as a person not get to define how I view myself instead of her defining me to myself. If I feel I am a man, it shouldn't matter what her perspective on the matter is. If she doesn't like it, don't date me or people like me. For her to say that XYZ are the characteristics of it and if I don't fit them, I'm a boy makes it seem it's her place to be arbiter of what defines…
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:00 AM

Thank you. People who say things like she got what she deserved are no better than feminists who say the same with disproportionate sentencing for rape and DV cases against women. The punishment MUST fit the crime no matter what our personal feelings on the matter are.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 08:52 PM
22

If it takes sentencing of a few women for society to finally open the eyes so be it. It should NEVER take unjust sentencing of anyone for laws to change. Man or woman, an attitude like that only justifies unjust laws for both sides and creates animosity. It's the exact same thing extremist feminists use when a man is punished overly harshly for any crime against women. "If we make an example of this one guy and destroy him, perhaps others will stop doing X as well". That kind of thinking of 'jus…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 08:50 PM
2

People don't think of the severity of the penalties when they commit crimes. That's not actually true. There is quite a bit of research that's been done (with crimes like robbery and even premeditated murder) where people do consider the penalties and commit the crime anyways because the reward for doing so is great enough. Something along the lines of a sort of "hedonic calculus". There is all sorts of criminological research to support this claim and way of thinking. Increasing the severity wo…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 08:14 PM
6

I'm pretty sure this is saying the exact same thing as the previous quote. That a verbal no and a nonverbal yes are made in the same ways to create that sense of "taboo" atmosphere and be 'exciting'. He is saying that by doing this, they are hurting everyone because it becomes harder to distinguish from actual "No, I DO NOT want to have sex" and "I'm saying no to be coy/I find it an erotic turnon". Personally, if it were me and a woman starts doing this, I would kick her the fuck out right then …
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:59 PM
0

She should really check her privilege. Was fine up to this point, then lost it. I laughed a bit too hard.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 03:40 AM
3

You might as well say that Martians are raping women, it's equally likely to women underreporting rapes, unless you can find a way to prove it with math. That's exactly my point though. Feminism has been known to make up claims without proper evidence. So now most men demand it as a way to curb that occurrence. If you knew someone consistently exaggerated about how big a fish they caught that day was, would you not ask for a photo? I'm not saying there isn't underreporting, but don't make up sta…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 04:56 PM
1

Gender bias is absolutely real. You're right. But that doesn't make it men's fault or 'the patriarchy'. It's just shitty people who are uneducated. Especially with claims similar to "women aren't as good at math". It's just people who are talking out of their ass about things they know nothing about. It would be the same as a woman saying "men just aren't as good at childcare". There are plenty of awesome dads just as there are plenty of awesome female 'mathletes'.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 04:47 PM
1

Yes, this is exactly the argument that hooks is addressing. You can't combine the "statistic" that only 10% are reported with anything, because the point is that it's impossible to obtain that statistic. Imagine that you suspect that threats of violence are underreported because women are ashamed to admit that they happened. This shame is deep enough that they will lie to police and even anonymous pollsters. But you can't make up your own story for these people either. If people don't want to ta…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 04:35 PM
1

You could absolutely argue that we need to fix the underlying issue here. The problem with the argument though is two fold. That it assumes there is a FAR worse problem than what is reported. And that because of that assumption, there is some form of problem we need to solve that may not even actually exist. It's quite a common practice for statisticians to extrapolate from the data collected the actual amount of whatever they're testing to the population as a whole. Even the best, most well fun…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 04:12 PM
1

No worries. It took me a while to understand all of this and why it was a problem. I'm happy to help if you have any serious questions I can answer. :)
/r/MensRights02/07/13 06:59 PM
3

True, not all feminism is, but it's not just the radicalism that's the problem. Radicalism in all things be it religion, philosophy, or politics, stems from a basic belief held by the group, just taken to an extreme. In this case, there is quite a bit of things in feminism that is aimed directly at hurting men or demonizing them. You can't make swathing statements one way or another, but you can definitely point to examples. (in my personal opinion) Feminism does some great things for the rights…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 06:29 PM
34

If you read the article though and things that he said, he has some pretty fucked up perceptions of reality. He catergorizes whole classes of people by talking about how 'chinese' they look. That right there is a red flag for something going on that needs to be addressed. I'm not saying it's right to swath all men who like asian women as having 'yellow fever' as I think that is definitely used as a derogative term, but the way he talks about and idealizes asian women is messed up. Basically, I d…
/r/MensRights12/05/13 12:42 AM
2

Yet feminism does this very thing, saying women's issues and that women are more important and that valuable than that of men. The whole movement is for women's issues not men's issues. Or do you not realize that. It's not that they WONT advocate for men's rights, it's that it has to come through a frame of women's rights and what it can do for them. If there is no benefit for women, there is no reason for them to care, therefore you don't see change. In some ways, this is true for all classes o…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 08:38 PM
4

Yes! A criminology based question!! I love these. So... Jeremy Bentham came up with a few explanations as to why crime is reduced for men who are married and crime perpetuated against married men decreases after they tied the knot and concluded a few things. Mainly his ideas were tied to what's called Hedonistic Calculus (which is used to explain a lot of other things as well, but we'll let that go). Hedonistic Calculus basically says that a man who intends to commit a crime looks at his attachm…
/r/MensRights11/04/13 08:28 PM
1

I personally feel like the only place I would define myself is moderate. I'm both an egalitarian and an atheist. From both sides of the political spectrum I get squeezed and sometimes it gets really hard. (that's what he said!) A lot of people assume MRAs (or anyone who doesn't agree with feminism) are conservatives because they assume we are for traditional gender roles from the 1950s and before. Really that's just a misconception of the facts. The same with atheists being liberals (although th…
/r/MensRights04/04/13 01:59 AM
1

I got pulled away from this conversation by a completely different argument someone was making in another post. I'm kind of happy I came back to this to reread it and saw yours. Thanks for this (albeit 2 month late on my part)! You make some good points as the differences between an argument of M v. W and an argument of White people v. Black people. I hadn't considered those facets of it, I was merely throwing my ideas down on paper, but I see your point. I will keep this in mind for future refe…
/r/MensRights01/04/13 11:22 PM
0

Yeah, ideology implies dogma and rigidity imo. I have always seen the MRA and MHRA (mens human rights activism) as more of a collective of people trying to point out the problems they see and trying to change them. There is no real unifying factor other than that. Everyone has their own specific problems and issues they face and the idea is to try to help one another. So really to answer this question, I personally would describe it as a collective of people trying to make their lot in life a bi…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 09:46 PM
1

I don't think the direct thinking in the instance of rape is, 'women should take no responsibility for their actions'. I think it's more along the lines of the claims women make (especially involving rape) being believed no matter what until the burden of proof says otherwise. From any real perspective, it's shitty logic none the less, but when you see a problem and this is the only solution you see as well to 'protect all rape victims who might not come forward otherwise' is to hold someone acc…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:45 PM
3

Dude, if this is true, she's going to 'miss the appointment' I guarantee it. She will then be required to keep it as you can't get an abortion after this point I believe and you will be on the hook. Find another appointment and FAST. Ninja edit: Do not believe a damned word out of her mouth without confirmation. She has fucked you over once in a serious fashion. SHE WILL DO IT AGAIN.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:17 PM
0

He's not coercing her in the least. He is offering no threats of violence or force in any way. He's just using her own tricks and special brand of crazy against her.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:09 PM
1

The problem most modern (college educated especially) feminists see when they say you're "too young and pretty" is just that. You're probably perceived as comfortable and middle class and because of that feel that you have no reason to "advocate for women". I really wish I could remember the name of the 2 feminist authors who wrote on this concept in the late 80s and early 90s, but my mind for names has escaped me today. Basically though, they spoke about a lot of things including how your race …
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:19 AM
10

What is a speech zone?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:09 PM
6

First bit of advice: Hire a (family law?) lawyer and tell them exactly what happened. Don't lie, don't fudge the truth, just tell it straight. They will make sure that you have everything taken care of including getting a paternity test done. Other than that, DO NOT SIGN ANY PAPERWORK FROM HER. DO NOT PUT YOUR NAME ON ANYTHING. DO NOT HOLD THE CHILD OR GO TO ITS BIRTH. Have nothing more to do with her without your lawyer present.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 03:00 AM
1

Would you agree that the majority of rapist are male? I would agree that there are male rapists. I am a bit suspect of comparing male:female rapists because of how statistics are gathered in studies, definitions of what constitutes rape, and other factors. I've seen some studies that say things like ~90% of rapes are committed by males, and others saying ~50% are. It really depends on who is doing the study and how they word and compile the survey/information. Personally, though I'd of course be…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:24 AM
1

Quick disclaimer: I get the feelings you took my previous post as an angry attack on you, if so, that was not my intent. The same goes for this one. When I use the word you, I'm using it in the plural sense talking about people in general. Who has ever said that most men are rapists? Noone has overtly said that "most men are rapists" (not counting the few batshit crazy radfems here). But rape is generally painted as a male on female crime that all men are stigmatized for. An example would be the…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 11:20 PM
2

Instead of, I am going to be cautious around men I don't know, so don't take it personally... because most men are rapists. It's removing the irrational blaming of most/all men for something they didn't, and would most likely never do willingly or purposefully. It also changes the whole 'men are creepers' aspect, as well as a plethora of other stereotypes.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:49 PM
0

Then you are quite lucky indeed. Very few women I've ever met have even offered to pay, let alone actually followed through. This is also a fairly well known phenomenon so it shouldn't surprise you the amount of thought people put into it. That's one good sign your girlfriend might be a keeper though. Good on you sir.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 06:56 PM
1

First, this is a PR company. Unless I can see who is paying them to do their research and who wrote their questions as well as the questions themselves, I have no interest in their research. Secondly, the way the questions they do show answers for are worded so vaguely, I could be considered a rapist without ever having put my penis in anything. Let's take a look: "One in 20 men said they would try to have sex with someone if they thought the other person was asleep." 'Try to have sex with someo…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 06:51 PM
1

The thing is, the average people this poster is aiming at is men and men alone. My edit was mainly about how people would react if we included female rapists.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:08 AM
3

It's an anti-rape campaign afterall, and rape is an act that usually includes physically overpowering the victim (Druggings are a good counterexample to my point, but I digress...) And that's exactly the thing they conveniently leave out. Men can be raped by women too. This is portrayed in a purely one way sense of men raping women or other men and anyone with a bit of actual knowledge on the subject know that it's not the only part of the story. Feminist literature, anti-rape campaigns, and pol…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 11:40 PM
2

Thank you for pointing this tiny caveat out.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 11:36 PM
3

This supposed woman is not some friend from out of town. You're not looking to be friends with this woman, so that doesn't compare. Let's look at the SAME situation comparably. Would you buy a male, who you just met yesterday, dinner? Probably not. It would be kind of weird. How about a week ago? Possibly, but still not very likely. What about a month ago? More likely, but only if you really became good friends and/or he bought you dinner or drinks one night. Your best friend you've known for 6 …
/r/MensRights19/01/13 11:31 PM
21

While I personally don't like this pairing of examples, it does make a point about responsibility and knowing your limits. You could argue that driving a car drunk is a VERY interpersonal act, especially when you hit someone else or run your car into their living room. For some reason, modern culture seems to have this weird relationship with sex where none of the normal, logical rules apply and I'm not just talking about fucking while drunk. In everything where sex is involved, the ideas of per…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 06:45 AM
4

I need to have you on reddit speed dial to answer questions I get hammered with. I'm just getting into this whole debacle having recently taken a few womens studies classes to see what all this was about. I consistently try making points like this because even from a generally uneducated perspective, I can smell bullshit with the way feminism works from a mile away. Did you read anything specific, just pick up stuff as you go, or a combination of a few things?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:39 AM
2

Any sector you like, male privilege and television have a hearty and well-established kinship. I would have to see a study where they counted up the numbers of each or something. I'm not sure that's really true. Not EVERY aspect of broadcast television has an equal number of both, but that's like saying because the View doesn't have any men, it's sexist. Right, and that which is left can be called female privilege. No draft in war time, no heavy-lifting, getting seats on the bus, these are all e…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 08:12 PM
3

That's kind of my conclusions on the topic.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:57 AM
5

Sure, but not in the way that feminism uses and describes it. Everyone has something that gives them advantage over another. Whether it's something small and personal, or large and encompassing. The fact that feminism demonizes people over it though is incredibly disgusting. Ironically enough the concept of feminism itself almost has it's own form of privilege and uses it to its advantage.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:56 AM
2

Not trolling in the slightest, although I can see how it looks like that. I'm just trying to better my arguments and it's harder to see one's own arguments holes when you're the only one looking. In terms of what you said, I actually agree. Although not even all (or even the most populated) western society advantage white people. A very good personal example was I spent time in Japan and sometimes had the hardest time getting service at certain places (although everyone was VERY polite to me) be…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:46 AM
1

haha, sorry. It was 5am my time when I wrote this. (6:30 now) so I apologize. Thanks for pointing it out.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:27 AM
5

How do you explain that most people on TV are men Can you explain what you mean by this? Are you talking actors, in commercials, overall? 'ladies first' Chivalry for all intensive purposes is dead. Some of it still remains. I still hold the door open for people, and might say 'ladies first' but mostly it's just me being polite or making a joking pass at an old set of traditions. the disparity between white people and black people in the justice system Criminal Justice! My favorite topic!! A HUGE…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:05 AM
3

But yet, it's perfectly ok for mainstream feminists to blame men, "The Patriarchy", and misogyny as the causes of women's problems? I'm not the most knowledgeable of people here on either the topics of feminism or mens rights, but maybe you should check your privilege facts before pointing fingers. A LARGE majority of mainstream feminists taught in univeristies use this EXACT language in their papers and writings. So please, tell me how 'no real feminist' does this?
/r/MensRights01/01/13 05:24 AM
0

This probably won't get much notice, but if people are worried about 'sperm-jacking' a friend of mine gave me some damn good advice a few years ago: "Always carry hot sauce with you whenever you go somewhere for sexy times." When I asked why, he explained that when you take the condom off, pour a couple drops of the hotsauce in the condom and mix it up a bit before throwing it in the trash. That way you know if she tries anything, and she learns a valuable lesson about trying to trick men into b…
/r/MensRights27/12/12 04:57 AM
27

This shit right here. Offer to pay for nothing, and do nothing with her until you consult a lawyer and get those results. Do not provide ANY financial assistance, even so much as money for a cab, until this is settled. She sounds like the type of person who will do anything to try to get you to pay and is stupid enough to think it will work.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 04:40 AM
3

I think this is absolutely something to remember. I see a lot of people responding to others in a very negative way and I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that we get caught up in this very easily. We need to remember that everyone is a human being and they are just fighting for something they believe is right, just as much as we are and we can't let our anger, depression, and anxiety get a hold of that and change it. If you start to feel yourself slipping, take some time away from the …
/r/MensRights24/11/12 09:34 PM
1

Feminism is not inherently bad nor inherently opposed to the MRM. It wasn't until radical second-wave feminism that some feminists began taking it too far and lumping men together and labeling them all as chauvinistic pigs or whatever. But it was only some feminists. Not all feminists believe that way, and anyone that has legitimately studied all the waves of feminism should be able to understand that. Hi, I have a bit (not all encompassing by far, but a bit) of knowledge on the different waves …
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:39 AM
1

I've actually been considering doing exactly this on my campus before I graduate. I'm not sure if it can be done, but I'd like to give it a try. Does anyone have specific suggestions for how to actually start one?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 05:08 AM
1

And what about the 4x more female partners killed then male?... Seems a bit hard to skew murder... This probably isn't TOO far off the truth albeit a little misleading. Women as a whole tend to more often be the instigators of physical abuse. From things like throwing shoes, to throwing punches, women generally start physical altercations more frequently than men do. (I think it's 60% - 70% of the time although I can't find the actual reports I'm thinking of, so I'm probably off) On the other ha…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:05 AM
2

Just about to ask that myself. I hope she's fucking trolling.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter