TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SkarnkaiLW Archive

View 0 posts and 33 comments by SkarnkaiLW on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Its pretty simple, hypergamy. High schoolers have few ways of distinguishing themselves because they don't have particularly many achievements or time to accumulate them. Thus they are attracted to males with any level of achievement or success, even as simple as living in one's own apartment and having a car can equal higher status.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 12:07 AM
3

because ad-hominem
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 11:50 PM
1

Southern Poverty Law Center
/r/MensRights24/12/13 11:31 PM
4

Mostly agree with the post, but libertarianism is not "fuck you I got mine" or some kind of atomistic individualism. Don't want to write an essay here, but many or even most libertarians care a great deal about their fellow men and women.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 07:35 AM
2

In terms of commitment, a man would "shit test" or "fitness test" a woman by pushing early and often for sex. To give in, means the woman is not a prime candidate for commitment. Or so I read in that thread I think, or somewhere else in the manosphere.
/r/RedPillWomen21/12/13 10:48 PM
1

Not sure if this is helpful information or if it will make you more paranoid, but your wife may be stalling in order to get more out of a divorce. California is one of the states with lifetime alimony for a divorce after 10 years, I think. Should get in touch with a lawyer whose expertise is in divorces/marital issues in the particular state where the license was issued? Not a lawyer, so giant grain of salt here. Should talk with Legal to cover the military side of it, as I think your housing al…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 01:06 AM
0

Still something of a manosphere newb, but I would say the Red Pill is seeing the world for what it is, rather than how we, or society would like it to be. The matrix analogy, basically. You see the code, and with the knowledge you can manipulate the world, but is also manipulates you, to a certain extent. You can engage to either exert your will (via bullet time, or whatever), to try and pull others out (who will fight you), or you can unplug.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/13 11:18 PM
6

Not sure, seems to be basically how Winston "loves" Big Brother in the end. trained to love and support women no matter their flaws, indeed that their flaws are virtues, and so they internalize the dual strategy of women as a fetish, as a form of stockholm syndrome.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/13 08:40 PM
0

1/8, so actually pretty close just under 2/15ths, if it were possible to be an odd fraction (without genetic engineering)
/r/MensRights19/12/13 07:37 PM
3

Depends on how concise you want it. The book is work of dystopian fiction, wherein the world has embraced communism, apart from the US as the last hold out, but rapidly embracing it. Great men (and a few women) have been disappearing, and as such the economy and technology of the world is stagnating and regressing, such that airplanes have been abandoned and the primary means of long distance travel has reverted to trains. The main character, Dagny, is attempting to keep her company, Taggart Tra…
/r/TheRedPill12/12/13 09:26 AM
1

Mistresses were a common thing for the elite. Just as post birth abortions were. This is the apex fallacy.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/13 05:56 AM
1

Seconding Smedley Butler Ludwig von Mises - mostly for standing his ground and standing for intellectual honesty. Intellectually demolished scientific socialism in 1920, kept his native country from going that way after WWI, and was hated and hunted by the Nazis. Norman Borlaug - Wikipedia alone should explain why. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Borlaug Fr. Maximilian Kolbe http://www.ewtn.com/library/MARY/kolbe2.htm Ignaz Semmelweis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignaz_Semmelweis The great…
/r/MensRights06/11/13 09:16 PM
1

The 9/11 effect, plus being primarily an economist, I imagine. If he was asked specifically about Medicare Part D, or Sarbanes-Oxley he would have a different response than to GW's military .. exploits.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 06:05 PM
2

There is no real "right" in the US. The right historically is the supporter of the Ancien Regime, monarchy, aristocracy, and so forth. Yes,aspects of traditionalism as well, but in the US this traditionalism pretty much amounts to preserving past 'victories' of the left. ie Eisenhower keeping nearly all of the New Deal, and so forth. What the left and right in the US are generally for show. The inheritance of the classic Liberals was split into two halves (economic and social liberties). Each of…
/r/TheRedPill01/11/13 08:28 PM
1

Part of me is sad that I even have to say this, but do you think libertarians want "the poor to die in the streets"? Almost all thoughtful people want the same end, the common weal and true progress on all fronts. The question comes down to means. The net effect of the Government is still negative, even when you take into account said efforts for the poor, misguided as I think they are. Democide is a things. Moreover, it amuses me that lack of faith in one's fellow human beings, though you would…
/r/MensRights08/10/13 01:53 AM
6

They are the winners in a particular marriage. Lawyers as a class are winners in the current system of marriage.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 07:25 PM
4

Appears to be a variant of the ad ignorantiam fallacy, or argument from ignorance. Basically if you can't think of a method of taking care of the poor, except via the State, and you care about it -> Ergo, the state is needed. When in reality many non-state solutions are possible, and the state may not even solve or even mitigate poverty.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 07:15 PM
0

Just their specified version of the race card. When that is overdrafted, they go to the "Man Up", "Whiny Losers", "Neckbeards & Internet Virgins" in their intellectual wallets.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 12:01 AM
6

Not only that, in the US it was also based upon religious lines, and this was also some of the fuel for the compulsory public education move in the 19th Century. Protestants viewed themselves as politically active, vs the sedentary/stay at home Catholic women. Thus giving women the vote would "double" the political power of WASPs. Likewise, schools would be used to undermine the "evils" of "papacy".
/r/MensRights05/10/13 10:59 PM
1

Sure, its a very unwholesome alliance. Basically melding "law and order" conservatives, with governments that want to offload responsibility/management of prisons (with associated union labor costs), as well as political profiteers. Edit: Just wanted to add a little bit, since you mentioned lobbyists. It seems a lot of people apply the same hypoagency to politicans, bureaucrats and judges that they do to women. Because there are lobbyists, the politicians are not responsible for their votes, pol…
/r/TheRedPill03/10/13 06:37 AM
2

My point was not to say that what is going in prisons is not a form of slavery, or good in any way. But that labelling it "private" is a rhetorical dodge that avoids the real root of the issue. That this is Government policy. It not the Holy, sacred, pure State corrupted by evil businessmen. This is and has been the status quo. It did not suddenly become evil, it is merely more expansive in its evil as more resources can be extracted from the public via taxation to fund it. Punishment via Debtor…
/r/TheRedPill03/10/13 05:47 AM
3

But wars happened even before the Military Industrial Complex became a thing. Even wars of Choice (eg the Mexican American War, War of 1812, Quasi War w/France.) Edit: I meant it was a red herring for the exact same reason. Sorry if it wasn't clear. If our justice system was private, the prison/punishment system would be completely different, as slave labor is unproductive, and the cost to house/feed/etc people is too high to turn a profit, without confiscatory taxation.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/13 02:11 AM
5

Have you never heard of Chain gangs? When prisons were "public" they uses prison labor to make licence plates and other stuff, and filled gov't and private coffers. The problem isn't who is running prisons, it is that the laws and legal system desires to fill them with people for so called "victimless" crimes.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/13 02:10 AM
3

That fact that prisons are run by private firms has no bearing on this at all. Its just a red herring, to distract from the real problem of the judicial system as a whole. It much like saying that our military is private, and thus we have wars for profit.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/13 09:19 PM
2

Well, Psychological Egoism is not Ethical (or Unethical) Egoism. It merely states this is how people behave, in a basically tautological fashion. It is the reality, not ideal. The appropriate values a person should hold is a subject of much more debate. Don't want to get into a summary on ethics or the like, but basically I believe some primitive "morals" exist as part of evolution (protecting one's children, mate, tribe, in roughly that order), but more developed forms require active training, …
/r/TheRedPill21/09/13 04:47 AM
3

Well one man's conditioning is another's building of character. Generally, I don't believe living up to one's values is a sacrifice, it is moral exemplarism, from Aristotle, and thus is morally praiseworthy. The military conditioning is not primarily to get the band of brothers mentality, although it tries to enhance it. The conditioning in the military is primarily to override the moral training on killing that one receives as a normal human being. Edit: This depends on one's MOS/specialty thou…
/r/TheRedPill21/09/13 04:23 AM
2

Actually it holds even for them. This is known as Psychological Egoism. In short, a person always acts based upon the most important value in their values hierarchy in a given moment. This is why males are generally raised in a certain fashion, and the extreme focus on nationalism/patriotism in education. If you can make being part of any group a large enough value in a person's psyche, they will act on that value.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/13 03:53 AM
1

Read a comment from another redpiller that Canada is actually more repressive on men than the US. Which might explain it.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/13 12:02 AM
1

Eh, her shorter works aren't that bad, and Atlas Shrugged was an easy read, because it was just a pile of confirmation bias for a libertarian. In terms of Red Pill though, Rand's depiction of heroic males and sub/dom behavior is telling, and this from a woman who in some ways was a cult leader. Also her system of Ethical Egoism (trading value for value in a "cold" kind of way) is still a marked improvement from solipsism, which is basically unethical egoism.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/13 09:18 PM
3

Along those lines, one of my favorite quotes: "Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance." H. L. Mencken
/r/TheRedPill17/09/13 11:16 PM
1

It was a republic. A republic is a compromise government between representative democracy (House reps, Tribunes), an Oligarchy (The Patrons -> Senators in Rome, as well as the Senate in the US), a Dictatorship (A Sole executive, the literal Dictator in the case of Rome, and the President in the US). Additionally, there is some adherence to the idea of Rule of Law (per Solon). However, via changes in Constitution (as well as weakening of the States), the President is mostly elected by the people …
/r/TheRedPill17/09/13 11:10 PM
1

Ah good to know, never been in that situation thankfully. Of course, if we do ever get sufficient computing storage/processing power to record everyone's genome/DNA sequence and track them, its pretty much game over for that.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/13 09:15 PM
1

Should still be a concern with those whose DNA is already databased by the various Gov't agencies though (ie suspects in some states, felons, all current and former military, etc).
/r/TheRedPill17/09/13 08:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter