| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Nice try though.Still, those were a shitload of great arguments you brought up there, buddy! Too bad you happened to meet somebody arguing in bad faith, like pro-lifers so commonly seem to do, and couldn't continue bringing them on! Remember when you suggested killing something with a heartbeat was plain murder? Good times, man, good times. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 18/05/19 08:50 PM |
| -1 | Nice try though.So it's inhumane to kill something with a heartbeat? What about animals we slaughter for meat? We do that because we rate their sentient ability to value their life lower than a minor quality of life increase for us, and we don't give a flying fuck about beating hearts. Saying that you can't kill something because it has a heartbeat is most definitely a arbitrarily drawn line based on personal opionion, and it hardly holds up to the standards of most pro-lifers other views. We have never valued … | /r/PussyPassDenied | 18/05/19 01:29 PM |
| 0 | Nice try though.Really? Because the only argument presented in this comment thread is "it's a gut feeling, but the other side does it too." You know, in the comment thread that was started off by someone specifically asking for pro-life arguments...? I assume you'll start providing all those other, rational arguments any second now...? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 18/05/19 12:15 PM |
| -1 | Nice try though.We worked hard on our ability to detect and analyse the emergence of sentience in increasingly complex bundles of nerves. Using the conclusions drawn from those abilities to decide when life needs to be protected and when not (which simply is an option, see: jerking off - should it be outlawed because cells exhibit signs of life? Should it be outlawed because it's killing off potential life?) is not the same as making up a moral code completely derived from personal opinion. What /u/29979245T sa… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 18/05/19 11:18 AM |
| 0 | Nice try though.No, a gross mischaracterization is claiming the analysis of sentience and information processing is on the same level of "just having a gut feeling where to draw the line" as literally having nothing but said gut feeling. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 18/05/19 11:15 AM |
| -3 | Nice try though.If you want to get a feel for the pro-life perspective, just decide roughly where you think the cutoff should be, and then imagine you're in a world where the cutoff is a lot later than that, and you have to defend your position in that world. If you want to get a feel for the pro-choice perspective, imagine living in a world where fertile ovules can be cloned and fetuses vat-grown and people outlawing masturbating/contraception, because for some reason - a gut feeling - potential life is extrem… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 18/05/19 10:42 AM |
| 6 | The naked truth about vibratorsWouldn't it be great if he could go to a doctor, explain his problem, and receive empathetic, humane treatment/assistance? That's why I stated "unless people were being prosecuted for discussing their issues with a professional", which I still don't think they are, so it seems to be going the right way...? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/05/18 04:23 PM |
| 20 | The naked truth about vibratorsWhy, though? A pedophile who keeps himself in check could never even be known to be a pedophile, a pedophile who doesn't is a danger to society and rightfully avoided/outcast. Unless people were prosecuted for digitally created media or discussing their issues with a professional, which I don't think they are? I guess there's the cases of people getting prosecuted as sex offenders for pissing in public or stuff like that, but that seems to be more of an issue with wrongful prosecution rather tha… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/05/18 03:28 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter