TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Skitrel Archive

View 3 posts and 91 comments by Skitrel on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The guy is constantly airy fairy and the way he presents himself is no different to "life coaching" a fraudulent field that seeks to con the spiritually inclined into believing bollocks. In fact, he promotes other "life coaches" too. http://www.davidwygant.com/kimberly.html I'd link to the Bullshit episode of Penn and Teller on life coaching here but it's apparently disappeared from all of the internet, probably false dmca's from con artists that don't want it circulating, worth grabbing on pira…
/r/seduction22/02/12 06:37 PM
-1

David Wygant is a masterful fraud. Fantastic at talking drivel that sells to idiots, terrible at saying anything new.
/r/seduction22/02/12 12:39 PM
3

is incredibly transparent/up-front about what that product is What? You tell me if annihilation method meets the marketing material it had of making you able to pick up absolutely anyone at all, no matter what. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfMBEQbpSDw It is quite possibly the worst product ever created in pua, it's just everything you can get for free, marketed with lies, charging 4000$. It is MM repackaged. Everyone that has ever worked with Neil Strauss has shot him down later on, calling hi…
/r/seduction16/02/12 10:54 AM
5

Taking advantage of idiots isn't immoral? Gotcha.
/r/seduction16/02/12 10:17 AM
7

$4000 for a useless dvd that will magically make you capable of 100% success and able to get any woman at all is NOT honesty and integrity. It is a pack of lies for a useless product he made millions on.
/r/seduction16/02/12 09:55 AM
1

I'm not attempting to be witty because I'm not attempting to shoot you down in order to boost my ego, nor am I going to participate in schoolyard games. What I have done however is argue all the points you've made using fact, reasoned arguments and logic. By failing to offer counter argument to a point you concede by omission. Attempting to divert attention away or drag the conversation into name calling does not change any of the points made. I'll bow out now, you can respond with something equ…
/r/seduction16/02/12 08:57 AM
1

So you concede on all points. Cool.
/r/seduction16/02/12 08:34 AM
2

How is that sexual assault? That's very childish thinking. Any physical sexual interaction that is not consensual is defined as sexual assault by law. This includes sticking your tongue down someone's throat. Every part of pickup is a chance. It's a numbers game, and it's one big game of luck and chance. Hell, that 10 at the bar does not have to sleep with you, but I'd rather take a "chance" instead of being so afraid to fail that I don't take action. And there's nothing wrong with taking a chan…
/r/seduction16/02/12 08:23 AM
1

This only makes you look bad.
/r/seduction16/02/12 08:23 AM
1

I'm comfortable with getting sexual quickly, I'm not comfortable with doing so on a chance, or in giving advice to others that they should do anything like this unless 100% certain of the outcome, as I've stated. Anything less than certain leaves the possibility of it being a sexual assault instead. Again, this is diverting by the use of personal attack, stop doing that.
/r/seduction16/02/12 08:05 AM
2

Yet she continued to run, he got no contact details and it went nowhere. I argue otherwise. This does not change the fact that this advice is dangerous to give, he openly admits to it being a chance that he took. You should not take chances with sexual assault. It's not cool. Regardless of the fact this worked out, there is a certain level of responsibility one has when giving advice, that responsibility is to not give advice that others will incorrectly use and cause fuckups to create discomfor…
/r/seduction16/02/12 08:04 AM
1

Don't be patronising, this is another personal attack but with a veil. You already know that I'm aware of this from my statement that I worked in the industry, it told you all you needed to know that I know all the theory from all the various sources, companies and individuals out there.
/r/seduction16/02/12 08:01 AM
1

You're still failing to offer an argument, instead focus on the personal nature of myself or yourself. I don't care about your credibility, this is all just ego masturbation. Offer up reasoned arguments with logical points. The biggest problem in the pua world is people coughing up bullshit or bigging themselves up based on x when none of it really matters, what matters is that what they say makes logical sense and can be fully reasoned with supporting evidence and observation. If it can't, they…
/r/seduction16/02/12 07:52 AM
2

Oh of course, he knows it's on within 30 seconds of meeting her, while she's backing away and showing no signs of interest. No, as he stated himself, he knew that he'd get no chance at all if he didn't do something drastic because he was going to get blocked, so he took a chance. Don't try to pretend it was based on esp.
/r/seduction16/02/12 07:32 AM
1

Worked in the industry. Have a relationship of 2 years currently. Moderate /r/dating_advice for fun. Nice try with the ad hom and stupid assumptions, do you always attempt to feel superior to others in order to bolster your ego? Do you not have enough personal strength to tell your ego to be cool for a few minutes while you have a discussion based on reason and logical points? Honestly, you're acting like you're 17 years old, be a man, start by having discussions instead of throwing insults to d…
/r/seduction16/02/12 07:31 AM
2

It doesn't matter if the girl is attracted to him, the fact is that this behaviour creates sexual assaults. By Simple pickup's own admission they do not by far have a 100% success rate, I believe they said themselves rejection happens probably 80% of the time. When bearing that in mind, how many sexual assaults occur before one is willing(assuming the best of this video) and it turns out good? You're choosing to ignore the danger of this behaviour for the very few events where it works out mutua…
/r/seduction16/02/12 07:11 AM
3

Awesome if you want to lie, be fake and manipulate your way into someone's pants using Machiavellian tactics.
/r/seduction05/07/11 04:00 PM
1

Having a degree in social psychology Demrec I would expect much better from you. You are familiar with the principle of "ritual magic" correct? - You ought to be, you did say you have a degree in social psychology... NLP is an instance of what social psychologists refer to as "ritual magic." Reduced to its simplest terms NLP works only to the extent that the coaching recipient believes that it works. The jargon, rituals, and practices of NLP thus serve principally to convince the trainee that so…
/r/seduction09/06/11 03:09 AM
1

Pre-note: Having finished writing this I realise it is EPIC long and I feel like you may just look at it and decide to fob this off because it's too much effort. I ask you, if you're really going to do that at least address the Derren Brown and ritual magic points. They're somewhat important wrongs. I have also crossed over by 10k character limit by 5k apparently... I will reply to myself with the second part, you can then reply to the second reply in order preserve the thread in a manner that i…
/r/seduction09/06/11 03:09 AM
1

False accusations? At what point have I made a false accusation? There isn't a you have your way you have mine answer here. Philosophically there is an answer, that answer is derived through triangulation. When you look at a distant object from multiple angles you can derive the correct distance, in the same way by expanding your views to fully understand all points you can zero in on the correct answer. I haven't been annoyed up until now, choosing to exit the debate is a cop out. You've failed…
/r/seduction08/06/11 11:41 PM
0

I gave the face of disapproval because you asked me to define quality then immediately say how it can't be defined. "stand only on your hands but stay on your feet" The question was a rhetorical one made obvious by pointing out you couldn't answer it. Next time I'll make that explicitly clear and as simple as possible for you. The spiel of a company I work for does not represent me as a person, im guessing you agree like a hive mind with anything that a company you work for comes out with? Befor…
/r/seduction08/06/11 09:19 PM
-2

Oh very good at discerning what I said...seeing how it's exactly what I meant. Never said that I defined anyone as a master in THAT statement so wonderful you can jump to conclusions, if you want to read other posts you see how I elaborate on it though. You might not. Your company however does, do I need to quote the spiel? As a representative of your company are you now telling me that you do not see any of them as masters despite their clearly being labelled by the company as them? Also FYI no…
/r/seduction08/06/11 08:51 PM
1

Anchoring and trance are hypnosis. Calling it suggestion might make you think your friends are doing something more ethical but that's simply not the case. And I did read your original feelings on NLP. Don't assume I didn't. I haven't mentioned anything about you being positive or negative towards it. Stop assuming and extrapolating things that aren't there, again.
/r/seduction08/06/11 08:41 PM
1

Yawn. "Mind control" in military government and scientific testing has been proven to ONLY work in conjunction with torture. Without the use of torture there has never NOT ONCE been a scrap of empirical evidence to support it. MK Ultra also had absolutely nothing to do with NLP other than with puas version of NLP which is in many cases misattributed as NLP and is in fact hypnotism. If you're using it to cite hypnotism, fair enough. NLP in it's correctly understood practices and uses is not hypno…
/r/seduction08/06/11 06:21 PM
1

It doesn't.
/r/seduction08/06/11 06:19 PM
-1

Get out of it with your look of disapproval. There is NO definition of quality. Each man makes his own definition of what quality is. What is a high quality woman to you is not a high quality woman to another person of different tastes. Not everyone sees the same qualities as something they want in a person. This is a false dichotomy that's been professed by people in the industry for years now, it's bollocks. First off, saying buyers remorse doesnt exist shows your ignorance on girls. Two I nev…
/r/seduction08/06/11 09:30 AM
-1

Define quality. There is no definition of quality and it's a poor argument. Everyone's taste is different. One guy likes a classy girl while another likes a naughty one. Also usually more often than not going that quick with intent usually leaves the girl with buyers remorse or feeling like shes a whore. Maybe your game is to get a bunch of quick lays but not mine. This is absolute nonsense. Presuming that I am after quick lays is a ridiculous error, please point out at what point I implied or s…
/r/seduction08/06/11 06:44 AM
-4

Nice guys don't finish last.
/r/seduction07/06/11 08:55 PM
-1

It is. It's been debunked thoroughly by science NUMEROUS times and is completely and utterly bollocks. No argument, there isn't one single scrap of evidence in it's favour that hasn't been thoroughly debunked while there's a whole host of evidence against.
/r/seduction07/06/11 08:53 PM
-5

I dont consider myself a "Master" because I feel a Master can close anyone Lmfao... Nobody can close anyone, what a load of bullshit. By saying this are you saying that the (self labelled) "Masters" of Style Life Academy (How are they different to the also labelled "Gurus"?) can close anyone at all? I suggest you're really careful about how you answer this one Prodigy...
/r/seduction07/06/11 08:50 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/seduction/comments/hmxku/conversation_good_article_on_how_not_to_run_out/
/r/seduction07/06/11 08:46 PM
0

Delete from Facebook. Hit the gym.
/r/seduction07/06/11 08:40 PM
-3

Seriously? 10-15 minutes? It shouldn't take you more than 30 seconds. All you have to do is smile, tell them they're cute and just ask them out. I am honestly SHOCKED that anyone thinks anything more is necessary. Don't over convolute things. This was actually the subject of a well known scientific study, conducted twice! Being direct and to the point should get you a positive response 50% of the time. http://www.blog.rlaschool.com/2011/06/07/direct-approach-science/ Honestly, 10-15 minutes is r…
/r/seduction07/06/11 08:25 PM
1

Go direct, tell them you think they're cute/attractive/look great and ask them out. Don't hesitate, just get to the point. http://www.blog.rlaschool.com/2011/06/07/direct-approach-science/
/r/seduction07/06/11 08:20 PM
6

Banned users talk shit. Admins don't go around ninja banning people willy nilly. Saw this exact same shit when Bungie started banning people for abusing glitches to get credits in game. "Heeey, I didn't do anything!" - Yes they fucking did, their mitigating circumstances were all bullshit. Their reward for lying was being humiliated as the staff published the very specific details that made their cheating obvious. The only difference here is reddit aren't humiliating, they're just getting on wit…
/r/seduction01/06/11 05:42 AM
1

Problem is that much of the time the girl isn't acting that way, the guy is simply demonising her for not being attracted to him and he's the subject of being used because he actually wants to be used and places himself in that position. I'm far from saying that all girls don't act like this though.
/r/seduction22/05/11 12:11 AM
1

I also added a superfluous apostrophe to the title... My bad guys.
/r/seduction06/05/11 01:56 PM
0

Take a photo of that reddit alien and you can cash it in for karma under the title "I failed my test today" or "I didn't revise for my test so I drew a reddit alien instead" You may get banned from future tests for photographing a test though... But think of the karma!
/r/seduction04/05/11 01:22 AM
0

I actually ended up making a blog post about that thread as it turned out particularly well. I feel bad for replying to you knowing that it's going to keep you on reddit slightly longer.
/r/seduction04/05/11 12:54 AM
1

My apologies, I didn't think you'd be bothered about whom you heard it from. I merely noticed it before he'd replied and felt that a faster response is always a better one.
/r/seduction03/05/11 11:59 PM
1

My apologies, I didn't think you'd be bothered about whom you heard it from. I merely noticed it before he'd replied and felt that a faster response is always a better one.
/r/seduction03/05/11 11:41 PM
1

Indeed I do. We should take this to pm though.
/r/seduction03/05/11 11:01 PM
1

I thought I was being extremely polite, given the circumstances. The circumstances being what? That someone would dare post a link to someone offering revenue sharing on "your" seddit? You weren't polite at all and you know it, you made a patronising and belittling remark in an attempt to establish yourself as above me. You're here because seddit is 22,529 eager marks. Nothing I can say, and no matter how "rudely" I say it, to you will alter the fact that 22,529 qualified leads is extremely valu…
/r/seduction03/05/11 10:57 PM
1

Me and prince have known each other a while through reddit. I met him here in seddit when I made a shill post in order to find people that aligned with the ethical mindset we have at /r/dating_advice while also being experienced enough to give advice on the topic. It was part of the sub-categorisation we did within /r/relationships and we needed to find quality moderators to help keep things in line. We've never met in person, something that you've made me realise I have to rectify!
/r/seduction03/05/11 10:12 PM
1

Cool stuff, I'm not trying to damage your community and would never wish that of anywhere on reddit. I love reddit and that's particularly obvious when you consider the amount of effort it takes to maintain multiple subreddits that have very strict submission rules.. Even with larger moderation teams there's a LOT that goes on behind the scenes. I was apprehensive myself about putting ads on the blog, I've refused to do it up until now and still think they're ugly and distract from the content, …
/r/seduction03/05/11 10:05 PM
1

Life is hard sometimes, and sometimes we get our feelings hurt. There's no need to be rude intj. Drop it. It appears I've come across you before, interesting. Even mentioned you in an old blog post actually. Didn't recognise the name. The blog post referenced this: http://www.reddit.com/r/seduction/comments/fgoah/gf_has_figured_out_my_game_and_is_not_pleased_how/ I understand the stance but as I said in my other comment to you, just because people can teach themselves something for free doesn't …
/r/seduction03/05/11 09:36 PM
1

So, your problem is with someone making money from it at all. Or with the way the industry operates? Just curious. I've come across this argument before and find it interesting, people seem to think that if something can be done for free then anyone trying to earn money from it is inherently immoral. I disagree with this entirely. I play guitar, I taught myself to play in fact. That does not mean that I think everyone should teach themselves how to play by reading up on it on the internet like I…
/r/seduction03/05/11 09:32 PM
1

Hello there. I own Real Life Attraction, the subject of this reddit post, I also moderate /r/relationships and /r/dating_advice and a number of other subs dotted around. I agree with you, guys who need this stuff are indeed desperate, I also agree that the pua industry preys upon these people, I should know, I worked in it for 5 years before finding the morals that I've got now. I've mentioned my issues with the industry here once before. Edit: this post I respectfully disagree with your automat…
/r/seduction03/05/11 09:16 PM
1

Do cite them, don't just say you can. The onus of proof isn't on him to disprove something that's said, it's on the person that says it to prove it. Don't mistake this for an attack, just saying yes please.
/r/seduction31/03/11 03:36 PM
-5

The thing is that from surveys and polling asian guys in fact DO have smaller average penis size. The black people one is however a myth and Caucasians in fact have the highest average penis length.
/r/seduction31/03/11 01:23 PM
-1

bast ಠ_ಠ
/r/seduction19/03/11 10:52 PM
2

No it wasn't, the guy made a judgement about her sexual choices and preferences based on nothing more than "female" which is a retarded sweeping generalisation. You'd be pissed if I called you a misogynist based on the fact that you post here.
/r/seduction19/03/11 10:12 PM
3

Oh please, you're wrong, the general advice on plowing given to newbies is to just keep going, the obvious "until you're explicitly told she's not interested" is left out because most guys will read into it when told this. Don't make out like guys are normally told in detail that plowing is about pushing past the minor resistances such as bitch shields and lmr, it's rarely ever explained in detail like that on forums such as reddit. Her point here is regarding the guys that just keep going regar…
/r/seduction19/03/11 10:09 PM
1

Ah yes, but there are also fundamentals that work all around, would you not agree with the above 3? Are there others, that's the question :)
/r/seduction15/03/11 03:21 AM
1

Would you not say that also creating harmony could also work though? That conflict is not a necessary part of the equation?
/r/seduction15/03/11 03:19 AM
1

It conflicts because the opposite can also be successful. The point here isn't to draw a picture of the grand scheme, the point here is to draw the absolute universals that aren't disputable. As I said, neither of those are universals, they are not things you should be doing 100% of the time and therefore do not fit here. The idea is to create something fundamental, a base core of 100% information that isn't disputed or argued. People new to the scene have a million different options and things …
/r/seduction15/03/11 03:19 AM
2

are just there to help brand it and add cool lingo for marketing purposes ftfy
/r/seduction12/03/11 12:27 PM
1

Why do you use such phrases as "attract anyone" and absolutes such as "all" on your website and in your marketing? Do you think using a testimonial that states "you will not get better value for your $2,000 than a bootcamp with Brad" is ethical? There are 10 week courses for as little as £200, explain how a 3day boot camp for 7-8 times the price is better value. None of the above can be explained correctly if you're being truthful, don't worry though, I won't hold you to your marketing spiel. It…
/r/seduction12/03/11 10:59 AM
2

Put it out of my misery!
/r/seduction08/03/11 11:36 PM
2

Ohhh yeah, I know what you mean. It's possibly the strangest subreddit out there to be honest. Noonches, the owner didn't intend it to become what it is but he's just sort of going with it. It's odd, there's clearly a great deal of depression there but they all mask it with humour, then there are some trying to help and others who are just there for the comics. Really weird.
/r/seduction05/03/11 04:19 PM
2

Yeah exactly, the best way forwards is to prove that the fears people have are based upon false beliefs. Once the grounding for the fear is disproven it's just a matter of them getting used to doing these things they used to fear and relaxing into it. The major problem is proving to them that their fear is based upon false beliefs. It's all well and good showing them through logic and reason but the real change comes when they're shown evidence. Sadly that can only come through experiences and n…
/r/seduction05/03/11 03:07 PM
1

The best advice on inner stuff is anything regarding limiting beliefs, it's a genuine method used by psychotherapists. There really isn't any other better way to improve self confidence and esteem through writing though, which is the major issue found in this area. What people absolutely have to do is go out and put things into practice, seeing improvement. In teaching I start people off with incredibly small tasks such as making very brief conversation with a shop assistant and steadily rise to…
/r/seduction05/03/11 02:26 PM
1

Ahh, well his lay video wasn't really marketing at all, it was more of a self ego boost and boast of his sexual conquests, it was both hypocritical and completely disrespectful and demeaning to the girls he had been with that year. I agree with you, the blueprint is an excellent resource but you're absolutely right, self validation is something that has yet to be written about in a manner that can actually teach it to people yet. I myself haven't been able to write it in such a way either. I ben…
/r/seduction05/03/11 02:06 PM
1

Tell that to RSD. Hey Tofu, I agree that RSD do mention various things about self validation but I disagree that they "teach" it. They might attempt to be they're unsuccessful.. Are you aware of Brad P's "lay video" at the annual pua conference?
/r/seduction05/03/11 01:48 PM
2

Understatement
/r/seduction05/03/11 01:41 PM
1

Apocalyptic. I covered this a while back and you'll benefit from reading my response here
/r/seduction05/03/11 01:39 PM
1

Clifton, I'm afraid I must disagree with you. I'm incredibly busy this weekend and unfortunately missed this submission nor do I have the time to fully explain, it's a shame I missed it as I did found what dating_advice has become now and would have liked to be here to defend it.. I did however explain this somewhat extensively in a post not too long ago. http://www.reddit.com/r/seduction/comments/fgoah/gf_has_figured_out_my_game_and_is_not_pleased_how/ That ought to explain why I and others dis…
/r/seduction05/03/11 01:38 PM
1

My thoughts and feelings may come across as romantic in nature but I feel that this PU scene should be seen as a means to, acquire the skills, to acquire the one. Opening and closing HB's doesn't mean shit when their boring and it's fleeting. There's nothing wrong with thinking like that but it's not to everyone's tastes, my general viewpoint on things is that it's ok to be promiscuous, monogamous, polyamorous, bi, gay, straight and everything else - provided that everyone involved understands w…
/r/seduction13/02/11 01:55 PM
1

Hmm, what you're trying to say then is that rather than point out the error(being angry) I should explain the root of it, the cause, the why, the logical reasoning behind my suggestion that it ought be controlled and therefore better explain break it down for those with a sciencey frame of mind? Or have I misinterpreted you? I could have done that, but I hadn't intended for my post to be a lesson for everyone, it was more of a thought experiment with Devil, not only did I calm him down and make …
/r/seduction13/02/11 02:18 AM
1

I have indeed, generally around the time I realise I'm trying to have an intelligent conversation with a troll. I'm not going to pretend I'm perfect, I've made no allusions to being so and whether I lose it or not occasionally does not change the fact that everything I've said is absolutely correct. What you are doing here however is detracting, instead of arguing the actual points you are trying to suggest that some personal flaw I have makes my points invalid, I'm afraid it does not.
/r/seduction13/02/11 01:19 AM
1

Thank you, after leaving I wanted to ensure that I didn't get drawn into any of the idolisation things or allow anyone I teach to become drawn into that again. We're all just human beings with different skill levels, we can all attain the same skill levels through gaining experience, having more skill doesn't make you a better human being than the next person. Too many people think they're the manly man when because they can pickup, the fact that they think this kind of contradicts the basis of …
/r/seduction13/02/11 01:13 AM
1

Becoming aggressive just shows that you've got a lack of emotional control and a lack of ability to deal with something in other better ways. The only time aggression is necessary is when you are in physical danger, it is completely pointless and a sign of immaturity in almost all other situations. Aggression is what happens when you lose control of yourself, if you lose control of yourself how can you ever claim to have good frame or state control? This is simply not true.
/r/seduction13/02/11 01:04 AM
1

I don't care about my comment karma, but I do care about this subreddit being so overrun with newbies that they not only post too many questions, but also downvote reminders to respect the sidebar guidelines. Hence the rage. But raging won't change things, on the contrary it will only make people see you negatively and encourage them to downvote you. You might care about Seddit but that does not mean one should lose one's head, there are better ways. You should know from the material here that a…
/r/seduction12/02/11 07:52 PM
0

An amateur shit show, brilliant, you're a modern wordsmith. Sarcasm aside, if someone makes a mistake due to their inexperience then it's still completely unnecessary to get angry at them for it, simply be nice and point out the error so that they might now make it again. It's unnecessary to get so worked up about this, it happens, yes there are a lot of inexperienced people, yes it is a little tedious having to explain the same things over and over again but no, it is not necessary for us to ge…
/r/seduction12/02/11 07:15 PM
1

You know you could have said all of the above in a way that isn't rude and inflammatory? Why are you so worked up by this?
/r/seduction12/02/11 07:00 PM
1

Ah, yes, I forgot it's freezing this time of year. Oh well, option still stands for the summer time and useful to others in hotter areas.
/r/seduction12/02/11 06:16 PM
2

I'll jump in here and say that if people are adamant that they want to go on a bootcamp then research is absolutely imperative, there is a clarification that needs to be made though. When researching, make sure that you are looking into whether or not certain people are good teachers, it doesn't matter how they do with women, it doesn't matter who their partner is, their own personal life has nothing to do with their ability to do their job. There are people who are absolutely fucking fantastic …
/r/seduction12/02/11 03:08 PM
3

Carpe Diem - Do something, anything! You can learn and learn and read and read but without leaving your computer and taking action you will obviously see no results.
/r/seduction12/02/11 02:31 PM
2

Got many friends? Have yourselves a get together(not necessarily a full blown party) and crash there. Other options... Doesn't Toronto have some very nice beaches? I've only passed through before so I'm not sure of the logistics but you'll have a far easier time getting things started on a beach at night/sunset than in a car or an alley. Beaches are one of the few outdoor places where it's not considered slutty, just be aware that sand gets everywhere, you'll need towels for comfort.
/r/seduction12/02/11 02:23 PM
2

This is one of the reasons I don't teach in a bootcamp format and why I branched away from the industry. You're going to be sold to in a manner that preys on your insecurities and wildest fantasies. They will over exaggerate the possibilities They have built a brand that plays towards misogynistic men and circular reselling. The people in the community are so heavily brainwashed by the brand image that they will defend it to the bitter end regardless of logic put forwards to them by people that …
/r/seduction12/02/11 02:09 PM
1

This is why the whole HB rating system is entirely pointless and generally just ego flaunting.
/r/seduction12/02/11 01:38 PM
1

Thanks Skitrel, I really appreciate you putting together such a thoughtful response for my situation. I think your message is something that really effectively bridges the PUA-to-LTR chasm, and I think it's the right way to go in my case. You may be glad to know that I "came clean" pretty early on about this stuff. I had framed it as part of my ongoing work toward self-improvement, and she had no negative reaction at all. If anything, her own self-confidence got a boost knowing that I picked her…
/r/seduction08/02/11 12:09 PM
1

Well, given that she knows he's been using "techniques" on her I'm working on the assumption she knew exactly what he's been doing. Coming entirely clean about it is builds trust and is safer in the long term if she doesn't know what it is given the fact that she could stumble across things at any time with it's presence in daily media.
/r/seduction08/02/11 10:53 AM
5

Ello [edited], DashingPrince mentioned me, I think I can shed some light on this situation that the typical advice of this community certainly wouldn't normally give, let me explain to you the reason why first though. What many people fail to realise when they get into the ASF community is that seduction/pua/asf/whatever term you prefer to use doesn't teach anyone the fundamentals of how to build a lasting relationship. What the teachings of these communities do is teach many different technique…
/r/seduction07/02/11 10:15 PM
1

Cool beans. TYL ;)
/r/seduction21/01/11 05:06 PM
1

Hmm, I think you may be misusing the term. a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others What you're actually referring to is simply some sort of antisocialness, opposed to a lack of caring for others.
/r/seduction21/01/11 05:03 PM
1

This is how I feel also yet it's not how the video portrayed things to be fair. The video portrayed "dating techniques" as a mask, when the reality is that it should become a part of your inner being, you aren't lying or being deceptive if you've made it an integral part of your natural habit. In a sense, you are just being yourself.
/r/seduction21/01/11 04:29 PM
2

I agree with you, I'm pretty surprised to see Derren sticking his name to this to be honest. Especially considering his extremely heavy use of NLP, which is visible in all of his acts. sociopaths like Mystery I'll disagree on that point though, having met the man, he's certainly not a sociopath, the man cares a lot.
/r/seduction21/01/11 04:27 PM
2

To be fair, the chat up line generator is pretty jokey and it's clearly just a tool for them to pull in some extra traffic from the casual crowd. Nobody takes chat up lines seriously. I think you'll find it's "English - English", given that there's multiple countries with entirely different accents that make up "Britain". (Sorry, bit of resentment there, being British myself =P)
/r/seduction21/01/11 03:44 PM
1

Source and full list of other episodes: http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/tv-shows/science-attraction/
/r/seduction21/01/11 02:38 PM
1

The system places ads where people are discussing keywords linked with that ad. Each of those places is clearly relevant to each of those ads. Sure, it's technically the wrong audience that it's getting to in these cases, but it proves that the system works the way it should by serving ads based on the conversation that is occurring.
/r/MensRights13/09/10 09:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter