| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| – | Why do these arguments always have to go to "your insecure" or "no wonder woman dont like you"?To claeify, i think t he logic of your intent is sound, not the comparison itself. Okay, I think i need elaboration rhen because I still think it fits that exact definition. The comparison i think you are making is that the same argument in a different context makes no sense, which is true, but you have changed the argument more than you intended, I feel. The order of magnitude isnt the same either (murder vs theft). If i am interpreting tou correctly, you are saying that both are just a broadst… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 28/02/26 02:33 PM |
| – | Why do these arguments always have to go to "your insecure" or "no wonder woman dont like you"?I think we are just disagreeing on definitions now. The point is your logic was fine, but the context and the order of magnitude was not. You could of merely argued from a pure logical stand point (set A contains b (abusers) and c (non-abusers) therefore all of set A are abusers) pure logical fallacy, and if they dont agree then hey, not your problem. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 28/02/26 02:21 PM |
| – | Why do these arguments always have to go to "your insecure" or "no wonder woman dont like you"?Thats the argument you should of stuck with tbh. And while we disagree on the false equivalence, i think even if true it just distract and detracts from your original argument, which made them just go rogue (ad hominem) | /r/PussyPassDenied | 28/02/26 01:58 PM |
| 1 | Why do these arguments always have to go to "your insecure" or "no wonder woman dont like you"?And apples and oranges are both fruits, doesn't mean their comparison is always in the right context. Here you changed the variables to a completely different argument (ie gender issues to racial issues) and although both arguments involve alienation, the context of both is vastly different. I would of kept the apology within the same context (gender issues). Simply changing the variables does not a good analogy make. Would help if we knew the original context too, its quite vague to know why th… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 28/02/26 01:41 PM |
| 1 | Why do these arguments always have to go to "your insecure" or "no wonder woman dont like you"?You are kind of both oversimplifying but also you are making a false equivalence argument (an apples and oranges argument). Also, its "to a tee" or "to a T", but that's just semantics. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 28/02/26 01:18 PM |
| 11 | Mouthy woman squares up with a Brazilian dude, who has little tolerance for her anticsThat's why I'm saying both are in the wrong, he should of disengaged after the push, he stayed, showing intent to continue the confrontation. She also kept approaching agggresivel which just antoginised the guy, should of tried what your saying, disengage and report, if your right you will be proven right. But this is from my point of view, it is a different country with vastly different systems and values so to pass moral judgement wo u of be a bit arrogant of me, in broad terms though, I agree… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 29/11/19 02:06 AM |
| 34 | Mouthy woman squares up with a Brazilian dude, who has little tolerance for her anticsDevils advocate: the only logic line would be that freedom from abuse is generally a human right in most countries and defending that right with reasonable force is permitted. However, there was no deescalation here at all so both parties are at fault. The fact she kept going in rather then disengage does make her the aggressor though, even though the first hit wasn't thrown by her, the other guy was trying to keep distance most of the time. He should not of done it, it was excessive, but to say… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 29/11/19 01:54 AM |
| 1 | Notice the self control @the beginningIn Australia we have an unwritten rule, winner of the 1 on 1 buys the other a beer, winner gets to be correct in the argument, everyone (painfully) wins Ps this only happens in rural town pubs, never seen this in the cities | /r/PussyPassDenied | 22/10/19 06:34 AM |
| 15 | ATOMIC Pussypassdenied: Della Lou Griffin, 53, who sold girl into prostitution, was sentenced to life in prison for aggravated sexual assault of a child and to 20 years on each of four counts of sexual assault of a child. Judge ordered a total of life + 80 year sentence.So "25 to life".just means 25 - 25 | /r/PussyPassDenied | 11/10/19 03:23 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter