TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Skrulltop Archive

View 0 posts and 63 comments by Skrulltop on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/MensRights02/06/26 05:25 PM
-2

Yes, but you're just looking at the tip of the iceberg though. We should - Re-stigmatize sex out of wedlock. - Praise marriage - Praise family units and staying together - Demonize feminism Turns out Christian morals is what everyone inherently needs and wants, but most won't admit.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 04:28 PM
9

It's up to good parents to teach their kids how the world works and to stand up to this crap when they see it. Especially your daughter speaking up against the hate on her brother.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 04:18 AM
0

LOL ok, you're way, way, way out there. Since you are just making troll claims with no substance, I'm stopping. Pearls before swine and all.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 03:01 AM
3

You have severe misunderstandings that can be cleared up by quick internet searches. Liberalism is and always has been a left wing ideology. At a very high and vague level, you could say leftism is for equality and worker rights, but when you start asking questions, it becomes painfully apparent that it really reduces to elitism, communism, socialism, which 100% of the time results in unbelievably massive wealth disparities. So, it accomplishes the exact opposite of what it pretends to solve for…
/r/MensRights16/05/26 01:47 AM
-1

Reparations is such a stupid argument. Stop.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 06:00 PM
4

I hope you're joking...everything feminism stands for and has pushed for is what the Democrat/leftists tow the line for. It is 100% lock step with leftism and always has been.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 05:50 PM
1

Praying for you. Drop work hours and be more involved in your church. Join a home group, join a discipleship group. You will love the community. Jesus saves.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 04:16 PM
1

No. The notion that high taxes made execs indifferent to profits is absurd. Profit maximization drives survival in competitive markets: firms that don't pursue it lose capital, talent, and market share to those that do. High marginal corporate rates (50%+ statutory in the 1950s) didn't eliminate this, they increased incentives for tax avoidance, deferral, debt financing, and shifting compensation.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 05:15 AM
-6

Sadly, it's not.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 08:01 PM
-16

Is that a joke? You must not pay attention to any US news. (which is fine). All Democrats are basically far leftists at this point, in the US, because of their shifting views over the last 15 years.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 06:58 PM
3

Would only work if you're talking to leftists.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 03:11 PM
5

Mental illness.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 07:57 PM
16

Identifying patterns and calling things out is not slander. Saying stuff like this is part of the reason why no one takes you seriously. You can't even have a normal conversation with people without being the victim.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 06:54 PM
1

You don't have to ask me, you can go read up on Muslim scholars who believe what I'm saying. Al-Suyuti, Ibn Taymiyyah, Umdat al-Salik, Shafi'i fiqh manual, Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri, Jalal ad-Din al-Mahalli, Jalal ad-Din as-Suyut, Abu Bakr (the first caliph) reinforces what I'm saying by interpreting 9:29 as a command to fight Jews and Christians until they submit to Islamic rule. In today's context, this interpretation argues that Surah 9 applies because the conditions it addresses—non-Muslim do…
/r/MensRights23/12/25 05:31 AM
0

There are multiple things going on in the historical background of Surah 9, it's not just one "specific war". You know much less than you pretend to. Interesting for you to lash out at people, throwing accusations of lack of knowledge when you, yourself, seem to know so little. Dunning Kruger much? What does apply is that most Muslims do not know the historical background of Surah 9. Surah 9 is used very easily by Muslims to wage war on whoever they want to, kill whomever they please, take slave…
/r/MensRights19/12/25 05:25 AM
2

No, it doesn't. Please provide the source and context of the scripture, and how it applies to today, not just for Israelites of the OT. I'll wait.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 10:03 PM
4

I'm not saying to treat people poorly, but Surah 5 and Surah 9 call for Muslims to violence against non-Muslims. So, it's understandable to not want Muslims around when their holy book literally calls for them to hurt you. Do all of them follow it? No. Should they? Yes, according to Islam, yes. It's perfectly reasonable to not want people around whose religion calls for this.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 09:15 PM
14

Soooo, she doesn't even have a charge for falsely accusing him of SA? She's only in trouble for filming him and putting it on the internet?
/r/MensRights17/11/25 04:46 AM
4

Right on, man. Good luck!
/r/MensRights12/10/25 03:04 AM
158

Run, run, run. There are a million girls out there way better than her. No woman you'd want to marry would ever do that. Why would you risk your entire life on her?
/r/MensRights11/10/25 11:06 PM
8

This, gentlemen, is modern feminism.
/r/MensRights04/10/25 02:51 AM
29

Any woman who demands the man provide everything and then she, herself, gets to work her own job and keep "her own money" is delusional, greedy, and logically inconsistent, at best. There is no legitimate argument for a woman to be keeping her own money. It simply shows that she loves money more than family, wants to be babied and buy luxury things at no expense to herself. She wants the man to sacrifice everything while she gains everything herself. She has no interest in a true partnership or …
/r/MensRights30/09/25 03:36 PM
2

Incorrect. I already told you what the word means, which is based on what the two root words literally mean. Calling linguistic accuracy "pseudo-science bs" is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights25/09/25 02:58 PM
2

Transphobic means I would be afraid of them. I am neither afraid nor unloving towards them. Claiming that "invalidating" them (which basically means I have to affirm literally anything they want me to believe) is hating on them is completely absurd and has no root in logic nor rationality.
/r/MensRights25/09/25 12:33 AM
1

She successfully deceived people for a period of time, yes. But it didn't actually make her genetically black, did it?
/r/MensRights24/09/25 09:17 PM
9

Hmm, did you read what I wrote? Feel free to point out something "transphobic" in there and then argue it. Don't just name call.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 09:14 PM
45

Sorry, but putting on a costume doesn't make you the sex you claim to be. I can't put on blackface and claim to be black, can I? It wouldn't make me black. Tricking someone into thinking you're the opposite sex doesn't make you the opposite sex. Even if my blackface make up was REALLY good and I actually deceived people into thinking I truly was black, it still wouldn't make me black, would it? A man is someone with XY chromosomes and/or XY gametes. This is not hate, it's not offensive. I don't …
/r/MensRights24/09/25 09:06 PM
-4

Well, you sound like a petulant child who didn't get his way. There are many things in life we can't control. Get over yourself, dude.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 05:04 AM
26

The only treatment of miscarriage is abortion? Wtf are you talking about? Miscarriage assistance is not banned anywhere. This is an insane leftist made-up talking point.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 03:39 AM
1

Ok...you're the one stating that FGM involves cutting penises, so you're clearly confused on what we're talking about. You're trying to conflate FGM to be the same as male circumcision, and they are not. I explained why they are not and you have failed to refute my point. Pretty sure the discussion is over at this point.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 02:23 PM
1

You clearly either cannot read or refuse to read anything I have written. I don't engage with bad faith arguers.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 04:34 AM
0

This is all incoherent and unrelated to any argument I made. I'm not clicking on your links.
/r/MensRights29/07/24 08:19 PM
-1

That's fine. It still doesn't cover the fact that I point out they are completely different things that have completely different results. Circumcision = good benefits and zero negative. FGM = damaging https://search.brave.com/search?q=negative+effects+of+female+circumcision&source=desktop&summary=1&summary_og=578146bb6531e39fab09b1
/r/MensRights29/07/24 05:33 AM
1

No, I never said anything about mocking from the look of the penis. I was talking about a cleft palate/lip.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:12 PM
1

You're clearly a bad faith arguer. Look at your loaded questions and misrepresentation of what I said. Or, perhaps your English is simply not good enough to engage in a debate like this. I don't engage with bad faith arguers.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 10:37 PM
1

I was just listing arguments that people make for why it's "bad". I never said you made the argument. Read the comments and don't assume life revolves around you. If you want your kid to wait, fine, go ahead. I really don't care. The cleft palate/lip comparison was to show how people like you don't care about consent when it's something YOU find important (Fixing a cleft palate/lip). But when it's something you don't find important (circumcision), consent all-of-a-sudden becomes the most importa…
/r/MensRights28/07/24 09:35 PM
1

Ok...notice how you can't refute a single thing I said. I'm the one intellectually engaging while you are the one pretending to be better than anyone who disagrees with you. Get off your soap box and come back to reality. Say something of substance or don't say anything. It's so boring.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 09:31 PM
0

"Yes it is. Removing or altering healthy tissue from the body of anyone under 18 is by definition barbaric." Nope. You can call it whatever you want and change definitions however you want. You're still wrong. "Which can be prevented by using proper hygiene. Same result, 100% less barbaric genital mutilation of baby boys." This is also incorrect. There are plenty of men who clean it as much as possible and still have issues with infections. "Define "over-sensitivity" and explain why men having m…
/r/MensRights28/07/24 09:30 PM
1

This sentence was about having a cleft palate/lip that was never tended to. I think you're understanding that I was talking about having foreskin, which I was not.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 09:27 PM
0

FGM is completely different, and you know it. It literally inhibits a woman's ability to orgasm and sexual sensation. There is no good argument for FGM at all. Circumcision does not change any functionality of the penis whatsoever. Notice how you didn't refute a single thing I said. All you have are logical fallacies. When that's the case, it's time to change your opinion on the matter.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 09:04 PM
-18

It's not barbaric. Leaving it leads to infections and can lead to huge over-sensitivity. People have been doing it for thousands and thousands of years - and for good reason. "But the baby cries!" Yes. The baby cries. Babies cry for everything because they have no way of expressing thoughts and feelings. "But it hurts them!" Wrong. Only if you do it the old fashioned way. The way they do it now has zero pain associated with it. They use a rubber band and a piece of plastic that kills the skin an…
/r/MensRights28/07/24 03:25 AM
2

It's like you're assuming that if a guy gets off to porn, he no longer desires to have a woman by his side and couldn't possibly be lonely.
/r/MensRights25/06/24 02:24 PM
6

Doubt.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 11:06 PM
-7

Let's not pretend like we can honestly dismiss anything that points the finger at men. Everyone needs to accept their own responsibility for things they can control and that affect them. All 3 of these points are true. But, two things an be true at the same time. These can all be true AND there can be really crappy women out there as well as modern feminism poisoning women's minds. We need to do our best as men to right the ship of society. Stop watching porn.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 03:13 AM
0

You don't agree with the name "Patriarchy"? Well, sorry. Words have meaning. Patriarchy, by definition, does not villainize men. It doesn't villainize anyone at all. If feminists you're talking to are using it as a cudgel to make you submit to them, you need to have the argumentative capacity to put them in their place with knowledge, logic, and rhetoric. Don't go around trying to change words because you failed to convince a feminist of something.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:20 PM
1

Owned
/r/MensRights12/05/24 01:18 AM
0

A small, solid, Christian church will absolutely help you.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 05:48 PM
1

65k is enough for a house in many, many places. It sounds like you simply want to live in a very high end place/location. Adjust your expectations to reality.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 02:25 PM
7

Look at your whole life and what you want your life to look like when you're too old to do anything about it. Know what you want. Save your money for what you want. This isn't a 30s only thing, it goes for everyone. Example: Do you want to flush $800-$2000/month down the toilet in rent for the rest of your life? If not, save your money and get what you want. Live with your parents for a year and save $20,000.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 09:51 PM
1

Wow, a lot of foolish comments here. Obviously, no one watched Ben talk. He's 100% right. This whole post is a strawman, victimhood mentality, and whining. If you retire without anything to do, your quality of life diminishes almost instantaneously and you'll die very soon because of it. People need purpose and men need a job to do.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 06:28 PM
2

If you don't care about changing their minds, act like Andrew Wilson and destroy them with good argumentation, facts, and logic in an aggressive, no-crap way. This will also likely be a shorter conversation. If you want to change their minds, you need to be softer with their smooth brains. Be calm and friendly. Gently ask questions and nudge them toward a SMALL change in their beliefs. If they like you, they will be MUCH more willing to change their minds on a topic. This is true for anyone.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 02:59 AM
4

Feminism used to mean equal rights, back in the 60s. Modern feminism means "We want equality when I like the results". Notice how there are no feminists complaining about lack of women on oil rigs. Notice how there are no feminists complaining about lack of women in plumbing. Notice how there are no feminists complaining about lack of women roofing houses. Notice how there are no feminists complaining about lack of women on crab fishing. Now let's look at how non-trad women spend their money vs …
/r/MensRights14/02/24 08:16 PM
47

I mean, in this video, the dude puts the dumbbell right behind her. It was a stupid move. However, that doesn't mean there's an epidemic of men being toxic in the gym towards women, blah, blah, blah.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 04:57 AM
1

Wow, what a video.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 07:18 PM
-3

Nah, you're wrong. No one will hide their true feelings for that long. You're just missing the flags.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 08:50 PM
17

There's a lot of "My wife was perfect and then she got all crazy! I couldn't have seen it coming.". And I just don't believe them. The more reasonable answer is: The red flags were there and you either chose to ignore them or your missed them completely. Some red flags to consider: - Calls herself a feminist. - Wants a traditional man but refuses to be a traditional woman. - "His money is ours, but my money is mine." mentality. - Does OnlyFans. - Is ok with women doing OnlyFans. - Does not think…
/r/MensRights02/01/24 02:59 AM
1

It's going to come with cancer, I guarantee it.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 08:21 PM
-1

You missed my first sentence where I said mature people.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 04:36 AM
-16

Please explain how what I said is against men's rights. And without insults, please.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 11:42 PM
-5

How about you start with a committed marriage between two mature people before you start making kids? "But I want to have sex with no responsibility!" If you haven't figured it out yet, life isn't about doing whatever you want with no responsibilities or consequences. If this is what you want, then you're a child.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 10:44 PM
51

There are two major problems here: Lowered education and drive for greatness in men. This is due to many reasons. Women feeling more and more entitled. "I'm a 10 no matter what" attitude. "I deserve X Y Z."
/r/MensRights20/10/23 01:23 AM
2

This is a great read
/r/MensRights02/09/23 06:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter