| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Whale gets triggered over human kissing at restaurant, gets sent back to Pacific OceanWell, the alternative is that she grew up with a normal childhood, and then suddenly decided to self-destroy, which is a much sadder thought. So it's not a "let's kill hitler as a baby", it's more a "It's a really depressing thought that anyone can decide to do what hitler did." | /r/PussyPassDenied | 01/04/17 10:17 AM |
| 1 | Saw these guys at Dragon*ConWell, if you can feel pressure, heat, stretching, whatever, then clearly, some of the nerves are not erogenous. It stands to reason, it's obvious, any fool can see, etc. is not what I'm here for. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/15 06:24 AM |
| 1 | Saw these guys at Dragon*ConYes, that's why I wrote what I did, about the nature of the nerve endings. There are plenty of nerve endings in the foreskin - no debate there. It's the idea that tens of thousands of them are sexual nerve endings, that I'm not sure is true. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/15 03:23 PM |
| 3 | Saw these guys at Dragon*ConHang on, I've seen variations of these facts, but not in that combination. I accept that the foreskin has tens of thousands of nerve-endings, but that they're all secually responsive (moreso than any other random nerve ending) is new to me, and I'm not certain that it's true. Could someone back it up with a source? Circumcisiondecision.com raises doubt, circumcision.org talks about the benefit of the foreskin, but doesn't mention nerve-endings. There are plenty of advantages, don't get me wrong,… | /r/MensRights | 09/09/15 04:52 AM |
| 12 | Saw these guys at Dragon*ConI was warned about it, told about general hygiene, etc., but I distinctly remember when I was a late teen on a wilderness trip, and I didn't clean behind the foreskin for... two weeks or something. I mean, it didn't smell nice, but there was no visible build-up of anything, at all. Of course, secretions vary from person to person, but I got the idea that smegma shows up after a long time of not washing your junk. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/15 04:42 AM |
| 0 | You should know: You're being watched, and branded, for taking part in this subreddit.Just posting here to check if I get on the list. | /r/TheRedPill | 29/07/15 05:52 AM |
| 5 | Drink in the face? Enjoy the floor.... don't touch the poo. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 26/11/14 06:07 PM |
| 0 | Drink in the face? Enjoy the floor.I tell this to my pupils all the time. Yes, he jostled you in the doorway - it was an accident, and no, it's not okay to punch him back. It's pretty simple. And then I see this on reddit, and it's like being back at work. "She did it first" and so on and so forth. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 26/11/14 06:06 PM |
| 15 | I acknowledge Feminist BS exists.Well, don't you see - penis-shaped rockets that eject combustion materials is all that any man can ever come up with. Only a real womyn could ever invent a rocket that uses the mysterious internal workings that symbolize the holy ovaries themselves, and don't need no man. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/14 08:14 PM |
| 15 | If a woman refuses an abortion when the man wants to have one, there should be a legal document signed releasing the man from obligation and his paternal rights.... I think I know what you mean, but you're using loaded language and bad grammar. Do you mean: "The father should do this within a set timeframe, so the mother has enough time to decide whether to keep the child or not"? | /r/TheRedPill | 28/09/13 08:40 PM |
| 55 | If a woman refuses an abortion when the man wants to have one, there should be a legal document signed releasing the man from obligation and his paternal rights.It's just missing something - the father also accepts that he has no right to seek out the child until that child has reached 21 (or 18 or whatever) years of age, and that any such attempt makes the document null and void, making the father responsible for back pay of child support. | /r/TheRedPill | 28/09/13 05:16 PM |
| 3 | Paternity Fraud is Rape! Paternity Rape is worse then Rape-Rape. A cuckolded deceived man is raped every day, his money, effort, devotion stolen, caring for a child that is not his. Comparable to secretly implanting the fertilized egg of her husband's mistress into the womb of an unsuspecting womanGot an erection? That's rape! Extremism aside, you're coming across as a deluded madman, with more expletives than points. The liberal feminists sound more balanced than you do, so you're not really doing much for your point of view. | /r/MensRights | 03/07/11 03:12 PM |
| 1 | This is not how it's done (stolen from r/f7u12)That's exactly how it's done. | /r/seduction | 30/12/10 09:26 PM |
| 2 | i have no idea anymore what words like 'feminism' and 'rape' mean. The common meanings are long gone and they've become Orwellian doublespeak: language that deliberately disguises, distorts, or reverses the meaning of words.The whole "rape by fraud" seems really strange to me. I googled it and found: "Last month, a judge dismissed rape charges in a case where a woman was allegedly tricked by her boyfriend into having sex with a stranger", "Sabbar Kashur met a Jewish woman in downtown Jerusalem and tricked her into thinking he was also a Jew and interested in a long-term relationship", "By obtaining intercourse with the nineteen-year old through a false representation of a significant or material matter, the fifteen… | /r/MensRights | 20/12/10 07:46 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter