TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Skwiish Archive

View 0 posts and 398 comments by Skwiish on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

None of those advertisements are for men or to appeal to men though. Most advertisment in general is targeted at women, so of course it’s about how it makes them feel, not about what men want to fuck. There has historically been very few fat people used in runway shows, but there is fat representation of men in the media far more often than for women until recently. However, in general it’s still “fat is unattractive” for both men and women. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6452135/ Give…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 06:53 PM
–

Like I said, there’s a shitload of research done on this. The orgasm gap only exists for heterosexual women, or women who have sex with men. This disparity doesn’t exist for women in lesbian relationships. Women can tell you why. In general, it’s a lack of stimulation. Most men focus on penetrative sex. I have been lucky with partners in my life, but I have also been in very long term relationships. Clitoral stimulation is rarely included in hookups with men, or sex with men you hardly know. I’m…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 06:39 PM
–

It’s all very interesting and very sad. Feminist researchers credit the "phallocentricity"[40] of mixed-sex partnering as being a main contributor to the orgasm gap; multiple studies of sexual behaviour and attitudes have concluded that mixed-sex partners prioritize PIV penetration and men's satisfaction.[28][41][42][1][43][24][44][45][46][excessive citations] In turn, this contributes to the faking orgasm behaviour being more prevalent in women than in men: as there appears to be 'a sexual scri…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 06:20 PM
1

Fat feminism is for women, then. Not about what makes them attractive to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 05:36 PM
–

Obese people make up the majority of people in the United States. Never heard of “fat feminism” in my life. Everyone should be more or less comfortable with their body, but I grew up with heroin chic and nearly all my friends ended up with an ED in high school.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 03:37 AM
1

Okay. Sure Jan
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 10:51 PM
1

Nope, I don’t agree that women are making fun of him, demonizing their relationship or saying they shouldn’t be together. I have only seen the exact opposite. Would you rather everyone blow smoke up his ass and tell him he looks like cavill? He’s not as attractive as she is but it’s a perfect example of women not caring as much about looks and going for personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 10:51 PM
–

Body shaming is not what I have ever heard women say they need help from men with. It’s the violence and over-sexualization and harassment.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 03:11 AM
-2

Oh it’s an “ugly opinion” now. Like rating attractiveness on a scale and generalizing an entire gender as “Stacies” or “plates” and other dehumanizing things? No one has ever claimed that women are blind, don’t be ridiculous. You’re just mad that women aren’t forced to keep these opinions to themselves and that now we can choose not to be with someone for any reason, which is why you’d like to focus on the attractiveness. You have all decided that it’s has to be about looks instead of repugnant …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 02:57 AM
–

So your problem is that he is sad that people recognize he is not as attractive as her? I thought that was obvious? That doesn’t mean people are against them being together or somehow demonizing their relationship. He is objectively not as nice to look at as she is.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 10:23 PM
–

Well if you have to search for that. You can find nearly anything you want by searching Google. That doesn’t mean it’s the most common or average opinion. You would prefer women to be a hive mind and all think the same exact thing so it’s easier for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 09:34 PM
–

I have only seen women praise him for how he loves her and goes out of his way to make her happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 09:26 PM
–

A lot of those “exceptional” men from history stole works from women. Exceptional ability is not exclusive to men, that’s a mythology that men built around themselves. Women were excluded because of their sex, even when they did accomplish things far beyond their male peers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matilda_effect The Matilda effect is a bias against acknowledging the achievements of women scientists and inventors, whose work is consequently attributed to their male colleagues Examples : Ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 12:36 AM
6

What are you talking about? Fathers are praised for “watching the kids” when it’s their own child, praised for changing diapers or waking up in the middle of the night. You know, all the stuff that would make a woman a bad mother if she didn’t do.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 11:35 PM
–

Men are not represented at the bottom. Women worldwide have higher rates of poverty and they make up 2/3rds of the worlds modern enslaved population, either out of trafficking or desperation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_21st_century The Global Slavery Index (2018) estimated that roughly 40.3 million individuals are currently caught in modern slavery, with 71% of those being female, and 1 in 4 being children.[131][132] As of 2018, the countries with the most slaves were: India (8…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 11:15 PM
–

It absolutely is the case, why would it mean that no men are at the bottom? That’s not how anything works lol advantage is never given equally, don’t be silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 11:05 PM
–

You can’t declare that men are “more likely” to do exceptional things when the men deny autonomy to other groups who are also capable of doing exceptional things. That doesn’t make them “more likely”, it means that only they have historically been granted the privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 11:02 PM
–

Then why is the offspring referred to as the father’s “legacy”? He doesn’t raise them, birth them or carry them for 9 months.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 09:13 PM
2

You’re saying that there is a way to predict that someone will cheat on you far in advance of that action taking place? Or is this only when women get cheated on?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 08:26 PM
3

As if it’s like going to a grocery store and grabbing a product off a shelf. People lie and cheat, sometimes decades later. It’s not an indictment on the person who “picked” as if it’s something you can perceive as defective before it fails you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 08:16 PM
–

Also that you should just want to do those jobs because it’s so important to society, but we aren’t going to pay you for any of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 07:50 PM
12

We all know what you really mean when you all complain about “dating” and “relationships”, but thanks for dropping the pretense in this case, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 03:29 PM
3

There was no denial from me, anyway. A marginal increase in likelihood of orgasm does not mean an attractive man play will with her clit 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 04:50 PM
1

So lesbians must find their partners extra hot? Is that why straight women don’t cum when men fuck them, regardless of how attractive they are? I don’t think that’s what’s happening. Even if there is a marginal increase in the likelihood of having an orgasm, most straight women do not have orgasms during penetrative sex with men. There are definitely other things that are far more important if you are trying to give a woman an orgasm. https://academic.oup.com/smoa/article/12/3/qfae042/7702123?lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 04:38 PM
2

How is it reaching when I am quoting one of the sources you provided? Did you not read it before you linked it?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 04:16 PM
1

My point was there is no way that guarantees a woman will receive an orgasm. Straight women do not have orgasms during hookups, or through penetration alone regardless of how attractive the man is. Per your own sources; Men's attractiveness predicted their female partner's copulatory orgasm frequency, although men's partners assessed attractiveness, so orgasm may have caused women to find their partners more attractive, rather than the reverse (Shackelford et al., 2000). In another study, women'…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 04:07 PM
3

Sex is not more enjoyable for women just because a man is attractive. That is true for men, but women are not going to orgasm because a man is hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 02:28 PM
0

You’re right but they don’t want to hear it. They would rather fantasize about women being cheated on https://news.gallup.com/poll/656708/lgbtq-identification-rises.aspx The recent increase is largely due to more adults in their late teens, 20s and 30s -- particularly young women -- saying they are bisexual. But younger adults are also more likely than older adults to identify as lesbian, gay, transgender or other nonheterosexual orientations. The rate of LGBTQ+ identification is likely to conti…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 08:05 PM
4

It’s been explained to death why that one dating app study from 20 years ago doesn’t apply to reality today. FAR more men are single than women. Women aren't going single en masse, they're just dating the same dudes and then blaming it on the ones who have nothing to do with how they were treated. That’s the part I was responding to. It’s wrong. The majority of women aren’t entertaining men at all. They are dating each other, bisexual or gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 07:29 PM
2

It’s not true. Lots of gen z women and millennials are bisexual. “Almost 30% of Gen Z women identify as LGBTQ+, most as bisexual,” Jeffrey Jones, a senior editor at Gallup, told NBC News. “That’s where a lot of the growth seems to be happening.” https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/nearly-30-gen-z-women-identify-lgbtq-gallup-survey-finds-rcna143019
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 05:14 PM
0

The women are dating each other. “Almost 30% of Gen Z women identify as LGBTQ+, most as bisexual,” Jeffrey Jones, a senior editor at Gallup, told NBC News. “That’s where a lot of the growth seems to be happening.” https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/nearly-30-gen-z-women-identify-lgbtq-gallup-survey-finds-rcna143019
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 05:13 PM
3

Being aggressively policed where? And that does not mean any behavior has changed. Most hasn’t. You’re saying women haven’t had severe social pressures from birth, to the benefit of men?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:34 PM
7

Or maybe the men could change their behavior for once.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:10 PM
3

Seeing as how each state is legislating this medication differently, it’s a pretty silly question, there isn’t a way to quantify this yet. It’s absolutely “cataclysmic” for some people since they are literally dying. They meaning women, which is probably why you lot seem to think it’s just fine. No one has moved any goalposts, I provided you with a wide variety of information about all the different diseases that people who have no interest in being pregnant are being affected by, and therefore …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:43 AM
4

Could you explain to me why the consequences would have to be “cataclysmic” before they are considered harmful and incorrect? I suppose we could wait until we have hundreds of thousands of people unintentionally harmed, more women dying of sepsis. The fact that these laws already vary by state effect different people in different ways. https://www.theregreview.org/2023/04/22/dolbow-patent-law-could-also-limit-mifepristone-access/ Currently, overlapping regulations create a precarious balance tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 11:55 PM
7

This is not true. Anyone who uses the medication that is used for abortions (mifpristone, misoprostol, etanercept, and methotrexate) are affected. This includes as an emergency contraceptive and for people who use it to treat cushings disease, as these drugs are more than an abortifacient. One of these is also used to treat soldiers with gulf war illness because it blocks cortisol in higher doses, another two for arthritis, etc. So with the laws changing in different states, people are having di…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 08:55 PM
9

Abortion being restricted has cost the lives of both women and babies. Go figure. So the conservatives trying to “save the lives of babies”, have just created policy that kills more people.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 08:43 PM
2

I am bisexual, I have probably eaten more pussy than you have. Yes I have made women come before lol You should save that crap for the men on this board who haven’t had the privilege. You’re right, getting men off is way easier than women, and women instinctually know what women like. Ask another woman maybe? Men are notoriously against asking/taking direction.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 05:27 AM
2

Yes of course straight women know what pleases them better than men, men don’t have the same plumbing, they don’t know what feels good without being told! This has to be the absolute dumbest take so far. Straight men know how to please straight women best? Clearly not! Since they never get off, no matter the dick. Straight and lesbian women have nerves in the same places, ffs. We are not a different species. Men are obsessed with the idea that their dick is “good” or is the source of orgasm, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 03:19 AM
2

The men at the gym literally have their nipples out. What gym are you going to where women are in tank tops with their tits out the arm holes?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 03:08 AM
1

Definitely occurs all the time in the manosphere
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 10:53 PM
9

Hahaha this is nonsense. It’s like you have never been inside a gym and are basing your opinion of them off manosphere YouTube videos. 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 09:51 PM
1

No, most women do not have casual sex. Having a one night stand does not mean you have casual sex. Women have friends with benefits or they fuck someone they know and trust. It’s not random hookups because they are also less likely to orgasm with random hookups. I will link you a source that another red pill man posted elsewhere in this thread https://pleasurebetter.com/orgasm-statistics/ Women in a relationship of 6+ months are more than 6 times as likely to orgasm during a sexual encounter tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 09:00 PM
1

Risk is relevant to women no matter what you look like. Sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 08:53 PM
1

Which is why women will turn down an attractive man if he’s untrustworthy or potentially dirty.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 06:51 PM
1

Those statistics are actually right around what I thought. From your own source about pleasure, that women don’t orgasm from one time hookups, but repeated encounters and relationships are better for women’s pleasure, they need clitoral stimulation even during penetration; there is nothing here at all about attractiveness of a male partner having an effect on a woman’s orgasm. 81.6% of women don’t orgasm from intercourse alone (without additional clit stimulation). Only 18.4% of women report tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 06:50 PM
2

Having a one night stand and regretting it is not the same thing as a “cock carousel” of dudes being used for casual sex. https://www.womens-health.com/sex-statistics-by-age-gender-relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 06:30 PM
3

It’s funny, I thought men were bad at sec because they don’t get it as often and therefore hate women and don’t care about our orgasm. 🤷‍♀️ I was a woman who could easily orgasm without toys but it took years to teach a man to do it for me, toys are more effective because sex lasts a shorter period of time than it would with another woman. Long term relationships are great for women for this reason, very rarely is a man able or interested or both when sex usually only lasts 10 minutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 06:24 PM
5

If I focused on your belly button instead of your dick, you’d be annoyed too, if only one of those is going to give you an orgasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 06:20 PM
4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orgasm_gap The orgasm gap or pleasure gap is the disparity in sexual satisfaction—specifically the unequal frequency in achieving orgasm during sexual encounters—between heterosexual men and women. Across every demographic that has been studied, women report the lowest frequency of reaching orgasm during sexual encounters with men. Researchers believe that multiple causes contribute to the orgasm gap.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Orgasm gap researcher Laurie Mintz…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 04:09 PM
20

They can’t do that because they gamify everything and it would ruin their chances to fuck as many women as they can. That’s why they cast such a wide net to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 03:27 PM
3

It’s okay if that’s hard to understand. Really matches up with reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 03:13 PM
5

I know you guys are obsessed with penetration because it’s the only part that involves you, but it’s the least necessary component of woman’s orgasm. Most of the time we experience the opposite problem where the clit is too sensitive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 02:45 PM
5

This actually explains most relationships, why women feel used for sex and labor, because men use them for sex and labor. lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 02:38 PM
3

Men are bad at giving women orgasms, it’s not the toys doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 02:35 PM
1

Being sexually open is reserved for men and always has been. The rates of orgasm for women in straight relationships is abysmal across the board. It’s the lowest of everyone, attractive partner or not. There’s shame, pain, pregnancy, stds risk, and still no orgasm, things that men don’t even think about when their dick is soft, let alone hard, so of course they are sexually open. It’s why there are no standards about where they’ll put their dick in the first place. If you didn’t get to have an o…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 02:31 PM
1

I’ve been told by redpill men that it’s not true for men because they have biological instincts to sleep with as many women as possible so they have evolved out of that or something. Here’s an example of this on Reddit : https://np.reddit.com/r/exredpill/comments/xwb5zd/is_redpill_right_about_pair_bonding/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 04:19 AM
1

I’ve been told by redpill men that it’s not true for men because they have biological instincts to sleep with as many women as possible so they have evolved out of that or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 04:05 AM
5

I have turned down men I found attractive. Men focus way more on superficial traits than women do and are far more likely to be interested in sex at the drop of a hat. The level of attractiveness of the man doesn’t change the risk of std or pregnancy if a condom breaks. Surely doesn’t mean I am more likely to have an orgasm, either.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 03:37 AM
18

Most women don’t have casual sex. It’s a different risk versus reward for women. There’s no likelihood you’ll have an orgasm, and at the same time taking on all of the risk of std and pregnancy or worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 06:15 PM
17

No, only women lose their ability to pair bond because of biology or something. It’s always a one sided thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 04:55 PM
12

Are you new here? The dudes here constantly use “dating” and “relationships” as a euphemism for sex. There are probably some here who would genuinely prefer a long term relationship, but the most of them are devastated they can’t have casual sex like women can, have the options women do, with the same effort as women. There’s a lot of pretense involved
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 04:53 PM
1

There are dating sites for autistic people specifically to find other autistic people. Your one friend doesn’t change that neurodivergent people typically seek out other neurodivergent people, since neurotypical tend to dislike or misunderstand us. There is evidence that ND people tend to have more ND friends than NT. https://www.aspie-singles.com/ https://autisticdating.net/ https://www.hikiapp.com/ https://www.autismdate.com/en.html https://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/autism-singles
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 04:36 PM
1

As I told the other guy, it’s obviously dependent upon your level of functioning, but the many autistic men on this subreddit blaming their autism or women for their lack of success is probably not the same group of people who are low functioning and unable to learn social skills. I did include my own anecdotes but sourced other material which backs up those anecdotes. There just isn’t that much research yet on neurodivergent relationships. ADHD is on the same spectrum as ASD, I am not sure what…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 02:13 AM
1

I never claimed everyone will reproduce. That goes without saying, mating is not 1:1 in any species on the planet and it would be catastrophic if it were. Sure, in some peoples reality it will probably be that they are unlucky ultimately. It still won’t be because women are selecting for non-autistic men as much as it’s a social skill deficit. I’ve never heard of someone being broken up with because they got a late diagnoses of autism. It’s more difficult to be personable and pick up on social q…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 01:57 AM
1

What stats are those?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 01:34 AM
1

I am not making it about you either, I don’t care about your success in dating. I am stating general facts about the data we have about neurodivergent relationships. For instance again, a lot of my neurodivergent friends found each other in the same classes or doing the same intellectual hobbies as one another. Of course there will be a subject of people who will struggle more or less depending on their level of disability, but you are claiming it’s not possible when it absolutely is. People who…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 01:30 AM
1

No, there’s a lot of evidence that neurodivergent people are naturally attracted and tend to find and befriend one another. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/27546330251359958 There is anecdotal evidence of neurodivergent (ND) people preferentially befriending each other. Here we present large-scale mixed-methods evidence investigating whether neurotype affects friendship making and exploring ND and neurotypical (NT) experiences of being friends with ND people. Our results show that ND pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 01:17 AM
1

I am sure people who have less ability to function will struggle to find love but even then it’s not unheard of. They even had a “love on the spectrum” dating show that was extremely popular, and many other examples of similarly abled people having full romantic lives. My point is that you will probably have to look for someone who is also neurodivergent if you want to be easily understood and accepted for all the things you cannot change about yourself and your ability. It’s a cop out to declar…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 01:14 AM
1

Did you not read my comments? I have repeatedly said that these skills might be harder for boys to learn because they have no real social pressure for it outside of dating, I am repudiating the sentiment that it’s a fated existence. I have a lot of neurodivergent friends who have had neurodivergent kids with their neurodivergent husbands, so I know for a fact it’s not your neurodivergence specifically that is your barrier to learning how to be a little charismatic. It’s your attitude about why i…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 12:59 AM
1

It’s still a misrepresentation because it’s not the autism that is the deterrent, it’s the lack of social skills. You can be upset that they are more difficult for boys to learn socially while still understanding that it’s a set of skills that you are all capable of learning. You can even consider dating as the social pressure if that’s what you desire, it’s just that women’s lives are far more internal and so is there neurodivergence.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 12:37 AM
-2

We are talking about children, if you can possibly imagine they are not supposed to be “more attractive” or whatever you just suggested. Women get diagnosed with disorders, just not neurodivergence. There’s a lot of misdiagnosed women who have been told they have bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, generalized anxiety, and depression instead of the appropriate diagnoses of autism, adhd, and ocd. Stereotypes regarding neurodivergent presentations are partly to blame for the gender …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 12:19 AM
–

I call bullshit. Autistic women learn social skills by social pressure from a young age. Your peers always know something is amiss, boys and girls alike, it’s very hard until you learn. This is why girls get such late diagnoses. There’s a lot less social pressure on boys, and less focus on misbehavior. Boys are expected to act out. Source : I am neurodivergent and didn't know until my late 20’s
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 08:33 PM
–

They are called social skills for a reason, they can be learned.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 07:36 PM
2

You realize that what your friend says doesn’t apply to anyone but her, right? I love spicy food but not everyone will even enjoy spice, some people have no taste for it at all. Women are not a monolith, and your friend isn’t speaking for all women. She is a statistical anomaly by all accounts. On average, women have between 4 to 8 sexual partners over their lifetime, with some studies indicating a median of about 4.2 partners for women aged 25 to 44 in the United States.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 08:02 PM
1

Anecdotes, anecdotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 10:49 PM
1

It 100% is related to how fast lesbian couples move. They also move in together as soon as they fall in love with each other, that’s why the term “U-Haul lesbians” exists. If you think that trend is not also affecting their marriage and divorce rates, you must not know many lesbians. Can you explain why you think of divorce as something overwhelmingly negative? It’s not a death sentence, so why are we using this metric? It’s also got absolutely nothing to do with orgasms or the orgasm gap. We ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 12:10 AM
1

Women love weddings and dresses and a fancy party, so they get married far earlier in their relationship. Divorcing when the relationship doesn’t work out isn’t a bad thing. There are far more angry, volatile men who hate their wives and would rather cheat on them or worse, than divorce. Women at least don’t kill their spouse or annihilate their entire families before they get divorced. I think more divorce is not really a bad thing if it prevents miserable lives, or deaths.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 08:36 PM
–

They had whole other families, what are you talking about? Business men away on “work trips”, or military men out on deployment in another country fathered and funded many more children than would be feasible today with inflation. Getting away with it until someone dies or tries to go looking wasn’t unheard of. Just the advent of DNA testing has changed how easily men get caught. https://thednageek.com/war-babes/
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 03:13 AM
–

Please quote where I said he has to be anything of the sort. There is immense risk for women, which is why we casually fuck people we trust/know. Usually a friend or ex lover where only the sex was good but nothing else worked out. Doesn’t matter what you look like, it’s not like you’re planning to have kids with this person.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 02:55 AM
2

I am not suggesting it’s the only way, just appealing to their lazy nature. I have had boyfriends in the past get jealous of toys and wouldn’t let me keep or use them, I’ve since found it’s much easier to subtract the man instead, personally. My point was that the focus being on themselves is indeed selfish, treating the female orgasm like a complicated mythological event that might not even be worth the effort is not as feasible now that we have rechargeable tools that can all but guarantee a f…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 02:43 AM
–

They literally aren’t a higher standard for me or any woman I know. Being sexually compatible and trustworthy regarding sexual health etc is literally the only requirement. You can be below average in looks, intelligence and ambition, and have no value to add to a relationship and still be suitable for a fwb situation. Being trustworthy and sexually compatible being the only requirement is usually why women only casually sleep with people they know or have dated in the past. Not worth the risk t…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 02:33 AM
–

Maybe try reading the comment again. Men prioritizing their own orgasm over that of their female partner when toys exist is selfish. Trying to blame women for having anatomy that isn’t as “easy” as their dipstick is selfish, if they want to fuck women. Having a quickie is not an excuse to neglect your partner’s orgasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 02:26 AM
–

It doesn’t have to be that way in the modern era though. There are all kinds of toys and techniques you can perform in order to prioritize the female orgasm. There is no excuse really, other than selfishness.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 12:36 AM
5

Has nothing to do with intuition. It’s just far less easy to live a double life than it used to be, like in grandpappy’s day where you could afford another family in the next town over or in another state.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 11:27 PM
–

This is a very overlooked aspect. If the orgasms were as easy (or guaranteed) with the same small effort, (like it is for men) it might make it worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 10:51 PM
–

Oh sure, there are probably some men that get away with it for years, but if you think that women can’t tell when the sex drops off or the man changes his behavior and causes her to suspect cheating that she won’t start looking for signs, maybe you are the one who is biased by the stories you hear from cheating men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 10:23 PM
–

No, I just know how frequently divorces are initiated by women because men are caught cheating all the time, waaaay before they would ever divorce a woman they hate. Sugar babies and only fans are some of the most frequently cited paper trails these days, but you can continue to believe that men who are sneaky never get caught.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 10:12 PM
–

I am not married but I might as well have been, since we were together for over 7 years. There were times we went without sex because of health issues, or if he or I wasn’t in the mood. You can do the mature adult thing and go take care of it yourself instead of shaming your partner into servicing you like a car or something. It’s deeply unsexy to throw a fit about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 10:08 PM
–

That’s up to the man, I suppose. Maybe with some sexually transmitted disease? Messages on his phone regarding transactions? Missing money from a joint account? Arrested for indecent exposure and solicitation? Some men get caught in the act. Happens frequently.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 10:05 PM
4

This is a huge reason among the women I know, in a blue state. Casual hookups are off the table because of all the undercover conservative men even though we have protections statewide.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 09:12 PM
5

Without romance or sex. I am neither asexual or aromantic. I think this is probably far more likely for the majority of women than you seem to think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 09:10 PM
–

No it’s not “owed” in a relationship. Sex is not duty of work.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 09:07 PM
–

Because sex and all the risks are higher for women. This is true for pregnancy, STI’s and accidents during sex like skin tearing. Maybe if it was a risk-free endeavor, we would have evolved to be less picky but that isn’t how our biology works.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 09:05 PM
–

There is nothing anatomically preventing women from having quickies. Lesbians do it all the time, it’s a matter of prioritization as she explained above. Men are prioritizing their orgasm always.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 09:02 PM
–

When he gets caught and divorced, he’s gonna be stuck with prostitutes and washing his own dishes and underwear. 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 08:59 PM
–

They think they are going to force us to be with them, or die.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 12:36 PM
3

So penetration is humiliating? Why would that be?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 08:16 PM
5

You are exactly right. Of course they aren’t going to listen to you, either. The risk of harm is always higher for the receiver. Wish I could give you an award. 🏆
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 08:13 PM
–

As a bi woman, it’s the same with tits. Everyone loves some big ol’ tiddies, but there is no way I am kicking someone out of bed for having itty bitty tiddies either.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 06:49 PM
2

Yeah, it’s typically catastrophizing how men are failing and “falling behind”, how terrible it is that no one is dating and getting married and most importantly having babies, it’s framed as some tragic thing that’s only occurring to men instead of something that is actually good for women. The real reason this is happening is because of the political divide between men and women, since women don’t want to be with someone who doesn’t share the same values and beliefs. Men don’t care.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 11:27 PM
5

No, instead of watching a single news segment and making sweeping generalizations, why not use statistics about the success women are finding as single women? That seems like a really good place to start, seeing as how the only way men can “fall behind” is if women are making headway. In my experience there is no lack of “proposals”, it’s just that women have redirected their energy into endeavors that benefit them. I don’t know any women who are pining over men, that seems to have been another …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 05:17 AM
8

No, we are opting out, you choose to believe news stories that have been written to fill a time slot. Most women are succeeding in their own lives and that’s why more single women own their homes by themselves than men do, have more college degrees than men do, and they aren’t exactly putting any of that stuff on the news.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 02:56 AM
1

I think this is related to your social circles. I’m in a blue state and I am bisexual so I think the queerness of the artsy fartsy social circles I’ve been a part of have been very liberal with their attitudes about sex and sharing sexual partners, probably in ways that are less common outside of them, but I think you and I are both millennials at least. The statistics for gen Z are significantly worse off in relationships of any type, probably because of the nature of internet dating. I persona…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 01:53 AM
1

We accept that men have a harder time having casual sex. Women do not value casual sex like men do. Men are the ones who cannot accept this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 01:41 AM
–

I’ve got a lot of friends who are men who are not misogynistic and vote blue, and those are the ones I know that don’t have a problem finding casual sex, but they don’t hold a lot of the toxic conservative values about “virginal purity” or what have you that you hear about here. I think the mismatch when it comes to casual sex for women, is that women don’t participate in casual sex with strangers at the same level that men like to, but they will have casual sex with friends, both with other wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 01:36 AM
1

I’m sorry that has been your experience. Is there an underlying reason for that? I know it’s different for women, who are often insecure from the start because of the messaging we get from society telling us that we are not good or pure enough just by the luck of being born as women. Women can tell when a man is only trying to fuck her, especially as we get older, having encountered many dishonest men who are only trying to use them for sex. Even when we are young, it can feel inherently predato…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 01:32 AM
11

Marriage has been a pretty unequal endeavor and now that women can choose to avoid the unpaid labor, they have done so in favor of paid labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 01:18 AM
2

Insecurity is a huge turn off for most people.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 01:13 AM
1

Earnest desire for your body parts can be unloving, definitely. Mostly it’s selfish. Women are far less likely to abandon their marriage over “sexual needs” and nothing else. Men will get into relationships with women they don’t like or respect in order to have access to her body and her domestic labor and child rearing. No love in that, either.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 01:12 AM
–

Attraction is not always a superficial thing tied to the way someone looks or sex. There is a lot of evidence that just being around someone you find average can become the most attractive person to you through their personality and other traits. There is over a dozen types of attraction and sometimes it takes a while for it to develop.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 01:04 AM
–

This says way more about the kind of people you choose to associate with. I don’t know many men who would discuss this with their friends to begin with, but maybe this is more to do with age/maturity.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 12:56 AM
–

No one thinks it’s bad. You just have to accept that the reason it’s difficult for men is because women don’t like to participate in casual sex as much as men do. This is why a lot of red pill men will trick women they hate into relationships because it’s easier to have consistent access to regular sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 12:54 AM
–

It doesn’t, but that’s not the discussion. The separation between sexual desire and love are improtant as they are not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 12:50 AM
–

The majority of women who have fuck buddies are finding them as friends or lovers first. Lots of amicable breakups where the sex is the only thing that worked out, or with friends who are trusted and have similar values.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 12:47 AM
1

I have to define the word polycule to you in order to prove I understand what they are? Why is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 12:40 AM
1

I was in one for many years with four people, two who only met once and didn’t like each other much, and there was definitely jealousy involved. I refuted the claim that it’s a standard in all similar relationships, or in favor of women and the detriment to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 12:36 AM
1

I have no confusion but thank you for your concern
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 12:31 AM
1

If you read the comment I was responding to, OP claimed In open relationships, its the woman who's fucking around while the man is usually the Nesting partner who barely gets action with other women on the side unless he's good looking. The gender power imbalance in poly community is absolutely insane So you agree with this statement?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 12:30 AM
1

You are assuming that’s why she asked. casual sex is easier for women, but women don’t date for casual sex often. They date for long term relationships. Finding sex for women is easy, yes, but that is not the same thing as finding a good quality man. Men define their success by the sex they have, women don’t prioritize sex in the same way men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 12:27 AM
2

I said they can be messy not that it’s a requirement, as in there is jealousy sometimes but people are human beings. The idea that they are inherently unequal because women can more easily find partners is the part I take issue with. Generally people I have known in polycules are not preoccupied with the amount of sex they get compared to others in that insecure way that is discussed here frequently.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 12:24 AM
1

Absolutely not, I have had plenty of experience with them personally and vicariously through close friends. They are messy but there usually isn’t a man stomping his feet because one of his woman partners has an easier time finding someone else to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 12:17 AM
–

Right, but that’s not related to love in most ways, especially when you are adults who work full time and have children. The feet-kicking fits men have about ending their relationships because they aren’t “loved” when it’s really more about coercing their wife into servicing them out of duty is just just pathetic. Love and lust are not the same thing, which is why most married women cry about affection instead, because that is showing love and has nothing to do with sexual contact.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 12:15 AM
2

Right, and none of those mean that it’s somehow a bad thing if there is an unequal amount of sex happening with each partner. People who get into polycules are generally not preoccupied with trying to own their partners sexually.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 12:12 AM
1

You’re trying to pick a fight with OP about her line of questioning and when she didn’t take the bait, you conclude that all men are right by assuming the most common claim from men here, that women claim dating is harder for them. Women repeatedly tell men that it’s a quality issue, there is no problems getting dates, they simply aren’t worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 12:11 AM
–

They believe that men get better with age, as opposed to women who hit a wall at the same age
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 12:04 AM
6

I think that’s really what the problem is here with most of you guys on this subreddit, it’s not that you all inherently lack the ability to get laid, it’s simply because women have more and easier options available to them and they aren’t interested in most of them and it confounds you because you’re so focused on sex at all times.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 12:01 AM
–

The problem is you are focusing on the wrong things again. I’m sure for some women, fucking a hot guy for one night is a thrill, but that is not a requirement. That hot guy might be a slob who’s illiterate and a complete idiot but if he seems nonviolent and trustworthy he could get lucky for a night.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 11:53 PM
–

Seems like a bunch of comments on Reddit. How do you know they are women? Do you speak to any women you know in real life about this sort of thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 11:45 PM
4

I have no need, I am self aware and don’t have insecurities about what I do with my genitals.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 11:43 PM
–

I think you are confusing open marriages with polycules. I have known people to open their marriages after a threesome or general dead bedrooms, only for the men to find out they aren’t as attractive to other women as they thought they were because of modern dating apps and dating disparities as you get older. Polycules where I live have far more same sex couples and aren’t preoccupied with ownership of another persons body parts. Maybe that’s more a queer thing? Lots of bisexuals in polycules h…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 11:38 PM
1

Men are incorrect about their conclusions about women, which matches up with their success rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 11:33 PM
1

Your silly conclusion that what men say is true is actually true. It’s definitely not, and especially here in this subreddit. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 11:28 PM
–

This is simply not true. Another one of those things that is easily disproven if you just go to a public place where you can see anyone coupled up. In my experience, even the most unattractive people can find themselves in polycules but I live in a blue state where there is less taboo about that sort of thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 11:27 PM
–

They aren’t. lol this is redpill mythology, it’s definitely not true in reality. If it were true, you’d see way more women with younger men and that’s not common at all. Most fuck buddies I have had were not even my type, but were friends first and most important trustworthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 11:20 PM
–

I’m sure if you took the advice that men give women here and lower your standards, you could also find a woman to fuck. Probably even regularly.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 11:15 PM
–

You know if that was the correct conclusion, don’t you think you guys would be more successful in helping each other out? It seems that either you overestimate their intelligence or your own.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 11:10 PM
–

Wrong again. Why do you guys think there are more requirements for a fuck buddy than a husband? There are far less. I’ve had fuck buddies I would never be with long term, that’s why they were fuck buddies. They don’t have to be anything other than a good and trustworthy friend who is upfront and obviously sexually compatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 11:09 PM
–

To them, sex is love and closeness and intimacy. They don’t think they are different things. That’s why married men will often cry about their wives not initiating, because it makes them feel undesired and they equate that to being unloved.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 11:02 PM
–

It’s literally not something women discuss, this is something men are extremely focused on because they are obsessed with sex but are insecure at their lack of ability to get it, so they don’t want any women they desire to have more experience than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 10:51 PM
–

This is only really telling about your experience with adult relationships and not much else.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 10:45 PM
–

I don’t concern myself with men who are preoccupied with sexual history to begin with. I don’t know how you can conclude that women who think like me are sexually promiscuous and have been somehow sidelined by “highly sexually experienced, secure, gifted men”, since all of those qualities are extremely uncommon to find together in one man to begin with. Plus I thought the justification for male promiscuity was the “genetic predisposition” to wanting novelty.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 10:42 PM
–

This is my reality as well as for a few of my friends and we have also stopped dating altogether because of the quality issues and just general mistreatment. You are somehow less human the more they want you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 10:26 PM
–

Why is this upsetting to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 10:05 PM
–

Core values, ambition and belief systems are not optional for relationships. The superficial things that are the focus here are the things that are optional but no one wants to believe women when they say that for some reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 10:03 PM
–

That was never up for debate, it’s how sexual selection works for nearly all species. It’s not unique to humans at all. Sex does not equal a compatible relationship, men on this subreddit just want easy sex and no responsibility for their own genetic material.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 10:00 PM
3

They don’t see the deception as anything other than “part of the game”, which is why they are definitely not ready to talk about coercion as rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 06:10 AM
4

What does this have to do with your previous unfounded statement?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 04:03 AM
7

Said without even a hint of irony. We are so cooked lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 03:58 AM
5

This is obviously bullshit if you just go outside to a mall and see shitload of people of all ages coupled up. They aren’t all movie stars.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 03:55 AM
1

Especially rebuttals that consist of no facts, and only feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 11:14 PM
1

Hahahahaha Nice rebuttal.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 10:54 PM
1

Why are you focused on the “men in power”? Their success is not how you define the average It’s called homosociality, men are homosocial in their little hierarchal structures, and they only use women as a tool to determine how they treat each other as males. Women aren’t the ones you’re trying to impress by fucking as many women as you can; that’s other men. Which is why it feels like a failure when women aren’t interested, but it’s easier to blame the “object” you desire. That failure is define…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 10:01 PM
1

You are just making stuff up. Provide sources and I will as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 07:29 PM
2

You’re incorrect. I can provide you sources if you are interested. It’s well studied and understood how social structures exist under hegemonic masculinity, and it’s got nothing to do with the agency of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 07:28 PM
0

No, feminists still recognize that the root of the issue is a toxic version of masculinity, where the hierarchy is determined by sexual access and domination. The entire basis is misogyny. Just because you think some of the advice is good, doesn't mean the ideology isn’t harmful. The advice that is given is very generic advice, has existed long before redpill and much like stoicism, there are far better sources to gather this information from. Redpill is attractive to disaffected males because o…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 02:24 AM
2

Do you know how averages work?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 06:10 PM
2

Unfortunately we will never know because men are obsessed with their sex drives, even as they age out of their healthy reproductive years, they will wipe out entire species of endangered animals in order to have a boner. Men in their 20’s are microdosing cialis and viagra right now, they have subreddits about supplements are overtaken by horny men with erectile dysfunction.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 02:56 AM
2

You just said they were not misogynists but then “covert” misogynists. You also don’t have to be successful with women to think that sex with them is a type of currency. Something that gets ignored here a lot is that men lie quite a bit about their sexual conquests, especially to each other. It’s absolutely looked at like a resource that is being withheld from some men and that’s the basis of a lot of incel ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 07:30 AM
2

He’s referring to hegemonic masculinity wherein men only admire and respect other men. It’s common among straight men, they will use sex with women as currency to impress their friends and gain status within an in-group. There’s a lot of data about this. Statistically there are probably a lot more bi men, but they won’t admit it even to themselves of the hierarchies men create for each other and how they also utilize homophobia to enforce them. Comp het is a real thing, probably only makes it ea…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 07:20 AM
–

No, he said that men dislike women even if they want to fuck them and that’s correct. Doesn’t have anything to do with being a gay misogynist. You are the only one confused. It’s kind of well known that men will fuck women for other reasons than liking women, even if they are straight.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 07:12 AM
1

No, he said that men dislike women even if they want to fuck them and that’s correct. Doesn’t have anything to do with being a misogynist. You are the only one confused
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 07:12 AM
1

No, he said that men dislike women even if they want to fuck them and that’s correct. Doesn’t have anything to do with being a misogynist. You are the only one confused
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 07:12 AM
2

Yes, even attractive men can be misogynists. This is such a terminally online take. Point me to the homophobia
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 07:03 AM
1

It absolutely applies to misogynists. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 06:57 AM
3

No, it wouldn’t tank. It would change. That’s literally what markets do, they change according to need/want. This isn’t even as disruptive as other things that have happened to the markets suddenly.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 11:50 PM
1

We are wired to fuck. That’s about it bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 11:48 PM
–

They “typically” don’t form those relationships because of hegemonic masculinity and other men making feelings “gay”. That’s the only reason. That’s not a good reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 09:50 PM
1

No, not necessarily. I have been jealous of my boyfriend’s guitar, doesn’t mean he was flirting with it. Attention is currency, after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 10:58 AM
–

You don’t need that support from the opposite sex is my point. You should be forming intimate relationships with other men, you can do this platonically. You don’t need to involve romance or sex in this kind of support in any way. There is also therapy. Why are those options overlooked in favor of putting all of that responsibility on a “romantic partner”?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 10:04 AM
1

Nah, mostly that if another woman has vetted you and you aren’t some creepy pervert that is dangerous or violent if you have a ring on your finger. Other women also will see you as “taken” and lighten up around a married man because the idea is he won’t be hitting on them, but men are notorious at completely misreading these situations with women. Isn’t that why you guys can’t tell when women are flirting? Or you suddenly definitely know that all these taken women are flirting? Can’t be both.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:34 AM
–

There are already a lot less single mothers as teenagers, it’s a huge reason the rate of reproduction has decreased in the US. It’s declined 77% in the last 30 years. Only conservatives are convinced this is a bad thing. https://www.npr.org/2023/01/08/1147737247/teen-pregnancy-rates-have-declined-significantly
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:10 AM
–

Biology has nothing to do with romantic love or romance or anything of the sort. You guys rely on the affection of women to emotionally regulate yourselves because you aren’t expected to do it yourself as a man. Every animal on earth has a biological urge to reproduce, you are conflating a tendency that was born out of patriarchy and a biological imperative. They aren’t the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:08 AM
1

Yep. I know of many, even though I won’t be having kids either. Genes can die but ideas don’t. You guys just say this to cope with never reproducing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:04 AM
1

Genes die, ideas don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:03 AM
2

It didn’t happen for the markets that advertise and capitalize on romantic love for women even though women seem to be moving away from that as a focus. Arguably; markets far more lucrative for capitalists in America. Edit; examples are wedding industry, romantic comedies, diamonds, etc
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:11 AM
1

Women too were once focused on finding romantic love. It’s in every piece of media directed at women, every bit of advertising trying to capitalize on this. Yet women have relationships that sustain them outside of romantic love, so it’s absolutely possible even in spite of all the subliminal messaging. This excuse is bullshit for men in the same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:01 AM
2

True, and I will do you one better; even those men who get into relationships where they are supposedly “ethically non-monogamous”, they manage to ruin those relationships with dishonesty. The dishonesty and manipulation are essential to the game of sleeping around, it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:27 AM
2

You’re incorrect. I have posted this information on this subreddit before, but it’s not popular since it’s reality. I’ll copy paste to make it easy: It’s called homosociality, men are homosocial in their little hierarchal structures, and they only use women as a tool to determine how they treat each other as males. Women aren’t the ones you’re trying to impress by fucking as many women as you can; that’s other men. Which is why it feels like a failure when women aren’t interested, but it’s easie…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:56 AM
2

Women need external stimulation, you guys are the ones that require penetration.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 10:59 PM
0

No, women are repulsed by promiscuous men, and it’s often the reason they divorce them. This is an essential part of the hierarchy that men create in a culture defined by hegemonic masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 10:47 PM
1

Always has been. They will never see it this way though.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 10:46 PM
1

All I did was provide you scientific studies done around the world that show how these structures exist in the absence of women. Not once did I claim women are supreme victims of anything, rather they are collateral damage in the animal farm type hierarchies that men create. You can continue to blame women for this but it changes nothing about the reality; that the failure to fuck women in order to gain manhood was not a system that benefits anyone except men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 11:22 PM
9

A lot of men do not feel it’s a mutual act and it’s something that they get to do to women instead, but that lines up with the same train of thought that allows men to devalue women who have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 08:33 PM
1

Then why are men “falling behind” left and right by multiple metrics, and blaming their failures on the lack of sexual access to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 05:08 PM
1

Nope, women aren’t “rewarding it”, that’s what men do to each other. It’s called homosociality, men are homosocial in their little hierarchal structures, and they only use women as a tool to determine how they treat each other as males. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosociality Moreover, a study done by Carol Martin (1989)[14] found that boys 4.5 years of age expressed significantly more dislike for a girl depicted as a "tomboy" than a boy depicted as a "sissy"; whereas boys 8.5 years of age…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 03:57 PM
1

Your needs do not require another person. That isn’t what a need is. Human beings are not the only ones who will sometimes never find a mate. There is more to life than romantic love.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 04:23 AM
1

Yeah, it’s husband material.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 03:47 AM
2

I don’t see how you can blame women for societal issues when women do not hold any power whatsoever in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 02:45 AM
2

No I thought men built society and gave women rights blah blah blah. Men created everything, including god. You can take the blame for your society as well, since we have not had any choice in how we get to participate in it as women until this recent century. On the point of male victimhood; There is now a Herculean effort being made (in Europe) in order to reach teen boys who are in these internet spaces and immersing themselves in hateful and harmful rhetoric. There are certain behavioral pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 02:38 AM
1

“Obtaining a mate” is hegemonic masculinity being enforced by other males. You can stop using that metric to measure your manhood at any time. Women don’t do this. https://operations.du.edu/inclusive-teaching/content/hegemonic-masculinity No one mentioned cults. It’s a bit of stochastic terrorism, a bit of lone wolf radicalization, a lot of misogynistic “woe-is-me” at self perpetuating loneliness. I know you aren’t actually asking me this, and so I am wasting my time, but I will still suggest yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 02:26 AM
0

Only misogynists make their sexlessness the motive for mass murder. #not all men, I thought
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 02:20 AM
1

In my experience, men get very upset if you have to give yourself an orgasm without their help. Jealous of toys etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:27 AM
0

I was talking to a Canadian who was trying to convince me to go visit him. I almost did it, so I totally get where you are coming from. We even discussed maternity mortality and he was shocked to learn it was so dangerous in the US
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:17 AM
9

Why not come out and just say it? You want to force women into sexual slavery again to benefit the men who aren’t being picked
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:14 AM
7

American men have Peter Pan syndrome and a shitload of them aren’t interested in any sort of monogamy for themselves, only their female partner. Going to a third world country for a wife is for looking for a dependent, not commitment. That’s about control, and definitely not about monogamy either.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:12 AM
3

No. The answer is no. Women can get dates as easily as you can find gay sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 12:50 AM
1

Actually you are wrong. That is the one common thread amongst almost all school shooters and this is a behavioral profile that the FBI uses. So it’s officially an incel problem and there have been dozens of studies on this, and other countries are now starting to classify this version of misogyny as terrorism. Here is one : https://news.lehigh.edu/new-research-highlights-link-between-school-shootings-and-violence-against-women A new study of school shooters over the past 50 years found that 70% …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 12:41 AM
0

Incels only feel “bashed into the ground” because for some reason the males in our species put all of their value as human beings into how many women they can get to touch their dick. That’s not something you have to do, but that’s the way you guys determine your worth amongst yourselves. This makes you blame women or become terroristic to society because you can’t introespect, and THAT behavior earns you the title “lowest of the low”.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 12:37 AM
3

You can easily find a date with a gay man. Gay men have no problems finding anonymous sex, let alone dates. Why don’t you go do that since it’s so easy?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 12:19 AM
3

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 12:13 AM
3

No, it’s not common sense. Women don’t date for the same reasons men do. When women are on tinder looking for a date, they aren’t trying to hop into bed for an orgasm. So no, it’s not easy for women to get a date that is worthwhile. This is exactly why women don’t use tinder anymore. It didn’t work for us either.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 12:04 AM
3

There is, it’s not “common sense”, it’s an assumption based on his feelings of rejection. He’s got no fuckin idea hat it’s like to be a woman on tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 11:57 PM
3

I was referring to his misuse of the English language specifically, but you are right that tinder is mostly made up of men. Closer to 75% male actually
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 11:47 PM
4

I resemble this statement as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 05:19 PM
10

You guys can’t keep substituting new definitions for things like “common sense” and “logic” when you really mean your feelings. Your feelings are not facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 05:16 PM
2

The real world means reality. Declaring that 80% of women only find 20% of men attractive is wildly incorrect and is being litigated right now ITT.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 08:21 PM
1

Okay, then it should make perfect sense to you why using flawed data from a single dating app and extrapolating conclusions to apply to the real world, since very obviously they are not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 08:14 PM
1

Again, yes, cause women are more likely to read bios before swiping. Maybe the mistake is thinking that women are repulsed by unattractive men, we mostly aren’t. It’s more indifference or ambivalence. It’s common to become more attracted to someone over time and because of factors that don’t involve looks at all. I wasn’t initially attracted to a couple of the long term boyfriends I have had, but we spent years together. Meeting through friends is probably your best bet unless you prefer the sup…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 07:59 PM
1

If you are unable to be charming through text, probably. I’ve never used a dating app after the first time I downloaded one, like most women I know, and I wouldn’t unless I was looking for casual sex. The fact that it’s mostly used for hooking up probably doesn’t help since the majority of women don’t engage in casual sex with strangers.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 07:52 PM
1

It’s reasonable to consider that ugly women have the same issue and are therefore required to lower their standards in order to attract a mate. You can go to any superstore and see that ugly people do indeed have relationships, and in all age groups. Many of them being followed around by a gaggle of children. I’d bet if you asked any of them, they didn’t find each other on the apps. It’s your fault if you know you aren’t attractive and you use a form of dating that requires you to be attractive …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 07:45 PM
3

Because maybe the women you are talking about are above your caliber? Maybe the same advice that everyone gives women applies to men too; if you want a relationship that badly, lower your standards. There are plenty of lonely women who would probably give you a chance but they probably don’t meet your standards. It’s the hypocrisy for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 07:33 PM
2

You are the one adding qualifiers like “exclusively”. Attractive people regardless of gender do better on dating apps because the criteria is always superficial. Men gamify these apps. This is why men swipe on everything they see. The OKCupid data doesn’t prove this idea about attractiveness either, but it’s usually the next talking point. Most women in the US do not use dating apps. It’s incomplete data.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 07:26 PM
-1

The idea that a chadfish account proves anything is related to what u said though. It’s not proof of anything other than women like to fuck the things they find attractive. Why is this something that gets repeated here like that requires proof in the first place? You guys are the ones always saying “iTs SiMpLe BiOlOgY”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 07:15 PM
-4

This thread is here to debunk common manosphere talking points and does a really great job. That’s not what this is. I’m describing a freedom that women gained that used to be exclusive to men. It’s also just a feature of sexual selection and can be observed in other animals, too. This is probably upsetting (considering the pressures applied to eliminate female choice) but it’s by no means a manosphere talking point, it’s not some revolutionary discovery. “Mammals sexually attracted by physical …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 07:07 PM
4

You are all going to have to get over the fact that women can afford to sexually select for looks now. It’s no longer life or death or exile without picking some random man to be with.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 06:56 PM
3

Still won’t fuck conservatives 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 10:00 AM
1

I am just trying to keep up, it’s late here. You were the one “making stuff up” earlier. Could have mistaken you for a feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 08:39 AM
1

Similar to the manosphere “logic”, and “common sense” which are substituted with completely new definitions that actually just say “my feelings are FACTS”?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 08:36 AM
1

Things definitely are up for debate especially in here, and maybe this in particular can be debated given individual tastes, but on a large scale and in the workforce, no. Not really, because it’s had longstanding impacts on women that persist worldwide. Plus, attitude adjustments take time so maybe someday the tantrums will stop, so the potential for change is there.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 08:30 AM
–

I never claimed I was smart. I said men don’t appreciate smart women and they don’t, this isn’t even up for debate because it’s documented in multiple studies. Weaponized incompetence has nothing to do with feminism, it’s a viral bit of commentary on the laziness of men. You don’t have to agree and no one expects you to since you seem to be a man. The only person even speaking about ideology at the moment is you, but your assumptions about me make it easy to assume yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 08:18 AM
–

Isn’t that what you are doing right now? Making stuff up.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 08:12 AM
–

It’s proof of a phenomenon experienced by “feminists”, at the very least. Though I’d argue the majority of women laughed for a reason that had nothing to do with feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 08:08 AM
–

That’s a lot of assumptions. Wonder what that says about you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 07:59 AM
1

I think so, it’s about the perception of discrimination against the most privileged among us and how that may change depending on generally accepted and perceived disadvantages. I doubt it will change your opinion, but maybe it will inform it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 03:12 AM
3

I know, I have been in relationships with some of those men over the course of my life. One of them lasting nearly 8 years. I honestly will never entertain a man who doesn’t feel the same way, as I feel it’s a values thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 01:37 AM
2

No surely not unique to men, but not as common in the reverse. “Weaponized incompetence” has been coined as a phrase recently because there’s a perceived benefit in heteronormative relationships for men who seem incapable, and has been used by men in malicious ways in order to extract labor and services from women they are partnered with.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 01:22 AM
1

That’s amazing! I think you’re very lucky. I am not going to claim it’s uncommon to find, but I do think educational aspirations for both parties often plays a role. My peers and I have encountered many inferiority complexes while entertaining someone who doesn’t match academically.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 01:18 AM
1

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12392872/ Here’s another study you may find interesting. An excerpt : The alt‐right increasingly claims that White men are becoming targets of discrimination, yet few studies examine how, and for whom, perceived (reverse) discrimination manifests among White men. We address this oversight by examining rates of change in perceptions of ethnic and gender discrimination across 10 annual waves of a nationwide sample of White men (2014 to 2023; N = 20,486). La…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 11:15 PM
1

You are the one who stated no one alive has been affected by sex discrimination and then move the goalposts 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 10:58 PM
1

The studies are in the article https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11199-013-0303-2 https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/handle/1808/258/Schmitt_Branscombe_perceiving.pdf?sequence=1
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 10:48 PM
1

Actually title IX has been a benefit to men too, and is supported by the male supremacist administration in the White House because they can use it against trans people : https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/keeping-men-out-of-womens-sports/ https://www.sportico.com/law/analysis/2022/title-ix-male-athletes-1234676974/ But men are indeed still discriminated against, mostly by other men though : https://www.sydney.edu.au/ Masculine presentation was enough to elicit preferential …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 10:29 PM
1

Except that discrimination did impact people alive today? Hence title IX in 1972 https://www.ed.gov/laws-and-policy/civil-rights-laws/title-ix-and-sex-discrimination If it didn’t have an impact, this would not have been necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 10:10 PM
1

Being granted aid when you have historically been restricted does not mean it’s an unfair advantage. It is a small effort to rectify centuries of discrimination.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 09:53 PM
1

That’s not proof, but enjoy your circlejerk.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 09:17 PM
2

How is feminism attacking men when comparing IPV rates? What does acknowledging that women are capable of abuse do to help the rights of men? Feminism does not deny this as far as I know. The harm is not the same between these groups. Denial in any way does not impact the rights of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 09:12 PM
1

So opting out of relationships is the same as never finding one? That doesn’t seem to match the ideologies here at all
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 08:51 PM
2

Is hot consistent across men? I know there are lower standards but surely that is true for men as well
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 08:50 PM
-2

I don’t think women deny that men are ugly sometimes. It’s just rarely the only reason she isn’t interested. It might certainly get you overlooked for someone else that has a much more attractive presentation, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 08:47 PM
2

There is a misconception here that there are lawyers involved at all. Most custody disputes are settled out of court without a lawyer (90%) So men are opting out of parenthood, it’s not being taken from them. https://www.brandonbernsteinlaw.com/child-custody-statistics/#:~:text=Parents%20settle%20greater%20than%2090%25%20of%20custody,mediator%2C%20but%20only%204%25%20required%20a%20trial.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 08:42 PM
1

You can fight for your rights without trying to remove the rights of others. I know, a novel idea!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 08:35 PM
2

Those are not related facts though. These are a bunch of statistics you have strung together with faulty reasoning. You know what they say about lies and statistics don’t you?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 08:23 PM
1

I wish you would actually post something concrete instead of your feelings about stuff. It would be far more effective for you as a debate standpoint and it would give me more of an ability to reply without having to appeal to your feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 08:17 PM
1

Didn't say women had all the power, just that they hold the majority of it. I picked Ghana as an example of a third world country, just because they have it bad in Ghana doesn't mean women in the West are just as oppressed. Boys are not actively being oppressed because they have fallen behind in enrollment in college. No one is forcing boys to have babies with old women for religious reasons. It’s a fair comparison since you bring up the third world where little girls are often married to old me…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 08:09 PM
3

Women hold all the power in the west? Literally no one is talking about Ghana. Women face an education system that is built by and for specifically men. Just because boys have fallen behind girls for the first time in human history doesn’t mean they are actively being oppressed. Men and boys have a history of fleeing professions they view as dominated by women, and it’s happening in colleges now too. It’s called male flight : https://open.substack.com/pub/celestemdavis/p/why-boys-dont-go-to-coll…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 07:45 PM
9

I dont know, a lot of men seem to prefer stupid women and cannot stand one smarter than themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 07:36 PM
3

No, the state supposedly represents the people but they are not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 07:03 PM
5

Women don’t use dating apps as frequently as men so that data is not applicable to the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 06:48 PM
4

Because friendship cures loneliness. Getting your dick wet does not. Having a romantic partner cures loneliness. Having an orgasm with someone does not.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 06:46 PM
3

Good luck trying to convince the state that it’s in their best interest. The institution of marriage is first and foremost a benefit to the state which is why you get a contract through them documenting it. What you are describing is monogamous relationships that don’t end in marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 06:39 PM
5

There are very many romantically lonely women who don’t resort to bigotry and terrorism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 06:37 PM
5

Yeah, they often conflate love and lust. Those are not the same thing. Just like casual sex and relationships. Not the same, and yet when discussed here there are many, many men who can’t seem to tell the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 06:35 PM
3

Girl children have faster cognitive development than boy children. This is observed in babies. Despite this, girls have been excluded from all educational opportunities until this recent century in America. Girl children are still subjugated and restricted from learning and literacy everywhere in the world. Having programs to increase enrollment is not oppressive to men or boys because women now have an opportunity to excel https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4129348/
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 06:21 PM
5

You must be very young because that is a recent development since women gained the right and ability to criticize men for their wrongdoings. Men have been the “default human” and gain all the benefits of society because its “man made” for “mankind” etc etc It’s so pervasive that it’s everywhere in the language we speak. Men have been trying to take the credit of other good men for all of eternity, they deny even knowing bad men though for some reason. But insist that there are bad men because th…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 06:05 PM
1

Queen of England because he had testicles. Being a monarch in a patriarchy does not flip the power structure in any capacity and largely has no direct impact on the women in that society, since you know, it’s still a patriarchy. No one has stopped wealthy women or women in general What wealthy women? Martha Stewart was the first self made woman billionaire and that witch hunt was prolific. "Get away from me you dirty peasant" "Bum" "Deadbeat" "Manchild" All of those names have nothing to do with…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 05:35 PM
2

It’s not sexist or a double standard to point out something that is studied and documented fact. https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/girls-outperform-boys Somehow being better students still does not overcome the sexism experienced by girls in the workforce. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36626072/
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 05:20 PM
1

Again you seem to be ignoring historical precedence where men hoarded all the wealth and power. Giving women the right to vote did not evenly redistribute that wealth or power, so saying “Women make money now! Why like men with money still?” is very silly, especially since men still hold wealth over everyone’s head; not just women. I suppose this is why everyone in this subreddit freaks out at the revelation that wealthy AND attractive men get a disproportionate amount of attention from women. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 05:14 PM
5

Women are just better students than men. Probably why historically women were kept out of higher education and business. You’re implying that women graduating at higher rates than men is not deserved? Men should also stop murdering men, but since they murder women at a rate in which women do not murder men, it’s not fair to compare. Name what systems benefit women over men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 04:54 PM
1

You have it backwards. Men made women economically dependent on men and then cry that women are only with them for money. Women gain the freedom to make their own money, and men cry that women don’t need them anymore. This is a result of oppression. Of course women will walk away when no longer forced to be with their oppressor. Now women don’t have to be with a man unless she likes him. This is where the problems for men begin.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 04:41 PM
6

They don’t get blamed for those things. They get blamed for upholding the systems in which those things prosper because they still directly benefit enough that they will not dismantle them. Clinging to it makes you a part of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 04:39 PM
1

Women are leaving men behind because of the red pill. No, it’s not enough that you don’t want to outright own us and legally abuse and rape us. You actually have to be good and decent people too. Women are far less upset about “men leaving women” because that would actually probably benefit us. It’s simply not true, though. You’ve just repackaged your hatred and called it something else, so it’s not as revolutionary as you seem to think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 04:33 PM
6

They deserve the credit for what they do that they are not forced by others to surrender. Fighting to keep your slaves in any capacity should not earn you praise when you eventually lose them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 04:32 PM
7

Because men didn’t one day see this inequality and violence and think, “Hey, maybe this unending evil we force on others is wrong”, the oppressed had to fight and still fight for freedom from those evils. What good things do you think men deserve credit for since they don’t want to be accountable for the evils that they still benefit from? Most of those evil things being still perpetrated by the same type of men with no end in sight?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 04:28 PM
8

Men only want credit for the good things. Somehow no man is responsible for the rape and murder and enslavement of an entire gender and other races, but all men deserve credit for the freedom from those things. Doesn’t make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 04:22 PM
3

Stop acting like you hold any moral high ground in this argument by throwing your constant whining self victimizing pity parties You mean like crying because no one wants to give you any pussy because you have a yucky personality?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 04:06 PM
3

Who took them away in the first place and decided anyone who wasn’t a white man was an animal? You don’t get a parade for having to treat others as equals instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 04:04 PM
1

No, every woman is more at risk of being murdered by a man than ever being murdered by a woman, statistically. Men commit the majority of violence in the world. Having dictators have never prevented women from being hurt, that is just a Republican wet dream because conservative men are naturally submissive. Women historically do worse under authoritarian rule. Again comparing a silly hashtag to actual violence is why no one takes you seriously. Women and girls are killed at an alarming rate, jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 03:44 PM
-1

So that justifies the terrorism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 04:22 AM
5

Women do tolerate men, just not in their homes or bodies anymore, that has nothing to do with “society” or the public.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 04:06 AM
0

The obsession with a hashtag is really telling when actual violence against women and girls receives radio silence from the majority of you. It’s hard to have an online bully, probably harder to survive mass shootings.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 02:49 AM
1

About what though? This subreddit would have even the sluttiest women I know second guessing casual sex and dating altogether with the way men act here, even though this place is tame in comparison to other places online.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 08:42 PM
1

If you believe that and it’s inevitable, why waste your time complaining about it? Nothing you can do since it’s the way we are born. Makes as much sense to be upset that we only have two arms.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 07:22 PM
1

Right. Ever stop to think about why that may be?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 02:21 PM
1

Whatever you say lol Women just don’t want to use casual sex apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 02:03 PM
10

I am a woman who dislikes romance novels and prefers sci fi or high fantasy, so maybe I am off base here, but I’d assume women like romance novels because they prioritize female pleasure in a way that reality simply doesn’t. It’s just as much fantasy as my preference of high fantasy, in that it’s very divorced from reality and not realistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 08:59 PM
1

Incorrect. No one likes performative niceness, or someone who is nice in order to manipulate someone into doing something or believing something. That’s not just women, that’s everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 06:34 AM
3

So it was natural when men could buy women instead?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 09:40 PM
2

Neither was the previous social expectation where every man got a broodmare.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 09:38 PM
2

I see the link? Maybe you need to refresh the page. The only person being smug is you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 08:33 PM
1

I did exactly the same and gave that advice and was told that I was wrong. That you have to be tall or rich. The goalposts move every time, they want to feel sorry for themselves and blame it on women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 06:55 PM
1

Sexual attention is sexual attention, at least that is what I am told here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 03:22 AM
0

Lots of girls like twinky boys, have you not paid any attention to popular culture? Or even Asian countries. They favor what could only be described as feminine features (in USA) in men
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 01:47 AM
1

Count me in, sounds a dream
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 01:46 AM
-1

Death to purity culture, ignore all the men screaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 01:42 AM
2

It’s dead. Being a slut is celebrated by women now. No, celebrating gaining the same freedom as men have always had is what that is. Only reserved for certain men. Most men are not attractive enough to be "sluts". I disagree, there are plenty of ways unattractive men can be sluts, they just have to have other qualities that outweigh their looks. Or they can whore themselves out on onlyfans for sexual attention if they want it, as long as they lower their standards on who gives them that attentio…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 01:10 AM
2

Yes they are enforced on western women, just less so. Porn is irrelevant. Being a slut in college is as old as college itself, because of the freedom involved. The purity culture is dying with some caveats, but that is not a bad thing for women, that’s clearly upsetting to some men. This still does not make them malicious or evil or trashy for engaging in behavior that used to be reserved for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:57 AM
1

That is an ad hominem and I am done acknowledging those from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:52 AM
1

I never referred to them as trash, you did. Those women you called trash are just naive, there’s a lot of messaging to little girls that makes falling in love look like it’s a fairytale. One good heartbreak is usually all it takes to shatter illusions and make them hesitant. Some women have theirs younger than others. Blaming women for not knowing how to tell that some men are completely driven by their lust and they have no morals, when women are raised to be the exact opposite of that, sometim…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:44 AM
1

Nope I was referring again to high schoolers. Lots of people go through awkward stages in puberty, but by the time you are in college you should be able to demonstrate that level of responsibility to a potential partner. If you are upset that the women you refer to as trash won’t give you pussy, I have to ask why you want the trashy pussy?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:34 AM
2

There are some that do. I have had guys do some of that right in front of me. There is a reason that women take into consideration how men will treat a server at a restaurant for instance. I know many women who have called off a date because of rudeness to a service worker. The men are always shocked about it because they are often pulling out all the stops for the woman. To a woman though, that reeks of performance.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:13 AM
1

You are not a woman. You can do the performative stuff all you want, it will trick some women into sleeping with you, those dalliances will never last. Maybe it’s my mistake for assuming you want more than a fling, but any woman who is serious about finding a partner will prioritize those things for long term. You will find the younger demographic fucking around and falling in love with broke dudes who will use them and abuse them, but that will never be anything other than a mistake in her mind…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:11 AM
2

If you are being nice to a woman in order to get her to fuck you, that is the definition of transactional niceness.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:07 AM
2

At this point I am certain you aren’t interested in what attracts women, you are just looking for ways to justify your spiteful anger for not receiving what you feel you are owed. This is a common mentality on this subreddit but it’s a self perpetuating cycle. Your descriptions of women may apply to teenagers and the like but it absolutely does not apply to adult women. I can’t make you listen or change your mind but your approach is obviously leading you here which is why I have to wonder why i…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:03 AM
1

You asked me how else to show responsibility without involving income and I explained many ways. Being responsible is attractive, you are the only one adding the qualifier “definitive”. You are walking into the point and still missing it. Of course these are things that any man can do(most still don’t), being responsible is an attractive quality and are often learnable skills. One attractive quality is just that; one attractive quality. You may need more than that to attract the caliber of women…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 11:50 PM
–

Having used the apps once doesn’t make them regular users. The majority of users on all dating apps are men. That is also not what a control group is or how they work. Hinge: Approximately 64% men to 36% women. Bumble: Around 67% men to 33% women, although some estimates are even higher. Tinder: Some sources report ratios as high as 76% men to 24% women. OkCupid: OkCupid has significantly more male users than female users; data from a 2020 survey indicated that 11% of men in the U.S. used the ap…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 11:13 PM
–

Most women do not use dating apps though. So using that data and extrapolating that this applies to all women, or even most women is really silly. This data applies to women who use OK Cupid or other dating apps. Edit to add : OkCupid: OkCupid has significantly more male users than female users; data from a 2020 survey indicated that 11% of men in the U.S. used the app compared to only 6% of women, and another source suggests there could be approximately twice as many male users as female users …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 10:49 PM
2

No one like transactional niceness. If you are being nice in order to manipulate someone into doing shit for you, that is repulsive and obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 10:18 PM
2

Living within your means, keeping a tidy living space, hobbies and friends and family relationships that you maintain. If you get called out on something, taking accountability is also pretty important. Being able to construct a plan for whatever reason whether it be like a safety thing or a day trip, having forethought. Being able to take care of yourself like grooming and general self care, and general maintenance of things within your domain. There’s a lot of ways to show that you are respons…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 09:59 PM
0

This is bisexual erasure. It’s right there after the L. You can actually choose to not date men if you also happen to like women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 07:12 AM
3

It’s just to counter all the men claiming that women must be sharing men, or maybe fucking old dudes, or whatever other shit they think up to explain the overused data from dating apps. They ignore that women don’t use those apps and are mostly not included in that data, but it feels better to conclude that we are all sugar babies or side chicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 06:03 AM
4

Bisexual. The women are bisexual. I actually think a vast majority of people are, it’s just less socially acceptable for men to be bisexual so they are in the closet or in denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 05:59 AM
-2

Babe, they are dating each other. Why do you think looking like a dyke is so popular? Sure some are doing it for aesthetics but there is a reason it’s happening, and it’s not because it’s sexy to old men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 05:50 AM
2

The most dangerous person to a pregnant woman is the man who got her pregnant. Homicide is the leading cause of death for pregnant women. https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/homicide-leading-cause-of-death-for-pregnant-women-in-u-s/ At least if we were physically equal, maybe it would be a fairer fight.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 03:33 AM
3

In my anecdotal experience, it starts off okay but I have yet to see a relationship with that dynamic that didn’t result in the man depressed and resentful. Maybe there is an income level that it doesn’t, but I haven’t seen it personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 03:26 AM
1

Were you close to your brother beforehand?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 03:21 AM
4

Not really, their egos get in the way when their friends make fun of them. Sounds good at first though, but men find it’s emasculating.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 03:18 AM
6

Modern women make their own money. Being responsible has little to do with your income as long as you have one.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 03:15 AM
2

Nevarrrr
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 03:13 AM
1

It’s literally their excuse for everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 03:10 AM
1

Because she didn’t accept your anecdotes, she doesn’t know anything? Hush
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 03:08 AM
5

So they are nice to other men, got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 03:07 AM
2

That may be true if you are trying to attract high school girls. It’s not realistic otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 03:05 AM
1

Maybe they asked him for an orgasm, too. We all know how the female orgasm is a myth.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 02:45 AM
3

Yes, of course I do. That’s not what we are talking about though. We are talking about men who abandon their dying wives because they are no longer able to take care of the “wifely duties”, it’s not the same as not being able to afford healthcare. I am sure all the men who divorce their sick wives have plenty of reasons why they waited until there was a terminal diagnosis, it’s certainly wasn’t because she was sick or anything, that would make him a social pariah. Surely they care, it must be co…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 01:01 AM
4

Yeah but they are allowed because penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 11:46 PM
1

That is literally the only part you keep bringing up, as if that is comparable to dehumanization. Yes, it’s soo sad that some women these days aren’t forced to overlook how men look anymore when dating, it’s no longer imperative to settle with a man you think is “nice” enough to not rape you or beat you. Good for women, bad for men. Men still treat women like pets or children or objects even if they are strangers, even if the man is working a public facing customer service role, even if the man …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 11:42 PM
1

That’s literally bullshit. I don’t care how you look if you are working in a public facing customer service role and still can’t control your genitals. Self control and manners are way more important in that scenario. Even an attractive man can be a pornsick creep.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 10:35 PM
2

Not everyone wants to be a sexual being at the grocery store or at the gas station. It IS dehumanizing, I don’t care if you like the size of my tits, let me pay for my shit and leave. But men will fumble all over themselves interacting with you if you are attractive, and wholly dismissive if you are unattractive. Treating people like they are something you like or dislike based on whether or not you find them attractive is the problem. Everyone should be a human to you first, and a pair of tits …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 10:02 PM
7

They taught us in nursing school that men will leave their wives for less than that, especially if they become incapacitated. The chances of a man leaving you when you have cancer skyrockets, even if it’s a curable one. The same can not be said in reverse, the women always stay with the sick men. It’s why we offer counseling to women who get a bad diagnoses. We warn them about this statistical fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 09:53 PM
2

Yeah I said that. Some women definitely do. Most women are not sizing up men in a sexual manner the way men do in public every day. Women holding a man to a conventional beauty standard still isn’t the same dehumanization.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 09:46 PM
7

No, just human. I think most women would rather men treat them like another person instead of an option, that’s typically my experience with pretty women too. Most women don’t go around hating on men who are ugly, and the pretty women don’t want to be treated like they are being evaluated like a piece of produce that someone can buy. Both of these things are dehumanizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 08:33 PM
6

Men treat unattractive women like shit all the time. Sometimes like they don’t even exist. God help you if you are an ugly fat woman, or worse; disabled. Basically if you aren’t on the fuck list, are you even a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 08:26 PM
2

No because generally that’s the way it already is. Men outright ignore women they don’t want to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 08:20 PM
8

There’s a bunch of historical resources that outline how egalitarian societies were ran, and the way that women raised children together. Some of those attitudes carried over into the agricultural age but a lot of communal things were stomped to death in order to establish property rights and paternal lines of inheritance. You’re definitely correct about religion being the social and corporal force that changed a lot of that
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 07:28 PM
-2

You do you, babe :3
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 07:31 PM
-3

Oh sure, we are gonna go with “surveys of younger couples” rather than centuries of traditional gender socialization and expectations. If that is your experience, then you are lucky. I never hear any women disagreeing with this, though. Women aren’t victimizing themselves, they are opting out, it’s the men who are bitching about government issued wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 07:19 PM
2

Well yeah, for men. And they get mad when you try to have your own, with or without their help, because heaven forbid. Or intimidated/jealous about toys.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 03:39 PM
-6

Feminists are not alone in that. This is why women do 90% of the unpaid labor at home even while working full time, men want the second income and a maid. Edit to add stats : While a definitive global percentage of men who perform unpaid labor isn't available, data indicates that men consistently do less unpaid work than women globally and in individual countries. For example, in the European Union, around 53% of employed men regularly perform unpaid housework compared to 93% of employed women. …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 03:34 PM
-3

Would love to see even one example of that lol
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 03:27 PM
3

It’s not intentionally to upset you, but you do seem bothered.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 06:59 AM
3

The sex is often mediocre, the relationship is a lot of work for women, and men give up on dates as soon as they get comfortable. Not worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 06:49 AM
1

The whole idea is tricking the woman though, most of the time. That is why there is such uproar when you start talking about “coercion”.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 06:44 AM
4

There’s moreto life than a romantic partner. You do not need a woman. There’s no reason to implement a system in which every man is “given” one.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 06:41 AM
6

No. Only one of us seems upset and it’s not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 06:02 AM
2

Less and less every year. lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 05:44 AM
6

We women don’t struggle to understand that at all, we only recently got the right to turn you guys down and live an entire life without being someone’s house slave. The men leftover from this change are super pissed about it though.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 05:39 AM
1

Hers are red. Mine is pink.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 02:31 AM
7

There’s plenty of women who engage here in good faith, they are just heavily downvoted.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 02:30 AM
1

Because there seem to be so many of them jerking each other off in the comments, it’s easy to mistake it for one of their normal circlejerk hangouts.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 02:29 AM
3

And “bicycle face” was a made up disease to prevent women traveling on bicycles. I forget what it was called, but we were also restricted from traveling by train or car because braking could cause our uterus to fly out of our bodies. Anything to control women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 02:26 AM
8

Isn’t the claim here that to get rich guys, women must be fucking them in all sorts of disgusting ways? How else do you think these men are going to get rich men to do things for them? The second man interviewed said he would go out and get a bunch of rich men to buy him things. Unless you think rich men are doing stuff like this for women with no sexual contact involved. Not really a popular suggestion around here lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 09:34 PM
9

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KRAYgwKS5_c
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 08:57 PM
15

You can have a preference for just about anything. That doesn’t mean it’s not hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 08:39 PM
35

They admit when asked if they were a woman for a day, they would go fuck a shitload of guys. Says quite a lot about the way they think about sex and the double standards they hold for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 08:22 PM
1

Tinder, like all dating apps are like 75% men, so your data is skewed.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 05:45 PM
–

I am a woman who knows many women, even in the blue states the girls don’t want to accidentally fuck a conservative so they don’t date anyone they don’t know anymore, and won’t engage in casual sex. You can be bitter about that, but it’s true. Plus, I have talked to women who have had children before their first orgasm, men don’t really prioritize anyone but themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 05:30 PM
-2

Most women do not engage in casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 08:27 AM
5

How convenient. Seems to be the most common in my experience, too. The whole thing was a crock of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 01:37 AM
9

“My love language is physical touch. (you touching me mostly)”
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 01:29 AM
3

Patriarchy and religion, and making women property kind of ensured all these genetic dead ends.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 06:01 PM
1

Yes, I agree. Calling women liars (when they are being lied to as a standard on a regular basis) when sometimes a bad guy gets through the defenses is stupid though. No one is perfect as detecting bullshit 100% of the time. There’s all sorts of elaborate strategies that get employed against women, some of which get discussed here all over Reddit, at length.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 07:47 AM
–

It’s not a lie though. Toddlers lie to get what they want, it’s one of the earliest forms of learned deception. If you think that is not routinely employed by people trying to trick others into relations with them, I don’t know what to tell you. Being genuinely kind will always serve you better with women than being an asshole or a liar with a facade of “niceness”. What a world we live in.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 07:14 AM
–

The problem for most women is that most men start off kind, which is why so many say “men only want one thing and will say anything to get in your pants”, there’s a lot of supposed kindness, not all of it is genuine. Sometimes fake nice men lie very well and for a really long time, until they feel like they don’t have to be nice anymore. Women are not fucking the misogynists who are venomous to women right off the bat. That’s not normal or average at all. I’m not the one misrepresenting things, …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 07:08 AM
–

I actually disagree that’s why men view relationships as transactional. Kindness is a guarantee for promotions at work? Kindness guarantees someone will sell you their goods? No. Kindness helps, but it’s never automatically rewarded with what you want. Why would it be that way with sexual contact with women? It definitely used to be much more important when women had to marry men to survive in the world and participate in society, but that is no longer the case. I can see why this would be viewe…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 04:29 AM
–

No, not “be yourself”, “focus on yourself”, it’s not the same thing. You can be pissed off that women out of your “league” aren’t tripping over themselves to be with you, but turning down women because they aren’t good enough just makes you a hypocrite. You use a lot of buzzwords, no one is gaslighting you. If you are a cripple with one good leg, not being able to run a mile is not because of your good working leg, why chop it off at the knee out of spite?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 04:06 AM
–

Men can only think this if they have a transactional view of interpersonal relationships where actions are currency for affection.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 03:54 AM
1

Nope, it’s a safety concern for women to go anywhere alone in public, under the influence or not. This is why we make group trips to the bathroom, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 03:53 AM
1

Well as a woman who had slept with a friend she finds unattractive physically, simply because of timing and setting and trust between friends, that sort of attitude is often obvious to women and would immediately disqualify you for me personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 03:31 AM
1

Wish I could upvote this twice.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:53 AM
1

No of course not! It’s perfectly human to be upset by that. Blaming other people for it is the problem. Not everyone is born attractive, just like not everyone is born with eyesight. You don’t get to blame inescapable truths on people who don’t give you what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:49 AM
1

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discerning discerning adjective dis·​cern·​ing di-ˈsər-niŋ Synonyms of discerning : showing insight and understanding : DISCRIMINATING a discerning critic
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:44 AM
–

“Every woman” just like “every man” amiright
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:41 AM
–

I was honestly asking why this is so upsetting. If it’s not the “no” answer, it’s a fundamental misunderstanding of women’s sexual interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:40 AM
2

Synonyms for discerning: selective, discriminating, judicious, differentiating, ascertaining. Choose whichever works for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:33 AM
–

Yep, women on the whole are way more choosy than men, it’s the major complaint you will find in this subreddit, worded a million different ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:21 AM
–

Hot PEOPLE have more choices, not just hot men. Stop focusing on the hot men, or hot people in general. Ugly people get laid all the time. Go outside and walk around Walmart and see how many ugly people are being followed by half a dozen children. The problem is that if you are ugly AND a shitty person, that’s like being a cripple and blaming your one good knee. You are only handicapping yourself further.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:12 AM
–

Absolutely not. You are describing behavior of men and ascribing it to women. Men will decide whether or not they would fuck a woman within moments of laying eyes on her.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 01:41 AM
–

So the upsetting bit is just the lack of attraction? Not that the answer is “no”? Individual women have different features they find attractive, though. It’s not unique to human women that they will disqualify a mate for something small. The nature of sexual selection of any species are directly affected by the risks involved in sexual contact for each party. The female assumes most risk and therefore are more discerning. I thought biological essentialism was popular among men these days, this s…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 01:32 AM
–

It’s absolves them from introspection and allows them to externally blame women for their perceived failures. They are “nice” so it’s the women who are malfunctioning.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 01:11 AM
–

Yes indeed. I have never heard a girlfriend say “That guy has a nice jawline, makes me so wet!” Because that would be silly. Dick is common loot to women. There is rarely one attribute that will make a woman want to fuck you, because it’s never about the features of the man, it’s the person. Which is also why it’s so easy to disqualify a man for being a misogynist, because one good looking misogynist is not worth the risk to a woman’s health, there will undoubtedly be another man with similar fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 12:48 AM
2

I thought no one cared about the suffering of men. Huh.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 12:42 AM
4

Literally not true. Even hot men can give you the ick by being a disgusting fuckwad.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 12:11 AM
3

That is because those things are what men prioritize, not women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 12:09 AM
12

Why would they have to be told this? Is it that men don’t have any such standard when trying to fuck women?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 12:07 AM
7

Men will sleep with women they aren’t attracted to because the use of her body parts is more important to them than the rest of her that’s attached to those parts. They don’t understand that women don’t want to sleep with people they find unattractive. Edit for clarity
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 12:04 AM
12

Undesirable men also gaslight women. Desirable men gaslight women. I’m sure desirable and undesirable women are also gaslighters. Is the expectation that women should still want to sleep with someone they don’t desire? That’s kind of ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 12:42 AM
2

Also, about all those positions of power…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:13 PM
4

She agrees with you, literally in her comment. You seem to misunderstand that women as a whole, aka aggregate, don’t want or desire men as a whole, aka aggregate. Individuals and their desires notwithstanding. No one said your wife shouldn’t desire you. Expecting every woman you encounter at the grocery store to desire you is what we are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 08:45 PM
1

Try social conditioning.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 08:42 PM
–

Your anecdotes have equal value to mine at the very least, and I am a woman who knows many other women. What you are saying is only true on the internet. Most women don’t give a shit if you are “shredded”. It really does come down to your personality. If you can get into relationships by being an asshole first, I can only feel bad for the women in your life. That still doesn’t make it normal
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 01:52 AM
1

Yeah, you would have to go outside and find them first.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 01:12 AM
–

I have no idea who that is and from your ability to form arguments, I likely don’t want to. But thanks for your attention to this matter, I guess lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 01:03 AM
1

You are describing behavior that is common from men. Men literally murder women when they get rejected. It goes from “Be my wife, I would do anything for you.” To “you’re a dirty ugly whore” as soon as you don’t want to touch their penis. This actually has been studied in men, it’s so common. Here is some light reading for you, if you feel inclined to educate yourself on reality. I could have been snarky and said something about including women in studies but I won’t. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.go…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 01:00 AM
0

How do you figure that? Abusive people don’t advertise that they are abusive. Are you often a dickhead to people you want something from? Pretty sure that level of deception is learned before you reach puberty so unless you are implying that abusers are easy to spot right off the bat, it’s you who have problems with reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 12:57 AM
0

That’s incorrect though. Good is a primary trait that women look for insofar that it is the absolute bare minimum. Men are pissed that you have to be anything more than “nice” or “good” in order to win the affection of a particular woman. Unfortunately, being nice and good are qualifiers that are required for literally any social interaction you have with anyone, anywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 12:48 AM
1

No, attractive men are abusive like unattractive men can be. Their physical features don’t directly correlate to selfish or violent behavior. The point is we should never ignore any abusive men, and especially not just because they are deemed attractive or unattractive. Abusive men are bad, mmkay?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 12:46 AM
1

Same, the assumption always being that women can’t keep “Chad” or whatever, ignoring that some attractive people do enter into long term relationships for years. It’s projection from their own personal experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 12:45 AM
5

Wild and unfounded speculation, I am sure that makes it easier to cope with.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 12:43 AM
11

Only according to other men. I am a woman and I know men who are kind AND attractive. Redpill tells men that attractive men are abusive, so it’s usually mutually exclusive in their heads.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/25 11:17 PM
6

That is not what derailing means. Doxxing someone is not holding them accountable. Gossiping is also not holding anyone accountable. Those are not the same thing, and there’s nothing “systematic” about how they are trying to communicate with you. You use a lot of words incorrectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/25 02:27 PM
4

Then they weren’t perfectly good enough. It’s not up to you who gets to pair up.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/25 02:22 PM
2

Literally nothing stopping you bro
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 07:23 PM
2

Why not go sleep with ugly fat women who are nice?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 07:17 PM
6

It’s consistent across every complaint in every subject, whether it’s attributed to malice or just ignorance, blame the nearest woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 02:16 AM
1

It absolutely is
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 09:47 PM
7

Haven’t you caught on yet? It’s always going to be women’s fault. If you just start there and work backwards, it all makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 08:45 PM
1

What you are describing is addiction, then. Not a need.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 02:42 AM
4

Pretty sure that’s due to all the femicide.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 09:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter