~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | This is just wrongAlso I am a male The biggest misunderstanding of the century is that a woman cannot be misogynistic, a man cannot be a misandrist, and someone cannot be racist against their own race. men don't need to be raised on gore and porn to become awful, they turn out horrible and violent no matter what you do. Also, are you saying that you are horrible and violent? | /r/EverydayMisandry | 29/07/26 06:47 PM |
| 32 | Atleast they’re not pretending to careSo if an adult man gets groped on a bus or train by a woman, or a male waiter gets groped by a female customer, it doesn't count as sexual assault. It's just women being playful and men being dramatic about it, right? Or let me guess, this actually never happens, and any story about it is actually a lie from men wanting attention. Only women get groped. Women never grope men. It's biologically impossible for it to happen. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 03/03/26 04:36 PM |
| 21 | Hope she sees this broMen often have higher case-fatality even within the same method category (e.g., hanging, poisoning). So it’s not just about “violent” methods, in this dataset, men were more likely to die following a suicide attempt, even when using the same broad method type. Source: Cibis et al. (2012), Journal of Affective Disorders — “Preference of lethal methods is not the only cause for higher suicide rates in males” (DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.08.032) Method Men case-fatality % (completed/total) Women case-f… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 03/02/26 11:44 PM |
| 18 | The hot takes just keep getting more foolish and absurdDid she accidentally just imply that being gay should be classified as a mental illness? lol. I guess searching how to change her sexual attraction shows some weird understanding of sexuality. Anyway, if she somehow started being attracted to women and dating them, she’d just learn that the issue isn't gender, it's the human race. Dating sucks for everybody. Also, being attracted to fictional characters because they are built to be perfect, ideal men (the same way a lot of fictional women are wr… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 30/01/26 12:34 AM |
| 12 | Just got called a snowflake, basement dweller for calling out & condemning misandry<image> "dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against men (i.e. the male sex)." Example: "Men deserve to be aborted" In my opinion, that is a misandrist comment. What is it in yours? | /r/EverydayMisandry | 20/01/26 10:58 PM |
| 14 | Just got called a snowflake, basement dweller for calling out & condemning misandryWhere is it written that misandry can only be committed by women? That is a classic mistake. Misandry is simply prejudice against men, the gender of the person doing the hating is irrelevant. Men can be misandrist (internalized misandry), just like many women perpetuate misogyny. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 20/01/26 10:50 PM |
| 16 | Just got called a snowflake, basement dweller for calling out & condemning misandryThis is a logical fallacy. The existence of cancer doesn't mean a broken leg isn't real. Proving that women face systemic issues doesn't change the fact that hating someone simply for being male is, by definition, misandry. Since you seem to think listing issues for one side magically erases the other, here is the list you are ignoring Men receive on average 63% longer prison sentences than women for the exact same crime and criminal history. Men make up ~70% of the homeless population and ~75-8… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 20/01/26 10:40 PM |
| 5 | Just got called a snowflake, basement dweller for calling out & condemning misandryThis has nothing to do with oppression or claiming to be a victim. Any group can be the target of prejudice, at least on an individual level. If you dislike someone because they are "X" and "X" is not an ideology or a choice, but simply how they were born (race, nationality, gender, sexuality), that is prejudice. It’s really not that deep. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 20/01/26 10:24 PM |
| 13 | Just got called a snowflake, basement dweller for calling out & condemning misandryClaiming a form of prejudice doesn't exist just so you can feel justified in practicing it doesn't make it imaginary. If you hate a demographic, you are a prejudiced person. If you hate someone or view them as inferior because of their gender, you are a sexist: if the target is women, it is misogyny; if it is men, it is misandry. Welcome to reality. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 20/01/26 10:12 PM |
| 10 | Saw this in a subreddit, for clients abused by therapistsThe confusion comes from how the CDC measures this, they track "Lifetime Victimization." (CDC 2010 Findings on Victimization by Sexual Orientation:) This means if a lesbian was assaulted by a man 15 years ago before she came out, she is counted in the "Lesbian Victim" statistic. The study does not exclusively measure abuse happening inside lesbian relationships. To find the real rate of violence inside these relationships, you have to adjust for who the perpetrators actually are using the CDC 20… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 17/01/26 08:58 AM |
| 33 | This is wrong on so many levelsA bit of context: Dennis is a narcissist and a sociopath. The show consistently hints that he may be a serial killer, and he is 100% a textbook psychopath. So this scene is just another sociopathic moment for Dennis, with Mac being shocked by it. If you want to see exactly what kind of person he is, here is a compilation of his behavior The "Implication" is that if she refuses sex, he might throw her overboard or kill her. Because she is trapped in the middle of nowhere with a strange man, she i… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 11/01/26 10:08 PM |
| 37 | This is wrong on so many levelsI have deep empathy for the fear women live with, because there are men who use this "implication," but the idea that all men benefit from this dynamic is incredibly shallow. In reality, for the vast majority of non-violent men, rape culture does not provide a benefit; it imposes a heavy social tax because of the implication. The threat that "I will hurt you if you don't do what I want" is only useful if I don't care about being perceived as a predator. Dennis is literally a sociopath, the show … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 11/01/26 09:57 PM |
| 35 | This Page Is the WorstJust because a demographic is responsible for the majority of a crime, it doesn't imply that the majority of that demographic are criminals. The fact that 90% of violence comes from men doesn't change the fact that 95% of men are non-violent. Finding a partner is hard because compatibility is rare, not because good men are rare. I believe the stories women and men tell, but we have to remember: we hear way more about the nightmares than the happy endings. No statistic shows that the majority of … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 10/01/26 08:07 PM |
| 13 | Can’t Believe Anyone Is on the Girlfriend’s SideI'm glad to hear that. It just proves that Reddit is full of echo chambers. Depending on where you post, the verdict flips completely. It is difficult to find a community that represents a normal, real-world perspective rather than the heavily biased takes that we see. I need to be careful to remember that, too. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 06/01/26 12:23 AM |
| 34 | Can’t Believe Anyone Is on the Girlfriend’s SideOne thought I have is that if the genders were reversed, the only similarity would be the conclusion: they should absolutely break up. (Not that I necessarily think they have to, but it clearly doesn't seem like a healthy relationship now). The difference is how we treat the word "no." When a man says no, he’s called cold, accused of not loving his partner, and told he should've just "banged her really quick" to be nice. When a woman says no nowadays, she is (rightfully) supported. But the irony… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 06/01/26 12:00 AM |
| 29 | Things Women Who Are Trash SayIf I could ask the person in the last image one question, it would be: Is this radical language really worth it? You can offer a complex defense for why it’s "not a generalization," but that ignores reality. Most people (1) won't interpret it that way, which only alienates allies and fuels culture wars, and (2) don't use it with that intent anyway (just look at what people who say "men are trash" are actually arguing about). People usually aren't thinking about sociopolitical systems when they p… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 30/12/25 09:43 PM |
| 4 | I really wanna bring back the misandrist fallacies bingo chart, but I got exams soon TvTThe investigation was by a TV network, not law enforcement. No law enforcement was involved. There have been no follow-ups -- nobody has been arrested, nobody has been investigated, no task force has been formed, the TV network has not issued any follow up. The STRG_F investigation did trigger law-enforcement action and follow-up reporting. Both links you’re sourcing are outdated and before the follow-up happened. 1. STRG_F follow-up: Lower Saxony case, BKA and prosecutors involved NDR/funk publ… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 07/12/25 07:36 PM |
| 1 | I really wanna bring back the misandrist fallacies bingo chart, but I got exams soon TvTSame as yours, unfortunately those crimes did happen. Just google it. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 07/12/25 03:42 PM |
| 21 | I really wanna bring back the misandrist fallacies bingo chart, but I got exams soon TvTHonestly, whether the ratio of SA perpetrated by women vs men is lower, equal, or higher doesn't really change much for me. The number of current reports is already high enough to care about. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 07/12/25 03:39 PM |
| 77 | I really wanna bring back the misandrist fallacies bingo chart, but I got exams soon TvTStrawman Argument When people say "women are just as bad as men," they almost always mean: "Women have the same human capacity for cruelty, selfishness, and evil as men do," not that they commit the exact same crimes or in the same frequency. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 07/12/25 02:41 PM |
| -9 | Every time a male gets killed, a misandrist enjoys.You can't be serious. Are you saying that all women could celebrate the death of men? It's like when those stupid misandrists say all men are rapists because they see a very small portion of them celebrating this online. Internet extremists don't represent the average person, far from it. Incels and femcels are not the majority. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 03/12/25 07:36 AM |
| -6 | Every time a male gets killed, a misandrist enjoys.Unfortunately, it seems like it. Kinda sad, honestly. So many good arguments to be made, and people choose to make up numbers from their heads because it feels right for them, not because it's true. I hate this. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 03/12/25 07:15 AM |
| -12 | Every time a male gets killed, a misandrist enjoys.What? So If 1% of men hurt women, does that mean 100% of women will be celebrating men dying? edit: I'm getting downvotes here, so I need to ask. Mind explaining the math here? Or do you guys genuinely believe that only like 0.1% of men hurt women? Remember that globally, 0.2–0.5% of men have ever committed a murder. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 03/12/25 07:15 AM |
| 19 | Supporting Women’s Rights =/= Supporting Modern FeminismMy biggest gripe with modern feminism is the lack of condemnation of the so-called extremist faction. They should call out those extremists far more often to make it clear that they don't agree with those ideas. Saying "all men should die' isn't that far from saying "all men are trash," but modern feminists are more likely to make excuses for this, framing it as a natural response, rather than treating it as a position they actively oppose and are distancing themselves from. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 30/11/25 02:00 AM |
| 20 | My sister is a "pick me"Men are both the majority of the homeless population and more likely to have no shelter at all btw. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 24/11/25 07:25 AM |
| 7 | Misandry being banned is somehow a bad thingThat's a whole other layer of the argument that isn't even worth discussing with them. Whether it systemically affects men or women is irrelevant if we can't even get on the same page about the fundamental definitions. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 08/11/25 02:59 AM |
| 9 | Misandry being banned is somehow a bad thingFor them, "misandry" means systematic hatred of men, not individual hatred. So, they are essentially saying, "Systemic prejudice against men doesn't exist, but I do hate them, though." It would be one thing to create new words to distinguish between individual and systematic prejudice, and then to debate which of those affects men. But to simply ignore that the current, established definition of the word applies to both levels is intellectually dishonest. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 07/11/25 11:20 PM |
| 128 | Misandry being banned is somehow a bad thingMISANDRY IS NOT REAL i hate men the most lol | /r/EverydayMisandry | 07/11/25 04:27 AM |
| 2 | Misandrist upset that she's not allowed to be more of a sexist bigotThanks for your breakdown of what the terminology means to YOU. I don't make the rules; society does. I explain what it means for society today, not for me. I don't hate women at all but women as of 2025 can be very very annoying and grind your gears because they know they can get away with mouthing off to you without consequences. Be careful that this doesn't overwrite your morals and push you toward extremism. It's sad, but it happens way too often. I've seen it happen to many boys and girls, … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 17/08/25 04:48 AM |
| 0 | Misandrist upset that she's not allowed to be more of a sexist bigotSo it sounds like to me that incel is just a buzzword that people just like to use because by that logic, a gay man or a husband can be an incel just because they made a hateful statement regarding women which makes no sense. It makes perfect sense once you understand that the meaning of the word has changed. I can see why that's confusing, but here is the key difference: The OLD meaning was about a situation (being unable to find a partner). The NEW (modern) meaning is about an ideology (misogy… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 17/08/25 03:56 AM |
| 0 | Misandrist upset that she's not allowed to be more of a sexist bigotThe meanings of words drift over time. For example, "nice" once meant "foolish," and "silly" once meant "blessed." What truly matters is a word's current meaning. While one could substitute "misandric" for "femcel" and "misogynistic" for "incel," I prefer using "incel" and "femcel" because they are the modern terms for these types of sexist internet trolls. The common understanding is that "incels" are men who hate women and "femcels" are women who hate men. You could also call them misogynistic… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 17/08/25 02:57 AM |
| 2 | Misandrist upset that she's not allowed to be more of a sexist bigotI hate how incels and femcels keep fueling each other’s resentment in a vicious circle. Incels reinforce femcels’ hatred of men, while femcels reinforce incels’ hatred of women, and both sides end up despising the entire opposite sex even more because of those exceptions: the awful and bitter individuals who represent the worst of each group. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 17/08/25 01:25 AM |
| 13 | Male victims of women aren't allowed to exist.Maybe it's related to the leak that happened in the tea app. Perhaps the subreddit has been reported, (falsely or not) for doxxing TeaApp users, or the Reddit admins are just worried that something like that might start happening there. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 26/07/25 05:34 AM |
| 2 | Some of the most insidious misandry comes from within.I'm all for misanthropy (not confuse that with misandry.) I mean, I'm a human and I hate humans, have you ever met them? They're cruel and selfish, and will betray anyone at the first opportunity for their own gain. They are destroying their own home. On a personal level, it's similar. Sure, there are some humans I like and respect, but the ones who have ruined things and made life hell are the ones I remember. I don't care about the rare, good exceptions, even if there are countless of them. Th… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 16/07/25 08:55 PM |
| 1 | I feel for her poor son.From my experience reading Reddit? Lol. I think you misunderstand me (or maybe I misunderstood your first comment). I'm talking about Reddit users, where it's often impossible to know someone's gender for sure, but a lot of people just default to their biases. If someone defends women, it "must" be a woman; if someone defends men, it "must" be a man. Obviously, that’s false, and not a very thoughtful way to see people, but it’s very, very common on Reddit… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 05/07/25 07:10 AM |
| 17 | Misandry. Doesn't exist.The simple fact that she's questioning this, rather than trying to justify it, is a great start. I just worry that the comments will try to validate her, rather than encourage her to reflect on why she's having these thoughts in the first place. Her prejudice isn’t coming from a rational place, but an emotional one, and that can be healed through reflection and self-awareness. Which, again, the fact that she’s even questioning it is a great sign, especially considering she is a teenager, a time … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 02/07/25 10:14 PM |
| 22 | I feel for her poor son.Not necessarily. Women who call out this kind of shit are automatically labeled as men. And if they have something like a female avatar, the misandrists might assume they’re just pretending to be a woman or whatever. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 30/06/25 11:52 PM |
| 27 | I feel for her poor son.Laughing at all the men fighting for their lives in these comments downvoting any comments that support and validate and agree with this women 😂 You clowns are proving the point 😂😂😂 yup. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 30/06/25 11:40 PM |
| 28 | I feel for her poor son.My father was a good man. And he is a nice kid, he's not some incel kid at all. He just has some typical masculine traits that really get on my nerves sometimes. But his mother, on the other hand... Remember what the traits are for her: "I think they're stupid, slow, disgusting. I think they stink and do everything wrong all the time." She’s not even talking about the actual bad stereotypes people associate with men, like being violent, aggressive, and rude. Because he's probably not... he's jus… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 30/06/25 10:07 PM |
| 18 | Another ridiculous hot take and generalizationThey’ve married/dated 90% of men? Damn! | /r/EverydayMisandry | 27/06/25 03:48 AM |
| 12 | I really need to unsubscribe from the vent sub.Basically, they're saying that men are doing this to themselves with the same toxic mindset that makes women's lives hell. Now, I'm not sure how that is an excuse for wanting more men to commit suicide. They probably just see it as an over-exaggeration, magnified by a hate that was created out of fear. In their minds, the belief is that most men are fundamentally bad, with rare exceptions, so it's acceptable to have exaggerated feelings towards them, similar to saying something like "kill all cr… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 25/06/25 11:50 PM |
| 27 | No wordsWhy do people refuse to research this topic further and keep repeating the same easily debunked points? Men often have higher case fatality rates than women even when using the exact same method. Preference of lethal methods is not the only cause for higher suicide rates in males Hanging: 83.5% (Male) vs 55.3% (Female) Poisoning by Drugs: 7.2% (Male) vs 3.4% (Female) Poisoning by Other Means: 28.2% (Male) vs 12.2% (Female) Sharp Object: 8.6% (Male) vs 2.5% (Female) Moving Object (Lying in front … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 23/06/25 04:25 PM |
| 49 | Another men bad postI feel like I need therapy This woman urgently and desperately needs therapy. Her symptoms point directly to Androphobia. The fact that it's actually hurting her own life, combined with her level of paranoia and avoidance behaviors ("called in sick," "cancelled meetings"), are classic, textbook symptoms of a severe phobia. This has gone far beyond simple prejudice and into a state of clinical paranoia. Frankly, it's unbelievable that she has a boyfriend while trapped in this mindset. If he's a g… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 21/06/25 10:31 PM |
| 10 | Imagine if this was round the other way ?I judge people by their ability to make a prejudiced joke and not realize it was prejudiced in the first place or why that's always a bad thing. You know... basic morality. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 20/06/25 09:27 PM |
| 41 | Saw this and thought of you guys.I don't know the content of the book, but looking at the titles of their other works, it doesn't seem that odd. "A deliciously dark, hilariously twisted story about friendship, love, and murder. Fans of My Sister the Serial Killer, How to Kill Your Family and Killing Eve will love this wickedly clever novel! Don't miss Katy Brent's new wickedly witty novel, The Murder After the Night Before**, available now!**" It seems like just another "How I did it" type of book, following a serial killer. No… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 19/06/25 02:27 PM |
| 1 | The Yaoi Community is so ignorant to the issues other gay men faced from toxic yaoi fangirls tumblr post by meI think the idea behind the term was mostly just about mocking women who liked yaoi/BL content, so it was a mix of homophobia and sexism. Male fans would often get creeped out just by seeing two male characters being shipped romantically by female fans, even when there was no real indication it was canon. I mean, fudanshi are literally the same thing, just called "rotten boys" instead of "rotten girls." So I don’t think it was necessarily about hating women, but more about a general dislike for … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 19/06/25 07:05 AM |
| 2 | The Yaoi Community is so ignorant to the issues other gay men faced from toxic yaoi fangirls tumblr post by meI thought most people don’t have an issue with it anymore, since it stopped being used as a slur and became more of a self-identification term. I rarely see it used in a negative way, kind of like "nerd" or "queer." Where I’m from, it’s a pretty normal term to use in weeb culture. I didn’t know people had an issue with it. I’ll be more aware of that next time. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 19/06/25 06:39 AM |
| 2 | The Yaoi Community is so ignorant to the issues other gay men faced from toxic yaoi fangirls tumblr post by meThat doesn’t really reflect my experience with fujoshi (women who love yaoi). The key factor is that they tend to enjoy seeing men with men, regardless of whether they sexual orientation it or even what type of relationship the characters have. I’m not sure if they represent the average female brain when it comes to that kind of perversion. <image> | /r/EverydayMisandry | 19/06/25 05:16 AM |
| 6 | Welcome Back, Henry VIIIIn this case, I don't really have a problem with the joke in the post. It’s so absurd, it feels like the OP was just making a dumb joke. BUT the comment section, is predictably depressing. It really feels that adults are just big children, especially with this kind of reaction. Someone calls out a sexist joke (misandry), and you can bet someone will jump in with the "it's 'punching up'" defense. "What's the problem with this joke? I think it's funny." "Would you find it funny if the genders were… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 15/06/25 05:14 PM |
| 32 | Welcome Back, Henry VIII"Umm, actually, calling my joke "misandry" is a form of misogyny. You're trying to police my reproductive humor, which is deeply problematic. This isn't about hating men; it's about disrupting the patriarchal expectation that I should be happy with any gender. It's a commentary on choice. Do better. /s" I, for one, am actually more pro-choice than most people. I believe that if either parent (father or mother) doesn't want the child, it's better for the pregnancy not to continue, since it's the … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 14/06/25 04:10 PM |
| 26 | This is just ridiculousTestosterone Bullshit. It's a popular idea (and very very wrong), the "testosterone causes aggression" myth really falls apart when you look at the science. The actual link is so weak it's almost meaningless. One major analysis found it explains less than 1% of the difference in aggression between men. To put that in scientific terms, the correlation is just r=0.071. For a link to be even moderately relevant, you'd need a number about four or five times higher. That’s why knowing someone’s T lev… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 09/06/25 07:35 PM |
| 3 | A concerned mother wanted to find a school environment where both boys and girls performed well for her son. Post got tons of dislikes and the replies are just boys bad girls good and how there is no hope.Edit: Please, Reddit users, before downvoting me, read more than the first sentence. I'm mostly defending boys here, lol, I just don't think the argument used here is a good one. --- It's true that history is filled with great men who had a fundamental impact. However, their success was a result of opportunity, not inherent superiority. The reason one gender produced 99% of science and technology is that society almost exclusively gave them the chance to do so in the past. This same principle ap… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 07/06/25 05:28 PM |
| 40 | And Yet If Crime Statistics Were Used Against Any Minority Group There Would Rightfully Be Uproar<image> They are considering suicide as violence? Really? | /r/EverydayMisandry | 31/05/25 05:03 PM |
| 26 | so disheartening that some people don't even view men as humanJUST IGNORE THE PLETHORA OF STATISTICS SHOWING THEY'RE VIOLENT RAPIST ANIMALS INCAPABLE OF EMOTION Remember, misandry doesn’t exist. No one thinks men are inferior or bad because of their gender. It’s a myth created to attack feminism. /s But for real, the fact that they say "cis men" instead of just "men" honestly gives me a bit of a transphobic vibe too. Like, what are they even implying here? Lol. Not that it matters much, they’re already deep in bigotry. I don’t expect much from them anyway. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 27/05/25 07:55 PM |
| 44 | Wtf did I just read?I would say misandry, but I just learned that misandry is a myth and "no one hates men because of their gender, it's just not a thing." So... I'm not sure. /s | /r/EverydayMisandry | 26/05/25 04:29 AM |
| 121 | Billie Eilish Being Exposed for Her HypocrisyNotice the lack of mentions of height, hair loss, and penis size, which are the most common "criticisms" of men's bodies. Height, in particular, is a very popular one from what I've seen. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 24/05/25 10:05 PM |
| 16 | Can anybody imagine a subreddit named "againstwomensrights" with tens of thousands of members?Gender and Sexual Minorities (GSM). It's an alternative to LGBTQIA+ | /r/EverydayMisandry | 22/05/25 03:46 PM |
| 15 | A totally sane, rational, normal woman gives a thorough analysis of 50% of the world's populationThe me from a few years ago would have thought those kinds of commentaries and generalizations were just stupid, hyperbolic internet talk. But nowadays, I honestly believe a lot of people truly mean it when they use words like "every" or "the vast majority," followed by a completely unrealistic exaggeration that is extremely easy to verify as false and disconnected from reality. At least back in the day, people did not have easy access to information. So if someone claimed that a certain gender … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 17/05/25 05:46 AM |
| 4 | Just wow- Dismissing her experience [...] - Blaming the non-existent concept of "misandry" - Just being openly sexist Hey, ChatGPT, if someone claims that misandry is a non-existent concept, is that a sexist claim? Would you say that they are being openly-sexism? Please answer briefly. "Yes, claiming that misandry doesn't exist can be a sexist claim if it's used to dismiss or invalidate men's experiences with gender-based prejudice. It's a form of open sexism if it denies the possibility that any group … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 14/05/25 07:22 PM |
| 12 | One of the Worst Content CreatorsFor your examples, lack of adequate menstrual leave or short maternity leave, are primarily struggles faced by average working women, not necessarily elite women who might have the resources, flexibility, or support systems to navigate these issues regardless of official policy. The "blindspot" isn't simply a male female issue; it's often an elite versus everyone else issue. Think about it: Do powerful men at the top also show a significant blindspot towards the struggles of average men? Often, … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 04/05/25 09:56 AM |
| 72 | One of the Worst Content CreatorsMen often have higher case fatality rates than women even when using the exact same method. Preference of lethal methods is not the only cause for higher suicide rates in males Hanging: 83.5% (Male) vs 55.3% (Female) Poisoning by Drugs: 7.2% (Male) vs 3.4% (Female) Poisoning by Other Means: 28.2% (Male) vs 12.2% (Female) Sharp Object: 8.6% (Male) vs 2.5% (Female) Moving Object (Lying in front of): 70.8% (Male) vs 33.3% (Female) Firearms: 78.8% (Male) vs 50.0% (Female) Jumping: 55.0% (Male) vs 43… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 03/05/25 05:21 PM |
| 16 | Do you think r/womenviolenttoo are misrepresented or taken out of exaggeration or based on accusation against the sub?Yeah, the thing is, good arguments aren't like, reserved for "good people". Even people who are way off base or pushing something nasty can occasionally make a point that actually holds true. That doesn't suddenly make the point itself bad. The mistake is when people hear a point, see that some group they hate also makes that point, and then just dismiss it out of hand, that's Guilt by Association. It happens all the time, in pretty much any kind of debate, not just the gender stuff. You [expres… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 23/04/25 10:05 PM |
| 12 | Even when feminists agree the statistics are right, they minimise them to absolve fellow women of accountability for committing rape<image> A fair comparison clarifies the difference between sexual coercion, rape, and being made to penetrate. [The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2016/2017 Report on Sexual Violence] For Women (Figure 1): Contact Sexual Violence: 54.3% of women reported experiencing at least one form of contact sexual violence in their lifetime. This includes rape, sexual coercion, and/or unwanted sexual contact. Rape (completed or attempted): 26.8% of women reported experiencing complete… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 24/03/25 01:17 AM |
| 24 | Even when feminists agree the statistics are right, they minimise them to absolve fellow women of accountability for committing rape<image> The table. Their point could be valid if, and only if, surveys on female survivors of male perpetrators do not include the same or equivalent questions. Since coercion is still considered a form of sexual assault in many reports, have you heard of the famous concept of "enthusiastic yes"? Many feminists have pushed this idea to redefine consent, emphasizing that anything short of clear, willing participation should not be considered valid consent. If the same standard applies to men, the… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 24/03/25 12:56 AM |
| 8 | The bear vs man thing is stupidIt's more like, humans are stupid, and we're terrible at managing risk. I do have an issue with people who pick the bear, falling into the mindset that it's the logical choice because a bear is supposedly "not more dangerous than a man", arguing that the probability of a bear causing any type of harm is lower than that of a man causing any type of harm towards a woman. Those are people who are or have already lost their grasp of reality, who see men as 20-50x more dangerous than they actually ar… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 21/03/25 07:50 AM |
| -2 | The bear vs man thing is stupidI kind of agree. For me, it goes both ways—a strong misunderstanding and a lack of empathy from both men and women on this topic. It's a mix of women who are actually brainwashed into thinking all men are more dangerous than a bear and women who are just more afraid of the chance of rape than death. One is prejudice, the other is not. I'm genuinely curious about how the responses would differ if women were asked to choose between a button that had a 1% chance of them being attacked by an actual … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 21/03/25 07:23 AM |
| 16 | Wonder if "Women are bitches" would be allowed as a book ?You have a point. There's a lot of content in the media with obvious misogyny, even these days. The idea of things not being allowed, I believe, is more of in the mainstream, as the pushback against "Women are bitches" is stronger than against "Men are trash". Misogyny is a still a very very real thing, and the title of that book is a very clear example of it. The other book, mentioned in the post, is an example of misandry. Both should be treated equally as forms of sexism, which is a widesprea… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 17/03/25 09:55 PM |
| 23 | When I Called Out a Statement That Completely Erases Female Abusers Including My OwnSaying "always a man" is even worse for me than "all men." While "all men" generalizes half the world's population, you could possibly argue, from a pessimistic viewpoint, that every person could be bad given the right opportunity. I know that people who say that aren't really including women in that statement/generalization, but one could theoretically argue that point, the idea that everyone would be bad if the situation presented itself. I don't agree, but I can see a general point against a … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 17/03/25 08:39 PM |
| 1 | Feminism is a spectrumWeird, it's still working for me. Try searching for "How Do You See Feminism?" in the sub search bar. The post was made six days ago and is still there for me, at least. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/03/25 12:54 AM |
| 1 | Feminism is a spectrumI understand that too and agree that good dialogues happen less than 5% of the time, with luck. To clarify my point, I'm suggesting that it's about trying to be the reasonable voice, even when it's difficult. I'm not asking or saying that we should necessarily go out and actively seek dialogue, as that will often be frustrating, but that when it's present, the benefit of the doubt should be given to individuals when interacting with them, because they might be more reasonable if presented with f… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 14/03/25 11:17 PM |
| 2 | Feminism is a spectrum"Why would I WANT to have dialogue with a movement which has proven to me time and time again to be against me because of my gender?" That's a fair question. My (And when I say "my", I mean really, truly mine, not the answer; I just want to share my perspective on this) My answer is: I want to have a dialogue with individuals who are willing to listen to me and don't have their hearts full of hate for the opposite gender. The movement has done something "anti-men", but whether that person I'm ha… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/03/25 05:12 PM |
| 1 | Feminism is a spectrumI get the point, my thought is more that I want to have a dialogue with "good" feminists those who don't approve of the rampant misandry but either diminish its significance/size or don't express their concern about the danger it poses. I don't want those people to see me as an antagonist, because I'm not. I want to engage in dialogue with them to understand why they think the way they do and potentially change their minds or mine on some topics. I strongly believe factual science and a sociolog… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/03/25 05:40 AM |
| 4 | Feminism is a spectrumThis subreddit seems more predominantly anti-feminist, especially for active users, and less so for lurkers, from what I've observed over the past few months. A recent poll showed that opinions on feminism are very divided among voters here. This is the current status of the poll's votes as of today. 42% (104) Feminism is not inherently hostile to men, but is rife with extremists it must deal with. 40% (98) Feminism is inherently hostile to men. It should not be trusted by men and their advocate… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/03/25 01:11 AM |
| 9 | I've come to dislike much of feminisim both in theory and community - but I also dislike anti-feminists.The lower on the hierarchy you are, the more violence you receive. I like this idea and others you've presented, but I disagree with the notion that women are inherently placed in a lower tier. Instead, I see it as a spectrum where individuals of any gender can occupy various tiers depending on the specific context. The term "patriarchy" itself feels loaded and lacks a clear definition in modern society. Its binary approach to gender oversimplifies reality. I'd argue it benefits a mere 1% rather… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 02/02/25 09:53 PM |
| 11 | People openly defending hatred against men and demonize them on redditUnfortunately, that won't work because some people can only understand this concept when talking about historically recognized marginalized groups. So, for them, it's a false equivalency, as if one is 'less' harmful and therefore fine to do. I can safely say, "I hate [straight]/[men]/[white] people; if you are triggered by this, you are part of the problem," and some of those people will be totally fine with it because if I replace those with a minority group, they recognize how disgusting the p… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 19/01/25 09:44 PM |
| 15 | People openly defending hatred against men and demonize them on redditThis gives off the same energy as the phrase, "I'm not racist; my best friend is black." Is it so difficult to avoid using language that has deeply prejudiced origins? If it sounds racist, it is racist. If it sounds sexist, it is sexist. Saying "I hate [group]," when that group is not based on an ideology but rather unchangeable traits like race, gender, etc., is and always will be a disgusting thing to do. If you cannot express your ideas and protest without the use of that kind of language, so… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 19/01/25 09:14 PM |
| 36 | Holy False Equivalence, BatmanYeah, this analogy falls apart quickly. There's a big difference between generalizing about a group based on a few individuals' actions and addressing specific, in-the-moment behavior, and that's where the pool analogy fails. "No running" targets a directly observed, immediate action that breaks a rule and creates a clear safety hazard in that specific situation. It's not a sweeping statement about everyone at the pool or a judgment on their character; it's an instruction to stop a particular ac… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 18/01/25 01:02 AM |
| 51 | 🙄That's a lot of fallacia logicals in just one text, quite impressive, disgusting too, but damn. It's like a bingo card for cognitive distortions and bad-faith arguments hasty generalization: making sweeping claims about ALL men based on limited or biased evidence. this is the overarching fallacy that encompasses many of the others. ecological fallacy: incorrectly assuming that statistics about men as a group apply to every individual man. ad hominem: attacking men with insults and name-calling i… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 11/01/25 02:22 AM |
| 41 | Men commit suicide, women are the victimThe married men/women who killed themselves tended to do so because they felt like bad parent or that they weren't good enough. Yeah, feeling that they weren't good enough or worthy is what makes people want to end their lives. Anyone who actually understands suicide knows that. People in the funeral industry understand about corpses, not the human mind. The married men/women who killed themselves were spiteful and angry with a "how dare my wife/husband..." attitude. "If you leave, I'm going to … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 29/12/24 09:08 PM |
| 6 | "talking about men's issues makes you a misogynist" ahh personIt's funny how they believe exactly the opposite... But no, neither group is for gender equality or gender supremacy; it's a misguided and biased gender war waged by people who are hyper-focused on one gender's issues and have lost sight of the nuances of the other side. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 16/12/24 11:50 PM |
| 10 | “No, ALL lives matter!”I think the list is incomplete, but not completely wrong. We should hold both men and women accountable for those things, as both contribute to the mindset reflected in some of the items on the list. Based on what I see in the images, it seems like they are aiming only at men as the creators of these issues. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 10/12/24 05:43 PM |
| 28 | So we can't even praise single fathers now? JesusMy greatest strength A parent who raises children on their own is nothing short of a hero. This is not only a amazing person, they are also the perfect role model for their children. - Do you want a Nobel Peace Prize for doing the bare minimum? So now a single parent raising their own kids is now a hero. People and their audacity for seeking praise over the smallest things. ... Shout out to good single parents out there, even if some people don't appreciate the hard work they do every day. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 09/12/24 07:57 PM |
| 45 | Reddit's mod support says misandry will be allowed on Reddit because men as a group is not vulnerable (as if misandry did not negatively impact young boys at all)I argue that they are misinterpreting their own rules, as what is written contradicts their actions. They claim to follow the principle of "Remember the human," but their application of this rule seems to only apply to marginalized groups. That's completely illogical. It's akin to saying we should only care about people with terminal illnesses and ignore those with other, less severe diseases, simply because their suffering isn't deemed 'as grave.' Such an interpretation is not only ridiculous a… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 07/12/24 10:24 PM |
| 11 | Men or bears ?Humans are notoriously bad at managing and understanding risks because of cognitive biases. The Availability Heuristic makes us overestimate the likelihood of memorable or recently reported events. Dread Risk causes us to fear catastrophic and uncontrollable incidents that threaten our personal autonomy. Take flying versus driving, for example. Air travel is WAY safer than car travel, yet many people fear flying intensely. This irrational fear persists despite overwhelming statistics showing tha… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 06/12/24 08:36 PM |
| 7 | Absolute Fucking TrashYup. Plus, women's abuse is way underreported, both because victims often don't realize they're victims and because the system tends to miss identifying these women as perpetrators. But honestly, even with a perfect dataset showing the true numbers - whether women abusers are 50%, 20%, 10%, or 1% as common as men - it wouldn't change my view. When we're talking about people being harmed, any number matters, regardless of the percentages, so my point about the moral aspect will still stands regar… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 05/12/24 11:14 PM |
| 8 | Absolute Fucking TrashTo equate statistical invisibility with unreality is to ignore the lived experiences of those silenced by societal bias. Turning this into a competition of victimhood only serves to divide us and distract from the real issue: preventing harm. Our priority should be creating a society where no one has to experience abuse, regardless of who the perpetrator might be. Blaming men, either individually or as a group, is ultimately unproductive because the root of the problem lies within the complex st… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 05/12/24 10:36 PM |
| 44 | "Be quiet and listen to women without making it about yourself, you parasite."It’s whataboutism when someone says: "Being a woman is so hard. Because ...." And the response is: "Well, being a man isn’t easy either. Because ..." This shifts focus away from women’s challenges and dismisses the original point. But if someone says: "Being a woman is so hard; I wish I could be a man because is easier." And the response is: "Well, being a man isn’t easy either. Because ..." This directly counters the claim that being a man is easier, making it relevant and not whataboutism. I'm… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 03/12/24 07:46 PM |
| 13 | Such a Myopic Way of ThinkingJust because a group holds institutional power doesn't mean individual members of that group are immune to prejudice or discrimination. - This means that having power at a societal level doesn't protect individuals from experiencing personal bias or unfair treatment. Prejudice operates on multiple levels - systemic (patriarchy) and individual (misandry). Discrimination can exist in two forms: - Systemic: Built into society's institutions and structures (like patriarchy) - Individual: Personal bi… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 03/12/24 04:36 AM |
| 53 | On a subreddit for 'exposing misogyny' lol"[hatred, contempt, and prejudice against men and boys] isn't real, and the mod team would REALLY appreciate if you didn't use that nonsense word on this subreddit. there's absolutely NO ONE on the planet who has ever held such ideas, past or present - it's literally an alien concept. prejudice could never target those groups. the proof? well... obviously... they're the ones who CREATE prejudice, so it's like, totally impossible for them to experience it! HA! it's not like we've ever seen things… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 29/11/24 07:09 PM |
| 28 | A Personal Story From School “One of You Will Become a Rapist”Just the classic Ecological fallacy. Another fallacy that distorts and manipulates reality, opening the door to prejudice. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 26/11/24 03:54 AM |
| 24 | What do all points besides the first even have to do with women being saved first?I have yet to see a gender """"discussion"""" that doesn't have whataboutism coming from both women and men. "But what about male suicide rates?" "But what about domestic violence stats?" "But what about custody bias?" "But what about workplace harassment?" "But what about draft requirements?" "But what about maternal mortality?" "But what about homeless population gender ratio?" "But what about wage gap?" "But what about workplace deaths?" "But what about SA statistics?" "But what about male DV… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 24/11/24 08:03 PM |
| 6 | How To Kill Men And Get Away With ItMy moral side agrees with you, but my marketing side disagrees. The title grabs more 'positive' attention as women who get interested because of the title (women seem to enjoy murder-related content a lot for some reason too). The title could be 'How To Kill A Rapist And Get Away With It,' yes, but unfortunately edgy girls will be more interested in the first title, which again isn't really problematic in the spectrum of book titles. and tbh: - "rapist" in the title = instant content warnings/re… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 21/11/24 11:37 PM |
| 6 | How To Kill Men And Get Away With ItI get it, but I don't think it's that weird of a title, given others, as the goal is to grab the attention of readers. If it was the opposite, for sure there would be women annoyed by that, insisting it's insensitive because women die too much at the hands of men, etc. And the common joke in the reviews of this book is 'taking notes,' so yeah, that warrants more warning. I can imagine similar jokes in more generic titles, but not just by replacing 'men' with 'women.' The book seems to be about a… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 21/11/24 11:10 PM |
| 31 | How To Kill Men And Get Away With ItI dont know the content of the book, but title of others works, doenst seems that odd of title "A deliciously dark, hilariously twisted story about friendship, love, and murder. Fans of My Sister the Serial Killer, How to Kill Your Family and Killing Eve will love this wickedly clever novel! Don't miss Katy Brent's new wickedly witty novel, The Murder After the Night Before**, available now!**" It seems like just another "How I did it" type of book, following a serial killer. Not necessarily mis… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 21/11/24 10:44 PM |
| 25 | “It’s literally every man.”If all men are either predators, enablers, or don't care, then no man will actually be 'holding predatory men accountable' because they would themselves be either a predator or an enabler. Therefore, by the image's own logic, all men are automatically 'part of the problem.' You know what's sad? There are men who will agree with all these bullet points except the last one, because they think they're the 'exception', the ones who care. It's sad that some people believe men don't report abuse towar… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 19/11/24 11:06 PM |
| 52 | Whoop whoop! Horribly misandrist sub just banned.I never saw the sub, but the archives show clear misandry. Though that's probably not why Reddit banned it, they typically ignore basic misandry until a community crosses into transphobia, harassment, threats, racism, or brigading. Does anyone know which it actually was? Pure misandry usually isn't enough for a ban. Edit: From the warning message when trying to access it, it seems it was banned for spam... great job, Reddit... "This subreddit was banned due to being used for spam." | /r/EverydayMisandry | 17/11/24 01:51 AM |
| 5 | Feminist therapist takes apart feminism and explores men's issuesTrue, but it makes it hard to recommend the documentary, even though the name is fitting. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/11/24 05:29 PM |
| 39 | Feminist therapist takes apart feminism and explores men's issuesExcellent video. The Red Pill documentary was my gateway to seeing men's issues, I mean REALLY seeing men's issues. I'm very grateful to Cassie, though I just wish she had chosen a better name. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/11/24 07:30 AM |
| 37 | Bruh fuck off.A crucial flaw in the article's approach for me, is its conflation of separate claims: "feminism isn't misandrist" (which has its own sources) gets mixed with "misandry isn't widespread" (a different claim entirely). This merging ignores that misandry, like misogyny, has existed for millennia before modern movements. By focusing primarily on internet-age manifestations and anti-feminist reactions, the article effectively erases misandry's long historical existence as a standalone form of prejudi… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 11/11/24 05:01 AM |
| 76 | Bruh fuck off.There is already a battle going on between the editors. Just compare the English page with the others; it is messy. The content has completely broken the neutral and objective point of view and has become very opinionated. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 11/11/24 03:45 AM |
| 42 | Bruh fuck off.Radical feminism has often been associated with misandry in the public consciousness. However, radical feminist arguments have also been misinterpreted, and individual radical feminists such as Valerie Solanas Many radical feminists openly embrace misandry - you can literally just ask them. It's bizarre that this article tries to push the narrative that misandry is a "myth.". The entire article reads more like a defense against accusations of misandry rather than an actual documentation of what … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 11/11/24 03:17 AM |
| 18 | This can’t be happening…For sure, there is absolutely no problem with wanting a lifestyle that doesn’t involve romantic or sexual relationships. For a straight woman, this would typically mean a life without men in a romantic or sexual sense. But we all know what will end up happening: another "femcel" place that blames men for all their issues. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 09/11/24 07:13 PM |
| 28 | This can’t be happening…If is anything like I hear from the movement in Korea, it's going to be filled with transphobia, homophobia, misandry AND misogyny. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 09/11/24 06:49 PM |
| 2 | Feminist answers to male suicide and other issues.Thanks! | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/11/24 06:17 PM |
| 12 | Feminist answers to male suicide and other issues.Does anyone know the mortality rates between men and women who choose the same suicide methods? For example, when comparing men versus women who use drug overdose attempts, how do their survival rates compare? The core argument often made is that men choose "more effective" methods, which leads to fewer failed attempts. However, if the mortality rates are HIGHER for men even when using the same "less lethal" methods, this would suggest that method choice is only PART of the reason for the MASSIV… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 31/10/24 10:54 PM |
| 50 | "Women, I suggest you try dehumanizing men" is seriously getting upvotes?If you are a woman, I suggest you try this exercise and notice how you view men differently overtime Hey try this cool technique for programming yourself to be bigoted! We should deliberately practice viewing people as less human. /s | /r/EverydayMisandry | 30/10/24 12:35 AM |
| 45 | In Response to Gilmore Girls Actor Scott Patterson Saying He Felt Objectified During a Scene"well akshually this harassment is fine bc historical power dynamics" The whole "oppression olympics" thing where people try to calculate exactly how many suffering points each demographic has is literally just a way to justify being trash to others while feeling morally superior. If something is ethically wrong when done to group A, it's wrong when done to group B. that's just basic moral consistency. don't objectify anyone don't harass anyone don't make excuses for bad behavior keep it real wi… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 24/10/24 06:19 PM |
| 4 | "Men are criminals and dangerous!!""Our world would be so much safer with xy chromosomes under control" Mask off moment suggesting genetic control, yikes. Maybe we should address safety concerns without casually advocating eugenics? Just a thought. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 23/10/24 08:41 PM |
| 1 | And what part of these statements is untrue?Honestly, I agree with you at the core of the argument, but Therefore, 99% of the "men are murdered too" types of replies are not deflection in any way, shape, or form. How are we supposed to know the true intentions behind those replies? Where do we gather this information, from subreddits aligned with feminist, radical feminist, red pill, or men's advocacy ideologies? Is the whole spectrum represented there? Or from Twitter, with its echo chambers that are anything but reasonable or honest, br… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 20/10/24 10:42 PM |
| 10 | And what part of these statements is untrue?Alright, from the devil’s advocate point of view and giving OP the benefit of the doubt, they are not necessary arguing these statements are factually untrue, they might fully acknowledge that men face violence, that making it a gender war isn't productive, and that everyone’s safety matters. But they could believe "those truths are not the point!" in the specific context of a discussion about violence against women. Their frustration might come from how these kinds of responses (however true) o… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 19/10/24 09:51 PM |
| 13 | DAMN THOSE MENHumans are notoriously bad at managing and understanding risks because of cognitive biases. The Availability Heuristic makes us overestimate the likelihood of memorable or recently reported events. Dread Risk causes us to fear catastrophic and uncontrollable incidents that threaten our personal autonomy. Loss Aversion leads us to prefer avoiding losses over achieving equivalent gains. Take flying versus driving, for example. Air travel is WAY safer than car travel, yet many people fear flying in… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 16/10/24 07:30 PM |
| 2 | Well feminist admit in nowI'm going to take a look at those. Thanks for the recommendations. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 14/10/24 06:33 PM |
| 4 | Well feminist admit in nowYeah, individual interpretations contribute to disparities in reporting sexual coercion. Hines and Saudino (2003) note that differing understandings of terms like "made" and "insist" can lead women to underreport their sexually coercive behaviors, unintentionally minimizing their actions. Women may also fail to recognize when they're being pressured into sexual activities. Both men and women might excuse their actions, believing they're not forcing anyone, while overlooking signs of coercion. So… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 14/10/24 06:05 PM |
| 112 | Well feminist admit in nowI want to address the claim that "Studies show that over 43% of American men have committed a sexual assault against a girl or woman since the age of 14." This statistic originates from a study by Abbey and Jacques-Tiura (2011): Study: Participants: 457 single men aged 18-35 from the Detroit Metropolitan area."Data were collected from 474 men; the analyses in this article were restricted to 457 participants who met data analysis criteria." Method: Used a modified version of the Sexual Experience… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 14/10/24 03:28 AM |
| 2 | No, people with toxic mindsets are the worst enemies of bothHumanity is its own worst enemy, with harmful traits in BOTH genders damaging society: from relational aggression & manipulation to physical violence & dominance. While the frequency may vary, NO single gender is the sole perpetrator, being influenced by cultural norms, upbringing, and individual choices. Blaming one gender ignores the shared responsibility we ALL have for our actions. We need a nuanced understanding that goes beyond simplistic "us vs. them" narratives. Society's tendency to sca… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 06/10/24 08:59 PM |
| 7 | Jesus fucking christTLDR: The current state of feminism, particularly its association with radical elements, is harming the movement and pushing away moderate voices. This, coupled with a tendency to dismiss men's issues and engage in harmful generalizations, is hindering true gender equality. How many true feminists exist out there—not those who merely claim to want gender equality, but those who are genuinely working for it? Feminism created the image of its own downfall by pretending to care about gender equalit… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 01/10/24 05:20 AM |
| 12 | Disgusting. No other word for it. Got body shamed for my pfp too.Misogyny fuels misandry, and misandry, in turn, fuels further misogyny... | /r/EverydayMisandry | 22/09/24 06:47 PM |
| 9 | Disgusting. No other word for it. Got body shamed for my pfp too.Frankly, I find it infuriating to engage with those who blindly cling to the demonstrably false notion that "misandry is a myth" while simultaneously acknowledging the systemic nature of misogyny. This blatant contradiction reveals either a staggering level of ignorance or a deliberate attempt to silence and invalidate men's experiences with prejudice. By denying the existence of misandry, they engage in the very behavior they claim doesn't exist - dismissing and belittling men's experiences and… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 22/09/24 06:40 PM |
| 14 | One of the Worst Feminist Authors"All men are allowed to abuse women" is not simply a flawed statement; it's a dangerous and demonstrably false generalization rooted in a radical feminist ideology that seeks to demonize men and undermine efforts toward true gender equality. This rhetoric, often disguised as concern for women's safety, relies on faulty logic, cherry-picked statistics, and a blatant disregard for nuance and factual accuracy. The very word "allowed" in the text, is a manipulative distortion of reality. It implies … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 19/09/24 08:49 PM |
| 4 | I do not believe women have it worse in the workplace.I completely understand, but it seems we don't need to base our conclusions solely on anecdotal evidence after all. I need to do a more complete research, but, I've edited my comments above and included a link to a study that actually confirms your beliefs, at least regarding hiring processes across multiple countries. I believe it reflects the idea that misogyny is not as prevalent in the hiring of women in first-world countries | /r/EverydayMisandry | 18/09/24 08:01 AM |
| 5 | I do not believe women have it worse in the workplace.I want to be clear that I wasn't trying to diminish your life experiences. That was not my intention at all. It just, the sentiment of "Honestly, it's getting hard to not be hateful" is a common but dangerous feeling, and it can be boosted by frustration. I'm not sure how deep you are in that mindset – you know, the classic "Not all men, but enough men," or "It's always men." It sounds similar to your disclaimer about avoiding generalizations, but still ends up with "a lot." Again, you could be … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 18/09/24 07:21 AM |
| 3 | I do not believe women have it worse in the workplace.I read your post and, that sucks. Being unemployed for that long and constantly getting rejected would make anyone feel angry and frustrated, especially when you think there might be a pattern. It's completely understandable that you're feeling angry and frustrated. Your experiences are valid, and it's not right to dismiss them. BUT I also want to suggest something to think about. When we're going through tough times, it's easy to fall into confirmation bias – that's when we latch onto anything … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 18/09/24 06:44 AM |
| 37 | SmhPerson A (Man): As a man, I feel like societal pressure to be the sole provider can be incredibly stressful. Person B (Woman): Uhh, what about women? Boo hoo, try having a baby. Person B (Woman): So you think women have it easy? "Man up" and stop crying, snowflake. Person A: I'm actually just talking about men right now. That should be allowed. Person B (Woman): Typical! When can we talk about women? Person B (Woman): Women have it worse in every way, so you should focus on that! What about peri… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 16/09/24 01:54 AM |
| 30 | SmhLet me try... Person A (Talking about their gender): As a [man/woman], I feel like societal expectations for [men/women] can be very [negative adjective]. Person B (Dismissing): Uhh, what about the [other gender]? Person B (Dismissing): So you think the [other gender] has/have it easy? [Dismissive laughter/comment] Person A: I'm actually just talking about [Person A's gender] right now. That should be allowed. Person B (Dismissing): Typical! When can we talk about the [other gender]? Person B (D… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 16/09/24 01:47 AM |
| 19 | This person makes me feel sick and uncomfortable 🤢That's true too, despite for people being way more empathetic towards children than adults. For boys, the lack of empathy and double standard in comparison with woman still comes into play. It's really messed up. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 12/09/24 05:17 AM |
| 44 | This person makes me feel sick and uncomfortable 🤢To address the argument about physical strength: Rape is fundamentally about a lack of consent and the violation of bodily autonomy. Social power, economic standing, workplace dynamics, and family relationships can all be leveraged to manipulate or threaten someone into non-consensual sex. I will never diminish the experience of a woman who was raped, just because she wasn't physically forced by the rapist, but rather manipulated using the social advantages of the attacker. Why not think the sam… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 12/09/24 04:46 AM |
| 1 | Apparently 1 in 10 men are nuggets dipped in shitThe Classic Template: No, not all [group identifier]. But if I gave you a box of Maltesers and told you that 1 in [arbitrary number, usually way lower than it should be] of them was actually a nugget of shit rolled into a ball and dipped in milk chocolate, you'd be wary of all of them, would you not? Directly from the dehumanization playbook... "the actions or characteristics of a small minority can justify suspicion and distrust towards an entire group." | /r/EverydayMisandry | 09/09/24 07:06 PM |
| 9 | For the first time, reddit took action against Misandry (report action in 2nd picture). Immediately after, the hate sub that features an uncountable of posts like this one went private. A small victory, but a victory nonetheless.Great to know that they need to go private. That subreddit was growing quite fast. I saw a few weeks, maybe months ago, they were discussing that it was a matter of time until their sub would be banned, and where they would go. I like the idea that they need to go to the same places that incels need to be to spread their hate in isolated places on the internet like Mastodon. I was planning to do a mega archive of the worst posts there, and how Reddit doesn't do anything about it, but it seems it… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 09/09/24 01:51 AM |
| 50 | For the first time, reddit took action against Misandry (report action in 2nd picture). Immediately after, the hate sub that features an uncountable of posts like this one went private. A small victory, but a victory nonetheless.I mean, they do remove misandry as hate speech sometimes. It just depends on the admin who sees the report and how willing they are to understand misandry as hate speech. I have reported content in that subreddit after seeing it posted here, and it was removed. <image> I always report content that is clearly hate speech. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. But it's good to know that many users in that subreddit get their content removed somewhat frequently because they whine about it, lol.… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 09/09/24 01:19 AM |
| 4 | Describing most men as snakes: “If you are in a room full of snakes and most of them are venomous, you won't blame yourself for being scared. So why is it not true for men?” (71)reverse racism I often find myself questioning why the term "sexism" isn't more prevalent. Instead of establishing separate rules against misogyny and misandry, wouldn't it be simpler and more inclusive to just say "no sexism"? But then I remember, of how some individuals resist using the term "racism" when referring to discrimination against white people because of their race, opting instead for the illogical phrase "reverse racism." I'll never grasp why so many people find it so difficult to s… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 07/09/24 08:35 AM |
| 14 | “All men will rape if given the chance based on my anecdotal evidence”I saw a Reddit comment claiming 99.999999% of users are either incels or femcels, festering in online echo chambers fueled by resentment and warped worldviews toward an entire gender, often due to past experiences, trauma, or ego. They adopt a black-and-white mentality, viewing their own gender as good and the opposite as inherently bad. This flawed reasoning stems from hasty generalizations (e.g., "women are gold-digging whores" or "men are trash and inherently violent"), anecdotal evidence (e.… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 30/08/24 10:44 PM |
| 2 | I don’t even comprehend: How are most males especially straight ones, and transgenders especially trans women.I think a lot of people, myself included, have gone through a similar evolution in their thinking about feminism. We started out genuinely wanting to support gender equality, believing in the idea of equal rights and opportunities for all genders. But somewhere along the way, we became disillusioned. Maybe it was the constant negativity towards men, the generalizations that painted them all as oppressors, or the dismissive attitude towards men's issues. Perhaps it was the feeling that, within th… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 23/08/24 05:11 AM |
| 6 | Maybe we shouldn't celebrate right wing extremism, maybe men who do misogyny should be disavowed in this sub ?I'm sharing my interpretation of the original post. They viewed it as something that could potentially be used to harm men in general, not just those who are repeat serious offenders, even if it's stated otherwise on paper. You can disagree, but that doesn't mean there's no risk of it being used in an unfair or misguided way, as OP argued. I don't necessarily agree with all their points, but labeling that post as misogyny seems a bit disingenuous to me. If this were to target specific individual… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 21/08/24 12:40 AM |
| 19 | Maybe we shouldn't celebrate right wing extremism, maybe men who do misogyny should be disavowed in this sub ?The author of the post you linked is expressing a fear that these measures against misogyny will be used to unfairly target all men, not just those who exhibit misogynistic behaviors. They see this as part of a larger pattern of what they perceive as anti-male sentiment and a power imbalance that disadvantages men. While their language is quite strong, it's coming from a place of anxiety about the potential for false accusations and the erosion of men's rights. So, when they say "they hate you,"… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 21/08/24 12:10 AM |
| 29 | This is an entire rant on a misandrist subreddit, tell me again why hasn’t this subreddit been banned.Always report, even though most of the time it doesn't work and Reddit seems ignorant. Sometimes, it actually gets through, and users who make these types of posts do get banned. I know this because a certain radical feminist subreddit that we all know well, sometimes has users upset after getting banned for hate speech against men. I find it amusing because they are aware that their subreddit could be banned any day if Reddit decides to remove the "vulnerable group" part of their rules, which c… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 16/08/24 07:47 AM |
| 6 | New misandry talking point unlocked: “Men only kill themselves for attention”Though I understand where the feeling comes from, I really do, I don't think it's a healthy mindset. If we flip the words, changing "woman" to "man" and "evil" to "object" or something similar, it would likely be considered misandry and could easily be screenshot and posted on this subreddit. Even if women have had terrible past experiences with men, or men with women, it doesn't justify not giving others the benefit of the doubt or presuming who they are and how they think. I understand the fee… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 14/08/24 10:38 PM |
| 2 | What the actual fuck.Very well, if you're so uncomfortable with it, I'll avoid using the word "c#nt" and instead call them "bearfuckers" and "yeast cultures", and only every three months or when we counter something very outrageous. Happy about that? Relax, I didn't even reply to you because I'm not uncomfortable with you using mild insults. I'm uncomfortable when someone calls your commentary unnecessarily aggressive with the "cunt" part, which we can agree is not needed, and they are downvoted because of that. Are… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/08/24 02:57 AM |
| 2 | What the actual fuck.Damn, I'm a bit worried and sad that people here are downvoting you because you point out the need to avoid degrading language. I agree with you. Using this type of language doesn't help anyone and just sends a bad message to others while diminishing your argument. It shows an emotional reaction rather than a logical one (which doesn't necessarily make someone wrong, but is completely unnecessary). We can be better than this. I know that some things can get on our nerves, but just because someon… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 06/08/24 09:24 PM |
| 6 | What the actual fuck.I think the argument in this part assumes that partners should be able to 'read' each other's desires, even if someone says 'yes' due to pressure or obligation. This happens in both male-female and female-male relationships. Of course, AskFeminist is going to have a big double standard and only see this as a women's issue, believing that men are already raised to be that way. There may be some truth to that, but it's not like we don't live in a society where women think that men only care about … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 06/08/24 08:22 PM |
| 21 | What the actual fuck.Things like enthusiastic consent aren’t really widespread, it’s more like “as long as she says yes, you’re good to go”. As a consequence, men are more concerned with getting a yes out of women than actually seeing if she wants to do anything. This seems undeniably to me like rape-adjacent behavior. And a significant amount of men will end up this way, unless: From what I understand, what they mean is that partners should have the skills to read the other person and notice if they don't really wa… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 06/08/24 07:50 PM |
| 20 | Hey guys! Feminist here! I was gonna ask for help on something!A snarky comeback won't help and might reinforce stereotypes. If your sister isn't open to a real dialogue, given her strong views, there's not much you can do right now. Her ego or temperament is a personal matter, unrelated to the gender discussion. If she does become receptive to a genuine conversation, focus on the arguments themselves, not on her personality or behavior. Maybe a better response would be: "If we judged all women by your attitude, we'd have a pretty warped view of half the po… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/08/24 08:43 AM |
| 36 | Hey guys! Feminist here! I was gonna ask for help on something!So when confronted with the question "Would you say the same thing about a woman?", people often resort to various biased justifications for their views. These justifications attempt to explain why they believe it's acceptable to treat men differently. Below are some common arguments your sister might use if you challenge her perspective with that question, along with potential counterpoints: Historical Oppression Argument "No, because women haven't historically oppressed others like men have. I… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/08/24 08:13 AM |
| 2 | Feminist here. I was wondering this: why is it ok to speak out against white racism, and heterophobia, but speaking out against misandry, you’re considered an anti-feminist/misogynist.This is very familiar... "Racism against white people doesn't exist. Racism is about systemic oppression and power dynamics. In most Western societies, white people hold the majority of power and do not face systemic barriers that people of color do, so they're incapable of disenfranchising white people." "Misandry doesn't exist. Sexism is about systemic oppression and power dynamics. Historically and in many societies, men hold more power and do not face systemic barriers that women do, so they… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 27/07/24 08:28 PM |
| 2 | Is it just me, or is white racism, and heterophobia taken more seriously than misandry?Heterophobia is one I can’t get on board with- that just sounds silly. Hmm, I can see why you said that, but... Bias and intolerance can target any group, and attempts to dismiss these prejudices often rely on redefining terms, appealing to broader societal issues, or claiming it's "just a joke" or "not real." It's crucial to recognize that while systemic oppression affects groups differently, individual prejudice can exist against anyone and should be addressed. Of course, there are factors aro… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 18/07/24 09:08 PM |
| 4 | Is it just me, or is white racism, and heterophobia taken more seriously than misandry?Of course it's a thing. In any large enough group, you'll find people who discriminate against outsiders. Nobody's immune to hate – it doesn't matter your sex, gender, sexuality, race, religion, or beliefs. Sure, is not as common as misandry or racism against white people, but the core idea's the same: "It's okay to hate them because of past discrimination, oppression, and prejudice." We see misandry in stuff like #KillAllMen hashtags, or assuming all men are potential rapists. And there's racis… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 18/07/24 04:25 PM |
| 9 | Reddit says this isn't hate speechThis is interesting timing, because I just reported a very insane hate commentary. The following was an answer to a post that asked something like, 'What are the reasons why you choose not to partner with men? (for straight/bisexual women)' Every last one of them sees you as inferior. They will condescend and talk to you like a child—even the “good ones.” They will condescend to you, interrupt and speak over you, and then blame you for getting angry and call you crazy and unstable. I’m sure it d… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 04/07/24 11:01 PM |
| 3 | Every single man sees women as inferior, condescends and talks to them like a child, etc. etc.I like the Radical Seed analogy. Imagine a seed of radicalization, waiting for the right conditions to sprout and flourish. Like any plant, it needs specific elements to thrive: Soil: Represents: Individual circumstances, past traumas, and vulnerabilities Effect: Those feeling marginalized or alienated become more susceptible to radical ideologies promising belonging and purpose Water: Represents: Interactions with those already holding radical views Effect: Provides validation, encouragement, a… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 03/07/24 07:46 PM |
| 7 | Every single man sees women as inferior, condescends and talks to them like a child, etc. etc.This looks like a satirical commentary of "what if a woman was an incel," but it's a real one... The title of this post was something like "Tell me all the reasons why you choose not to partner with men (for straight/bisexual women)." I don't know how this is even allowed; it's just hate speech. Crazy. 1. On Perception: Woman: "Every last one of them sees you as inferior. They will condescend and talk to you like a child—even the 'good ones.'" Man: "Every last one of them sees you as a walking w… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 03/07/24 07:46 PM |
| 3 | Their true colors always come out. They're not just misandrist, they're homophobic too.This claim of "They're not real feminists" is a "No True Scotsman fallacy" in my opinion. There is diversity within feminism, including many views that might be problematic. It's similar to saying, "A true policeman will never break the law! He is a man of the law, and breaking it goes against the principles of his work!" When faced with evidence of a policeman breaking the law, some might dismiss it by claiming, "Well, no true policeman would do that." This approach excludes the counterexample … | /r/EverydayMisandry | 27/06/24 10:05 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter