SkyNightZ Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	At what point is a man's attraction to a woman 'sexist'? I'm also black. Snap	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/06/20 06:08 PM
1	At what point is a man's attraction to a woman 'sexist'? Your not comparing the part that matters. The comparison I am making (which is still valid) is that people being in control don't automatically change the social narrative. That's the point. Case in point. It's the liberal elite who are mostly white that are doing all this anti white shit. Ever heard of white guilt... I didn't make that phrase up. The comparison stands. I'm not saying that white people face persecution at the same rate as black people. I'm saying despite showing someone in power…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/06/20 04:59 PM
1	At what point is a man's attraction to a woman 'sexist'? No. My analogy is correct. You are saying there CANNOT be any prejudice against white men in the media because there are white men in the media. There was a black man in the highest office of the US. Therefore by the same logic the country that voted this person in can't be racist. Of course that's not true so you try and disconnect the two. But they have the same root. Person in power defies the example and therefore dismiss the whole argument. Us: bias against white men You: white men in media	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/06/20 10:47 PM
2	I think social media and online dating is mentally ruining women I don't believe in prohibition. I don't believe it's other people's responsibility. I don't believe it's societies job to control women. Why don't you address my points... Or rather answer this. Are there things in reality which can be bad for someone. Whilst simultaneously saying that very thing makes people feel like their freedom is being taken away? I say this because I made sure to non stop repeat in my first comment that women of course have a choice. But you skipped over that to make the …	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/06/20 10:41 PM
1	If you're not creepy or fragile, you shouldn't be terrified to express interest in women or flirt whatsoever because of MeToo and mainstream media/feminism telling you that your masculinity is toxic. I disagree. People who have been treated bad, and then treated well. Treat others well. Without that bad experience, you just get immense hubris.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/06/20 06:45 PM
1	At what point is a man's attraction to a woman 'sexist'? It's social collapse. For example you say how can there be a movement against white men when there are white men in media. That argument is like "How can there be racism when there was a black president".	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/06/20 06:42 PM
7	Do you think women are naturally more attractive than men? I am Bi. Women are more visually attractive in general. The appeal of a man is somewhat the visual but more the idea behind that visual.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/06/20 06:36 PM
3	I think social media and online dating is mentally ruining women I get you're trying to be down the middle but this response just isn't. If your wife deleted social media, while it means she is part of the problem, social media is obviously the other half. If someone is addicted to smoking, obviously the addiction is bad, and the person should get help. Doesn't mean you pretend smoking is healthy for people in general just not your wife. The problem being expressed isn't that women are not allowed choice. But you likening interpersonal relationships to gaming…	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/06/20 06:30 PM
2	Misogyny hurts the cause of equality for men and boys. Please think before you post! Couple things to point out. Females when looking at humans as Male or Female are the only ones that can reproduce. It ISN'T misogynistic to recognize this. The base biological drive that keeps the species alive is the desire SHARED by men and women to reproduce. There is a TOXIC mentality bleeding into 'woke' people that calling women baby makers is in some way offensive. It by definition isn't. Women are baby makers. They also have agency which means they DON'T have to make babies, but it's sti…	/r/MensRights	15/10/19 06:13 PM
2	A computational linguist just did his thesis on r/Mensrights, specifically on how we can use machine learning to analyze how ideological differences manifest in patterns of language use at scale. Want to point out that Feminism isn't open to the radical stuff. About 1 year ago I cannot be sure, they went through a mod ban wave. Now whilst they are still untolerable for the most part, you will find that every post that is pure BS miraculously has 0 comments. Upvoted, but 0 comments. They are trying to hide their craziness. Also, you also can't be unbanned if you were banned by a mod that was banned..... crazy right.	/r/MensRights	21/06/19 05:07 PM
1	'A baby cannot provide ... consent': Calif. lawmakers denounce infant intersex surgeries “These surgeries should be performed only with informed consent by the person whose life will be permanently impacted." No they are not lol. A vaccination doesn't include surgically removing parts from someone's body against there will. A vaccination is however unlike forcibly removing intersex organs that pose no threat to an individual, a treatment against virus' and disease that DO cause a threat to an individual. You have no logical argument here.	/r/MensRights	01/09/18 08:34 PM
1	'A baby cannot provide ... consent': Calif. lawmakers denounce infant intersex surgeries “These surgeries should be performed only with informed consent by the person whose life will be permanently impacted." A deformity, that doesn't inhibit someones life is part of someones body. To surgically remove that thing that isn't affecting someones life without prior consent is causing damage. If you are not helping them, and they have no asked, it is damage. Now that type of damage is called mutilation. To do it to a child is ... child mutilation. You can argue as you see fit, but deformity doesn't in and of itself mean that someone must be held against there will and have said deformity removed.	/r/MensRights	01/09/18 03:39 PM
1	'A baby cannot provide ... consent': Calif. lawmakers denounce infant intersex surgeries “These surgeries should be performed only with informed consent by the person whose life will be permanently impacted." Gender isn't a preference. Having organs removed that pose no danger to a child is called CHILD MUTILATION. This has nothing to do with transgender what so ever.	/r/MensRights	30/08/18 05:13 PM
-1	Father wins payout after being prevented from seeing children for two years If you read everything I said you will find I said the mum (mother, woman) may have breached their rights. But the authorities did not breach the children's rights. Unless you are proposing that during the investigation the GOV should have taken the children into custody and have them treated by a therapist to find out if the mum was lying (baring in mind at this point there was no proof of anything). Tell me, if the children were not being coerced to lie by the mum and they testified against th…	/r/MensRights	10/03/17 04:28 PM
1	Father wins payout after being prevented from seeing children for two years Their rights were not really breached though. Not a fun experience but the kids did testify against the dad so at the time they were practically given what they asked for. If their rights were breached it would have been by the mum in which case it has nothing to do with the actual case.	/r/MensRights	10/03/17 11:33 AM
1	Part of the Danish government wants to change the law, so that one can be convicted as a rapist if it can be proven that consent was not given. Meaning that a girl regretting sex and stating "I was sooo drunk" could get a man convicted They are both drunk (nullify consent) then have consensual sex. while drunk they could be horny beasts but both realise it was a mistake after.	/r/MensRights	24/08/16 11:21 AM
2	Article I was linked to regarding the Draft No matter the numbers it just doesn't matter. Women die for themselves, dying during pregnancy is in no way for men, it is for the advancement of humanity but in the short term normally because child rearing brings positive emotions to a women. When anyone dies at war it is rarely in a rambo-esk blaze of glory, with the person in question being content with what they have done, no its normally an unsuspecting soul stepping on an IED, Getting shot in the head, Getting blown up by rockets, Crashin…	/r/MensRights	13/06/16 01:57 PM
1	This is logical The thing with this post is its giving the wrong context on what Masie was saying. We here all think feminists are the scum of the world, Masie was talking about the normal feminists the ones who fight for actual women's issues, not the plague of rats known as modern day bra burners.	/r/MensRights	13/06/16 12:53 PM
1	Men should have a say in abortion Lets get down to the basics shall we. If a man and a women have sex with consent, and the women falls pregnant there are 2 scenarios that should be equal but are not. The man wants the baby and the women doesn't in which case the man loses a potential child. The other scenario is the man doesn't want the child and the women does, in this scenario the man has to pay out child support for 18 years. Now in both these situations there is one thing evident, the male always loses. That isn't equality …	/r/MensRights	13/06/16 11:55 AM
1	Just had the following convo with a feminist on omegle. This is how they really think. Trains have wheels, hold people and cargo, and move them to places quickly. Thats the same as planes, cars, buses you name it. Doesn't mean a train IS a plane, or a car does it. He may have been using techniques trolls use but you have to remember that a troll always does it for the same reason, to envoke a strong negative response from the recipient. Don't even try to give an example of otherwise because then they are not trolling, they are simply performing actions akin to a troll.	/r/MensRights	13/06/16 11:40 AM