Slackslayer Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-27	BEGONE! THOT! No amount of sexism will ever make me side with a landlord	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/02/22 06:16 PM
1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Aww I thought we really had something there :( But 2 years is 2 years, I don't have an interest in arguing on subs like these anymore.	/r/MensRights	10/11/21 06:17 AM
1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Lol this is a 2 year old thread	/r/MensRights	10/11/21 05:33 AM
4	Why so specific... Nah nah nah toe fetish is a must have for any modern man	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/09/21 11:29 AM
-4	Just happened to a friend of mine lmao You really shouldn't be this emotionally attached to a subreddit.	/r/PussyPassDenied	25/04/21 12:27 AM
11	she showed her :sung Men can have a cute fuckin hedgehog	/r/PussyPassDenied	23/07/20 12:19 PM
0	As he should He has proof that he was nowhere near the accuser during those dates that the alleged incident occurred. This proof is not yours to make a determination on. People are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, not innocent until I've read enough on the internet to determine they're guilty.	/r/PussyPassDenied	26/06/20 04:26 PM
-4	As he should Look at the comment at the start of this thread. I'm not treating the dude as guilty, I'm condemning the people who took 2 seconds to look at the article and threw those principles out the window, such as u/thefudmaster .	/r/PussyPassDenied	26/06/20 12:37 PM
-9	As he should Oh for christ's sake. Are you incapable of critical thinking? Not treating him as guilty does not mean you get to automatically treat the accuser as guilty for lying. You investigate.	/r/PussyPassDenied	26/06/20 11:35 AM
-44	As he should Real question, you already know these people are lying, how? Because you're taking him by his word? Have you seen any of his evidence yet, or even confirmed such evidence exists? Is defamation a crime where you're guilty until proven innocent? Seems like the exact same problem.	/r/PussyPassDenied	26/06/20 04:25 AM
-4	Does this belong here? Ah yes the classic r/AITA approach: if it isn't illegal you can't be an asshole	/r/PussyPassDenied	22/04/20 11:13 PM
1	Pussy pass denied by pussy That's true, as are they lowered in relation to an officer's age. It's an expectation of a high standard of fitness, relative to a reasonable expectation of what kind of shape you can maintain while actually being on duty. Police work tends to rarely involve serious physical exertion, and even more rarely on the upper body rather than legwork. And people are still expected to be able to have a life outside of work and the gym.	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/03/20 10:49 AM
1	Pussy pass denied by pussy You made the claim that physical strength was not needed to effectively enable the arrest of someone who is non compliant. Which isn't the same thing as not being in favour of minimum physical fitness requirements. It doesn’t matter how irrational you think the mind set of the perpetrator is, it’s reality. Weird, my point was that it very rarely is reality. It's a list of successive steps, each one rarer than the last. You arrive at a point where it will not be reality for 99,9% of the police fo…	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/03/20 10:21 AM
1	Pussy pass denied by pussy Disarmed one, shot both with the first officer's weapon. Quite different to what I said, especially since the way the conflict broke out it seems the second officer wasn't in line of sight. It was the first time in the history of the gendarmerie that two females from the force had been killed in the same operation, an investigator said. Hmm.	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/03/20 09:57 AM
0	Pussy pass denied by pussy That’s why we are discussing the need for a minimum standard in physical fitness. Has somebody been arguing against that? Neither people in the thread nor the article itself (though we are already in a different profession from it) has taken a position against minimum standards. It has critiqued the priorization of maximal physical qualification and largely ignoring people skills as a variable in hiring practices. But this situation, where a person, outside of metropolis, successfully executes t…	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/03/20 01:48 AM
-5	Pussy pass denied by pussy if you can’t physically handle yourself with out getting over powered and your weapon stolen what do you do? The most common answer to this question? You rely on your partner. Your point about this not being some video game holds true here, there's no expectation of a situation like this being a 1v1. Being physically overpowered isn't some risk only faced by women either, all you need is a significantly burlier assailant. Which is why police don't patrol alone but most commonly in pairs. Disarmi…	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/03/20 03:49 PM
-3	Pussy pass denied by pussy Resisted arrests that ultimately do go violent (as in, not running away but fighting) can be solved through either nonlethal methods such as a taser or lethal if absolutely necessary. Wrestling someone into the ground through physical prowess is arguably be more ethical than electrocuting them outright, but I wouldn't say it's a mercy that needs to be afforded to someone resisting arrest. What I'm getting at is that wrestling a perp into the ground looks a lot more satisfying than suddenly watch…	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/03/20 01:21 PM
-11	Pussy pass denied by pussy It isn't befitting of this sub to look at the contents of an article, making fun of it based on it's title is enough for the people here. I don't know if it was this sub, but this isn't the first time there's been a mockfest of this article based on it's title, and I'm too lazy to write stuff myself so I'll just pull some adresses of the exact things people are saying here from the article: In 2016, only 4% of emergency calls to which U.S. fire departments responded were actually fires. The majo…	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/03/20 09:55 AM
-1	Nice try though. If conservative politics in 2017-2019 have taught me anything, it's that doing something that triggers the other side is always worth it, no matter what the consequences might be. So, woman president it is.	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/05/19 09:07 AM
20	Lie about rape . . . GET 10 YEARS SLPT: if you've raped someone, just kill them afterward for a better reputation	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/03/19 01:37 PM
3	Cardi b drama rn I mean, only about killing people which we all know to be a nonissue	/r/MensRights	28/03/19 05:32 PM
1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities You're simply not addressing the actual argument. You're nibbling at the conclusions and balking at it not comforming to your premises. Do you know why I'm doing that? Because you've wrapped your head around this notion that forcing idealistic equality in spite of countless complicating real-life factors is unquestionably the best way forward. You don't have shitty logic, it's just bordering on delusional if you think it should be applied before many of those factors are sorted. Avoiding any sen…	/r/MensRights	26/03/19 11:08 PM
1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities So you're all for women getting special treatment and their recklessness being subsidized either way. Absolutely, given that the alternative is infanticide. Though it really isn't just women that get this treatment, it applies to single fathers equally. It's just a rarer situation. Shouting past your detractor is indeed a waste of time. Yeah, it's just hard to not do when your detractor is a rock.	/r/MensRights	26/03/19 05:08 AM
1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities to unilaterally create a responsibility. To unilaterally decide to not annihilate a responsibility. That responsibility was created bilaterally. If you can relinquish consent to use of your body's resources to support a child, so can the man. I do wish biology conformed to this simplistic equal opportunity world view. It doesn't, and trying to force it just leads to pain and suffering. If women’s partial responsibility for pregnancy does not obligate them to support a fetus A woman's partial res…	/r/MensRights	25/03/19 10:07 PM
1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities This analogy is starting to not represent the original issue in the slightest. Otherwise the argument is: abortion shouldn't be allowed because if it is allowed when the woman doesn't want the child, she can lie about not wanting the child even though she does want it, but just hates it because she's a horrible person. What.	/r/MensRights	25/03/19 09:31 PM
1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities A) women having sole responsibility for children as the default Yeah, this one, but with slight adjustment as to not have children just die if the mother fails to rise up to that responsibility. I'm all for child support being government-funded, but as long as this doesn't happen, the current system needs to stay in place. Generally I just disagree with the notion that there is no inherent responsibility in having unprotected sex, just because there are consequent options after the fact. My logi…	/r/MensRights	25/03/19 09:15 PM
1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Uh no. If they consent to it, then they're responsible. Right, okay, a guy cannot be expected to have moral agency. The logic is starting to make sense. You must not actually believe in human agency it seems. ..nevermind. The mother is the one who decides if the man becomes a father or not There's a step before this that I feel might have been left unmentioned here. Yes, after conception, that is correct. Do not act for a second like there weren't ways for a guy to avoid that result. That's why …	/r/MensRights	25/03/19 08:24 PM
1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Out of wedlock pregnancy has been climbing for some time. Yeah, because rates of marriage have been going down, and age of marriage has been going up. People nowadays often choose to have children without getting married. We can just kill fetuses, so it's okay to not hold people responsible for having fetuses if they do have them. Also only one party gets to decide if that happens and the other party has no say either way. Imagine if you stabbed someone, then think that means you are allowed to …	/r/MensRights	25/03/19 01:48 PM
-1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Why do you feminists always use outlier cases to define the rule? Because as long as those outlier cases exist, ruling by the majority standard fucks over completely innocent people.	/r/MensRights	25/03/19 10:30 AM
0	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Getting pretty sick of this as well, but clarify a few things, will you? First of all, wanting reproductive rights but not reproductive responsibilities. Why do you think you are entitled to both those things? Or is it a case of either reproductive rights to justify responsibility, or neither child support nor any right to offspring? It's called equality. Sad that you think it will never happen. There is no such thing as true equality when you are trying to manage inherently inequal natural phen…	/r/MensRights	25/03/19 03:20 AM
0	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities This made no sense. It is laughable. It's called a sense of humor, being laughable is the point We are discussing what SHOULD be. Pay attention Yeah I'm starting to get it, you want to live in a fantasy world. My mistake here was not providing idealistic solutions which are still more likely than what you're proposing, like: -A fully functional male birth control pill, allows you to do what you want to do without risks of pregnancy, just like desired. -Livable universal income, meaning all is pr…	/r/MensRights	25/03/19 02:31 AM
0	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities So you're fine with banning abortions and holding women accountable for their actions? If equality can't go one way, it can go the other. Abortion itself is a woman taking accountability. You brought a problem into the world, then took it out. It's not that complicated.	/r/MensRights	25/03/19 01:49 AM
0	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities I mean damn right it's different, at the very least take the same amount of responsibility and off your offspring! Don't tell me it's the same before you've done that. you'll never get me on board with slave labor that someone never wanted any part of. Lol congratulations, your slave master is a baby! when it comes to the male having zero choice in anything Fuck right off with that, you have the choice of joint custody or child support. Right now you have parental rights, you just don't want the…	/r/MensRights	25/03/19 01:38 AM
0	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities For deadbeat dads, absolutely. It already works like this I believe, the person with custody gets child support from the other party, regardless of gender. Or those that didn't want the child at all ever and left? I feel like it goes to show how tricky and nonequivalent it is to just switch genders, when I'm not sure if this is about abortion example or the adoption one. Anyway, there responsible and irresponsible ways of doing this. If you always held the stance that you wouldn't take part in t…	/r/MensRights	25/03/19 01:14 AM
0	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities I can't stand the double standards that most people seem to have where women get 100% choice, 0% responsibility and men get 0% choice, 100% responsibility. Fuck those people Apparently responsibility can only be counted in child support. I'm getting real fucking sick of people saying that any option that a woman may pursue means avoiding responsibility. Abortion? Taking no responsibility for getting pregnant. Gives child up to parents who can take better care for it? Refuses to take care of her …	/r/MensRights	25/03/19 12:22 AM
1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities I really don't. Good talk.	/r/MensRights	25/03/19 12:13 AM
1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Now apply this to child support Gladly. If you go and kill the child, you won't have to worry about child support ever again! Seems like the similar situation has a pretty similar solution. For real though, "Gotcha's" are fun, but they don't contribute shit to conversation. You consented to having semen in your body, and with the potential consequences. You consented to releasing semen in her body, and with it the potential consequences. Both have quite similar counterarguments in my opinion. "I…	/r/MensRights	25/03/19 12:11 AM
1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities If the mother made the decision to have a child knowing she wouldn't get support and knowing she would need it, then she was irresponsible. Except if she didn't make that decision, but was forced to due to the unavailability of abortion where she lives. Or maybe the father decided to ditch while she was already multiple months pregnant. It's easy to assume she has all this longterm knowledge, but it is far from assured. Financial situations can also change with the loss of a job (especially give…	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 11:53 PM
1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities If you support abortion for reasons other than medical, then it is being used as birth control: to prevent childbirth. Ah yeah this was me getting your opinion confused with another viewpoint, which is that some people use abortion as the primary birth control method, which is absurd. There are no shortcuts out of pregnancy, no matter the inconvenience. You're sure about that? Want to test that theory? Because I will yeetus that fetus real fast. And yes, abortion is killing another HUMAN being. …	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 11:39 PM
0	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities No, we do not have any reproductive rights. You can't reproduce, can you? You have complete control over the fate of your child if you ever get pregnant my dude. Irrelevant. The fact remains is that she has choices. You have options too, you can for example not pay child support and go to jail! Options don't mean shit when all the options are shit. She can easily get it taken care of without that, or leave it somewhere on a fire dept. steps. No questions asked. If we ignore the fact that that's …	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 11:24 PM
0	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities She has about 25 contraception methods that dont involve less pleasure. And when something goes wrong with those methods? (it is quite difficult to find out if a certain birth control method doesn't work, without getting pregnant that is.) But you better not touch a guy's right to bust his nut in whomever he damn pleases without consequences...	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 10:34 PM
0	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Not in a society that incentivizes avoiding the consequences of not practicing it. "Back in my day, we didn't do something irresponsible like fixing a self-made hole in the boat and just faced the consequences when we take it out to sea!" You have the tools to erase consequences. However, safe sex is always encouraged still. Let's just accept that humans are violent, and forget prosecuting murder too. Probably could happen if we had the tools to resurrect humans. In this scenario, you're saying …	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 08:45 PM
-1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities You are aware that in many places you pay child support for a child that was given up for adoption, father and mother alike. Giving them up for adoption is no more a way out than giving away custody. ENFORCED child support without equal say in entering into a parental arrangement is unthinkable It isn't, because child support is not equal responsibility. It's some of the responsibility, with the person taking care of that child bearing all of the time cost, and usually more of the financial cost…	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 08:25 PM
1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Birth complications could kill you, you might miscarry meaning no future was even affected, you might commit suicide due to postpartum depression. There's still potential death ahead, which we should give the same value as real, apparently.	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 07:55 PM
-1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities You seem to think there are no petty or vindictive people. I like how both of those terms imply revenge, and definitely not shits and giggles. Also the logic of willingly putting your dick into a violent and vindictive person whom you have wronged somehow before doesn't ring alarm bells. Imagine if you invited someone hated into your home, but now that they're in your home you beat them up claiming they were in your home without consent. If you wanted that to pass, you'd need evidence of a break…	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 07:52 PM
1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Well, I don't think that the future of a potential person outweighs the future of a real person.	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 07:38 PM
0	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Oh please, you are fully aware that that definition of people isn't actually people. It's just an attempt to demonize discussion by portraying your definition as the "common sense" one.	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 07:20 PM
-4	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities And if it is inside them consensually, what exactly is the motivation for cutting it off, even if legal? The problem is this complete demonization of people. Apparently if something is allowed, even if completely heinous, people will do it just for shits and giggles. That isn't real life.	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 07:15 PM
1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities What I'm arguing for is giving men the same post-sex choice of opting out that women have. I call it equality. I know it must be a foreign idea to you. That's what you already have. A woman's opt-outs can hurt her financially and emotionally (abortion and it's costs, giving away a child when pumped full of maternal hormones). Did you know that people who give their children up for adoption, barring some exceptions like young age, also pay child support to the adopting family? Yours is financial.…	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 07:08 PM
-2	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Why should a man be punished financially for having a kid that was concieved through deception? Well gosh, maybe if you didn't want to have children, don't have sex? /s Jokes aside, that situation does suck. But the money isn't meant to be a punishment for you. It's for the care of your future child, who is innocent of his/her mother's actions. And given your description of the mother, that money is sorely needed... Look, I know this is probably intrusive, but if you're telling the truth about h…	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 06:46 PM
3	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities "Pro-life", everybody! If you care this little for human life, stop arguing for it's value. You'd have no problem killing a baby if you thought it was going to have an abortion of it's own one day	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 06:12 PM
-1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities So much expected from the woman, so little from the man. Then maybe she shouldn't be having sex at all if she's not prepared to deal with her responsibilities post-sex. That is a concept, is it not? I could argue this exact point but change the gender. But what you are arguing for is to eliminate those post-sex responsibilities from men. If signing rights away would secure us to not having to pay child support, I'm all for that. I do not care. I wish it was a possibility. Not as simple as the op…	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 06:06 PM
4	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities If you call that thing people, then I for one fully support the murder of people. I only make exceptions for people who weigh over half a kilogram.	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 05:04 PM
-1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities I think everyone should be selective about who they sleep with, while keeping in mind that a pregnancy may result from your actions. Yes, everyone should be selective, but that's not some foolproof solution to the problem at hand. If everyone was flawless, there wouldn't be a problem in the first place! People make plenty of mistakes. Also, out of all these unideal solutions to the situation, why is child support the unthinkable one? I'm pretty sure that if you hold yourself to those standards, …	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 05:01 PM
1	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Yeah true, I assumed a lot here. In an utopian world, I'd agree with you. But doing away with child support before you can assure that she can exercise those choices is problematic, and still the case in many places. Abortion clinics can be few and far between, expensive as well as extremely mentally taxing, since medical professionals often interject their own views on abortion into their work and medical advice. Also, if you bear no responsibility for the pregnancy, then this would also mean t…	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 04:46 PM
-4	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities I think such consequences would make women more careful about who they choose to sleep with causing a drop in unwanted pregnancies. Oh fuck off, chastity has been tried too many times to even count, and it never works. You should probably face the reality that humans are just horny. Going by the same logic, maybe you should be more careful about what women you sleep with, if you don't want to have a child with them? As for alternatives, abortion can often be costly, or heavily restricted. Adopti…	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 04:20 PM
6	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Which body is leeched for nutrients and has to go haywire on hormonal production just to not be drained dry by a parasite? Yeah, still the mother's. That's all an embryo is if you don't want it there, a human parasite. Don't act like the child just lays in stasis there for the pregnancy. If it did do that, you couldn't perform an abortion via a pill in the first place. But you have the right to control what you put in your own body, and if the parasite doesn't cope well with that, too bad.	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 04:05 PM
2	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Yeah fair enough, my bad. this sub is getting on my nerves, which unfortunately means jumping to conclusions from time to time. Not something I should let myself do.	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 03:58 PM
5	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities She had a choice to not have sex though. She could have used birth control That she could have, but abstinence is neither particularly healthy nor an enjoyable way to live your life. Not gonna lie, sex is pretty great. As for birth control, there's a 99% guarantee for a reason. It isn't foolproof, some birth control doesn't work properly for certain people, and the only way to find out if it doesn't is... well, getting pregnant. Using abortion is killing another living being Also true, but kind …	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 03:56 PM
3	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities As long as abortion is easily available and affordable/free. If it isn't available, then child support should absolutely stay. If it is but it's somewhat expensive, then perhaps a single payment of that caliber to get off the hook? You're essentially covering the cost of the abortion, whether she wants to have one or not.	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 03:33 PM
-6	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities A father can sign away his parental rights, but he is still responsible for paying child support. If a woman can decide she wants nothing to do with a child (abortion), then a man should be able to have the same rights. In one scenario there's still a baby to support, in the other there is not. Signing away your parental rights doesn't make the child not exist, just that you will not personally take part in nurturing it. Nobody gains anything when you give your rights away, just takes one parent…	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 03:27 PM
0	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities As if that is any less the guy's fault, condoms exist you know?	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 03:19 PM
-15	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Weird to hear from a sub that thinks women shouldn't be able to have abortions. So if you're a guy and have sex, you don't have any responsibilities, what the hell happened to "if you didn't want a child, you shouldn't have banged" ?	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 03:18 PM
11	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Early abortions are most commonly aborted without any contact to the embryo. If you take away someone's right to take a pill that just happens to cause a miscarriage, then yes, you're taking away bodily autonomy.	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 03:13 PM
-4	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities I'd say it should be if that woman doesn't fucking want your dick in her	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 03:03 PM
7	Feminists want all the rights and none of the responsibilities Apart from the vast amount of early abortions that are done with a pill.	/r/MensRights	24/03/19 03:02 PM