TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Slandalf Archive

View 0 posts and 18 comments by Slandalf on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

This falsely assumes that: 1) Widespread, celebrated hate toward a group is only harmful when the average person from the scapegoat group is physically smaller than the average person from the group whose hate is being normalized; it downplays not only the physical ability of psychopathic adult women to enact harm - especially when systems such as the Duluth model already reward female abuse and punish male victims - but also the myriad non-physical ways that hate causes psychological harm (some…
/r/MensRights10/12/24 09:10 AM
14

Don’t forget the foundational principle of economic activity: businesses are primarily interested in oppressing women rather than making money.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 05:51 PM
12

On the contrary, it’s inspiring to see you campaigning for the next Republican win before he’s even taken office. Thanks for your service!
/r/MensRights13/11/24 04:00 PM
22

Gearing up for a 2028 loss already I see lmao
/r/MensRights13/11/24 02:20 PM
4

Damn men! Simultaneously working so well together that they can benefit men broadly while also not working together well enough to even benefit men broadly 🤣
/r/MensRights01/11/24 05:10 PM
7

This is a method of redirecting the proactive, targeted actions that feminists reserve for addressing anti-woman discrimination to the broader condemnation of “patriarchy” which typically only serves as the starting point of their campaigns to fix gender inequality. Of course, in this case since the subject is anti-male discrimination, it functions as the ending point as well. If you attempt to drill down further into the sort of specific prescriptions, campaigns, or policymaking they universall…
/r/MensRights31/10/24 04:37 PM
16

The fact that “only” 30% (still an absurdly high proportion) of men who have a reason to suspect have tests confirm their fears tells us nothing about the true prevalence of paternity fraud, since a lack of suspicion doesn’t imply paternity - it merely says that particular man doesn’t suspect anything. To your second point - sure, and the less coercion there is on men to settle, the less they might cheat on their wives as well, but that does nothing to excuse adults who choose to marry, betray t…
/r/MensRights29/10/24 07:38 AM
7

What can I look up to find out what Biden did?
/r/MensRights15/10/24 01:14 AM
2

Lol, amazing how feminists now consider the “happy ending” that the patriarchy doesn’t believe women deserve is a hyper-exaggeration of traditional gender dynamics
/r/MensRights04/10/24 04:55 PM
3

“Silly MRA, patriarchy invented gynocentrism, and women won’t have agency until the average female income is above the average male income”
/r/MensRights17/09/24 04:28 PM
21

To expound on 2: There’s also considerable discussion on the “misogyny” of older women being less attractive (i.e. being freed from the objectification young women face). It’s clear feminists don’t argue for principles; they argue for women getting exactly what they want exactly when they want it, and anything less is misogyny. Shockingly they see nothing problematic about the infinite number of ways men are subject to varied levels of attraction by women due to factors outside of their control.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 04:34 PM
50

“A horde of creatures more dangerous than bears gathered in a secluded forest where no one would be able to hear women scream? LET US IN NOW!!”
/r/MensRights30/06/24 07:40 PM
50

Imagine such article decrying a decrease in child rearing, noting that men are less likely to do it due to social stigma, and then ending on the prescription that society needs to find ways to persuade women back into those roles
/r/MensRights26/06/24 01:56 PM
11

Complete non-sequitur from your (false) claim that academics have discarded the mechanism underlaying the most fundamental premise of their ideology. The belief that patriarchy benefits all men via male privilege does not preclude belief in the concept of “fragile masculinity”, especially as it’s virtually always framed as a side effect of male domination (as nonsensical as that logic may be).
/r/MensRights19/06/24 04:33 PM
79

“Montgomery County prosecutors argued the killing was premeditated, saying she had made numerous online searches on how to strangle someone and did research on mental illnesses that lead women to kill their own children.” Unredeemable monster. These aren’t the actions of someone who had a spontaneous psychotic break during the killing. This is a sequence of choices made by a woman who sees living children as objects in her demonic game of spite and vengeance against a man who didn’t make as much…
/r/MensRights24/05/24 06:03 PM
1

So bizarre that you could recognize OP’s analogy was bad and then construct that one
/r/MensRights22/05/24 04:40 PM
1

“So what if women have literally billions of completely safe encounters with male strangers and continue to choose doing so every single day across the globe? What about this hyper-specifically constructed hypothetical which virtually never happens? It clearly proves men are more dangerous than bears!”
/r/MensRights22/05/24 04:25 PM
1

I’d say not technically, but it would appear that way against a modern backdrop of granting bonus intersectional oppression points to all who intersect groups considered to face marginalization. Since feminists don’t consider men marginalized, they would never consider that disabled men face unique challenges specific to their own intersection, but merely oppressed as disabled. Of course, in practice this leads to social approval of treating disabled men the same way you’re allowed to treat men …
/r/MensRights21/05/24 04:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter