TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SlapMyCHOP Archive

View 0 posts and 161 comments by SlapMyCHOP on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
24

Tim McGraw and Faith Hill got married in 96. Not dead yet but 25 years for a celeb couple is insane. I realize it's prob the exception rather than the rule though.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/21 01:58 AM
9

Never bang the ex
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/21 05:09 PM
2

Given that she got up after one throat push and kept coming, I'd venture to guess she was progressively discouraged from doing shit up to this point and he ramped up his behaviour in response to a still-present threat. But that's my interpretation. Case law says self defence (or defence of another for that matter) does not have to be measured with nicety. That is to say, you dont have to perfectly match the level of force required to stop a threat and only exert that much force. There is some ma…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/21 12:17 AM
3

True. But we do know that he pushed her away and she still kept coming so it's not out of the realm of possibility that she was behaving in a manner that would warrant that level of force.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/21 10:11 PM
3

I mean, from the context we do have, we can clearly see that she was coming after someone with some kind of intent and even after being pushed away (read: an appropriate amount of force applied), she still gets up and is coming after whomever it is, signalling that more force is needed to keep her away. Force is to be proportionate to the threat and a person's size has NOTHING to do with the amount of threat they present. In this situation it would not be appropriate to pull out a gun and shoot …
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/21 09:21 PM
15

You dont know what she did before this, so you cant make that determination.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/21 08:26 PM
7

Equal rights bud. You wanna fuck around, you're gonna get told.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/21 08:23 PM
1

I thought your comment was serious because there are morons who do actually think and say shit like that. Cheers mate, welcome to the internet haha
/r/PussyPassDenied15/03/21 12:08 AM
5

Have you ever had an original thought or are you just a walking tape recorder?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/21 11:20 PM
-6

You have no reasonable expectation of privacy in public. Anyone can take (normal) pictures of anyone else.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/03/21 06:45 AM
1

Wow its like.... I literally mentioned this is addressed directly in the book. Literally spending chapters explain how sexist feminist orgs took over academic circles... And your just like "I am covering my ears and screaming No I don't believe your lies". You have referenced one book. My examples are real life actions with impacts on real people. How many men were arrested just because of VAWA's aggressor arrest stipulation? How many male victims were arrested because of the same? You are tryin…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/21 09:47 PM
1

Your attacking women over a strawman, as if they actually go with and agree like a hive-mind to what your saying. It's not a strawman though. It's the reality as revealed by my own experience and has been showcased by this sub. I already addressed in my comment the fact that women arent a hive mind and that individual women can do shitty things to the detriment of women as a whole. This sub is taking issue with those women and the fact that to some guys, they are told that women are equal etc et…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/21 07:34 PM
3

It's purely a reaction to the apparent hypocrisy of women where many complain they arent equal and yet abuse their gender for personal gain. Now, some of these people are probably different people ie the ones who abuse their gender and its privileges are not the same as the ones who are complaining about inequality where women have a shortfall, but the message still exists that women should be equal so wherever you get a woman acting like she should be Equal+™, you get guys who think it is absur…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/21 05:22 PM
2

In 2019, there were 14.8 MILLION single mothers in the US. [The American criminal justice system holds almost 2.3 MILLION people in 1,833 state prisons, 110 federal prisons, 1,772 juvenile correctional facilities, 3,134 local jails, 218 immigration detention facilities, and 80 Indian Country jails as well as in military prisons, civil commitment centers, state psychiatric hospitals, and prisons in the U.S. territories.](The American criminal justice system holds almost 2.3 million people in 1,83…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/20 04:00 PM
6

It does for some people. Idiot.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/20 08:56 AM
6

Well I can say Scottish accents and Australian accents are difficult as fuck to undertand too and it's not racist. So this accent is fucking difficult to understand. It's not our fault we enunciate words perfectly so every other accent of English can understand us.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/20 08:55 AM
11

It has no asterisk so no, it wasnt edited.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/20 08:51 AM
16

Lmao hand waving away thousands of deadbeat fathers as having no culpability because they were wrongfully arrested or killed by police is the worst take Ive read on reddit so far today. Congrats.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/20 08:49 AM
24

Fuck you for telling people to kill themselves. Asshole.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/20 08:45 AM
1

Got it, you're an iduot.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/20 07:05 PM
2

Exactly my point. Saying "just dont have sex" is not a good argument against women in their seeking abortion rights and is not a good argument against men seeking fin abortion rights.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/20 04:02 PM
1

The man has unequal choice. Equality above all else.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 10:16 PM
1

Then the responsibility is on the woman as well for the child. She knows the choice she is making. Saddle her 100% with the responsibility if you dont want the state to pay for it. Freedom, but personal accountability as well.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 09:33 PM
2

The one that comes to mind is NOW advocating for VAWA, a sexist piece of legislation that led to mandatory arrests in domestics. Lots of stories of men being arrested after being abused due to their physical size difference followed.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 09:31 PM
1

Then men also deserve one option afterward. Equality.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 09:28 PM
1

I think so as well. It would hopefully receive support by both genders who are annoyed at having to sign up
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 07:39 PM
2

Definitions and actions are very different. The actions of prominent feminists has been counter to what you're saying.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 07:38 PM
1

MYTH 5: Women earn 77 cents for every dollar a man earns—for doing the same work. FACTS: No matter how many times this wage gap claim is decisively refuted by economists, it always comes back. The bottom line: the 23-cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap na…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 07:35 PM
0

So by that logic, women had multiple options beforehand and understands that sex can lead to babies is sufficient to outlaw abortion, yes?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 06:30 PM
1

Sexual assault, is defined broadly as any assault (as defined in section 265 of the Code) that transpires in circumstances of a sexual nature. Still get a bias, which might interact with the lack of detail. "Female abusers must do something severe and obvious before they will be held accountable as perpetrators. Males must be abused in more severe and obvious ways before we will take them seriously as victims." -- Health Canada Can you point me to where they write that? Incidentally, why do the …
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 06:29 PM
0

Doesnt change the fact that he's paying for something he wanted the opposite of and was then forced into.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 06:23 PM
1

Equal rights means equal lefts". What they fail to realize is that while we want equality, men and women are fundamentally different in different ways. You wouldn't hit a child as hard as you could just because they hit you as hard as they could. I think those people are just tired of seeing women abusing men and then when he defends himself a bunch of white knights jump him then take it too far to championing violence that is unproportional.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 06:03 PM
2

I think for the people who are invested in the ideal, it feels like it would be easier to get the legislature to include everyone rather than repealing it outright. It feels like a repeal is a higher hill to climb so if they get everyone in then finally feminists will back up their words with action. But, I suspect they'll just fight women being put on the draft and leave men out to dry as always. Edit: the saying is "by and large." Just so you know
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 05:59 PM
1

If a man gets a woman pregnant and she chooses to keep it when he doesnt, he is on the hook for child support.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 05:56 PM
1

Or you just move countries.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 05:55 PM
1

They arent. They are paid equal pay for equal work. You are falling victim to shitty statistics interpretations.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 05:52 PM
2

It's the mentality and expectation that they be courted and impressed. That is where the entitlement comes from.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 05:51 PM
1

Well so far neither has happened. So something needs to be done. Meanwhile men are required to jump through hoops to receive federal funding while women aren't. Feminism just straight up doesnt advocate for men. They don't care.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 05:49 PM
1

I dont think you understand what you're saying when you say "non-aborted fetus." A non-aborted fetus encompasses any fetus that is taken to term and delivered and alive. It is literally all people alive. Words have meaning. "Non-aborted fetus" isn't just applicable to those kids who were considered to be aborted but then weren't. If you care do much about unloved kids why don't you adopt? You dont know me. You cant make assumptions about me fuckface. My partner and I do plan to adopt at least on…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 05:47 PM
1

I think the push to allow up to and after birth is misinformed at best and malicious at worst. Put it up for adoption after it's born. That said, I also think it should be left to medical professionals and legal experts informed by those medical professionals as to the point at which it constitutes a person. However, I think the justification for abortion is actually that we cant compel a person to be a host for another so it doesnt really matter if it's a person at any point before birth.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 05:44 PM
1

same as most US states, Australian states, Canada I'm in Canada and we have "Sexual Assault" and that's all. No charge of "rape" or "forced penetration." Sexual Assault has the same levels as regular assault. Sexual Assault, Sexual Assault with a weapon, and Aggravated Sexual Assault. That's it. That encompasses the sexual touching of another without their consent. Obviously if you do other stuff (murder, torture, imprisonment, etc) you will have additional charges for those separate acts. Are y…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 05:35 PM
1

The UK needs to do similar to Canada and just make one blanket offence category called "Sexual assault." The existence of separate offences precluding women from being called rapists really speaks to society's attitude towards the matter, as if women rapists aren't evil enough to have the label applied. Even if they have the same sentences, being unable to write in the media about the "convicted rapist" solely on the fact that it's a woman is stupid as hell.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 05:30 PM
1

Not a sound argument for not having equality of draft.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 05:27 PM
1

I see your point and I fully appreciate your risk-aversion. I just value the rights of the parents higher. I even value the right to liberty of the father more than the right to life of the fetus, because I dont consider it to be a person under whatever threshold has been determined. Pretty sure it's prior to the start of the 3rd trimester but dont quote me.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 05:26 PM
1

A timely welcome to the typical No True Scotsman as always with feminists.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 05:20 PM
2

Which is it? Can you simply, spontaneously, and anonymously give children up at drop-offs, or can you not? Which of your statements is false? Because one has to be. They directly contradict each other. They are both true. Which is true depends on your sex. If you are the mother, you can. If you are the father, you can't. And when, after years, the previously unknown rapist, and father of the child, is found, she can pop up, and demand child support from him later. Good. This is literally the dum…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 05:19 PM
1

It's not a person.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 05:07 PM
1

So youre against abortion too right?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 05:04 PM
0

Lmao mathematically speaking "non-aborted fetuses" are literally every person ever born so it is also more likely to cure cancer or invent a super efficient energy technology.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 04:58 PM
1

Please please please take a stats class. The raffle is one event and the tickets are dependent events if one wins or not. The sex events are what are called "independent events," where each one is not affected by the outcome of the past (except in the case of a positive result cuz then obviously you cant have another positive result).
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 04:54 PM
1

Same argument people are using against fin abortion: if you dont want the kid just dont have sex.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 04:51 PM
1

Same argument used to deny abortion
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 04:49 PM
1

Then the child can know that it was the mother's choice to keep it and the reason it is in poverty is its mother.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 04:44 PM
1

Fuck right off
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 04:42 PM
1

They do more than feminists. And MGTOWs are entirely different. It is literally just men deciding not to engage in the courting and marrying societal expectations.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 07:52 PM
2

It will be overturned when the prosecution appeals. You have to follow the legislation and precedent. You can only make precedent decisions on novel cases.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 06:57 PM
1

And yet feminism doesn't help men in areas where they are disadvantaged.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 10:00 AM
1

You asked for examples, I gave them to you. Just because someone advocates for men's rights doesnt mean they hate women or are anti feminist. and rightly so, men and women who work for men's issues do no call themselves MRAs. Because people like you insist on focusing on the radicals and vilifying the MRA title to the point that any real egalitarian wants nothing to do with it. And yet feminism remains stronger than ever despite achieving much of what it set out to do.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 09:05 AM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men's_rights_movement See section "prominent men's rights activists." One was even president of NOW. I would also include Christina Hoff Sommers in there as well. Sure, there are progressive men in feminism. But only when they advocate for the advancement of women up to the status quo. Feminism is for women's rights. Which is fine. I agree with equality. But don't demonize MRAs for their radicals. I'm sure you wouldnt like it if I criticized feminism on the basis …
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 07:51 AM
1

but MRAs and MGTOWs are entirely about hating women, No, they're not. You're paying attention to the radicals too much. seduction" community which is absolutely closely intertwined with the MRA/MGTOW movement. Disagree that theyre intertwined. What really defines these groups is their anti-female and anti-feminism activity, They aren't anti female. They're pro male equality. If you think MRA is anti female, then feminism is anti male. Feminism claims it advocates for men, but it doesnt. It just …
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 07:26 AM
2

Dude are you actually fucking stupid? Learn the rules of logic. Here you go: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.alphascore.com/resources/free-lsat-course-prep/a-lesson-in-formal-logic-for-games-and-logical-reasoning/amp/
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/20 09:42 PM
1

That's like saying r/femaledatingstrategy is an offshoot of feminism/TERFs/femcel ideology.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/20 09:37 PM
5

I have legit asked and their reason is "feminism doesnt think anyone should have to do those jobs so we dont advocate for women to do them." Bunch of bullshit in my opinion. Those jobs need to get done. You can't not have underwater welders or riggers or construction workers. They just use their cop out to remove themselves.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/20 09:26 PM
49

Sometimes they're governed by statute or are told misleading things by one or both sides.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/20 08:55 PM
-2

Lmaooo blaming a societal failing on one political party. Idiot.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 11:20 PM
2

Where does Alinity start writing?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/20 01:26 AM
3

Ive seen people make that exact statement not as a joke. Even if it is a joke, it's not a funny one
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/20 05:15 AM
1

You do realize that Samsung is used by more people and rival Apple in starting prices right? Blue text means fuck all except that you paid more for the same shit dum dum.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/20 01:45 AM
1

They ban for legitimate conversation as well.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 11:16 AM
0

forced into abortions No one is forcing them into an abortion. It is about allowing decisions to be made and women would be able to make informed decisions based on their situation. focusing on appeasing murderous men so they don't kill more doesn't seem right. It's not appeasing murderous men. It's addressing an issue possibly leading normal men to becoming murderous. Most people are not inherently evil and those who turn to it do so due to circumstantial influences.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 07:59 AM
2

we've essentially hit the crux of the issue Indeed. there's a duty of care from both parties, and that's the main disagreement. Just a note here, I think there should be a duty of care owed where both people agreed to have it. Financial abortion is not giving carte blanche for a man to tell the woman he will contribute and then ditch post-birth at any time with no repercussions. I am advocating for informed decision making allowing men to decide post conception in a "one time only" type fashion.…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 07:50 AM
0

Giving a specific burden shifting right to men and not women is the opposite of equality. And yet we are giving a burden shift to women. That which results in no burden for either. Even in scenarios where the man wants the kid and she aborts anyways. The "burden shift" already exists in a one sided fashion.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 07:46 AM
1

Sad to see. I am disinclined to use it as an argument due to distaste for the use of such a sad statistic, but maybe if there was an alternative to harm not so many of these cases would happen. Or maybe pregnancy and birth make some people go crazy. Infanticide occurs by women with seemingly little explanation as well.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 07:44 AM
3

I don't think it's fair or justified to simultaneously accept that a child might be subject to life 'behind the curve' by virtue of the fact that the other person who contributed to their existence doesn't wish to assist. This is a base disagreement in our values I think. I take issue where one person (the woman) has opportunity to make decisions concerning another (the man) with no required input by that other. You value the child, I value the unwilling father. The mother ultimately would make …
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 07:41 AM
4

Of course it's uncommon. As I would expect. Just saying that the above poster (likely) wasnt justifying poison, just that those who feel powerless and trapped by their lack of options other than to just be fucked by the system may turn to alternatives.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 07:29 AM
2

I dont disagree that it is a prison worthy move. Just saying that the less ethically inclined segment of the male population may resort to worse actions if they feel powerless and trapped by their inability to do anything about the mistake despite the woman's ability to make decisions at several points with no consultation from the man.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 07:27 AM
3

Where's the woman's option to have sex that results in a pregnancy and have to take no further action to avoid an infant? There isn't. And Im not saying it would require no action by the man. It would have to be a legal process to financially abort. Where's the equal option for women to not have an abortion but still escape financial responsibility for a child thay carries half their DNA? The existence of an option for women to abort IS their option. You are arguing for 100% equality when the bi…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 07:24 AM
1

It is when the woman decides as much. If the boy says he doesnt want it and she says too bad, Im having it, he's fucked.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 07:09 AM
0

If you bring a child into the world and you don’t adopt it out Except that's not the decision of the man in any capacity. That is the woman's jurisdiction. And yet the man is held for the woman's decision to keep the child at every turn.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 07:08 AM
3

However hard pregnancy is is irrelevant to the discussion of fair options for men and women post conception.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 07:03 AM
4

Theyre saying that some men will resort to less than ethical options if we do not give them fair outs.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 07:01 AM
6

The difference is that there are options for women after conception and none for men. Equality means giving equal options for both genders as best we can in a given scenario. If the woman goes through with having the baby despite the man stating he will not be responsible, she does so with the KNOWLEDGE that she is subjecting her child to a potential life behind the curve. If the kid has issue with that, take it up with the mother for going through with it regardless. As it stands, we hold men a…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 07:00 AM
5

Equity implies equal outcome.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/20 08:35 PM
-2

Are you a lawyer? There is a burden of proof on that. The likelihood of transmission factors into the judge's consideration. After proving the elements of a tort (here, just that contact occured, which is the punch), the onus is on the dude to prove any defence. That includes any necessary elements of said defence ie her having the disease and the likelihood of infection. In simple terms, hypotheticals have little bearing on a court (ie "what if she has X?")
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 05:24 AM
-2

It's not a reasonable assumption that she would have aids. If you knew she had aids, it would be different but it would be your duty to prove she did AND you knew. Not only that, but given the case law, I think the abysmally low chance of transmission through saliva would factor into the judge's reasoning that it is not a matter of life and death.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 04:11 AM
7

The punch and the spit are both a battery. The dude will try to argue self-defense and provocation. Self-defence is not limited to be "measured with nicety" ie you may defend yourself above the bare minimum force. But he would likely fail in this case due to his aggressive swing that does not match the level of threat she is displaying. He will probably be found liable in battery with the defence of provocation reducing the damages payable to her significantly.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 12:46 AM
4

Call it instinct if you need a reason
/r/PussyPassDenied05/12/19 07:25 AM
6

Men dont get to decide what's sexist against women When you say this, you make it sound like men should have no voice in what is actually sexist behaviour to women. Which they absolutely do.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/19 08:31 PM
2

You are making yourself and your cohort of right wing Trump supporters look like immature fuckwits. Just so you know.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/19 08:43 PM
1

The school and community as well.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/19 08:51 PM
11

Dont listen to this bellend. The issue with infant circumcision is not the circumcision part; it's the infant part. Violating a baby's right to bodily autonomy because someone thinks something is more aesthetically pleasing is absurd and completely illegal in the case of girls. It's only when it's done to men that it's okay.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 02:51 PM
11

You do realize you can get yourself circumcized if that's what you want
/r/MensRights21/08/19 02:49 PM
1

Agree to disagree.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/19 01:57 PM
3

I get what youre saying but I usually see the blatant hate being downvoted. The comments that are typically upvoted are just enjoying women finally getting a taste of what it means to be a man, all the time.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/19 01:46 PM
4

No, not necessarily. It sometimes does have that anti women vibe in the comments, but this sub is about appreciating moments in which women typically get far preferential treatment that stems from only the fact that they are women. Women are getting equality here, essentially, and it's not what they expected nor do they like it.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/19 01:41 PM
1

If you are waiting on people to text you back, you're doing it wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/19 07:14 AM
2

Then what is the point? Because that's all I see when I see people complain about the historical "plight" of the housewife.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/19 02:56 AM
1

Dear god, to have to be stuck at home and be taken care of while the man risks his life at war or his dangerous job. The humanity. Give me a fucking break.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/19 12:03 AM
2

Okay, I get that. I get the impression though that OP is too entrenched in the anti-feminist excessive propaganda to offer a true argument.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/19 04:12 PM
3

I dont agree with everyone OP says either. But you cant make blanket statements about a group of people and when members of that group speak out with discontent you cant the say "if you're offended clearly youre who Im talking about." May as well make an ad about jewish thieves and then when jews rightfully become offended say "you're obviously offended for a reason." It doesn't work like that.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/19 03:48 PM
3

You cant tell people that if they dont feel the same as you then they must be part of the problem. It doesnt work like that. You can express dissatisfaction with something without being that they are targeting.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/19 02:51 PM
0

An in joke requires that more than one person understand it. Just you understanding does not make it an in joke.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/01/19 09:04 AM
7

Never change B99
/r/PussyPassDenied06/01/19 08:58 AM
7

The problem is that the word feminism has been coopted by the extremists and made to be a "women first" ideology. It stems from the fact that anyone can claim the title of feminist. There is no criteria as to what the beliefs of feminism are and so anyone can claim feminism and their beliefs are a part of it. Now, doing exactly what you're doing right now (claiming "real feminism" doesn't do this or believe that) is not a help to the situation. You can't just claim that those aren't "real" femin…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/18 03:35 PM
1

Also, even if the person is of age, it could still be considered sexual assault because the teacher is in a position of power over her students.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 11:25 PM
1

Perhaps it would force people to seriously consider whether or not they want to go to war if it is the mothers and daughters going as well as the fathers and sons.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 05:24 AM
3

"Just because you are offended, doesn't mean you are right." I think this quote applies in many many many instances.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 09:27 PM
1

Right. Because who needs men to reproduce right? Heh heh stupid men. /s
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:06 AM
9

That's how they continue to get exactly what they want. All they have to say is "the poor women"
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:45 AM
1

Fair enough. I'd have to see the statistics on it to confirm it, but I already know feminists over hype things that further their cause. (What else is new? /s)
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:38 AM
1

If I set a drink down, it's done. I don't touch it again. And I'm a fit man. It's idiotic to think that if we "abolish the patriarchy" people will be able to just set their drinks down and then pick them up again. I also cover the top of my drinks when I'm holding them, and try to refrain from drinking from cups with large openings at the top. Your safety is your biggest concern.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:36 AM
1

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminism-and-the-disposable-male/ Watch that, tell me what you think. I think it's right up your alley :)
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:26 AM
1

Honestly. It's insane how many times I've been dismissed from an argument through the use of "you're just a neckbeard that can't get any." What people (or people on reddit) have yet to realize is that MRAs are just people out in the world. They aren't jaded (well, most of them) and they don't live at home with their parents in the basement.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:36 PM
60

Men are taught to watch their drinks as well. THAT part is common sense, and not a gendered issue.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 05:21 AM
5

No, it is true. Women ARE oppressed in SOME aspects of life, and are privileged in others. Men, too, ARE oppressed in SOME aspects but privileged in others. To simply state outright that women are not oppressed is naïve.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 05:19 AM
1

The "patriarchy" is simply an external force feminists use to remove responsibility from themselves for their own shortcomings. Can't get a promotion? Patriarchy. Not making enough? Patriarchy. Can't wear whatever you want? Patriarchy. Rather than accept the responsibility of an individual's actions, it is found that it is far easier for that individual to simply blame that external force for the struggles faced.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 07:46 AM
3

there are violent and sick people who will assault people sexually and physically without motivation. Those people aren't the general population. Ftfy
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:09 AM
1

Fair enough
/r/MensRights22/05/14 03:19 AM
1

Thank you for the explanation. However, the reasons that source provides does not account for the fact that boys' right to bodily autonomy is being taken away when the decision is made for them. Unless it is a life or death situation, that decision should not be made. This is my opinion, however, and you're free to believe whatever you like :)
/r/MensRights20/05/14 10:47 PM
1

No idea what that is, mind explaining?
/r/MensRights19/05/14 10:56 PM
0

Let's not turn this into an "us vs them" debate. Leave it at "both feminism and MR are needed in developing countries.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 10:39 PM
2

Personally, I have almost no sensitivity left in the glans. Wanna know what the most sensitive piece is? THE SCAR BECAUSE THATS WHERE THE NERVES ARE STILL INTACT. I am living evidence that yes, foreskins have a purpose and a function. This isn't the Middle Ages. Any benefits that are gained through circumcision are very easily compensated for with modern technology.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:48 PM
11

Who are you to say what anyone else is or isn't missing out on? You can't speak for every other circumcised man out there. Don't be so insensitive.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 02:35 AM
7

It is mutilation. The shock at the word is intentional.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 02:34 AM
6

Clicked on the first one...NOPE. So many nopes.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:16 PM
2

She's not "saying" anything. She is pandering to women to try to get their vote. Nothing more. Further, I guarantee that not every single one of those women would say the "I'd die before" line. Putting those words into every woman's mouth is just perpetuating the ideology that women are helpless victims.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 01:05 AM
3

Sometimes. Sometimes the guy actually is being creepy, like stalking and such. I always tell women they should adhere to the "Channing Tatem test." If a man does something nice for you, put Channing tatem in place. If that thing is still creepy, then the guy is creepy. If it is suddenly romantic or cute, then the woman is supposed to look at it straight on, and realize they are refusing based on the guy's appearance.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:59 PM
0

Men are taught from a young age to "pursue" women because they may just be playing hard to get, that they might actually like the pursuit and having a man go out of his way to attempt to make her like him.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 02:02 AM
1

Local troll, move along.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 05:39 PM
1

They are people nonetheless and they will be the ones who run the world one day. Perhaps you shouldn't treat them with such disrespect.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 05:37 PM
1

Once again, go ahead and take a place on Omaha beach on D-day and see how you feel about it then. I guarantee you would much MUCH rather be prevented from fighting than be subjected to that.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 09:48 PM
1

Please. Go ahead and take a place in the advance on D-day at Omaha beach. See how much you would complain about not being allowed to fight.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 09:41 PM
2

At least it's not assuming that all young men are violent, but rather that men are expected to be by society. It's better, still a little biased, but not accusatory of all young men.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 01:02 AM
2

Ah, I understand. I don't like affirmative action. Opportunity should be equal, not outcome.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 05:09 AM
9

Firstly, it's not "consent technicalities." If a man denies consent and a woman continues anyways, it is rape. Consent was not obtained. Further, men who are taken advantage of when under the influence are also considered to be raped. I'm not talking about the "you're drunk, I'm drunk, let's go fuck" kind of intoxicated, I'm talking about passed out, incoherent. That is also considered rape. Next, which is the least common form, is a woman ties up a man and physically rapes him. Now, you may say…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 05:07 AM
1

Two wrongs don't make a right
/r/MensRights02/04/14 02:50 AM
5

Please update with any results or replies in the future.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 02:49 AM
3

Or she*
/r/MensRights02/04/14 02:47 AM
1

Yes that's what he meant
/r/MensRights02/04/14 02:47 AM
5

Done with this debate. Circular logic because circular logic right? Have fun with your close mindedness.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 02:32 AM
12

You obviously aren't understanding that fraud is still fraud even if another person didn't do something. Not wearing a condom isn't illegal. Fraud is. I would ask for you to stop being so obtuse, but based on other replies, I can see that that is not going to happen
/r/MensRights01/04/14 05:09 PM
9

The problem is that minute you say white pride or straight pride, those minorities automatically feel "oppressed"
/r/MensRights31/03/14 08:33 PM
2

Most women know that regretting sex doesn't mean that they were raped. But most men also know that rape is not something that is tolerated whatsoever and we still have "rape is bad" posters everywhere.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 05:01 PM
1

What's your formal position title and what kind of an education did you need to get there?
/r/MensRights30/03/14 04:27 PM
2

My apologies, misunderstood. I hope you can see how I would take the comment as one about every woman, as your comment was brief and I think anyone could take that and think you were being serious in thinking that there are actually no good choices for anyone. Once again, i apologize.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 07:34 PM
0

This is not an anti woman subreddit. There are women who a great people. Take that kind of opinion back to /r/theredpill
/r/MensRights28/03/14 07:39 PM
8

I was about to explain it, then I realized it's just the local troll.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 01:23 AM
2

That was pretty blatant, but then again, Poe's law.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 12:47 AM
1

I, too, got banned from r/feminism for asking a question, honestly trying to get information. I guess hoping for an intelligent answer was too much.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 12:46 AM
7

My mind just exploded. I didn't look at it from that angle. Also, a comma in your sentence "how could it be(put comma here) the woman was of age?" would have been very very beneficial. It truly shows that she is only seeing women as potential victims.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 12:23 AM
0

Given your circumstances, I can kind of understand what that must be like. I cannot fully say I understand, because nobody can, I realize that about many people's plights. I also understand your justified disdain for feminist culture and the laws set in place. I wholeheartedly agree that feminists need to talk the talk AND walk the walk when it comes to men's rights if they claim they are helping. I do. I also have to look at it from the other side as well, it's just what I believe. To say that …
/r/MensRights21/03/14 05:04 AM
0

You are just as bad as the radical feminists who say "my beliefs are correct and no one can change them." I support MR and feminism on a case to case basis. If I see something unjust or untrue solicited by either group, I publicize it. To say that those who "tolerate" feminism are deluding themselves is just justifying your own radical beliefs.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 02:06 AM
1

That is the best mental image lol
/r/MensRights16/03/14 04:54 PM
3

First of all, the word history originates from the Greek word histōr, meaning wise or learned. Your emphasis on the HIS in history is meaningless. Further, while issues concerning men may be brought before the public, these issues are not gendered. They also concern women. However, women have a much, much larger social justice movement raising awareness for their GENDERED issues than men do. Never occurred to you as to why FGM is illegal, but MGM (or, for those who think it's justified, circumci…
/r/MensRights04/03/14 06:48 AM
0

You're ridiculous. Every other week is definitely NOT just about men. Go back to your feminist sites.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 02:19 AM
2

That's really helpful for future use actually. Thank you
/r/MensRights22/02/14 01:57 AM
5

That's not what this is about
/r/MensRights21/02/14 07:35 PM
1

Yeah, well not all women are as forward as you are. I've experienced first hand women who just hope I catch on the "blatant signals" she's sending. It gets ridiculous. And even if you say, look, just talk to me about what you want, they say no, I don't want anything different than what were doing now. And then they get pissed off because I don't know why she's upset.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:42 PM
8

OP is not bringing up the point that you can't treat your SO like the most important person to you (which is how it should be, and how I think I do) but the fact that men are consistently being told by women how to think and act, and yet if men were to attempt to say something of the like about their female counterparts, he'd likely be called misogynistic and oppressive.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 11:47 PM
9

Actually in a case in Canada there was a man who tried to make his defense intoxication when he was charged with manslaughter. He was drunk at the time, and it was the first case that used intoxication as a defense since it was just after it was added to the great book of legal defenses. The judge ended up ruling that the only way you can use intoxication as a defense is if you can prove that someone else was responsible for the intoxication, which is very difficult to do. I'll try to find the c…
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:13 AM
–

Feminists claim that men should love a woman no matter her size, shape, or build. Why not the same for women to men?
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter