TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Slight_Intention_628 Archive

View 0 posts and 45 comments by Slight_Intention_628 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

For now they do, it's been untested that's for sure. I think a level of skepticism is warranted given the past. We can talk and speculate all we want, all that matters is what actually happens when that what has been put on paper is put to the test.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/26 03:43 PM
15

That's the problem. In my EU country women have as much military obligations as the men. The EU has no problems trying to enforce equality and rights for women both internally and abroad. Now for men they do not uphold equality. The EU should force Ukraine's hand to also draft women and only after that should the EU be talking about sending those eligible for the draft back to Ukraine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/26 03:08 PM
31

Let's be real here, they are workshopping new ways to win online arguments about male suicide statistics. There is no serious engagement or attempt to even understand or represent the positions of the men that do the thing they say they do. Yes it happens, we are aware, almost every guy that has had a relationship with a woman that has a personality disorder probably has experience with suicidal threats. We are not here calling those women misandrists if they actually commit suicide. It's just d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/26 12:54 AM
2

I don't get why someone would want a diamond, plenty of other stones to go around, do a little research and pick something that doesn't cause that much misery in the world. Even the synthetic ones for normalizing that piece of compressed carbon.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/06/26 12:01 AM
9

Even in Abu Ghraib they get the benefit of the doubt and their male supervisor gets the majority of the blame. If i remember correctly one of the women even stated that they did not do anything wrong, conveniently they did so after completing their rather short punishment. But the victims were men so who cares right? I personally view killing as a gender role that is pushed onto men by society and a lot is done to condition men to be able to do it. It's a burden men are expected to carry. In soc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 10:23 AM
1

Not any specific ones, just try and stick to publications by historians associated with a university. I'd recommend first building a understanding of how humanity has advanced to where we are now. Especially the agricultural revolutions, they affected the land that was available and increased the density of populations immensely. Which supported more specializations. Just innovations in general are very important and placing them into perspective. If you take a modern example, lets say the washi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 12:32 PM
11

Don't, they need the attention on the topic as much as we do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/26 11:05 PM
9

It's more of a concept than anything. In the most basic form, men holding more political power than women for the most part of history, this holds true. Now we come to the problem, dishonesty of the term being used because of half truths, omitting responsibilities and expectations to frame history in such a way that men are depicted as tyrants to women. Examples are that women couldn't own property, this is usually false. What they usually couldn't own was land or a title but they could own a bu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 10:24 AM
1

Whatever ecochamber you're in I'd advice you to get out. This isn't new, they did the same things in Syria as well, even using thermobaric weapons in civilian areas. I think you're mistaken who the real nazi's are in this conflict, namely the russians. Are there problematic groups within the armed forces of ukraine ? yes. Are they given leeway to do whatever they want? Fuck no. Unlike the russian army that doesn't give a fuck about preserving life, they throw away their own men like they are wor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/26 02:44 PM
9

I don't really think it matters all that much, what matters is that a substantial amount of women held slaves and asked to be compensated for their loss when it was abolished. What also gets pushed under the rug is the exploits of the daughters of the confederacy and their role in the propagation of the lost cause mythos, their efforts to create a community around that. They commissioned a lot the monuments of former confederate generals for example. Once more that mythos is now being pushed by …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/26 11:57 PM
17

When the war broke out they published a rapport accusing Ukraine of using tactics that endangered civilians thus violating their rights under international humanitarian law. All while Russia was busy with their Bucha massacre. indiscriminate use of cluster munitions on urban centers and kidnapping children. Not publishing anything about those violations or mentioning it in the same rapport. It should've been the end of that organization but alas it is still here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 08:52 PM
17

Not sure what you expect from them. They have shown what they are when they made their hit piece on Ukraine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 08:38 PM
5

Why are you so angry at me? It is a known fact that many of the men that rape are victims of sexual abuse themselves. Abuse that had been done to them by men and women. Saying without evidence that men enjoy this content and not just neglecting but denying the possibility that they may also have been victims of abuse is just really telling. You seem devoted to the belief that all that is evil is rooted in men. Personally i see men and women being horrible and the only way to lessen the harm that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/26 10:55 PM
19

This is just vile. Women consisted up to 40% of the slave owners in the south. Mind you not just white women but also mixed race women. Substantial amounts of compensatory money was given to former slave owning women by the British government when it became illegal to own slaves.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/04/26 10:29 PM
9

Funny how you're not wanting to give men the benefit of having poor mental health or bad things happen to them.. Is there any evidence that there is actually a significant difference? So far it only looks like you are projecting your own biased attributions onto the groups.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 08:17 AM
14

If i am honest can't even think of a mass murder where women were the majority of victims. I am sure there is one just doesn't come to mind. Usually if it was an organized slaughter then it's men first. Like Bucha was 341 men and 72 women, 28 children.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/04/26 08:01 AM
-1

I meant misinformation as spreading falsehoods, i did not intend it to be a euphemistic statement for the false accusations of rape and pursuit of underage girls. It's my understanding she didn't make these accusations herself but repeated them from others that did make them. Stop making it about semantics, it's his claim she accused thus i used that word. Just read the freaking court doc. You'd see how frivolous the claims in it are and the clear intent and severity that is lacking in what was …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/26 02:14 PM
-4

I think a dismissal of a summary proceeding is quite relevant, yes. And it was not dismissed on a technicality, he failed to meet the standard required just like hearsay shouldn't land you in prison. I don't think either of your options are good descriptions of the events. A better description of events would be. Artists career in ruins, blames his accusers for his downfall. Artist files suits against his accusers. One of the accusers retracts their accusation and publicly apologises for spreadi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/26 12:31 PM
-1

Ye i am confused about that part cause i see the article being about the court dismissal and the false accusation by the other woman is just additional context to the article. What is it that you would change about the rolling stone article ? For me that they added this quote “Ms. van Ooijen has tried to destroy Mr. Lewis’s life with a calculated campaign of lies and misinformation. The evidence against Ms. van Ooijen is overwhelming. The truth will come out." in the article is pretty in favor o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/26 11:02 AM
8

The reason for dismissal by the judge can be publicly accessed. These are 2 separate women, the one that issued an apology is not the one that got sued by the singer. He requested 5 different charges and they all got dismissed because the evidence provided by him did not meet the standard (for defamatory statements) according to Dutch law I think he didn't do himself any favors by adding on 2 accusations that were bullshit, accusing the woman of stalking him or his business partners with just 2 …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/26 10:18 AM
30

Women with negative feelings about men and masculinity will gravitate towards her content and she provides them with affirmations and excuses to feel the way they feel. All while insinuating her target audience is blameless and doesn't need to effectuate meaningful change. She makes unsubstantiated claims and uses her status of a psychology doctorate as legitimacy. She uses the same playbook as many in the manosphere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/26 11:29 AM
-8

I view feminism as a collection of many different ideas and policies. Those that call themselves feminist do not all subscribe to the same set of ideas, principles and policies. When I say they I mean the portion of those that hold that belief or act in the way i describe. There are many policies feminist support that I have no problem backing. I have no problem with women gaining more power in the corporate or governmental organizations. I support women's self determination and support the abil…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 10:46 AM
1

Yes, for they can highlight specific things where women could be granted more societal freedom and responsibility then they currently have. I am not against feminism, what I am against is when they resist or prevent the changing of men's gender norms and gendered expectations. When they minimize the problems we face in society. That they say they are for equality but will always prioritize women at the expense of men. That they are unapologetic about the use of dishonest framing to shape narrati…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 09:55 AM
9

It's not just the sacrificial aspect of war, it's also the killing and survivors guilt. It places a great mental burden on men and if the limited aid is inadequate to help them, then they are judged because they don't live up to societal expectations of mental fortitude. A judgement by people that haven't got a frame of reference for that kind of burden.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 12:40 AM
10

I think I've not formulated my question well enough cause i agree with you here. What i was asking is for examples of a majority policy position within feminism that would lead to women giving up or taking on something that primarily favors men. Examples of that would be like encouraging women to take on jobs that are damaging to men. Here i am thinking of dangerous jobs but also mentally challenging jobs like abattoir workers. Those being firmly in men's hands due to gender roles or societal ex…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 03:08 PM
14

Can you point out a position that feminism held where they didn't stand to gain but would further the position of men where men had been disadvantaged?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 11:18 AM
7

I disagree with the user you're responding to and his views are abhorrent to me. Your view of feminism I disagree with as well. I see no true willingness for a position in favor of men where women have to give up something. Most of the policies and ideas that would benefit men would also put women in a better position. There are feminists that are willing to give up some positions but I don't see that as the majority position within the overall movement. Then there are also feminists that have v…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/03/26 11:12 AM
9

Any policy positions from Feminism regarding men are pretty limited and most of the time when they have them it is to the benefit of women. I can't think of any that would be for equality with women having to be the ones giving up something for it. Don't even get me started over held positions and spoken ideals, the actual practice of them. This isn't unique to feminists but it is also not exclusive of them. Misandry and Feminism are not mutually exclusive.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/03/26 10:45 AM
16

This must have been going on for years, been quite some time ago when I saw the 'All men are trash' ones. Personally I just presume someone wearing something like this has a personality disorder and thank them for the advertisement.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/02/26 12:11 AM
17

The idea that women can be primarily involved in child trafficking and production of cp must be swept under the rug at all times. It's pathetic how these self proclaimed feminists cannot attribute agency to these women for their horrific actions. It's like a pattern of externalizing actions of women and internalizing actions of men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/26 11:31 AM
7

Not sure what you are on about, you can use it and be critical of the usage of it. One should scrutinize stats, methods and claims. It's one of the principles that science is based on. If that is what comes across as anti feminist then so be it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/26 01:48 PM
8

Ye i agree and no framework should be inherently trusted or be seen as the end all be all like some folks do with intersectionality. You can approach the subjects just fine if one is capable of gathering context, listening/reading instead of only prescribing. The caution aspects comes into play when someone uses the framework of intersectionality and it's important to evaluate their weighing of the intersections and use of the framework to support their conclusions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/26 12:51 PM
8

Don't care for the video or creator either. However, the perception of privilege and use of intersectionality should be met with caution. The framework lends itself to abuse and selectivity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/26 12:07 PM
5

Ye the problems arise when only one conceptual framework is used. It's just a tool and like in DIY not everything can be solved with a hammer. It helps to have more frameworks available and look at things through each of them to get a more nuanced picture of the situation. So things like CRT can be used in addition to and not as the sole framework. Also when using frameworks you need to be aware of their innate flaws.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 10:43 AM
9

Ah you mean to say that the suicide rate that has risen barely 0,1/100k more then for the same category as men. 10 to 30 year olds. Also the only category where the suicide rate for women has increased in the last 10 years. Where they are still outnumbered almost 2 to 1. The country where the murder rate for women has declined over the last 20 years with an equal amount of men being murdered by their relatives or friends. The country which provide a lot of incentives for mothers to work part tim…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/26 06:33 PM
13

The post reeks of trying to deflect judgement of herself by blaming men.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 12:33 PM
12

What happened to you is unacceptable. Sorry that societal standards are complete bs when it comes to this topic and anything related to male sexuality. You deserved better support and so do the others that are or were in the same situation. All deserve our protection, understanding and fairness of judgement. To me it seems that the root of this problem is the view that we are primarily agents. Especially in any sexual setting. Men are perceived as in control and willing to take on risk. So that …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/25 10:19 AM
36

Yea, it also has always been there just like with men. We just choose to ignore it. Rage bait articles in every kind of women's magazine, usually in the opinions section. To drive sales and engagement. Now it has just shifted to online platforms. Be it TikTok, Tumblr. The Guardian or a Variety piece. The messaging is excused under the protective veil of victimhood, by downplaying it or presenting the harm it causes as righteous retribution.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/11/25 01:40 PM
6

Thank you for responding and explaining your position. I think i understand your intention and points (better) now. Many of the things you say are reasonable, I don't expect women that identify with feminist policies to know every detail. Personally I support policies that get us as close as possible to equality. For I think true equality isn't realistically feasible. The only thing I disagree with is that it is enough for women to just stay silent about misandry. We also need women to speak out…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/11/25 02:20 PM
31

What anyone says about being a real man tells you more about the speaker than men. They told you all you might want to know about them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 06:53 PM
4

Hey, i am not sure if i understood what you are trying to say in your comment. The overall message i feel like you are trying to convey is that within the feminist movement it is hard to speak up against those that make hateful comments about men. That they might not be fully aware of all the positions a subgroup holds. That women that identify as feminist may not all actually hold misandrist views and will remain silent in public spaces. If talked to privately that they might have way more nuan…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/11/25 06:07 PM
2

Yes contained within their collection are things that you can take one from each and create a cycle of violence. To answer the second question i am going to reframe it a little bit. Yes, the very nature of social media means it affects the ability of an individual to communicate. Because of this relationship social media also affects the power wielded through communication. Speed and propagation are amplified by social media. There are many different cascading effects that follow from this inclu…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 09:32 PM
18

It's easy to deny injustice being done if one closes themselves from inconvenient truths. To name a few instances: The Central Park Jogger Case, George Stinney Glynn Simmons Rubin Carter Herbert Alford, Alex Heineman
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 03:19 AM
5

Because it is a logical fallacy to assume that they will disappear if the patriarchy is abolished. This is because the word patriarchy is a collection of descriptors with regards to which gender has power over policy in a society. Just because the balance of gender with power over policy changes and thus patriarchy is abolished, that doesn't mean that the actual policy that causes harm for men has changed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/25 09:35 PM
8

It's because being able to have a social bond with a man that signals sexual interest is more preferable then losing that ability. Because it brings a complex set of advantages and disadvantages. Subconsciously they know that many men will most likely break the bond if they communicate that they have no sexual interest in them. They also subconsciously or consciously know that many of those men have complex interests in them as a person that is not limited to sex. Breaking the bond for men is mo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/25 04:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter