TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SlimThugga Archive

View 2 posts and 793 comments by SlimThugga on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

td;dr: because trans people
/r/MensRights14/12/15 06:14 PM
4

We need effective birth control for men ASAP so outlandish laws like these won't happen.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 08:02 PM
1

I don't see the problem here. It's a women's festival for women. Whether transwomen are women or not is debatable, especially so if they have a penis. They allow post-op transwomen which is already very tolerant. Transwomen forcing themselves into women's spaces like this is one of main things breeding radical feminists.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 07:50 PM
2

Nice science.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 07:23 PM
1

I appreciate your input.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 02:21 PM
0

For something to be a lie it just needs to not be 100% true. Gender is, or is not, purely biological. It's a big deal, the implications of either side are very different, and not limited solely to how trans people are to be treated.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 02:19 PM
2

Yes, but it's not like I need to, when trans people's own research is so poorly interpreted to begin with. Basically there are some differences in some structures of the brain between men and women. But this is not universal. And, trans people share some of those key differences with the gender they identify as. But this is not universal either. There's lots of stuff that puts more holes in the gendered brain theory, but I didn't post in order to start a long winded argument/debate. Point simply…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 01:31 AM
9

You are right, don't be afraid to use that kind of thinking. I bet a lot of people think this in private but swallow it down in public discourse. Just talk to a lot of therapists/psychiatrists who deal with trans people. Without violating confidentiality they are at least able to tell you the rationale people have when they go to them for gender related issues. Perceived better treatment in society, association with more positive values (empathy, beauty, politeness, motherhood, positive sexualit…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 06:10 PM
1

This could be interpreted either way. If she compared obesity in men to terrorism and proceeded to list things we need to do for men (but not women) so the rates go down, you'd have been just as angry. Think about it for one second.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 12:16 PM
7

I really like his accent.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 08:25 PM
56

They should go to therapy too, to combat these terribly gendered ideology So, trans people, after psychotherapy, go on hormones and often enough undergo surgery exactly to drastically alter their physical appearance to resemble the typical gendered image. Yet all these "I identify as" peeps are like "genitals don't reflect your gender!", "don't let your appearance define you!"? Am I missing something here, cause I stopped categorizing mental maladies past "bigender-fluid"...
/r/MensRights08/12/15 11:06 PM
1

As long as you don't see anything wrong with women being attracted to muscular, wealthy men... I don't. And MRAs don't go around trying to convince people that all men are equally beautiful, that their personalities are equally interesting, that a chiseled body is an unrealistic and unhealthy standard, that we are being objectified whenever a dude's abs are on display to sell something. MRAs also haven't launched campaigns to take women's magazines off the shelves or reform them into displaying …
/r/MensRights03/12/15 12:29 AM
2

It's not really a simple message when you're trying to replace everything you dislike with this message. If attraction were really so relative, we wouldn't have any need for such "everyone is beautiful" messages to begin with. Or do you perhaps believe that attraction is largely a social construct? Either way, I and a large fraction of men on this subreddit, are pretty tired of hearing in all sorts of creative ways, some less subtle than others, that people like me are entitled misogynists for r…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 10:15 PM
1

Ah, sarcasm. I'll try to word this differently: Heterosexual men's preference: slender, young, attractive women Feminism's message: all women are beautiful, all sizes are healthy and totally sexy, beauty at any age, men's preference is misogynistic
/r/MensRights02/12/15 08:29 PM
1

Thing is, the calendar has had a long standing "tradition" of showcasing physically attractive women (to men's tastes). This is a sharp turn they're taking (think it was the same last year, idk), and, more importantly, not the only case of something by men, for men, being turned into something more acceptable by feminists or women in general. You're right that you can look elsewhere to find attractive women. That is only the case because this particular brand of feminism hasn't succeeded in taki…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 08:20 PM
2

If I gather correctly the Pirelli calendar used to be about young, physically attractive women in skimpy clothing. Something for men, and like anything men like, feminists have to try and fuck it up and make it about themselves somehow. I don't give a shit either, it's a stupid-ass calendar. It's just the principle, exhibit #3248998 of feminism and this "all bodies are equally beautiful!" crap trying to insert itself into men's clubs and tell them what they should and shouldn't like instead.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 05:53 PM
2

Saw the spotlight for it on TV, that whole calendar sounds like a fucking joke, and the way the women in it look is the smallest of its issues.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 01:03 PM
1

Yeah, weird that the article is about her. The rest of the specimens in the calendar are far more monstrous.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 12:57 PM
2

Yeah that's kind of what I said too, did I not? That you need to have some kind of constancy, not a tendency, when you say there are male brains and female brains and transsexuals totally have the brain of the gender they identify as (complete with all implications of this, like how they should be treated and what message this sends to society at large). Almost all transsexuals I've had the pleasure of arguing with strongly cling to the gendered brain theory. Are they perhaps a minority now?
/r/MensRights01/12/15 07:30 PM
0

while this study does not address that topic in any way Behavior is reflected in brain structure, how does it not? It's important that people don't use research to come to unproven conclusions Seems like that's exactly the conclusion of this study here, that people shouldn't come to the conclusion that differences between men and women "gendered" behaviors can be explained by there being male brains and female brains, as there really is no such thing.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 07:00 PM
1

Uh, no shit, they say brains, what else would they be referring to? As for the social concept, what else would behaviors be rooted in, if not our brains?
/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:31 PM
-2

Ok, guess you're retarded or something, nevermind, shit.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:29 PM
0

No...it's pretty much based on the concept of having a "male/female brain". That is how the condition is currently approached by the mainstream medical community and that is what most transgender people they will tell you, that they have a certain gendered brain but are born in the "wrong body". You worded it right, it's a BELIEF that one's body isn't as it should be, but that's not how it's treated.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 03:54 PM
4

What does his future hold? More former coworkers, colleagues, etc women out of nowhere jumping on the gibsmedat gravy train, saying he's guilty. I'm guessing there's gonna be a few good settlements whether or not he actually did anything. His reputation is also permafucked, again, whether or not he's guilty.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 02:57 PM
0

This can already be inferred by looking at the studies transgender people post every time there's a debate on the nature of their condition.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 02:53 PM
4

No they're not. Feminists aside, vast majority of women are on women's side first and foremost. They juggle between traditionalist and progressive values to maximize their own well being, not men's, even when the two coincide. The vast majority of women out and about in the real world: Believe there is a wage gap Feel that women have it worse than men to various degrees Are the more likely to initiate divorce Don't oppose the alimony system Don't oppose biased child custody laws Feel that father…
/r/MensRights27/11/15 02:09 PM
3

Yes, absolutely, but online dating brings out and perpetuates the utter worst aspects of it. Women are no longer driven to put even the traditionally low amount of effort required into themselves in order to get laid. Why bother when you have droves of thirsty men competing to lick your virtual feet? This endless validation drives them to up their standards even more. They see all these guys and think "Wow, I must be some hot shit if so many guys like me, you know what, I think I deserve a top q…
/r/MensRights22/11/15 09:10 PM
2

Come to my sub and help make it popular, I'm too lazy and busy to do shit :(
/r/MensRights22/11/15 09:57 AM
1

"Women are Wonderful" effect in action.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 09:56 AM
1

Guys tend to not be interested in a lady if she's fat at all. You greatly underestimate the amount of thirsty men out there. I encourage you to make a fake OkCupid profile of an overweight woman, with the most basic interests you can come up with. Give it a few days, GUARANTEED you will have dozens of messages to sift through.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 09:47 AM
8

The whole site, no, the whole online dating scene is blatant "discrimination" based on sex. Women of all shapes and sizes make their little profiles, state what they want ("no messages saying just hi, impress me!!") and receive limitless male validation in their inbox daily. Unless you're a really high quality man, you're invisible. My advice? Give up. Stop using that site. Every second you're on it serves only to fuel this system.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 09:46 AM
22

I'll say it again. This is totally happening. Join us in a few years, when Movember, if it'll still be around at all, will go from: Men, grow a moustache in november to raise awareness of prostate cancer! to: Men (transmen, bigender and androphiles included), and women (some women have moustaches, we must also bring awareness and celebrate that), grow a moustache (if you want, not everyone can as they don't have facial hair growth privilege) to promote diversity, inclusiveness, and healthy mascu…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 07:14 PM
14

Surprise, surprise, it has a cunt. Nah, male hating is not a female exclusive trait. Ever heard of male feminists?
/r/MensRights17/11/15 08:52 PM
6

As someone who's anti-muslim and pro-MRA, this poster is extremely confusing.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 09:17 PM
5

Yes women do commit less murders and violent crimes. That is because they realize they are weaker No. Let's call it what it is. It's because they don't NEED to. There's never been any pressure on them to be breadwinners or strong ones in order to secure a relationship with the other sex. That's the way it worked since....ever and it isn't any different today. As a woman, it's hard to end up committing theft or feeling angry enough to seriously harm someone. Society will shower you in sympathy, t…
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:52 AM
38

exclusionary I really hate how the social justice movement has butchered that word. No matter the movement, there's always special snowflakes that feel left out and ignored for very loosely, rationalized, reasons, and oops, the whole movement is sexist and exclusionary, it must be appropriated, diversified and safe space'ified to include them, to the point it won't mean anything anymore, least of all what it was originally meant to be. Join us in a few years, when Movember, if it'll still be aro…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 04:32 PM
10

Just the age old bullshit double standard. It's only a cause for concern when it happens to women, or when what happens to men negatively affects women. Men have been mercilessly ridiculed for some years now over living with their parents in their 20s. I dare you to find a non-MRA written article about dudes living with their parents that doesn't imply we're: not man enough, selfish, childish, fragile, can't handle a modern liberated woman in a modern world, having a masculinity crisis Then it f…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 12:59 AM
1

Yeah...I made it but lost the motivation to do anything with it afterwards.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:22 AM
3

Fuck off, will ya? No one's lamenting the basic fact the the woman has a "life of her own". That's what you took away from this? Guess you missed this very important part: I saw my father heartbroken, but more importantly financially destitute and in court to fight for custody for us. She's free to have a mind of her own and love whoever the fuck she wants if she's not happy anymore, I fully agree with you on that, but why alienate the kid from his father, and force said father to fund the liber…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 12:57 AM
3

/r/womenarewonderful
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:31 PM
5

Well, the type of porn she wants to promote is this: “We celebrate real world bodies, real world flab, real world penis size and breast size — unlike porn, which is full of ludicrously aspirational body types.” So if you want to see a dude with a dad bod and a small penis having sex with a 200lbs empowered hairy woman with pepperoni nipples, feel free to support her.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 12:11 AM
29

Almost every single article about shit like this: "I huffed and puffed and stared and stomped and did everything but somehow they don't understand, how is this possible???!?!?" I don't know, have you tried opening your mouth and (politely, yet firmly) asking? I don't often see that written anywhere in these whine-fest articles. Always a long arsenal of sighs, stares, grunts, eye rolls, and photo taking, but no actual talking. Quote from same article: And they’ll stay put until someone actually s…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 11:54 PM
11

The point is that you -should- read those books to properly realize how terrible feminism is.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 07:17 PM
2

They do exactly that in Saudi Arabia. But that's bad too?
/r/MensRights31/10/15 02:24 PM
8

Not with the feminist editors guarding the article.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 11:06 AM
4

But it is. I'm sorry, dude. I will sound like an asshole, I probably am. I don't care. But it fucking is. Very few people commit these heinous crimes without a reason. Yes they are sick and broken but they often don't turn that way out of the blue. I'm sick of everyone washing their hands and ignoring the obvious elephant in the room whenever men do crazy shit like this, but whenever some woman kills her kids, all you can hear is how the poor thing was so traumatized/battered/stressed/etc. Both …
/r/MensRights16/10/15 06:19 AM
0

Yeah...and 18 year olds are 24...and MILFs are not actually mothers...and the sex ed teacher isn't actually a teacher. Bummer. Stop watching American garbage.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 08:30 PM
2

I fully support this. I'm not even doubting their ability to make it happen or that they'll be happier. Good thing for everyone, really.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 07:36 PM
4

You sound bitter as fuck. I say they can handle it, as the OP says, I'll help them pack.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 07:32 PM
2

This is not TRP (not by itself, anyway), this is simply not letting your spouse walk all over you.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 10:34 PM
6

What?
/r/MensRights13/10/15 11:27 AM
4

"Here are some numbers. White men have bigger number. White men are very problem! I am logic!" How can these cunts not see their circular logic? It's like, we throw all these conflicting pressures on men while telling them they are the root of all evil in the world, and when a select few of them (75% sounds like a huge number, until you actually look at the raw numbers) lose their shit, what do these cunts want? MORE restrictions, MORE feminism for boys, MORE shaming of men, MORE pressures, MORE…
/r/MensRights12/10/15 09:11 PM
0

Anyway, now that we've got the definitions stuff out of the way is there any part of my previous response you disagree with? Uh. Yeah. I told you what's wrong with your response, and you gave me a reply full of backpedalling about what you meant or didn't mean with your retarded definitions. As if I'm in the wrong for not automatically knowing you got your definition of "cuckold" from 4chan, or something.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 06:23 PM
-2

Way to completely ignore my point in favor of semantics. We absolutely are animals. We just happen to be highly intelligent animals. We are animals, as part of the biological category. But, as I said, we do way too many things differently for the "we're just like animals" argument to work the way you want it to work. And this is why a cuckolded man us more unable to forgive his cheating wife Err...what? Cuckolding, by definition, means that a MAN is aware of their spouse cheating on them, and no…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 05:11 PM
-3

Dude, fuck, lol. You sound like a redpiller. Not even gonna check posting history. No one loves the "we're just like animals" argument more than they do. "Women are the submissive weak sex who want to fuck the alpha male with the best genes. Just look at animals!" Studies of other primate species, although different in some capacities, are the most ethical sources of human instinctual behavior available to us currently. yes...except in cases in which it IS perfectly ethical to test humans, like …
/r/MensRights09/10/15 05:07 PM
-3

You're using a hindsight bias driven explanation on what is a rather shoddy social study to begin with. Even if the study were 100% true and accurate, "animals do it" is still not automatically the best explanation for why it is so. We are not animals, we do a LOT of things different than them, so saying "just look at nature, that's totally why we do it too" is really...well...not smart. And...I don't know. Personally speaking, am I really the only dude offended here? If you don't want to have k…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 02:03 PM
1

Wha? But how is it possible to sexually betray someone without also betraying them emotionally and viceversa? The way they asked the question is pretty weird and it makes it sound like sexual and emotional betrayal can be separate. Any link to the study?
/r/MensRights09/10/15 01:23 PM
-9

If we look at nature I've never heard anyone say anything smart when beginning their argument with that expression.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 01:20 PM
3

TL;DR: Guy fucks around with a waitress. She gets pregnant and doesn't want to abort, despite both her and her family being financially destitute and not capable of aiding with child care. Guy is angry. Guy wants her to take a paternity test. Girl acts fishy about this, but guy claims he made sure they did the thing properly. Paternity test comes out saying he's not the father, but instead it probably belongs to some other dude who lied about nutting inside her. Guy is happy and celebrates. Baby…
/r/MensRights08/10/15 08:28 PM
15

I hope this means they'll stop demonising men for finding women attractive? Like 90% of their userbase are into that garbage, why would they stop appealing to them and lose all that cash moneys?
/r/MensRights05/10/15 01:52 AM
1

I know, but...if you're looking for that perfect movement for everyone, with its perfect discussion that always hits the notes everybody wants, and no one's feelings ever get hurt...you're in for a disappointment. So you know that /r/feminism has an insta ban policy for 4 years ... and you take part in the weekly "i got banned from a sub with an insta ban policy" circle jerk ... I don't, I tried to address some of your concerns regarding this circlejerk.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 04:29 PM
1

Man, what, you missed the point after I already explained it to you and you seemed to assimilate it. We get it yo, it's not open. We laugh about it. We don't control and redirect speech like that. It's silly. "Well, just go talk in places where they allow you to talk, and the way they want you to talk" is even more laughable to suggest as some sort of solution. And you know, I've been here for over 4 years and /r/feminism has been pretty much the same all this time. When exactly was it open to M…
/r/MensRights03/10/15 03:54 PM
1

That's not what you're doing. You're "they're not so bad"-ing them against the majority of this subreddit saying otherwise. The equivalent to that would be a /r/feminism thread with complaints about having a bad experience with MRAs in debates or something on MRM subs/forums, and someone coming in there saying "I dsagree with you, they're not so bad, you didn't follow their rules right"
/r/MensRights03/10/15 03:36 PM
1

Nope, I just said you're not part of the circlejerk, as you call it, so you'd be banned if we operated like feminist discussion boards, regardless of what you openly affiliate with.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 03:15 PM
1

Yeah, it's what the point is. That it's an echo chamber. Few other subs try to control and redirect speech and criticism so much. Few other ideological movements, I'd wager. I'd have an easier time speaking out as a white supremacist on anti-racism boards than a MRA on feminist ones. If /r/MensRights moderated as feminists do, you'd have been banned by now. And you wouldn't like it either, it feels bad, maaaaan :(
/r/MensRights03/10/15 03:06 PM
2

I don't why this information is impossible for mras to absorbe. No one has trouble absorbing it. That's the policy. We're all laughing at how silly it is. People get banned from /r/askfeminists too btw
/r/MensRights03/10/15 02:38 PM
2

I'm sorry, is there some special way of approaching academic feminists then? Is telling them that they are wrong and presenting evidence not sufficient? Also, what stats are you referring to? The 1 in 4 rapes, the wage gap, the DV stats, the ones who have been debunked a million times over (in places that didn't censor attempts at doing so, that is) We may have missed some new development here. Your last statement is particularly funny, because if you actually take the time to search through the…
/r/MensRights03/10/15 02:26 PM
1

Okay. Define "knows what they are talking about and keeps a cool head", seeing how it seems to exclude being an MRA. Curious.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 11:54 AM
1

If it's gonna be on steam weekly sales for $0.19 and have trading cards, I'll definitely consider buying it!
/r/MensRights02/10/15 11:31 PM
9

Gotta train them early. Respect the pussy. Please the pussy. Feel bad for having a penis.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 10:09 PM
4

Fuck no. Feminism is about women's issues and their perspective on them. Wrong or right, it should stay a female-centric sub with female moderators who decide how it works. Would YOU be okay if, say, half the MRA mod team were also women who had a say in how the MRM should work and what could or couldn't be said on the sub? "How can we men control feminism, define what it is, and what should or shouldn't be allowed within it?" is what your question sounds like.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 04:18 PM
4

But it's representative of the wider sentiment in society.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 04:43 PM
4

Doesn't make any sense even by feminist definitions. Sounds like a really half arsed attempt at pandering to men while still trying to blame them for everything. "It's not your fault but it is."
/r/MensRights28/09/15 06:08 PM
4

I do, it's better for the environment. They taste better too.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 11:12 AM
-1

Ooh, a reaction gif, you must be a professional internet funny person.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 01:03 AM
0

I said it's probable for it to happen given the multitude of cases in which it does. The broader statement is about the scenario is how I would interpret it.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 10:09 PM
-1

Because I see a lot of cases like these on a near daily basis. Not saying anything about this kid in particular, I said that it happens enough I see it as a problem.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 10:01 PM
-3

Often enough there are a lot of kids who are kicked out of school and/or sent to a gender therapist for shit like what that kid did. They're wrongly told they might be trans and end up buying it (and every single gram of mental baggage years down the road) when all they did was have long hair at a shitty school. The kid just wants long hair, but the school tells him it's only for girls, parents sometimes are in on it, and if you add a gender therapist into the mix, you're left with a very confus…
/r/MensRights25/09/15 09:51 PM
-2

You're a fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 09:49 PM
-8

Oh hey, you must be /u/Leblodk's retarded little cousin. Prolly didn't read the article either. The kid's 11, nobody cares about your shitty music.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 09:28 PM
5

She's willing and able to cook for you. Still a better deal than most single mom alimony queens will offer you.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 07:53 PM
-11

Yeah yeah you really made me mad and all that, internet master trole. Now go away.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 07:45 PM
-14

Truly retarded if that's what you understood. There's a plethora of cases where boys get kicked out of schools and taken to gender therapists for wearing dresses or having long hair, etc in class because everyone overwhelmingly tells them such things are for girls. Fucking internet comedian.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 07:23 PM
-28

Kid's probably going to end up thinking he's a girl inside. Too many cases like these.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 05:51 PM
5

I think red pillers call it the thousand-cock stare. EDIT: Gotta love the first related article though. "Thirtysomething and childless: why are men waiting to have babies?" with a picture of dopey looking Hugh Grant holding a baby. Oh boy...
/r/MensRights22/09/15 02:27 PM
5

Funny, as a dude I perceive other bearded dudes as more trustworthy than clean shaven proper folk. Anyone else? I think there was even a saying or something about this, but I can't for the life of me remember it...
/r/MensRights21/09/15 11:11 PM
59

But he got hurt because of the patriarchy, it's the patriarchy telling men to fight and women to stay home, once we dismantle the patriarchy everything will be alright....what? You say we should oppose such one sided divorce rulings then, because they enforce the very same patriarchal idea that women are weak and need the state to provide for them? No no, that doesn't count, women are oppressed, you see, we need to dismantle the patriarchy first! Every single feminist argument regarding divorce …
/r/MensRights21/09/15 01:26 PM
3

There is no reals, only feels. TERFs would agree that MTFs treat feminism as a sort of girly funclub where they hate men for fun cause that's what girls do, and they wanna fit in so they do it too. They don't actually have a clue what it's about, they just unload their fee-fees with the big words, patriarchy, heteronormativity, male gaze, gender is an oppressive social construct (this one always gets me), blablabla
/r/MensRights21/09/15 01:06 PM
2

This woman masturbates while imagining herself as a woman. Harms no one right? Wrong.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 12:58 PM
2

Some of the most fanatical supporters of radical feminism I've seen are MTF transsexuals. For such deluded deranged fucks, being anti-man is an essential part of being a woman, so they do everything they can to fit in and prove they're women. There is no logic, only feelings.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 12:57 PM
2

LOL at viagra being $0.00 and BC costing $$$$. BC is anywhere from 3 to 20 Euros (or dollars even, it really makes no difference, it's cheap everywhere even without healthcare coverage and there's hundreds of brand combinations) while viagra can cost in the hundreds and no healthcare that I know of covers it. There's a reason viagra (both real and the many counterfeit versions of it) is such a common product on black market pharmacies.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 02:57 PM
3

That has to make a lot of people really uncomfortable in a group/crowd situation. Women for sure would feel uncomfortable if there were more men than women in that bathroom. The opposite is also true, good luck not feeling like a creep if you're a dude and there's only women in there. People need their space for this kind of stuff, stop telling them they should feel comfortable with this. They won't and shouldn't. The only party benefiting from this are the institutions that won't have to deal w…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 10:12 PM
2

You've obviously never listened to rap.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:36 PM
6

Unless you absolutely want the certification, don't bother. There's a plethora of resources for learning how to code in any language you want on the internet.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 04:09 PM
8

change "lock up all men" to "lock up all blacks" to see just how sexist this woman's views are. No, you don't need to do that. At least I hope not, it should be obvious enough that putting anyone in a camp is not a good thing. Is this really how it works? Put all men in camps "Huh? I don't get it." Put all blacks in camps "Ohhh, now I get it. It's a bad thing, right?"
/r/MensRights13/09/15 04:57 PM
4

Edit: Even then, he says "Nazi Death Camps"… bullshit dude. That's dishonest rhetoric. She said put them away in a camp, women can check them out for awhile, and when men start behaving better, they'll consider letting them back out. Shitty? Yes. Nazi death camp? Nah. LMAO. I don't believe this fucking concern troll here. Are you sarcastic or are you seriously trying to rationalize someone's claim to make a camp to control an entire gender as a not-so-bad thing? "It's okay guize, it's totally no…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 02:58 PM
7

Eh. Looks are just as important for dudes. If you're balding and out of shape , she won't go crazy over you even if she might go crazy over your high salary. Easy to mistake one for the other.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 02:40 PM
2

What's wrong with BlackPeopleTwitter? And being an active poster? What, you need to be an established 24/7 MRA to post about your issues here now? I don't get you.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 09:57 AM
5

I don't know about this particular case (it's just a lousy screenshot so I can't tell) but this level of female to female blind asskissing is pretty rampant with feminist sympathizers (not necessarily feminists but people who think it's alright because female empowerment sounds cool and whatnot)
/r/MensRights09/09/15 05:55 PM
14

The Sisterhood is real.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 05:39 PM
15

Mate, your response is much too broad and thought out to be worth serving a basic "look it up / educate yourself" dipshit with.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 01:36 PM
2

Disgusting...
/r/MensRights08/09/15 08:35 AM
7

Read the article she linked that came up with that number. Chocolates and magazines are apparently part of the essential spending for your period.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 03:40 PM
14

Right? I didn't even consider arguing the numbers because they didn't seem that far fetched to me as a man. A pack of pads is around 5 Euros (with 22% VAT here) and lasts for one cycle. So that's 5 Euros a month meaning 60 Euros a year. What the fuck does that woman use? Let's read the study she linked more carefully. Pads/tampons/panty-liners/menstrual cups - £13 New underwear (due to spillages) -£8 Pain relief - £4.50 Chocolate/sweets/crisps - £8.50 Other (magazines/toiletries/DVDs etc.) – £7 …
/r/MensRights07/09/15 01:19 PM
2

It's just a stupid miscategorization coupled with the govt's lust for taxes that led to it not being addressed sooner. It is unfair, like arguably a lot of the taxes on other things, YES, but certainly not a representation of society at large hating and oppressing the glorious womyn's body. There's tax on toilet paper too (not everywhere), but I don't take that as a sign of society hating me and wanting to oppress my glorious excretory system.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 01:02 PM
15

The stereotype about women being better with people is utter bullshit, it's Women Are Wonderful effect in its purest form. Men are pretty gosh darned good at being polite and people-oriented, but since women are preeeetttyyyyyyy and have softer voices, that means they're "better with people", fuck off with that shit.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 10:59 AM
1

No women will join in there because they feel threatened and invaded whenever there's a ratio of less than 10 women per 1 man in any debate.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 07:19 PM
4

And you get to drive around quads or bicycles or white vans (there has to be some freudian explanation behind her specific selection of vehicles) all day! Granted, porn isn't allowed, but it seems the patriarchy has blessed me with an insatiable sex drive and quite a vivid imagination, so I guarantee you that's a non-issue :D At one point, we'd overpower the female wardens and keep them hostage in exchange for porn and guzzoline. Or we can just strap them to the white vans like trophies and driv…
/r/MensRights05/09/15 10:09 AM
2

Orange juice camp!
/r/MensRights04/09/15 08:22 PM
59

Those images look comically unrealistic. They'll only get laughed at by people who don't understand the issue.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 02:43 PM
3

It is now very much the case that people who don't strongly identify with any particular ideology and don't care much for any of this gender war crap are veritable diamonds in the rough in the world of relationships. I see it everywhere now that people who are only out for themselves are far less selfish and entitled than any kind of gender scholar. Demanding articles like these (which come from both sides) only prove that everyone really just wants to find a person who hasn't been damaged by th…
/r/MensRights04/09/15 12:44 AM
-7

No, it's the lowest amount of effort you could put in when trying to understand a situation.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 02:11 PM
-4

I don't see the problem and the point you're trying to make or even how it might be related to men's rights. Is it the age old "imagine if the genders were reversed!!!" bullshit or what?
/r/MensRights02/09/15 01:18 PM
2

If gender identity is such a big deal for transsexuals (since that's what this policy would be, lipservice to them), why deny it for everyone else? I don't understand. MTF transsexuals insist on being called female pronouns. FTM transsexuals insist on being called male pronouns. So why can't regular people have their gender identity verbally validated as well?
/r/MensRights29/08/15 12:51 PM
2

Should have picked a name that doesn't sound like menarche.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:09 AM
3

'everyone in the world thinks I am right' Never met a feminist who thought that. The crazy ones usually think everyone hates them and oppresses them and eye rapes them every day.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:04 AM
3

This is very childish and is gonna do us way more harm than the good you'll get from having a few cheap laughs (online petitions aren't good for much else anyway). I just KNOW this will come back and bite the MRM in the ass even though it was probably just some random dude ("Janet Wilkinson" my ass) who started it.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:03 AM
1

Nope, he's mansplaining. It's gendered because it's specific to dudes and it revolves around the conversational posturing and demeanor based on the idea that women are overemotional and undisciplined, making mountains out of molehills. And no, just because it's gendered doesn't make it sexist as there's no sexist implication behind the word. Get over yourself please. And homophobia? Gay slur? What the fuck are you talking about? It was a metaphor for you being an overzealous suckup, you dipshit,…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:29 AM
14

Excellent advice in that third paragraph, Josie! That the world owes you nothing and you technically don't deserve anything. If only we could apply this to women too, in the same situations you described. Sometimes men will be hired over you. Sometimes men will be paid more than you. Sometimes men will give you unwanted attention. Sometimes men will give you no attention. Your boyfriend might dump you for another woman he deems to be more attractive. Your employees might disrespect you. It will …
/r/MensRights28/08/15 10:20 PM
1

He's textbook mansplaining. Using your typical "me man, me calm and logical, you woman, you overemotional" posturing and mannerisms without really making any point. If anything he just keeps confirming what I said, that women with power were an exception, not a rule. Only near the end he says that women had what is called covert power, but like I said, just because women could tell their shitty husbands to go to work (because if they didn't, the whole household would break down since women could…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 07:32 PM
1

Uh, yeah they will. They'll say he did it because he was a troubled victim riddled with grief who lashed out at another one of white man's heinous oppressive crimes. But yeah it would be nice if, just once, whenever any white dude commits a crime, they'd seriously consider that maybe, maybe, he too got to that point as a result of a long streak of hurtful events that got to him the wrong way, and wasn't simply conditioned by the patriarchy into thinking that killing shit is awesome and makes him…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:49 PM
3

TwoX is not a women-only subreddit. Men can post there too, just remember to apologize profusely before and after posting your very carefully apologetic opinion being as evasive as possible simply trying to say that you disagree with something there. If you do that, you might not even be banned immediately. I agree with 90% of that post, except of course the ego auto-fellatio part about how women have it worst, men know nothing, and their troubles pale in comparison to women's no matter what. Al…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:10 PM
0

Yeah mang, I get it, women are illuminati, controlling men to control other women you're right what was i thinking
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:12 PM
0

Watched the whole thing. Looks like this dude is trying to mansplain why women had oh so much power in history but actually ends up making all the points I made. Women had no say if we went to war, who we went to war with and for what. They had no say regarding laws. They had no say regarding which gender could do what. BUT YES, they had power in the household. They're the ones who made their husbands go to work...because if they didn't the whole family would economically break down...because wo…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 08:11 PM
0

LMAO! You're fucking retarded. Literally the reason people criticize the MRM: fucktards like you. DUDE. We were talking about patriarchal vs matriarchal societies with examples given by Drakaris. He's stroking his entitled cock over patriarchal societies being superior to matriarchal ones. Because we've built all these cool skyscrapers and shit while that stoopid female-only village of rape survivors only built some huts. It's not even remotely comparable because we've killed and enslaved people…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:46 PM
0

The other sex being women. But men as well were under the control of other men. Whereas in the matriarchal mini-society that other dude mentioned, no one's forcing you to be a caretaker OR a construction worker. If they did, they could build cool skyscrapers too and that guy wouldn't be such a bitch about it.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:26 PM
-5

Yea, shitlords, masculinity is bad. Just look at what matriarchy and femininity produces in 21st century - this, this and this. What... Aren't you impressed? These are actual pictures from actual villages from actual matriarchies in 21st century (yes, this madness actually still exists...). Now what does masculinity produce, hah! This, this or this? Can you even compare them? No, you can't compare them. Patriarchy has had tens of thousands of years, all of earth's resources, and an entire other …
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:05 PM
1

Seems pretty redundant. A fancy label to describe average human beings looking for a relationship. Am I missing something here?
/r/MensRights25/08/15 09:40 PM
10

What a gigantic senseless whine-fest of an "article".
/r/MensRights24/08/15 03:34 PM
4

Welcome! Can I give you some shit-in-your-coffee type of advice that I'm probably gonna get blasted for? I've read your little story. Don't go full MRA like you went full SJW. Be an MRA if you want but believe me, you will inevitably see some stories, opinions and collective reactions that will feel off and you might be afraid to criticize because of some "greater good" all-or-nothing group mentality. Don't. AND following said criticism, don't feel shocked if you'll have people verbally ganging …
/r/MensRights24/08/15 01:55 AM
7

No, it means It will take longer than usual to come to the conclusion that it's the man's fault
/r/MensRights23/08/15 01:45 PM
23

All these comments make me laugh, I swear. Few people get the point. I don't want these women to get fucking 10 years in jail and never be employed again for fucking Chad Thundercock Jr, captain of the football team. Yeah, I said it, he was 16, he's one year short of being legally able to consent (an adult already in most European countries) probably knows what sex is and very likely enjoyed it all the way. He's not a fucking victim. It's when the reverse happens that you have a problem and that…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 01:33 PM
3

This won't stop the real male feminists. The ones who'd gladly shove all men in a meat grinder for a bit of female approval. If anything, it'll just motivate them to side with the movement even more. Most tight-knit movements (especially radical ones) has such exceptionally zealous, even self loathing, individuals (who go against the movement's core values via means of some "hard" trait like gender or skin colour) will stop at nothing to get in the movement's good graces and be considered "one o…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 10:55 PM
3

Think maybe we can track down the teachers and show them this? Maybe one or two will object hard enough to have buzzfeed take this garbage article down.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 08:51 PM
4

<women are wonderful> B-b-but look at how cute she is! I'm sure she's nice and just made an honest mistake. Besides, the judge did give her a VERY stern warning about how close she was to going to prison, I'm sure that's enough to teach her a lesson. </women are wonderful>
/r/MensRights20/08/15 08:18 PM
14

Yeah, what the hell is that all about? "You almost very nearly got sent to prison!! I hope you've learned a lesson after this punishment." What a joke.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 08:15 PM
1

I'm not making anything sexual, it's just fucking scary, as an 8 year sibling, that your father wants to take you out (separately from your sister) in order to show you his strong side, that he's the man of the house and shit, especially since the kid already has a negative opinion of her father. How about you buy her a happy meal, show her genuine love and act like a normal human being? Of course, that might be hard from a red piller, someone who thinks girls should be raised to know their valu…
/r/MensRights20/08/15 11:48 AM
0

Being disposable.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:31 PM
-1

Take them out on "dates." For example, every other week take one out to dinner, just you and one of your daughters. You must become the strong masculine role model. They must see this side of you. Wow that's not creepy at all!
/r/MensRights19/08/15 07:16 PM
1

Go away with your alarmist warmongering bs, terper
/r/MensRights19/08/15 07:15 PM
2

You're sitting in the middle of a minefield, pretty much. Your wife is unhappy, and the kids are with her. Those are the prerequisites to having your whole life ruined on a whim. There are many steps you could take here, as other users have pointed out. You could try couple counseling, a discussion with your wife, your kids, both, BUT each of these is a risk, because you could be one small disagreement away from your wife deciding to divorce you. And if she does that, you are 100% fucked no matt…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 07:09 PM
1

You look cute as fuck! If I were a woman I'd totally have sex with you and not regret it and accuse you of rape afterwards.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 12:44 AM
2

Our core values are different regardless of however we choose to discuss them, so none of that "you're just as bad as they are!!" fallacy, please, we're not comparable.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 07:43 PM
2

All ideological movements use mockery. It's an easy to understand way to communicate and employ "us vs them" mentality (another unavoidable thing in these movements). There's a list of reasons people hate the MRM for, and mockery is at the bottom of it.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 07:19 PM
2

First they made the "for her" pen. Then the "act like a lady, think like a man" ads. Now this. Poor BIC keeps screwing up, huh? Anyway, the commercials suck, but come on, what's with the "imagine if the genders were reversed" cliche? Looking at the dislike number on the youtube videos, I'd say people are disliking the ads just fine without the help of the MRM, and the same would go if the genders were reversed (and situations adjusted accordingly)
/r/MensRights16/08/15 07:13 PM
5

So...you admit gynocentric education system is more serious than some stupid room temperature difference, which feminists make a big deal out of, but you say MRAs are dumb for mocking that? You sound like a concern troll finding all sorts of petty excuses for why we are bad.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 11:01 PM
3

Yeah, because being slightly uncomfortable with the ambient temperature in your office is the same as being considered broken, disruptive, lazy and mentally ill, being scorned, given worse grades, and even being medicated (potentially with lifelong consequences) throughout most of your education years. Did you just post whatever senseless shitty analogy you could think of purely for the sake of being contradicting?
/r/MensRights15/08/15 10:03 PM
1

I find myself taking these little personal social gender switcheroo studies (I'm counting transgender experiences here as well) less and less seriously, because their outcomes are as varied as those of regular people living their gendered lives normally. The people, the situations they encounter, and how they perceive these situations overall, vary wildly. Plenty of dudes live as women and have a fantastic time Plenty of dudes live as women and have a bad time Plenty of women live as dudes and h…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 11:45 PM
1

Here is a decent source Youtube video of anti-circumcision pundit
/r/MensRights12/08/15 08:48 PM
1

Like the 20 000 plus nerve endings that exist in the foreskin (more than twice the amount found in the clitoris) The penis and clitoris have roughly the same number of nerve endings. Where'd you come up with this ludicrous number?
/r/MensRights12/08/15 06:53 PM
1

ITT people think we should have 50/50 representation in advertising for a 99/1 issue. Dude, Eastern European countries are fucking shit for women. I've been around there, if you're a dude who talks about smacking your wife around now and then, no one will bat an eyelash. Get the fuck over yourselves, this is why people don't take you seriously.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 11:50 AM
2

Eastern Europe needs feminism a lot more than most places.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 11:44 AM
2

When you see half-naked women dancing, that is because they are trying to be sexy, they want people to say things about them. LOL. Are you fucking 12? Fuck off. Oh and the dudes NEED to be shirtless. For practicality and stuff! Totally!
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:09 PM
-1

You're retarded. Good day.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:05 PM
0

Age has everything to do with it. He even said, IN THAT STAGE, IN THAT CONTEXT LOL You posted dudes over 18. In that CONTEXT, people drool over half naked women over 18 all the time as well and it's fine.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:32 PM
0

No, dude. YOU missed the point and are just looking for a reason to keep being angry. The OP posted a video of half naked dudes (over 18 of age) cheered by female audience. "We all know if the genders were switched, there would be absolute outrage." The genders are already "switched" quite often and there's no outrage. You see half naked women dancing or whatever on TV all the damn time and people are fine with it. YOU instead posted a completely different video about women going crazy over a mi…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:30 PM
0

The dudes in OP's video aren't 16 so you're talking about something else entirely.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 08:47 PM
12

Sadly, some men, much like dogs, remain loyal even if treated wrong.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 04:24 PM
1

Chop a part of your penis off for these reasons which are mitigated by wearing a condom. Also you still have to wear a condom afterwards but...uh...just chop it off anyway, it'll be fun, we gave you reasons and everything!
/r/MensRights06/08/15 04:21 PM
-12

What a fake looking story. Not saying it IS fake, but you really SUCK at writing.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 04:15 PM
3

trp pls go u scare me with alpha talk!
/r/MensRights06/08/15 02:46 PM
1

Who said anything about the audience's reaction? Over simplifying? Over simplifying WHAT? That doesn't even make any sense. Look, the dudes got the same reaction as a half naked girl would have gotten were she there dancing provocatively. And the show displays a fair amount of both half naked men as well as women. And the crowd loves it either way.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 02:16 PM
4

Because talking about spinning them HB8 plates and how women are bitches who should stick to babymaking helps men's movement much more.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:16 PM
1

Male nipples are not erogenous. Men's "breasts" or lack thereof are not a secondary sex characteristic. It's the same reason why it's socially acceptable for men to be shirtless in public, but not women.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:12 PM
4

There we go again with this "if the genders were switched" shit. They show half naked women on TV ALL. THE. TIME dude. Way more than dudes. I really doubt America's Got Talent didn't show some female dancer in a skimpy outfit as well.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:32 AM
4

I didn't know 12 year olds go to bars. Maybe you meant school cafeteria?
/r/MensRights05/08/15 10:43 PM
2

Thank you! This whole "imagine if the genders were reversed!!" thing really grates my brain sometimes. Seems a lot of people throw it on everything without thinking twice these days. OP is probably some SRS troll. New account and the first thing he/she posts is this? Gr8 b8 m8
/r/MensRights05/08/15 10:35 PM
-12

feminists really should stop jumping straight to "sexism!" as the word will eventually lose all meaning. You people always say that. What if everything will actually be meaningfully sexist instead?
/r/MensRights05/08/15 08:24 AM
11

That last point says it all. It's a feminist sub, as usual, trying not to be so open about it at first so they can attract some suckers and trick them into staying. After a couple hundred subs the groupthink agenda will be too strong to ignore, they'll stop pretending to be nice, and the sub will die. Here's a nugget that will get you banned from any feminist men subs. NO ONE anywhere who suggests building a new "non-toxic" masculinity (that's what 90% of discussions there consist in) has actual…
/r/MensRights05/08/15 08:21 AM
5

Would be nice if she ACTUALLY WORKED one of those jobs instead of doing some generic photoshoot. I actually find this type of thing insulting. "Look at me, I'm doing a dangerous job! Ok, snapped the photos? Good, phew that was hard work, time for lunch."
/r/MensRights04/08/15 07:48 AM
18

You fucked a 13 year old and loved it. The least you could do is not try to paint yourself as the victim then.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:50 PM
1

Jezebel starting to become less and less relevant, not making enough ad impression moneys perhaps? This indeed looks a lot like lip service.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 10:52 PM
2

A rainbow-painted plain shitty cutout of something resembling a uterus while trying not to resemble a uterus. Tax payers money funded a council that "selected" that.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 07:26 PM
22

I actually thought this article from Buzzfeed would be written on a positive note. Boy am I gullible. I like the gigantic quotes. Editor must have bashed the mouse button so hard it broke when she selected the largest font possible.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 07:06 PM
4

You greatly underestimate the lengths some men go to in order to supplicate women. Not only would they accept this tax, they would actively defend it.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 08:04 AM
2

This has to be the saddest trolling attempt I've ever seen. It's like you picked up "trolling for total morons" and didn't even read that, you just skimmed through it. You're just fucking around aren't you?
/r/MensRights25/07/15 09:52 PM
1

white male Your trolling was pretty decent until you threw that little nugget in. Couldn't help it, huh? 3/10 made me reply
/r/MensRights25/07/15 10:49 AM
4

No, you're fine. TwoX is a shithole.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 09:36 PM
2

People growing up with a single mother are more likely to have issues, but this is a whole new level of psychological abuse. Maybe those kids will be okay now, at an early age. But once puberty hits and they start having a sexuality, they WILL have issues, visible or not. Maybe they'll be grossed the fuck out, maybe they'll have problems being attracted to other women, who knows? And they'll be too ashamed to tell their liberated amazonian mother to cut it out, and it'll get worse over time. One…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 08:23 PM
13

How does this stuff even happen? Did they just swing the scalpel like a battleaxe or what?
/r/MensRights18/07/15 05:53 PM
7

If it goes like the others, she’ll come home in the middle of the night, crawl into bed beside me, and tell me all about how she and Paulo had sex. I won’t explode with anger or seethe with resentment. I’ll tell her it’s a hot story and I’m glad she had fun. It’s hot because she’s excited, and I’m glad because I’m a feminist I’m grateful to my wife for pushing us to take this leap, and whatever happens to us in the future I would do it all again. And when she comes home tonight and crawls into b…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 06:45 PM
-5

So...you're financially and emotionally abusing her because she has no other options is what you're saying?
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 08:31 AM
5

At a first glance, the dating app Tinder might appear to be the archetype of the fickle, vain, selfie-dominated world we now live in, but dig a little deeper and the social discovery platform that is a "fun way to connect with new and interesting people around you" is playing an important role in gender equality. "We're going down the shitter as a society, but at least we're doing it equally!"
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:39 AM
1

Be a man! Get the fuck back in that coal mine/oilrig/battlefield/construction site you fragile piece of shit!
/r/MensRights19/06/15 08:08 PM
2

The men's tea tastes like privilege.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 08:06 PM
2

So much idiocy. This is what we've come to, huh? Men just aren't allowed to have their own things no matter what, even things that are intended to be silly like some of the stuff on this list clearly is. "How dare they?!?! We have feminine products, and we have neutral products, it's enough, use the neutral products and stop being such a fragile piece of shit!" And there's WAY more feminine-only things that are every bit as senseless. I could come up with a mirror article showing the same type o…
/r/MensRights19/06/15 07:54 PM
4

Yes, the dudes can show up in cargo pants and a tshirt, that's because they aren't considered the pretty/cute/sexy gender. They could wear a tux and some nice shoes, but it's the same thing. Few expectations, few results. There are more expectations on women, but they get more out of it. It's a double edged sword. You're free to wear simple attire as men do, you won't get tar and feathered for it, people just won't give a shit about you, as they don't give a shit about men. Celebs get paid shit …
/r/MensRights17/06/15 11:55 PM
1

Why just look at the pretty feeeemale icons for feeeemale users! We're good men who make women feel like home in our space!
/r/TheRedPill15/06/15 04:05 PM
0

So...it should be socially acceptable for men to be women then? Gotcha.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:37 AM
7

Bunch of men talking shit about a woman? "OH MY GOD I JUST BARFED, HAD A SEIZURE -AND- SUDDENLY DEVELOPED TERMINAL STAGE CANCER, THIS IS HORRIBLE, IM PRETTY SURE I ALSO GOT RAPED READING THAT" or "What a bunch of horrible sad virgin neckbeard sociopath fatarses" (on the irony in this, bashing people for being presumptuous while being presumptuous). Meanwhile, THIS is perfectly okay. If you don't think it is, clearly you are a bitter virgin neckbeard. EDIT: LOL @ this post. I'm drowning in a cock…
/r/MensRights13/06/13 07:30 PM
2

In desperation, feminists often claim that women get "unwanted messages" Because they do. A lot of them. That aside, you are right. Most women on that site subscribe to traditional social dynamics, sex selection, the courting, yadda yadda, and while they whine about the negative sides of it, they're not doing a damned thing against it, on or off that site. "Please don't message me if all you have to say is hi" translates to "Dear males, I want to exercise my sex selection rights. Please write me…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 08:31 PM
3

Of course, it's called gender dysphoria, not gender euphoria. It's about NOT identifying as the assigned sex, not necessarily about identifying otherwise. Society just gives one other official option though. Not every transgendered person had gender dysphoria. This is written just about everywhere. Not necessarily. Just someone who's far enough from the middle to not identify completely as neither. This doesn't need to be pretty far. If the average identity is 50% to one's sex (vs anything lower…
/r/MensRights05/06/13 04:57 PM
2

Actually...from what I've been reading, a statistically significant amount of trans people did not identify as the opposite gender completely from the start. Some felt perfectly fine as their assigned gender for many years, some felt slightly off, some questioned it a lot or struggled with it. Most trans people on these boards would agree with me on that, and the irrelevancy of your motives for transitioning. The advice I tend to see for people who consider transitioning is almost always the sam…
/r/MensRights05/06/13 03:29 PM
21

Interesting that you toss the issue of gender identity into the mix. I guess that takes a lot of courage, being brutally honest about it like so, and when considered, it raises a lot of questions some people would rather not have answered. How fluid is gender? With so many manifestations of shades of grey, how set in stone and "born with it" is one, really? Honestly speaking, having been, and perhaps still being, in the same shoes you are into now, I've always wondered, just how many people who'…
/r/MensRights05/06/13 12:45 PM
5

I guess the OP was surprised that this was a reasonable article, rather than say, conclude that women performing badly in either leadership or follower positions is and always will be the fault of the patriarchy until we will have systematically dismantled it and removed all shreds of masculinity in any position of power so women don't feel oppressed anymore and function like the perfect beings who can do no wrong and would be better than men at every single task. I've seen a handful of opinions…
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:16 PM
3

Any half serious gamer wouldn't give a shit about IGN from the get-go.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 10:33 PM
37

Coming out of lurking like what up, I got a big cock. As someone from Italy, I can wholly confirm this. I've kinda seen it coming for some time now. As you can imagine, there is no femicide (femminicidio) here. It's a bullshit term created for a strawman that's completely disconnected with reality. As far as I can see it, this whole charade started with the Sara Scazzi case something like three years back, in which a 15 year old was supposedly murdered by her uncle. It was later found out that t…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 09:48 AM
7

gasp /r/mensrights advocates physical violence against women, I'm telling SRS!!1
/r/MensRights27/12/12 02:24 PM
2

Appropriate place considering her childish behavior.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 02:23 PM
2

I'm not supporting the women in the videos or not, whether the women deserved getting punched or hit for what they did is irrelevant, the problem is the MRAs taking such joy in seeing a woman get hit, and linking to /r/mensrights as they know other mras will see it and be glad. Once again you are making it sound as if it's the woman getting hit part we would have a positive reaction to, rather than the bully getting hit part. You don't get extra sympathy just for having a vagina. I'm not sure if…
/r/MensRights22/12/12 07:19 PM
1

I have not seen the video (got a link?), but judging by the title, I can say that no matter your gender, if you bully someone, you deserve no sympathy, and it's always enjoyable to see someone getting bitten in the ass by karma. This is probably what our reaction here was. I guess you conveniently ignored the bullying part when stating we post videos of women getting beaten and laugh at them. Seriously though, I need more context here. Funny you linked to that subreddit in particular. /r/justice…
/r/MensRights22/12/12 06:46 PM
8

MRs problems come from how they act, like posting videos of women getting beaten up and laughing. F LOL what the fuck are you talking about? Context please.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:13 PM
25

Why would we not complain about feminism when it is a major source of some of the problems we face? I agree about the stupid facebook posts though.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 09:45 AM
2

I did not say it was 50/50 at all. I did mention how I believe feminism and its influences constantly telling women they are victims oppressed by their fellow man is a factor in this perceived disparity. I also believe men tend to take it better than women anyway, even when the situation is equally shitty for the both of them. Whether via biology (testosterone, aw yiss) or social factors (on how men must tough it out or shrug it off and be men), or both, they deal with it better. I really can't …
/r/MensRights19/12/12 11:00 PM
9

I know what you're talking about, and this isn't a gender issue. A lot of it has to do with overpopulation, horrible media (intrusive, promotes mass mindless consumption of pointless shit, degrades cultural values, loves to put emphasis on bad events to make people believe the world is in an even worse state than it actually is), unstable economy, etc. This is why most PEOPLE are increasingly unhappy. Of course, men and women have their ways to unwind to prevent themselves from committing mass s…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:23 PM
4

Most men however will fall into the "non-stud" category. A negative category in contrast with the "stud" category. Society ALSO pressures men into fulfilling certain expectations you know. Not just that, but feminists will be among the first to jump and slut shame promiscuous men, outing them as sleezy, objectifying, etc. Irony so thick you need a chainsaw to cut through it.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:25 PM
1

My head is full of fuck...
/r/MensRights19/12/12 08:05 AM
2

Your deductive reasoning failed to deduce the sarcasm in that comment. When he said 1 in 6 men aren't sexually abused, he meant that 1 in 6 men ARE sexually abused, though I believe that statistic is bollocks.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:01 PM
1

This very much concerns male health, not wrong subreddit at all.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:00 PM
1

There's more than BPA out there, but this is a step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:58 PM
1

Here it says girls do better at timed tasks though. I think we're nitpicking too much just to hate on the person with the penis. If women, according to you, are so consistently weak even in childhood, then clearly, we shouldn't allow such an inhumane a thing as to allow a girl on a boys team either (even when she holds her own just fine). Really though, given the frequency of this type of phenomena of one or a few individuals dominating in groups of the opposite gender, I find it more plausible …
/r/MensRights18/12/12 01:45 PM
1

That is all well and true, but you forgot one thing. His age. He's 13, so more likely than not, pre-pubertal, meaning his testosterone level should be comparable to that of a female. I'd understand the testosterone argument if this guy had, I don't know, any facial or body hair whatsoever, which he doesn't. He's also visibly of smaller stature than the girls he plays with and against. It's really not applicable. EDIT: This is rich. I'm being downvoted for stating the scientific facts while this …
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:39 AM
1

Came here to say this (and I did it too, in fact). If this guy had any discernible male secondary sex characteristic, the testosterone argument would have been applicable, alas it is not.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:38 AM
4

The girls he plays with and against are almost 1.5x his size...
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:36 AM
2

No, he's right. This thread and a handful of others are part of a pro-feminist brigading attempt by a bunch of concern trolls. There's a huge number of threads about how we can make nice with feminism lately. It has already been explained time and time again why we can't do that. Notice how all of a sudden any anti-feminist comment is being downvoted to oblivion for no other reason than it being anti-feminist. He's right to point that out and be angry about it. It shows just how slimy feminists …
/r/MensRights16/12/12 09:42 AM
1

Both movements have their extremists who take the message and twist it to suit their own needs Show me those people who call themselves MRAs and advocate for putting women back in the kitchen or something extremist like that. A couple of trolls posting crap here and being downvoted into oblivion don't count. I'll wait.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 01:20 AM
1

I don't think many people here automatically assume it's bullshit. People have deduced that it's bullshit, based on the things they've seen, heard, and felt, people have done because of, or in in the name of feminism, things that have not done anything good for men, or have even made things worse.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 10:59 PM
1

I would say this is part biological and part due to environmental influences (parents and relations in school are probably huge factors) Without going into details, I'll say that I've personally experienced some of the worst of both genders, so I really have no reason to play favorites in any way. You might say I dislike women a bit more, but that's because of social factors regarding their behavior. Where I live, most of the women I deal with are vain, shallow, and it feels like they only give …
/r/MensRights15/12/12 10:37 PM
0

What kind of question is that? Are you saying our movement that focuses on our own unique male issues is pointless if we don't come to an agreement with feminism? Hardly, and if feminists wanted an agreement, they probably should have voiced it since the beginning of our movement, but, y'know how it goes: (insert overused Gandhi quote here) That's what this is. "Let's make friends with the MRM, fewer and fewer people put up with our bullshit, maybe we'll become likeable again that way."
/r/MensRights15/12/12 10:22 PM
9

Male on female rape is rampant and personally I think it's not so bad that it receives more focus than female on male rape given that it clearly happens more often, but the other approaches taken by feminists in solving the issue ("teach men not to rape", teaching all women that all men are potential rapists, and teaching women zero personal responsibility, ignoring everything but male on female rape entirely or blaming those cases on men's inherent nature as well, etc) don't work and do far mor…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 10:09 PM
0

There doesn't need to be. We'll live. I hope you'll manage to sleep at night, what with all that false concern weighing you down and all.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 09:56 PM
0

Please get out and take your feminist buttbuddy brigade with you.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 09:44 PM
0

Nice downvotes. Evidently we're being brigaded with this heap of crap.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 09:42 PM
1

No. None of the nice (it feels so wrong to use this word here) stuff posted in the video can contradict her desire to eradicate most men off the face of the earth and establish a worldwide castration day, which she very much still has. I'm also STILL not convinced that this isn't a really good troll. After all, she seemed to take enjoyment in faking her own death. I don't really give a shit at the end of the day though; basket cases like these making themselves visible probably do more to help t…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 06:02 PM
0

My sentiment exactly. Clearly there is a horde of feminists coming here trying to make nice, and their approach is to say we have just as many bad apples as they do. It makes me laugh, really, that they can't swallow their pride and blind faith in feminism for but a second in order to make nice with others. Better say they're just as bad as you are, yeah that's the common ground, surely it'll work! :/
/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:44 PM
1

Anybody else sick of all these concern trolls as of late? Seriously, what happened? All of a sudden you got all these people coming in here saying "both sides" have their wrongs and extremists, in, get this, equal measure. I get the feeling these are feminists trying to make nice and "compromise" by falsely saying we have our bads as much as feminism has. Laughable to think that's as far as their pride allows them to extend the idea of making nice. This reminds me of how parents try to reconcile…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:35 PM
11

I replied to my friend's FB post saying, "Is it at all possible that just more guys like punk rock?" And she quickly responded "Absolutely not," as I was reprimanded by a handful of her feminist friends for even suggesting the idea. What the fuck? How are people this stupid? Have you asked her explanation for female dominated leisure activities then? But yeah, variation of interests among genders (or people for that matter) is a preposterous concept, it's sexism alright, better push some AA and …
/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:20 PM
2

Second; Women think differently because they are taught to think differently. They are trained, from birth, to see the world a certain way and a lot of that POV is entirely fallacious and self serving. They are not very different from men at their tabula rasa state. It's when people start imprinting thought patterns on them that they become different. You're completely discounting sex hormones influence on behavior. I agree we're not irreconcilably different at the end of the day, but saying out…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 02:34 PM
1

/r/conspiracy is that-a-way
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:51 PM
0

Russia is far from being a feminist country. And given that we're sitting at over 7 billion people, increasingly harder to sustain, I say...GOOD.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:46 PM
2

Transhumanism is about looking beyond social and biological limits, including gender roles, the value of biological life over artificial one, and so on and so forth, yet this guy, while saying humans don't matter (which is pretty true in the big picture) still prattles on and on about how much he loves alpha males and matriarchy. If he weren't so loathing of so-called beta males, his little motivational messages would almost be encouraging. As a transhumanist he should know that going to the gym…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:00 PM
2

I'm all about egalitarianism, just make sure to avoid appearing to play the victim. That's impossible if you want to bring attention to cases in which you actually ARE a victim. Man's mistake in this context was perhaps that he played tough guy, not victim, too much, and trivialized his own woes.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:35 PM
2

How about a separate subreddit strictly for posts regarding women gone bad?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:54 AM
3

I know girls in real life who are like this word for word. Food for thought.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 06:21 PM
3

I've not heard of any MRAs that want to remove women's rights. And if there are, I'm sure that we, as a MRA group, can collectively agree that they are not to be called MRAs to begin with, let alone speak in any way on our behalf. Stop feeding the feminist trolls with that bullshit.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 10:07 AM
1

Anything that's in the (old) book is on the site and everywhere else if you want to look and see for yourself. I'm fond of their EDS list is all, it's a good reference point for people who're starting to find out about the subject.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:34 PM
1

Try the Snoop Lion method. 81 blunts a day. Or maybe you have estrogen dominance, or a little too much testosterone or something....
/r/MensRights09/12/12 11:04 PM
1

It's not true of all trans people, but most of them, the mainstream community, i.e. the voice that matters. I can't see why anyone would care to differentiate based on natal hormones or plastic pollutants. Why? They really should, above anyone else, be aware of environmental endocrine disruption and speak out against it, as they are the most obvious effect of it. Instead, they unconditionally accept any sexual anomaly as shit that just happens and that's that. They just go with the flow like ani…
/r/MensRights09/12/12 03:27 PM
6

Good post, but the comments make me wanna bang my head against a wall. Can't argue with a victim complex of that magnitude.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:19 PM
3

They don't acknowledge EDS as being a culprit for at least some transgender cases, as that goes against their theories of being "born in the wrong body" and basically delegitimizes their whole existence on a conceptual level, reducing them to being simply a byproduct of environmental pollution.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 11:12 AM
3

www.ourstolenfuture.org Nothing will be done until the trans community stops ignoring the elephant in the room.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:14 PM
5

That wasn't the original point. You get downvoted, not censored, and if you relay your arguments in a semi-coherent manner, you will probably be met with a retort, whereas dissent on feminist spaces tends to be met "lol straight white male you are WRONG, check your privilege!" If you try to reasonably point out there are some people who identify as "feminists" who only believe in the equal rights parts, not the anti-male parts, and that we should not be insulting feminism as a whole, only the ex…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:39 PM
10

The "friend zone" as it manifests itself outside of TV-land is not about sex, but about relationships. A man is "friend zoned" when his romantic feelings are not reciprocated - he is attracted to her, but not she to him. He loves, but his love is not returned. I can't stress this enough, and indeed, I am exhausted from how much I've said it in TwoX, It's primarily about romance, not just sex. Think about it. The people who only want you for sex and want that sex badly like you describe are the o…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:55 PM
1

Because that's how gender politics work and individualism has little, if any room, in them, unless you're just playing make believe individualism, like so-called libertarians who nevertheless want their freedoms enforced by a government. On paper, the sex perhaps shouldn't get credit for the actions of a few individuals, but for the purposes of advocating and then enforcing changes for social and legal aspects of sexes (groups), it becomes relevant that overwhelmingly members of that one sex do …
/r/MensRights26/11/12 12:31 AM
1

I believe the intention was that it refers to the most physically challenging and dangerous jobs being undertaken overwhelmingly by men.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 06:33 PM
11

Speaking as an individual feminist here, I cannot speak for others... but here it goes. Yes, there are some people out there that want it the way as you describe it, but those (in my book) are not feminists (What are they, if not feminists? Other than people with a grudge, I have no idea). Here's the thing. Are you on some sort of True FeminismTM council that decides who is and isn't a feminist? Because those people you say aren't feminists are the majority who call the shots in the name of femi…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 04:23 PM
0

lol gaize, spermjacking don't real hurrrrr
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:49 PM
17

WTF? Damn patriarchal natural disasters.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 12:09 AM
9

Male? Oh, you mean dolan, I thought you were talking about her profile pic. They go really well together now that I look at it :D
/r/MensRights24/11/12 05:35 PM
3

It's a legitimate Italian adjective :)
/r/MensRights24/11/12 04:21 PM
1

It seems so, but it isn't. For it to be fallacious, it would require the existence of radfems who aren't hateful sociopaths and are really just reasonable people advocating for equality in a peaceful way. I've yet to encounter a radfem that believes men are anything but inferior to women so...given that, I would say that the OP's statement isn't fallacious any more than assuming a christian believes in god is fallacious.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 10:14 AM
1

Quite enjoyable to read through.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 12:37 AM
2

Shaving since 9? Someone find this dude and give him a cold beer and a warm pat on the back, together with an invite into the MRM.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 09:47 PM
10

Testosterone is linked to increased assertiveness, and if you're more prone to aggression, you're more likely to act on it under the influence of testosterone (commit violence). Of course, this shouldn't matter, because being aggressive does not mean you will lash out and kill the first person you'll come across for no reason, and we really can't continue to pretent women magically can't be aggressive, all things considered. Estradiol, the most potent estrogen (female hormone) has also been link…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:51 PM
3

Your posts are just one gem after another, aren't they?
/r/MensRights10/11/12 05:19 PM
3

Gotta love herd mentality.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 05:16 PM
0

Beh, I thought only feminists would even consider these radical unigendered "utopias". Childish, really.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 05:13 PM
-1

Perfect.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 11:30 AM
1

Hence the quotes around the word duty...most people still think that's what it is, a duty.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 11:14 AM
1

Actual study and related article here. The author just took it upon him/herself to add their own speculations and conclusions ala Fox News style. You're also wrong to lay upon your ear and hope for PC to save the day, since this sort of misandric tripe IS politically correct.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 11:12 AM
8

Isn't that a shop?
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:00 PM
2

In before deletion.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:22 AM
11

That's why they call it the Pussy Cartel, get with the lingo :D
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:32 PM
2

All this makes me jealous, because breast cancer and ovarian cancer aren't getting the same treatment. Yeah. Poor breast cancer only receives anywhere from 2x to 5x the funding compared to prostate and testicular cancer combined, and if it's not breast cancer awareness month, you can bet your arse that at any given time, somewhere out there is surely breast cancer awareness month awareness day.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 12:46 PM
14

No more, please. This one really has nothing at all to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 12:21 AM
1

What a stupid fucking behavior...
/r/MensRights03/11/12 07:15 PM
0

Aye. It's just that instead of both genders being allowed to make fun of each other all they want, I would simply prefer it if neither of us made fun of each other, and I would definitely prefer the media not making these jokes for us. But I'm fine with things being equal, either way it goes. For now, ads like the above can get a company in ruin (well, not Sony, they're far too big) while males in all aspects are fun for the whole family :/
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:21 PM
1

We're apparently on different planes of thought here, or you are simply trying to allege one issue to another. You asked me to define objectification and why one would take offense and that is what I tried to do. I've made my comparison, it's right there in the comment and I would think it obvious that it's not about the legal system bias you mentioned. So you don't watch/read/listen to or otherwise consume any porn then, I take it. Predominantly solo stuff :)
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:17 PM
5

Well, the ad portrays a woman as a plaything, breasts akin to buttons you can push to derive enjoyment. To compare, try imagining if it were a man used as a table or rug (get it? cause we're strong and sturdy) addressed to women with the punchline, "men finally have a use" or something. You don't even have to imagine that actually, there are plenty of ads just like that you can find with a bit of searching. Isn't that like the modern male slavery you speak of? Don't think that's offensive as wel…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 03:32 PM
4

I don't think you speak for the entirety of this movement when you say that, but of course you are free to have your own priorities. I've said my piece.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 01:36 PM
5

But we wouldn't stand for it, would we? Then the same standard should be held to the ad above. It's one of the cases that I can agree on it being objectifying. It's not that sort of "that man looked at me for more than 2 seconds and called me cute, ugh, objectifying!" tripe, it's pretty much portraying a woman as a fun time sex object. "Fun in advertisement" is no argument here, because that's just what people use to defend the existence of ads depicting men as stumbling mumbling goofballs. It's…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 01:19 PM
0

The OP is talking about pubescent teenagers, as in, minors who nevertheless have noticeably developed secondary sex characteristics.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 01:10 PM
9

It's objectifying, as it's pretty blatantly likening a woman to an object.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 12:31 PM
8

I don't know. It seems pretty tasteless to me. What if it were a man in the same position?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 12:31 PM
-1

Not sure what the point in making such a list is... It feels like some sort of exclusive club or popularity contest. There are also a plethora of men and women who've made striking one-shot videos on youtube concerning the MRM. So many people have been hitting the nail on the head even before this subreddit was born. I feel like that list does them all a disservice.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:54 AM
0

You should have linked directly to the site. The one post that bothered to do so only got 4 lousy upvotes.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 09:41 AM
5

Maybe she can afford to throw $138 on food precisely because she doesn't tip :D
/r/MensRights31/10/12 08:45 AM
9

Nah, that's not how it works. Feminists taught me that all you have to do is shake your Patriarchal Wand of Privilege around a few times and you'll instantly receive some money. We gotta use that privilege we have, you know.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 04:21 PM
2

They're instructed to do that to anyone. I'm reasonably certain it's not prejudice or any malintent. When something like that happens, I apply what I learned from Reddit and reply with "I know more than you." Ron Swanson style. They leave me alone after :)
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:07 AM
10

Summed up: Beta men who have limited choice in whom they can mate with are naturally unworthy losers, anti-feminist, MRA, and so on. On the other hand, there's absolutely nothing wrong with women in the same position. They cannot be physically/emotionally/mentally undesirable (read: batfuck insane radicals). They are being denied their basic rights because of the patriarchy that lets those pesky privileged men choose!
/r/MensRights29/10/12 04:16 PM
22

Whenever things get bad and I feel demoralized, I like to remind myself that 100% of humanity is useless to the universe.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 03:05 PM
6

Great. More wackos who've skimmed through a biology book that one time trying to call shots on just what we need to do with testosterone.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 11:11 AM
2

The dreaded B and C words.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 12:58 PM
22

Penisword of Patriarchy Binds when picked up One-Hand 200-400 Damage (Psychological) Requires sex = male Equipped: +30 Strength Equipped: +30 Stamina Equipped: -20 Intelligence Equipped: +29% Increased gold gain Equipped: +200 Privilege Equipped: +90% chance to cast "Rape" when used Equipped: +50 extra damage against female creatures
/r/MensRights27/10/12 11:48 AM
6

So what if it did promote aggression? Why is it a bad thing so long as you don't needlessly hurt anyone with it? Being assertive gets shit done. Common sense and good morals would dictate that attacking each other at biological level should be a no-no in arguments, yet so many feminists condemn testosterone left and right for all the evils in the world and our icky man nature, while we're supposed to be hush-hush about the overemotional havoc their own hormonal fluctuations can cause, because th…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:42 PM
-3

Concern trolls gonna concern troll.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 10:00 PM
2

Not necessarily, since most of that bad experience or lack thereof (i.e. not knowing what masculinity is having never felt it) stems from the gender dysphoria itself, hormone levels and brain chemistry.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 11:39 PM
2

That's the erroneous assumption people make here. They think that a transgendered person automatically has a good impression on both genders, but think about it for a second. They're transgendered, which means they've had gender dysphoria, which means their experience with that gender was likely not a typical one (probably not pleasant from the get-go) and thus their opinion on which gender has it better is no better than that of anyone else, really.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 11:30 PM
1

Aye, and there are surely feminist FTMs as well. What I'm saying is that, due to this variety, underlining these trans-perspective stories doesn't much matter, since there's bound to be roughly the same camps as in the heteronormal world. So, case in question, knowing that a FTM somewhere is MRA sympathetic doesn't provide me any extra mental comfort than I'd get if that person were your average Joe heterosexual cismale. It's not a novelty anymore :)
/r/MensRights24/10/12 03:04 PM
0

Yep. It's a rather open subreddit, so imagine the shock on SRS monkeys when someone -gasp- is even slightly male-sympathetic and open to arguments in there. They're not used to something like that, so when their militant bullshit fails they shrug it off because hey, it's a MRA dominated subreddit anyway, amirite?
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:55 PM
1

That subreddit is hilariously shitty because of the SRS drones. Every time there's any sort of sympathy or male-inclusive attitude in an argument, there's always that one dolt that says: "well duurrrr of course you say that but it doesn't matter because this subreddit is actually run by MRAs anyway hurrr"
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:49 PM
22

I'm going to be a bit of an asshole and say that I find these types of trans-revelations largely irrelevant. Why? Because for every MRM sympathetic FTM there's at least a handful of MTFs envenomed militant feminists. I'd say it's just bias born of trying to belong and gain approval, but what do I know? On a lighter note... Sadie calls herself a failed lesbian. She’s had sex with three women in her life, and all three of them are now in various stages of becoming men. Bad Luck Sadie.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:43 PM
0

Well, perhaps I should have mentioned that I also subscribe to the determinism philosophy. That is, we make choices based on previous outcomes based on previous choices and so on right down to basic chemistry. So, as I said, I will say it again, you are right to say that some behaviors are due to social conditioning, but at the end of the day, more often than not, it was not willing social conditioning, it came down to stimuli to which our body chemistry reacted in a certain way to shape our per…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 10:12 PM
0

What you say isn't false, but that doesn't discount how even subtle differences in appearance alone can drastically alter the way you view the world as well as the way others view you. Also, as I said, biological makeup; Simply put, there's a myriad of substances (not all in the same concentration in all individuals) altering the way we think and see the world (see: neurotransmitters and sex hormones).
/r/MensRights21/10/12 05:43 PM
4

The point is that due to our different biological makeup, we have different tendencies to what we WANT to do, how much we want to do it, etc.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 01:01 PM
1

Troll blog. It couldn't be more obvious.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 10:10 AM
3

Oh it's that tumblr shit again, seen it just two days ago, come on...
/r/MensRights20/10/12 11:54 PM
0

Click on the link and it will become evident :)
/r/MensRights20/10/12 11:53 PM
1

Sigh...there's always that one person getting stingy when you talk about the overwhelming majority of cases and insisting on reminding you of the 1% cases as if you don't know of them. Well thanks for the refresher, but even when I try to bring up all possible combinations of sex in my head, only on a few of them does it seem advantageous for both partners to use the cream. But hey, you can do whatever you want of course. I sincerely doubt this still hypothetical product would be legally off-lim…
/r/MensRights20/10/12 10:21 AM
2

I don't see why both partners need to bathe in the stuff...what's the difference? Is more cream splooshed around better?
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:38 PM
3

It's a specific male health issue. You could put it in /r/science and /r/health, of course, but I think this subreddit should still view it, we are activists after all, and hormonal health seems to be a very overlooked issue by the general population.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 05:19 PM
6

Are you bloody kidding me? Where else would it be?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 04:46 PM
2

If you could bench 820 like me you'd get to nitpick too I like how you're a hybrid between a regular and a novelty account.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 06:57 AM
10

Hmm, how did that quote go again? Asteroid strikes earth and wipes out life, women hit worst of all? This is just ridiculous. Does that other HALF somehow not stand to become illiterate? Do they already receive funding from some different program (but then, why are they mentioned)? Is The PatriarchyTM automagically looking out for them? What?
/r/MensRights16/10/12 09:55 PM
3

It's just a scapegoat pseudolegal statement they try to use in an attempt to silence us and ignore any arguments we make. "Nanana SLPC listed you as a hate group, I can't hear you nananana" Were it not that, they'd just go with the usual tripe about the patriarchy, privilege checking, etc anyway.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 09:39 PM
1

Okay.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 08:08 PM
1

LOL, you reported me? Because you can't stand being wrong? Pathetic, but not unlike most that I have seen from the extreme anti-choice right-wingers. Wow, I have mentioned that I am pro-choice, yet here you are, making this bullshit accusation that I'm the evil one here? Astounding. Abort for health and economic reason, not because of sex. What's the problem? I mean really, you have that strong of a bias for a certain gender that you really couldn't bear giving birth to and raising it? You gotta…
/r/MensRights16/10/12 07:45 PM
1

Oh please. You're in no place to tell me I'm derailing with hyperbolic statements. You put a fetus on the same level any random clump of cells and to you, that clump of cells has enough discernible sex to be able to choose to abort it based on it, yet not enough to make that officially count as being an abortion based on sex. Someone disagrees and you're like "fuck you I do anything I want, you don't know shit". How can I not call you out when you come here with a newbie account guns blazing sho…
/r/MensRights16/10/12 07:08 PM
0

A fetus (or more accurately, zygote or embryo) is a clump of cells. Once again, not comparable to the ones in your ballsack. You're derailing and going in circles with this. Bad analogy or ideology, which is it? My nutsack doesn't turn into a human being every 9 months, that other lump of cells in the womb does, so I don't think you're making a good comparison there. So, apparently, that clump of cells is human enough to have a sex, but not human enough to count for anything when you're aborting…
/r/MensRights16/10/12 02:12 PM
2

"Proof of God found. Checkmate atheists" "Comments and ratings disabled"
/r/MensRights16/10/12 02:06 PM
0

ExpendableOne's comment wrapped it up nicely.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 02:05 PM
3

There's a difference between expressing opinions and trolling or throwing a psychotic fit and cussing like a sailor, such as you are doing.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 02:00 PM
2

Like the feminists? From level-headed people to genocidal dipshits under the same banner and claim of equality, though I suspect not by mutual agreement, but still...I'm not so sure about this.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 10:25 AM
0

I thought you said it was a clump of cells, like the one in my nutsack.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 09:32 AM
1

Please don't derail with hyperbolic statements like that. Yes, it is about letting, because abortion isn't something you do in a lunch break then merrily go back to working spreadsheets. I say you should abort all you whenever you want so long as you have a good reason for it, such as a bad financial situation, or having an unwanted pregnancy from the get-go, not "oh it's a male/female? Well fuck that shit". If you oppose that, you must have serious bias against giving birth to a children of a c…
/r/MensRights16/10/12 09:28 AM
1

slippery slope You're already tumbling down your own slope when you let people freely abort purely based on sex.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:51 PM
1

So, apparently, that clump of cells is human enough to have a sex, but not human enough to count for anything when you're aborting it based on that sex. Okay then... My nutsack doesn't turn into a human being every 9 months, that other lump of cells in the womb does, so I don't think you're making a good comparison there. You'd be better off calling a fetus pre-human or something, it'd be more accurate.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:42 PM
2

guess we (as decent human beings) don't have to worry, seeing as she hates men so much that no sane man would want/be able to be with her long enough for her to get pregnant Oh, you'd be surprised. When it comes to love and relationships, it isn't seldom that rationality gets tossed out the window.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:32 PM
2

Crazy talk from crazy people. Nothing more. I curse the internet for giving voice and sanctuary to all manner of radical wackjobs like these.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:28 PM
5

That's a pretty inefficient way to portray it. This speaks more of unconventional gender roles rather than any abuse against men. It also looks like some cheesy porn scene.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 04:28 PM
2

Ditto, not because I don't support the cause, but because online petitions never actually change anything.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 04:04 PM
2

Boy, that escalated quickly. Though the prospect of killing sex drive while maintaining the outgoing attitude, motivation, and good mood that comes with the whole testosterone package is hard to imagine being possible, viable even. Why didn't the chinese men in your story simply resort to porn and sexbots?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:56 PM
3

Some of this guy's posts make me think he's an SRS puppet.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:19 PM
8

He posted the overall results. One of them is that that you are guaranteed to lose a great deal of nerve endings, and by consequence there will be a degradation in pleasure felt during sexual intercourse.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:50 PM
0

Denying that men, on average, have a higher sex drive than women is denying biology. I don't see why this is such a problem though, because having a higher sex drive and not feeling ashamed of it does not mean you are a walking talking embodiment of a penis, or a slut if you're a woman.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 12:25 AM
10

It's all evolutionary biology. Competition for mating and whatnot. Sure, when you think of society at large, there are plenty of fish in the pond and we seem to get along, but whenever we find ourselves in pockets/groups, that rudimentary behavior swiftly rears its ugly head out to remind us it's still coded in there for backwards compatibility. My high school years were split between a mixed school and an all-boys one. The difference was crystal clear, and I hate to be derogatory here, but it's…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:33 PM
3

Well if you subscribe to this ideology and adopt a laisez faire m.o. for it, I ask, are you also okay with how women approach mating (you know exactly what I'm talking about), as that is also biological?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:48 PM
6

I guess she thinks that because the 1% are mostly white men, the rest of the wage slaves who are white men are somehow wiping their arses with silk and having a jolly good time while being unable to be discriminated against, just because they share the same skin colour with some corporate fatcat somewhere. It's insulting, it's inane, it's feminist logic.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:18 PM
1

Live 20 years longer but feel 20 years older. Zero sum game.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:43 PM
20

It's a NSFW by default subreddit.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:00 PM
3

That's not sexism because men are privileged. They enjoy it anyway. /s
/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:57 PM
4

accually is dolan ehe hehehe
/r/MensRights19/09/12 09:04 PM
5

Another gem of feminist logic. Join us next week when some other whackjob will discuss how much she hates the word "boob", as it is coined by The PatriarchyTM to reduce women's glorious breasts to mere objects of sexual desire; boob, a childish word, signifying breasts are simply toys to play with.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:21 PM
1

O NO, NOT THE B WORD!
/r/MensRights16/09/12 08:42 PM
2

Fucking whack jobs is what these people are.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 11:00 PM
-1

We aren't. I am not. The public has no business interfering on such a direct level with the guy's sales. Besides, his music is one thing, his personal life, another. Were I this guy I'd sue for damages, and I'm sure his record label would have a thing or two to say about losing sales.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 10:59 PM
11

Yeah this is pretty typical on college billboards where I live. Ads of people renting apartments, with 90% of them addressed to female students. I'm guessing the stereotype is that boys are troublemakers and would tear the place apart or something.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 12:30 PM
3

Feminism. Pristine definition and mass approval on a site intended for the latest teen/internet lingo and filled with buzzwords for various sex positions. Nope, nothing strange about that at all, no propaganda of any kind here folks. EDIT: Accidentally a word
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:23 PM
5

Feminism. Pristine definition and mass approval on a site intended for the latest teen/internet lingo and filled with buzzwords for various sex positions. Nope, nothing strange about that at all, no propaganda of any kind here folks.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:23 PM
12

hetero-shaming
/r/MensRights10/09/12 01:43 PM
1

That is a troll site.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:46 PM
1

Official figures (as in, from neutral sources, not organizations with an agenda) cite this: Approximately 1 in 4 women will experience some form of rape or sexual assault within the course of their lifetime. Sexual assault can be as much as stopping juuuust short of well and truly raping someone, and as little as telling someone they're going to be raped, or catcalling, if this causes them emotional distress. The figure is also freely bloated to account for the unreported cases. When talking doc…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 06:16 PM
-21

Where has the OP specified the name or location of the school in question? It's not written on his pic so can yours be taken as evidence?
/r/MensRights01/09/12 12:13 AM
2

It's like Yahoo! Answers. Trolls. Trolls everywhere. Maybe some fetishists here and there too but still, y'all getting trolled.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 07:18 PM
1

It's not about effort. A shirt and a pair of jeans are practical, and that's that, it ends there. Women have a huge variety of all sorts of decorative showy stuff as part of their gender-specific clothing, and they're just made for the female body and its features most of the time. If you're talking about skirts like nondescript nondecorated pieces of cloth, sure, let's wear those I say. But if you want men to wear a dress that's narrow at the hips and has cups for breasts...then you see, it's n…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 09:23 AM
2

It's not about effort. A shirt and a pair of jeans are practical, and that's that, it ends there. Women have a huge variety of all sorts of decorative showy stuff as part of their gender-specific clothing.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 09:23 AM
1

If girls are better than boys, why is it that "dressing like a girl" is socially prohibited for boys, while a girl can - and is sometimes encouraged - to dress like a boy? Because, at the time being, dressing like a boy means jeans and a plain t-shirt. Dressing like a girl involves a lot more than that.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 10:13 PM
4

But, in all actuality, women are the larger victims of this world wide than men. Now, the whole "Because I'm a woman!" line is crap, but being a member of this majority isn't a good thing. But the numbers are almost even, as stated above. The ad is carefully worded to avoid giving away how one sided it is: "Out of all children who can't go to school, 53% are girls and 47% are boys. Invest in me, because I am a girl."
/r/MensRights30/08/12 12:46 AM
1

Equality for women. Sounds about right. After all, how often do you see feminists intervene against inequalities where men are disadvantaged? Equality defined by women, for women.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:37 AM
3

I see you AintNeverGonnaStop trolling.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:11 AM
1

Gut feeling, but I think a sizable amount of them are transwomen.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 11:32 AM
1

many asexuals have sex and gain pleasure from it Yeah I got that, but don't you think that's at least a little bit confusing, simply following word semantics and all? You could never say: some atheists believe in gods and form a religion around it. Also, your statement about women sounds sketchy at best, since most girls I know actually have quite strong opinions about men who they find attractive. Yes, but the point is that the way they perceive attractiveness sounds similar to what you describ…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:12 PM
1

Going by your interpretation of that definition, it sounds as if a lot of women are asexual because for them, men's status and personality hold greater weight than looks alone when deciding who to have sex with. So people's looks alone don't stir you. Something does though, right? If you derive sexual arousal from anything and are able to orgasm just fine to that, it seems silly to call you asexual, definitions be damned. But that's just my take on this, derived from myself also not feeling any …
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:52 PM
1

First, let me make it clear that being an asexual has not removed my libido. I still desire sex, I'm just not attracted to specific physical features. That's not asexual...that's actually quite normal.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 03:23 PM
-1

There are more feminists saying stupid stuff than feminists saying smart stuff.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 12:08 PM
7

He talks about mammals and tries to throw some evolutionary biology in there about how men are irrelevant to reproduction, conveniently missing out a key fact. AI and IVF involves sperm and they are scientific procedures. I hear making sperm from stem cells is possible, but again, still a scientific procedure. What I mean to say is that, purely biologically speaking, men are necessary for reproduction. The author is either oblivious to that, or is smugly and zealously taking the above mentioned …
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:33 PM
5

Of course, but that's not the message this picture sends.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 11:57 PM
0

Awesome! Subscribed.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:56 PM
1

The female symbol with a broken chain (or a fist inside it) is traditionally feminist. Only difference I see between this and that is a male symbol instead of a female one. Were they paintings, I'd say the similarities between them extend beyond them both having paint.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 11:31 AM
1

It may not intend to, but I think it promotes the separatist attitude of feminists bearing similar logos. I.e. breaking free of The PatriarchyTM. I personally don't feel like I need to go all angsty and break free of anything, but of course, I do feel like there are many issues men face which are not given attention, or even acknowledged to exist, irregardless of whether they are a byproduct of feminism or not. How about...a male symbol under a magnifying glass? Signifying need of attention to p…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 12:01 AM
1

Oh god no. That is so tacky and it's copying feminism. I'm all for feminists complaining over shit that matters, let's not ruffle feathers with a copycat logo.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:52 PM
1

Tell her two wrongs don't make a right.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:49 PM
1

It's more likely than not that a guy made that, seeing Robert Pattinson (Edward Cullen from Twilight) in that third picture. Most girls love that guy, no? Not the most glorifying picture of him either.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:39 PM
3

Once again. Xenoestrogens. Xenoestrogens everywhere. I wonder how long is it going to be before this dire issue gets the attention it deserves. So far, we've heard of that 20% serum testosterone levels decline in 20 years figure, we see boys doing worse in schools and increasingly often afflicted by problems linked to hormonal disruptions (autism, ADD, aspergers, delayed puberty, which all affect boys more than girls), and transgender cases are skyrocketing. With plastic production and the pollu…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 10:33 AM
22

Yes, it's a small chance of it happening, but don't you understand? It's the FEEWINGS that matter. There's a small chance I will be sexually harassed on a bus. But it's there and my FEEWINGS tell me to feel threatened every single time I get on a bus! Do something about it! My FEEWINGS are what matters. Males do not have a counterpart to FEEWINGS. So what if the chances of them dying every time they walk out the door are greater. They don't show FEEWINGS so nobody gives a shit. With the plane in…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:14 PM
1

Hah. Make it an East European one or you're just as fucked buddy.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 12:36 PM
5

Wut? You mean The PatriarchyTM isn't used as a strawman in feminist arguments? Coulda fooled me...
/r/MensRights18/08/12 01:05 PM
2

Drop all the feminism-hating bullshit. What fun would that be?
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:56 PM
31

Nah. Girls bully because they are conditioned by the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:05 PM
3

I think it's satire, but then again, the world is a pretty diverse place.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:45 PM
10

-Clicks on username- -Scrolls- -Notices post in SRS related subs- -Is not at all surprised- The common scenario on TwoX
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:51 PM
0

I would not go as far as to call them man-hating, but countries like Spain and Italy aren't great places to be if you like to be a traditional masculine man. Same ole court bias, social stigma and media ridicule. Getting mixed messages on Norway and Sweden too. The eastern bloc countries like Romania/Ukraine/Bulgary/etc are more or less still traditionalist, things aren't great economically, so they can't afford luxuries like feminism and batfuck gender theory just yet, as men are still needed t…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:47 PM
0

And as a European I can tell you your speculations are way off. Depends on the country.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:44 PM
2

Eh, I think you both should have received the same sentence, if you can call it that.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 02:05 PM
1

Person A somewhere is told she's a pushover for being so polite all the time. Person B somewhere else is told she's a bitch for being rude/impolite. Fallacious conclusion: well if you're nice you're a pushover if you're not you're a bitch derkaderpderrr
/r/MensRights14/08/12 02:02 PM
1

Tastes like consumerism.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 06:03 PM
2

Harhar, you must be that one person who voted on only women being disadvantaged in today's society, hi hater!
/r/MensRights09/08/12 11:40 AM
3

Most feel MRM is automatically egalitarian, hence you even have almost half of people identifying as such.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 11:31 AM
1

gender roles play a huge part in things like divorce, custody, health care, domestic violence, and the justice system. No, that's the thing, they do not, prejudice does. Saying we need to change our roles/demeanor, if that's what you're totting, is pretty much the equivalent of telling black people not to act so black if they want less racism against them. Think about that for a second. Being a masculine manly man isn't about beating your wife and getting piss drunk, so if that assumption is wha…
/r/MensRights08/08/12 10:35 PM
2

To the top with you, this is spot on and I want to add something as well. I see seemingly more and more people who come here and say "I support the MRA and I'll fight for your right to wear a dress" and little else, and I wonder "Huh? That's cute and all but this isn't about wearing dresses, that is the LEAST of our problems.". I don't know just how many of these people are honest souls simply not fully informed on the scope of the movement, but it's obvious part of them are lgbt/feminists tryin…
/r/MensRights08/08/12 08:26 PM
7

swag
/r/MensRights05/08/12 06:33 AM
2

You're forgetting those things called chromosomes. XY is still male. Doesn't make one bit of difference what the individual looks like.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 06:25 AM
1

Ad campaigns.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 06:48 PM
2

I won't argue that the response was disproportionate but, trying to be purely technical about it, all I can see is a black eye and a busted hand, rest just seems to be blood smeared around. I'd call that thrashed more than pulverized. Pic lacks a lot of context anyway. Your response is a good one.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:10 AM
1

That's a very perceptive analogy. Needs to be at the top.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 05:37 PM
3

I believe that the construct of masculinity is much, much more harmful to men than the construct of femininity is to women. More harmful, perhaps, is women making claims about what masculinity is or isn't. I have to wonder, from where do they draw the gall and authority to make those claims. Sorry if I sound rough, but you have to understand why I'd get a little offended at that, because were I to make such claims in public about femininity I'd be metaphorically tar and feathered, and rightfully…
/r/MensRights29/07/12 12:40 PM
4

No, you don't understand. Feminists are all about equality, thus in order to achieve equality we must simply do what they say. Makes sense. /s
/r/MensRights29/07/12 11:14 AM
10

Definitely this. Don't let them have the last laugh, the only thing they'll miss is your wallet. Give them the finger and run your ass outta there. Join the foreign legion or something, anything but killing yourself yields a better outcome.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 08:36 PM
3

Seriously, it's fucking mind blowing how well that worked.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 09:52 PM
6

Oh man. I hope this isn't real, because if it is...feelzbadman.jpg I exchanged a few words with her and, to be honest, that agenda she had seemed more of a product of misinformation along with an unfortunate series of events she had to experience in life, rather than, say, pure batshit anger out of absolutely nowhere. She thought testosterone is this evil chemical compound that is responsible for all the evil in the world, like so many feminists who don't know their biology, and boy is that a wr…
/r/MensRights23/07/12 10:35 PM
3

I don't much like this vein of thinking. It implies masculinity is somehow subjective. It's a set of genotypical and phenotypical traits, and if you don't fit them, you're not masculine, and oh well, that's that, no one should cut your head off for it, but, y'know, you can't run around in a flowery dress and claim you're masculine just cause.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 05:44 PM
3

It's okay because a woman said it, teehee
/r/MensRights19/07/12 10:51 AM
4

It's a parody of this, just as ridiculous, that's why the reaction is so funny and a bit justified for someone not aware of that. We weren't happy about the original either, though we didn't make "KILL ALL WOMEN" death threats about it.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 10:50 AM
1

The presentation seems a bit too focused on men adopting female gender roles, wouldn't you think? I don't like bronies, or really, anyone with a "everyone should do what they want" mentality. It's naive and plain foolish.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 12:58 AM
1

For the nth time, it's a fucking troll.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 11:37 AM
2

“Fucking cunt, I’d take her into the back alley and show her what I’m made of. She won’t even see it coming,” I don't know, dude. I'm all for any kind of jokes but that seems a bit much to say with a smile on your face.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 08:40 PM
0

Egalitarian with feminist ideology = feminist with feminist ideology. Oh, and I've seen far worse crap being upvoted when people failed to read between the lines. I suggest you stick around and read more if you think gender is a social construct, masculinity is about not showing emotion, and that letting your children embrace their natural gender differences means teaching your son to be a douche and your daughter to be a cum rag.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 06:28 PM
3

Yeah, because now the definition has been inflated so much that by now rape can be as little as being looked at for more than 3 seconds at a time by a stranger.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 06:03 PM
0

Wow. You have serious comprehension problems if that's what you understood from what I said, either that or your ideology is set in stone from the get-go. If you think gender is purely a social construct and masculinity is about not showing emotion, then you sure as hell are no friend of the MRA, take your feminist garbage somewhere else.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 10:55 AM
0

Well, to me, you appear to be biting into that faulty feminist ideology according to which "everything" is a social construct and that raising kids identically and/or pushing atypical gender stereotypes unto them will produce identical results and end all the evils of the world. Like it or not, there are biological differences that will later manifest themselves as differences in personality and behavior. For me a better approach is to capitalize on that, enhance the strengths, fix the weaknesse…
/r/MensRights09/07/12 01:08 AM
0

Hate to break it to ya but some of the things there are wishful thinking and downright impossible.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:59 PM
16

Heavily downvoted = something below -50 karma per comment, NOT -2.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 11:27 PM
7

I don't know what the fuck a Magic Mike is, but for starters I know that one in every other blockbuster movies has a Skanky Suzy. Fawning over those is not even THAT unacceptable, and that's the way it should be. How is it acceptable for women to drool over this Magic Mike? It should be acceptable to drool over whatever you like.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 02:44 PM
5

I think you posted in the wrong thread, mate.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 02:36 PM
19

That's a stupid quote considering everyone gets offended at something. Maybe they don't voice it by saying something like "I take offense at X", but they do it somehow. Nearly half the submissions in here are you guys getting offended about some saying or another somewhere, hell 90% of the posts in /r/atheism are the same way. Nothing inherently wrong with that, it is what it is, don't be hypocritical about it.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 02:04 PM
1

Too bad testosterone deficiency isn't really taken that seriously. Most physicians and even specialized andrologists don't consider you for testosterone HRT unless you're significantly below the lower end limit and show serious symptoms associated with the condition.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 02:34 PM
12

There is no patriarchal dominance to begin with is what the point is...
/r/MensRights24/06/12 04:16 PM
1

This post deserves more exposure. If feminism wants to help liberate us of our roles, they shouldn't speak out for it only when that role is a masculine one, or simply one inconvenient for them, while leaving the convenient ones unspoken of. Men wanting to be feminine? Liberate them, let them play with dolls and try feminine outfits! Women wanting to be masculine? How admirable, "we can do it!", etc! Men wanting to be masculine outside women's control? NOPE, those immature losers need to man the…
/r/MensRights23/06/12 10:54 PM
1

I'm so fucked, lol.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 06:53 PM
5

Sheep group mentality, that's what.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 02:01 PM
1

I smell a troll...
/r/MensRights16/06/12 02:37 PM
1

lolol feminists & manginas be maaaaaad
/r/MensRights10/06/12 11:40 PM
6

That is a troll. Please stop linking to that troll. Do not link to it, do not respond to it, ignore it.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 06:32 PM
170

It should be noted that studies show that 20% of sexually active girls, age 12-18 are TRYING TO GET PREGNANT ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights02/06/12 09:07 PM
1

Wow, good on ya, you have my respect and sympathy. It's absolutely ridiculous to think that this is a purely genetic and an entirely out of control situation, what with traditional roles getting warped so fast and so much negative portrayal of males in the media and society in general. Glad you overcame these troubles, and don't worry, you are not the only one.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 04:23 PM
1

Not at all.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 12:07 AM
-9

I don't wanna be the "blame the patriarchy" person, but I think a lot of them are really coerced into it. Unlike women in the west, they really have no other choice. It's either go with it or get stoned or something.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 11:55 PM
1

My guess is that it's connected to the ongoing debate regarding objectification within the current setting of society. I.e. the question would be, if these women pose naked for a calendar, is it an expression of the freedom of femininity, or have they done it forcefully under the leering gaze of the patriarchy? I don't know though (didn't read due to NSFW), it could be about something else.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 12:08 PM
11

Heh. Seems like we're responding feminism by becoming feminism2. I couldn't take anyone with a laureate in male/female studies seriously on any level. This type of crap has no place in any serious academic environment in my opinion.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:51 PM
1

I'd have preferred that conditions warranted buying every person in that room a beer, but sadly we're not quite there yet.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 12:16 PM
1

Italy's full of misandric bullshit like this.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 12:04 PM
1

I don't think you understand what I said. G'day mate.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 10:36 AM
0

That's pretty misandri-wait a minute, why would a dishwasher talk and say something like that?
/r/MensRights16/05/12 10:19 AM
3

"Heya, Bob, nice weather we're having, huh?" "Sure is, Jim, sure is. What have you been up to?" "Same old same old, Bob. I'm in need of more employees for the new branch of my company, but my funds are stretched too thin at the moment" "Ah, I know the feel. Say, have you tried hiring women instead of men?" "Women, Bob?" "Yes, women. You can hire women and legally only pay them 77% as much as you'd pay a man for the same work in the same working hours" "Brilliant, Bob, just brilliant, this will s…
/r/MensRights15/05/12 12:41 PM
-8

You obviously have not witnessed the recent expressions of resentment in regards to MRAs posting there and starting arguments.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 04:15 PM
-13

It's probably because of the horde of MRAs who have invaded that subreddit, you know, as they say, "with their cocks and opinions".
/r/MensRights14/05/12 03:18 PM
0

Not too bad of a rap. Definitely needs better sound quality for starters, but I guess every bit of racket we make helps.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 12:19 AM
3

Yer a troll, Comet.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:19 PM
1

I've seen plenty of examples of the opposite as well. No need to burn bridges like that.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 08:03 PM
1

Oh wow, that's pretty funny. Is Jezebel flat out trolling now or are those people really fucking retarded? Cause from my point of view she pretty much got railed over there. That other guy calmly pointed facts and the flaw in her logic and she basically responded with the equivalent of "NO U!". Terrible.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 12:15 AM
1

This one is parodying how ridiculous the real one was :)
/r/MensRights28/04/12 02:33 PM
1

Nope. Exact same entitlement logic.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 02:16 PM
-13

You ARE blaming the victim, at least on some level. It's childish and naive to say the guy had no fault "in the slightest". Actions have consequences (reactions). People should take some responsibility for their actions and know what they may cause. A woman wearing a short skirt and getting raped doesn't put the blame on her, but let's be perfectly frank, showing off those legs may have been a deciding factor that made the rapist think "you know what fuck it, look at those legs and that ass, I'l…
/r/MensRights28/04/12 02:05 PM
1

Yeah...I gotta get the fuck outta here asap.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 12:01 PM
2

They don't actually like Barbie either as far as I know. She's kind of hated on the basis of being a stereotypical blonde "bimbo" and main symbol of restrictive gender roles early in life.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 12:27 PM
0

Spot on. There are women who scoff and say something like "silly man, the audacity you'd have to possess to think women dress for YOU!" then say "ugh, YOU try walking a mile in high heels, we have to do this every day so we're considered pretty by you guys with your sick standards" throughout the course of the same day. It boggles the mind.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 11:24 AM
37

Feminism's default setting has been full retard for a while now.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:01 PM
7

This is a very good idea more people should use.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:36 PM
2

Came here to say this. Bad speech bubble placement. Let's just hope outsiders will bother to click on the comments instead of drawing that conclusion.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 05:12 PM
0

Gender roles were never inherently bad, and they are not a mutually exclusive concept with equality. If anything was bad it's perhaps that they were too forced and some people had drawn too short of a stick, but in the end, looking at the state of humanity as a whole, which is pretty good all things considered, I'd say: you can't argue with results. Personally, I like gender roles, or any similar one-for-all model. Next to the advantages you've described, it gives structure and streamlines thing…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:24 AM
19

Hmm. Could use more tastefulness.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:32 PM
1

Clearly you didn't even read my post.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 11:23 PM
1

You don't have to be a PUA to be someone who picks up women. Or do you mean you NEVER go to a club/bar/party and try to pick someone up?
/r/MensRights06/04/12 10:23 PM
0

This, my friends, is why feminism is our enemy. What if SRS people are actually the good guys subtly trying to motivate us to go against the evil feminism? /conspiracykeanu
/r/MensRights06/04/12 03:02 PM
3

Have you tried having a calm talk with her about all of this? What's her motivation? Jealousy? Lack of trust? Just wondering. EDIT: She gave you an iphone at least, not so bad, is it?
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:19 PM
5

That's just your dad being a piece of shit over a fucking chair.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 03:17 PM
17

And despite a plea for leniency from her daughter, the judge told her he had no choice but to jail her for 20 months. Wow, a whole 20 months, a bit harsh, isn't it? /s
/r/MensRights31/03/12 05:43 PM
-1

How is being born male a performance-enhancing advantage over being born female in a women's beauty pageant? It's not guaranteed to be an advantage, but it is a whole different fruit basket because you acquire most your feminine body traits via external substances. If anything, following that logic this is like banning someone with cerebral palsy from competing using only the body they were born with like everyone else. Hmm no it isn't, at all, and people with cerebral palsy have their own speci…
/r/MensRights26/03/12 10:14 AM
0

Apparently, the rules state that you must be a naturally born female to participate. Reasonable, first because, hey, it's their rules, and second, for the same reason steroids and other such performance enhancing compounds are banned in sports, either it's your body and your merit or get the fuck out.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 04:41 PM
0

You aren't born with a gender. Go learn the difference between sex and gender, transphobe. It's not his fault. Gender used to be interchangeable with sex until pseudoscientists started using it as a definition for one's behavior in comparison to what is normally expected of a certain sex. It takes more than feeling like a man/woman to be one.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 04:35 PM
0

Yes...differences in sexuality, attraction mechanics, arousal, etc. Sex drive is just sex...drive...the drive to have sex.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 10:58 AM
1

I have to say that makes no sense whatsoever, mate. Sex drive is a quantitative measure, it cannot be "different", it is objectively "desire to have sex", and it ranges from weak/none to strong. Maybe you mean the way arousal and attraction works in us is different, case in which you'd be right.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 01:22 AM
1

Don't ruin this word. Feminism is one of the greatest achievements of modern Western society in the last fifty or so years. The feminism of 50 years ago isn't the same as the one today. Today you have all sorts of factions with different goals and outlooks for women and men, ALL claiming to be the real feminists. Is it really so hard to believe that one can more than a bit of trouble distinguishing the "real" feminists from the false ones in this sea of different ideologies? I think almost every…
/r/MensRights20/03/12 11:39 PM
0

Wut? Have you READ the article?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 04:09 PM
19

I don't see the problem with this.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 10:52 AM
2

I think a lot of people mistake aggression for violence...
/r/MensRights20/03/12 09:47 AM
1

i mean, how much porn out there is about a woman violently shoving man's face into her pussy compared to all the porn out there where a man is violently shoving a woman's face onto his dick? L M A O You'd be surprised, you really would be...
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:43 PM
1

Firstly, there are basically an even number of transmen and transwomen, as well as other transgender variants (usually called genderqueer). Well, you can find "official" statistics that cite anywhere between 2:1 (or slightly less) to a 5:1 ratio of M2F vs F2M, with different ways of counting. Some simply count people with any degree of gender dysphoria while others only count those who have had gender reassignment surgery. I do believe there may also be many people hiding their possible surgerie…
/r/MensRights07/03/12 01:49 AM
-1

Some novelty accounts are just so good, they're bad. Funny how that works out.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 08:11 PM
-9

You're right, trans issues are a part of men's rights, but not in the way you think. It says something when 90% of trans people are transwomen somehow and that the number of transpeople keeps rising and rising. It reflects how the social construct of heterosexual masculinity has become an unwanted antique, an inconvenience in some places, something people quickly dispose of with just a couple dozen bucks a month. It says that maybe, just maybe, we SHOULD worry about how men's testosterone has dr…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 02:51 PM
2

Victim Olympics champion.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:55 AM
4

Welp, guess I can't stay here either.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:51 AM
1

It's always funny to see some feminists going at it like so: "we women carry life, and we can do it without men! men are redundant, women are the future" all because science makes it possible NOW, after 200k years of modern human existence. We can do a lot of things with the aid of technology, but it doesn't mean we should, and we certainly shouldn't take it for granted. I think all these ideas (artificial sperm, artificial wombs) are a slippery slope. What exactly do we hope to achieve once bot…
/r/MensRights04/03/12 04:38 PM
1

I think the idea is that it's earning scorn because of its mission, which consists of all the stuff you listed there :)
/r/MensRights03/03/12 10:08 PM
6

It says, "earning scorn from bigoted feminists", and not all feminists. I don't think that's angry.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 02:58 PM
-1

But I am genuinely confused as to why this article does not even mention the possibility that this person might be a 20 year old transgender man. Because it's irrelevant. Sounds like a step towards equality if you ask me.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 02:23 PM
1

Imagine if we lived in a culture where each ethnicity had it own pronoun. Blacke went for a walk, White went to the market, Browne is at home, etc. That's unnecessary. That's not likely to happen (again), and of course is unnecessary. Gender identity is not on the same level as race, I think it's a bigger deal, since reproduction and gender roles lie at the center of everything. You don't need to be explicit about people's gender when you are referring to them any more than you need to be explic…
/r/MensRights03/03/12 12:29 AM
5

I don't think a teen girls's opinion on facebook should be considered a men's rights issue. FTFY
/r/MensRights02/03/12 11:33 AM
2

I disapprove with this. The majority of humanity has a sexual identity, you can't throw that away overnight because some delusional feminists think the words "he" and "men" in "women" are the root of all evil. This is all very childish to begin with though. I like OP's solution, but that's going to cause conflicts anyway. Some people just won't be happy unless we're all "xe".
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:32 PM
1

Thanks for your concern. I was concerned as well a while back, so I've done a total testosterone count a month ago and it's the lowest of low while still in the normal limits. I don't smoke, drink, I sleep right, I eat a balanced diet, and so on and so forth. Both docs I've been to so far have refused to hear me out on it, claiming that if it's normal, everything's fine. Trying to see if I can change my family physician, and I'll see if I'll be any luckier with someone else. I don't think I've e…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 04:01 PM
5

Nothing to joke about. Estrogen mimickers are common everywhere, and it's not just BPA that's a culprit. Needs more concern.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 12:54 PM
2

Never give up.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 01:51 PM
30

"Are you a real man? Not unless you get raped you aren't!" was my first reaction.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 01:36 PM
1

Karma's the last thing trolls care about.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 09:14 AM
5

I'm guessing he was talking about this.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 06:34 PM
2

This is so retarded. We're sentient human beings, not robots from some assembly line.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 01:30 AM
2

So from that point of view it's really more of a the man vs. the little guy thing instead of feminism vs. men. Articles like these are a welcoming bucket of cold water to the face now and then.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 09:56 PM
1

Not sure if this is still up, but have my answers anyway. In modern Western society? Woman. Maybe. Women. From women? No. From men? Honestly, one or two times when I was a child. Bad perception of traditional masculinity. A lot of things stem from that, I think. Looking at the past, people seem to only remember the wars and killings. It is thought that all the great, awesome things men have done, they've done because they oppressed others who had the chance of doing better. People also seem to t…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 01:18 PM
1

You may be on to something there...
/r/MensRights22/02/12 03:37 PM
1

Is it just me or is this getting posted every other week?
/r/MensRights22/02/12 12:38 PM
3

This is probably gonna be buried, but... First off, everyone excretes some hormones through urine, so it's not just the birth control (which is said to account for about 1% of all estrogenic compounds found in water) that adds hormones into our water supply. This is not to say that estrogenic mimicking compounds are nothing to worry about, because they really are. Bigger offenders, however, are said to be plastics, those of bottled water primarily, as not only they are all the craze these days, …
/r/MensRights21/02/12 01:41 AM
3

The interactive advertisement, which will be available for two weeks from Wednesday, cost £30,000 and is activated when the viewer opts to see it. Heh, joke's on them! No one -chooses- to view advertisements.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 07:51 PM
1

Chill. This isn't something in which someone absolutely must be blamed, and the reason is almost never one sided anyway. The article presents a few scenarios that are just as likely for a female to experience should she be the one not having sex. Of course, blame feminism for pushing the idea that if a woman wants sex and you don't, you're a shitty excuse for a man, and that if a woman doesn't want sex while you do, you're a manipulating sex obsessed misogynist.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 11:33 PM
-2

I'm not American so I don't understand the flak that's flying in this thread. Are you guys in this subreddit against healthcare coverage for BC as well? Seems really surprising. Why?
/r/MensRights19/02/12 11:12 PM
1

Confirmed.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 04:17 PM
1

You are not the world, only a less active part of it. Not sure if sarcasm.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 08:04 PM
3

Better not let anyone see this thread or they'll think we support rape! To be honest, it does have that tone to it, it feels as if it is implied that women's testimonies shouldn't be accepted at all, which is not so, the idea is that they shouldn't be automatically taken as undeniable proof without a second thought. That a woman names a rapist is simple proof that he raped. She has no reason to do it otherwise lolololo
/r/MensRights18/02/12 07:38 PM
3

I don't get it. Is it satire? I like how many times the word rock is mentioned though, cause that's exactly what diamonds are, common rocks people put a huge price on because of symbolism.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 04:21 PM
0

She's right there. The world ultimately revolves around sex and reproduction.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 04:13 PM
4

Not sure why you're being downvoted. It's wrong to mix them up like that, and it'd be hypocritical since many people here claim to hate feminism but not women.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 03:58 PM
22

He's right though, about the house hearing and all.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 03:34 PM
18

It's funny cause a lot of women feel like that at the moment over that whole men-only meeting over female birth control thing.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 03:33 PM
1

Deriving pleasure doesn't technically mean it's erogenous. Some women like anal, but they don't have a prostate, so it's more of a mental pleasure.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 02:50 PM
1

Usually, only under abnormal hormonal balance. Another funny thing is, women's breasts by themselves can be arousing to men. Men's breasts alone don't have that effect on women.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 10:53 AM
2

I think it is for direct physical labor with fewer layers of command and less regulation, then again I don't see many women in that domain so I don't know for sure. It would be logical, otherwise everyone would be carrying the 2 lbs instead of the 80, because of the same pay for either. Pure speculation here.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 09:41 PM
7

Women's breasts are erogenous zones, men's breasts are not. Just throwing that out there, make what you will of it, I have no strong opinion on this matter.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:49 PM
0

Case in which it becomes sexism, woohoo!
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:46 PM
3

The man carries 80 lbs. The woman carries 2 lbs. The guy gets paid more because he worked more, whereas the wage gap myth says that women get paid less than men for THE SAME work (which is, of course, bogus).
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:44 PM
6

Nah, that guy carries 80 lbs while the woman carries 2 lbs, so it's not the same work at all.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:40 PM
3

Whatever her reasons, the exposure is deliberate, the intent is for you to look Heh, one can never be sure nowadays.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 07:09 PM
4

Oh, so that's why people downvote me. I'm more sighing about people completely ignoring the important point about sexism rather than admiring her rack, which is a pretty nice rack at that.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 07:08 PM
6

Thumbs up if you only clicked on this video to ogle her tits (I did). long sigh
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:17 PM
2

I don't understand the people who had a fucking fit about him showing up at the Grammys. I mean, they're music awards, not the Nobel prize, are we supposed to judge a person's artistic potential based on his personal life events? I'm not a fan of the guy but it's not like he sings about beating Rihanna either, so I don't see the issue.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 01:59 PM
0

Nobody sides with THOSE people, though. This here is pointless bashing in my opinion.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:56 AM
2

I've been kinda okay with that game in which you throw dishes at your husband (look for my post if you really give a shit and think I'm a hypocrite or something), but defecating on someone under those circumstances is pretty fucked up, psycho fucked up. Maybe the solution is to start doing the same with reversed genders. When people will object and say it's fucked up, whip up the original, then what motherfuckers?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:42 AM
0

Mmmm, estrogens. Bottoms up, boys.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:01 AM
2

And coincidentally, I don't think people who starve themselves to "look good for men" are PhD material.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:43 PM
-5

No need to get mad about this, it's actually kinda true, or at least, used to be for many years. The idea behind that is that men tried to get as many women as possible pregnant to pass down their DNA, while women selectively picked only the strongest, alpha males to mate with. You can still spot these tendencies today and if you deny it you're a bloody fool.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 01:21 PM
0

This subreddit really received a lot of flak in that thread, but I've noticed we got a couple hundred new readers after that, from which, who knows, some may genuinely be interested in this whole MRM thing, so it's not all bad.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 01:17 PM
1

The frustration is understandable.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:22 PM
6

Herp derp.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:44 PM
8

I have a few ideas. Don't link to 4chan posts Don't link to every crappy little Facebook post of some stupid teenager More moderation to weed out the trolls and misogynists Somewhat related to 3, don't become like some feminist subreddits and censor out legitimate debates More links in the sidebar would be nice. People whine that there aren't sources, flood them with sources and statistics I say. That's all I can think of for starters. Mind you I've only been here for a couple of months, so feel…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 10:54 AM
3

No John, YOU are the zombies!
/r/MensRights11/02/12 10:49 AM
11

"Women have legitimate issues, but I hate feminism." Aaand it leads to a vicious circle of pointing fingers accusing each others movements of being against them.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 10:46 AM
2

Humans used to have bigger brains before, so yes, size isn't all that matters. EDIT: Uh, okay, guess you don't believe me, so here.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 10:33 AM
2

Maybe that's where they're getting at! Hehe
/r/MensRights10/02/12 06:27 PM
1

That's fucked up.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:03 PM
4

Well, I don't know about being a woman, but being multiple women can't be all that easy.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 11:55 PM
3

It's mostly a list of "WOMEN CAN", and not "ALL WOMEN DO", and a good chunk of it is accurate and backed by statistics. Read carefully before calling someone a woman hater like that. Is it that hard to believe that male privilege and female privilege aren't mutually exclusive states?
/r/MensRights09/02/12 01:01 PM
22

4chan? I don't quite habeeb it.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 08:17 AM
1

I guess the next time I'll groom myself and everything to look good in the eyes of women, I'll call myself a victim of the matriarchy instead of assuming some responsibility for myself and embrace the notion that, HOLY SHIT MAYBE, JUST MAYBE, the way others perceive us is part of how we actually are.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:20 PM
1

Some people online love calling each other trolls to shirk out of giving counter arguments. "Oh, you said something I have no way of properly arguing against for some reason? TROLL! You're trolling so nothing you say matters, hah!"
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:00 PM
6

I know right? Hell froze over cause this person is in the deep reds on my RES.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 08:03 PM
1

You are a joke or have no real idea who you associate yourself with.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 03:14 PM
1

"I want to walk around wearing highly revealing clothing without being seen as available and inclined to have sex with people...except to the ones I like."
/r/MensRights06/02/12 03:02 PM
1

High heels aren't exactly on the list of things women don't want to give up on, everybody knows they're not great to walk in and can cause back problems in the long run. Most feminists are also against them (except when it comes to symbolism, hohoho, crush that patriarchy under your red high heels or something like that). Just saying.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 12:49 AM
19

You just replied to a MRA, dolt.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 11:55 PM
-4

That is kind of in poor taste though...
/r/MensRights31/01/12 10:52 AM
-1

It's a game show. Apparently she was acting according to script...he wasn't. Goes without saying we're being polluted with more and more "reality" shows like these.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 03:42 PM
7

I'm glad someone noticed and said it, brain tumors can often cause personality changes.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 01:46 PM
1

Zhan told the paper that Xiao Meng used to say that a son would be a big burden because the parents are responsible to buy him a house and get him a wife. Hmm, perhaps the local custom is that girls don't receive that same benefit, has that been looked into?
/r/MensRights22/01/12 12:58 AM
4

Yep. Oppressive patriarchy, how dare you repress her sexuality/femininity, etc.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 05:10 PM
1

Fuck, lady, just admit you wanted a girl and give your baby up for adoption already instead of taking it out like that, jeez.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 04:58 PM
6

Misandry, I agree, but...don't be the shitty stereotype and pick up your shit.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 10:08 PM
-1

Nice one.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 10:03 PM
1

Kick her in the groin, haha, that's funny!
/r/MensRights14/01/12 01:34 PM
0

Nah, not because of that, I had a quick glance at your posting history because of your catching username. How cute, do you wanna wear the big boy pants? Would you wike a widdle penis of your vewy own too?
/r/MensRights13/01/12 09:55 PM
3

Go back to "Trolling 101", you're terrible at this.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 08:42 PM
2

I, of course, would expect similar gender role specific boons in return.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 11:50 AM
-3

I don't find any of that sexist at all, I'll gladly do all those things for any non-batshit-crazy-feminist woman.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 10:48 PM
14

GASP You misogynistic pig! How dare you make demands like that, who do you think you are mr patrhiarchy supporter?
/r/MensRights08/01/12 10:43 PM
1

Suit, covers you. Dress, shows your legs. People miss this basic fact about clothing and blame differential treatment based on misogynistic societal norms but the fact is, it's not that being female (together with clothing) is looked down upon, it's that wearing showy clothing is looked down upon, and traditional female clothes are like that, while men's clothing is not. Women have the goods for women clothing, men don't. We're not sexy with our bodies, we're sexy with our personalities and achi…
/r/MensRights08/01/12 02:34 PM
0

Sissy culture, trannies, etc in rising numbers are due to the current societal norms in which masculinity implies being a goofy, hairy, brutish know-nothing with no real purpose who only wants LOL ME PUT PENIS IN VAGINA sex, and femininity being that precious beautiful flower, with powerful and complex sexuality, who gives life, yadda yadda bullshit. Just look at advertisements, products, programs, whatever you want, it's all about the female nowadays. Masculinity has become a joke, it's tossed …
/r/MensRights08/01/12 02:26 PM
7

I gather from your replies in this thread that you would wish this issue to be completely unmentioned and not at all considered in cases of rape. I'll say this, there's very rare diseases that are very well documented, because when they do happen, they kill you in a pretty nasty way. Why would we not take false rape reporting into consideration? It seems like that would foster a pretty untrusting view of women, right? I see you've repeated this once or twice. You could call it lack of trust, sor…
/r/MensRights07/01/12 08:37 PM
16

I don't really trust facebook posts...
/r/MensRights06/01/12 03:43 PM
1

Sort of. I acknowledge that we're the same but different, but I wouldn't go as far as that guy above who seems to have a personal vendetta against men and women finding similarities with each other.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 03:27 PM
-10

That's cause women's traditional gender roles are shitty, while, minus the whole slaving for women bit, ours are awesome as shit. Nothing sexist about it, it's just how it is, we didn't start whining about roles.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 10:49 PM
0

Not functionally, no.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 10:20 PM
5

Acting like men and women are equal on any level is just outright denial Well, we're about 99.9% the same, according to DNA, so we are equal on some level.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 09:34 PM
-6

is it the provocatively-dressed woman suppressing the conservatively-dressed ones? or the other way around? how are they suppressing their sexuality? The less attractive ones become feminists and damn the whole male gender for having a preference and free will :)
/r/MensRights05/01/12 07:25 PM
15

SRS's default (and only) setting is full retard.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 11:05 AM
2

Check my what? Fuck you.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 05:14 PM
6

I wish someone would take a biology book and smash a few feminist faces with it. I'm sorry, I just do, it's the subnormal testosterone levels in me speaking. Testosterone has a whole host of effects, including bone density and health, help in prevention of mental diseases like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, mental energy and intelligence, muscle mass gain and maintenance, wards against some cancers (but increases risk of prostate and testicular cancer in higher concentrations) libido and mood (low…
/r/MensRights01/01/12 12:47 PM
9

Well, that's why dogs are the smarter species, they probably know what a species is.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 10:48 AM
0

Nope. Didn't skip that at all. More like you didn't read that at all. To be clear, I have no problem with "girls only" clothing stores. What got me about this particular store was the name. Justice. Just for girls Literally, had to do a double take. If it was "Justus" or some kind of play on words, wouldn't have given it a second glance. He even says it himself. Oh noes, it's called Justice, and it's just for girls, why couldn't it have been called Justus or something else? Either way you wanna …
/r/MensRights01/01/12 10:27 AM
3

Libido and love can actually go together in men too??? Whoa, fucking Keanu Reeves up in this bitch!
/r/MensRights01/01/12 10:22 AM
0

I meant the irony or sarcasm or anything of the sort from his side to denote that he, in his post, doesn't actually mean that he's seriously taken aback I think you skipped that. Get it now? As I see nothing (whatever figure of speech, /s tag, something) to denote that he ISN'T seriously taken aback by something so ridiculous and harmless to a non paranoid human being, hence my thought is that posting this shit makes us look bad (as paranoid fools). Happy New Year!
/r/MensRights31/12/11 09:42 PM
0

I meant the irony or sarcasm or anything of the sort from his side to denote that he, in his post, doesn't actually mean that he's seriously taken aback by something not indented to be a double standard, but rather that he post it as a funny little joke reference to the actual issue, you pedantic putz. If there is none, and he actually is taken aback by sign taken at face value, I stand by my original statement, people posting shit like this with "zomg they're taking ova the world" tones are one…
/r/MensRights31/12/11 09:34 AM
1

I didn't detect any irony, sorry.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 09:15 AM
0

Shit like this is why we're laughed at.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 08:52 AM
2

Hmm, I wanna be sexy. Which suit should I wear? Black or....black? :)
/r/MensRights31/12/11 08:52 AM
2

I'm just saying, that would be the sort of pedantic response you'd give to some stranger you're arguing with online, not to someone you conceived a child with. I'd just use a bit more tact, it's joint custody, isn't it?
/r/MensRights29/12/11 08:21 AM
-13

I think that's a bit overboard towards someone expressing, from what I gather, genuine (albeit uninformed) concerns for the child's well being, or did you forget the /s tag?
/r/MensRights28/12/11 11:15 PM
8

Demonizing women is just an easy way to scam gullible neckbearded mras like yourself. Shed a tear over that. Guess what, so is demonizing men. Shoo, go away troll.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 10:54 PM
3

To a T.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 09:59 PM
1

There has been an influx of IAmA posts about correctional camps of all kind yesterday. It started with a serious post about a guy getting sent to such a camp, it immediately followed with a (negatively met) IAmA about someone who claimed to take kids to such camps, then came the IAmA of someone who claimed to be a camp the kids go to, and so on, most were deleted. The post you linked to is pretty much related to that, and so, has a fair chance of being a fabrication.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 08:24 PM
1

It's a fake part of that recent "correctional camp" spam wave.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 05:06 PM
3

Well done.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 11:00 AM
1

srs is fucking pitiful, no great loss, don't worry.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 06:50 PM
1

Fuck it, not gonna lie and pretend, I'd have loved to be molested by someone looking like that at age 10/12, might have given me more confidence than I had throughout all my school years too.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 01:27 AM
1

in which it is described that if a woman is aggressive then it is because of something the man did. As opposed to men getting angry for no reason at all? People sometimes don't like something about their significant other, and some of them, male or female, turn to various forms of violence to cope with it. So what is the base for that model, that if a man upsets a woman, he's automatically done some wrong?
/r/MensRights15/12/11 12:42 AM
9

LOOOL And a mugger/thief may be have chosen that route to to feed their poor family. And maybe a murderer has been under the weather lately. And maybe a rapist has been very sexually frustrated lately. And that poor drunk who killed 4 people on the highway? Psh, that person was DRUNK, clearly we can't hold them responsible for their actions! Of course none of them are given a free pass, so FUCK YOUR BULLSHIT.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 03:05 PM
0

One of those angry trans people trying to radically relate to women.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 09:46 PM
1

Uhm, NO.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 09:36 PM
24

As a woman, I am sick and tired of these wimps. Not only do we have to live with the hideous fear of rape and HIV, we must expend energy assuring men that "not all of you are bad". We know this already, which is why we want those of you who don't abuse women to stop whining, challenge your peers, roll up your sleeves and fight with us. Making us feel that we must be grateful you don't rape us adds insult to injury. But I was taught by an activism campaign that in order to stop rape I must simply…
/r/MensRights08/12/11 09:07 PM
1

Ten thousand pounds....per...YEAR? Holy fuck, and I thought I had it bad. Even 5k is enormous, fucking outright robbery.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 09:39 PM
1

Link: "LOL LOOK AT ME, I'M AN ENTITLED CUNT WHO CAN'T TAKE A JOKE" Comments: "FEAR NOT PRINCESS, WE SHALL PROTECT YOU!"
/r/MensRights04/12/11 10:02 PM
1

She looks pretty passable........what?
/r/MensRights04/12/11 09:17 PM
2

While diet can affect sperm quality, daughter genetic predisposition to obesity is always from the female side of the family, while the son can have it from either the female or male side I believe. That aside, having some responsibility in parenting and lifestyle choices instead of pointing fingers would be the better route. I've seen plenty of fat mothers dragging their fat mini-me daughters to the fast food joints I've been to and I don't point fingers at genetics, I give the benefit of doubt…
/r/MensRights04/12/11 04:27 PM
1

I was speaking of the general situation, not the case in particular.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 01:13 PM
1

Your dad's a hero.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 08:58 PM
5

I wish I could say, "so what, doctors have been predominantly male until just a decade or so ago and we did fine, we won't die if the opposite happens" and okay, I am, but after seeing bitching and moaning about a wage gap that never existed followed by massive taunts and insults over small percentage gains females got over males, I feel like a touch of "oh no you don't!" wouldn't hurt either.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 08:51 PM
13

The wage gap myth is still being pushed all around, it's so effective I don't think feminists will stop using it so soon, it's been their rock so far.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 08:43 PM
1

It's truly fucked up that people can get arrested just for being nice like that. I hear what he does is called "risk behavior" or "fitting a profile". I guess in a couple of years I can expect to get arrested for having my hands in my pockets while being inside a bank. Risky behavior indeed.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 08:36 PM
1

Of all the things to complain about...really, /r/mensrights? It's targeted advertising, if it's around, it works, and it works because someone researched the market and holy crap, turns out there's a lot of women to target. Changing diapers. Now a privilege, we want it too!
/r/MensRights02/12/11 11:54 PM
3

The reasonable thing to do is to disclose it. As much as I LOVE seeing cases where some evil baby-maniac gets her plans trumped and bullshit exposed, it's better to prevent than to cure. You'll save everyone the grief by letting it known from the start. If your SO happens to be a baby-maniac, she'll know better than to try anything and either get some sense and stick with you through it, or leave, you'll save your time and heart integrity. If she isn't, well, hooray, support each other and live …
/r/MensRights02/12/11 11:03 PM
0

This is probably a clichè but... Internets. Srs business!
/r/MensRights02/12/11 10:48 PM
1

Outplayed and outclassed.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 06:00 PM
2

I'm okay with that.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 05:43 PM
1

Doesn't having low testosterone mean low fertility anyway? I'm aware of the fact that bodybuilders after prolonged periods of androgen intake experience the whole shriveled nuts thing from their disuse in natural androgen productive but I'm finding it weird that given to treat people with LOW testosterone to begin with, it lowers fertility even more. Is this longterm or immediate? I think longterm, fertility should improve. Do they take actual testosterone or derivates? Also, under what form?
/r/MensRights01/12/11 12:20 AM
-5

You best be trolling, nigga. Testosterone? Contraceptive? Wut?
/r/MensRights30/11/11 11:55 PM
-6

So long chivalry, courtesy of feminism. "BUH WHERE IS DUH CHIVULRHUUUU"
/r/MensRights30/11/11 07:19 PM
7

"But we still have a long way to go"
/r/MensRights30/11/11 07:15 PM
2

Lawyer up, lawyer up, lawyer up. Fight for yourself because if you ask me, the relationship is pretty much over. Even if you accept the child, you'll likely somehow be shafted in the long run as she seems to have a knack for taking big decisions without listening to you anyway.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 06:30 PM
3

Oh my god that's fun, this is unacceptable, stop having fun and go back to work for women like a real man would! Man up!
/r/MensRights30/11/11 03:25 PM
3

Well no shit Sherlock.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 12:08 PM
6

trollsarebad
/r/MensRights29/11/11 12:07 PM
3

Not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 08:17 PM
-1

Maybe someone can learn how to use a search engine and not be ashamed of it. There's porn of pretty much EVERYTHING for EVERYONE on the internet, you just have to swallow your pride, admit you want it, and search for it. And yeah, gotta love the hypocrisy of this: "OMGZ WHY IS WIMMENZ IN PORN, ITS DEGRADING, OBJECTIFYING, DISGUSTING, DAMN MEN AND PATRIARCHY" "OMFGZ WHY IS THERE NO PORN FOR WIMMINZ WITH CUTE GUYS, DAMN MEN" Men need to see a penis in straight porn I prefer women doing things solo…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 01:29 PM
2

I speculate what may or may not be, based on those things because they are the first I see on a person. If you claim not to do that at all, you are a liar or a vegetable.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 12:36 PM
1

I find it really tiring as well. But it also bothers me when I wander by mensrights and see everyone flipping out from the obvious fact that men are more prone to violence then women. Men have more testosterone which correlates with aggression. This stems from our genetic drive to compete for resources/women. Aye, and a solution should involve some sort of compromise instead of telling men to chop their balls off because they are the root of evil, hehe.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 12:19 PM
1

FWOW MUFH MOW OF HIS TOFHIC HAYFE FPEEFH BEEFOW WE TFAKE TO AMS MY FELLOW MENS FRIGHFTS ACTIFIFTS?
/r/MensRights27/11/11 12:13 PM
4

Britain is slowly turning totalitarian.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 12:00 PM
7

This shit's fucking bananas, naw meen?
/r/MensRights26/11/11 11:35 PM
31

This is parodying that.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 11:22 PM
2

YOU DELAY THE INEVITABLE, SHEPARD
/r/MensRights26/11/11 10:07 PM
14

"That's right women, all you have to do in order to stop child abuse is to NOT abuse children, it's that simple" Heh, see it's funny because that's what they tell men in anti-rape campaigns.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:22 PM
0

SHEPARD! YOUR ATTACKS ARE POINTLESS!
/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:21 PM
8

Seen plenty of cases in which a dude bitched about a woman or all in some way and received cheers and comfort (even from women) as well, granted I'm not sure they are as common. More often than not the bitching itself is done in humorous tones though.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 08:39 PM
1

Dohohoho, good one, good one, hey, tell us the one with the reptilian shapeshifting feminists again, cracks me up every time!
/r/MensRights26/11/11 11:09 AM
3

Stupidest thing? Dumb motherfucker? Okay. Are we discussing reptilian overlords here? No? Well shit, guess there's not much point in typing that in Google, unless we want to find out they don't actually exist, which many sites would tell, if you don't already know. Ok, ok, here, I'll guide you, I would actually use your own lazy fat hands on that keyboard and guide you key by key if I could, but whatever, let's type: male victims of (chose that since I now realized you're one of those people who…
/r/MensRights25/11/11 08:46 PM
2

I'm not on the same page as some of these people on rape. Females being raped, are, in my humble opinion, a bigger issue than males being raped by females (except children).
/r/MensRights25/11/11 07:21 PM
3

Ever heard of slang or insults in general? This one here happens to be a gender specific insult. Please, feel free to call me a dickhead, shmuck, dick, wanker, prick, cock, tosser as well, I won't take it as an insult against ALL men unless you said "men are dickheads", now, did I say "women are cunts" anywhere? No, alimony queens like the one in this post are cunts, and if I have to think twice, so are you. G'day, terribad troll.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 06:22 PM
0

Well, men who abuse this system are a very small percentage and the cases are probably less extreme, whereas cases in which a man is reduced to poverty and/or thrown in the slammer from excessive alimony/child support/divorce penalty are rampant. Being black is something you can't choose or change and it is caused by biology, being an alimony lord/lady is something depends on the person's will ("hmm, my ex-spouse is having economic difficulties, I better not demand get this to court and demand a…
/r/MensRights25/11/11 06:08 PM
2

Okay thetrollination
/r/MensRights25/11/11 05:32 PM
1

But I didn't. I merely typed three words, scroll a bit, maybe click around and there's plenty of sources. The fact that on three words a site like that popped as the first result is enough reason to think that maybe, just maybe, we're not bullshitting around here. Also, is agenda the new cool word around here? I notice people have been throwing it around like crazy at the slightest non-disorganized form of protest to anything.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 05:31 PM
1

I didn't imply that you're a bigot, just reminiscing on that stupid claim you made a bit earlier, funny.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 04:05 PM
0

Three words were all I had to type. This is of course in addition to the fact that one in a couple links posted here is about a man being exceptionally shafted by the custody/welfare/alimony system. Guess the links in the sidebar are hard to use as well. Sources? Psh, DONT ASK ME FOR THE SOURCES
/r/MensRights25/11/11 04:03 PM
-3

As in, here, in this subreddit, save for a couple of loons. There is some against feminists and similar activists, I see quite a bit of paranoia even against simple jokes, I'll give you that.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 03:58 PM
-2

You would know better. Heh, bigotry he says...
/r/MensRights25/11/11 03:55 PM
2

Failtroll.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 03:13 PM
8

Bigotry is hated towards others holding different beliefs, though it's usually acknowledged as prejudice towards things that can't be chosen, such as sex, race, height, weight, race, etc. I think you will find that neither me, or almost anyone else here gives much of a care on a welfare sapper's religious belief, sexual orientation, nationality, or skin colour. There is no prejudice against women, The problem is, well, the welfare sapping itself and those who don't have a problem with it, that t…
/r/MensRights25/11/11 03:02 PM
10

Yeah, heavens forbid we use simple insults instead of long paragraphs to describe commonly known things we're not happy with. Ok, ok, here, I'll fix that quote for you, since you find those words and expressions somehow strange: Person of the female gender who exhibits personality and behaviour characteristics in some ways bothersome to other people, usually of the male gender Person of the female gender who relies on welfare for financial support. Does not usually hold a qualified job position …
/r/MensRights25/11/11 02:42 PM
18

Ohhh, it's been a bit quiet with the myriad of men going through such struggles, and only now when a few women get to experience this too, it's suddenly problematic, I see, I see.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 02:06 PM
1

Fucking terrible, and it's far from being a one of a kind case...
/r/MensRights25/11/11 01:59 PM
3

Oh, wow, guess it really flew over my head. Sorry.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 05:34 PM
-1

All of the differences between men and women are socially constructed, including strength EDIT: The sarcasm was too subtle for me, I'll leave this here anyway as a reference point. Uh, no, biggest no on strength. Testosterone helps build and sustain muscle mass and bone density among other things. Men clearly have a natural advantage there. Sure, women can be "the hunter" as well, but they need twice the effort for the same result. That said, I'm a bit split on this. It isn't right to mix boys a…
/r/MensRights24/11/11 02:00 PM
1

Are Fast Company the new Jezebel or what?
/r/MensRights23/11/11 01:37 PM
0

You're implying that women can't do harm so this is ok. No, please don't put words in my mouth. I did little more than explain how something can be funny from one perspective but not from another, contrary to what the "OMG, IMAGINE IF IT WERE A WOMAN" people's belief that every joke, every single social mechanism has to work exactly the fucking same for both men and women. This little game here is okay like video games in which you kill prostitutes are okay, it's about context. I did not say tha…
/r/MensRights22/11/11 11:40 PM
1

Irrelephant.jpg No, you might find it relevant by reading the next line after that. We're not the same, so not every single situation can be applied to us equally. That's why the whole "imagine if it were a girl in this ad/game/article/etc" can SOMETIMES be bullshit. In this case, I explain why this is funny from one point of view but not from the other. Try to read the whole thing someone says before posting shitty attempts at being funny like that.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 11:35 PM
-3

Congratulations, you probably didn't make it past the fourth word of what I wrote before your comprehension skills gave up on you. If I'm a bigot for analyzing all the factors before taking a decision instead of simply letting myself influenced by the first little thing that pops in front of my eyes, so be it. I'm a bigot, where's my prize?
/r/MensRights22/11/11 08:51 PM
-2

What part of: "Men and women, as similar as they are in so many ways, aren't the same, so not every single situation can be mirrored from one gender to the other" wasn't clear?" As things work right now, it would not be funny the other way around.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 08:47 PM
-7

Men and women, as similar as they are in so many ways, aren't the same, so not every single situation can be mirrored from one gender to the other. Men are predisposed to being stronger than women, hence the humour in that situation relying on irony. Some time ago men have actually been known for being the domestic violence perpetrators, the funny factor here liees in the unexpected situation reversal. Another thing, look at the character archetypes, weak, fat, bald guy with glasses and woman in…
/r/MensRights22/11/11 06:13 PM
3

It's going to be dull indeed when we end up eliminating the tiniest joke one gender can make about the other. In other words, stop crying about shit like this and focus on the real issues.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 04:40 PM
4

Yeah man, you're right, love without sex can't possibly exist, it's a wife's duty to satisfy her man whenever he needs to be satisfied, it's true cause you said it and you said you speak for 99.99% of men so it must be true, I mean you even said it in a badass way and everything!
/r/MensRights22/11/11 12:12 PM
3

Watch out, we got a badass on the internet. Attention women, you're obligated to give this guy sex in a marriage whenever he wants, it's totally his right because of his "achievements" in life, do it cause he totally speaks for 99.99% of men lololo what a badass!
/r/MensRights22/11/11 11:18 AM
2

As much as I'd hate it, I'd rather see a world led by women if bigoted redneck fucks like you end up speaking for the 99.99% of the population. Fortunately, that is not the case, you may as well go fuck your own mother because I can't imagine anyone putting up with your self entitled bullcrap.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 10:57 AM
3

Platonic relationships. Speak for yourself instead of making crude generalizations.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 10:43 AM
-1

What the hell are you being downvoted for? Are people having trouble finding that quote on the site or what?
/r/MensRights22/11/11 10:24 AM
2

You're saying it's discrimination to feel bad and express it when someone dumps you? She even said she thought they had something special.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 04:50 PM
1

That's nice. So, it's plain as daylight to see that some feminists are really okay people while others are not. Pretty soon "feminist" will just become synonomous to "woman"; some are awesome, some are real scumbags who want you dead.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 11:20 AM
12

What is it with men and raping women? They're a bunch of sleezy pieces of shit. No one supports rape here in case you haven't noticed, so what's the fuss about, you're free to make fun of rapists as well as women who bite on testicles.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 11:13 AM
1

Isn't it forbidden to question your man and yadda yadda all that under christianity? They throw that fucking book around only to follow whatever the fuck they want from it whenever it's convenient.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 09:09 PM
2

Psh, we all know men are to blame for that. /s
/r/MensRights17/11/11 08:49 PM
4

Separating men and women from a young age like that, unintentionally teaches them they're unique snowflakes and gives many a skewed perspective when relating to their opposite gender. I want see less gender studies and more mathematics, biology, geography, astronomy, etc. We're a tiny spec of dust to the universe, we can try to grow, or you can spend years learning about how things relate to your vagina. I don't think the presence of the opposite gender is highly distracting unless you don't giv…
/r/MensRights17/11/11 02:01 PM
1

Almost anything that alters our hormonal balance and is beyond our means to control (hard to avoid those estrogens when you need the water to survive) is pretty alarming because apart from those cancers, a person's behaviour and personality also stands to be subtly shifted, it shouldn't be swept under the rug when you see less manly men, and more gay and trans people. Yes, perhaps there are genetic factors, and yes, social ones as well, but the environment increasingly laced with all sorts of su…
/r/MensRights16/11/11 01:34 AM
0

It depends on the context, didn't I just say that? If someone want to nitpick this so they can play victim, let them by all means, but I believe the intended haha part of it is fooling around with your partner, not "LOL RAPE MEN, LOL IZ FUNNY TO RAPE MEN LOLOL".
/r/MensRights15/11/11 09:41 PM
0

Meh, seems in good humour. No one would actually do that as more than just a joke, and one that risks getting you labeled as a crazy fucking bitch.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 09:16 PM
1

edited my post shortly after you replied I think
/r/MensRights15/11/11 08:34 PM
0

Pretty sure this refers to sexual games, it doesn't explicitly say rape unless you want to nitpick like people who see jesus in toast. Suppose cowboy and cowgirl agreed to have sex. Cowgirl surprise cowboy by tying him up with rope, or handcuffing him to the bed and, well, having sex with him. Should that be considered rape, cause sex can be pretty boring without the element of surprise to spice it up sometimes.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 08:31 PM
1

A zit, either just 'cause or because of an ingrown hair. Testicular cancer doesn't just suddenly come and go like that, so you should be fine.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 12:40 PM
3

It's assumed consent was given before that little sexual game, the title and bulletpoints make it obvious, instead of saying for instance: LOL RAPE A MAN AND TELL HIM YOU HAVE AIDS XD". It's shit like this.....
/r/MensRights15/11/11 12:33 PM
2

Pedophilia is the attraction to prepubescent children. One, pedophilia is defined as sexual attraction to children, USUALLY prepubescent but the definition, I believe, isn't an official one set in stone since puberty onset and intensity varies. Teenagers are still children. Second, so, it can debated if this is ephebophilia or not, but I don't know what kind of kid is or is not sexually mature at 14 when that's just a cut above the onset of puberty on average (personally, I didn't have a single …
/r/MensRights14/11/11 09:57 PM
1

Wow, nicely done.
/r/MensRights14/11/11 07:23 PM
2

It's hard to resist the thought that such people are raging manginas with femdom fantasies.
/r/MensRights14/11/11 07:18 PM
5

Damned if you do, mocked if you don't.
/r/MensRights14/11/11 07:10 PM
-6

I didn't misunderstand anything. You called SETHW a pedo for wanting to see reduced punishments for male ephebophiles rather than increased punishments for female ephebophiles. No, because he said... we need men in these situations to be treated with the same common sense as this. preemptively: please dont call for this woman to be lynched with the same madness as a man would have been. in reality, consensual sex like this is a job for the school ethics board, not the police or courts. so 3 days…
/r/MensRights14/11/11 03:34 PM
-4

Not sure if sarcasm or misunderstood the argument here...
/r/MensRights14/11/11 03:21 PM
-8

lol why is it a problem? I mean, seriously, can we stop pretending teen boys being sexed by attractive female adults is utterly disgusting? It's bad, but come on now.
/r/MensRights14/11/11 02:21 PM
14

No thanks pedo, having sex with kids is not okay, repeat after me, NOT okay. Three days in jail isn't what I'd call more than necessary for having sex with minors.
/r/MensRights14/11/11 02:08 PM
1

Censorship isn't the proper approach to this. I'll say it again, this sickfuckery should be exposed to as many people as possible.
/r/MensRights14/11/11 01:52 PM
5

Cosmetics are, more often than not, harmful to everyone, physically or not.
/r/MensRights14/11/11 01:20 PM
1

....right.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 10:40 PM
2

I can give plenty of examples that some of them do.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 10:25 PM
1

That was most likely posted by a 13 year old who finally got her first period, relax a little. Give it a little bit of time and her next message will complain about the lack of nice guys in the world. Besides, there's just as many boys and men who LOVE to let everyone know how much they like boobies/tits/bazookas/melons/jugs/etc.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:58 PM
2

Blue has a definition, a man-made definition. It means that the light emitted falls with in the 440–490nm wavelength. It's really not that hard. Oh, nice, you've also completed high school, that's cool, but I was refering to it metaphorically, blue's been called blue before we could assess wavelengths with something other than our eyes. People who saw blue called it blue, people who work know work is usually harder than being a stay at home parent. We could measure stress levels, but again, no o…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 03:41 PM
0

They don't need to, just like they don't need to poll all Americans to accurately determine an election. It's called a statistical sample. That's not what you've done, and you have no documentation to show this. Again, neither do you have one to show the contrary. On the other hand, I wonder, what sort of statistical evidence do you need to show that the colour blue, is in fact, motherfucking blue. It's generally agreed upon by people who saw that colour. You know you're wrong, but to "win" anyw…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 10:46 AM
3

This post is both, ain't that awesome?
/r/MensRights13/11/11 02:24 AM
1

Right, so you're talking out of your ass. Not really. We assume there's 100 to 500 billion stars in our galaxy, but no one actually counted them one by one. It's what you can call a generally agreed upon speculation, we made it after seeing a shitload of stars, just like you can assume that people with a job complain less about whatever they do at home (given that they spend less time there) than people without one. Example, I don't think a woman working in construction/mining/military/surgery i…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 01:08 AM
8

So, even if you like a woman's non conventional personality trait ("tough girls"), you're objectifying her? Okay, what the fuck, I'll play along, what's the alternative, how do you not objectify women? Someone ask her that, I'm dying to know the answer.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 12:41 AM
0

Source? Or are you just making things up to further your anti-women agenda. Well, I don't think anyone bothered to gather some statistics on that. "Hey, mothers with jobs, would you say being a mother is the hardest job in the world? How about YOU, mothers without jobs, would YOU say being a mother is the hardest job in the world?" I can't find a source, maybe YOU can find one that proves me wrong then? In fact, you could have done that as you first disagreed with me. Also, I don't know where sh…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 12:33 AM
1

True, but are we any worse than the Feminists who push ideas like this being the MOST dangerous decade to be a Woman? I feel that at least part of the misunderstanding between us is generated from overblowing issues. Overblowing wage gap, overblowing rape rates, who gets raped, by whom, and so on and so forth. You're right about the rest of the stuff.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 09:06 PM
2

He didn't mention anything about mothers who work or not, just the claim that "being a mother is the toughest job in the world" usually when it's said by mothers who don't work, please don't freely expand on his subject just to make a point.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 09:02 PM
-1

No, but people need to understand this is still pretty damn rare. Cite one example from Zimbabwe, couple from India, a few from America and the next thing you know people start to believe this is common occurrence and most women are sperm thieves. Remember the whole "we live in the least violent decade" thing? You wouldn't ever think that from reading all the news, the brain like to play tricks like that.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 08:43 PM
5

Uhm, okay...how? This video here shows a man expressing his opinion on why the whole "being a mother is the hardest job in the world" thing is bullshit, which people here seem to agree with. I don't see any "all women r dumb lolol, men r teh best!" anywhere. Sounds to me like you're anti-reason or your joke was a little too subtle.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 05:17 PM
5

I like how they conveniently left out the other less convenient things men experience. I say left out because that's exactly what the fuck they flat out did, when you have an extension that flips the gender on any article on the internet, you can't miss all that shit. Garbage site, I think I'll add it on adblock so I don't accidentally give them page views from now on. Props to whoever has the will to check that site and inform us of the type of bullshit coming out of it.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 02:30 PM
-1

I thought we've been over this already, it's fucking Zimbabwe they're talking about. Women raping men is probably the least of their problems there yet there's people talking about it as if it's a day-to-day threat in their modern city.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 02:03 PM
1

It's understandable that anyone reaches such a point of near insanity after a certain amount of abuse, yes. We're humans, we got to where we are because we fought back, we fought back against animals, we fought back, quite brutally, against some of our own oppressive leaders. We can only take so much before that basic fighting instinct kicks in, and repeated abuse from whom should be our loved one is a good example of it.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 11:45 AM
0

That argument is silly, I mean, sure it does, but race doesn't fully share the same social characteristics as every other human characteristic, gender included. Should gay bars be considered discriminatory too? What about feminine hygiene products? It would make things pretty darned awkward. There's things that, unlike skin colour, quite simply don't work well for everyone and in that ladies night, childish as I consider it to be, the women don't talk about erradicating the male gender, they tal…
/r/MensRights11/11/11 11:36 AM
3

A sexual abuse case of this magnitude should always be taken this seriously, but sexual abuse is simply not taken as seriously when the victims or victimizers are female. I give up, I don't know how to respond to this logic.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:45 PM
-1

Analyzing solely what is written there, it's not sexism.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:32 PM
-2

I agree. I also agree that if a man is physically, sexually and emotionally abused for long enough (or maybe just nagged enough) he should be able to cut off his wife's clitoris, sew her vag shut and punch her in the face. It's only fair! You're overblowing it sky high. Neither I, nor the author of that article say anything anywhere near like that. Nowhere is it claimed that genital mutilation is okay, it is claimed that it's understandable for someone can reach the mentality to do that after ye…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:19 PM
0

Ever heard of leaving? That is what people should do when a relationship becomes abusive. It is what many people do each and every day. They just leave. Supporting the idea that the sexual mutilation of an unconscious person is justified in the retributive sense, after a person CHOOSES to remain in an abusive relationship doesn't wash, IMO. It's not always as straightforward as that. Cases in which the woman is threatened with death should she denounce the guy are not uncommon, especially in poo…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:13 PM
6

Women jobless, a catastrophy, something must be done. Men jobless, "man up!", get a job you lazy bastard, etc.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:32 PM
-3

Eh... I've always considered myself to be somewhat of a pacifist. You seriously have to wonder about woman who has the cojones to cut off a man's weenus. Lord knows I wouldn't be able to go through with something like this, no matter how much the woman-beating, philandering bastard deserved it. Cutting off a dude's private parts -- with scissors (scissors!) no less -- would probably be more punishment for me than the man itself. Shudder! Blech! Ick! Then again, I've never been pushed to such a p…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 05:12 PM
2

I don't use Facebook, I'm a primitive savage.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 03:26 PM
1

for the record, i posted the question on my facebook. Ah, it all makes sense now
/r/MensRights10/11/11 01:31 PM
3

Assuming my thoughts and personality wouldn't change under the influence of a new hormone balance, I'd be pretty much the same and try to maintain as many of my current habits as possible, such as modest clothing, thoughts on men and women, etc etc. I'd also push hard for some out loud equality activism since there aren't too many women who speak out for us and their word means a lot. Oh, and I'd know how to fight, I'd probably kill a rapist. Oh, and I'd love to go work in construction or someth…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 01:37 AM
-1

Fine, since it means such a great deal to you for some reason, sorry for being rash about a misunderstood comment's context.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 01:22 AM
-1

Lost what? Wrong what? Argument what? Sorry someone can't write in a clear informal manner? LOL I guess I should be!
/r/MensRights10/11/11 12:13 AM
-2

Whatever ya whiner.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:57 PM
-2

Well apparently I took his words out of context.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:36 PM
-4

What am I supposed to play guesswork with what people mean by their comments now? This isn't fucking literature class, reword it to more plainly reflect exactly what you're trying to say and you won't have people taking things out of context or missing the point.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:35 PM
-9

Oh wow, great advice, do whatever he wants to do? Totally works.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 09:47 PM
-9

Uncalled for.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 09:47 PM
1

or arms, legs, and spleen, etc, you can live without them but it's better if you have them.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 09:46 PM
0

LOL! Why talk about those guys as if it's a men's right issue? Christians also believe a woman should obey her man without question and such and such, complain about that too or treat it as a "I don't like that religion" issue.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 07:51 PM
3

Well, saying something like "haha all women are whores who belong in the kitchen" = misogyny. Calling one woman a cunt, bitch, hoe etc online because you don't agree with her or whatthefuckever is displease expressed towards that one person, with gender specific insults. Same goes for being called a prick, dick, dickhead, pencildick, wanker, etc. It's not misandry, it's insulting one or a few people. "all men are a bunch of thuggish dumb brutes, women are better" - misandry. I think some people …
/r/MensRights09/11/11 01:53 AM
-1

Zimbabwe....really? I mean, come on.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 11:41 PM
2

Apparently, only men insult, oh and they only insult women, imagine that! Woman haters!!! There's a term for this type of sneaky smear job but it doesn't come to mind right now.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 10:17 PM
1

So if someone were to say "I want to fuck a trans woman because she's actually a man," that would be EQUALLY transphobic. lol why the fuck? If you wanna have free sexuality, you should let people fuck or not fuck whoever they want for whatever reason they want. So under your laws, not fucking someone trans is bad, fucking someone BECAUSE they are trans...also bad, wow, great. Trans women wanna be women, but they'll always be trans women, no amount of surgeries of any kind will change that, so th…
/r/MensRights07/11/11 01:00 PM
7

Yeah, congratufuckinglations, your bachelor's in women's studies compared to my high school diploma clearly makes you SMARTER. ME MAN. ME STOOPID!
/r/MensRights07/11/11 12:27 AM
4

Gotta love how they're acting as if they can actually take up any man toe-to-toe, "cutting up men", oh puh-lease. Don't worry, just another little angry group, like KKK and skinheads (LOL GUIZE WE TOTALLY HAVE A PLAN TO KILL OFF ALL DEM NIGGERS!), chauvinists (LOL GUIZE WE TOTALLY HAVE A PLAN TO KEEP DEM BITCHES IN THE KITCHEN!), religious freaks (LOL WE TOTALLY HAVE A PLAN TO SEND ALL UNBELIEVERS IN HELL), and so on, don't be intimidated by what they say, it's all just angsty drivel so long as …
/r/MensRights07/11/11 12:17 AM
4

The Y chromosome is experiencing what is refered to as "rapid evolution", in simple terms, it can't fix "bad" genes due to incompatibility with the X chromosome so it eliminates them altogether. It's just as likely that the Y chromosome will keep the minimum necessary genes for sex differentiation given that we don't have natural (lol, gotta love seeing the "WELL YEAH WELL WE CAN NOW HAVE CHILDREN WITHOUT MEN, SEE? THEY'RE ALL USELESS, WIMMENZ NATURALLY RULE" argument, as if their bodies natural…
/r/MensRights06/11/11 11:59 PM
8

Don't wanna fuck me? Transphobe!
/r/MensRights05/11/11 04:40 PM
3

That one has a dick.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 04:38 PM
4

Nothing wrong with prefering your child be of a certain gender, it's not a new thing, we're just more open about it with each other in modern days. She already has two boys as well, good on her I say.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 03:32 PM
1

I see.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 01:17 PM
-1

Err, he snapped and killed her when she damaged his star wars toys, he even said so himself, that was the main reason, the breaking point, not necessarily the years of abuse. Murder is murder. If women might get away with softer sentences after such cases of committing murder after being abused, it doesn't necessarily mean the men should also get softer sentences, it's far better if both receive equally harsh sentences, and abuse be taken more seriously and prevented altogether if possible.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 11:29 PM
-8

You do realize I was mocking him, since for nearly (yeah, cept for testosterone, mood, erections, sex) all intents and purposes he may as well be neutered, right? Unless he saved some sperm in the bank or he's willing to later pay a lot of money to maybe reverse what he's done, he kind of removed himself from the gene pool there, and it's a bit sad when we have to commit such acts least our lives could potentially be fucked by a tiny lie. Anyway, the guy above even kindly points my mockery, so a…
/r/MensRights03/11/11 05:15 PM
-4

Aye, that is the scientifically correct term.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 01:38 PM
2

He's spot on at underlining all the hypocrisies and bullshit of feminism, but he trolls and responds in a chauvinistic manner so that doesn't put him in the best of lights.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 01:36 PM
2

But their topic has not been domestic violence.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 01:25 PM
-7

Congratulations on nicely submitting to voluntarily neutering yourself.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 12:45 PM
7

Both are crappy people, guy is a raging meathead, girl is an extremist cunt, whatever.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 09:51 PM
1

I had hoped to be there as well, but I'm rather fresh. Maybe next time.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 06:41 PM
5

What's wrong with being angry, depressed, or violently upset if you've had injustices be inflicted upon you? Shouldn't such anger get a "free pass", to quote a certain someone saying such a thing about women talking about erradicating the male gender? Oh, right, patriarchy!
/r/MensRights02/11/11 06:32 PM
1

But realistically, they do have it much worse than the men (there). It's not a men/women's rights issue so much as a stupid religion issue. Also, I find your user name appropriately hilarious for this situation.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 01:40 PM
0

Well then, yes, I believe you are right.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 11:23 PM
1

Yes, a bit.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 10:12 PM
2

Heh, Saudi Arabia. Women in there don't exactly have it any better you know...
/r/MensRights01/11/11 10:02 PM
6

I was arguing with a feminist and she insists that such cases are a minority. And her point would be...what? That they are somehow irrelevant because of that? Really?
/r/MensRights01/11/11 10:00 PM
2

No no, I know they're dead serious, but to me it appears they're also desperately trying to be funny in everything they say in that little circlejerk. I do take it all very seriously even if they seem like cartoon villains in their manner.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 01:17 AM
2

They're disappointingly unfunny, and you can tell they're trying. "haha, i'm funny, castrate them, I mean, hah, isn't that funny?" "Oh, uhhh yeah boss, you're funny, haha, very funny boss, yeah!"
/r/MensRights01/11/11 12:14 AM
4

That picture is really old, forecasters aren't exclusively female in any of those countries. Oh, and bad news for new fans of Italy. I barely watch TV (much less the weather of all things) but from what I see, they did away with weathermen quite some time ago, nowadays it's just CG and a male or female voice, depending on the time of day. Just making sure no one's gonna go all "LOL DEY ONLY HIRE FEMALE PRESENTERS FOR DA WEATHER FORECAST!" some time in their arguments.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 10:27 PM
2

How pro-patriarchic of her, thanks lady!
/r/MensRights31/10/11 09:54 PM
2

Oh! But of course! I guess the other feminists who don't want to commit gendercide are all automatically good then!
/r/MensRights31/10/11 10:26 AM
5

This shouldn't be censored, this should be exposed.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 11:55 PM
8

Well, we can't all be sane. If anything can be solid proof that women, indeed, as opposed to the stereotype, CAN be vicious murderous pieces of shit, THIS, my friends is it, take notes.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 11:21 PM
2

It wouldn't, but we don't have erogenous breasts. Are you suggesting we also objectify our pecs and wear bras next, or that a little girl doing that should be acceptable? Sorry but you gotta draw the line somewhere, not everything can be equal, trying to force it so is a bad idea.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 11:09 AM
2

is a man....gina
/r/MensRights26/10/11 11:56 AM
3

Whoa me totally not know that, me stoopid man, me only like fuck. "Precum" as it's colloquially called, has rather slim chances of ending up in the right place to cause pregnancy, slightly higher chance (3% vs 2% I believe it was?) of failure than a condom, so there's that. Realistically not all failures are specifically due to precum, so take that aside and it's pretty even. You'd mostly need a big dick, and/or lots of precum for pregnancy to happen out of it. As a side note, ever heard about b…
/r/MensRights25/10/11 07:11 PM
3

baseless insults your post summed up
/r/MensRights25/10/11 05:24 PM
2

Not as a birth control method, since that wouldn’t prevent pregnancy Hah, really? Well, I mean, of course, why would it? Everybody knows just touching a woman can get her pregnant, after all! Child support! I say child support!
/r/MensRights25/10/11 05:17 PM
1

You're right, but there's an influx of LGBT people lurking around trying to push their plights through us, so I guess that's why you got downvoted.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 06:56 PM
8

Was gonna say the same. Fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 11:08 AM
1

lol looks better? Please excuse my roughness but It's a penis for crying out loud, it spends its time in someone's pants or in someone else's vagina, mouth or ass, not in front of their eyes on a day to day basis. You might wanna doublecheck that straight friend of yours' true sexual orientation.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 06:29 PM
3

Take your bullshit somewhere else please, or if you're serious, fight against the idiots giving your movement a bad name, make it so that blogs write complaining about this and not the "catastrophy" of men accompanying children to the bathroom.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 07:58 PM
1

Nothing wrong with having gender roles, they're not the problem, problem is getting everyone to be happy with a balance between what they can do, what they want to do, and what needs to be done to keep the world going. As we can both see, that's pretty darn hard at the moment, we're not sure how to approach this or if it's even possible. For the purpose of propeling society foward faster, you may be right, it may be simpler, as it has been until now, for one side to take control and run things f…
/r/MensRights22/10/11 12:10 AM
3

That somehow makes a lot more sense than it should.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 09:14 PM
1

But think about it. If the natural way for a home to be set up is with the man as head of household, would there really be a need to create religious rules to establish that? Cute. In the retarded little connection her brain was capable of creating, between men ruling and religion, she seems to have conveniently forgotten that humanity existed for quite a great many more years than religion has. I thought an atheist would know that, well, an informed person anyway. So either women "pretended" fo…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 09:13 PM
4

I'm pretty sure he's blissfully happy.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 05:07 PM
6

Over the last decade, the directors of marketing (or whatever they are called) have been rapidly rubbing their hands over how much profit this whole male/female only strategy has been generating. Think for a second and honestly tell me just how many of today's gender targeted items REALLY have a NEED to be like that. If you break even the necessary hygiene products like shampoos and soaps down for example you'll find more or less the same ingredients in all shampoos, minus the flavors and vitami…
/r/MensRights18/10/11 01:38 PM
3

Next stop, from the same uni: "amazing, female students outnumber male ones 3 to 2, clearly because women are intelligent and hard working and men are lazy pigs!"
/r/MensRights17/10/11 07:27 PM
2

Aye, if anything, cunt punts should be made equally funny.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:59 PM
1

This isn't /r/LGBT and that has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 07:39 PM
19

People who aren't evil, oppressive misogynists of course! Makes perfect sense.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 06:29 PM
1

The founding virtues – industriousness, marriage, and religion, are still the basis for male empowerment and achievement. It may be time to say to a number of our young men, “Get off the video games five hours a day, pull yourself together, get a challenging job, and get married.” It’s time to bring back men. Oh, alright, sure, except that for women you had a bit more support and at least a bit (because I'm not discrediting the female rights movement, but it's currently breaking the point of equ…
/r/MensRights15/10/11 12:19 AM
43

This is absolutely ridiculous and pointless, it's a MARRIAGE we're talking about here, has that definition been changed to "two people competing with each other, forced to live in the same house" when I wasn't looking? Are we now so utterly unbearable that such women need some sort of legal, on-paper guaranteed incentive to stay with us or what?
/r/MensRights14/10/11 06:52 PM
1

Honestly I think it's amazing how poorly we get along as a species, to the point we're actually considering developing means for same sexes to produce offspring. If we have the mental capacity to not just develop these scientific means, but to also think of their intended and unintended consequences, no gender will end up being irrelevant. We have to see the points past which reliance on technology becomes a weakness and not a strength.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 02:23 PM
3

Pretty much. You want a man to cuddle and be lovey dovey, you got one, now you changed your mind? What the hell, media? It's really hard to accept the stereotype of some people just not knowing what the fuck they really want.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 05:01 PM
1

Look mommy, I did something on the internet, I'm somebody!
/r/MensRights07/10/11 11:06 PM
1

D'awww, does the widdle wady want to wear big boy pants when she gwows up?
/r/MensRights07/10/11 09:43 PM
3

Ah, I love that reason thing you do there.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 10:29 PM
2

....what? Have you really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
/r/MensRights06/10/11 10:05 PM
2

Those comments, wow...
/r/MensRights06/10/11 09:42 PM
4

I'm almost 100% certain that studies showing that women earn 75% of what men do will be around even when women will earn way over 100% of what men would.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 09:38 PM
3

Because we stand by and let it for fear of being accused of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 02:11 PM
2

Ten. Years. And no one's blaming the dude for assuming the child as his own given that he's probably pretty much forced to anyway.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 06:08 PM
2

I think mommy (who lied about using birth control, lol) and daughter had 10 years of princess fun, then mommy called daddy when the financial going got rough, and I'm sorry to say it but that guy is also someone who seems like a chump to accept an out of the blue, late parenthood like that. "Hey I was allowed 0% contribution on this child's personality development for 10 years and such, but now I'm gonna happily play daddy anyway!"
/r/MensRights05/10/11 02:30 PM
1

Yep, who said they are done exclusively by men? I sure didn't, sorry if that came off from my manner of speaking.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 01:27 PM
1

lol Yippee, equal pay in comfy jobs, also "women can do >dangerous thing< too!"...but not really, most deaths, injuries, dangerous jobs are suffered by men. Either we're a bunch of clumsy motherfuckers or you don't know jackshit about proportions, son.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 12:30 PM
0

Not impressed anymore after seeing this sort of man bashing and poking for the hundredth time.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 09:17 PM
0

There's this thing called a proportion......
/r/MensRights04/10/11 11:25 AM
5

And yet. Army, men. Janitors, men. Firemen, men. Police force, men. Miners, men. But, you know, FUCK those guys, you got your equal or greater pay in the easy going nice, comfy desk jobs, so really, why would your prattling about pay gap and equal workforce opportunities extend to give a shit outside those jobs? Things are SO fair right now, oh "but we still have a lot of work to do"!
/r/MensRights03/10/11 12:29 PM
-1

Good news for Gays. Okay? Go on... Goodbye, mother and father! You're saying it as if THIS is the good thing and mother and father shouldn't exist at all. Get the fuck outta here.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 09:57 AM
4

Pointless subreddit imo
/r/MensRights02/10/11 10:36 PM
-3

Psychology, field dominated by feminists nowadays, fact. Also you should have learned how this works by now: They cry about the smallest imbalance "oh no we are so oppressed, it's patriarchy!" Immediately brag upon gaining an advantage, usually with reverse discrimination "harhar, men are losing derp derp, girl power!"
/r/MensRights01/10/11 09:00 PM
3

Didn't read. By the same person who wrote this.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 08:19 PM
12

How about idiots who prattle on about "herp derp too much testosterone, it's bad!" learn a bit of fucking anatomy. Testosterone and estradiol (and not estrogen, estrogens are a group of hormones among which estradiol being analogous to testosterone) are both major, very fucking important sex hormones that affect a lot of things. That's right, hard as it may be for feminists and other oafs to fathom, testosterone isn't just an aggression on/off switch, neither is estradiol a magical sparkly goody…
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:41 PM
12

Well, to be fair, there's plenty more rap about bitches n hoes, so I guess it balances itself out, but I don't think that song is the best example of using sex to manipulate men anyway.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 01:16 PM
13

Being pro-woman and pro-man is... being a feminist, pretty much? No, thegloss, it reaaaaally isn't.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 09:52 PM
2

Thank you kindly. It's surprising to see people using childish acronyms when talking about sexual intercourse, of course that person is probably not an outstanding one either.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 06:14 PM
4

SWF? ISO? CPL? DD? BC? NSA? NSH? wtfamireading.jpg
/r/MensRights23/09/11 02:52 PM
1

Nice skirt she's wearing, got me really horny, oops, chance has it I also have rapist tendencies...oh well.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 10:53 AM
29

I just LOVE the condescending tone of it, you can see it between each pair of words really, it's like: "u man, so u stupid, i explain slow and simple for u because u stupid, feminism is good, beer and hotdogs, u like beer dont u huhuhu, feminism is beer and hotdogs"
/r/MensRights21/09/11 07:38 PM
1

Wow, that woman has guts.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 12:43 PM
6

You offer someone a hand and now they try to bite your whole arm off.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 08:05 PM
0

rofl these people think genders are like clothes, to be freely worn and changed at will based on convenience.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 02:44 PM
5

When I watch a film like Captain America where the main character is skinny and short then he is injected with drugs and becomes big and strong and a "man" THIS is what we are fighting against. If you are short, skinny you are still a man. If you are poor you are still a man. Uhm, when has that been the problem? You should have rephrased it a bit to say that if you're big and strong you're still a man, not some horrible brute from mars. Feminists indeed seem to LOVE gay people, transsexuals, que…
/r/MensRights04/09/11 06:00 AM
4

It's THAT infuriating.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 06:39 PM
2

Damn, that number next to your name just keeps getting redder and redder... Unfortunately most of what is presented by MRAs as 'matriarchy' is in fact evidence of patriarchy, and there's overwhelming evidence to demonstrate that we live in a patriarchial society that remains heavily skewed in favor of male privilege. It's cute that I see the glass half full and half empty yet you're still putting weight on a claim that society is not only not governed by a matriarchy (which I specifically claime…
/r/MensRights25/08/11 05:36 PM
1

As a whole, we are governed by neither a patriarchy or matriarchy, it's a balance that varies from place to place, but generally every time someone says something like "omg patriarchy/matriarchy!" they tend to overblow the whole issue on either side. There, I did what you might call heavy thinking of the issue by just looking outside, trolololo...okay get out now.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 10:54 AM
1

Go away AMR troll.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 12:33 AM
12

I think every time someone says "patriarchy", it's a given that they ultimately don't know what the fuck they're talking about.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 03:58 PM
1

I want lol this sums up all the problems about feminism, men's rights, egalitarianism, etc etc all of it. You 'want'. "I want my opposite gender to X". Don't want. Just do, adapt, thrive, search for that one person you 'want' because it's already out there, don't push the whole gender into that 'want' instead.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 11:30 AM
2

Doesn't he have muscle mass as well?
/r/MensRights20/08/11 06:40 PM
-2

It almost is if you're fat to begin with, that's six hours of jogging there (less at higher intensity, rofl, I've yet to see someone really overweight able to achieve that, you trying to excuse yourself or something?). Second, the more subtle point you seemed to have skipped, if you are fat, and are able to burn 3000 calories in a day, why the fuck would you then eat 4500 calories, you deserve to made doubly made fun of in that case. Really, if you perform physical activity, and eat enough to ga…
/r/MensRights20/08/11 05:36 PM
-3

You can't be active as all fuck while still managing to take in more calories than you're burning. Matter of fact, you can't be active as all fuck at all if you're fat, I don't often hear of fat (as in fat, not just overweight with muscles, plain ole fat) people starting out with intense cardio and weight lifting sessions, and if by some miracle they do, then they probably don't remain fat for too long, they progress.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 05:22 PM
-3

Being fat implies lack of physical activity. It's not sexist to not like a physically inactive internet politician (since I doubt you can be physically active and fat at the same time, or is it a "gland thing"?), mens sana in corpore sano, after all.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 05:03 PM
6

Single mom?
/r/MensRights17/08/11 02:54 PM
0

"How many Jews can you fit in a Mercedes?" I'm curious to know how women/feminists can be involved in the answer to this question.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 06:41 PM
2

Sitting on the fence, watching this conflict unfold is like watching your parents divorce, only on a larger scale. "IT'S YOUR FAULT!" "NO, IT'S YOURS!" "YOU DID THIS" "AND YOU DID THAT" "WELL I HATE YOU" "I'VE ALWAYS HATED YOU!" "IF IT WEREN'T FOR ME YOU'D BE NOTHING" "IF IT WEREN'T FOR ME YOU COULDN'T AFFORD TO SAY THAT" Why the fuck won't you just stop this infighting, praise your similarities which outnumber your differences, and get along as human beings as one big fucking family (humanity) …
/r/MensRights12/08/11 05:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter