TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SlootShamer Archive

View 0 posts and 35 comments by SlootShamer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

I'm not knocking their desire to start a family. But I would say that means they should retire from military service first. And if one has scruples about needing to marry young lest one "fornicate", I'd say military service is not for such a person.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/14 08:53 PM
8

But they do have a choice getting married while in the service. Military life is incompatible with family life. No married man should be away from home for extended periods of time.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/14 07:08 PM
11

Congratulations. Now dump the gf.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/14 07:04 PM
67

For the filthy hearted, nothing is pure.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:20 AM
1

While I don't think every evil one finds inordinately in single-mother households is due directly to the absence of a father, much of it is. Often times when these startling numbers are mentioned, the first thing the hamsters start spinning out is that it is solely a question of money. Namely, when dads are absent the kids face a financial deficit and this (and only this) is the reason for worse outcomes. Even if one were to grant (for argument's sake) that the only pitfall of absentee dads is a…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 08:59 PM
23

TL-DR: Women ought to be equal players in public life, but generally fall behind in actual moral agency when compared to men.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 02:36 PM
2

This sounds very "carrot and stick" to me.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 01:34 AM
15

Obviously no one likes being under sold. And that's all there is to it.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 09:51 PM
0

Disgusting people rallying for a disgusting cause. Surprising?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 09:30 PM
5

The idea behind Marxism is of "shared wealth". Most people find this idea detestable as usually they make it by working hard towards furthering their own ends. Problem - while not "Marxists", early Christians were certainly communists. They took the bits about sharing everything and renouncing acquisitiveness quite seriously, at least according to the book of Acts, etc.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 08:52 AM
1

Sell it to them as a "multicultural experience." XD
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 08:44 AM
6

Sure - "hold yourself" to a higher standard. But seeing as I'm not really an 'MRA', that means I am weighing the two ideologies and their activists and organizations as a third party. I find one wanting more than the other.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:06 AM
2

Surprise surprise - it turns out a girl who will let herself get passed around like this MIGHT also be of questionable honor or honesty? Who would have known...
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 12:22 AM
0

I feel bad for Cpl.Corwin. fin
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 12:09 AM
3

Bolshevism isn't dead. Conspiracy against the family under the guise of "helping women and children" in that exact tradition of subversion is alive and well. "Cultural Marxism" is most definitely a thing. It is Bolshevism-lite.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 11:45 PM
26

I take what Feminists and MRA say with skepticism on reddit for the reasons you are stating. Skepticism is great, but I don't agree with the equivocation implied by this statement. For all of the shit they take, the MRA is nowhere near as self congratulatory or belligerent as the activist feminist community. The main reason they're controversial at all is for even existing, and that alone is sufficiently infuriating within the feminist paradigm.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 11:28 PM
1

Strange you see it that way. As an "old timer" myself, I only see this stuff gaining more and more power. Google "mean world syndrome." Terms like "rape culture" and "patriarchy" or repeated in mainstream news sources with the commentators even blinking. Yes, but at the same time the so called "mainstream" is rapidly becoming less and less relevant. The Internet has also joined all kinds of disparate people together. The juggernaught of niche culture is only going to keep on expanding. Political…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 03:43 PM
9

It's just the same shit we've been bombarded with since the original "women's suffrage" movement. When they're not arguing that men and women are equal (translation: men don't best women in anything of importance), feminists will unflinchingly retreat into some pretty heavy cliches about "gentle women" and how we'd all be living in paradise if only women ran the world. It really is something to marvel at, given how seriously these broads take themselves.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 03:08 PM
1

Maybe. Though I won't be surprised if domestic/servantrobots become common place by the time the spinster in the OP becomes that old. Or at least they will be available to those of means. Automation/tech is the largely uncredited giant in all significant social change over the last two hundred years. And it is only accelerating.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 03:00 PM
5

Seriously, a group of women? In Vegas? WTF do you think is going to happen? Yes, guys are going to be chatting up your woman and yes they will ask for her number. Is it wrong she gave it out? Fuck yea it is. You know what else is wrong? A bunch of women (never mind attached women at that) taking un-chaperoned vacations to party towns like Las Vegas. Women who carry on like trashy sluts tend to get themselves in trashy slut trouble.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 02:44 PM
15

Neo-bolsheviks are hysterical liars and gaslighters. Of course significant segments of the new media are afraid of them. SJWs will play all sides - including taking advantage of the basic decency of normal people through misrepresentation. Hence why you see so many SJWs willing to selectively court social conservatives when it suits them. Odd bedfellows indeed! Fortunately, I actually see this kind of loopy far-left identity politics business beginning to fall out of fashion, and not just on the…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 01:10 PM
1

Truly. In even a small town there are likely plenty of young ladies who are naturally more "wake up in the morning" beautiful than the better part of Hollywood. Which is understandable - after all, show business is largely about being perceived as what one isn't. Even partied-out, plain looking spinsters can be made to look quite good in the right lighting, with theatrical quality make-up and a good stylist. Never mind what can be done with digital manipulation...
/r/TheRedPill19/08/14 09:08 PM
15

What I hate about saying we shouldn't charge them in order to not deter real victims from coming forward. Of course it's bullshit reasoning. The argument begins and ends with the fact that no other brand of false reporting is treated with such an extreme case of kid gloves. Be assured, one will get the horns from authorities if they waste police time over any other topic. And at the end such offenses (besides false reports of sexual assault, of course) will invariably come with a stern rebuke by…
/r/TheRedPill19/08/14 08:53 PM
2

Shit like this is making my faith in humanity and women dwindle fast. I honestly WANT to be loving, nurturing and actually care about girls I'm seeing/dating, but the evidence has proven time and time again that I need to be an arrogant, selfish asshole to even get a woman at all. Half of the problem is many men coming up into maturity today don't have good role models of confident masculinity. Men either find themselves beating their heads against the wall with prevailing "BP wisdom", or wind u…
/r/TheRedPill19/08/14 08:06 PM
8

This is also part of the reason why most all civilized cultures also have had some notion of propriety when it comes to mixed company. This wasn't simply to avoid suspicion, but also because these people had a more realistic understanding of how people relate to one another, and the inherent dangers for a woman implicit to being alone with strange men. Put another way, if a lady was intent on not being a victim and staying true to her "beloved", there were basic circumstances she would never ent…
/r/TheRedPill19/08/14 06:29 AM
6

"If only women ruled the world, there would be no wars."
/r/MensRights18/08/14 09:50 PM
0

What I wrote was... How deliciously American of you. That is not a statement that is incompatible with the understanding that there are in fact "American socialists." Rather it was a comment on a kind of statement/critique that is quintessentially American insofar as one will not see it mirrored elsewhere (save perhaps as a kind of recent cultural export.) Simply put, you've read too much into my statement.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 01:30 AM
1

I am too against wholly centrally planned economies, though I do see a central government involvement in certain industries as being probably necessary (transportation infrastructure, things like the FAA, etc.) Oh heavens, I don't even think one should be including civil infrastructure in the same category as "state industry." They are not at all the same thing. Even capitalist-market economies require such things to function. I'm more of a syndicalist. In practice I think this is the best appro…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 01:25 AM
2

Your kids are craving boundaries. Your wife, who "yells at you when they're difficult," is craving a co-parent. That's certainly part of it. But in my experience, there is still (and may long be) a huge distance between the identities modern westerners build around their "legal rights" and what they in fact want/need in their human relationships to feel at peace with them. If OP's wife is like most modern western women, she needs a HUSBAND (and not simply a "co-parent" or "partner") a hell of a …
/r/MensRights18/08/14 01:13 AM
1

Didn't you know that a liberal welfare state is socialism you silly commie? /s :) I wouldn't go so far as to say that I am in fact a "socialist" - and I'm certainly not equally sympathetic to everything that falls under the banner of "socialism" (for instance, centrally planned economies have been shown not to work; and I think "one party governments" are antithetical to the whole point of a "worker's state.") BUT I certainly find fault in confusing socialism with liberalism of all things! Where…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 12:49 AM
5

Your problem is that you have no control over your wife and kids. Plenty of special obligation, but neither unique honor nor rights in your own home. Of course you want to run away and join the circus. What you're describing is the shitty scam recent generations of men have been roped into under the guise of marriage. Before divorcing the wife (and certainly before you abandon your kids as a lost cause), try acting like a man for once - or at least, do something manly beside playing family piggy…
/r/MensRights17/08/14 11:06 PM
6

Yes, that would be a plain reading of the New Testament. Likewise, the early Christians lived as communists based on this straightforward understanding of the Christian doctrine. Of course, that's a bit of a problem for the cafeteria conservatism which prevails in the U.S...
/r/MensRights17/08/14 09:12 PM
8

The narrative fits right in with what Ayn Rand wrote. No, she was a pretty silly woman at the end of the day as well. Feminism is much like socialism, except that it paints women as being incapable of being responsible for themselves instead of the masses. How deliciously American of you. Elsewhere we find the whole idea of working men not fighting for power and their families to be a supremely servile and contemptuous thing. But I suppose - like many yanks - you use "socialism" (workers control…
/r/MensRights17/08/14 09:10 PM
5

Restricting women to vote, hold property, etc. etc. would be a downside to the bad old days - but women always had empathy as a benefit. Please note that universal enfranchisement amongst citizen males only preceded that of women in the decades immediately prior to women's suffrage. Prior to that, there were commonly property minimums that acted as barriers to participation in elections. This was the state of affairs in both the USA and the UK, and many other nations. Indeed, the only reason the…
/r/MensRights17/08/14 01:03 PM
40

I think it's delicious that feminism fundamentally operates on the basis of traditionalist social dynamics and aesthetics. First world liberal feminism is essentially women who can't shaking down men who can - a story as old as humanity itself.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 12:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter