| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | [FR] Half f-close. Just a report of tonight's events. Interesting.Just because you put a condom on doesnt mean you 'get' to f close. | /r/seduction | 22/01/12 11:12 PM |
| 11 | Self-confessed radical feminist gave her baby son a neutral name ‘Sasha’ and now she regularly dresses Sasha, 5, in girls’ clothes.The whole issue is that if he follows a typically male path, he might not become something that he has the potential to do (e.g. dancing, nursing, carer). I can see where she is coming from in that sense, that he shouldn't be limited to one particular path (male). But then she actively disregards that, as you said, by not being allowed to wear "overtly masculine" clothes, etc. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/12 06:07 AM |
| 13 | Self-confessed radical feminist gave her baby son a neutral name ‘Sasha’ and now she regularly dresses Sasha, 5, in girls’ clothes.The difference is the way people treat you. She's not gonna be changing lots of people's attitudes about pink = girl, and blue = boy. She's making a statement about society's preconceptions, but then she feeds into it by actively dressing her kid to fit into one of those preconceptions. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/12 05:37 AM |
| 3 | Reading a book at the bar.Fucking hell, NSFL even | /r/seduction | 21/01/12 05:30 AM |
| 55 | Self-confessed radical feminist gave her baby son a neutral name ‘Sasha’ and now she regularly dresses Sasha, 5, in girls’ clothes.I can kinda see what she's trying to say, but she actively disregards it when she dresses him herself. If anything, she should just lay out an assortment of clothes and let him pick them. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/12 05:09 AM |
| 1 | Lifehacks (sorta) that help with Gameyou don't need to do them, but if you only do things that help you with women, then you're an idiot. | /r/seduction | 21/01/12 04:51 AM |
| 1 | Shaking my head at this right now... Imagine if it was #realmenwant..I'm not god's gift to women. I don't get laid like a rockstar, but when I do have sex, it's not cause I'm a douchebag. Stop blaming women for your lack of success with them, dude. The kind of women who go for the actually abusive men aren't the ones you want to be with, anyway. either way, bro, if your theories about women are right, shouldn't me being a conceited asshole get me women anyway? | /r/MensRights | 19/01/12 10:44 AM |
| 0 | Shaking my head at this right now... Imagine if it was #realmenwant..well, my apologies for you being a bitter fuck that doesn't know how to talk to women. Honestly, there is nothing more pathetic than men who go on about how the only type of men women go for are the "bad boys" who treat them badly, when it's simply not true. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/12 02:10 AM |
| 2 | Shaking my head at this right now... Imagine if it was #realmenwant..well clearly you're horrible with women because I don't treat women "like shit" and SOMEHOW I get laid. I wonder why? Is it because I don't call/text her, cheat on her, hit her, lie to her? No, it's because I'm a likeable human being who doesn't put her on a pedestal. Also I have charm and wit oozing out of my anus. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/12 03:34 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter