But it's true. Not really...it isn't. A accusation on it's own doesn't cancel out anything. When did he say that? Not the same as actually doing it then. Not at all...if they admitted that then that's all we really need to hear and that says a lot about them. Meanwhile you bring up other accusastions too...so please don't be a hypocrite here. I obviously know that. I have no one way anecdotes...but again there is no concrete evidence that he is guilty...even the prosecutor said i…
Not really...her story has holes and she never contacted anyone or even the police and she's made false allegations before. No he hasn't admitted to rape.
I mean...there were many other false accuastions that admitted they wanted a payout as they said and even this rape allegation has holes in it as you can see in the other comments and she has made false allegations before too.
I mean...these are still accusations without real full prove. That isn't concrete proof though and the examiner could have had a bias. How are we sure she's telling the truth? Again no concrete proof. Nah it wasn't that...it was just him trying to convince her to have sex with him. It wasn't like a threat. That isn't what he said. Nah he isn't one. He really isn't one though.
