TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SmithW-6079 Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by SmithW-6079 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Don't worry mate, I'll take it from here.
/r/BlackPillScience30/10/22 10:33 PM
9

It is in Christianity. Divorce for anything other than infidelity is a sin.
/r/BlackPillScience30/03/22 11:36 AM
2

They've always been radicals, just now it has a distinctly Marxist tone.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/22 01:09 AM
4

I agree, however that's not my point nor the issue at hand. The FBI want to talk to him about his connection to Epstein and regarding various other accusations, so far he's refused to do so. The only reason he's been able to do so is because of his position in the royal family. The longer he resists settling these claims, the more people are going to assume his guilt. If he's innocent, it would be in his best interest to cooperate with any such investigation. He could also pursue a malicious sla…
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/22 01:02 AM
2

I don't disagree. The point being he's repeatedly refused to answer questions or face his accuser. Neither you nor I would get away with such behaviour, it's only because of his position as a member of the royal family that he's been able to do so. That's not going to help his case in the eyes of the public, most people will just see him as a member of the privileged elite, getting away with misconduct.
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/22 11:59 PM
0

No, I'm a conservative. I believe that those accused of a crime, should answer any official questions regarding the crime. Nobody should seek to use their position to avoid accountability, whether that be Hilary Clinton or HRH The Duke of York. My position isn't that he is guilty, only that he's made himself LOOK guilty by refusing to answer such questions.
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/22 11:04 PM
7

Feminism was hijacked by radical Marxists back in the sixties and seventies. It's a common tactic of Marxists to attack the person rather than address their argument. In fact it is a tactic that Saul Alinsky encouraged in his book 'rules for radicals'.
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/22 10:55 PM
1

He's being treated that way because he's consistently tried to avoid answering questions and on the one occasion when he did, he lied through his teeth. My point is that he's not exactly helped his own case in that regard, if he was innocent then he'd have no problem talking to the FBI would he. You're correct, justice needs to take place but it won't until he is forced to answer questions. As far as I'm concerned, he should do as much as is required of him or be struck off the civil list.
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/22 10:39 PM
0

Then why has he consistently refused to talk to the FBI? An innocent man would want to clear his name. He could have done so by talking to the FBI on British soil without the fear of arrest. How do you prove that kind of negative? Also, it is up to the accuser to prove the accused's guilt, not for the accused to prove his innocence. Agreed but he still needs to address his connection to Epstein. Other than a failed damage limitation exercise, he's not done that. He's been hiding behind his royal…
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/22 10:27 PM
6

In all fairness, he's not helped himself there. He could have spoken to the FBI years ago but he made so many excuses for why he wasn't going to do so. If he was innocent, surely he'd want to prove it. Edit: I'm not sure why I got the downvote. I'm a British citizen and while I'm not an avid royalist, prince Andrew has repeatedly done a lot of damage to the reputation of the royal family, not least by refusing to answer questions on the above subject and his connection to Epstein. Innocent men d…
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/22 09:38 PM
29

This is exactly why men don't talk about domestic abuse, Dr Phil has shown that it's one rule for men and an entirely different rule for women. Violent and abusive women thrive off of situations like that. So much for equality between the sexes.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 12:19 PM
0

You take offence, at m pointing out of your offense! You understand that Hamas wants to drive Israel into the sea? That Israel has a right to exist? That Israel is attacked by rockets almost on a daily basis? You understand that by doing (((this))), you're not referencing the nation Israel but..... ....... (((an entire ethnic group)))? Didn't think so!
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/21 08:28 PM
4

Do you mean antisemites? They're awful bigots who just like feminists, judge other people based on some arbitrary aspect of their character.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/21 02:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter