TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SnarkMasterRay Archive

View 0 posts and 147 comments by SnarkMasterRay on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

One doesn't need to respond to criticism and pressure, and if someone does respond it doesn't have to be with confrontation, although there are definitely some who view anything short of full capitulation as confrontation. In my dealings with feminists who push "it's all patriarchy" I simply say "no, it's people in power and that is male, female, white, and BIPOC. Plenty of poor white men without a chance in life and there are now more women going through college than men in the US." That may or…
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:58 PM
16

You mean? like asking a question? ever other word? Mix that with vocal fry and I'm done & gone.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 04:55 AM
2

What I was referring to was de-facto mens-only clubs. The rules didn't explicitly state no women in many cases, it was just "how it was done." That was where the original discrimination lawsuits and efforts started. Some more firm examples: Gentlemen's clubs will be forced to admit women Seattle Rainier Club membership
/r/MensRights27/01/22 05:50 PM
14

It's a case of equal not being equal and having a double standard. I would be fine with having women's only gyms if we could have men's only gyms, but that was effectively outlawed back in the day because of sexism and the old boys club. It's a case of "eat your cake and have it to."
/r/MensRights26/01/22 10:36 PM
69

Kinda of like unions. Teachers unions are there to advocate for teachers, not the children. Police unions are there to advocate for police, not the general public. Why would we expect a group that advocates for one sex to actually be focused on equality? That's why I consider myself an egalitarian - you don't get to equality by advocating for just one group.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 08:07 PM
1

Sounds like two (or three depending on how you want to look at it) people behaving badly in general.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 05:30 PM
3

Is that really irrational anger though? I'm not totally against objectification and I believe both sexes do it regularly, but is it irrational to be angry that they first and many times only thing a person in general is judged or valued on is their physical attractiveness?
/r/MensRights23/09/21 06:13 PM
24

Anything can be considered harassments today. 20+ years ago I was given the advice that "if someone feels your behavior is harassment, it is." It might not be, but you absolutely must think this way today to protect yourself from people (this is not limited to sexual harassment). We live in a perverted puritanical world where the first wrong you commit can destroy your life and livelihood.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:23 PM
2

Where are men supposed to reasonably get support? "You're privileged so you don't need any support." I hope the /s is obvious.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 06:29 PM
14

Feminism = equality Egalitarianism = the wrong type of equality
/r/MensRights14/07/21 06:13 PM
34

Ohio's wiretapping law would appear to support the father's actions, something OP didn't mention in the mass of links and policy.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 01:42 PM
2

Or maybe this discussion first.
/r/MensRights29/05/21 03:43 PM
4

Maybe you protect yourself by saving the ship from getting torpedoed instead of consigning yourself to a lifeboat.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 10:17 PM
4

It's not barbaric. It's a piece of skin. So's the clitoris. "Female Circumcision" is now called "Female Genital Mutilation." That should put it into perspective.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 11:34 PM
9

Australia seems to be the grips of a hysteria that political scientists will be analysing for years to come. Non-exhaustive list: America and Canada as well.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 03:11 PM
2

No true Scotsman, eh?
/r/MensRights12/04/20 06:35 PM
2

Both parties are built on the foundation of tribalism - if you think the left side of the spectrum is immune you need to take a step back and re-examine their internal politics.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 06:34 PM
14

feminism is just the belief that women and men should be equal No - by the very nature of the word it is female-centric. Equality would be Egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 01:51 PM
5

Video was shot by a friend of hers - how likely would it be to end up in court?
/r/MensRights02/09/19 03:40 PM
12

I was just surprised given the sub and how much news it made here.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 04:49 AM
26

Seriously?
/r/MensRights07/07/19 04:45 AM
3

I haven't had anyone demand I suppress my emotions since my Dad asked me if I wanted something to cry about 40+ years ago. Quite the opposite in fact - there's a lot of "get in touch" type messaging out there.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 02:07 PM
12

This is the way of modern US politics. Rather than try and focus on making your voice stronger and better, an inordinate effort is placed on making everyone else' voice weak.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 02:53 PM
5

It depends on how interesting the NSA or other governments find you!
/r/MensRights26/12/18 09:03 PM
6

It's hardwired into men that they just be polite like that. Naw, it's trained like most social norms. I see a lot more men these days who are self-absorbed and not being polite. I have doors opened for me more often when I'm carrying a load in by older men than younger ones.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 01:39 AM
2

Bullshit and flat out wrong unless your goal is to perpetuate inequality. Take the moral high ground and be the example to others and they won't have any cannon fodder for their, "see, they're behaving badly" arguments.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 06:01 PM
25

Well duh, you're a man and thus are probably out to rape all women. She had to do that for protection! /S
/r/MensRights21/08/18 10:32 PM
5

Name one politician who was office within the last 25 years who honestly supports the overthrow of the government, followed by a dictatorship, where the working class control all industry. Kshama Sawant of the Seattle City Council has come close and the Seattle City Council is full of all sorts of virtue signalling and social justice.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 11:42 PM
6

You know, you can strive to be better than your adversary and hold the high ground.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 05:23 PM
1

And there was at least one soldier of color in the movie as well; French trying to get on to the Mole near the beginning.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:50 PM
-20

Still not a men's right issue.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 10:08 PM
1

No kids, no desire to.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 05:29 AM
1

The law enables and encourages bad behavior. I'm not saying it doesn't, just that you can decrease the amount of an effect it has on your life by learning how to keep the people who might cause that to a minimum in your life. It may mean that you don't get laid your first date or two, but it can pay off in the long run.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 11:58 PM
1

You never were in a good relationship, were you? It all depends on what you want. My ex and I both really like aviation and spent trips just hitting every air museum we could in a region. Yeah, I can still do that and enjoy it, but it's diminished because I don't have someone that I'm intimate (not talking sex here) with to share it with. No single words that can convey a conversation. No raised eye brows that only the other person understands. No shared experiences. I'm single now. I do all rig…
/r/MensRights11/02/17 04:41 AM
1

No risk, no reward.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 03:10 AM
1

Figure out how to read and understand people and you won't need to worry about the law as much.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 03:09 AM
2

What did you do that got her angry? Circumstances play a large part of this. I was divorced a couple of years ago and she and I are still friends. I never gave her anything to rage over, so maybe I'm somehow super unique and special, but I've run into a lot of women who would get mad but not try and destroy your life over it.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 03:07 AM
2

Male, got divorced, ex and I were civil and are still friends. She never went off the way Tiiimmboo whatver too many characters did.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 03:05 AM
1

They can; I have a friend who does. It's just a lot more rare and harder when there's a fight.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 12:12 AM
2

And run by an elected rich white conservative, so you may want to take the blinders off.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 10:53 PM
2

Unless you know roughly 3.5 billion women then this is literally the case.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 10:13 PM
1

Getting out is a better idea.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 09:54 PM
1

Which I happen to agree with, But someone stated that she was a terrible person just for lying about it and I'm saying that ONE terrible event doesn't automatically make one a terrible person. We've all made mistakes that have hurt someone else, but that doesn't mean we're terrible people. She obviously went WAY, WAY over the line, but if we're going to fix the problem of false accusations we need to take a step back and do more than simply say they are evil people and not care any more. WHY did…
/r/MensRights06/01/17 05:32 PM
0

You are confusing things. Lying about it is one thing. Not confessing the day after is another. Not confessing the day after the day after is another thing. Each is separate. People are wanting to hang her for lying without understanding the reason she initially lied. I am not saying she is not a terrible person, just that ONE EVENT does not necessarily make someone a terrible person. Twenty-one years of not coming clean does make her a terrible person, but the initial incident is complex and no…
/r/MensRights06/01/17 07:22 AM
1

No, she's definitely an awful person I didn't say that she wasn't. I said that ONE THING doesn't make someone an awful person. Repeated acts (not coming clean for years counts) definitely do. If she lied because her Dad beat her and she was trying to get away, she's not a terrible person, she's an incredibly DAMAGED person. If she then continues with that lie, they yes, sure as shit she's terrible. But we need to separate out the wheat from the chaff on this and determine the true facts. Pitchfo…
/r/MensRights06/01/17 07:21 AM
1

I didn't say "things" though, I said "a thing." Sure as shit, letting him rot that long is a terrible thing. But I was specifically referring to people wanting to hang her for the initial lie, despite the notion that she had been abused. What she did was wrong, but it was not done in a vacuum. If we're going to learn from and prevent things like this happening again, we need to pay attention and discern the full extent of what actually happened. We need to be more than just "EVIL WITCH, BURN HER…
/r/MensRights06/01/17 07:17 AM
2

No it doesn't. Twenty One years is filled with days upon days of not coming forward. Each one of those is a separate event, and a separate thing. "A" terrible thing doesn't necessarily make her a terrible person. We don't know why she lied, maybe there was a "good" reason. That one thing doesn't make her a terrible person. It's all of the years SINCE, the constant, repeated failure to come forward and set the record straight that makes her a terrible person. I am not saying she's not a terrible …
/r/MensRights06/01/17 07:13 AM
1

You are confusing things. Lying about it is one thing. Not confessing the day after is another. Not confessing the day after the day after is another thing. Each is separate. People are wanting to hang her for lying without understanding the reason she initially lied. I am not saying she is not a terrible person, just that ONE EVENT does not necessarily make someone a terrible person.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 07:10 AM
-32

Doing a terrible thing doesn't necessarily make one a terrible person. I agree she should have come clean earlier, but you're convicting her with as much evidence and understanding as the original judge.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 02:48 AM
1

Donald Trump has been rather effective at controlling the narrative, wouldn't you say? If the Left were truly masters would they have lost? Both sides are rather good at twisting the narrative. It's dangerous to turn your back on either of them.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 08:24 AM
24

Donald Trump.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 06:31 PM
1

I'm not saying that there are no cases where hate is logical. Just that if we want to truly fight to win, there has to be a logical, non-emotional core that exists that can speak clearly and concisely about what is wrong. You did that with your second sentence. It's the "Fuck feminists" only type of statements we need to avoid. This is a battle of ideology, and to win that, you have to think as much about the general population's impressions of action and words as anything. We're never going to …
/r/MensRights10/11/16 04:20 AM
6

Yes. There should be equal opportunity. Equal outcomes is far more complex and not a black and white statement.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 12:15 AM
8

Well, I consider myself egalitarian so the components I think should be kept are honestly the ones that dovetail with equality. Women should be able to have the same freedoms of men in that they should be able to work towards a desired destiny (i.e. "A woman's place is...."). Equal pay for equal work IF they are talking about true equal work (experience, hours put in, physicality if it's a manual labor job). Please note the first sentence says they should be able to WORK TOWARDS a desired destin…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:17 PM
53

There's a difference between criticism and hate. If we really want to deflect the bad parts of feminism with maximum impact we need to be better and not simply a mirror image. Be the ideal, not the counter.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 04:57 PM
-1

Not sure why it is popping up all over again. Because we have an echo chamber too. It's news to some, but others like to keep hammering a point and will use old stories to do so.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 05:32 PM
-5

Downvotes prove my point.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 04:02 PM
-8

Not really, the way we've evolved it's easier to get mad than remain happy in stressful situations. It is much easier to focus on the negative.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:57 PM
1

We need to behave better if we're going to keep any moral high ground. It may take longer, it may be harder work, but it is WORTH IT.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 11:38 PM
5

Anderson was her name, Bingo was her name-o. Completely different things.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 11:26 PM
34

The whole thing was kind of an insult to the original cast of brilliant characters.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 11:22 PM
1

If you legitimately want a discussion you go to where the people are. Reddit does not have a monopoly on the people, so we need multiple avenues for this.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 01:59 PM
2

So, go down the road of emotionally shaming members of our own gender that women are famous rather than try and rationally discuss or point out logical flaws?
/r/MensRights11/07/16 01:56 PM
12

Not much else to say, except that paybacks can be a real bitch. "Self realization. I was thinking upon the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'" - Chris Knight in the movie "Real Genius"
/r/MensRights31/05/16 08:30 PM
1

Hence "did exist." Past tense.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 10:15 PM
1

Yes, caused by the choices she made, not her gender.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 08:09 PM
1

A woman who chooses to take five years off to have kids and goes back to the same job that she left and yet earns less than a male who stayed the entire time does have a wage gap, but because of the choices she made, not her gender.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 08:09 PM
1

The wage gap DID exist and does exist now, but only because of decisions women make in their lives (having kids mainly). The effect this will have is debatable at this point.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 01:38 PM
11

Everything's amazing and no one's happy.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 06:30 PM
1

lack of sympathy One problem is that there are very vocal groups with a lack of sympathy on both sides. It makes it less likely that someone will move to center if they are expecting an attack if they show any "weakness."
/r/MensRights19/04/16 10:07 PM
4

"Kill all Men" is not an opinion. Not all hate speech is distasteful opinion and vice versa.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 08:56 PM
19

OP is referring to the selective service, where men are required to sign up but women are not. That is the context of the "I deserve to be shot at" that I think the downvoters and responders are missing.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 10:24 PM
15

Every last vestige of non-conformity thinking will be rooted out and destroyed!
/r/MensRights23/10/15 08:36 PM
4

What's our vector, Victor?
/r/MensRights09/10/15 09:41 PM
1

What proof do we have this was made by more than one person for more than their own personal use? As /u/bycrozz points out, it looks like RES tagging. I'm ready to call "ready, fire, aim" on this one.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 08:37 PM
1

Nyet - you are clear, comrade!
/r/MensRights29/07/15 08:30 PM
1

Sometimes you have to cut good tissue out to get the cancer! The greater good demands it!
/r/MensRights29/07/15 08:29 PM
4

Let's please not act like the rabid feminists.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 12:26 AM
3

There are no innocents in War - read up on the Rape of Nanking and Unit 731. The Japanese government was doing evil things as well. So, should the US have just stopped at the shores and forced the entire country to starve to death because their government couldn't lose face and surrender? This is why war is so horrible and why we must keep talking about history and not paving over it and pretending the messy stuff that makes you uncomfortable didn't happen. Bad people will continue to do bad thi…
/r/MensRights29/06/15 04:17 PM
15

You know what's really idiotic? No, what?
/r/MensRights23/06/15 04:56 AM
2

That's what I came to say, albeit it's current;y 740 upvotes and 248 signatures.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 01:50 AM
-1

Raising a child is no where near as expensive as the industry would have people to believe. How many do you have?
/r/MensRights20/04/15 06:31 PM
-6

While it is interesting that the father's MONEY is seen as more important than his presence in his children's life, I disagree that child support should be completely abolished. Both parents have a responsibility. Both should be "oppressed" for their actions and have to pay for it in some way. The current system is badly designed, but that doesn't mean we should throw all of the responsibility on women.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 04:21 PM
1

Yes, and you do that by presenting good, factual arguments and examples that undermine their recruitment of the next generation. Show both men and women beneficial ways to feel empowered instead of just trying to tear each other down.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 10:01 PM
-1

Then you should know that this isn't lethal ground.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 11:10 PM
-1

If you've been in a war then you know. If you think a cultural battle like this is "lethal" then you're just guilty of not knowing the english language. Being subjugated and repressed is a crime, but it ain't lethal.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 06:26 AM
1

Logic takes time. You have to think long term, not white hot immature rage. Do you honestly think that flooding reporting systems is going to "teach" them anything other than "men misogynistic pigs who will try and sabotage our righteous efforts"? I'm doing the same thing to you that I'm espousing we do to them. I probably can't change your mind, but you don't really matter that much. By answering in a logical way with points that people can reflect on, I take away a portion of the power of your…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 06:23 AM
2

Just stand the ground on logic. If you present a good, logical argument people will get tired of the shrill yellers and see them for what they are, and logical, well reasoned statements for what they are.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:15 AM
1

It is not wise to fight stupid with stupid. You are making a connection that is flat-out wrong and have no idea what lethal ground is.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:13 AM
9

Because that's a bad way to frame it. I've worked for bad bosses of both sexes. Saying that men are more suited essentially says that anyone who isn't male is LESS suited to be a leader. It's too broad a brush to use.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 03:33 AM
1

Two wrongs doesn't make a right. As much as I believe there should be repercussions for false statements and damages for lost reputation and slander, I also believe that we should hold to the principles of innocent until proven guilty, and that the accuser should not be publicly shamed, made fun of, or made a chew toy of group rage. If we are to seek change, we need to set a good example and not merely the flip side of the same coin.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 03:45 PM
0

My question remains unanswered.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 06:12 PM
-2

You have two people working the assembly line doing the same work, but one's been there longer. Unions being what they are, the person who's been there longer has a larger paycheck.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 04:03 AM
-5

You've never dealt with real hate before, have you?
/r/MensRights10/10/14 04:00 AM
-12

Women ARE paid less than men for the same work. But guess what, MEN are paid less than men for the same work - it's called experience.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 11:17 PM
-6

And you hate women, if we're using equal weights. I know women who complain about the wage gap, but they don't hate men. They just hear about this wage gap and wish they were making more money. Your view is overly simplified and biased.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 11:16 PM
5

So, someone has an epiphany and you attack them for it? Bravo!
/r/MensRights02/10/14 02:21 AM
5

Be the change you hope to see.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 05:00 PM
1

It seems that about 3/4 of the posts here are whining about feminists instead of working on men's rights. I don't think "destruction of female privilege" is a goal either; or at least, it's a bad way of saying "equality for both sexes."
/r/MensRights04/09/14 11:03 PM
1

No, not really. "The point" of providing a good, mature face for Men's Rights is not "the goal" of the movement. It's just one aspect we should strive for. It's not a simple issue, it exists on multiple levels. If you want to win people over so they listen and don't dismiss you out of hand, a reputation as a dick doesn't help. So, to present your argument so that people listen and believe and advocate, you need to come across as respectful and not what so much of the radical feminist movement is…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 08:24 PM
0

So, your take away is that we should be more like TRP? No thanks!
/r/MensRights04/09/14 03:53 PM
0

Bad press makes it grow badly.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 02:56 AM
0

No, bad press can kill a small movement before it gets any sort of traction.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 07:36 PM
0

Fuck you, grow up, and expand your horizons outside your little shit-filled sandbox. There, I responded as an effective asshole and didn't coddle your feelings.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 07:36 PM
-1

"No such thing as bad press" is bullshit. Yes, there is bad press. You've seen that meme, "You're not wrong, you're just an asshole." People don't want to ally with assholes and will do things just to spite them. You're doing the MRM no good with that attitude.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:59 PM
1

How do they realize "we" are right when they back out due to the unpleasantness right away? You may attract more extremist posters, but you drive away the moderates, and they're the ones you need to sway.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:57 PM
4

I wasn't aware of the /r/mensrants subreddit until this thread made mention of it. Perhaps a sticky reminder off and on would help get the word out? Either that or bumping it up higher on the sidebar....
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:52 PM
2

It's almost as if "they" decided the best way to fight extremism is to act the exact same way in reverse. I'd much rather focus on solving problems than complaining about them. Take complaints about all the hardcore feminism stuff off the subreddit and focus on how we can actually effect change
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:50 PM
-1

The point is not to change the minds of those who won't, but to keep others from joining them.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:46 PM
8

For all of the shit they take, the MRA is nowhere near as self congratulatory or belligerent as the activist feminist community. Doesn't matter. Hold yourself and your principles to the HIGHEST standards, not the "better than some other group" standards.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:03 AM
1

No, I don't care about you because you don't care. Because you think that because it doesn't matter to you, it shouldn't matter to others. Because this has already happened to you and it's too late to change your destiny resulting from it, but by the same token, we can perhaps change the destiny of those who are yet to come.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 09:18 PM
4

Eh, we don't care about you anyway; this is about future generations. Give a care and advocate for those that are too young to. If you honestly don't really care even about that, then
/r/MensRights13/08/14 09:45 PM
26

How do you like not having a choice in the matter? That's what this about. It's a pervasive, forced change to roughly / at least 58% of American male babies.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:09 PM
1

And if you kill someone their family may sue. You're in for a long, expensive court case, and do you really want to support lasers that much.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:11 PM
3

A similar comment to "A woman gives birth to a baby four times a second on planet earth. This woman must be found and stopped!"
/r/MensRights08/06/14 06:12 AM
5

One wonders if making false statements will be added to the charges....
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:40 PM
3

Why? Are you just into watching people tear each other down?
/r/MensRights14/05/14 10:40 PM
2

Have you ever been hit? Have you ever been beaten so badly you needed to go to the hospital? You cheapen true violence with an attitude like that. You just need to come up with a better description for the affect verbal abuse has.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 11:05 PM
2

It doesn't get you away from the pain in the quiet times. It's a part of you you can't run from. When someone dies, you miss them but at some point recognize they're gone and that you can't do anything about it. But when it's kids you love, it will torture you. Maybe I can sneak back and see them.. I just want to see them! You never live without regret and pain.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 11:00 PM
3

If it's not too much trouble, could you post the date of his suicide near the top? There's nothing until the very bottom where I see the posted date.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 10:58 PM
3

It helps a story go viral to sensationalize it - this one doesn't need that, but the "mods have been deleting" tag is going to generate more clicks.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 10:48 PM
4

Is it really anyone else's business?
/r/MensRights24/04/14 10:36 PM
7

I hope your daughter (and hers) are OK/better/coping these days.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 10:34 PM
3

When have politicians as a group ever wanted to do more than the easiest thing to get lots of votes?
/r/MensRights18/04/14 05:57 PM
2

That's cool, putting Party before country is the same as putting your sex first too, so it's consistent at least.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 05:56 PM
8

Go independent! Write people and tell them why you are or are not voting for them. I don't think any other party is is viable than the top two, so I spread the votes around based on issues and then give feedback - it might not have all that much effect now, but if more people did it....
/r/MensRights17/04/14 10:28 PM
2

I can empathize. I travel to DC and San Francisco for research and bring some delicate equipment with me. I always bring it as carry-on so I can control and keep it safe. Of course, I did leave my laptop on the plane once.....
/r/MensRights25/02/14 08:05 PM
2

Yeah, my wife's 5' so I'm the one that puts our bag in the overhead. That said, when she's traveling alone, her clothes are so much smaller than mine that half of the time she can just bring a backpack and fit the whole thing under the seat in front of her....
/r/MensRights25/02/14 04:30 AM
87

Don't forget that if you can't lift it, you should probably check it (regardless of sex).
/r/MensRights24/02/14 06:53 AM
-2

Thus demonstrating your complete ignorance as to where you were. Maybe you shouldn't throw stones, since you ig'nant yourself?
/r/MensRights23/02/14 01:06 AM
3

That's not caution - it's paranoia.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 01:01 AM
1

And if we can't reach across the aisle and try and trust someone, no one's getting nowhere (intentional double negative).
/r/MensRights22/02/14 09:25 PM
3

You think most hardcore feminists think that way?
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:14 AM
14

Want to know why men objectify women? Because it's easier to be dominant with an object, plain and simple. Want to know why some men have trouble respecting women's boundaries? Because they've been rejected so many times for not being dominant enough. Disagree. I objectify women because I enjoy visual aspects of the form. Keep in mind that objectification is only one aspect of my relationship with another person. I may look at a woman and go, "Damn, she's hot," but that doesn't mean that I am go…
/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:42 PM
1

It just perpetuates the system. If your idea of equality is replacing the current system with you at the top, then I'm sorry, but there's no positive change there and I'll fight it. (speaking to the blogger and not you specifically).
/r/MensRights08/02/14 03:44 AM
89

Actually, no. She added this: Edit: I see I have acquired some visitors from the Mens Rights subreddit. Hi there! Just so you know, this is my space. You can comment if you like (I see some of you have) be aware that I will authorise your coments or not, on my whim. No free speech here. Free speech equals equality, so I guess we have another example of where she stands.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 06:34 PM
0

WTF kind of response is that? He states that teachers are trained and certified, which is true. Doesn't mean that they're trained WELL and that the certs aren't BS - just that there are some set standards. Just because he doesn't say teachers are the problem you're going to assign bias? If you lead off with a statement like that it usually indicates your own bias. And to be clear before you accuse ME of bias, yes, I know. Everyone's biased. I believe the US school system is screwed up, but a goo…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 09:35 PM
-9

And yet false rape accusations seem to be the thing most posters here are concerned with.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 06:59 PM
7

The one issue feminists should be focusing on is inequality in politics and high level jobs (CEO's, senators, mayors etc.), What are you talking about? They're there. Mary Barra was just named CEO of General Motors, Carly Fiorina was CEO of HP for a while.... The issue is that there have been LESS women who have had the lifetime of work necessary to gain the experience and reputation that is required for those jobs. If you look at the numbers of women entering the workforce NOW, it ain't going t…
/r/MensRights14/12/13 10:33 PM
2

Like any movement, there are good points and bad points. Open minded and close minded believers. There's not a good answer to your question, because you're painting a large topic with a large brush. Feminism just is - it's how its proponents act upon the 9sometimes conflicting) ideas that should be evaluated.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 07:22 PM
10

Are they counting kids separate? I've seen statistics (on phone, won't look for references now) that indicated a large number of people who were living in poverty were "children" ( vague reference with no sex given).
/r/MensRights16/11/13 03:33 AM
1

Lawyers generally specialize. Some will focus on property law, others on criminal, there are a bunch that focus on intellectual property and copyright. I used to work with a firm that ONLY did social security cases. It's not sexist, it's just specialization on a specific part of law that is complex. If you take a case to court, you want to win, and you want a lawyer who is intimately familiar with that topic.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 05:10 PM
2

And obviously all Facebook employees subscribe to that theory.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 09:31 PM
23

Noisy idiots who get traction in the press.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 05:57 PM
1

Shouldn't have let you out in the first place!
/r/MensRights28/07/13 03:22 PM
3

Is grape soda rape?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 11:05 PM
10

It's rape, Dave. Everything's rape. Everything is rape Dave
/r/MensRights26/07/13 11:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter