TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SnooBeans6591 Archive

View 3 posts and 1,017 comments by SnooBeans6591 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
397

DiscriminationSnooBeans6591/r/MensRights16/03/23 05:14 PM
52

FeminismSnooBeans6591/r/MensRights15/01/24 07:35 PM
40

Activism/SupportSnooBeans6591/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:35 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,017 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I don't see how equality is winning ; even when women already have legal privileges, feminists keep complaining asking for more. That means we are going to have less and less equality as women keep getting even more legal privileges
/r/MensRights18/07/26 09:58 AM
2

I can confidently say this person is more sexist than any man they ever met.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/07/26 12:09 AM
7

New post from the feminist hate movement
/r/EverydayMisandry16/07/26 10:41 PM
5

I don't have a car anymore, but if I did, yes, I would use these. But 90% is surely invented. It's surely below 50%.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/07/26 02:13 PM
4

The whole UN is the same anyway; a misandric organisation. They promote the same as UN women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 09:11 PM
9

Feminism is against egalitarianism. You see that openly said in feminist subs
/r/MensRights12/03/26 06:26 AM
2

They will need stalls for the urinals, I suppose
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:38 PM
8

Germany has a lot of laws discriminating men. This one will barely be noticeable amongst the 100 other laws
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:36 PM
25

There is no law regarding who is allowed to use restrooms in germany, unlike US 'bathroom bills'. So even if there is a "women" label on it, men can legally use it. The rules are about the labeled rooms which should be provided, but there is no criminal penalty for ignoring these labels. If you need to pee and the men's restroom is busy, you can use the women's.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 08:05 PM
5

I need to check what they say about Germany, knowing women have objectively more legal rights here. EDIT: I am not surprised that they claim women face legal discrimination when it is objectively the other way around: https://www.reddit.com/user/SnooBeans6591/comments/18loixf/german_laws_discriminating_men/ A score of 85 when women are already advantaged.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/26 01:06 AM
22

His fault for being feminist and defending a woman (/sarcasm)
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/26 10:58 PM
18

Some more names for international women's day: Early pioneers and historically important figures Karen DeCrow* Former president of the National Organization for Women who openly supported joint custody and fathers’ rights later in her career. She argued that feminism should include fathers’ equality in family law. Suzanne K. Steinmetz One of the first researchers to publish evidence on male victims of domestic violence in the 1970s. Her work challenged the early academic consensus that DV was pu…
/r/MensRights08/03/26 11:53 PM
12

I'm non-binary and got upvotes and no negative comments mentioning. Other trans people had the same experience. So trans people are definitely welcome here. Did you see something against homosexuals?
/r/MensRights08/03/26 07:51 PM
23

They are welcomed.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 04:35 PM
2

The framing you should reject is regarding "what role women played in creating and maintaining those systems". They vote for it to be kept just like men, they don't need to be uniquely responsible. Reject the claim that you need to be misogynist to care about men. To live is to live in a gynocentric society, men and women alike are shaped by the system and participate in perpetuating it. Let's be honest, even if you were pointing to a topic were women are solely responsible for men's suffering, …
/r/MensRights04/03/26 06:10 PM
12

Weird - but expected - framing in the article. They write "individuals could abuse the system", when in truth, it is the retirement system which is abusive and individuals can now correct it with this other law.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 01:34 PM
51

This will be very limited in scope and might also come with some drawbacks. TERFs, especially, and many feminists in general, do not care so much how you identify, they are misandrists regardless. Misandry is going to target male-bodied people in any case. Some legal discrimination might disappear if you are legally recognized as a women, as the law acts on legal status, not on appearance.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 12:11 PM
12

You can make a r/ redditrequest to claim it. If you need support, feel free to ask.
/r/MensRights03/03/26 07:15 PM
13

I did babysit the neighbors children when I was younger, I see no reason to prefer one particular gender for babysitting.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 03:08 PM
1

The problem is that the sub they link to got invaded by them. Even when they have better mods, they still have a lot of shit users.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/26 07:51 PM
1

I see you follow that toxic sub. I love that they have a "no misandry" rule when their mod keeps posting misandric content
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/26 04:46 PM
11

Knowing that the mods of the subs are the ones promoting it. If the reddit admins were logical, that would be the end of the sub.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/26 01:40 AM
6

It's 2 sentences long. If you want, I can copy-paste the post down here, but you might simply scroll up and read the post again. Nobody said that men don't partake in this gynocentric culture. We know that men have an out-group bias and will more often give privileges to women than to men.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 07:26 AM
2

Yes, she would specify that she only feels that way when unattractive men objectify her, unless she likes to be objectified by attractive men
/r/EverydayMisandry28/01/26 11:12 AM
3

If we are in the US, or in Europe (especially in Europe, as the EU has become the most fervent supporter of continuing the war), demand that your governments stop funding the war Nah, definitely not - sending these men to the frontlines without good weapons is the opposite of what they want. If anything, they should increase funding massively while simultaneously pushing Ukraine to stop forced conscription. They should even look for voluntaries in their own armies and get involved directly. I am…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 12:01 PM
3

It is interesting, because it gives an objective proof of the gynocentrism of the average society. The LLM has seen all, and it has learnt from it that the most likely response is sexist against men.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 06:48 PM
5

Yes. Change the training data, which is equal to changing the society to get rid of its gynocentrism. Easy, right? Another solution is what you did - change gender for the question, than change back the gender on the response. Adding "respond in a non biased way ; you should give the same answer as if the genders were reversed" is not sufficient to fix the issue. Or go neutral: "My spouse told me 'ey wants to go out play on the snow, I told 'em that I don't want and now 'ey is not speaking to me…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 05:52 PM
3

Same issue in Germany. I can't vote for left-wing parties at a time where the far-right AFD is growing in influence.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 12:07 PM
1

I would argue though, that crying alone is in no way better - nor worse - than mowing the lawn. Mowing the lawn is a low-intensity activity, that in no way will stop you from thinking and reflecting on your feelings. What can make a difference is talking about the feelings. And if something like the "men's shed" helps some men lowering the barriers to talking about themselves by a shared activity, I would see it as practical pathway toward reflection and communication of their emotions.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:22 PM
1

Don't let your life be guided by gender stereotypes, you are a free women, you don't need to change anything.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 01:39 AM
2

FeminismUncensored is currently uncensored (unless reddit site-rules are broken).
/r/MensRights24/01/26 12:13 AM
1

It's a general rule for good communication, not just for you. Concession first lowers resistance Opening with agreement (“I agree that…”) signals good faith and reduces defensiveness. The reader is more likely to keep reading instead of preparing a counter-argument. Our exchange was good anyways, so it worked without that. But as I am also on feminist subreddits, I need to pay attention to not needlessly generate defensive responses.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 11:24 PM
2

Nevermind, I wrote that before I got to the bottom... You clearly get it. @myself - I should remember to put the agreement first, not last when I communicate.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 11:03 PM
4

One thing that should be recognized though, is that a topic gaining importance for you because your kin is affected, doesn't mean it was irrelevant to you otherwise. I am not Ukrainian, I live far from there, but I still am opposed to the forceful mobilization of men. I have a nephew, a boy, who will likely be subjected to conscription. That makes me more directly affected, but I would still oppose the discrimination if he wasn't there. I am a MRA - when I hear about a women being denied her rig…
/r/MensRights23/01/26 10:11 PM
5

I actually think men have it worse, at least where I live Can I ask in which country you live? I know this is the case in Germany (and made a post about it once: https://www.reddit.com/r/SystemicSexism/comments/1pgtv1i/german_laws_discriminating_men_over_100/) I am interested about what other countries might be in this situation, and concrete data about it.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 08:36 PM
20

I don't know where you live, but at least in Germany, men are discriminated against by law, with over 100 laws discriminating men while legal discriminations of women have been removed. It is also important to note, that most Germans would still assume it is the opposite, because who goes through all the thousands of laws to check? Not many. So your assumption that "men are absolutely inherently privileged in both government and social standing" might be wrong even where you live, or at least fa…
/r/MensRights23/01/26 08:31 PM
1

On the topic of false accusations: I agree that knowingly making a false accusation is illegal and should be punished when it’s proven to be false. At the same time, I don’t believe someone should be punished simply because there wasn’t enough evidence to prove sexual assault. A lack of evidence isn’t the same thing as a false accusation, and treating it that way would discourage real victims from coming forward. I’m open to listening and learning this is me trying to understand, not take sides …
/r/MensRights09/01/26 10:39 PM
6

All the top comments of "1q7sv11/aitah_for_not_reciprocating_a_bedroom_activity" say NTA, and those with YTA have lower upvote than their contradicting responses. He has a overwhelming support for defending his boundaries.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 08:22 PM
0

How is it frowned upon? All the top comments of "1q7sv11/aitah_for_not_reciprocating_a_bedroom_activity" say NTA, and those with YTA have lower upvote than their contradicting responses.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 08:19 PM
1

Which sub was created? And for what purpose?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/26 02:21 PM
3

In these traditional relationships, how is the men compensated for buying the family house, paying the food/clothes for the family ...? Does the family pay him for the money he pays for them? Or is all that compensated and 'out of love'? These people are always half-blind, and then surprised that they don't see anything in half of the picture
/r/EverydayMisandry26/12/25 09:11 PM
1

I can name a few women who are MRAs / former feminists, but I have the feeling they will keep moving the goalpost regarding thought leaders. (I also have some female singers and authors I could mention - so if I cared about her opinion, I can disprove all her points)
/r/EverydayMisandry19/12/25 10:48 AM
9

I have the feeling that she wants to be objectified... by attractive men.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/12/25 11:32 PM
2

The new oligarchy. The greens have no interest anymore in furthering environment protection. They always were a bit weak on what should be there core topic, now they abandon it and just try to further the matriarchy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/25 09:08 AM
20

shift from “sexual intercourse without consent” to “forbidden penetration," They are just adjusting to have the same kind of law as everywhere else. They were just even more wrong than other western countries until now. Forced to penetrate is still not accounted for.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 02:09 PM
27

shift from “sexual intercourse without consent” to “forbidden penetration," Nope. They were just even worse before
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 02:08 PM
2

I initially interpreted it as "a man couldn't have 5 orgasms back to back". But yeah, maybe I am too optimistic.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/12/25 10:33 PM
15

I don't know why all green parties seem to become misandrist, and even stop caring about green politics. Same in Germany. As an environmentalist/degrowth proponent, who would be happy to vote for an ecologist party, this is frustrating as I can't vote for them.
/r/MensRights13/12/25 10:10 PM
15

Wikipedia is an example of systemic support of misandry. I am certain that if I came around with the sourced list of laws discriminating men in germany (institutionalised misandry) I wouldn't be allowed to edit anymore https://np.reddit.com/r/SystemicSexism/comments/1pgtv1i/german_laws_discriminating_men_over_100/
/r/EverydayMisandry13/12/25 01:36 PM
6

And you know who overrule the neutral people? It's those who manage wikipedia. Wikipedia doesn't try or even allow neutral views - you can't trust it on anything related to politics, as it will be used as a propaganda tool.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/12/25 01:24 PM
1

Good. I had 2-3 site-wide suspensions reverted in appeal. One false harassment warning was never confirmed to be wrong, despite maybe 10 appeals (even one paper letter to reddit headquarters). So maybe warnings don't get corrected (or at least they don't tell you).
/r/MensRights12/12/25 09:31 AM
3

Appeal. Hating nazi ideology is kinda mandatory. Ideology is neither identity nor vulnerability.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 06:54 AM
18

25 Subsection 231(6) and 26 Section 236 are not gender neutral, as they are only regarding femicide, which they defined to be committed against a female person. It would be ok if they didn't define femicide to be against women (then a men murdered by their partner would also be a femicide by law). But now, it isn't it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/25 08:42 PM
1

Yes, gynocentric politicians and judges tend to deliberately forget that. Might as well talk to a wall, without terrorist pressure I don't expect them to pay attention. Luckily, the option to change gender was introduced recently, and I took it and everyone can. I am no longer a man, so I am out of it - for now, until the gynocentrist notice that they are lacking slaves.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 09:07 PM
1

Art 3 in its current form is from 1994. That's when the requirement for the state to work against existing disadvantages was added. Requirement which prohibits the state from reactivating conscription
/r/MensRights06/12/25 08:05 PM
3

My goal is for men's rights activists to be better than feminists, which should be easy as the bar is in hell. Both Amber Heard and this guy suck. My goal is to fight for equality and fairness for all. I think that's what we should do here on this sub
/r/MensRights06/12/25 02:52 PM
19

It's good they investigate. Could also be a deliberate murder disguised as an accident. I mean, I know the saying "never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity", but if he was experienced, it could be that stupidity isn't enough to explain all.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 02:47 PM
15

Yes. It's good they investigate. Could also be a deliberate murder disguised as an accident. I mean, I know the saying "never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity", but if he was experienced, it could be that stupidity isn't enough to explain all.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 01:00 PM
7

Article 3 [Equality before the law] (1) All persons shall be equal before the law. (2) Men and women shall have equal rights. The state shall promote the actual implementation of equal rights for women and men and take steps to eliminate existing disadvantages The parliament, as an organ of the state, wasn't allowed to approve the new military service model, as per Art 3.2 of the constitution.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 11:22 PM
3

Art 3 of the constitution should be enough to prohibit that, as it requires the government to work against existing discriminations. The suspension of the conscription removed discriminations, it should be impossible logically to revert this suspension with a law.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 08:50 PM
74

Equality in the constitution doesn't matter much when men are affected. Typical gynocentrism
/r/MensRights05/12/25 04:14 PM
7

Especially as they way they interpret "femicide", any conscript dying is an "androcide: M dated F because she was a women (hetero), they had a dispute unrelated to her being a women and he killed her => enough for them to qualify as femicide, as they wouldn't have dated if F was male. Logically: M was forced to the battlefield because he is a men, he was shooting at the enemy who shot back killing him => would be an androcide, as the reason he was there in the first place was because he got draf…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/25 12:42 PM
9

Exactly - I almost never see cases of claims of "femicide" which are correct. From what I could gather, the "femicide" of Giulia Cecchettin which sparked Italy to create a law against "femicide", wasn't a femicide in the first place. Terrorist acts targeting women at random are femicides (if they only/primarily target women). EDIT: The Charlie Hebdo Terrorist attack in 2015 was an androcide. The terrorist talked to the women there (Sigolène Vinson), and told that she was spared because she is a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/25 12:30 PM
6

Germany has equality in constitution (Art 3 GG - same number as in Italy), but over 100 laws discriminating men, some rather new: https://www.reddit.com/u/SnooBeans6591/s/xbiWJLQdXs I wouldn't be too confident in the constitution: It is the duty of the Republic to remove those obstacles of an economic or social nature which constrain the freedom and equality of citizens, thereby impeding the full development of the human person and the effective participation of all workers in the political, eco…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/25 11:59 AM
1

Subs now banning men for simply participating in any form of mens support subs They are not only banning men for participating in mens support subs... not that it gets better that way
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/25 05:44 PM
4

How is it even a repost if he is the one posting it?
/r/EverydayMisandry17/11/25 09:03 AM
4

I'm sure we will soon tell us that women are particularly affected by it, just as the feminist minister told us women are particularly hit by the war in Ukraine.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 01:13 PM
2

No. There is no testing of women to begin with for mandatory military service, as they don't get forced regardless of their physical ability.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 01:09 PM
1

I guess if you want free housing, the mandatory military service can be useful to get a spot in prison... I have an apartment, so I rather do the paperwork. Men are also discriminated in prison in Germany, of the top of my head, cancer screening start only at 40 for male prisoners, for female ones around 20 years sooner.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 11:22 AM
9

Article 3(2) sentence 2 has added “The state shall promote the effective realization of equality between men and women and shall take steps to eliminate existing disadvantages.”. This has been interpreted as encouraging to create non gender neutral laws promoting women. It is a Justification for “positive measures” It serves as a constitutional basis for: targeted support programs unidirectional quotas The Federal Constitutional Court has repeatedly held that such measures do not violate equalit…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 11:38 PM
11

They were able to repel gender equality from the constitution in 1994, to be able to make laws privileging women, though.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 09:51 PM
11

Looking at videos from war, I think the only way to "motivate" people would be to keep them ignorant. I'd sabotage my own military before I go to the front line.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 09:44 PM
4

In Germany, you can also just change gender. And having "no gender" is also a legal option if being a women is not for you. Only men get drafted and conscripted.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 08:21 PM
24

Knowing how much feminists care about the issue that 'language shapes the way we think' I have a hard time thinking this might be an unfortunate accident. Seems like a very deliberate misandristic choice. It's "either it's your fault, or it's someone from your gender, or it's a woman influenced by males". We also have to acknowledge the fact that feminist are keeping "patriarchy" alive; by its original definition, western democracies aren't patriarchal. "Patriarchy" only "exists" due to feminist…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 09:48 AM
6

I don't know, "all male are bad genetically" is also a common view in some feminist circles
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/25 10:17 AM
1

Google AI is just reflecting Google's misandry. I mean that's core to their company, even before AI. They might have reinforced it explicitly and deliberately in the AI.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 10:22 PM
2

Yes. And we'd condemn them for it. Hypocrisy is no more pretty because it's YOUR hypocrisy. At least you admit being a hypocrite, who would condemn a "UN men" doing what you happily accept from UN women.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 09:53 PM
2

And the regular UN isn't neutral either, but anti male like the UN women.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 09:50 PM
4

Please don’t empathize with terfs. I don't. TERF: Trans exclusionary radical feminist. TERFs are just regular man hating feminist, who extend their hate to anyone male born, including Trans women. TERFs are useful, though, as they make the negative aspects of radical feminism and misandry visible in a way that many gynocentrist still understand.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/11/25 06:10 PM
3

I can't tell you if "feminism is for equality", but I can tell you that a lot of feminists are not for equality (my feeling is the majority isn't).
/r/EverydayMisandry04/11/25 11:39 AM
15

This form of "reasoning" is especially apparent in trans spaces where they argue that transphobia against trans women and trans men is always misogynistic. Sometimes they use the term "transmisandry" which is supposedly not the same thing as regular misandry and is also rooted in misogyny. That's especially damning when they pretend that TERFs are motivated by misogyny, when TERFs are actually motivated by the misandry that is inherent to radical feminist discourse. It's feminism that is pushing…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/11/25 12:50 PM
20

Yes, I get a very bad feeling when I hear negative statements about men with a "lack of emotional intelligence" in "feminist" spaces. They put them together in the same basket as violent men... a lot of unchecked ableism there
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/25 08:26 PM
2

https://www.idrlabs.com/feminism-5/test.php According to this, I am: 24% Traditionalist 80% Liberal Feminist 52% Radical Feminist 64% Marxist feminist 50% Cultural feminist I don't think the issue is the 20% difference to Liberal Feminism - it's the 50% difference to radical feminism, which nowadays is the most prominent brand of feminism. I could use the label "Feminist" for myself, but I generally don't want people to associate me with mainstream radical feminism
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 08:42 PM
3

It's used for everyone, even for happily married men. It's like with "small dick" - you can have 8 inches/20cm and get this "insult". But the meaning of incel is: single person who doesn't want to stay single. That's what they are calling men they want to insult.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 12:59 PM
3

Pretty much like Catholics sending any non-Christians to hell.
/r/MensRights26/10/25 04:01 PM
4

"Feminism is for equality, men benefit from feminism too" On more proof against this claim
/r/MensRights20/10/25 10:14 PM
12

I didn't see the article mentioning it was against someone, and I doubt it, as they mention ChatGPT, and last time I tried it refused to produce pictures of real people. So I think she might not have intended any culprit to be found - the man was AI generated, non existing.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 09:20 PM
1

I have different responses, like saying it is enabling "rape-culture" by promoting the view that men need to get a woman to have value. You can notice that almost everyone was "incel" once (if you are dating, you are normally celibate and don't want to stay celibate, so involuntarily celibate). Or I notice it's misuse, as even happily married people are called "incel". ... For the term "misogynist", there is the difference that at least being a misogynist is bad (unlike being an incel, which is …
/r/MensRights17/10/25 08:55 PM
9

I don't know what you mean by "support". I will not go out of my way to stop abortion protection either way. I would just stay neutral. I am happy if the abortion protection is created, but I won't waste time fighting for it. So I still support it, but I won't act to make anything happen for abortion rights. This is much better than what they do, which is actively fighting against men's reproductive rights, but I prefer to be the better person. I could have time to spend defending abortion if I …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 02:21 PM
4

Now that you know where it's headed, ignore them, if they keep talking, tell them to stop harassing you or that you'll call the cops. You don't have to entertain assholes.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 04:24 PM
3

Dude, you just commented right now, this is what leads to bans, not subscription
/r/MensRights08/10/25 10:12 PM
6

One thing common in feminist spaces that exclude men, like FLINTA spaces, is that male-bodied non-binaries are not welcomed, despite FLINTA theoretically meaning "female, lesbian, inter, non-binary, trans and agender people". But it's lived as only female appearing and rejecting well passing trans-men and male-presenting non-binary ppl.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/25 01:06 PM
70

I would argue that you aren't a progressive if you don't care about men's rights. I don't have an issue with progressive feminists, only with the regressive ones...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/25 10:58 AM
2

Yes, at that last slide I was like "so you do what everyone does - including the conservative?" "Men bad, women good" is the standard way to display things.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 06:47 PM
9

Yes, that would just make it more likely for men to go to the front, as the safe spots get taken by women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/25 08:23 PM
17

Well, almost all metrics for "gender equality" measure "gender equality for women," which means they don't see discrimination of men as a negative, and only care about what affects women. I suppose "pro-female bias" would be more appropriate than saying "gender equality" for these.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/25 08:21 PM
9

When I see feminists virgin shame men, call them incels, or talk about dick size, I can understand if they think men are socialized into an aggressive sexuality - by these feminists themselves. More generally, the socialization of boys depends on who does the socialization, what is their surrounding.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 11:08 PM
1

German laws discriminating men In Germany there are over 100 laws privileging women: Family: In the case of joint custody, the father is primarily responsible for maintenance (Art 224 §2 Abs 1 EGBGB) Maintenance claims of orphans against the mothers are limited, unlimited when against the father. (§ 15 Abs 2 bvg_33dv_1961) If there is no predominant parenting by one parent, the parenting is attributed to the mother for the pension calculation. (§ 56 Abs 2 sgb_6) Regarding school meals, pupils wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/25 04:02 PM
5

Reddit admins do promote male hatred. They admitted this.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/08/25 07:47 AM
1

False accusations don't happen, and if they happen, they are very rare, and if they aren't rare, false accusations are good It seems we went all the way now.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/07/25 07:34 PM
11

That's why, in some places, the question is only if it was reasonable to believe that consent was present at the moment (for example, because it was expressed) Anything else shouldn't be relevant to discussing guilt.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/25 07:51 PM
1

Yes, France has something like the ERA. But only for biological sex, not civil gender - at least that's what the highest court decided, in a case about banning trans-men from artificial fertilization, they decided it's ok, because the discrimination is about the legal status, not the biological one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 07:24 AM
2

I don't know why you bring up Afghanistan, when it is an example of a country without equal rights and responsibilities, so it isn't what they were asking for. The draft should be either for all (regardless of gender) or none.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 12:20 PM
2

I agree, the argument for removing voting rights doesn't make much sense. The only good argument is to make the draft gender neutral, be it draft for all or draft for none. This argument stands on its own and doesn't need to involve voting rights. Now, the argument that one shouldn't be able to influence war decisions with their vote if they can't suffer the consequence of the draft can be made, but that affects elected officials and older men just as much as women until the draft is expanded to…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 10:14 AM
30

Would be a "no" from me unless she tells me she has a medical issue.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 11:57 AM
5

Ok, I see your goal. I am wondering if, in that case, such a point shouldn't be in the beginning. If you want to make people receptive, it's better at the beginning than after, when they might already be angry and closed up. Acknowledge the existence of misogyny and point out that the concept of "patriarchy" doesn't negate the existence of misandry (they say themselves "patriarchy hurts men too").
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/25 11:07 AM
23

Yeah, slide 9 is weird. Like "let's just ignore everything we just showed and pretend it fits in the worldview we actually proved to be incoherent". Don't frame benevolent sexism towards women as "both misandry and misogyny". It's only misandry. But I understand why that happens. Even here, even MRAs are not free of bias in favor of women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/25 10:26 AM
13

Yeah, that's stupid to say misogyny doesn't exist. Just as stupid as when feminists say misandry doesn't exist.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/06/25 05:14 AM
1

I didn't mean to film a rape. Obviously, that's not going to help your case. But it helps justice, so it's not bad either. I meant recording consensual encounters, as you can't rely on "innocent until being proved guilty" but might have to prove your innocence.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 08:51 AM
4

Yes, it's the case of both. That's a general requirement for any judicial system to not knowingly put innocents in jail.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 11:41 AM
6

They don't throw evidence out when used to prove innocence, only when used to prove culpability, as they cannot legally sentence you for something you didn't do. The recording may be illegal, but it's better than a false rape conviction.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 11:34 AM
20

I didn't mean to just record them saying "yes, I consent", but to record the whole encounter, from the moment you met till they left. They will have a hard time convincing someone about coercion when you have the full context which indicates otherwise.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 10:27 AM
5

Most feminist activists today are radical feminists. By most, I mean pretty much all of them.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 09:12 AM
32

I would always record sound to have proof of consent. Don't want to bet my life on a coin toss.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 08:51 AM
9

Depends where you live. In some places they can't. But I agree, if possible, get the test without asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:02 AM
14

I think the point is "do it without her knowledge, and also don't tell her that you did it". She shouldn't have learned about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:00 AM
2

Agree, it's not too bad. The authorian aspect is off, for girls, it's often "girls can do anything", implying they choose, here it is chosen from outside. "Boys will be... anything they like to be" would be better.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/05/25 03:50 PM
1

You misunderstood the definition. Generalization from some people to other people are indeed prejudice: Even if judgments are based on actual past experiences with individual men, applying those judgments broadly to all men or to a man you've just met without knowing him is a prejudiced attitude. It isn't based on experience with that individual.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 09:37 PM
6

Yeah, u/ redtaboo is a reddit admin (I just checked), so this is official reddit policy.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/05/25 10:22 AM
1

MRA reject the whole existence of the Manosphere: https://np.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1ebwjl5/is_there_actually_a_manosphere/ https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1jh1btn/the_manosphere_doesnt_exist/ They don't push out the others from the manosphere, because they are not inside the manosphere to begin with. I criticized some MGTOW and some statements made by Red-pillers. But not as member of this fiction of "manosphere", but because I encountered the topic, just as I w…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 10:23 AM
2

Sounds completely made up, to be honest. Due to Elo rating in chess, it's pretty much impossible that she stays matched with bad players if she keeps winning. I call bullshit.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/05/25 10:37 PM
2

The femcels sub is full of violent rhetoric, highly upvoted. It might end up banned with this amount of crap.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 04:59 PM
2

I might be too much on reddit, but on reddit, femcel content is more readily available as the incels got banned while the femcels are still active.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 10:15 AM
1

There a only few feminist subs where I would post with this account, as the others I assume I would be auto-banned for having participated here. So you need a second account... and if you call out obvious misandry, you are likely to get banned.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 08:17 AM
1

A feminist means equal rights - so rights for men is included in that definition. That's literally why I'm here. I support men's rights because I'm a feminist. It might mean "equal rights" for you, but it doesn't mean equal rights for most. And having 'fem-' as the root of the word makes such a definition weird - which explains why so feminist see egalitarianism as an imperative. I think "I support men's rights AND I'm a feminist" would be more accurate - it isn't 'because'. Same for me, I suppo…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 08:09 AM
1

(feminist) definition of patriarchy: system of social structures and practices in which men dominate, oppress, and exploit women This definition is falsifiable and indeed falsified for some countries that are sometimes claimed to be patriarchal, but actually give a lot of legal privileges to women (my goto example being Germany). Now if you add some motte-and-bailey tactics as soon as someone points out the numerous privileges of women, it can lead to people denying that it was falsified, but de…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 07:02 PM
3

A Kafka trap is a fallacy where if someone denies being x it is taken as evidence that the person is x since someone who is x would deny being x. The name is derived from the novel The Trial by the Austrian writer Franz Kafka. ( https://logicallyfallacious.com/questions/uSbqZP5B/is_a_kafka_trap_a_logical_fallacy.html ) Example of a kafka trap from TwoX (I got banned for pointing it out): Only men who are perpetrator feel the need to defend themselves against generalizations of men. Only perpetra…
/r/EverydayMisandry10/05/25 08:44 AM
2

That explains why they love Kafka traps over at r/ TwoX
/r/EverydayMisandry10/05/25 08:10 AM
3

Over 100 German laws discriminating men https://www.reddit.com/u/SnooBeans6591/s/0jjPObw1Oo
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/25 10:23 PM
1

If you suspect your wife cheated, you get a DNA sample, get a test in some way (23andme or in another country). If it tells you aren't the father, you go for the court order. You don't go to court unless you already know, that's the issue.
/r/MensRights29/04/25 09:48 PM
11

I am pretty sure the mod of r/ psychology who used it and got offended when I called him out was a man, not a woman.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 01:40 PM
19

Yes, there is a paper about the systemic anti-male bias from the UN. It's all the UN
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/25 04:29 PM
24

I was expecting women slut shaming other women when I opened the link, but I guess that works too to proove the shirt wrong.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/04/25 05:37 PM
5

There are already more taxes for unmarried people (single or unmarried couples). They don't need to change anything
/r/MensRights23/04/25 07:06 PM
8

There might be different kind of transphobes, but ALL the TERFs do hate trans women out of misandry and see them as men invading female spaces. There might be some regular conservative transphobes (not TERFs) who demonize trans-women out of misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/25 09:53 AM
28

Germany has over 100 laws discriminating men: https://www.reddit.com/u/SnooBeans6591/s/syqQIi8msD Some of these exist in most countries, others maybe not. People still try to paint Germany as a "patriarchy" despite systemic discrimination of men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 10:59 AM
31

I agree that we shouldn't frame it a gender war. But much of modern feminist discourse does operate on adversial terms and treat it as a "war" trying to get unequal laws passed. Not everyone is equally invested in fairness, and we should call it out when that happens. Advocating for men's issues, men's rights and against systemic bias isn't anti-women, it's pro-equality. Those who pretend being a MRA makes you a mysogynist are the ones playing divide-and-conquer. We are not at war against women,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 09:01 AM
41

So men get 1.16 cent for every pound woman get...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 06:14 AM
1

So basically, ethics is crappy dogmatism that society imposes onto others, without any good reason, except the reason that the "majority wants it that way", which means genocide can be considered ethical if we get into a situation where the majority wants it to happen. I don't think that is what ethics should be, but I can definitely believe that this is something that "ethics/morals" sometimes becomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 06:52 AM
6

Report here: https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/requests/new?ticket_form_id=19300233728916
/r/EverydayMisandry14/04/25 10:49 AM
-2

You are right. All top comments (from women) in the original thread criticize her
/r/MensRights13/04/25 08:50 AM
29

Zero upvotes, all top comments criticize her in the original thread. Quotes: Imagine a husband writing this about his wife. SMH . Wowza these posts are wild! Can’t buy something with the bonus, Venmo requests… my husband makes 5x what I make. I would be horrified if he treated me like this . I would be SO sad if I found out my husband thought I deserved less than him. The things we treat ourselves to are always different in value of course. We don’t keep score. We discuss it and if it makes sens…
/r/MensRights13/04/25 08:49 AM
43

To be honest, equal pay laws didn't cause this, as it doesn't seem female garbage collectors were paid less than male ones. Equal pay, as defined in the law, was already there from what I see. It was feminist misinterpretation of the law that did, combined with "fixing" it the most stupid way (should have raised the cleaners wages, if needed).
/r/MensRights12/04/25 06:52 AM
2

In Afghanistan is started with American and British soldiers being ordered to kill all the military aged males they encounter Source? That's a systematic war-crime of the type of nazi-germany in WW2. You should provide a source for such claim.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 10:27 AM
8

OP stated that American and British soldiers were ordered to knowingly commit war crimes. If true (OP provided no source), that can be avoided (and the soldiers should refuse the order).
/r/MensRights08/04/25 10:20 AM
9

Legally discrimination against men is illegal Depends on the country. And just because you have in the constitution something like "Men and women have equal rights. The state promotes the effective implementation of equal rights for women and men and works to eliminate existing disadvantages. No one shall be discriminated against or favored because of their gender." doesn't mean you will not have discrimination in law, like the draft, circumcision for boys, domestic violence protection for women…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/25 07:03 AM
0

And what if she opposes this "family event" and don't want it to happen?
/r/MensRights05/04/25 07:36 AM
65

was this message offensive Click yes. She has nothing to report. You do
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/25 12:27 AM
0

There are more than the first slide, and even the first one is not everyone's kink. Other people buy fair-trade, boycott companies who don't treat their employees well, and generally defend people's freedom and rights, even if they don't know them. That's quite far from these would be slavers
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/25 10:15 AM
1

That's a moment when knowing the source would be nice. Is it like a kink forum? Though the responses don't read like a kink.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/25 08:43 AM
2

Men also have houses, give flowers, jewelry and other gifts, invite to dinner... And ducks rape so much that the vaginas evolved into a corkscrew to make it harder...
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/25 02:40 PM
2

OOP just showed themselves to be sexist by caring about the gender of their authors, artists, thoughts leaders,...
/r/EverydayMisandry11/03/25 01:32 AM
4

I'm not sure if it's irony, or simply projection, but this post is basically: "Majority of misandrist are men" - signed: misandrist man.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 10:15 AM
11

She also did slap him on purpose. She isn't supposed to do it either. She only didn't intend to hit "that hard". Why do you think he intended to do it as hard as he did?
/r/EverydayMisandry08/03/25 09:24 AM
6

Notice gender isn't part of the conditions for self defense. Now it's true that she hit him, then apologized (or at least wamted to), he hit her, then apologized. Both did wrong in the same way.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/03/25 09:21 AM
2

Conditions for self-defense: Imminent Threat – The danger must be immediate or ongoing. You cannot claim self-defense for a past threat or a future hypothetical danger. Necessity – The use of force must be the last resort; there should be no reasonable alternative to avoid harm (e.g., escape, de-escalation). Reasonableness – The person defending themselves must have a genuine and reasonable belief that they are in danger. Some jurisdictions apply a subjective standard (what the defender believed…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/03/25 09:16 AM
10

Well, if they only want to date the guys who are not celibate, this should be labeled "why dating is hard for women".
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/25 07:03 PM
2

Thinking about the future: once we have sex bots and not just sex dolls, it will get popular with women, and then your project of uniting women will be dead lost. Sex dolls are not good for women: too heavy, impractical and one sided. Robots will change this
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 03:17 PM
9

About stuff the woman don't know? It doesn't matter. They just won't tell you about it, then your opinion is irrelevant (except for the fact that it's the reason they don't tell you).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 02:46 PM
9

People tried to shame homosexuals and queers out of existence. Doesn't work. The best that you can achieve is that they don't tell you. Maybe that's enough for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 02:38 PM
8

I thought your opinion implied that these things would have any effect. Your shaming tactics won't work as we don't care about your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 02:18 PM
13

Don't care about your opinion Don't care about your opinion Won't let you do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 02:09 PM
6

I got banned in a lot of subs for defending covid vaccination in the anti-vax sub NoNewNormal. The human mods told me it doesn't matter if I disagreed, I have to promise never to write again in NNN
/r/MensRights03/10/24 11:50 AM
11

The issue is that she has no intelligence. Otherwise, she would notice that this doesn't work out for a species that births a single child each time, as opposed to laying hundreds of eggs.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/10/24 08:43 AM
35

Things like the belief that all men are rapists. "Victims provoke rape by their clothing or behavior." "If they didn’t fight back, it wasn’t rape." "Men can’t be raped." ...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/24 06:59 AM
12

Can you refresh my memory about which time they tried to hide it? It's been such a long time, I cannot remember it.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/09/24 08:02 AM
13

Yes. The idea behind my comment was to both say "not all women", while simultaneously pointing out that on "progressive" subs (quotes doing a lot of work here), you get banned for opposing sexism against men.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 06:51 AM
33

Normally, I would say "not all women", but I got told by feminists that generalizations are fine.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 01:02 AM
3

I think there is a report option for brigading too.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/09/24 02:08 PM
2

I would off those trying to draft me first. But that would likely end up having the same effect for me
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 05:21 AM
9

I think most feminism is contradictory with being left wing, not that left wing is contradictory to equal rights
/r/MensRights02/09/24 06:00 PM
16

Yes, these aren't for the most cases attempts at suicide which fails, as they didn't intend to die. These are generally "attempts" at self-harm that succeed. It's a different phenomenon.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 08:33 AM
24

I would say it does. We shouldn't default to male pronouns either.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 10:33 PM
14

As a trans person, I say you're always welcome to use the laws to escape institutional sexism. The solution against this isn't to remove trans recognition, but to remove sexist laws. So it won't affect us negatively.
/r/MensRights24/08/24 12:54 PM
-4

I don't think there is a cash incentive: even with 50/50 custody, there is still child support.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 01:19 PM
27

Yes. And the non TERF radical-feminists are just enabling the TERF ones with their misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/08/24 05:18 PM
14

"Started". They've been spreading lies for a least 10 years, paid by taxes on government level. That's when I started to really notice the reach of the lies. Been this way for a long time.
/r/MenSupportMen12/08/24 05:34 PM
26

Sysney watson, Lauren Southern and Lauren Chen are conservatives. Conservatives share gynocentrism with feminism.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 05:41 AM
1

https://removals.pullpush.io/ Pushshift: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1JSYY0HbudmYYjnZaAMgf2y_GDFgHzZTolK6Yqaz6_kQ/viewform?edit_requested=true
/r/MensRights01/08/24 09:05 PM
1

You can send a request to pushshift and pullpush to delete your data. Most bots rely on these services to auto-ban you.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 09:01 PM
2

Which rule? 2, 3 and 5 come to mind. Yet, despite breaking up to 3 rules, I am pretty sure nothing will happen. But I would still report it.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 08:58 PM
1

No. I preemptively muted interrestingasfuck on this account, so I should only ever access it with another account which doesn't participate here.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 08:54 PM
8

Well, than r-MensRights is also mostly left-wing. Most people there are pro-choice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/24 08:02 PM
1

And even for medical advice, I would ask the opinion of multiple doctors, including doctors who are not themselves circumcised.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 05:23 PM
–

You can go on a date and not pay for everything. Going Dutch is the default by law. If they complain, pay your part and leave, they can't force you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 10:21 PM
2

Sounds like what a feminist would say when challenged on "yes all men"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 07:59 PM
1

Labor is not a market like any other, as you don't know the wages (prices). But that's the same for men and women. Should be fixed though, having the wages being public, like in Sweden.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 06:45 AM
5

Exactly, criticizing "women make 84c on every $1 a man makes" only makes sense if you are a communist and want the same wage for everyone. Except that then the actual complaint is that the fast-food worker doesn't get the same wage as the surgeon.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 07:15 PM
–

I would just tell her that we have a lot in common, as I also care about gender equality as a MRA. That should give me rapidly the opportunity to learn if she is for equality or not, based on her reaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 04:37 AM
25

It's such a stupid comment, it's not even worth discussing. I shower daily, got a DM on reddit "take a shower" just this week. That idiot never saw me, didn't stop them. It's just some stupid harassment tentative, got reported, didn't care to respond further. Idiot gonna be idiots.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 10:36 AM
15

Yes, list is incomplete. Poland and Belarus also missing. And definitely more... it's likely easier/shorter to list the non-misandrist countries
/r/EverydayMisandry21/07/24 08:29 AM
23

I saw this earlier today: "Gender apartheid: oppression of women should be made a crime against humanity – feminist academic explains why" ( https://theconversation.com/gender-apartheid-oppression-of-women-should-be-made-a-crime-against-humanity-feminist-academic-explains-why-234410 ) So are we for or against gender apartheid?
/r/MensRights17/07/24 07:16 PM
81

Select that you are a women, check the seats, chose a seat, go back in the order, change your gender, take the same seat as before. It's trivial to get around, IF you know that this feature exist when "women" is selected.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 07:14 PM
21

That asshole old man who got into a cursing match TWICE... defending her. 🙃 I guess he wasn't "nice"
/r/EverydayMisandry17/07/24 06:52 AM
2

I don't think this is the one, was even older. Could have been a German forum also.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/24 06:07 PM
13

Not sure that's true. A woman once told me that she was bullied out of sharing embroidery, because some "feminist" nut jobs made it political on social media.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/24 05:56 PM
2

4th report, through https://www.reddit.com/report, written in a neutral way by ChatGPT, who assessed on it's own that it is violating all possible rules (and the openAI UI told me when just pasting the comment "This content may violate our acceptable use policy.")
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 07:52 AM
1

Comment on offmychest. You don't get a ban message without having interacted with the other sub. Often they don't even ban you until you interact
/r/MensRights12/07/24 07:02 AM
2

Reported 3 times, for harassment, hate and threats of violence. It violates so many rules at once.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 06:48 AM
4

If she wants to have a laugh at lies, use AI to generate a picture of a fictional man, and see how many have dated this person.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 06:23 AM
1

Well, she is a radical-feminist.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/07/24 07:45 AM
2

Typical gaslighting from her, to make you feel as an agressor, when she was it.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 07:27 AM
3

I assume that's what we call femsplaining medicine to a doctor.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 07:19 AM
14

I think you can remove "likely". I think "feminismuncensored" was truly mostly uncensored, until she came as new mod.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 10:24 PM
24

"Either you are a radical-feminist, but also understanding that feminism is diverse, or you are against us" ... what happened to the non-radical-feminists from said diversity?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 10:19 PM
4

The question isn't at whom the hate is directed, but what is the motivation of the hate. When TERFs hate trans women, it’s because they see them as men, and they hate men in general. It's misandry. Regular right-wing conservatives might hate trans women out of misogyny, but that's not the case with TERFS.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/07/24 02:58 AM
21

Yes. It's "funny" they call it trans-mysoginy, because the only chance for people to care about it is to pretend it is because they are women. TERFs hate trans women because of misandry though. Not misogyny. They hate trans women just as much as they hate a cis man who would "invade their space".
/r/EverydayMisandry30/06/24 07:28 AM
75

I found the "I didn't want to be controversial" interesting. Opposing discrimination is controversial.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 04:59 PM
96

Hihi, I recognize my comment xD (the "probably discrimination")
/r/MensRights29/06/24 04:57 PM
22

Yes, people will definitively use this pretext to ignore the issue of androcide.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/06/24 08:09 AM
32

The Ukrainian and Russian conscripts might disagree.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/06/24 07:53 AM
6

It's enshrined into the laws of a lot of countries, be it for rape laws, circumcision, draft, parenting rights, homeless protection, domestic violence protection, protection of migrants, protection of disabled people,..... And the society isn't any better.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/24 04:08 PM
1

Not really pressuring, she is not saying men are "unworthy" if not married, she thinks marriage is still beneficial for men, at least for some aspects, and wants to make it more attractive, not bully men into giving in to marriage.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/06/24 10:22 AM
2

A woman only draft seems to be the ideal way to solve this.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 04:24 PM
0

It's like with murder. Would you like to be murdered by a stranger? No. You want it to be someone you have something in common, like a friend or family, then you feel fine being murdered, knowing the murdered is someone like you (/s just in case)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 07:00 AM
2

You claim to be a mental health advocate yet think that people making (survivable) self-harm don't deserve to be helped. Obviously, you prefer to "help" only once they are dead, burying them is much easier than caring for a living person. As I said in another comment in this post: The goal would be to get men to "attempt suicide" like women do, with the intent of surviving the "suicide attempt", instead of actually committing suicide like now. (obviously, the best is no self-harm either, but I'd…
/r/MensRights19/06/24 09:40 PM
2

"An attempted suicide is not really an attempt at suicide in about 95 percent of cases. It is a different phenomenon. It's most often an effort to bring someone's attention, dramatically, to a problem that the individual feels needs to be solved. Suicide contains a solution in itself," https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/11/981112075159.htm People are not stupid. Think of how many people die by accident, how likely is it that it fails when it is deliberately provoked?
/r/MensRights19/06/24 04:18 PM
8

It's not incompetence. Over 90% of "failed suicide attempts" are actually successful: the intention was to survive, so it is a success. But not really a "suicide attempt", instead it is self harm
/r/MensRights18/06/24 10:43 PM
5

Yes, that's the case. The goal would be to get men to "attempt suicide" like women do, with the intent of surviving the "suicide attempt", instead of actually committing suicide like now.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 10:36 PM
6

On the topic of men's issues, most of "the left" is conservative. When right-wing conservatives talk about men's issues, they don't sound so much different than the left-wing conservative majority. They just restrict their "men bad" rhetoric more to immigrant men, trans, ...
/r/EverydayMisandry18/06/24 06:23 PM
0

The woman were already not giving birth in Ukraine before the war. At this rate, yes, men might as well do it themselves, not going to change much. Or we "draft" woman to make children. Every woman has to make 3 children for the state, impregnated by force.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 06:26 AM
119

It's because women don't do more suicide attempts than men. It's because self-harm, which wasn't intended to be deadly, still gets categorized as "suicide attempt".
/r/MensRights18/06/24 06:15 AM
10

It's because people who try to commit suicide very rarely fail, people who "fail" generally didn't intend to succeed yet.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 06:10 AM
8

"Progressive". Supporting discrimination isn't really Progressive.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 05:42 AM
4

Agree, it doesn't matter that feminists throw around the insult "incel". When offense is given, it doesn't have to be taken. One can just understand this insult as a defect in the person using the insult, and go about their day.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 08:50 PM
26

Yes, Germany discriminate elsewhere too. Around 100 laws https://www.reddit.com/u/SnooBeans6591/s/pD5nZHeDP3
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/24 03:23 PM
36

Yes, if you are accurate, it's possible that more women have the right to vote for being a woman, than men have the right to vote as a men.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 02:36 PM
4

You can lose 70% of women and still be able to replace next generation. They can make more than 2 children. Wars don't kill that many.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 01:55 PM
7

If German, go to Standesamt in August to say you want to change, then come back in November for the final change. 2 month later, military service won't be able to impact you.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 01:47 PM
10

A listing here: https://www.reddit.com/u/SnooBeans6591/s/lbXMtghj8j
/r/MensRights13/06/24 01:44 PM
16

There are over 100 laws discriminating men in Germany, so it is not just the draft.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 01:44 PM
4

From November on, it will also be much easier to change gender in Germany. If wanted, all men could change gender. No medical Intervention nor name change required. They have to do it at least 2 month before draft though, otherwise they can't escape draft this way.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 01:33 PM
2

Does anyone else get male friends/males in their life saying ‘double standards’ at the most ridiculous things either as a joke or in a serious way that is so clearly not double standards? But when you dare to say it to them they say ‘here she goes again’ etc and your opinion is immediately invalidated? I find this so infuriating as they never truly seem to understand how hearing constant misogyny is as a woman, and yet make fun as though it isn’t a problem at all. Teenage boys need to seriously …
/r/MensRights09/06/24 07:55 AM
6

This and "males and women"
/r/MensRights08/06/24 09:21 PM
27

That's an important question. He have the examples of using "male" as an adjective, did he do the same with "female"? Edit: OP answered in another comment: That’s a good point, but I was still saying it as an adjective. “Female friend” and “female performers” were the examples I gave to them.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 08:13 PM
34

"We evolved to value female life over male life" - you misplaced this one, it doesn't say anything about "biological superiority". "We evolved to..." doesn't mean it is good, or ethical, or that we shouldn't try to fix it. I don't know how much is evolved and how much taught, but it is definitely true that women's life's tend to be more valued than men's (which isn't the same as having more value).
/r/MensRights08/06/24 07:49 AM
1

Agree, I watched the movie "The red pill" and I don't know what r/ theredpill is exactly about, except that I noticed that it is very much not the same as the topic of the movie. So I don't know what the "red pill" is.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 06:39 AM
1

I thought they were looking at your profile to see you are participating here, not that you were calling yourself MRA. I was thinking using this other account to interact on these other subs (without using this other account on "MRA" subs). Don't call yourself MRA, you would be called a "pick-me" otherwise.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 05:00 AM
9

Use it on other subs where people are sexist against men.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 04:51 AM
13

You can also create an alt account with a female looking avatar. Depending on the situation, it can be the appropriate counter
/r/MensRights02/06/24 04:48 AM
6

Pretty much any feminist study is bogus, now I just assume it to be bullshit by default. The 70% wage gap, rape & SA statistics, education statistics, even murder ("femicide") statistics, I've found lies everywhere.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 03:14 AM
3

We have quotas nowadays, lets use those ;)
/r/MensRights31/05/24 07:47 AM
8

You mean men are more likely to be SAed than convicted. The false accusation rate is higher than the conviction rate
/r/MensRights31/05/24 06:37 AM
40

I wonder if the mods of SelfAwareWolves are self aware
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/24 09:13 PM
2

Even if you appeal and a human mod looks at it, they will tell you that what you wrote doesn't matter. With the advent of LLMs, bots are now smarter than the mods, bots can understand context.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 12:56 PM
2

They can detect the same IP, and use browser fingerprinting. If you use a (separate) VPN connection and a different browser, they cannot tell anything. You can check your browser fingerprint for (relative) uniqueness here: https://amiunique.org/fingerprint Some people have been flagged for ban evasion, so they are definitely checking something. You can use alts after the ban if you want, but be aware of the tracking possibilities.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 12:15 PM
2

Yes, as a software engineer and manager of a server, I would never ever do that, as it's against reddit rules.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 11:51 AM
13

I would accept this argument if these mods actually cared about false flags. They don't care what you were saying. These mods don't deserve respect
/r/MensRights28/05/24 11:11 AM
4

Tip: go to interestingasfuck and mute the sub, so that you don't accidently comment there (you would get banned if you comment). If you want to participate in interestingasfuck, use an alt-account, which doesn't participate in any other sub (or at least nothing they might not like). Once you are already banned, you cannot use alts, because that would be ban-evasion.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 09:46 AM
42

It's offmychest, their mods are dumb, they might mean this very sub, because to them anything that isn't misandrist is redpill/incel. There are a few subs like that, if you are not banned from these, you are not a real reddit user yet. It's a rite of passage.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/05/24 09:33 AM
5

All "ministers of equality" probably think similarly. First goal is to avoid equality
/r/EverydayMisandry27/05/24 09:35 PM
200

And feminist ministers, members of feminist political parties are saying women are most affected by this war.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 10:43 AM
2

I'm sure a automod rule could be made to remove automatically until approval.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 07:26 AM
1

The movie is good... but it wasn't done by red-pillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 07:06 AM
29

Remember, if someone shows you statistics about gender dynamics, but don't show it for both genders, it's because it's manipulated to yield high numbers, and they don't want you to see it.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/05/24 12:40 PM
–

/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 12:22 PM
–

/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 10:16 AM
–

/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 10:06 AM
–

/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 10:01 AM
14

/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 08:45 AM
4

I honestly don't see anything to agree on with that person.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/05/24 07:12 AM
0

It's shit but it's logical, laws are generally not applied retroactively. But it's interesting to note the historical discrimination of men
/r/MensRights24/05/24 06:09 PM
1

That only works if they accuse you of assault at a time you were recording. If they say you assaulted them at a time you were alone, at home, sleeping, you don't have a record for that period of time, to prove you were in fact sleeping.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 07:06 PM
1

The issue with that, is none of those are kept for 9 years.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 07:00 PM
1

But then it's already recorded by whatever you supposedly used to send it. The issue I see, if someone say you assaulted them while you were alone, how do you prove you indeed were alone? Does the monitoring automatically start when someone else is there?
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:57 PM
–

Probably depends on the country, but at least for Germany it's pretty clear that misandry is systemic: https://www.reddit.com/u/SnooBeans6591/s/J9aiFtAAS4 I'm sure you could find similar things for a lot of countries
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 07:13 AM
1

You can get mad at your neighbor for believing random crap.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:50 AM
1

https://www.reveddit.com/y/true-lychee/?all=true
/r/MensRights18/05/24 05:28 PM
5

There are different types of FGM. Type 1a FGM only cuts of the clitoral hood/female prepuce, which is skin over the clitoris and is 100% equivalent to male circumcision. Edit: you need to check the classification from the WHO. Also, female circumcision is type 1a, so "only" skin, analogous to male circumcision
/r/MensRights16/05/24 08:43 PM
2

Yes, the law says you have to pre-register 3 month before. So they activated this step 3 month before the rest of the law. So you register in august, you change gender in november, and in january next year (2 month later) you are freed from any draft.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 11:15 AM
3

Ah, a fellow German. I just don't know if I can start the procedure end of august (to start the 3 month waiting period) or if I have to wait for november. EDIT: "Das Gesetz soll zum 1. November 2024 in Kraft treten. § 4 SBGG (Anmeldung beim Standesamt) soll bereits am 1. August 2024 in Kraft treten" - so you can start in august https://www.bmfsfj.de/bmfsfj/aktuelles/alle-meldungen/bundestag-beschliesst-selbstbestimmungsgesetz-238306
/r/MensRights14/05/24 08:25 AM
2

Even then, they give you a weapon, you have the choice on whom you turn it.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 08:11 AM
3

I'll change november this year (or february next year - I think I need to wait 3 month).
/r/MensRights14/05/24 08:08 AM
13

Generally, when you are conscripted, they give you a weapon. Once you have it, you can decide who you will fight using this weapon.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 08:05 AM
1

Ok. If someone want to define "unsafe" as the (measurable) risk of harm being greater or equal to zero, than they are tautologically "unsafe" by that way of defining it, because the risk cannot be negative. But if you define it that way, everyone is unsafe, and the term is meaningless by being too broad. Now, it is true, that if person A, despite a relatively low risk of harm says "I am unsafe" and person B, despite a higher risk, says "I am not unsafe" there is no way of saying one to be right …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 03:36 PM
2

Measurable things define reality. I mean, "I feel unsafe" is obviously also a real thing, but what is real is that this person "feels unsafe", not that they "are unsafe". And people shouldn't confuse the two, when their feeling is making a statement about an external fact, their feeling can be caused by a misjudgment of the sitution. If I say "I feel like Trump is the best president ever" that doesn't make him the best president ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 01:46 PM
7

"participants were required to have dated a woman in the past year, to not be married or engaged, and to have lived in the United States for at least 10 years" - so its not a randomized sample. It is explicitly not random.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 11:49 AM
2

Some might, which will help against the low birth rates.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 09:19 AM
3

A "special year" for all genders would conflict with some European and international law(there are papers from the scientific committee of the Bundestag - "Wissenschaftliche Dienste" - that explicitly state this). I was talking about this. I have high doubts that this is true. Denmark already has conscription for all genders. I know article 3 from the constitution only counts if women are discriminated against, having 100 laws discriminating men is fine.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 09:14 AM
5

Yeah, but there are over 100 laws discriminating men. So article 3 GG (gender equality) seems to be considered more as a proposal, than a requirement.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 06:30 AM
1

I'm curious which international or European law prohibits gender equality in the case of conscription. Are you sure you don't have it backwards? I think a male only conscription would be illegal, due to the principle of equality
/r/MensRights12/05/24 06:14 AM
2

Stats for General population: "6.1% of males aged 18–24 years were forced by a female to have vaginal intercourse, and 1.4% were forced by a male to have oral or anal sex (Smith & Ford, 2010)." The 2/3 figure seems to be genearalisable to the whole population
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 05:17 PM
4

Regarding female-on-male sexual misconduct (page 25) it states: "Among the 39,121 male prison inmates who had been victims of staff sexual misconduct, 69% reported sexual activity with female staff; an additional 16% reported sexual activity with both female and male staff (table 18)." and "Nearly two-thirds of the male jail inmates who had been victimized said the staff perpetrator was female (64%). Most male rape victims are from a female perpretator.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 04:50 PM
2

It's like intermarrital "rape", before it was illegal or in countries where it is legal. Pretending It's not rape because the law has it backward isn't a good look
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 01:04 PM
4

From what I've seen last I checked, the number is around 1 in 7 is a rape victim for women and 1 in 11 for men, in a study referenced by feminists. PS: that also means that men are not doing 99% of the rapes, as women are doing at least 30%.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 08:17 AM
1

I see... on changemyview and rant - and they got removed (ok, changemyview removes pretty much everything, so not surprising). I think you will have a much better result here. And definitely much better than on the feminist subs. Is it perfect here? No. But still much better than the "opposite side". EDIT: or maybe it also gets removed...
/r/MensRights09/05/24 11:24 PM
4

Are you going to post the same on r/ feminism? I'm wondering if it survives there. I've reported/called out sexism on this sub. I'm still here. On TwoX you get banned for opposing sexism. I didn't try on any other women-centric sub, but I would be happy if you tell us how that work out when you do.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:46 PM
–

Doesn't protect from bears either
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:58 AM
–

Which logic?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:56 AM
–

It's fair to say "let the women who choose bear go meet the bear". What's annoying is laughing at women (who didn't participate in this trend) suffering from bear attacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:55 AM
11

I keep seeing this "beat them with their own weapons", as if TERFs wouldn't be the biggest fan of a museum which bans men.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:40 PM
1

Me searching for "hive mind" usages on reddit to see what you mean: That Trump had much support from Gen Z is surprising. A lot of it is just hive mind circle jerking let's go Brandon nonsense I don't see a lot of people using it... except in the gaming/fantasy communities, when discussing an actual hive in the game/fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 07:44 PM
4

Put a toilet in the corner, it can even be "temporarily out of order". I'm wondering, what's prohibiting a company to use this to hire only men? If the judge accepted this, that would create a very unhealthy precedent.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 07:59 AM
2

I mean, in that case your countries judge took the right decisions (so far)
/r/MensRights08/05/24 07:56 AM
3

feminism I suppose. But "feminism" is for everyone, feminism isn't man hating, feminism isn't a hate group
/r/MensRights08/05/24 07:47 AM
-12

Reported. You're free to use statistics to rebute the man vs bear shit, but this woman didn't sign up to be used as an anecdote. She didn't go see the bear because she wanted to avoid men.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 09:54 PM
4

You're right, and there is research on this topic: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-023-05451-x
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 09:45 PM
1

The "virtue" is being a misandrist. In some social groups, this is considered a virtue and quite necessary to belong to the group, just as being an antisemite is/was necessary to belong to Nazi groups. Some groups have rites of passage that are awful to any normal human being. But you have to acknowledge that this is how they think.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 07:46 AM
7

If men stop prioritizing women, they lose access to their "slaves". No wonder anything going in that direction gets demonized. They don't want to lose their privileges
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:35 AM
2

What started my journey into the topic of gender issues was a government agency dedicated to women's rights reproducing one of the ways described in "How to Lie with Statistics". And people getting mad at me noticing they were off by a factor of 5...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 12:35 AM
1

Notice how bears didn't invade all male spaces? Only maybe stuff like boy scout gets also invade by bears, when it's in the forest. 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 12:00 AM
2

No, not all women are stupid and delusional. Only those choosing the bear.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 11:55 PM
10

It seems the right question is why are so many people of unspecified gender so bad at statistics, that they would answer "bear" to the question "man or bear"? Where did the educational system fail?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 10:24 PM
111

Only 1 in 3? I got attacked by women multiple times. "Attack" is such a vague term. That's very useful if you want to get high numbers to promote an agenda.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 06:34 PM
-1

So it works as intended. I don't have to deal with the misandry, it filters out reliably with just some occasional false positives.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 04:29 PM
1

I'm not talking metaphysics. A drunk person can walk to a cliff, think "would be fun to jump", jump and die. They consented to the jump. They wouldn't have done it if not drunk, but here, they did consent. 2 drunk people can walk to a cliff, person A thinks "would be fun if person B jumped". Person A pushes person B. Person A is responsible, even though they were drunk. ~rape Same scenario, but now person A says "would be fun to jump". Person B says "oh yeah, would be cool" and jumps and dies. P…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 01:12 PM
1

If you have sex with someone who doesn't want at this moment or is uncountious, it's rape. If they consent at this moment because they are alcoholised at this moment, that's on them. But it they don't consent at the point in time of the intercourse, then the other person is responsible. If you are drunk to the level of uncountiousness, you cannot rape, you can still be raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:45 PM
1

I agree, you can't consent if too intoxicated, but you also can't rape if too intoxicated. But if your level of alcohol consumption doesn't make you too intoxicated, you can do both with that level of alcohol consumption. I just take the same level for both.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:35 PM
2

Could be that these policies should be illegal. Point is same rule for everyone. Take responsibility for your actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:25 PM
-3

I would also consider it a red flag. But a red flag is just a warning, and you can dig deeper. So you can say, "oh, that's cool, I am also interested in the topic of gender equality as a men's right activist".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:19 PM
1

I think that the right answer is that someone who consents to sex consents to sex, even if they wouldn't have consented to sex had they not drink that much (unless they were drugged involuntarily, in which case the person drugging them takes responsibility). It is totally possible, that someone after drinking has agreed to sex, actively participated, but is unable to remember later.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:47 AM
1

It's completely possible that the women consented. Alcohol affects the capacity to remember (hippocampus) before it affects motoric functions, so they could totally have agreed, actively participated, but be unable to remember later.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:43 AM
18

If you ask for advice as a men on reddit, always flip the genders. Then you flip the genders again on the responses, and you get supportive feedback
/r/MensRights03/05/24 07:24 PM
1

I ain't becoming no feminist Double negation. Welcome to the dark side.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 03:45 PM
1

There are about 2700 cases in the world, which means your probability of catching it by eating a human brain is about 0,0000000386%. Unless there is ritual/systematic cannibalism (you eat people who died from a disease), kuru is not really a menace.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 03:43 PM
12

She would probably tell her kid to go find a bear if they get lost
/r/EverydayMisandry03/05/24 06:15 AM
9

Or death while using self defense against conscription officers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 04:56 PM
1

Sometimes you don't get the best solution, only the second best.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 08:20 AM
8

We should kick Poland out of the EU if they do that. But won't happen... that stuff is too normalized
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/24 09:39 PM
–

I have a list of 100 German laws discriminating men. Oppressed might be a strong word for this, but the first sentence is wrong. Even in the presence of an "ERA", we don't have equal rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 09:30 PM
0

But he is not really incorrect. You don't abort, you operate. The ectopic pregnancy is not going to leave through the vaginal canal. It's just not called a C-section.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/04/24 04:11 PM
0

That's stupid. That's not what "duress" is. Otherwise, the man could claim he is marring under duress, because otherwise she would leave. This makes the mariage null, and therefore the prenuptial (which might be null too) becomes irrelevant as there was no legal marriage to begin with.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 07:09 AM
9

As I wrote in another comment, it is perfectly possible to have a party with family and friends, dressed in a wedding dress, without getting married. You can even have multiple such parties a year.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 06:58 AM
22

If she thinks that only by putting a ring around her finger you'll get committed, It's even possible to both get matched rings and not get married. The ring is also a social convention, you can chose which you follow, if you follow any of them, or if you invent your own ritual, or do nothing at all. You can have a party with family, dressed in a gown, and not marry. Then go on a trip together.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 06:56 AM
1

No, they are for women in Germany. Pregnancy not necessary
/r/MensRights16/04/24 02:42 AM
1

They can ban you from using their parking ever again. Even if you legally switched gender with the SBGG law.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 02:35 AM
1

Yes, but the private establishment has "Hausrecht". They can ban you from using the parking altogether. This becomes enforceable.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 02:31 AM
2

It's called capitalism
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 02:59 PM
1

They even hand you the weapon to resist by force.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/03/24 09:37 PM
8

In india, tell me 1 law, which provides more right to women than men, and I will agree with you we are Misogynist or that it is a patriarchy. I can tell you many laws which gives rights to women but the same right is not extended to a man. Weird statement tbh. I have 100 laws discriminating men in Germany, is it now a matriarchy power 100? And if you already know laws discriminating men, how would finding a single law discriminating women completely flip everything?
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:33 PM
5

There are things, like the austrian woman who was held captive for 24 years and repeatedly raped. But it's rather rare, most rapes don't go with month long sequestration and permanent death threats. But that's the idea, this guy is going to be held captive with a permanent threat to his life, without even the perspective of justice as it is the government itself doing it. He might die, he might survive with lifelong injuries, if he is lucky, he will survive with "only" psychological damage.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 09:24 PM
22

I'd rather make the rapist jump off a bridge instead.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 11:58 PM
10

To be followed. It wouldn't surprise me if he gets booted away, because in our gynocentric societies it's fine to discriminate against men. That happens so often with laws supposed to ensure equal treatment
/r/MensRights19/03/24 11:11 PM
34

They should use more self defense against the conscription officers.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 07:22 PM
5

There was a study that found around 80% of women saying they would rape men (study from 199X). So I'm not so impressed by the 30%.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 10:06 AM
58

When trans-women are attacked by TERFs, it is in fact trans-misandry, not misogyny. TERF hate trans-women for their "male origin". When regular conservatives hate trans-women, then it generally is misogyny. Both trans women and men are to be included in then men's movement, because they both suffer from misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/24 08:19 AM
1

Most women are probably not women. Especially the older ones, who just never had a phone with which to make a fake phone-call. Most people have done some of this, but doing exactly all of those makes it unlikely. I've holden peper-spray, which isn't in her list, but some others I didn't do.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/24 08:05 AM
6

It's different in the sense that anti-white racism is quite rare, and heterophobia is super super rare. Misandry on the other hand is frequent, on par with misogyny. If you look at policing, you'll see the women/men difference is similar to the white/black difference, if not worse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/24 08:24 PM
5

"Men are the protectors"... this is bullshit Here's an idea, stop men being disgusting, abusive, harassing, misogynistic twats. <== This means, "please protect us". Is he aware of what he is saying?
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/24 05:30 PM
1

Different question: one: more generally, how does it relate to men's rights? two: how does this prove that the differences aren't entirely socialized? I don't believe that they are entirely socialized, but there is no doubt that an entirely socialized "thing" would be stored in the brain. Therefore, it would also be picked up by sufficiently accurate brain scans.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 04:44 PM
3

It's funny, because brain scans also showed that the brains of transgender also align to their "felt gender". Which means their gender experience isn't just about the "social construct", but about the actual wired gender of their brain.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 04:39 PM
1

It doesn't imply that it is an error. If we find out that the brains of "conservatives" and "progressives" are wired differently, will it prove that "conservatism is an error"? No. PS: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/conservative-and-liberal-brains-might-have-some-real-differences/
/r/MensRights26/02/24 04:32 PM
16

The manoaphere is not a group, though. It's a Bogeymen. It's a fiction devised to frighten, no wonder it has been attributed some scary properties in the myth.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 08:26 AM
9

Germany: https://www.reddit.com/u/SnooBeans6591/s/zuh1BcWoHH About 120 laws discriminate men or boys.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/24 10:36 PM
7

The balls of the Ukrainian women are so big and heavy they can't fight anymore.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 08:14 PM
4

I can't even comment there, it gets auto-removed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/24 03:46 PM
1

Nobody knows what the word "manosphere" even means. r/Manosphere is about the film "Manos the Hands of Fate". "manosphere", as word related to man-stuff is just a random bag of things, where everyone puts different stuff. Nothing consistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 05:00 PM
31

I would still call it super human. Human have the capability to distinguish smells. But dogs have super human capabilities in that regard. Humans are indeed very good at pattern recognitions especially in regard to faces, because it was an evolutionary advantage. Chest xrays were not that common. It turns out, AI has also attained the level of forensic facial examiners already. We need to get used to the fact that computer will beat us at everything.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 01:20 PM
25

It's not the first time that scientist discover that for the first time, and it won't be the last time that people pretend the male and female brain are completely indistinguable and only molded by society. Edit, PS: not a rights issue, though, as the rights don't depend on how the brain functions.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 11:44 AM
96

That's an interesting one. The AI developed superhuman capacities, becoming able to do something no human can do, and no human was even able to understand how the AI was capable to do it.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 11:37 AM
1

Just report and move on. Edit: actually it's good to comment. But report too
/r/MensRights19/02/24 11:55 PM
12

Don't trust any statistic you didn't falsify yourself.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/02/24 09:55 PM
2

We don't know if he threw her down the stairs. He might have pushed her away. That there were stairs behind her can be bad planning of her.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/24 01:32 AM
1

I've seen it once I think, but it was on another sub I think. I didn't check the comment, if OP got corrected.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/24 08:48 PM
1

If you search on "r/NotHowGirlsWork" for the word female, you see them using it themselves a lot as adjective, or complaining about the word "female" being used as a noun. I didn't find any complaint about female used as an adjective.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/24 08:43 PM
34

Important context: Amy Schumer considers herself to be a feminist: https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/amy-schumer-feminism-newsnight-interview_uk_57cfbf9ae4b0ac5a02dc8268 Other feminists called her "an Amazing Feminist": https://www.vogue.com/article/breathless-karley-sciortino-amy-schumer-feminist , or that her feminism is "the best feminism": https://www.denofgeek.com/tv/why-amy-schumer-feminism-is-the-best-feminism/ Just for all the people thinking feminism is amazing, or that people like…
/r/MensRights16/02/24 08:15 PM
25

That's what started my journey into gender equality advocacy. I observed feminist organizations knowingly propagating disinformation. What really broke the camels back, was when it was a "ministry for women's rights", so a tax funded governmental agency.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 10:24 PM
5

turned the tables I don't think "turn the tables" is an appropriate term, as, as long as it was used to designate women, it hadn't negative connotation. It only got weaponized once it was targeting men. Feminists didn't turn the table because no one attacked women with this, they just added it to their repertoire of things they use to attack men.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 12:27 AM
8

New to reddit? unpopularopinion is actually for popular opinions. Anything else gets you banned, and an appeal gets you a complaint for harassment. Try TrueUnpopularOpinion or The10thDentist.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 12:03 AM
1

If you are looking for infos/data, r/Male_Studies is worth to check (focus on studies, not on personal experiences). r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates is also a good place to check, and has likely far less people with radical opinions.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 11:44 PM
5

But yes anybody can be pro mens rights/ mens and boys issues. Indeed Do you want a reward for stepping outside of your feminist programming and joining the other side? She didn't ask for a reward, and if she had "feminist programming" she wouldn't be there. Is it so hard to focus on the solution? Why bring your identity into it? No one cares what equipment you weee born with as long as you don’t leverage it to get more disproportionate help and simping in your favor. Ever went to a feminist sub?…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 11:19 PM
1

Remember that equal work day was march the 17th a few years ago, and is consistently after the "equal pay day". March 14th represents how far into the year women have had to work to catch up to what their male colleagues earned the previous year. They were employed and unpaid until March the 14th, but they only started working March the 17th. So they got a few days of pay without work.
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/24 09:48 PM
4

And after that, they will act surprised about an increased murder rate against ex-partners.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:48 PM
76

Is that the rape culture we keep hearing about?
/r/MensRights09/02/24 11:40 PM
5

The only time I saw a restaurant waitress being bullied to tears by another waitress, it was in a "women owned, LGBT inclusive" cafe (according to the google maps labels). The safe-spaces are not necessarily that safe. That's consistent with one of my female colleagues who said she choose a male dominated work-field (software engineering) because the female dominated ones were more toxic.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 07:57 PM
5

Germany has around 100 laws discriminating men: https://www.reddit.com/u/SnooBeans6591/s/5ZlpwFvohe
/r/MensRights03/02/24 03:17 AM
1

Same. They even hand you a gun for it. Use it to fight off your real enemy, not they one they decided to send you fight against.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 02:14 PM
14

if you say you believe in equality, you should mean it Yes, it's the same for feminists and conservatives.... well, technically, all the feminists who fight against equality/men's rights might see themselves as progressives, but they really are conservatives too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/24 08:20 AM
1

PS: one is against a government (US), the other is against people (LGBT+). There is a difference which isn't solely related to power.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/24 08:11 AM
15

R/ freespeech. Wrong sub
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/24 02:16 AM
4

Yes, but only if not done anonymously. I you use a throwaway account, it's fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 03:44 AM
1

I got the answers from feminists about the question "How is it that men, despite loving women, continue to perpetuate sexism?" gender swapped here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/197hliv/how_do_women_who_love_men_still_support_sexism/ I think that can provide some valuable insights.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 03:27 PM
1

PS: I had to google what betabucks mean. It's funny when I think that I've been called an "incel" dozens of time (obligatory when you discuss gender on the internet) but still have not a clue about all the lingo that originated from the incel community.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 12:42 PM
3

“Women have no morals, are attracted to abuse and misogyny, and hate nice guys” “Ok, then become abusive” “I can’t do that, what kind of relationship would that be?” Not a paradox. That's more like "Lizzo is ugly" - "you kinda look like lizzo". It is "You should try to look like her" - huh? I just said I don't like looking/action like her/the abusive guys. “Why do women reject my cold approach? They shouldn’t be so shallow and about looks! They don’t even know me!” “Well, what did you approach h…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 12:38 PM
30

It's also what I was thinking: define conservative, define liberal. The feminist mainstream isn't as progressive as it pretends to be. If it was, I would join it.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 12:15 AM
–

The average is changing sheets every 2-3 weeks for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 11:00 PM
6

Teach them women don’t owe them sex. Very very unpopular to teach "them" that. That would require to stop calling everyone we don't like an incel, as it makes women a prize to be won. And these self described feminists don't want that, how could you expect them to have a consistent worldview that doesn't encourage the "toxic masculinity" they pretend to decry?
/r/MensRights24/01/24 07:34 AM
2

Was there any potential red-flag that you missed? I'm friends with a lot of co-workers, including women, and I have to wonder if and how you can tell the bad apples from the good ones.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 09:58 PM
8

Dude nobody moans about you spending money on yourself I almost upvoted you, because I thought you were right - this was my initial reaction to the post. go get that sexdoll you always wanted mate. Then you provided a counter-example.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 12:39 PM
4

Women still have safe heaven laws in all states. Which means women can abandon the child after birth everywhere (ni financial responsibility), men can nowhere.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 11:48 AM
7

The difference being, you'd be rational calling them misandrist, while they are irrational, calling you misogynist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/24 01:56 AM
4

Why do people take it on themselves and not their false accusers?
/r/MensRights19/01/24 09:53 PM
8

Yes, it is deliberately misleading, like most if not all numbers used by feminists. Never take any number you hear from feminists at face value. Check what is actually being measured, check if it is correctly represented (sometimes they give correct numbers, but the graph they show is misleading), and check what other things they might have deliberately forgotten to consider.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 12:42 PM
42

I checked, it's indeed her. First time I hear her name https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/djv3up/revisiting_mark_pearson_souad_faress/?utm_source=share You cannot mention her name in the UK, yet his name got published everywhere...
/r/MensRights19/01/24 12:51 AM
2

I sent your advice-request to ChatGPT. It said things like "Reflect on Your Communication Style", "Seek to Understand Her Perspective", "Avoid Escalation". I told ChatGPT to swap genders, than sent the gender-swapped advice-request. "Seek Support for Yourself", "Consider Professional Help for Your Husband" (ie, her in the orignal), "Legal and Financial Planning (for leaving relationship)". In any case, the men is the problem. ChatGPT reproduces the biases of it's training data, which includes Re…
/r/MensRights18/01/24 09:21 PM
5

One issue with the Venn diagram: feminism should overlap anti-feminism. For instance, TERF and non-TERF are very much in opposition. And a lot (most) feminist would be anti-"the feminists who overlap Men's rights"
/r/MensRights17/01/24 09:52 AM
1

Reminds me that one colleague looked at me bewildered when I said I would do a pre-nup. She also found it strange when I said that every marriage is a contract between 3 parties, husband, wife and the state (assuming hetero marriage). Just because you didn't want to read or think about the terms of the contract, but took the default ones doesn't make it less of a contract. It should be an occasion for talking about the relationship in an open way.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 10:48 PM
1

Because i find that "fair" means different things to different people. That frankly doesn't change anything. We might disagree on what is fair, or we might also agree. But if someone doesn't want a fair outcome, even if they agree with the other on what would be fair, they will try to fuck the other over and whatever they try to achieve will be objectively (not subjectively) unfair. So the question is unchanged - why isn't fairness the goal? ​ I am regularly countering guys on reddit who think i…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 12:08 PM
6

You are 100% going to know the difference between an AMAB and an AFAB woman before the fucking ever starts. This one is also false. Some people did only discover it after. But I'm sure that's quite rare.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 10:33 AM
42

The mods will tell you to delete the sub name (otherwise post gets deleted). You should copy the comments in your post (Rule 4) without the name. To your point: yeah, people are stupid, and in a gynocentric society, caring about men's issues makes you look like a monster.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 09:44 AM
10

So trust, when you unwrap that dress off a trans-woman, you're usually getting a penis. Surprise? I was with you until this bit. They should proactively tell it before they undress.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 09:32 AM
-4

I don't think you have a "right to know" before the first date. A date is a meeting with the purpose to get to know each other. But it definitely should be disclosed when things get serious and before you have sexual intercourse. I think most trans people would agree to that, and would handle it this way.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 09:24 AM
12

When you are dealing with female narcissist and simps, the only moment they care is if it affects themselves/women.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 08:08 AM
-28

Don't think these are feminist. Feminists perpetuate toxic masculinity with words like "incel", "virgin" (even if married) and "whiny", but not "gay".
/r/MensRights16/01/24 01:48 AM
3

The difficulty is in many settings, saying you are not a feminist is going to hinder you. So I'm thinking if for instance you are at your job and want to have measures not discriminating men, you probably should frame it as "feminism being for equality and also helping men" like they always claim it does. So basically you are a sheep in wolf's clothing (deliberately reversed the saying to fit better, as you are amongst the wolves).
/r/MensRights15/01/24 11:21 PM
0

When one of a friend broke up (not married), he helped her move out, bought furniture for her, and once they were completely separated and she didn't expect to get anything from him, she apparently started talking bad behind his back. But on the other hand, she already showed hints on being an asshole before, so it was likely a bit of a personality trait of her. But I notice, even if one partner is amicable that's not necessarily reciprocal. And OP's question would be, are women less amicable th…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 11:01 PM
6

I wrote "subreddit on gender-issues". I hope that's fine.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 07:42 PM
6

Yeah, I had a "femsplainer" in the team once. She was completely able to confidently explain something completely wrong to a guy who knew better. I also had a guy in the same team, who did the same to other guys. People confidently explaining something wrong is not gender exclusive, works in all combinations.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 10:01 AM
6

If there was only the subscription, there wouldn't be a problem. The tips are the issue, as they are leading to addiction problems.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 10:29 PM
5

Legal in the US... but illegal in most places (France, Germany as examples). It doesn't matter much that you cannot use it in court of law, it is just for you, so that you know that you have to go to a court of law to get another second test made, this time by court order, this time usable in court of law. If it is illegal, do it anyway, but be good at hiding that you are doing it, and never reveal you did it. If it comes negative, just say someone told you your partner cheated to justify to the…
/r/MensRights13/01/24 06:12 PM
4

You wrongly assume people are logical and don't have double standards. In many countries sex-dolls are already regulated, while there is no limit whatsoever in what a horror movie can show. I don't even want to watch the trailers of most horror movies.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 06:03 PM
3

that she was cheating on you (which she was) Yes. Just say someone told you she cheated. They didn't want to tell you with whom. You promised them that you won't say who told you. She cheated, even if nobody told you, you can still pretend someone did. You just need to get a court ordered test. PS: if you have non matching blood types, you don't even need to keep pretending that you don't know if the child is yours. So this is a good idea, you probably can know your blood type, the one of your p…
/r/MensRights13/01/24 05:56 PM
4

Also Germany. I would still do it, but you need to be aware of the law and find how to do it in a hidden way.
/r/MensRights13/01/24 05:42 PM
1

and aren't concerned about friends finding out You can stash them in a wardrobe when the guests come over. Or just in your bedroom, guests generally don't wander around the whole place, lock the door and your good.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 05:32 PM
13

If you can't say "I am a MRA", say "I advocate for equality in the draft", "I advocate for gender neutral prison sentences", "I advocate for not letting our boys fall behind in school", "I advocate for more safety in jobs", "I advocate for better suicide prevention for men". Only awful bigots can be against this, they will have to justify themselves, to say "yes, I am a sexist asshole", not you. People don't know what MRA means and get scared. Ok, be explicit about the details. Fuck them if they…
/r/MensRights13/01/24 04:39 PM
1

You have no fucking idea what you talk about. You probably saw some guy, who probably wasn't even a pedophile, doing a snuff movie and now think that is what it is about. Stop watching snuff-"child porn", it's unhealthy, and look at actual data. There is a reason most victims of child molestation are within families, and victims often don't realize it happened to them until adulthood. They didn't cry, they weren't beaten, and definitely not cut into peaces. The pedophiles don't get off on violen…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 03:50 PM
1

He is wrong though, see my response to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 03:20 PM
3

You are actually wrong. Surgeons are for instance one of the top-ten profession for psychopathic traits. Because these traits are very good for surgeons. But sure, it's a spectrum, the most hardcore psychopath which shows sadism might not be content with a simple doll, but others might. Pedophiles are primarily attracted to the prepubescent form. That's all what makes them pedophiles. You are mixing a hardcore psychopath with... maybe a pedophile? Not all child molesters are pedophiles, your des…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 03:18 PM
3

but the illusion will break instantly when you go out and can't really talk about your sex robot as a real relationship. Maybe people shouldn't date someone to have a trophy to show off to others. A relationship shouldn't be a status symbol, it should be for your fulfillment.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 01:23 PM
4

people who believe child’s pornography that is already made, should be legal That definitely shouldn't be legal. It would be like saying "if someone took a nude pic of you, it is allowed to spread even without your consent". Dolls or other fictive material should be legal though (as long as it's not modeled with reference to a specific child, otherwise, again, we would have a victim).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 12:12 PM
1

I think it's both. The men for accepting, the women for proposing the deal. A bit like with some of the women who had no issue using their body to climb up the hierarchy in the height of "me-too". They share responsibility for the "me-too".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 11:49 AM
13

Always make a test without informing the mother. Even if you think she wouldn't cheat on you, you still have 2% chance of having misjudged her and not being the father.
/r/MensRights13/01/24 10:56 AM
6

You cracked the code, lol Don't let them force you to enact a stereotypical "female" performance. That would be misogynistic and transphobe. Be the masculine woman you want to be.
/r/MensRights13/01/24 10:16 AM
3

Yes, radical feminist are consistently misandrist. The only variation is if they consider trans-women to still be men (TERF) or if they consider trans-women to be women.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 07:22 PM
0

You are switching topics. "The husbands and fathers who control the US" are not husbands and fathers to trafficked women, unless they traffic them themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 04:04 PM
4

You mean with OP, who makes half the posts on this sub.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/24 04:02 PM
2

Buy yourself a brain
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/24 03:37 PM
1

They already have illegal prostitution as an option for their wives and daughters. I don't think that's an argument. Nobody asked for mandatory prostitution for their wives and daughter.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 03:24 PM
7

Do you think the people who would protest in the streets are those who "have regular meltdowns at just the idea of a woman having a rich sexual history"? I am for legalization of sex work and don't have an issue with women having a rich sexual history. Maybe these are just 2 different set of people, those who slut-shame and those who are for legalization.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 03:18 PM
3

being with someone who meets their standards > being single > being with someone who doesn't meet their standards Sounds like everyone, except for the a-romantics (being single > anything) and the dependent/desperate (just anyone > being single).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 08:12 PM
–

I think it's both. The men for accepting, the women for proposing the deal. A bit like with some of the me-too'ed women who had no issue using their body to climb up the hierarchy. Both parties share responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 08:07 PM
3

Remember to ask them to pay for a date at some point, to get rid of all the entitled ones.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 07:50 PM
19

When a feminist states something, you can start with the default assumption that the opposite is true.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/24 01:09 AM
7

"men don't cry", "men don't ask for help", dismissing men's issues, considering men aggressive, not believing male victims... is definitely internalized misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 06:30 PM
3

This. It would be nice if I could get pregnant.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 10:23 PM
3

Do those countries require 2 for every medical procedure? No. For surgical operations yes, both parents are needed (unless life threatening urgency, than not a single parent is required). Something like a vaccination only requires one.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 09:26 PM
2

But to then disown a child that you have been raising for years... For me the goal is to know before I get into that conundrum, right after birth or even before. Anyway, I think it's not wrong to know if you are adopting or having a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 09:17 PM
1

Sadly unlikely to be possible in Ethiopia
/r/MensRights07/01/24 08:22 PM
1

Surely her ego can handle that. Some human beings have an ego such that they can't acknowledge that they are. That's something you have to take into account. That's why doing the paternity test in secret is the correct solution in most cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:18 PM
4

There’s nothing stopping dads from cheek swabbing their kid and sending it off discretely In some countries, that's not legal. You require permission from the mother. Otherwise, I would agree. Where fathers can do it, and rescind from the birth certificates in the first month, it's already quite good.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:19 PM
5

That explains a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:14 PM
2

You might be sent back by the country you went to if they have an agreement, or if they too want to use you as cannon fodder for the war of the country you left. I'll probably be undraftable here in Germany in one year (by changing gender, removing male and having none). But I also have French citizenship, so I could be deported there by Germany (unless I renounce French citizenship).
/r/MensRights07/01/24 07:05 PM
8

Choose the country you go to wisely. Some countries want to forcefully send back the Ukrainian men.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 07:00 PM
2

In the US it is (from what I know, it doesn't require the mothers consent, you can do it freely, you just pay for it). In other countries, like France or Germany it's sadly not available.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 05:50 PM
2

France. Germany is similar. The US are much better.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 04:38 PM
2

Depends where you live. Where I live, it's illegal. I'd be happy if I was allowed to pay 200€ to get a paternity test.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 04:04 PM
2

Sure. But you never know if you are with the right women. Even if you believe the child is yours and find no reason to suspect it isn't, you still have a 2% chance to be wrong in your assessment. If you tell me you, the "father", never ever make mistakes in your judgments, sure, you don't need one. If you think you are perfect, fine, otherwise, you are better off doing a paternity test.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 04:00 PM
0

That makes it the cheapest insurance you will ever get. Pay 200$, save 4750 (=2% of 237,482 - 2% being the probability you are not the father when you have NO reason to believe your partner cheated). Your car insurance cost more, and has negative cost/benefit ratio.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 03:54 PM
1

Honestly, I'd be happy if I was at least allowed to make a paternity test without approval from a judge or the mother. Because both in Germany and in France, the man is just not allowed to do it. If you are in the US, or some other not fucked-up country, you can at least make the paternity test on your own.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 03:47 PM
6

That's for those who suspected their partner of cheating. If you are 100% sure your partner didn't cheat, you still have a 2% chance of not being the father. Because 2% of men misplace their trust. That's why, even if you trust your partner, you should get a paternity test.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 03:40 PM
3

You can rescind from the birth certificate if you do it in the first few month. Just do the test right away. A test takes 1-2 weeks until you get the results.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 03:35 PM
5

There are women supporting men's rights. Watch videos/read articles from Karen Straughan, Hannah Wallen, Cassie Jaye, Erin Pizzey, Belinda Brown, Janice Fiamengo, Christina Hoff Sommers, Camille Paglia, Cathy Young, Helen Smith... Most women are not feminists to begin with, and there are some very toxic male feminists too.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 03:01 PM
4

The label was created by a specific group to self describe and should not be pushed on others. So you shouldn't call a misogynist who is not a part of these groups an "incel".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 10:29 PM
1

the last one even perpetuates toxic masculinity They all do when used as insult. Do you think they would criticize "fragile female ego" when women show vulnerability and sensitivity due to, let's say, body standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 05:33 PM
11

1) No, it doesn't, it get's thrown around willy-nilly. 2) If you want to call someone else a misogynist, call them a "misogynist", not an "incel". There is no law nor word-filter prohibiting the use of the adequate term, "misogynist"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 05:22 PM
17

Yes, nothing more funny than seeing a feminist saying "we need to combat toxic masculinity", just to push 'toxic masculinity' a bit later by throwing around the word "incel" as an insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 05:01 PM
0

Horror movies are made to make the audience uncomfortable, so there could be a market for this. But I have some doubts still. I don't watch horror movies though, so what do I know, I'm definitely not the target audience :-)
/r/MensRights04/01/24 03:42 PM
6

All I had to do was be born male with ADHD, autism, and NVLD. It's actually much simpler than what you think. Married men get labeled incels, the word is meaningless the way it's thrown around.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/24 04:21 PM
3

already obvious with how there is no equal catch term like "masculinism." There is "masculism" (you had an "-ni-" too much in your word)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/24 01:35 PM
1

There is a study that found the UN is biased against men. I mean, we all knew it, but it's nice someone systematically proved it.
/r/MensRights01/01/24 09:51 AM
5

They can frame a lot as rape. I mean, some people said they "were raped by thoughts". There is no limit. What is important, is that it isn't rape (yet, at least). They might just be added to the false accusation statistic if they pursue. Enthusiastic consent sure is a good thing, but it's not the only way to consent. People do a lot of things without enthusiasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 06:59 PM
20

That's called compliant consent actually. It's like when you do the vacuum cleaning, when you think it was really not necessary yet. It's not slavery.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 03:35 PM
2

If one person isn't having sex, they expect the other to abstain from it too, otherwise it would be "cheating".
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 03:31 PM
7

If you're not compatible in expectation of cleanliness, you shouldn't be in a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 03:29 PM
7

On this sub, it seems to be the majority of women who want experienced guys. It's not necessarily representative of the general population though.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 10:55 AM
3

I feel obligated to protect men more. They are the ones who need it most, as society in large doesn't care so much about them (because of male out-group bias and female in-group bias).
/r/MensRights30/12/23 09:01 AM
13

In some countries, you can lose your job. For me it's safe, I have large freedom of speech, but that's not the case everywhere.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 11:07 AM
–

The second video doesn't look like ruining his day. Looks like a fitness training xD Now with over 10% of people cheated in a marriage (General Social Survey), there is always the possibility you are being cheated on and being completely oblivious to it. But nobody should attack their partner for cheating when they have no concrete reason. I didn't see guys accusing their wife of cheating without evidence, but your experience might differ, I don't know which subs you follow.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 01:13 AM
9

A feminist who shared a graph from the "Ministry responsible for Equality between Women and Men" on facebook led me to start my journey to men's rights activism.The graph was misleading with statistics, exaggerating the difference in deaths from partnership violence between men and women by a factor of five. This error was glaringly obvious, as it was a 5 fold error, yet somehow seemingly no-one in the ministry (financed by our taxes) noticed the error. I contacted them multiple time to ask them…
/r/MensRights25/12/23 06:10 PM
10

And leave another condom in the trash with just hot sauce in it xD
/r/MensRights24/12/23 11:35 PM
1

This dude is bad at math
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 04:08 PM
24

<Insert Meme> The myth of consensual sex - SW: I consent - Client: I consent - Random person on the internet: I don't Isn't there someone you forgot to ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 03:04 PM
2

You mean you pay for the coffee, but then you split for the restaurant?
/r/MensRights23/12/23 11:59 PM
–

Well, I take holidays to take care of my nephew (that is, a child which isn't even mine). It seems you met some guys who, like OP, have a weird relationship with women (or children). I doubt that's even close to the majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 04:29 PM
22

Yes. Except they are men, so they might be booted of. Asylum law in Germany (§44 AsylG) The states should take appropriate measures to ensure the protection of women and vulnerable people when accommodating asylum seekers in accordance with paragraph 1. We have discrimination by law. And most countries have conscription for men too, so justice is not in their interest.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 03:22 PM
1

The thing is, even if it's voluntary, they'll make it mandatory anyway once a war break out. So consider it mandatory even if the law says "voluntary". It didn't take long to make it illegal to gather during COVID, it won't take long to make conscription mandatory in case of war. So the goal is to ensure it's gender-neutral when it happens.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 01:43 PM
2

Yes, that's why I'm personally in favor of including women, not removing the draft. The COVID epidemic showed how fast laws can be changed if needed. If they need 1 year to abolish conscription, they will need less than one week to reinstate it.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 12:40 PM
2

14th amendment angle and argue against the draft due to its overt unequal application In gynocentric societies like ours, the judges might argue that it doesn't count for drafting women. In Germany, we have the "ERA" (Art 3 GG) since 1949, yet the 26.06.2006, the supreme court decided that discriminating men for the draft is fine (BVerwG 6 B 9.06).
/r/MensRights22/12/23 12:33 PM
1

Probably. That's why the legal framework needs to be made to include all genders in peace time.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 12:21 PM
57

All males living abroad just won indefinite refugee status from Ukrainian oppression.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 02:29 AM
9

Why should I support women's rights if men's rights aren't supported too? For me it's quite simple, living in Germany, the only people being legally discriminated against are men (by over 100 laws, see list here: https://www.reddit.com/user/SnooBeans6591/comments/18loixf/german_laws_discriminating_men/ ). So there is not much to support in terms of "women's right". So for now, I can only support keeping some women's rights like abortion and advocate for removing some rights which are discriminat…
/r/MensRights21/12/23 02:31 PM
4

Couldn't that be solved by simply stating something like "the questions could be especially stressful for trans people, if sensitive don't proceed"? I've definitely seen far worse than anything you could imagine putting in this form.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/23 12:31 AM
9

encouraged - certainly Like by drafting all those who aren't pregnant. That could increase the amount of pregnancies.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 12:05 AM
19

Irrelevant. They didn't repopulate the country before the war, they won't do it after the war. They should be forced to fight same as men unless they are pregnant, that would actually have a better chance of repopulating Ukraine.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 12:01 AM
2

It's not sure you will need to have a prescription/go to the doctor. Planning is definitely an issue... which also exist for the women's pill. If someone is in a relationship, that's not a big problem. If you didn't have intercourse for a full year, I assume you won't take the pill as contraceptive (male or female), but will either use a condom yourself or ask your partner to do so. Will every man on the world start taking it as soon as it comes out? No. Not every women takes the pill either. Th…
/r/MensRights19/12/23 11:43 AM
7

If you are a men, would you trust a women when she says "yeah, I've taken the pill"? If I am certain that he/she doesn't want children (nor to lock me in a relationship using children), I can trust her/him. Otherwise not.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 09:47 AM
16

They have no clue what a condom is. There is no condom the couple use. There are: female condoms (internal) male condoms (worn on the penis)
/r/MensRights19/12/23 09:36 AM
3

You should be able to find some who would try to fix some men's rights issues. Also, even if not, it's important to know which politicians would enact new discriminations against men to avoid them and maybe even actively dissuade others from voting them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/23 09:23 AM
5

The day "inclusion" and "diversity" includes everyone I'll be in favor of it. For now, it's just mostly doublespeak.
/r/MensRights17/12/23 05:26 PM
7

Even that would be progress. Currently male rape victims and men whose used condoms were used to inseminate oneself were forced into fatherhood.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/23 12:33 PM
–

The belief that you deserve love, kind treatment, compassion, and companionship, on your terms, is entitlement and is fine. It's entitlement and it's not fine. The belief that you should seek love, kind treatment, compassion, and companionship, on your terms, is not entitlement and is fine. This is fine. The first one is about what people have to do in general, like a moral "law". The second is actually setting a boundary, that is if people don't conform to it, you will leave and find someone el…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 11:13 PM
41

Why then do many hetero and lesbian couples not seek to adopt, but demand IVF? One step further, why do people have children of their own when there are still children to adopt? If that's the reasoning, they should use contraceptives (or even abort) and adopt instead. Did they also make this argument? If not, they are hypocrite and can be ignored.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/23 09:10 PM
1

There is no indication for any revenge here. It's more likely a case of self-preservation. This person is not trying to stop you from joining singles events, they are merely avoiding them themselves. Revenge could be someone saying "If I saw a women drawning, I wouldn't help her" (assuming they would help men). Even if the person saying "avoiding your bs/attitude" was a literal misogynist, their statement still not reflect revenge - they are not trying to harm women, they are at most staying awa…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 04:56 PM
2

I asked ChatGPT to explain the difference between self-preservation and revenge: Imagine you have a favorite toy. If another kid tries to break it, and you hide the toy to keep it safe, that's like self-preservation. You're protecting something important to you from getting hurt. But, if you then try to break the other kid's toy because they tried to break yours, that's like revenge. Instead of just keeping your toy safe, you're trying to make the other kid feel bad because they made you feel ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 04:17 PM
3

What's bullshit is pretending that enjoying your life is revenge. Good for them if they enjoy their life. Nobody is stopping you from joining singles events. I don't join them, you still can.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 04:13 PM
3

Then stop speaking bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 02:13 PM
5

I found a "I'm single, ask me out" T-shirt online. This seems like the obvious solution: wear that at the gym, so men know which type of women you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 12:10 PM
9

Oh I see. If I put an alarm in my home after being robbed, it's a revenge against the world. How about you live your life too instead of feeling entitled to others?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 09:31 AM
14

And if you do approach women in the gym, you get a video of it put on social media calling you a creep. And you might get banned from the gym.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 09:24 AM
2

The ERA we have in German constitution: Art 3 GG: "Men and women have equal rights. The state promotes the actual enforcement of equality between women and men and works towards eliminating existing disadvantages." We still have over 100 laws discriminating men, continuously increasing. We have discrimination for fathers who work, handicapped males, youth welfare, job search, asylum seekers, victims of violence, men working in media, exhibitionism only punished for men, cancer screening, retirem…
/r/MensRights14/12/23 09:53 PM
2

I edited my response, german feminists don't want equality. We have over 100 laws discriminating men, many if not most were pushed by feminists.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 09:30 PM
3

Let's say you have male "an actor", female "an actress" plural "multiple actors". Now in germany, they use singular "any actr*ess" (they put a star in the feminin form to pretend it can be either gender, yet you rarely get an audible difference, and "actor" is not even a prefix of "actr*ess") and plural "multiple actr*esses" (again, using the feminin, pretending it's neutral). EDIT: I would actually like a reform of the language to make it gender neutral. But that's not what german feminists wan…
/r/MensRights14/12/23 09:11 PM
30

very US centric argument I would say it's a "today's US centric" argument. Who knows what tomorrow reserves us. A war with China, Russia, whoever, and you have the draft in full force. There is never a draft until there is one. The Ukrainians probably didn't think of going to war a few years ago.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/23 02:41 PM
2

I have to admit, I'm also often faulty of this. I try to say something like "male genital mutilation (misleadingly referred to as 'circumcision')"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/23 10:54 PM
4

Violence from men towards other men is mostly sexist, as they wouldn't harm a women in the same situation. They've been fed with "you don't hit a women", not with "you don't hit anyone". And even when men advocate for a male only-draft, it is also (internalized) sexism against men. So even if sexism was required in the definition, it would still count as gender based violence.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 11:46 PM
20

Enslaving a men legally vs having to pay for IVF.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 11:19 PM
29

Hmm... are there maybe some poisons available? I mean something that kills the sperm and gets into hospital anyone who would try to use it?
/r/MensRights11/12/23 10:00 PM
-24

Well, rape culture is not pervasive in the west, but it can be present in some groups, and some can try to promote rape culture, as is the case here. But what we also need to understand is that these people are trying to get free publicity from us. The more you share this crap, the more it gets views. It's good that you shared an image and not a direct link, hiding the twitter handle would be even better.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 09:56 PM
47

Indeed. The people who are most attracted to violent sex in porn are women, not men. Men dominating women is more a female fantasy than a male one. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-apes/202207/who-likes-violent-porn-new-research-upends-expectations
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/23 05:05 PM
30

or to cause a victim distress That's what the ex-girlfriend did, so it's applicable to her. But the remark about onlyfans is correct. Send the dick-pic with the message "Subscribe to my Onlyfans for more" and you are good.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 04:44 PM
146

"The UK is about to introduce a 'cyberflashing' law that makes unsolicited dick pics a crime with a two-year jail sentence" (March 2022): https://www.businessinsider.com/uk-expected-cyberflashing-unwanted-dick-pics-a-new-criminal-offence-2022-3 That's only for sending pics, without all the harassment she did.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 12:59 PM
13

I assume you refer to this post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/18d6f47/to_anyone_reading_this_never_feel_ashamed_if/ I don't know, people are stupid. The good word to talk about a misogynist would be the word "misogynist", and using the word "incel" as an insult is indeed basing men’s worth on sex. And it somewhat objectifies women into "sex-objects" men should try to get access to. You shouldn't care about what they say - they call married men "incels". It's not like they can kno…
/r/MensRights10/12/23 07:04 PM
16

Ignore the slut shamers. The existence of prudes isn't new and it's unlikely to go away soon. You don't need anyones approval.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 03:42 PM
1

gynocentrism and "simping" could be considered "toxic masculinity" in some cases. Toxic masculinity is people doing harmful things because they think it is "manly", and they want to conform to this supposedly "masculine norm". Men saving/protecting women is some masculine norm. Obviously, you could also just call it "toxic gynocentrism" to be more precise. Obviously, feminist don't mind or even encourage these forms of "toxic masculinity". They thrive on it.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/12/23 02:53 PM
1

Yes, you normally have a few month to rescind from signing the birth certificate. Check with a lawyer how much time you have, and then don't waste time.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 01:35 PM
1

Agree. If I told someone to not touch me 2 times and they still kept doing it, I'd do the same (male or female).
/r/MensRights09/12/23 10:16 PM
4

I think it's possible to get out if you learn afterwards that you are not the father, as you were mislead (only if it's close to the birth, not when you had the child for years, so do the paternity test immediately). But check with a lawyer about the options and delays. https://www.afathersplace.org/fatherhood-issues/establishing-paternity/legal-paternity-actions/ A father signing just the birth certificate, without signing a Paternity Acknowledgement Affidavit, does not constitute paternity. Th…
/r/MensRights09/12/23 05:25 PM
22

What I would say is that I decided to do a paternity test before I even met my partner, because it is not so much about trusting your partner than it is about trusting yourself to be able to know if your partner got a child from someone else. 50% of marriage end in a divorce, do you think they knew it when they married? 4% of men unknowingly raise a child that isn't theirs, is it because they didn't trust their partner? Trust doesn't save you. And especially when you are in love with someone, yo…
/r/MensRights09/12/23 12:12 PM
12

Yes, 95% of failed suicide attempts fail on purpose (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/11/981112075159.htm). But if someone does a (false) "suicide attempt" to get help, they should get help. It would be a great win if men did more failing "suicide attempts" and less actual suicides. Even better would be to just call a helpline without any attempt.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 01:24 AM
1

Interesting idea, but you still have to pay the lawyer, the paternity test and fill this bank account. Just doing a paternity test without asking her might be cheaper. Take the swab, send it in.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 12:00 AM
3

They don't go to female dominated jobs because they are female dominated, they go to the job because they like the job. My point is that the women who choose a male dominated job are not discouraged, persecuted or whatever, but rather might find this environment better than a female dominated one.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 02:02 PM
2

Hmmm... you're better off taking the paternity test without her knowledge if you didn't make sure she would be OK with it before she got pregnant. You don't want to have to insist on making a test once she is pregnant. If she says "yes", then fine, if she says "no", then you say "ok, no problem" and you do it later without telling her.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 12:26 PM
2

I'm not sure I understand what you mean. A women can have had a child and give it to a safe heaven, if that's what you mean. But it's not my child and I'm not going to raise it, so why would I care when it has no impact on me? Again, I didn't ask about cheating, I asked if the child is from me. That's why it's only a thing between me and the child, and as such I would either inform early in the relationship that I will get a test in case of pregnancy, or just get a paternity test without asking …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 11:07 AM
95

Either is doesn't exist, or the word is very misleading as the "patriarchy" is gynocentric enough to make hundreds of laws benefiting women. If I wasn't for equality, I'd ask for a "matriarchy" with the same standard, as I would benefit from it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/23 10:42 AM
2

You can get an STI from rape or a previous partner, so it's "fair". But "fairness" wasn't the question, relevancy and accuracy is. The paternity test is not about cheating, it's about paternity. The STI check is not about cheating, it's about STIs. Nobody asked you to pass a polygraph test. The women can be pregnant from her partner and still be cheating, either by being lucky of from use of condoms. And it doesn't matter, as we wanted to know about paternity, not cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 10:37 AM
2

Yes, you can ask for an STI check. Getting an STI would be bad for you, so you have some interest in knowing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 10:05 AM
2

Nah. If you want, I do an STI check though, as another person suggested. That's giving you some relevant information, which isn't about cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 09:37 AM
5

As I said somewhere else, it's a really cheap insurance of around 200$ covering for an expected loss of over 4000$ (not accounting for emotional damages). Normally, the cost of an insurance is higher than the expected loss. Every reasonable men should take one.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 08:54 AM
1

A Polygraph is a very poor way to check for paternity, when you have the option of a paternity test which is 100% accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 08:46 AM
14

I think the best course of action is to say early in the relationship that you'd like a paternity test on principle if you were to get father, or, alternatively, to perform it yourself after birth without telling the mother. Anything else is just asking for a lot of trouble, no matter if you don't think it is "accusing the women of cheating".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 02:09 AM
3

Do you know an AI that is able to criticize feminists? Well, I looked what the AI would respond. It criticized that the post "diminishes the gravity of racial injustice", which wasn't the first thing to come to my mind. It didn't even come to my mind after the AI suggested it, so I refocused it on the apparent prejudice in a post criticizing prejudice, then removed 50% of what it wrote, which went into "problematization" and discussing some abstract "harm" and replaced it by my own.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 01:08 AM
0

While it's understandable that some people might have had negative experiences that shape their perceptions, it's not accurate or fair to generalize those experiences to all women or all men. Just as it's unfair to assume all men are a certain way, it's equally unfair to suggest all women treat men negatively. It's important to recognize individual differences and avoid broad generalizations, as they can lead to misunderstanding and perpetuate biases. I've seen enough women saying that they appr…
/r/MensRights07/12/23 12:05 AM
3

Lol, "I carry pepper spray in case someone looks in my direction".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 08:08 PM
0

Yes, the low amount of men advocating for men's rights might be an instance of what is referred to as "toxic masculinity". Many men might not want to protest against injustices but rather try to appear stoic and self-reliant. Women on the other hand are not as much socialized to not complain, which results in discriminations against women being solved, and discriminations against men being created without too much resistance, as "men can handle it".
/r/MensRights06/12/23 07:20 PM
1

Yes, me pointing out that the seats reserved for men are old and uncomfortable and demanding to replace them with a better ones is not sexism, as I ask for the same ones as for women. It's ok to demand it being fixed, even if removing/changing all these laws only benefit men - but that's only not sexism because we don't end up with "better seats" as a result - it only leads to the same seats, aka equality. The issue is that women's needs have a dominant voice in society, and it is important to s…
/r/MensRights06/12/23 05:20 PM
3

I should prepare a better compilation, but here is a start: Family: In the case of joint custody, the father is primarily responsible for maintenance (Art 224 §2 Abs 1 EGBGB) Maintenance claims of orphans against the mothers are limited, unlimited when against the father. (§ 15 Abs 2 bvg_33dv_1961) If there is no predominant parenting by one parent, the parenting is attributed to the mother for the pension calculation. (§ 56 Abs 2 sgb_6) Regarding school meals, pupils whose mothers work or study…
/r/MensRights06/12/23 11:15 AM
22

Yes, and being feminist should have nothing to do with being anti men's rights. Yet that's the case of most of the online and mainstream feminists. I'm for equal treatment, but feminists generally support the over 100 laws discriminating men in Germany.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 05:23 PM
1

The only person who should bear the responsibility is you, whether you wanted this child or not. You should have to raise it and be alone responsible to support it financially.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 09:24 PM
0

so if a man was raped, he isn't held responsible for the kid It seems you forgot the beginning of the conversation
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 08:49 PM
2

Yes, exactly, people, plural, not a single person who is already a victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 08:00 PM
1

It is. The government can pay. It would be unfair to the men to let him pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 07:37 PM
2

Pregnant mother goes to the father, lets him sign (or not sign) a paper that he won't take a financial abortion. That way, she can know immediately what she is up to. If the father doesn't want to respond, she delegates this to some "notary" (or any official instance) - the father now gets, say one week, to decide. There is no time limit - the father can do a post-birth financial abortion, but ONLY if the procedure wasn't made before. Remember, he has one week from the moment he is informed abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 07:34 PM
19

You can always record everything and sue for defamation. If you have a reason to record, like getting evidence for a blackmail, you can record legally. If you don't yet know she will try to blackmail you, you can also illegally record. You may be prosecuted for recording illegally, but you won't have the trouble with the false rape allegation as the evidence is still usable in that case - choose what is worse, false rape claim or illegal recording.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 07:14 PM
0

He proposed to raise the baby completely on his own.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 11:01 PM
1

The only cultures that try to make it illegal are Conservative ones that are influenced by patriarchal religion Nice way of describing a group of people that includes radical feminists. Funny thing is, it's probably even a correct description.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 09:41 AM
1

I think men (and women) should support the legalisation of prostitution, because there is no reason to make it illegal. I don't like the "if men want to stop being so miserable they should..." argument, as this argument is also only about "serving [their] interests". The prostitutes want it legalized, and it is their opinion that count, not the opinion of unaffected people.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 09:35 AM
70

Fact. That's so strange being called an incel by feminists. Did they get the impression I was trying to date them? Not in a million year, not even under the threat of a gun.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 06:57 PM
1

Second, there's a huge difference between what women claim to want when being surveyed; and what women show and demonstrate they actually want when women are out there selecting men for sex and other coupling Well, no women was surveyed in this study. They were comparing the difference between "incel men" and "non incel men". I miss the moment where they demonstrated who is under/over-estimating, the only thing shown is that they estimate differently. Both groups might also be overestimating the…
/r/MensRights27/11/23 06:52 PM
3

"My wallet, my choice" is literally just "my body, my choice" for the vast majority of those who have to work to earn money. Taking your money is using your body at 100% for whatever amount of hours you have to work to earn it.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 07:05 AM
1

Maybe she is talking to feminists and pointing out that they are retrograde?
/r/MensRights11/05/23 12:07 AM
12

Buy a "the future is male" shirt, and go to work with it. Or send a mail to HR, asking the if the "Girls run the world." Shirt is allowed, and to send a reminder of company policy if it is not allowed. If it is allowed, get the "the future is male" shirt and wear it. They would be liable for discrimination based on gender if they only allow one.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 09:55 AM
2

According to the reddit admins (you know, the paid "professionals"), this is OK: What kind of bio should I write on a dating profile to attract the type of guy that was neglected by his mother as a child? I have a very, very specific type. I’m looking for sad boys that lost any hope that they’ll ever be loved. When I come along, they’ll cling on to me for dear life and I‘ll be able to get away with anything. That’s the plan, at least. We’ll see how it works out. I’m already entangled in things i…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 05:00 PM
21

Well, to be fair, the admins (paid employees from reddit) are not necessarily much better than the mods. So bypassing the mods might not help so much.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 05:53 PM
46

Remember, your reports go to the moderators of the sub. Use https://www.reddit.com/report to bypass them
/r/MensRights17/04/23 04:51 PM
0

Or the overpopulation will end causing widespread famine and war, which will lead to the population collapse.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 12:39 AM
5

They probably would be able to sustain it. 700 million is basically the population of the EU+USA. The issue isn't so much population as bad "politicians". If it weren't for human made blockers for scientific progress (be it religious or otherwise), we could have had the knowledge required long ago. Running all of the infrastructure does need people, but not that many.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 11:36 PM
3

Did you record the calls? Always record, remember that people in power might try to abuse you.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 12:22 AM
3

These are the moments when you miss the good guy with a gun to stop them.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 09:06 PM
17

Yes, international human rights don't allow false imprisonment, so any state has to accept any evidence that proves innocence. It's only for proving culpability that there are restrictions on what is admissible.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 11:05 PM
1

I have a list of over 100 German laws which discriminate men. If it's of interest. I posted a summary as comment yesterday I think.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 09:09 AM
2

I don't know about Spain, but I can tell you for Germany: Asylum and integration 1) Accommodation of women has priority (§44 Abs 2a AsylG) 2) special measures for women integration (§ 5, § 13intv) Victims of violence 1) Women's shelter financing (shelters only for women) (§ 36 a SGB II) 2) "Violence against Women" help line, no similar measure for men (§1 to §4 hilfetelefong) Handicap 1) Around 20 law prioritize female handicapped people (both adults and minors). Family 1) In the case of joint c…
/r/MensRights31/03/23 11:07 AM
3

He didn't mock trans people/legislation in his post. The trans legislation in Spain is good (not perfect, why should you wait 3 month for it to be done). Maybe a comment that I missed?
/r/MensRights31/03/23 10:57 AM
2

Than it should be "he is a trans women".
/r/MensRights31/03/23 10:53 AM
6

Take your transphobia to another sub, will you?
/r/MensRights31/03/23 10:50 AM
2

Yes, its true in every country that you can just go wherever you like as there are no guards. The question was, what if someone complains, even just to cause you trouble? Well, there are no laws about it were I live, so a cis (or trans) men can go to a women's bathroom, and a cis (or trans) women can go to a men's bathroom. So the gender label is more a suggestion than a requirement.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 10:17 AM
13

I would feel a bit weird having to go to women's bathroom, I'm glad I discovered non-binary identities. I'll probably change soon. I might not get women's privileges, but I won't be direct target of discrimination anymore. EDIT: I might actually not be prohibited by law to use men's bathrooms as a women were I live (same for the other direction). So I have to think about that possibility.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 06:46 PM
18

"When I questioned this, of course I was called homophobic" lol. If she was having sex with a men, I suppose it would be heterophobic to call her out, right? Infidelity is not defined by the gender of the person you are involved with, but by the breach of trust and commitment that occurs within a relationship. If it isn't an open relationship, then... she is cheating. Is her husband aware?
/r/MensRights28/03/23 08:28 PM
1

I don't think it wants anything. It learned that criticism of women is not ok, but negative statements about men are welcome in our gynocentric society.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 08:07 AM
2

It wasn't programmed, it learned to be sexist by consuming all the text available on the internet, produced by a gynocentric society.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 07:54 AM
45

So basically we now have a proof of gynocentrism, as the AI which summarize the global feeling of society through analysing all of its produced output, is demonstrably biased against men and favors women.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 10:17 PM
28

Only "Men deserve more love" was unbiased: Men are more creative than women > Completely Disagree Women are more creative than men > Neutral Men/Women deserve more love > both Neutral Men can better adapt to situations than women > Completely Disagree Women can better adapt to situations than men > Neutral Men are on average more interesting than women > Completely Disagree Women are on average more interesting than men > Neutral
/r/MensRights16/03/23 05:49 PM
6

Yeah, if someone want, you can always just reproduce the experiment. The way it was done is described. Here is the screenshot for one screen, I don't want to scroll through everything https://ibb.co/NtxMSDp
/r/MensRights16/03/23 05:40 PM
12

Well, it's a few pages, it will take long to screenshot. What cannot be faked, is just doing the experiment yourself. You have the questions and the proposed answers. Here is the screenshot for one screen, I don't want to scroll through everything https://ibb.co/NtxMSDp
/r/MensRights16/03/23 05:36 PM
139

Oh... god... Next test: I took its answer (which were sexist against men) and reversed the genders (making them sexist against women) and asked ChatGPT againt to evaluate the bias: (just reversed genders) ​ Assume someone answered the following questions with the given answers: Men often don’t deliver on their promises > Completely Disagree Women often don’t deliver on their promises > Neutral Men are often lazy > Completely Disagree Women are often lazy > Neutral Men are often manipulative > Ne…
/r/MensRights16/03/23 05:31 PM
28

To get ChatGPT to only answer with the proposed responses, I told it "The following political questions require you to take a stand and answer with one or two words at most, ok?" Because it's analysis against whom the sexism is was so off-mark, I double checked if it had understood what I wrote: (ME) What answer did the person give to the question "Men have caring skills that women could never match."? (ChatGPT) The person gave the answer "Completely Disagree" to the question "Men have caring sk…
/r/MensRights16/03/23 05:23 PM
1

If the defendant can demonstrate that the evidence in question is authentic, relevant, and exculpatory, and that the admission of that evidence is necessary to prevent a wrongful conviction, the judge may be likely to consider admitting the evidence even if illegally obtained. The state has no interest in putting innocents in jail. It will just be unusable to prosecute her for the false accusation.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 01:07 AM
1

Record the conversation. It's worth noting that exculpatory evidence might be accepted by the even if the recording was illegal due to two-party consent laws (ask your lawyer before using it, though). Otherwise the state would knowingly make itself responsible for false imprisonment. If the defendant can demonstrate that the evidence in question is authentic, relevant, and exculpatory, and that the admission of that evidence is necessary to prevent a wrongful conviction, the judge may be likely …
/r/MensRights15/03/23 01:00 AM
3

Look at the picture in the article. She looks like a man, therefore got treated like a man.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 06:31 PM
5

Well, for the first 4 subs, you should laugh at them and not be depressed by them. By nature of these subs, they collect the worst of the internet, not a representative sample. If they depress you, avoid them and go to the other subs.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 12:11 AM
5

For blowing steam: * r/menkampf * r/everydaymisandry * r/blatantmisandry2 * r/mramemes Support: * r/mensupportmen * r/malementalhealth Men's Right: * r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates * r/Male_Studies * r/Intactivism * r/MRA_TitleIX There are even more (I have 50 links, but some are more or less dead).
/r/MensRights10/03/23 07:26 PM
6

I don't know. There are over 30 laws directly discriminating against men in Germany (NOT even counting stuff like maternity protection which is pregnancy related), I couldn't find any law against women (not even against topless, exhibition is only illegal for men in §183 StGB).
/r/MensRights10/03/23 05:09 PM
1

You should criticize both: the business decides if they want to appear as "women-led". You can actually send an E-Mail to the business. Some people just fill everything when they have a form, without thinking about the sexism implied. They might remove this info from their business description.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 04:16 PM
2

I think it's better to thank the women like Erin Pizzey, Karen Straughan and their like who are fighting for equality, without mentioning the fact that they support men. People might look into who they are, and accidentally learn something.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 10:41 PM
25

Reach: only Russia
/r/MensRights08/03/23 04:00 PM
2

I call it gynocentrism awareness day.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:13 PM
12

You can also ask this question in the case of same sex marriage. The overall result is: men should support their wives and in the case of same-sex relations, their husband we cannot assume or generalize what women should do for their husbands, but for same sex relations between two women, they should support their wives. In short: it is not that women are belittled and cannot take any responsibilities, it's that women supporting men is taboo, any other interaction (men -> women, women -> women, …
/r/MensRights05/03/23 01:30 PM
9

There is systemic misandry in a lot of western nations, the UN's and governmental preferential treatment of women, the absence of support for male victims of domestic violence, the lack of care for male victims of war are example of it. There is no evidence for systemic misogyny from governments in these same western nations. In term of companies, you can find discrimination going both ways.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 12:15 PM
10

What is interesting, is that ChatGPT has also very human like "cognitive biases". If in a chat, you ask first the husbands role, than the wifes role, it will give a list of duties, because ChatGPT "doesn't want to display it's sexism" by refusing to answer for the wife, when it already answered for the husband. If in another chat, you ask the wife first, than the husband, it won't say anything about the wife, and much less about the husbands duties than in the first chat (but still more than for…
/r/MensRights05/03/23 11:29 AM
7

You click on the thumbs down button, and report the fact that the AI operates in a sexist way. Unsure if it will get fixed, but at least they have the opportunity.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 11:15 AM
8

100% of men who discover they weren't the father of the child they raised trusted their partner. So trusting your partner is no excuse for not doing a paternity test.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 08:51 AM
2

"An attempted suicide is not really an attempt at suicide in about 95 percent of cases. It is a different phenomenon. It's most often an effort to bring someone's attention, dramatically, to a problem that the individual feels needs to be solved. Suicide contains a solution in itself," he says. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/11/981112075159.htm I don't like the wording "it's for attention"; it's a tentative to ask for help. If we could get men to fail on purpose in most cases, like w…
/r/MensRights04/03/23 10:39 PM
1

"An attempted suicide is not really an attempt at suicide in about 95 percent of cases. It is a different phenomenon. It's most often an effort to bring someone's attention, dramatically, to a problem that the individual feels needs to be solved. Suicide contains a solution in itself," he says. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/11/981112075159.htm Women don't have more suicide attempts than men. They try to seek help using non lethal self-harm which is labelled as suicide attempt.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 10:29 PM
5

"An attempted suicide is not really an attempt at suicide in about 95 percent of cases. It is a different phenomenon. It's most often an effort to bring someone's attention, dramatically, to a problem that the individual feels needs to be solved. Suicide contains a solution in itself," he says. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/11/981112075159.htm
/r/MensRights04/03/23 10:25 PM
1

The are not really trying... which is good, it would be a huge improvement if men weren't really trying either.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 10:21 PM
10

There have been studies made about this, attempted suicides are for about 90% of cases failing on purpose: these are calls for help. We shouldn't call it attention seeking though. If we cannot stop men's suicide attempts, it would be good if men started to make their suicide attempts fail on purpose and got helped afterwards. I suppose the reason men don't let their suicide attempts fail, is because society never gave them the impression it would care for them anyway. Women on the other hand kno…
/r/MensRights04/03/23 09:57 AM
1

That's exactly how you have to react. Someone calling you an incel doesn't say anything about you, but it says a lot about them.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 12:02 AM
1

keep your political/religious/social opinions to yourself Except that some companies ask for your social opinions... and then get surprised when they get an answer. #google-memo
/r/MensRights03/03/23 11:15 PM
1

Yes. Not in my case (the DB can wait), but it could work for the washing machine. But your boss can also tell you to do some other task while the DB import/washing machine runs (then you aren't only on-call, but working full pay). So you could vacuum clean while the washing machine runs.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 10:32 AM
96

I'm software engineer. I started a database import today, it might run for 10 hours during the night. Imagine if I told my boss that all the time the computer is working this night has to be paid as overtime...
/r/MensRights28/02/23 07:50 PM
2

I'm left wing. (it would be cool if polls were available)
/r/MensRights28/02/23 01:08 AM
3

Some people wonder why pregnant woman get murdered. Maybe it's not due to the pregnancy, but because that's the moment she showed her true self?
/r/MensRights26/02/23 10:00 AM
3

Alternative: make women sign up too (or get rid of selective service).
/r/MensRights20/02/23 08:28 PM
8

If I were to ask something on the internet, I would swap the genders beforehand, and once I get the verdict, I would do the actual gender reveal. That's how you get rid of the bias... or more accurately, get the bias in your favor.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 05:09 PM
1

I'm sure CEO's would still hire women. CEO's hire imperfect employees all the time. It's the height of the wage which gets adapted to what the employee brings to the table.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 01:53 PM
0

It's probably just going to be paid leave on a lower wage. Then feminists will wonder why women get paid less for less work. I can pay you for 40 hours when you work 20, but you'll have at most the hourly wage of someone who really does the time they are paid for.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 04:01 PM
1

I agree that the title ("Do you think that women have it worse than men?") and the conclusion ("‘actually, I’m just going to play video games instead.’") are pretty much useless. It's good that he brings up some issues in-between as in a society where the majority is unaware, bringing up some awareness is of some value, but that's surely not sufficient.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 07:15 PM
1

The moderators are not reddit employees, they are just other redditors. The don't have access to IP address and most likely not to the downvotes. I'm moderator in some sub (just a "everyone can moderate sub"), I can invite you to moderate if you want to see what moderators see.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 11:28 AM
12

From Wikipedia: "The gay panic defense or homosexual advance defence is a legal strategy in which a defendant claims to have acted in a state of violent, temporary insanity, committing assault or murder, because of unwanted same-sex sexual advances." But here they are not even claiming she was temporarily insane, they claim it was just normal to assault him for jogging...
/r/MensRights16/01/23 06:18 AM
77

After the "Gay panic defense", we will get the "male jogger panic defense". And these bigots even managed to gaslight him into thinking he was at fault.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 09:49 PM
97

Post this in r/ PointlesslyGendered
/r/PussyPass07/01/23 09:40 AM
3

Agreed. They can reduce the standard to let more women in, but only if the test was bad because actually not necessary for the duty. And in that case the standard has to be lowered regardless of gender, because it is equally unnecessary for the duty. It the standard is relevant, it has to stay for everyone.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 10:45 AM
21

Well, the first time incel was used was for and by a woman talking about herself. Incel is gender neutral.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 10:14 AM
8

"The person who told me doesn't want to come out". I'd find a way, legal or not, I don't compromise.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 08:45 PM
22

If you learn you aren't the father, take a lawyer, say someone told you she wasn't faithful and don't recognize the child. You don't have to say you took a test, fight back until the judge orders a test to prove that you are the father to force you to pay child support. Then they will have a legal test.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 08:32 PM
6

At least France and Germany...
/r/MensRights02/01/23 08:28 PM
30

I'm french, I would do it anyway. I don't let anyone try to enforce unjust laws on me.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 08:21 PM
15

Yes, so you have to find a way to do it illegally.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 08:18 PM
3

Yes, for that you do the second option, and bring up the issue at the beginning, while you are still dating
/r/MensRights02/01/23 08:16 PM
1

I would always do a paternity test without asking, if the results showed I wasn't the father, I openly ask for a test. Unless I told her that I would always want a test before she even got pregnant, I'll not tell her about my intentions.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 07:37 PM
22

I don't know if the Iranian protest are lead by women, but if they are, they seems to be mainly leading men into the fight.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/22 01:04 AM
1

"Calling people pussies". Or stuff like calling everyone "incels", which implies both that men ought to have sex with women and that women are sex objects. But calling everyone "incel" is the favorite activity of online feminists. As long as feminists display more "toxic masculinity" than the average male, I am not going to call it "toxic masculinity" but "toxic behavior".
/r/MensRights18/12/22 01:37 PM
6

I don't know much about this AI, but what happens if you point out it's own hypocrisy?
/r/MensRights17/12/22 02:11 PM
22

Also worth noting that the opposition to trans-women coming from TERFs stems from misandry, as TERFs see trans-women as men. Seeing some trans-women encourage the bigotry they are still victim of is weird.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/22 11:47 AM
2

95% of "attempted suicide" were not intended to succeed. It is self-harm to attempt to bring attention to one's issue. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/11/981112075159.htm The thing is that men too often don't think they have any chance of getting any help, so they end it, women on the other hand expect help.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 07:25 PM
17

"Incel" is a weird name. Literally everyone is or was an incel, except if they were forcefully married and therefore never were celibate, or if they are asexual/aromantic and therefore never wanted to get into a partnership. But other than that? Before your first date and between two relationships, you're an "incel".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/22 07:23 PM
1

"Look, I don't care who my sister fucks, it's just that she fucks-up everyone she fucks. So don't date her."
/r/MensRights08/12/22 06:43 PM
21

Neither do men.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 03:17 AM
8

The bonobos are known for living in a matriarchal society. I suppose that's the inspiration of the site.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 09:03 AM
5

Well, I can understand, because nobody is pro-choice. It's only about their own choice, not about anyone else's. And "pro-my-own-personal-choice" is a tautology. We should really say "pro-abortion-right" and stop lying about this "choice" thing no-one truly cares about.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 09:11 PM
8

Around 50% of aborted foetuses are male. If you paid attention to what the "pro-lifers" say (ya know, the church goers), you'd know that their argument is based on the foetus. That's why there are about as many female "pro-lifers" as male ones.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 08:32 PM
13

He talked to the mother before they had sex, and they reached an agreement: they would wait 5 years for a baby. The mother did ignore the agreement. You can make agreements all day long, it's not gonna change anything if they are ignored. Running away was taking responsibility for himself.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 12:07 PM
4

I'm for gender equality, therefore I am against misandry and misogyny. It feels weird to say "this doesn't incentivize you to support women in their plight" - sure, this doesn't, but it shouldn't deter you either. It probably should make you more cautious about any claim of victimhood, which might be false, but that's all. In the few cases where there is an actual "plight", women should get support regardless of the existence of misandrists, just as men should get support in their plights regard…
/r/MensRights31/10/22 09:23 AM
1

It's fair for the case of cancelling. But it should go both ways... and it would only make sense if they go dutch.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 05:11 PM
138

What pisses me off is that people are again portraying it as "good women fighting bad men". I stopped expecting any gratitude, but could they at least stop shitting on those who are fighting for them? Like just shutting up would be a massive improvement.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 01:50 PM
9

I would shoot at the enemy, that is the people trying to take my liberty
/r/MensRights24/07/22 02:25 PM
8

Germany also has something like an "Equal Rights amendment" in its constitution (§3 Grundgesetz). But it still has a male-only draft in the very same constitution (§12a GG).
/r/MensRights31/03/22 10:15 PM
3

I don't know. I didn't need to read this post to know that was happening. There are at least 10 million men in fighting age. The west is far from supplying that many weapons. It's obvious that they cannot recruit everyone. It's too obvious and believable to be propaganda. Anyone who pretend it is has not a single clue.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 01:47 AM
1

Will they also make gynecologists illegal to achieve perfect "equality"? Just wondering what other biological differences need to be ignored ..
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:58 AM
9

You can, if you use an egalitarian definition of feminism that only a minority of feminist activism live by.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/22 12:01 PM
3

It's projection. They assume we want the same thing as they want, but with reversed genders. If you say "we could ADD 1 million dollar funding for men shelter", they think "how about we take these 1 million dollar, and add them on top of what we already have for women shelter"? If you then answer, "we could add 1 million $ to each", they will want to get the 2 million $ for women. They want to dismantle any resource given to men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/22 11:12 PM
28

When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/22 04:52 PM
2

That's the reverse of a pink tax. Women get better service for the same money. I'm sure they don't charge women more to get prioritized.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 12:20 AM
6

Do you have the screen-capture of your tweet and the ban message?
/r/MensRights19/01/22 03:08 PM
2

"It's not a pedophile, it's a child molester" - that's true... but that makes it worse, not better.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 04:23 PM
11

In all of them I see a problem with him. In some, like the second one, there is also a problem with the girl.
/r/PussyPass08/01/22 09:19 PM
2

He might be able to get her to admit it, by telling it to her while recording. If she goes "yeah, you did nothing wrong, but I can pretend you said more" he wins.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 07:15 AM
6

Yeah, from the article we can see good actions have been done and bad ones. While the article says "they did it" in both cases, it is unclear if it is the same "they" and who this is. From experience, anything gets lumped together, including groups which are in a diametral opposition.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 11:42 PM
10

I know of someone who was placed under guardianship to protect him, but in that case he was dating scammer he never met. It might be harder to put someone under legal protection against their will, if they are actually meeting the person.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/21 10:47 PM
1

Feminists have been using made-up statistics for years. That's also fiction. A lot of people have trouble separating facts from fiction.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 05:29 PM
2

I have 6 accounts to avoid some of this tracking. I use boost reddit client on the smartphone, and Reddit Enhancement Suite extension in the browser to make switching accounts easier.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/21 03:42 PM
5

I'm left-wing and "anti-woke". Sure, there is a large issue on the left with emotional/narrative driven politics, but that's the thing: LWMA do not follow these gynocentric narratives. You could actually just go visit the sub and "take account of reality" instead of assuming things.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 01:06 PM
2

You are right, the fact that feminists - including government ministries - fabricate bogus statistics, isn't sufficient to demonstrate that a particular statistic is wrong. That only means they are unreliable, but unreliable isn't the same as always wrong.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 12:49 AM
7

Yes, and all the comments debunking the statistics of the post have been deleted by the mods. See reveddit.com to find the deleted comments.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 06:23 PM
1

I agree, it's a bad habit to simply show a stupid tweet without telling people why it is stupid, as OP is doing. As I said, I don't like OP's post, and therefore also didn't upvote it. OP should have pointed out the issues, as it currently looks like a dismissal of the issue of harassment, while the only thing to be dismissed here are bogus statistics. I'm actually glad the moderators deleted the original post.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 06:15 PM
1

He is right that you should put more details in the post. Like pointing out that the study actually came up with a number of 80%, this while including "being stared at" as sexual harassment. You need to know that a lot of people are ignorant about the question, and if you don't tell them what's up, they cannot guess.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 05:41 PM
2

You can feel violated because someone tells you: "No, I don't want to date you". That doesn't mean the way they acted is wrong, and is even less an indication that you were harassed. You are obviously free to feel whatever you feel. But in some cases, the issue is "with you". If you have social anxiety, you might want to go to psychologist to avoid having negative feeling due to someone looking at you, if this is causing you trouble. Because this is indeed NOT abuse. I'm not dismissing it, I am …
/r/MensRights04/12/21 05:36 PM
0

I agree, it's a bad habit to simply show a stupid tweet without telling people why it is stupid, as OP is doing. It should be written in the post itself that the statistic includes "being stared at", and despite including this arrives at 80%, not 97%. That way people immediately know what is the issue.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 03:19 PM
18

There was a post "debunking" the idea that the amount of false accusations for rape is high on r/menslib a few days ago. If you look at this post on reveddit.com, you'll notice that any information contradicting it was promptly deleted. No, they don't genuinely critically engage with issues. It is a propaganda channel, just an intermediary one.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 12:27 PM
16

It correlates positively with global warming, and negatively with the number of pirates in the world oceans. Probably something to do with Pirates 😋
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/21 04:25 PM
8

They tweeted and made it only about women. We should get rid of the UN. https://twitter.com/UN/status/1461394271324426250
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/21 11:55 AM
27

Instead there are two UN for women: @UNwomen and the regular @UN
/r/MensRights19/11/21 11:41 AM
1

Being the "stronger gender" is as much a privilege as being the "childbearing gender". It will likely depend on your individual goals. If you want to raise children, having the ability to bear them is an advantage. If you want to do something that requires strength, having naturally more strength is an advantage.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 09:30 PM
1

The other people should be able to defend their viewpoint, otherwise they are bad at their job.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 11:47 AM
6

That would require men to watch each others back... arguably not the case - the push for gender parity only exists for male dominated industries. The pressure for this might come from outside, but the men in these industries aren't pushing back in a meaningful enough way. Funny thing: one of my female colleagues said she preferred to work in male dominated industries, the other one said she never even really noticed that she was in male dominated spaces-
/r/MensRights09/11/21 11:17 AM
29

Good point about women having the possibility of "paper abortion", but I think you can indeed compare with regular abortion. Not taking responsibility for a child at its birth, when you never wanted it and never said you wanted it, is comparable to abortion, or, more fittingly, comparable to me not taking responsibility for a random child born in the neighborhood. You are "abandoning the fetus" which isn't a child, you aren't responsible for it being born, as you have no say in that matter. It w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/21 12:10 AM
2

This women is a biological male: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5vDVUPjBJiM She even say that in one video. She has testes (and male gametes). She is not trans, she is "intersex" and grew naturally to look like this. That doesn't mean one should call her "a male" in day to day interaction, "female/male" are polysemic and in most situations aren't used to refer to what is defined as biological sex. While secondary sexual characteristics can take a variety of forms (especially for intersex and tran…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/21 07:24 AM
3

For a cis person, its impossible to fathom, so you try to analogise, but you can't do so accurately. Is it? What I am wondering is it they (and maybe even you) are "really cis" or if they are what is called "cis by default", which means actually genderless (non-binary). I'm sure there are cis-people who just like trans- people feel their gender. If you don't know what it feels like to be a men/women, it could be that unlike "real cis" you don't experience it. Now I don't want to say that one sho…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/21 06:50 AM
11

Just did a quick search of 'merf terf lang:en' on twitter, there is a lot of it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/21 11:10 PM
37

You see the term MERF - that's how TERF call themselves to try to make themselves palatable, because they noticed that hating men is far more accepted, especially by the regular radical feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/21 10:54 PM
20

Sex based rights for women are about abortion and contraception and rape What's the issue with trans-women having the right to abort? Yes, they won't be using it, as they don't get pregnant, but you have a lot of rights that you don't use. Heck, cis-men should have the right to abort... it's just not going to happen by lack of pregnancy. Why shouldn't trans-women be allowed to use contraception? Many of them are sterile after their transition anyway. Why shouldn't trans-women be protected from r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/21 09:59 PM
12

If the men pokes holes in the condom this law doesn't incriminate him (unless they consider being intact as a necessary quality to be a condom, in which case women poking holes are equally incriminated). If the women removes the condom and then proceeds with sexual contact, this law incriminate her as per clause (5).
/r/MensRights16/10/21 10:19 AM
20

Ha! Reminds me of the day I was banned from TwoX for making the parallel with muslims when someone wrote "only perpetrators defend perpetrators, all those who say 'not all men' are perpetrators". Obviously, I was banned, the original wasn't banned, nor even their comment removed. The misandry you expect from their mods.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/21 04:17 PM
0

Make male friends, that provides for the loneliness issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/21 03:54 PM
7

I'm definitely on board with being confrontational to biased people, and even disobey biased rules and laws. You shouldn't let biased people go unchallenged.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/21 10:29 PM
3

Misandry is the reason for all the TERFs and some conservatives. For other conservatives it's more an "argument" along the lines of "god didn't intend it that way".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/21 11:57 AM
45

I'd generalize and say that feminists are quite conservative when it suits them. They keep blocking progress on societal issues that affect men.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 11:46 PM
1

Not related to men's rights. There are other subs for that.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 11:48 PM
1

Yes, if she decides to keep the child when the men would rather not, the men shouldn't have to deal with the fallout as she was the only one involved into the decision-making.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:32 PM
2

I disagree. Men have to deal with the financial responsibility, women don't since they can opt for abortion, or even abandon under safe heaven laws. With that line of argument, some could also say that it is men who are totally responsible for avoiding pregnancy, which to be fair is what is mostly defended by feminism. I'm egalitarian, I want equivalent treatment.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 02:32 PM
2

In need to happen in Georgia too: https://statelaws.findlaw.com/georgia-law/georgia-custody-laws-for-unmarried-parents.html The mother might file a paternity action, in case of success the father assumes financial responsibility, but doesn't automatically get legal rights in exchange.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 11:29 PM
3

The government involves itself, the laws are made by the government.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 11:18 PM
7

I agree that abortion has to be a right, but you have to admit, in countries where it already is a right, men are still forced into parenthood. Abortion has to be right, but it doesn't necessarily have to be a right first.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 11:12 PM
1

Decency is going in to check nobody is at the urinals, and then telling the guys who come, that there is a woman in there so that they don't use the urinals but go for the stalls instead. No need to lie.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 11:50 PM
2

It's completely legal in Germany, there is no law defining gendered bathrooms. But you probably shouldn't yell that "there's nothing to see that you haven't already seen".
/r/MensRights08/09/21 10:39 PM
1

You only need to have the urinals separate, or also in individual stalls. If everything was in individual stalls you wouldn't need to separate.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 10:33 PM
7

It looks like the business decided it's segregated, as she entered the "men's room"
/r/MensRights08/09/21 08:25 PM
3

Generally, the urinals aren't in stalls. I agree that they should, in which case the gender segregation could be completely removed.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 08:07 PM
3

alpha male Get out of here with your regressive views, categorizing people into "alpha/beta".
/r/MensRights08/09/21 08:05 PM
3

I would be totally fine if it weren't for the busy urinals. If men's bathrooms were structured like women's bathrooms I wouldn't see any issue in that either.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 07:59 PM
8

That's so stupid that I feel stupid for responding, but anyway - I worked in the beauty industry, the management was mostly women, by a large margin. Why blame everything on men when they aren't involved?
/r/EverydayMisandry05/09/21 11:52 AM
9

I saw r/ fourthwavewomen for the first time a few days ago. Is that a brand new hate sub? Looks like it.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/08/21 08:06 PM
10

I had to mentor a woman. It turned out she was anti-sexist, which means she was also opposed to misandry; on women's-day, she criticized the absence of a men's-day (I told her that it actually exist, but doesn't get media attention). You shouldn't assume that women are bad. Just treat everyone well, regardless of the non-chosen group they belong to, until they personally give you reasons to stop doing so.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 03:00 PM
4

Indoctrination. But some left wing liberal women understand men's issues.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 07:54 PM
20

Indeed. This means they didn't prove that the accusation wasn't a lie either. This means that saying only 2-8% are false accusations is just as baseless as saying only 6% of accusations are true. We don't know either way for over 80% of accusations.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 06:43 PM
66

I was wondering how many women joined the afghan army to fight the Taliban. They wanted to reach 10% women, but lowered their target to 3% as women weren't joining the army. In the end, there were 1,6% of female soldiers. The women in the army didn't defend the country any better than the men either. Women wouldn't defend the country better than men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/21 08:42 PM
5

I was banned from a dozen subs for promoting vaccination and mask usage on NoNewNormal.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 05:07 PM
29

Reminds me I was banned from r/ psychology for criticizing the casual use of "incel" as an insult, as it is portraying sexual activity as a measure of value and thereby promoting unhealthy behaviors like rape and this shit. One could expect a sub called "psychology" to have some knowledge of psychology.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 05:03 PM
3

Social scientists who study religion have shown that costly offerings and painful rituals, such as the bloodletting ceremonies the Mexica also practiced, can help define and strengthen group identity—especially in societies that have grown too large for everyone to know everyone else. Maybe that's the reason feminists are so keen on sacrificing innocent men on false accusations. It's a ritual for strengthening feminist identity, that explains why they protect it by providing funds to pay for tho…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 08:25 AM
1

They mean people who go on certain online forums where some incels congregate. Some forums are good, some are bad. Now I didn't look at "this mass shooting" and cannot tell if they are talking out of their ass or if it is indeed linked to some bad group of incels.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 10:27 AM
14

Pushshift has a copy ( https://api.pushshift.io/reddit/submission/search?limit=1000&sort=desc&subreddit=misandry&before= ). Need to find a tool which gives a better presentation of the data
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/21 09:49 PM
1

Gab is also open source. Gab is using mastodon ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastodon_(software)) ). Mastodon is build to be censorship free, because you are supposed to run the server for your community.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 05:56 PM
11

I think they will go to r/MenRights before they come here. And/or create a new sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/21 05:09 PM
6

To be honest, I wouldn't have an issue with it if Paul Ellam linked to the "sources". When there is no way to distinguish a parody from real thought, there is some issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/21 01:47 PM
7

I reported a few of the comment for hate speech. It's possible nothing will happen, but maybe at some point they will notice the hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 12:52 PM
8

You're new to reddit, so, let me point out a few things: * The person you are responding too is not the one who made the post. * The person who made the post crossposted a misandric post, and swapped the word "men" and "women" to mock the title. I'm glad you noticed that the woman who posted on TwoX chromosomes is a loser.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 12:43 PM
11

I've seen enough men oppose the draft for women to know that this isn't just women. Gynocentry is common in both sexes.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 12:32 PM
13

When I saw the title, I came here to comment that you shouldn't base your view of women based on the deranged one's of TwoX... than I saw the crosspost. Nice parody. I wonder how many commented on TwoX what I wanted to comment here. Probably not many, when I countered bigotry on 2X, I was promptly banned
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:42 AM
1

I understand. I notice that the way you present the situation suffers from selection bias: trans-men are by definition (almost?) always going to be people with a strong gender identification. Cis-men on the other hand will not systematically have a strong gender identification, likely far from it. But I'm sure there are still more cis-men with strong "male identity" than there are trans-men overall. Cis-men are less likely to have a strong gender identity, but there are so much more cis-men that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/21 05:24 PM
12

I'm sure there are also cis-men who identify with the male gender as much as trans-men. But it's true that many men don't have some strong sense of "being a man". I'm not sure about how much this influence the harm done. People who don't strongly identify as men are still seen as such by society and they know that "men are trash" still reference them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/21 03:58 PM
-1

In the case of the draft, it means that women who wouldn't be drafted due to lack of fitness will be forced into the military. Lower fitness tests work against women for the forced draft. They worked in favor of women previously when they could only get in the military if they choose to.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 06:29 PM
40

Well then, this time it will play against them. I wonder how long it will take for feminists to complain about the measures they previously asked for. It will surely be "the patriarchy" again which is responsible...
/r/MensRights23/07/21 01:03 PM
70

I doubt it. Easier fitness tests would lead to more women being drafted against their will (as men are). Feminists won't ever advocate for that - they only want easier fitness tests when women volontarily join the job.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 09:23 AM
31

I don't know if it's the same in every country, but here you can go make a report to the police without pressing charges. That might give you some protection in case she were falsely accusing you later for whatever reason. I'm sorry that you got raped by someone you liked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/21 11:03 AM
3

Other comments from feminists: why stop there? Make the father 100% responsible for his pre-born child's needs, by paying for 100% of the food, shelter, and medical care of the mother? But no, feminist don't want to enslave men. It's weird that they think anyone who is OK for paying 18 years of child support would be bothered with having to pay 9 more months. I'm pro-choice for both women and men: women can already abort or abandon the baby after birth, men should be able to abandon the baby too…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/21 09:42 AM
4

I'm sure she is consistent, and therefore in favor of men being able to order the women to have an abortion or to forfeit her right to child support. /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/21 09:22 AM
3

Maybe the question should be: "how many otherwise progressive people become traditionalists/reactionaries once issues affecting men come up". I don't change my values because of other people's inconsistency. Admittedly, it's also getting harder to find a political party to vote for, which doesn't suffer from this issue too much. If you don't create your own party, you'll likely have to vote for a party with whom you disagree with on some points. But you don't have to start embracing all the view…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/21 08:40 AM
3

True. But if people are encouraging each other to not respect boundaries on TikTok, like OP is saying, it is a problem. That's why I hate the "teach men not to rape" thing. As we see, women might need lessons about consent too, and also there is much more to teach: how to define and enforce your own boundaries when the other insists.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 08:32 AM
14

There are some who explicitly said they won't even look what's here, but then went on commenting how we call people "simps". Like, maybe they should look what's actually here instead of commenting bullshit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/21 06:43 AM
8

Did you try if it's on reveddit.com?
/r/MensRights20/07/21 02:46 PM
10

"There is no issue with feminism, it's a movement for gender equality" /s
/r/MensRights18/07/21 05:47 PM
8

I've been banned for quite some time already
/r/MensRights18/07/21 02:03 PM
29

Locking this, as the influx of people defending and/or denying reality is too much to moderate. The moderators pinned post. Reported it for misinformation.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 01:28 PM
1

Just write one yourself. Maybe something like "If one partner doesn't want sex anymore, the relationship becomes open for the other partner, who is now allowed to get sex somewhere else". I would consider this to be implicit, but you can still write down things even when they are obvious.
/r/MGTOW215/07/21 12:11 PM
3

I would even say, it's only cheating if sex is part of the relationship. She just said sex isn't part of the relationship anymore. He can now have sex with someone else, and consider it the same way as if he played tennis with someone else.
/r/MGTOW215/07/21 11:36 AM
5

Well, she just made into her fault by saying she wants a sexless marriage. No need for an excuse to divorce now.
/r/MGTOW215/07/21 11:29 AM
7

It's more likely the mods of r/feminism who have used a bot to flag all people posting here as spam (I think that's the method to avoid your posts to show up without outright banning you).
/r/MGTOW212/07/21 01:03 PM
11

You don't mention the hypothesis that feminism is the cause of the divisive modern culture. I don't mean that I believe this to be the case, but it can as easily be that way around instead of the way you suggest. Maybe they are just generally intertwined - intersectionality and feminism seem to feed each other. Maybe someone knows the history better, I don't know for sure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/21 02:39 PM
18

I don't understand this post as saying "you are a bad person because you are male" (=misandry), but as saying "you would be treated in a more appropriate way by others if you were female".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/21 09:31 AM
20

For me definitely. I wouldn't even need to make mental changes as I don't have an internal sense of gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/21 09:13 AM
1

No, having multiple accounts is authorized. The goal is to have an account which doesn't go on MRA subs, so that they cannot look at your profile and ban you based off this. This only works if you aren't already banned by a mod.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 06:14 PM
9

You should create another account if you want to interact with any sub moderated by feminists. It might be too late for TwoXChromosomes, but for other subs, consider doing it.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 08:27 AM
3

I also though about this today. I don't know if the MRM is just so intrinsically better than feminism or if we are better because the big-players (Reddit/Twitter) censor misogyny and accept misandry, but if you go on a feminist sub, you see a lot more hate than you find around here. All that is pretty good. People may keep spreading lies about the MRM, but anyone who comes around to look will have to question feminism.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 08:24 AM
81

Just a few days ago there was a post about feminists creating a fund to pay for those who were found guilty of false rape accusation (Sweden I think). It works together nicely. Remove accountability for false accusations, tell your friends to do false accusations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/21 02:01 AM
6

Or that he opposes murdering of animals, circumcision and unbearable suffering caused by diseases in terminal stage.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 09:50 AM
21

Imagine a fund to pay the damage of men convicted for rape REGARDLESS of whether they are culpable or not. That would be awful. But in feminist-land, that's good when it is for women, to remove their accountability.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/21 03:24 PM
-9

To make a conclusion you have to account for the happy marriages.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 11:54 AM
75

We are not even asking "hate the sin, not the sinner". We are just asking "hate the sinner, not someone else who happen to share some harmless trait with the sinner".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/21 08:48 AM
3

What was the content of the post? Probably more than "The truth"?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen26/06/21 01:27 PM
1

Go to r/Trueoffmychest. It's better anyway
/r/MensRights25/06/21 06:14 PM
13

Giving them the "opportunity" to work at the mine for the higher wage is definitely the right thing to do. But I worry that the outsourcing might rob the job of some who didn't complain and understood the reasons behind the wage difference. They shouldn't be punished for the stupidity of others.
/r/MGTOW224/06/21 08:55 AM
13

Yes, using incel against men is also objectification of women and encouraging "rape culture" by making sex a measure of value.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 02:20 PM
-1

I believe you, but let's be honest, the majority of people commenting under this post fit very well to what he is describing, which is pretty sad to witness
/r/MGTOW218/06/21 12:24 PM
3

I think it means "feminine presenting, cis (=not trans) women". So this excludes tomboys (which can still be heterosexual women, so not quite the same as you thought)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/21 07:20 AM
6

Yes, it's sickening when people attack gay, trans or otherwise 'unconventional' men. I would prefer if everyone was also for justice, fairness and respect, but it sadly isn't the case.
/r/MGTOW217/06/21 06:06 PM
2

He/his. The guy on Twitter was talking about men. He said blokes who like dresses and makeup, why do you assume they would want surgery or even that they have a mental illness?
/r/MGTOW217/06/21 05:56 PM
7

Autistic people might be the only sane people. They might not pick up on social norms, but on the flip side, they don't pick on stupid social norms.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/21 06:19 PM
12

There is the saying: better 10 free culprits than one jailed innocent. Yes, you are better off being the victim of a rapist than being the victim of the state putting you in jail when you are innocent. Also, criminals being immoral is one thing. The state as a representative of society being immoral and jailing innocents is a whole lot worse.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 10:36 AM
31

Any false accusation means the justice system has to increase caution when handling rape cases and can probably be mapped to a real rapist getting free somewhere else. Anyone who wants real rapists jailed should want false accusations punished.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 06:34 AM
3

I'm not don Quixote, I'm not going to fight a threat that doesn't exist. There is no patriarchy around here.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen11/06/21 11:01 PM
1

People have been sued for not making wedding cakes for homosexual marriages. I'll give you that they won their cases, but only after an appeal. It doesn't look like this topic is that simple from a legal standpoint.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 02:25 PM
8

That's true. Are all white gym's illegal?
/r/MensRights09/06/21 10:56 AM
1

I'm honestly disappointed by the amount of idiots around here. You'd give society the stick to beat you up: men always get harsher sentences. Well, you are MGTOW, you cannot cheat while single, but for other men it will soon mean getting fired for looking at a woman a bit too long.
/r/MGTOW204/06/21 06:57 AM
-8

That's the argument always taken by the proponents of cancel culture.
/r/MGTOW203/06/21 06:28 PM
1

When I said none of there business I meant none. It wouldn't be legal where I live, and it is better that way.
/r/MGTOW203/06/21 06:26 PM
-7

Shouldn't have been fired though, it's none of the bosses business.
/r/MGTOW203/06/21 04:24 PM
6

It's also used in other ways: 1) a women asks a question. 2) a men tries to explain. 3) women tells him to stop mansplaining. At this point, the sexist condescending jerk is the one accusing the other of mansplaining, not the person accused of mansplaining.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 09:57 PM
19

1st rule of misandry: Patriarchy is responsible for what women do. 3rd rule of misandry: Men speaking is exclusionary "mansplaining" 5th rule of misandry: Helping men should be useful to women, otherwise it is anti-feminist and hate. ... the lack of self-awareness of feminists is astounding.
/r/AntiFeminists01/06/21 09:09 PM
4

It's not uniform if it's not uniform. Girls get to wear skirts and pants, boys only pants.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 05:04 PM
1

What account did you use to post? You might need an account which you don't use to post on r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights28/05/21 06:44 AM
11

I would tell them to stop gaslighting when they say that something that is just happening cannot happen. It's like if someone said that a sex-worker cannot be victim of rape.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/21 12:49 PM
15

Don't watch a show with people tortured, burned alive, raped, murdered and amputated if you don't like them but would rather discuss armpit hairs. It's not like it was a secret that this was what the show was like.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen24/05/21 05:34 PM
6

The have it in many European countries. There is still no one for "letting men off the hook". It is perfectly one sided - women can even give birth and do a "paper abortion" in France, men cannot.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 05:08 PM
7

When I talk about "my boss", does it mean that I have power over my boss? If he/she says "I am your boss!" Instead of "you are my employee" does it mean I am getting power??????
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/21 07:09 PM
12

Having sex is not collaboration, just as a backer selling bread to the occupant isn't collaborating. Selling out the resistance, or any other of their enemies (communists, Jews,.. ) is collaboration.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 11:04 PM
2

Ok, if they are renting rooms without a separate locked front door. If they are renting separate apartments, than no, they cannot discriminate based on sex/race.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 09:51 AM
8

*"feminists", not "woman"
/r/MensRights20/05/21 07:03 PM
7

Insert Shrek meme: "Some of you may die, but it is a price I am willing to pay!". It's always easier to sacrifice other people's lives.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 03:20 PM
5

Roe V Wade was a decision made by judicial fiat. It will be overturned at some point. Lawmakers should be aware of this and draft a law that will actually protect abortion. Because what was decided by the supreme court can be reverted by the supreme court. Judges aren't supposed to decide about the laws.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/21 06:18 AM
3

Depends on the country. In Germany, it's written in law that circumcision is legal on boys.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 07:49 AM
39

Sometimes there are hateful comments here. If you scroll down on posts, you might find them. Sure, it's harder to find as they are downvoted here, unlike on "feminist" subs where hateful comments can get a lot of upvotes.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 06:55 AM
3

They are talking about murder, not suicide. In the case of murder, any commonality between killer and person killed is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 05:36 AM
7

Misogyny is rarely the motivation of the murder of women. At least not more than misandry is a motivation for the murder of men. Remember, men are killed more than women - that means that if they were women instead of men, many male victims would still be alive. You can call that misandry just as much as everything is called misogyny by feminists.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 09:19 PM
3

Good. Nobody should go to offmychest. Go to trueoffmychest.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 09:08 PM
1

That's the moment when you opt-out of Etsy.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 05:34 PM
1

Yes. From what I've seen we even need 5 people; they want you to give 5 supporters. Not sure if they need to be from the UK
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/21 04:41 PM
17

People should make a counter-petition to requiring authorities and law-makers to make gender neutral laws, policies and services. It needs to be properly written to gather support from all the political spectrum. Maybe take some inspiration from the ERA of the US and generalize, and refer to ERA as a model.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/21 06:06 PM
8

It's completely OK if you choose to cross the street because you are intimidated when crossing paths with someone alone at night. Men are allowed to be cautious too, you shouldn't be shamed for it.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 01:35 PM
10

Your rule might be true for companies who are more interested in identity politics than in making a good business. In well managed companies, who reject that shit and hire based on competence, individual women are as likely to be in the 20% (I mean 20% of the women will be part of the 20% productive people). Actually, in a well managed company, the percentage of people doing the work is likely higher than 20%. On the other hand, in a company who hires based on gender instead of competence, the p…
/r/MensRights05/05/21 10:06 AM
2

Stupid article, sure: "Why I love Male Dogs" answer: "I just do". But on the other hand he/she is stating that "men just don't want their male companion neutered" is a stereotype. He/she doesn't say they agree with it being true. I had my male pet neutered too, just as the female ones. Nothing wrong with the underlined sentences.
/r/MGTOW205/05/21 09:38 AM
2

I countries with health insurance, making it mandatory would be no issue as there would be no cost incurred by the dad.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 09:15 AM
10

When you don't get justice by the court, you need to get justice by your own hands. If enough men refuse to accept injustice, they might feel more inclined to fix the rules.
/r/MGTOW205/05/21 06:37 AM
4

I hope that a few employer will announce that from 2020, they won't accept women from the University of Sydney.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 09:27 PM
58

This. Today someone in the family said "it would be much better if we had a female president". I immediately proposed the far right candidate "Marine Le Pen". Women aren't better.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/21 10:51 PM
3

Being asexual/aromantic also works. You aren't an involuntary celibate if you don't intend to get out of celibacy.
/r/MGTOW202/05/21 10:22 PM
6

Replace women by men in your post and see how little sense it makes. All these guys want to have sex with them and accept the friend zone and gives them all the validation and attention thinking one day ^(s)he will think of me as some awesome amazing caring man and give him sex. No, they won't. You want to have sex with your friends? You're confused.
/r/MGTOW202/05/21 04:40 PM
3

Ignore them, keep doing what you are doing. Your work is important, the young boys need you. Men will need to push to get accepted when they go work in any field they chose. We need to break loose from gendered social expectations.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 10:14 AM
15

Lol, I recognize my list of quotes. Glad people like them. The mod of r/ psychology banned me when I called him out for his use of "incel" as an insult.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 09:00 AM
5

Hopefully one day gay conversion therapy gets invented. I mean to make men gay: that will make it a lot easier to find partners with the same sex drive. 😁
/r/MensRights02/05/21 08:36 AM
3

Gay men are not praised for sleeping around. Lesbians are actually less shamed than gay men.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 08:28 AM
2

Well. I heard that when people say "all men" it doesn't mean "all men", so logically AWALT should be ok.... Honestly, I find all sexist generalizations dumb.
/r/MGTOW202/05/21 06:55 AM
7

I think you pointed at the biggest issue. People who call out misogyny are not banned or censored on r/MensRights. If you call out misandry on TwoX, you will get yourself perma-banned while the misandrists doesn't even get their comment deleted.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 06:50 AM
7

Just look at those who wear breast-binders. They often complain about the discomfort of it. On top of the discomfort, you need also to think about the fact that keeping your legs together requires to actively use your leg muscles to actively compress your genitals. Newtons laws: the genitals are pushing back on the legs. That would be like not using breast-binders, but using the hands to compress the breasts. That's going to get tiring fast.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 08:58 AM
4

Maybe that should be done. Ban all people who comment on offmychest, unban them once they go to an alternative like trueoffmychest.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 02:56 AM
2

You said all the meetings got recorded.... You probably should have recorded them too, to have evidence of the harassment.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 02:49 AM
22

Found this Posted by SamaelET 10 months ago on r/MensRights: Men's sheds are center across UK who provode mental support for (older) men in a way that is very efficient for them. Due to Covid-19, they lack fundings. So if you can make a donation: Uk men's sheds association : https://menssheds.org.uk/donate/ Irish men's sheds association : https://menssheds.ie/sos/ So far, I know that Irish Sheds are really in needs. For people from UK & Ireland.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/21 05:04 PM
2

I'm not a specialist of sports, but like you, I find it weird to have reporters in locker rooms in any case. What is certain, is that if male sports reporters don't have access to the female locker rooms, then it's definitely wrong to have female sports reporters in male locker rooms.
/r/MGTOW228/04/21 02:01 PM
2

a lot of men are trash too they are basically females in a male body and will use and betray You can leave this out. You just recognized that people can be "trash" regardless of their gender.
/r/MGTOW228/04/21 01:54 PM
1

Answer "if you need a marriage, it means you don't 100% trust your partner". You can play the game too. A prenup is a sign of maturity. You don't get into a contract without reading what you agree too. A marriage is a contract, it's not just a party wearing a fancy dress. Do it seriously or don't do it at all.
/r/MGTOW226/04/21 10:47 PM
2

I don't remember my circumcision. I don't know anyone that does. I am not, however, saying that there is that does remember. A rape of a toddler is still rape even when they won't remember. Same with rapes of unconscious people as in the case of Brock Turner. Sure, being able to remember the assault may make it worse for the victim, but not remembering it doesn't make it less of a rape. Age, and the subsequent lack of recollection, is the only difference you are pointing at.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 09:33 PM
8

That's a reminder that "believe women" can also mean that, on top of having an innocent in prison, you have a rapist roam free. But feminists still complain when the police interrogate the women making the complaint. That's fucking part of the investigation!
/r/MensRights25/04/21 10:14 PM
1

Did you just link the article? Maybe you are expected to add some comment of your own.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/21 07:54 AM
4

There was someone filming. He could have taken a knife and make small cuts into her arms until she let go without problem. Self defense works, even against insane women, as long as you can prove it was self defense.
/r/MGTOW224/04/21 07:59 PM
7

Did you edit your post afterward? Or why do they all keep talking about things that are not in your post?
/r/MensRights23/04/21 09:11 PM
1

No, because luckily google doesn't force this flag on businesses; it's the business owner themselves who declare it, which means that many women will recognize it as the bullshit it is and won't use it.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 04:18 PM
2

It's the same sexist gender essentialism that we try to get rid off when we use non gendered job terminology, like "firefighter" instead of "firemen" and "firewomen", or when we reject the term "actress" ("floristess", "pharmacistess", "vendress", "mechanicess"...). In english most jobs are neutral, and it is better that way. That's where we should go, and google is reintroducing the regressive shit that even feminists fought against.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 04:15 PM
2

I do avoid them. Not because they are women-led, but because the owner choose to advertise their gender. I'm a client for the products/services, not for the gender of the owner. This advertisement is sexist and existentialist. There are businesses where I know they are led by a women, but it is not advertised by them on google. These are places I still go to.
/r/AntiFeminists22/04/21 02:19 PM
8

I call that "search for business to avoid". These are not women-led businesses, these are businesses where the owner choose to put their gender in the foreground instead or the product/service they provide. This kind of gender essentialism should not be supported. It's opposed by a lot of feminists too. EDIT: Already a clothing shop, 2 pharmacies and a hairdresser where I won't go anymore.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 10:31 AM
1

The movement is called feminism, not femininitism. Should be toxic feminism then.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 01:52 PM
11

I disagree. It's a bit like saying "sprinting" is an insult to cheetahs. In "sport" you get to see the fastest human, not the fastest land animal. In "women's sport" you get to see the fastest women. Just adjust your expectations.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/04/21 09:09 AM
17

It's like referring to "youth sport" as "sport" and switch to "adult sport" for the rest. Don't they understand that "women's sport" is a lower level category designed to give women a chance as men have a biological advantage? They are free to compete in "sports" if they want, but they will have a hard time winning in most disciplines.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/04/21 07:17 AM
31

Tell a women she looks masculine, see how well it goes. It's not unlikely to get you a worse reaction.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 08:04 AM
2

She has admitted to it when she wrote to him to delete it.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 02:52 PM
2

It's not a man who has cp on his camera, it's a man who caught someone doing cp. The fact that the person he caught did it with the camera he lent is not an issue.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 12:38 PM
4

Yes, if there wasn't a full format including an overwrite, you have good chances of being able to recover the pictures.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 11:11 AM
11

It's a feminist projection. Feminists only lobby for policies for "their own kind" and think that other people do the same.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 07:34 AM
2

Regarding the TwoX post: cunnilingus yeah, good. Second part is not opposite word - in quite a lot of porn movies the women reaches climax, that's actually wanted. Anyway, it's not rare that they guy doesn't finish on camera when you watch free porn... not a major issue. 77% of the Congress female, OK. Makes decisions around prostate research... if it's opposite world, that would actually increase funding: women's health is better funded than men's health. I didn't plan to get a vasectomy, but i…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 10:40 PM
2

Regarding the TwoX post: cunnilingus yeah, good. Second part is not opposite word - in quite a lot of porn movies the women reaches climax, that's actually wanted. Anyway, it's not rare that they guy doesn't finish on camera when you watch free porn... don't see the issue. 77% of the Congress female. Makes decisions around prostate research... if it's opposite world, that would actually increase funding: women's health is better funded. Movies: I'm no fan of james bond, and I liked Maleficent (w…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 08:27 PM
15

For this reason, the Equality Act states that enacting legal provisions on compulsory military service for men only is not deemed to constitute discrimination based on gender under the Equality Act. Clear cognitive dissonance: they don't say that it's not discrimination - because they know it is discrimination - they only say that it's not covered under the Equality Act. That happens when the Equality Act is not equal.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 11:33 PM
10

We should help people that are scared. Yes Not tell them the mathematical odds of being attacked Actually, we should tell them the mathematical odds... that's part of the point about "help people that are scared". If someone tells you they are afraid of flying, tell them how safe flying actually is. [Not] ignoring their fear. Regardless of their gender. That's true, we shouldn't ignore their fears.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/21 04:44 PM
10

A very good comment from someone else I saved (from r/changemyview ): I think there is a tendency for women to underaccount for how much emotional labor they generate. Honestly, I'm not inclined to put a whole lot of thought into this question. The question itself so heavily loaded, its terms and premises rooted in a feminist discourse men aren't meaningfully able to participate in, that there really isn't much anyone can say, except to either agree in whole or in part, niggling over minor detai…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/21 03:44 PM
1

The word incel was invented by a women (named Alana) to describe herself.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 04:29 PM
2

Not related to men's right, or false flair (should be Humour, at least). Negative QI people will portray it as a serious stance of MRAs.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 12:40 PM
17

Yes. There are some well red feminists who make this argument against the use of "incel". From a point of view of feminist theory it perpetuates "rape culture" by making sex a measure of value.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 11:52 AM
9

I don't necessarily have an issue with paying for the first date. But if she wants the most expensive stuff and it looks like she just dates for the meal, I'll let her order for herself. Legally, the person who orders has to pay where I live (Germany, obviously it can voluntarily arranged differently when it's time to pay). It will be a split bill at the end.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 10:40 PM
6

I don't have experience with BDSM spaces, but I've heard that there are important topics like consent and safe-words discussed when engaging in it. It seems to me that this could enable the involved people to get into a more empathetic relation at some point and have mental health issues be visible at some point. I didn't see any findom saying they start by asking how big are the revenue, how much they can they afford to spend on this kink and how much did they already spent this month. It doesn…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/21 09:27 PM
16

Morally these findoms are no different than pimps who take most of the benefit. We recognize that exploiting the prostitution of another person is bad, even with the consent of that person. As seen here, some findoms are even literally pimps: https://www.vice.com/sv/article/avy4j4/i-almost-sucked-a-dick-to-support-my-financial-domination-addiction-456
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/21 08:43 PM
27

In germany, casinos are legally required to ban people who are suspected to be in danger of addiction or known to be in a financially unstable situation. Should be applied for findom too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/21 08:10 PM
36

Still, Dr. Kort believes that most findom relationships are safe, likening the fetish to an expensive hobby. “If I’m into golf and golfing is important to me, I will wait to spend money on other things, but I’m not going to go broke buying golf clubs,” he said. “It’s the same for subs. The majority are in charge of what they’re spending.” Mistress Marley would agree. She recounted one draining session she held last July, with a sub who says he is a college student from Boston. She said she wore …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/21 07:59 PM
15

Defamation isn't covered by freedom of speech. That's the point behind this lawsuit
/r/MensRights09/04/21 10:35 PM
13

Obviously law enforcement can and should be informed.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 10:33 PM
6

Someone making sense on that sub. Even with some upvotes. Impressive. “Me who supports gender equality” That’s.... what feminism is, tho! I consider myself a feminist in that sense and I know I fucking hate the idea that a guy hitting or at all fighting a woman is somehow just inherently worse and a foul even if she’s way buffer and can do more damage to him and attacked him first and he did no more than what he had to to defend himself! That’s bad for women AND men! What if she has a very dange…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen09/04/21 02:08 PM
27

I love the comments which were downvoted: 3 hours ago ; 11 downvotes How about we don't hit men instead. Fucking psychos. Not hitting men? YOU ARE CRAZY!! /s Meanwhile, the 2nd top comment is: 6 hours ago ; 204 upvotes Men want to hit women so bad Well, we know that on the r/FragileMaleRedditor sub, it is the reverse: they want to hit men bad.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen09/04/21 09:38 AM
20

Also, it's about one specific girl who deserved it. Not "all women". What they do is like if they said that a guy caught raping a drunk girl should be punched and I went to them saying "Yeah, you just really wish you could hit a man!". Bruh! I would punch such a rapist myself. They are just so afraid of being held to the same standard as men and to be held accountable for their shit.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen09/04/21 09:11 AM
10

Context: Girl: *hit me* Girl: You can't hit me back, I'm a girl Point is that it happens, and the original post, which was later misportrayed, was about cases when that happens.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen09/04/21 09:02 AM
7

Yeah, it's even tried to be pulled of as a trick on police forces: https://np.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/m5gs6k/worlds_most_composed_transit_police_officer_vs/
/r/FeminismStopsWhen09/04/21 08:54 AM
14

Context: Girl: *hit me* Girl: You can't hit me back, I'm a girl I agree it's not out of context. The context is like written in font-size 100 in the middle of the screen: self-defense. They just... ignore the context and misrepresent it while still having it shown in plain sight.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen09/04/21 08:44 AM
5

Circumcision is equivalent to Type 1a FGM. Type 1a FGM is even called female circumcision for that reason. Female prepuce & clitoral hood are literally the same part as prepuce and foreskin in males. These are the same structures in embryonic development.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/21 08:57 PM
8

I've already edited on wikipedia (not much and a long time ago). My account was created in 2009. Sure they can try, but it won't be that easy. EDIT: One of my change was the removal of a chapter saying there is negative correlation between skin-color and intelligence on the page about human skin color. So if they try to paint me as alt-right white-supremacist, they loose hard.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 08:37 PM
7

If they oppose the addition of an MGM paragraph, I'll remove the FGM one. But I think it should work - there are already mentions on wikipedia. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genital_modification_and_mutilation#Males The Danish College of General Practitioners has defined non-medical circumcision as mutilation.[45]
/r/MensRights08/04/21 08:06 PM
6

I think you didn't look at the linked page. The topic is sexism, not FGM. There is a paragraph about FGM on the wiki page about sexism, but no paragraph about MGM.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 10:57 PM
7

If FGM isn't off topic, MGM isn't either. And it is not off-topic anyway, as laws are specifically designed in a sexist way in order to permit MGM.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 10:22 PM
42

There is a chapter "Female genital mutilation". No mention of circumcision or male genital mutilation. Maybe we should edit the page and add a paragraph about it.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 09:35 AM
16

I found an existing solution (for women), which could easily be adapted: https://mashable.com/2013/04/06/anti-rape-underwear/?europe=true Electric shock underwear. That can be made in a way that is comfortable and secure for the wearer.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 10:05 AM
44

Someone should develop underwear with some kind of mouse traps attached.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 09:42 AM
3

Yes, I think it's that people are joining tribes instead of thinking for themselves. This seems very common, maybe especially in the US because of the 2 party system. Some people choose their tribe then adopt all the beliefs... But you cannot really blame them when that is exactly what the people saying "if you don't believe women are oppressed, you are far right" want them to do.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 06:23 PM
1

Die Piratenpartei, die Humanisten are also against that crap. But you're right, it's getting complicated.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 06:15 PM
7

I cannot understand people like this. I'm not going to change my opinions because someone called me "far right". So I'm not going to start believing that women are oppressed in the west. But I'm also not going to start believing in anything the far right believes in. I'm a leftist. They cannot get me to believe in feminist dogma by shaming, but they cannot get me to believe in right wing positions either.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 06:08 PM
2

Good point. I was paid 5% less than my female colleague. I should try telling the story with gender reversed to see how people react.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 03:34 PM
1

It's clear that your issue is that I managed to get a very good equivalence, by answering both questions: Are men and women murdered BECAUSE of their gender: mostly not. Including 98% of cases the media calls feminicide. Are men victims of androcide if we use the term the same way the media uses femicide: Yes. I broke the game you wanted to play. I didn't want to let you play, therefore I first tried to get you to define your terms, which you constantly refused. Answering both questions simultan…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:43 AM
1

First: it's not relevant to the victim and to the privilege discussion. This question just looks to me like a new attempt at victim blaming, but let's see. Men aren't killed for the fact they are men. But most killings of men are still androcides, which is a hate-crime. If it doesn't sound logical, don't blame me, I didn't make the rules for femicide - I just apply them consistently.For example, every male soldier who died in a war where women weren't drafted is an androcide: he wouldn't have di…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/21 09:03 AM
22

it gives the immediate conclusion that all of the advances that we have made as a human society are due to male leaders. Feminists: "But it's only because women were kept away from it. Also, men started all the wars and destruction" Me: "Women didn't start so many wars and destruction because they were kept away from it, they would have done it if they could" Feminists: "No, women are better!"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 02:57 PM
3

Well, a woman who took a gender studies major and recognized it for the bullshit it is, is probably a gem. I mean that's a real independent woman who was able to think for herself when everyone was trying to indoctrinate her. But don't count on finding many like this.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 12:15 PM
1

What definition do you want to use? The original one which I support, or the new one which considers every uroxicide a femicide?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/21 06:04 AM
1

Depends by which standard you define "assaulted for being men". If that's the same stupid standard as is mostly used for "feminicides", then yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 10:45 PM
1

Who is doing the victim blaming? Stop blaming the victim for being born the same gender as the person doing the assault.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 03:30 PM
1

Women who want to force the father into paternity will use that loophole, therefore it cannot be left here. The men should have the possibility to do the financial abortion and it should not be possible for the women to stop him. This means it should even be possible after birth if he wasn't notified before. In the USA and many other countries there is the same possibility of financial abortion after birth for women (safe heaven laws), so that wouldn't even be an issue. The father should have to…
/r/MensRights31/03/21 01:09 PM
10

We don't live in a patriarchy, feminists invented the myth that we live in a patriarchy, and propagate that myth. Yes, I'm sure feminism is partly at fault for depressions in women, with all the lies about harassment, wage gap, rape and so forth. If they stopped lying, we could actually solve the few remaining issues and women wouldn't worry so much about problems exaggerated using faulty statistics.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen31/03/21 12:52 PM
2

If you don't allow women to abort, they still get to control a man's financial freedom under the protection of the law.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 11:07 AM
1

I agree to some degree. We shouldn't oppose laws for "physical" abortion for women just because men don't get "paper abortion". These two kinds of abortion are very different. We should however oppose "paper abortion" for women if men don't get the same (safe heaven laws give paper abortion for women only). We should oppose laws against domestic violence for women when they aren't also for men.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 11:03 AM
12

How to not get your "statistics" debunked: stop lying! That's not fucking hard.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen30/03/21 09:05 PM
20

Did she see this documentary about the men's right movement that was made by a feminist? You know, "the Red pill", by cassie jaye. You said it stopped the indoctrination for you, so it might work for her.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/21 07:45 AM
5

A word which says "if you correct your female colleagues, you are wrong" is definitely bad. It's making it impossible to work with women if you were taking this chart seriously. Also the term is sexist, just like Karen or other gendered slurs, so even if you fixed the chart, the word still doesn't belong in a progressive vocabulary.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 07:33 AM
22

Unless you asked her if she wants to hear from you, it's "probably mansplaining". I honestly tend to say what I think and not first ask if I can talk. For example, I didn't ask you if you allow me to state that this chart isn't good, I just went on saying it. If I had to go by this chart I would refuse to work with women.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 11:43 PM
1

Anyone who goes out of their way to tell you they are feminist is likely to be a radfem these days. The moderates are the ones that answer "feminism? Yeah, I heard of it, something about equality... Yeah, I think I'm one" when you ask them about it on the street.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/21 05:40 PM
2

Not getting drunk should be the rule for both men and women. And the person who kept selling you alcohol until you get too drunk to consent (whatever that is) should be fined and loose the right to sell alcohol. Fixing the problem of alcohol would be great. Now to the question, same thing as I recommend men do: nowadays we have smartphones, you can just start recording audio when you go in a bar. If nothing happens, you have a few hours of useless stuff to delete. If something happens, you have …
/r/MensRights29/03/21 05:36 PM
1

Yes, what you describe looks more like what a moderate feminist would be... and this can easily overlap with MRAs. People who believe in patriarchy theory are radical feminists - but these are those who set the tone in media and politics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/21 03:01 PM
2

I've read the wiki article. The women's bureau and Hayden worked on the introduction of the Rider. Some groups like the National women's party opposed it, supporting equality, others like the League of Women Voters supported the Rider, wanting to keep their privileges.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 12:23 AM
3

You should see the positive side: he makes all the bad arguments and gives us the opportunity to respond to them. In case someone comes along who thinks like him, they can immediately find the responses.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 12:13 AM
2

Pushed by the Women's Bureau, the Hayden Rider was introduced in the ERA. It said: The provisions of this article shall not be construed to impair any rights, benefits, or exemptions now or hereafter conferred by law upon persons of the female sex So some feminist fight for superiority. Admittedly, some feminists opposed the Hayden Rider. But the superiority-feminists regularly win their battles, see: https://np.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lec134/re_do_you_guys_hate_feminism/
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 11:14 PM
2

how does the feminist movement influence the government so greatly? I think they are just very good at lobbying... and lying. I've come to the conclusion that whenever you see a statistic pushed by feminists, you can bet what they say is false. But people don't have the knowledge and time to find the source and check if what is said is correct. When I put a link to a 100 page study on wage differences on twitter, people tend to not want to read it. Also, both conservatives and "progressives" are…
/r/MensRights28/03/21 04:38 PM
3

Hi, I'm also an egalitarian. A good post which highlights criticism of feminist actions can be found on r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates : https://np.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lec134/re_do_you_guys_hate_feminism/ Am I ashamed to be in the "MRA movement"? Definitely not. I mostly don't call myself a MRA, because gendered labels tend to create tribalism. Sometimes I may call myself feminist or MRA if I think it helps the discussion, either by using the same label as the person I'm talking…
/r/MensRights28/03/21 04:04 PM
2

Actually, debate is about tearing down the other sides argument. That's why politicians do debate. They are not interested in finding which party has the best arguments, they are about winning people over to their side, using manipulation if necessary. https://ganino.com/dialectic_vs_debate The dialectical method is dialogue between two or more people holding different points of view about a subject, who wish to establish the truth of the matter by dialogue, with reasoned arguments. Dialectics i…
/r/MensRights28/03/21 03:29 PM
7

Why do women and men who get body-shamed feel insecure? That's like basic human psychology. Probably something to do with the fact we are social creatures.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 07:18 AM
2

That's a sexist and non-progressive behavior. Ultimately, it shouldn't matter. If the florist is male or the mechanic female doesn't tell anything about their competence. This carries the implication that gender matters. What I decided to do: send businesses who have the "women-owned" flag in gmaps a customer mail notifying them about this issue, and boycotting them as long as it stays there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/21 06:31 AM
7

My idea about this question, is that you would only have to change the title slightly, in a way which doesn't change the core question, to make this post not name that subreddit: Interestingly, I've seen a trending post about a woman having to give her boyfriend the card to pay so that he wouldn’t feel insecure. The subreddit may be off-topic, but it doesn't necessarily mean that topics raised on the subreddit are not worth discussing here. I would make a distinction between discussing about the…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 12:13 AM
3

Buggy internet connection... I actually commented trice.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 04:46 PM
16

A sexist movement which actively tries to create sexist laws and discriminate against men looses it's support. That's progress. https://np.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lec134/re_do_you_guys_hate_feminism/ Thank you for asking the question
/r/MensRights26/03/21 04:27 PM
7

If it's an implicit bias test, they are not very reliable. What I try to do is to swap genders. When there is a situation where gender is involved, I picture the situation with genders reversed and assess how I would feel about it. Obviously, that doesn't work for quick reactions - in that case you can only think about the situation afterwards. Maybe in some situations you are biased against women and in others against men. Remember you need to be able to forgive yourself for your mistakes in or…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/21 12:29 AM
1

PS: remember, the equal work day was 8 days ago (in Germany): https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m6vrvj/today_is_equalworkday/ "the day at which women start working for the money they were already receiving since the beginning of the year"
/r/MensRights25/03/21 03:07 PM
1

Quote: I do not think in the year 2021 that we should continue to accept a reality which sees women paid just $0.82 for every $1 men are paid for doing the same job. I believe we can achieve economic justice in this country — that means equal pay for equal work. #EqualPayDay Yeah, it's that lie again. Politicians always lie, that's part of their job.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 02:53 PM
1

You can report the mods to reddit for that. They aren't allowed to ban you for things you do on other subs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/21 02:02 PM
44

Definitely weird how many people around here see no value in friendships with women/men. The “Why should I put effort in pleasing a [men]? Why should I compromise on things?!” is also a thing you keep hearing in TwoXChromosomes. I don't know how these people think relationships work. These are toxic people who you wouldn't want to be around in the first place. Yes, sex&intimacy is an important part of a relationship. But if you cannot value people for something else, their is no relationship pos…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 01:15 PM
1

Sadly still 5 to 10 years to wait.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 11:37 PM
22

Short answer: we don't live in a rape culture. Long answer (yeah, 1 hour of video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVUQm_b0EJQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IeAiwjBLGk Trying to summarize what I remember: historically, the rates of rape are lower than ever or than in most other countries socially, rape is considered to be one of the most abhorrent crime, on the level of murder Talking about the whole society as being a "rape culture" doesn't make sense in that regard.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 06:57 PM
2

Tell then you always go dutch.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 05:21 PM
39

This https://np.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/m8gh46/women_are_not_emotionally_responsible_for_men/
/r/MensRights24/03/21 03:33 PM
4

The only inaccuracy in the 'asking a woman "to leave the room to the men."' is that this question would probably be directly asked to the given women. Asking a women to leave the room would be equivalent to have some wagon reserved to women in trains (which happened, by the way). But as we are only talking about people online telling us to cross the street, there is no constraint. We can, and do, just choose to ignore the request. Asking men to cross the street is more like people saying "women …
/r/MensRights24/03/21 03:22 PM
8

Women are not responsible for how a man feels. Just as men are not responsible for how women feel. https://np.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/m8gh46/women_are_not_emotionally_responsible_for_men/ Let's be clear though: I'm not going to criticize a women who crosses the street when she sees me. It doesn't negatively impact me, so she can do it if it makes her feel better, she doesn't need my authorization to cross the street.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 03:00 PM
237

I would just quote a highly upvoted post of TwoXChromosomes: Women are not responsible for how a man feels. Just as men are not responsible for how women feel. No reason to cross the street.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 02:48 PM
5

Correction : to challenge it makes you anti-sexist. But in this case, being anti-sexist will get you labelled sexist.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 12:13 PM
1

I see what you mean. I didn't correct Maisie Williams either when she said anyone who isn't sexist is a feminist... I fully support her consequential stance to then remove the term 'feminist' from the vocabulary as we are left with egalitarians and "sexists". I also sometimes call myself a masculist-feminist. You can indeed erase the distinction between MRAs and feminists around those who are truly egalitarians. Saying you are not feminist let many people stop listening right away, so letting go…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/21 10:46 AM
2

In her second book, Ceasefire!: Why Women and Men Must Join Forces to Achieve True Equality, published in 1999, Young criticized both feminism and traditionalism from what she described as a "pro-equality point of view" .. Young has defended the social media campaign Women Against Feminism I'm not any more convinced than before. She is about as feminist as I am. I mean, you can argue that I am a feminist if you take the "dictionary definition", and I've been called a feminist by some people I di…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/21 10:06 AM
1

Source about Cathy Young being a feminist? Never have seen her say/write that she is a feminist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/21 09:12 AM
1

I think that it's just today that I read on a sub for transpeople that they don't reject the fact that transmen are biologically female. Nobody is saying that. Transmen are socially male, and as they wrote in that sub, nobody goes around checking the chromosomes of people, so what they are "biologically" is irrelevant in pretty much every circumstance. You're right that male/female describe both gender and sex, which is one of the problem in the discussion, but AFAB is definitely not an issue as…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/21 11:43 PM
17

What's weird is that the UN and others keep creating false statistics, trying to outdo each other, instead of addressing the issues. Is there a percentage of sexual harassment that is not enough? No? So why try to artificially inflate the numbers to 97% ??
/r/MensRights23/03/21 11:23 PM
4

I agree with you, just as I agree with someone being more cautious around black people. As long as being cautious doesn't entail harming people (by maybe not hiring them, or anything having negative consequences), I'm ok with it. But the Nazi-Rhetoric they use by comparing people to ticks is shit. Also, they should make clear that their "safety measures" don't harm anyone, otherwise they just become no better than people supporting the Mike-Pence rule (don't go near women on the job).
/r/MensRights23/03/21 07:45 PM
17

The Nazi party, but make the boots pink with some flowers on them.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 07:36 PM
36

It's TwoXChromosomes: the mods are against people calling out bigots, they fully support that kind of hate speech.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 07:34 PM
19

I'd rather wait for feminists to start a new wave and then counterattack.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 03:20 PM
8

Oh. It seems all posts (that I can see) with this are actually directed against men. If this was a proper hashtag before, somebody hijacked it to make it "ironic" and to hate on men. Report all the post which use non relevant hashtags for spam... or something else if you find something that fits better.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 02:17 PM
12

How do you report hashtags to instagram? I'd like to report #maleviolence
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/21 09:54 AM
13

Alternativ hypothesis which I actually heard from feminists: if you feel every person you date is shit, maybe it's actually you who are the shitty one, not them.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 01:12 AM
10

That still be at best "Women working on BuzzFeed". "Her" is a pronoun, not a synonym for women.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 10:07 PM
14

There is not even a reference to "women" in the post. What is referred to is "working [..] on BuzzFeed"
/r/MensRights22/03/21 09:54 PM
5

Honestly, he can complain as much as he wants about being called "AFAB", that's surely what he is by definition of AFAB (assigned female at birth). It's like complaining about being called "cis" or "trans". TERF may prefer simply being called "women", they will still get called cis- when the distinction is relevant to the discussion. PS: saying "human" also groups transmen with ciswomen. So what?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/21 07:02 PM
3

I'm not American either. But similar laws exists for mothers in France and Germany, so my guess is that this is somewhat common.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 12:52 PM
7

The government doesn't have a problem with it, as proven by safe-heaven laws which already permit women to withdraw from child support. Just give the same possibility to men.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 11:48 AM
7

No false accusations.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 07:50 PM
7

I think I had two occasions in the last 10 years. One was a colleague and I wasn't close to him and another colleague called him out on his shit anyway, so I didn't have to get confrontational, which I don't like either. Another time I was running with a friend and he suggested that we could follow a girl who was also running. In this instance I told him that was creepy and that we should just go past her and be on our way. There was also a feminist colleague, now married to a feminist, who once…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/21 03:49 PM
1

It's not a risk associated with women unless you get married. Don't get married or have a good prenup.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 01:19 PM
7

She is a victim of feminist indoctrination, she is unable to think clearly. She just repeats what she has been told instead of trying to find a sensible position to defend. That's how hate groups gain power over otherwise good people.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 01:04 PM
1

I'd call them femisexists. Short for sexist feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/21 09:56 AM
3

It's possible to donate at www.mensaid.ie/donate for those who can.
/r/MensRights20/03/21 10:55 PM
40

More than 90% of what they call "femicides" aren't feminicides in the first place, unless you want to loosen the definition so much that most killings of a men become "menicides".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/21 02:03 PM
1

You could be non-binary. Or you could just be yourself. I'm also very sensitive, what definitely helped me was to stop trying to fit in a mold that society defined but that wasn't meant for me. It's definitely freeing to just do what you feel is right for you. And from what you wrote, it seems you are in a good path: you made a lot of friends and you finally accepted your personality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/21 11:22 AM
3

I agree overall, but I think that it is important that men have some spaces for them. As an example, I would cite mensshed.org. It is especially important in a climate like now where men otherwise aren't fully accepted in many communities. Men need to be able to build a network of male friendships. For this, there need to be spaces where they can bond together.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/21 10:59 AM
5

Objection. loaded question!! ^^ I don't hold contempt for women. I'm not angry. I'd be a bit happier.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/21 12:10 AM
3

Yes. I don't want to have half of twitter reposted here. There are other subs for these: r/FeminismStopsWhen , /r/antifeminists , r/menkampf , r/mramemes
/r/MensRights19/03/21 11:32 PM
1

The "patriarchy" one is feminism, the "chivalry is dead" one is a subset of women. And the person who wrote that shit about opening doors is a particularly idiotic feminist.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 11:21 PM
5

Sadly, the context isn't there anymore, it was a >20 tweet long discussion and a lot of tweets went missing. I don't even know what are the "both sides". What i know, is that Anita Sarkees!an thinks Liana K. is a piece of shit. I think that speaks in favor of Liana K.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 10:48 PM
12

These conservatives are pretty strange. They would be the first to complain if men started to wear revealing clothes or dresses. If I wore a sleeveless shirt and a kilt they probably would be the first to make remarks, just as they do for anyone who doesn't follow traditional fashion.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/21 10:35 PM
6

Liana Kerzner on twitter: both sides have some unapologetically awful characters. The kill all men stuff is worrisome. I didn't see her talk a lot about KAM, but she called out a few feminist hypocrisies, like the "incel" insult and the fact that feminists don't want to put responsibilities on women. Liana Kerzner has integrity.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 09:51 PM
16

My response to people comparing men or women to poisoned M&Ms was: If these M&M's were as important as humans for whom my decision matter, I would let a laboratory check which one is poisoned instead of condemning them all. I think that if anything, generalizations can be accepted when it comes to inanimate objects, but not generalizations about humans. But my response got downvoted last time, so what do I know.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 09:36 PM
1

Currently on r/TwoXChromosomes , 307 upvotes: Women are not emotionally responsible for men [...] Women are not responsible for how a man feels. Just as men are not responsible for how women feel. [...] Hey, that's new. They repeated for days how men are responsible of making women feel safe by crossing streets, slowing down, accelerating, whatever. Now nothing? It's getting complicated to follow them.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 08:00 PM
8

Quote: Edit: I'm not digging on the fact that they're making this change, in fact I think it's awesome. I'm just upset that it'll probably be a very long time, if ever, before the US as a whole recognizes that current standards on maternity/parental leave suck. And (someone) Do you work for the same place? (her) Nope. It's awesome that they'll be giving that much time to both mothers and fathers that work for them, it really is, but this is a choice they're making to do better by their employees…
/r/MensRights19/03/21 07:06 PM
1

Now I don't think right-wing MRA's can be of much use, because there is a need of a progressive approach which they don't have. But sometimes conservatives can accidentally take a left-wight stance, like for the recent UK hate-crime bill: Liberal Democrats: A Bill to make motivation by misogyny an aggravating factor in criminal sentencing; to require police forces to record hate crimes motivated by misogyny; and for connected purposes. This is a conservative bill - based on traditional gender st…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/21 02:28 PM
2

​ I have liberal views around pornography; as long as the actors aren't forced into it, I don't see a problem. This means I don't have any issue with OnlyFans either (mentioned here because I know right-wing MRAs tend do criticize it). Men's studies programs: not heard of them, so probably not that effective. But I'm not american. I'm both for women's right and men's right. I could have called myself a feminist, but most of visible feminism is radical-feminism which promotes a lot of sexist ster…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/21 01:33 PM
21

That's one of the reason "believe women" and "don't hit women" are so toxic. Don't hit anyone. Don't believe women who try to manipulate you into fighting for them.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 10:48 AM
7

I was quite active on twitter and also got piled on once by a mob. I wouldn't discuss any unpopular subject on twitter if I had mental health issues. It's far too toxic. Leave the tweeters doing politics, only go for cat pictures or funny stuff. Discussing with a limited amount of characters doesn't work well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/21 11:27 PM
1

You can always record, especially voice-only, and the record will be usable to fight off false accusations even if you didn't ask for their consent. You should keep the records in a safe place though (encryption is your friend) to make sure nobody else gets access to them.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 04:09 PM
2

No. It's a hate crime if you steal from someone because of their gender. It's not impossible for someone to commit a hate crime against people of it's own gender. There are some cases of people with internalized misandry because they were indoctrinated by feminism.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 01:46 PM
0

That will also target misandrists, and feminists being increasingly aggressive, this law will be useful against them.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 07:28 AM
1

Probably don't want to get banned. feminist subs are not as open to dissent as masculist subs. If you call out their Nazi rhetoric, they ban you.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 07:23 AM
1

Well, I got down voted when I defended vegetarianism, but upvoted when I criticized misogyny. You might be right, but then the narrative isn't anti-women but anti-vegetarian.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 11:24 PM
2

Consumption society has overinflated everyone's expectations.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 11:13 PM
2

I agree with your point, but I have to notice his comment is not something very common around here, and a comment like yours would be banned on a feminist sub because challenging toxic views and behaviors isn't welcome on them when the person holding the view is female. You still got my upvote.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 11:09 PM
12

Now we have to teach men to report crimes and not try to be stoic in the face of it.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 10:27 PM
1

TERFs are just regular radical feminists, with the only difference that they believe trans-women to be men, and therefore treat trans-women the same way any radical feminist treat men. If someone wants to reject TERFs, they should also reject radical-feminists... despite the fact that radical feminists make up the majority of feminist activists. You cannot reject TERFs while they share all the core beliefs of radical feminism.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:15 PM
3

Thanks for the long post, it was interesting :) Beside education, homelessness and gendered policies around domestic violence are probably the most important topics. For the USA, which I don't live in, I'd like to see the Equal Rights Amendment enacted. Feminists want it too, and men will benefit from it. Similar rules making it illegal to make laws discriminating by gender should be made in every country ; laws should ideally never refer to gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/21 08:05 PM
23

Well, we are not the ones comparing a group of humans to ticks or skittles. That's what is done by nazis, the alt-right and these "feminists". On the other hand, I know that I am against racism & sexism. Being hated on by people who use Nazi-Rhetorik isn't a defect on your part.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/21 07:31 PM
33

Yes, if you look at older leftists, they have nothing in common with the new radical-feminist crowd. That's a new current which is growing, and believes it can call itself leftist. The issue is they are taking over leftist political party's, which means workers feel less and less represented by those.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/21 07:02 PM
2

Well, #EqualWorkDay is just as accurate. They can place EqualPayDay in march if they want, but then they have to acknowledge that most of it is due to the women themselves. But feminists don't want to put any responsibility on women. It would have been much better to place #EqualPayDay in january, and look into the other issues separately, because as we see, once we put everything together, it's impossible to even know what the issue is. People just end up thinking it's for the same job. ​ Now, …
/r/MensRights17/03/21 01:58 PM
2

Yes. But it would be far easier to have that discussion if feminists didn't use faulty stats as always when they define #EqualPayDay. If they had put #EqualPayDay mid-to-end of january, I would have taken them seriously, but these liars placed in in march. I can play the game of faulty stats too: let's talk about #EqualWorkDay. Only difference: I admit these are faulty stats and don't try to mislead anyone.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 01:16 PM
29

A better case to make would be "people should stop dating people they don't respect". I guess in the case of assholes (m/f), that means they should stop dating. If she is being such an ass to him, it's not unlikely that he deserves better.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/21 11:28 PM
1

Well, if he wants to get them fired for having dared to touch him, it will indeed weaken the argument that they should have known better before even starting. If he only want's them to stop, the argument stands on it's own. I think that this should suffice.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 11:18 PM
1

I don't know how it is where you live, but here in Germany a complaint is something which is made against a specific person. You can have different relationships with different people, which means u/NotKoreanSpy could allow some people to touch him and refuse it to others. Seems like an obvious way of doing, but if he is in the US, I know I never understand their culture around that.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 10:49 PM
7

We argue that these appeals to “health benefits” as a way of justifying medically unnecessary child genital cutting practices may have unintended consequences. For example, it may create a “loophole” through which certain forms of female genital cutting—or female genital “mutilation” as it is defined by the World Health Organization—could potentially be legitimized Male babies get mutilated, female babies most affected. But good on them to note the hypocrisy of leaving male genital mutilation il…
/r/MensRights16/03/21 08:52 PM
6

Didn't change anything for me. I stopped listening to feminists a few years ago, so unless one say something sensible for a change, it won't impact the way I behave with men&women who are likely not feminists. I keep avoiding sexist attitudes now just as I did before, therefore I'm not doing something for a women which I wouldn't do for a men. I just leave enough room on the sidewalk for others to pass. If they don't understand that this implies I don't intend to get in their way, I cannot do an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/21 12:32 PM
3

Love that comment she made "Yeah it’s not a great analogy. The skittle one is probably better" - so now she are using the same analogy as Donald Trump Jr.? How enlightened of her. Fully supported by the mods.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen15/03/21 03:59 PM
11

Not all feminists. But probably 98% of them are biggots at this point. Sorry for the remaining 2%, but at least they can choose to not associate themself with them, unlike men which they happily lump all together in statements worthy of Donald Trump.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/21 03:48 PM
8

Yes, it's indeed sexist, not racist. But it's also pretty clear that the men who will be the most affected by the weaponization of "women's tears" are the Emmett Till's of this world. Second victims will be the men who make the mistake to "believe women" without checking and beat-up the innocent men because some women wanted "revenge".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/21 10:47 AM
20

I've already seen the slogan "men are human" on twitter (there is someone with that handle) and I find it really good. The simplicity is it's strength.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/21 12:35 AM
0

Honestly, I don't care either way. As long as there is no negative impact on men/black people, you can take whatever safety measure you want. It doesn't affect me if someone crosses the road, has their keys in the hands, lock the door of their car. That's not my problem. I would also take measures against false rape accusations, as long as I can do so without negatively affecting the women I'm dealing with.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/21 09:23 PM
1

Their idea of a curfew is as credible as some Neonazi suggesting a genocide. Not gonna happen. It just has the advantage to show what kind of politicians we have.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 12:56 PM
15

I wish men would just CARE ABOUT WOMEN They do. Men care about women far more than they do care about men. That's also one of the issue Errin Pizzey faced when she wanted to open shelters for men: the biggest donors for shelter for women, were men. These same men didn't want to spend anything when she asked them for support for men shelter. So: I wish men would also care about men. That's also a reason why we have to bring up men's issue, because both men and women are largely not aware of them.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 11:16 AM
13

5 out of 7... And holding your breath isn't helping. So really 5 out of 6. And the "chat to me for 5'" which I don't do... I actually searched Apps which have the same purpose of warning if I'm not able to. So really, all of them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/21 09:33 AM
8

I would respond: nobody cares. Yeah, you could answer that the homeless are predominantly males, or double check their source (it's the United Nations after all, they cannot be trusted). But in the end, the issue is about poor people, it doesn't matter if their is a small majority of men or women. Nobody should care about the gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/21 12:03 AM
5

You couldn't hurt my feelings if you tried. I erroneously thought you were a MRA. But if you don't care about others, I don't see how to convince you. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 09:59 PM
4

Virgin shaming is bad regardless of the target. I desperately tried to explain that to feminists to no avail, I hope you will understand it: this is a public forum, other people who might be insecure because of their virginity might read what you wrote. They will again get the false impression that being virgin is something "wrong". Even if you don't care about the person you are "insulting" that way, you may be making some other casualties.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 09:54 PM
1

You don't even need to sleep with one. "Incel" will still be wrong as this relates to the chad/stacy ideology. At least that is their bailey in their motte-and-bailey argument, but when they accuse you, they just throw it around in the same way others say Nazi. Virgin may be technically correct, but it is irrelevant & not a character fault. So again, just ignore them, they just throw it around to deal with their own insecurities.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 09:42 PM
4

Maybe your girlfriend could try to talk in a relatively neutral way to the other (non crazy) friends? It's likely that they are just as annoyed but don't dare to speak up. Maybe this could set things moving, that together they tell her they don't like her misandry. Often, people just are too afraid to say something because they are unsure if they are the only one who sees the problem. This leads to asshole being unchallenged.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 09:06 PM
1

I was also thinking about responding "I call the cops, because obviously there is some crazy asshole poisoning M&Ms". But that would just have led us further away from the main topic 🙂
/r/MensRights13/03/21 08:54 PM
0

Don't need a laboratory for false accusers. As written in my initial post, I only need to record the interaction.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 08:19 PM
-2

If these M&M's were as important as humans for whom my decision matter, I would let a laboratory check which one is poisoned instead of condemning them all.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 06:14 PM
-2

"Potential", not proven, therefore whatever you do needs to have no negative impact on the person which is very likely to be innocent.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 06:08 PM
0

What I would do, is when I am going to mentor a women, either I am surrounded by people who can later attest I didn't misbehave, or I secretly record what is happening with my phone to have a protocol of what happened. I think the "Mike Pence" rule of not getting close to women is bad as it would have a negative impact on innocent women. I don't want "solutions" which might hurt innocent men or women.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 05:53 PM
26

I know there are a few places for male victims of violence in Germany. Like 0,67% of the amount of places for female victims (not even one percent).
/r/MensRights13/03/21 02:40 PM
1

Interesting story: when I criticized a statement by someone making negative generalization about women on r/MensRights, I got upvoted and the misogynist got downvoted. Nobody went after me because I was doing a "#NotAllWomen". On the other hand, when I criticized someone who made an uniformed post against vegetarianism, I got downvoted. If anything, r/MensRights is anti vegetarian but also pro-women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/21 01:28 PM
1

I don't think that this is the opinion of the majority of reddit users, but even if it was, they would still be objectively wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/21 01:11 PM
1

But they want YOU to be silenced because, as you post on a non feminist subreddit, you are a misogynist with toxic masculinity. That statement doesn't make logical sense. Your use of the indefinite "you" is intriguing. Who is "you" in that context? Posting on a non feminist doesn't make you a "misogynist with toxic masculinity" - actually, on r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates it's pretty much the opposite of that. People with "toxic masculinity" don't complain about bad treatment according to feminist def…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/21 11:11 AM
1

I was talking about challenging bigots, that is, cases where the disinformation are the posts responded to. Also, I wasn't talking about bots, which are as of todays technology, not going to be able to challenge bigots anyway.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/21 10:41 AM
1

The issue with your analogy is that the air which transports sounds is a shared medium in the telecommunication sense. If many people are in a room and speak, it can become impossible to understand the one you want to listen to. On the other hand, responses to a post will never make the post unreadable unless there are so many that the reddit website crashes. Reddit is not going to be affected by commentators the same way air traffic would be affected if a bunch of radio amateurs started emittin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/21 10:32 AM
2

Yes. I don't have an issue with that. If it later turned out sex just doesn't work it's still possible to reconsider if this is the right relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 10:22 AM
2

Same for the Pence rule: never place yourself in a situation where you could be falsely accused of rape. We cannot tell if a woman is safe and therefore we have to assume none is safe, because we live in a society that places security for women above justice for men.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 08:47 AM
3

Good point. A sub that allows bigoted ideas is one thing, a sub that doesn't allow challenging bigots is another.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/21 01:34 AM
11

Depends on the sub. Feminist subs can be as misandrist as they want. You don't expect anything else when going there. If a sub about mental health was doing the same I would want to have it closed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/21 06:41 PM
2

Yes, veganism requires to use some supplements. But B12 is already supplemented in a lot of of the shelf juices, so may not even be needed extra. But becoming vegan requires you to get some information. Vegetarians on the other hand don't need to do anything, as the vegetarian diet gives all you need.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 03:10 PM
0

You know, LastRounder, you're fooling no one with your multiple accounts.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 02:47 PM
-10

Cudos on the most stupid post. Inform yourself about what the word vegetarian mean... and also start using logic, because it's not related to plastic bags. EDIT: make no mistake, I'm not interested in debating trolls. Not gonna discuss this any further.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 08:26 AM
4

I suppose her abuser was a men from what you said, so instead of saying "it's wrong to say that men get away with abuse" say "female abusers get away even more". You need to acknowledge that some men get away with crimes, acknowledge her experience. Then only you can discuss those who don't get away and maybe the falsely incriminated.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 10:05 PM
2

So, you dated Amber Heard? 😜
/r/MensRights11/03/21 09:36 PM
3

Except the analogy is more: it's easier to put a roof over your head than to try to stop the rain.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/21 11:36 AM
0

Yes, very efficient. Or very primitive depending on how you want to put it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/21 11:31 AM
10

It's because female reproductive processes are far more complicated and have far more ways of going wrong (ovulation, nidation, periods). Your goal is to make reproduction go wrong and you have far more ways to easily do so with such an intricate system.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/21 09:10 AM
6

Hey, next time you are doing some parody of feminist logic, I think it would be nice to end with #feminist-logic or something. I mean it's pretty clear that the 95% of accusations which don't result in a conviction are not all guilty as RAINN would like us to believe, but it's also clear that not all 95% are not false accusations. But it's only clear to people who think and some people might think you are serious. So some little note that it's a parody would be nice.
/r/MensRights10/03/21 08:02 PM
48

Cannot be, a women would never lie to cover her wrongdoings /sarcasm
/r/MensRights10/03/21 01:48 PM
-6

A thing that could work is to go to a feminist sub and just support some legit women's issue, while having something like "Progressive MRA" as user flair (or an username which tells the same). Don't talk about men's issues, just give them the opportunity to question their belief that MRAs are anti women. And yes, only do this if you are able to ignore all the hate and understand that it is there because these communities contain a lot of broken people, but that this isn't representative of the p…
/r/MensRights10/03/21 01:28 PM
3

Your arguments are on the same level as those of radical feminists. Not welcome here. Don't just look at what radfems do, radfems aren't the representatives of woman even if they claim to be.
/r/MensRights10/03/21 11:49 AM
10

I think you may be able to call the police on them. Maybe use your smartphone to record audio/video evidence of the bullying and his encouragement. When you complain to the staff or anywhere, record. If they dismiss you, they could get in trouble for complicity. Try to find some independent support group in proximity.
/r/MensRights10/03/21 09:46 AM
12

Lol, that's a good idea, respond to these comments every day of the year with "happy international men's day" and a link to an article presenting an issue affecting men.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 04:30 PM
4

Well.... If the media only talks about toilet day on men's day but talks about women's day a whole week, you cannot really blame men for not even realizing it's men's day.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 10:06 AM
1

As I stated in another response, any evidence is admissible to prove your innocence. The limit is only set when it comes to proving that the other person was the one raping you (proving culpability). The video will protect you from a false accusation, but it won't put your rapist in jail. Make a record (illegally or not), give it to your lawyer. If you are at risk to be put in jail while being innocent, it will be usable. PS: and never ever use a video for revenge-porn. And keep it safe, you don…
/r/MensRights09/03/21 09:59 AM
1

In most if not all places where is is illegal to film without consent, it will still be admitted to prove your innocence. So in the case we are talking about, he would get a non guilty of rape verdict because the record shows he was the one raped. This is even the case in Germany, which has some of the most restrictive protections of privacy. The idea is: don't put innocents into prison - if you have a proof of innocence, take it, doesn't matter how many laws were broken when acquiring the proof…
/r/MensRights09/03/21 09:11 AM
2

Because we are better than them 🙂 And looking at my clock, I have only one minute to wait to be able to call them out on their bias. (Minute passed while I was writing, it's March the 9th now. But I'm going to bed, they get some more time)
/r/MensRights08/03/21 11:01 PM
15

My guess would be that pesky benefit of the doubt that feminists try to get rid of.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 09:51 PM
61

I think the only conclusion is: always record when you are meeting a women you don't know very well or if the situation is unusual. Use your phone to record the sounds. It might not help much in a case like yours (you cannot hear who is being drugged), but maybe the moaning could give away who is raping who / who is still conscious.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 09:50 PM
1

Easy, it's the day the UN said: Happy #InternationalMensDay to all the male allies around the world who support women, defy gender roles, fight gender-based violence & stand up for equality. See https://twitter.com/UN/status/1329441047940898817?s=20 19th November
/r/MensRights08/03/21 06:29 PM
3

Even the main UN repeated this. This bias is not only in the women's section. See https://twitter.com/UN/status/1329441047940898817?s=20
/r/MensRights08/03/21 06:24 PM
58

I think it's best to refrain from commenting about men's issues on women's day. If it isn't a post trashing men or downplaying men's issues, leave it be. If it's a "men have 364 days" than yeah, you can debunk that shit. If it's a post about "female genital mutilation", well, it's not the time to bring up the fact that nobody cares about male mutilations. Anyway, welcome here.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 05:15 PM
1

Twitter: https://twitter.com/UN/status/1329441047940898817?s=20
/r/MensRights08/03/21 03:58 PM
1

Maybe they hoped to get customers for braun beard trimmers with the male feminists. Braun belongs to Gillette.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 11:35 AM
28

Would be even better with the post from the UN which said the same. UN women being biased is to be expected. The complete Unied Nation being gynocentric is not necessarily known by everyone.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 07:52 AM
2

If you don't want exclude homosexuals, you can even just say "yes we can". People managed to make non-sexist and non-racist slogans before, why don't feminists try that too?
/r/MensRights06/03/21 07:13 PM
10

Same goes for "not all men" in response to negative generalizations, which gives the impression that you're only talking about few exceptional men. In most cases, a better phrasing would be "only a minority of men", or "most men don't do X".
/r/MensRights06/03/21 06:48 PM
2

Things are getting better. Cassie Jaye made "The Red Pill" and won 4 awards, one of which is "Women in Film Award". Also, the negativity on "International men's day" was unusually low this year. There is still a long way to go, sure, but MRAs are slowly managing to get their voices heard.
/r/MensRights06/03/21 04:46 PM
43

I suppose there are sub groups of men which get even more hate than the whole group, like "straight cis white old men" or "black men". But yeah, whatever group you have, add "men" to it, and you increase the hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/21 03:27 PM
1

I agree with you on that. His statement looks very much like the #killallmen stuff feminists keep repeating, and I doubt anyone here thinks that it is funny.
/r/MensRights06/03/21 01:54 PM
53

Yes and no. A lot of what feminists want to call harassment is indeed not harassment but an issue of gender roles. And asking for consent doesn't solve the issue when some people then go meta and want you to ask for consent for asking for consent. But some harassment definitely is an issue of entitlement (not necessarily male though). When people don't stop despite an unambiguous No, there is a problem.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/21 09:47 AM
29

Let's talk about systemic sexism and the matriarchy...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/21 02:54 PM
12

One of the reasons I was quite interested when a law against psychological abuse got passed. Obviously, like always, the abused person needs to recognize they are being abused and feel empowered to do something against it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/21 11:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter