Let me break it down for you so your slow pea brain can understand. Judicial system, or the law, works via whats legal or not. If its illegal then they get punished. Simple as that. It has nothing to do with morality, which is specific to a certain person and why they believe in. To answer your question, even if a small number of people thinks murder is good, does not mean that murder should not be penalised. Why? Because 1. Its the law 2. The way society works is that the popular sentiments alw…
Are u fucking autistic. No shit the rate for masturbwrikn would be close to 100% because that's the entire point of masturbation unless you're a gooner.
Am I hearing you? You're telling men to drop their standards, and then in the same posts you say ' why would women drop their standards'? The level of hypocrisy is actually hilarious
You literally have a post advising men to drop their standards when in the exact same post you said 'why would women drop their standards'. Why would I believe any of the nonsense u spew?
I would argue that youre continually shifting the goalpost here. First, I just don't want to date him. Then, not disgusting for not being my cup of tea. Finally, it goes on to unwanted sexual advances. These are talking about 3 pretty different things. Also, what constitutes as 'unwanted sexual advances'. Does talking to you count? Does looking in your direction count? I would say that both does, but this means that what op said is correct after all. You do view that with disgust. Both things ca…
I would argue that youre continually shifting the goalpost here. First, I just don't want to date him. Then, not disgusting for not being my cup of tea. Finally, it goes on to unwanted sexual advances. These are talking about 3 pretty different things. Also, what constitutes as 'unwanted sexual advances'. Does talking to you count? Does looking in your direction count? I would say that both does, but this means that what op said is correct after all. You do view that with disgust. Both things ca…
Itsnt the benefit inherently obvious in this case. I'm not agreeing with him, I'm just saying that your reading comprehension and inference skills needs to improve if your capability to understand this text is this low.
Lowkey feel like everyone in this comment section did not read your main paragraph at all, just your title and then got butthurt. That being said, your ideas are not wrong, but your conclusion is. Your scope of argument is simply too narrow to be coming up with this sort of conclusion.
That's your only definition of what classifies as a need? Isn't that a bit narrow minded? How about being able to adjust with society, or get a job to support themselves? Is that not a need?
