TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SnooStories6895 Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by SnooStories6895 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Bro. Age gaps aren’t the issue. Control is. Let’s stop pretending “dating younger women” is just a preference. More often, it’s about insecurity and control. Younger women are easier to impress, less likely to push back, and that power imbalance is exactly the point. What Gen Z is rejecting isn’t age gaps. It’s manipulation disguised as attraction. If that offends you, maybe ask why.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 11:23 PM
0

You’ve made it clear this isn’t a discussion for you, it’s a tantrum. Take a breath, grab a juice box, and run along.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 07:03 PM
1

I appreciate that. It takes a lot to step back and say, “Maybe I came in too hot,” and you did that with clarity and humility. I agree the original post wasn’t just unfiltered, it was hostile in a way that pushes women out of the conversation. That’s not just indecent, it’s damaging. So thank you for calling that out. I also hear you on the personality traits. The strengths often associated with women like collaboration and empathy aren’t just valuable, they’re essential. The goal isn’t to repla…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 06:15 PM
1

I appreciate this. This is a much more balanced take than most of what’s been said. I agree that broad generalizations (from either side) can muddy the complexity of gender and contribution. Where I push back is on the framing of male dominance in these fields as anything but about power. It’s not that men simply filled those roles - it’s that systems were built in ways that actively excluded women and other neurodivergent thinkers unless they conformed to male-coded behaviors. That IS an expres…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 05:39 PM
0

I actually watched the entire Wax/Perry interview, so I know exactly what you're referencing. But let's clear something up. I'm not a raging feminist. I'm not even a particularly conventional one. I just have a low tolerance for arguments that claim to champion truth while ignoring nuance, context, or intellectual honesty. Yes, the male variability hypothesis is real. But using it to dismiss structural inequities or paint women as inherently unfit for high-level contribution isn't scientific - i…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 05:23 PM
-2

I can take care of myself. I don’t need thinly veiled control disguised as concern. “Men built all those spaces” is doing a lot of heavy lifting for a sentence that erases the forced exclusion, stolen credit, and systemic barriers women faced for centuries. You don’t get to gatekeep progress and then act wounded when others ask to participate in shaping it. Women didn’t demand those spaces be “reengineered”—we demanded they stop being rigged. That’s not sabotage. That’s equity. If the “original …
/r/MensRights18/06/25 05:07 PM
-3

Did you really just compare women doing laundry by a river to men colonizing entire legal, political, and economic systems? Congregating for survival labor isn’t the same as holding institutional power. One was necessity. The other was control. Strict sex roles didn’t cut both ways. They cut women out of opportunity. You’re not defending women’s contributions. You’re minimizing the structures that erased them. I bet you think the cure to all gender conflict is to just give women back their sacre…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 02:09 PM
-10

I’m stealing that. It’s a good line. Thanks!
/r/MensRights18/06/25 02:41 AM
-18

You dropped that line like you were walking away in slow motion from an explosion, thinking you just delivered a mic drop. lol Run along.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 02:08 AM
-16

You spent a decade studying women like we’re invasive species, then came back with “we’re not compatible” like it’s a research conclusion instead of a projection. Men colonized every public, private, and professional space for centuries—and now that women dare to take up oxygen in a subreddit, it’s “spooky”? You’re not being oppressed. You’re being witnessed. That’s the difference.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 11:35 PM
0

Wow. This has all the hallmarks of a ChatGPT prompt you skimmed, fed your bias into, and pasted back without even reading what I actually said. You’re accusing me of “getting hurt feelings,” “not caring about men’s needs,” and “shaming attraction,” but none of that reflects the argument I made. That tells me you didn’t read - you reacted. Probably to a version of me that only exists in your imagination. You’re not engaging—you’re just editorializing. You’ve created this straw-woman caricature so…
/r/MensRights17/06/25 09:25 PM
-1

Bro, your gaslighting is sending me. No one said “she just got fat” was the only problem. You implied that losing attraction justified emotional withdrawal. I’m saying women leave when the emotional labor becomes a one-way street. That’s not “justification." It’s reality. And the whole “who’s yelling?” deflection? Cute. I said yelling about conditional love because, well... look at your post. It’s not projection - it’s pattern recognition. Funny how when women leave, you demand nuance. But when …
/r/MensRights17/06/25 08:55 PM
-15

When in doubt.. blame the white knights and misandrist women. Can’t be that the post struck a nerve or exposed something uncomfortable. It must be a conspiracy of simps and man-haters, right? Reddit isn’t full of white knights. It’s full of people tired of watching basic empathy get framed as betrayal. If calling out entitlement, shallow expectations, or emotional immaturity makes someone a “misandrist,” maybe the bar for masculinity is lower than y’all think. Sometimes it’s not the world that’s…
/r/MensRights17/06/25 06:27 PM
-1

The “I’m not mad, just disappointed” monologue from someone who clearly is mad but trying to sound like a debate coach. Classic! Calling out “fragile egos” isn’t about disagreement—it’s about the predictable meltdown that happens when men on this sub get challenged on their behavior. The faux-intellectual tone, the strawman arguments, the immediate leap to “you’re just a smug idiot”? That’s not disagreement. That’s defense mode dressed up in thesaurus words. You’re right—this sub doesn’t ban peo…
/r/MensRights17/06/25 06:23 PM
2

No one’s denying that physical attraction matters. But when you act like a woman’s entire worth hinges on whether she still hits your fantasy standards, you’re not talking about love. You’re talking about control. You keep insisting “men need looks to love” like that’s some unchangeable law of nature. But guess what? Most women value attraction too. The difference is, they don’t reduce their partner’s humanity to a dress size. If looks are that important to you.. fine. Then don’t get married. Ru…
/r/MensRights17/06/25 06:20 PM
0

Ah yes, the classic “how dare you notice the vibe in here” defense. Not gatekeeping - just observation. If a space is full of performative outrage and fragile egos, calling that out isn’t superiority - it’s pattern recognition. But hey, you’re right—we all know how stupid women can be too, right? That’s why I’m here, leveling the playing field. You’re welcome. If self-awareness feels like an attack, that’s not on me. That’s a you problem.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 05:41 PM
-11

You’re out here yelling about “conditional love,” but let’s be real—it’s men who have historically built their entire self-worth around being providers and then act shocked when being only a wallet doesn’t inspire lasting affection. Women aren’t leaving just because a man lost his job—they’re leaving because he lost his job, stopped showing up emotionally, shut down communication, and expected her to hold the entire emotional weight of the relationship while he spiraled and sulked. You think the…
/r/MensRights17/06/25 05:17 PM
-14

Lmao, that’s your rebuttal? The tired “but women want tall guys” deflection? Come on. Plenty of women are in relationships with men under 6 feet. You just notice the ones who aren’t because you’ve convinced yourself it’s a universal dealbreaker. That’s not a reflection of women—it’s a reflection of what you choose to believe. Also, a dating preference is not the same thing as an ultimatum within a committed relationship. If your partner already chose you and then you withhold affection unless th…
/r/MensRights17/06/25 03:39 PM
4

You actually seem out of place in this forum—most posts here aren’t exactly known for self-awareness. So credit where it’s due: you showed a flicker of it. But let’s be real—“nobody teaches men how to talk about weight” isn’t a get-out-of-jail-free card. Nobody teaches women how to navigate aging while being silently judged by the person who’s supposed to love them, either. You had years to figure out how to bring this up with compassion. Instead, you waited until it curdled into resentment, the…
/r/MensRights17/06/25 03:26 PM
3

You’re asking how to say it, but the problem isn’t the delivery—it’s the belief underneath it. You spent 8 years stewing in silent judgment, and when you finally spoke, it wasn’t from love—it was from frustration and entitlement. The real issue is that your desire was never just a preference. It became a condition for attraction, intimacy, and ultimately her worth in the relationship. If you truly cared about her, not just her body, the conversation would’ve started with: “How are you feeling in…
/r/MensRights17/06/25 03:18 PM
-25

Oh wah. So tired of these Greek god vs. “scraps” false equivalencies. This isn’t about men can’t have preferences—it’s about how those preferences are delivered like ultimatums to women who have literally sacrificed their bodies for childbirth, marriage, and family. You’re not being run out of the village with pitchforks for wanting attraction—you’re getting called out for packaging conditional love as victimhood. And yeah, society claps for “YAS queen” moments, but let’s not pretend men are som…
/r/MensRights17/06/25 03:13 PM
3

Wanting to be attracted to your partner isn’t the problem. The issue is how you framed it—as if your wife’s worth in the marriage is tied to her body returning to a version that served your desire. You waited 8 years, not to protect her feelings, but to keep the peace until you couldn’t hold back your resentment anymore. That’s not love, that’s emotional withholding. You say you ‘finally get turned on looking at her again’ like that’s a reward—for you. You mention crying as if it were unfortunat…
/r/MensRights17/06/25 03:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter