TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Snooves Archive

View 6 posts and 546 comments by Snooves on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I prefer to think of it not as a benefit for the individual, but a benefit for society. The people who cannot afford birth control are the last people who should be having lots of kids. Cut off the programs which make having tons of kids as someone who shouldn't viable. No free healthcare of any kind for them. No WIC, no free school lunches, no foodstamps.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 12:41 AM
2

I don't care who you are, or what gender you are. If you want birth control, pay for it yourself. If you can't afford it, do without. You are not owed birth control merely for existing and having genitals.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 12:27 PM
9

Not sure if trolling, or you just don't understand what this sub is for. If everyone involved is happy, sweet. Have a good life. I don't object even a little.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 01:28 AM
8

Thoughtcatalog is a stupid site with content written by stupid people. There is pretty much nothing else to say.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 07:08 PM
1

I already have. The mods of this sub are kind of dumb.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 02:49 PM
-4

Apples and oranges. Taking on consumer debt is completely voluntary. Nobody makes you get a credit card. You're not mandated to have one and you certainly aren't mandated to run up a bill on one.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 01:46 PM
1

She shouldn't have gotten anything....
/r/MensRights21/01/13 03:40 PM
3

Is there a way to verify the truth of this story? If this is really going on, we should start taking collections for this man so that he can fight his legal battle. Being forced to pay for someone else's kid, just because the mother named you on the birth certificate is fucking slavery and highway robbery. We should do whatever we can do to help.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 03:20 PM
1

The way these people write makes me think that maybe we should have continued pursuing eugenics policies in this country..... People this dumb should not be allowed to have children.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 03:12 PM
0

Posting from Infowars? You should change your SN to "0bvious_Idiot".
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:40 AM
0

If you're dumb enough to believe that a fetus is a human being, sure.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 01:03 AM
7

I would never have heard of the MRM if it wasn't for PZ Myers.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:31 AM
67

Take some personal responsibility. You didn't get fired "because of woman" you got fired because you snapped at a coworker. You should have just kept calm, documented her behavior and reported her. Then you would probably still be employed.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:36 PM
3

4 = many?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:01 PM
-1

There is a difference between men's rights, and arguing that you should be allowed to be a dickhead without criticism. Sex jokes, nude calendars etc at work are not a men's right issue. If you think they are, you are in the wrong subreddit and you should leave before you make us look any worse.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:56 PM
-2

Telling people to act like professionals in a professional setting is "feminization"? Are you trolling, or just a complete retard?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:35 PM
6

Not sure if trolling, or stupid.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:19 PM
5

Doesn't SRS have anything better to do than troll? I guess there is nothing good on day time TV atm?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:58 PM
1

Not sure if trolling, or just very stupid.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:07 PM
1

she mentioned that rape was worse than death and should receive harsher sentencing. That's just hysterical nonsense.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:24 AM
1

What, pray, is unreasonable about expecting to have activities and people in your life that are separate from work activities and people? Nothing, but that's not what "work-life balance" is in practice. Work-life balance is people who chose to have kids, requesting favorable hours and pay at the expense of those who chose not to, and leaving those who chose not to, behind to pick up the slack. If you feel like you need the ability to randomly restructure your hours as you see fit, it absolutely …
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:06 PM
-22

"Work life balance" is for entitled turds who don't want to work, no matter who raises a stink about it.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 07:44 PM
1

Quit crying and start one. Domain names are like $10.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:08 PM
3

This is not an MR issue. It is irrelevant to anything.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 04:50 PM
2

Not sure if trolling, or just stupid. That being said, I wouldn't take a bullet for anyone. This "real men" crap is nonsense and my life has value too.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 02:56 PM
16

Record her going on one of these sprees where she threatens not to have sex with you. Take it to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 02:17 PM
3

Not sure if trolling, or just brain washed by the Alex Jones bunch.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:25 PM
5

Getting married is fine as long as you do it right. Having children can go badly quickly, but may still be worth it to you so there is some cost-benefit analysis to be done. Where are you getting the alcohol thing?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 09:27 PM
24

Dump her. She sounds like an entitled little turd and the only way to fix that is to make her stand on her own.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:18 PM
2

I'm a Libertarian because I feel people should be free, and that hard work shouldn't be penalized through taxation redistributing wealth from those who work to those who don't. I'm not rich, but am solidly middle class. I read the "No Rings for Liberal Women" article, and honestly real opinion about it. I understand the author's resentment about not wanting to be with someone who votes to have the government pick his pocket, but don't see the article as a solution or as anything more than a circ…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 04:39 PM
3

Have you ever seen the Simpsons before?
/r/MensRights12/11/12 07:35 PM
3

Congratulations, you have a position which allows you some flexibility. Other people do not.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 09:15 PM
1

Moronic blog spam is moronic.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 08:49 PM
-1

It's not trolling, it's just a statement of fact. In order to be useful for your employer, you need to be there when they request that you be there. That's how employment works. Labor when needed for payment. Some jobs may be able to schedule flexibly, but many can't. If you aren't prepared to accept that reality, you have no real place in the workforce.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:36 PM
-2

If work-life balance is important to you, you probably have no real, serious place in the workforce.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 03:05 PM
3

I see no reason to be bothered by this.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 02:52 PM
1

Why the brackets in the word?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:55 PM
2

You're right, it was a slip of the mind. I edited the post to fix that.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 03:05 PM
22

This. It's an MTV show. People don't land there because they have great personalities or are interesting people.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:52 PM
5

Yeeeeeeeeeah, if someone touches my wife/daughter after talking about raping them, they're going to be looking at more than a blinding and a beating. Hooray for the 2nd amendment!
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:57 PM
0

This isn't really an MR issue.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:09 PM
2

Part of me wants to agree with you, but part of me also knows that nobody is forced to be a waiter.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:54 PM
4

That's it's already been posted to this sub three dozen times?
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:52 PM
2

This post is bad and you should feel bad.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:12 PM
2

New account, this is the only post and you're not bothering to provide any sources. This is most likely trolling.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 04:42 PM
207

Going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're not a troll, because I have seen this happen before on the metro. Some woman wearing one of those baby harness things got super pissed at a guy who was sitting in the handicapped spot. He had crutches and one of those huge broken ankle boots. Eventually he got up and gave her his seat, which was pretty sad to see.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 09:14 PM
1

I'd like to see this policy expanded. Ban all the ragers!
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:41 PM
7

Time for the death penalty!
/r/MensRights01/11/12 09:03 PM
-1

Dump her and find a new one. People are pretty easy to replace.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 05:57 PM
-2

So, your complaint is that people who study something worthless are learning things which are worthless?
/r/MensRights01/11/12 05:43 PM
-3

I'm actually pretty happy about that. I develop for the Xbox 360 for beer/pizza money and if these changes bring in more customers, they're fine by me.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 07:53 PM
1

Where the hell did this statistic come from? Her butt.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 02:50 PM
6

Pretty sure you're a troll.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 07:55 PM
2

Then shoot for a paternity test.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 07:19 PM
4

Take a paternity test. If he's the father, his ship is sunk. If he isn't, he can probably deflect any demands she makes in court, especially if they were unmarried and he didn't put his name on the birth certificate.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 07:14 PM
4

Hopefully she goes to prison for a long time for this.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:44 PM
1

Explain.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:15 PM
0

What's that? Communists working to censor viewpoints they don't like? Truly shocking. Never before in human history has a Communist state engaged in such behavior!...... Oh, wait...
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:36 PM
0

welp, consider /r/communism an enemy... I already did. What western man in his right mind would see Communism as anything else?
/r/MensRights30/10/12 03:47 PM
-2

Go back to SRS troll.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 02:55 PM
1

This belongs in /r/mensrightsmeta
/r/MensRights29/10/12 09:02 PM
-3

We shouldn't push anyone into the humanities. The humanities aren't useful. Reading old poetry isn't going to put anyone on Mars, and being able to identify Renaissance paintings isn't going to cure cancer. We should push everyone we can, regardless of gender into STEM fields.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 08:00 PM
5

/r/mensrightsmeta exists for meta posts. That being said, I would like to see these disallowed.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 03:35 PM
-1

How big was his fund? $85k may be entirely reasonable.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 02:53 PM
0

It's okay. Why would you want to be anyway?
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:35 PM
3

Complete financial abortions are not unfair to women. They are identical in power to surgical abortions.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 11:36 PM
2

TIL asking people if you know them is third degree assault. This is completely horrible. I hope he lawyers up and sues the police department
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:00 PM
1

Wow, can you afford that without completely being demolished financially? What do you make in a year?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:21 PM
1

Soooooooo asking someone a question makes them a victim of "Third degree assault"? That's sickening.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 03:25 PM
2

Ouch. Any idea what you'll get hit for with alimony/child support? EDIT: You should probably pick a number that sounds reasonable and multiply it by 5 as a worst case scenario.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 03:23 PM
13

This is also racist too. Your customer is a scummy douchenozzle.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:42 PM
2

Long story short she decided that it would be fun to start calling the cops every time we started arguing and they filed a PPO request for her. That is going to hurt in court. That's how my mom hosed my dad in their divorce.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:38 PM
2

Hire a lawyer. Try to come to a civil agreement that doesn't wreck you financially. Don't agree to anything without your lawyer present.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:11 PM
1

As I've been to your blog, I'm tempted to give some snarky BS answer about "derailing", like I know I'd get if I asked an isomorphic question in a feminist space. Instead, I'll just answer you: Why was Violentacrez so important? I don't think he was important. I think the people here got freaked out over him being doxxed and his subreddit being taken over by SRS because /r/violentacrez briefly said that /r/mensrights was next. That being said, getting rid of him might actually be counterproducti…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:05 PM
15

This is a non issue. First, the quote you put in the title isn't in the piece. Second, this isn't a permanent thing, it's a seasonal showing of feminist art... Stop being outraged over themed art exhibits that last a couple of months, and worry about stuff that matters, like divorce reform.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 08:34 PM
2

Well done!
/r/MensRights25/10/12 08:28 PM
-3

I'm not commenting in that thread. Rebecca Watson is one of the most prolific trolls on the internet, and I'm not feeding her.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:59 PM
5

You're misinterpreting the sticker. Basically, there is this nutjob group in the US called the American Family Association. When democrats launched into their "War on women" tirade, about how not forcing insurers to pay for birth control was somehow equivalent to banning it, the AFA argued that the "real war on women" is all the women who get aborted, because people at the AFA are stupid nut sacks who can't tell the difference between a fetus which would develop into a baby girl, and an adult wo…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:56 PM
5

That's better than basically being a slave who is in and out of jail over delinquent child support payments.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:23 PM
3

It takes about ten seconds to use the search on the sidebar, and this has literally been posted dozens of times.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:28 PM
6

To keep from spamming reposts.....
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:14 PM
3

Oh look, it's this image again.... Please search the sub before posting.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:07 PM
28

Refuse to pay and move to another country. That is the only way you will avoid essentially being a slave for the rest of your life. I hear Panama is nice this time of year.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:41 PM
3

Didn't you know that not treating accused men as guilty instantaneously and punishing them harshly, immediately and without trial is misogyny?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:43 PM
2

This is just sad. She gets a group together and leads the beating of some helpless dude, then lies to the cops about her involvement and won't get any punishment out of it?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:47 PM
6

I like that he sees a problem with sending nonviolent "criminals" to prison, but dislike that he feels that not sending them to prison should be reserved just for women. How about we just stop sending nonviolent "criminals" to prison?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:42 PM
12

No he can't.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:57 PM
8

It's moronic.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 03:58 AM
5

I'm a programmer. When my parents found out that I liked programming and math, they threw books at me. They were 100% on board. I learned to write batch files and some HTML when I was 7. I learned C++ when I was 10 and I started Java when I was 15.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 03:57 AM
1

The second amendment is a pretty solid solution to assault if you're living in the USA.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:05 AM
6

Reddit can't help you, try this
/r/MensRights21/10/12 06:02 PM
2

What state do you live in?
/r/MensRights21/10/12 05:59 PM
1

This is a troll tumblr.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 03:40 PM
3

Not sure if trolling, or mentally ill.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 08:48 PM
0

You're a troll, you gave yourself away when you referred to everyone in SRS as "women" GTFO this sub.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:34 PM
2

Your screen name leads me to believe that you are either a troll from SRS, or a complete retard.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:16 PM
2

This mindset is delusional to an almost religious point. What's that? Reality doesn't match my religious beliefs? WELL THEN REALITY IS WRONG!!! Also, it's less that being in a bad marriage benefits men enough to want to stay, and more that being in a bad marriage is not as bad as having your life ruined by divorce court.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:49 PM
3

This is not even tangentially related to the MRM.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 02:45 PM
4

wat? no way!
/r/MensRights16/10/12 02:49 PM
1

Oh look, it's this video again.....
/r/MensRights16/10/12 02:37 PM
2

The fact that she got up and kept attacking him after he hit her is a strong indication that he didn't punch hard enough.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 02:15 PM
5

It's fine. The reason the bot exists is because people from SRS would post something that sounded reasonable, wait for it to get upvotes, then edit it to something like "I love rape!" and send it to the admins claiming that we were a hate sub. Minor changes to add new details won't get you burned.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:51 PM
2

Your friend is an idiot.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:50 PM
2

However, I can only commit to a minor role as I don't have a whole lot of free time. I should have specified that I'm in the same boat. That being said, I've already got some webhosting and I'm sure there is some platform that will just automagically give me a forum.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:33 PM
1

Me too buddy.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 06:23 PM
5

Pretty sure you're trolling, buuuuuuuuuut Reddit isn't a place for legal advice. Go ask a lawyer.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 05:56 PM
2

I guess it depends on the style of the board. Personally, I like 4chan-esque boards, where topics stay alive by being posted in and topics which aren't getting posts just fall off and get deleted. However, that isn't great for persistent info, IE things that should always be there regardless of last time they had a response.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 03:55 PM
2

I'm a web developer by trade, mostly J2EE stuff, but I could throw up some quick php board for us to use.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 03:48 PM
2

Not sure if trolling, or mentally ill.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 03:01 PM
-1

If they had put him to death for the murder, none of this would have happened.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 02:47 PM
14

I lived in a boarding school for my junior and senior years of high school. During my senior year, we went through the "great porn purge" wherein every male had to turn in all electronic devices to be searched for porn. The dean of students, who was male, brought me into his office, took my flash drive and combed through it. It was only 256MB, but I had about 15k small images on it, because I was working on an image processing problem for a class. Looking back on it, it's funny to remember him c…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 01:07 PM
1

Programmable computers were not even invented during Ada Lovelace's lifetime, and would not be created for several more centuries. Dude with a CS degree who works as a programmer here. The mathematical concept of a "computer program" is 100% independent from having any machines around capable of running it. Also, the reason Ada Lovelace gets called the world's first computer programmer, is because she encoded an algorithm to run on Babbage's analytical engine. From the Wikipedia article: The Ana…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 12:57 PM
11

Good idea? Bad idea? Completely irrelevant. The issue is choice. If some adult wants to have part of his dong lopped off, fine, but nobody should be able to impose that on anyone else and it certainly shouldn't be something done to all infants. The lack of foreskin tends to decrease the ability to gain sexual disease. This argument is just bad. I'm sure that if I cut off your fingertips, it would decrease your ability to get a hangnail, that doesn't justify cutting them off.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:40 PM
2

This is the biggest problem in the article: "There is nothing unusual about this judgment," McKenzie said. "These disputes go on every day. But you don't have this kind of human antagonism or emotion in any other kind of case. This man was obviously under a very great deal of stress." McKenzie said the judge applied standardized guidelines for spousal and child support. Standard practice is to seize more than 100% of his total income? That shows a huge problem with the standard practice! The art…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 04:33 PM
2

No. Why would we want to adopt fallacious nonsense, just because the people who oppose us are using fallacious nonsense?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:55 PM
2

Insane amounts of hyperbole never help any cause... DAE think 0bvious_Atheist should change his login to 0bvious_Troll?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:52 PM
-1

"Only STEM degrees are real and hard!" Truth hurts bro.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:39 PM
4

Little does she know that they have been pussy wipped into submission by the women of the country You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:07 PM
-2

Violentacarez was a slimy turdball, and the world would be no worse off if he parked his car on some train-tracks and took a nap. That being said, doxxing people is completely uncalled for. I'm glad to see these domains banned.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:58 PM
3

Yea, but that was also a JeremiahMRA sockpuppet.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:45 PM
2

Ah, is this the 32843286482th JeremiahMRA sockpuppet account?
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:35 PM
4

Only guys who really fight against Leftism ..... We push the buttons of the emasculated, passive-aggressive Leftists, which is why they attack us so vigorously. Not sure if trolling, or just very stupid.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:33 PM
1

Not sure if trolling, or just very stupid.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 09:20 PM
-5

Please do a modicum of research before posting here. This article has been posted about three dozen times already.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:26 PM
0

This isn't really an MR issue, as the lack of free speech in the UK affects everyone.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 01:56 PM
2

This is also why charges should be brought when it can be proved that the accuser lied. 1000x this. The punishment that the accuser would get should be equivalent to whatever the accused would have gotten if the accused was convicted.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:14 PM
8

In the event that any names are released, all names should be released.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:13 PM
13

This is why identities should be kept secret until someone is convicted of something.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 02:52 PM
1

This
/r/MensRights05/10/12 08:54 PM
1

This
/r/MensRights05/10/12 08:52 PM
2

My bad, I realize the post is contextless. Basically, the reason I put it in MR is because Zvan was the leading force in forcing Justin Vacula to resign from being co-chair of the Secular Coalition for America’s Pennsylvania chapter. Her reason for stirring up stuff against him? He wrote an article for AVfM and disagreed with some prominent feminists at skepchick and is an MRA. She construed that as "bullying", though somehow using her pull to get him harassed into giving up a leadership positio…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 08:52 PM
1

Please delete your post and don't claim to be representing us. Your stupidity will smear us all!
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:26 PM
3

Oooooooooooooooh, I can give some context here: /MR used to have a very prolific troll by the name of "JeremiahMRA". This guy was the worst of what the community could possibly have. Racist, homophobic, actually sexist, a hardcore conspiracy theorist, and above all else, really, really stupid. Kind of like Bryan Fischer minus 70 IQ points. People complained to the mods about him, because he was making the sub look bad. His posts were not representative of the MRM, but were easy to single out to …
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:15 PM
3

I don't think the name of the accuser or the names of the accused should be released until the end of the court case, but in the event that there is a release, I'd like to see both parties have their identities released, as that is less prone to abuse.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:24 AM
2

What makes you think I share an ideology with SRS?
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:23 AM
1

I don't think releasing anyone's identity is a good idea, until this is decided in court. That being said, I'd rather see both identities released, as opposed to only one.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 12:47 AM
2

I'm not even close to an SRSer.....
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:30 PM
8

Yes, not liking sites like AVfM or "In Mala Fide" definitely makes me an SRSer. Your logic is infallible.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:16 PM
0

I'd react with limitless apathy.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:06 PM
4

I'd ask why the University of Essex was wasting money on something so stupid.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:04 PM
-5

I don't read any, because sadly, they're all pretty terrible.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:59 PM
3

Hmm, I'm torn between giving you some snarky answer about "derailing" like I would get if I asked something similar with genders reversed in a feminist sub, or actually answering. I think I'll go with actually answering: If it can be demonstrated that they did this. Throw the book at them. Give them the maximum possible punishment they can get for this. If it can be demonstrated that she is lying, throw the book at her. Give her the maximum possible punishment the people she is accusing would ha…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:54 PM
3

If I was in your spot, I'd opt to have them surgically descended. Of course, I have nowhere near as much information about your condition as you do, so my judgement, like the judgement of everyone else here, is probably 100% worthless.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 02:08 PM
1

?
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:39 PM
2

I almost think you should change your screen name to "0bvious_Troll".
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:31 PM
2

This should be renamed "Ways to get a restraining order and charges related to harassment filed against you".
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:13 PM
6

I'd be exactly as apathetic as I am to this.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:11 PM
8

This isn't a men's rights issue, this is an issue of supply and demand.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 08:48 PM
17

Given the bad spelling and grammar, the situation you're describing, and the fact that this is your first post, I'm going to guess you're a troll from SRS trying to bait people into overreacting to this. In the event that you aren't, Reddit is not a place for legal advice, nor is it going to help you in any measurable way to post here. Reddit basically exists for entertainment only. My advice to you is to keep looking for lawyers, ask friends, family and anyone else who might help you. You can p…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 08:05 PM
1

Being a dick to random people because you believe you are better than them, and spending the majority of your free time trying to hook up with random women has nothing to do with class.....
/r/MensRights02/10/12 08:00 PM
0

What do you think the chances that the "alpha" spammers read the meta is?
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:23 PM
0

I put it here, because I see tons of "herp derp imma alpha" spam in this sub.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:14 PM
0

There is no such thing as an "alpha", or at least it doesn't mean what you think it means. There are only people, some of whom are arrogant douchenozzles who like to pretend they're better than other people.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:01 PM
-1

I didn't read the post, because blogs will rot your brain. That being said, I think housework division should be determined couple by couple. I'm married and my wife actually told me, before we got married, that she wanted to be a housewife. We had a long discussion about what that meant, who was expected to do what, and how money would work. She makes all of the meals that we eat at home, keeps the apartment clean and takes care of our cats. In return, I pay 100% of the bills, medical costs, gr…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 05:59 PM
1

Random question, why hasn't rightsbot posted here?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 09:12 PM
2

It's a tasteless joke, so I'm inclined to ignore it. Though I could see this being taken as offensive by both genders. Offensive to women, as it implies that sex-acts are what they're most valued for. Offensive to men because it implies that they have no emotions and only think with their dongs. That being said, it's a joke on Reddit, so it's not worth getting offended over.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 09:06 PM
4

This article is just conspiracy nonsense, as shown by this: Some of them are refusing to work at all, in protest against the government's secret plan to give ALL the tax dollars to women. You can't just make a claim like that, not back it up at all or bother to source it and then expect to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:48 PM
2

This post is just 100% derp.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:39 PM
1

I'm enjoying that he got beaten up too. Down with religion!
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:51 PM
2

Not sure if trolling, or just very stupid.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:40 AM
45

This long, rambling article seems like it could've been written by an eight grader. The dumbest part was this: Even in the most female-denigrating cultures women are prized, if only, for their childbearing. If you take that away, then what? This technology becomes another form of violence. Hooray for non-violent violence!
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:39 AM
5

This is a semi-amusing rewrite of the blog post about women not being puzzle boxes. I actually disagree with both posts. Everybody is a puzzle-box. There is some set of external stimuli which will get anyone to do anything.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 03:43 PM
19

This is possibly one of the most sexist things I've encountered on the internet.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 07:53 PM
2

I like this name, just because it clearly labels their bookstore as I place I should not support with my money.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 05:36 PM
3

I live in a red state where conceal carry licenses are easy to get. If it's a real attack, and not just a game with friends, I'm going to skip kicking you anywhere and just shoot you. Attack adrenaline may prevent pain from a groin kick, but it won't keep you alive with some well placed bullet holes.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:26 PM
1

First people come in all sizes. Second, why would anyone expect a game about fighting dragons that has a race of goofy goblin/elf people, plant people and werewolves to be any kind of realistic?
/r/MensRights12/09/12 02:47 AM
1

Also, what does the height of fictional characters have to do with Feminism?
/r/MensRights12/09/12 02:39 AM
1

Umm First, players get to choose their height during character creation. Second, Norns are bigger than humans.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 02:32 AM
0

The difficulty of a job is a complete red herring. No matter how hard it is, there is still value in housework and housework still deserves to be rewarded financially.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 08:43 PM
2

it's more likely that a wife gives her husband an allowance in the west. That's fine with me too. If one person is taking care of all the housework, while the other works, any fair-minded spouse if going to give them some money for it. Housework is non-trivial and should be treated as non-trivial.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 07:17 PM
2

Am I the only one here who already gives my wife an allowance? Seriously, she takes care of cleaning, laundry, food, and tons of other stuff. That isn't trivial, it takes time, labor, it generates value in the home and it deserves compensation. That being said, I don't think it is up to any government to mandate this sort of thing.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:57 PM
1

Amazingness is irrelevant to legality. I don't think the government should be controlling what private citizens decide to consume, but I acknowledge that for the time being, it is illegal.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 04:33 PM
4

Here's the simplest way to avoid getting busted for pot. Don't have or consume pot. I don't agree with the laws that make it illegal and I will vote for candidates who want to overturn them, but that does not change the fact that as of right now, it is illegal and laws are in place to that effect.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:21 PM
19

"I mocked him and was obnoxious and he didn't worship me for it" is pretty much how this article sounds.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 07:19 PM
2

Spot on.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 02:19 PM
1

Either refuse to sign, or dump her.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 02:15 PM
5

He's an idiot and if you agree with his positions on the subject, most likely you are also an idiot.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 01:07 PM
2

My sandwiches (and the ones my wife eats) are usually made by Subway. Perk of being wealthy.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 09:47 PM
-3

Why should male gamers change their behavior? Your question is implicitly sexist. I'm a male gamer, but I don't rage or trash talk. I have no problem with ragers and trash talkers being banned, as it generally makes gaming communities better.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 09:44 PM
2

She was a schizophrenic. This is more about mental illness than anything else.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:47 PM
0

Why mock Thunderf00t thought?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:18 PM
2

It would be insanely fun to be a blogger on that site.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:18 PM
0

Satire or not I don't really see the problem with this. If your goal is to get married and be a housewife, I'd rather women who wanted to do it plan out their course of action and look in universities. I wouldn't really view it as gold-digging, so much as common sense. Planning and hanging out in some universities Engineering Department, in an effort to find an engineer to marry is better than finding some dirtbag on the street who is in and out of prison and will lead to a better family life. I…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:00 PM
2

That being said, I've never read the books, but my wife loves them and she said the movie was crap.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 09:15 PM
-1

I thought the movie was pretty bad. It was like a hour too long and it seemed like 2/3 of the movie was slightly blurry shots of the sky through the trees, slowly rotating. I found myself constantly checking my watch and thinking things like "Holy shit, it's only been three minutes since I last checked this thing? I thought it was at least 15".
/r/MensRights13/07/12 09:14 PM
0

Scientology is dumb, but it shouldn't be enough to seal him away from seeing his daughter. If I was him, I'd write up a very nice suicide letter about the unfairness of being taken advantage of by divorce and custody courts, then I'd mail it to every media outlet I could think of and blow my head off. A high profile death might actually get something done.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 08:36 PM
2

This sounds exactly as stupid as that FeministFrequency youtube channel which does the same thing, but in reverse.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 02:27 PM
1

Commenting here to find this again later.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 09:05 PM
7

In Mala Fide should not be missed. All it did was make the MRM look bad.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 08:26 PM
1

Ignatius is pretty cool. I disagree with him a lot, but he's not a troll, so there is no reason to want him to leave.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 02:29 PM
1

Who wants to take bets that when he wakes up, he'll be charged?
/r/MensRights10/05/12 05:29 PM
1

I would take it. I would have LOVED to have it in high school.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 08:42 PM
1

Commenting just to be able to read this easier later.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 07:17 PM
10

I'm curious as to what other legislation has passed that is pseudo-related. The "Macho on the public transit" thing wasn't a law, it was a stupid blog.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 07:17 AM
2

Best news of the day. I had no idea he was banned. I'm glad he's gone and I hope he never sets up another account to darken the doors of the MRM again.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 04:09 PM
5

It's not mensrights in general. There are just a couple of retards/trolls here like JeremiahMRA/JeremiahGuy who give the sub a bad name.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:20 PM
3

I'd drain my bank account, take as much of my property from the household as I could in one pass and become a ghost.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 03:13 AM
1

This entire thread is proof of that. Click the link at the top.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 12:35 PM
1

AVfM is 100% shit.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 03:44 AM
1

Serious question: how did you meet your SO? Was this a mail-order thing, or did you just know a lot of ukranian women? All of the women being from the USSR was just coincidental. I don't know a super high concentration of people from there. She moved from the Ukraine to an area of Oklahoma with a pretty high concentration of people from the Ukraine, none of the other women I dated were from that area. My wife and I met in junior year of high school. We just happened to end up in the same school,…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 03:58 PM
1

lol that'd be a logical name for them. When I called the Ukrainian burritos, I was half joking, but it caught on.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 01:42 AM
1

Talking to her now. She apparently cooks Ukrainian things all the time, I just fail to identify them. Something I thought was garlic bread is actually a "Pampushka", which is pretty much Ukrainian garlic bread.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 01:41 AM
1

"Rice Holubtsi"
/r/MensRights06/04/12 01:39 AM
1

It goes both ways. Sometimes she puts little bits of meat in them.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 12:05 AM
1

Typo made in haste. Too unimportant to fix.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 07:50 PM
2

Wow rightsbot is good. 5 seconds after posting this, I made a small edit for clarity and he got the original text before my minor and very fast edit.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 07:15 PM
2

I happen to think that videogames are very wrong. They encourage all sorts of violence. Hammer into the minds of young adult men that robbery, murder and rape is entertainment. My friends surely you agree that nearly all videogames should be banned? No.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 09:22 PM
3

feminist domestic violence experts have labeled it abuse if a man withholds sex and/or affection. Source? This is something I'd like to read. I've seen money claimed before, but never sex/affection.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 12:37 PM
7

Web developer here. Only one female dev working where I am. She's 110% incompetent and everyone knows it. She's mostly given data entry tasks and text changes on JSPs to keep her out of the way.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 11:42 PM
2

Assuming you're not a troll. Save all the texts, do not contact her in any way and get ready to spend a night in jail. Then lawyer the hell up.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 03:14 AM
8

Being male? Not a choice. The reason I disagree with him is because BC pills are for more than contraception. My wife takes them to prevent migraines and to control endometriosis. Plus, covering them makes healthcare cheaper.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:32 PM
12

Neither do I, but his argument is at least logically coherent and was civilly presented.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:02 PM
16

Good article. Too bad loud idiots are trying to interrupt this man's life. Sad that some people can't tell the difference between attacking somebodies arguments, and attacking the person themselves.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 03:47 PM
1

This has nothing to do with the MRM and OP is either a troll, or just very stupid.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 02:49 PM
1

Never post from Breitbart. All the site does is edit things wildly out of context to make it seem like someone is arguing the opposite of what they actually are when you put the footage in context.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 02:47 PM
8

Don't go after a friend's woman. Take responsibility for your actions and don't weasel out of them. Own up to things if you're caught. Never go against a friend. If you don't like them, don't be a friend. These are just imaginary. For every guy who does this, there are hundreds who don't.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 01:41 PM
0

But in that case, shouldn't we also consider which race/ethnicity gets into more accidents. I think we should. If you belong to a group which statistically costs insurers more, it's perfectly fair for them to charge more, until they've established a personal relationship with you. That is unfair and discriminatory, so why is it okay to do it on the lines of gender? Because people of different genders cost different amounts on average. I'm fine with gender specific rates. My problem comes when th…
/r/MensRights27/03/12 02:07 PM
5

Make a scene. Be impossible to ignore.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 02:05 PM
2

Here's my list: Down voting a stupid post from a stupid troll.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 08:54 PM
1

This thread is dumb and you should feel dumb.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 06:39 AM
1

I don't have to respect complete idiots or people who discredit the movement by trolling. You fit into both categories.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 09:24 PM
0

You are one of the most insidious trolls in this subreddit. I suspect that you are a JeremiahMRA/JeremiahGuy sock-puppet account. Have a down vote.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 06:15 PM
15

Feels bad man. Giving someone an advantage when applying for jobs or school is unfair to the people who get skipped over due to the advantage. It is also unfair to the person who gets the advantage, because when they start school/work, they will immediately be perceived as that incompetent affirmative action hire/student, who wouldn't have gotten in otherwise and probably won't cut it.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 06:12 PM
34

It's a dumb idea, poorly thought out by religious retards who only cooked it up in hoped that it would make abortions harder to get.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 09:46 PM
2

Good article. Nice to see someone taking on the poorly thought out nonsense from Jezebel.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 02:42 PM
1

Yes, I'm clearly on meth because I think that self-defense should actually end a violent situation. Your powers of observation are amazing.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 01:30 AM
1

What dermanus said is largely nonsense.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 12:28 AM
5

either equal or slightly higher to prevent harm This is where I disagree. If you punch me in the face and then pull a knife on me, the appropriate response isn't to punch you in the face a little harder and pull a slightly larger knife. nor does that really prevent harm. The appropriate response it to hit you as hard as I can. If it breaks your jaw and puts you in the hospital? Cool. Hard to be a threat from a hospital bed. If it gives you a concussion? Cool. Hard to be a threat while unconsciou…
/r/MensRights22/03/12 12:27 AM
5

Because if you can't prove something with evidence, or argue your point when reality is taken into consideration, minimizing and trying to deflect opposing arguments is the next best thing.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 11:48 PM
-15

There is no achievement gap because everyone who is home schooled is an illiterate dunce cap.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 09:55 PM
1

An English major isn't about memorizing books and quotes - its about learning rhetoric and being able to structure written works well and clearly/persuasively. Again, something you don't have to be an English major to do. English majors are more employable than Business majors fyi - their degrees set them up nicely for any sort of white collar work as well as pre-med, pre-law etc. Hooray, one major is more useless than another useless major. As for philosophy its just really really really really…
/r/MensRights21/03/12 08:45 PM
-5

English is "goofy nonsense" ? Uhm, even in STEM you need to be able to write well if you want to get anywhere (yes, science is writing too!) and a lot of that foundation knowledge starts in English classes and we all still rely on our English faculty colleagues/friends for tips on sentence structure and structure. You don't need to waste your life reading ancient myths and writing emo poetry to write coherently. It's a wasteful thing to study in depth and as a college major does nothing, but pre…
/r/MensRights21/03/12 06:53 PM
-11

I was going to upvote this post, but then OP derped out in the comment section so downvote for you OP.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 06:24 PM
3

There is a difference between professors and people trained in STEM fields, and professors and people trained in goofy nonsense like philosophy, English, gender studies, sociology et al. I don't think OP's mom was talking about scientists when she complained about professors. EDIT: nvm, read comments by OP. He derped out. The idea that all professors are out-of -touch, don't live in the "real world" and do nothing useful is just moronic.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 06:22 PM
7

This guy is an idiot. Nobody forced him to hit his wife.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 02:38 PM
3

Agreed. The right to a physical abortion should be accompanied with the right to a financial abortion. Nobody should be able to unilaterally trap someone for 18 years, or force someone to give birth.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 01:53 PM
4

I've got to disagree. Whatever force is necessary to end the threat is justified. Anything else is just an escalation and puts you at greater risk from your attacker.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 01:50 PM
3

I'm completely shocked. Something good from AVfM. I'm ordering the book right now. Good job OP. Have an up vote.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 04:30 PM
1

Here's the solution. Sue the company you work for. Be every bit as noisy as she would be. That's how you'll get attention and change. If they can crap all over you, because they know you won't sue, they will.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 01:57 PM
3

Good flier!
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:25 PM
1

I in no way agree with the article. Then why post this nonsense?
/r/MensRights19/03/12 07:14 PM
1

That's true, I suppose trolling and stupidity are not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 06:49 PM
5

OP is either a troll, or just very stupid. Most likely a troll.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 05:31 PM
1

I can't take anything posted on WorldNutDaily seriously.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 04:10 PM
-1

Oh look, another article arguing something to the effect of "Legislation trying to outlaw abortion and contraceptives isn't a Republican war on women, because Bill Maher said mean stuff about Sarah Palin once..." Have a down vote OP.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 02:42 PM
0

Unrelated to the MRM, but a pretty good read anyway.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 02:26 AM
8

I think you hit the nail on the head OP. When I was in 9th and 10th grade, no female would get within 300 yards of me. I was the creepy guy who hung out in the library. Then I went to a merit-based science/math boarding school, got two degrees and started making $75k/yr as a software dev at 21. Suddenly some of those women who wouldn't talk to me, who are now single mothers wanted to "party" and sent me flirtatious and even borderline dirty texts. tl;dr: Find new people. Date one of them. The ol…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 09:53 PM
1

I was expecting something entertaining or useful. I was disappointed.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:58 PM
-3

I think you did the right thing OP.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 02:10 PM
1

Asking MRAs as a whole this question is a little nonsensical. We're a really diverse group. Some of the people here are women. Here's my personal answer. Just be pleasant and don't waste a lot of money.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 02:01 PM
5

This is a terribly sad story, but it has absolutely nothing to do with the MRM.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 09:45 PM
1

There is nothing inherently wrong with the act itself, but expecting people to be supportive/receptive of stories about it at school is a stretch. Most people do not want to hear about other people's activities.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 08:41 PM
1

Me, or him? I'm pretty sure he's a troll as in another thread he referred to people being weirded out by his sexual relations with a vaccum cleaner as "creep shaming".
/r/MensRights15/03/12 08:29 PM
1

Not sure if trolling or...?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 08:28 PM
2

Good post from a great source. Thanks for sharing OP, enjoy the +1.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:58 PM
2

Pretty sure this post is trolling. Not sure anyone is stupid enough to sincerely put up the proposed answer.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:44 PM
1

Wat?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:44 PM
3

Lets assume everything you are saying is 100% correct and that your proposed solution is 100% correct. A group with anything less than a 2:1 girl/boy ratio should be dissembled by the teachers. That's impossible, unless two times as many girls as boys are in a class. If you wanted to implement it nationally, you'd have to have two times as many girls as boys in schools, which isn't possible.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:43 PM
1

I share that sentiment, but sometimes they're legit.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:41 PM
-1

This post is just nutty. If you've failed at life and are some kind of video game playing, unemployment collecting failure, it's your fault.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:23 PM
3

I don't want anyone "censored", though I would like to see trolls like JeremiahGuy and married_woman_with_k, banned. They do not represent a legitimate part of the movement. JeremiahGuy posted a link yesterday about how DV is necessary and about how it's right and proper for a man to beat a woman, just for being annoying. The rationale in the article being that the beatings are fine, because men are over women and women are actually turned on by being beaten. That article did not support equalit…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:15 PM
1

There is no draft in the USA, only the Selective Service in the event a draft returns. I agree however, that either everyone should have to sign up for it, who is healthy and the right age, or nobody should.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:08 PM
3

Congratulations. You've stumbled onto an major issue in the MRM.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:07 PM
3

By the way, how much have you donated to men's rights organizations in the last year? I have donated $0 dollars to any cause. That is 100% irrelevant. In the meantime, you'll still be sitting on Reddit, doing zero activism and concern trolling. And you'll be sitting on Reddit making it look like the SPLC was right about MRAs, unless one of the mods bans you again. On the other hand, the radicals will continue to gain the attention of the media, providing the moderates a channel to spread their m…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 09:37 PM
1

Haha, no. The SLPC article complained about SAVE Services, too. They hate MRAs because we are anti-feminist. An article about how it's cool to hit an obnoxious woman, because women are beneath men and are actually sexually attracted to violence isn't anti-feminist, it's anti-woman. You're a sick individual JeremiahMRA, you probably need a stint in a psych ward if you actually believe that crap.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 09:28 PM
6

The inmalafide article is part of why people thing MRAs are just wife-beating jerks.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 09:16 PM
4

The article doesn't define liberal, and defines being intolerant by changing some settings to keep from seeing another person's political views online. By those standards, everyone who chooses not to read Fox News is intolerant against conservatives, for simply choosing what they view online. . . .
/r/MensRights14/03/12 04:18 PM
3

There are so many things wrong with this article that my head might explode. Why would you think this was good, useful, or related to the MRM OP?
/r/MensRights14/03/12 03:46 PM
1

How is this an MRM issue? Some people like playing the game with the models. Others don't. The article seemed to express that without denigrating men. I used to play Warhammer 40k. I stopped, because the game was incredibly slow and a single turn, by a single player could easily exceed 30 minutes. Plus, not having board spaces, and just having to rely on a tape measure to determine unit ranges was incredibly tedious. Plus it was expensive. When I played, about 30% of the players were female. A l…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 02:49 PM
3

Aaaaaaaaand JeremiahMRA returns to remind us all why he got banned in the first place.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 02:41 PM
-1

Go-go power troll.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 12:02 AM
2

This entry is kind of dumb.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 11:43 PM
-1

I think the article contains a lot of legitimate criticisms and highlights the fact that we have a huge image problem. People who actually care about the need to split off from the social conservatives and the people who just hate women. I find the title offensive though.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 10:03 PM
6

This is one of the most horrible things I have ever read.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 09:52 PM
7

Try that as a single man. It won't work.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 04:02 PM
1

Honestly, you're probably stuck. How long is the alimony term for?
/r/MensRights13/03/12 02:50 PM
3

Eh, it can't hurt.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:19 PM
1

I don't think you could sue the tradesman over his allocation of resources. You could definitely not buy from him and be vocal about it though. Sellers are driven by money. If he knows his policy is causing him to lose money, he'll change it.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:09 PM
2

OP, you're an idiot.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:08 PM
5

I'm in the US. I live in a backwards, small rural town and there are still 3 places I can think of off the top of my head, within two miles of where I live that I can get all the free condoms I want. This "Waaaaaaah!!! Condoms aren't covered" meme is retarded.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:07 PM
4

Not sure if trolling, or just very stupid.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:06 PM
4

For about the billionth fucking time: CONDOMS ARE OVER THE COUNTER, WHICH INSURANCE/PRESCRIPTION COVERAGE NEVER COVERS EVER. Further, condoms can be obtained freely, easily, or at relatively low cost pretty much everywhere. You do not have to have your asshole probed to get a condom. You do not have to have a prescription to buy condoms. They are not a pharmaceutical. Your FSA/HSA covers condom purchase, so you will not have to pay taxes on them. Seriously, I cannot be the only one sick and fuck…
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:05 PM
12

No trolling nor blaming others in this thread Can I blame the trolls who encouraged him?
/r/MensRights12/03/12 05:12 PM
7

You should also consider paying back the alimony that you extorted from him with the legal system.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:44 AM
0

The reasoning behind this, is that little kids are bad at aiming and get pee on the toilet seat. Nothing to see here, no reason for outrage.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 11:11 PM
3

I'd like to step up to be a mod. I'm always on and I'll ban the SRSers, the people who just hate women, and the klan members with glee.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 10:36 PM
2

Why are you against it?
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:58 PM
2

Good deal.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 03:44 PM
-1

Only a handful of socially conservative crazies here, who actually hate women are against the BC mandate (Well, them and some Ron Paul types who are against the healthcare law as a whole). The only real area of inequality I see, is the need for a financial abortion for men.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 03:43 PM
10

Mitchell Call, a self-described male feminist and a double-major psychology and women and gender studies senior, says the fliers seemed uninformed of feminist material. He might have found the perfect storm of useless degrees. I wonder how much debt he had to take on for them? Anyone wanna bet he ends up Occupying Wall Street when he can't find a job other then burger flipping on graduation?
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:59 PM
-24

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL EDIT: My comment is a little dumb, but to be fair, I'm drunk and I confused this with a conversation I was having with someone about The Spearhead, though the CSM is pretty shitty too.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:54 AM
4

The Spearhead is stupid shit for stupid people and it's part of the reason nobody takes us seriously.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:31 AM
-28

Yes, I'm sure something with "Christian Science" in it's name is reputable......
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:30 AM
-5

Any sane people will decide it's stupid shit.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:12 AM
0

The spearhead is a moronic troll rag and makes us look bad every time something from it is posted here. It deserves to be on the SPLC list.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:21 AM
2

Agreed, my proposal was just a start. We need to ban anybody who takes the-spearhead seriously too. I put up a thread about Rebecca Watson yesterday and it degenerated into an argument over the usage of the word "cunt". That section of the comments should be a who's-who of who to ban.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:08 AM
9

Stick a cactus up my ass if I can have that kind of power.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:05 AM
2

We should start by banning Jeremiah MRA and married_woman_with_k
/r/MensRights09/03/12 12:53 AM
6

If a boy competes with a girl and wins he's a bully, if he loses he's a wimp, that's why they split them in the first place, not to mention the teasing he will now get for going. It seems like that is a broader issue with gender roles, rather than specifically a MRM issue, though I see where you are coming from.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 10:10 PM
-1

However, in a feminist society all-male spaces are forbidden, while all-female spaces are allowed to exist, or even encouraged. That isn't what's happening though. From the article (highlighting mine): It comes on the back of an 88 per cent increase in young female members since 2005, during which time it has also become compulsory for all groups in Britain to be co-educational.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 10:07 PM
0

Sounds good to me.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 08:18 PM
4

This is just scary. I'm glad to be living in the US and to have first amendment protections.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 08:09 PM
1

Not sure how this is an MRM issue, or even an issue. So long as nobody was coerced in or out, everything is fine.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 07:07 PM
6

Here's the tl;dr of the article: "I refuse to debate anyone who won't concede that I'm right on everything prior to debate".
/r/MensRights08/03/12 06:48 PM
6

I'm down. I would rather do it in writing than via voice or camera. Vocal debates often degrade into a deflection contest/soundbite war and fail to have any actual substance. I won't cite nonsense sites like AVfM or the-spearhead. I expect you to not cite similar nonsense like Jezebel. We can post results here, or I can host them elsewhere.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 05:11 PM
7

Wow, that's messed up.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 01:00 AM
1

I kind of like the idea behind it, but you did an awful job of actually making the graphics. The bottom text is hard to read on most of them.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 03:46 PM
3

Diamond rings are a trap for stupid people. If your fiancee insists on one, chances are: You're wealthy and it's a reasonable request. Either she or you is stupid. When I got married, I was working at Dollar General for minimum wage, in my last year of college. There was no engagement ring, because my soon-to-be wife who was living with me, has a pretty solid understanding of money and realized that most of the rings worth having cost as much as half a year of rent. Needless to say, rent was mor…
/r/MensRights07/03/12 03:07 PM
2

It's a repost of a repost's repost.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 02:58 PM
1

Both the custodial and noncustodial parent have to maintain a place to live, so your objection seems moot.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 09:47 PM
1

How does getting rid of child support achieve that?
/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:22 PM
1

Perhaps, but now you're suggesting that the NCP pay 100% of it plus X% of it depending on custody. Not even close. I'm saying, pay proportional to custody allotment. If you have 50% custody, pay 50% of the child's expenses. If you have 100% custody, pay them all.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:16 PM
-1

Finally, a spearhead article that doesn't suck. +1 for you JeremiahMRA.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 07:43 PM
2

He is an angry feminist troll who sits on this board all day. His goal is to incite arguments. I suspect he is a prominent feminist blogger, but whoever he is, I respectfully ask the moderators to ban him. He does a good job of calling out idiots, trolls and socially conservative fascists. I think he's pretty cool.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 07:37 PM
1

Again, the only portion being challenged is the individual mandate. Regardless of it's constitutionality, having employers funded health insurance cover birth control is not in violation of the first amendment. We can play this constitution game all day. Just because something isn't specifically mentioned in the constitution, does not mean that it is unconstitutional.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 07:29 PM
1

I reiterate, with relevant portions highlighted...: Condoms aren't covered because it isn't necessary. They don't require a prescription, they are not medication. They require no operation. If you have to buy them, they're dirt cheap. If you can't afford dirt, many clinics hand them out for free. I can think of three places off the top of my head within ten miles of where I live that I could get just about as many as I want for free. Asking why insurance companies don't provide condoms is like a…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 07:26 PM
1

It will make the kid unwanted by the non-custodial parent. I doubt that they will be unwanted, so long as they weren't unwanted in the first place. It turns kids into pay to play. I agree, and I think this is a valuable tool to ensure that men who do want access to their kids, post-divorce, get access. Right now there are many cases when a man is denied access, and forced to pay crazy child support payments. Under my system, that would not be possible. I think they pay ought not be there in the …
/r/MensRights06/03/12 07:14 PM
1

I don't think it punishes people for seeing their kids. If the marriage was intact and they lived together, it's probably close to what they would be paying anyway. However, it does punish spiteful people who try to deny access to children to ex-spouses. You can't live on child support welfare, and not allow the dad to see his kids under this system, because by cutting off his access, you cut off your own welfare source. I think it's a good deal all around.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:55 PM
3

Was expecting nonsense in the article, instead the nonsense is in the title.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 05:11 PM
0

I'm be cool with it being tied to custody rights. 50% custody? 50% of the support. Only get to see your kid one day, every two weeks? Congrats, you are now responsible for only ~7% of the expenses since you only have that much custody.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 04:26 PM
0

Child support payments should be tied to the average cost of raising a child in the regions. Any raises or decreases should be tied to the CPI. Raises should not be tied to salaries, however, decreases should be. (IE don't try to collect from a homeless man). Prison sentences for those who can't pay should be abolished.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 03:59 PM
2

I don't think it's manufactured. Rush said some seriously stupid things that were offensive to a lot of people. He's already lost 8 or 9 sponsors over it.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 03:56 PM
1

From that thread: Condoms aren't covered because it isn't necessary. They don't require a prescription, they are not medication. They require no operation. If you have to buy them, they're dirt cheap. If you can't afford dirt, many clinics hand them out for free. I can think of three places off the top of my head within ten miles of where I live that I could get just about as many as I want for free. Asking why insurance companies don't provide condoms is like asking why they don't cover bandaid…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 03:35 PM
0

It's still not really related, since the portion of the healthcare law having it's constitutionality challenged isn't the birth control provision. The part being challenged is the individual mandate to make people buy health insurance. Even if the individual mandate is struck down, the rest of the law will still be in effect, unless it is repealed.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 03:33 PM
0

Did you read the thread in the link?
/r/MensRights06/03/12 03:23 PM
0

If the mandate is constitutional or not as a whole is a non-sequitur. That's being debated in courts right now. What I'm arguing is that the provision which requires employer provided health insurance to offer birth control, does not violate the first amendment of the constitution. I've shown this by showing you the majority opinion on Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith. If you want a tl;dr of the ruling, it says that making a law which applies to everyone, if …
/r/MensRights06/03/12 03:23 PM
1

Where are tampons and sanitary pads funded? This just seems like a non-sequitur. Also, the compelling interest isn't poverty, it's affordable access to health insurance for everyone. Part of this was achieved by making access to preventative measures cheaper/free. You can see a long argument about it here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qf2ih/breaking_news_democrats_bribe_feminist_voters/c3x3hoo
/r/MensRights06/03/12 12:15 AM
2

Sue them.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:25 PM
-2

Oh yea, at least 1/2 the stuff on reddit is just made up.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:08 PM
3

Quotas are bad because they breed resentment in the workplace and reinforce the stereotypes they are mean to fight.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:28 PM
6

If a law or regulation is not specifically aimed at a religious group, but affects them, it does not violate the first amendment. This is why members of the Native American Church still cannot get away with using Peyote. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_Division_v._Smith Read Scalia's majority opinion. Realize you are wrong. The addition of birth control to employer funded healthcare isn't aimed at Catholics. It is a universal mandate which applies to all employers providing health insura…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 08:42 PM
4

No. Belief in magic isn't an excuse to get out of following laws. Religion is given far more respect and deference in this country than it deserves. If your beliefs are not based in reality, there is no reason for me to take them seriously or to respect them at all. I don't want Jesus freaks controlling access to healthcare, for the same reason I don't want homeopathic nutjobs to be able to sell their concoctions as medicine.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 08:32 PM
3

I completely agree.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 07:59 PM
8

I think we REALLY need to get past the idea that breaking up with someone makes you a "terrible" person. Breaking up is fine, just do it before you are married, or if you are married, do it with good reason. "We were successful, but I felt like I wasn't doing anything" isn't grounds for a divorce. It's grounds to start a business or get a productive hobby. I also think we need to stop having young people believe the fantasy of lifelong, romantic "love". I agree. I think marriages have a lot less…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 07:33 PM
-6

This is from 4chan, so it's probably made up. However, this would be a good way to settle stuff like this.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 07:08 PM
13

What is wrong with divorcing for selfish reasons? Making a commitment that someone else builds their life around, and then unilaterally deciding to walk out, when you've admitted that the other person is doing everything you agreed to, just because you have some vague whim to "find yourself" is obnoxious. The fact that her complaint seems to be "we were too successful" is just irritating. I don't get it. And what kind of person, exactly, wants his wife to hang around if she doesn't want to be th…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 06:50 PM
1

I'm calling it trolling, because I refuse to think that there is someone stupid enough to present this idea, or to take it seriously. You have to be working for a rise, nobody is this dumb.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 06:43 PM
4

This is still stupid, and is still probably trolling.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 06:27 PM
10

Are you taking advertisers? If you can get decent traffic, I'll pay you to advertise my data management business. You'll get financial support, I might get more memberships. Good deal for everyone.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:31 PM
23

This is just awful. the tl;dr of the article is "I initiated a divorce for selfish reasons and feel bad about it sometimes".
/r/MensRights05/03/12 04:45 PM
1

No, in this case it's for the benefit of the child, not the benefit of him. If it was the case where she wanted to be a mother, but he did not want to be the father, then he should have no liability and no custody. She's the one who chose the child should exist. She had 100% of the control over that. Shouldn't she have 100% of the responsibility for it? Or are we punishing people for other people's choices now? Since he was for it, and they agreed it would be born and that he would have a go at …
/r/MensRights05/03/12 04:40 PM
9

This is one of the saddest, craziest stories I've read recently. I think this is more of a race thing than an MRM thing. It sounds like he was pounced on because he was black, rather than because he was male, but wow. The misconduct that put him in jail for 30 years is sickening. This man had his life stolen.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 04:32 PM
0

Well, I left the possibility that you are just very stupid in there. A sincerely held stupid belief would point to that.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 04:14 PM
-6

You chose not to take the morning after pill. You chose not to abort. All he did was choose to have sex. If you're going to cut him off from access to his kid, which is the only upside to having one, then you should relieve him of the responsibility too. Anything else is just slavery in slightly more polite terms.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 04:13 PM
-6

Now at the time, this man was smoking heavily, both pot and tobacco, had not had a job for over 6 months and stayed in a pigsty of an apartment, in debt to boot. I was living with my mother, actually being the co-owner of our house, had a stable job that I loved and was on my way to being mostly financially comfortable. Probably should have aborted, but it was your choice. We got into a huge fight when I told him about the pregnancy because I, evidently, had doubts as to whether or not he could …
/r/MensRights05/03/12 03:25 PM
2

ITT: A teacher tries to make math interesting and engage students. He gets fired for it.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 03:01 PM
-2

Catholics firmly believe that BC pills can cause abortions. Catholics are firmly stupid. We shouldn't take religion into account when making legal decisions.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 03:00 PM
6

I can't take anything from the CWA seriously. Conservative Christians are just as bad as feminists. When they debate, it's just two different slave drivers arguing over whipping techniques.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 02:59 PM
2

I'm not sure if you're trolling, or just very stupid. Have a downvote.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 02:57 PM
5

Not sure if trolling, or just very stupid. Either way, a down vote is merited.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 02:04 PM
3

And Dr. Bernard R. Perez, a Tampa eye surgeon with throat cancer who was married for 20 years, said he had been ordered to pay his former wife 85 percent of his income; for the last three years, he has lived in his brother’s garage and is near bankruptcy, he said. Each man was also ordered in court to carry a life insurance policy naming his former wife as sole beneficiary. What the fuck....
/r/MensRights05/03/12 04:47 AM
1

Because someone, somewhere out there is into it. Personally, I'm not into lesbian porn. That doesn't mean I need to start crying every time someone who is into it fires it up.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 04:06 AM
2

It's not suppose to be realistic. It's suppose to be porn.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 03:13 AM
4

Move to China. You're screwed everywhere in the US.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 03:04 AM
2

If there was a good market for porn, for women, there would be a hell of a lot of porn for women. Porn costs nothing to produce, and makes massive profits. Lesbians with long, fake pink nails? Really? Eww, somebody else's sexual fantasies are different from mine! This sort of nonsense is the same logic used by the anti-gay bigots.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 03:03 AM
3

I got drunk and was slutty and probably had sex which was consensual at the time, but I regretted it after sobering up, therefore RAPE.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 01:44 AM
6

Send the screencap to everyone in your state legislature, and to your governor.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 01:24 AM
2

Yes, but the only reason it is widely practiced is because of the mass spread of nonsensical religious beliefs. Religion is the problem here.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:51 AM
1

Yea, that was more or less an excuse. I was only called "a widely practiced medical procedure" because of all the noise that was made about it.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:36 AM
10

More porn is made twords men's supposed tastes than women's supposed tastes. That's not bias, that's capitalism. Most porn is consumed by men, so most of it is target at men.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:15 AM
16

When will men receive these rights? When we stop treating religions with respect and deference that they don't deserve. FGM is easy to stop, because it usually comes from Islam. They are a tiny, easily marginalized religious minority in this country, and of them, those that practice FGM are an extreme minority. When you try to get rid of MGM, you have to fight the overwhelming majority of Jews who believe that the practice is sacred and Christians who feel that they have to defend the Jews at al…
/r/MensRights04/03/12 11:48 PM
17

I don't think it was "a demonstration of who has the power". He managed to fire up a perfect storm of stupidity and mindless ad hominems over an extremely politically sensitive issue. He sort of got all the anger people have towards the anti-contraception idiots directed at him, by becoming a mouthpiece of that movement and saying what everyone knew they believed anyway.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 11:41 PM
8

What do feminists consider "discrimination" or "misogyny" Go ask a feminist subreddit.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:23 PM
1

Strawman, no one here attacks women without suffering downvotes, you are conflating "feminist" with "woman" they are not one and the same. People post shit from that uncle Elmer retard and from the Eagle forum and they get upvoted.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:20 PM
6

I agree with you. I think some of the social conservatives here who post shit that basically reads "let's go back in time and nail women to stoves, you know for Jesus and family and stuff" make us look bad to people on the outside who would otherwise sympathize with us.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:18 PM
4

I think it's on the verge of collapse. The vast majority of people associate us with theocrats and fringe idiots like Alex Jones.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 08:47 AM
0

They need to ban you. You are not only an embarrassment to MRAs, you are an embarrassment to humanity. Too bad the mods of this board refuse to actually moderate.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 04:16 AM
1

Then why does it not cover any form of male contraception or birth control? (Condoms and vasectomies.) Most insurers cover vasectomies (source http://www.vasectomy.com/ArticleDetail.asp?siteid=V&ArticleId=10 ). Condoms aren't covered because it isn't necessary. They don't require a prescription, they are not medication. They require no operation. If you have to buy them, they're dirt cheap. If you can't afford dirt, many clinics hand them out for free. I can think of three places off the top of …
/r/MensRights03/03/12 04:15 AM
1

You're the troll. It's not hard to tell for anyone who looks at your post history.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 03:43 AM
2

Soldiers I know pretty much say the same stuff. I know some people who joined up, just because they wanted to kill someone.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 03:37 AM
-1

Congratulations on being one of the theocratic retards who pollutes this movement and prevents success.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 03:34 AM
2

The goal was to make health insurance more affordable. Preventative care is cheaper than dealing with problems after they've formed. According to: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb11.jsp the average birth in 2003 costs $8,300. According to a CPI Inflation Calculator, that's equivalent to $10,224.56 in 2012. According to http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/birth-control/birth-control-pill-4228.htm the typical one month supply of birth control pills is between $15 and $5…
/r/MensRights03/03/12 03:33 AM
2

A concern troll would definitely exploit male suicides to argue that we should all jump on the Jesus bandwagon and go back in time about 60 years.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 03:07 AM
1

Breaking News: SpeakToTheSky is an idiot.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 10:20 PM
-6

Just another JeremiahMRA troll thread pretending that religious conservative nostalgia for nuclear famalies has anything to do with the MRM.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 10:10 PM
3

I'm also thinking about abandoning the MRA title. I don't like that the movement has ties (perceived only, in my opinion) to religious social conservatives. I think the theocratic retards claiming the mantle of the movement make us look crazy to people on the outside. If you want examples, go look up JeremiahMRA and married_woman_with_k.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 07:38 PM
1

I can't find the full video. The one I got was about two minutes long. I found it by searching "paternity" on the page you linked.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 04:43 PM
3

I'm a dude. I support both feminist and MRA ideas. I basically want the abolition of gender roles and equality for everybody. The reason I don't actively participate in feminism, or claim the title, is because I disagree with the feminist meta-narrative. They see basically all social interactions between men and women as men being in an oppressive role, and women being subjugated. Men are portrayed as being privileged holders of power, regardless of their situation, and women are always portraye…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 03:27 PM
3

I think this is a troll thread and I am happy to down vote it.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 02:42 PM
1

Flee the country. It's Canada so you're screwed, probably even if it isn't yours.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 02:45 AM
1

She's on my insurance through BCBS. I pay about $60/wk and it makes her $600 migraine meds cost cost $30 and her $125 birth control cost $8. It's pretty sweet.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 02:24 AM
1

"It covers 'birth control', not hormonal therapy for irregular menstruation etc." If my wife needed extra hormonal therapy, I could probably get BCBS to cover it. The life of a software developer comes with some pretty badass medical insurance. "It specifically says 'birth control'" And? I'm not sure what your point is here. It also probably covers IUD and other birth control methods? Not sure if it covers IUD or not. Never tried to use it for anything other than the oral pill. "Does it cover ma…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 12:37 AM
1

Absolutely none. There is a medical problem, and medical insurance provides a solution. I'd be pretty angry if the policy I'm paying for, which covers my wife and I were to stop providing something she uses.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 10:24 PM
1

Birth control, as covered in most insurance policies, is prescribed for reasons other than to control birth. Reasons include, management of endometriosis, management of migraines, management of cramps, etc. It's legit and should be covered in those cases. "elective" birth control, that which is taken just to prevent pregnancy usually isn't covered, nor should it be. EDIT: Actually, I think what is covered in a health insurance plan should be between the provider and the consumer. No reason for t…
/r/MensRights01/03/12 10:10 PM
0

No, trolls are people who discredit the MRM by showing up. Trolls in this subreddit are people who aren't aiming for equality. They're the people who cry about how awful it is that you can't chain your wife to the stove and keep her pregnant and barefoot in the name of "intact families". They're the people who seem to think that women need to be dominated. They are not promoting equality, they are every bit as bad as some of the feminists like Gloria Steinem, just in the opposite direction. They…
/r/MensRights01/03/12 04:59 PM
1

Someone who posts blatantly sexist, socially conservative nonsense and claim that they are part of the MRM. If you want a good example, look at anything put up by married_woman_plus_k in the last two weeks. I think these are the worst kind of trolls, because they make us look like theocratic crazies to anyone outside the MRM.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 04:35 PM
8

She'll get like 20 hours of community service and a verbal warning. Then she'll make hundreds of thousands of dollars on the talk show circuit and become a folk hero to women who only think violence is bad when it isn't directed at males and coming from females.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:54 PM
1

I should really do this. Sometimes I just get sick of seeing troll posts by JeremiahMRA and married_woman_plus_k. Those clowns make us all look like theocratic morons.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:50 PM
3

"The MRM wasn't taken seriously until people like Uncle Elmer and real MRAs started pushing people's buttons and getting them out of their comfort zone. People like you are nothing but concern trolls and more harmful to the movement than feminists." No, that took us from a small group that people had sympathy for, to a small group that most people think is either comical or crazy. If we want to be taken seriously, we need to dump the blatantly sexist social conservatives. The only time anything …
/r/MensRights29/02/12 08:43 PM
10

Troll harder JeremianMRA. This article has nothing to do with the MRM and nothing to do with equality. It's just sexist nonsense about brainwashing your female children to be subservient to men. This is why we can't have nice things. These religious crazies present themselves as the face of the MRM and people everywhere see them, and (rightfully) reject their stone age nonsense. They never even get exposed to any actual MRM issues or arguments, because the social conservative crazies scare them …
/r/MensRights29/02/12 08:18 PM
12

This article isn't an MRA piece, it's just stupid sexism coming from religious conservatives. We need to expunge these social conservative crazies from the movement, they make us all look like theocratic morons and make it hard to be taken seriously. There is nothing worse than arguing with a feminist online, from an MRA perspective, and then have some unrequested MRA "backup" show up waving Phyllis Schlafly articles. It pretty much, on spot vindicates 90% of what your opponent is saying about t…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 07:43 PM
13

I you go fishing, and you don't catch any fish, you don't blame the fish, you blame the bait.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 03:48 PM
18

His killer said he was a bastard who deserved it. That means this is fine, right? Not murder at all, because his killer didn't like him.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 04:48 AM
1

Page won't load.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 04:45 AM
6

Here's the tl;dr version: It's not free speech if you use it to say something I don't like.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 04:41 AM
3

Here's the tl;dr version: It's not free speech if you use it to say something I don't like.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 04:41 AM
24

Here's the tl;dr version: It's not free speech if you use it to say something I don't like.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 04:41 AM
2

Downvoted because JeremiahMRA is 100% troll.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:47 PM
13

JeremiahMRA is an obvious troll. He doesn't want women to vote and holds religious right-wing positions that Rick Santorum would be ashamed of.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:46 PM
10

Hope he succeeds.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 07:08 PM
14

When you systematically remove opportunities from a group, retool education to not function very well for them and pump them full of messages that say that trying to be successful is somehow oppressive, what do you expect?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 04:35 PM
6

Not sure how this is an MRM issue.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 10:46 PM
0

I saw that this article was from the "American Thinker" and immediately thought it would be complete garbage. Was pleasantly surprised that it is only half garbage.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 09:40 PM
1

That bothers me too, but it's better than throwing them on the streets.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 08:19 PM
14

I've noticed this bias before too. When men are underrepresented/behind in something, you hear nonsense like "this is just the competition men have always feared from womyn". When women are underrepresented/behind in something the message becomes "OMG PATRIARCHY DISCRIMINATION UNFAIR UNFAIR UNFAIR WHY YOU HATE WOMYNZ?!?!??!!".
/r/MensRights27/02/12 08:00 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 07:26 PM
6

Housing policies change all the time. My second year, I had to move from my third floor room, to the second floor because third floor was made a "smokers only" floor.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:47 PM
4

Troll alert.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:45 PM
15

At least some legislators are recognizing that there is a problem. The quote in the article saying that it doesn't make sense to take so much that the men go homeless, because the you can't collect anything gives me some hope.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 03:51 PM
3

Oh, I see. I misinterpreted your question. In terms of the conclusions from the article, I see nothing wrong. In terms of the tone it was written in, there is definitely some bias.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 02:51 PM
3

Well, if you are going to kill yourself, sell everything you have and physically give the cash to someone. Otherwise the courts will just give it to her after you've died, effectively enslaving you from beyond thegrave.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 02:02 PM
2

Overreaction. The basic premise of the article is "different groups of people behave differently" and it seems to be backed up by data. The writer seems to be a condescending turdball though.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 02:00 PM
2

A financial abortion would give the father an out. It would also make "trap" pregnancies pretty much impossible. Taxpayers would still be on the hook, but there is no good way to fix that, short of sterilizing welfare queens, or drastically reducing welfare payments to people who don't work.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 06:26 AM
2

Well, when you consider that the choice to abort/not abort lies 100% with the female, it becomes 100% her fault if she chooses to carry the baby to term. This makes financial abortions fair.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 06:22 AM
4

This is 110% fucked up. We need to make some noise about this.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:17 AM
2

Not sure how this is an MRM issue.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:16 AM
2

I can kind of see your point. I'm pretty passionately pro-choice. I'd like to see "financial abortion" alongside the option for induced abortions. Similarly, as most surgical abortions are illegal after a certain time frame, I'd add something like, once the father is notified of the pregnancy (it'd need to be something in writing) he has an identical amount of time to "financially abort". Here's hoping that made sense, I've had some rye whiskey tonight.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 04:55 AM
-6

It's hard to tell on the internet. Poe's Law and Poe's Paradox and all that.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 01:34 AM
-11

Not sure if trolling, or sarcasm, or just stupid.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:54 AM
5

This just seems like a public safety issue...
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:26 AM
1

I'm confused. Not sure if your commen is sarcasm or not. If she has 100% of the decision, shouldn't she have 100% of the consequence?
/r/MensRights26/02/12 09:05 PM
2

This is complete and total bullshit. We need to make some noise about this to relevant officials.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 09:00 PM
6

"The system sucks, can't change it, not going to try", is not a legitimate argument. Obviously the current system had to come from somewhere. It is the result of laws which made sense in society 60-100 years ago, mixed with gradual changes. Gradual changes and reforms are the answer. Also, how would women get screwed by financial abortion?
/r/MensRights26/02/12 08:03 PM
29

Pretty much this. Sexy women dominating your fantasy entertainment? SEXISM!!! Huge, hulking muscular men who are also sensitive dominating you fantasy entertainment? Well, they're just superior to real men!
/r/MensRights26/02/12 08:00 PM
10

The only sexism I experienced, from a school, was in my freshman year of college. All of the male freshmen had to watch a video about sexual harassment and rape. The basic gist of the video was "all of you are potentially rapists and unless she's screaming her approval the whole time, any sexual activity, consensual or otherwise is actually rape. Also, if she's had any alcohol that night, it's automatically rape, even if she drank it all enthusiastically and voluntarily and she initiates sexual …
/r/MensRights26/02/12 04:29 PM
1

Legislation and ginned up outrage over a goofy TV ad are two different worlds entirely.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 03:13 PM
13

It's hard to find a feminist who will oppose an asset/opportunity transfer from a man to a women, or from men to women as a whole. A central part of their ideology is that men in general are "overprivilidged" oppressors and that any success, or status a man may have represents ill-gotten gains because of that privilige. Are you a poor, uneducated man from some coal mining hell-hole in the Appalachian mountains? Doesn't matter. You're still an "overprivilidged" oppressor and someone to fight agai…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 05:36 AM
7

Yep, this is why men tend to avoid women in the workplace.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 08:14 PM
13

I take neither PETA, nor feminists particularly seriously.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 07:26 PM
0

It was written by Gloria Steinem, what do you expect?
/r/MensRights25/02/12 02:21 PM
1

Well, seeing as a rape conviction will get you sent to prison, where you yourself will probably get raped, I'd have to say yes.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 02:20 PM
4

Good deal. Hope to see this go national.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 02:11 PM
1

I've never understood the whole "I'm going to walk around 80% naked, but please don't look at me" mentality.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 02:10 PM
1

Your tl;dr should say: tl;dr: I wrote two pages to express two sentences worth of information.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 02:08 PM
0

Here's my suggestion. When you're close to death/permanent bed riddenness, sell all your stuff. Hell, sell some of it for whatever you can get. Some guy offers you $10 for your car? Take it, it's not like you need it anymore. Then, give that money, in person, as cash (don't leave a paper trail) to whomever the fuck you want. It's completely sick that she extorted you in life, this will keep her from seizing your stuff in death.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 02:05 PM
5

I'm all for her aborting, if that is her decision, but not telling him is pretty shitty and is grounds to leave.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 02:00 PM
0

That's what you get for making a joint account.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 01:58 PM
-1

You're either a troll, or a complete retard. There is no way this thread is serious.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 12:09 PM
1

Yea, but you'll still be stuck waiting to take your 30 second pee behind the 3 guys who need to take a 10 minute shit.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 12:08 PM
3

Men can get in and out of bathrooms quickly because of a magical thing known as a urinal. If we had to use shitters for everything, it'd be slow going in our bathrooms too. Men and women are different physically and bathroom design should reflect that. To claim that is sexist or somehow unfair female advantage is moronic, and probably trolling.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 12:59 AM
-4

I read the text. It was stupid enough that I'm pretty sure you are a troll.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 12:56 AM
4

I don't think this is an MRA issue. Giving women more toilets, if they take longer just seems like a common sense thing to do and is really more convenient for everyone. It's kind of annoying when I go to the movies with my wife and afterwards we both go to the bathroom. I'll be in and out in 90 seconds and she'll be in for 15 minutes just because of lines. Also, Breitbart is a pretty crappy source for anything.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 11:01 PM
2

Additionally, since the manufacturing sector of the US has been shipped off to India and China, loads of uneducated people can no longer get jobs. For the women, it just means that they can marry someone and be housewives (which is legit if both parties want it that way), or they can have a baby and live on perma-welfare. For the men, it means welfare, or homelessness since our culture doesn't give men the "marry up and be a homemaker" option.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:40 PM
3

It's not. I agree with you. There is a definite double standard. If a woman is poor, uneducated and jobless, you should marry her for love. If a man is poor, uneducated and jobless, you should avoid him, he's a creepy loser and you deserve better. This is more of a societal problem than anything related to the government though.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:37 PM
2

I think we can help reverse this with a couple of things: Shrink the "safety net" so it can't be used as a "safety hammock". If it is economically harder for single breeders to exist, there will be fewer of them. Increase access to, and education about contraceptives. Pills and rubbers cost less than a new person. Easier access to abortion. A government subsidized abortion is a lot cheaper than a government subsidized child.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:35 PM
2

It is completely absurd.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:31 PM
2

Your argument of "move out of the south" is the same thing as people who say that if you don't like the federal government, you should move out of the country. I shouldn't have to move, no government, state or federal should be able to personally interfere in the life of a peaceful, productive citizen. Right now, whenever Oklahoma passes stupid laws which, they get struck down in the federal courts. The federal government is our retard helmet that keeps the Down Syndrome toddler that is this sta…
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:12 PM
3

Disagree. Santorum is a theocratic freedom hater. Gingrich is a moron and on par with villains from Charles Dickens novels in his beliefs. Romney is Obama, but with a more dangerous foreign policy and Ron Paul's advocacy of kicking issues to the states would result in much more government interference in personal lives in the South, where I live. Also, I don't think you can blame VAWA on Obama. It was signed by Clinton in 1994 and reauthorized by congress in 2000 and in 2005. No matter what part…
/r/MensRights24/02/12 06:54 PM
6

Fascism at it's best. If I were him, I would appeal as much as I could on First Amendment grounds as forced speech is a violation of free speech.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 03:29 PM
7

This is the most trivial of issues. Who cares what someone wants to be called? EDIT: The way you make it sound like children are property makes me think you are probably a troll.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 03:12 PM
25

Apply for a job, when they reject you sue for gender discrimination, use the email in court. Victory.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 04:38 AM
3

I disagree. The odds of getting raped are probably a lot lower than your chances of getting reported to HR.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:18 AM
1

You're a troll. Anyone who swallows Phyllis Schlafly's nonsense is either retarded or a troll, or a retarded troll.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:18 AM
6

"Tell them their assumptions are based on what's politically correct in a world where everything is backwards, a world that is falling apart, where the family unit has been destroyed, and education is nothing but indoctrination, and so they really have no business discussing these matters like their opinions mean shit." That will just make you sound like a socially conservative retard.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 10:56 PM
9

This sort of deception should be grounds to put someone in prison.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 10:23 PM
1

How is this an MRA issue? Shock therapy may be bad (I don't really know, I have no training in the subject), and may need to be abolished, but that seems unrelated to the MRM.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 10:08 PM
2

"Oh? Show me a feminist 'accomplishment' that isn't anti male at it's heart." Voting rights for women. "Better yet, show me something...ANYTHING...that average men want, that Feminists have accomplished." Making stuff better for men is not part of the feminist movement. That's why the MRM is needed. It brings balance. "There is NO DIFFERENCE between 'radical' and 'regular' feminists. One simply provides political cover for the other, nothing more." If you make sane people aware of radicals, they…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 09:41 PM
10

I have no children. My dad warned me about debt, and that it is easy to get burned by it. He taught me how to save and manage money, and that money is the reward for labor and essentially symbolizes labor. When I do have children, I plan to pass along the message he gave me.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:52 PM
2

Both are pretty bad. We can't get rid of government, religion on the other hand, can be eradicated via education.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:02 PM
3

Feminism, largely isn't the enemy. Radical feminism is. The religious crazies just make us look like theocratic retards and their beliefs/values usually go against the MRM. I've read articles where Gloria Steinem (crazy feminist) debates Phyllis Schlafly (crazy theocrat). It's like listening to two slave drivers arguing about whipping techniques. You might dislike being whipped by one a little less, but at the end of the day, they still both view you as slaves, and they still both want to give y…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 06:48 PM
0

Not sure why this could be considered an MRA issue.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 05:00 PM
4

A big part of the answer is less religion.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 03:20 PM
2

If I were him. I would refuse to pay, make as much media noise as humanely possible and appeal this through every level of the court system I could. If I did end up having to post an apology, at least by that time loads of people would have heard my story.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 03:14 PM
1

I think charging people different rates, based on characteristics of the person you are charging is not discriminatory. It's fine to charge women more for health insurance, they use more healthcare on average. It's fine to charge men more for auto insurance. We crash more cars.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 03:08 PM
2

You file. Pre-emptive strike.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 12:27 AM
0

This article is 100% derp.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 10:51 PM
3

Eep, sorry for editing my comment after you replied. I had not yet seen the reply.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 10:49 PM
8

Thanks for the warning.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 10:44 PM
5

Can't watch Youtube at work. Will watch this later.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 10:21 PM
170

About 6 years ago, when I was 16 I had the cops called on me 3 times in a single afternoon and was questioned by them twice. My crime? Accompanying my little sister (she was 12 at the time) on a walk through a residential neighborhood to deliver Girl Scout cookies. I didn't bother anything or anybody. I didn't take or break anything. I just followed her around and carried the cookie boxes. I had a pocketknife with a 3 inch blade which I used to open the larger boxes, so I could get the individua…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 08:55 PM
5

Preemptive. There is no reason to poke, pry or otherwise tempt fate. The only move I have in this game, which makes sense is to not reach out.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 08:39 PM
13

You're totally welcome here, the MRM affects everyone =) "Most women are not quick to sue" I agree with you, but I still disagree that this is a reason to reach out to her. Let's play with game theory and weigh the potential risks against the benefits. My options are, I can either reach out, or not. Her options are complain to HR, or don't. If I don't reach out to her, and she doesn't complain to HR, I gain and lose nothing. If I don't reach out to her, and she complains to HR, chances are very …
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:55 PM
2

I agree that gender roles exist, but they are not a sufficient constraint to hold ambitious people back. Lists like this one demonstrate that.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 04:22 PM
40

I agree with this post. I work as a software developer. Twice a day, all of the male devs (all of us but one) go outside and walk around for 15 minutes. We don't invite the female one (who I will refer to as C), because we want to speak freely on the walk and don't want to risk C getting offended and reporting someone to HR.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 03:29 PM
9

You shouldn't have quit. You should have sued.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 03:13 PM
1

I do not care about ads. All if you don't like an ad, don't buy the product.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:59 PM
3

Show her this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_billionaires If she's not succeeding, it's her fault, not the result of some amorphous anti-woman conspiracy.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:59 PM
0

Quit being a wuss. Dump her and refuse contact. Ignore her in the communal space. Nobody can control you, but you.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:55 PM
2

I'm all for homemakers, my wife is one. The way it is presented in the article just makes me cringe though.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:48 PM
2

Yea? Unless religious fascists have their way, you can abort a fetus with no legal repercussions whatsoever.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 12:44 AM
1

Herp derp because individual subreddits should have to put up with limitless trolling amirite?
/r/MensRights21/02/12 10:15 PM
4

I don't dispute that. Abortions are illegal in the US, in most circumstances well before that point though.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 10:13 PM
7

http://playstationeu.i.lithium.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/204723i0313C97B2F781578/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&px=-1
/r/MensRights21/02/12 10:11 PM
-1

I think a smarter interpretation of the article is that nobody wants to marry a depressed, alcoholic loser.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 10:09 PM
3

Just as a thought experiment, doesn't blanket-hating people for being bigoted, make you bigoted against bigots?
/r/MensRights21/02/12 07:54 PM
14

I was all with you until the (murder) part. That's just retarded. If you can see why an acorn is not an Oak tree and tell me why stepping on one is not the same thing as cutting down an Oak, you can tell why abortion is not murder.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 07:53 PM
3

This article is awful. The whole thing reads like he imported some slave woman from Vietnam and then chained her to his stove. My wife is a homemaker. It's not because she was forced to be one, or because she was denied education, or because we have some insane set of religious beliefs, or because I bought her from some far away land, or because I chained her to a stove. She's a homemaker because she wants to be, and because we can afford it. That should be the entire set of criteria governing w…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 03:22 PM
2

Having someone work, then taking their labor and using it for your personal gain, with no gain to the laborer is known in most parts of the world as slavery.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 03:12 PM
6

You deserved the ban. Your argument is pretty much just "men aren't smarter than women, we're just better at thinking!". That's pretty sexist bro.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 02:57 PM
102

Waaaaaaaaaaaah I'm not a piece of ass, now look at my ass! But don't want to fuck me while you're fucking me! I wonder if this is a Facebook troll.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 04:12 AM
2

I think "Friend-zoning" in general represents emotionally abusive relationships. I was "friend-zoned" by a woman whom I'll refer to as Q. Q and I went to high school together. Q and I would talk for hours every day. I wanted to date Q and everyone on earth knew it, but Q always considered me to be "just a friend". Q would date guys who were more athletic, or more physically attractive than me, then complain to me that all the guys she dated were jerks. I kept my schedule wide open for Q. I tried…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 10:36 PM
6

Congrats, you are now a feminist and (at least on this issue, I don't know you well enough for any broader statement) an MRA.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 09:54 PM
1

"You do not have an argument that would stand up against that." Other than the insanely obvious statement that if the mother does not abort, then she has chosen to provide for the baby financially. If she wants to keep it, and the father wants to financially abort, then she should be liable for it's support. EDIT: Additionally, if the female wished to financially abort, without aborting the fetus, she has the option of giving it up for adoption.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 08:14 PM
14

I'm completely okay with this. The only change I really want to see to abortion law everywhere is for men to have the option of a "financial abortion". IE the ability to sever all legal and monetary ties to a pregnancy.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 05:09 PM
1

Without a link or reference, this just seems like trolling.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 10:37 PM
1

I do not understand the point of the story. I don't think bird behavior is comparable to human relationships.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 10:11 PM
1

Seems like spam.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:17 PM
1

I can't take anything involving Rick Santorum seriously. That man is a mix between a Saturday morning kid's cartoon villain and Francisco Franco.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:07 PM
5

I don't go to twoX ever. It's a useless troll-hole.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 10:10 PM
2

Don't ban NiceGuysSTFU. He called someone out for citing Schlafly. That's a good thing. That woman is an idiot and makes the MRM look like a bunch of theocratic retards. Schlafly is not an MRA, she is just a religious, traditional gender roles styled sexist.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 04:41 PM
1

It's a troll-hole. I avoid it.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 04:27 PM
-2

This doesn't bug me. I knew I wanted my wedding outside and for everyone to eat a big meal for years before the event. Hell, I knew that stuff for years before meeting my wife.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 07:59 PM
1

Nobody should take Rick Santorum seriously. He's a bigoted retard. He is not an MRA, he is just a sexist, though I am certain that some people who dislike the MRM will try to conflate the two. If we are to be taken seriously as a movement, we need to ditch the social conservative crazies. Hearing a "traditional values" conservative argue with a feminist over the role of men and women in society is like listening to two different slave masters compare whipping techniques. You may dislike being wh…
/r/MensRights16/02/12 03:24 PM
1

This post inspired the do not reply to trolls post.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 05:09 AM
4

If you're going to troll, at least be clever or funny about it. Subtlety is key.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 08:07 PM
10

Just a troll. Nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 07:03 PM
2

You should feel bad for posting this. Schlafly and the insane, turbo-conservative Christian morality squad are a big part of what gives MRAs a bad name.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:34 PM
2

What is SRS? I see that thrown around a lot here and I've only been on Reddit for like a week.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:32 PM
1

I agree with you. Honestly, I posted my comment as a reply to yours, mostly because by the time I had finished typing, the post was deleted and I was not allowed to comment directly upon it.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 10:38 PM
2

I paid for all of the dates with my (now) wife. Before we were married, and especially really early on, I sort of treated dating as I would a dinner interview. Since I was the one who requested that she come, I just considered it polite to pay for the meal. I still take her on dates even though we are married, and I pay for those because she is a housewife with no personal income. Continued dating was part of the agreement we made before we got married and we both enjoy dinner and a movie.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 09:34 PM
4

Job security at it's finest.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 03:45 AM
0

=)
/r/MensRights14/02/12 03:42 AM
5

Even with a huge influx of people into the field, we'd all still be useful. Fields that work on creating the future will always have better economic outlooks than fields that work on looking into the past.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:38 PM
1

Also, blatant sexism in the article. It's cool for a woman to want her husband to be more educated than her, but not cool for men to want to be the more educated person in the relationship.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 08:05 PM
0

tl;dr: Women are getting better educations and are now disproportionately more educated than men. However, most women still want to marry a man more educated than themselves, which leads to many unmarried, educated women.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 08:04 PM
3

It was just a local Chili's.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 07:32 PM
7

My wife and I see eye to eye on the MRA stuff. She has also pointed out some legitimate grievances, but I think they relate more to the perception that I am 100% in control financially and do not consider her input, than to the fact that she is a woman. IE when we go to restaurants, even though we eat at the same table, I may get better service and better food, so when it comes time to make a tip, we both pick numbers and I average them, unless her service was SUPER TERRIBLE which it has been so…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 06:52 PM
-1

Why? Because I understand that the best way to deal with reasonable police requests is to politely comply and make clear that you aren't a threat? I've been pulled over four times in my life. Not once have I been handcuffed, tased, shot, beaten, pepper sprayed or even spoken to in rough tones. Why? Because I carry identification and conduct myself in the way I would want someone to behave if I was the cop. Out of the four encounters, I got one ticket for something that was 100% my fault, driving…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:01 PM
104

I think this goes beyond feminism and straight to the heart of college. People are straight up lied to and told that any degree is a path to prosperity and that every degree is worth having. That's just not true. I would have loved to study literature or history for a few years, but I picked my degrees on one, pretty simple question. Where are the jobs? When you ask that, it's hard to compete with math and computer science.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:42 PM
-6

I'm mostly okay with this. Ignore police orders and bad things will happen. Cop probably should have gone to non-lethals first thought. That's my beef with this.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:19 AM
1

Yahoo Answers is just trolls trolling trolls.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:11 AM
1

I wonder where all of these goodies are coming from? My insurance get's my wife birth control pills, and I have to make a run to Walmart when I want condoms.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:05 AM
6

Rural Oklahoma.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:49 PM
3

It is friend, and it isn't even unique. SpeakToTheSky had a similar experience. Stuff like this goes on all the time.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:19 PM
5

Well, OP started with a respectable working man job and women don't want him. I've seen both sides of this fence. I've gone from untouchable to "hey what are you doing let's party tonight". I've seen the falseness of it all. I sympathize with OP.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:17 PM
12

Wow, that turned into a wall of text rant, so I'm going to tl;dr it. tl;dr: I was "creepy" until I started making $70k/yr then women who called me creepy in highschool started contacting me to say "always thought you were nice/cute/funny/attractive".
/r/MensRights12/02/12 06:04 PM
27

I had the exact opposite experience. There were LOADS of women in high school who would have nothing to do with me, because I'm not physically attractive, am socially awkward and am boring. I admit fully to all three things. and I don't really place any value on being attractive, handling social nonsense or being interesting. Plus, I came from a poor family, and everyone knew my family was poor. I was branded "creepy" and the charge spread like wildfire. Then, I graduated high school, got some m…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 06:03 PM
5

Not sure if troll, or just very stupid.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 10:38 PM
3

It's all good, tyvm =)
/r/MensRights10/02/12 07:09 PM
1

You just kind of seem to hate women. What even makes you think we're going to get divorced?
/r/MensRights10/02/12 07:09 PM
17

Isn't the NSFW flag FOR people who browse Reddit at work? Browsing Reddit or reading news articles is just about all there is to do while my code compiles.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 07:08 PM
4

Sorry, I just clicked it, say body outlines and closed it as fast as I can, as I'm at work. Please flag it as NSFW just as a courtesy.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 07:01 PM
-4

Please put a NSFW flag on this.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 06:42 PM
1

It seems the majority of my comments have been removed anyway =(
/r/MensRights10/02/12 06:23 PM
1

I don't know if this is a product of gender, or gender bias in upbringing. I've noticed that boys seem to be brought up with the idea that everything is a competition, while girls seem to be brought up with the idea that everything is cooperation. I think that if everyone was raised under the same conditions, the numbers of men and women who pay evenly vs. by merit would be about the same. EDIT: Upvoting to be polite.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 06:15 PM
1

That's pretty awesome =). I think being told that her choice of lifestyle is illegitimate kind of gets her down sometimes. I will share this comment with her.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 06:04 PM
1

?
/r/MensRights10/02/12 04:32 PM
1

Not sure if trolling, will respond anyway. What makes you think she will divorce me? Even by pessimistic standards I probably still have 50/50 odds.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 04:31 PM
1

I think we're about even. IT can have obnoxious hours, but it's not too bad stress-wise.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 04:12 PM
2

Yes, first post. Had not heard of Reddit, or Men's Rights until reading a blog complaining about Men's Rights on Reddit.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 04:11 PM
2

You just kind of seem to hate women.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 04:11 PM
1

That sounds like what she does. On big dinner days, which happen randomly about twice a week she'll make something like a roast with vegetables, that takes 5+ hours to cook. On other days, or for lunch, smaller goodies like baked potatoes. Weekends we eat out, because it's her weekend too. We also usually catch a movie.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 04:08 PM
1

That's kind of what makes it double funny to me. We're by no means "Traditionalists". We just happen to have one thing that works really well for us that looks traditional, even though we didn't arrive at it because of any sort of tradition.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 04:05 PM
1

I honestly don't care. If the apartment is clean and she made food then her end of the deal is upheld. She can spend the rest of the day playing Xbox 360 and eating popcorn for all I care.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:58 PM
2

That's kind of hard to do though. Everyone our age seems to feel this way. Everyone who doesn't is too old to connect with.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:53 PM
1

This article is stupid as hell.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter