TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SnowAssMan Archive

View 4 posts and 65 comments by SnowAssMan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

That's the best you could manage? Most of the "anti-male activism" done in the world is also done by men, not women or feminists. So quit scapegoating women & feminists. Women aren't the overwhelming majority of perpetrators of rape of male victims, men are. 'Made to penetrate' still isn't rape. You just want it to be rape. Why should I start referring to something as rape, when it isn't, just because you would prefer it that way? 'Made to penetrate' is sexual assault, not rape. End of discussio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/20 07:49 PM
-3

I understand that you want "nonconsensual envelopment" to sound as traumatic as rape, but it'll never be on par with being non consensually, anally raped by another man, which is what rape currently is, regarding male victims. Sexual assault is not limited to "getting your ass grabbed at a club". It can include coercion too, which comes with all the same drawbacks you listed. Feminists widely cite the 1 in 5 vs 1 in 71 as well as 99% of rapists are men stats. See. You just want to support to you…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/20 03:15 PM
-3

Is it ignorance because of anti-feminist indoctrination, malice, or some of each that drive your statements?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/20 02:19 PM
-8

What justifies "nonconsensual envelopment" being classified as rape, while leaving all the other forms of sexual assault the way they are i.e. not classified as rape? Why is it so important to classify "nonconsensual envelopment" as rape? Sexual assault should just be taken more seriously, no? It just seems selective, political, in order to support disingenuous "whataboutism" type anti-feminist arguments, rather than making any actual progress on men's issues. Female perpetrators are clearly not…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/20 10:26 AM
-10

Sometimes they will mention female-perpetrated rape, but not only is it rare That's right. Female perpetrated rape is incredibly rare. No one who is genuinely concerned about male rape victims focuses on female perpetrators. And WTF is this trend of "The vast majority of those who do X are men!"? Because otherwise you're giving exceptions as much weight as the general rule. Statistical outliers don't a gender issue make.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/20 10:08 AM
1

Certainly. Have you seen the video by Cody Johnston on cops and guns? I concur with his evaluation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/20 10:13 PM
3

They need to be disarmed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/20 01:10 PM
4

The cops are "the system's" first defence. Cops have consistently been on the wrong side of history. Think about it. They'll kill you without a second though if there is a revolution in the USA. Cops treat us like we're the enemy, which makes them the enemy. They can, & often do, get away with murder, because you can't call the cops on the cops. As the saying goes: one bad apple spoils the bunch. And there are a hell of a lot more than just 1 bad one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/20 07:05 AM
1

Women, on average, choose different career paths from men. This gets amplified the more feminist a country is, because allowing people to choose whatever careers they are interested in leads to greater gender differences. If feminism is a one way street to freedom of choice, then why aren't you a feminist/ally/supporter of feminism?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/20 09:29 AM
1

OP claimed that our culture is "gynocentric". Where is the evidence?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/20 08:41 AM
0

Media is business, not art. "Free expression" is for art, not a business that can be regulated. Mass media has a massive effect on the population. If there is a strong correlation between drinking a lot of soda & developing diabetes, maybe don't promote soda drinking within the narrative of a TV show, movie, video game etc.? This should be the responsibility of regulatory bodies like Ofcom in the UK, & the FCC in the USA. I personally have never seen a real gun in real life, but I know exactly w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/20 08:15 AM
1

Bias is irrelavant No bias, not a gendered issue. the evidence is plentiful.... crickets... tumble weed... more crickets... Here's is a new one you can try circulating in your echo-chamber: Women get gynaecologists, why don't men get their own doctors?! This is feminism's fault somehow! btw, stop pretending to have the memory of a goldfish. If you argue that there is a benefits gap that disadvantages men & I prove otherwise, all that means is that your claim was wrong, not that "feminists want t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/20 07:44 AM
0

Where is your feigned outrage that I called you a gendered slur? Where is your evidence that a bias against men in the health system is causing them to die? anti-feminism 101: no evidence to support any of their claims, ignoring evidence that disputes their claims & going on & on & on & on about feminism & how it's to blame for all of life's problems.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 06:33 PM
0

But men's public health isn't compromised. The benefits gap is actually the other way around: "Women are less likely to be offered pensions, health coverage and disability plans. In fact, high poverty rates among elderly women have been linked to lack of pension coverage. Additionally, many female heads of household remain on welfare because they cannot find jobs with adequate health insurance coverage. When it comes to union contracts, men are also twice as likely to be covered" I'm still waiti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 05:57 PM
0

All media affects everyone consuming it. There are plenty of studies confirming a positive correlation between consuming video games & exhibiting aggressive behaviour: http://spp.sagepub.com/content/2/1/29 http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/122/5/e1067 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20192553 http://yvj.sagepub.com/content/11/2/132.abstract http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcom.12044/abstract https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21905039 http://www.sciencedirect.com/scien…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 05:42 PM
1

You're confusing "girl power" & empowertising with feminism. Feminism understands the effects of conditioning, socialisation. When everyone is expressing the same tastes, obviously that's automatous, the opposite of "agency".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 05:01 PM
-2

Stop trying to stretch 'gendered slurs' to include those words. Men tend to lead unhealthier lives & be less likely to make doctor's visits. Must be due to "gynocentrism" or feminism. Definitely not toxic masculinity. You must be trying your hardest not to be taken seriously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 02:57 PM
-4

But calling male politicians gender-neutral slurs is not a gendered issue. You're the one doing the mental gymnastics in order to make it about gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 11:21 AM
-2

Listen, Mr identity-politics, does misogyny magically stop being misogyny if practised by women? Yes, or no?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 10:58 AM
-3

Just to be clear, there is no such thing as "sex negative feminism". Sexual objectification, fetishisation & subservience of women in media is criticised by feminists. "Sex positive" feminists make an exception for porn. They're being inconsistent, because they think it makes them look concordant with the left. They have to be pro-"obscenity" because the right is anti-obscenity, even if that means endorsing sexual objectification of women in the process. It's more about optics than anything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 10:48 AM
-5

How does that in any way dispute what I said, unless you believe it's only sexist when men do it? Internalised misogyny is also a result from mainstream hardcore porn – duh
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 10:26 AM
-3

Who gets the most gendered abuse though? Certainly not male politicians.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 10:09 AM
-5

Have these same women got a problem with men masturbating without porn? Do they have a problem with erotica & sex scenes in movies? If no then "sex negative" isn't a thing. Feminists have a problem with men using women as fetishised masturbation aides in order to fuel men's sexual revolution. How very unreasonable of them. How about a sexual liberation of both sexes, instead of compromising one's humanity for the other's pleasure? Porn, almost never, depicts equality sex. Mainstream porn is very…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 09:48 AM
1

So feminism is marxist & capitalist & it's an ideology? Maybe stop watching Youtube videos & read a book. Feminism is anti-patriarchy/anti-sexism/anti-androcentrism. Being anti-ideology isn't itself an ideology. It's a counterculture. Get it right. You're not doing yourself any favours by getting it wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/20 10:35 AM
1

You describe feminism as being capitalist which you then describe as being a bad thing. So you're an anti-capitalist? identity politics is just a way to temper women & pop-feminists. It's not supported by feminism as a whole. (yes, there is a difference between a random woman & a feminist). You use the term 'ideology' a lot to describe countercultures, which are practically the exact opposite of ideologies. You can't just make up your own definitions to terms & expect others to be able to unders…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/20 05:27 AM
1

Kanin is widely discredited. You shouldn't determine which numbers are the most accurate by which ones you like the most. when a woman violate Again, men can do it too. It's not a women vs men thing, it's a forced to penetrate vs rape thing. There are lots of different forms of sexual assault. All are unconsensual, but they're not all rape. Male on male rape is arguably worse than male on female rape, so why put forced to penetrate in the same category? Also, women can rape men by using an objec…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/20 05:14 AM
1

How are you getting those false accusation numbers? Just because an accusation doesn't lead to a conviction doesn't mean it was false. The exact opposite problem exists. The vast majority of rapists walk free. I think you mean 'forced to penetrate', which is measured differently than rape. And no, the forced to penetrate rates are not close to parity with rape rates. Btw, it's not only women who perpetrate the 'forced to penetrate' crime.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/20 05:37 PM
1

"Wymn"? You've clearly got issues with women, which is not uncommon in these parts. Describing a marxist professor as an ideologue is an irony lost on people like you who don't know the first thing about marxism. You even use terms like "bourgeoisie" unironically lol You're a marxist, mate. Have I outed you? Is that why the lady doth protest so much? I know you're trying the "no, you are" tactic, but that doesn't usually work outside the playpen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/20 05:20 PM
2

Rates of circumcision are decreasing, thankfully, while vaginoplasties are on the rise, unfortunately.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/20 06:42 AM
-2

Sounds like you're talking about gas-lighting, which is something that women experience a lot more of. I haven't got someone's blog to back this statement up though lol Oh wait, here's one: https://blogs.psychcentral.com/relationships/2016/01/20-situations-in-which-men-gaslight-women/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/20 06:05 AM
1

I don't think there are plenty of examples, I think there are only a few exceptions, as with every rule.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/20 05:33 AM
1

How can you go on & on about class struggles, pretending that they are the only ones that exist, only to then slag of marxism? Would you refer it if men were infantilised, instead of women? You seem to envy children.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/20 05:23 AM
1

Ugh. Look up 'intersectionality' & the definitions of terms ending in 'centric'. You seem to lack a fundamental understanding of these. women and children first mode Oh, so now even children have more rights than men? lol okay.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/20 04:12 PM
1

Social privilege means 'spared injustice'. Male privilege refers to spared gender-based injustice. Men might be viewed as lesser for being poor, but not for being male. Men's intelligence, competence & abilities aren't underestimated. They are judged by the content of their character.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/20 02:14 PM
0

I less detailed version of this is what I've been saying from the start, but thanks anyway.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/20 05:37 AM
-1

They are just examples of androcentrism. Where are the examples of "gynocentrism"? When are women ever the default?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/20 04:34 AM
-1

The norm was "Were", "wifman" was language feminisation, & "werman" was a retronym.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/20 04:15 PM
-1

Other languages exist? You don't say? I'm bilingual myself, so I'm well aware of the gendering in other languages, but it's hardly relevant. The English language is androcentric, as are French & all the Germanic languages. They all have language feminisation. Yes, prized possessions, especially vehicles are referred to as "she", well done. No idea why you went out of your way to try and debunk something I never said. I've only ever heard feminists use the rat example anyway, but none of that add…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/20 03:44 PM
1

So you can recognise that gender roles can hurt men too, but you reject 'toxic masculinity', even though toxic masculinity literally means gender roles can hurt men too, okay. So all women have the freedom to do whatever they want they just so happen to choose from a limited pool of things, while men do everything else? You don't think perhaps there is overwhelming social pressure discouraging them from doing the things men do the majority of? Men's gender roles allow them such variety, which ca…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/20 03:05 PM
-1

lol okay if feminism leads to everyone taking on traditional roles, then you should be pro-feminism. Looks like I've got to spell it out for you. The most influential & lucrative positions are held by men. Either women would be in 50% of those position or positions that women typically enter would be just as influential & lucrative if feminism was the status quo. Type 'sexy' into Google images. Why are the results 99% women? Either women wouldn't be in the private-sphere or it'd pay off to be th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/20 02:53 PM
0

The University of Cambridge is one of the oldest English-speaking universities. It was being attended by men since the early 13th century. The first female student didn't arrive until the 1870s. How did that happen? And again, why are 99% of scientists, politicians, philosophers, inventors etc. all male, historically, with only a change occurring recently?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/20 01:43 PM
0

You're delusional. If feminism is the status quo then... ... where is the female representation in media or science or politics? ... why are the majority of women, the majority of the time, in the private-sphere where they have no political bargaining power so their labour remains unrecognised & unpaid? ... why are anorexia, bulimia & cosmetic interventions on the rise? Just because academia recognises concepts like patriarchy as legitimate & doesn't succumb to appeals to nature doesn't mean our…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/20 01:33 PM
-3

Finding fault with a term because you don't like the way it sounds is the dumbest thing I ever heard. The connotation it evokes in your excuse of a brain doesn't in any way affect its denotation. Would you prefer 'androcentrism'? OP wants to call it "gynocentrism", I'm having a hard time finding your comment calling him out for being "incorrect, misleading & sexist". Secondly, that's perfectly concordant with feminism's concept of patriarchy. Thirdly, norms are enforced by everyone, dear, even c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/20 10:26 AM
1

If women had the freedom to work then what accounts for the lack of women in higher education, historically? Why are 99% of scientists, politicians, philosophers, inventors etc. all male in the past & only recently started changing?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/20 10:07 AM
-1

Femininity is being limited to a sexualised ornament & mother, while masculinity is everything else. As a man you can be a leader (politician) or a follower (soldier) or use your brain (scientist) or your muscles (athlete) or your creativity (artist) or a heroism (firefighter). When women do any of those things (except maybe artist) they compromise their gender identity. How does a man compromise his? The issues distribution between the genders is just nowhere near 50/50.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/20 09:45 AM
0

In attacking a strawman you finally understood what patriarchy actually is. Your interpretation is concordant with feminism's. The "evil conspiracy" isn't a belief of anyone's.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/20 09:34 AM
0

But our culture is clearly androcentric. It regards 'man' as the norm & 'woman' as other, 'Man' means human. 'Man' that refers to being male is a retronym. 'Woman' is the earliest example of what is known as language feminisation in order to distinguish the other from the norm. If I say "I was walking down the street & came across a person", anyone I'm talking to will imagine that person to be normative: a member of the social majority i.e. cis, straight, white, middle-class, adult, male. ADHD, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/20 04:20 AM
1

Feminism isn't an ideology, it's a counterculture.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/20 05:50 AM
1

Still defending the lie even after being caught red-handed... typical. You purposely misrepresented the thread as victim blaming. There are more people on this thread calling it toxic masculinity than on the one you linked! People like you are the reason the MRM is dismissed as being disingenuous. How about don't make shit up, can you manage that? You're toxic to the movement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/20 02:23 AM
-2

I'm addressing a direct quote of yours that I lifted from your post. It's just a lie, plain & simple.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 01:09 PM
-1

Of course straight away people came in and said that this was a perfect example of "toxic masculinity" I went to the thread & only one person mentioned 'toxic masculinity'. All the comments I saw were sympathetic with the man, including the commenter that mentioned 'toxic masculinity'. So quit crying wolf. 'Toxic masculinity' describes the mechanism responsible for men not being able to share their feelings. Undermining 'toxic masculinity' is counter-productive to men's issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 12:01 PM
1

Which sub-reddits are not disproportionately anti-feminist. Genuine question. The anti-feminist trash in proxy MRA subs like this one & r/unpopularopinion is annoying.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 09:41 AM
2

Wow, you actually decided to argue with the bodycount. Define "recently" then. You're going to have to show evidence that most of female homicide victims were abusing these men. Were the children they killed also abusing these poor murderers? "women now have options to escape from abusive relationships and men don't" – You live in topsy-turvy land, don't you? How many men are financially dependant on their wives? How many women stalk & hunt men down when they try to get away? Men can bugger off …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/20 04:05 PM
-1

In thought the point you were making was that women are preferred in secretarial & accounting positions? If you had credibility you'd add it, along with a surprised Pikachu face. The mods are clearly biased. Practically all of reddit is in favour of undermining feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/20 03:39 PM
1

Just add that qualifier, or leave out the study. The fact that you won't do either speaks volumes on behalf of your "credibility".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/20 11:37 AM
1

The majority of women's physical violence against men (domestic violence) is in response to being abused by those men: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2968709/ Ultimately, you can't argue with a bodycount: 77% of all domestic homicide victims are female: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/222320.pdf In the cases female perpetrators of male homicide victims, usually the victim was an abuser: http://ncdsv.org/images/If%20I%20had%20one%20more%20day_Fatality%20Review_2006.pdf ht…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/20 11:27 AM
0

Some MRA guy: did you guys know employers prefer female secretaries over male ones??? You: surprised Pikachu face The long quote you posted from the study was just a longer version of what I already said. 96% prosecuted & found guilty of domestic violence were male & 86% of victims of violent acts by a significant other were female, both can be confirmed by the source Ilinked: https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fvs03.pdf
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/20 01:10 AM
1

They only looked at part-time secretary & accounting jobs. That's no great uncovering.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/20 12:59 AM
0

lol another lazy, illiterate loser. Read the first source. It's not even close to what he says it is. Anything that affirms your biases, eh?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/20 04:53 PM
0

Try actually reading his first source, just the first one. It's not what he says it is, predictably.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/20 04:50 PM
-1

Your first study only looked at part-time work as secretaries & accountants. So you misrepresented it. Ironically it also says this: "the younger female types received callbacks significantly less frequently than the younger men, when applying to highly qualified jobs" So I could say about your post: the first study about employment discrimination against men in favour of women instead uncovered discrimination against women in favour of men. In the case of the auditions & resumés – your "sources…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/20 04:48 PM
-1

Those posters are for people like you because you don't respect women. Men are already respected. If a poster said 'respect women', would it be enough to add the word 'too' at the end? I can already predict that you'll say no, because you want to undermine the idea that women's issues exist.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 03:34 AM
-9

removal of the glans clitoris is the same as removal of foreskin?
/r/MensRights16/05/20 03:23 AM
3

Difference is, a lot of 6ft guys would find her attractive. A lot of guys actually prefer chubby chicks. Conversely no woman prefers short guys.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/04/20 12:10 PM
0

lol don't redpillers expect men to do the exact opposite of what you're saying?
/r/RedPillWomen05/02/20 03:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter