TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SnusMats Archive

View 1 posts and 113 comments by SnusMats on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

IntactivismSnusMats/r/MensRights24/06/20 08:55 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Every single one of my male friends in scandinavia agreed that it is the most sensitive(together with the frenulum) when i told them to compare those parts. But people from cutting cultures don't know this stuff.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 06:48 AM
42

Dude/dudette, not even in scandinavia is it illegal (the first countries to ban spanking ffs..) But im 100% certain it'll happen quite soon. And when the ball starts rolling.. ye boie. Basic rights are a'comin'
/r/MensRights09/09/22 10:37 PM
8

The most baffling thing to me is this.. This (pro cut) dude, compiled a bunch of studies, and makes this conclusion " A consensus from physiological and histological studies was that the glans and underside of the shaft, not the foreskin, are involved in neurological pathways mediating erogenous sensation" https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33008776/ Now, how the fuck is that even possible? Is that really the level of quality on "published and reviewed" science? Im from Europe, i have a foreskin, e…
/r/MensRights04/09/22 08:12 PM
19

If someone replies with those claims, just tell them to look up the std/sti rate of the only "cut" western country, compared to the rest. They make those kinds of claims for all kinds of stds/stis but in reality they are in last place on many of those things they believe to be protected against.. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=most+stds+in+the+developed+world
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:56 AM
3

Biggest problem is the indoctrination and ignorance people from cutting cultures are forced to live with, having the best parts of your genitals cut off isnt that optimal either.. Its all bogus. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/27/Sorrells.gif
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:36 AM
2

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/27/Sorrells.gif This exactly matches the most sensitive parts, so if you have your frenulum intact you can get an idea how that whole tip area of the foreskin is like.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 11:15 PM
12

If by "a piece of skin" you mean "contains the most nerve dense and erogenous zones of the penis", then yes. If not.. then im afraid you are misinformed about what the foreskin actually is.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 07:20 PM
9

Of course it should be shut down, freedom of religion would be a good argument if someone was stopping you from cutting parts from yourself, not other people..
/r/MensRights12/06/22 04:06 PM
3

If you don't recognize those zones, you really must have medical issues. This is how it is for the rest of us. There's no doubt that is where the nerves are located.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 05:09 AM
3

The tip of the foreskin is as sensitive as the frenulum is, they are connected.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:25 PM
4

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/27/Sorrells.gif Parents decide if you get to keep your best bits or not.. thats not right.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 04:42 PM
4

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/27/Sorrells.gif The parts in red are the most nerve dense and erogenous by far.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 04:41 PM
14

The mother can imagine because she's completely fucking indoctrinated.
/r/AntiFeminists30/04/22 04:30 PM
1

That's highly subjective. But doing it routinely means you always have a certain risk of complications. Letting the kid wait means they will most likely belong to the 98-99% of guys who wont even get circumcised, you have to add those numbers to the mix to get the right % of risks and complications..
/r/MensRights26/04/22 07:00 PM
10

Absolutely. When guardians can decide to amputate parts of their normal healthy childrens genitals, something is very wrong.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 10:02 AM
14

Several times i've had discussions with pro-cut guys who say they are on the side of science, and science says there is no difference.. But then when we talk about the erogenous zones of the intact penis, they admit they don't have all of those.. but that obviously just means that I/intact guys are just lying about those parts, because science says there is no difference.. lol.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 06:44 AM
3

That's what you have to believe when you have the most basic rights taken away from you as a helpless infant, and when you grow up indoctrinated into cutting culture. You are as far from free as can possibly be when it comes to this issue. Your childish coping just looks ridiculous. The fact that you don't know that those are the most erogenous and pleasurable parts is just tragic. There is nothing excess about it.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 11:56 AM
4

You suffer from complete indoctrination and delusion. As far from free and rational thinking as you can possibly get when it comes to this subject.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:46 AM
10

The best part is not the glans. Just because women have most of their feeling in the clitoral glans doesn't mean the most nerve dense and erogenous zones on the penis (frenulum and ridged band) are of less value. Our sex organs developed differently, with the nerves also located in different places.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 10:47 PM
2

The way you expressed yourself here just comes across as dismissive of the whole issue. Do you think this subs entire view on circumcision is just some "whatabout-ism" in response to FGM?
/r/MensRights23/03/22 03:27 PM
7

I can't believe someone who claims to be for equality dismiss genital mutilation like that... You claim you are a changed man, and yet you havent done even the basics of rising above the most toxic elements of your culture.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 11:10 AM
1

Your kids might find out just what got lopped off and might put a completely different value on those parts than you do. You can't decide the value of erogenous zones for another person. You should be empathetic enough to know what the right choice is here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 11:54 AM
3

And you are aware that they cut off the most pleasurable parts right? There's no guarantee they'll even leave the frenulum intact. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/27/Sorrells.gif
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 07:05 PM
1

That completely varies between individuals. And no, statistics would show between the cut USA and intact western countries if there really was that massive pro's to circumcision. So far it's just a bunch of claims in biased studies. Intact countries in the western world achieve even better results on stds than the US with just education and hygiene. Even if it did provide amazing benefits it should still be up to every individual if they think those benefits warrant the amputation of those parts…
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 06:09 PM
1

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/27/Sorrells.gif
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 11:05 AM
2

You'd have to actually have some knowledge about both sexes most erogenous parts to make a comparison.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 10:15 AM
2

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sorrells.gif Compare to this illustration and see how much of those most erogenous parts you have left. (As shown in red) Most cut guys only have that sensitivity on the frenulum, or part of the frenulum since the frenulum also often cut away at. At least empathize with all those who do suffer. Not everyone has your dick and the same cut as you do.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 10:13 AM
5

You must be from a male genital mutilating culture. Because the level of indoctrination you're showing is beyond ridiculous. I bet you can't point out the most erogenous zones on a intact penis.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 10:03 AM
4

Ah, so you're just completely uneducated on the anatomy of the penis, and take your info from old wives tales and biased medical advice from genital cutter. Good job.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 09:58 AM
1

You were not at all born and indoctrinated into a cutting culture, i bet...
/r/MensRights13/01/22 10:24 AM
0

All the nerves are in the foreskin and frenulum those are the main erogenous zones, your ignorance on this issue won't change any of that.. I really don't think all the nerves/pleasure are located in the labia? Your stance on this isn't based on anatomical knowledge and studies. You are fooling yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 12:58 PM
2

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/25/male-circumcision-ceremonies-death-deformity-africa Even during the type of circumcision done in the US they still remove the most erogenous parts. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sorrells.gif There is no reason to divide genital cutting into different camps. It is a human rights issue. In all those countries that perform FGM they also perform MGM in the exact same type of environments with extremely high number…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 12:44 PM
0

Yes that sure is what they all say during interviews and studies.. or not. Western women like to pull "facts" about these kinds of things out from their.. hats. Why don't you google around about FGM and see if you can find some info about cut womens ability to feel pleasure/orgasm, instead of just making stuff up? I don't think it's honest att all to speak for all those women like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 12:34 PM
–

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/25/male-circumcision-ceremonies-death-deformity-africa Stop pulling stuff out of your.. hat. Its obvious you have absolutely no idea about the anatomy of the penis. There are also different types of fgm. None of them is like removing the entire penis, because none of them actually remove the ability to have penetrative sex. They leave the vagina intact. In fact, if they removed the exact same amount of skin and erogenous par…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 12:12 AM
7

How come you came to the conclusion that the foreskin is no good to have then? You converted to Islam or Judaism?
/r/MensRights13/11/21 05:20 PM
9

The foreskin (also) exists because it contains the most nerves, the most sensitive and pleasurable parts. Do you not have a foreskin? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/27/Sorrells.gif The glans is nowhere near as sensitive as those parts they cut away at. Sounds like you are born and raised in a genital cutting culture.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 04:49 PM
12

It's done because it is an old tradition, people are completely indoctrinated. The only country in the western world with a majority of their males cut (USA) has the worst stats when it comes to stds/hiv compared to the rest of the intact countries. There are no benefits to circumcision in the modern developed world.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 04:41 PM
7

Keeping those parts is definitely better, why would you want a maimed dick? I know no dudes who would want to get circumcised, and everyone here thinks it should be illegal to circumcise kids. The foreskin is an amazing sensitive and erogenous part of my dick.. If you don't feel that way about yours you are free to cut yours off, but deciding to cut your kids is really fucked up.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 04:39 PM
6

there was some insane feminist rambling about how women have it worse that had the most upvotes in the entire thread.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 03:38 PM
2

What invalidated her opinions is her complete and obvious misandry. That person couldn't care less about a dude and his chopped up dick.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 12:35 PM
1

You can replace that last part with "the most sensitive and erogenous parts of the penis", which probably sounds crazy if you have no idea about the Frenulum or Ridged band.. But it is the truth, alot of guys end up with both the frenulum and ridged band completely cut off. The glans is nowhere on the same level of sensitivity.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 10:29 AM
9

Alot of people here in scandinavia care, when i talk to them they are overwhelmingly against the practice.. then when you talk to Americans it's a completely different story. Alot of the Americans even challenge you on the fact that the frenulum and tip of the foreskin are highly sensitive and erogenous parts.. it's like a lost knowledge there... Americans are truly living in their own little universe.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 10:25 AM
6

The tip of the foreskin and the frenulum are the most sensitive parts of the penis, some guys end up with both these parts completely cut off, that is more than a difference in looks.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 07:23 PM
8

I definitely wouldn't say the most sensitive and pleasurable parts of my penis is "a tiny flap of skin", the entire tip of the foreskin is as sensitive as the frenulum, calling it "a flap of skin" is completely misleading.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 07:17 PM
2

In the western world the cut US has the worst stats on stds.. there are obviously less radical ways to deal with these things.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 04:48 PM
5

FGM is any cutting to the female genitals, not just removing the clitoris. I am saying that circumcision cuts away a huge chunk of tissue and the most sensitive and pleasurable parts of the penis, if they cut away the exact same amount off tissue/erogenous parts from a vulva you would most likely consider it much more severe than what you consider male circumcision to be.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 11:46 AM
12

Alot of men notice the difference in sensation. You can't cut off the most sensitive parts of the penis and expect people not to notice. There are alot of bogus research on this area regarding the functions and sensitivity of the foreskin. To get a clear picture of the effects you have to read the testimonies from those who got cut, some say it got better, some say it got worse. Of course all those who died from the procedure can't say much at all.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 10:58 AM
2

The difference is that the glans is not the most sensitive and pleasurable part of the penis.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 10:52 AM
8

The foreskin contains 30-50 square cm of highly erogenous skin, and contains the most pleasurable parts (the ridged band and frenulum). How is that like cutting off the clitoral hood? Just because they developed from the same tissue doesn't mean its the same thing to cut em off. You might as well make the comparison like this, :the equivalent to male circumcision is to remove 30-50 square cm of skin and the most pleasurable parts of the vulva. That gives it a completely different picture doesn't…
/r/MensRights06/07/21 10:50 AM
5

Circumcision removes 30-50 square cm of highly erogenous skin and also removes the most sensitive parts (the tip of the foreskin "ridged band" is completely removed, and the more famous "frenulum" is often partially or completely removed). If they removed exactly as much tissue/erogenous parts from a vulva you would no doubt consider it a very severe type of genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 10:44 AM
5

A male circumcision removes 30-50 square cm of highly erogenous skin and cuts away at the most sensitive parts of the penis (the tip of the foreskin "ridged band" is completely removed, and the more famous "frenulum" is often partially or completely removed as well). As far as i know the clitoral hood doesn't consist of that large % of the entire skin of the vulva, nor is it the most sensitive and pleasurable part.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 10:28 AM
6

Im not gonna maim my perfectly healthy dick. You'd have to be really indoctrinated to mutilate yourself or your children like that.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 05:24 AM
3

The tip of the foreskin (the ridged band) and the frenulum are sensitive and pleasurable on a whole other level.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 05:19 AM
4

It's not excess. Where did you get that idea? It contains the most fine touch sensitivity of the entire penis.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 04:33 AM
2

Some don't notice and some do, it's not an exact surgery and there are many different styles, high/low loose/tight, with or without frenuloplasty.. and no penis is exactly the same. So the outcomes do differ as well.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 07:02 AM
9

You don't have feeling in cut off parts, and the foreskin contains the most sensitive parts of the penis. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/apjgxy/paper_published_in_the_british_journal_of_urology/ (most sensitive parts in red) There are 1000's and 1000's of men on these subs who do notice a difference, and of course they do.. r/circumcisiongrief r/foreskin_restoration expecting every man to have the same sensitivity after getting cut is delusional, they cut off 30-50 % of the entire …
/r/MensRights16/04/21 10:41 AM
5

Its actually very sensitive and pleasurable skin. Do you still have the frenulum on the underside of the glans? The entire tip of the foreskin is of the same sensitivity/pleasure.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 09:22 AM
11

The adult foreskin has on average 30 to 50 square centimeters of tissue surface area (roughly the size of a credit card), with numerous specialized nerve endings that respond to tactile stimulation. They cut away at the most sensitive parts of the penis. (as shown in red in the link) https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/apjgxy/paper_published_in_the_british_journal_of_urology/
/r/MensRights17/12/20 04:14 PM
6

We have a long way to go.. look at the upvote/downvote ratio just on this post, even this sub is full of genital mutilators. This is really fucked up.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 01:10 PM
5

Im Swedish, one of my female schoolmates went on to study "genusvetenskap", basically full on feminist studies. Then i met some of her new classmates.. they indeed talked very casual about their disgust for "white cis men", they also tried their best to get some stares/comments at the pub by basically having sex on one of the tables.. as soon as some old dude made a comment like "höhö, have room for one more?", they went completely nuts and started to "educate" him and his buddies... geesus.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 09:50 AM
7

Most circumcised men don't know that the most sensitive and erogenous parts were already cut from their genitals. The glans is not the most sensitive/erogenous part of the penis, but I think the clitoris is for women.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 06:48 PM
3

It'll pass eventually. The ball is rolling.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 07:35 PM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/apjgxy/paper_published_in_the_british_journal_of_urology/ You don't cut off the most sensitive parts from an infants penis just in case. That's completely fucked up.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 10:38 AM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/apjgxy/paper_published_in_the_british_journal_of_urology/ The most sensitive/pleasurable parts shown here in red and purple. If you got to experience those parts and the pleasures they give, you would most likely do as 99% of intact men do and keep them.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 10:36 AM
2

So those things should change, yes? What about the religious mutilation of children? shouldn't toxic religous practices change?
/r/MensRights02/10/20 04:50 AM
3

You oppose toxic aspects of western culture, but have no problem with toxic aspects of religion?
/r/MensRights01/10/20 07:24 AM
11

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/apjgxy/paper_published_in_the_british_journal_of_urology/ This shows the most sensitive parts of the penis mapped out, these are also the parts that get cut off during a circumcision.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 07:18 PM
14

Cut America isn't better off than intact Europe.. Also, the parts that get cut off are some of the most sensitive of the entire penis, better let the boys/men decide for themselves if they think the "pros/gains" warrant the amputation of these parts.. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/apjgxy/paper_published_in_the_british_journal_of_urology/
/r/MensRights30/09/20 03:51 PM
2

A normal penis isn't hypersensitive or excruciatingly painful.. The foreskin has a completely different sensitivity than the glans, it feels detail and fine touch, the glans doesn't feel that. If a person would like to get desensitized there are different types of cuts that can do that for them. Those who are cut as babies end up with variations of high/low, loose/tight, with frenuloplasty/without, It should of course be the individuals choice when they are mature enough to realize what gets cut…
/r/MensRights31/08/20 04:26 PM
3

You are aware that there are many different types of fgm? Mgm basically always removes the most sensitive parts of the penis. The glans is dull compared to the fine touch abilities and pleasure one gets from the parts of the foreskin.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 05:19 AM
1

Lots of people don't like kids /Aren't fit to be parents/don't want to throw away a huge chunk of their life to care for and provide for another person, i don't think that's selfish. Where we differ in opinion is just who should pay for it. Child support laws can be devastating to the people who have to pay, and very unfair. Sometimes a parent is denied to even be a real part of a childs life and still they have to pay up, that ain't right.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 06:57 PM
1

I don't think that's right. There are tons of people in trouble, even in jail because they couldn't keep up with paying child support for a kid they don't even know.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 06:48 PM
1

So the mother should be able to dip out and give her baby away, with no "financial punishment", but the man shouldn't be able to do that? It's better the state give financial aid in those cases.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 06:28 PM
1

That doesn't matter. If a woman doesn't want to be a parent she can give the child away for free, she doesn't have to pay the foster care child support and she shouldn't have to.. A man shouldn't have to pay either for a child he doesn't want anything to do with. Financial aid in that case should come from the state.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 06:19 PM
1

If an accidental pregnancy happens, and the woman wants to keep the baby and the man doesn't, he should be able to give up his parental rights and walk away.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 06:09 PM
1

It doesn't matter the scenario, if a man doesn't want to be a father he shouldn't have to, And he shouldn't have to support the choice made by a woman. A woman can give up her parenting rights and give the baby away, the man should have the right to not be a part of a childs life the same way. If a single mother can't afford to give her baby a reasonable living standard, the state should give her financial aid.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 05:55 PM
-1

A man shouldn't be forced into slavery for 18 years because some woman stole his sperm. There are cases where women try to get pregnant with wealthy dudes/lie about birth control/take sperm from tossed condoms. If the dude says no early on in the pregnancy, he should be able to walk away.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 12:16 PM
-1

Its his responsibility if he stays in the relationship or expresses that he wants to be a parent, other than that it should be on the woman.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 12:05 PM
-1

It depends. If a woman wants to have a baby/gets pregnant with a one nighter/short fling that wants nothing to do with either her or the baby he should be able to walk away. Her body/her choice/her responsibility.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 11:36 AM
3

The foreskin contains the most sensitive/erogenous parts of the penis.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 01:58 PM
3

You would most likely belong to the 99% of intact men who choose to not get circumcised as an adult. After living with an intact penis and realizing how much nerves and pleasure there is in the foreskin, almost no one gets circumcised.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 04:49 AM
1

Yes most people are fine and pleased, but not everyone, + there are botched circumcisions that can be completely horrible (but that's not really what we are discussing here). They do report an increase in feeling after foreskin restoration. Considering there are many types of cuts where some also leave/cut off the frenulum, off course people will have different results too. The penis isn't a magical thing where you can cut off any amount of foreskin +/- the frenulum and expect absolutely nothing…
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/20 12:22 PM
1

Cutting off body parts leaves you without feeling in that bodypart. It certainly is no stretch at all to assume if you cut away enough tissue from a persons genitals, they would at some point begin to notice.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/20 11:58 AM
1

I don't think it's a stretch to assume it is because of the circumcision when you regain sensitivity after foreskin restoration. Yes it won't be as the original foreskin jam packed with nerves, But it will protect the glans and make it an "inside moist organ" again, that seems to help alot.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/20 11:41 AM
1

A person with sensitivity issues would know if they get more sensitive and get a better sex life after restoring their foreskin. If you read testimonies from guys over at r/circumcision some say no difference, some say it's different but not less sensitive, some say they are a bit less sensitive, and some do say they experienced a great loss in sensitivity and they regret getting circumcised. I only know personally how unique sensitivity there is in the foreskin, im 100% sure that those who do s…
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/20 11:25 AM
1

Tons of guys experience sensitivity issues after circumcision, just check out r/circumcisiongrief , those who restore their foreskin report a increase in feeling, r/foreskin_restoration They even recommend different types of cuts in r/circumcision depending on if you want to maximize/minimize sensitivity loss. And personally knowing just how much pleasure and sensitivity is in the foreskin, im not suprised that people do experience loss of sensitivity, The foreskin contains the most sensitive an…
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/20 09:25 AM
2

I did answer you, as in " But i do cum/feels amazing when my girlfriend plays with these parts." Something is very fishy about those studies, + You can only examine penile sensitivity in the parts that are left after the circumcision.. You need to only venture as far as r/circumcision to see testimonies from guys who got cut as adults, some are unhappy about the loss of sensitivity and regret the choice to get cut. There are entire subs of unhappy cut men r/foreskin_restoration r/circumcisiongri…
/r/MensRights27/06/20 07:54 AM
3

Thats not how i have sex.. most people don't... I don't stick it in my girlfriend and then twist from side to side. But i do cum/feels amazing when my girlfriend plays with these parts. the frenulum (on the underside of the glans) and the tip of the foreskin (ends up below the glans in a ring when pulled back), bring the most sensation and pleasure during sexual activites and when the vagina/lips/hand passes by these areas it feels the best (where i feel the most detail). https://en.wikipedia.or…
/r/MensRights26/06/20 08:28 PM
3

What do you mean even if you're wrong? I have a intact set of genitals, i can just reach down and touch the different parts. The study is completely spot on. These are not parts that should be cut off childrens genitals.
/r/MensRights26/06/20 07:12 PM
3

https://i.redd.it/jbpvyi1wizf21.jpg the red areas are by far the most sensitive and pleasurable.
/r/MensRights26/06/20 08:35 AM
2

Alright, for me its the same senitivity/pleasure, but the area is a bit bigger on the underside, also larger area of that sensitivity on the sides than on the top
/r/MensRights24/06/20 11:10 AM
4

How does this picture match what you can feel for yourself? are you cirucmcised or intact?
/r/MensRights24/06/20 10:52 AM
3

You have a frenulum? Is that kind of sensitivity only there on the underside of the glans? or is it the whole way around where the ridged band would end up like in the picture?
/r/MensRights24/06/20 10:51 AM
2

That sucks. There is no kind of that sensitivity there at all?
/r/MensRights24/06/20 10:10 AM
1

How is it for you?
/r/MensRights24/06/20 10:05 AM
2

Thanks for the answer!
/r/MensRights24/06/20 09:35 AM
21

Only people who were indoctrinated into cutting cultures believe those health myths. Smegma is completely natural and vaginas produce lots more, It's very easy to just rinse off. Cut America have more stds than intact Europe, hygiene and condoms does the trick, not mutilating childrens genitals. https://i.redd.it/jbpvyi1wizf21.jpg How great would the benefits have to be to warrant cutting the most erogenous parts from a small childs genitals?..
/r/MensRights21/06/20 10:26 AM
3

It definitely is mutilated, and you can tell. https://i.redd.it/jbpvyi1wizf21.jpg Circumcision cuts away the most sensitive parts of the penis.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 03:05 PM
4

Actually it's not. https://i.redd.it/jbpvyi1wizf21.jpg In my view, this is spot on.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 03:00 PM
6

Do you have any idea how sensitive and erogenous the foreskin is? Calling it a piece of skin shows great ignorance.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 01:23 PM
5

All those countries cut their boys in the same conditions. The foreskin is the most sensitive/erogenous part of the penis.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 01:21 PM
2

https://i.redd.it/jbpvyi1wizf21.jpg This exactly matches the erogenous/sensitivity zones on my intact penis. I couldnt imagine cutting them all off, that's horrible. Most who where brought up in cutting cultures have no idea that these parts are the most sensitive and pleasurable.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 09:10 AM
5

It is one thing to decide for yourself that you don't value the foreskin and the pleasure it provides, but when deciding that for your child it is just genital mutilation. Most who where cut as babies have no idea what was really cut from their genitals, if they could find out im sure many more would be very upset. Most who say they "prefer" a cut penis just likes their penis, guys like their penises.. if those guys where born and raised in Europe they would be just as glad about their intact pe…
/r/MensRights16/06/20 06:00 AM
3

Yeah it's quite alot of skin. On an adult it's like somewhere around the size of a master card. No problem!
/r/MensRights15/06/20 08:37 PM
11

Most people from cutting cultures completely downplay the sensitivty and pleasure of the foreskin and regurgitate ridiculous myths like "it's just extra skin" , "bacteria will grow there". "SMEGMA!!", in reality the foreskin is among the most sensitive parts of the entire penis, and comparing stats between cut America and intact western countries shows that the US often has even worse stats on stis/stds/hiv/penile cancer/ just about anything they claim it should protect against. Women produce mo…
/r/MensRights15/06/20 08:31 PM
4

Whatever you have to tell yourself.. ignorance is bliss.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 07:23 PM
3

The foreskin contains some of the most erogenous/sensitive parts of the entire penis, How can you not know this?... ah ye thats right.. https://i.redd.it/jbpvyi1wizf21.jpg
/r/MensRights11/06/20 03:32 PM
1

They are both bad for the same reason, they cut off the main erogenous parts from the genitals. Bet you didn't know that the foreskin contains the most erogenous parts of the penis.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 10:48 AM
3

Good. Keep not doing it then!
/r/MensRights20/05/20 11:29 AM
2

Please don't mutilate childrens genitals.
/r/MensRights20/05/20 10:58 AM
2

https://i.redd.it/jbpvyi1wizf21.jpg Cutting away the most sensitive parts of the genitals is cutting away the most sensitive parts of the genitals.. any kind of mutilation to the genitals of children is absolutely disgusting. People should learn that the foreskin contains the most erogenous/pleasurable parts of the penis.
/r/MensRights20/05/20 10:46 AM
4

https://i.redd.it/jbpvyi1wizf21.jpg Circumcision cuts away the most sensitive parts of the penis. Especially when they cut of the frenulum too. If people realized what they actually cut off they would stop doing it to their kids.
/r/MensRights20/05/20 10:45 AM
2

For me the tip of the foreskin feels like a continuation of the frenulum (the front under the tip) all the way around, like shown in this study. https://i.redd.it/jbpvyi1wizf21.jpg
/r/MensRights20/05/20 10:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter