TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

So-Contribution Archive

View 0 posts and 387 comments by So-Contribution on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It made sense at the time, if the husband was the main breadwinner, and held responsible for his wife's debt, that he would have a say in her getting credit.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 10:19 AM
1

it’s that their attention/comment/advice is unwanted When is an appropriate time for attention/comment/advice, and how would a man determine that time?
/r/MensRights25/09/23 09:18 AM
1

My point still stands. There's no point in using a method that doesn't work. She's paranoid about some guy. She checks his social media, and it all looks very good. Now she's less paranoid. Profit ? Did she actually manage to lower the objective danger? Or did she make it worse, by preferring social media pages of "bad boys"?
/r/MensRights11/09/23 05:42 AM
1

My point wasn't to question the numbers, but to understand how you can "make sure" somebody is not a serial killer by checking their social media pages. Real serial killers would make sure they're not posting pictures of their basement.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 05:29 AM
1

In order to get involved in a romantic relationship we have a number of unwritten rules: The men are supposed to take the initiative Men are not supposed to bother women who are unavailable Women signal their availability in non-verbal, often subtle, ways. Given these rules, we must accept that women have the responsibility for sending out clear signals of their intent. Don't blame men for misunderstanding confusing signals. I think the majority of what's called "rape" is just a matter of sendin…
/r/MensRights11/09/23 05:25 AM
3

Even if we assume those numbers to be correct, how does one "make sure" ?
/r/MensRights11/09/23 04:46 AM
–

It's not privilege when you work hard to get into that position.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 03:13 PM
–

The pink tax is just capitalism in action. Products are priced based on what the customer is willing to pay. Women willing to pay more isn't "hatred of women". Abortion affects women of course, but the overturning of Roe v Wade wasn't motivated by hatred of women. It was motivated because the original Supreme Court decision was inappropriate use of constitutional law. Even state level anti abortion laws are not implemented because they hate women, but because they care about the life of the unbo…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 06:01 PM
1

"If men could get pregnant, abortion would be legal, and tampons and condom's would be free and available in every store." We all know this is true Highly doubtful. Men need more food than women, and food is not free. Men use condoms and they are not free. Men are getting their genitals mutilated, and nobody cares. Men are drafted for war where they get maimed and killed, and nobody cares. More men live on the street, and nobody cares. More men die on the job, and nobody cares.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 04:43 PM
–

Roe v. Wade, prostitution and the "pink tax" all have nothing to do with misogyny. The gender pay gap doesn't exist. Gendered social conditioning isn't a female only issue. Sexual harassment isn't misogyny, just like men getting mugged and assaulted more isn't misandry.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 04:39 PM
1

"a majority of young men who suddenly had so much promised by patriarchy" What kind of promises ? Stuff like: "you get to provide for a family"? And now young men are suffering because they can no longer do that??
/r/MensRights26/08/23 12:03 PM
1

"the supremacy of the father in the clan or family" We clearly don't have that.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 12:01 PM
1

Isn't it also patriarchical laws that deem men to be superior in physicality to women, therefore women must be protected? Women demand to be protected.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 02:03 PM
1

It made sense that the husband was in control of joint property that he alone was responsible for acquiring in the first place.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 02:00 PM
1

Hierarchical systems are the best at getting things done efficiently. The system doesn't favor men, but a few men are good at getting to the top. Realize that quite a few men started out at a low position. People like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs literally started in a garage, and built their own multi billion dollar companies. If a black woman wants to do the same, I'm sure there's another garage somewhere that she can use.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 12:05 PM
14

A patriarchy is not defined as "a system where the people at the top happen to be mostly men" The top chess players are all men, but there's no patriarchy in chess. It's a completely open system where both men and women compete on merit. A handful of men just happen to be better than 99.9999% of the men and 100% of the women.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 12:00 PM
1

You're free to wear girly clothes, and others are free to mock you for it.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 03:21 PM
1

"would you still love me if I was a worm?"
/r/MensRights23/08/23 03:20 PM
1

I don't see why people should be complaining about the division of tasks in somebody else's relationship. It's something for the people involved to talk about and reach an agreement. If they can't reach an acceptable agreement, they're free to end the relationship, and find somebody else.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 03:19 PM
1

I haven't watched the movie, so I have no idea what people mean by that phrase. I'll just ignore it.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 10:54 AM
1

I'm pretty sure each of those jobs takes 1 minute, if you spend a bit of time organizing your system. Instead of throwing the kitchen towels in with the rest of the laundry, throw them in their own little hamper so they don't have to be sorted. When you walk back and forth, make sure you carry something each way, etc... 7 loads of clothes sound like a lot too. Do you obsessively change clothes, or do you have a family of 8?
/r/MensRights23/08/23 10:45 AM
1

What do you spend 30 minutes on? A load of kitchen towels doesn't need to be ironed, so I can't imagine why it would take you more than 5 minutes.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 10:06 AM
1

For men, the popular saying should be reversed: "a man needs a woman like a bicycle needs a fish"
/r/MensRights23/08/23 09:24 AM
1

It's not a double standard, it's just biology. Men and women are not the same, so different standards apply. Similarly, for a man, the ideal woman has a higher percentage of body fat than the ideal man has for a woman.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 03:31 AM
1

If you want to limit yourself to the top 10% and - the odds are not in your favor. At all. Especially because those top few percent men have plenty of options themselves. What does she have to offer except tell him "I am the worn out table!"
/r/MensRights20/08/23 02:45 PM
1

And the 40 year old rich successful guy isn't going to pick her. They're going to pick a cute 25 year old without a career.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 12:52 PM
1

That's a quote from her defense lawyer. Obviously, he's going to say stuff like this. That's his job.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 05:28 AM
1

Lead by example.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 04:39 AM
6

the top 500 companies in the world managed to increase the proportion of female CEOs How about you create a startup, appoint yourself CEO, and then grow it into a top 500 company? That's what several of these men have done. Why do you deserve the easy route of waiting until other people build the throne for you to sit in?
/r/MensRights20/08/23 04:15 AM
27

more women in power might be a good idea. Men do very little for other men, but women do even less.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 05:19 PM
5

If sex is just a fun little activity that means nothing, why do people get upset about cheating?
/r/MensRights19/08/23 02:37 PM
16

You'd be surprised how much of the dark ages is still programmed into people's brains.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 02:34 PM
1

That's another red flag, then.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 12:45 PM
1

She is a 9, at least. Maybe close to a 10. Beautiful face, no make-up. Absolutely could be a model. Her eyes and smile were kind and warm. Body was smoking hot. I mean perfect. If she looks like that, and is still single, that's your first red flag.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 11:58 AM
1

And if you give them special privileges to reach the same level, they're encouraged to put in even less effort, and ask for more privileges to compensate. See the 'lazy girl jobs' for example.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 05:42 AM
1

Early, formative immersion is available to anyone with internet. The new entries in the world's chess elite are all young kids who started playing the game in the internet era. If you already own a phone or a PC/laptop, you can play/learn/study chess online for free. For a modest additional subscription you can access a wealth of material that even the world's top players use. The world's best chess engine is free to download as an open source project. Barriers to entry are really low, and the g…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 11:55 AM
1

Correct, but that means that female GMs only grew 3x faster than male. It's a noteworthy improvement, but there's still a huge gap to be explained. Out of the 1251 new GMs, only 37 are women, so we went from 1% female to 3% female. In the world top 100, 6% are teenagers, so chess is not a world of old men. The effect of modern changes such as the rise in anonymous online chess should have very quick and noticeable effects on statistics. It takes talented kids less than 10 years to go from learni…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 11:44 AM
40

Ladies, next time don't complain if you see a man with his dick hanging out.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 11:21 AM
1

But at the same time do you think its fair for a man who has just done 12 hours of physical labor to earn money for the family to come home and be expected to perform MORE physical labor? It's also funny when you consider the fact that my grandmother used to spend an entire day doing the laundry for a family of 8, using a bunch of open tubs with primitive detergent, filled with water that had to be hand pumped, and carried in buckets, and boiled on the stove to make it hot, and then agitated wit…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 09:58 AM
1

Sure, there used to be a social component, but it's been greatly diminished in recent times. If anything, young girls are encouraged more than boys. Also, to put your numbers in context there were 674 total GMs between 1970 and 2000, and 1251 GMs from 2000 to present, so there's been a growth in chess in general.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 09:27 AM
1

It wasn't clear to me that when you were talking about "going to a chess tournament" you meant as a spectator. I assumed you were talking about going to a tournament to participate. Most chess tournaments are not really heavy in live spectators. To revisit your previous question with the next insight. Yes, I would expect women with an interest in chess to be watching the games for the games, and not really care about the gender of the players.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 09:14 AM
1

nothing inspires young girls like watching men win You don't go to a chess tournament to watch others win. You go there to beat them. Girls have a much higher chance of beating their opponents when they go to tournaments with other girls.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:31 AM
1

Men earning noticeably more than women on average Because 1) they work harder and longer, and 2) they have innate interest in the type of jobs that make more money. 3) they are more competitive. Why violent crimes are overwhelmingly committed by men Men are naturally more violent, but that's not a property of 'patriarchy'. Why women are still expected to do the lion's share of work in the home Women prefer it that way. How many women want to spend 10-12 hours a day doing a tough job, and then co…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:28 AM
1

Your first line where you define patriarchy conflicts with the rest of the paragraph. Our system has more males at the top power position, but they didn't get there because they're advantaged at the expense of women. They got there because they are just better at it. Compare with the other topic, chess. Men dominate the top 100 of chess players, but there's no discrimination or privilege. The men have to work hard to reach the top.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:20 AM
1

Would it be better if all other countries get more efficient by using robots and AI, while the US still employs people?
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:16 AM
2

There's no "subculture" or expectations. Women are free to play in open tournaments. They see they don't perform as well as the men, so they decide to sign up for tournaments restricted to women.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:00 AM
–

United said they had gathered "extensive evidence and context not in the public domain" and spoke to "numerous people with direct involvement or knowledge of the case". They know more than you, I think.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 07:23 AM
1

I have no read specific studies. It's a mix of seeing many different sex differences in behaviors that stem from brain differences, plus the obvious differences in results.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 07:09 AM
2

Where talking about chess, not overall intelligence. Overall intelligence measures a wide range of skills that tends to average out sex differences. Men could be better at one part of the IQ test, and women could be better at another, and they end up with the same average number, especially when you look at ordinary people. Chess is an extremely specific skill, and when talking about chess tournaments, we're not talking about the middle part of the bell curve. We're talking about the extreme 0.0…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 06:48 AM
1

Now we can finally objectify objects. It's perfect for everybody.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 06:33 AM
2

The sources are the obvious rating differences in chess. Why is that "quite a claim"? Male and females of almost every species have different roles and different goals, and it makes perfect sense that each sex has a brain that's optimized to perform the tasks they are most likely to encounter. Why are male ducks wired to rape the female ducks, and not the other way around?
/r/MensRights18/08/23 06:32 AM
2

The results say that they are not. If you want to argue that these results are caused by external factors, you'll have to provide evidence for that.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 06:22 AM
2

Intelligence wise, men and women are on equal footing High level chess is only loosely correlated with intelligence. It's mostly spatial pattern matching and memorization. Here's the former world champion giving a demonstration: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eC1BAcOzHyY
/r/MensRights18/08/23 06:15 AM
1

It's a promotional tool to get more women into chess, because there are differences between the sexes. Otherwise, we could just promote them to go into open chess.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 06:09 AM
1

Go ahead and set one up.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 06:03 AM
1

Math at schools is simple enough that everybody can understand it, and you can expect individual differences based on many different external factors. Math at university level or beyond is still male dominated, because innate talents start to rule over any social/cultural aspect.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 06:01 AM
1

And for chess there's, brain structure, testosterone and aggressiveness, so what's the difference?
/r/MensRights18/08/23 05:56 AM
1

My kids were in a chess club, and they participated in tournaments where I watched. In both cases, they are sitting in rooms full of other people, including parents, coaches, arbiters, organizers, teachers. They are less likely to be "creeped on" than when they ride in a bus.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 05:52 AM
3

Women are just as strong and intelligent as men Chess playing ability has little to do with general intelligence. It's a highly specific skill. And no, women are not equal, so they can get their own leagues if they want. It doesn't hurt anyone.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 09:08 PM
2

no evidence that I'm aware of, of any biologically based differences in male and female chess ability That's because the brain is an insanely complicated organ, and we don't understand how it plays chess, so it's going to be pretty much impossible to provide evidence at a biology level. We do know there are many differences between male and female brain, so it would be very strange if chess playing ability was not affected by these differences. Boys do many crazy things that most girls are total…
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:29 PM
6

feminists accuse each other of not being real feminists all the time Where does this happen? I want to watch.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:10 PM
3

there are more male chess players than female ones It's a popular explanation, but not really satisfying unless you can also explain why there are more male chess players. It could be that girls give up chess, because they notice that they aren't making progress as fast as the boys of similar age. It could be that girls are discouraged, but in modern times that's getting hard to defend. It could be that girls develop other interest than an inherently stupid game that takes a lot of dedication to…
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:56 PM
3

Most chess nowadays is played online. You make an account, using any random name, and start playing and gaining rating. You can play thousands of games, and nobody ever knows if you're a boy or a girl.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:49 PM
1

Ironically, putting more men in a position where they have absolutely nothing to lose could very cause some of the issues that she does care about.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:37 PM
19

No particular reason, except that men have proven to be better at it. It's the same as for physical sports. There's no reason why men should be faster runners, but we can observe it to be true. Similarly, we can observe that men are better in chess. The best active female player at this moment is Hou Yifan, ranked 127 in the world. Part of the reason could be that the male brain is more likely to develop into a direction that's good for chess. Another part of the reason is that men are more comp…
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:28 PM
1

it must be bad to be a trans woman in any sport It's also bad to be a regular dude in any sport. Most people would never win in a professional competition.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 06:27 PM
109

Simple reason is that women are not as good in chess as men, just like they are not so good in running or lifting heavy weights or driving F1 cars. To give them an opportunity for competition, we made a separate category. We also have separate categories for youth players of various ages. There's nothing wrong with that.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 06:24 PM
11

It's not based on physicality. The brain is just another organ in our body, and like every other organ, there's a difference between the male and female version.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 06:21 PM
1

It's not really about safety, but rather about the opportunity for women to win tournaments.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 06:20 PM
1

In theory, yes, but in practice, there are barely any women making money in open tournaments.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 06:18 PM
–

You should elaborate a bit. What do you mean by "deconstruction of patriarchal norms", exactly? And what's your own opinion?
/r/MensRights17/08/23 04:16 PM
1

If you prefer you can wait until people start doing/saying things that make you uncomfortable, and then start recording before it escalates. Or you can record all the time, and don't tell anybody about it, and just erase the recording at the end of the day/next morning if nothing happened.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 11:38 AM
1

It's not sudden. Most of the things have been like that forever, but they were more controlled. Now, we're letting totally unhinged women make the rules.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:45 AM
76

Try to put yourself in situations where there are witnesses. Keep a recording device, and if there's something that makes you uncomfortable, make a point of mentioning it so that it gets recorded. Stay as professional as you can. Don't make jokes, don't talk about gender issues or politics.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:36 AM
5

Not really, no. You'd have to start by explaining what is your definition of "patriarchy" and how it specifically leads to criminals picking male victims. All you've done is some handwaving and pointing.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:31 AM
1

The body positivity movement was created by and for women Even if true, who cares? Why can't we all benefit from good ideas? Should we ban women from using ideas that were done by and for men? They are not saying dad bods are bad Why would they say: "if you have a dad bod, it’s time to hit the gym. It’s good for you — and we’ll appreciate you more", if they thought dad bods were not bad? Why even take the effort to write the article if you don't really care about men have dad bods? Why complain …
/r/MensRights17/08/23 05:49 AM
3

The "patriarchy" is responsible for men being victims of violent crime? How does that work, in high resolution?
/r/MensRights17/08/23 05:38 AM
16

She probably didn't want to go to the cops, because she wasn't raped.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 05:13 AM
1

No, don't become immature and petty.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 05:05 AM
2

Even when women are married off by their parents, female hypergamy works by proxy. Obviously, the father of the girl is going to look for a man that can take good care of his daughter.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 04:46 AM
5

Female hypergamy.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 05:58 PM
3

Funny how the body positivity movement was designed for black women, but when white women appropriated it, there was no problem. How convenient. And if there are all these rules, how come the almighty patriarchy is not in charge of them?
/r/MensRights16/08/23 05:24 PM
39

"When you give an undercover police squad a hammer, everything looks like a nail"
/r/MensRights16/08/23 11:50 AM
92

If you have undercover police squads walking around, why not give them the job to stop all kinds of crime, most of which will be more serious than catcalling?
/r/MensRights16/08/23 11:42 AM
–

I don't think the guy's job is to teach kids about the experience of having a period. His job is to help institutions with the Period Act, which is a law that requires public institutions to provide free period products. As far as I can see, the work does not require personal experience.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 11:12 AM
6

That's not any of the standard definitions. Also, the problem is that 'power' is poorly defined. If a white guy gets attacked in a black neighborhood, who has the power? Does the white guy have more power because Biden is also white? Or do the black guys have more power because they're carrying guns ?
/r/MensRights16/08/23 10:32 AM
13

To be more accurate, it's not "white men hold more power", but "positions of power are predominantly filled by white men"
/r/MensRights16/08/23 10:28 AM
19

Indeed, men's version of the story is questioned always a lot more. In the last couple of years I've been seeing more body cam videos of police officers dealing with women, either for public disturbance, traffic violations, or domestic unrest, and it's become very clear that there are plenty of women who have no problem telling obvious lies. Or you can see them changing their stories multiple times, switching from pleading to crying and back, trying different emotions to see which one sticks. If…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 08:30 AM
1

It's a war instigated by Russia, trying to capture sovereign territory of Ukraine, and committing genocide on its people. Without the US and other Western countries, the Russians would have started earlier, and also taken over the rest of Eastern Europe.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 05:56 AM
1

The film is an extreme example of damaging trivializing.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 05:11 AM
2

Instead of getting frustrated, it's important to communicate. Because men and women communicate in different ways, it's also important for both of them to learn how to do that in a clear manner. For example, a lot of women communicate by being passive aggressive, saying stuff like "fine, I'll do all the cleaning up", and then man thinks "oh, great, she's doing all the cleanup, that's nice"
/r/MensRights16/08/23 05:03 AM
2

Have you ever heard the concept of "learning" ?
/r/MensRights16/08/23 04:57 AM
3

Yeah, the comic claims that asking someone for help is a huge mental load because they assume that you still have to continue to micro-manage your offloaded task because the husband doesn't know how to watch a boiling pot or do some other mundane tasks.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 04:54 AM
1

the wings were shit Try the breast next time.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 04:49 AM
2

in this stupid-ass proxy war. It's not a proxy war, though. It's the purest classical war. Grab land, remove the existing population and replace it with your own.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 04:47 AM
3

True when wikipedia deals with objective science stuff. Very far from true on social issues, where the "footnoted sources" are just brainwashed in leftist academia.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 04:44 AM
1

Let's not harass some strangers who may have done nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 04:24 AM
5

is the advice you give them dependent on their gender? No. The most important advice is to tell them not to ignore red flags early in a relationship, which applies equally well to both genders. Also, communicate clearly (also non-verbally) and try to make smart choices. I also let them know that they can always count on help, and they won't be judged harshly for doing something stupid.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 03:58 AM
79

What I find interesting is how many people completely believe every word from a one-sided story.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 03:52 AM
3

I would love to hear the other side of the story. I've seen too many crazy manipulative women videos to trust anybody's word.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 05:27 PM
2

Genes have a very large impact on a person. That's just a fact. You can call that racism, or you can call it diversity. That's up to you.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 06:27 AM
20

It's biology. Women are torn between unreliable fuckboys and boring but dedicated husbands. The ideal solution is to stay with the boring provider, and get impregnated by a bad boy on the side.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 04:58 AM
6

That's not really how DNA works, though.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 04:55 AM
1

Single fathers are not ideal, but neither are single mothers. The mothers may indeed be better at nurturing, especially for infants, but fathers are better at discipline and teaching independence when the child gets older.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 04:54 AM
–

Trump isn't really a saber rattler. He withdrew troops from Afghanistan, and does not want to provide military aid to Ukraine. Russia is not a democracy.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 05:46 AM
–

it's other men who send them Ask them to explain what they mean. Does it mean that when the government is majority women, men will no longer be sent into war? Do women have any responsibility for voting for male presidents who sent men into war?
/r/MensRights14/08/23 05:02 AM
1

gender is a social construct. And yet, the same people will argue that people are born gay.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 04:56 AM
1

women find it easier than men to multitask and switch between tasks The difficulty is not multitasking in itself. The hard part is keeping up the quality of the work done.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 03:57 AM
1

no you can not do that, not that it was a deal breaker. What's the difference? If he tells her, "no you can't do that", she knows she could divorce him first, and then do it anyway. It's the same thing.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 03:41 AM
1

So in order to avoid "control", one must quietly wait for their partner to cross a boundary, and then just slap ones thighs, and say "whelp, that's it, I'm leaving".
/r/MensRights14/08/23 03:35 AM
–

What does "forbid" mean in practice? Usually it just means that "it's a deal breaker for me, and I'll walk out of this relationship if you insist on doing it", which is perfectly fine.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 03:33 AM
1

Men who sleep around are called perverts, fuckboys, womanizer, community dick, and manwhores. Stop, you're turning them on.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 03:26 AM
1

Doing volunteer work isn't "chasing".
/r/MensRights14/08/23 03:24 AM
–

Women sacrifice career for family In what way is that a sacrifice? Couldn't you say instead that "men sacrifice their family for a career?"
/r/MensRights13/08/23 03:05 PM
1

It's just a silly doll movie. How can you watch that wrong?
/r/MensRights13/08/23 02:47 PM
1

There is also the myth of a workplace culture that is entirely meritocratic and unbiasedly focused on “excellence.” So, because the workplace culture is not perfectly unbiased, we must replace it with a clear bias for women, even if they didn't deserve the place on merit? If there's a problem with meritocracy, why not pinpoint the flaws, and fix those? Would that not be more equal?
/r/MensRights13/08/23 01:37 PM
1

Gynocentrism is not an evolutionary adaptive set of behaviours. It does not increase the prospects of society or the number of copies of the genome, it reduces them. Gynocentrism was never about improving society. It's purely about the genes of the woman that demand to be put on a pedestal as a price for a chance to mate with her. Similarly, genes for psychopathy are not for improving society. They are for improving the chances of the person carrying them.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 01:01 PM
1

Believing that gynocentrism exist, and has biological origins is not the same as "advocacy for natural gynocentrism".
/r/MensRights12/08/23 12:55 PM
8

What power do men have that women don't? Why can't the women just say "20% more, or I'll walk"?
/r/MensRights11/08/23 05:07 PM
9

Why would any medical place volunteer to pay 20% more for men doing exactly the same amount of work?
/r/MensRights11/08/23 05:00 PM
1

Then don't.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 02:39 PM
3

I don't care to have a discourse Then why do you even bother to comment? Just go away and do everybody a favor.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 02:37 PM
3

Screaming, insulting and kicking would be immediate show stoppers for me. I don't understand why people put up with that.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 09:10 AM
1

Trying to prevent suicide should be done by looking at the cause, not by removing the method.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 07:15 AM
–

So she got rejected, and in order to feel better about that, she came up with a theory that all men reject all women.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 03:27 AM
1

This will just encourage men not to have children That why they need the neighbor to step in.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 05:48 AM
1

"Pretty Boys Are Poisonous" What she really means: "out of all the men in the world, I am mostly attracted to the ones that are bad for me. Instead of picking better men, I'll continue to pick the same ones, and then write poetry about them"
/r/MensRights10/08/23 05:31 AM
–

men should do something about it. But when men want to do something about it, they protest, and call them alt-right incel misogynists.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 06:28 AM
88

Science homework shouldn't even be about the scientists, but only about the science.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 05:54 AM
–

So in turn everyone here is very misogynistic No they're not. I assume you're using the word "misogynistic" wrong.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 05:26 AM
24

At best, feminism is cherry picking places where women had fewer rights than men, and advocating to change those. At the same time, feminists never cared about the places where men had more responsibilities, or where men had fewer rights, or where women had more privileges. It's never been about equality.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 04:46 AM
1

Not a good reason to punish the innocent. We can assist people who need help in collecting evidence for abuse.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 03:55 AM
–

That's not "no fault", then.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 03:33 AM
–

This is not a "movement". It's just a bunch of diverse people who think men deserve equal rights.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 03:06 AM
–

she wants to be treated as an equal. I bet she doesn't. If she was treated like any other dude, she'd be in tears before the hour was over.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 04:16 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMlkt4NovRE
/r/MensRights08/08/23 04:04 PM
20

They fuck you up, your mum and dad. They may not mean to, but they do. They fill you with the faults they had And add some extra, just for you.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 11:55 AM
1

Women protest about being treated as sex objects. Women protest against teachers telling them not to be sex objects.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 06:26 AM
3

I believe the complaint was about the statement "the future is female", not necessarily about "girl power"
/r/MensRights08/08/23 05:32 AM
7

girls run the world Ah, so we can blame these girls for causing climate change.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 05:29 AM
2

A lot of people are convinced that oil companies are to blame for selling the stuff to us. It boggles the mind.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 05:21 AM
1

Show us a place where the different types of feminists are arguing with each other.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 04:57 AM
1

Saying some women aren’t comfortable around men If that's a valid reason for women-only spaces, why can't some men feel uncomfortable around women?
/r/MensRights07/08/23 03:01 PM
135

It's an interesting view, but there's still a lot of female thinking in there. Edit: I also realized that a trans man actually gets a chance to have an article written about their experiences, but a regular dude, with a much more accurate view of what life is like as an ordinary man would have no such chance.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 01:10 PM
1

If there's a market for that kind of service, I wish her the best of luck.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 12:38 PM
1

The author's favorite book is a thesaurus. The over-the-top writing style completely distracts from whatever message is hidden in there.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 07:20 AM
1

I don't think personalities change that much. The change in behavior can be huge, but then it's usually just the mask that slips more and more. If you pay attention in the beginning, you can nearly always see through cracks in the mask. The problem is that in beginning relationships, people desperately want the relationship to work, and are willing to overlook little things. They are less critical, when they should be extra critical.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 05:45 AM
1

In another reaction you were mocking the OP: Men can't attend a 500 person festival in the UK.. men truly are the most opressed minority, along with atheists and white people And now you're saying it's not okay to exclude one sex. Or, it's okay in this case because it's only a small event, and we should allow things that go against our principles if they happen on a small scale.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 03:54 AM
1

I think the most important thing is not what you say, but to observe carefully and don't ignore red flags. In relationships that go wrong, there are usually subtle warnings from the first day.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 03:46 AM
26

do you ever think about why so many nazis might hate Jews?
/r/MensRights07/08/23 03:25 AM
1

It's not about "revoking the right for circumcision". It's about bodily autonomy. The mother in the article claims that men don't have any bodily autonomy issues. Circumcision is a counter example to that claim. Military conscription is another counter example. Abortion is not just a woman's bodily autonomy issue, because the fetus isn't part of the mother's body. Also, women can work around the abortion ban by moving to an abortion friendly state, or only having sex when they are ready to have …
/r/MensRights06/08/23 04:50 PM
6

It is not a statement meant to literally advocate for the genocide of men “When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’
/r/MensRights06/08/23 04:25 PM
3

Name one feminist that doesn't use words like "patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity"
/r/MensRights06/08/23 04:23 PM
9

But where did that norm come from? One day, men decided they were going to hate females?
/r/MensRights06/08/23 03:56 PM
10

And where does misogyny come from? Do men grow up disliking females?
/r/MensRights06/08/23 03:53 PM
14

Suppose they do, would that be okay?
/r/MensRights06/08/23 03:47 PM
56

He will have bodily autonomy — a privilege I lost in June 2022 when six Supreme Court justices voted to overturn Roe v. Wade." The argument is that abortion goes against the bodily autonomy of the unborn child. She may disagree that the fetus has that right, but it's dishonest not to mention it.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 03:44 PM
24

I'm personally not seeing any protests for revoking men's rights for circumcision or whatever bodily autonomy https://www.bloodstainedmen.com/
/r/MensRights06/08/23 03:34 PM
1

i fully agree with the other poster The other poster was being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 02:46 PM
1

Men trying to walk in women's spaces is a problem that doesn't exist? In order for us to have laws against murder, do we need evidence that murder is actually a widespread issue? Or should we also have laws against murder if it only affects a small minority of victims?
/r/MensRights06/08/23 08:02 AM
1

It demonstrates that you don’t actually care about women’s sports outside of excluding trans people. That makes no sense. I, and many other people, care for fairness in life, including sports. People can express their opinion about all kinds of issues of fairness, even if they are not directly involved with them. I want murderers to have a fair trial with a proper defense, even though I am not a murderer, I don't know any murderers, and I've never been to a trial. For example, I also wouldn't wa…
/r/MensRights06/08/23 07:34 AM
7

You can advocate for a fair and well regulated women's sports league without watching it yourself.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 07:06 AM
2

Do people in the trans community have a problem with excluding men from women-only spaces? If not, then how would we do that? How can we tell the difference between a man trying to get access to a woman-only space, and a trans woman? If there's no acceptable way to tell the difference, it basically means we have no way to guard women-only spaces, and they effectively no longer exist.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 07:03 AM
8

90% level headed is better than most subreddits, I would say.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 06:16 AM
21

women are raped by men at higher rates than men are raped by women A lot depends on how you define "rape" and how much effort is done to find out the proper statistics. If a man and woman both had a few too many drinks and end up having sex, and she regrets it the next morning, some would count that as the man raping the woman, and not as the woman raping the man, even though they both did the same thing.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 05:28 AM
36

Both men and women have done bad things, to both other men and women. The problem is that she (and many others) are only cherry picking the bad things that men do. One of the differences between men and women is that men do their bad things in the open. Women do their bad things in secret, so they don't get social rejection.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 04:18 AM
1

Cultural stereotypes continue to characterize women as “communal” (eg, kind, dependent, nurturing) and deficient in “agentic” traits (eg, logical, independent, strong) that stereotypically characterize men It's not just a cultural stereotype. It's based on biological differences between men and women. These differences then impact the culture, and culture reinforces them. You can see a large amount of overlap between all kinds of cultures and tribes all over the world. You can even observe many …
/r/MensRights05/08/23 06:37 PM
16

Yes. People don't sit at home and think "I'm interested in becoming a multi million dollar CEO, where can I start?" Some of the biggest CEOs, like Bill Gates, or Steve Jobs started with nothing but interest in tinkering with computers, founded a company from scratch, and let it grow to multi million dollar size. How many women are interested in working 100 hour work weeks in their parents garage to play with technology, rather than going shopping for a new cute pair of shoes with slightly lower …
/r/MensRights05/08/23 05:48 PM
16

What other scholars work on gender related labor divisions? Biggest reason for the difference is women and men have different interests, motivations, and skill sets, all caused by biology, which is mostly denied by "scholars".
/r/MensRights05/08/23 05:26 PM
34

Gender studies "scholars" are mostly wrong and confident.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 05:17 PM
25

These are also not the prices they charge in Uganda.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 04:50 PM
39

Still, $525 is a small sum if it helps to dodge paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 03:42 PM
1

Europe. But the same argument is also valid when a sewage job can carry 70%, and the wife does the other 30% with some part time jobs.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 10:44 AM
–

Ok, let's assume a man stops doing those things. What is he going to do instead?
/r/MensRights05/08/23 10:34 AM
6

No, that's not what a patriarchy is. A patriarchy requires a system where men are appointed to control those things, and where women are excluded. What we have is equal opportunity, but men and women just have different skills and different interests, and end up doing different jobs.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 02:37 AM
1

Nobody would ever be convicted of lying simply due to lack of evidence. For both parties, the same rule applies, namely that a criminal conviction requires evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 12:27 PM
–

If you report a crime, you'll have to show some kind of evidence to support your story. We don't want the police to start harassing innocent people just because someone accused them.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 12:21 PM
–

conforming to the values of a male dominated workplace Why not? You're saying that as if there's something wrong with these values and that the values of a female dominated workplace should be the norm. Well, I've heard plenty of awful stories about female dominated workplaces. Favoritism, backstabbing, sabotaging, personal vendettas, laziness, sexualizing...
/r/MensRights04/08/23 09:07 AM
1

Even assuming the numbers are correct, women have a much lower threshold for reporting harassment, and reports are taken more seriously.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 08:59 AM
–

courts are reluctant to accept that a female defendant was tricked or pressured into transporting drugs I can see where it could be appropriate to have more lenient sentences for people forced into transporting drugs, there's no good reason to make special rules for women. Men can get tricked or pressured as well. It may even happen relatively more often to women, but men make up nearly all of the death sentences, so I would be willing to bet there are more male victims of such circumstances.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 03:34 AM
–

I haven't watched the movie, and if someone invites me, I would decline. Even if the message was positive, I wouldn't be interested in this type of movie.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 02:23 AM
1

More hate between people is wonderful, right?
/r/MensRights04/08/23 02:14 AM
1

These patterns mostly evolve from biology. Men are more interested in objects women are more interested in people. You can see the exact same gender division in easily approachable places, such as youtube channels from single individuals. Arts and crafts are predominantly done by women, wood & metalworking are mostly done by men, even though there's no good reason why it couldn't be equal.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 04:15 PM
3

Apparently, women are tough enough to keep men as slaves for the dirty and dangerous jobs, but not tough enough to handle a man walking behind them in a park.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 02:57 PM
1

Also, women should now do all the dirty and dangerous jobs such as logging, crab fishing, mining, oil rigging, and sewer cleaning.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 09:49 AM
–

Why should an individual man (with or without struggles) care about masculinity or male culture, instead of just focusing on himself?
/r/MensRights03/08/23 09:19 AM
1

Try to ignore/avoid her as much as possible instead of having verbal fights.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 04:24 AM
1

Why are you self-censoring so many common words ? It's okay to say "abuser" or "lesbian".
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:53 AM
1

Better pro-Ukraine propaganda story if you use an attractive young woman.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:51 AM
1

Not an excuse, but a reason.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:46 AM
2

Oh, you can milk just about anything with nipples.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 07:00 PM
1

A nobody speaking from ignorance, like a child at a dinner table.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 04:43 AM
1

Studies show a speed limit of 20 mph results in way less accidents and fatalities. That's not realistic.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 03:58 AM
–

They're truly delusional.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 06:10 PM
1

Everything is just "social factors" (which of course then need to be declared "problematic" and changed) Except, of course, being lesbian or gay, which they will insist is something that people are born with, and is not a choice. The whole field is very much driven by where they want to end up at. In order for every man and woman to be completely equal, we must ignore biological factors, but in order to fight gay/trans conversion therapy, we must insist on biological factors. The fact that these…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 01:55 PM
1

as they are taught to those that are born male Are they clarifying who teaches those men?
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:19 AM
–

A clear refutation of the "social constructs" can be seen in the interests of gay men. As children, they are socialized just like straight boys, but despite that, we can clearly see a difference in the professions they pick, going for entertainment, hospitality, and fashion sectors more than straight men.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:16 AM
1

Funny how you immediately jump to conclusions about what you think my opinion is.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 07:55 AM
–

I could give you some answers to think about, but I don't want to be downvoted into oblivion, so I'll just ignore.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 05:25 AM
–

Conservative icons Dennis Prager, Ben Shapiro and Steven Crowder boast millions of followers on YouTube, a platform whose ads and viewing suggestions make it easy for a young, male YouTuber “to get sucked into a very conservative sphere of politics and media,” If you want young men to watch a liberal host, then produce something they want to watch. You've tried constant misandrist messaging, and it didn't work. Maybe try something else?
/r/MensRights01/08/23 05:18 AM
1

Yes, they should be strong and independent and get a job so they don't need continued alimony payments by the ex-husband. The marriage is over, and they both go their own ways. If she argues that the years of marriage made her lose all work skills, and homekeeping is the only skill she has left, then he pays her for doing that. Why should the ex husband continue to work for her, if she's not doing anything for him?
/r/MensRights01/08/23 05:07 AM
–

Exactly. If she's getting alimony, she should be coming over to cook and clean.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 03:04 PM
1

Let me guess, she was really excited to be able to go into a bar, and not have men bothering her? She could buy her own drink, and sit there in peace with a good book.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 04:08 PM
–

How can you know how much sensitivity you've lost if you can't compare ?
/r/MensRights30/07/23 02:13 PM
–

How many people in your country can compare the two?
/r/MensRights30/07/23 12:49 PM
1

If you completely trust each other to stay committed, why do you need a marriage?
/r/MensRights30/07/23 04:51 AM
1

“The gender gap is narrowing,” Let's have a drink to celebrate equality.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 04:33 PM
3

Unless they get mad while wearing a trench coat.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 01:37 PM
–

What does it mean to be "white" anyway ? I mean, if she's going to demonize a group of people based on some group characteristic, I wouldn't mind seeing a definition.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 12:42 PM
–

She looks white to me, and she deserves the same broad brush she uses herself.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 12:24 PM
–

What a horrible person.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 10:20 AM
17

How do you define "patriarchy", and exactly how are men benefiting from it?
/r/MensRights29/07/23 05:05 AM
–

The main motive for the massacre was ethnic hatred and Islamaphobia, not misandry It wasn't just ethnic hatred that made them decide to kill all men and not all women.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 04:58 AM
1

Most of the article I've read before. It's a puff piece made from stolen ingredients.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 04:59 PM
1

Somebody wanting some more equal rights for men is apparently just one small step away from being a terrorist.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 12:31 PM
33

Just look around. We have hundreds of women's interest groups, women's marches, constant attention for women's problems in the media, majority women's voters, women's days.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 11:08 AM
29

Our systems run on democratic votes, as well as interest groups lobbying, and people protesting. Just because there's a man in office doesn't mean they don't listen to women. Women have more power to influence policy than men. How many women vote or would protest for equal rights in a draft ?
/r/MensRights28/07/23 10:57 AM
30

Some of them, yes, but the draft, parental rights for fathers, suicide, domestic violence, are also done by women.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 10:44 AM
24

The whole article is just awful propaganda to make men's rights look bad.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 07:04 AM
1

"Don't you understand? I'm a woman!"
/r/MensRights28/07/23 05:18 AM
3

They're "pre-approved" men.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 03:16 PM
4

It would be much better to have campaigns to attract both girls and boys at the same time. If you're going to go through all the trouble to make a campaign, or have coding camps or things like that, it's a small effort to also include boys. You can attract more girls without having to reject boys.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 02:51 PM
7

All that study says is the women report more pain than men, not that doctors ignore pain experienced by women but don't ignore the same pain experienced by men.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 05:19 AM
1

No, it's not. You can even see it in animals. The females in many species mate with the winners among the males. It's also the reason that males are generally bigger, and carry bigger antlers/horns.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:17 PM
1

So we need r/ReallyTrueUnpopularOpinion
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:11 PM
1

It would be better and easier for everybody if there was a default two parent policy, except if there's a court order to deny access to one of them.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 03:35 PM
1

The whole pay gap discussion is so tiresome. Most articles like to sound really dramatic by taking aggregate values for all men and all women. A much better way would be to compare hourly income for men and women doing the exact same job with the exact same performance. This is hard to calculate, because the exact performance is not known to researchers. Another factor is how hard you're willing to negotiate. Since men and women are quite different, it's not surprising if you find a difference i…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 03:06 PM
37

They essentially want the best possible outcome for women, But only in the most shallow way. They don't realize that pushing for short term outcomes for women there's a real risk of worse outcomes for women down the line. For instance, when you favor women in a divorce, the consequence will be that fewer men choose to get married.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 02:49 PM
7

It's not trivial if somebody blows up because you're not doing it right. I see no reason why a man should go out of his way to move the seat back down after use. The least effort for everybody is to move the seat only before use, unless you want to keep both seat and lid down for hygiene reasons.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:19 PM
27

If the parents are separated but they have some sort of shared custody, schools should inform both. It shouldn't be a big deal.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 08:32 AM
1

People with privilege who think they are oppressed do not make good decisions.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 05:18 AM
24

The entire reason for male violence is female selection.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:59 AM
4

"It's just a movie, why are you so fragile, getting upset about a movie?"
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:45 AM
1

If a woman rejects a man for crying, why would you call that "toxic masculinity" ? By the way: I never see feminists acknowledge that women's rejection is the main reason that men don't cry, let alone teach girls not to do that.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 05:14 PM
1

A whole bunch of statistics, but I'm missing the cause. What exactly are the reasons that this happens? Do American mothers decide to quit their job and stay at home, because "it's the stereotype"? Are they fired when pregnant?
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:28 PM
1

A lot of emotional problems are due to some underlying issue. Stress about work, stress about making enough money, stress about having a shitty marriage but you can't leave. You can't solve the emotional problem on its own. You need to solve the underlying problems.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:14 PM
5

I feel like I’ve seen a bigger push by feminists specifically though for men to open up about their feelings Was there ever a push by feminist for women to accept men who open up about their feelings? Because that's the biggest problem. It doesn't make sense for a man to cry if it means that his wife/girlfriend is going to run away.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:12 PM
1

He may not be a genius, but he's very smart, and understands a lot about tech. He doesn't understand everything, and has a tendency to simplify problems. On the other hand, that's also a strength. Sometimes real geniuses have a tendency to overcomplicate, so when you combine the two, you can get really innovative solutions. The Falcon 9 rocket is a great design, and owes a lot to Elon's vision.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:02 PM
–

yet apparently transphobia is rampany omg MRAs Is it ? Where's the evidence ? I would not take any sub on reddit as a fair representation of feminist opinion. Nearly all subreddits are echo chambers, where people with dissenting opinion learn to keep their mouths shut.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/23 02:18 PM
–

The F in TERF means Feminist. I don't know the ratio of the two subgroups. Do you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/23 02:08 PM
–

Another sign of a cult is that dissenting voices get banned, so that none of the members gets exposed to outside opinions. Banning is a sign of fear, not a sign of being right.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 01:44 PM
1

The air conditioned well paying jobs are where they seek equality Where "equality" means "as many women as possible"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/23 06:20 AM
6

And there's plenty of transphobia and homophobia among feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/23 04:45 AM
1

If there's no natural order, a free for all is a logical consequence of everybody trying to save themselves first.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:15 AM
3

A good reason for women and children first could be that more people will be saved in the end, because the men will then cooperate to get the women and children to safety. If it's a free for all, it's more likely to end up in chaos and fighting.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 05:46 PM
5

Men do not out earn women, though.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 04:21 PM
62

Imagine there was a dress code that did not allow women to wear sexy outfits to work. Who would be most upset ?
/r/MensRights24/07/23 03:00 PM
1

I think it would have been nice to be treated as a normal human, and not an Untermensch, but you're probably right that was too much to expect.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 01:46 PM
1

only men have a say (which they typically use to benefit men) Even in societies where only men have a say, they still give high priority to well being of women.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 01:05 PM
1

If the alternative is sleeping under a bridge and begging for change, then they are forced.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 11:37 AM
1

Women have better odds trying to marry a billionaire. Some even manage to divorce, and getting rewarded with a huge amount of unearned cash.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 10:40 AM
–

No, there's not enough demand for gardeners or florists, and a man still needs a job.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 10:23 AM
1

it's headed towards equal division of Rights and labor No, it's not. I still see no women doing dirty & dangerous work, or getting forced to sacrifice their lives in a muddy trench.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 09:57 AM
4

men are welcome to stay at home if they like. No, they're not. There are not enough women that are volunteering to do hard work outside the house, while the man stays at home and watches the kids, and then in the weekends, expects his wife to mow the lawn and fix broken shingles on the roof. You first said a "patriarchy" is a system set up for the benefit of men. In reality, it's benefiting mostly women, even if it means they have fewer choices. Of course, while women were lacking some choices t…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 08:58 AM
5

A system where men go out and do dangerous backbreaking work while the women stay at home and watch the kids is not "set up for men".
/r/MensRights24/07/23 08:31 AM
2

Even patriarchal societies are gynocentric.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 08:28 AM
1

The only sense in which there's some truth is the fact that 1% of men are highly successful, and outperform all other men and women in their field. Women at least have a chance to marry such men, join in their success, and give some of that DNA to their own children.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 07:00 AM
1

Good to see you're not taking things too seriously.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 06:34 AM
1

Most of that is not discrimination but just cutthroat competition, where the goals justify the means.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 05:28 AM
–

I'm not upset, just making some observations. I'm mostly ignoring the whole thing. I'm also ignoring all the whiny fragile women complaining about their fake little problems. you're not making any "progress" though. Things will only get worse.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 05:05 AM
–

It's not saying "all men are x." How many good men are shown in the movie ?
/r/MensRights24/07/23 04:51 AM
–

It wouldn't have been so bad if this movie was the only thing, and everybody knew it was just a silly caricature, and the next movie would have a similar caricature about women. The problem is that dumb sexist caricatures of men are everywhere around us, every day. then it's obviously hitting a little too close to home and you're afraid of a little introspection. And now you're confirming it's not just a silly caricature, but actually close to reality.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 04:50 AM
1

So a white man digging trenches for a living cannot complain about things because another white man is the boss of the company he works for?
/r/MensRights24/07/23 04:43 AM
–

Yes, people are upset that "shitting on men" is "entertainment media". Is that so strange ?
/r/MensRights24/07/23 04:41 AM
1

Plenty of men do harder jobs than giving birth to a child. Grow up yourself.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 04:29 AM
2

For $18 they better have fresh yokes.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 04:22 AM
1

Instead of stabilizing at 50/50 leadership, I think it will swing to majority women and stay there. There are already places with large majority women, like school admins, and men are still rejected for new seats opening up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/23 03:57 AM
1

Movies like Barbie have an influence on the general population you need for support.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 03:24 AM
1

Don't confuse certain left wing parties with left wing policies. The US is a really bad example of this, because of the 2 party system. You'll see a lot more variability in the Europe, including also right wing parties that have no religious affiliation.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 03:21 AM
1

a guy who's sexist is far more likely to listen or change their behavior if another guy calls them out. Only if they are good friends, which OP already explained is unlikely. If they are strangers, like some random guy on the street, he's not going to care what some other guy says. In fact, he may very well throw in a few punches to make his point, with a non zero chance that the nice guy gets killed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/23 04:48 PM
1

People like this are also the type of guy who starts a random fight Which is exactly the reason I'm not going to say anything to them. There's a very real risk of getting beaten up. People have died that way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/23 04:36 PM
8

My grandmother had six kids, and did all the laundry by hand in open tubs. Water had to be fetched outside and carried in buckets. If you wanted hot water, you had to boil it in a kettle. After washing, the clothes were wrung by hand, and then hung up to dry on a clothesline. That was a lot of hard work. Nowadays, people have 2 kids, and a washer/dryer that does all the work. If you don't iron, you can do all the laundry for a week in one hour of work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/23 03:11 PM
11

They've been sold a dream. She could be right that there exist better men than her fiance, but she ignores the fact that these men also prefer a better woman than what she has to offer. You can't have 100 women all marrying the same 5 perfect men.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 08:55 AM
1

What is "many" ? Can't be more than 100.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 06:15 AM
1

When you overthrow the elites, you just get new elites, standing in ruins.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 04:37 AM
14

I can't imagine people taking this platform so seriously that they feel the need to check someone's profile in the first place.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 04:23 PM
1

Why should men be forcefully conscripted? To fight for your home, your family, and everything you've got.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 02:28 PM
1

"If the workers can come up with a few billion, sure they can!". If the workers buy the stock early, when it's still cheap, they wouldn't have to pay billions. Of course, they would take a risk that the company is going to fail, but guess what? That's what investors do. You want to wait until you can see which few companies are successful, and then take money from them. That's unfair. the initial investors would be repaid their investment plus a reasonable percentage Doesn't work. Why would you …
/r/MensRights22/07/23 02:00 PM
39

Don't bother. If there are too many negative ratings, they will used as evidence of sexism against women, and get removed from statistics. Just ignoring is your best weapon.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 07:42 AM
1

They are not occupying anything. They are the legal owner of the company. The company makes products that benefit society. For instance, Tesla makes electric vehicles that provide value to buyers. Nothing would change for society, if Musk decides to sell his Tesla shares to another owner, except if the new owner uses their voting rights to make different decisions.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 04:53 AM
1

Free Market Socialism. Workers own the workplace. If a group of workers own the workplace, that's capitalism.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 04:47 AM
94

Nothing. Just ignore.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 03:24 PM
1

Also circumcision and the draft.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 03:22 PM
1

So you're not free. What more freedom would you want? You want to have the option to sit on your ass, and enjoy free stuff that somebody else makes for you? Sorry, that's not going to work. If you want to have a house, clothes, and food, you'll have to make yourself useful. In socialism, you are less free because you'll be forced to work wherever the state tell you to. You don't have the option to use your skills & talents to start your own business.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 02:20 PM
1

Never said that he made the stuff. You never said someone else made the stuff. Anyway, the free market covers not only goods, but also labor. You're not forced to sell your labor. You can also start a company, by yourself, or together with other people, and create your own products or services. A key feature of capitalism is that you have various options, and you're free to pick one.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 01:43 PM
3

For casual sex, people should be using condoms anyway, to reduce the spread of infections.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 12:51 PM
4

I've seen the backstabbing happen with a group of women friends. They were standing around in a group, waiting for the train, having a great time together. As soon as one of them left to go buy a coffee, the others started whispering gossip about her. When she came back a few minutes later, they all went back to cheerful laughing.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 11:31 AM
2

Ownership of the stuff you make yourself is the foundation of every human society, so I didn't think it was necessary to mention that explicitly, but you are right that it's part of capitalism too. The alternative, where some dude does all the work, and somebody else comes along and grabs a share for free, simply doesn't work. It fails even at very small scales.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 10:08 AM
1

taxes he paid over the previous decade compared to his earnings. Stock appreciation is not earnings.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 09:33 AM
2

The people you describe typically get their wealth from founding a company, owning most of the shares, and then making the company wildly successful. If you create a successful multi-billion dollar company, it comes with great benefits to society, and you deserve a nice reward for it.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 09:32 AM
1

That the 5 day work week was fought for in blood by labor unions and a 4 day work week can be fought for as well 5 day work weeks were possible thanks to discovery of plentiful oil reserves and explosion of technological advances, combined with old work ethos, and well educated population. Those times are slipping away. How did this turn into advocacy for competition with 3rd world countries It didn't. You're confusing advocacy with inevitability. If you choose not to compete, you will get acces…
/r/MensRights21/07/23 08:41 AM
1

What makes you think that people can be competitive in the world working only 4 days, when there are people on the other side of the world working 6 days, and have been getting access to the same technology ? It would be nice to have that kind of luxury where you can do everything you want with minimal amount of work, but don't mistake that for a right.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 08:19 AM
1

yeah, most of these problems are self inflicted.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 06:13 AM
41

When your study only focuses on girls, don't be surprised to find mostly issues affecting girls.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 05:12 AM
17

standing up against sexist behaviour, promoting and supporting women in their workplaces The 2nd part is sexist behavior that I'm standing up against.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 05:09 AM
1

The article is really vague on what exactly are the problems.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 05:01 AM
3

Having a free market is the definition of capitalism.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 04:41 AM
1

I do think billionaires shouldn't exist Depends. If you get rid of the crony capitalism, a billionaire is just the result of someone creating huge value for society.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 04:40 AM
1

How is this a labor rights issue ? The article doesn't say anything about labor rights.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 04:37 AM
1

Not just centuries. We were like that when we were still swinging from trees.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 04:23 AM
1

If a man shows emotion do you believe he is less of a man? Most people believe he is less of a man, yes. And you would have to fix that first, before you can tell a man to show his emotions
/r/MensRights20/07/23 03:55 AM
58

And when they do manage to snag a high earning man, they'll complain he won't put away his dishes and socks.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 05:35 PM
50

At some point in time, they will come in handy as cat food.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 04:24 PM
377

The biggest driving factor for women in the US was a shortage of suitable educated men I thought they didn't need men anymore. The future is female, remember?
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:29 PM
27

remove paywall: https://archive.is/20180116231649/https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2018/01/the-humiliation-of-aziz-ansari/550541/
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:09 PM
112

Wait until he learns that crying is going to make things worse.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:06 PM
7

Whenever a woman gets a nasty reply on Twitter, somebody will shout "misogyny!", even though it's not systemic or systematic, but just a single incident.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 01:33 PM
8

Welcome to the party, pal!
/r/MensRights19/07/23 03:27 AM
13

You can see this when you browse places like YouTube. Nobody's stopping anybody from taking up a hobby and making a video of what they're doing, but you can very clearly see gender divisions. 99% of videos on woodworking, metalwork, electronics or programming are by men.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 11:03 PM
22

Musk and Zuckerberg are just having some fun, but this lady is all piss and vinegar about the whole thing. For what reason? I have no idea.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 06:10 PM
92

You need to look for a guy who looks like they have a super big ego. And then get a drink, hook up, and then get crushed by his super big ego. Sounds like a plan.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 04:44 PM
10

There are plenty of men around who don't care about perfect looks. Of course, most of these men get rejected for not having perfect looks themselves, or being shorter than 6'0". You probably won't even find them on dating apps, because they've given up after never getting matches. The top 5-10% of men who get all the matches can afford to be rude and picky.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 04:17 PM
19

... IF they like a spontaneous person ...
/r/MensRights18/07/23 04:10 PM
1

forced to modify your appearance to fit societal standards Nobody's forcing anybody to dress up. Of course, they're going to judge you for it, but it's your choice to give a fuck.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 04:31 AM
23

It's not resentful. Female crime is treated with a lot more sympathy, and that's not fair.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 03:36 AM
10

Regretting having sex 3 weeks after the fact now counts as harassment.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 03:02 PM
23

microwave your child's chicken nuggets for dinner. Don't forget the really tricky levels of Candy Crush.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 04:07 PM
74

How many women who are complaining about the division of tasks would like to swap everything? She can get up at 5:15 in the morning to go to work, but in return she can leave her dishes laying around. Any takers?
/r/MensRights16/07/23 01:10 PM
6

Waging wars benefits women more than men. They get a fair share of the spoils, and they don't get maimed and killed nearly as often. If a lot of men are killed, multiple women can share one man.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 12:23 PM
1

It benefits women with stability. Biologically speaking, women are the gatekeepers to having a baby. Women select the best man. Men are trying to be the best at showing that they can take care of the wife & children. So they do most of the work, earning money, providing house & food, and building things for them, and fighting off other men. Since the men have to work hard to provide a safe and nurturing environment they also did the long term planning and making difficult decisions. It makes sen…
/r/MensRights16/07/23 12:20 PM
2

You completely didn't read my last reply, and are just saying the same thing. The police squad is going to be watching for catcalling TO OTHER WOMEN. They should be witness of catcalling just as much as the average person walking on the street is, no matter their gender. If I don't hear catcalling, they won't either... unless this is a very typical London problem, that's why I added the disclaimer in my very first sentence.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 04:26 AM
2

Yes, but you're not a woman so clearly you're not going to witness it very often I realize that, but it was also a reflection on the effectiveness of the police squad, when they are walking the street. They would be in the same position as me, watching if other people are getting catcalled. "I've never seen a man get screwed over in a child custody battle" That usually doesn't happen in the middle of the street in a loud tone.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 11:29 PM
4

key word here is "witness".
/r/MensRights15/07/23 05:49 PM
9

Most men don't defend cat calling, but still think it's a minor issue that doesn't warrant a special police unit.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 05:31 AM
8

I don't live in London, or even the UK, but the number of times I've been walking in the street, and actually witnessed someone catcalling has been less than 5 times in the last 40 years.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 05:25 AM
1

Ma'am, put down the crack pipe, put your hands in the air, and slowly back away from the keyboard.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 04:38 AM
15

men are in most of the important and powerful positions Only 0.1% of men are, and there's immense competition at the top. Most men don't even try to get there.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 04:36 AM
1

And talking in a condescending way is also done between men, but then nobody notices it. Women do it as well, often worse when accompanied by very clear infantilization.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 04:28 AM
1

Men's rights are being restricted due to assumed danger of rejected men getting aggressive. This study can be used as an argument against that.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 11:58 AM
6

If LeftWingMaleAdvocates is shut down, maybe someone could resurrect it by asking to become a mod.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 05:44 AM
1

Yesterday I saw a tweet from a woman complaining that a male researcher in his presentation only cited other male researches, and zero female researchers. When people replied there could be various non-sexist reasons for this, their comments were called "misogynistic" and "angry"
/r/MensRights12/07/23 03:47 AM
5

The new piece is a lot longer too. At least someone put some effort into it.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 07:26 PM
1

It has nothing to do with contribution to society, but rather the female's pickiness in selecting a mate. As long as the favored male survives, she doesn't really care about the others.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 07:24 PM
129

If this is ever a technical possibility, there will be a law against men using it.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 07:05 AM
85

You should continue telling you teach, and unmatch anybody who has a problem with that.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 06:37 AM
1

So your advice to men having problems is to pretend those problems don't exist, and spend your energy on helping other people?
/r/MensRights11/07/23 05:33 AM
1

For chrome, there's also an extension called "Web Archives" that has a context sensitive menu for every link, and allows you to pick a number of archive sites.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 05:24 AM
105

A new masculinity will be a norm shift, and that takes time As expected, her solution to men having problems is to change masculinity. How come there is not a word about how we can make society be fairer for men ? Look at the trouble that Johnny Depp got just because we "believe all women". For every Depp, there are thousands of Smiths and Browns that nobody has heard of, suffering similar fate without recourse. She quietly admits a core problem: women are not attractive to the soft emotional ma…
/r/MensRights11/07/23 05:23 AM
1

But men can’t. They are literally forced into doing things they don’t want to Within the boundaries, there's still a lot of freedom to maximize your personal welfare. You think feminism has done nothing to get women in the workforce? I think organized feminism played a very small role. The biggest reason is the industrial revolution changing the nature of the work. There was less need for hard and dangerous work, and more need for service type jobs that appeal to women. There was also less house…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 04:41 AM
1

I reject your offer to devalue my life Good for you. You can do whatever you want for yourself. You're just not going to change the foundations of society.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 04:20 AM
1

women were coming home in body bags with their face half eaten off by maggots from lying in the sun for 3 days, war would be less likely to happen No, war would be more likely. Russia would love it when that happens, because then Ukraine would be more willing to surrender. You are right that society cares more about women. That's also biology. Women are privileged because they are the gatekeepers to offspring. This isn't just a human choice. Look at a herd of animals, and you'll see the same beh…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 03:46 AM
1

The basis of the sexist practice is the simple biological fact that men make much better fighters. There's no fix for this.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 03:11 AM
5

I hope they can reach a peace agreement soon There can be no peace agreement with a foreign occupier. There can only be surrender.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 02:57 AM
4

At the end of the day, they know that this man being enslaved, trafficked, and killed ultimately benefits them It also benefits other men, including the conscripted men who survive this war.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 02:56 AM
3

I've seen similar videos of Russians.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 02:51 AM
1

The world is much bigger than just democrats and religious tradcons.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 04:12 AM
6

I don't care. If someone makes a bad movie, I just don't watch it.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 04:05 AM
4

What you are not allowed to do is use your position of power to coerce and control them. What if your spouse really wants a new car, but you refuse to pay for it. Is that also coercive control ?
/r/MensRights09/07/23 03:49 AM
3

Even if he hates his ex wife, it's still not misogyny.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 03:41 AM
–

Nobody. But that means there could be unknown side effects of a certain drug on women, because they weren't tested as thoroughly.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 01:32 PM
1

They don't have to care, but then they shouldn't come out and claim feminism stands for equality.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 07:14 AM
2

Most of our laws were made by men, but they generally favor women. Even if the law is completely neutral, once it reaches a courtroom, the female party is favored. When there's a disaster or war, women get saved while men have to stay and fight or deal with the consequences. When there's dirty or dangerous work to be done, men will do it. If a woman is harassed in public, men will step up and protect her. If police respond to a call of domestic abuse, the man is arrested and more likely to be fo…
/r/MensRights08/07/23 07:12 AM
–

if you don't want your partner to cheat on you, you're a toxic control freak. Who says that besides a few nutcases?
/r/MensRights08/07/23 06:52 AM
1

Keep reading. Notice the pattern that those that are claiming misandry exists are all downplayed as "pathetic misogynist groups of men", and those claiming that misandry is not a problem are all uplifted as "scholars", even though the whole field of gender studies is just a group of men hating activists.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 06:51 AM
15

If people (men or women) are not capable of working to sustain themselves, the appropriate solution is for a safety net provided by society as a whole, not a single ex-husband.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 06:40 AM
32

Medical research has only fixated on men There is some truth in the fact that experimental medications are tested on men, because of the huge potential risks to any unborn children if the women happen to be pregnant. Even with screening, getting pregnant in the middle of a trial is always a possibility. For similar reasons, medications aren't tested on children as much. I don't think there's any good solution to these dilemmas.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 06:37 AM
7

Feminists want to make those jobs easier and safer. Men have to enlist in the selective service, feminsts want to get rid of it. Can you give a few examples of feminists coming out and saying these things?
/r/MensRights07/07/23 11:34 PM
3

Probably, yes.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 07:16 PM
4

Well, it's the top comment, so most agree.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 04:21 PM
1

avoid war by not fighting back and become victims of genocide ? there would be no need to make it illegal to leave Plenty of men want to stay and fight, but they don't want to do it alone.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 12:52 PM
1

They are fighting for their homeland. What other options do they have?
/r/MensRights07/07/23 12:45 PM
10

Practically speaking, too, deconstructing patriarchy toward these ends is ultimately the most productive. When he says "deconstructing patriarchy", what does that mean? Be specific. And how does that help a man who's being abused by a woman? If men aren't being recognized as victims of abuse, why not start a program to fund men's shelters where men can go to, and ask for help, and we promise that they'll be taken seriously ? We can start doing that today. Feminists have been trying to "deconstru…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 10:08 AM
–

Do you honestly read that article and get the impression it was written in a neutral tone ? The opening paragraphs don't even bother to explain what it is, but go straight into dismissal and whataboutism.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 06:40 AM
1

How does a link about global violence and other one about homicides in the US support your claims about marital rape in India ? And where's your source that false accusations are rare?
/r/MensRights07/07/23 05:48 AM
1

Why was that so hard? Why are you asking me? Ok, now go ahead and present the sources for your claims.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 03:27 AM
4

You're just misunderstanding and rushing to your pet conclusions.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 04:03 PM
3

I didn't make any claims. Why should a conversation between you and me involve claims made by others ? If you have citations for your claims it should be easy to post them. If you don't have citations, then why are you just making up shit?
/r/MensRights06/07/23 12:31 PM
1

millions of women .....a small handful of men Citation required, for both. Often, this is not the case. Another citation required for this claim.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 12:14 PM
4

The vast majority of rapes are committed by men. Why not give women the legal right to fight that? That's not what I meant. The point is that we don't want to send innocent men to prison on false accusations. Often, abusers will wait until the woman is pregnant before taking off his mask to make sure the woman is more or less tied to him. The same applies the other way around. The woman could be an abuser wearing a mask, and the man not capable of seeing through it when he's "carefully selecting…
/r/MensRights06/07/23 11:56 AM
5

saying courts are imperfect isn't an argument for not trying to improve the lives of women. Depends on the cost. If improving the lives of women requires making the lives of men worse, it may not be worth it. Ones that they have the capability to carefully select for love and loyalty. That same argument could be applied to the women. They have the capability to carefully select for love and loyalty as well.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 11:35 AM
71

No, banning true rape is not draconian. Sending men to prison on false charges is.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 11:09 AM
5

You should probably start by explaining what exactly you mean by "patriarchy".
/r/MensRights06/07/23 03:35 AM
24

Men say what kind of woman they want. She says what men should be, but if men actually acted like that, she wouldn't be attracted to them.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 03:25 AM
3

Not at all. There are many individual differences, but the overall average has a long term impact. Imagine you go swimming with 100 people, all in different directions, in a body of water that slowly flows to the North. After a while, the center of the group has moved to the North, even some people may have been swimming in opposite direction.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 05:27 AM
2

Why did males develop to be faster, stronger, tougher etc Because the females have a huge prize (offspring) waiting for the winner.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 04:47 AM
3

But we are equal as people. There are many difference between men and women. Not just physical strength, but also many mental differences. The things that interest people, the way we communicate with others, the way which we solve problems, the way in which we compete with our peers. Dating & relationship building is completely different. The way men and women are treated is different. Imagine seeing a crying woman in a store. She gets sympathy and help. A crying man in a store is a creep who ne…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 04:45 AM
3

Just because they make the same wage as you doesn't mean they were not expected to maximize their incomes. When dating, a man is always judged on how much he's able to provide. A man who goes dating without a job, hoping to find a woman who will take care of him isn't going to be very successful.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 04:36 AM
6

Feminists control the "toxic masculinity" narrative that is taught to young boys and men.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 01:36 PM
6

Even if there are radical voices that young men listen to, they wouldn't sit and listen unless the words already resonated with them.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 12:44 PM
7

How can feminists define masculinity however they want? Because it gives them power.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 09:35 AM
6

But what you notice about all of them is that they never stop talking about women How did the author reach the conclusion that all of them are like that ? How hard did he look for men that stopped talking about women? MGTOW believe that women are extremely likely to make false accusations of sexual and domestic violence No, they believe that some women do. Imagine you have a bowl of M&M's, and you knew that just one was poisoned, would you eat some ?
/r/MensRights03/07/23 09:33 AM
7

"men should pay for the bill" toxic femininity? I'm pretty sure they call that "toxic masculinity" instead.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 09:25 AM
1

How does that compare to women going their own way? Do they stop talking about men?
/r/MensRights03/07/23 09:23 AM
9

Frankly, I don't give a shit. I just ignore all modern bad movies that come out of Hollywood. There are plenty of old movies that I don't mind watching again.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 05:33 AM
–

The disclaimers don't change the fact that you went out of line by interfering with somebody else's life. You weren't being "kind", you were out of line.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 04:10 AM
–

You sound like a massive douchebag, to be honest. a simple 20 year old buying an ice cream for a child is the end of the world It's not the end of the world, but not interfering with some other family's parenting choices wouldn't be the end of the world either.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 04:04 AM
–

Bad idea to give snacks to a kid you know nothing about. They could have allergies or dietary restrictions.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 03:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter