TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SocialMediaMakesUSad Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by SocialMediaMakesUSad on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Do you believe that any job under capitalism is slavery, or a violation of bodily autonomy?
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:29 PM
1

doesn't justify a scenario where women have the right to not be forced into [parent]hood and men doesn't, when men could get the same right. We don't have to justify this, because it isn't the case. Women are forced into motherhood if the child is born-- they can't get out of financial responsibility, unless both parents surrender the child for adoption, same as the man. You're hysterical, calm down and use your brain. Stop making bad analogies to slavery. Most of your arguments are obvious shit…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:27 PM
-2

>it lasts about 9 months What exactly lasts about 9 months? The changes to the way your body stores fat? The changes to your breasts? The cellulite on your body? You can literally die from pregnancy, and it happens more in America than in other developed nations. Perineal tears, some of which lead to lifelong incontinence (fecal and/or urinary), occur in 9 out of 10 mothers delivering for the first time. (source) The idea that pregnancy just "ends" in 9 months is ignorant. But in any case, even …
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:07 AM
1

except completely different of course.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:30 AM
1

>it does not justify giving women the right to not be forced into fatherhood while deniying the same right to men. We would deny women the right to "escape" motherhood just as we do men if it weren't for the key issue of bodily autonomy. Now, the court systems are biased, of course, but legally speaking, a wealthy woman who gets pregnant and then ditches the baby with a jobless father is required to pay child support. We do not let anyone avoid parenthood just because they don't want to support …
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:23 AM
0

But you're still missing the point. > It’s a result of the choice I made Sure, but there are vastly different consequences, and you are saying there should be no difference in whether they accept them or not. Thus, you are ignoring the extreme differences between the two situations when you say they should be treated the same. Very simple. By the way, so many people asserting that working is the same thing as losing your bodily autonomy... should I start recruiting for a socialist revolution in …
/r/MensRights01/09/22 10:54 PM
-1

You're so badly in denial. Different levels of criticism for different things is normal. You've retreated so far from anything resembling the point of this Reddit post that you're not even making a point any more. Look at your argument now. "I'm talking about 'How society views sexually active boys/men'" Really? So something entirely unrelated to a man's ability to opt out of fatherhood or child support, which is literally the topic of this post. If you weren't a giant fucking liar, you'd admit …
/r/MensRights01/09/22 09:29 PM
-2

lol
/r/MensRights01/09/22 09:25 PM
-7

Lol, so you claim the only thing your'e upset about is tone. Fine, let's let you have your lie. Controlling someone's finances and controlling their body are not equivalent, and that explains the difference in tone between those two scenarios. When a man doesn't want to have his finances controlled to support a child, we reject that, and may feel the need to discuss his prior choices.. When a woman wants to retain control over her body, we accept that, even if we have some feelings about her pri…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:21 PM
-15

There is no hypocrisy, you're being myopic. Your position is based on the belief that telling a woman she must go through pregnancy is the same as telling a man he must pay child support. These are not comparable things. When society tells a woman it's okay to get an abortion, we're telling her that she has ownership over her own body. When society tells a man to pay child support, we're saying that a child shouldn't be raised poor and destitute. Controlling someone's finances and controlling th…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:49 PM
1

If men had wanted to take a different, lower paying but less dangerous job, could they have done that with reasonable ease? If women had wanted to take the dangerous but high paying job, could they have done that with reasonable ease?
/r/MensRights12/08/21 06:08 PM
1

It's one thing to argue the concept isn't useful; it's another to take the language and willfully misuse it. That helps no one, and furthers no discussion. In fact, it makes it look like you're willing to intentionally embrace ignorance for the sake of furthering a political agenda. Who is even going to engage you in a conversation about how useful the concept of "privilege" is, or listen to a word you have to say, right after you've said "someone died in an accident so obviously they weren't pr…
/r/MensRights11/08/21 07:19 PM
-27

Yes, but without the "but women" part. There is of course nothing wrong celebrating the fact that a woman was in charge. And there is of course nothing wrong with remembering the sacrifices of the men who died doing it. Either of these will be accepted throughout reddit. With a good title and interesting body, you could see this information upvoted on many different subreddits. But as soon as you throw in that "but all anyone remembers is that a woman is in charge" and "these men were not privil…
/r/MensRights10/08/21 10:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter